Speaker 1: You're listening to the Buck Sexton Show podcast, make sure
Speaker 1: you subscribe to the podcast on the iHeartRadio app or
Speaker 1: wherever you get your podcasts. Oh my gosh, the libs
Speaker 1: are in a panic over free speech because Jimmy Kimmel,
Speaker 1: the least talented, least funny late night host on the scene,
Speaker 1: has been pulled off the air indefinitely.
Speaker 2: Maybe canceled, maybe long term suspension.
Speaker 1: Either way, it's the funniest thing that's happened to or
Speaker 1: with Jimmy Kimmel in a long time, Funnier than any
Speaker 1: skits that he's done, Funnier than any monologue he has
Speaker 1: put out there.
Speaker 2: I am laughing my.
Speaker 1: Butt off right now as Jimmy Kimmel is pulled off
Speaker 1: the air. Because he's a jerk, he's a bad guy.
Speaker 1: He celebrated when Tucker Carlson was kicked off of Fox News,
Speaker 1: he celebrates when bad things happen to conservatives and Republicans
Speaker 1: all the time. He's not funny, he's a jerk, he's
Speaker 1: a sub mediocrity, not talented, and you can just tell
Speaker 1: that he's been a tool of the lib elites for
Speaker 1: a long time.
Speaker 2: That's it, And so I'll get.
Speaker 1: Into a little more of the specifics here, but I
Speaker 1: just first want to celebrate this. And it's funny to
Speaker 1: me that all these Democrats are saying, oh my gosh,
Speaker 1: but what's gonna happen now. What's gonna happen now is
Speaker 1: there's one less overpaid jerk on television making fun of
Speaker 1: half the country and lying to the half of the
Speaker 1: country that actually agrees with this guy. By the way,
Speaker 1: very few people watch him. He was fourth in fourth place.
Speaker 1: They always say third place. No, no, he's behind Guttfeld's number one.
Speaker 1: So he's behind Guttfeld and whoever the other ones are.
Speaker 1: And because I guess Colbert is done too. Oh maybe
Speaker 1: it's third now because Colbert's gone. Whatever point is, he's
Speaker 1: the worst. He had like a million viewers, which for
Speaker 1: that kind of a show on a network is preposterous.
Speaker 1: I mean, the Tonight Show with Jane Leno had episodes
Speaker 1: at its absolute peak?
Speaker 3: Was it Tonight Shows Jay Leno?
Speaker 2: Right?
Speaker 1: I was get Late Showman. I didn't really watch this.
Speaker 1: This is where Clay I disagree. I was always a
Speaker 1: Leno guy, not a Letterman guy, even though I'm from
Speaker 1: New York and I feel like you're supposed to like
Speaker 1: Letterman in New York Letterman was I just thought he
Speaker 1: was just kind of snide. I never really liked him.
Speaker 1: I didn't get it anyway. Leno seemed to me like
Speaker 1: he was at least jolly, so I like that more.
Speaker 1: But on that show in the nineties, there were episodes
Speaker 1: that were twelve to fifteen million viewers. It was crazy
Speaker 1: viewers in some of those episodes, so a million for
Speaker 1: Jimmy Kimmel. The ratings are trash, So I do think
Speaker 1: because people are going to say this to me, Oh.
Speaker 2: But Buck, they wanted to get rid of him. They
Speaker 2: wanted to get rid of him.
Speaker 3: That's why. Yeah, I'm sure they did.
Speaker 1: But they also realized they had a problem on their
Speaker 1: hands with what he said about the Charlie Kirk assassination.
Speaker 1: They also realized that this is a guy who wasn't
Speaker 1: going to be increasing audience at any point. Really just
Speaker 1: not that not not very talented, and I mean, honestly,
Speaker 1: I've never heard him say anything funny.
Speaker 2: If you he has a staff of probably.
Speaker 1: I would guess ten to twenty writers who are writing
Speaker 1: jokes from all the time. If you have ten to
Speaker 1: twenty people who are writing jokes for you. You would
Speaker 1: think you could be funny, right, That's their only job
Speaker 1: is to write your jokes. He's not funny. He's just
Speaker 1: not a very good comedian. I mean the best work
Speaker 1: he ever did was The Man Show, which.
Speaker 3: Was very.
Speaker 1: Very uh, you know, locker room comedy kind of stuff,
Speaker 1: bathroom humor, and you know, a lot of stuff about boobs,
Speaker 1: but not that's anything wrong with boobs, but it's just
Speaker 1: enough of this guy, Jimmy Kimmel on the TV.
Speaker 3: Okay, So that's from a.
Speaker 1: Taste and content perspective, I understand that there's going to
Speaker 1: be all these people and they say that, oh, well,
Speaker 1: what about the First Amendment, as if Democrats care about
Speaker 1: the First Amendment at all. I'm sorry, We've seen this
Speaker 1: play out too many times. We're very aware of the
Speaker 1: game that they play, which is, when it's someone they like,
Speaker 1: the First Amendment matters, and the First Amendment extends to
Speaker 1: that person, have that job paid a lot of money
Speaker 1: by a private company, always in forever because that person
Speaker 1: agrees with them, And any public pressure or any public
Speaker 1: rebuke of some lib who has some privileged perch in
Speaker 1: the media is somehow a First Amendment issue. You know,
Speaker 1: like they like they pulled Colbert because he sucks and
Speaker 1: because the show is losing a ton of money.
Speaker 2: They're like, ugh, but he's stood up against Trump.
Speaker 3: So this is really no, it's not about the First Amendment.
Speaker 2: It's about he's not good.
Speaker 1: It's about he's not doing a show that people want
Speaker 1: to watch that draws a large enough audience for advertisers
Speaker 1: to want to continue to spend the preposterous money they
Speaker 1: spend to be on these programs in the first place.
Speaker 1: By the way, it's all there's all kind of a
Speaker 1: lot of insider deals that go on here with the
Speaker 1: libs who run the Madison Avenue agencies and the libs
Speaker 1: who run the you know, the production and the corporate
Speaker 1: side of Comcast or CBS or Paramount or you know,
Speaker 1: all these different corporate entities, and they know each other,
Speaker 1: and they're all just keeping that cash flowing through each other.
Speaker 1: And they're Democrats somehow. The Democrats, and this is a
Speaker 1: whole other conversation, have taken over all these places, with
Speaker 1: the exception of Fox News.
Speaker 3: And they're able to just do whatever they want.
Speaker 1: Well, they have to have people at least that have
Speaker 1: an audience, right, say what you will about John Stewart
Speaker 1: in the early two thousands that I've said a lot.
Speaker 1: I mean, he's a propagandist, he's very dishonest, but he
Speaker 1: was clever, he was good at his job, and he
Speaker 1: made a lot of money because he drew a big
Speaker 1: audience to a show that wouldn't have had it otherwise.
Speaker 1: That's capitalism. I mean, it is gross, but it's still capitalism.
Speaker 1: But what you have here with Jimmy Kimmel is the
Speaker 1: market working as it should. But then let's talk about
Speaker 1: the First Amendment here, because there's a big problem the
Speaker 1: Democrats have with this. Oh my gosh, the FCC commissioner
Speaker 1: said that they should clean up their act over at
Speaker 1: at ABC with Kimmel. We'll get to this in a second,
Speaker 1: but our sponsored Paradigm Press wants to tell you that
Speaker 1: AI is a big deal. As technology advances go, artificial
Speaker 1: intelligence will be a game chan a historic, epic changing
Speaker 1: game changer. And we let on the AI front before
Speaker 1: Biden came along. Then we lost some of that, but
Speaker 1: Trump is getting us back at the very top of
Speaker 1: the game. The AI zar is doing a phenomenal job,
Speaker 1: and this administration is preparing an estimated trillion plus dollar investment,
Speaker 1: drawing in multiple partners what I call Manhattan Project too.
Speaker 1: It could trigger an investment boom as soon as October fifteenth.
Speaker 1: I break it all down in a brand new interview,
Speaker 1: including the companies I believe could soar when this comes about.
Speaker 1: Find this interview in all the details online at a
Speaker 1: new website. The website is offair twenty five dot com.
Speaker 1: That's off air twentyfive dot com, paid for by Paradigm Press.
Speaker 3: All right, so the.
Speaker 1: Libs are playing the oh my gosh, but the First
Speaker 1: Amendment game. All right, let's talk about the first event
Speaker 1: for a second.
Speaker 3: Shall we?
Speaker 2: Where were all of these people.
Speaker 1: Whether it's Chris Hayes over at MSNBC, which is still
Speaker 1: a thing apparently I think they're changing it too, MS
Speaker 1: now or something. Where were all these people when in
Speaker 1: June of twenty four June of twenty twenty four, the
Speaker 1: Supreme Court said that you know what, the Yeah, the
Speaker 1: Biden administration absolutely pressured social media companies during COVID. But
Speaker 1: bringing a lawsuit now, you can't prove that they made
Speaker 1: those decisions because of the pressure, and you don't have standing.
Speaker 2: And you can't prove.
Speaker 3: That these that they're going to do it again.
Speaker 1: So for these essentially technicalities, we're going to allow the
Speaker 1: government to use third parties to censor private speech. The
Speaker 1: government can coerce third parties for speech censorship, and you
Speaker 1: can't because you can't even prove a discernible harm from this.
Speaker 1: According to the majority, it was a six to three decision.
Speaker 1: Of course, the cowards, the coward Roberts and the mediocrity
Speaker 1: Amy Cony Barrett went with the psycho.
Speaker 3: Libs on that one. That's how they got to the
Speaker 3: six three. Uh. But yeah, this is where we are, folks.
Speaker 1: They the Supreme Court weighed in and said, the government
Speaker 1: is allowed to agitate private companies to make certain kinds
Speaker 1: of decisions, and unless you can prove that there was
Speaker 1: some specific government action taken to harm that company, you
Speaker 1: don't really have any standing. So I just want to
Speaker 1: know where we're all the First Amendment? Where are all
Speaker 1: these First Amendment absolutists. Oh my gosh, we need the
Speaker 1: acou Where are they?
Speaker 3: Where were all of those people?
Speaker 1: When the Supreme Court said that the massive censorship industrial
Speaker 1: complex of the covid era was fine, they had no.
Speaker 3: Problem with that.
Speaker 1: So, okay, these are the rules. These are the rules.
Speaker 1: So I don't want to hear any complaints about this.
Speaker 1: I don't want to hear any whining from these libs.
Speaker 1: I just simply do not care. And that's where it is.
Speaker 1: I think Trump should just say whatever he wants about
Speaker 1: whatever companies are doing, because the Supreme Court says decided
Speaker 1: this is what it's gonna be. If they're gonna let
Speaker 1: people get away, if they're gonna let the Biden White
Speaker 1: House get away with having individual Americans singled out by
Speaker 1: the White House for censorship pressure on the most powerful
Speaker 1: speech platforms in the world. Which is a fact. It
Speaker 1: happened to my friend Alex Parentson, happened to other people.
Speaker 1: It is a fact that has happened. If that's those
Speaker 1: are the rules, this is the game we're playing. Okay, fine,
Speaker 1: Trump's gonna tell these companies. You know, I think that
Speaker 1: guy's I think that guy stinks. You should take him
Speaker 1: off air. I didn't do it into you. I'm just
Speaker 1: telling you I think these stinks. You can't prove a harm,
Speaker 1: you don't have standing. See how that works.
Speaker 2: Oh no, libs, So sad, let's.
Speaker 1: Talk about preborn every day, there are thousands of women
Speaker 1: across our nation contending with an unplanned pregnancy, and there's
Speaker 1: so many different pressures out there to choose abortion, which
Speaker 1: is just tragic. But the Preborn network of clinics are
Speaker 1: offering hope. They step in and offer life for that
Speaker 1: child and compassion for that pregnant mother that she may
Speaker 1: not get anywhere else. The Preborn Clinics begin this whole
Speaker 1: journey with a free ultrasound for that mom when she
Speaker 1: walks into that clinic, and that moment, that that connection
Speaker 1: between mother and child so often is just the game
Speaker 1: changer for the decision for life. Over three hundred and
Speaker 1: fifty thousand babies have been saved through this life giving work,
Speaker 1: and so many mothers have an entirely new outlook and
Speaker 1: a love in their heart. So this is so important.
Speaker 1: Please donate. It's happening every day. Preborn is there for
Speaker 1: these moms and these tiny babies. Twenty eight dollars a
Speaker 1: month can save a life. That's the price of a
Speaker 1: free ultrasound for these moms when they walk in. Twenty
Speaker 1: eight dollars a month, you'd be saving a baby a month.
Speaker 1: With Preborn's help, Dial pound two fifty and say the
Speaker 1: keyword baby. That's pound two five zero say the word baby,
Speaker 1: or go to preborn dot com slash buck that's preborn
Speaker 1: dot com slash b u c K.
Speaker 3: One more thing.
Speaker 1: The Cato Institute put out an analysis of murders by
Speaker 1: political ideology since nineteen seventy five, excluding nine to eleven.
Speaker 1: And you might say that seems very specific. Why nineteen
Speaker 1: seventy five, that's kind of a oh oh, they're going
Speaker 1: back fifty years. Interesting, they're leaving out and quite a
Speaker 1: period there, aren't they Like the late sixties and the
Speaker 1: early seventies. There's a lot of really bad stuff that
Speaker 1: was going on. If your re membory, you know, but
Speaker 1: you know, weather underground, you start to think about this.
Speaker 1: But the bigger problem is that this analysis of murders
Speaker 1: by political ideology, which of course shows that the right
Speaker 1: is far and away the uh, you know, the biggest
Speaker 1: it's three hundred and ninety one murders. Islamism is one
Speaker 1: hundred and forty three murders, and leftists.
Speaker 3: Are only sixty five murders.
Speaker 1: That's what they want to tell you over at the
Speaker 1: Cato Institute, which is a garbage a garbage thing.
Speaker 3: Think they leave out nine to eleven.
Speaker 1: They just excluded They say that, right, and thing like, yeah,
Speaker 1: we're just not including nine to eleven.
Speaker 2: Ah, oh, you know this is real.
Speaker 3: Yeah. The team can't even believe this.
Speaker 2: I told you. They did this to me at C
Speaker 2: and M one.
Speaker 3: They put me up.
Speaker 1: They're like, well, explain this. Look at all the right
Speaker 1: wing murders that have happened in the last twenty years.
Speaker 1: You know, this is back when it was this is
Speaker 1: like twenty twenty fifteen, right, So like, look at all
Speaker 1: the right wing murders over the last twenty years. And
Speaker 1: they're like, there's so many more than Islamic murders. So
Speaker 1: why are you so concerned about Islamism? And I'm like, you, guys,
Speaker 1: cut out the three thousand people who were killed on
Speaker 1: nine to eleven by ji honists, the worst terrorist attack
Speaker 1: in the history of the planet. You just how do
Speaker 1: you think cutting that out is a valid way to
Speaker 1: get a sense of the threat. And by the way,
Speaker 1: and I've had to make this argument before too, we
Speaker 1: have spent probably trillions of dollars over the last twenty
Speaker 1: some odd years trying to stop another nine to eleven.
Speaker 3: Okay, so we're.
Speaker 1: Spending we're not spending trillions of dollars trying to stop
Speaker 1: the next Amish terror attack.
Speaker 3: I can assure you.
Speaker 1: So it's not even just the attacks that have happened,
Speaker 1: it's all the plots that we have stopped and all
Speaker 1: the resources and time and effort to stop those plots.
Speaker 1: I've been in the offices in this country where this
Speaker 1: is the mission, and I can tell you it is
Speaker 1: Muslims who want to blow up people that are the
Speaker 1: premier terror threat of the last twenty five years, without question.
Speaker 1: And if you're going to start to look at the
Speaker 1: So that's part one, and I just love this though
Speaker 1: just excluding nine to eleven, I don't know, it's kind
Speaker 1: of excluding Pearl Harbor makes it pretty difficult to understand
Speaker 1: why World War two got the US involved, right, I
Speaker 1: mean that this seems a little weird.
Speaker 3: Just skip that one.
Speaker 1: But then there's also when you look at the I
Speaker 1: looked at some of the data set that they have.
Speaker 1: I mean, they have all these different people that they're
Speaker 1: claiming a right wing like some guy who was upset
Speaker 1: at the like he was getting massage parlor stuff and
Speaker 1: he killed some ladies who worked in the massage parlor
Speaker 1: and he was just like a nut. They're calling that
Speaker 1: right wing terrorism. All we know about the guys that
Speaker 1: he was getting massages and there were like prostitutes that
Speaker 1: work there and he was like upset about it and
Speaker 1: you kill I mean this guy, how is he right wing?
Speaker 1: There are other guys. There are immigrants who are non
Speaker 1: white who are basically in cells who have killed people,
Speaker 1: and they count that as right wing terrorism. When you
Speaker 1: look at the list, you go so basically, everything that's
Speaker 1: a murder that's really weird that doesn't have somebody who
Speaker 1: says I'm a Trantifa, you know, Bernie bro left wing
Speaker 1: and even then they try to exclude that. But everything
Speaker 1: that's a murder that has some kind of psychological psychiatric
Speaker 1: component is right wing according to this data set. Yeah,
Speaker 1: it's it's nuts. It's really nuts. They're liars, that's not
Speaker 1: a surprise. But I'm here to hold them to account.
Speaker 1: Thanks for hanging everybody,