1
00:00:03,200 --> 00:00:07,960
Speaker 1: This is Bloomberg Law with June Bresso from Bloomberg Radio.

2
00:00:09,240 --> 00:00:12,719
Speaker 1: The Jose's Department is struggling to contain the fallout over

3
00:00:12,800 --> 00:00:18,160
Speaker 1: revelations to the Trump administration issued secret subpoenas for communications

4
00:00:18,200 --> 00:00:21,520
Speaker 1: metadata of at least two House Democrats, members of the

5
00:00:21,600 --> 00:00:24,760
Speaker 1: news media, and then White House Counsel Don the Gan.

6
00:00:25,280 --> 00:00:29,120
Speaker 1: Former Attorney General Jeff Sessions, and former Attorney General William

7
00:00:29,200 --> 00:00:32,639
Speaker 1: Barr claimed they didn't know about the subpoenas. On CNN

8
00:00:32,720 --> 00:00:36,200
Speaker 1: State of the Union, House Speaker Nancy Pelosi said that's

9
00:00:36,240 --> 00:00:39,400
Speaker 1: beyond belief, so we will have to have them come

10
00:00:39,560 --> 00:00:44,120
Speaker 1: under oath to testify about that. Pelosi said that drops

11
00:00:44,120 --> 00:00:47,519
Speaker 1: Donald Trump below even Richard Nixon in terms of reprehensible

12
00:00:47,600 --> 00:00:54,000
Speaker 1: presidential behavior. An enemy's list. This is about undermining the

13
00:00:54,120 --> 00:00:58,840
Speaker 1: rule of law. Attorney General Merrick Garland announced today that

14
00:00:58,920 --> 00:01:02,400
Speaker 1: he's ordered a review to evaluate and toughen the department's

15
00:01:02,480 --> 00:01:07,280
Speaker 1: existing policies and procedures for obtaining records from lawmakers or

16
00:01:07,280 --> 00:01:10,920
Speaker 1: their staff. Joining me is William Banks, a professor at

17
00:01:10,959 --> 00:01:15,240
Speaker 1: Syracuse Law School. The Speaker of the House, Nancy Pelosi,

18
00:01:15,319 --> 00:01:18,679
Speaker 1: has said that what the joice Department did here with

19
00:01:18,800 --> 00:01:22,720
Speaker 1: these subpoenas is worse than Watergate? Do you agree with that?

20
00:01:23,120 --> 00:01:26,160
Speaker 1: It's too early to say. During it's possible that this

21
00:01:26,240 --> 00:01:28,720
Speaker 1: is a big scandal, but there's so many things we

22
00:01:28,840 --> 00:01:34,399
Speaker 1: don't know about the subpoenas, about what investigation was concerning,

23
00:01:34,920 --> 00:01:39,080
Speaker 1: whether there were multiple investigations going on. It seems like

24
00:01:39,200 --> 00:01:44,600
Speaker 1: this is all connected to leak investigations, but leak investigations

25
00:01:44,600 --> 00:01:49,960
Speaker 1: that are prompted by politics more than concerns about national security.

26
00:01:50,000 --> 00:01:53,440
Speaker 1: For example, if there's a pattern here in what we've

27
00:01:53,480 --> 00:01:57,000
Speaker 1: been able to learn so far, it's that the supposed

28
00:01:57,080 --> 00:02:00,960
Speaker 1: leakers are those whose records were subpoenas and obtained were

29
00:02:01,160 --> 00:02:04,720
Speaker 1: political opponents of Donald Trump, so that the White House

30
00:02:05,000 --> 00:02:10,360
Speaker 1: was apparently enlisting the Justice Department to do its political

31
00:02:10,960 --> 00:02:15,280
Speaker 1: sniping and warfare rather than simply asking it to enforce

32
00:02:15,360 --> 00:02:17,480
Speaker 1: the law. And if that's the case, I think that's

33
00:02:17,480 --> 00:02:21,440
Speaker 1: what Speaker Pelosi is driving out. That's bad, it's very bad.

34
00:02:21,600 --> 00:02:24,320
Speaker 1: But of course, at the same time, we don't have

35
00:02:24,560 --> 00:02:29,720
Speaker 1: strict legal limits on what the Justice departments capabilities of

36
00:02:29,919 --> 00:02:33,800
Speaker 1: exercising the subpomb of power are, particularly with respect to

37
00:02:34,200 --> 00:02:37,480
Speaker 1: members of Congress or their staff well in order to

38
00:02:37,480 --> 00:02:42,960
Speaker 1: trigger a Justice Department leak investigation. Is it usually a

39
00:02:43,080 --> 00:02:48,360
Speaker 1: leak of classified material that's an issue? Yes, And that's

40
00:02:48,360 --> 00:02:53,320
Speaker 1: important I think to say, because you know, so, what

41
00:02:53,360 --> 00:02:58,280
Speaker 1: was there classified material that was leaked? Perhaps concerning the

42
00:02:58,360 --> 00:03:03,519
Speaker 1: Russia investigation, perhaps concerning what Moeller was looking into. Uh,

43
00:03:03,560 --> 00:03:07,520
Speaker 1: there are a number of other possitibility, certainly the media, uh,

44
00:03:07,639 --> 00:03:10,720
Speaker 1: subpoenas that were revealed about a week ago the time

45
00:03:10,840 --> 00:03:15,000
Speaker 1: cingm the Washington Post. Those have the look of the

46
00:03:15,120 --> 00:03:18,520
Speaker 1: kinds of weak investigations that were undergoing even during the

47
00:03:18,680 --> 00:03:23,280
Speaker 1: Vomit administration. But these, you know, bringing in members of Congress,

48
00:03:23,360 --> 00:03:28,320
Speaker 1: their staff, members of the families. That's uh, that's stepping

49
00:03:28,360 --> 00:03:32,320
Speaker 1: in a new direction. Yeah. Attorney General Merrick Arland said

50
00:03:32,800 --> 00:03:35,880
Speaker 1: that these seizures were done under a set of policies

51
00:03:35,880 --> 00:03:39,480
Speaker 1: that have existed for decades, But that doesn't mean it

52
00:03:39,520 --> 00:03:43,840
Speaker 1: didn't cross the line. That's right. But again, you know

53
00:03:43,880 --> 00:03:48,400
Speaker 1: that what we're talking about here probably are violations of

54
00:03:48,520 --> 00:03:54,240
Speaker 1: longstanding norms of good conduct and government and separation of

55
00:03:54,440 --> 00:03:59,920
Speaker 1: powers principles that the executive branch doesn't intrude into affairs

56
00:04:00,000 --> 00:04:04,440
Speaker 1: of Congress. But they're not written laws, they're not reduced

57
00:04:04,440 --> 00:04:08,880
Speaker 1: the statute. They're not even reduced to administrative regulation. They're

58
00:04:08,880 --> 00:04:12,760
Speaker 1: not part of the Constitution as such. But it's longstanding

59
00:04:13,200 --> 00:04:15,960
Speaker 1: that we never had to worry about in the past

60
00:04:16,080 --> 00:04:19,599
Speaker 1: until the last five years or so. Would a judge

61
00:04:19,640 --> 00:04:25,760
Speaker 1: have to approve these subpoenas, Yes, so they're probably connected

62
00:04:25,800 --> 00:04:31,400
Speaker 1: to lead investigations, and that's the justification for for exercising subpoenas.

63
00:04:31,400 --> 00:04:34,120
Speaker 1: And then also by the way that the gag orders

64
00:04:34,200 --> 00:04:37,680
Speaker 1: telling them not to telling the companies that companies not

65
00:04:37,760 --> 00:04:42,320
Speaker 1: to reveal that the records have been taking Trump's first

66
00:04:42,360 --> 00:04:46,640
Speaker 1: Attorney General Jeff Sessions, his second Attorney General William Barr,

67
00:04:46,640 --> 00:04:50,599
Speaker 1: and former Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein claimed to have

68
00:04:50,720 --> 00:04:54,840
Speaker 1: no knowledge of this. Could an investigation like this be

69
00:04:55,040 --> 00:04:59,680
Speaker 1: going on without the knowledge of the Attorney General? Not

70
00:04:59,800 --> 00:05:02,440
Speaker 1: a they're doing their jobs. One of them is either

71
00:05:02,560 --> 00:05:05,680
Speaker 1: telling a lot or weren't paying attention to what their

72
00:05:05,720 --> 00:05:09,800
Speaker 1: subordinates were doing. There was another official whose testimony is

73
00:05:09,839 --> 00:05:13,000
Speaker 1: going to be sought here, Mr John Demurs, who's head

74
00:05:13,040 --> 00:05:15,839
Speaker 1: of the National Security Division at the Department of Justice.

75
00:05:15,880 --> 00:05:18,520
Speaker 1: He announced stepping down as of next week. This was

76
00:05:18,560 --> 00:05:22,360
Speaker 1: a planned departure, not hastened I think by these events.

77
00:05:22,560 --> 00:05:25,839
Speaker 1: But the merge was another official head of NSD National

78
00:05:25,920 --> 00:05:29,200
Speaker 1: Security Division who could have authorized these subpoenas. But in

79
00:05:29,240 --> 00:05:34,040
Speaker 1: any case, Rosenstein should have known or approved the Attorney General.

80
00:05:34,160 --> 00:05:36,960
Speaker 1: This was not everyday business in the Department of Justice.

81
00:05:37,720 --> 00:05:41,279
Speaker 1: They also seized the records of journalists. That seems to

82
00:05:41,320 --> 00:05:45,479
Speaker 1: cause a particular problem when they're seizing journalist records in

83
00:05:45,600 --> 00:05:51,960
Speaker 1: classified leak investigations. Have journalists records been sees before? Only rarely?

84
00:05:52,000 --> 00:05:54,279
Speaker 1: And again you know this this is what caused I

85
00:05:54,320 --> 00:05:56,800
Speaker 1: think President Biden are locked off the tough the other

86
00:05:56,880 --> 00:05:59,760
Speaker 1: day that he thought it was a terrible policy and

87
00:05:59,839 --> 00:06:02,120
Speaker 1: that it would never ever happen again. I think it's

88
00:06:02,120 --> 00:06:05,440
Speaker 1: something like that he said. Now, of course, Attorney General

89
00:06:05,480 --> 00:06:08,520
Speaker 1: Garland and his deputy are going to be busy trying

90
00:06:08,520 --> 00:06:12,200
Speaker 1: to construct policy to put his words into practice. But

91
00:06:12,760 --> 00:06:15,919
Speaker 1: you may remember that then the Obama administration, Attorney General

92
00:06:15,960 --> 00:06:20,120
Speaker 1: Holder drafted a Justice Department policy that made it easier

93
00:06:20,720 --> 00:06:24,200
Speaker 1: to go oufter journalists and weak investor. And then it

94
00:06:24,279 --> 00:06:28,159
Speaker 1: was it was exercised with some vigor a number of

95
00:06:28,200 --> 00:06:32,159
Speaker 1: times more often than the Obama administration than the Republican

96
00:06:32,360 --> 00:06:37,200
Speaker 1: administrations that have proceeded. Former White House Council Don McGann.

97
00:06:37,800 --> 00:06:42,760
Speaker 1: His records were also subpoened. Does that go way beyond

98
00:06:42,920 --> 00:06:47,839
Speaker 1: to have a city White House Council's records. It's quite

99
00:06:47,960 --> 00:06:53,280
Speaker 1: bizarre to have an investigation of your own lawyer. Um

100
00:06:53,600 --> 00:06:57,119
Speaker 1: about which again he's getting the provider apple. I believe

101
00:06:57,120 --> 00:06:59,360
Speaker 1: it was his gagged from telling him that his records

102
00:06:59,360 --> 00:07:02,680
Speaker 1: had been taking the records of his family. Uh. There

103
00:07:02,720 --> 00:07:05,120
Speaker 1: are a few possibilities there. You know, mcgon when McGan

104
00:07:05,320 --> 00:07:08,440
Speaker 1: was working on a lot of things at that period,

105
00:07:08,520 --> 00:07:14,360
Speaker 1: including investigations that were part of the Moller work, investigations

106
00:07:14,920 --> 00:07:19,200
Speaker 1: related to Paul Manaforts criminal cases as well as the

107
00:07:19,280 --> 00:07:23,800
Speaker 1: Russia investigation. So uh, and by that time, I think

108
00:07:23,840 --> 00:07:27,640
Speaker 1: in eighteen and McGann and President Trump were on the outs.

109
00:07:28,280 --> 00:07:30,680
Speaker 1: So it may be that it was just kind of

110
00:07:30,720 --> 00:07:35,480
Speaker 1: some vindictive decision by the President to try to dig

111
00:07:35,560 --> 00:07:39,920
Speaker 1: up dirt on Don McGann, which is quite ridiculous. I've

112
00:07:39,960 --> 00:07:44,000
Speaker 1: heard some Republicans say, well, look at the searches of

113
00:07:44,280 --> 00:07:48,640
Speaker 1: Rudolph Giuliani, who was the president's lawyer. Is that analogous

114
00:07:48,720 --> 00:07:51,920
Speaker 1: to what was done to Don McGann. No, I don't

115
00:07:51,920 --> 00:07:55,720
Speaker 1: think so. There's been no allegation that Mr McGann violating

116
00:07:55,760 --> 00:07:59,640
Speaker 1: the law in any way, so they're interested to know

117
00:07:59,760 --> 00:08:03,880
Speaker 1: who he was talking to, not whether he engaged in

118
00:08:03,880 --> 00:08:06,960
Speaker 1: the law violation. Not certainly not the case with Johanna.

119
00:08:07,560 --> 00:08:12,240
Speaker 1: Quite the contrary. The Justice Department Inspector General is going

120
00:08:12,320 --> 00:08:16,720
Speaker 1: to investigate this, But there are editors who want to

121
00:08:16,800 --> 00:08:19,520
Speaker 1: investigate this on the Judiciary Committee, but they may not

122
00:08:19,680 --> 00:08:23,560
Speaker 1: have They probably won't have the Republican vote that they

123
00:08:23,600 --> 00:08:26,240
Speaker 1: need in order to do that. Is it sufficient for

124
00:08:26,280 --> 00:08:30,240
Speaker 1: the Justice Department Inspector General to investigate this? Do you think?

125
00:08:31,320 --> 00:08:34,720
Speaker 1: I have a lot of confidence in Mr Horowitz, As

126
00:08:34,760 --> 00:08:38,680
Speaker 1: you know, he's done Yeoman's work over the use and

127
00:08:38,800 --> 00:08:41,599
Speaker 1: trying to hold up the integrity of the i G

128
00:08:41,960 --> 00:08:44,719
Speaker 1: as an institution in the Department of Justice. We all

129
00:08:44,760 --> 00:08:49,080
Speaker 1: know that Inspectors general have been under a tremendous assault

130
00:08:49,160 --> 00:08:53,720
Speaker 1: and pressure during the Trump administration firings and the last

131
00:08:53,760 --> 00:08:57,640
Speaker 1: and the like. And Horowitz is hunk tough and it's

132
00:08:57,679 --> 00:09:00,400
Speaker 1: hun tough, even though he's had to deal with Bill

133
00:09:00,440 --> 00:09:03,679
Speaker 1: Barr and just Sessions. I think he'll have, of course,

134
00:09:04,240 --> 00:09:08,080
Speaker 1: much more cooperative Attorney General maw and Mary Garland. But

135
00:09:09,080 --> 00:09:12,440
Speaker 1: there he's independent, he has his staff, he has the

136
00:09:12,520 --> 00:09:15,640
Speaker 1: resources to dig and get what he needs. He'll get

137
00:09:15,720 --> 00:09:19,520
Speaker 1: deliberate about it, and I don't think anyone will question

138
00:09:19,640 --> 00:09:25,760
Speaker 1: his integrity or his independence of partisan uh politics. I

139
00:09:25,760 --> 00:09:28,600
Speaker 1: want to get your take on the way Garland is

140
00:09:28,640 --> 00:09:32,400
Speaker 1: handling some Trump issues. You know, the Justice Department seems

141
00:09:32,440 --> 00:09:35,880
Speaker 1: to be all in for protecting whoever the president was.

142
00:09:36,120 --> 00:09:40,959
Speaker 1: For example, they're still defending Trump in the defamation lawsuit.

143
00:09:41,760 --> 00:09:45,920
Speaker 1: They've been defending him, even releasing his tax record, the

144
00:09:46,000 --> 00:09:49,800
Speaker 1: tax records to Congress at this stage, and now there

145
00:09:49,960 --> 00:09:52,920
Speaker 1: seemed to be defending what happened here. Is there too

146
00:09:53,000 --> 00:09:58,760
Speaker 1: much defense of the prior administration all for perhaps the

147
00:09:58,880 --> 00:10:02,560
Speaker 1: idea that you know, the isn't a political justice department? Well,

148
00:10:02,880 --> 00:10:04,959
Speaker 1: I don't think it is too much. I think it

149
00:10:05,440 --> 00:10:12,160
Speaker 1: sets uh an example of nonpartisanship, of bringing the Justice

150
00:10:12,160 --> 00:10:17,000
Speaker 1: Department back to the straight and narrow posture that it's

151
00:10:17,120 --> 00:10:20,000
Speaker 1: always been supposed to have and that it's practiced for

152
00:10:20,040 --> 00:10:24,240
Speaker 1: the most part over its entire institutional history. So it

153
00:10:25,160 --> 00:10:28,920
Speaker 1: looks a little silly sometimes and and they're probably you know,

154
00:10:29,280 --> 00:10:31,360
Speaker 1: lawyers whose eyes are rolling in the back of their

155
00:10:31,360 --> 00:10:34,120
Speaker 1: head head doing some of this work, but I think

156
00:10:34,160 --> 00:10:37,080
Speaker 1: it's got to be done. Thanks Bill. That's William Banks

157
00:10:37,120 --> 00:10:44,280
Speaker 1: of Syracuse Law School. This is Bloomberg Law with June

158
00:10:44,280 --> 00:10:49,200
Speaker 1: Brussel from Bloomberg Radio. The race to be Manhattan's next

159
00:10:49,240 --> 00:10:52,680
Speaker 1: top prosecutor is taking place amid a crime surge that

160
00:10:52,760 --> 00:10:56,640
Speaker 1: has seen murders up more than sevent so far this year.

161
00:10:56,880 --> 00:10:59,760
Speaker 1: But at a candidate forum earlier this year, five of

162
00:10:59,800 --> 00:11:04,280
Speaker 1: the eight Democratic hopefuls said they supported reducing police funding

163
00:11:04,640 --> 00:11:07,920
Speaker 1: and some even call for cutting back the prosecutor's office.

164
00:11:08,280 --> 00:11:12,079
Speaker 1: Joining is Patricia Hurtado, Bloomberg Legal reporter. In the DA's

165
00:11:12,160 --> 00:11:15,360
Speaker 1: race in Manhattan, I's there are two seemingly conflicting forces

166
00:11:15,400 --> 00:11:18,960
Speaker 1: at work. That's the surgeon crime in New York and

167
00:11:19,320 --> 00:11:24,840
Speaker 1: the racial justice movement. Are candidates fighting both those. It

168
00:11:24,920 --> 00:11:28,600
Speaker 1: seems like what they're doing is they're straddling the two

169
00:11:28,960 --> 00:11:33,680
Speaker 1: issues in the best way. Basically, their campaigns want to

170
00:11:33,679 --> 00:11:36,720
Speaker 1: address it. So some of the more liberal I guess

171
00:11:36,720 --> 00:11:40,040
Speaker 1: I would call them more progressive candidates of who are

172
00:11:40,160 --> 00:11:45,320
Speaker 1: more for disabling or dismantling the existing criminal justice system

173
00:11:45,320 --> 00:11:48,400
Speaker 1: because they find there's there's too much prejudice or there's

174
00:11:48,000 --> 00:11:53,000
Speaker 1: too heavy handed prosecutions of brown and black people. So

175
00:11:53,360 --> 00:11:55,800
Speaker 1: they are having to address that they're being asked to,

176
00:11:56,440 --> 00:12:01,080
Speaker 1: and some of them are more modern it, and they

177
00:12:01,120 --> 00:12:04,440
Speaker 1: are basically saying crime is bad, So we need to

178
00:12:04,480 --> 00:12:07,480
Speaker 1: not dismantle the system. We need to really just continue

179
00:12:07,559 --> 00:12:11,600
Speaker 1: during our jobs if we're elected, and prosecute crimes. The

180
00:12:11,720 --> 00:12:16,480
Speaker 1: Trump investigation is what's been driving news about the Manhattan

181
00:12:16,559 --> 00:12:20,080
Speaker 1: d A's office for years now, but that doesn't seem

182
00:12:20,120 --> 00:12:22,960
Speaker 1: to be an issue in the campaign. Well, I some

183
00:12:23,040 --> 00:12:25,920
Speaker 1: of the candidates have said that it would be improper

184
00:12:25,960 --> 00:12:29,000
Speaker 1: for them to talk about something they know nothing about.

185
00:12:29,200 --> 00:12:32,480
Speaker 1: I mean, it's a criminal grand jury is supposed to

186
00:12:32,480 --> 00:12:36,280
Speaker 1: operate in secrecy, right, so they've been calling witnesses, and

187
00:12:36,400 --> 00:12:39,080
Speaker 1: any candidate is not pritty to what's going on in

188
00:12:39,120 --> 00:12:43,080
Speaker 1: the grand jury. And if they make comments now ahead

189
00:12:43,160 --> 00:12:45,600
Speaker 1: of you know, say, for example, one of them said

190
00:12:45,600 --> 00:12:50,480
Speaker 1: Trump deserves to be prosecutor indicted, that would automatically make

191
00:12:50,559 --> 00:12:53,400
Speaker 1: them flodder and make them a target for if there

192
00:12:53,480 --> 00:12:56,400
Speaker 1: is a case later down the road and they get elected,

193
00:12:56,800 --> 00:13:01,439
Speaker 1: that candidate could be attacked by employers as saying this

194
00:13:01,600 --> 00:13:05,880
Speaker 1: person has a vendetta against us, and it's a wrongful prosecution.

195
00:13:06,440 --> 00:13:09,520
Speaker 1: So most of them are not there tiptoeing around the

196
00:13:09,600 --> 00:13:12,720
Speaker 1: subject in a and the best way they can. But

197
00:13:12,880 --> 00:13:16,920
Speaker 1: it is a huge It will be if it happens.

198
00:13:16,960 --> 00:13:20,160
Speaker 1: The d A who will get elected for the Manhattan

199
00:13:20,200 --> 00:13:24,000
Speaker 1: District Attorney's office so to replace Divans who's the current ZIA,

200
00:13:24,559 --> 00:13:28,880
Speaker 1: will have a huge job on their hands if that happens.

201
00:13:29,000 --> 00:13:31,840
Speaker 1: Some people are pointing out if you can imagine a

202
00:13:31,960 --> 00:13:35,920
Speaker 1: case that's so high profile like this, which really need

203
00:13:36,520 --> 00:13:39,600
Speaker 1: strong leadership at the top of the helm to withstand

204
00:13:39,840 --> 00:13:43,600
Speaker 1: all the buffeting of criticism that Trump lawyers could heap

205
00:13:43,679 --> 00:13:47,240
Speaker 1: upon the prosecutors for all kinds of reasons. Look at

206
00:13:47,280 --> 00:13:50,720
Speaker 1: the trouble. You know, the amount of litigation and fighting

207
00:13:50,880 --> 00:13:54,280
Speaker 1: and fighting subpoenas uh conceived from what Trump has already

208
00:13:54,280 --> 00:13:57,520
Speaker 1: done in other cases. He took cases and appeals on

209
00:13:57,679 --> 00:13:59,959
Speaker 1: his taxes all the way to the Supreme Court wire.

210
00:14:00,720 --> 00:14:04,920
Speaker 1: So a d A with not that much experience might

211
00:14:05,120 --> 00:14:09,679
Speaker 1: be at a disadvantage compared to someone who can handle

212
00:14:09,840 --> 00:14:13,200
Speaker 1: the political pressure that's brought to bear up by trumpet

213
00:14:13,200 --> 00:14:16,760
Speaker 1: his lawyers as well as think of the media criticism

214
00:14:16,960 --> 00:14:20,080
Speaker 1: from both the right and the left of his despair

215
00:14:20,400 --> 00:14:23,440
Speaker 1: and all the criticism. A DA will have to be

216
00:14:23,640 --> 00:14:28,600
Speaker 1: very strong to withstand. And whether this storm of a

217
00:14:28,640 --> 00:14:32,400
Speaker 1: Trump trial, if it happens. Something that seems surprising to

218
00:14:32,440 --> 00:14:35,280
Speaker 1: me because you're in New York City. Here is there

219
00:14:35,280 --> 00:14:38,960
Speaker 1: no polling being done, no independent polling. I guess the

220
00:14:39,080 --> 00:14:42,880
Speaker 1: thing is is they are calling. Uh, there's some just

221
00:14:43,320 --> 00:14:46,760
Speaker 1: very small poles of trying to reach out to people

222
00:14:46,800 --> 00:14:50,240
Speaker 1: on the phone. It seems to me because of the pandemic,

223
00:14:50,640 --> 00:14:54,680
Speaker 1: they're not walking around talking to people, knocking on doors

224
00:14:54,720 --> 00:14:59,000
Speaker 1: because you know, they're still are social distancing requirements and

225
00:14:59,040 --> 00:15:02,320
Speaker 1: putting people at harm and walking up to strangers. I mean,

226
00:15:02,360 --> 00:15:05,400
Speaker 1: there's more campaigning we've seen in the last month and

227
00:15:05,400 --> 00:15:09,280
Speaker 1: a half or so of candidates going out to farmers markets,

228
00:15:09,280 --> 00:15:12,800
Speaker 1: but the pulling it seems to be impaired terribly by

229
00:15:12,840 --> 00:15:16,560
Speaker 1: the pandemic. And so it's almost like these tiny little

230
00:15:16,640 --> 00:15:20,720
Speaker 1: fragments of checks of like what questioning five people or

231
00:15:20,720 --> 00:15:23,680
Speaker 1: eight hundred people, you know, of the thousands that could

232
00:15:23,760 --> 00:15:27,200
Speaker 1: vote in the election are eligible to vote. Let's just

233
00:15:27,520 --> 00:15:29,800
Speaker 1: take each of the candidates and talk a little bit

234
00:15:29,800 --> 00:15:32,200
Speaker 1: about each. We're going to do it in alphabetical order

235
00:15:32,240 --> 00:15:34,600
Speaker 1: as you did in your story. There's two Hani a

236
00:15:34,680 --> 00:15:38,560
Speaker 1: Boushe who sounds like she wants the office to be

237
00:15:38,720 --> 00:15:43,520
Speaker 1: more like a social work office than a prosecuting office. Yes,

238
00:15:43,680 --> 00:15:46,920
Speaker 1: she's one of the more progressive candidates. She's very popular

239
00:15:47,000 --> 00:15:51,800
Speaker 1: with millennials. Uh. She has strongly criticized the basic process

240
00:15:51,840 --> 00:15:55,360
Speaker 1: of the system, saying that it's unfair, and she has

241
00:15:55,440 --> 00:15:59,840
Speaker 1: called for all kinds of actions you know, uh, based

242
00:15:59,840 --> 00:16:02,880
Speaker 1: the league going after the roots of crimes, she said,

243
00:16:02,960 --> 00:16:06,360
Speaker 1: And she won't prosecute you know, crimes that she say

244
00:16:06,520 --> 00:16:11,520
Speaker 1: are like sex workers people, sects of robberies. She's one

245
00:16:11,520 --> 00:16:15,200
Speaker 1: of the endorsement of Bernie Sanders Um. But you know,

246
00:16:15,320 --> 00:16:20,200
Speaker 1: she definitely wants to basically have the office go in

247
00:16:20,240 --> 00:16:24,480
Speaker 1: a different direction and not prosecute crimes that many of

248
00:16:24,560 --> 00:16:27,360
Speaker 1: us would see as a typical crime like their beating

249
00:16:27,520 --> 00:16:32,520
Speaker 1: or turnstyle jumping for crimes by youngsters, but they are

250
00:16:32,600 --> 00:16:35,520
Speaker 1: like robbery for tom. And she says she'll shrink the

251
00:16:35,560 --> 00:16:38,440
Speaker 1: District Attorney's office and there are at least two dozen

252
00:16:38,520 --> 00:16:42,720
Speaker 1: crimes that she won't prosecute. The Manhattan District Attorney's Office

253
00:16:42,800 --> 00:16:45,840
Speaker 1: handles all kinds cases. If you can imagine. I mean

254
00:16:46,040 --> 00:16:50,320
Speaker 1: they handle everything from you know, pur snatching on the

255
00:16:50,360 --> 00:16:55,560
Speaker 1: subway in Manhattan to you know, major murders. But murders

256
00:16:55,640 --> 00:16:59,320
Speaker 1: are a small fraction of what the d A office

257
00:16:59,360 --> 00:17:03,600
Speaker 1: prosecute than what police arrest for. Some have pointed out

258
00:17:03,680 --> 00:17:07,160
Speaker 1: that if the police are arresting people, then they get

259
00:17:07,160 --> 00:17:10,240
Speaker 1: to the District Attorney's office to assess what kind of

260
00:17:10,320 --> 00:17:14,119
Speaker 1: crime they will do. If I'm not mistaken, I believe

261
00:17:14,160 --> 00:17:16,400
Speaker 1: a Bushi was the one that said at a debate

262
00:17:16,640 --> 00:17:20,120
Speaker 1: that it's called the Early Case Assessment Bureau, and she

263
00:17:20,640 --> 00:17:23,640
Speaker 1: was arguing that it should not be done to assess

264
00:17:23,680 --> 00:17:27,200
Speaker 1: what kind of crimes to prosecute. It should be done. Instead,

265
00:17:27,240 --> 00:17:31,960
Speaker 1: she would reassign prosecutors to assess what the police role

266
00:17:32,400 --> 00:17:36,720
Speaker 1: was and to police wrongdoing rather than to investigate the

267
00:17:36,800 --> 00:17:42,560
Speaker 1: actual crime. So it'll be interesting if someone like Tony wins.

268
00:17:42,560 --> 00:17:45,840
Speaker 1: What's going to happen, you know, this dichotomy between the

269
00:17:45,920 --> 00:17:50,000
Speaker 1: police officers arresting people getting brought into the precincts, the

270
00:17:50,160 --> 00:17:52,360
Speaker 1: d A assessing what kind of case they would bring,

271
00:17:52,400 --> 00:17:55,040
Speaker 1: and then maybe the DA would just say, hey, we

272
00:17:55,080 --> 00:17:57,800
Speaker 1: don't believe in these kinds of crimes anymore. So police

273
00:17:57,800 --> 00:17:59,920
Speaker 1: are arresting, but the people arrested aren't going to get

274
00:18:00,040 --> 00:18:05,240
Speaker 1: obsecuted and let go. Now. Alvin Bragg, veteran state and

275
00:18:05,400 --> 00:18:09,960
Speaker 1: federal prosecutor, tell us about him. He has an interesting background.

276
00:18:10,160 --> 00:18:13,320
Speaker 1: He has worked in the U. S. Attorney's Office of

277
00:18:13,400 --> 00:18:16,280
Speaker 1: the Southern District with the likes of Prep Berrara, who

278
00:18:16,280 --> 00:18:19,879
Speaker 1: has endorsed him. He handled cases there, and then he

279
00:18:19,920 --> 00:18:24,359
Speaker 1: went on to work for Eric Schneiderman as in the

280
00:18:24,400 --> 00:18:27,360
Speaker 1: New York Attorney General and worked as a top deputy

281
00:18:27,400 --> 00:18:31,960
Speaker 1: to him. Um, he's a progressive. Many times he cites

282
00:18:32,000 --> 00:18:34,399
Speaker 1: out he is a black man, is been a victim

283
00:18:34,600 --> 00:18:38,240
Speaker 1: of wrongdoing by police, and he's had guns pointed to

284
00:18:38,320 --> 00:18:43,000
Speaker 1: his head both by police and perpetrators. So he has

285
00:18:43,040 --> 00:18:46,280
Speaker 1: portrayed himself as the kind of person that New Yorkers

286
00:18:46,400 --> 00:18:52,280
Speaker 1: need because he would really get what the prior generations

287
00:18:52,320 --> 00:18:55,879
Speaker 1: of Manhattan District attorneys don't understand, what it's like to

288
00:18:55,920 --> 00:19:00,320
Speaker 1: be a black man, a minority in society. He got

289
00:19:00,359 --> 00:19:04,360
Speaker 1: the New York Times endorsement. How important is that? It's

290
00:19:04,400 --> 00:19:09,399
Speaker 1: probably it's extraordinarily important, And um, it's hard to say

291
00:19:09,440 --> 00:19:13,200
Speaker 1: that this is the strange thing is there's so many candidates.

292
00:19:13,440 --> 00:19:17,320
Speaker 1: In fact, there's not just eight Democrats that are Republicans

293
00:19:17,560 --> 00:19:20,399
Speaker 1: in the in the race as well, and it's gonna

294
00:19:20,440 --> 00:19:24,560
Speaker 1: be interesting. Yes, Democrats out number I think tender one

295
00:19:24,720 --> 00:19:28,520
Speaker 1: Republicans in Manhattan. In Manhattan tends to vote liberally, but

296
00:19:28,720 --> 00:19:32,119
Speaker 1: it's unclear how many people will actually come out and

297
00:19:32,200 --> 00:19:35,800
Speaker 1: vote for the Manhattan District Attorney's race. So the endorsement

298
00:19:35,880 --> 00:19:38,479
Speaker 1: of the New York Times for some people that maybe

299
00:19:38,520 --> 00:19:41,320
Speaker 1: just want a little bit of an impermeater of somebody,

300
00:19:41,560 --> 00:19:42,960
Speaker 1: you know, what is the New York Times telling me

301
00:19:43,000 --> 00:19:45,680
Speaker 1: I should do? Oh yes, I believe in their philosophy

302
00:19:45,680 --> 00:19:47,879
Speaker 1: and their politics. I'm going to vote for this person.

303
00:19:48,000 --> 00:19:51,600
Speaker 1: So it could be a good way. Um. Of course,

304
00:19:51,640 --> 00:19:54,760
Speaker 1: the New York Times audience tracks a little, you know,

305
00:19:55,040 --> 00:19:59,679
Speaker 1: more liberally and possibly more upscale according to some. So

306
00:20:00,240 --> 00:20:02,480
Speaker 1: I guess for those kinds of voters to pay attention

307
00:20:02,480 --> 00:20:05,840
Speaker 1: to The New York Times, it's meaningful. Lizz Krate, who

308
00:20:05,920 --> 00:20:09,280
Speaker 1: is a veteran of the Manhattan DA's office herself, Yes,

309
00:20:09,520 --> 00:20:15,840
Speaker 1: and she has basically the most centrists of all the Democrats.

310
00:20:15,880 --> 00:20:20,040
Speaker 1: She's hardly what you would call a right wing person.

311
00:20:20,240 --> 00:20:24,000
Speaker 1: She's a very moderate and she is totally for law

312
00:20:24,040 --> 00:20:28,080
Speaker 1: and order. She has one the endorsement of police unions

313
00:20:28,160 --> 00:20:31,480
Speaker 1: and important endorsements like the PBA, the New York City

314
00:20:31,480 --> 00:20:36,440
Speaker 1: Police Benevolent Association UM. She believes there are many crimes

315
00:20:36,440 --> 00:20:40,560
Speaker 1: that her competitors, the other candidates are saying they will

316
00:20:40,600 --> 00:20:44,679
Speaker 1: not prosecute. She said and repeatedly that she doesn't believe

317
00:20:44,760 --> 00:20:48,080
Speaker 1: prosecutors need to declare I will never prosecute X crime

318
00:20:48,560 --> 00:20:51,480
Speaker 1: because you might find yourself with a very important case

319
00:20:51,800 --> 00:20:55,080
Speaker 1: and you've already declared you're never prosecuting it. That kind

320
00:20:55,080 --> 00:20:57,159
Speaker 1: of puts you in a box and you can't do it.

321
00:20:57,640 --> 00:21:00,960
Speaker 1: So she believes that the d A supposed to enforce

322
00:21:01,000 --> 00:21:03,080
Speaker 1: the law, and that's what she said. She's doing good

323
00:21:03,080 --> 00:21:07,480
Speaker 1: to do so. Diane Florence, another veteran of the Manhattan

324
00:21:07,520 --> 00:21:10,960
Speaker 1: d A's office. Yeah, she's one of the backing of

325
00:21:11,040 --> 00:21:14,520
Speaker 1: lots of unions, and her reputation has been she was

326
00:21:14,560 --> 00:21:17,760
Speaker 1: headed a unit that was prosecuting certain kinds of crimes

327
00:21:17,760 --> 00:21:21,879
Speaker 1: that had to do with UM building enforcement. And she's

328
00:21:21,960 --> 00:21:25,119
Speaker 1: pointed to her background doing these kinds of cases that

329
00:21:25,240 --> 00:21:29,560
Speaker 1: she can handle complex cases. She's gone up against very

330
00:21:29,800 --> 00:21:35,080
Speaker 1: very complicated financially complicated with multi defendants cases and still

331
00:21:35,119 --> 00:21:38,320
Speaker 1: been able to prosecute the cases. And she was at

332
00:21:38,320 --> 00:21:42,000
Speaker 1: the in the office for like twenty years. She is

333
00:21:42,520 --> 00:21:47,040
Speaker 1: on the more UH centrists. She's not as as progressive,

334
00:21:47,160 --> 00:21:49,720
Speaker 1: saying I will defront the police, I will never prosecute

335
00:21:49,720 --> 00:21:54,320
Speaker 1: certain crimes. She's been a more moderate person now. Thomas

336
00:21:54,400 --> 00:21:58,719
Speaker 1: Kenneth is the only Republican in the race. Yeah, and

337
00:21:58,880 --> 00:22:01,960
Speaker 1: he's more in the category of I'm the d A,

338
00:22:02,200 --> 00:22:04,800
Speaker 1: I'm supposed to enforce the law and that's what I

339
00:22:04,840 --> 00:22:09,240
Speaker 1: will do. He is a Republican, however, which maybe um

340
00:22:09,440 --> 00:22:13,800
Speaker 1: there aren't as many registered Republicans in Manhattan, so it

341
00:22:13,880 --> 00:22:17,600
Speaker 1: depends on how he tracks with voters and how his

342
00:22:17,760 --> 00:22:21,879
Speaker 1: message is received. He is a former JAG prosecutor for

343
00:22:21,920 --> 00:22:25,240
Speaker 1: the government, and he's a former veteran of the army,

344
00:22:25,400 --> 00:22:29,560
Speaker 1: so he has done you know, military career Iraq War veterans.

345
00:22:29,600 --> 00:22:33,119
Speaker 1: He is basically espoused a look, my job as a

346
00:22:33,200 --> 00:22:36,720
Speaker 1: d enforced the law, and he is very critical of

347
00:22:36,760 --> 00:22:40,359
Speaker 1: the more progressive candidates on the far left and the

348
00:22:40,440 --> 00:22:44,600
Speaker 1: d a's race. On the Democratic side, Lucy Lang is

349
00:22:44,880 --> 00:22:48,680
Speaker 1: another veteran Manhattan DA, but she's also a reformed candidate

350
00:22:48,680 --> 00:22:53,359
Speaker 1: has that working. She's actually espousing both ideas that she

351
00:22:53,480 --> 00:22:56,959
Speaker 1: can reform with within, and she has done it in

352
00:22:57,000 --> 00:23:00,320
Speaker 1: the past. She's talked about she's a former Manhattan d

353
00:23:00,320 --> 00:23:03,600
Speaker 1: A under Side Dance. She was the top ranking d

354
00:23:03,720 --> 00:23:07,360
Speaker 1: A there. She handled homicides and other kinds of complex

355
00:23:07,359 --> 00:23:11,120
Speaker 1: gang cases, and she has said that she has come

356
00:23:11,200 --> 00:23:16,040
Speaker 1: up with systematic ways to address problems. So she came

357
00:23:16,119 --> 00:23:19,760
Speaker 1: up with an initiative in the office that later on

358
00:23:20,119 --> 00:23:23,000
Speaker 1: ended up being UM. It's called the Institute for Innovation

359
00:23:23,359 --> 00:23:27,520
Speaker 1: at John Jay College of Criminal Justice. So she's pointing out, look,

360
00:23:27,560 --> 00:23:29,359
Speaker 1: I was in the system, and I already came up

361
00:23:29,359 --> 00:23:32,440
Speaker 1: with these progressive ideas, and this is what the office

362
00:23:32,520 --> 00:23:36,080
Speaker 1: can do. So it's her mantra. Appears to be changed

363
00:23:36,119 --> 00:23:38,959
Speaker 1: from within, and I can be progressive as well as

364
00:23:39,000 --> 00:23:44,280
Speaker 1: still do the job. Eliza Orleans, she's a longtime public defender,

365
00:23:44,320 --> 00:23:46,760
Speaker 1: but a lot of people know her as a reality

366
00:23:46,800 --> 00:23:50,840
Speaker 1: show contestant. Yeah. I mean, it's unclear how many of

367
00:23:50,920 --> 00:23:54,720
Speaker 1: her Twitter followers from the reality TV show She Wasn't

368
00:23:54,960 --> 00:23:58,880
Speaker 1: Survivor and if any of them are actual New York

369
00:23:58,960 --> 00:24:02,960
Speaker 1: vote Manhattan voter UM very popular. A lot of social

370
00:24:03,000 --> 00:24:07,840
Speaker 1: media que profile, and she is also a very one

371
00:24:07,840 --> 00:24:11,000
Speaker 1: of the more progressive candidates the same very critical of

372
00:24:11,119 --> 00:24:15,520
Speaker 1: the entire criminal justice system. And there's Dan Court, who

373
00:24:15,600 --> 00:24:19,520
Speaker 1: is a state assemblyman. Dan Court is an Manhattan assemblyman

374
00:24:19,840 --> 00:24:23,399
Speaker 1: for the State Assembly. He's been a defense lawyers, but

375
00:24:23,840 --> 00:24:26,760
Speaker 1: his work in the system has been as a as

376
00:24:26,760 --> 00:24:30,160
Speaker 1: a civil lawyer and a criminal lawyer. So he did

377
00:24:30,359 --> 00:24:34,000
Speaker 1: personal injury work for civil litigation, and he did pro

378
00:24:34,119 --> 00:24:38,520
Speaker 1: bono low income tenants in his facing addiction. He's been

379
00:24:38,560 --> 00:24:42,400
Speaker 1: critical of the system that it's out of control, UH

380
00:24:42,440 --> 00:24:46,359
Speaker 1: and there's too many minorities getting unfairly prosecuted by the system.

381
00:24:46,560 --> 00:24:50,840
Speaker 1: So he's on the spectrum of the more UH progressive

382
00:24:51,280 --> 00:24:55,520
Speaker 1: candidates running who wants to see systemic change in the system.

383
00:24:55,560 --> 00:24:57,560
Speaker 1: They they're not happy with the way it is right

384
00:24:57,560 --> 00:25:00,040
Speaker 1: now and they would like to see some massive of

385
00:25:00,040 --> 00:25:04,160
Speaker 1: her haul. Last, but the most well funded is Tally

386
00:25:04,240 --> 00:25:08,159
Speaker 1: Farhati and Weinstein, a former federal prosecutor whose husband is

387
00:25:08,200 --> 00:25:12,440
Speaker 1: a hedge fund manager. She has quite the resume, Rhodes scholar.

388
00:25:12,960 --> 00:25:15,199
Speaker 1: You know, she has a story as an immigrant. Like

389
00:25:15,320 --> 00:25:19,919
Speaker 1: Connie Abushi, she and her family fled Iran. She says

390
00:25:20,080 --> 00:25:25,639
Speaker 1: um came here and she clerked for Sandrade O'Connor and

391
00:25:25,720 --> 00:25:29,160
Speaker 1: worked for Merritt Garland when he was a federala Pellate

392
00:25:29,240 --> 00:25:34,160
Speaker 1: Court judge. She worked as special counsel to Stand Attorney

393
00:25:34,160 --> 00:25:38,400
Speaker 1: General Eric Holder, and then for Lauretta Lynch she took over,

394
00:25:38,720 --> 00:25:41,800
Speaker 1: and then she went to the Brooklyn U s Attorney's

395
00:25:41,880 --> 00:25:45,480
Speaker 1: office where she handled crimes UH and then went to

396
00:25:45,520 --> 00:25:50,440
Speaker 1: go work as special counsel to Erik Gonzalez, the Brooklyn

397
00:25:50,480 --> 00:25:54,359
Speaker 1: District Attorney, where she worked on a reviewing cases to

398
00:25:54,400 --> 00:25:58,200
Speaker 1: see any of their wrongful prosecution. So she's basically also

399
00:25:58,359 --> 00:26:02,119
Speaker 1: straddling this. Her point to are that she has the experienced,

400
00:26:02,240 --> 00:26:07,040
Speaker 1: the expertise, and the know how of how the federal

401
00:26:07,080 --> 00:26:10,240
Speaker 1: system works. That she also has this great resume, and

402
00:26:10,359 --> 00:26:14,040
Speaker 1: she's worked for a district attorney who is also progressive.

403
00:26:14,400 --> 00:26:18,880
Speaker 1: The New York Daily News endorsed her. From my personal experience,

404
00:26:19,000 --> 00:26:22,200
Speaker 1: I've gotten more flyers from her than any other candidate.

405
00:26:22,600 --> 00:26:26,800
Speaker 1: She has lots of TV ads. Hasn't she outspent every

406
00:26:26,800 --> 00:26:30,680
Speaker 1: other candidate in the race. The latest numbers, according to

407
00:26:30,720 --> 00:26:34,720
Speaker 1: the Daily News and the City Website, she's put in

408
00:26:34,960 --> 00:26:38,879
Speaker 1: recently eight million dollars an incusion of her own money

409
00:26:38,880 --> 00:26:42,399
Speaker 1: of eight million dollars to her campaigner. That goes way

410
00:26:42,520 --> 00:26:45,720
Speaker 1: past the most raised by any other candidate, which I

411
00:26:45,760 --> 00:26:49,640
Speaker 1: believe tops at two million dollars. Thanks so much, Patty.

412
00:26:49,720 --> 00:26:53,280
Speaker 1: That's Patricia Hurtado, Bloomberg Legal Reporter, and that's it for

413
00:26:53,280 --> 00:26:55,880
Speaker 1: this edition of the Bloomberg Law Show. Remember you can

414
00:26:55,880 --> 00:26:58,720
Speaker 1: always at the latest legal news on our Bloomberg Law Podcast.

415
00:26:59,000 --> 00:27:01,760
Speaker 1: You can find them on at podcast Spotify and at

416
00:27:01,920 --> 00:27:06,720
Speaker 1: www dot Bloomberg dot com, slash podcast slash Law. I'm

417
00:27:06,800 --> 00:27:08,880
Speaker 1: June Brusso and you're listening to Woomberg