WEBVTT - Venezuela Debt Gets China Support, AllianceBernstein's Khan Says

0:00:05.800 --> 0:00:08.360
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to the Bloomberg p m L Podcast. I'm pim

0:00:08.400 --> 0:00:11.440
<v Speaker 1>Fox along with my co host Lisa Bramowitz. Each day

0:00:11.480 --> 0:00:15.000
<v Speaker 1>we bring you the most important, noteworthy, and useful interviews

0:00:15.040 --> 0:00:17.520
<v Speaker 1>for you and your money, whether you're at the grocery

0:00:17.560 --> 0:00:20.560
<v Speaker 1>store or the trading floor. Find the Bloomberg p m

0:00:20.680 --> 0:00:32.040
<v Speaker 1>L Podcast on Apple Podcasts, SoundCloud, and Bloomberg dot com.

0:00:32.080 --> 0:00:34.800
<v Speaker 1>There was a report late yesterday in the Wall Street

0:00:34.880 --> 0:00:38.760
<v Speaker 1>Journal talking about how JP Morgan, which operates the main

0:00:39.080 --> 0:00:42.640
<v Speaker 1>benchmark that is used to invest in emerging markets debt,

0:00:42.760 --> 0:00:46.160
<v Speaker 1>the JP Morgan may be forced to remove Venezuelan debt

0:00:46.320 --> 0:00:50.480
<v Speaker 1>from its benchmark index as a result of U S sanctions,

0:00:50.680 --> 0:00:54.200
<v Speaker 1>details of which are expected to be announced today. They

0:00:54.200 --> 0:00:55.800
<v Speaker 1>may have already been announced. They want to check that

0:00:55.840 --> 0:00:57.480
<v Speaker 1>because that was supposed to come at eleven. I want

0:00:57.480 --> 0:00:59.680
<v Speaker 1>to bring in Shamila Khan. She is director of Emerging

0:00:59.680 --> 0:01:03.720
<v Speaker 1>Market Debt and Alliance Bernstein in New York. And Shamila,

0:01:03.800 --> 0:01:06.800
<v Speaker 1>I want to start by talking about the market response

0:01:06.840 --> 0:01:09.680
<v Speaker 1>to some of the rumors. I have been very surprised

0:01:09.720 --> 0:01:12.360
<v Speaker 1>to see no market response, and I would think that

0:01:12.400 --> 0:01:16.040
<v Speaker 1>there would be a massive further decline in Venezuela bonds.

0:01:16.080 --> 0:01:19.760
<v Speaker 1>Should there be a removal of this UH, this particular

0:01:19.800 --> 0:01:23.120
<v Speaker 1>type of debt from benchmark indexes. What's going on here?

0:01:23.840 --> 0:01:26.200
<v Speaker 1>So what's going on really is a lot of uncertainty

0:01:26.240 --> 0:01:28.880
<v Speaker 1>in terms of what kind of sanctions are going to

0:01:28.959 --> 0:01:32.520
<v Speaker 1>be announced. To the extent that the U. S. Treasury

0:01:32.560 --> 0:01:34.760
<v Speaker 1>sticks to the kind of sanctions they employed at the

0:01:34.800 --> 0:01:38.640
<v Speaker 1>time of the Russian invasion of Ukraine UH and only

0:01:38.760 --> 0:01:42.240
<v Speaker 1>limit the sanctions to newly issued debt in the future

0:01:42.480 --> 0:01:46.200
<v Speaker 1>of Venezuelan entities, then the impact on the index is

0:01:46.240 --> 0:01:48.560
<v Speaker 1>going to be fairly negligible, which is why you're not

0:01:48.680 --> 0:01:54.200
<v Speaker 1>saying as seeing a tremendous price response UM in the bonds. UH.

0:01:54.240 --> 0:01:56.760
<v Speaker 1>In addition, there have been some humors, rumors in the

0:01:56.840 --> 0:02:00.240
<v Speaker 1>last day or so off you know, Chinese involvement in

0:02:01.480 --> 0:02:05.760
<v Speaker 1>helping the Venezuelan government make its Maartom payments UM, which

0:02:05.760 --> 0:02:08.600
<v Speaker 1>are being negotiated in China by Venezuelan officials that have

0:02:08.720 --> 0:02:12.120
<v Speaker 1>been further supportive of prices. Wow, that's really interesting. I

0:02:12.160 --> 0:02:14.360
<v Speaker 1>just want to bring you some headlines related to this.

0:02:14.480 --> 0:02:17.920
<v Speaker 1>So President Trump has just as we were introducing you,

0:02:18.280 --> 0:02:22.040
<v Speaker 1>Trump signed an executive order on new Venezuela sanctions that

0:02:22.080 --> 0:02:26.840
<v Speaker 1>include UH some ban in dealing in new debt and

0:02:26.919 --> 0:02:30.000
<v Speaker 1>equity from the state run oil company which is trades

0:02:30.080 --> 0:02:33.799
<v Speaker 1>under the tick Peta VESA, as well as Venezuela Venezuela

0:02:33.840 --> 0:02:37.920
<v Speaker 1>government issued debt and equity UM. We had been hearing

0:02:38.240 --> 0:02:41.000
<v Speaker 1>that this could be potentially nuanced so that it wouldn't

0:02:41.040 --> 0:02:45.200
<v Speaker 1>necessarily affect people in the US trading existing bonds between

0:02:45.280 --> 0:02:47.680
<v Speaker 1>each other. But we still need to parse through the

0:02:47.720 --> 0:02:49.760
<v Speaker 1>details and we will bring them to you when we

0:02:49.840 --> 0:02:53.480
<v Speaker 1>get them. But Shamila, what about from your perspective, does

0:02:53.480 --> 0:02:58.000
<v Speaker 1>Alliance Bernstein own Venezuela and debt? Have you been selling

0:02:58.240 --> 0:03:01.080
<v Speaker 1>your holdings of it? And now where do you expect

0:03:01.080 --> 0:03:04.560
<v Speaker 1>to go from here with those holdings? So, Alliance Pornstein

0:03:04.639 --> 0:03:07.919
<v Speaker 1>manages a number of funds that are benchmarked to emerging

0:03:07.960 --> 0:03:12.160
<v Speaker 1>market solvereign in disease that include Venezuela debt. As such,

0:03:12.280 --> 0:03:15.160
<v Speaker 1>we are holders of Venezuela debt. But our stance in

0:03:15.240 --> 0:03:19.240
<v Speaker 1>Venezuela has been very defensive for some time, and the

0:03:19.280 --> 0:03:21.960
<v Speaker 1>way we think about Venezuela is really take a very

0:03:22.000 --> 0:03:27.000
<v Speaker 1>strong fundamental stance with respect to these country's um future

0:03:27.639 --> 0:03:30.919
<v Speaker 1>with respect to ability to pay back its debt um.

0:03:30.960 --> 0:03:33.600
<v Speaker 1>There is no real reason Venezuela should be in the

0:03:33.639 --> 0:03:37.400
<v Speaker 1>economic situation it is in right now. Uh. It has

0:03:37.440 --> 0:03:41.840
<v Speaker 1>a lot of resources and it definitely does not appear

0:03:41.880 --> 0:03:44.480
<v Speaker 1>to us a solvency issue, but rather a liquidity issue

0:03:44.720 --> 0:03:46.640
<v Speaker 1>and the fact that the country does not have a

0:03:46.640 --> 0:03:49.600
<v Speaker 1>credible regime and has not been able to attract investment

0:03:49.640 --> 0:03:52.680
<v Speaker 1>into the country. We do not see the current situation

0:03:52.720 --> 0:03:55.480
<v Speaker 1>as a sustainable situation. We do believe that there will

0:03:55.520 --> 0:03:57.720
<v Speaker 1>be a change in the future which will lead to

0:03:57.760 --> 0:04:01.040
<v Speaker 1>a better economic situation in Venezuela. And when we are

0:04:01.120 --> 0:04:04.520
<v Speaker 1>putting together our exposures, we keep this fundamental view in mind,

0:04:04.960 --> 0:04:08.400
<v Speaker 1>because our investments are always forward looking as far as

0:04:08.440 --> 0:04:11.880
<v Speaker 1>fundamentals are concerned. Well, Shamala, I just want to give

0:04:11.920 --> 0:04:13.640
<v Speaker 1>you the opportunity. I mean, if you're talking about the

0:04:13.640 --> 0:04:17.640
<v Speaker 1>country's ability to repay it stead or potential ability, what

0:04:17.720 --> 0:04:20.960
<v Speaker 1>about the potential ability of the country to restructure itself.

0:04:21.000 --> 0:04:22.559
<v Speaker 1>I mean, that doesn't look like it's going to happen,

0:04:22.560 --> 0:04:26.040
<v Speaker 1>at least internally. And uh, have you had any pushback

0:04:26.080 --> 0:04:28.599
<v Speaker 1>from investors who say, you know what, we really don't

0:04:28.640 --> 0:04:32.719
<v Speaker 1>want our money being lent to any entity that is

0:04:32.720 --> 0:04:36.640
<v Speaker 1>supported by such a repressive regime. That's absolutely true, and

0:04:36.720 --> 0:04:39.680
<v Speaker 1>that is something that we don't think is sustainable. We

0:04:39.720 --> 0:04:42.760
<v Speaker 1>do not believe that the repressive regime is a sustainable

0:04:42.920 --> 0:04:47.440
<v Speaker 1>regime in the near future, uh and in the medium term,

0:04:47.800 --> 0:04:50.080
<v Speaker 1>as a result of which we believe that there will

0:04:50.120 --> 0:04:52.680
<v Speaker 1>be a change to a more credible regime which will

0:04:52.760 --> 0:04:55.880
<v Speaker 1>be able to put together policies um and that is

0:04:56.040 --> 0:04:58.039
<v Speaker 1>what we are looking for in order to be less

0:04:58.080 --> 0:05:01.000
<v Speaker 1>defensive in our positioning in when as Allah. The other

0:05:01.040 --> 0:05:03.520
<v Speaker 1>thing to keep in mind is that prices are already

0:05:03.560 --> 0:05:06.039
<v Speaker 1>at very depressed levels. They are at all time lows

0:05:06.080 --> 0:05:07.920
<v Speaker 1>and for many of the bonds, and they are treating

0:05:08.360 --> 0:05:11.440
<v Speaker 1>below what has been historically the recovery rates on emerging

0:05:11.480 --> 0:05:15.320
<v Speaker 1>market sovereigns. So to a great extent, this country is

0:05:15.360 --> 0:05:20.080
<v Speaker 1>already pricing in a restructuring of its external debt, Shamila. So,

0:05:20.440 --> 0:05:23.720
<v Speaker 1>given the fact that we are getting now new sanctions

0:05:23.800 --> 0:05:26.880
<v Speaker 1>by the US on Venezuela debt and equity, do you

0:05:27.040 --> 0:05:29.680
<v Speaker 1>have any sense of how this could affect your day

0:05:29.680 --> 0:05:32.960
<v Speaker 1>to day? Does this change anything about the way you

0:05:33.040 --> 0:05:38.320
<v Speaker 1>approach investing in Venezuela well? We were expecting sanctions from

0:05:38.360 --> 0:05:40.400
<v Speaker 1>the United States, so this is something that we have

0:05:40.520 --> 0:05:45.640
<v Speaker 1>taken into consideration when constructing our own portfolios, and at

0:05:45.640 --> 0:05:49.080
<v Speaker 1>this point as we are really seeing the headlines come

0:05:49.120 --> 0:05:52.679
<v Speaker 1>out as we speak. From what I can understand based

0:05:52.720 --> 0:05:54.960
<v Speaker 1>on what I'm reading right now, it is a ban

0:05:55.080 --> 0:05:57.880
<v Speaker 1>on dealing in new debt, which is debt which will

0:05:57.920 --> 0:06:00.520
<v Speaker 1>be issued in the future, which would not impact any

0:06:00.520 --> 0:06:03.520
<v Speaker 1>of the existing debt. There are some headlines about certain

0:06:03.560 --> 0:06:07.400
<v Speaker 1>bonds possibly getting impacted. It's unclear to me which bonds

0:06:07.440 --> 0:06:09.719
<v Speaker 1>those are, but what we have tried to do is

0:06:09.760 --> 0:06:13.559
<v Speaker 1>limit our holdings to the Venezuelan bonds, which we believe

0:06:13.560 --> 0:06:16.640
<v Speaker 1>will not be controversial with respect to payments and are

0:06:16.680 --> 0:06:20.520
<v Speaker 1>generally accepted by the opposition as legal debt. Thank you

0:06:20.600 --> 0:06:22.839
<v Speaker 1>very much for being with us. Shamaila Khan is the

0:06:22.880 --> 0:06:26.440
<v Speaker 1>director of Emerging Market Debt for Alliance Bernstein And once again,

0:06:26.920 --> 0:06:31.080
<v Speaker 1>President Donald Trump has signed an order that imposes new

0:06:31.200 --> 0:06:34.039
<v Speaker 1>U S sanctions on Venezuela and debt. This is new

0:06:34.080 --> 0:06:36.800
<v Speaker 1>debt from the government as well as from the state

0:06:37.120 --> 0:06:52.680
<v Speaker 1>oil company Petasa. Well, how about ordering your dinner from Amazon.

0:06:52.839 --> 0:06:56.200
<v Speaker 1>It doesn't seem too far of idea, and indeed, with

0:06:56.240 --> 0:06:58.560
<v Speaker 1>the purchase of Whole Foods, it seems like something is

0:06:58.600 --> 0:07:00.359
<v Speaker 1>going to happen at least next week and terms of

0:07:00.400 --> 0:07:02.400
<v Speaker 1>prices here. To tell us more about the effect on

0:07:02.400 --> 0:07:06.400
<v Speaker 1>the grocery store industry is Shira Overday are technology columnists

0:07:06.400 --> 0:07:09.920
<v Speaker 1>are Bloomberg gad Fly. She follows all of this technology

0:07:09.960 --> 0:07:13.040
<v Speaker 1>for our fast commentary section of Bloomberg and you can

0:07:13.040 --> 0:07:16.000
<v Speaker 1>follow her on Twitter at Shira Overday. And also whether

0:07:16.040 --> 0:07:19.200
<v Speaker 1>us we have Sarah Halzac, our retail columnist for Bloomberg

0:07:19.240 --> 0:07:21.680
<v Speaker 1>gad Fly. It's all coming together and you can follow

0:07:21.960 --> 0:07:25.640
<v Speaker 1>Sarah at on Twitter at Sarah Halzack. Um. You know, Sarah,

0:07:25.640 --> 0:07:28.280
<v Speaker 1>maybe we should just start with you, as uh, someone

0:07:28.320 --> 0:07:33.520
<v Speaker 1>that's following retail. What effect do you believe the move

0:07:33.600 --> 0:07:35.880
<v Speaker 1>by Amazon to acquire Whole Foods? What do you think

0:07:35.920 --> 0:07:39.200
<v Speaker 1>it will make the other grocery stores do, because they're

0:07:39.200 --> 0:07:41.160
<v Speaker 1>not going to just sit back and wait for someone

0:07:41.200 --> 0:07:44.160
<v Speaker 1>else to take their market share away. That's exactly right,

0:07:44.200 --> 0:07:46.040
<v Speaker 1>and I think what it's gonna do is really put

0:07:46.080 --> 0:07:48.840
<v Speaker 1>pressure on them to squeeze every bit of pricing they

0:07:48.880 --> 0:07:52.320
<v Speaker 1>can out of what they're offering to customers. You know,

0:07:52.440 --> 0:07:54.520
<v Speaker 1>Whole Foods for a long time now has had this

0:07:54.600 --> 0:07:58.400
<v Speaker 1>reputation as whole paycheck. They really hadn't been competitive on

0:07:58.400 --> 0:08:01.280
<v Speaker 1>a price front. And so as consumer gets more health

0:08:01.360 --> 0:08:04.320
<v Speaker 1>minded and they want these organics, there's been a lot

0:08:04.360 --> 0:08:07.640
<v Speaker 1>of room for other grocers to take share their Kroger, Walmart,

0:08:07.680 --> 0:08:10.560
<v Speaker 1>all the legal they're offering these kinds of products at

0:08:10.560 --> 0:08:13.240
<v Speaker 1>better prices. Now that Amazon is going to make Whole

0:08:13.280 --> 0:08:15.920
<v Speaker 1>Foods get serious about being competitive in that way, it

0:08:15.960 --> 0:08:18.520
<v Speaker 1>really throws down the gauntlet to the rest of the sector. Shira,

0:08:18.600 --> 0:08:21.440
<v Speaker 1>I want to bring you in here from the Amazon perspective.

0:08:21.880 --> 0:08:24.560
<v Speaker 1>It's not that novel of an idea. If you cut prices,

0:08:24.560 --> 0:08:26.720
<v Speaker 1>people will be more interested in something, right, and this

0:08:26.760 --> 0:08:29.320
<v Speaker 1>is sort of it's but it's business model. But I

0:08:29.320 --> 0:08:32.440
<v Speaker 1>imagine that there are reasons that Whole Foods didn't have

0:08:32.600 --> 0:08:34.760
<v Speaker 1>lower prices to begin with. In other words, that cuts

0:08:34.760 --> 0:08:37.439
<v Speaker 1>into their margins and their profit margins. I mean, where

0:08:37.640 --> 0:08:41.240
<v Speaker 1>is the long term goal here for Amazon and how

0:08:41.280 --> 0:08:44.160
<v Speaker 1>profitable is this model? It's a fair quiesh. I mean,

0:08:44.200 --> 0:08:48.720
<v Speaker 1>it's it's worth noting that even a grocer like Whole Foods,

0:08:48.760 --> 0:08:52.360
<v Speaker 1>albeit an expensive grocer like Whole Foods has significantly better

0:08:52.400 --> 0:08:55.920
<v Speaker 1>operating margins than Amazon. Right You're talking five percent in

0:08:55.960 --> 0:08:58.400
<v Speaker 1>the last quarter for Whole Foods, a five percent operating

0:08:58.400 --> 0:09:01.240
<v Speaker 1>margins and two percent operating margins for Amason. So it's

0:09:01.240 --> 0:09:03.480
<v Speaker 1>weird when you acquire a grocer and you're buying a

0:09:03.559 --> 0:09:07.720
<v Speaker 1>higher margin business than the what you already have. But look,

0:09:08.000 --> 0:09:10.679
<v Speaker 1>you saw what Amazon did right away, which is really

0:09:10.800 --> 0:09:14.200
<v Speaker 1>it just shows their ruthless genius, which is they set

0:09:14.240 --> 0:09:17.679
<v Speaker 1>out on day one to change the perception of Whole

0:09:17.720 --> 0:09:22.200
<v Speaker 1>Foods as this expensive place to buy fancy groceries that

0:09:22.559 --> 0:09:25.320
<v Speaker 1>you know, they use the word savings and you know,

0:09:25.520 --> 0:09:29.199
<v Speaker 1>organic foods for everyone, uh several times in their news

0:09:29.240 --> 0:09:33.600
<v Speaker 1>announcement yesterday. And it's really about changing the perception and

0:09:33.640 --> 0:09:36.720
<v Speaker 1>getting more people in the door and starting to steal

0:09:36.720 --> 0:09:40.120
<v Speaker 1>that market share from other grocers. Well, you know these uh,

0:09:40.360 --> 0:09:41.920
<v Speaker 1>this idea that there's going to be let's say, a

0:09:41.960 --> 0:09:46.440
<v Speaker 1>membership program that would morph from Amazon Prime over to

0:09:46.520 --> 0:09:49.360
<v Speaker 1>let's say a point of sales system at Whole Foods,

0:09:49.920 --> 0:09:52.959
<v Speaker 1>is that something shure that you believe is just gonna,

0:09:53.120 --> 0:09:56.200
<v Speaker 1>you know, normally going to happen. I mean they endicate

0:09:57.040 --> 0:09:59.400
<v Speaker 1>I will say it's unclear exactly how that's gonna work, right.

0:09:59.440 --> 0:10:03.959
<v Speaker 1>Amazon's said yesterday that they're going to essentially make Amazon Prime,

0:10:04.040 --> 0:10:08.000
<v Speaker 1>their existing hundred dollar a year shopping club, into the

0:10:08.040 --> 0:10:11.240
<v Speaker 1>sort of loyalty card program for Whole Foods, and we

0:10:11.280 --> 0:10:13.240
<v Speaker 1>didn't get a lot of details, but you can sort

0:10:13.240 --> 0:10:16.960
<v Speaker 1>of imagine that Amazon will try to make it worth

0:10:17.320 --> 0:10:20.800
<v Speaker 1>Prime members time to shop at Whole Foods and not

0:10:20.880 --> 0:10:23.839
<v Speaker 1>at other places. And that's a clever idea. Well, and

0:10:24.360 --> 0:10:26.400
<v Speaker 1>just to follow up the idea about point of sale

0:10:26.559 --> 0:10:29.000
<v Speaker 1>is that maybe you will be in a situation in

0:10:29.000 --> 0:10:31.440
<v Speaker 1>which you will not have to actually give your credit

0:10:31.480 --> 0:10:35.800
<v Speaker 1>card or your cash in order to make a transit

0:10:36.240 --> 0:10:39.360
<v Speaker 1>a purchase at Whole Foods because you're a Prime customer,

0:10:39.520 --> 0:10:42.120
<v Speaker 1>you're logged in, you're done, it goes into your Amazon ACA.

0:10:42.240 --> 0:10:44.160
<v Speaker 1>Maybe I don't. I don't think we're there yet. We

0:10:44.280 --> 0:10:47.280
<v Speaker 1>will see exactly how they integrate the sort of cash

0:10:47.320 --> 0:10:50.400
<v Speaker 1>register system with Prime. But you can sort of imagine

0:10:50.520 --> 0:10:52.400
<v Speaker 1>where you go to check out, if you're a Prime member,

0:10:52.640 --> 0:10:56.360
<v Speaker 1>you get a better discount on those bananas or that

0:10:56.480 --> 0:10:58.440
<v Speaker 1>jar of peanut butter than you would if you're not

0:10:58.559 --> 0:11:01.160
<v Speaker 1>a Prime member. And again, it means that if your

0:11:01.240 --> 0:11:04.440
<v Speaker 1>prime member, and a lot tens of millions of Americans are,

0:11:04.920 --> 0:11:06.920
<v Speaker 1>that gives you an extra incentive to shop at Whole

0:11:06.920 --> 0:11:09.240
<v Speaker 1>Foods and not at the Kroger or whatever down the street.

0:11:09.400 --> 0:11:11.600
<v Speaker 1>And I just want to point out that Amazon shares

0:11:11.600 --> 0:11:15.319
<v Speaker 1>have actually been down for a third consecutive day, so

0:11:15.360 --> 0:11:18.480
<v Speaker 1>even though yes, Kroger shares and other grocery store shares

0:11:18.520 --> 0:11:21.880
<v Speaker 1>have gone down, although Kroger's bouncing back a little bit today, Uh,

0:11:21.920 --> 0:11:25.200
<v Speaker 1>you know, Amazon's down too with the question of profit margins.

0:11:25.520 --> 0:11:27.280
<v Speaker 1>But Sarah, I want to bring you back in here.

0:11:27.320 --> 0:11:31.960
<v Speaker 1>Amazon one in the retail war or is winning because

0:11:32.160 --> 0:11:36.680
<v Speaker 1>not just on lowering prices, they also found a way

0:11:36.679 --> 0:11:41.000
<v Speaker 1>to distribute goods efficiently and quickly as well as often cheap,

0:11:41.080 --> 0:11:43.480
<v Speaker 1>more cheaply but not always. Um, I want to give

0:11:43.520 --> 0:11:47.080
<v Speaker 1>you a chance to sort of argue the case for

0:11:47.400 --> 0:11:51.040
<v Speaker 1>why this may not work in the grocery industry. In

0:11:51.080 --> 0:11:53.880
<v Speaker 1>other words, does Amazon have to compete on a level

0:11:53.920 --> 0:11:57.319
<v Speaker 1>that goes beyond just lowering prices? And what is the

0:11:57.360 --> 0:12:00.640
<v Speaker 1>barrier to entry there? Yeah, so put some plea. A

0:12:00.720 --> 0:12:03.840
<v Speaker 1>perishable supply chain is just a whole different ball game

0:12:04.080 --> 0:12:06.319
<v Speaker 1>than the kind of supply chain the Amazon has built

0:12:06.320 --> 0:12:09.800
<v Speaker 1>already for selling US laundry detergent and selling US sweaters

0:12:09.840 --> 0:12:12.000
<v Speaker 1>and all that kind of stuff. Right, So, someone in

0:12:12.040 --> 0:12:14.000
<v Speaker 1>the grocery business once told me, for example, when you're

0:12:14.040 --> 0:12:17.000
<v Speaker 1>thinking about grocery delivery, you have to consider things like

0:12:17.040 --> 0:12:20.920
<v Speaker 1>that when bananas ripen, they emit something that makes apples

0:12:21.000 --> 0:12:23.560
<v Speaker 1>ripen at a different pace than if they were not

0:12:23.720 --> 0:12:26.520
<v Speaker 1>next to that banana. Right. This is supply chain no

0:12:26.640 --> 0:12:30.240
<v Speaker 1>how that the Walmarts and the Trader Joe's and Krogers

0:12:30.240 --> 0:12:32.920
<v Speaker 1>of the world had been building for a really long time.

0:12:33.320 --> 0:12:36.840
<v Speaker 1>The Amazon simply doesn't have. And so Whole Food certainly

0:12:36.880 --> 0:12:39.160
<v Speaker 1>has some of that know how, But it'll be interesting

0:12:39.160 --> 0:12:42.320
<v Speaker 1>to see how Amazon is able to kind of leverage

0:12:42.360 --> 0:12:46.840
<v Speaker 1>that and expand it more widely. Sarah, I beg your pardon. No,

0:12:46.920 --> 0:12:48.559
<v Speaker 1>I was just gonna say that. I mean, Sarah makes

0:12:48.559 --> 0:12:50.400
<v Speaker 1>a good point, which is that Amazon has been in

0:12:50.400 --> 0:12:54.840
<v Speaker 1>the grocery business for ten years. So they've had Amazon Fresh,

0:12:54.920 --> 0:12:57.640
<v Speaker 1>which is their grocery delivery service, up and running starting

0:12:57.640 --> 0:13:02.120
<v Speaker 1>in Seattle and in other market now to um for

0:13:02.200 --> 0:13:04.480
<v Speaker 1>ten years and it really hasn't made much of a

0:13:04.559 --> 0:13:07.240
<v Speaker 1>dent in the grocery industry, and that points to some

0:13:07.280 --> 0:13:10.000
<v Speaker 1>of the issues that Sarah pointed out, that they haven't

0:13:10.040 --> 0:13:14.760
<v Speaker 1>necessarily figured out the sort of logistical dynamics of the

0:13:14.760 --> 0:13:17.800
<v Speaker 1>grocery business quite yet. You know, they're smart people, they

0:13:17.840 --> 0:13:20.160
<v Speaker 1>can figure it out, but you know, ten years of

0:13:20.200 --> 0:13:23.240
<v Speaker 1>experience has shown that they haven't necessarily cracked it yet. Well,

0:13:23.400 --> 0:13:25.679
<v Speaker 1>and to your point, I just want to apply that

0:13:25.720 --> 0:13:28.600
<v Speaker 1>to whole foods, because, you know, Sarah, it looks as

0:13:28.600 --> 0:13:34.000
<v Speaker 1>though what the sales are perishable foods at whole foods, right,

0:13:34.040 --> 0:13:38.679
<v Speaker 1>nonperishable items they fare pretty poorly at whole foods, they do.

0:13:38.920 --> 0:13:40.640
<v Speaker 1>And I think that that sort of gets to this

0:13:40.720 --> 0:13:43.600
<v Speaker 1>idea that you know, people are willing to spend a

0:13:43.600 --> 0:13:45.719
<v Speaker 1>little bit more for the things they're putting inside their

0:13:45.720 --> 0:13:48.560
<v Speaker 1>bodies for feeling like they're having grass fed beef and

0:13:48.800 --> 0:13:52.360
<v Speaker 1>you know, chicken that's not treated with antibiotics. They're willing

0:13:52.400 --> 0:13:55.120
<v Speaker 1>to plunk down more money for those kinds of things.

0:13:55.280 --> 0:13:57.760
<v Speaker 1>The man for toilet paper, they're just not willing to

0:13:57.800 --> 0:14:01.040
<v Speaker 1>pay a premium, and so that that's one challenging thing

0:14:01.040 --> 0:14:02.559
<v Speaker 1>they'll have to contend with. You know, I think it's

0:14:02.559 --> 0:14:05.440
<v Speaker 1>really interesting to note that back in two thousand nine,

0:14:05.480 --> 0:14:08.880
<v Speaker 1>when Whole Foods had only two d seventy three stores. Uh.

0:14:09.000 --> 0:14:12.520
<v Speaker 1>Some research from canter Retail shows that seven percent of

0:14:12.559 --> 0:14:15.320
<v Speaker 1>shoppers said during that time period they visited Whole Foods

0:14:15.360 --> 0:14:18.880
<v Speaker 1>on a monthly basis. Now they have over four hundred stores.

0:14:19.320 --> 0:14:21.640
<v Speaker 1>The sheriff shoppers that visit them on a monthly basis

0:14:21.720 --> 0:14:25.520
<v Speaker 1>is virtually unchanged. So they're really having trouble growing the

0:14:25.600 --> 0:14:28.960
<v Speaker 1>base of customers who are interested in their product. And

0:14:29.000 --> 0:14:33.240
<v Speaker 1>I think that that package dry goods uh price issue

0:14:33.360 --> 0:14:35.480
<v Speaker 1>is a big one. Thank you so much for joining

0:14:35.520 --> 0:14:38.080
<v Speaker 1>us great insight. Sarah how Zac and Shara over Day,

0:14:38.320 --> 0:14:42.240
<v Speaker 1>both Godfly columnists, they don't jointly wrote a column on

0:14:42.320 --> 0:14:45.680
<v Speaker 1>this issue that's fabulous. Check it out Bloomberg dot com

0:14:45.840 --> 0:14:49.480
<v Speaker 1>slash god Fly, also on the Bloomberg at NI space

0:14:49.640 --> 0:15:06.000
<v Speaker 1>god Fly. The National Hurricane Center says that the storm

0:15:06.360 --> 0:15:10.200
<v Speaker 1>Hurricane Harvey has maximum sustained winds of a hundred and

0:15:10.240 --> 0:15:13.120
<v Speaker 1>ten miles per hour and it is just below the

0:15:13.160 --> 0:15:16.480
<v Speaker 1>category three level four A storm. Forecasters say the storm

0:15:16.520 --> 0:15:19.440
<v Speaker 1>is expected to reach that mark before making landfall late

0:15:19.480 --> 0:15:23.280
<v Speaker 1>today and early Saturday in Texas. And here to tell

0:15:23.400 --> 0:15:26.120
<v Speaker 1>us more about this is Shenando Bassu. He is a

0:15:26.160 --> 0:15:30.040
<v Speaker 1>meteorologist and gas analyst for Bloomberg New Energy Finance, and

0:15:30.080 --> 0:15:32.640
<v Speaker 1>he joins us here in our studio. Shenando, thanks very

0:15:32.720 --> 0:15:35.080
<v Speaker 1>much for being with us. Maybe just give everyone a

0:15:35.200 --> 0:15:37.840
<v Speaker 1>detailed over you know, view of what what we can

0:15:37.880 --> 0:15:41.640
<v Speaker 1>expect over the next let's says hey, Pam. Yeah, thanks

0:15:41.640 --> 0:15:43.920
<v Speaker 1>so much for having me here. So of course we

0:15:44.040 --> 0:15:46.680
<v Speaker 1>know that right now Hurricane Harvey is going to be

0:15:46.720 --> 0:15:49.600
<v Speaker 1>strengthening up to a category three. But what's unusual about

0:15:49.600 --> 0:15:52.640
<v Speaker 1>the storm really is how quickly it has intensified. It's

0:15:52.920 --> 0:15:57.280
<v Speaker 1>intensified so rapidly over the last forty eight hours UM

0:15:57.320 --> 0:15:59.600
<v Speaker 1>as of this morning, the central pressure down to about

0:15:59.640 --> 0:16:01.960
<v Speaker 1>nine and seendy millibars, and of course those wind speeds

0:16:01.960 --> 0:16:05.080
<v Speaker 1>making it up there to about ten. And the other

0:16:05.160 --> 0:16:07.800
<v Speaker 1>big piece of this is the duration and the amount

0:16:07.840 --> 0:16:10.320
<v Speaker 1>of rain that we're going to be getting. Um we're

0:16:10.320 --> 0:16:13.200
<v Speaker 1>looking at up to thirty or even over thirty inches

0:16:13.240 --> 0:16:16.920
<v Speaker 1>of rain in parts of the coastal part of Texas

0:16:17.000 --> 0:16:19.600
<v Speaker 1>as a result of the storm and the trajectory it's

0:16:19.600 --> 0:16:22.000
<v Speaker 1>expected to take, I mean even as late as next

0:16:22.080 --> 0:16:26.400
<v Speaker 1>Monday or Tuesday, that storm, Hurricane Harvey just still kind

0:16:26.400 --> 0:16:30.000
<v Speaker 1>of hovering over um the central and eastern part of

0:16:30.480 --> 0:16:33.240
<v Speaker 1>coastal Texas there. Yeah, people have talked about how it's

0:16:33.240 --> 0:16:36.040
<v Speaker 1>going to stall out over Texas and it's going to

0:16:36.120 --> 0:16:39.960
<v Speaker 1>be stalling out over populated areas of the state. What

0:16:40.160 --> 0:16:43.120
<v Speaker 1>have the evacuation order has been like and what is

0:16:43.160 --> 0:16:46.480
<v Speaker 1>the expected damage supposed to be? Yeah, I mean the

0:16:46.600 --> 0:16:48.840
<v Speaker 1>damage of course is a big part of this, certainly

0:16:48.920 --> 0:16:53.080
<v Speaker 1>to coastal oil and gas infrastructure. We've already been seeing

0:16:53.280 --> 0:16:56.440
<v Speaker 1>offshore platforms being evacuated on you know, all the major

0:16:56.520 --> 0:16:58.720
<v Speaker 1>oil companies and all their smaller e nps as well

0:16:58.840 --> 0:17:03.800
<v Speaker 1>evacuating their their oil platforms and UM as far as

0:17:04.080 --> 0:17:06.680
<v Speaker 1>you know, the gas gas infrastructure is a little bit

0:17:06.680 --> 0:17:08.879
<v Speaker 1>different though, because you know, we haven't seen that much

0:17:08.920 --> 0:17:11.720
<v Speaker 1>of a price movement yet in gas, and that's because

0:17:11.720 --> 0:17:14.359
<v Speaker 1>you know, ever since um, you know, two thousand and

0:17:14.400 --> 0:17:16.280
<v Speaker 1>eight with Gustav and Ike, you know, a lot of

0:17:16.320 --> 0:17:19.720
<v Speaker 1>that infrastructure has been beefed up, and also the gas

0:17:19.760 --> 0:17:23.280
<v Speaker 1>production environment has changed substantially, with a lot of that

0:17:23.320 --> 0:17:27.440
<v Speaker 1>production shifting over to the northeast. So as a result,

0:17:27.480 --> 0:17:29.399
<v Speaker 1>you know, we're not going to be seeing a whole

0:17:29.440 --> 0:17:32.560
<v Speaker 1>lot of movement in the gas markets from the supply side. Now,

0:17:32.840 --> 0:17:34.879
<v Speaker 1>going back to your point about the effects and the

0:17:35.080 --> 0:17:38.560
<v Speaker 1>demand is really the big story here. With um effects

0:17:38.640 --> 0:17:41.440
<v Speaker 1>of course of the power markets with multiple power outages

0:17:41.440 --> 0:17:44.359
<v Speaker 1>and that kind of thing, flooding impacting a lot of

0:17:44.400 --> 0:17:47.960
<v Speaker 1>the power assets down there, and also the wind farms

0:17:47.960 --> 0:17:51.000
<v Speaker 1>with the high winds that are expected tell us about

0:17:51.040 --> 0:17:54.280
<v Speaker 1>how the demand will go down number one, because it's

0:17:54.280 --> 0:17:57.240
<v Speaker 1>going to be a weekend and also you have the

0:17:57.280 --> 0:18:00.639
<v Speaker 1>situation it's just gonna be less use of electricity, yeah,

0:18:00.720 --> 0:18:03.880
<v Speaker 1>for sure, um. You know, with people evacuating the area,

0:18:03.920 --> 0:18:06.240
<v Speaker 1>and of course also industry shutting down. You know a

0:18:06.280 --> 0:18:08.720
<v Speaker 1>lot of the plants and and factories and so on

0:18:08.720 --> 0:18:10.960
<v Speaker 1>and so far in that area shutting down. You know,

0:18:11.000 --> 0:18:16.040
<v Speaker 1>we're expecting uh, just industrial demand alone to account for

0:18:16.040 --> 0:18:19.440
<v Speaker 1>about two to mc f of gas per day um.

0:18:19.520 --> 0:18:21.680
<v Speaker 1>So that that piece of it shutting down. Also, we

0:18:21.760 --> 0:18:25.199
<v Speaker 1>have a major nuclear plant, South Texas Nuclear that is

0:18:25.560 --> 0:18:30.040
<v Speaker 1>probably going to be shutting down maybe today or early tomorrow, um.

0:18:30.040 --> 0:18:32.920
<v Speaker 1>And that going offline accounts for about two gig lots

0:18:32.960 --> 0:18:35.399
<v Speaker 1>of power right there, so you know, and in the

0:18:35.440 --> 0:18:39.280
<v Speaker 1>aftermath of the storm, you know, gas generation will have

0:18:39.359 --> 0:18:41.640
<v Speaker 1>to fill in for that missing nuclear piece right there.

0:18:41.720 --> 0:18:44.320
<v Speaker 1>You know, it's interesting we were talking about this right

0:18:44.359 --> 0:18:47.440
<v Speaker 1>before the segment when we were talking about how gasoline

0:18:47.520 --> 0:18:51.280
<v Speaker 1>prices have increased. That's probably where you've seen the biggest

0:18:51.720 --> 0:18:56.240
<v Speaker 1>effect of this impending hurricane, with prices at one point

0:18:56.359 --> 0:19:00.280
<v Speaker 1>rising to the highest levels since November. Yet this will

0:19:00.280 --> 0:19:04.000
<v Speaker 1>not translate to higher prices that people end up paying

0:19:04.040 --> 0:19:07.760
<v Speaker 1>at the gas station simply because of the production. You

0:19:07.840 --> 0:19:10.080
<v Speaker 1>sort of touched on this, but can you give us

0:19:10.080 --> 0:19:13.560
<v Speaker 1>a sense of how much production has moved away, frankly

0:19:13.640 --> 0:19:16.720
<v Speaker 1>from this region in Texas and more up north to

0:19:16.920 --> 0:19:20.040
<v Speaker 1>say North Dakota and the shell production. Yeah, yeah, sure,

0:19:20.119 --> 0:19:22.119
<v Speaker 1>So I think there are a couple of pieces to that.

0:19:22.200 --> 0:19:24.439
<v Speaker 1>So the first is, of course, with the number of

0:19:24.480 --> 0:19:27.480
<v Speaker 1>refineries that have gone down just today, I think we're

0:19:27.560 --> 0:19:30.800
<v Speaker 1>just in just around the eight mark that has gone offline,

0:19:30.840 --> 0:19:32.960
<v Speaker 1>which is certainly higher than what you would see on

0:19:33.000 --> 0:19:34.760
<v Speaker 1>a you know, on a day to day kind of basis.

0:19:34.760 --> 0:19:38.200
<v Speaker 1>So that's what's taking a shot at the supply side

0:19:38.200 --> 0:19:40.840
<v Speaker 1>of gasoline. That's why we're seeing a rise in the

0:19:40.880 --> 0:19:44.800
<v Speaker 1>price there. As far as natural gas, however, um, because

0:19:44.840 --> 0:19:47.159
<v Speaker 1>now we're seeing so much more production in in in

0:19:47.359 --> 0:19:50.480
<v Speaker 1>the Marcellus regions up in Pennsylvania, and you know, the

0:19:50.520 --> 0:19:55.879
<v Speaker 1>northeastern general Gulf production has declined significantly over the last

0:19:56.200 --> 0:19:59.880
<v Speaker 1>you know, five to eight years, and so that air

0:20:00.040 --> 0:20:02.480
<v Speaker 1>yet that region as a you know, production region, the

0:20:02.520 --> 0:20:05.320
<v Speaker 1>importance of that has gone down real quick. Almost the

0:20:05.400 --> 0:20:07.560
<v Speaker 1>last time that we saw a storm of this magnitude

0:20:07.640 --> 0:20:12.560
<v Speaker 1>actually hit landfall in the US, UM in the US

0:20:12.720 --> 0:20:15.840
<v Speaker 1>in Texas two thousand and eight. Was that was the

0:20:15.920 --> 0:20:18.960
<v Speaker 1>last time we had a hurricane ike And was this

0:20:19.080 --> 0:20:21.280
<v Speaker 1>Is this going to be more or is this gonna

0:20:21.320 --> 0:20:23.520
<v Speaker 1>be weaker or stronger than I It's going to be

0:20:23.600 --> 0:20:26.680
<v Speaker 1>about the same or a little bit stronger. Yeah, especially

0:20:26.920 --> 0:20:31.200
<v Speaker 1>um with the precipitation in the rain. Yeah, definitely important

0:20:31.200 --> 0:20:33.600
<v Speaker 1>to watch and anyone who's listening, who is in that area,

0:20:33.720 --> 0:20:36.480
<v Speaker 1>please be safe. I am very concerned. It sounds like

0:20:36.480 --> 0:20:37.680
<v Speaker 1>it's going to be a lot of rain and a

0:20:37.760 --> 0:20:40.560
<v Speaker 1>lot of flooding and certainly very messy at the best

0:20:40.720 --> 0:20:44.440
<v Speaker 1>and uh and potentially life threatening it worse. Shenando Basso,

0:20:44.520 --> 0:20:46.679
<v Speaker 1>thank you so much for joining us. He's meteorologist and

0:20:46.720 --> 0:21:02.240
<v Speaker 1>gas analysts for Bloomberg New Energy Finance. Talking about Hurricane Harvey.

0:21:04.040 --> 0:21:07.040
<v Speaker 1>If you've noticed over the past couple of months, we've

0:21:07.080 --> 0:21:10.960
<v Speaker 1>been talking a lot about range bound markets, sleepy markets,

0:21:11.080 --> 0:21:15.359
<v Speaker 1>lack of volatility, lack of volumes, lack of impetus to sell,

0:21:15.640 --> 0:21:18.480
<v Speaker 1>but bullish and here to explain whether we're gonna see

0:21:18.480 --> 0:21:19.840
<v Speaker 1>anything that's going to break us out of this one

0:21:19.840 --> 0:21:22.840
<v Speaker 1>way or another is David Ader. He's chief macro strategistic

0:21:22.880 --> 0:21:26.600
<v Speaker 1>inform of financial intelligence. He is also a writer for

0:21:26.680 --> 0:21:30.240
<v Speaker 1>our Bloomberg Profits UH section that's part of Bloomberg View

0:21:30.280 --> 0:21:32.840
<v Speaker 1>and he also was the number one ranked US government

0:21:33.000 --> 0:21:38.200
<v Speaker 1>bonds strategist by Institutional Investor magazine for ten years. David,

0:21:38.240 --> 0:21:40.840
<v Speaker 1>thank you so much for joining us. You know I'd

0:21:40.840 --> 0:21:43.879
<v Speaker 1>love to get your sins Right now. We are seeing

0:21:44.480 --> 0:21:48.000
<v Speaker 1>treasury yields dip lower yet again, even as we see

0:21:48.200 --> 0:21:51.679
<v Speaker 1>UH markets rally, stock markets rally, I'm looking at a

0:21:51.760 --> 0:21:54.560
<v Speaker 1>ten year treasury yield UH that is lower than two

0:21:54.560 --> 0:21:57.400
<v Speaker 1>point two percent. Where do you think we're headed with

0:21:57.440 --> 0:22:01.240
<v Speaker 1>this treasury yield by the end of this year? Oh?

0:22:01.440 --> 0:22:04.760
<v Speaker 1>I I think that there's a great chance we'll see

0:22:04.840 --> 0:22:10.679
<v Speaker 1>two eleven. How's that for a traumatic call. I'm blown away,

0:22:11.320 --> 0:22:13.440
<v Speaker 1>isn't it isn't it. I mean for the balance of

0:22:13.520 --> 0:22:16.240
<v Speaker 1>the year, you know, I mean, I would like to think,

0:22:16.840 --> 0:22:20.280
<v Speaker 1>um that we will get a little more activity other

0:22:20.320 --> 0:22:24.119
<v Speaker 1>than these sort of six basis point weekly ranges. And

0:22:24.160 --> 0:22:26.480
<v Speaker 1>if I you know, with a bit of a bias,

0:22:26.560 --> 0:22:28.640
<v Speaker 1>I think that you know, we are going to say

0:22:28.840 --> 0:22:31.200
<v Speaker 1>I hate to say this term uncertainty is going into

0:22:31.280 --> 0:22:32.919
<v Speaker 1>the end of the year, as we get around the

0:22:32.960 --> 0:22:36.719
<v Speaker 1>dead ceiling, as we get around the possibility the likelihood

0:22:36.760 --> 0:22:40.080
<v Speaker 1>of a new FED chairman. And I think we're going

0:22:40.080 --> 0:22:42.600
<v Speaker 1>to continue with low inflation. So I think that there's

0:22:42.640 --> 0:22:45.600
<v Speaker 1>a risk that we could actually um take tens a

0:22:45.680 --> 0:22:49.679
<v Speaker 1>little bit below two percent. But I would not get

0:22:49.720 --> 0:22:52.960
<v Speaker 1>overly excited. I do not think the there's going to

0:22:53.000 --> 0:22:57.080
<v Speaker 1>be a big directional play in in yields for for

0:22:57.119 --> 0:23:00.280
<v Speaker 1>the balance of this year and and you know, very

0:23:00.320 --> 0:23:02.640
<v Speaker 1>possibly into next year, which raises a whole new set

0:23:02.640 --> 0:23:05.720
<v Speaker 1>of questions. Well, we've been getting a lot of warnings.

0:23:05.760 --> 0:23:09.080
<v Speaker 1>I guess whatever things feel like they're getting stagnant, we

0:23:09.080 --> 0:23:11.320
<v Speaker 1>start to get a lot of warnings of terrible things

0:23:11.359 --> 0:23:13.000
<v Speaker 1>to come. And we've gotten quite a few of them

0:23:13.400 --> 0:23:16.719
<v Speaker 1>from some pretty big investment managers that you know, the

0:23:16.800 --> 0:23:18.880
<v Speaker 1>end is ny and that markets are going to collapse

0:23:18.920 --> 0:23:21.960
<v Speaker 1>and that you know we're going to have a real correction. Um,

0:23:22.800 --> 0:23:25.720
<v Speaker 1>do you agree that there is something that's imminent and

0:23:25.720 --> 0:23:30.000
<v Speaker 1>and sort of uh bad, that's percolating under the surface.

0:23:30.040 --> 0:23:32.760
<v Speaker 1>And if so, where is where are we most at

0:23:32.840 --> 0:23:37.480
<v Speaker 1>risk of seeing some kind of problem? Where? Oh, I

0:23:37.520 --> 0:23:39.679
<v Speaker 1>think there is. I think that there's a big, huge

0:23:39.720 --> 0:23:42.040
<v Speaker 1>thing under the surface. I just don't know whether it's

0:23:42.080 --> 0:23:44.720
<v Speaker 1>going to prove bullish or bearish for interest great, And

0:23:44.760 --> 0:23:48.600
<v Speaker 1>I don't know what it is. I mean, um, the

0:23:48.680 --> 0:23:52.520
<v Speaker 1>economy is, it doesn't seem to be accelerating, it doesn't

0:23:52.520 --> 0:23:55.560
<v Speaker 1>seem to be decelerating. We're dealing with sort of this

0:23:55.640 --> 0:23:58.320
<v Speaker 1>muddling that we've dealt with for a very long time.

0:23:58.880 --> 0:24:03.560
<v Speaker 1>The maschinations out of Washington, the antics between the White

0:24:03.560 --> 0:24:06.320
<v Speaker 1>House and the Congress, I mean, have have no I

0:24:06.320 --> 0:24:07.840
<v Speaker 1>don't know if I want to use the term jump

0:24:07.880 --> 0:24:12.000
<v Speaker 1>the shark. But I think finally, the risk markets, the

0:24:12.200 --> 0:24:15.800
<v Speaker 1>risk markets are are losing their patients. So whether it's

0:24:15.800 --> 0:24:19.040
<v Speaker 1>about some physical stimulus or whether it's about tax reform,

0:24:19.080 --> 0:24:22.560
<v Speaker 1>and we start putting that off into um into next year,

0:24:22.560 --> 0:24:26.960
<v Speaker 1>with the potential of a default certainly over the debt

0:24:27.040 --> 0:24:30.199
<v Speaker 1>ceiling I think likely to reside with us, you know,

0:24:30.400 --> 0:24:34.639
<v Speaker 1>through October UM. And then the question about what is

0:24:35.000 --> 0:24:37.800
<v Speaker 1>what is the balanty reduction going to look like? And

0:24:37.840 --> 0:24:39.720
<v Speaker 1>I think all those things are going to put more

0:24:39.720 --> 0:24:43.440
<v Speaker 1>stressed on risk assets than on the treasury market. So

0:24:43.480 --> 0:24:47.239
<v Speaker 1>I would say that's where, um, that's where the risk is.

0:24:47.320 --> 0:24:50.560
<v Speaker 1>I mean valuations of course, are high credit spreads for example,

0:24:51.000 --> 0:24:54.720
<v Speaker 1>are type buy backs have slowed down? So that is

0:24:54.760 --> 0:24:57.960
<v Speaker 1>where I think we're going to we would feel it. Well, David,

0:24:58.040 --> 0:25:01.520
<v Speaker 1>what are you recommending that clients do that? Oh? Do what?

0:25:02.320 --> 0:25:05.879
<v Speaker 1>Cash under your mattress? Just you know, freeze, dride food

0:25:06.000 --> 0:25:09.240
<v Speaker 1>for cash and hunker down. Wait wait, wait, wait, wait,

0:25:09.280 --> 0:25:11.680
<v Speaker 1>hold on a second. How much cash? And when did

0:25:11.720 --> 0:25:15.240
<v Speaker 1>you start? How much? And how much free drive and

0:25:15.560 --> 0:25:18.800
<v Speaker 1>cans or packages that you know, but are you have

0:25:18.840 --> 0:25:21.160
<v Speaker 1>you been recommending over the past few weeks that people

0:25:21.200 --> 0:25:25.240
<v Speaker 1>build their cash stashes or is it over the past year?

0:25:25.680 --> 0:25:28.680
<v Speaker 1>Or and and how much? No? And and and realistically

0:25:28.760 --> 0:25:30.879
<v Speaker 1>I think that from a from a portfolio, from a

0:25:30.920 --> 0:25:34.320
<v Speaker 1>fixed income now we're talking on the fixed income side, UM,

0:25:34.359 --> 0:25:38.040
<v Speaker 1>I think I would you retain a fairly good front

0:25:38.160 --> 0:25:40.800
<v Speaker 1>end cash position, and then I would have a barbelled

0:25:40.800 --> 0:25:43.840
<v Speaker 1>portfolio with exposure at the long end. Again because I

0:25:43.880 --> 0:25:47.359
<v Speaker 1>don't think that we're seeing any inflation problems. So the

0:25:47.440 --> 0:25:50.760
<v Speaker 1>barbelled portfolio would allow me to if we, for example,

0:25:50.800 --> 0:25:53.040
<v Speaker 1>were to see if that High court, if we were

0:25:53.080 --> 0:25:55.199
<v Speaker 1>to see opportunities I want to hunk. I want to

0:25:55.200 --> 0:25:57.359
<v Speaker 1>have some cash on hand to take advantage of it

0:25:57.800 --> 0:26:00.560
<v Speaker 1>um in other asset classes. So I think that the

0:26:00.560 --> 0:26:03.359
<v Speaker 1>Barbel portfolio for now is the one I would like.

0:26:03.440 --> 0:26:06.560
<v Speaker 1>And I think also, um, you know, I don't think

0:26:06.560 --> 0:26:08.879
<v Speaker 1>the Fed's going to hike this year, and I'm you know,

0:26:08.960 --> 0:26:11.199
<v Speaker 1>next year we'll get I think we'll get a new

0:26:11.240 --> 0:26:15.680
<v Speaker 1>FED chairman. Presumably there will be umdabish Trump like slow

0:26:15.760 --> 0:26:19.600
<v Speaker 1>interest rates and I but I do think that there

0:26:19.720 --> 0:26:21.600
<v Speaker 1>is still some risk at the front end. Is going

0:26:21.600 --> 0:26:24.520
<v Speaker 1>to get UM a little bit nervous about the feed

0:26:24.600 --> 0:26:26.480
<v Speaker 1>as we approached next year and we get past the

0:26:26.520 --> 0:26:30.760
<v Speaker 1>debt ceiling situation. So I think the Barbel portfolio is

0:26:30.800 --> 0:26:32.280
<v Speaker 1>the one that makes the most sense to me. And

0:26:32.320 --> 0:26:35.720
<v Speaker 1>in terms of a duration exposure to a benchmark, I

0:26:35.760 --> 0:26:38.000
<v Speaker 1>would be a little bit long duration. Now, well, David,

0:26:38.000 --> 0:26:39.840
<v Speaker 1>when do you throw in the towel. I mean, I

0:26:39.920 --> 0:26:41.800
<v Speaker 1>want to know because you know you'll be the last

0:26:41.800 --> 0:26:47.280
<v Speaker 1>bear standing when I throw in the towel. Um. You know,

0:26:47.359 --> 0:26:49.960
<v Speaker 1>I think in these in these coming weeks, in these

0:26:50.000 --> 0:26:54.400
<v Speaker 1>coming months, you know, we will get obviously more information

0:26:54.560 --> 0:26:57.520
<v Speaker 1>on inflation. The FET has always talked about that that

0:26:57.680 --> 0:27:02.000
<v Speaker 1>that there has been talking that ultimately they'll reach their targets.

0:27:02.080 --> 0:27:04.400
<v Speaker 1>I do not care about the dot pots. I don't

0:27:04.400 --> 0:27:07.800
<v Speaker 1>really care about their their own expectations. I want to

0:27:07.840 --> 0:27:11.520
<v Speaker 1>see what the data is going to look like, you know, David,

0:27:11.800 --> 0:27:14.000
<v Speaker 1>I have to wonder. You know, people lament that this

0:27:14.080 --> 0:27:17.600
<v Speaker 1>market has been newter, either by financial regulation or by

0:27:17.640 --> 0:27:21.760
<v Speaker 1>so many years of Federal Reserve interference. But are we

0:27:21.840 --> 0:27:24.960
<v Speaker 1>just seeing a market that's a normal, that's moving back

0:27:25.320 --> 0:27:27.320
<v Speaker 1>to a model where people actually have to look at

0:27:27.400 --> 0:27:29.479
<v Speaker 1>data and actually look at the companies and not just

0:27:29.520 --> 0:27:33.040
<v Speaker 1>wait for what comes out of the lips of central bankers.

0:27:34.040 --> 0:27:36.639
<v Speaker 1>You know, I know we always look at it, and

0:27:36.680 --> 0:27:39.119
<v Speaker 1>if you're an economist or you're a strategist, you know

0:27:39.160 --> 0:27:42.919
<v Speaker 1>you historically and academically we rely on the data. But

0:27:43.080 --> 0:27:45.480
<v Speaker 1>you know, we've we've had data up, we've had it down,

0:27:45.520 --> 0:27:50.160
<v Speaker 1>and the treasury market. Generally, the yields are staying in arrange,

0:27:50.640 --> 0:27:53.520
<v Speaker 1>so we will get back to it. We still need

0:27:53.560 --> 0:27:56.560
<v Speaker 1>to look at those factors because it will impact central

0:27:56.560 --> 0:28:00.600
<v Speaker 1>bank policy here and around the world. But um, the

0:28:00.600 --> 0:28:05.399
<v Speaker 1>the the quantitative easy that's still going on elsewhere, the

0:28:05.480 --> 0:28:09.160
<v Speaker 1>continuing reinvestment which the FED is doing, even if they're

0:28:09.200 --> 0:28:12.359
<v Speaker 1>going to be in tapering. I do think he's put um,

0:28:12.520 --> 0:28:16.200
<v Speaker 1>you know, put restrictions on the volatility that you would

0:28:16.200 --> 0:28:20.560
<v Speaker 1>otherwise be seeing in in in the fixed income markets

0:28:20.600 --> 0:28:25.200
<v Speaker 1>that slowly, gradually, glacially is coming off. So I don't

0:28:25.200 --> 0:28:27.760
<v Speaker 1>see drama, but I do think, you know, in a

0:28:27.800 --> 0:28:30.520
<v Speaker 1>few years, will probably get ourselves back to a more

0:28:30.560 --> 0:28:34.600
<v Speaker 1>normal environment. Having said that, I still think that that

0:28:34.760 --> 0:28:37.399
<v Speaker 1>there's a generational issue that interest rates are going to

0:28:37.440 --> 0:28:41.720
<v Speaker 1>be lower than we might otherwise have seen, just because

0:28:41.800 --> 0:28:44.480
<v Speaker 1>we are in a sort of a muddling growth mode.

0:28:44.920 --> 0:28:46.600
<v Speaker 1>I want to thank you very much for joining us.

0:28:46.640 --> 0:28:49.680
<v Speaker 1>David Adder is the chief macro strategist for Inform of

0:28:49.760 --> 0:28:54.200
<v Speaker 1>Financial Intelligence. He is also a Bloomberg profit. Bloomberg profits

0:28:54.200 --> 0:28:58.520
<v Speaker 1>are professionals who offer actionable insights on markets, the economy,

0:28:58.560 --> 0:29:02.360
<v Speaker 1>and monetary policy, and Bloomberg profits may actually have a

0:29:02.400 --> 0:29:07.640
<v Speaker 1>steak in the areas in which they write about. Thanks

0:29:07.640 --> 0:29:10.280
<v Speaker 1>for listening to the Bloomberg P and L podcast. You

0:29:10.320 --> 0:29:14.080
<v Speaker 1>can subscribe and listen to interviews at Apple Podcasts, SoundCloud,

0:29:14.200 --> 0:29:17.680
<v Speaker 1>or whatever podcast platform you prefer. I'm pim Fox. I'm

0:29:17.720 --> 0:29:21.240
<v Speaker 1>on Twitter at pim Fox. I'm on Twitter at Lisa

0:29:21.280 --> 0:29:24.440
<v Speaker 1>abramoids One before the podcast, you can always catch us

0:29:24.480 --> 0:29:26.040
<v Speaker 1>worldwide on Bloomberg Radio.