WEBVTT - #167 Wrongful Conviction: Junk Science - Roadside Drug Test Evidence

0:00:00.640 --> 0:00:03.800
<v Speaker 1>You're sitting in the passenger seat of your car, staring

0:00:03.840 --> 0:00:07.280
<v Speaker 1>out the window. Your boyfriend is driving, and you look

0:00:07.280 --> 0:00:10.160
<v Speaker 1>over at him. You can tell that he's getting tired.

0:00:10.240 --> 0:00:14.440
<v Speaker 1>It's been a long day. You left Louisiana five hours

0:00:14.440 --> 0:00:18.720
<v Speaker 1>ago and he's been driving the entire time. You're going

0:00:18.760 --> 0:00:21.120
<v Speaker 1>to Houston, where he has an interview for a job

0:00:21.120 --> 0:00:24.119
<v Speaker 1>on an oil rig. You find the monotony of the

0:00:24.239 --> 0:00:28.040
<v Speaker 1>drive to be somewhat calming. It's a big difference from

0:00:28.080 --> 0:00:31.280
<v Speaker 1>your usual day to day of running around doing your

0:00:31.360 --> 0:00:34.599
<v Speaker 1>job and taking care of your teenage son who has

0:00:34.680 --> 0:00:38.440
<v Speaker 1>special needs. Of course, you love your kids and your

0:00:38.520 --> 0:00:41.760
<v Speaker 1>job is great, but for the first time in a while,

0:00:42.080 --> 0:00:45.879
<v Speaker 1>you feel yourself really relaxing, and you're happy to have

0:00:46.000 --> 0:00:48.120
<v Speaker 1>nothing to do or worry about for the next couple

0:00:48.200 --> 0:00:52.400
<v Speaker 1>of days. When you finally get to the motel in Houston,

0:00:52.560 --> 0:00:56.880
<v Speaker 1>you're both exhausted. You dump your suitcases at the foot

0:00:56.920 --> 0:00:59.680
<v Speaker 1>of the bed, and you're tempted to skip dinner and

0:00:59.800 --> 0:01:02.440
<v Speaker 1>just stay in for the rest of the night, but

0:01:02.760 --> 0:01:04.520
<v Speaker 1>you don't want your boyfriend to go to bed on

0:01:04.560 --> 0:01:07.839
<v Speaker 1>an empty stomach, so you both get back in the car,

0:01:08.360 --> 0:01:11.160
<v Speaker 1>grab some hamburgers from a fast food drive through and

0:01:11.680 --> 0:01:16.720
<v Speaker 1>then start heading straight back to the motel. Your boyfriend

0:01:16.800 --> 0:01:20.120
<v Speaker 1>rubs his eyes when he changes lanes, and out of

0:01:20.200 --> 0:01:24.920
<v Speaker 1>nowhere you see blue and red lights flashing behind your

0:01:24.959 --> 0:01:38.440
<v Speaker 1>car and a siren blaring. You look up and watch

0:01:38.480 --> 0:01:41.440
<v Speaker 1>in the rear view mirror as a police officer slowly

0:01:41.560 --> 0:01:46.759
<v Speaker 1>walks up to the driver's side window. License some registration.

0:01:48.120 --> 0:01:51.160
<v Speaker 1>You rummage in the glove compartment for the registration. Well,

0:01:51.600 --> 0:01:55.920
<v Speaker 1>what's the problem, officer, your boyfriend asks, no signal wall

0:01:56.000 --> 0:02:00.280
<v Speaker 1>changing lanes, You hand the registration to your boyfriend, who

0:02:00.760 --> 0:02:05.600
<v Speaker 1>in turn hands it to the officer. License. The officer says, again,

0:02:06.760 --> 0:02:12.960
<v Speaker 1>Your boyfriend holds tight onto the steering wheel. I don't

0:02:13.000 --> 0:02:17.520
<v Speaker 1>have a license, sir. Please step out of the vehicle.

0:02:18.480 --> 0:02:22.600
<v Speaker 1>Your boyfriend gets out, closing the door behind him. The

0:02:22.639 --> 0:02:25.800
<v Speaker 1>officer sticks his head into the car window and looks around.

0:02:26.240 --> 0:02:30.520
<v Speaker 1>He never makes eye contact with you. Then the officer

0:02:30.560 --> 0:02:33.520
<v Speaker 1>steps away from your car and calls out to his partner,

0:02:33.720 --> 0:02:37.200
<v Speaker 1>who's sitting in the police car. There's a needle in here,

0:02:37.480 --> 0:02:43.799
<v Speaker 1>the officer says, excuse me, what are you talking about.

0:02:44.680 --> 0:02:47.800
<v Speaker 1>You have no idea what the officer thinks he saw,

0:02:48.840 --> 0:02:51.200
<v Speaker 1>but you certainly did not have any kind of needle

0:02:51.200 --> 0:02:55.720
<v Speaker 1>in your car. The cop ignores your question and walks

0:02:55.760 --> 0:02:58.960
<v Speaker 1>over to the passenger window. Ma'am, I'm gonna need your

0:02:59.000 --> 0:03:02.399
<v Speaker 1>consent to sirch the car, and I'll tell you right now.

0:03:02.480 --> 0:03:05.040
<v Speaker 1>You don't consent, we're gonna be sitting here a long

0:03:05.200 --> 0:03:07.240
<v Speaker 1>time until we can get a canine out here to

0:03:07.280 --> 0:03:10.880
<v Speaker 1>sweep the car. You don't have anything to hide, so

0:03:11.120 --> 0:03:14.720
<v Speaker 1>you say, yeah, okay, go ahead. You stand on the

0:03:14.760 --> 0:03:16.960
<v Speaker 1>side of the road with your boyfriend in the thick

0:03:17.040 --> 0:03:21.639
<v Speaker 1>Texas heat while both officers search the car. A few

0:03:21.680 --> 0:03:25.320
<v Speaker 1>minutes later, the first officer stands up straight. It looks

0:03:25.320 --> 0:03:29.200
<v Speaker 1>like he's pinching something between his index finger and his thumb,

0:03:29.560 --> 0:03:33.040
<v Speaker 1>and he's holding it up to the moonlight. You can't

0:03:33.080 --> 0:03:35.200
<v Speaker 1>see what it is, but you see that. The officer

0:03:35.400 --> 0:03:40.040
<v Speaker 1>says something to his partner, who then comes over to you. Man,

0:03:40.160 --> 0:03:43.440
<v Speaker 1>we have reason to believe that there's crack cocaine in

0:03:43.520 --> 0:03:47.520
<v Speaker 1>your car, the officer says. He tells you both to

0:03:47.680 --> 0:03:51.960
<v Speaker 1>put your hands behind your back. He starts cuffing your

0:03:51.960 --> 0:03:56.680
<v Speaker 1>boyfriend and you're adrenaline starts pumping. You're sweating now and

0:03:56.920 --> 0:03:59.680
<v Speaker 1>you can't tell if it's the ninety degree heat or

0:04:00.080 --> 0:04:03.840
<v Speaker 1>if it's pure nerves and anxiety. As the officer tightens

0:04:03.840 --> 0:04:07.560
<v Speaker 1>the cuffs painfully around your wrist, you have the wrong

0:04:07.600 --> 0:04:10.440
<v Speaker 1>idea here. I don't have drugs in my car. I

0:04:10.480 --> 0:04:15.200
<v Speaker 1>don't do drugs. I've never done drugs. One officer walks

0:04:15.240 --> 0:04:18.480
<v Speaker 1>over to you and then takes you to the police car.

0:04:19.200 --> 0:04:22.479
<v Speaker 1>The other one opens up the trunk. He takes out

0:04:22.520 --> 0:04:25.280
<v Speaker 1>something that looks like a zip lock baggie, then walks

0:04:25.320 --> 0:04:28.880
<v Speaker 1>back over to you. He opens the bag and pulls

0:04:28.880 --> 0:04:32.320
<v Speaker 1>out a test tube. Then he takes what he's been

0:04:32.360 --> 0:04:35.200
<v Speaker 1>pinching between his fingers and drops it into the tube.

0:04:35.960 --> 0:04:39.640
<v Speaker 1>He shakes it around, looks at it. Then he looks

0:04:39.680 --> 0:04:43.719
<v Speaker 1>at you, and a wide grin creeps across his face.

0:04:44.839 --> 0:04:47.839
<v Speaker 1>He waves the tube right in front of your nose.

0:04:48.839 --> 0:04:51.919
<v Speaker 1>A liquid that seems to change from red to blue

0:04:51.920 --> 0:04:55.920
<v Speaker 1>and the flashing lights is dangled in front of you.

0:04:55.920 --> 0:05:01.000
<v Speaker 1>You're busted, ma'am, the cop says. The take you to jail.

0:05:01.960 --> 0:05:04.800
<v Speaker 1>Your boyfriend is charged with driving without a license and

0:05:04.960 --> 0:05:08.560
<v Speaker 1>is released soon after. But you don't know that yet

0:05:08.600 --> 0:05:11.719
<v Speaker 1>because you're placed in a tiny holding cell with one

0:05:11.760 --> 0:05:15.640
<v Speaker 1>other woman who tells you that she murdered someone. You're

0:05:15.640 --> 0:05:20.880
<v Speaker 1>feeling sick, and you still haven't eaten all day. You're terrified,

0:05:21.440 --> 0:05:24.920
<v Speaker 1>but you're not just worried about yourself. You're really worried

0:05:24.920 --> 0:05:31.080
<v Speaker 1>about your son. Someone calls your name from a thick

0:05:31.160 --> 0:05:34.400
<v Speaker 1>plastic window that separates you from the people working at

0:05:34.400 --> 0:05:37.480
<v Speaker 1>the jail. You walk up to the window and see

0:05:37.480 --> 0:05:41.000
<v Speaker 1>a tired looking man on the other side. He introduces

0:05:41.080 --> 0:05:45.640
<v Speaker 1>himself as the court appointed defense attorney. He tells you

0:05:45.640 --> 0:05:49.360
<v Speaker 1>you're being charged for possession of crack cocaine. Look, this

0:05:49.440 --> 0:05:52.680
<v Speaker 1>is a felony, he says, and you're facing two years

0:05:52.720 --> 0:05:59.919
<v Speaker 1>in stay prison. You're in disbelief. Jesus, how is this possible.

0:06:01.000 --> 0:06:04.159
<v Speaker 1>The attorney looks down at his papers and says, look,

0:06:04.640 --> 0:06:07.240
<v Speaker 1>you have a choice. It's not much of a choice,

0:06:07.240 --> 0:06:10.279
<v Speaker 1>but you do have a choice. The prosecutor is offering

0:06:10.360 --> 0:06:13.840
<v Speaker 1>you a plea deal. If you plead guilty, you'll get

0:06:13.960 --> 0:06:16.480
<v Speaker 1>a forty five day sentence in jail, and you'll probably

0:06:16.520 --> 0:06:20.880
<v Speaker 1>only have to serve half of that. You say, I'm innocent.

0:06:21.080 --> 0:06:24.240
<v Speaker 1>I'm not going to plead guilty to something I didn't do.

0:06:25.480 --> 0:06:28.560
<v Speaker 1>The defense attorney kind of leans in a little bit

0:06:28.680 --> 0:06:33.360
<v Speaker 1>and looks at you through his wire rim glasses and says, ma'am.

0:06:33.600 --> 0:06:36.320
<v Speaker 1>They tested the substance they found on the floor of

0:06:36.360 --> 0:06:39.599
<v Speaker 1>your car and it came up positive for crack cocaine.

0:06:39.680 --> 0:06:43.560
<v Speaker 1>So according to this test, there was crack in your car.

0:06:44.160 --> 0:06:47.440
<v Speaker 1>Now you can wait until the forensics lab runs another

0:06:47.520 --> 0:06:50.560
<v Speaker 1>test on it, but there's a huge backlog. You could

0:06:50.600 --> 0:06:54.200
<v Speaker 1>wait months for that test to come back. You begin

0:06:54.320 --> 0:06:58.039
<v Speaker 1>to physically shake. You're on the verge of bursting out

0:06:58.120 --> 0:07:01.840
<v Speaker 1>in tears right there in the middle of the jail.

0:07:02.120 --> 0:07:06.279
<v Speaker 1>You think about your options. Months in jail, waiting for

0:07:06.320 --> 0:07:10.440
<v Speaker 1>the evidence that will prove your innocent, two years in

0:07:10.480 --> 0:07:14.080
<v Speaker 1>prison if it doesn't, And can you even trust the

0:07:14.160 --> 0:07:16.520
<v Speaker 1>test if the one that they did on the side

0:07:16.520 --> 0:07:18.840
<v Speaker 1>of the road was clearly wrong. I mean there was

0:07:18.840 --> 0:07:22.440
<v Speaker 1>no crack in your car. You think about your youngest

0:07:22.480 --> 0:07:25.640
<v Speaker 1>son and you're terrified of what's going to happen if

0:07:25.680 --> 0:07:30.240
<v Speaker 1>you can't get out of your fast. He really needs you.

0:07:30.240 --> 0:07:34.080
<v Speaker 1>You work managing an apartment complex. Part of your compensation

0:07:34.360 --> 0:07:36.000
<v Speaker 1>is that you get to live in an apartment in

0:07:36.040 --> 0:07:38.880
<v Speaker 1>the building that you manage. It at least allows you

0:07:38.960 --> 0:07:42.440
<v Speaker 1>to stay close to your son at all times. Right now,

0:07:42.440 --> 0:07:45.640
<v Speaker 1>he's with his dad. But if you're stuck here for months,

0:07:45.760 --> 0:07:49.960
<v Speaker 1>or god forpid years, you'll lose your job, your home,

0:07:50.480 --> 0:07:54.000
<v Speaker 1>the safety net for you and your kid. The decision

0:07:54.080 --> 0:07:57.480
<v Speaker 1>is basically made for you. You can't sit in prison

0:07:57.520 --> 0:08:00.920
<v Speaker 1>for months. You have to get out and get out

0:08:01.040 --> 0:08:05.040
<v Speaker 1>as quickly as you can. The next thing you know,

0:08:05.840 --> 0:08:09.520
<v Speaker 1>you're standing in front of a judge. You can't stop trembling,

0:08:10.600 --> 0:08:17.200
<v Speaker 1>You're weeping uncontrollably, you can barely breathe. Somehow, when the

0:08:17.280 --> 0:08:21.200
<v Speaker 1>judge asks you, how do you plead, you force out

0:08:21.240 --> 0:08:28.120
<v Speaker 1>the words I plead guilty. They take you back to

0:08:28.160 --> 0:08:31.240
<v Speaker 1>a cell where you'll serve twenty one days of the

0:08:31.280 --> 0:08:35.240
<v Speaker 1>forty five day sentence. You are given the prosecutor files

0:08:35.280 --> 0:08:37.880
<v Speaker 1>a motion for the evidence in your case to be destroyed.

0:08:38.960 --> 0:08:42.600
<v Speaker 1>After twenty one days, you're let out of jail. Your

0:08:42.679 --> 0:08:47.360
<v Speaker 1>worst fears have been realized. You've been fired, you've been

0:08:47.440 --> 0:08:50.560
<v Speaker 1>kicked out of your apartment. You don't know where most

0:08:50.600 --> 0:08:54.199
<v Speaker 1>of your belongings are, and you don't know where to turn.

0:08:58.480 --> 0:09:01.000
<v Speaker 1>The story you just heard is based on the true

0:09:01.040 --> 0:09:05.120
<v Speaker 1>events of Amy Albritton's wrongful conviction that resulted from a

0:09:05.240 --> 0:09:10.720
<v Speaker 1>roadside drug test. Somehow, the prosecutor's order to destroy the

0:09:10.800 --> 0:09:15.719
<v Speaker 1>evidence never got signed off on, and that substance they

0:09:15.800 --> 0:09:18.920
<v Speaker 1>found in her car that they claim tested positive for

0:09:19.080 --> 0:09:23.600
<v Speaker 1>crack cocaine it turned out to be a food crumb.

0:09:25.040 --> 0:09:29.640
<v Speaker 1>Based on the junk science of roadside drug testing. The

0:09:29.720 --> 0:09:32.920
<v Speaker 1>steady life that Amy built for herself and her family

0:09:33.400 --> 0:09:40.360
<v Speaker 1>was completely turned upside down. And Amy isn't the only one.

0:09:41.240 --> 0:09:45.040
<v Speaker 1>I'm Josh Dubin civil rights and criminal defense attorney, an

0:09:45.040 --> 0:09:49.040
<v Speaker 1>innocent ambassador to the Innocence Project in New York. Today,

0:09:49.400 --> 0:09:54.520
<v Speaker 1>on Wrongful Conviction junk Science, we explore roadside drug testing.

0:09:55.960 --> 0:10:00.360
<v Speaker 1>Turns out these faulty tests, which cost police departments two

0:10:00.480 --> 0:10:03.959
<v Speaker 1>dollars a piece or less, are widely used across the

0:10:04.120 --> 0:10:08.400
<v Speaker 1>United States. They caused countless people to plead guilty to

0:10:08.440 --> 0:10:12.880
<v Speaker 1>crimes they didn't commit. These tests continued to be used

0:10:12.920 --> 0:10:17.079
<v Speaker 1>despite scientific evidence that proves just how ineffective they are.

0:10:28.920 --> 0:10:32.160
<v Speaker 1>In nineteen seventy three, during the height of the War

0:10:32.200 --> 0:10:35.280
<v Speaker 1>on Drugs in the United States, a chemist by the

0:10:35.360 --> 0:10:38.959
<v Speaker 1>name of L. J. Scott Jr. Was tasked with creating

0:10:39.000 --> 0:10:43.800
<v Speaker 1>a test that could confirm the presence of cocaine. Now

0:10:44.040 --> 0:10:47.160
<v Speaker 1>Scott was already aware of one chemical that was being

0:10:47.320 --> 0:10:50.720
<v Speaker 1>used to test for cocaine, but the problem was it

0:10:50.760 --> 0:10:54.800
<v Speaker 1>was highly unreliable. This faulty test was made up of

0:10:54.840 --> 0:11:00.720
<v Speaker 1>a pink liquid, a chemical called cobalt thiocyanate. When cocaine

0:11:00.800 --> 0:11:04.280
<v Speaker 1>was added to this pink liquid, it turned blue, and

0:11:04.320 --> 0:11:08.439
<v Speaker 1>so the thinking went, whenever the pink liquid turns blue,

0:11:08.679 --> 0:11:11.600
<v Speaker 1>we could know if there is cocaine present. But the

0:11:11.760 --> 0:11:15.680
<v Speaker 1>problem was that it wasn't only cocaine, but plenty of

0:11:15.760 --> 0:11:20.880
<v Speaker 1>other substances that could also turn this pink chemical blue.

0:11:21.040 --> 0:11:23.360
<v Speaker 1>So Scott set out to work on creating a more

0:11:23.400 --> 0:11:28.520
<v Speaker 1>accurate test. He experimented with other chemicals, and finally he

0:11:28.600 --> 0:11:32.320
<v Speaker 1>came up with a three step test. Here's how it worked.

0:11:33.040 --> 0:11:38.320
<v Speaker 1>A small sealable bag contained three vials of chemicals. First,

0:11:38.679 --> 0:11:42.160
<v Speaker 1>the substance suspected to be cocaine was added to the

0:11:42.200 --> 0:11:45.600
<v Speaker 1>first vial that contained the same pink chemical as the

0:11:45.640 --> 0:11:51.360
<v Speaker 1>original test, cobalt thiocyanate. If that urn blue, it meant

0:11:51.360 --> 0:11:56.439
<v Speaker 1>the substance might be cocaine. Then the vial was placed

0:11:56.480 --> 0:11:59.719
<v Speaker 1>into the small bag with the other two vials. The

0:12:00.040 --> 0:12:03.520
<v Speaker 1>first vial was broken open, so the liquid contents would

0:12:03.600 --> 0:12:05.920
<v Speaker 1>leave the vial and sit at the bottom of the

0:12:05.960 --> 0:12:10.720
<v Speaker 1>transparent bag. Then the second vial would be broken open.

0:12:11.480 --> 0:12:16.880
<v Speaker 1>This vial contained a second chemical, hydrochloric acid, that was

0:12:16.920 --> 0:12:19.760
<v Speaker 1>supposed to mix with the first chemical and turn the

0:12:19.800 --> 0:12:24.320
<v Speaker 1>substance pink again. Then the third vial would be broken.

0:12:25.000 --> 0:12:29.400
<v Speaker 1>This final vial was filled with chloroform. If the liquid

0:12:29.440 --> 0:12:32.320
<v Speaker 1>mixture at the bottom of the bag split into two

0:12:32.400 --> 0:12:35.800
<v Speaker 1>layers so that a pink liquid floated to the top

0:12:36.280 --> 0:12:40.280
<v Speaker 1>and blue sank to the bottom, Scott said this confirmed

0:12:40.559 --> 0:12:45.680
<v Speaker 1>that the substance being tested was indeed cocaine. After working

0:12:45.679 --> 0:12:48.720
<v Speaker 1>on the test for nine months, Scott was so sure

0:12:48.760 --> 0:12:52.640
<v Speaker 1>of it that he declared the method proposed herein is

0:12:52.679 --> 0:12:57.600
<v Speaker 1>almost impossible to misinterpret. It is highly sensitive and specific.

0:12:59.080 --> 0:13:02.839
<v Speaker 1>Officers started carrying these portable roadside drug tests on them

0:13:02.880 --> 0:13:07.079
<v Speaker 1>while they patrolled neighborhoods and pulled people over for traffic violations.

0:13:07.880 --> 0:13:11.880
<v Speaker 1>They started using the tests on people suspected of possessing drugs,

0:13:12.200 --> 0:13:16.960
<v Speaker 1>and the arrest started flooding in. But this test turned

0:13:16.960 --> 0:13:20.280
<v Speaker 1>out to be not quite as full proof as Scott thought.

0:13:20.920 --> 0:13:24.720
<v Speaker 1>A study by toxicologists found that the three vile tests

0:13:24.960 --> 0:13:30.960
<v Speaker 1>would also show positive results for substances other than cocaine. Lytocane,

0:13:31.000 --> 0:13:34.400
<v Speaker 1>for example, a common numbing agent found in many first

0:13:34.440 --> 0:13:40.600
<v Speaker 1>aid kits used to soothe cuts and burns, also tested positive. Nevertheless,

0:13:40.960 --> 0:13:44.199
<v Speaker 1>Scott started his own company that sold drug test kits

0:13:44.240 --> 0:13:49.959
<v Speaker 1>to law enforcement. This company still exists today, and interestingly enough,

0:13:50.520 --> 0:13:54.760
<v Speaker 1>he stopped selling the kits with the three vile process. Instead,

0:13:55.240 --> 0:13:58.440
<v Speaker 1>he went back to the one step process, the test

0:13:58.520 --> 0:14:01.880
<v Speaker 1>with just the pink liquid that was already known to

0:14:01.920 --> 0:14:05.880
<v Speaker 1>be faulty, and to test positive for so many other substances.

0:14:06.640 --> 0:14:09.240
<v Speaker 1>He did this so that he could sell them for

0:14:09.360 --> 0:14:14.200
<v Speaker 1>less money, and they were a hit, and he expanded

0:14:14.200 --> 0:14:21.840
<v Speaker 1>beyond cocaine tests. His company also sells tests for opiates, MDMA, marijuana, LSD,

0:14:22.240 --> 0:14:26.440
<v Speaker 1>bath salts, and meth amphetamine. His website boasts that the

0:14:26.480 --> 0:14:30.360
<v Speaker 1>tests coming easy to use cheap packaging that prevents officers

0:14:30.360 --> 0:14:34.920
<v Speaker 1>from cutting their fingers while breaking the vials. When interviewed

0:14:34.920 --> 0:14:38.240
<v Speaker 1>by reporters from Pro Publica, Scott said that he had

0:14:38.320 --> 0:14:41.960
<v Speaker 1>no idea that these tests alone could send people to prison,

0:14:42.760 --> 0:14:49.280
<v Speaker 1>but indeed they were countless innocent people, including Amy Albritton,

0:14:49.920 --> 0:14:55.080
<v Speaker 1>ended up convicted based on cheap, highly flawed roadside tests

0:14:55.600 --> 0:14:56.520
<v Speaker 1>just like these.

0:15:00.720 --> 0:15:02.760
<v Speaker 2>Now, the problem with the drug kit is that these

0:15:02.760 --> 0:15:06.480
<v Speaker 2>things are incredibly unreliable, and so they come up with

0:15:06.680 --> 0:15:11.200
<v Speaker 2>positive for things like chocolate, like cleaning supplies like aspirin,

0:15:11.680 --> 0:15:16.840
<v Speaker 2>like sugar, weight gain powder, candle wax, drywall, soap, sand.

0:15:16.920 --> 0:15:19.280
<v Speaker 2>They all come back and test positive for narcotics. Because

0:15:19.320 --> 0:15:21.400
<v Speaker 2>these things are very unreliable and they're not supposed to

0:15:21.400 --> 0:15:25.880
<v Speaker 2>be used specifically for actually getting a conviction, but many

0:15:25.920 --> 0:15:28.880
<v Speaker 2>people plea in the system to never get to a trial,

0:15:28.920 --> 0:15:31.640
<v Speaker 2>and these are used as the only evidence to actually

0:15:31.640 --> 0:15:34.360
<v Speaker 2>obtain a conviction. That's what happened in Amy's case.

0:15:35.160 --> 0:15:38.600
<v Speaker 1>On our show today, we're talking to Greg Gloud. Greg

0:15:38.800 --> 0:15:43.960
<v Speaker 1>is a policy fellow at Americans for Prosperity Now. Americans

0:15:43.960 --> 0:15:48.720
<v Speaker 1>for Prosperity is a grassroots organization that educates citizens about

0:15:48.840 --> 0:15:52.840
<v Speaker 1>policy issues at the local, state, and national level, and

0:15:52.960 --> 0:15:55.840
<v Speaker 1>one of the issues that Greg works on is criminal

0:15:55.960 --> 0:15:59.160
<v Speaker 1>justice reform. So I want to go into detail about

0:15:59.160 --> 0:16:02.720
<v Speaker 1>these drug tests and kids walk us through some of

0:16:02.720 --> 0:16:06.240
<v Speaker 1>the issues associated with these tests. It sounds like there

0:16:06.360 --> 0:16:07.440
<v Speaker 1>are quite a few of them.

0:16:08.600 --> 0:16:11.480
<v Speaker 2>Oh yeah, I mean, so, there are a variety of

0:16:11.480 --> 0:16:13.520
<v Speaker 2>issues that go along with drug test kits, and there's

0:16:13.520 --> 0:16:17.240
<v Speaker 2>so many areas in that chain of sequence from finding

0:16:17.280 --> 0:16:19.760
<v Speaker 2>the substance to actually testing it that can go wrong.

0:16:20.240 --> 0:16:22.680
<v Speaker 2>And so first and foremost is actually training. And so

0:16:23.400 --> 0:16:25.600
<v Speaker 2>it seems very easy. You drop something in a vial

0:16:25.640 --> 0:16:27.080
<v Speaker 2>and you test it and see if it turns a

0:16:27.080 --> 0:16:28.720
<v Speaker 2>different color, and if it does, then it's supposed to

0:16:28.720 --> 0:16:32.240
<v Speaker 2>be drugs. But it's not that simple, and so officers

0:16:32.280 --> 0:16:35.160
<v Speaker 2>have to be trained accordingly on how these work. And

0:16:35.640 --> 0:16:38.360
<v Speaker 2>the problem is a lot of different substances actually change

0:16:38.360 --> 0:16:40.240
<v Speaker 2>the color. And so the way that the thought process

0:16:40.240 --> 0:16:42.040
<v Speaker 2>is supposed to go about this is if it's not

0:16:42.080 --> 0:16:44.960
<v Speaker 2>a drug, the substance shouldn't change in there. However, a

0:16:45.000 --> 0:16:47.880
<v Speaker 2>lot of substances actually make that color go different, and

0:16:47.960 --> 0:16:51.040
<v Speaker 2>so you have these situations where officers aren't properly trained

0:16:51.080 --> 0:16:53.240
<v Speaker 2>on how to use them, they break the different vials

0:16:53.280 --> 0:16:56.120
<v Speaker 2>in the wrong way. It could be cold outside, the

0:16:56.160 --> 0:17:01.320
<v Speaker 2>temperature changes different things, the chemicals might expired within them.

0:17:01.480 --> 0:17:03.160
<v Speaker 2>There's a lot of different ways that this can go wrong.

0:17:03.240 --> 0:17:06.000
<v Speaker 2>But even if you do everything correctly, everything right, the

0:17:06.040 --> 0:17:08.560
<v Speaker 2>officer has been properly trained and he's one of the

0:17:08.600 --> 0:17:11.159
<v Speaker 2>best you know at actually utilizing this he was a

0:17:11.200 --> 0:17:14.920
<v Speaker 2>former chemist. Let's just say the most crazy scenario where

0:17:14.920 --> 0:17:17.439
<v Speaker 2>he knew exactly how to do this. There are so

0:17:17.560 --> 0:17:21.800
<v Speaker 2>many different non controlled substances that actually test positive for

0:17:22.000 --> 0:17:24.679
<v Speaker 2>drugs and change that substance that look like narcotics that

0:17:24.760 --> 0:17:27.000
<v Speaker 2>it makes it impossible to really verify if this is

0:17:27.040 --> 0:17:27.720
<v Speaker 2>a drug or not.

0:17:28.400 --> 0:17:30.919
<v Speaker 1>And let's be honest, most of these officers are not

0:17:31.119 --> 0:17:36.280
<v Speaker 1>scientists or chemists. And there are many other problems, including

0:17:36.320 --> 0:17:39.840
<v Speaker 1>that these tests just aren't that easy to read. One

0:17:39.880 --> 0:17:43.199
<v Speaker 1>color can easily be interpreted as another. So what are

0:17:43.240 --> 0:17:44.240
<v Speaker 1>some examples of this?

0:17:45.320 --> 0:17:48.480
<v Speaker 2>For example, one test, it says that LSD should turn

0:17:48.520 --> 0:17:51.480
<v Speaker 2>all of black, but sugar turns dark brown. Now, if

0:17:51.520 --> 0:17:54.480
<v Speaker 2>you're on the side of the road pulling someone over

0:17:54.600 --> 0:17:58.640
<v Speaker 2>at night, there's lights flashing, things are going on, it's noisy,

0:17:58.800 --> 0:18:01.880
<v Speaker 2>it's hot, you're in South Texas. You're shaking this thing

0:18:01.960 --> 0:18:04.199
<v Speaker 2>around and you're looking at it and you're saying, is

0:18:04.240 --> 0:18:06.719
<v Speaker 2>that dark brown or is that all of black? I mean,

0:18:07.359 --> 0:18:10.000
<v Speaker 2>it's a pretty ridiculous question, but this can mean the

0:18:10.040 --> 0:18:14.760
<v Speaker 2>difference between someone being arrested or being let go free

0:18:14.800 --> 0:18:17.880
<v Speaker 2>because of this slight color change. And then another test,

0:18:17.960 --> 0:18:20.679
<v Speaker 2>another very popular test, cocaine is supposed to be a

0:18:20.720 --> 0:18:25.119
<v Speaker 2>deep orange yellow, while salt is a strong orange. If

0:18:25.119 --> 0:18:26.840
<v Speaker 2>you can explain to me what a strong orange is

0:18:26.840 --> 0:18:30.159
<v Speaker 2>compared to a deep orange yellow, please let me know.

0:18:41.040 --> 0:18:44.320
<v Speaker 1>So I'm thinking of someone like Amy, who we talked

0:18:44.320 --> 0:18:47.879
<v Speaker 1>about at the beginning of this episode and whose story

0:18:48.000 --> 0:18:51.320
<v Speaker 1>was actually published in an article by pro Publica And

0:18:51.359 --> 0:18:53.520
<v Speaker 1>by the way, if you're interested, you can find this

0:18:53.760 --> 0:18:57.120
<v Speaker 1>article and others about these roadside drug tests and our

0:18:57.200 --> 0:19:01.639
<v Speaker 1>show notes. But someone like Amy is taken to jail

0:19:01.760 --> 0:19:07.200
<v Speaker 1>based on this flawed roadside test, and she's told by

0:19:07.200 --> 0:19:10.919
<v Speaker 1>her court appointed defense attorney that there's another test that

0:19:10.960 --> 0:19:14.159
<v Speaker 1>can verify the results. Of course, that test is going

0:19:14.200 --> 0:19:17.679
<v Speaker 1>to take quite some time, but she's told that nonetheless.

0:19:17.680 --> 0:19:20.720
<v Speaker 1>So tell us about that second test, the lab test.

0:19:21.200 --> 0:19:24.760
<v Speaker 1>Is it actually reliable, And if it is reliable, why

0:19:24.760 --> 0:19:27.720
<v Speaker 1>aren't they using it to verify the results right away

0:19:27.840 --> 0:19:31.240
<v Speaker 1>instead of having, you know, people like Amy be presented

0:19:31.280 --> 0:19:36.159
<v Speaker 1>with this very precarious circumstance in which they're made to

0:19:36.240 --> 0:19:38.520
<v Speaker 1>wait around for a while.

0:19:39.280 --> 0:19:41.520
<v Speaker 2>With all these drug test kits, you know, and it

0:19:41.560 --> 0:19:44.679
<v Speaker 2>says it right on the box, they should be verified

0:19:44.800 --> 0:19:48.679
<v Speaker 2>by a forensics lab. And so most jurisdictions either have

0:19:48.720 --> 0:19:51.760
<v Speaker 2>a state lab and then also for a larger cities,

0:19:51.760 --> 0:19:54.280
<v Speaker 2>they'll have their own lab. So essentially what they do

0:19:54.520 --> 0:19:57.000
<v Speaker 2>is take the substance, heat it up a lot, break

0:19:57.000 --> 0:19:58.640
<v Speaker 2>it down to its elements, and then you can tell

0:19:58.680 --> 0:20:01.000
<v Speaker 2>from that with you know pretty much one hundred percent

0:20:01.040 --> 0:20:04.240
<v Speaker 2>certainty that what it is is either narcotics are not. However,

0:20:04.600 --> 0:20:06.800
<v Speaker 2>most of the time it's not getting to that point.

0:20:07.160 --> 0:20:09.879
<v Speaker 2>A lot of places, you know in Texas, the Department

0:20:09.880 --> 0:20:12.359
<v Speaker 2>of Public and Safety there just doesn't have the time

0:20:12.440 --> 0:20:15.439
<v Speaker 2>and bandwidth to actually verify a lot of these cases.

0:20:15.440 --> 0:20:18.240
<v Speaker 2>Some jurisdiction, now Houston, after this story kind of broke,

0:20:18.600 --> 0:20:21.000
<v Speaker 2>is now not allowing for plea deals to be accepted

0:20:21.040 --> 0:20:24.840
<v Speaker 2>without that verification. But a lot of jurisdictions, preticting small jurisdictions,

0:20:24.880 --> 0:20:27.280
<v Speaker 2>we have these major backlaws. People are playing within a

0:20:27.320 --> 0:20:29.640
<v Speaker 2>couple of days, and then these things aren't being verified.

0:20:29.720 --> 0:20:33.080
<v Speaker 2>Back every case can't get tested. With the amount and

0:20:33.240 --> 0:20:36.040
<v Speaker 2>volume that we have, there's one point six million arrests

0:20:36.040 --> 0:20:38.639
<v Speaker 2>for drug offenses each and every year, and if you

0:20:38.680 --> 0:20:41.240
<v Speaker 2>try to verify and test all these substances, you never

0:20:41.280 --> 0:20:43.520
<v Speaker 2>get through it. And so those are the problems. So

0:20:43.640 --> 0:20:47.639
<v Speaker 2>the actual test, the actual science that should be used

0:20:47.640 --> 0:20:51.760
<v Speaker 2>here is not being utilized because the criminal process stops

0:20:51.760 --> 0:20:53.680
<v Speaker 2>within a couple of days for most of these individuals,

0:20:53.720 --> 0:20:54.760
<v Speaker 2>and then the plea happens.

0:20:55.480 --> 0:20:58.240
<v Speaker 1>So let's pause there for a second. Tell us about

0:20:58.240 --> 0:21:01.600
<v Speaker 1>the plea. Why does so many innocent people end up

0:21:01.760 --> 0:21:05.960
<v Speaker 1>pleading guilty once they're charged based on these faulty roadside

0:21:06.040 --> 0:21:06.679
<v Speaker 1>drug tests.

0:21:07.640 --> 0:21:10.320
<v Speaker 2>So a plea deal is a negotiation, and so what

0:21:10.359 --> 0:21:13.040
<v Speaker 2>it is is, hey, I can give you ten years

0:21:13.040 --> 0:21:15.520
<v Speaker 2>on this, or you can take two today instead of

0:21:15.560 --> 0:21:18.280
<v Speaker 2>going to trial, Let's settle this today. And so that

0:21:18.400 --> 0:21:20.080
<v Speaker 2>is very attractive for a lot of people that are

0:21:20.080 --> 0:21:22.760
<v Speaker 2>facing so much time, and it really does get to

0:21:22.800 --> 0:21:25.960
<v Speaker 2>a point where it's quite coercive. Maybe they set your

0:21:26.040 --> 0:21:28.760
<v Speaker 2>bail at five thousand dollars, ten thousand dollars. You can't

0:21:28.800 --> 0:21:31.359
<v Speaker 2>afford it. So you sit in jail and you're claiming

0:21:31.359 --> 0:21:33.760
<v Speaker 2>your innocence. You're claiming your innocence. Now the prosecute delays

0:21:33.800 --> 0:21:36.520
<v Speaker 2>your case again, delays your case again. We'll accept a

0:21:36.520 --> 0:21:38.080
<v Speaker 2>forty five day deal, or we can go to trial

0:21:38.080 --> 0:21:39.679
<v Speaker 2>and maybe you'll get two years. And you have an

0:21:39.680 --> 0:21:43.280
<v Speaker 2>overworked public defender who has a huge backlog of cases

0:21:43.280 --> 0:21:44.680
<v Speaker 2>on their own and can't give you the time of

0:21:44.760 --> 0:21:46.960
<v Speaker 2>day because you can't afford your own attorney. And so

0:21:47.000 --> 0:21:49.200
<v Speaker 2>they're telling you take the plea, you have no chance

0:21:49.359 --> 0:21:51.679
<v Speaker 2>go through this, and you're still sitting in jail, and

0:21:51.720 --> 0:21:53.800
<v Speaker 2>sitting in jail, and jail's not a great place, and

0:21:53.920 --> 0:21:56.719
<v Speaker 2>jail it's hot or it's freezing cold, and you're with

0:21:56.760 --> 0:22:00.159
<v Speaker 2>other people that are actually you know, dangerous criminals in

0:22:00.160 --> 0:22:02.320
<v Speaker 2>this place, and you're going through it, and you start

0:22:02.320 --> 0:22:05.119
<v Speaker 2>to think of this cost benefit analysis of do I

0:22:05.160 --> 0:22:06.960
<v Speaker 2>stay in here, take this and go, or do I

0:22:07.040 --> 0:22:09.520
<v Speaker 2>continue to fight this case of potentially risk you know,

0:22:09.600 --> 0:22:12.560
<v Speaker 2>multiple years, are staying in here for another six to

0:22:12.640 --> 0:22:14.720
<v Speaker 2>eight months. You know, the public defender is telling you

0:22:14.760 --> 0:22:17.840
<v Speaker 2>the backlog at that lab is twelve to eighteen months.

0:22:17.840 --> 0:22:20.000
<v Speaker 2>You know, you can't get out for quite a while.

0:22:20.040 --> 0:22:21.760
<v Speaker 2>You know, these are the types of fears and risk

0:22:21.840 --> 0:22:24.639
<v Speaker 2>and things people are going through in this process. And

0:22:24.680 --> 0:22:27.040
<v Speaker 2>so that's why folks like Amy and thousands of others

0:22:27.080 --> 0:22:30.280
<v Speaker 2>across the country have accepted plead deals, even when they're

0:22:30.320 --> 0:22:31.280
<v Speaker 2>actually innocent.

0:22:32.359 --> 0:22:36.359
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, And what's really tragic is that once these innocent

0:22:36.400 --> 0:22:40.359
<v Speaker 1>people plead guilty. Whatever was used to convict them, you know,

0:22:40.440 --> 0:22:44.200
<v Speaker 1>whatever was taken from their car and dropped in one

0:22:44.240 --> 0:22:48.040
<v Speaker 1>of these biles that the police are saying tested positive

0:22:48.080 --> 0:22:52.239
<v Speaker 1>for a certain drug usually gets destroyed. So if they

0:22:52.240 --> 0:22:54.199
<v Speaker 1>ever want to get a hold of the evidence to

0:22:54.280 --> 0:22:57.240
<v Speaker 1>try to demonstrate that they actually pled guilty to something

0:22:57.240 --> 0:23:00.560
<v Speaker 1>they didn't do, they can't get it exactly right.

0:23:00.640 --> 0:23:02.800
<v Speaker 2>You know, evidence in a lot of these cases has

0:23:02.880 --> 0:23:05.360
<v Speaker 2>been destroyed, and so we really don't know how many

0:23:05.440 --> 0:23:07.480
<v Speaker 2>people have been wrongfully convicted because you may not be

0:23:07.520 --> 0:23:08.240
<v Speaker 2>able to.

0:23:08.280 --> 0:23:09.200
<v Speaker 1>Verify the results.

0:23:09.280 --> 0:23:12.399
<v Speaker 2>I know Pro Publica did a study and they estimated

0:23:12.400 --> 0:23:15.600
<v Speaker 2>about one hundred thousand people a year probably plead guilty

0:23:15.640 --> 0:23:18.400
<v Speaker 2>based upon drug test kits alone. And so even if

0:23:18.400 --> 0:23:20.240
<v Speaker 2>you have a small air rate there, I mean, you're

0:23:20.280 --> 0:23:23.600
<v Speaker 2>talking about thousands of people potentially each year that actually

0:23:23.600 --> 0:23:25.840
<v Speaker 2>had never done anything wrong pleading guilty. And how many

0:23:25.840 --> 0:23:29.000
<v Speaker 2>of those cases do you actually have the destruction of evidence. Luckily,

0:23:29.040 --> 0:23:31.760
<v Speaker 2>for Amy, and it's tough to say Anything's lucky about

0:23:31.760 --> 0:23:35.040
<v Speaker 2>her case was that, you know, in Harris County, you

0:23:35.080 --> 0:23:37.760
<v Speaker 2>had a forensics lab that didn't want to destroy evidence,

0:23:37.760 --> 0:23:40.760
<v Speaker 2>and you also had so much volume that a motion

0:23:40.880 --> 0:23:43.199
<v Speaker 2>to destroy evidence about at the bottom of the barrel

0:23:43.400 --> 0:23:45.200
<v Speaker 2>for a judge of signed. So that motion was never

0:23:45.280 --> 0:23:47.639
<v Speaker 2>signed in her case, and so six months later this

0:23:47.760 --> 0:23:49.480
<v Speaker 2>was actually tested and it was a food crump.

0:23:50.320 --> 0:23:53.680
<v Speaker 1>So because of what was really an oversight, the evidence

0:23:53.720 --> 0:23:57.080
<v Speaker 1>in her case was never destroyed. So they were able

0:23:57.160 --> 0:24:01.560
<v Speaker 1>to retest the evidence and find out that she's actually innocent,

0:24:02.440 --> 0:24:05.600
<v Speaker 1>and they sent the letter to Amy's house notifying her,

0:24:05.640 --> 0:24:08.359
<v Speaker 1>but it took a long time to actually get that letter,

0:24:08.960 --> 0:24:11.679
<v Speaker 1>so Amy went a long time not knowing that this

0:24:11.800 --> 0:24:13.640
<v Speaker 1>evidence had ever been retested.

0:24:14.880 --> 0:24:17.200
<v Speaker 2>Now, the problem with that, and the problem in Amy's

0:24:17.200 --> 0:24:19.640
<v Speaker 2>case is that she had moved from her original address

0:24:19.680 --> 0:24:21.280
<v Speaker 2>at that time. And so for a lot of folks,

0:24:21.359 --> 0:24:23.520
<v Speaker 2>I mean, this has been going on for years, they

0:24:23.520 --> 0:24:26.680
<v Speaker 2>can't find everyone, and so these criminal convictions continue to linger.

0:24:26.920 --> 0:24:28.679
<v Speaker 2>Some of these individuals were homeless, some of these are

0:24:28.720 --> 0:24:31.560
<v Speaker 2>extreme poverty. Some of them moved out far away and

0:24:31.600 --> 0:24:34.159
<v Speaker 2>don't understand that this is going on, and so a

0:24:34.160 --> 0:24:36.520
<v Speaker 2>lot of these cases are still unresolved to this day.

0:24:36.560 --> 0:24:38.360
<v Speaker 2>And that's exactly what happened to Amy's case. I think

0:24:38.400 --> 0:24:41.640
<v Speaker 2>her initial letter was sent in twenty fourteen. It took

0:24:41.760 --> 0:24:44.520
<v Speaker 2>until two reporters from the New York Times to finally

0:24:44.760 --> 0:24:47.879
<v Speaker 2>get in touch with her and finally found her. You know,

0:24:48.040 --> 0:24:50.280
<v Speaker 2>six years later after this happened, she had already had

0:24:50.280 --> 0:24:53.679
<v Speaker 2>the criminal conviction on her record. She had lost everything

0:24:53.680 --> 0:24:55.560
<v Speaker 2>she was working at like a convenience store, and then

0:24:55.680 --> 0:24:57.440
<v Speaker 2>kind of working for a slumlord after that because she

0:24:57.440 --> 0:25:00.199
<v Speaker 2>couldn't get a job with a felony record. So this

0:25:00.359 --> 0:25:03.480
<v Speaker 2>entire woman's life is ruined based upon the evidence of

0:25:03.520 --> 0:25:04.240
<v Speaker 2>this drug care.

0:25:05.280 --> 0:25:08.159
<v Speaker 1>Look, I know exactly what you're talking about. I have

0:25:08.280 --> 0:25:11.399
<v Speaker 1>so many clients that when they get out, you know,

0:25:11.440 --> 0:25:16.760
<v Speaker 1>there's always you know, a celebration and oftentimes it's covered

0:25:16.760 --> 0:25:21.879
<v Speaker 1>in the press. And after that first you know, twenty

0:25:21.920 --> 0:25:26.560
<v Speaker 1>four forty eight seventy two hours, you know, a different

0:25:26.640 --> 0:25:30.399
<v Speaker 1>kind of nightmare begins for them. You know, trying to

0:25:30.440 --> 0:25:36.200
<v Speaker 1>assimilate back into society is just you know, very very difficult.

0:25:36.359 --> 0:25:41.040
<v Speaker 1>The psychological harm that is done, you know, from somebody

0:25:41.040 --> 0:25:45.600
<v Speaker 1>being in a combined space and having to answer to someone,

0:25:45.720 --> 0:25:48.760
<v Speaker 1>having to ask permission to do something, you know, simple

0:25:48.800 --> 0:25:50.959
<v Speaker 1>things like go to the bathroom or eat. It's just

0:25:51.320 --> 0:25:58.520
<v Speaker 1>it's hard to undo. And you know, this stain of

0:25:58.560 --> 0:26:04.520
<v Speaker 1>a wrongful incarceration or wrongful conviction really sticks with you.

0:26:03.119 --> 0:26:06.720
<v Speaker 2>You know the Internet, things don't leave there, and so

0:26:06.840 --> 0:26:08.680
<v Speaker 2>you have this arrest record on there. You have these

0:26:08.680 --> 0:26:11.560
<v Speaker 2>convictions on there, and those linger with you for quite

0:26:11.600 --> 0:26:14.400
<v Speaker 2>a while. It costs thousands of dollars to get your

0:26:14.440 --> 0:26:17.560
<v Speaker 2>case exponge, even if you're wrongfully convicted, and even if

0:26:17.600 --> 0:26:20.560
<v Speaker 2>you get that off your physical record, the digital record

0:26:20.680 --> 0:26:23.360
<v Speaker 2>still stays there. You have a mug shot that's out there,

0:26:23.400 --> 0:26:25.959
<v Speaker 2>you have this arrest record, you have the plea. You

0:26:26.000 --> 0:26:28.400
<v Speaker 2>have all these different documents and they can be scrubbed

0:26:28.400 --> 0:26:30.159
<v Speaker 2>from one thing, but they can pop up on another.

0:26:30.480 --> 0:26:34.120
<v Speaker 2>You'll have the same company have something called mugshots dot

0:26:34.119 --> 0:26:36.960
<v Speaker 2>com and then they'll have mugshots with the z dot

0:26:37.000 --> 0:26:38.280
<v Speaker 2>com and then you have to pay to get it

0:26:38.320 --> 0:26:40.399
<v Speaker 2>off of there. And so you know, I'm sure if

0:26:40.440 --> 0:26:43.119
<v Speaker 2>you looked up Amy Albritton and criminal history on a

0:26:43.119 --> 0:26:45.119
<v Speaker 2>lot of these different sites, you probably still see that

0:26:45.200 --> 0:26:48.600
<v Speaker 2>she was arrested, charge and convicted for drug possession. And

0:26:48.720 --> 0:26:50.480
<v Speaker 2>if you're trying to get a job, you're trying to

0:26:50.480 --> 0:26:54.119
<v Speaker 2>get public funding, public housing, apply to school, all these

0:26:54.119 --> 0:26:56.520
<v Speaker 2>different things that's going to pop up, and sometimes an

0:26:56.560 --> 0:27:00.359
<v Speaker 2>employer or a college or something else will just brush

0:27:00.440 --> 0:27:02.200
<v Speaker 2>past you because of that, even though you were actually

0:27:02.240 --> 0:27:03.600
<v Speaker 2>exonerated of a crime.

0:27:04.160 --> 0:27:07.200
<v Speaker 1>So if these tests are so problematic, why is law

0:27:07.280 --> 0:27:10.720
<v Speaker 1>enforcement still using them? Why are they so popular?

0:27:11.800 --> 0:27:14.399
<v Speaker 2>Well, they're incredibly popular. And the reason that they're so

0:27:14.520 --> 0:27:16.760
<v Speaker 2>popular is because they're cheap and they allow and I'm

0:27:16.840 --> 0:27:20.320
<v Speaker 2>using this term loosely, for officers and proseures to gather

0:27:20.480 --> 0:27:23.240
<v Speaker 2>some sort of chemical evidence early on in the trial

0:27:23.280 --> 0:27:26.280
<v Speaker 2>and keep that churn of the criminal justice system going.

0:27:26.320 --> 0:27:28.680
<v Speaker 2>We had one point six million arrests for drug offenses

0:27:28.720 --> 0:27:31.800
<v Speaker 2>in twenty eighteen. If everyone went to trial on those things,

0:27:31.840 --> 0:27:34.440
<v Speaker 2>you'd never get through. It would take decades to get

0:27:34.440 --> 0:27:36.920
<v Speaker 2>through all the cases. And so what a field drug

0:27:36.960 --> 0:27:39.640
<v Speaker 2>test kit does is allow us to exhibitize the criminal

0:27:39.760 --> 0:27:42.720
<v Speaker 2>justice system and garner police from individuals at the earliest

0:27:42.720 --> 0:27:43.879
<v Speaker 2>stage in the process.

0:27:44.480 --> 0:27:47.920
<v Speaker 1>So, do you think there's anything that can prevent these

0:27:48.040 --> 0:27:53.000
<v Speaker 1>roadside drug tests from resulting in innocent people getting convicted.

0:27:53.800 --> 0:27:57.119
<v Speaker 2>Because of investigative stories like we had in Atlanta. There

0:27:57.160 --> 0:27:58.879
<v Speaker 2>was an incredible one down there where they found that

0:27:58.920 --> 0:28:01.720
<v Speaker 2>one hundred and forty five if people just in twenty

0:28:01.840 --> 0:28:05.320
<v Speaker 2>seventeen alone were wrongfully convicted of drug possession, and the

0:28:05.320 --> 0:28:08.920
<v Speaker 2>ones in Houston, and we had certain cases in Arizona

0:28:08.960 --> 0:28:12.119
<v Speaker 2>and Las Vegas. These investigative reports and these types of

0:28:12.160 --> 0:28:15.080
<v Speaker 2>podcasts that you guys are doing has brought more information

0:28:15.119 --> 0:28:17.520
<v Speaker 2>on the inaccuracies of these and actually, inhers count they

0:28:17.560 --> 0:28:21.399
<v Speaker 2>no longer allow for a plea to be entered until

0:28:21.440 --> 0:28:24.639
<v Speaker 2>it has been verified by a laboratory, and so you

0:28:24.720 --> 0:28:27.800
<v Speaker 2>are seeing changes across the country on how these are utilized.

0:28:27.840 --> 0:28:31.719
<v Speaker 2>But still in many jurisdictions, particularly smaller jurisdictions, judges are

0:28:31.760 --> 0:28:35.240
<v Speaker 2>taking these pleas and prosecutors are driving these pleas without

0:28:35.240 --> 0:28:36.560
<v Speaker 2>actually verifying the results.

0:28:37.359 --> 0:28:41.720
<v Speaker 1>These types of stories are extremely valuable, but the sad

0:28:41.800 --> 0:28:44.560
<v Speaker 1>truth is that these kinds of changes take a lot

0:28:44.600 --> 0:28:48.040
<v Speaker 1>of work and a lot of time. So in the meantime,

0:28:48.920 --> 0:28:51.600
<v Speaker 1>for the immediate future, is there anything else that can

0:28:51.680 --> 0:28:54.800
<v Speaker 1>be done to stop these kinds of wrongful convictions?

0:28:56.000 --> 0:28:59.000
<v Speaker 2>If you're about to accept a plea based upon this alone,

0:28:59.160 --> 0:28:59.440
<v Speaker 2>do not.

0:29:00.000 --> 0:29:00.160
<v Speaker 1>Now.

0:29:00.200 --> 0:29:03.760
<v Speaker 2>You do have newer technologies today that actually are able

0:29:03.760 --> 0:29:06.400
<v Speaker 2>to be more readily accurate and don't produce as many

0:29:06.440 --> 0:29:09.400
<v Speaker 2>false positives, but those are very expensive and a lot

0:29:09.400 --> 0:29:12.280
<v Speaker 2>of you know, smaller jurisdictions can't afford those, and so

0:29:12.760 --> 0:29:14.479
<v Speaker 2>that's a good thing, but that's going to be, you know,

0:29:14.560 --> 0:29:17.320
<v Speaker 2>a long ways out, and so you know, these drug

0:29:17.360 --> 0:29:19.280
<v Speaker 2>test kits are still very prevalent, so this just should

0:29:19.320 --> 0:29:21.120
<v Speaker 2>not be used in the first place.

0:29:24.520 --> 0:29:27.680
<v Speaker 1>It's likely that stories like Amy's would have remained cloaked

0:29:27.680 --> 0:29:30.760
<v Speaker 1>in silence had it not been for journalists from Pro

0:29:30.800 --> 0:29:34.520
<v Speaker 1>Publica and The New York Times who did extensive reporting

0:29:34.600 --> 0:29:38.160
<v Speaker 1>to understand the depth of the problems that are associated

0:29:38.160 --> 0:29:42.719
<v Speaker 1>with roadside drug test kits. In fact, Amy likely wouldn't

0:29:42.760 --> 0:29:45.400
<v Speaker 1>have learned about the retesting of the evidence in her case,

0:29:45.680 --> 0:29:48.640
<v Speaker 1>which verified what she already knew that she was innocent,

0:29:49.200 --> 0:29:53.360
<v Speaker 1>if these reporters hadn't tracked her down. It's because of

0:29:53.400 --> 0:29:57.920
<v Speaker 1>these investigative journalists that the problems associated with drug test

0:29:58.000 --> 0:30:01.240
<v Speaker 1>kits came to light, and it's in a large party

0:30:01.320 --> 0:30:06.080
<v Speaker 1>to their reporting that local municipalities across the country are

0:30:06.120 --> 0:30:10.400
<v Speaker 1>being pressured to change their regulations regarding roadside drug tests.

0:30:11.320 --> 0:30:14.400
<v Speaker 1>Oversight is being implemented to ensure that the work of

0:30:14.480 --> 0:30:18.920
<v Speaker 1>crime labs is reliable. There's increased scrutiny of plea deals

0:30:18.920 --> 0:30:22.760
<v Speaker 1>for drug offenses where there isn't evidence to support a

0:30:22.800 --> 0:30:28.600
<v Speaker 1>person's guilt. This kind of reporting is extraordinarily important for

0:30:28.760 --> 0:30:33.120
<v Speaker 1>helping the Innocence Project and lawyers like me identify cases

0:30:33.160 --> 0:30:37.240
<v Speaker 1>where individuals were wrongfully convicted, and to bring these cases

0:30:37.280 --> 0:30:41.560
<v Speaker 1>to the public's attention. So subscribe to news outlets like

0:30:41.640 --> 0:30:45.560
<v Speaker 1>Pro Publica, The Marshall Project, the New York Times, or

0:30:45.600 --> 0:30:50.000
<v Speaker 1>wherever you see quality journalism that is focused on exposing

0:30:50.040 --> 0:30:53.960
<v Speaker 1>the shortcomings of our criminal justice system. We hear this

0:30:54.000 --> 0:30:59.040
<v Speaker 1>phrase fake news, fake news. It's all fake news, carelessly

0:30:59.160 --> 0:31:02.760
<v Speaker 1>tossed around to the point where people are actually beginning

0:31:02.800 --> 0:31:06.320
<v Speaker 1>to believe that they should be dismissive of anything written

0:31:06.360 --> 0:31:10.520
<v Speaker 1>by a journalist. This is so dangerous for reasons that

0:31:10.600 --> 0:31:14.200
<v Speaker 1>I think are obvious to listeners of this show. This

0:31:14.320 --> 0:31:19.080
<v Speaker 1>assault on our media makes support incredible news organizations more

0:31:19.120 --> 0:31:22.680
<v Speaker 1>important than ever, as it is often under the microscope

0:31:22.680 --> 0:31:27.800
<v Speaker 1>of their thorough investigative reporting that we uncover and then

0:31:27.960 --> 0:31:38.840
<v Speaker 1>prevent the junk science behind wrongful convictions. Next week, we'll

0:31:38.880 --> 0:31:43.040
<v Speaker 1>explore the junk science of eyewitness identification with the renowned

0:31:43.080 --> 0:31:49.360
<v Speaker 1>psychologist and memory expert Elizabeth loftis Wrongful conviction junk science

0:31:49.480 --> 0:31:52.520
<v Speaker 1>is a production of Lava for Good Podcasts in association

0:31:52.640 --> 0:31:56.120
<v Speaker 1>with Signal Company Number One. Thanks to our executive producer

0:31:56.200 --> 0:31:59.000
<v Speaker 1>Jason Flahm and the team at Signal Company Number One

0:31:59.560 --> 0:32:03.720
<v Speaker 1>executive producer Kevin Wardis and senior producers Karen Kornhaber and

0:32:03.760 --> 0:32:08.000
<v Speaker 1>Britz Spangler. Our music was composed by Jay Ralph. You

0:32:08.000 --> 0:32:11.680
<v Speaker 1>can follow me on Instagram at dubin Josh. Follow the

0:32:11.680 --> 0:32:15.880
<v Speaker 1>Wrongful Conviction podcast on Facebook and on Instagram at Wrongful

0:32:15.880 --> 0:32:18.600
<v Speaker 1>Conviction and on Twitter at wrong Conviction