WEBVTT - #156 Wrongful Conviction: Junk Science - Fingerprint Evidence

0:00:00.960 --> 0:00:04.520
<v Speaker 1>It's Friday night. You hop in the shower, then put

0:00:04.519 --> 0:00:07.960
<v Speaker 1>on your favorite blue button down shirt. You look at

0:00:07.960 --> 0:00:10.719
<v Speaker 1>yourself in the mirror and hype yourself up a bit.

0:00:11.640 --> 0:00:14.440
<v Speaker 1>You're forty years old, but you've taken good care of

0:00:14.480 --> 0:00:17.599
<v Speaker 1>yourself over the years and still look pretty damn good.

0:00:19.280 --> 0:00:21.400
<v Speaker 1>You head out, and when you get to the club,

0:00:21.440 --> 0:00:24.280
<v Speaker 1>you see your friend Alvin standing outside on the corner

0:00:24.360 --> 0:00:28.080
<v Speaker 1>waiting for you. You smile because Alvin's always a good time.

0:00:28.600 --> 0:00:30.680
<v Speaker 1>He might be the only person who can keep up

0:00:30.680 --> 0:00:34.199
<v Speaker 1>with you when you dance all night. You both head

0:00:34.280 --> 0:00:37.159
<v Speaker 1>inside and grab a drink, catch up a little bit,

0:00:37.320 --> 0:00:40.880
<v Speaker 1>and then hit the dance floor. The place is all

0:00:40.960 --> 0:00:44.880
<v Speaker 1>bass and flashing lights. Neither one of you stops moving

0:00:44.960 --> 0:00:47.840
<v Speaker 1>until they turn off the music and the DJ tells

0:00:47.880 --> 0:00:51.240
<v Speaker 1>everyone it's closing time. Time to get out of here.

0:00:52.159 --> 0:00:53.960
<v Speaker 1>When you get outside the club, you say goodbye to

0:00:54.040 --> 0:00:56.440
<v Speaker 1>Alvin because you have to get up early in the morning.

0:00:56.720 --> 0:00:58.600
<v Speaker 1>You're not going to go back to his place tonight.

0:01:00.120 --> 0:01:02.880
<v Speaker 1>You give Alvin a call the next weekend, but there's

0:01:02.880 --> 0:01:07.000
<v Speaker 1>no answer. You don't think much of it because Alvin

0:01:07.080 --> 0:01:10.280
<v Speaker 1>sometimes just doesn't answer his phone. He's the kind of

0:01:10.280 --> 0:01:14.280
<v Speaker 1>guy that does his own thing. But then a few

0:01:14.360 --> 0:01:18.200
<v Speaker 1>days later, you get a call from another friend. He

0:01:18.240 --> 0:01:21.600
<v Speaker 1>tells you he passed by Alvin's house and there were

0:01:21.680 --> 0:01:26.800
<v Speaker 1>police officers surrounding it. They said that Alvin had been murdered.

0:01:28.160 --> 0:01:31.160
<v Speaker 1>You hang up and immediately head to the police station.

0:01:31.840 --> 0:01:35.000
<v Speaker 1>You want to help figure out who did this. You

0:01:35.080 --> 0:01:38.160
<v Speaker 1>meet with detectives and you find out that Alvin was

0:01:38.240 --> 0:01:41.560
<v Speaker 1>murdered on the night you went dancing with him, but

0:01:41.640 --> 0:01:46.400
<v Speaker 1>he wasn't discovered until nine days later. His landlord found

0:01:46.480 --> 0:01:48.960
<v Speaker 1>him on the floor of his apartment, and you hear

0:01:49.080 --> 0:01:53.080
<v Speaker 1>all this, and you're just immediately nauseous. If you had

0:01:53.160 --> 0:01:55.840
<v Speaker 1>stayed at his house that night, maybe you could have

0:01:55.920 --> 0:01:59.760
<v Speaker 1>protected him. You tell the police everything you can remember

0:02:00.240 --> 0:02:03.920
<v Speaker 1>that night. You want to do anything you can to

0:02:04.000 --> 0:02:06.279
<v Speaker 1>help them find out who did this to your friend.

0:02:09.520 --> 0:02:12.120
<v Speaker 1>The police call you in four times over the next

0:02:12.120 --> 0:02:16.200
<v Speaker 1>two weeks as they investigate Alvin's murder. One day, they

0:02:16.240 --> 0:02:19.440
<v Speaker 1>tell you they're taking fingerprints of everyone who had been

0:02:19.480 --> 0:02:23.239
<v Speaker 1>around Alvin in the days preceding his death. They tell

0:02:23.280 --> 0:02:25.920
<v Speaker 1>you that by allowing them to take your prints, it'll

0:02:25.919 --> 0:02:28.840
<v Speaker 1>help them figure out who committed the murder. Part of

0:02:28.880 --> 0:02:31.480
<v Speaker 1>you feels like you're in an episode of some detective

0:02:31.520 --> 0:02:34.320
<v Speaker 1>show when they press the tips of your fingers and

0:02:34.400 --> 0:02:37.679
<v Speaker 1>the palms of your hands on a cold inkpad, then

0:02:37.840 --> 0:02:40.360
<v Speaker 1>roll the tips of your fingers one by one on

0:02:40.400 --> 0:02:43.680
<v Speaker 1>a piece of paper. You've seen this process what seems

0:02:43.720 --> 0:02:46.800
<v Speaker 1>like hundreds of times before on TV and in the movies,

0:02:47.280 --> 0:02:50.640
<v Speaker 1>but you've never actually done it yourself. You have no record.

0:02:50.840 --> 0:02:55.040
<v Speaker 1>You've never been fingerprinted before. Not long after that, the

0:02:55.080 --> 0:02:57.760
<v Speaker 1>police call you into the station one more time, but

0:02:58.520 --> 0:03:04.919
<v Speaker 1>something has shifted. They bring you into an interrogation room.

0:03:05.440 --> 0:03:08.840
<v Speaker 1>The first thing they do is show you a polaroid

0:03:09.120 --> 0:03:13.760
<v Speaker 1>of Alvin's body. You immediately feel fluid bubble into your

0:03:13.960 --> 0:03:17.919
<v Speaker 1>esophagus and you quickly scan the room for a garbage can.

0:03:18.200 --> 0:03:21.800
<v Speaker 1>Your mind quickly computes shit if IPU in front of

0:03:21.800 --> 0:03:25.800
<v Speaker 1>these cops, they'll think I did this. You manage to

0:03:25.919 --> 0:03:29.400
<v Speaker 1>swallow the vomit and there's a sharp burn in your throat.

0:03:30.560 --> 0:03:33.600
<v Speaker 1>Then they show you another picture and Alvin is flat

0:03:33.639 --> 0:03:38.520
<v Speaker 1>on his back. There's blood everywhere, on his clothes, the

0:03:38.600 --> 0:03:41.120
<v Speaker 1>carpet next to him. You can't even see his face.

0:03:41.120 --> 0:03:44.720
<v Speaker 1>Whoever did this? Put Alvin's big white box fan over

0:03:44.760 --> 0:03:47.400
<v Speaker 1>his head and shoulders, so you can't see the top

0:03:47.440 --> 0:03:50.080
<v Speaker 1>portion of his body. You used to make fun of

0:03:50.080 --> 0:03:52.800
<v Speaker 1>Alvin for that fan. You were always telling him just

0:03:52.880 --> 0:03:56.440
<v Speaker 1>to invest in a damn ac unit. Already the whole

0:03:56.440 --> 0:04:01.040
<v Speaker 1>thing seems so surreal. And now the office are pointing

0:04:01.080 --> 0:04:03.720
<v Speaker 1>at the fan in the picture and they say, you

0:04:03.760 --> 0:04:07.640
<v Speaker 1>see those bloody smudges on the fan, Those are fingerprints

0:04:08.200 --> 0:04:10.280
<v Speaker 1>and the prince we took from you the other day.

0:04:10.920 --> 0:04:14.280
<v Speaker 1>We've collected over a dozen fingerprints of people who were

0:04:14.360 --> 0:04:18.719
<v Speaker 1>in Alvin's apartment before he was murdered, and only yours

0:04:18.760 --> 0:04:21.560
<v Speaker 1>matched the prints on that fan. There were no signs

0:04:21.560 --> 0:04:24.280
<v Speaker 1>of break in at his apartment, but you didn't have

0:04:24.360 --> 0:04:27.440
<v Speaker 1>to break in, did you. Alvin let you in after

0:04:27.560 --> 0:04:30.680
<v Speaker 1>your night out together. Then you got in an argument

0:04:30.760 --> 0:04:33.320
<v Speaker 1>with him. You got jealous that he was dancing with

0:04:33.400 --> 0:04:37.320
<v Speaker 1>other men, and you stabbed him to death, didn't you.

0:04:37.320 --> 0:04:40.119
<v Speaker 1>You stare at the officer and disbelieve no. You say,

0:04:40.160 --> 0:04:43.119
<v Speaker 1>what are you talking about? Why would I come here

0:04:43.160 --> 0:04:45.919
<v Speaker 1>willingly to help you guys out if I had anything

0:04:45.960 --> 0:04:49.599
<v Speaker 1>to do with this. They don't listen to a word

0:04:49.680 --> 0:04:53.160
<v Speaker 1>you say. They put handcuffs on you and put you

0:04:53.240 --> 0:05:02.120
<v Speaker 1>in custody at your trial. Prosecution calls a fingerprint expert

0:05:02.200 --> 0:05:06.480
<v Speaker 1>to the stan. He says, before we're even born as

0:05:06.560 --> 0:05:10.360
<v Speaker 1>fetuses in the womb, human beings develop ridges on their

0:05:10.400 --> 0:05:14.159
<v Speaker 1>fingers and hands. In addition to those ridges, we have

0:05:14.320 --> 0:05:18.200
<v Speaker 1>glands that secrete oils, so that when we touch objects,

0:05:18.440 --> 0:05:21.880
<v Speaker 1>the whorls, loops, and swirl pattern of those ridges are

0:05:21.960 --> 0:05:26.400
<v Speaker 1>left behind. Fingerprint analysis has been around for over one

0:05:26.520 --> 0:05:30.200
<v Speaker 1>hundred years, and we know that each of our fingerprints

0:05:30.279 --> 0:05:34.240
<v Speaker 1>are unique. The fingerprints were covered from this crime scene

0:05:34.400 --> 0:05:37.479
<v Speaker 1>were visible to the naked eye because they were left

0:05:37.520 --> 0:05:41.960
<v Speaker 1>as impressions in the victim's blood. I analyze these prints

0:05:42.279 --> 0:05:46.320
<v Speaker 1>and compare them to defining characteristics of the defendants prints.

0:05:47.120 --> 0:05:50.919
<v Speaker 1>The bloody prints found near the victim's body clearly belonged

0:05:51.000 --> 0:05:54.560
<v Speaker 1>to the defendant. I am one hundred percent certain about this.

0:05:55.680 --> 0:05:59.120
<v Speaker 1>The prosecution calls two more fingerprint experts to the stand,

0:06:00.000 --> 0:06:04.839
<v Speaker 1>and they all agree these are your prints. But your

0:06:04.880 --> 0:06:08.640
<v Speaker 1>attorney calls two witnesses to the stand, fingerprint experts that

0:06:08.720 --> 0:06:12.360
<v Speaker 1>claim it isn't even close. There's no way these prints

0:06:12.360 --> 0:06:16.160
<v Speaker 1>belong to you. The jury isn't phased by the conflicting

0:06:16.160 --> 0:06:19.960
<v Speaker 1>opinions of the expert witnesses. They are convinced by the

0:06:20.000 --> 0:06:24.280
<v Speaker 1>impassioned story that the prosecutor laid out. They convict you

0:06:24.320 --> 0:06:28.479
<v Speaker 1>of first degree murder and abuse of a corpse. Your

0:06:28.600 --> 0:06:33.039
<v Speaker 1>sentenced to life without parole. There is shouting in the

0:06:33.040 --> 0:06:36.200
<v Speaker 1>courtroom as you're escorted out by cops with your hands

0:06:36.240 --> 0:06:40.400
<v Speaker 1>cuffed tightly behind your back. You can't understand why this

0:06:40.480 --> 0:06:45.200
<v Speaker 1>is happening. What is going on? Those are not your fingerprints.

0:06:45.600 --> 0:06:51.400
<v Speaker 1>You feel totally and completely helpless, But lucky for you,

0:06:52.120 --> 0:06:56.479
<v Speaker 1>this isn't the end. The fingerprint experts that testified in

0:06:56.520 --> 0:07:00.440
<v Speaker 1>your defense call this conviction a gross miscarriage of justice.

0:07:00.960 --> 0:07:05.200
<v Speaker 1>They demand that the evidence be reevaluated. A panel of

0:07:05.240 --> 0:07:09.840
<v Speaker 1>experts do just that and find that the prosecution's evaluation

0:07:10.120 --> 0:07:13.760
<v Speaker 1>was clearly wrong. The prints at the crime scene clearly

0:07:13.800 --> 0:07:17.800
<v Speaker 1>do not match your fingerprints. One of the experts for

0:07:17.840 --> 0:07:21.960
<v Speaker 1>the prosecution admits he made a mistake. You're afforded a

0:07:22.000 --> 0:07:26.160
<v Speaker 1>new trial and you are found not guilty. But this

0:07:26.240 --> 0:07:31.240
<v Speaker 1>process takes two agonizing years, and after serving that amount

0:07:31.240 --> 0:07:34.120
<v Speaker 1>of time in prison for a crime you never committed,

0:07:34.320 --> 0:07:41.480
<v Speaker 1>the murder of your friend, you're released. The story you

0:07:41.640 --> 0:07:44.760
<v Speaker 1>just heard is based on the true story of Richard Jackson,

0:07:44.960 --> 0:07:48.320
<v Speaker 1>who was wrongfully convicted and sentenced to life without parole

0:07:48.720 --> 0:07:51.360
<v Speaker 1>for the murder of his friend Alvin Davis in nineteen

0:07:51.440 --> 0:07:55.440
<v Speaker 1>ninety eight. While fingerprint analysis has been proven to be

0:07:55.480 --> 0:07:59.600
<v Speaker 1>purely subjective, it still holds a firm place in the

0:07:59.640 --> 0:08:07.160
<v Speaker 1>public imagination and therefore enjures minds as reliable science. I'm

0:08:07.240 --> 0:08:11.280
<v Speaker 1>Josh Dubin civil rights and criminal defense attorney, an innocent

0:08:11.400 --> 0:08:15.320
<v Speaker 1>ambassador to the Innocence Project in New York. Today, on

0:08:15.440 --> 0:08:21.400
<v Speaker 1>Wrongful Conviction Junk Science, we examined fingerprint evidence. Contrary to

0:08:21.400 --> 0:08:25.440
<v Speaker 1>what pop culture has ingrained in the American conscience. Matching

0:08:25.600 --> 0:08:28.800
<v Speaker 1>known prints of a suspect the prince left at the

0:08:28.840 --> 0:08:32.560
<v Speaker 1>scene of a crime is not an exact science. It

0:08:32.640 --> 0:08:36.520
<v Speaker 1>is entirely subjective, up to the eye of the examiner.

0:08:37.640 --> 0:08:41.240
<v Speaker 1>So how did fingerprints become so widely accepted and thought

0:08:41.280 --> 0:08:45.520
<v Speaker 1>of as the gold standard as full proof evidence. It

0:08:45.600 --> 0:08:48.800
<v Speaker 1>turns out that the first time fingerprints were admitted into

0:08:48.800 --> 0:08:52.400
<v Speaker 1>evidence was almost one hundred and ten years ago, and

0:08:52.440 --> 0:08:56.240
<v Speaker 1>the methods used to match prints to individuals hasn't changed

0:08:56.320 --> 0:08:56.880
<v Speaker 1>much since.

0:09:01.920 --> 0:09:04.960
<v Speaker 2>The Pacers Foundation is a proud supporter of this episode

0:09:05.080 --> 0:09:08.400
<v Speaker 2>and of the Last Mile organization, which provides business and

0:09:08.520 --> 0:09:13.319
<v Speaker 2>tech training to help incarcerated individuals successfully and permanently re

0:09:13.520 --> 0:09:17.200
<v Speaker 2>enter the workforce. The Pacers Foundation is committed to improving

0:09:17.240 --> 0:09:22.000
<v Speaker 2>the lives of Hoosiers across Indiana, supporting organizations dedicated primarily

0:09:22.040 --> 0:09:25.560
<v Speaker 2>to helping young people and students. For more information on

0:09:25.640 --> 0:09:28.600
<v Speaker 2>the work of the Pacers Foundation or the Last Mile Program,

0:09:28.760 --> 0:09:32.800
<v Speaker 2>visit Pacersfoundation dot org or the Lastmile dot org.

0:09:39.480 --> 0:09:42.880
<v Speaker 1>As Clarence Hiller painted the railing outside his home in

0:09:42.880 --> 0:09:46.840
<v Speaker 1>the early evening of September eighteenth, nineteen ten, he couldn't

0:09:46.880 --> 0:09:50.079
<v Speaker 1>stop looking over his shoulder. It seemed like the entire

0:09:50.200 --> 0:09:53.040
<v Speaker 1>South Side of Chicago was on edge. There had been

0:09:53.080 --> 0:09:56.040
<v Speaker 1>a number of robberies in the area, and everyone was

0:09:56.080 --> 0:09:59.480
<v Speaker 1>worried that they could be the next victim, And so

0:09:59.720 --> 0:10:02.120
<v Speaker 1>in the the middle of that night, when Clarence heard

0:10:02.120 --> 0:10:05.040
<v Speaker 1>the screams of his wife and daughter, he was prepared

0:10:05.080 --> 0:10:08.840
<v Speaker 1>to launch into action. He confronted the stranger in his house,

0:10:09.040 --> 0:10:11.600
<v Speaker 1>and as Clarence tried to force the man out, both

0:10:11.679 --> 0:10:15.840
<v Speaker 1>the robber and Clarence fell down the stairs. Three shots

0:10:15.840 --> 0:10:19.520
<v Speaker 1>were fired, the intruder fled, and his neighbors came outside

0:10:19.520 --> 0:10:22.040
<v Speaker 1>and their slippers and robes to see what had happened.

0:10:22.520 --> 0:10:25.920
<v Speaker 1>They found Clarence bleeding just outside his front door with

0:10:26.000 --> 0:10:29.560
<v Speaker 1>his daughter standing over him. The police were called and

0:10:29.760 --> 0:10:33.200
<v Speaker 1>a suspect, Thomas Jennings, was found just eight blocks away.

0:10:33.880 --> 0:10:36.720
<v Speaker 1>His coat was torn and bloody, and he was carrying

0:10:36.760 --> 0:10:41.120
<v Speaker 1>a revolver. Thomas Jennings was ultimately convicted, but this wasn't

0:10:41.120 --> 0:10:45.160
<v Speaker 1>the only evidence used in his prosecution. When Thomas Jennings

0:10:45.160 --> 0:10:48.200
<v Speaker 1>climbed into the Hiller's home that night, he grabbed onto

0:10:48.240 --> 0:10:51.360
<v Speaker 1>the railing that Clarence was painting the night before, leaving

0:10:51.440 --> 0:10:54.280
<v Speaker 1>a fingerprint behind in a semi wet coat of paint.

0:10:55.240 --> 0:10:57.560
<v Speaker 1>The prosecution cut off the piece of the rail with

0:10:57.600 --> 0:11:01.520
<v Speaker 1>the fingerprint that Jennings left behind. At his murder trial,

0:11:01.880 --> 0:11:05.120
<v Speaker 1>jennings defense attorney argued that this new forensic method of

0:11:05.200 --> 0:11:08.800
<v Speaker 1>lifting and comparing fingerprints couldn't be trusted. There were no

0:11:08.920 --> 0:11:12.240
<v Speaker 1>tests that could prove that it was reliable. But then

0:11:12.440 --> 0:11:15.360
<v Speaker 1>the prosecutor got in front of the jury and pressed

0:11:15.360 --> 0:11:18.599
<v Speaker 1>his finger onto a piece of paper. He then demonstrated

0:11:18.640 --> 0:11:20.760
<v Speaker 1>how he was able to lift his own print off

0:11:20.800 --> 0:11:23.600
<v Speaker 1>of it. By proving that he could collect the evidence

0:11:24.000 --> 0:11:26.120
<v Speaker 1>he was able to convince the jury that it was

0:11:26.240 --> 0:11:30.960
<v Speaker 1>also possible to accurately analyze and match it to a suspect.

0:11:31.760 --> 0:11:35.720
<v Speaker 1>The judge ruled that fingerprint testimony was admissible and Jennings

0:11:35.760 --> 0:11:40.120
<v Speaker 1>was convicted. The precedent of admitting fingerprints has been upheld

0:11:40.160 --> 0:11:43.360
<v Speaker 1>again and again, despite the fact that numerous men and

0:11:43.400 --> 0:11:48.360
<v Speaker 1>women have been falsely identified through fingerprint evidence. For example,

0:11:48.400 --> 0:11:50.880
<v Speaker 1>on March eleventh, two thousand and four, there were a

0:11:50.880 --> 0:11:54.720
<v Speaker 1>series of explosions in Madrid during rush hour. Ten bombs

0:11:54.760 --> 0:11:57.600
<v Speaker 1>went off, all within two minutes of each other. One

0:11:57.679 --> 0:12:00.760
<v Speaker 1>hundred and ninety three people died in almost two thousand

0:12:00.760 --> 0:12:05.720
<v Speaker 1>were injured. Upon investigation, Spanish authorities found a fingerprint on

0:12:05.720 --> 0:12:09.160
<v Speaker 1>one of the plastic bags that contained a detonator. They

0:12:09.240 --> 0:12:12.440
<v Speaker 1>photographed it, then reached out to countries around the world

0:12:12.440 --> 0:12:15.480
<v Speaker 1>to help find the culprits of the attack. The US

0:12:15.520 --> 0:12:19.160
<v Speaker 1>authorities ran the print through a database of fingerprints. Twenty

0:12:19.240 --> 0:12:23.520
<v Speaker 1>possible matches appeared. One of them was Brandon Mayfield, but

0:12:23.600 --> 0:12:26.960
<v Speaker 1>Brandon Mayfield hadn't left the country in ten years. He

0:12:27.000 --> 0:12:30.640
<v Speaker 1>didn't even have a valid passport. FBI analysts had no

0:12:30.760 --> 0:12:32.920
<v Speaker 1>idea how Mayfield would have been able to fly to

0:12:32.960 --> 0:12:36.839
<v Speaker 1>Spain and back completely undetected, and yet they pursued him

0:12:36.840 --> 0:12:40.360
<v Speaker 1>as a suspect. It turns out that Brandon had converted

0:12:40.400 --> 0:12:44.319
<v Speaker 1>to Islam after marrying his Egyptian wife, and so American

0:12:44.360 --> 0:12:47.640
<v Speaker 1>authorities must have seen him as a convenient suspect just

0:12:47.720 --> 0:12:51.439
<v Speaker 1>a few years after nine to eleven. In fact, despite

0:12:51.480 --> 0:12:54.800
<v Speaker 1>evidence that showed that it was extremely unlikely that Brandon

0:12:54.800 --> 0:12:57.760
<v Speaker 1>had left the Prince on that back, three different FBI

0:12:57.800 --> 0:13:01.679
<v Speaker 1>agents testified that the prince found in Spain matched Mayfields.

0:13:02.120 --> 0:13:05.400
<v Speaker 1>They said that it matched with one hundred percent certainty.

0:13:05.920 --> 0:13:09.040
<v Speaker 1>They arrested Mayfield, and while he sat in jail, the

0:13:09.120 --> 0:13:12.680
<v Speaker 1>FBI tried to convince the Spanish authorities that these prints

0:13:12.679 --> 0:13:15.840
<v Speaker 1>were Mayfields, but the Spanish police didn't see what the

0:13:15.880 --> 0:13:18.880
<v Speaker 1>FBI saw. The prince didn't seem to match it all,

0:13:18.920 --> 0:13:22.080
<v Speaker 1>from their perspective, a far cry from a match with

0:13:22.080 --> 0:13:25.319
<v Speaker 1>one hundred percent certainty. They said that when they compared

0:13:25.360 --> 0:13:27.960
<v Speaker 1>Mayfield's prince to the ones on the bag, it was

0:13:28.160 --> 0:13:33.880
<v Speaker 1>quote conclusively negative. They eventually did find a match for

0:13:33.920 --> 0:13:37.160
<v Speaker 1>the fingerprints and apprehended the man who left them behind

0:13:37.240 --> 0:13:40.320
<v Speaker 1>during the attack. The FBI admitted that they made a

0:13:40.360 --> 0:13:45.000
<v Speaker 1>mistake in pursuing Mayfield and let him walk free. Mayfield

0:13:45.040 --> 0:13:48.439
<v Speaker 1>is now probably the best known case of mistaken fingerprints,

0:13:49.040 --> 0:13:57.760
<v Speaker 1>but he certainly isn't the only one.

0:13:54.280 --> 0:13:57.360
<v Speaker 3>And we probably can guess if the Spanish police hadn't

0:13:57.400 --> 0:14:00.520
<v Speaker 3>been involved, or if they didn't have DNA, imagine this

0:14:00.520 --> 0:14:03.480
<v Speaker 3>case in the United States. Mister Mayfield would have been convicted.

0:14:04.320 --> 0:14:09.680
<v Speaker 3>How would his defense lawyer have attacked three FBI agents

0:14:09.720 --> 0:14:12.160
<v Speaker 3>with all of this experience, who claimed with one hundred

0:14:12.160 --> 0:14:15.880
<v Speaker 3>percent certainty that this print belonged to mister Mayfield. But

0:14:16.200 --> 0:14:21.440
<v Speaker 3>here's the point here. You could assume that three fingerprint

0:14:21.480 --> 0:14:25.840
<v Speaker 3>examiners with decades of experience who were certified, followed the

0:14:25.880 --> 0:14:28.400
<v Speaker 3>process and they were all wrong.

0:14:30.240 --> 0:14:34.640
<v Speaker 1>Joining us today is Mary Moriarty, the chief public Defender

0:14:34.720 --> 0:14:38.080
<v Speaker 1>of Hennepin County in Minnesota, and I'm really excited to

0:14:38.080 --> 0:14:41.960
<v Speaker 1>have her as a guest. She is a staunch defender

0:14:42.000 --> 0:14:45.080
<v Speaker 1>of the rights of the accused, an outspoken one of that,

0:14:45.200 --> 0:14:49.120
<v Speaker 1>and we need more public defenders like that in our country.

0:14:49.280 --> 0:14:53.080
<v Speaker 1>She has worked to challenge the admission of fingerprints. So, Mary,

0:14:53.160 --> 0:14:55.440
<v Speaker 1>tell us a little bit about how you first became

0:14:55.520 --> 0:14:56.760
<v Speaker 1>interested in fingerprints.

0:14:57.600 --> 0:15:01.280
<v Speaker 3>So it goes back to when I as a child. Actually,

0:15:01.320 --> 0:15:03.880
<v Speaker 3>if you notice, my last name is Moriarty, and I

0:15:03.920 --> 0:15:08.440
<v Speaker 3>had a particular interest in Sherlock Holmes, and I got

0:15:08.720 --> 0:15:13.600
<v Speaker 3>for Christmas one year the Hardy Boys book that talked

0:15:13.640 --> 0:15:17.040
<v Speaker 3>about how to collect evidence, and one of the things

0:15:17.080 --> 0:15:20.960
<v Speaker 3>I had in there was a recipe for fingerprint powder,

0:15:21.440 --> 0:15:25.760
<v Speaker 3>and so I would go take my parents' glasses, wineglasses,

0:15:25.800 --> 0:15:28.080
<v Speaker 3>that kind of thing, and I would dust them for prints.

0:15:28.080 --> 0:15:30.200
<v Speaker 3>I would put tape over it and I would lift

0:15:30.200 --> 0:15:33.000
<v Speaker 3>the print. But I never really thought, well, what do

0:15:33.040 --> 0:15:36.239
<v Speaker 3>you do after that? It was just an interesting exercise

0:15:36.440 --> 0:15:40.080
<v Speaker 3>in taking items that I knew my parents had touched

0:15:40.160 --> 0:15:43.200
<v Speaker 3>and actually trying to lift the prints from them.

0:15:44.000 --> 0:15:46.320
<v Speaker 1>Well, I think I was like screwing around with a

0:15:46.400 --> 0:15:48.840
<v Speaker 1>Rubik's cube and playing with Gi Joe figures. So this

0:15:48.960 --> 0:15:52.320
<v Speaker 1>makes me feel a little bit insecure about what I

0:15:52.400 --> 0:15:55.200
<v Speaker 1>was doing as a kid. But it certainly sounds like

0:15:55.600 --> 0:15:59.320
<v Speaker 1>you were headed towards a career involving forensics in the law.

0:15:59.400 --> 0:15:59.960
<v Speaker 1>For a while.

0:16:00.680 --> 0:16:04.200
<v Speaker 3>My father was actually a public defender, and some of

0:16:04.200 --> 0:16:08.320
<v Speaker 3>my dad's clients were actually my classmates, and I got

0:16:08.320 --> 0:16:13.160
<v Speaker 3>to know them as individuals. There's an attempt to otherwise

0:16:13.480 --> 0:16:17.440
<v Speaker 3>people who become public defender clients. And you know, the

0:16:17.480 --> 0:16:20.280
<v Speaker 3>age old question that public defenders get asked is how

0:16:20.280 --> 0:16:23.480
<v Speaker 3>can you represent those people? And it's very easy because

0:16:23.520 --> 0:16:28.600
<v Speaker 3>those people are our brothers, our dads, our sisters, our cousins.

0:16:29.040 --> 0:16:31.600
<v Speaker 3>And you look at what those clients have been through,

0:16:32.040 --> 0:16:34.760
<v Speaker 3>and so many of them have a history of trauma,

0:16:35.280 --> 0:16:40.000
<v Speaker 3>you can understand why they find themselves in these particular situations.

0:16:40.520 --> 0:16:43.560
<v Speaker 3>And I think growing up my parents fostered a really

0:16:43.640 --> 0:16:47.600
<v Speaker 3>strong sense of justice in my life. In every situation,

0:16:47.720 --> 0:16:50.080
<v Speaker 3>they would sit me down and say, you know, what

0:16:50.520 --> 0:16:53.920
<v Speaker 3>is the right thing to do here? So fast forward

0:16:54.200 --> 0:16:57.240
<v Speaker 3>when I went to law school. Once I finally made

0:16:57.240 --> 0:16:59.400
<v Speaker 3>that decision, I knew that there was only one thing

0:16:59.440 --> 0:17:02.080
<v Speaker 3>that I wanted to be and that was a public defender.

0:17:02.120 --> 0:17:05.400
<v Speaker 3>I wanted to be in a courtroom representing the same

0:17:05.440 --> 0:17:18.080
<v Speaker 3>people that I got to know through my father's practice.

0:17:19.240 --> 0:17:22.240
<v Speaker 1>All Right, so you became an attorney and got a

0:17:22.320 --> 0:17:24.280
<v Speaker 1>chance to right some of the wrongs that you saw

0:17:24.520 --> 0:17:28.320
<v Speaker 1>the system. But what were your thoughts about fingerprints when

0:17:28.320 --> 0:17:29.480
<v Speaker 1>you first started out?

0:17:30.400 --> 0:17:32.919
<v Speaker 3>I have to acknowledge. So I've been a public defender

0:17:32.960 --> 0:17:36.359
<v Speaker 3>for thirty years and I certainly had fingerprint cases, and

0:17:36.520 --> 0:17:40.679
<v Speaker 3>I also accepted without questioning that they were based on

0:17:40.760 --> 0:17:45.520
<v Speaker 3>science and that an expert could actually testify that a

0:17:45.840 --> 0:17:50.560
<v Speaker 3>single finger made this print from the crime scene. And

0:17:50.800 --> 0:17:55.120
<v Speaker 3>fingerprints have been accepted as evidence in courts for over

0:17:55.200 --> 0:17:59.400
<v Speaker 3>one hundred years, and people assume that it's reliable.

0:18:00.240 --> 0:18:02.720
<v Speaker 1>So this is something that always fascinated me. I don't

0:18:02.720 --> 0:18:05.239
<v Speaker 1>even know when it was that I began to believe this,

0:18:05.320 --> 0:18:09.640
<v Speaker 1>but even I had come to the belief that fingerprints

0:18:09.640 --> 0:18:11.919
<v Speaker 1>were sort of the gold standard, and that seems to

0:18:11.920 --> 0:18:15.639
<v Speaker 1>be sort of a consistent, you know, collective thought in

0:18:15.680 --> 0:18:19.840
<v Speaker 1>the American psyche that fingerprints are regarded as being just

0:18:19.960 --> 0:18:21.760
<v Speaker 1>really reliable. Why do you think that is?

0:18:22.520 --> 0:18:26.520
<v Speaker 3>They're in popular culture. We've all grown up being given

0:18:26.640 --> 0:18:29.840
<v Speaker 3>a certain perspective on what fingerprints are. When I started

0:18:29.840 --> 0:18:32.840
<v Speaker 3>getting an interest in fingerprints, I would say to people

0:18:32.960 --> 0:18:35.600
<v Speaker 3>outside the legal system, my friends, I would say, you know,

0:18:36.080 --> 0:18:39.840
<v Speaker 3>when you think about how a fingerprint from a crime

0:18:39.920 --> 0:18:43.600
<v Speaker 3>scene is compared to the known print of somebody, what

0:18:43.640 --> 0:18:45.840
<v Speaker 3>does that look like in your mind? And they will

0:18:45.880 --> 0:18:50.439
<v Speaker 3>always say, well, I envision the crime scene print on

0:18:50.520 --> 0:18:54.360
<v Speaker 3>a screen right next to the known fingerprint, and then

0:18:54.400 --> 0:18:58.120
<v Speaker 3>I see a computer merging them and bells going off, going.

0:18:58.000 --> 0:18:58.600
<v Speaker 2>Ding ding ding.

0:18:58.640 --> 0:19:02.119
<v Speaker 3>It matches, and that makes sense. It makes sense that

0:19:02.160 --> 0:19:04.880
<v Speaker 3>people would think that. When I tell people that that's

0:19:04.960 --> 0:19:08.919
<v Speaker 3>not at all what happens, they are shocked. Lay people

0:19:09.040 --> 0:19:11.520
<v Speaker 3>hear that there are these databases and they tend to

0:19:11.560 --> 0:19:14.439
<v Speaker 3>think that everybody's fingerprints are in it. And so I

0:19:14.480 --> 0:19:19.239
<v Speaker 3>think what people believe is that, Okay, you get a

0:19:19.480 --> 0:19:22.159
<v Speaker 3>fingerprint off a gun and you put it in a

0:19:22.280 --> 0:19:25.440
<v Speaker 3>database and the computer comes up with the match and

0:19:25.520 --> 0:19:29.119
<v Speaker 3>that's it. So that's not true at all. So of

0:19:29.200 --> 0:19:33.040
<v Speaker 3>course we're all entrenched in popular culture. We've been told

0:19:33.200 --> 0:19:37.280
<v Speaker 3>for many, many years fingerprints are fantastic, and you know,

0:19:37.320 --> 0:19:41.399
<v Speaker 3>why would anybody take the time to actually look to

0:19:41.520 --> 0:19:42.640
<v Speaker 3>see what they do?

0:19:43.720 --> 0:19:46.800
<v Speaker 1>So tell us a little bit about what they actually do.

0:19:47.200 --> 0:19:50.359
<v Speaker 1>Practically speaking, how does it actually work? What if fingerprint

0:19:50.600 --> 0:19:52.600
<v Speaker 1>examiners look at.

0:19:52.640 --> 0:19:57.000
<v Speaker 3>The way fingerprint examiners actually look at fingerprints is through

0:19:57.040 --> 0:20:01.760
<v Speaker 3>what they call a methodology called ACE. So it's a

0:20:01.800 --> 0:20:09.680
<v Speaker 3>C E slash V, which is analysis, comparison, evaluation and verification.

0:20:10.520 --> 0:20:13.560
<v Speaker 3>So here's a description of what they actually do. Let's

0:20:13.600 --> 0:20:19.120
<v Speaker 3>say a person is shot with a gun. They will lift,

0:20:19.359 --> 0:20:22.400
<v Speaker 3>and by lift, I mean they'll look for a fingerprint

0:20:22.520 --> 0:20:26.400
<v Speaker 3>on that gun and then they will try to remove

0:20:26.440 --> 0:20:29.680
<v Speaker 3>that fingerprint so that they can compare it. So the

0:20:29.720 --> 0:20:34.200
<v Speaker 3>a part is analysis. They are supposed to look at

0:20:34.240 --> 0:20:38.880
<v Speaker 3>that fingerprint to see whether there is enough detail in

0:20:38.920 --> 0:20:42.880
<v Speaker 3>it to go any further. People have seen these pictures

0:20:42.960 --> 0:20:46.760
<v Speaker 3>of somebody rolling their finger over a pad of ink,

0:20:47.119 --> 0:20:50.160
<v Speaker 3>and that's how you get the print. That's not what happens.

0:20:50.520 --> 0:20:54.560
<v Speaker 3>When people touch objects. You get a fragment, and sometimes

0:20:54.600 --> 0:20:58.480
<v Speaker 3>it's smeared, and sometimes there's dust on it, sometimes there's oil.

0:20:58.560 --> 0:21:01.399
<v Speaker 3>There are a lot of different facts. And so here's

0:21:01.480 --> 0:21:04.879
<v Speaker 3>the deal. It's not that you're comparing a fully rolled

0:21:04.920 --> 0:21:08.479
<v Speaker 3>fingerprint to a fully rolled fingerprint. You are first looking

0:21:08.600 --> 0:21:12.200
<v Speaker 3>at a fragment of the print, and it is totally

0:21:12.280 --> 0:21:17.480
<v Speaker 3>within the subjectivity, the subjective discretion of a fingerprint analysis

0:21:17.560 --> 0:21:21.880
<v Speaker 3>or examiner to decide whether there is enough information on

0:21:21.960 --> 0:21:25.520
<v Speaker 3>that print to even go ahead and compare it. So

0:21:25.680 --> 0:21:26.680
<v Speaker 3>just think about.

0:21:26.400 --> 0:21:30.359
<v Speaker 1>That, right, That's kind of scary because it's up to

0:21:30.800 --> 0:21:34.920
<v Speaker 1>the judgment call of one analyst on that particular day,

0:21:35.400 --> 0:21:38.919
<v Speaker 1>and I'm quite sure that another analyst looking at the

0:21:38.960 --> 0:21:42.040
<v Speaker 1>same portion of a print might come up with the

0:21:42.080 --> 0:21:47.160
<v Speaker 1>opposite conclusion. So it turns out that the A in ACV,

0:21:47.359 --> 0:21:51.800
<v Speaker 1>the very first step is problematic and pretty flawed. So

0:21:51.960 --> 0:21:54.760
<v Speaker 1>the next letter is the C for comparison. Where you're

0:21:54.800 --> 0:21:57.959
<v Speaker 1>taking a print left at a crime scene and comparing

0:21:58.000 --> 0:22:00.879
<v Speaker 1>it to a suspects print. Tell us a little bit

0:22:00.880 --> 0:22:02.680
<v Speaker 1>about what that process entails.

0:22:02.760 --> 0:22:07.480
<v Speaker 3>Mary, So once you make the decision to go forward,

0:22:07.720 --> 0:22:12.280
<v Speaker 3>then you are onto the sea or comparison, and you're

0:22:12.359 --> 0:22:16.600
<v Speaker 3>comparing the fully rolled print to the fragment of a print.

0:22:17.200 --> 0:22:20.440
<v Speaker 3>So Josh, you might look and compare those two fingerprints

0:22:20.440 --> 0:22:23.800
<v Speaker 3>and say, you know, I see enough here. I see

0:22:23.880 --> 0:22:27.760
<v Speaker 3>twelve points of comparison. That's enough for me to say

0:22:27.800 --> 0:22:32.040
<v Speaker 3>that this is the same person. I might look at

0:22:32.040 --> 0:22:36.520
<v Speaker 3>it and say, oh, I see five points of comparison.

0:22:36.640 --> 0:22:39.399
<v Speaker 3>I think that's enough to declare that it's a match.

0:22:39.920 --> 0:22:43.920
<v Speaker 3>So once again, it is completely subjective.

0:22:44.280 --> 0:22:48.680
<v Speaker 1>Right and saying, well, sometimes we think ten points that

0:22:48.720 --> 0:22:52.480
<v Speaker 1>look the same between a rolled print and a fragment

0:22:52.520 --> 0:22:55.720
<v Speaker 1>of a print are enough similarities to declare a match,

0:22:55.760 --> 0:22:58.119
<v Speaker 1>and sometimes we think five is enough. And that just

0:22:58.520 --> 0:23:02.639
<v Speaker 1>doesn't seem scientific and seemed very reliable, and so Mary,

0:23:03.119 --> 0:23:06.600
<v Speaker 1>something we've been addressing a lot on this podcast is

0:23:06.760 --> 0:23:10.280
<v Speaker 1>the two thousand and nine NAS Report. Tell us a

0:23:10.320 --> 0:23:14.680
<v Speaker 1>little bit about what the NAS report said about fingerprints.

0:23:15.560 --> 0:23:19.520
<v Speaker 3>The National Academy of Science is the most prestigious scientific

0:23:19.560 --> 0:23:24.879
<v Speaker 3>body in the United States and they advise Congress on

0:23:25.160 --> 0:23:29.080
<v Speaker 3>issues of science, medicine, pretty much anything you can think

0:23:29.119 --> 0:23:33.240
<v Speaker 3>of when it comes to sciences, and the National Academy

0:23:33.240 --> 0:23:38.600
<v Speaker 3>of Science was asked to examine the comparative forensic sciences.

0:23:39.160 --> 0:23:43.560
<v Speaker 3>It was a groundbreaking report and it was very in depth.

0:23:43.720 --> 0:23:49.000
<v Speaker 3>They took testimony, they solicited research, and it rocked the

0:23:49.040 --> 0:23:52.840
<v Speaker 3>forensic science community. One of the things that you realize

0:23:52.880 --> 0:23:55.480
<v Speaker 3>when you look at the report, if you are a scientist,

0:23:55.560 --> 0:23:58.280
<v Speaker 3>you know that there are certain tenets of science, like

0:23:58.320 --> 0:24:01.680
<v Speaker 3>you have to be able to replicate the process. When

0:24:01.720 --> 0:24:06.600
<v Speaker 3>a scientist does an experiment, they document what they do.

0:24:07.200 --> 0:24:10.040
<v Speaker 3>And the National Academy of Science was very clear that

0:24:10.160 --> 0:24:14.080
<v Speaker 3>fingerprint examiners, as well as any other comparative forensic examiners,

0:24:14.200 --> 0:24:17.840
<v Speaker 3>do not provide documentation. And I found this to be true.

0:24:17.920 --> 0:24:21.919
<v Speaker 3>You would order, you would ask for a fingerprint examiner's file,

0:24:22.520 --> 0:24:26.119
<v Speaker 3>and you wouldn't really see many notes. You wouldn't know

0:24:26.200 --> 0:24:28.719
<v Speaker 3>what they were actually looking at. You might have a

0:24:28.760 --> 0:24:31.439
<v Speaker 3>picture of a fingerprint with some circles on it, but

0:24:31.880 --> 0:24:34.040
<v Speaker 3>you wouldn't know what they were looking at. So there

0:24:34.119 --> 0:24:38.040
<v Speaker 3>was no way to replicate the process that they actually used.

0:24:38.600 --> 0:24:41.800
<v Speaker 3>There was no basis for saying that it came from

0:24:41.880 --> 0:24:45.359
<v Speaker 3>the same source. And most of the people who did fingerprints,

0:24:45.800 --> 0:24:48.760
<v Speaker 3>and probably still do in some places, are not scientists.

0:24:49.000 --> 0:24:51.840
<v Speaker 3>They are not recruited because of their scientific background. They

0:24:51.840 --> 0:24:56.240
<v Speaker 3>are often police officers who were apprenticed into this position

0:24:56.400 --> 0:24:59.120
<v Speaker 3>because the police officer who examined the print was going

0:24:59.160 --> 0:25:04.200
<v Speaker 3>to retire. And then there's the evaluation where you're actually

0:25:04.280 --> 0:25:07.879
<v Speaker 3>making the decision about whether this comes from the same source,

0:25:08.359 --> 0:25:12.160
<v Speaker 3>and there's a lot of controversy there. Fingerprint examiners used

0:25:12.160 --> 0:25:15.159
<v Speaker 3>to come in and say that they had one hundred

0:25:15.200 --> 0:25:18.520
<v Speaker 3>percent certainty, they were one hundred percent certain that this

0:25:19.119 --> 0:25:23.400
<v Speaker 3>print from the crime scene came from this particular client,

0:25:24.160 --> 0:25:26.320
<v Speaker 3>and there was no basis for that. In fact, that's

0:25:26.359 --> 0:25:29.640
<v Speaker 3>not even allowed anymore. And why is there no basis

0:25:29.680 --> 0:25:33.960
<v Speaker 3>for it? You would have to have population statistics, right,

0:25:34.040 --> 0:25:36.880
<v Speaker 3>I mean, that's what DNA has, That's why they come

0:25:36.960 --> 0:25:39.320
<v Speaker 3>up with these numbers. It's one in a million that

0:25:39.359 --> 0:25:43.359
<v Speaker 3>it came from this person. There are no population statistics

0:25:43.400 --> 0:25:44.760
<v Speaker 3>regarding fingerprints.

0:25:56.080 --> 0:25:57.639
<v Speaker 1>Okay, so we're seeing that there are a lot of

0:25:57.640 --> 0:26:01.600
<v Speaker 1>flaws with both analyzing and comparing prints, the A and

0:26:01.640 --> 0:26:04.560
<v Speaker 1>the C and as that neither of these steps are

0:26:04.600 --> 0:26:09.520
<v Speaker 1>actually rooted in the scientific methods. And now we're onto E, right, ACE.

0:26:10.640 --> 0:26:13.959
<v Speaker 1>So the E is evaluation where they decide if it's

0:26:14.000 --> 0:26:16.240
<v Speaker 1>a match or not. And so it seems that if

0:26:16.320 --> 0:26:20.320
<v Speaker 1>analyzing and comparing the prints aren't scientifically proven to work,

0:26:20.800 --> 0:26:24.000
<v Speaker 1>the evaluation of those prints and deciding whether or not

0:26:24.040 --> 0:26:26.159
<v Speaker 1>it's a match can't be done to any degree of

0:26:26.320 --> 0:26:30.320
<v Speaker 1>certainty either. That just seems like common sense. So this

0:26:30.680 --> 0:26:35.120
<v Speaker 1>is purely subjective. But there's one last letter in these

0:26:35.160 --> 0:26:39.640
<v Speaker 1>steps that examiners follow, and that's the V for verification. Right,

0:26:39.680 --> 0:26:44.000
<v Speaker 1>it's ace V. And I'm already skeptical because the first

0:26:44.040 --> 0:26:46.400
<v Speaker 1>three steps of the process are flawed, So how could

0:26:46.440 --> 0:26:48.000
<v Speaker 1>the results be verified?

0:26:48.920 --> 0:26:53.920
<v Speaker 3>Imagine this, A fingerprint examiner would decide that this fragment

0:26:53.960 --> 0:26:56.960
<v Speaker 3>of a print came from this particular person, and then

0:26:57.000 --> 0:27:01.160
<v Speaker 3>they would hand it off to another fingerprint examiner for verification.

0:27:01.960 --> 0:27:05.399
<v Speaker 3>But the issue was it was never blind. So, Josh,

0:27:05.480 --> 0:27:07.840
<v Speaker 3>let's say you and I were fingerprint examiners in the

0:27:07.840 --> 0:27:11.240
<v Speaker 3>same office, and I would make a decision about a print,

0:27:11.400 --> 0:27:14.199
<v Speaker 3>and then I would ask you to verify what I

0:27:14.320 --> 0:27:17.440
<v Speaker 3>had done. And the problem with that is you already

0:27:17.520 --> 0:27:21.360
<v Speaker 3>knew what I had done. It wasn't blind. In science,

0:27:21.480 --> 0:27:25.040
<v Speaker 3>they do blind verification, so that the person who's actually

0:27:25.119 --> 0:27:29.520
<v Speaker 3>attempting to verify or replicate what the first person did

0:27:29.720 --> 0:27:33.240
<v Speaker 3>it doesn't know what the result was actually, So the

0:27:33.359 --> 0:27:38.000
<v Speaker 3>fact that the verification wasn't blind led to what people

0:27:38.040 --> 0:27:41.040
<v Speaker 3>call confirmation bias, which is a huge problem.

0:27:41.359 --> 0:27:44.879
<v Speaker 1>All right. So, once the NAS basically said that the

0:27:45.080 --> 0:27:49.399
<v Speaker 1>ACEV process is really a recipe for wrongful convictions, this

0:27:49.480 --> 0:27:53.120
<v Speaker 1>should have been an explosion in the criminal justice system

0:27:53.240 --> 0:27:55.640
<v Speaker 1>in the courts, and it just wasn't. And that's I guess,

0:27:55.640 --> 0:27:59.479
<v Speaker 1>a different issue altogether. We have to keep pushing in

0:27:59.520 --> 0:28:02.920
<v Speaker 1>that regard. But you are still trying to push and

0:28:03.080 --> 0:28:07.000
<v Speaker 1>challenge the admissibility of fingerprints in the criminal justice system,

0:28:07.359 --> 0:28:09.520
<v Speaker 1>and I have to tell you, it just seems like

0:28:09.800 --> 0:28:13.880
<v Speaker 1>it must be so difficult, Mary, because this is not

0:28:14.040 --> 0:28:18.679
<v Speaker 1>like any kind of scientific analysis. But it just feels

0:28:18.760 --> 0:28:24.159
<v Speaker 1>to me that everyone believes fingerprint evidence works. It's so

0:28:24.640 --> 0:28:29.200
<v Speaker 1>ingrained in pop culture, and just like the intrinsic belief

0:28:29.240 --> 0:28:32.720
<v Speaker 1>that people have that we've grown up with. So tell me,

0:28:33.000 --> 0:28:36.359
<v Speaker 1>what are some of the problems you've run into when

0:28:36.440 --> 0:28:40.080
<v Speaker 1>trying to call and question this so called science.

0:28:40.800 --> 0:28:44.360
<v Speaker 3>When you're in court litigating this. You're absolutely right, that

0:28:44.600 --> 0:28:46.880
<v Speaker 3>is one of the things you hear from prosecutors and

0:28:46.920 --> 0:28:50.040
<v Speaker 3>you hear from judges. Of course, this is reliable. It's

0:28:50.080 --> 0:28:52.960
<v Speaker 3>been coming into court for decades and decades, and nobody

0:28:53.000 --> 0:28:56.240
<v Speaker 3>has ever challenged it before. So that is a big

0:28:56.320 --> 0:29:00.680
<v Speaker 3>hurdle to get over, much more so than other things

0:29:00.760 --> 0:29:03.200
<v Speaker 3>like bite marks, blood spatter and that sort of thing.

0:29:03.640 --> 0:29:08.120
<v Speaker 3>The court system always lags behind science, and it was

0:29:08.200 --> 0:29:13.560
<v Speaker 3>an uphill climb to convince judges and prosecutors that there

0:29:13.560 --> 0:29:16.920
<v Speaker 3>were problems with fingerprints, or if you could convince them

0:29:17.360 --> 0:29:20.040
<v Speaker 3>that there were problems, you certainly couldn't convince them that

0:29:20.080 --> 0:29:23.880
<v Speaker 3>they should exclude that evidence. In fact, judges and I

0:29:23.920 --> 0:29:25.720
<v Speaker 3>heard this quite a bit. It's like, well, you know,

0:29:25.800 --> 0:29:28.440
<v Speaker 3>let's just let the jury decide. But then you get

0:29:28.480 --> 0:29:32.360
<v Speaker 3>back to the problem of jurors thinking that fingerprints are

0:29:33.040 --> 0:29:35.040
<v Speaker 3>you know, they've been with us forever. They're embedded in

0:29:35.080 --> 0:29:38.320
<v Speaker 3>popular culture, and you have to get over all of

0:29:38.360 --> 0:29:42.880
<v Speaker 3>that history to convince durors that there are indeed issues. Essentially,

0:29:43.320 --> 0:29:48.040
<v Speaker 3>the presumption is that prints are infallible. In a case

0:29:48.120 --> 0:29:51.000
<v Speaker 3>where your client is supposed to be presumed innocent and

0:29:51.120 --> 0:29:53.960
<v Speaker 3>the prosecution or the government has to prove their case

0:29:54.000 --> 0:29:57.600
<v Speaker 3>beyond a reasonable doubt, a significant piece of evidence is

0:29:57.640 --> 0:30:01.360
<v Speaker 3>presumed to be infallible. You have a lot of work

0:30:01.400 --> 0:30:04.000
<v Speaker 3>to do to try to educate them that that's not

0:30:04.080 --> 0:30:04.800
<v Speaker 3>the case.

0:30:05.320 --> 0:30:07.640
<v Speaker 1>Right, because it turns out that judges are really no

0:30:07.760 --> 0:30:12.440
<v Speaker 1>different than jurors. I mean, in some instances they're more sophisticated,

0:30:12.600 --> 0:30:17.720
<v Speaker 1>not always. They certainly have less time and frankly sometimes

0:30:17.800 --> 0:30:22.320
<v Speaker 1>less patience, but they're sort of not immune to the

0:30:22.360 --> 0:30:25.920
<v Speaker 1>impact of pop culture and precedent. But look, some people

0:30:25.960 --> 0:30:28.640
<v Speaker 1>may be listening to this and thinking, I don't have

0:30:28.680 --> 0:30:30.520
<v Speaker 1>a law degree, but I want to help. I want

0:30:30.560 --> 0:30:33.320
<v Speaker 1>to do something about this. So do you have any

0:30:33.360 --> 0:30:37.640
<v Speaker 1>ideas for what our listeners can do to help I do?

0:30:37.880 --> 0:30:39.560
<v Speaker 3>And I wanted to go back, just for a moment

0:30:40.240 --> 0:30:43.720
<v Speaker 3>to talk about precedent because where I went in my

0:30:43.920 --> 0:30:48.720
<v Speaker 3>mind are courts saying that actual innocence of a client

0:30:48.800 --> 0:30:53.000
<v Speaker 3>on death row doesn't matter because procedure was followed. So

0:30:53.480 --> 0:30:59.280
<v Speaker 3>that should alert your listeners how much courts adhere to

0:30:59.680 --> 0:31:04.760
<v Speaker 3>press and are deferential to previous findings to the point

0:31:05.080 --> 0:31:09.000
<v Speaker 3>where they would authorize that somebody received the death penalty

0:31:09.240 --> 0:31:13.320
<v Speaker 3>because the process was followed. Anyone in the public wants

0:31:13.720 --> 0:31:18.080
<v Speaker 3>the law enforcement, the system to get things right. And

0:31:18.120 --> 0:31:20.880
<v Speaker 3>the only way we can get things right is if

0:31:20.920 --> 0:31:25.920
<v Speaker 3>we understand the limitations of these forensic sciences, so people

0:31:25.920 --> 0:31:30.960
<v Speaker 3>can be writing letters, calling their prosecutors, their policymakers, county commissioners,

0:31:31.200 --> 0:31:35.200
<v Speaker 3>city council members. What are you doing to make sure

0:31:35.640 --> 0:31:41.240
<v Speaker 3>that police officers, that crime lab examiners understand this information?

0:31:41.720 --> 0:31:44.640
<v Speaker 3>And that would be really helpful because people really do

0:31:44.800 --> 0:31:49.240
<v Speaker 3>listen more to constituents and people in the public than

0:31:49.280 --> 0:31:51.520
<v Speaker 3>they do potentially defense lawyers.

0:31:53.560 --> 0:31:56.440
<v Speaker 1>You know, I've said this before, and I really do

0:31:56.560 --> 0:32:01.080
<v Speaker 1>think it bears repeating. Pressure breaks pipes. What you all

0:32:01.200 --> 0:32:05.160
<v Speaker 1>can do as listeners of this podcast is take action.

0:32:06.080 --> 0:32:08.800
<v Speaker 1>You're on here because you want to learn something, but

0:32:08.920 --> 0:32:11.920
<v Speaker 1>you also want to do something about it. The way

0:32:12.000 --> 0:32:14.960
<v Speaker 1>that we stop this junk signs from making it into

0:32:15.040 --> 0:32:17.720
<v Speaker 1>our courts is to shine a bright light on it.

0:32:18.640 --> 0:32:22.320
<v Speaker 1>Google the NAS Report that we've continually talked about during

0:32:22.360 --> 0:32:26.720
<v Speaker 1>this season. That report details how so many of these

0:32:26.760 --> 0:32:32.440
<v Speaker 1>disciplines of forensic science, including fingerprints, are really problematic. The

0:32:32.600 --> 0:32:36.840
<v Speaker 1>problem is judges don't know about it. Find out who

0:32:36.880 --> 0:32:40.240
<v Speaker 1>your local criminal court judges are and send them the

0:32:40.360 --> 0:32:44.480
<v Speaker 1>NAS Report. Highlight this section on fingerprint analysis and send

0:32:44.640 --> 0:32:48.640
<v Speaker 1>to your local criminal court judges. It's only by educating

0:32:48.680 --> 0:32:51.800
<v Speaker 1>our judges and speaking truth to power that we can

0:32:51.960 --> 0:32:55.280
<v Speaker 1>really make change happen. And if you don't think that

0:32:55.360 --> 0:32:58.160
<v Speaker 1>your voice matters, just take a look around the country

0:32:58.240 --> 0:33:01.560
<v Speaker 1>right now. It's the collection the voice that is causing

0:33:01.760 --> 0:33:04.560
<v Speaker 1>change to happen, and we can do it one step

0:33:04.560 --> 0:33:15.640
<v Speaker 1>at a time in our criminal justice system. Thank you

0:33:15.680 --> 0:33:18.560
<v Speaker 1>for listening to Wrongful Conviction Junk Science. We're going to

0:33:18.560 --> 0:33:21.720
<v Speaker 1>be taking a little break, but our next episode will

0:33:21.720 --> 0:33:25.400
<v Speaker 1>be out on October seventh. In the meantime, we will

0:33:25.440 --> 0:33:28.480
<v Speaker 1>be keeping a critical and close eye on our criminal

0:33:28.600 --> 0:33:32.080
<v Speaker 1>justice system. We would love to hear how you're doing

0:33:32.120 --> 0:33:34.520
<v Speaker 1>that along with us, so please leave us a comment

0:33:34.600 --> 0:33:36.440
<v Speaker 1>and let us know what you've been up to, and

0:33:36.560 --> 0:33:40.400
<v Speaker 1>stay on the Wrongful Conviction podcast feed as Jason Flamm

0:33:40.400 --> 0:33:45.080
<v Speaker 1>will continue to release episodes between now and October seventh.

0:33:47.440 --> 0:33:50.440
<v Speaker 1>Wrongful Conviction Junk Science is a production of Lava for

0:33:50.480 --> 0:33:54.680
<v Speaker 1>Good Podcasts and association with Signal Company Number One. Thanks

0:33:54.720 --> 0:33:57.479
<v Speaker 1>to our executive producer Jason Flamm and the team at

0:33:57.520 --> 0:34:02.360
<v Speaker 1>Signal Company Number One, ducer Kevin Wardis and senior producers

0:34:02.440 --> 0:34:06.400
<v Speaker 1>Kara Kornhaber and Britz Spangler. Our music was composed by

0:34:06.480 --> 0:34:10.520
<v Speaker 1>Jay Ralph. You can follow me on Instagram at dubin Josh.

0:34:11.040 --> 0:34:14.960
<v Speaker 1>Follow the Wrongful Conviction podcast on Facebook and on Instagram

0:34:15.000 --> 0:34:18.360
<v Speaker 1>at Wrongful Conviction and on Twitter at wrong Conviction