WEBVTT - Tech News: Facebook on the Ropes

0:00:04.400 --> 0:00:07.800
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to Tech Stuff, a production from my Heart Radio.

0:00:12.119 --> 0:00:15.000
<v Speaker 1>Hey there, and welcome to tech Stuff. I'm your host,

0:00:15.120 --> 0:00:18.079
<v Speaker 1>Jonathan Strickland. I'm an executive producer with iHeart Radio and

0:00:18.079 --> 0:00:20.840
<v Speaker 1>I love all things tech. And it's time for the

0:00:20.880 --> 0:00:26.640
<v Speaker 1>tech news for Tuesday, September twenty one, twenty one. And

0:00:26.800 --> 0:00:29.040
<v Speaker 1>here's a follow up on a story that I talked

0:00:29.080 --> 0:00:32.639
<v Speaker 1>about last week. The Wall Street Journal has recently published

0:00:33.040 --> 0:00:36.520
<v Speaker 1>a few stories that put Facebook in a really negative light.

0:00:37.159 --> 0:00:39.760
<v Speaker 1>One of those stories was about an internal study that

0:00:39.840 --> 0:00:43.800
<v Speaker 1>looked at how divisive content on Facebook goes up in

0:00:43.840 --> 0:00:47.000
<v Speaker 1>the ranks in the Facebook algorithm because that kind of

0:00:47.040 --> 0:00:50.800
<v Speaker 1>content encourages high engagement. So essentially, it's saying what most

0:00:50.800 --> 0:00:52.840
<v Speaker 1>of us already know, which is that if you stir

0:00:52.920 --> 0:00:55.480
<v Speaker 1>shinola up, folks will get head up about it and

0:00:55.560 --> 0:00:59.240
<v Speaker 1>join the fracas. That's my colloquial way of saying that,

0:00:59.720 --> 0:01:03.040
<v Speaker 1>you know, saying or posting awful things gets a rise

0:01:03.080 --> 0:01:05.960
<v Speaker 1>out of people, and they in turn get emotional and

0:01:06.000 --> 0:01:08.760
<v Speaker 1>typically they then engage. And we know this is a

0:01:08.800 --> 0:01:11.319
<v Speaker 1>thing because it's been going on since long before there

0:01:11.360 --> 0:01:14.520
<v Speaker 1>ever was an Internet, and even back in the days

0:01:14.560 --> 0:01:16.679
<v Speaker 1>when the Internet wasn't really much more than a bunch

0:01:16.680 --> 0:01:19.319
<v Speaker 1>of message boards. We saw this in the form of

0:01:19.360 --> 0:01:23.560
<v Speaker 1>flame wars. Like everybody knows this. This is like the

0:01:23.600 --> 0:01:26.840
<v Speaker 1>basis of a lot of toxic behavior on the Internet

0:01:26.920 --> 0:01:29.480
<v Speaker 1>and in the world in general. So none of this

0:01:29.560 --> 0:01:33.800
<v Speaker 1>is new, But the study essentially confirmed that Facebook's algorithm

0:01:33.840 --> 0:01:38.720
<v Speaker 1>promotes content like that and then amplifies it, so something

0:01:38.760 --> 0:01:41.760
<v Speaker 1>that was already getting a lot of engagement could go

0:01:41.840 --> 0:01:44.520
<v Speaker 1>to the level where it goes viral, and when that

0:01:44.640 --> 0:01:48.200
<v Speaker 1>stuff is divisive, it can do a lot of harm.

0:01:48.320 --> 0:01:50.520
<v Speaker 1>Then there was the study that I talked about last

0:01:50.520 --> 0:01:55.080
<v Speaker 1>week in which Facebook researchers found that Instagram users can

0:01:55.120 --> 0:01:59.520
<v Speaker 1>experience a negative impact on their mental health. Particularly teenage

0:01:59.520 --> 0:02:03.600
<v Speaker 1>girls are are vulnerable to this, and the researchers found

0:02:03.600 --> 0:02:07.080
<v Speaker 1>that some users, including up to thirty two of teenage girls,

0:02:07.440 --> 0:02:10.880
<v Speaker 1>experience self esteem issues and worse, and that this links

0:02:10.919 --> 0:02:15.400
<v Speaker 1>back to their activities on Instagram. But those stories weren't

0:02:15.520 --> 0:02:18.880
<v Speaker 1>the end of it. There was more. The journal also

0:02:19.040 --> 0:02:22.240
<v Speaker 1>published a report that said as bad as Facebook is

0:02:22.480 --> 0:02:27.000
<v Speaker 1>dealing with these issues in English speaking countries, it's even

0:02:27.080 --> 0:02:31.080
<v Speaker 1>worse elsewhere, and that's because apparently Facebook just doesn't have

0:02:31.160 --> 0:02:35.280
<v Speaker 1>the staff on hand to deal with problems in places

0:02:35.320 --> 0:02:40.680
<v Speaker 1>that have other languages, and so issues like misinformation campaigns

0:02:40.680 --> 0:02:44.160
<v Speaker 1>can be even worse in those other places because there

0:02:44.160 --> 0:02:47.040
<v Speaker 1>aren't enough moderators who can curb the problem. They're not

0:02:47.120 --> 0:02:50.480
<v Speaker 1>enough people who understand the language to recognize when those

0:02:50.520 --> 0:02:55.720
<v Speaker 1>things are happening. CNBC's Salvador Rodriguez points out that a

0:02:55.800 --> 0:02:58.880
<v Speaker 1>company that makes around thirty billion dollar in profit, and

0:02:58.880 --> 0:03:02.320
<v Speaker 1>that's not revenue, that's profit, you know, they might be

0:03:02.360 --> 0:03:05.399
<v Speaker 1>able to actually hire on some folks who understand other languages.

0:03:05.440 --> 0:03:08.639
<v Speaker 1>And I think that's a pretty salient point. Facebook has

0:03:08.720 --> 0:03:11.280
<v Speaker 1>responded in a blog post that essentially says the Wall

0:03:11.280 --> 0:03:14.600
<v Speaker 1>Street Journal got stuff wrong. However, the blog post does

0:03:14.639 --> 0:03:18.200
<v Speaker 1>not refute any of the points of the internal study

0:03:18.240 --> 0:03:21.800
<v Speaker 1>that the journal was citing. So I mean, I guess

0:03:21.840 --> 0:03:25.000
<v Speaker 1>the wrong stuff would be any conclusions that the journalists

0:03:25.040 --> 0:03:28.000
<v Speaker 1>were drawing as a result of reading over the data.

0:03:28.320 --> 0:03:30.679
<v Speaker 1>I'm not sure that that blog post is going to

0:03:30.760 --> 0:03:34.560
<v Speaker 1>convince anyone. I feel like there's a real momentum building

0:03:34.639 --> 0:03:38.400
<v Speaker 1>against Facebook, and my guess is that soon it's going

0:03:38.440 --> 0:03:42.120
<v Speaker 1>to be politically unfeasible to offer the company any sort

0:03:42.120 --> 0:03:45.640
<v Speaker 1>of protection. In related news, the m I T Technology

0:03:45.680 --> 0:03:49.920
<v Speaker 1>Review gained possession of another Facebook internal study. These things

0:03:49.960 --> 0:03:52.960
<v Speaker 1>just keep on coming out. This one was actually done

0:03:53.000 --> 0:03:55.880
<v Speaker 1>way back in twenty nineteen. I say way back because

0:03:55.920 --> 0:03:58.240
<v Speaker 1>twenty nineteen was before we ever had a pandemic. Do

0:03:58.280 --> 0:04:01.600
<v Speaker 1>you remember those days? Anyway, that study was looking into

0:04:01.640 --> 0:04:04.840
<v Speaker 1>the proliferation of troll farms that were dedicated to spreading

0:04:04.880 --> 0:04:09.000
<v Speaker 1>misinformation and propaganda in the lead up to the presidential

0:04:09.000 --> 0:04:13.040
<v Speaker 1>election in the United States. A former Facebook employee handed

0:04:13.080 --> 0:04:15.640
<v Speaker 1>the report over to the m I T Technology Review.

0:04:16.040 --> 0:04:19.560
<v Speaker 1>That employee reportedly had nothing to do with the the study,

0:04:19.760 --> 0:04:22.359
<v Speaker 1>but had access to it before they left Facebook, and

0:04:22.400 --> 0:04:25.680
<v Speaker 1>the study showed that troll farms were pushing content out

0:04:25.720 --> 0:04:30.599
<v Speaker 1>that was seen by around one hundred forty million Americans

0:04:30.640 --> 0:04:34.760
<v Speaker 1>every month, and that these troll farms had created networks

0:04:34.800 --> 0:04:39.040
<v Speaker 1>of Facebook pages, and that some fifteen thousand pages targeting

0:04:39.160 --> 0:04:44.200
<v Speaker 1>US audiences actually originated out of Kosovo and Macedonia. Now

0:04:44.279 --> 0:04:47.520
<v Speaker 1>keep in mind this is after Facebook had already been

0:04:47.560 --> 0:04:50.960
<v Speaker 1>through the wringer in the two thousand sixteen election, which

0:04:51.000 --> 0:04:53.960
<v Speaker 1>means you would expect Facebook to have some protections in

0:04:54.000 --> 0:04:56.760
<v Speaker 1>place to guard against the same sort of thing. Happening

0:04:56.760 --> 0:04:59.600
<v Speaker 1>again just a few years later, but according to the review,

0:05:00.160 --> 0:05:04.159
<v Speaker 1>the few measures that Facebook did activate mostly prevented quote

0:05:04.200 --> 0:05:07.760
<v Speaker 1>the worst of the worst end quote. Jeff Allen, author

0:05:07.800 --> 0:05:10.240
<v Speaker 1>of the report and who was at the time a

0:05:10.360 --> 0:05:14.640
<v Speaker 1>senior level data scientist with Facebook, said that quote, we

0:05:14.720 --> 0:05:19.359
<v Speaker 1>have empowered in authentic actors to accumulate huge followings for

0:05:19.560 --> 0:05:24.040
<v Speaker 1>largely unknown purposes end quote. So, in other words, Facebook

0:05:24.120 --> 0:05:27.839
<v Speaker 1>has given the ability for people who are not who

0:05:27.839 --> 0:05:32.839
<v Speaker 1>they claim to be to get enormous followings and then

0:05:32.920 --> 0:05:36.159
<v Speaker 1>potentially to do, you know whatever. It might be good,

0:05:36.240 --> 0:05:39.200
<v Speaker 1>or it might be bad, probably bad. So this ties

0:05:39.240 --> 0:05:42.159
<v Speaker 1>in with our earlier story showing that Facebook is very

0:05:42.240 --> 0:05:45.599
<v Speaker 1>much aware of how its systems enable bad actors to

0:05:45.640 --> 0:05:49.920
<v Speaker 1>reach huge audiences and spread misinformation. When that misinformation convinces

0:05:49.920 --> 0:05:53.400
<v Speaker 1>people that, you know, the COVID vaccine is harmful, or

0:05:53.520 --> 0:05:57.600
<v Speaker 1>that misinformation says the virus itself is overblown, then it

0:05:57.760 --> 0:06:01.080
<v Speaker 1>not just you know, affects those users on Facebook. It

0:06:01.080 --> 0:06:03.680
<v Speaker 1>affects their behaviors and people can get sick and some

0:06:03.760 --> 0:06:07.560
<v Speaker 1>of them will die. Facebook, as you would imagine as

0:06:07.600 --> 0:06:10.520
<v Speaker 1>representatives that say say the company is taking measures to

0:06:10.600 --> 0:06:14.000
<v Speaker 1>keep the platforms safe and to eliminate these issues. But

0:06:14.120 --> 0:06:17.200
<v Speaker 1>like I said, I feel that Facebook is pretty much

0:06:17.240 --> 0:06:21.080
<v Speaker 1>on a collision course with the US government and likely

0:06:21.120 --> 0:06:23.640
<v Speaker 1>some other governments around the world, with the aim to

0:06:23.800 --> 0:06:26.240
<v Speaker 1>break up the company or otherwise reduce its power to

0:06:26.279 --> 0:06:30.919
<v Speaker 1>facilitate harm. I mean, it is pretty damning evidence when

0:06:31.160 --> 0:06:35.520
<v Speaker 1>internal studies within Facebook are confirming some of the accusations

0:06:35.560 --> 0:06:39.600
<v Speaker 1>that people have had against the company, and meanwhile representatives

0:06:39.640 --> 0:06:44.320
<v Speaker 1>for the company have continuously denied or deflected those accusations.

0:06:44.520 --> 0:06:48.559
<v Speaker 1>Meanwhile their own studies from inside the house are saying

0:06:48.560 --> 0:06:51.720
<v Speaker 1>the same thing. Not a good look. A few weeks ago,

0:06:52.000 --> 0:06:55.400
<v Speaker 1>I talked about how El Salvador adopted bitcoin as their

0:06:55.640 --> 0:06:59.960
<v Speaker 1>the country's national currency. Previously, it had been mostly relying

0:07:00.160 --> 0:07:03.359
<v Speaker 1>on the US dollar. Well, recently, bitcoin has had a

0:07:03.360 --> 0:07:06.240
<v Speaker 1>bit of a dip. It dropped ten percent in value

0:07:06.600 --> 0:07:09.280
<v Speaker 1>very quickly, not long ago. It's not to say that

0:07:09.480 --> 0:07:12.200
<v Speaker 1>it's in a spiral or anything, but it didn't have

0:07:12.200 --> 0:07:16.720
<v Speaker 1>a dip, and Salvador and President Naive Boo Keley responded

0:07:16.760 --> 0:07:19.640
<v Speaker 1>to that by directing the government to purchase even more bitcoin,

0:07:20.040 --> 0:07:24.000
<v Speaker 1>buying the dip. In other words, the country purchased another

0:07:24.160 --> 0:07:26.360
<v Speaker 1>hundred fifty bitcoin which was worth around six and a

0:07:26.360 --> 0:07:28.880
<v Speaker 1>half million dollars at the time, and that brings the

0:07:28.920 --> 0:07:32.280
<v Speaker 1>total number of bitcoin held by El Salvador to seven hundred.

0:07:32.840 --> 0:07:35.680
<v Speaker 1>It will be interesting to see how El Salvador progresses

0:07:35.680 --> 0:07:38.960
<v Speaker 1>while relying on a currency that has frequent and frequently

0:07:39.040 --> 0:07:43.000
<v Speaker 1>dramatic fluctuations in value. I'm not saying it's impossible, but

0:07:43.080 --> 0:07:47.800
<v Speaker 1>it's gonna be tricky. If bitcoin stabilizes and becomes more

0:07:48.280 --> 0:07:54.640
<v Speaker 1>of a reliant kind of thing or reliable kind of thing. Um, yeah,

0:07:54.680 --> 0:07:56.760
<v Speaker 1>I guess it could work, but right now, it's just

0:07:57.320 --> 0:08:01.800
<v Speaker 1>it's so volatile that I am very curious to see

0:08:01.800 --> 0:08:04.840
<v Speaker 1>how this works for El Salvador in the future. And

0:08:04.880 --> 0:08:07.280
<v Speaker 1>of course we talked to in the previous episodes about

0:08:07.320 --> 0:08:10.680
<v Speaker 1>how a lot of critics are worried that the fact

0:08:10.720 --> 0:08:14.720
<v Speaker 1>that bitcoin is is frequently associated with stuff like money

0:08:14.800 --> 0:08:18.280
<v Speaker 1>laundering and corruption, that this will play a large role

0:08:18.320 --> 0:08:20.480
<v Speaker 1>in El Salvador as well, but we'll have to wait

0:08:20.480 --> 0:08:24.280
<v Speaker 1>and see. Let's talk about tech and climate change for

0:08:24.320 --> 0:08:29.400
<v Speaker 1>a second. So the Big Five that being Alphabet, Amazon, Apple, Microsoft,

0:08:29.440 --> 0:08:33.720
<v Speaker 1>and Facebook have all stated that their respective companies have

0:08:33.840 --> 0:08:36.600
<v Speaker 1>plans to go carbon neutral and at least in some

0:08:36.679 --> 0:08:40.880
<v Speaker 1>cases even carbon negative over the next several years, most

0:08:40.920 --> 0:08:44.880
<v Speaker 1>of which are aiming around for that goal. Microsoft even

0:08:44.920 --> 0:08:48.280
<v Speaker 1>says that the company intends to remove enough carbon from

0:08:48.320 --> 0:08:52.200
<v Speaker 1>the atmosphere to offset all the carbon the company has

0:08:52.280 --> 0:08:55.920
<v Speaker 1>ever generated. Ever, So, in other words, by I think

0:08:55.920 --> 0:08:59.800
<v Speaker 1>it's twenty fifty, Microsoft plans on having systems in place

0:09:00.240 --> 0:09:04.320
<v Speaker 1>that will effectively remove the equivalent amount of carbon that

0:09:04.360 --> 0:09:07.760
<v Speaker 1>the company has ever produced. That's pretty phenomenal if it

0:09:07.760 --> 0:09:11.559
<v Speaker 1>actually works out. Now, let's talk a little bit about actions,

0:09:11.640 --> 0:09:14.240
<v Speaker 1>because those speak louder than words, right. You can claim

0:09:14.640 --> 0:09:16.920
<v Speaker 1>to have this plan in place, but unless you do

0:09:17.000 --> 0:09:19.920
<v Speaker 1>stuff about it doesn't do you much good. And when

0:09:19.960 --> 0:09:22.160
<v Speaker 1>it comes to some of these companies, the promises being

0:09:22.200 --> 0:09:26.800
<v Speaker 1>made might not actually be achievable, at least not from

0:09:26.840 --> 0:09:30.880
<v Speaker 1>the companies themselves all by themselves. Let's take Apple for example.

0:09:31.160 --> 0:09:35.080
<v Speaker 1>So the Guardian reports that a semiconductor manufacturing company called

0:09:35.160 --> 0:09:38.880
<v Speaker 1>t s MC, this is part of Apple's supply chain,

0:09:39.480 --> 0:09:43.920
<v Speaker 1>has its goal to become carbon neutral by twenty Now,

0:09:43.960 --> 0:09:47.319
<v Speaker 1>Apple's goal was to get its entire supply chain to

0:09:47.440 --> 0:09:52.079
<v Speaker 1>carbon neutral by so there's a disconnect there of twenty years.

0:09:52.080 --> 0:09:55.320
<v Speaker 1>I mean, that's huge, right now, The company t s

0:09:55.480 --> 0:09:59.840
<v Speaker 1>MC in Taiwan uses nearly five of all electricity and

0:10:00.040 --> 0:10:04.000
<v Speaker 1>Iwan while manufacturing silicon chips. It also used around sixty

0:10:04.040 --> 0:10:08.320
<v Speaker 1>three million gallons of water in twenty nineteen for that purpose,

0:10:08.679 --> 0:10:12.160
<v Speaker 1>and it will likely consume more over the near future,

0:10:12.200 --> 0:10:16.360
<v Speaker 1>not less, at least, you know, when the ability to

0:10:16.440 --> 0:10:20.600
<v Speaker 1>manufacture at scale has really returned in full effect. And

0:10:20.720 --> 0:10:23.160
<v Speaker 1>this is yet another reminder that the world is way

0:10:23.200 --> 0:10:27.400
<v Speaker 1>more complicated than the way we typically see it in messaging.

0:10:27.840 --> 0:10:31.280
<v Speaker 1>You know, you might think, oh, Apple, Apple makes iPhones,

0:10:31.520 --> 0:10:34.240
<v Speaker 1>that iPhone came from Apple, but we all know that's

0:10:34.240 --> 0:10:37.719
<v Speaker 1>oversimplifying things way too much because there are a lot

0:10:37.760 --> 0:10:42.199
<v Speaker 1>of different companies that that produce components within that iPhone

0:10:42.600 --> 0:10:45.440
<v Speaker 1>that are not Apple. Apple partners with those companies, they

0:10:45.480 --> 0:10:48.040
<v Speaker 1>are part of Apple's supply chains. So it is a

0:10:48.120 --> 0:10:52.280
<v Speaker 1>much more complex ecosystem than just a single company. And

0:10:53.080 --> 0:10:55.360
<v Speaker 1>we have to remember there's this ripple effect, right, The

0:10:55.360 --> 0:10:59.480
<v Speaker 1>manufacturing process has this ripple effect on different economies around

0:10:59.520 --> 0:11:02.520
<v Speaker 1>the world as well as different environments. Now, I am

0:11:02.559 --> 0:11:05.280
<v Speaker 1>not blaming Apple for this, because I mean, for one thing,

0:11:05.320 --> 0:11:08.920
<v Speaker 1>the company made its own uh owned and operated businesses

0:11:09.280 --> 0:11:13.640
<v Speaker 1>carbon neutral back in eighteen. That is amazing. Hats off

0:11:13.679 --> 0:11:15.880
<v Speaker 1>to Apple for doing that. That's great. This is just

0:11:15.920 --> 0:11:20.440
<v Speaker 1>a reminder that when we hear these promises about attaining

0:11:20.480 --> 0:11:24.200
<v Speaker 1>carbon neutrality across all lines of businesses, we have to

0:11:24.240 --> 0:11:27.720
<v Speaker 1>remember it's not always entirely up to the companies that

0:11:27.760 --> 0:11:30.560
<v Speaker 1>are making those promises, and we need to make sure

0:11:30.600 --> 0:11:32.280
<v Speaker 1>that all the pieces are in place in order to

0:11:32.320 --> 0:11:36.360
<v Speaker 1>take care of all the different components. We have more

0:11:36.440 --> 0:11:38.720
<v Speaker 1>to talk about with tech, even more with tech and

0:11:38.800 --> 0:11:41.760
<v Speaker 1>climate in just a moment, but first let's take a

0:11:41.840 --> 0:11:52.240
<v Speaker 1>quick break. Okay, before the break, I was talking about

0:11:52.720 --> 0:11:56.040
<v Speaker 1>carbon neutrality and climate change in tech. This is kind

0:11:56.120 --> 0:11:59.640
<v Speaker 1>of related to that in a way. I want to

0:11:59.679 --> 0:12:03.400
<v Speaker 1>talk out the Bezos Earth Fund that's obviously named after

0:12:03.480 --> 0:12:06.960
<v Speaker 1>Jeff Bezos, the founder of Amazon. That fund has pledged

0:12:07.040 --> 0:12:10.920
<v Speaker 1>one billion dollars toward efforts to conserve and protect vulnerable

0:12:10.960 --> 0:12:13.840
<v Speaker 1>areas around the world. And this is part of a

0:12:14.000 --> 0:12:17.959
<v Speaker 1>ten billion dollar commitment that Jeff Bezos has made toward

0:12:18.080 --> 0:12:22.600
<v Speaker 1>preserving natural habitats and fighting climate change globally. And the

0:12:22.640 --> 0:12:26.480
<v Speaker 1>initial focus is on a region in the Pacific Ocean,

0:12:26.480 --> 0:12:29.960
<v Speaker 1>a tropical region of the Pacific uh the tropical Andes

0:12:30.040 --> 0:12:35.679
<v Speaker 1>Mountains and the Congo Basin. Now you might wonder how

0:12:35.760 --> 0:12:39.319
<v Speaker 1>does this actually work, because obviously you can't just dump

0:12:39.400 --> 0:12:43.280
<v Speaker 1>airplane loads of cash on an area to make it better.

0:12:43.320 --> 0:12:45.680
<v Speaker 1>The Pacific Ocean does not care if you make it

0:12:45.840 --> 0:12:49.599
<v Speaker 1>rain dollar bills over it. No, So this fund is

0:12:49.640 --> 0:12:54.600
<v Speaker 1>actually doling out large amounts of money toward established organizations

0:12:54.640 --> 0:12:58.200
<v Speaker 1>that focus on this kind of work on preservation and

0:12:58.240 --> 0:13:02.000
<v Speaker 1>fighting climate change. So really it's almost like a grant

0:13:02.040 --> 0:13:06.640
<v Speaker 1>foundation that's granting this money to other organizations. This in

0:13:06.679 --> 0:13:10.360
<v Speaker 1>itself is still a challenge, both because even if you're

0:13:10.400 --> 0:13:13.240
<v Speaker 1>just donating to charity yourself, you always want to try

0:13:13.280 --> 0:13:16.280
<v Speaker 1>and select organizations that have the potential to do the

0:13:16.320 --> 0:13:19.439
<v Speaker 1>most good with your donation and to make the best

0:13:19.559 --> 0:13:23.280
<v Speaker 1>use of the money you you offer. And also, once

0:13:23.280 --> 0:13:26.600
<v Speaker 1>you hit a certain scale of donation, you might actually

0:13:26.600 --> 0:13:30.600
<v Speaker 1>be giving an organization more money than that organization can manage.

0:13:30.960 --> 0:13:33.760
<v Speaker 1>It can literally be too much of a good thing. Yeah,

0:13:34.120 --> 0:13:37.840
<v Speaker 1>if you are really focusing on smaller, more local organizations

0:13:37.880 --> 0:13:41.800
<v Speaker 1>that can do you know, direct good in a region,

0:13:42.280 --> 0:13:44.439
<v Speaker 1>then you might have to spend a lot more time

0:13:44.480 --> 0:13:47.200
<v Speaker 1>managing that whole situation. Because again, you don't want to

0:13:47.240 --> 0:13:50.040
<v Speaker 1>overwhelm the organization by giving it more than it can handle.

0:13:50.640 --> 0:13:53.880
<v Speaker 1>But at least this is some good news that's related

0:13:53.880 --> 0:13:57.120
<v Speaker 1>to Amazon, which is nice because the rest of my

0:13:57.160 --> 0:14:01.000
<v Speaker 1>Amazon news is not quite so positive. Of those pieces

0:14:01.800 --> 0:14:07.319
<v Speaker 1>is about um sponsored results in Amazon item listings. So

0:14:07.559 --> 0:14:10.200
<v Speaker 1>when you go on to Amazon and you're searching for something,

0:14:10.280 --> 0:14:13.240
<v Speaker 1>let's say it's a ball peen hammer, then you're gonna

0:14:13.280 --> 0:14:17.439
<v Speaker 1>get results on that, and that's going to include results

0:14:17.480 --> 0:14:21.120
<v Speaker 1>from companies that have paid to be in your view,

0:14:21.440 --> 0:14:24.080
<v Speaker 1>like on that first page. So Amazon has been doing

0:14:24.080 --> 0:14:26.080
<v Speaker 1>this for a while. It's not like it's brand new,

0:14:26.280 --> 0:14:29.320
<v Speaker 1>but over time the company has increased the number of

0:14:29.360 --> 0:14:33.200
<v Speaker 1>sponsored item slots on those initial lists. Like in the

0:14:33.200 --> 0:14:35.880
<v Speaker 1>past it might be you know, two to three items,

0:14:36.280 --> 0:14:40.840
<v Speaker 1>and now it can be five or six on some searches. Uh.

0:14:40.920 --> 0:14:43.320
<v Speaker 1>And like search engines in general, you know, we typically

0:14:43.360 --> 0:14:46.440
<v Speaker 1>see people stick to the first page or first couple

0:14:46.480 --> 0:14:49.640
<v Speaker 1>of pages of results when they're searching for stuff. Now,

0:14:50.320 --> 0:14:52.320
<v Speaker 1>I have to admit I'm kind of an outlier because

0:14:52.360 --> 0:14:54.960
<v Speaker 1>I will frequently page through multiple pages in an effort

0:14:55.000 --> 0:14:57.480
<v Speaker 1>to find, you know, the best fit for whatever item

0:14:57.600 --> 0:15:00.400
<v Speaker 1>I'm looking for. I've always got this fear that on

0:15:00.520 --> 0:15:03.200
<v Speaker 1>the next page was the perfect fit, and I went

0:15:03.240 --> 0:15:06.560
<v Speaker 1>with something you know, I settled for something less. So

0:15:07.200 --> 0:15:10.720
<v Speaker 1>with these sponsored results, there's no algorithm around how popular

0:15:10.800 --> 0:15:13.360
<v Speaker 1>the item is, or how well reviewed it is or

0:15:13.400 --> 0:15:16.400
<v Speaker 1>anything like that. It shows up there because the company

0:15:16.480 --> 0:15:20.920
<v Speaker 1>paid for that spot. And Amazon has also increased the

0:15:21.000 --> 0:15:24.440
<v Speaker 1>price for ads, which, yeah, I don't even know how

0:15:24.520 --> 0:15:26.640
<v Speaker 1>much revenue Amazon must be pulling in when you factor

0:15:26.720 --> 0:15:29.320
<v Speaker 1>both of those things together. They're showing more ads, and

0:15:29.360 --> 0:15:33.400
<v Speaker 1>they're charging more per AD, and they've got millions of

0:15:33.400 --> 0:15:38.040
<v Speaker 1>people using the site, and I mean, that's going hog wild,

0:15:38.160 --> 0:15:42.520
<v Speaker 1>especially during pandemic. Now, the amount charged is not a

0:15:42.600 --> 0:15:45.040
<v Speaker 1>big amount on a per click basis. If you look

0:15:45.040 --> 0:15:49.200
<v Speaker 1>at it as how much does Amazon charge for an

0:15:49.240 --> 0:15:52.760
<v Speaker 1>AD for a single click, it's a dollar twenty seven.

0:15:53.320 --> 0:15:56.320
<v Speaker 1>That's not very much, But that's one click. That's per click, right.

0:15:56.640 --> 0:15:59.880
<v Speaker 1>You multiply that times potentially tens of thousands of click

0:16:00.480 --> 0:16:04.320
<v Speaker 1>and you apply that pricing across all items, across all categories,

0:16:04.600 --> 0:16:07.280
<v Speaker 1>and you really start seeing the cash pile up, which

0:16:07.280 --> 0:16:10.400
<v Speaker 1>I guess then you could throw at the Pacific Ocean. Amazon,

0:16:10.560 --> 0:16:13.200
<v Speaker 1>by the way, says that it doesn't dedicate slots to

0:16:13.440 --> 0:16:16.360
<v Speaker 1>sponsored items, So in other words, it doesn't have like

0:16:16.480 --> 0:16:19.680
<v Speaker 1>a minimum or a set amount. It's not like every

0:16:19.680 --> 0:16:22.560
<v Speaker 1>time you search for something, you're gonna get six sponsored

0:16:22.600 --> 0:16:27.040
<v Speaker 1>results and then everything else. In fact, it's possible, according

0:16:27.040 --> 0:16:29.480
<v Speaker 1>to Amazon, that you could do a search and get

0:16:29.480 --> 0:16:32.160
<v Speaker 1>no sponsored items at all, depending on whatever it was

0:16:32.200 --> 0:16:35.280
<v Speaker 1>you were searching for. Now, I've recently had to purchase

0:16:35.320 --> 0:16:38.520
<v Speaker 1>a bunch of stuff, so anecdotally, I can say that

0:16:38.600 --> 0:16:41.880
<v Speaker 1>I have noticed way more sponsored items than I remember

0:16:41.880 --> 0:16:44.400
<v Speaker 1>seeing in the past. However, I also have to say

0:16:44.480 --> 0:16:47.280
<v Speaker 1>that could just be confirmation bias on my part. It

0:16:47.400 --> 0:16:50.000
<v Speaker 1>might not actually reflect reality. It may just be that

0:16:50.040 --> 0:16:53.520
<v Speaker 1>I'm noticing it more. Anyway, it's good to pay attention

0:16:53.560 --> 0:16:56.160
<v Speaker 1>to this kind of thing when you're a comparison shopping now.

0:16:56.200 --> 0:16:59.480
<v Speaker 1>Just because something is sponsored doesn't mean it's the best fit,

0:16:59.560 --> 0:17:02.000
<v Speaker 1>but it all. It doesn't mean it's not the best fit.

0:17:02.160 --> 0:17:05.359
<v Speaker 1>It might be the best option for you, but it

0:17:05.440 --> 0:17:08.439
<v Speaker 1>is good to remember that it's a sponsored item and

0:17:08.480 --> 0:17:11.880
<v Speaker 1>that the reason it's showing up in your view has

0:17:11.920 --> 0:17:15.480
<v Speaker 1>nothing to do with its price, its quality, or reviews

0:17:15.600 --> 0:17:19.760
<v Speaker 1>or anything like that. Uh, it may fit those criteria

0:17:20.000 --> 0:17:23.800
<v Speaker 1>that you need, but it doesn't necessarily do that, so

0:17:24.160 --> 0:17:26.560
<v Speaker 1>you need to keep that in mind when you're comparison shopping.

0:17:26.840 --> 0:17:30.760
<v Speaker 1>OSHA a k a. The Occupational Safety and Health Administration

0:17:31.200 --> 0:17:33.760
<v Speaker 1>is a regulatory agency in the United States that is

0:17:33.880 --> 0:17:37.399
<v Speaker 1>charged with assuring safe and healthy working conditions in the

0:17:37.520 --> 0:17:43.239
<v Speaker 1>US by establishing and enforcing standards. And when there is

0:17:44.080 --> 0:17:47.760
<v Speaker 1>an incident that that results in an injury, like a

0:17:47.800 --> 0:17:51.680
<v Speaker 1>serious injury, something you know, beyond just slapping a band

0:17:51.680 --> 0:17:55.240
<v Speaker 1>aid on someone, then companies are supposed to report that

0:17:55.320 --> 0:17:59.160
<v Speaker 1>to OSHA. They are legally bound to do so well.

0:17:59.280 --> 0:18:02.800
<v Speaker 1>The Tech Journal is m site. The information took data

0:18:02.840 --> 0:18:06.760
<v Speaker 1>from OSHA and looked at Amazon delivery stations. Now, delivery

0:18:06.760 --> 0:18:11.960
<v Speaker 1>stations are hubs that exist between warehouses and customers. Amazon

0:18:12.080 --> 0:18:16.280
<v Speaker 1>essentially established delivery stations largely in an effort to eliminate

0:18:16.320 --> 0:18:20.040
<v Speaker 1>the need to rely on other delivery services like ups

0:18:20.080 --> 0:18:24.639
<v Speaker 1>and instead use its own owned and operated delivery vehicles

0:18:24.840 --> 0:18:27.960
<v Speaker 1>in order to get packages to end customers. So the

0:18:28.000 --> 0:18:30.760
<v Speaker 1>way Amazon typically works with shipping is that it has

0:18:30.840 --> 0:18:36.400
<v Speaker 1>these massive warehouses that hold products. These then get shipped

0:18:36.480 --> 0:18:39.840
<v Speaker 1>to the delivery stations, and then workers at the delivery

0:18:39.880 --> 0:18:43.280
<v Speaker 1>stations sort and load the boxes onto delivery vehicles, which

0:18:43.320 --> 0:18:46.280
<v Speaker 1>then go out to you know, deliver the stuff to customers.

0:18:46.640 --> 0:18:49.840
<v Speaker 1>And according to the information, the rate of injuries at

0:18:49.880 --> 0:18:54.000
<v Speaker 1>Amazon delivery stations is more than twice that of the

0:18:54.080 --> 0:18:58.359
<v Speaker 1>industry average. People are getting hurt twice as often at

0:18:58.400 --> 0:19:03.120
<v Speaker 1>Amazon delivery stations as people who work at comparable facilities.

0:19:03.359 --> 0:19:06.720
<v Speaker 1>It's also a higher injury rate than what is seen

0:19:06.800 --> 0:19:11.320
<v Speaker 1>at other Amazon facilities, including warehouses and sorting facilities. The

0:19:11.400 --> 0:19:15.439
<v Speaker 1>delivery stations are the most dangerous. The information also points

0:19:15.440 --> 0:19:19.359
<v Speaker 1>out that companies only report to OSHA if those injuries

0:19:19.400 --> 0:19:21.520
<v Speaker 1>are severe enough. Like I was saying before, it has

0:19:21.560 --> 0:19:23.760
<v Speaker 1>to be something more than what would require a first

0:19:23.800 --> 0:19:28.560
<v Speaker 1>aid response. So we're not just talking about people stubbing

0:19:28.560 --> 0:19:31.440
<v Speaker 1>a toe or something. We're talking about some serious injuries,

0:19:31.480 --> 0:19:36.840
<v Speaker 1>everything from moderate to potentially critical injuries. And you know,

0:19:36.840 --> 0:19:39.160
<v Speaker 1>who knows how many bumps and scrapes people are getting

0:19:39.160 --> 0:19:42.920
<v Speaker 1>along the way. The study also found that Amazon had

0:19:43.200 --> 0:19:47.080
<v Speaker 1>overstated the number of employees working at these delivery stations

0:19:47.119 --> 0:19:50.840
<v Speaker 1>on more than one occasions. Now that matters because it

0:19:50.880 --> 0:19:55.320
<v Speaker 1>means Amazon's information to OSHA indicates that these delivery stations

0:19:55.320 --> 0:19:59.800
<v Speaker 1>had more employees. Thus were more fully staffed, and that

0:20:00.000 --> 0:20:03.760
<v Speaker 1>would usually mean that you would see fewer injuries, right,

0:20:03.840 --> 0:20:08.200
<v Speaker 1>because you're you're dividing the work well amongst the people

0:20:08.280 --> 0:20:10.560
<v Speaker 1>that you have. But if in fact fewer people are

0:20:10.600 --> 0:20:14.240
<v Speaker 1>working there, then that means you have fewer people doing

0:20:14.320 --> 0:20:17.480
<v Speaker 1>more work. And that work includes moving heavy stuff like

0:20:17.520 --> 0:20:20.520
<v Speaker 1>heavy packages, as well as working around delivery vehicles that

0:20:20.560 --> 0:20:22.800
<v Speaker 1>are coming and going all the time. So it's no

0:20:22.840 --> 0:20:26.080
<v Speaker 1>wonder there have been lots of injuries. No real report

0:20:26.119 --> 0:20:29.040
<v Speaker 1>from Amazon yet about this, apart from the company saying

0:20:29.080 --> 0:20:35.280
<v Speaker 1>that it works hard to improve safety conditions and its facilities. Okay, well,

0:20:35.359 --> 0:20:38.240
<v Speaker 1>I've got a few more stories to cover, but before

0:20:38.240 --> 0:20:47.679
<v Speaker 1>I get to those, let's take another quick break. Okay,

0:20:47.720 --> 0:20:50.160
<v Speaker 1>we're gonna talk a little bit more about workers rights

0:20:50.160 --> 0:20:53.520
<v Speaker 1>and tech organizations in the form of instat cart. So,

0:20:53.560 --> 0:20:56.080
<v Speaker 1>the company is rumored to be preparing an initial public

0:20:56.119 --> 0:20:59.040
<v Speaker 1>offering or i p O. That's when a private company

0:20:59.080 --> 0:21:03.080
<v Speaker 1>becomes a publicly traded company on a stock exchange. This

0:21:03.160 --> 0:21:06.800
<v Speaker 1>process is lengthy, it is not a sure thing. They

0:21:06.880 --> 0:21:09.320
<v Speaker 1>just take a look at we work for an example

0:21:09.320 --> 0:21:13.960
<v Speaker 1>of that. But some instacart workers are spearheading a campaign

0:21:13.960 --> 0:21:17.159
<v Speaker 1>to convince users to boycott the app. They're using the

0:21:17.200 --> 0:21:21.360
<v Speaker 1>hashtag delete insta Cart to promote their cause, so they

0:21:21.359 --> 0:21:24.040
<v Speaker 1>want to put pressure on the company. If insta Cart

0:21:24.080 --> 0:21:27.080
<v Speaker 1>is planning ongoing public then public opinion is going to

0:21:27.119 --> 0:21:31.239
<v Speaker 1>impact the share price and thus the company valuation and

0:21:31.320 --> 0:21:34.399
<v Speaker 1>the I p O. So this is important stuff. And

0:21:34.440 --> 0:21:36.800
<v Speaker 1>the workers have a list of demands that they want

0:21:37.080 --> 0:21:41.000
<v Speaker 1>to have met from the company. One of those includes

0:21:41.080 --> 0:21:46.760
<v Speaker 1>Instacart reinstating a previous commission pay model where people got

0:21:46.800 --> 0:21:50.720
<v Speaker 1>a dedicated amount of money per order. Um. They want

0:21:50.800 --> 0:21:54.040
<v Speaker 1>a ten percent default tip built into the transaction. Right now,

0:21:54.080 --> 0:21:57.080
<v Speaker 1>the default tip is at five. They wanted to be

0:21:57.200 --> 0:21:59.280
<v Speaker 1>up to ten percent because they say a lot of

0:21:59.359 --> 0:22:03.680
<v Speaker 1>users never bother to go outside of the default. Uh.

0:22:03.760 --> 0:22:07.359
<v Speaker 1>I always I always go to twenty percent at least

0:22:07.680 --> 0:22:12.600
<v Speaker 1>and sometimes over than that, because I mean, these folks

0:22:12.600 --> 0:22:15.040
<v Speaker 1>are working hard and they're they're doing a real service

0:22:15.080 --> 0:22:18.280
<v Speaker 1>for me. But that's me anyway. They also want a

0:22:18.280 --> 0:22:21.480
<v Speaker 1>system that does not penalize workers for stuff that is

0:22:21.520 --> 0:22:25.200
<v Speaker 1>outside their control. So for example, uh, there's a cold

0:22:25.240 --> 0:22:28.320
<v Speaker 1>brew coffee that I absolutely love and it is almost

0:22:28.400 --> 0:22:30.960
<v Speaker 1>never in stock in any of the stores. I always

0:22:30.960 --> 0:22:33.880
<v Speaker 1>put it into the order just in case, but more

0:22:33.920 --> 0:22:36.359
<v Speaker 1>often than not, I get a message saying they were out.

0:22:36.840 --> 0:22:41.359
<v Speaker 1>Well right now, instacart allows me to review my you know,

0:22:41.520 --> 0:22:44.960
<v Speaker 1>results of my delivery and I can say, oh, the

0:22:45.000 --> 0:22:49.000
<v Speaker 1>delivery person didn't find all the items, uh, and that

0:22:49.080 --> 0:22:52.960
<v Speaker 1>can reflect badly on that person. It penalizes the insta

0:22:53.040 --> 0:22:56.160
<v Speaker 1>cart gig worker and it's not really their fault, right,

0:22:56.200 --> 0:22:58.639
<v Speaker 1>I mean, if the company's off stock, they couldn't do

0:22:58.680 --> 0:23:01.879
<v Speaker 1>anything about that, so it's not fair. They want that changed.

0:23:02.080 --> 0:23:05.280
<v Speaker 1>They also want occupational death benefits, and they want the

0:23:05.320 --> 0:23:08.719
<v Speaker 1>system that assigns orders to workers to be more transparent.

0:23:08.760 --> 0:23:11.240
<v Speaker 1>They say that it's gotten less so over the years.

0:23:11.680 --> 0:23:14.320
<v Speaker 1>The workers are asking users to delete the app to

0:23:14.400 --> 0:23:17.440
<v Speaker 1>send a message to insta Cart because if the installed

0:23:17.440 --> 0:23:19.919
<v Speaker 1>base for the app drops dramatically, they hope that that

0:23:19.960 --> 0:23:23.440
<v Speaker 1>will end up pressuring the company to granting these demands

0:23:23.520 --> 0:23:26.159
<v Speaker 1>because it will not look good on its way toward

0:23:26.240 --> 0:23:30.080
<v Speaker 1>an initial public offering. Workers say instat carts changes have

0:23:30.160 --> 0:23:33.159
<v Speaker 1>resulted in lower pay for workers who are working just

0:23:33.240 --> 0:23:36.080
<v Speaker 1>as hard, if not harder, than they were before, but

0:23:36.119 --> 0:23:39.639
<v Speaker 1>they're making less. The workers acknowledge that asking users to

0:23:39.720 --> 0:23:42.639
<v Speaker 1>delete a delivery app during a pandemic is potentially a

0:23:42.640 --> 0:23:46.520
<v Speaker 1>pretty big request for what it's worth, I just deleted

0:23:46.560 --> 0:23:49.840
<v Speaker 1>it from my phone, even though I have depended upon

0:23:49.880 --> 0:23:53.520
<v Speaker 1>it quite heavily in the past, because I happened to

0:23:53.600 --> 0:23:57.400
<v Speaker 1>believe in the cause of the workers. All right, moving on,

0:23:57.880 --> 0:24:01.280
<v Speaker 1>have you been to Thailand in the last ten years?

0:24:01.720 --> 0:24:04.520
<v Speaker 1>The reason I ask is that if you have, your

0:24:04.600 --> 0:24:08.679
<v Speaker 1>data might be among the one hundred six million records

0:24:08.720 --> 0:24:11.760
<v Speaker 1>of international travelers who have gone to Thailand that was

0:24:11.760 --> 0:24:15.280
<v Speaker 1>found to be stored on a database on the web

0:24:15.720 --> 0:24:19.320
<v Speaker 1>without password protection. So, in other words, anyone who got

0:24:19.440 --> 0:24:21.960
<v Speaker 1>hold of that U r L to that database could

0:24:22.000 --> 0:24:24.440
<v Speaker 1>go and look through it and see the personal information

0:24:24.560 --> 0:24:28.360
<v Speaker 1>of one six million people who had visited the country

0:24:28.440 --> 0:24:31.920
<v Speaker 1>over the last decade. A security researcher with compare Tech

0:24:32.240 --> 0:24:35.840
<v Speaker 1>alerted Thai authorities about this problem last month, and the

0:24:35.960 --> 0:24:39.639
<v Speaker 1>day following that alert, those authorities were able to secure

0:24:39.680 --> 0:24:43.439
<v Speaker 1>the database. So how long was that database up I

0:24:43.440 --> 0:24:47.399
<v Speaker 1>don't know, but the search engine census c E N

0:24:47.640 --> 0:24:53.159
<v Speaker 1>S y S indexed the database on August twenty one, So,

0:24:53.160 --> 0:24:56.040
<v Speaker 1>in other words, not only was the database unprotected and

0:24:56.200 --> 0:24:59.119
<v Speaker 1>up on the web, but a search engine indexed it

0:24:59.520 --> 0:25:02.240
<v Speaker 1>so that means it would come up in search results

0:25:02.320 --> 0:25:06.080
<v Speaker 1>for any sort of relevant query. The researcher who found

0:25:06.160 --> 0:25:09.560
<v Speaker 1>the database found it two days after it had been indexed,

0:25:09.920 --> 0:25:12.320
<v Speaker 1>and on the twenty three the database was under lock

0:25:12.359 --> 0:25:14.600
<v Speaker 1>and key. The former u r L of the database

0:25:14.640 --> 0:25:17.120
<v Speaker 1>is still active, but if you were to visit it now,

0:25:17.320 --> 0:25:19.719
<v Speaker 1>you would see a message that reads and I quote

0:25:20.119 --> 0:25:24.960
<v Speaker 1>this is honeypot. All access were logged end quote. According

0:25:24.960 --> 0:25:28.240
<v Speaker 1>to the authorities, no one obtained unauthorized access to the database,

0:25:28.240 --> 0:25:31.160
<v Speaker 1>though I'm not sure how they determined that or whether

0:25:31.160 --> 0:25:34.200
<v Speaker 1>the information is accurate, but once again that shows how

0:25:34.240 --> 0:25:38.119
<v Speaker 1>poor data management security policies can make all of us vulnerable.

0:25:38.280 --> 0:25:40.879
<v Speaker 1>The folks who were in that database did nothing wrong.

0:25:41.200 --> 0:25:43.160
<v Speaker 1>At least they did nothing wrong as far as being

0:25:43.160 --> 0:25:46.040
<v Speaker 1>included on that database is concerned. I don't know if

0:25:46.040 --> 0:25:49.080
<v Speaker 1>they're entirely innocent of all wrongdoing, but they had no

0:25:49.119 --> 0:25:51.720
<v Speaker 1>control over the security of their own data, and that's

0:25:51.720 --> 0:25:55.120
<v Speaker 1>a problem. Netflix has an interesting new offering that has

0:25:55.200 --> 0:25:58.680
<v Speaker 1>very specific parameters for a certain target audience. Viewers will

0:25:58.720 --> 0:26:02.480
<v Speaker 1>get free access to about tw of all the content

0:26:02.640 --> 0:26:06.760
<v Speaker 1>on Netflix Streaming to watch free of charge. That is,

0:26:07.080 --> 0:26:11.840
<v Speaker 1>there's no subscription. There's no advertising, nothing, but there are

0:26:11.840 --> 0:26:14.280
<v Speaker 1>a couple of requirements you have to meet. First, one

0:26:14.359 --> 0:26:16.919
<v Speaker 1>is that this offering is for Android users, so it

0:26:17.000 --> 0:26:20.159
<v Speaker 1>only applies on Android devices. And the other is that

0:26:20.200 --> 0:26:23.280
<v Speaker 1>the offering is for people in Kenya. And you might wonder,

0:26:24.040 --> 0:26:27.479
<v Speaker 1>what the what, what's going on, and maybe a lot

0:26:27.520 --> 0:26:29.720
<v Speaker 1>of you are already saying, well, of course, the first

0:26:29.760 --> 0:26:33.600
<v Speaker 1>taste is free, and that's exactly right. This is essentially

0:26:33.600 --> 0:26:36.399
<v Speaker 1>a marketing campaign with the ultimate goal to be to

0:26:36.520 --> 0:26:40.760
<v Speaker 1>convince Kenyans to subscribe for you know, paid for Netflix services.

0:26:41.440 --> 0:26:43.000
<v Speaker 1>You know, you give them a sample of what is

0:26:43.040 --> 0:26:46.720
<v Speaker 1>available on the platform. Android smartphones are popular in Kenya,

0:26:47.040 --> 0:26:50.439
<v Speaker 1>often like the most popular computing device in Kenya, and

0:26:50.520 --> 0:26:53.520
<v Speaker 1>so that represents a potential new audience for a Netflix.

0:26:53.760 --> 0:26:56.040
<v Speaker 1>But to get things rolling, the company needs to convince

0:26:56.080 --> 0:26:58.879
<v Speaker 1>Kenyans that they want the service in the first place.

0:26:59.240 --> 0:27:00.600
<v Speaker 1>And I think you were going to see lots of

0:27:00.640 --> 0:27:03.800
<v Speaker 1>similar campaigns across different companies in different parts of the world.

0:27:04.160 --> 0:27:07.439
<v Speaker 1>Many companies use growth as the most important metric of

0:27:07.480 --> 0:27:12.600
<v Speaker 1>the organization's success, but for subscription based businesses, there comes

0:27:12.600 --> 0:27:15.560
<v Speaker 1>a point in any market where you start to hit saturation.

0:27:15.960 --> 0:27:18.480
<v Speaker 1>And you see growth slow down, you might even see

0:27:18.480 --> 0:27:21.520
<v Speaker 1>it stabilize, and if you're in trouble, it might start

0:27:21.560 --> 0:27:25.040
<v Speaker 1>to go and reverse. It is very hard to create

0:27:25.200 --> 0:27:28.200
<v Speaker 1>new customers in a saturated market. You know, you've pretty

0:27:28.280 --> 0:27:31.000
<v Speaker 1>much got everyone who wants to be on the service

0:27:31.119 --> 0:27:33.560
<v Speaker 1>on the service you've got in the worlds to go,

0:27:33.760 --> 0:27:36.760
<v Speaker 1>So it makes more sense to look for untapped markets

0:27:36.840 --> 0:27:40.280
<v Speaker 1>elsewhere in the world and then aggressively go after those

0:27:40.600 --> 0:27:43.280
<v Speaker 1>and when you do that, boom, you get your growth back. Now.

0:27:43.280 --> 0:27:45.040
<v Speaker 1>I used to see this a lot when I worked

0:27:45.080 --> 0:27:52.320
<v Speaker 1>for a multibillion dollar cable content company that rhymes with Discovery. Anyway,

0:27:52.600 --> 0:27:55.400
<v Speaker 1>we'll have to see if Netflix is Queen's gambit pays off.

0:27:56.560 --> 0:28:00.359
<v Speaker 1>That was a reference. I've been talking a lot about

0:28:00.400 --> 0:28:03.400
<v Speaker 1>NASA recently, with series on text stuff dedicated to things

0:28:03.440 --> 0:28:06.480
<v Speaker 1>like the evolution of space suits and the various space

0:28:06.600 --> 0:28:08.800
<v Speaker 1>stations that have been in orbit around the Earth over

0:28:08.800 --> 0:28:12.440
<v Speaker 1>the years, and have also covered the Artemis Project, NASA's

0:28:12.480 --> 0:28:15.320
<v Speaker 1>plan to return to the Moon. Now, while the return

0:28:15.359 --> 0:28:17.280
<v Speaker 1>of humans to the Moon is likely to be pushed

0:28:17.280 --> 0:28:20.919
<v Speaker 1>back from the plan deadline because of stuff like you know,

0:28:21.640 --> 0:28:24.639
<v Speaker 1>not having space suits ready in time, other parts of

0:28:24.640 --> 0:28:27.480
<v Speaker 1>the project are moving forward. One of those is to

0:28:27.600 --> 0:28:30.200
<v Speaker 1>land a new rover on the surface of the Moon.

0:28:30.600 --> 0:28:35.040
<v Speaker 1>The rover is called the Volatile Investigating Polar Exploration Rover

0:28:35.359 --> 0:28:38.240
<v Speaker 1>or VIPER. Now that tells me someone came up with

0:28:38.280 --> 0:28:40.840
<v Speaker 1>an acronym that they thought was totally bad ass, and

0:28:40.880 --> 0:28:43.320
<v Speaker 1>then they worked their way backward from there. Or maybe

0:28:43.360 --> 0:28:45.520
<v Speaker 1>I'm wrong. Maybe they came up with a full name

0:28:45.600 --> 0:28:49.080
<v Speaker 1>first and then they said, hang on. The acronym for

0:28:49.120 --> 0:28:53.400
<v Speaker 1>this name is VIPER. That's bad ass. Anyway, NASA has

0:28:53.440 --> 0:28:56.960
<v Speaker 1>identified the target landing spot for the rover. It's near

0:28:57.000 --> 0:28:59.200
<v Speaker 1>the south pole of the Moon, on the edge of

0:28:59.200 --> 0:29:03.280
<v Speaker 1>a crater called the Nobile Creator and Viper's mission will

0:29:03.320 --> 0:29:06.720
<v Speaker 1>be to seek out resources that could be useful you know,

0:29:06.800 --> 0:29:10.600
<v Speaker 1>some might say critical for long term Moon missions. We're

0:29:10.640 --> 0:29:14.000
<v Speaker 1>talking stuff like ice, which could be used to generate

0:29:14.040 --> 0:29:17.440
<v Speaker 1>not just water, but also oxygen and even rocket fuel.

0:29:18.280 --> 0:29:21.560
<v Speaker 1>This will mark the first time that anything has directly

0:29:21.680 --> 0:29:25.800
<v Speaker 1>explored that specific region of the Moon. Previously, we've studied

0:29:25.800 --> 0:29:29.080
<v Speaker 1>it only through fly by missions, where you know, satellites

0:29:29.080 --> 0:29:32.720
<v Speaker 1>have gone by and taken measurements and metrics and pictures

0:29:32.720 --> 0:29:34.760
<v Speaker 1>and stuff. But this will be the first time we'll

0:29:34.800 --> 0:29:38.000
<v Speaker 1>have wheels on the ground, so to speak, in that region.

0:29:38.400 --> 0:29:41.320
<v Speaker 1>The thought is that in areas that are in permanent

0:29:41.440 --> 0:29:44.000
<v Speaker 1>shadow on the Moon, you might be able to find ice,

0:29:44.240 --> 0:29:46.520
<v Speaker 1>but we won't know for sure until we go there.

0:29:47.000 --> 0:29:52.040
<v Speaker 1>Viper is scheduled to go loony in tree. And finally,

0:29:52.280 --> 0:29:56.560
<v Speaker 1>another space news, Pooping in space is difficult. I've covered

0:29:56.600 --> 0:30:00.840
<v Speaker 1>this extensively, some might even say gratuitously, in those text

0:30:00.840 --> 0:30:04.360
<v Speaker 1>Stuff episodes about space suits. But recently this has popped

0:30:04.360 --> 0:30:06.520
<v Speaker 1>into the news again thanks to the crew of the

0:30:06.520 --> 0:30:10.840
<v Speaker 1>Inspiration Four. That was the group of four non astronauts

0:30:11.080 --> 0:30:15.640
<v Speaker 1>who boarded a SpaceX Crew Dragon spacecraft last Wednesday, went

0:30:15.680 --> 0:30:18.400
<v Speaker 1>into orbit, stayed there for a few days, and then

0:30:18.440 --> 0:30:22.920
<v Speaker 1>returned back to Earth this past weekend. Elon Musk, responding

0:30:22.960 --> 0:30:25.360
<v Speaker 1>to questions about the mission, said that the next Crew

0:30:25.520 --> 0:30:29.600
<v Speaker 1>Dragon space capsule would have quote an upgraded toilet end

0:30:29.640 --> 0:30:34.000
<v Speaker 1>quote because and I quote, we had some challenges with

0:30:34.080 --> 0:30:38.040
<v Speaker 1>it this flight. Now you might wonder where the toilet

0:30:38.280 --> 0:30:41.720
<v Speaker 1>is on the Crew Dragon capsule, and I'll tell you

0:30:42.360 --> 0:30:47.960
<v Speaker 1>it's located above the crew seats. It's on the ceiling.

0:30:48.800 --> 0:30:53.280
<v Speaker 1>Now in microgravity, up and down are largely meaningless, but

0:30:53.520 --> 0:30:55.520
<v Speaker 1>it does mean that to use the toilet, you'd have

0:30:55.560 --> 0:30:58.400
<v Speaker 1>to float up to the top of the capsule, position

0:30:58.440 --> 0:31:01.920
<v Speaker 1>yourself so that you are upside down with regard to

0:31:01.960 --> 0:31:05.520
<v Speaker 1>the bottom of the capsule, and position yourself on the toilet,

0:31:05.560 --> 0:31:08.040
<v Speaker 1>and you use a little privacy curtain that divides the

0:31:08.040 --> 0:31:10.400
<v Speaker 1>capsule so that you know you're not turning it into

0:31:10.440 --> 0:31:14.000
<v Speaker 1>a spectator sport, and then you are inside a glass

0:31:14.040 --> 0:31:16.920
<v Speaker 1>dome once you're you know, positioned on the toilet, and

0:31:16.960 --> 0:31:19.560
<v Speaker 1>then you would do your business. You know what a

0:31:19.640 --> 0:31:23.240
<v Speaker 1>feeling when you're pooping on the ceiling. I made myself

0:31:23.320 --> 0:31:25.959
<v Speaker 1>laugh when I thought that up, which tells you that

0:31:26.320 --> 0:31:28.920
<v Speaker 1>i might be forty six years old, but I'm still

0:31:28.960 --> 0:31:32.200
<v Speaker 1>a thirteen year old boy at heart. Anyway, the next

0:31:32.280 --> 0:31:35.080
<v Speaker 1>Dragon capsule will have an improved toilet, and I cannot

0:31:35.120 --> 0:31:38.520
<v Speaker 1>wait to learn what the heck that actually means. And

0:31:38.560 --> 0:31:42.880
<v Speaker 1>that's it. That's the news for Tuesday, September twenty one. One.

0:31:43.040 --> 0:31:45.280
<v Speaker 1>If you have suggestions for topics I should cover on

0:31:45.400 --> 0:31:48.120
<v Speaker 1>tech Stuff, reach out to me on Twitter. The handle

0:31:48.160 --> 0:31:51.560
<v Speaker 1>for the show is text Stuff h s W and

0:31:51.600 --> 0:31:59.720
<v Speaker 1>I'll talk to you again really soon. Text Stuff is

0:31:59.760 --> 0:32:02.960
<v Speaker 1>an I heart radio production. For more podcasts from I

0:32:03.040 --> 0:32:06.640
<v Speaker 1>heart Radio, visit the i heart Radio app, Apple Podcasts,

0:32:06.760 --> 0:32:08.760
<v Speaker 1>or wherever you listen to your favorite shows.