WEBVTT - Leading Off July 2nd, 2024 (Ep. 854)

0:00:05.840 --> 0:00:09.000
<v Speaker 1>Welcome in everybody to Fantasy Pros MLB. This is Leading

0:00:09.039 --> 0:00:10.840
<v Speaker 1>Off Live, brought to you by Betts three six five

0:00:10.880 --> 0:00:13.080
<v Speaker 1>Bet five bucks, get one hundred and fifteen bonus bets

0:00:13.440 --> 0:00:15.840
<v Speaker 1>when you use the promo code leading Off only at

0:00:15.880 --> 0:00:18.000
<v Speaker 1>Bet three six five. It is me Joey P. That

0:00:18.079 --> 0:00:20.200
<v Speaker 1>of course is the Welsh, and it's you, the Peanuts

0:00:20.200 --> 0:00:23.040
<v Speaker 1>and the Cracker Jacks. Not a lot from yesterday in baseball,

0:00:23.120 --> 0:00:27.040
<v Speaker 1>but certainly we're going to talk about the James Wood debut.

0:00:27.320 --> 0:00:30.160
<v Speaker 1>Very exciting stuff there. The baseball world was a buzz.

0:00:30.520 --> 0:00:33.280
<v Speaker 1>A lot of games today, full slate. We've got some

0:00:33.320 --> 0:00:34.800
<v Speaker 1>bets for you. We've got a lot of fun things

0:00:34.840 --> 0:00:38.080
<v Speaker 1>going on end. Because of the July fourth holiday, we

0:00:38.159 --> 0:00:40.599
<v Speaker 1>will not be working July fourth, everybody. We want you

0:00:40.640 --> 0:00:43.000
<v Speaker 1>and everyone else out there to enjoy the holiday, but

0:00:43.159 --> 0:00:45.519
<v Speaker 1>us more poortly enjoy the holiday as well. We want

0:00:45.520 --> 0:00:47.120
<v Speaker 1>to take some time off here, a little.

0:00:46.880 --> 0:00:48.320
<v Speaker 2>Bit of a getta.

0:00:48.479 --> 0:00:50.280
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, Welsh needs a blow on July fourth there, so

0:00:50.320 --> 0:00:53.080
<v Speaker 1>we're gonna give him a blow on July fourth. All

0:00:53.120 --> 0:00:55.280
<v Speaker 1>the fireworks is gonna go, enjoy them, and we'll be

0:00:55.320 --> 0:00:57.360
<v Speaker 1>back on Friday. But because of that, we're moving things

0:00:57.400 --> 0:01:00.840
<v Speaker 1>up prospecting with the Welsh tomorrow today waiver wire, just

0:01:00.880 --> 0:01:03.800
<v Speaker 1>so you get all the information you need Welsh. First

0:01:03.800 --> 0:01:05.080
<v Speaker 1>of all, I have to start the show off with

0:01:05.080 --> 0:01:08.760
<v Speaker 1>an apology because I bullied you into a home run

0:01:08.760 --> 0:01:11.200
<v Speaker 1>pick yesterday. Ah, because I just wanted to have fun

0:01:11.200 --> 0:01:13.319
<v Speaker 1>with you. I just wanted you and me once to

0:01:13.360 --> 0:01:15.680
<v Speaker 1>have fun. And if James Wood, after all the James

0:01:15.720 --> 0:01:17.800
<v Speaker 1>Wood stuff, hit a home run in his debut yesterday,

0:01:18.080 --> 0:01:20.679
<v Speaker 1>we would have been so happy together, frolicking hand in

0:01:20.760 --> 0:01:22.880
<v Speaker 1>hand through the AI.

0:01:23.280 --> 0:01:25.560
<v Speaker 3>It had been you, me and James Wood holding hands

0:01:25.600 --> 0:01:30.560
<v Speaker 3>running through a baseball field. Everybody in this live stream

0:01:31.400 --> 0:01:34.640
<v Speaker 3>knew your Alvarez was hitting a home yesterday. As soon

0:01:34.680 --> 0:01:36.959
<v Speaker 3>as I was like, well, I was gonna take your Valvarez,

0:01:37.040 --> 0:01:40.319
<v Speaker 3>but I'll go with you, the chat was like, and

0:01:40.319 --> 0:01:42.760
<v Speaker 3>guess what, I didn't know your Nalvarez hit a homer,

0:01:43.040 --> 0:01:46.039
<v Speaker 3>except it then got tweeted Twitter Cot And as soon

0:01:46.040 --> 0:01:49.600
<v Speaker 3>as someone just tweeted me Jordan, I went h we

0:01:49.640 --> 0:01:50.880
<v Speaker 3>all knew it was gonna happen.

0:01:51.400 --> 0:01:52.480
<v Speaker 2>I should have went with it.

0:01:52.720 --> 0:01:56.480
<v Speaker 3>I would probably be at twenty two homers right now.

0:01:56.520 --> 0:01:59.240
<v Speaker 3>Had I just followed the path that I've laid out

0:01:59.240 --> 0:02:01.680
<v Speaker 3>for myself, but I dev eight from it because I

0:02:01.720 --> 0:02:05.040
<v Speaker 3>get weird brain thing and I did follow the Jason Wood.

0:02:05.040 --> 0:02:07.360
<v Speaker 1>But I'm okay with giving you the home run. But

0:02:07.440 --> 0:02:08.640
<v Speaker 1>I'm sure fred Dinger won't.

0:02:08.760 --> 0:02:11.720
<v Speaker 2>Oh wild cards would.

0:02:11.280 --> 0:02:14.240
<v Speaker 1>Just go cards, would you know, take it to the

0:02:14.280 --> 0:02:15.720
<v Speaker 1>League office, probably take.

0:02:15.639 --> 0:02:17.880
<v Speaker 3>It to the Supreme Court. We're not gonna do that,

0:02:18.120 --> 0:02:19.480
<v Speaker 3>so don't worry about that.

0:02:19.840 --> 0:02:21.520
<v Speaker 1>We got some rookie lookie stuff though, too, a lot

0:02:21.560 --> 0:02:23.360
<v Speaker 1>of rookie stuff going on. But let's just jump in

0:02:23.440 --> 0:02:26.160
<v Speaker 1>right to the James Wood singled, had a walk, five

0:02:26.160 --> 0:02:29.320
<v Speaker 1>played appearances yesterday. The game went to extra innings, so

0:02:29.840 --> 0:02:32.840
<v Speaker 1>you know, it's a nice first moment, you know, comes

0:02:32.919 --> 0:02:35.239
<v Speaker 1>up there, gets a great ovation from the home crowd.

0:02:35.440 --> 0:02:38.640
<v Speaker 1>Good to see the Nats fans excited, you know, really

0:02:38.639 --> 0:02:41.040
<v Speaker 1>excited again for something like this. You know these you

0:02:41.040 --> 0:02:43.200
<v Speaker 1>know back in the day we're excited for Strasbourg and

0:02:43.240 --> 0:02:45.080
<v Speaker 1>so and all these things. It's been a while if

0:02:45.080 --> 0:02:47.800
<v Speaker 1>you're a Nats fan since the World Series, basically that

0:02:47.840 --> 0:02:50.920
<v Speaker 1>you've been excited for anything. Three of the four balls

0:02:50.960 --> 0:02:54.120
<v Speaker 1>you put in play yesterday, one hundred and seven mone

0:02:54.160 --> 0:02:58.040
<v Speaker 1>hour single all had ninety six ninety five exit v

0:02:58.120 --> 0:03:01.320
<v Speaker 1>low if you're into that kind of thing. Mackenzie in

0:03:01.400 --> 0:03:03.600
<v Speaker 1>that game as well, one runner five and two thirds

0:03:03.600 --> 0:03:06.360
<v Speaker 1>struck out eight mets yesterday, So they just wanted to

0:03:06.400 --> 0:03:09.079
<v Speaker 1>kind of revisit the Sodo trade for a second. Now

0:03:09.080 --> 0:03:12.440
<v Speaker 1>that we have James Wood up, Mackenzie gore sixteen starts

0:03:12.440 --> 0:03:15.600
<v Speaker 1>this year, six and seven, a three six zero ERA.

0:03:15.800 --> 0:03:19.280
<v Speaker 1>He's got a kper nine over ten cj Abrams hitting

0:03:19.320 --> 0:03:21.679
<v Speaker 1>two eighty two with a five thirteen slugging and a

0:03:21.760 --> 0:03:24.639
<v Speaker 1>fifty two ohps, thirteen homers, forty two RBI, thirteen steals.

0:03:25.360 --> 0:03:29.080
<v Speaker 1>James would obviously up already had a great triple A season.

0:03:29.400 --> 0:03:31.880
<v Speaker 1>Robert Hassel forty nine games, still kind of, you know,

0:03:32.040 --> 0:03:34.440
<v Speaker 1>mid figuring things out a little bit there. It's got

0:03:34.440 --> 0:03:36.800
<v Speaker 1>eleven steals, hitting two seventy eight, but the slugging is

0:03:36.840 --> 0:03:40.720
<v Speaker 1>only at three sixty nine. So looking back on it

0:03:40.800 --> 0:03:43.360
<v Speaker 1>all now we have a little bit more perspective, the

0:03:43.480 --> 0:03:46.240
<v Speaker 1>Nats made some hard decisions. Clearly, the best decision would

0:03:46.280 --> 0:03:48.280
<v Speaker 1>not have been to spend money on Stephen Strasburg. It

0:03:48.280 --> 0:03:50.360
<v Speaker 1>would have been to spend on the position player. They

0:03:50.400 --> 0:03:53.960
<v Speaker 1>did not. After that decision was made, Now that you

0:03:54.040 --> 0:03:57.880
<v Speaker 1>have some perspective. What is your perspective of this trade

0:03:58.520 --> 0:03:59.880
<v Speaker 1>looking back on it a few years later.

0:04:00.880 --> 0:04:03.160
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I mean it doesn't look good like that's the

0:04:03.240 --> 0:04:04.840
<v Speaker 3>easy way to say it, but there is.

0:04:05.200 --> 0:04:08.200
<v Speaker 1>I'm surprised. That's that's the take here, Expelled.

0:04:08.280 --> 0:04:08.360
<v Speaker 4>No.

0:04:08.680 --> 0:04:11.200
<v Speaker 3>I like you can do the path though, because then

0:04:11.240 --> 0:04:12.560
<v Speaker 3>they trade well, because here's the deal.

0:04:12.600 --> 0:04:14.240
<v Speaker 2>They traded three.

0:04:14.400 --> 0:04:16.839
<v Speaker 3>You know, major league level players. You know, they traded

0:04:16.880 --> 0:04:20.880
<v Speaker 3>away and you've got Gore, You've got James Wood, which

0:04:20.880 --> 0:04:23.680
<v Speaker 3>could be helping this team right now. What I look

0:04:23.720 --> 0:04:26.840
<v Speaker 3>at though, is they traded away Sodo and they got

0:04:26.880 --> 0:04:29.880
<v Speaker 3>back Drew Thorpe, and then they then turned Drew Thorpe

0:04:29.960 --> 0:04:33.159
<v Speaker 3>into Dylan c So you know, you can kind of

0:04:33.240 --> 0:04:35.320
<v Speaker 3>run through the path of like, all right, they got

0:04:35.360 --> 0:04:38.920
<v Speaker 3>a year of Sodo and then they turned Sodo into

0:04:38.960 --> 0:04:40.760
<v Speaker 3>Dylan ce S, which I guess it kind of like

0:04:40.839 --> 0:04:43.760
<v Speaker 3>it helps itself. My problem is is when you trade

0:04:43.839 --> 0:04:48.200
<v Speaker 3>that weight of great players, I mean specifically it's Gordon Wood.

0:04:48.760 --> 0:04:50.600
<v Speaker 3>When you trade that way, well in Abrams, I keep

0:04:50.640 --> 0:04:54.960
<v Speaker 3>forgetting about Abrams was sold. He's the I mean, he's

0:04:55.000 --> 0:04:57.760
<v Speaker 3>the core piece here. When you trade that level and

0:04:57.800 --> 0:05:00.240
<v Speaker 3>then you can't re sign and.

0:05:00.200 --> 0:05:03.080
<v Speaker 2>Bring Sodo back. Then, I think it's a failure like that,

0:05:03.160 --> 0:05:04.040
<v Speaker 2>And I always.

0:05:03.760 --> 0:05:05.840
<v Speaker 1>Thinking from the okay, so I'm I'm thinking from the

0:05:05.920 --> 0:05:08.600
<v Speaker 1>NATS side that I think they've done pretty well here. Oh,

0:05:08.640 --> 0:05:10.359
<v Speaker 1>I think they have to get about Padres. I'm I

0:05:10.520 --> 0:05:12.760
<v Speaker 1>was even thinking about the Padres. I'm talking about the

0:05:12.800 --> 0:05:14.640
<v Speaker 1>Gnat side of this deal. I'm looking at it and

0:05:14.640 --> 0:05:16.560
<v Speaker 1>it was heartbreaking at the time. It's still not the

0:05:16.640 --> 0:05:19.320
<v Speaker 1>right decision. He should have paid total whatever he wanted

0:05:19.360 --> 0:05:22.120
<v Speaker 1>and bought out all the years and just backed up

0:05:22.160 --> 0:05:23.520
<v Speaker 1>the truck for him because you knew it was gonna

0:05:23.520 --> 0:05:26.080
<v Speaker 1>be your franchise talent for the next decade. It's dead.

0:05:26.080 --> 0:05:30.280
<v Speaker 1>They didn't, but now Abrams would Gore. Is that enough

0:05:30.279 --> 0:05:32.760
<v Speaker 1>to show for that move? I thought it was.

0:05:33.279 --> 0:05:34.920
<v Speaker 3>I always kind of thought it was, though, like when

0:05:34.920 --> 0:05:36.279
<v Speaker 3>that trade happened, I got.

0:05:36.160 --> 0:05:38.720
<v Speaker 1>I was not. I was skeptical, far more skeptical at

0:05:38.760 --> 0:05:39.080
<v Speaker 1>the time.

0:05:39.480 --> 0:05:42.640
<v Speaker 3>I think like I had optimism to mckinzi Gore though

0:05:42.680 --> 0:05:44.560
<v Speaker 3>during that time McKinsey Gore was kind of a mess.

0:05:44.600 --> 0:05:47.760
<v Speaker 3>With the Padres c j Abrams believed in and James

0:05:47.760 --> 0:05:49.680
<v Speaker 3>Wood we knew the upside was plus they still got

0:05:49.760 --> 0:05:53.480
<v Speaker 3>Yarlands Susana, and I think Hassle's not gonna happen, but

0:05:53.520 --> 0:05:55.760
<v Speaker 3>Susana has a chance to worst be you know, a

0:05:55.760 --> 0:05:56.720
<v Speaker 3>relief pitcher in there.

0:05:56.720 --> 0:05:59.080
<v Speaker 2>But this is a it's an interesting trade in.

0:05:59.000 --> 0:06:01.040
<v Speaker 1>That deal too. Let's he was playing in New Mexican.

0:06:01.240 --> 0:06:04.320
<v Speaker 3>I will say multiple teams that have traded off that

0:06:04.440 --> 0:06:07.479
<v Speaker 3>felt wrong have I think the White Sox are another

0:06:07.520 --> 0:06:10.080
<v Speaker 3>example of like it was like, oh, we're trading away

0:06:10.120 --> 0:06:12.400
<v Speaker 3>Gilito and we're trading away Dylan Ceese. But then you

0:06:12.440 --> 0:06:14.800
<v Speaker 3>look and you're like, there are a couple position players

0:06:14.800 --> 0:06:17.200
<v Speaker 3>and their miners away from having like a really great

0:06:17.240 --> 0:06:19.480
<v Speaker 3>system in bouncing back. I think the Nationals are proof

0:06:19.520 --> 0:06:21.360
<v Speaker 3>of that. And a guy like James Wood in that debut,

0:06:21.839 --> 0:06:25.240
<v Speaker 3>you got to see a little bit of everything on hand.

0:06:25.320 --> 0:06:28.080
<v Speaker 3>You got to see him work that first at bat

0:06:28.480 --> 0:06:31.039
<v Speaker 3>really hard. I mean he drove that count up. You

0:06:31.120 --> 0:06:33.400
<v Speaker 3>get to see the hard hit drives an opposite field

0:06:33.440 --> 0:06:37.159
<v Speaker 3>single one oh seven. You saw the speed they ruled

0:06:37.160 --> 0:06:39.880
<v Speaker 3>the second one in error. We're gonna be honest with you,

0:06:39.960 --> 0:06:42.000
<v Speaker 3>like he was right there at first and then he

0:06:42.040 --> 0:06:44.360
<v Speaker 3>moved over to second. You just didn't get to see

0:06:44.440 --> 0:06:46.000
<v Speaker 3>him get the ball in the air and see some

0:06:46.040 --> 0:06:47.960
<v Speaker 3>of the wild stuff that he can do. As I

0:06:48.000 --> 0:06:50.360
<v Speaker 3>mentioned like left easy doesn't put big extra base hits

0:06:50.360 --> 0:06:53.680
<v Speaker 3>on a bad strikeout, but he was also taking early

0:06:54.080 --> 0:06:56.039
<v Speaker 3>strikes just to kind of see the counts I thought

0:06:56.040 --> 0:06:56.320
<v Speaker 3>there was.

0:06:56.720 --> 0:06:57.640
<v Speaker 2>Again, it's one start.

0:06:57.640 --> 0:06:59.680
<v Speaker 3>There's so much good out of it for James Wood

0:06:59.720 --> 0:07:02.080
<v Speaker 3>should be and people should really be excited. And also,

0:07:02.200 --> 0:07:04.640
<v Speaker 3>just to reiterate your other point when you brought up

0:07:04.680 --> 0:07:08.159
<v Speaker 3>Mackenzie Gore, I think McKenzie Gore has just been sneaky.

0:07:07.760 --> 0:07:08.760
<v Speaker 2>Sneaky good all year.

0:07:08.839 --> 0:07:10.480
<v Speaker 3>This is the Gore that I saw coming out of

0:07:10.520 --> 0:07:11.920
<v Speaker 3>high school. This is the gore I saw in the

0:07:11.920 --> 0:07:15.360
<v Speaker 3>backfields for the Padres, whipping that curveball in through it

0:07:15.480 --> 0:07:17.720
<v Speaker 3>nineteen percent of the time in his last start, had

0:07:17.720 --> 0:07:20.360
<v Speaker 3>a forty five percent whiff rate. The curveball looks amazing.

0:07:20.600 --> 0:07:23.119
<v Speaker 3>Slider's eating thirty eight percent whiff rate in this start.

0:07:23.320 --> 0:07:26.800
<v Speaker 3>Mackenzie Gore is a great Dynasty buy right now as well.

0:07:26.960 --> 0:07:29.600
<v Speaker 3>But James Wood should make us feel pretty good now.

0:07:29.800 --> 0:07:32.960
<v Speaker 3>I think we can spend the next month hopefully feeling

0:07:33.040 --> 0:07:35.960
<v Speaker 3>really good about prospects. Is as we mentioned yesterday, Cherio

0:07:36.000 --> 0:07:37.640
<v Speaker 3>in length right now, James wood Is that we can

0:07:37.720 --> 0:07:40.640
<v Speaker 3>feel positive and camon Aro probably going to be an

0:07:40.640 --> 0:07:43.120
<v Speaker 3>option coming off of the All Star break, but we'll

0:07:43.160 --> 0:07:44.160
<v Speaker 3>talk about more of that tomorrow.

0:07:44.160 --> 0:07:46.440
<v Speaker 1>I suppose mord to more teaser, that's what they call it.

0:07:46.440 --> 0:07:49.720
<v Speaker 1>The business Hunter. Brown still good on the roll, six

0:07:49.720 --> 0:07:53.200
<v Speaker 1>scoreless innings, more for the Astros, beating up on the

0:07:53.200 --> 0:07:54.280
<v Speaker 1>Blue Jays three one.

0:07:54.600 --> 0:07:56.800
<v Speaker 2>He's so good.

0:07:56.840 --> 0:08:01.000
<v Speaker 1>Brown has by lower the year right now, probably live anyway.

0:08:01.240 --> 0:08:04.040
<v Speaker 3>I think his last five starts he's had like a

0:08:04.080 --> 0:08:09.200
<v Speaker 3>sub one era. He's just not this major whiffy strikeout

0:08:09.240 --> 0:08:11.280
<v Speaker 3>pitcher because he's become more heavy sinker.

0:08:11.320 --> 0:08:12.920
<v Speaker 2>But the sinker has saved him.

0:08:13.160 --> 0:08:17.480
<v Speaker 3>He had forty five swings in this start yesterday, only

0:08:17.560 --> 0:08:22.880
<v Speaker 3>eight induced whiffs, and the called strike ratio was down

0:08:23.000 --> 0:08:25.160
<v Speaker 3>as far as like wists go, too, because that's just.

0:08:25.160 --> 0:08:26.400
<v Speaker 2>Not necessarily his game.

0:08:26.440 --> 0:08:28.760
<v Speaker 3>He'll pump in the fastball that's actually getting some of

0:08:28.800 --> 0:08:33.160
<v Speaker 3>the strikeouts. Sinker cutter week contact. He's been so good,

0:08:33.320 --> 0:08:36.240
<v Speaker 3>you said it, one of the best buys of the year,

0:08:36.360 --> 0:08:39.120
<v Speaker 3>and I just roll the rest of the season. I

0:08:39.120 --> 0:08:40.880
<v Speaker 3>don't think he's going to be sub one era or

0:08:40.880 --> 0:08:42.920
<v Speaker 3>anything like that to finish out, but I think he

0:08:43.000 --> 0:08:45.200
<v Speaker 3>is going to finish out very strong, and we're gonna

0:08:45.200 --> 0:08:48.840
<v Speaker 3>be talking about him maybe as a top fifteen sp

0:08:49.000 --> 0:08:51.480
<v Speaker 3>next year if he continues this role.

0:08:52.720 --> 0:08:56.560
<v Speaker 1>The Yankees pitching coach Matt Blake has been working with

0:08:56.600 --> 0:08:59.840
<v Speaker 1>Carlos Rodan trying to get a better approach in terms

0:08:59.880 --> 0:09:03.640
<v Speaker 1>of fastball, because we mentioned earlier this week that Carls

0:09:03.679 --> 0:09:05.640
<v Speaker 1>Rondon up to twenty earned runs now his last three

0:09:05.640 --> 0:09:09.920
<v Speaker 1>stars guys are have opposing batters have a twelve fifty

0:09:09.960 --> 0:09:13.199
<v Speaker 1>three ops over that spand so that's not been good.

0:09:13.720 --> 0:09:16.760
<v Speaker 1>H tonight, you guess, Louis Heel, so Welsh, how are

0:09:16.760 --> 0:09:19.840
<v Speaker 1>you feeling about this start here for our boy Louie tonight?

0:09:20.880 --> 0:09:22.280
<v Speaker 1>Paid tension, little.

0:09:22.080 --> 0:09:24.480
<v Speaker 2>Tense, little tension, A little tension up.

0:09:24.640 --> 0:09:27.199
<v Speaker 3>Shout out my boy. Dennis Hitler actually was with Louis

0:09:27.280 --> 0:09:30.840
<v Speaker 3>Heel yesterday. There's a thing at a brewery or whatever.

0:09:31.559 --> 0:09:37.400
<v Speaker 3>But on paper, in theory, this is a good spot

0:09:37.600 --> 0:09:39.920
<v Speaker 3>for Louis Heel. This is a team that you know,

0:09:40.200 --> 0:09:41.960
<v Speaker 3>the walks aren't gonna be up there. You're gonna have

0:09:41.960 --> 0:09:45.520
<v Speaker 3>guys swinging through their shoes. His k's have been solved.

0:09:45.520 --> 0:09:48.400
<v Speaker 3>The only problem is is he's been his stuff has

0:09:48.440 --> 0:09:50.520
<v Speaker 3>been a little bit off. He's been sitting inside the

0:09:50.520 --> 0:09:52.280
<v Speaker 3>plate a little bit more, and then when he gets

0:09:52.280 --> 0:09:54.320
<v Speaker 3>inside the plate, he starts throwing balls.

0:09:54.320 --> 0:09:56.120
<v Speaker 2>He has gotten to get back to that big.

0:09:55.880 --> 0:10:01.760
<v Speaker 3>Efficient, crazy pitch mixed stuff. I'm cush optimistic for what

0:10:01.920 --> 0:10:04.520
<v Speaker 3>cold did for me on Sunday or Saturday whatever it was.

0:10:05.280 --> 0:10:09.079
<v Speaker 3>Heel gets back to heelness and becomes the king of

0:10:09.120 --> 0:10:12.079
<v Speaker 3>the heel. Luis got to do some business.

0:10:13.040 --> 0:10:16.160
<v Speaker 1>Oh that was it. That was a really good dad

0:10:16.240 --> 0:10:20.520
<v Speaker 1>joke to give me the heel. That's solid, solid work there.

0:10:20.600 --> 0:10:23.040
<v Speaker 1>All right, let's have something here, boss. I don't know

0:10:23.080 --> 0:10:26.920
<v Speaker 1>if you buy Bob Nightingale. Uh, track record's not always

0:10:26.920 --> 0:10:28.000
<v Speaker 1>great about reporting things.

0:10:28.240 --> 0:10:32.480
<v Speaker 2>Is there anybody worse? Is there anything ty for guy

0:10:32.600 --> 0:10:33.280
<v Speaker 2>you have a thing with?

0:10:33.880 --> 0:10:35.760
<v Speaker 1>I don't have a thing, but it was pointed out

0:10:35.760 --> 0:10:38.400
<v Speaker 1>to me years ago and ever since it's like, you

0:10:38.480 --> 0:10:40.160
<v Speaker 1>know that thing that you can't see it once you've

0:10:40.160 --> 0:10:42.719
<v Speaker 1>seen it. And then every time I see him in

0:10:42.760 --> 0:10:46.120
<v Speaker 1>the off season, all he does is basically create clickbig nonsets.

0:10:45.760 --> 0:10:46.840
<v Speaker 2>Like I mean, that's Nightingale.

0:10:48.480 --> 0:10:50.320
<v Speaker 1>Who was the guy that also got destroyed about the

0:10:50.320 --> 0:10:51.320
<v Speaker 1>Otani Toronto thing?

0:10:52.440 --> 0:10:55.320
<v Speaker 2>Or was that him? I actually thought that was Nightingale.

0:10:55.360 --> 0:10:56.320
<v Speaker 2>To be honest with you.

0:10:56.480 --> 0:10:59.120
<v Speaker 1>It might have been both of them, but Moros.

0:10:58.559 --> 0:10:59.520
<v Speaker 2>Maybe they're one person.

0:10:59.520 --> 0:11:02.720
<v Speaker 3>Maybe they're just like those clickdate accounts that are out there.

0:11:02.840 --> 0:11:05.840
<v Speaker 1>Apparently, now that the Mets are hovering around five hundred,

0:11:05.960 --> 0:11:08.520
<v Speaker 1>that Pete A. Lonzo may not be traded at the DAD.

0:11:09.600 --> 0:11:12.200
<v Speaker 1>We'll believe that one when I see it. However, the

0:11:12.240 --> 0:11:14.640
<v Speaker 1>White Sox do intend to trade Garrett Crochet, which, by

0:11:14.679 --> 0:11:18.600
<v Speaker 1>the way, fun fact leading the league in strikeouts Garret

0:11:18.600 --> 0:11:22.960
<v Speaker 1>Crochet and more than Tyler Glasnow I did not have

0:11:23.040 --> 0:11:24.240
<v Speaker 1>that on my Bengo car Gras I.

0:11:24.280 --> 0:11:24.920
<v Speaker 2>Did a video.

0:11:24.960 --> 0:11:27.120
<v Speaker 3>I just did the video on him. I think I

0:11:27.160 --> 0:11:30.800
<v Speaker 3>mentioned on here. But since June first, thirty seven percent

0:11:30.920 --> 0:11:33.800
<v Speaker 3>K percentage and he has the best K minus walk

0:11:33.840 --> 0:11:36.360
<v Speaker 3>percentage since June as well. He has been unreal. But

0:11:36.440 --> 0:11:39.000
<v Speaker 3>that was the thing that was why we presented by

0:11:39.480 --> 0:11:42.880
<v Speaker 3>dang It. I completely forgot about this same dang it

0:11:43.480 --> 0:11:46.760
<v Speaker 3>because we asked people to, you know, should we trade

0:11:46.800 --> 0:11:50.240
<v Speaker 3>Garrett Crochet in the videos and people were commenting, and

0:11:50.360 --> 0:11:54.040
<v Speaker 3>ah man, someone had such a good comment, and I forgot.

0:11:54.120 --> 0:11:55.679
<v Speaker 2>I don't know if I can pull it back up.

0:11:56.000 --> 0:11:57.640
<v Speaker 1>You guys have more things to roll through. If you

0:11:57.640 --> 0:11:59.080
<v Speaker 1>want to go see if you can find the comment.

0:11:59.240 --> 0:12:02.880
<v Speaker 1>So I'll look here. Rookie Lukie time the Brewers sent

0:12:02.920 --> 0:12:07.079
<v Speaker 1>Tyler Black down to Triple A again. Kobe Mayo Apparently

0:12:07.720 --> 0:12:10.480
<v Speaker 1>a little interview yesterday with Michael Ayas says that Kobe

0:12:10.480 --> 0:12:13.000
<v Speaker 1>Mayo really doesn't have much to prove left in the

0:12:13.000 --> 0:12:15.520
<v Speaker 1>minor leagues. Well, should we going to get a Kobe

0:12:15.520 --> 0:12:17.719
<v Speaker 1>Mayo call up soon? It feels like we might.

0:12:17.960 --> 0:12:21.320
<v Speaker 3>Feels like said there was only two guys worth stashing,

0:12:21.360 --> 0:12:24.200
<v Speaker 3>and that was James Wood last week and Kobe Mayo.

0:12:24.360 --> 0:12:27.200
<v Speaker 3>He's absolutely on fire. They just got to make room

0:12:27.280 --> 0:12:29.600
<v Speaker 3>for him. I don't know how comfortable this team is

0:12:29.679 --> 0:12:32.480
<v Speaker 3>with you know this many rookies. Jackson Holliday didn't work.

0:12:32.559 --> 0:12:34.960
<v Speaker 3>Kerstad has actually been pretty solid since he's gotten back,

0:12:35.000 --> 0:12:36.440
<v Speaker 3>So I don't know how they make it work, but

0:12:36.920 --> 0:12:39.880
<v Speaker 3>I completely agree he does not need to be in

0:12:39.920 --> 0:12:40.680
<v Speaker 3>the miners anymore.

0:12:40.679 --> 0:12:42.240
<v Speaker 2>He's gotten very little to prove.

0:12:42.880 --> 0:12:45.440
<v Speaker 1>The White Sox are promoting Kyle Busch from double to

0:12:45.480 --> 0:12:47.599
<v Speaker 1>Triple A. He's twenty four years old. He was the

0:12:47.600 --> 0:12:51.480
<v Speaker 1>guy in the Giolito Lopez deal five and three with

0:12:51.520 --> 0:12:54.040
<v Speaker 1>a two point one two era, a seventy eight to

0:12:54.120 --> 0:12:57.840
<v Speaker 1>thirty three strikeout walk rate in eighty innings. Is this

0:12:57.840 --> 0:12:59.959
<v Speaker 1>something that the dynasty folks should be paying attention to.

0:13:00.240 --> 0:13:02.480
<v Speaker 1>I know he wasn't like the highest rated prospect necessarily,

0:13:02.559 --> 0:13:05.000
<v Speaker 1>but certainly from a performance standpoint, you know, put up

0:13:05.000 --> 0:13:07.360
<v Speaker 1>a two era in double A like that has my attention.

0:13:07.920 --> 0:13:10.040
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, all those guys, That's what I was talking about

0:13:10.040 --> 0:13:12.880
<v Speaker 3>with the White Sox, Like their system is so unique

0:13:12.880 --> 0:13:15.000
<v Speaker 3>and interesting because they what they did was they build.

0:13:15.000 --> 0:13:16.880
<v Speaker 3>They did the anti dynasty thing. That's what I tell

0:13:16.880 --> 0:13:18.800
<v Speaker 3>a lot of people. People will send me these trade

0:13:18.800 --> 0:13:20.280
<v Speaker 3>things and we'll be like, hey, I'm trading away these

0:13:20.280 --> 0:13:22.560
<v Speaker 3>great prospects for a pitcher, and I'm like, Eh, don't

0:13:22.559 --> 0:13:25.280
<v Speaker 3>go by pictures when you're revamping your dynasty. Do that

0:13:25.400 --> 0:13:28.040
<v Speaker 3>kind of lasts or don't have you know, trade away

0:13:28.080 --> 0:13:30.720
<v Speaker 3>great hitters and be the centerpiece be pictures. But in

0:13:30.760 --> 0:13:33.720
<v Speaker 3>real baseball, that is what you want to do, and

0:13:33.760 --> 0:13:36.839
<v Speaker 3>that's what the White Sox did. They prioritize getting guys

0:13:36.880 --> 0:13:40.920
<v Speaker 3>like Thorpe and Eerie Rt and Ky Bush, Nick Nastrini

0:13:40.920 --> 0:13:43.760
<v Speaker 3>from the Dodgers. I think Kay Busch is more of

0:13:43.760 --> 0:13:45.960
<v Speaker 3>a back end rotation player. But the good thing is

0:13:46.240 --> 0:13:48.360
<v Speaker 3>they've been they've all been working and that's why they

0:13:48.360 --> 0:13:50.679
<v Speaker 3>were all in Double A with Edgar Querrel. They've all

0:13:50.720 --> 0:13:52.840
<v Speaker 3>been working with their same guy, and I think that's

0:13:52.840 --> 0:13:56.280
<v Speaker 3>built a lot of confidence. I think again, it's a streamer,

0:13:56.400 --> 0:13:58.800
<v Speaker 3>it's not someone and we're looking to pick up big term.

0:13:59.400 --> 0:14:01.760
<v Speaker 3>But by the way, here was the comment on Garrett Crochet.

0:14:01.760 --> 0:14:04.120
<v Speaker 3>Because we wanted all these people's take, which there's some

0:14:04.160 --> 0:14:07.679
<v Speaker 3>good ones in here we had. I'm holding no trade.

0:14:08.360 --> 0:14:10.000
<v Speaker 3>Garrett Crochet will get traded.

0:14:09.760 --> 0:14:13.120
<v Speaker 2>And get an extension with somebody's take a bunch of others.

0:14:13.440 --> 0:14:14.520
<v Speaker 1>That's a take I agree with.

0:14:14.920 --> 0:14:17.000
<v Speaker 3>Football Mania said, I believe it would be insane to

0:14:17.040 --> 0:14:20.640
<v Speaker 3>trade Crochet unless you get a huge holse starters, not prospects.

0:14:20.640 --> 0:14:22.760
<v Speaker 2>That's what I would do. But this was my favorite.

0:14:23.520 --> 0:14:26.520
<v Speaker 3>The moving blanket said I'm buying yarn to knit because

0:14:26.560 --> 0:14:27.720
<v Speaker 3>I believe in Crochet.

0:14:28.160 --> 0:14:28.520
<v Speaker 1>That was.

0:14:30.120 --> 0:14:32.080
<v Speaker 3>The dad joke inside of me that loved that comment.

0:14:32.160 --> 0:14:35.320
<v Speaker 3>So good job making comments from everybody on the video.

0:14:35.680 --> 0:14:39.560
<v Speaker 1>Marcelo Mayor was not playing yesterday in Double A. He

0:14:39.600 --> 0:14:43.520
<v Speaker 1>has a back issue he's working through, but Welsh mentioned

0:14:43.560 --> 0:14:46.200
<v Speaker 1>him the other day on his video too. I believe

0:14:46.200 --> 0:14:48.520
<v Speaker 1>Marcello Mar's other guy that you were talking about or recent.

0:14:48.360 --> 0:14:50.280
<v Speaker 2>A while back. But I want David.

0:14:50.000 --> 0:14:52.040
<v Speaker 1>Hamlett last one by a couple one onth ago.

0:14:52.160 --> 0:14:54.520
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, and David Hamilton, that's been the big one. I'll

0:14:54.560 --> 0:14:57.600
<v Speaker 3>say the batting average is like tapering down a tiny.

0:14:57.360 --> 0:15:00.080
<v Speaker 1>Three seven, three seventy one, four seventy nine slash A

0:15:00.240 --> 0:15:01.040
<v Speaker 1>that's pretty good.

0:15:01.200 --> 0:15:03.520
<v Speaker 3>No, it's really good, and that I had pointed him

0:15:03.520 --> 0:15:05.440
<v Speaker 3>out and I but at the time I was, I

0:15:05.440 --> 0:15:07.360
<v Speaker 3>was very dismissive of David Hamilton. I was like, the

0:15:07.360 --> 0:15:10.120
<v Speaker 3>only thing holding Marcella Mayor back from coming up is

0:15:10.200 --> 0:15:13.240
<v Speaker 3>David Hamilton. To a degree, I think that's like that

0:15:13.400 --> 0:15:16.800
<v Speaker 3>still kind of applies. But Hamilton two seventy twenty one

0:15:16.840 --> 0:15:20.880
<v Speaker 3>stolen bases, He's expected batting averages around the general same area.

0:15:20.920 --> 0:15:22.840
<v Speaker 3>He's barreling up like he's just had like a really

0:15:23.320 --> 0:15:26.800
<v Speaker 3>solid good season. But in May when I was dismissive,

0:15:26.840 --> 0:15:29.640
<v Speaker 3>he was hitting three thirty three. In June he's down

0:15:29.640 --> 0:15:32.480
<v Speaker 3>to two fifty three. But he did just steal twelve

0:15:32.520 --> 0:15:34.840
<v Speaker 3>bases in June. So I think Mayor is a guy

0:15:34.880 --> 0:15:36.560
<v Speaker 3>that they could look at especially as they're looking to,

0:15:36.800 --> 0:15:39.040
<v Speaker 3>you know, continue on win games and stuff like that

0:15:39.240 --> 0:15:40.720
<v Speaker 3>if Hamilton tapers back.

0:15:40.760 --> 0:15:42.360
<v Speaker 2>But they do like Hamilton right now.

0:15:42.720 --> 0:15:45.560
<v Speaker 1>You know what time it is, Welsh, It's time to

0:15:45.680 --> 0:15:49.360
<v Speaker 1>hit the waiver wire for week fifteen with Joey p

0:15:49.720 --> 0:15:51.640
<v Speaker 1>and the Welsh. I've got some names for you, I

0:15:51.680 --> 0:15:53.600
<v Speaker 1>believe it or not. Two Mets. I don't know what

0:15:53.640 --> 0:15:55.640
<v Speaker 1>the world's coming to. Christian Scott's going to get the

0:15:55.680 --> 0:15:58.840
<v Speaker 1>call again, coming back up to make a start Wednesday

0:15:58.840 --> 0:16:01.000
<v Speaker 1>against the Nats, and he's roster in just fifty four

0:16:01.000 --> 0:16:02.480
<v Speaker 1>percent of leagues. A lot of people had to drop

0:16:02.560 --> 0:16:06.520
<v Speaker 1>him roster crunch. I understand the guy was spectacular when

0:16:06.520 --> 0:16:08.640
<v Speaker 1>he was pitching for the New York Mets. Looking for

0:16:08.720 --> 0:16:11.640
<v Speaker 1>him replacing Tyler McGill long term. In this people are saying, well,

0:16:11.680 --> 0:16:14.600
<v Speaker 1>they're not committing to him. I'm gonna commit to him regardless.

0:16:15.000 --> 0:16:16.920
<v Speaker 1>You gotta add this guy as soon as you possibly can.

0:16:17.000 --> 0:16:19.800
<v Speaker 1>Fifty four percents too low for Scott, and the Mets

0:16:19.880 --> 0:16:22.240
<v Speaker 1>are hovering around five hundred all of a sudden, are

0:16:22.480 --> 0:16:24.760
<v Speaker 1>more relevant. He's got a three nine zero ERA, twenty

0:16:24.760 --> 0:16:27.920
<v Speaker 1>five strikeouts, just six walks over twenty seven innings with

0:16:28.080 --> 0:16:30.760
<v Speaker 1>the Mets this year. Another Met and I'm putting this

0:16:30.840 --> 0:16:33.360
<v Speaker 1>out there because he was on a waiver wire video

0:16:33.440 --> 0:16:36.680
<v Speaker 1>I did like a month ago. And he's still just

0:16:36.720 --> 0:16:38.920
<v Speaker 1>sixty six percent rostered even though he has a nine

0:16:39.040 --> 0:16:43.000
<v Speaker 1>hundred OPS and it's Mark Viento's. How is he still

0:16:43.040 --> 0:16:46.160
<v Speaker 1>just sixty six percent rostered? Okay, let's just talk about

0:16:46.160 --> 0:16:48.160
<v Speaker 1>this for a moment. Over his last nine games heading

0:16:48.200 --> 0:16:51.680
<v Speaker 1>into this week, three twenty four batting average, seven rbi,

0:16:51.800 --> 0:16:54.680
<v Speaker 1>ten runs scored. Okay, On the year, he is slashing

0:16:54.680 --> 0:16:57.000
<v Speaker 1>two ninety seven, three fifty five five to seventy eight,

0:16:57.320 --> 0:17:00.320
<v Speaker 1>ten homers, twenty three RBI, twenty four run score. Now

0:17:00.320 --> 0:17:03.320
<v Speaker 1>he's not stealing any bases, that's fine, But Welsh Mark

0:17:03.400 --> 0:17:05.840
<v Speaker 1>Vento's qualifies a first qualifies the third plays every day.

0:17:05.880 --> 0:17:08.000
<v Speaker 1>He's got a nine hundred ops. How the hell is

0:17:08.000 --> 0:17:09.280
<v Speaker 1>he just at sixty six percent?

0:17:09.640 --> 0:17:10.080
<v Speaker 2>Hands up?

0:17:10.160 --> 0:17:12.600
<v Speaker 3>I'm putting my hands up because I completely agree. Like

0:17:12.680 --> 0:17:16.639
<v Speaker 3>I did this on IL yesterday, Mark Viento's is the

0:17:16.880 --> 0:17:21.200
<v Speaker 3>number one pick up if he is available in any format.

0:17:21.240 --> 0:17:23.080
<v Speaker 3>And guess what he was under like if e goes

0:17:23.160 --> 0:17:25.560
<v Speaker 3>under sixty two percent in CBS when we did it

0:17:25.680 --> 0:17:29.359
<v Speaker 3>yesterday way under another formats. You did some of the

0:17:29.400 --> 0:17:31.520
<v Speaker 3>surface level stuff. I mean ten Homer's three zero one

0:17:31.560 --> 0:17:34.400
<v Speaker 3>batting average kind of speaks for itself, but underlying an

0:17:34.400 --> 0:17:38.160
<v Speaker 3>elite fifteen percent barrel rate, he's hitting the ball really hard,

0:17:38.240 --> 0:17:41.240
<v Speaker 3>averaging over ninety EV with a one thirteen max. And

0:17:41.280 --> 0:17:44.600
<v Speaker 3>he's cut his strikeouts by eight percent down to like

0:17:44.960 --> 0:17:47.639
<v Speaker 3>not just that's a solid number. He was thirty percent

0:17:47.720 --> 0:17:50.359
<v Speaker 3>last year, he's down to twenty two percent. Just making

0:17:50.520 --> 0:17:53.800
<v Speaker 3>great contact with huge, huge power that can pull it

0:17:53.840 --> 0:17:56.520
<v Speaker 3>on all sides of the field. I am a big,

0:17:56.800 --> 0:17:59.480
<v Speaker 3>big Mark Viento's pickup guy, and you, I think you

0:17:59.520 --> 0:18:01.840
<v Speaker 3>were like ahead of all of Oh you put on

0:18:01.880 --> 0:18:03.119
<v Speaker 3>you red baity.

0:18:03.119 --> 0:18:05.320
<v Speaker 1>If you go back and watch the shows on leading off.

0:18:05.560 --> 0:18:07.760
<v Speaker 1>When Beatty was struggling, I was telling people go pick

0:18:07.840 --> 0:18:10.240
<v Speaker 1>up Fiano's he's red hot at triple A. He was

0:18:10.280 --> 0:18:12.720
<v Speaker 1>hot in spring training. There's no reason not to add

0:18:12.760 --> 0:18:15.320
<v Speaker 1>this guy. And Batty of course got sent down. Now

0:18:15.320 --> 0:18:17.040
<v Speaker 1>I know Baty's all of a sudden him for some power.

0:18:17.200 --> 0:18:19.600
<v Speaker 1>I really don't care. Fiantos isn't given up that job

0:18:19.640 --> 0:18:22.480
<v Speaker 1>anytime soon, so look at that. If anything Goody's a

0:18:22.480 --> 0:18:23.400
<v Speaker 1>guy that's trade bait.

0:18:23.400 --> 0:18:26.239
<v Speaker 3>At some point, go to Angelo, put Angelo's comment up,

0:18:26.280 --> 0:18:29.679
<v Speaker 3>and then put Michael Impo's come because.

0:18:29.600 --> 0:18:33.040
<v Speaker 1>Eighteen point six percent roster to ESPN leagues, that's great,

0:18:33.080 --> 0:18:37.399
<v Speaker 1>and Yahoo fifty six percent rostered. Mine is on CBS.

0:18:37.400 --> 0:18:40.360
<v Speaker 1>That's the roster percentage I gave you, So it's absurd.

0:18:40.440 --> 0:18:43.800
<v Speaker 1>He needs to be roster Neston Curestad also not rostered enough.

0:18:43.840 --> 0:18:46.679
<v Speaker 1>Fifty five percent. You gotta hold this guy on your

0:18:46.760 --> 0:18:50.480
<v Speaker 1>roster available in fifty percent of the leagues. Thirteen games on

0:18:50.520 --> 0:18:53.760
<v Speaker 1>the year so far, two homers, eight RBI, he's hitting

0:18:53.760 --> 0:18:56.439
<v Speaker 1>three hundred. He's a four hundred OBP at the big

0:18:56.520 --> 0:18:59.280
<v Speaker 1>league level so far over those thirteen games. He's going

0:18:59.320 --> 0:19:01.240
<v Speaker 1>to be a contributor as the year goes on for

0:19:01.280 --> 0:19:02.840
<v Speaker 1>the Orioles, and if not, then he's going to be

0:19:02.880 --> 0:19:05.280
<v Speaker 1>an everyday player somewhere else. So I understand some of

0:19:05.280 --> 0:19:07.200
<v Speaker 1>the platune stuff is a little annoying. I don't care.

0:19:07.359 --> 0:19:09.800
<v Speaker 1>Kurse Dad needs to be rostered in more leagues. Same

0:19:09.840 --> 0:19:12.600
<v Speaker 1>with Landon Knack of the Dodgers. In the meantime, here

0:19:13.119 --> 0:19:15.280
<v Speaker 1>for the Dodgers make any moves in the month of July,

0:19:15.480 --> 0:19:17.560
<v Speaker 1>nac is gonna keep getting some starts. He's got a

0:19:17.560 --> 0:19:20.680
<v Speaker 1>two oadra, a point nine to six whip, twenty five strikeouts,

0:19:20.720 --> 0:19:24.159
<v Speaker 1>eight walks in thirty innings so far. With Walker, Bueller's

0:19:24.240 --> 0:19:29.119
<v Speaker 1>issues with Bobby Miller's issues with Clayton Kershaw's shoulder, Yamamoto

0:19:29.200 --> 0:19:32.280
<v Speaker 1>on the IL, Look, there's room at the table for

0:19:32.400 --> 0:19:34.560
<v Speaker 1>Landon Knack. He's rostered in twenty four percent of leagues

0:19:34.600 --> 0:19:36.280
<v Speaker 1>and he gives you win equity every single day he

0:19:36.280 --> 0:19:38.959
<v Speaker 1>takes the mount because he pitches for the Dodgers. Welsh,

0:19:39.080 --> 0:19:41.359
<v Speaker 1>I'm shocked that he's just twenty four percent rostered on

0:19:41.400 --> 0:19:42.200
<v Speaker 1>CBS right now.

0:19:42.720 --> 0:19:46.240
<v Speaker 3>I'm not sure if I'm like shock shock, Oh member, Yeah,

0:19:46.280 --> 0:19:49.720
<v Speaker 3>But like when you're like expanding it and you're looking at, like,

0:19:49.800 --> 0:19:52.720
<v Speaker 3>all right, who are teams for players that you would

0:19:52.760 --> 0:19:54.919
<v Speaker 3>want to pick up if they're getting opportunities, It's like

0:19:54.960 --> 0:19:58.639
<v Speaker 3>the Dodgers would be that one. There's a little Gavin

0:19:58.680 --> 0:20:00.960
<v Speaker 3>Stone in him and it's like low K percentage when

0:20:00.960 --> 0:20:02.360
<v Speaker 3>he put up some big K perk.

0:20:02.960 --> 0:20:04.959
<v Speaker 1>I'll take all the Gavinstone I can handle right now,

0:20:04.960 --> 0:20:07.439
<v Speaker 1>because he's been tremendous. I'm just right.

0:20:08.760 --> 0:20:10.920
<v Speaker 3>I don't disagree with that at all. But I'm just saying,

0:20:10.960 --> 0:20:14.040
<v Speaker 3>like there's some underlying stuff that like you don't get

0:20:14.080 --> 0:20:16.560
<v Speaker 3>away with, Like a Dylan Cees is a prime example

0:20:16.560 --> 0:20:19.320
<v Speaker 3>of a guy where when Dylan Sees has a bad outing,

0:20:19.359 --> 0:20:21.560
<v Speaker 3>he might still have nine strikeouts and four or five

0:20:21.600 --> 0:20:24.119
<v Speaker 3>are in runs. That's not really happening with some of

0:20:24.160 --> 0:20:25.960
<v Speaker 3>these Dodger pitchers, but there's just a lot of run

0:20:25.960 --> 0:20:28.520
<v Speaker 3>support they're pitching well. He does have a run and

0:20:28.520 --> 0:20:31.680
<v Speaker 3>a half expected the ra higher than his current It

0:20:31.760 --> 0:20:34.399
<v Speaker 3>doesn't change the fact of like I would be spot,

0:20:34.480 --> 0:20:36.640
<v Speaker 3>I would be maybe more than just spots.

0:20:36.400 --> 0:20:39.320
<v Speaker 1>Star temporary tattoo. That's what he is. He's not the

0:20:39.320 --> 0:20:41.840
<v Speaker 1>long term solution and Welsh, I don't think he's gonna

0:20:41.840 --> 0:20:43.960
<v Speaker 1>get overexposed. And that's what you're saying, I think to

0:20:44.000 --> 0:20:46.960
<v Speaker 1>everybody from correct, which is, Look, this guy's not great,

0:20:47.280 --> 0:20:49.040
<v Speaker 1>but he's pitching for the Dodgers. He's gonna make a

0:20:49.040 --> 0:20:51.520
<v Speaker 1>couple starts. He's got inequity. If you're gonna pinch for

0:20:51.520 --> 0:20:53.680
<v Speaker 1>starting pitching right now, you go there and you're gonna

0:20:53.680 --> 0:20:56.720
<v Speaker 1>burn and turn him into somebody else eventually, But for now,

0:20:56.760 --> 0:20:58.040
<v Speaker 1>he's a guy that could be useful in the month

0:20:58.040 --> 0:21:00.800
<v Speaker 1>of July. Also after the All Star break, keep an

0:21:00.800 --> 0:21:03.240
<v Speaker 1>eye on dl Hall qualifies at RP, but he might

0:21:03.280 --> 0:21:06.120
<v Speaker 1>get another shot at this rotation spot. He did throw

0:21:06.200 --> 0:21:10.360
<v Speaker 1>sixty pitches three innings on Saturday, one run, five hits,

0:21:10.400 --> 0:21:12.679
<v Speaker 1>struck out four, walked one. This was the guy that

0:21:12.720 --> 0:21:15.240
<v Speaker 1>came over from the Orioles in that trade for Corbyn Burns.

0:21:15.240 --> 0:21:17.760
<v Speaker 1>He's twenty percent rostered. The Brewers have all sorts of

0:21:17.880 --> 0:21:21.440
<v Speaker 1>rotation problems with some injuries and performance. I think deal

0:21:21.520 --> 0:21:22.879
<v Speaker 1>Hall is going to get a look in this rotation

0:21:22.920 --> 0:21:25.639
<v Speaker 1>sooner than later, probably after the All Star break. Welsh,

0:21:25.640 --> 0:21:26.160
<v Speaker 1>what do you think?

0:21:26.520 --> 0:21:28.960
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I definitely think that's a high possibility. I had

0:21:29.000 --> 0:21:31.399
<v Speaker 3>brought to the table maybe it was last week or

0:21:31.440 --> 0:21:35.040
<v Speaker 3>the week before on the prospects segment, Chad Patrick, who

0:21:35.080 --> 0:21:37.800
<v Speaker 3>was a former diamondback who moved over. That's the guy

0:21:37.920 --> 0:21:41.600
<v Speaker 3>that also could get an opportunity in the rotation near future.

0:21:41.640 --> 0:21:44.760
<v Speaker 3>Good strikeouts. But DL Hall is a player they tou

0:21:44.800 --> 0:21:47.200
<v Speaker 3>did that they wanted to put into the rotation. He's

0:21:47.240 --> 0:21:50.280
<v Speaker 3>had some sustainability issues when he was an Oriole, but

0:21:51.160 --> 0:21:54.879
<v Speaker 3>if you lay out the pitching prospects, he'll be the

0:21:54.960 --> 0:21:57.560
<v Speaker 3>number one because Gasser, I think is having Tommy John surgery.

0:21:57.600 --> 0:22:00.359
<v Speaker 3>Corlis Rodriguez wasn't great. Dl Hall will be the number

0:22:00.400 --> 0:22:03.240
<v Speaker 3>one given the opportunity, So yeah, I think.

0:22:03.359 --> 0:22:05.520
<v Speaker 1>Worry about anything too. She's missed most of the year,

0:22:05.640 --> 0:22:07.200
<v Speaker 1>so now it's a matter of, hey, can you give

0:22:07.200 --> 0:22:08.600
<v Speaker 1>you seventy five innings down the stretch?

0:22:08.840 --> 0:22:09.240
<v Speaker 2>Very true.

0:22:09.200 --> 0:22:11.280
<v Speaker 1>I think that answer is probably yes, and that's a

0:22:11.320 --> 0:22:13.360
<v Speaker 1>good thing for the Brewers. So there you have it, everybody.

0:22:13.359 --> 0:22:16.080
<v Speaker 1>That's the waiver Wire for week fifteen. Drop your comments

0:22:16.119 --> 0:22:17.879
<v Speaker 1>below of course if you're watching, and let us know

0:22:17.880 --> 0:22:20.520
<v Speaker 1>who you're picking up this week, and as always had

0:22:20.560 --> 0:22:23.360
<v Speaker 1>a word of fantasybros dot com for more waiver Wire content.

0:22:23.440 --> 0:22:26.480
<v Speaker 1>On the MLB side, Welsh Little three up and three down.

0:22:26.480 --> 0:22:28.600
<v Speaker 1>Then we'll get to the injuries. Brenton Doyle homer twice,

0:22:28.680 --> 0:22:32.159
<v Speaker 1>Jad Martinez a three run bomb and David Peterson no

0:22:32.240 --> 0:22:34.199
<v Speaker 1>decision against the Nats, but six and a third of

0:22:34.240 --> 0:22:37.080
<v Speaker 1>two run ball not too bad. Three down. Bryce Wilson

0:22:37.080 --> 0:22:40.000
<v Speaker 1>five runs and four innings against the Rockies. Hunter Harvey

0:22:40.359 --> 0:22:42.240
<v Speaker 1>five runs, four earned at the top of the tenth

0:22:42.280 --> 0:22:44.879
<v Speaker 1>take the Big l and Dalton VARs Show continues to

0:22:44.960 --> 0:22:49.120
<v Speaker 1>hit nothing hitless again seventh consecutive start, OH for three

0:22:49.200 --> 0:22:54.879
<v Speaker 1>yesterday against the Astros. So daltenvar show not performing very well.

0:22:54.880 --> 0:22:58.280
<v Speaker 1>Injuries mri on Corey seekers left hand negative. That's good.

0:22:58.560 --> 0:23:02.560
<v Speaker 1>Vlad Guerrero was not arting yesterday. We had Zach Gallon

0:23:02.640 --> 0:23:06.000
<v Speaker 1>start moved up to next Thursday against the Dodgers. That's

0:23:06.000 --> 0:23:09.520
<v Speaker 1>apparently what's going on. Justin Verlander has yet to resume

0:23:09.600 --> 0:23:12.600
<v Speaker 1>throwing because of the neck issue, so that's not good.

0:23:12.600 --> 0:23:15.560
<v Speaker 1>He's not even playing catch right now, not even baseball activities.

0:23:15.640 --> 0:23:19.439
<v Speaker 1>He's not even opening pocks of tops, baseball card, no

0:23:19.560 --> 0:23:24.080
<v Speaker 1>baseball activities none. Brandon Nimo was out yesterday after he

0:23:24.200 --> 0:23:28.199
<v Speaker 1>cut his forehead after falling in a hotel. Now, if

0:23:28.240 --> 0:23:30.400
<v Speaker 1>you know Brandon Nimo, he's kind of like a choir boy.

0:23:30.640 --> 0:23:32.119
<v Speaker 1>So I kind of want to know how this happened.

0:23:32.160 --> 0:23:34.480
<v Speaker 1>Like did Brandon Nimo go out and like party with

0:23:34.520 --> 0:23:38.040
<v Speaker 1>the guys once and like stumblely bumbly back to the

0:23:38.080 --> 0:23:42.159
<v Speaker 1>hotel room. Because Nimo is a well known like I said,

0:23:42.800 --> 0:23:46.200
<v Speaker 1>good boy, So I want to hear more about this story.

0:23:46.200 --> 0:23:47.880
<v Speaker 2>I don't know implying.

0:23:48.400 --> 0:23:49.639
<v Speaker 1>I'm not implying anything.

0:23:49.680 --> 0:23:51.040
<v Speaker 2>Are you trying to say he likes to have a

0:23:51.119 --> 0:23:53.120
<v Speaker 2>good time on the road.

0:23:53.160 --> 0:23:56.240
<v Speaker 1>Maybe I don't know, but I would think more of

0:23:56.320 --> 0:23:57.000
<v Speaker 1>him if he did.

0:23:57.240 --> 0:23:57.639
<v Speaker 2>I don't know.

0:23:57.720 --> 0:24:01.879
<v Speaker 3>I want to one day write a book about I won't,

0:24:01.920 --> 0:24:04.840
<v Speaker 3>but I want to write a book about all of

0:24:04.880 --> 0:24:08.680
<v Speaker 3>the ridiculous injuries that players have gotten from the what

0:24:08.840 --> 0:24:11.880
<v Speaker 3>is it? Clinton Barmas fell through the roof of a barn.

0:24:11.880 --> 0:24:13.919
<v Speaker 1>And heard them, fell down the stairs and tripped over

0:24:13.960 --> 0:24:14.400
<v Speaker 1>his dog.

0:24:14.480 --> 0:24:17.960
<v Speaker 3>Ears again, there was a guy a tile fell out

0:24:17.960 --> 0:24:21.160
<v Speaker 3>of his shower and broke his toe, Like there's baseball

0:24:21.200 --> 0:24:22.920
<v Speaker 3>players are undefeated on.

0:24:22.880 --> 0:24:26.520
<v Speaker 1>The most hand opener. I remember, like I remember if.

0:24:26.600 --> 0:24:28.560
<v Speaker 2>This is probably something like that.

0:24:28.600 --> 0:24:31.040
<v Speaker 3>He's probably like, oh, YouTuber was filming me and I

0:24:31.080 --> 0:24:32.880
<v Speaker 3>tried to do a backflip and I slipped and fell

0:24:32.880 --> 0:24:34.399
<v Speaker 3>on a poodle, you know, like you don't know what

0:24:34.440 --> 0:24:34.960
<v Speaker 3>it's gonna be.

0:24:35.119 --> 0:24:36.840
<v Speaker 1>How do you fall in your hotel room? Like what

0:24:36.880 --> 0:24:43.439
<v Speaker 1>do you? What are you doing? Like like they're not

0:24:43.440 --> 0:24:44.560
<v Speaker 1>even that big rooms.

0:24:44.760 --> 0:24:46.160
<v Speaker 2>Maybe it was a Yankee hotel room.

0:24:46.320 --> 0:24:48.959
<v Speaker 1>One more note code I senga out since the big

0:24:49.119 --> 0:24:50.399
<v Speaker 1>end of the year where the shoulder injury is going

0:24:50.440 --> 0:24:53.320
<v Speaker 1>to make his first rehab start on Wednesday. That's tomorrow

0:24:53.320 --> 0:24:58.280
<v Speaker 1>for single a Brooklyn. He's gonna make it all right. Welsh.

0:24:58.400 --> 0:25:00.880
<v Speaker 1>You know what time it is. It's time yet again.

0:25:00.920 --> 0:25:01.480
<v Speaker 1>It's Tuesday.

0:25:01.480 --> 0:25:04.160
<v Speaker 2>It's time for the best bets of the day with.

0:25:04.200 --> 0:25:06.080
<v Speaker 1>Joey p and the Welsh. Make sure you place your

0:25:06.080 --> 0:25:07.880
<v Speaker 1>bets over a bet three six five bet five bucks,

0:25:07.920 --> 0:25:09.639
<v Speaker 1>get one hundred and fifteen bonus bets when you use

0:25:09.640 --> 0:25:12.399
<v Speaker 1>the promo. Go to leading off only at bet three

0:25:12.680 --> 0:25:15.280
<v Speaker 1>six five gambling problem go one hundred gambler or one

0:25:15.320 --> 0:25:19.879
<v Speaker 1>hundred bets off In Iowa, terms and conditions apply. Welsh. Uh,

0:25:20.200 --> 0:25:22.199
<v Speaker 1>why don't you start with the betting today? Because I

0:25:22.200 --> 0:25:24.120
<v Speaker 1>went full James Wood and it was over three.

0:25:24.119 --> 0:25:26.960
<v Speaker 2>Oh, because I was three and oh yesterday because you.

0:25:26.880 --> 0:25:29.159
<v Speaker 1>Were three and oh, I waszero and three. I was

0:25:29.440 --> 0:25:31.120
<v Speaker 1>you know, I want to have fun. It was three

0:25:31.160 --> 0:25:33.879
<v Speaker 1>games on the slate, only one at night. Really, I

0:25:34.000 --> 0:25:35.720
<v Speaker 1>just wanted to have some fun. You didn't work out.

0:25:35.760 --> 0:25:37.040
<v Speaker 3>I know, it was great to have fun. I want

0:25:37.040 --> 0:25:38.399
<v Speaker 3>to have a little bit of fun. And I just

0:25:38.480 --> 0:25:40.840
<v Speaker 3>bet the one hit for James Wood and that paid off.

0:25:40.920 --> 0:25:43.600
<v Speaker 3>So yes, it was a nice clean sweep of a

0:25:43.720 --> 0:25:46.240
<v Speaker 3>very short slate. I will tell you we have a

0:25:46.280 --> 0:25:48.959
<v Speaker 3>lot more and a lot more enticing stuff today. So

0:25:49.000 --> 0:25:51.359
<v Speaker 3>it's gonna be either a volume day and uh oh,

0:25:51.480 --> 0:25:54.000
<v Speaker 3>volume days haven't done so well, or it is just

0:25:54.080 --> 0:25:56.399
<v Speaker 3>gonna be honing in. So here are a couple of

0:25:56.440 --> 0:25:58.800
<v Speaker 3>my favorites, and this is kind of like a ladder.

0:25:58.880 --> 0:26:00.480
<v Speaker 2>To be honest with you, I've got a bet.

0:26:00.560 --> 0:26:02.679
<v Speaker 3>I've got a two piece parlay, and then i got

0:26:02.720 --> 0:26:05.040
<v Speaker 3>a three piece parlay that I'm playing around with, but

0:26:05.080 --> 0:26:08.600
<v Speaker 3>you'll understand it. So number one Boston Red Sox first

0:26:08.640 --> 0:26:12.679
<v Speaker 3>five innings. I love my first fives. I am going

0:26:12.800 --> 0:26:16.160
<v Speaker 3>for them to be up a run. So minus point five.

0:26:16.520 --> 0:26:19.439
<v Speaker 3>That's minus one twenty right now. Because I'm back in

0:26:19.480 --> 0:26:21.760
<v Speaker 3>Cutter Crawford. I'm a big Cutter Crawford fan. I mentioned

0:26:21.800 --> 0:26:25.760
<v Speaker 3>him in some videos recently, and his K percentage since

0:26:25.880 --> 0:26:28.720
<v Speaker 3>June he's been in like the top ten and K

0:26:28.960 --> 0:26:32.720
<v Speaker 3>percentage and K minus walk percentage, so his strikeouts have

0:26:32.800 --> 0:26:35.840
<v Speaker 3>really taken a jump up. That is why I mean,

0:26:35.840 --> 0:26:37.560
<v Speaker 3>I'll be honest with you, I am taking his just

0:26:37.680 --> 0:26:41.280
<v Speaker 3>individual strikeout number, but I'm putting this together for my

0:26:41.480 --> 0:26:46.919
<v Speaker 3>second bet. Cutter Crawford alternate strikeouts at five paired with

0:26:47.040 --> 0:26:52.600
<v Speaker 3>turreek Schoobles alternative strikeouts at five. Interesting about Schooble, he

0:26:52.680 --> 0:26:56.480
<v Speaker 3>has only had less than how to say this, right,

0:26:56.600 --> 0:27:00.919
<v Speaker 3>he's only once this entire season, not how five strikeouts

0:27:00.960 --> 0:27:03.000
<v Speaker 3>that's a better way to put it. Every single start

0:27:03.000 --> 0:27:04.840
<v Speaker 3>he has had five strikeouts or more except for one

0:27:05.080 --> 0:27:10.199
<v Speaker 3>that was against Houston. This matchup, I mean, it's a

0:27:10.200 --> 0:27:13.320
<v Speaker 3>fine matchup. It's a good strikeout number. He usually hits this,

0:27:13.440 --> 0:27:15.360
<v Speaker 3>and then it's not crazy. We're not looking at six

0:27:15.400 --> 0:27:17.240
<v Speaker 3>and a half or seven and a half. So give

0:27:17.280 --> 0:27:20.320
<v Speaker 3>me Scooball and Cutter Crawford both at five paired together

0:27:20.800 --> 0:27:23.320
<v Speaker 3>that I got at minus one thirty, So there's that

0:27:23.359 --> 0:27:24.160
<v Speaker 3>one's juiced up.

0:27:24.320 --> 0:27:25.840
<v Speaker 2>And then here was something I did the other day.

0:27:26.359 --> 0:27:27.640
<v Speaker 2>I had a lot of fun with it, so I'm

0:27:27.640 --> 0:27:28.240
<v Speaker 2>gonna run.

0:27:28.080 --> 0:27:30.920
<v Speaker 3>It back and I hit it and this was taking

0:27:31.680 --> 0:27:36.439
<v Speaker 3>three first fives and getting the plus one and a half.

0:27:36.880 --> 0:27:39.440
<v Speaker 3>So just gonna pair this and slow down for a minute.

0:27:40.040 --> 0:27:44.679
<v Speaker 3>This means that each team will be within one and

0:27:44.680 --> 0:27:47.160
<v Speaker 3>a half runs by the end of the first five,

0:27:47.240 --> 0:27:50.960
<v Speaker 3>so plus one point five on these three teams and

0:27:51.000 --> 0:27:55.520
<v Speaker 3>their favorites. I'm taking the Boston Red Sox, the Baltimore

0:27:55.520 --> 0:27:58.400
<v Speaker 3>Orioles and the San Diego Padres. So that is backing

0:27:58.480 --> 0:28:02.880
<v Speaker 3>cutter Crawford, Rodriguez and Dylan sees that their team can

0:28:02.960 --> 0:28:05.760
<v Speaker 3>be losing by one run through the first five, and

0:28:05.800 --> 0:28:10.400
<v Speaker 3>I still hit this if they're winning beautiful this.

0:28:10.880 --> 0:28:12.480
<v Speaker 2>It's a lot of teams. It's riskier.

0:28:12.520 --> 0:28:14.840
<v Speaker 3>It's plus one eighteen. I put a little bit more

0:28:14.840 --> 0:28:17.240
<v Speaker 3>on it. But again, the Boston Red Sox, the Baltimore

0:28:17.280 --> 0:28:20.520
<v Speaker 3>Orioles and San Diego Padres through the first five innings

0:28:21.000 --> 0:28:23.479
<v Speaker 3>plus one point five. I'm gonna see if I can

0:28:23.560 --> 0:28:24.480
<v Speaker 3>run one of those back.

0:28:24.840 --> 0:28:27.800
<v Speaker 2>Those are my bets. As a jet flies right.

0:28:27.640 --> 0:28:29.600
<v Speaker 1>Over heard that happening there.

0:28:29.680 --> 0:28:33.280
<v Speaker 3>That was a fighter jet which it was like the

0:28:33.440 --> 0:28:36.800
<v Speaker 3>Angel what is it? The just flying lou Angels just

0:28:36.840 --> 0:28:38.520
<v Speaker 3>going Welsh's bit.

0:28:38.840 --> 0:28:41.880
<v Speaker 1>The bomber flying over Welsh's bets at the very end there.

0:28:42.000 --> 0:28:44.560
<v Speaker 1>Look at that. How do you follow that? I don't know,

0:28:44.640 --> 0:28:47.320
<v Speaker 1>but I'll try the White Sox at Cleveland, you got

0:28:47.360 --> 0:28:49.560
<v Speaker 1>FlexIt and Carrasco on the bounds. So I'm gonna go

0:28:49.600 --> 0:28:52.680
<v Speaker 1>with the over and the total runs over nine, I

0:28:52.720 --> 0:28:55.800
<v Speaker 1>think we can get there. Flexing Carrasco should be good

0:28:55.840 --> 0:28:59.240
<v Speaker 1>for it. Theoretically, so let's go start there. This one's

0:28:59.240 --> 0:29:01.320
<v Speaker 1>a bit of an upset. You're right, well shod. We

0:29:01.320 --> 0:29:03.600
<v Speaker 1>talked about this earlier, Luis Hill. On paper, this should

0:29:03.600 --> 0:29:07.120
<v Speaker 1>be a good situation for him tonight, but I can't

0:29:07.320 --> 0:29:10.320
<v Speaker 1>get away from this number on the money line for Cincinnati.

0:29:10.880 --> 0:29:14.440
<v Speaker 1>Even if he'll pitches well, can they keep it close? Maybe?

0:29:14.520 --> 0:29:16.600
<v Speaker 1>I don't know. Plus one seventy two. With the way

0:29:16.640 --> 0:29:19.320
<v Speaker 1>he'l has pitched his last two starts, it's too tempting

0:29:19.320 --> 0:29:22.880
<v Speaker 1>of a number for then. I'm not a hater. I'm

0:29:22.960 --> 0:29:26.600
<v Speaker 1>trying to live in the now, and plus one seventy

0:29:26.640 --> 0:29:28.280
<v Speaker 1>two is a really nice number on the money line.

0:29:28.280 --> 0:29:29.560
<v Speaker 1>There's a lot of things that can go right and

0:29:29.600 --> 0:29:33.000
<v Speaker 1>wrong in a baseball game. Even if he'll bounces back,

0:29:33.880 --> 0:29:36.480
<v Speaker 1>I'm getting almost two to one on this. It's hard

0:29:36.680 --> 0:29:39.600
<v Speaker 1>not to take it. So plus one seventy two. Look,

0:29:39.720 --> 0:29:42.880
<v Speaker 1>Marte's up there. Eli Dola Cruz has been hot again.

0:29:43.440 --> 0:29:46.800
<v Speaker 1>I like the Reds chances of going in there and

0:29:46.960 --> 0:29:49.080
<v Speaker 1>either putting a hurt and on heel, or if he'll

0:29:49.120 --> 0:29:52.080
<v Speaker 1>bounces back and everything's right with the world, maybe keep

0:29:52.080 --> 0:29:53.760
<v Speaker 1>this game close. One bounce of a ball goes the

0:29:53.800 --> 0:29:55.800
<v Speaker 1>other way. But I don't know, man, the way things

0:29:55.800 --> 0:29:57.960
<v Speaker 1>are going, I can't turn away from this number. Plus

0:29:57.960 --> 0:30:00.120
<v Speaker 1>one seventy two on Cincinnati the money line. Also, so

0:30:00.400 --> 0:30:02.520
<v Speaker 1>speaking of the money line, Detroit with Scooba on the

0:30:02.520 --> 0:30:06.040
<v Speaker 1>mound on the road against Minnesota, I think Schooble handles

0:30:06.040 --> 0:30:07.960
<v Speaker 1>this business. Minus one oh eight you're getting. That's a

0:30:07.960 --> 0:30:10.720
<v Speaker 1>pretty good number, almost even money on that. So that's

0:30:10.720 --> 0:30:13.160
<v Speaker 1>where I'm going today. For my best bets of the day,

0:30:13.200 --> 0:30:15.239
<v Speaker 1>download the Betting Pros app and you can follow us

0:30:15.240 --> 0:30:18.600
<v Speaker 1>at Betting Pros dot com slash Joe slash Welsh. Those,

0:30:18.680 --> 0:30:21.440
<v Speaker 1>my friends, are the best bets for Tuesday in Major

0:30:21.520 --> 0:30:25.000
<v Speaker 1>League Baseball. All right, Welsh, let's hit the home run

0:30:25.080 --> 0:30:27.400
<v Speaker 1>board and take a look at it. I'm still at

0:30:27.400 --> 0:30:30.520
<v Speaker 1>twenty three. You should have one extra. But life is

0:30:30.600 --> 0:30:34.160
<v Speaker 1>cruel today. You can always go to the Discord Fantasybros

0:30:34.200 --> 0:30:36.960
<v Speaker 1>dot Com slash chat. Join that today and don't forget.

0:30:37.080 --> 0:30:39.200
<v Speaker 1>If you're out there trying to do nice things. The

0:30:39.360 --> 0:30:43.800
<v Speaker 1>Orlando Cabrera Jersey can be yours. All you have to do.

0:30:43.960 --> 0:30:48.800
<v Speaker 1>Fantasypros dot com slash mlbreview. If you're listening to the show,

0:30:48.960 --> 0:30:52.040
<v Speaker 1>if you're watching the show, it doesn't matter. Fantasypros dot Com,

0:30:52.080 --> 0:30:55.920
<v Speaker 1>slash mlbreview, take the moment, drop a five star review

0:30:55.920 --> 0:30:58.720
<v Speaker 1>of the show, and you could win this throwback Montreal

0:30:58.800 --> 0:31:02.200
<v Speaker 1>expos Jersey. So today I'm keeping it simple. I'm going

0:31:03.160 --> 0:31:06.440
<v Speaker 1>back to the well for the over that I was discussing,

0:31:06.480 --> 0:31:09.400
<v Speaker 1>and I'm gonna go with Jose Ramirez from my Homer Welsh.

0:31:09.520 --> 0:31:12.400
<v Speaker 1>I don't see a Homer in this for you? Where

0:31:12.440 --> 0:31:14.480
<v Speaker 1>are you going for your home run? What's this mystery?

0:31:14.520 --> 0:31:15.600
<v Speaker 1>You didn't put one in today?

0:31:16.080 --> 0:31:18.240
<v Speaker 3>Well, I was working on everything else. But you want

0:31:18.240 --> 0:31:19.840
<v Speaker 3>to know, it's so funny. While you were doing all

0:31:19.880 --> 0:31:22.120
<v Speaker 3>the stuff, I was kind of going through and I'm like,

0:31:22.160 --> 0:31:24.240
<v Speaker 3>all right, who do I wanna roll out my Homer?

0:31:24.240 --> 0:31:25.680
<v Speaker 3>And then I was like, oh, I found who I

0:31:25.720 --> 0:31:28.720
<v Speaker 3>want to roll Jose Ramirez. And then I look and

0:31:28.760 --> 0:31:31.120
<v Speaker 3>you had stupid Jose Ramirez on the phone.

0:31:31.200 --> 0:31:33.080
<v Speaker 1>Now you're gonna be so mad today if you don't

0:31:33.080 --> 0:31:34.600
<v Speaker 1>hold hands with me and Jose Riz.

0:31:34.720 --> 0:31:38.400
<v Speaker 2>Oh man, do I hold out your damn forever? All right?

0:31:38.520 --> 0:31:42.720
<v Speaker 2>I am gonna go with you know what, I'm gonna

0:31:42.720 --> 0:31:43.480
<v Speaker 2>hold hands again.

0:31:43.520 --> 0:31:45.280
<v Speaker 3>That was my gut. I'm gonna go with the gut

0:31:45.280 --> 0:31:51.040
<v Speaker 3>here We're gonna go. Jose Ramirez, MKA, hand in hand, reach.

0:31:51.400 --> 0:31:58.320
<v Speaker 1>Out, touching you kidding, bombs on the board.

0:31:59.440 --> 0:32:01.640
<v Speaker 2>Sweet Jose Ramirez.

0:32:04.160 --> 0:32:07.400
<v Speaker 1>So many home runs in Cleveland this year, so many,

0:32:07.800 --> 0:32:09.280
<v Speaker 1>so many, so many.

0:32:09.480 --> 0:32:11.760
<v Speaker 3>All right, I said that they got the panel out

0:32:11.800 --> 0:32:13.640
<v Speaker 3>and it's just flying out to bar more.

0:32:14.520 --> 0:32:16.360
<v Speaker 1>Just knock out all the wood paneling. That's what you

0:32:16.400 --> 0:32:16.760
<v Speaker 1>gotta do.

0:32:16.880 --> 0:32:18.160
<v Speaker 2>Take the old house wood panel.

0:32:18.920 --> 0:32:21.720
<v Speaker 1>We'll be back tomorrow with more baseball if you haven't

0:32:21.720 --> 0:32:24.960
<v Speaker 1>already subscribed to Fantasy Pros MLB and I hope you

0:32:25.040 --> 0:32:27.000
<v Speaker 1>enjoyed the show today and hope you have a great

0:32:27.000 --> 0:32:29.080
<v Speaker 1>rest of your day and appreciate you guys who are

0:32:29.080 --> 0:32:31.800
<v Speaker 1>all jain us live in the Peanuts and the Cracker Jacks.

0:32:31.800 --> 0:32:33.320
<v Speaker 1>That'll do it for us, But the story of the

0:32:33.320 --> 0:32:36.000
<v Speaker 1>game goes on for the Welsh. I'm Joey P. We'll

0:32:36.040 --> 0:32:42.280
<v Speaker 1>see you next time. Kids. Hoose hose, ho hose hose.

0:32:43.120 --> 0:32:49.080
<v Speaker 4>Hey, thanks for listening to the Fantasy Pros Fantasy Baseball Podcast.

0:32:49.320 --> 0:32:51.680
<v Speaker 4>If you love the show, the best freeway to support

0:32:51.760 --> 0:32:54.400
<v Speaker 4>us is by leaving a positive review on Apple.

0:32:54.120 --> 0:32:55.400
<v Speaker 1>Podcasts or Spotify.

0:32:55.640 --> 0:32:59.240
<v Speaker 4>Follow us on x, Instagram, and TikTok at Fantasy Pros

0:32:59.320 --> 0:33:02.000
<v Speaker 4>and subscribe to our YouTube channel at YouTube dot com

0:33:02.040 --> 0:33:03.600
<v Speaker 4>Slash Fantasy Pros m lb

0:33:11.320 --> 0:33:11.760
<v Speaker 1>M hmm,