WEBVTT - TURNOUT Episode 5: ‘More rhetoric than reality’

0:00:00.480 --> 0:00:04.680
<v Speaker 1>If you design, engineer, build, or maintain buildings in California,

0:00:04.840 --> 0:00:08.240
<v Speaker 1>you can get free technical training, continuing education credits, and

0:00:08.280 --> 0:00:11.079
<v Speaker 1>prepare for a range of certifications through pg n e

0:00:11.240 --> 0:00:14.960
<v Speaker 1>S online classes. Enroll at PGE dot com slash training.

0:00:16.040 --> 0:00:18.760
<v Speaker 1>Hey guys, I'm Kayleie Shore. On my podcast Too Much

0:00:18.800 --> 0:00:21.440
<v Speaker 1>to Say. I share my thoughts on everything from music

0:00:21.480 --> 0:00:25.240
<v Speaker 1>to Martini's, social media and social anxiety regrets to risky

0:00:25.239 --> 0:00:28.280
<v Speaker 1>text and so much more. I have been known to

0:00:28.320 --> 0:00:32.040
<v Speaker 1>read my literal diary entries on my show, and sometimes

0:00:32.080 --> 0:00:34.360
<v Speaker 1>I do interviews with my crazy group of friends. So

0:00:34.600 --> 0:00:36.440
<v Speaker 1>if you guys want to tune in, you can hear

0:00:36.479 --> 0:00:38.800
<v Speaker 1>new episodes of Too Much to Say every Wednesday on

0:00:38.840 --> 0:00:41.839
<v Speaker 1>the National Podcast Network, available on the I Heart Radio app,

0:00:41.880 --> 0:00:46.480
<v Speaker 1>Apple podcast, or wherever you listen to him. Make sure

0:00:46.479 --> 0:00:49.159
<v Speaker 1>to check out Drink Chance, your number one music podcast

0:00:49.200 --> 0:00:51.920
<v Speaker 1>on the Black Effect Podcast Network. Host n O r

0:00:51.960 --> 0:00:53.760
<v Speaker 1>E and d J E f N sat down with

0:00:53.840 --> 0:00:59.200
<v Speaker 1>artists and icon Ya, which Vulture called one most significant interviews.

0:00:59.240 --> 0:01:02.000
<v Speaker 1>I literally had to go like Danos and I don't

0:01:02.040 --> 0:01:03.800
<v Speaker 1>want to have to be the villain. But when I

0:01:03.840 --> 0:01:08.040
<v Speaker 1>went and did the Donda thing, he returned and anybody

0:01:08.040 --> 0:01:11.040
<v Speaker 1>had to sit back and watch the real leader. Check

0:01:11.040 --> 0:01:14.120
<v Speaker 1>out Drink Champ's conversation with Yea and many more legendary

0:01:14.200 --> 0:01:16.920
<v Speaker 1>artists each and every Friday on the Heart Radio app,

0:01:16.959 --> 0:01:19.880
<v Speaker 1>Apple podcast, or where ever you listen to your favorite shows.

0:01:23.400 --> 0:01:26.320
<v Speaker 1>We've always said that this series is about so much

0:01:26.360 --> 0:01:30.600
<v Speaker 1>more than just this election. As we've shown in our

0:01:30.640 --> 0:01:34.360
<v Speaker 1>first four episodes, the voting issues of our past and

0:01:34.600 --> 0:01:38.280
<v Speaker 1>how our country responds to them paved the way forward

0:01:38.560 --> 0:01:43.119
<v Speaker 1>shaping future elections, including the history making moment we're living

0:01:43.200 --> 0:01:47.480
<v Speaker 1>in today. But now here we are just days away

0:01:47.520 --> 0:01:51.200
<v Speaker 1>from the presidential election, and I don't know about you,

0:01:51.320 --> 0:01:55.120
<v Speaker 1>but I have severe asset indigestion. So before getting into

0:01:55.200 --> 0:01:58.160
<v Speaker 1>our main interview today, I wanted to dive into some

0:01:58.240 --> 0:02:03.040
<v Speaker 1>of this week's big election stories. So the good news,

0:02:03.200 --> 0:02:06.840
<v Speaker 1>particularly for a show called Turnout, is that people are

0:02:07.000 --> 0:02:11.399
<v Speaker 1>turning out to vote in droves. By this recording, Americans

0:02:11.440 --> 0:02:16.440
<v Speaker 1>have cast over seventy one million early ballots, which is

0:02:16.480 --> 0:02:19.560
<v Speaker 1>more than half of all ballots cast and the two

0:02:19.639 --> 0:02:23.799
<v Speaker 1>thousand sixteen election people are mailing them in voting early

0:02:24.160 --> 0:02:28.320
<v Speaker 1>making a plan for election day. It's so inspiring, I,

0:02:28.480 --> 0:02:30.799
<v Speaker 1>for one called a lot of my friends to make

0:02:30.800 --> 0:02:33.959
<v Speaker 1>sure they were getting their asses to the polls. I'm

0:02:34.000 --> 0:02:36.079
<v Speaker 1>calling to see if you voted or you have a

0:02:36.200 --> 0:02:42.480
<v Speaker 1>voting plan, Katherine, Yeah, calling to see if you voted

0:02:43.919 --> 0:02:55.600
<v Speaker 1>already submitted by a mailing ballot. Good. But the rules

0:02:55.639 --> 0:02:58.440
<v Speaker 1>about how and when those votes will be counted are

0:02:58.480 --> 0:03:01.320
<v Speaker 1>the subject of a political tug of war in some

0:03:01.480 --> 0:03:05.680
<v Speaker 1>key states, states like Wisconsin, where the Supreme Court had

0:03:05.680 --> 0:03:09.480
<v Speaker 1>to step in with the decision on October in another

0:03:09.560 --> 0:03:13.919
<v Speaker 1>major blow to Democrats, Wisconsin can't count mailed in ballots

0:03:14.000 --> 0:03:17.680
<v Speaker 1>received after election day if it's not close. In Wisconsin,

0:03:17.840 --> 0:03:20.520
<v Speaker 1>it doesn't matter. If it comes down like it did

0:03:20.639 --> 0:03:23.320
<v Speaker 1>last time to tens of thousands of votes. This could

0:03:23.400 --> 0:03:26.040
<v Speaker 1>very easily make up the difference between who ends up

0:03:26.080 --> 0:03:29.560
<v Speaker 1>winning this election. The Wisconsin ruling is just the latest

0:03:29.600 --> 0:03:33.040
<v Speaker 1>in a flurry of election year decisions that, rather than

0:03:33.080 --> 0:03:36.680
<v Speaker 1>grant leeway because of the pandemic is Democrats argue, have

0:03:36.840 --> 0:03:43.280
<v Speaker 1>mostly sided with Republicans keeping voting restrictions in place. Texas

0:03:43.280 --> 0:03:46.440
<v Speaker 1>Supreme Court just issued a ruling essentially shutting the door

0:03:46.520 --> 0:03:49.560
<v Speaker 1>on allowing all Texans to vote by mail during the

0:03:49.560 --> 0:03:52.880
<v Speaker 1>coronavirus pandemic and the US Supreme Court blocked a lower

0:03:52.880 --> 0:03:56.720
<v Speaker 1>court from allowing curbside voting in Alabama. Another change in

0:03:56.760 --> 0:04:00.360
<v Speaker 1>the witness signature debate for South Carolina absentee ballot. There

0:04:00.400 --> 0:04:03.360
<v Speaker 1>has been so much back and forth. Finally the Supreme

0:04:03.360 --> 0:04:07.400
<v Speaker 1>Court ruled that those signatures are required, and there are

0:04:07.400 --> 0:04:10.440
<v Speaker 1>more cases like these that could be affected by Judge

0:04:10.440 --> 0:04:14.240
<v Speaker 1>Amy Coney Barrett's swift assent to the highest court in

0:04:14.280 --> 0:04:19.000
<v Speaker 1>the land. This was a rigorous confirmation process, and I

0:04:19.040 --> 0:04:23.400
<v Speaker 1>thank all of you, especially Leader McConnell and Chairman Graham,

0:04:23.520 --> 0:04:27.240
<v Speaker 1>for helping me to navigate it. It's a privilege to

0:04:27.320 --> 0:04:30.320
<v Speaker 1>be asked to serve my country in this office, and

0:04:30.360 --> 0:04:35.960
<v Speaker 1>I stand here tonight truly honored and humbled. While it's

0:04:36.000 --> 0:04:39.320
<v Speaker 1>true that this political tug of war has always happened

0:04:39.360 --> 0:04:43.400
<v Speaker 1>as each party vised for power every election, this year

0:04:43.640 --> 0:04:47.600
<v Speaker 1>is different. Mail in voting has surged this year as

0:04:47.640 --> 0:04:51.200
<v Speaker 1>Americans seek to avoid crowds at polling places, even as

0:04:51.240 --> 0:04:55.040
<v Speaker 1>Trump repeatedly claimed without evidence that it leads to voter fraud.

0:04:55.160 --> 0:04:59.120
<v Speaker 1>Because the President of the United States has taken fears

0:04:59.120 --> 0:05:02.560
<v Speaker 1>of voter fraud to a new level, a level that

0:05:02.720 --> 0:05:07.400
<v Speaker 1>questions the integrity of the entire election process. This is

0:05:07.440 --> 0:05:10.160
<v Speaker 1>going to be a fraud like you've never seen. Thousands

0:05:10.160 --> 0:05:11.920
<v Speaker 1>of votes are gathered and they come in and they

0:05:12.080 --> 0:05:14.719
<v Speaker 1>dumped in a location, and then all of a sudden

0:05:14.760 --> 0:05:17.000
<v Speaker 1>you lose elections that you think you're gonna win. You know,

0:05:17.160 --> 0:05:20.120
<v Speaker 1>so many years I've been watching elections and they say

0:05:20.240 --> 0:05:23.400
<v Speaker 1>the projected winner or the winner of the election. I

0:05:23.440 --> 0:05:25.640
<v Speaker 1>don't want to see that take place in a week

0:05:26.520 --> 0:05:31.160
<v Speaker 1>after November third, or a month or frankly, with litigation

0:05:31.200 --> 0:05:35.039
<v Speaker 1>and everything else, that can happen years, years, or you

0:05:35.160 --> 0:05:38.680
<v Speaker 1>never even know who won the election. I'm Katie Kuric,

0:05:38.839 --> 0:05:42.040
<v Speaker 1>and this is turnout. Can you or the White House

0:05:42.040 --> 0:05:44.640
<v Speaker 1>staff where you camp anervide any evidence to back up

0:05:44.640 --> 0:05:47.680
<v Speaker 1>your claim? The mail in voting is wife with fraud,

0:05:47.760 --> 0:05:49.960
<v Speaker 1>like the example you gave the people work in your

0:05:50.000 --> 0:05:53.440
<v Speaker 1>rooms filling out a false balance. And where's the evidence?

0:05:54.920 --> 0:05:56.920
<v Speaker 1>I think there's a lot of evidence, but will provide

0:05:56.920 --> 0:05:59.800
<v Speaker 1>you with some, Okay, and there's evidence that's being compiled

0:05:59.839 --> 0:06:03.200
<v Speaker 1>today on the podcast. An interview with an unlikely critic

0:06:03.440 --> 0:06:08.640
<v Speaker 1>of President Trump. The president's rhetoric, unproven rhetoric, the fact

0:06:08.720 --> 0:06:13.880
<v Speaker 1>that there is not sufficient evidence to show systemic fraud

0:06:14.320 --> 0:06:17.800
<v Speaker 1>did flip the switch, because that's where your responsibility comes in.

0:06:20.000 --> 0:06:23.800
<v Speaker 1>Benjamin Ginsburg is a top Republican election lawyer who just

0:06:23.960 --> 0:06:28.160
<v Speaker 1>retired in August after thirty eight years and the GOP trenches.

0:06:28.839 --> 0:06:32.120
<v Speaker 1>Now he's spending his time writing op eds, and one

0:06:32.200 --> 0:06:36.320
<v Speaker 1>that got my attention back in September was a surprisingly

0:06:36.480 --> 0:06:41.000
<v Speaker 1>blunt rebuke of the president's baseless claims that the electoral

0:06:41.040 --> 0:06:45.880
<v Speaker 1>system is rigged. The sanctity of elections and making sure

0:06:45.920 --> 0:06:50.480
<v Speaker 1>they're done properly should be of deep concern to everyone.

0:06:50.520 --> 0:06:55.280
<v Speaker 1>It really is the foundation of the democracy. And for

0:06:55.720 --> 0:07:00.000
<v Speaker 1>the forty years that I'd been working in Republican politics,

0:07:00.360 --> 0:07:03.960
<v Speaker 1>I was either in a precinct or part of a

0:07:04.320 --> 0:07:07.200
<v Speaker 1>sort of a roving lawyer team in a state for

0:07:07.320 --> 0:07:11.960
<v Speaker 1>running a nationwide program where we were talking to people

0:07:12.280 --> 0:07:17.440
<v Speaker 1>in polling places to see what the problems were. Republicans mean,

0:07:17.680 --> 0:07:20.440
<v Speaker 1>probably back since the days of Tammany Hall and the

0:07:20.440 --> 0:07:25.840
<v Speaker 1>big city machines have been suspicious of fraudulent elections in

0:07:25.920 --> 0:07:29.840
<v Speaker 1>vote rating, so we've always looked for it. And every

0:07:29.880 --> 0:07:34.480
<v Speaker 1>state law has provisions for poll watchers or election observers,

0:07:35.040 --> 0:07:38.480
<v Speaker 1>and both parties should take full advantage of that, because

0:07:38.520 --> 0:07:42.640
<v Speaker 1>it's very important to have your people in a polling

0:07:42.680 --> 0:07:46.440
<v Speaker 1>place to look for problems, and so we've we've done that.

0:07:46.720 --> 0:07:51.000
<v Speaker 1>Now there were sort of sporadic instances of fraud that

0:07:51.080 --> 0:07:56.400
<v Speaker 1>came to light, but never nothing that would justify a

0:07:56.520 --> 0:08:00.800
<v Speaker 1>president of the United States, really any candidate saying our

0:08:00.840 --> 0:08:04.520
<v Speaker 1>elections are fraudulent and they're rigged and the only way

0:08:04.560 --> 0:08:07.600
<v Speaker 1>I can lose is if they cheat, because they're simply

0:08:07.880 --> 0:08:11.360
<v Speaker 1>is not evidence to support that, and so to say

0:08:11.400 --> 0:08:16.240
<v Speaker 1>otherwise is completely destructive. So I think that this has

0:08:16.800 --> 0:08:20.920
<v Speaker 1>brought us into new and in dangerous territory, and the

0:08:20.960 --> 0:08:23.960
<v Speaker 1>fact that I had been a part of those programs

0:08:24.040 --> 0:08:26.960
<v Speaker 1>for so many years meant that I thought I had

0:08:26.960 --> 0:08:30.400
<v Speaker 1>a perspective on it. And what concerns you the most

0:08:30.480 --> 0:08:36.240
<v Speaker 1>about the rhetoric we're hearing undermining our electoral process from

0:08:36.280 --> 0:08:39.520
<v Speaker 1>the President of the United States himself, Well, you see

0:08:39.559 --> 0:08:44.920
<v Speaker 1>it reflected in the polls this cycle, where a dangerously

0:08:45.160 --> 0:08:48.960
<v Speaker 1>and shocking the high number of people say they're not

0:08:49.120 --> 0:08:51.679
<v Speaker 1>sure that the election is going to be valid and

0:08:51.760 --> 0:08:57.240
<v Speaker 1>the results accurate. And that's really a product of presidential

0:08:57.360 --> 0:09:02.199
<v Speaker 1>rhetoric and certainly not a product of of any real evidence. Well,

0:09:03.000 --> 0:09:06.960
<v Speaker 1>let me ask you this, to play devil's advocate, We've

0:09:07.000 --> 0:09:10.560
<v Speaker 1>never had an election quite like this, obviously been in

0:09:10.600 --> 0:09:17.160
<v Speaker 1>the midst of a of a pandemic with really unprecedented

0:09:17.280 --> 0:09:22.600
<v Speaker 1>number of mail in ballots, and I'm curious if you

0:09:22.679 --> 0:09:28.560
<v Speaker 1>think that that might provide fertile ground for the kind

0:09:28.600 --> 0:09:33.920
<v Speaker 1>of election fraud that some people in the specifically in

0:09:33.960 --> 0:09:38.400
<v Speaker 1>the Republican Party or warning us of. Well, first of all,

0:09:38.440 --> 0:09:40.640
<v Speaker 1>I think there are two sides to the coin, and

0:09:40.679 --> 0:09:44.320
<v Speaker 1>we should we should talk about that. So there is

0:09:44.679 --> 0:09:51.240
<v Speaker 1>a huge difference between a rhetorical fusillade that elections are

0:09:51.240 --> 0:09:55.200
<v Speaker 1>fraudulent or rigged and actually being able to show that

0:09:55.720 --> 0:09:58.320
<v Speaker 1>in a way that would taint the results of an election.

0:09:58.880 --> 0:10:04.600
<v Speaker 1>And rather than than talking at a rally or UH

0:10:04.920 --> 0:10:09.600
<v Speaker 1>making threats in a tweet, you will really have to

0:10:09.679 --> 0:10:14.520
<v Speaker 1>go precinct by precinct and find specific instances of fraud.

0:10:15.160 --> 0:10:18.520
<v Speaker 1>They can find specific instances of fraud. It should be

0:10:18.600 --> 0:10:23.160
<v Speaker 1>rooted out and UH and corrected. But to be able

0:10:23.160 --> 0:10:26.440
<v Speaker 1>to actually throw the results of the election in doubt,

0:10:27.240 --> 0:10:32.520
<v Speaker 1>there will have to be ballots that are called into questions. Now,

0:10:32.920 --> 0:10:36.560
<v Speaker 1>I don't believe that there will be a specific number

0:10:36.600 --> 0:10:40.720
<v Speaker 1>of individual ballots that can be called into question, and

0:10:41.000 --> 0:10:45.800
<v Speaker 1>mass challenges have always been frowned upon in as a

0:10:45.840 --> 0:10:49.880
<v Speaker 1>matter of law and in legal proceedings. So I think

0:10:49.960 --> 0:10:53.080
<v Speaker 1>that UM feelings have been rebbed up to a much

0:10:53.200 --> 0:10:58.199
<v Speaker 1>higher degree in this election. But I think the results

0:10:58.200 --> 0:11:03.160
<v Speaker 1>in the casting and counting of it's themselves will will

0:11:03.280 --> 0:11:06.720
<v Speaker 1>be done in a way that there will be verifiable

0:11:06.800 --> 0:11:11.480
<v Speaker 1>results of the election. How can you assure listeners of

0:11:11.520 --> 0:11:15.640
<v Speaker 1>that that the systems are in fact in place that

0:11:15.760 --> 0:11:21.280
<v Speaker 1>will prevent and penalize any kind of voter fraud, even

0:11:21.320 --> 0:11:24.840
<v Speaker 1>it's if it is in fact very sporadic. Well, I

0:11:24.880 --> 0:11:27.360
<v Speaker 1>think that's I think it's true on a number of levels.

0:11:27.720 --> 0:11:30.320
<v Speaker 1>First of all is that you can go back and

0:11:30.360 --> 0:11:35.720
<v Speaker 1>look at instances of fraud that have been uncovered and prosecuted. UM.

0:11:35.960 --> 0:11:38.880
<v Speaker 1>Rarely is it enough to overturn the results of the election,

0:11:39.040 --> 0:11:43.400
<v Speaker 1>but sometimes. There was a congressional race in North Carolina

0:11:43.880 --> 0:11:47.960
<v Speaker 1>in two thousand eighteen where there were illegalities found, so

0:11:48.000 --> 0:11:52.359
<v Speaker 1>a new election was held. There have been elections in Paterson,

0:11:52.440 --> 0:11:56.040
<v Speaker 1>New Jersey, UH in this past year where there was

0:11:56.080 --> 0:12:01.480
<v Speaker 1>found to be systemic fraud, and that was correct that UM,

0:12:01.480 --> 0:12:03.960
<v Speaker 1>but at the end of the day, I think people

0:12:04.000 --> 0:12:09.480
<v Speaker 1>can take a degree of certitude knowing that their ballots

0:12:09.559 --> 0:12:13.240
<v Speaker 1>are going to be counted in their community by their neighbors.

0:12:13.840 --> 0:12:19.080
<v Speaker 1>The US system has over ten thousand five jurisdictions with

0:12:19.559 --> 0:12:22.280
<v Speaker 1>with some degree of authority for the casting and counting

0:12:22.280 --> 0:12:26.120
<v Speaker 1>of ballots. UH. In a normal year, over a million

0:12:26.160 --> 0:12:29.280
<v Speaker 1>people will volunteer to be poll watchers. They are all

0:12:29.400 --> 0:12:34.080
<v Speaker 1>people from your communities. And um I was co chair

0:12:34.120 --> 0:12:38.040
<v Speaker 1>of a presidential commission, bipartisan commission back in two thousand,

0:12:38.160 --> 0:12:41.800
<v Speaker 1>thirteen and fourteen, where we got to spend an extraordinary

0:12:41.800 --> 0:12:46.280
<v Speaker 1>amount of time meeting the actual people from the communities

0:12:46.760 --> 0:12:50.319
<v Speaker 1>on the state, county, UH and local levels who are

0:12:50.360 --> 0:12:54.640
<v Speaker 1>responsible for conducting elections. And I take a great amount

0:12:54.640 --> 0:13:00.160
<v Speaker 1>of solitude in in knowing how good those people are

0:13:00.160 --> 0:13:03.600
<v Speaker 1>and how much they do care. Having said that, what

0:13:03.679 --> 0:13:07.200
<v Speaker 1>was your reaction, Ben, when you started hearing Donald Trump,

0:13:07.559 --> 0:13:13.320
<v Speaker 1>President Donald Trump and other high ranking Republicans start laying

0:13:13.360 --> 0:13:20.880
<v Speaker 1>the groundwork for an all out assault on our democratic process. Well,

0:13:20.920 --> 0:13:23.640
<v Speaker 1>I'm not sure that they laid the groundwork for an

0:13:23.679 --> 0:13:29.800
<v Speaker 1>all out assault. I think they used irresponsible and regrettable rhetoric.

0:13:30.440 --> 0:13:36.200
<v Speaker 1>But again, the groundwork for an assault would require challenging

0:13:36.440 --> 0:13:41.800
<v Speaker 1>on a local level in a very granular fashion, and

0:13:42.240 --> 0:13:48.000
<v Speaker 1>the battleground states, with the exception of Pennsylvania, Wisconsin, and Michigan,

0:13:48.360 --> 0:13:52.080
<v Speaker 1>have all begun to process their absentee ballots already. The

0:13:52.120 --> 0:13:55.640
<v Speaker 1>mail in votes that we've been reading are coming in

0:13:55.640 --> 0:13:59.079
<v Speaker 1>in such heavy quantity. Uh. And there have not been

0:13:59.160 --> 0:14:04.320
<v Speaker 1>those wide skill challenge so at least so far, that's

0:14:04.360 --> 0:14:10.080
<v Speaker 1>been more rhetoric than reality. Hold that thought. We'll be

0:14:10.200 --> 0:14:21.640
<v Speaker 1>right back after this short break. My name is Hannah,

0:14:21.840 --> 0:14:24.840
<v Speaker 1>I'm Dan, I'm Ben, and we are Group Love. If

0:14:24.840 --> 0:14:27.440
<v Speaker 1>you're dealing with stress or anxiety, or just need some help,

0:14:27.920 --> 0:14:30.560
<v Speaker 1>cal Hope is here for all Californians with free mental

0:14:30.560 --> 0:14:33.720
<v Speaker 1>health resources to help you navigate this uncertain time. Go

0:14:33.840 --> 0:14:35.760
<v Speaker 1>to cal Hope dot org to live chat with one

0:14:35.800 --> 0:14:38.720
<v Speaker 1>of their incredible listeners, or call their warmline at one

0:14:39.080 --> 0:14:44.360
<v Speaker 1>three three three seven Hope. That's one three three one

0:14:44.520 --> 0:14:51.640
<v Speaker 1>seven h O p e hopeless here in California. Adoption

0:14:51.680 --> 0:14:54.000
<v Speaker 1>of teams from foster care is a topic not enough

0:14:54.040 --> 0:14:56.440
<v Speaker 1>people know about, and we're here to change that. I'm

0:14:56.480 --> 0:15:00.000
<v Speaker 1>April Dinuity, host of the new podcast Navigating Adoption Present

0:15:00.040 --> 0:15:03.440
<v Speaker 1>to buy adopt us Kids. Each episode brings you compelling,

0:15:03.520 --> 0:15:06.600
<v Speaker 1>real life adoption stories told by the families that lived them,

0:15:06.600 --> 0:15:10.400
<v Speaker 1>with commentary from experts. Visit adopt us Kids dot org,

0:15:10.480 --> 0:15:14.280
<v Speaker 1>slash podcast, or subscribe to Navigating Adoption presented by adopt

0:15:14.320 --> 0:15:16.560
<v Speaker 1>us Kids, brought to you by the U. S. Department

0:15:16.560 --> 0:15:19.480
<v Speaker 1>of Healthy Human Services, Administration for Children and Families and

0:15:19.600 --> 0:15:25.360
<v Speaker 1>the ACT Council. Introduce the Bizita You're all Things Music,

0:15:25.400 --> 0:15:29.440
<v Speaker 1>business and media podcast. Join me, Joe w Leski and

0:15:29.520 --> 0:15:33.600
<v Speaker 1>my co host Colin McKay every Wednesday, where we've discussed

0:15:33.640 --> 0:15:36.720
<v Speaker 1>the breaking news changing the music industry and what your

0:15:36.800 --> 0:15:40.280
<v Speaker 1>favorite artists and creatives are up to. Collin, who's your

0:15:40.320 --> 0:15:43.920
<v Speaker 1>favorite artist? Oh? You know? The track Factor, Demi Levado,

0:15:44.640 --> 0:15:50.640
<v Speaker 1>Rana Grande, Captain be Part Snap Back to Reality eminem Style.

0:15:50.840 --> 0:15:53.800
<v Speaker 1>Join music industry professionals, Joe and I as we pulled

0:15:53.840 --> 0:15:56.760
<v Speaker 1>back the curtain of the successes and failures of the biz.

0:15:57.280 --> 0:15:59.200
<v Speaker 1>You guys have been hanging out a while. What are

0:15:59.240 --> 0:16:03.400
<v Speaker 1>they doing? Com I guess listening to an ad Sorry.

0:16:03.440 --> 0:16:06.840
<v Speaker 1>Listen to new episodes of the biz Tape every Wednesday

0:16:06.920 --> 0:16:10.680
<v Speaker 1>on the Nashville Podcast Network, available on I Heart Radio app,

0:16:10.760 --> 0:16:24.480
<v Speaker 1>Apple podcasts, or wherever you listen to podcasts. Let's return

0:16:24.520 --> 0:16:29.520
<v Speaker 1>to my interview with Republican election lawyer Ben Ginsburg. Let's

0:16:29.520 --> 0:16:32.360
<v Speaker 1>talk about these legal battles. The r n C and

0:16:32.400 --> 0:16:36.440
<v Speaker 1>the Trump reelection campaign, as you know, have doubled their

0:16:36.520 --> 0:16:40.120
<v Speaker 1>legal budget to twenty million dollars. I think you called

0:16:40.160 --> 0:16:45.800
<v Speaker 1>it a torrent of voting litigation already underway. What up

0:16:45.840 --> 0:16:51.320
<v Speaker 1>with that, Ben? Well, So it's an interesting it's an

0:16:51.360 --> 0:16:53.880
<v Speaker 1>interesting phenomenon, and I think you need to take a

0:16:54.000 --> 0:16:59.479
<v Speaker 1>step back to appreciate. I in two thousand ten, Republicans

0:16:59.520 --> 0:17:03.960
<v Speaker 1>did very well in the Obama mid terms and took

0:17:03.960 --> 0:17:07.399
<v Speaker 1>control of the number of state legislators and won a

0:17:07.520 --> 0:17:11.200
<v Speaker 1>number of governorships, and then increased that in in two

0:17:11.280 --> 0:17:15.119
<v Speaker 1>thousand and twelve on the state and local level. That

0:17:15.240 --> 0:17:20.560
<v Speaker 1>gave Republicans the ability to pass legislation that they felt

0:17:21.080 --> 0:17:26.520
<v Speaker 1>gave them an advantage in the electoral context. And so

0:17:26.680 --> 0:17:31.720
<v Speaker 1>they did pass any number of laws. Uh, the the

0:17:31.760 --> 0:17:35.640
<v Speaker 1>Clinton forces and really much more of the Biden forces,

0:17:36.119 --> 0:17:39.679
<v Speaker 1>decided that they would go to court to try and

0:17:40.160 --> 0:17:45.440
<v Speaker 1>turned back those pieces of legislation that Republicans passed. Now,

0:17:45.840 --> 0:17:49.200
<v Speaker 1>before we start clicking our tongues at the bad Republicans

0:17:49.240 --> 0:17:54.440
<v Speaker 1>for doing that. Recognized that when Democrats won control of

0:17:54.560 --> 0:17:59.200
<v Speaker 1>the Nevada legislature and governorship and the New Jersey legislature

0:17:59.240 --> 0:18:02.840
<v Speaker 1>and governorship, they have now since two thousand and eighteen,

0:18:03.280 --> 0:18:09.639
<v Speaker 1>passed the Democratic version of legislation that helps them in elections.

0:18:10.200 --> 0:18:14.199
<v Speaker 1>So it's something that both parties do. The RNC sued

0:18:14.240 --> 0:18:19.240
<v Speaker 1>the Democrats after they passed that legislation. The Republicans have

0:18:19.320 --> 0:18:23.560
<v Speaker 1>been more successful in this past decade in winning legislatures,

0:18:23.920 --> 0:18:26.399
<v Speaker 1>and so they have passed any number of laws that

0:18:26.440 --> 0:18:29.800
<v Speaker 1>the Democrats don't like, and the Democrats have gone to court,

0:18:29.880 --> 0:18:33.280
<v Speaker 1>both federal and state to try and redress it. Now

0:18:33.320 --> 0:18:35.480
<v Speaker 1>that the shoe is a little bit on the other foot,

0:18:36.000 --> 0:18:39.639
<v Speaker 1>after the two thousand and eighteen elections, Democrats have passed

0:18:39.680 --> 0:18:43.520
<v Speaker 1>their bills and Republicans have gone to court. So the

0:18:44.000 --> 0:18:47.280
<v Speaker 1>weight of the legislation is really because Republicans did better

0:18:47.359 --> 0:18:51.560
<v Speaker 1>in elections earlier in the decade. Well, this seems pretty

0:18:51.640 --> 0:18:54.800
<v Speaker 1>left up to me, Ben, I mean, why are these

0:18:55.200 --> 0:19:00.639
<v Speaker 1>election laws so malleable depending on who's in power? Can they?

0:19:00.680 --> 0:19:03.840
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I guess that's a that's our system of government.

0:19:03.920 --> 0:19:06.360
<v Speaker 1>But it seems a little screwed up to me. Well,

0:19:06.520 --> 0:19:10.320
<v Speaker 1>I you know, I think that they are policy choices

0:19:10.720 --> 0:19:15.840
<v Speaker 1>that get made in legislation. It happens in laws involving elections.

0:19:16.520 --> 0:19:20.879
<v Speaker 1>It certainly happens in laws involving taxes or the environment

0:19:21.400 --> 0:19:25.359
<v Speaker 1>or any other issue that you want to choose. There

0:19:25.400 --> 0:19:29.640
<v Speaker 1>are differences between the power the parties, and when one

0:19:29.720 --> 0:19:32.520
<v Speaker 1>party gets in power, they have a tendency to want

0:19:32.520 --> 0:19:35.960
<v Speaker 1>to pass their agenda. I get that, but voting should

0:19:35.960 --> 0:19:39.720
<v Speaker 1>be sacrosant, saying don't you think, well, I think that

0:19:39.760 --> 0:19:45.320
<v Speaker 1>there are there are disagreements in policy over elections. Republicans

0:19:45.359 --> 0:19:49.320
<v Speaker 1>tend to fear fraud and Democrats tend to fear suppression.

0:19:50.000 --> 0:19:53.800
<v Speaker 1>And in one of the other underlying phenomenons that's grown

0:19:53.800 --> 0:19:58.320
<v Speaker 1>in the country over the last thirty years is polarization.

0:19:59.240 --> 0:20:03.920
<v Speaker 1>So that uh, there are very few undecided voters at

0:20:03.960 --> 0:20:08.040
<v Speaker 1>this point in an election. That means that each party's

0:20:08.200 --> 0:20:11.640
<v Speaker 1>go to their base to try and energize their basis

0:20:11.720 --> 0:20:16.720
<v Speaker 1>to come out and so the rhetoric and the foundational

0:20:16.800 --> 0:20:20.560
<v Speaker 1>work that gets done reflects that. And that is what

0:20:20.720 --> 0:20:25.000
<v Speaker 1>I think you're saying is bad. And you know that, Um,

0:20:25.520 --> 0:20:28.600
<v Speaker 1>that's a much bigger phenomenon than just elections and voted.

0:20:29.600 --> 0:20:33.440
<v Speaker 1>Do you believe that concern about voter fraud can inevitably

0:20:33.560 --> 0:20:37.359
<v Speaker 1>lead to voter suppression. Well, I think that they are

0:20:37.440 --> 0:20:41.480
<v Speaker 1>in some ways two sides of the same coin. And

0:20:41.640 --> 0:20:45.399
<v Speaker 1>I think that not all the laws that are accused

0:20:45.440 --> 0:20:49.840
<v Speaker 1>of being suppression are suppression. And as I've written, I

0:20:49.880 --> 0:20:53.199
<v Speaker 1>think many of the charges about fraud or wrong. But

0:20:53.600 --> 0:20:59.120
<v Speaker 1>I think unfortunately the fraud versus suppression narrative is creeped

0:20:59.160 --> 0:21:02.800
<v Speaker 1>into the get out the vote plans for both parties,

0:21:03.240 --> 0:21:08.360
<v Speaker 1>and as you try and energize your base with red

0:21:08.480 --> 0:21:11.120
<v Speaker 1>nat rhetoric, which is what we do these days, on

0:21:11.160 --> 0:21:15.560
<v Speaker 1>both sides, Republicans are gonna yell fraud, Democrats are gonna

0:21:15.920 --> 0:21:21.159
<v Speaker 1>yell suppression. That probably does energize their base. But what

0:21:21.320 --> 0:21:24.320
<v Speaker 1>I think you're rightly pointing to is what about people

0:21:24.359 --> 0:21:27.680
<v Speaker 1>in the middle of the spectrum who are not hard partisans,

0:21:27.840 --> 0:21:31.720
<v Speaker 1>who really kind of went away the candidates and the

0:21:31.800 --> 0:21:34.560
<v Speaker 1>issues and vote one way or the other. They hear

0:21:34.600 --> 0:21:38.719
<v Speaker 1>the loud decibels about fraud and suppression and think, wow,

0:21:38.840 --> 0:21:40.879
<v Speaker 1>that's a hassle for me to go to the polls.

0:21:40.880 --> 0:21:43.600
<v Speaker 1>So I'm not going to go to the polls. Can

0:21:43.640 --> 0:21:47.679
<v Speaker 1>you give me an example of a Republican law, state

0:21:47.800 --> 0:21:53.679
<v Speaker 1>law passed by a Republican controlled legislature regarding voting and

0:21:53.800 --> 0:21:57.480
<v Speaker 1>one that might have been passed by a Democratic legislature.

0:21:58.640 --> 0:22:02.240
<v Speaker 1>I well, I mean, let's let's take a look at

0:22:03.160 --> 0:22:06.040
<v Speaker 1>at the date in which absentee ballots need to be

0:22:06.119 --> 0:22:10.080
<v Speaker 1>received by a state. So the at least the cases

0:22:10.119 --> 0:22:13.800
<v Speaker 1>that are going up to the Supreme Court are ones

0:22:13.960 --> 0:22:20.119
<v Speaker 1>where Republicans voted to have all absentee ballots received in

0:22:20.200 --> 0:22:24.159
<v Speaker 1>the polling place on election day. The current Democrats have

0:22:24.280 --> 0:22:29.000
<v Speaker 1>been convinced that, uh, it is better really for them

0:22:29.040 --> 0:22:32.199
<v Speaker 1>to get more votes in to be able to extend

0:22:32.240 --> 0:22:37.040
<v Speaker 1>the deadlines on the receipt of absentee ballots. So any

0:22:37.080 --> 0:22:41.280
<v Speaker 1>ballot postmarked by election day can be received three days,

0:22:41.400 --> 0:22:46.560
<v Speaker 1>six days, twelve days after an election. So a Republican

0:22:46.680 --> 0:22:53.040
<v Speaker 1>legislature would pass election day receipt and a Democratic legislature

0:22:53.280 --> 0:22:58.400
<v Speaker 1>has passed some days afterwards. If there is so little fraud,

0:22:59.320 --> 0:23:05.200
<v Speaker 1>why is the Republican party passing all these laws preventing fraud?

0:23:05.840 --> 0:23:12.159
<v Speaker 1>If if experience tells us that there is very little fraud,

0:23:12.600 --> 0:23:18.359
<v Speaker 1>so the the credibility of our elections also depends on

0:23:18.440 --> 0:23:23.880
<v Speaker 1>their appearance. In other words, can voters take confidence that's

0:23:23.920 --> 0:23:28.439
<v Speaker 1>that it's a system with some standards so that cheating

0:23:28.480 --> 0:23:31.679
<v Speaker 1>and fraud don't go on. In other words, the appearance

0:23:32.000 --> 0:23:37.760
<v Speaker 1>of impropriety is recognized, for example, in campaign finance laws,

0:23:37.800 --> 0:23:42.359
<v Speaker 1>which I'm sure you love to justify limitations on the

0:23:42.480 --> 0:23:47.080
<v Speaker 1>size of contributions. That's there hasn't been a finding of impropriety,

0:23:47.359 --> 0:23:51.439
<v Speaker 1>it's an appearance of impropriety. The same holds true in

0:23:52.080 --> 0:23:55.440
<v Speaker 1>the election contest that you do need to put some

0:23:55.520 --> 0:24:00.080
<v Speaker 1>standards on it, whether it's showing voter identification when you

0:24:00.200 --> 0:24:03.320
<v Speaker 1>go into the polls or a signature match on an

0:24:03.359 --> 0:24:08.920
<v Speaker 1>absentee ballot to give voters after the election. Uh, some

0:24:09.040 --> 0:24:13.760
<v Speaker 1>elements have proof that in fact, all the votes are legitimate.

0:24:14.600 --> 0:24:18.359
<v Speaker 1>You outright asked Republicans to quote take a hard look

0:24:18.400 --> 0:24:22.520
<v Speaker 1>before advocating laws that actually to limit the franchise of

0:24:22.640 --> 0:24:28.480
<v Speaker 1>otherwise qualified voters. Yeah. I think that's important for Republicans

0:24:28.520 --> 0:24:31.919
<v Speaker 1>to do. I think that's not always enough of the

0:24:32.000 --> 0:24:35.840
<v Speaker 1>equation in in all these states. I think it is

0:24:35.880 --> 0:24:39.560
<v Speaker 1>important to to make it easy for people to vote.

0:24:39.920 --> 0:24:44.680
<v Speaker 1>To give you an example, Republicans have all of a

0:24:44.720 --> 0:24:48.800
<v Speaker 1>sudden gone negative on drop boxes, where voters can take

0:24:48.840 --> 0:24:52.120
<v Speaker 1>their ballots and drop them in a box, and that's

0:24:52.160 --> 0:24:55.560
<v Speaker 1>the way it gets uh. They get processed encountered, so

0:24:55.640 --> 0:24:58.639
<v Speaker 1>they don't have to stand in lines either in early voting,

0:24:59.040 --> 0:25:03.719
<v Speaker 1>they don't have to trust the mails by by mailing

0:25:03.760 --> 0:25:07.439
<v Speaker 1>them through the postal service the drop box. Republicans for

0:25:07.480 --> 0:25:10.600
<v Speaker 1>some reason have decided that drop boxes are a bad

0:25:10.680 --> 0:25:15.199
<v Speaker 1>idea that to me is a barrier two voters. That

0:25:15.200 --> 0:25:18.160
<v Speaker 1>that makes little or no sense. And I don't think

0:25:18.160 --> 0:25:21.159
<v Speaker 1>it's right that the Republican Party in a number of

0:25:21.240 --> 0:25:27.480
<v Speaker 1>states taken that position. When we come back, being Gensberg

0:25:27.600 --> 0:25:31.800
<v Speaker 1>throws water on the president's fiery claims and the democrats

0:25:31.920 --> 0:25:45.080
<v Speaker 1>worst post election fears. I call the Union Hall as

0:25:45.200 --> 0:25:47.880
<v Speaker 1>his amount of life and death. I think these people

0:25:47.960 --> 0:25:52.600
<v Speaker 1>of planning to kill Dr. King. On April four, Dr

0:25:52.680 --> 0:25:55.199
<v Speaker 1>Martin Luther King was shot and killed in Memphis. A

0:25:55.240 --> 0:25:58.800
<v Speaker 1>petty criminal named James Earl Ray was arrested. He pled

0:25:58.800 --> 0:26:00.840
<v Speaker 1>guilty to the crime and spent the rest of his

0:26:00.920 --> 0:26:06.399
<v Speaker 1>life in prison. Case closed right, James Hill Ray was

0:26:06.520 --> 0:26:11.200
<v Speaker 1>upon for the official story. The authorities would parade all,

0:26:11.320 --> 0:26:14.840
<v Speaker 1>we found a gun, the James L. Raybald in Birmingham

0:26:15.000 --> 0:26:18.359
<v Speaker 1>that killed Dr King, Except it wasn't the gun that

0:26:18.440 --> 0:26:21.760
<v Speaker 1>killed Dr King. One of the problems that came out

0:26:21.880 --> 0:26:25.320
<v Speaker 1>when I got the ray case was that some of

0:26:25.320 --> 0:26:28.479
<v Speaker 1>the evidence, as far as I was concerned, did not

0:26:28.680 --> 0:26:33.000
<v Speaker 1>match the circumstances. This is the MLK tapes. The first

0:26:33.040 --> 0:26:36.520
<v Speaker 1>episodes are available now. Listen on the I Heart radio app,

0:26:36.640 --> 0:26:41.959
<v Speaker 1>Apple podcasts or wherever you get your podcasts. Give us

0:26:41.960 --> 0:26:44.800
<v Speaker 1>every attention. We need everything you've got fast. Waiting on

0:26:44.920 --> 0:26:49.119
<v Speaker 1>Reparations would beat the podcast. Tune in every Thursday politics

0:26:49.119 --> 0:26:51.520
<v Speaker 1>and wordplay. We fight for the people because they got

0:26:51.560 --> 0:26:53.800
<v Speaker 1>us in the worst way. From the Hill Cooper, the

0:26:53.920 --> 0:26:56.680
<v Speaker 1>Bomb Bay to count Game, from the Left on Clay

0:26:56.800 --> 0:26:59.720
<v Speaker 1>to what the Neo kanse Every Thursday cop to head

0:27:00.000 --> 0:27:02.560
<v Speaker 1>off to break us off with some break because we're waiting.

0:27:04.840 --> 0:27:07.520
<v Speaker 1>Listen to Waiting on Reparations of my Heart radio app,

0:27:07.720 --> 0:27:13.720
<v Speaker 1>Apple podcasts or wherever you get your podcasts. After thirty years,

0:27:13.800 --> 0:27:16.119
<v Speaker 1>it's time to return to the halls of West Beverly

0:27:16.280 --> 0:27:18.280
<v Speaker 1>High and hang out at the peach pit. On the

0:27:18.320 --> 0:27:21.679
<v Speaker 1>podcast nine O two one OMG joined Jenny Garth and

0:27:21.760 --> 0:27:24.679
<v Speaker 1>Tori Spelling for a rewatch of the hit series Beverly

0:27:24.760 --> 0:27:27.080
<v Speaker 1>Hills nine O two one oh. From the very beginning,

0:27:27.359 --> 0:27:30.440
<v Speaker 1>we get to tell the fans all of the behind

0:27:30.480 --> 0:27:33.119
<v Speaker 1>the scenes stories to actually happen, so they know what

0:27:33.200 --> 0:27:36.080
<v Speaker 1>happened on camera, obviously, but we can tell them all

0:27:36.200 --> 0:27:38.199
<v Speaker 1>the good stuff that happened off camera. Get all the

0:27:38.280 --> 0:27:41.359
<v Speaker 1>juicy details of every episode that you've been wondering about

0:27:41.359 --> 0:27:43.880
<v Speaker 1>for decades. As nine O two one oh, super fan

0:27:44.000 --> 0:27:47.000
<v Speaker 1>and radio host Sissany sits in with Jenny and Tory,

0:27:47.119 --> 0:27:50.639
<v Speaker 1>two reminisce, reflect and relive each moment, from Brandon and

0:27:50.720 --> 0:27:54.439
<v Speaker 1>Kelly's first kiss to shouting. Donna Martin graduates, you have

0:27:54.520 --> 0:27:58.639
<v Speaker 1>an amazing memory. You remember everything about the entire ten

0:27:58.720 --> 0:28:02.280
<v Speaker 1>years that we filmed that show, and you remember absolutely

0:28:02.280 --> 0:28:05.080
<v Speaker 1>nothing of the ten years that we filmed that show.

0:28:05.800 --> 0:28:07.919
<v Speaker 1>Listen to nine O two one OMG on the I

0:28:08.040 --> 0:28:11.399
<v Speaker 1>Heart Radio app, Apple Podcasts, or wherever you get your podcasts.

0:28:16.240 --> 0:28:19.880
<v Speaker 1>Why do you think President Trump is saying fraud, fraud, fraud, fraud,

0:28:19.880 --> 0:28:23.239
<v Speaker 1>fraud whenever he gets a chance. No, I don't know.

0:28:23.280 --> 0:28:25.920
<v Speaker 1>I'm a humble lawyer and not a psychiatrist, so I'm

0:28:25.960 --> 0:28:28.400
<v Speaker 1>not sure. I really know the answer to that question.

0:28:29.000 --> 0:28:31.800
<v Speaker 1>Come on, Ben, you know the answer, Well, I know,

0:28:31.800 --> 0:28:36.000
<v Speaker 1>why tell me the answer. I think because he wants

0:28:36.040 --> 0:28:41.240
<v Speaker 1>to be able to delegitimize the election. Play that out

0:28:41.320 --> 0:28:44.520
<v Speaker 1>for me, Katie, What would play that out for me?

0:28:44.600 --> 0:28:48.120
<v Speaker 1>How does that happen? So I don't know. I mean,

0:28:48.320 --> 0:28:52.520
<v Speaker 1>I think he said I'm not sure. Here, wait a second, Well,

0:28:52.640 --> 0:28:55.080
<v Speaker 1>let's say what if he says, Ben, let's just let's

0:28:55.120 --> 0:28:57.920
<v Speaker 1>just play this out like you said. What if he

0:28:58.000 --> 0:29:02.200
<v Speaker 1>says that there's voter fraud is everywhere, and some of

0:29:02.240 --> 0:29:08.640
<v Speaker 1>these Republican legislatures, you know, agree with him, or people

0:29:08.720 --> 0:29:11.920
<v Speaker 1>who he has in his pocket agree with him, and

0:29:12.040 --> 0:29:16.760
<v Speaker 1>then he can hold the entire country hostage by saying

0:29:17.360 --> 0:29:21.480
<v Speaker 1>this isn't legitimate. I don't know that it's honestly, It's

0:29:21.520 --> 0:29:24.280
<v Speaker 1>honestly not the way it works. That's why I said

0:29:24.320 --> 0:29:30.880
<v Speaker 1>before that there's a massive difference between talking about fraud

0:29:31.040 --> 0:29:36.440
<v Speaker 1>and trying to be legitimize an election and having the

0:29:36.520 --> 0:29:42.120
<v Speaker 1>proof of that in a state election process. And that

0:29:42.120 --> 0:29:47.360
<v Speaker 1>that's why I think the the notion that that he's

0:29:47.400 --> 0:29:50.680
<v Speaker 1>somehow going to disrupt the whole country is a little

0:29:50.680 --> 0:29:55.880
<v Speaker 1>bit overblown because like you. No one can exactly say

0:29:56.040 --> 0:29:58.720
<v Speaker 1>the steps that it would take to get from O

0:29:58.920 --> 0:30:04.719
<v Speaker 1>G Everything's fraud joint to actually stopping the certification of

0:30:04.720 --> 0:30:07.920
<v Speaker 1>a vote and the naming of a slate of electors

0:30:08.160 --> 0:30:12.960
<v Speaker 1>in in any state. So it's a case of all talk.

0:30:13.120 --> 0:30:17.160
<v Speaker 1>But if you did have to hypothesize, ben, how someone

0:30:17.320 --> 0:30:23.480
<v Speaker 1>might try to go about delegitimizing uh, the election results,

0:30:23.920 --> 0:30:29.200
<v Speaker 1>How might one do that if one was so inclined, Well,

0:30:29.240 --> 0:30:33.920
<v Speaker 1>I think I think the hypothetical that I did discussing

0:30:34.000 --> 0:30:38.480
<v Speaker 1>one of those Washington Post top eds was that the campaign,

0:30:38.600 --> 0:30:44.760
<v Speaker 1>the Trump campaign would quite cynically engage in mass challenges

0:30:45.160 --> 0:30:48.880
<v Speaker 1>of voters as they went into polling places on grounds

0:30:48.880 --> 0:30:53.320
<v Speaker 1>of registration and then in the counting of ballots on

0:30:53.560 --> 0:30:58.200
<v Speaker 1>the validity of absentees as they came in. But it

0:30:58.240 --> 0:31:03.560
<v Speaker 1>would have to be mass of blunderbus challenges. So, if

0:31:03.560 --> 0:31:07.600
<v Speaker 1>the polls are to be believed, um in the key

0:31:07.600 --> 0:31:10.720
<v Speaker 1>battleground states, there are not enough challenges. Now, if the

0:31:10.760 --> 0:31:17.080
<v Speaker 1>results are considerably closer, right, and this does hinge on

0:31:17.640 --> 0:31:20.880
<v Speaker 1>the results in in any of the battleground states being

0:31:20.920 --> 0:31:25.840
<v Speaker 1>really close, then it might be possible to to challenge

0:31:25.960 --> 0:31:30.920
<v Speaker 1>enough ballots to hold up a certificate of election. Uh,

0:31:31.160 --> 0:31:34.880
<v Speaker 1>so that so that the electoral College would would get

0:31:34.880 --> 0:31:38.040
<v Speaker 1>a little bit murky. Well, what would happen if it's

0:31:38.120 --> 0:31:41.800
<v Speaker 1>close enough that you could challenge the results in these

0:31:41.920 --> 0:31:46.120
<v Speaker 1>key battleground states? Um, you know, take me through that.

0:31:46.240 --> 0:31:49.280
<v Speaker 1>Then what would happen? Well, I mean it depends on

0:31:49.400 --> 0:31:53.800
<v Speaker 1>the state. So uh, you know, there there are so

0:31:53.840 --> 0:31:58.240
<v Speaker 1>many there's so many variables and different pieces that would

0:31:58.280 --> 0:32:01.000
<v Speaker 1>have to fall into place, uh, that you would be

0:32:01.440 --> 0:32:05.320
<v Speaker 1>tempted to say it's impossible, except Florida happened in two thousands,

0:32:05.400 --> 0:32:12.160
<v Speaker 1>So not impossible, but it's really highly unlikely. Uh. What

0:32:12.160 --> 0:32:16.280
<v Speaker 1>what would have to happen is that I guess the

0:32:16.320 --> 0:32:21.000
<v Speaker 1>electoral college nobody would have two seventy votes when all

0:32:21.040 --> 0:32:25.080
<v Speaker 1>the states to coun tabulate their ballots did, and there

0:32:25.120 --> 0:32:29.520
<v Speaker 1>would be one, two or three states that were within

0:32:29.680 --> 0:32:33.080
<v Speaker 1>the margins of closeness set by state law, which is

0:32:33.520 --> 0:32:38.120
<v Speaker 1>either point two percent or point five of of the

0:32:38.200 --> 0:32:42.600
<v Speaker 1>difference between the two candidates, and so there would be

0:32:43.240 --> 0:32:46.800
<v Speaker 1>a recount or a contest. And you know, when they're

0:32:46.840 --> 0:32:50.720
<v Speaker 1>that closed, there are always ballots that that can be disputed.

0:32:51.160 --> 0:32:55.360
<v Speaker 1>But that's also part of the legitimate process if an

0:32:55.360 --> 0:32:58.400
<v Speaker 1>election is closed to go through a recounter a contest.

0:32:59.360 --> 0:33:01.120
<v Speaker 1>Do you think we i get to the point where

0:33:01.120 --> 0:33:04.800
<v Speaker 1>the Supreme Court decides who the next President of the

0:33:04.840 --> 0:33:07.760
<v Speaker 1>United States is this go around? Well, I mean, I

0:33:07.840 --> 0:33:11.520
<v Speaker 1>think it's I think it's really really unlikely. I think

0:33:11.560 --> 0:33:15.960
<v Speaker 1>the greatest chances that will have a pretty clear indication

0:33:16.240 --> 0:33:19.720
<v Speaker 1>of a winner, if not election night, within a couple

0:33:19.760 --> 0:33:23.800
<v Speaker 1>of days of that, I think given the all the

0:33:23.880 --> 0:33:27.000
<v Speaker 1>absentees that have been found, it may take a week

0:33:27.120 --> 0:33:33.400
<v Speaker 1>or two longer. I think, Uh, you know, the election

0:33:33.520 --> 0:33:37.640
<v Speaker 1>has been so close and contested that it's been thrown

0:33:37.760 --> 0:33:40.920
<v Speaker 1>in doubt three times out of the fifty seven that

0:33:40.960 --> 0:33:43.320
<v Speaker 1>we've had. So I'm gonna take a wild guess that

0:33:43.840 --> 0:33:47.480
<v Speaker 1>there's a five point two chance of it being that.

0:33:48.280 --> 0:33:51.200
<v Speaker 1>And so in that scenario, it might end up going

0:33:51.280 --> 0:33:54.960
<v Speaker 1>to the to the Supreme Court. But that hasn't happened

0:33:54.960 --> 0:33:57.760
<v Speaker 1>often in our history, and it's a mistake to bet

0:33:57.800 --> 0:34:02.120
<v Speaker 1>against history. Let's talk about two thousand, because you were

0:34:02.160 --> 0:34:06.600
<v Speaker 1>imminently involved in the recount in Florida. Bob Balaban played

0:34:06.680 --> 0:34:10.680
<v Speaker 1>you in the movie Recount. Did you like that casting,

0:34:10.719 --> 0:34:14.719
<v Speaker 1>by the way, Ben, Yeah, I mean, I don't know.

0:34:15.239 --> 0:34:17.960
<v Speaker 1>Somebody must have been somebody must have thought I was

0:34:18.040 --> 0:34:24.000
<v Speaker 1>short and bald. Are we gonna win? Mr? Ginsburgh? By

0:34:24.040 --> 0:34:29.080
<v Speaker 1>tomorrow morning? The stains of Bill Clinton will be washed away,

0:34:29.680 --> 0:34:32.799
<v Speaker 1>and honor and dignity will finally be restored to the

0:34:32.800 --> 0:34:36.880
<v Speaker 1>White House. Let me just point out. Let me just

0:34:36.920 --> 0:34:40.080
<v Speaker 1>point out about the casting that I thought Bob Balaban

0:34:40.239 --> 0:34:44.800
<v Speaker 1>was terrific, But Michael Hooley, who was by opposite on

0:34:44.840 --> 0:34:48.480
<v Speaker 1>the Democratic side, is both shorter and balder than I am.

0:34:48.560 --> 0:34:51.520
<v Speaker 1>And he was played by Dennis O'Leary as six ft

0:34:51.560 --> 0:34:54.600
<v Speaker 1>two inch guy with a full head of hair. So

0:34:54.800 --> 0:34:58.440
<v Speaker 1>I'm just gonna throw that out as as a casting

0:34:58.520 --> 0:35:02.680
<v Speaker 1>example of the film. Duly noted, duly noted, But how

0:35:03.000 --> 0:35:06.279
<v Speaker 1>insane was it for you? It made by the way

0:35:06.280 --> 0:35:09.319
<v Speaker 1>it made me want to rewatch recount tonight because I

0:35:09.360 --> 0:35:12.600
<v Speaker 1>was covering that every day when I was at the

0:35:12.640 --> 0:35:17.440
<v Speaker 1>Today Show. I mean, was that completely insane? Yes, it

0:35:17.520 --> 0:35:20.799
<v Speaker 1>certainly was. Just remember when you rewatch it that we

0:35:20.840 --> 0:35:25.799
<v Speaker 1>won the recount and they won the movie. Well, I

0:35:25.840 --> 0:35:28.120
<v Speaker 1>guess it depends on who you were. Who are you

0:35:28.280 --> 0:35:32.040
<v Speaker 1>rooting for for president? Right? Well, I'm just saying that's

0:35:32.040 --> 0:35:35.319
<v Speaker 1>a statement of fact, but you know, I mean it

0:35:35.400 --> 0:35:38.800
<v Speaker 1>does show us something about the system. With this whole

0:35:38.840 --> 0:35:43.520
<v Speaker 1>difference between the popular vote and the electoral college. Does

0:35:43.560 --> 0:35:46.400
<v Speaker 1>it ever make you wonder if if the system needs

0:35:46.440 --> 0:35:51.400
<v Speaker 1>to be rethought in the electoral college perhaps gotten gotten

0:35:51.480 --> 0:35:54.239
<v Speaker 1>rid of well, I mean, that's an interesting point. I mean,

0:35:54.320 --> 0:35:58.560
<v Speaker 1>the historical antecedents of the electoral college is that the

0:35:58.600 --> 0:36:04.719
<v Speaker 1>founding fathers needed compromise between the agrarian interests and the

0:36:04.760 --> 0:36:09.680
<v Speaker 1>federalists who were more more in the cities, and so

0:36:09.840 --> 0:36:14.240
<v Speaker 1>the electoral college was the compromise that we've had for

0:36:14.719 --> 0:36:19.319
<v Speaker 1>two hundred and forty some years. Um, it's a compromise

0:36:19.480 --> 0:36:24.320
<v Speaker 1>that that's worked in the sense that campaigning for president

0:36:24.440 --> 0:36:29.200
<v Speaker 1>would be completely different. Uh. And what would happen is

0:36:29.280 --> 0:36:34.120
<v Speaker 1>that candidates would go to urban areas and forget rural

0:36:34.160 --> 0:36:38.920
<v Speaker 1>areas because they're just aren't enough votes. So um, that

0:36:38.960 --> 0:36:43.359
<v Speaker 1>would be that would be uh shift and really an

0:36:43.520 --> 0:36:49.000
<v Speaker 1>isolation of the country um as a whole. I mean,

0:36:49.160 --> 0:36:52.600
<v Speaker 1>I think that changing the electoral college and talk of

0:36:52.640 --> 0:36:56.440
<v Speaker 1>that is something that comes about when Democrats don't win

0:36:56.520 --> 0:36:59.840
<v Speaker 1>a series of presidential elections they think they should like

0:37:00.080 --> 0:37:03.000
<v Speaker 1>yess is if Joe Biden is elected, all the talk

0:37:03.040 --> 0:37:07.640
<v Speaker 1>of the electoral college will will retreat to fashionable cocktail

0:37:07.719 --> 0:37:10.560
<v Speaker 1>parties on the west side of Manhattan and maybe the

0:37:10.600 --> 0:37:14.320
<v Speaker 1>East side. But but I mean, it's changing the electoral college.

0:37:14.600 --> 0:37:17.360
<v Speaker 1>Those are the rules under which we play the games.

0:37:17.400 --> 0:37:20.719
<v Speaker 1>The equivalent of a football team that's that gains a

0:37:20.760 --> 0:37:24.200
<v Speaker 1>lot of yards but can't score, saying forget it, don't

0:37:24.239 --> 0:37:27.080
<v Speaker 1>worry about what's on the scoreboard. We're not counting that anymore.

0:37:27.400 --> 0:37:30.000
<v Speaker 1>The team that gains the most yards is gonna win.

0:37:30.440 --> 0:37:33.359
<v Speaker 1>So you can change the rules they really want to,

0:37:34.040 --> 0:37:38.080
<v Speaker 1>But changes that are done to sort of uh preordained

0:37:38.120 --> 0:37:41.960
<v Speaker 1>and outcome, which is what this bout of wanting to

0:37:42.040 --> 0:37:45.960
<v Speaker 1>change the electoral College is about doing that to get

0:37:46.120 --> 0:37:49.920
<v Speaker 1>to gain a specific political result. It's bad, bad reason

0:37:49.960 --> 0:37:52.840
<v Speaker 1>to change an institution that's been around for two hundred

0:37:52.920 --> 0:37:58.280
<v Speaker 1>forty years. On the other hand, ben if of people

0:37:58.280 --> 0:38:02.520
<v Speaker 1>in this country by already five are living in cities

0:38:03.400 --> 0:38:08.480
<v Speaker 1>um and far outweigh the number of people in rural areas,

0:38:08.560 --> 0:38:12.480
<v Speaker 1>maybe an adjustment could be made. Well maybe if that's

0:38:12.520 --> 0:38:15.719
<v Speaker 1>the way the demographic patterns really go, then I think

0:38:15.760 --> 0:38:19.200
<v Speaker 1>that's possible. Look, I also think that that part of

0:38:19.239 --> 0:38:23.200
<v Speaker 1>the angst that's felt about the electoral college has really

0:38:23.200 --> 0:38:25.520
<v Speaker 1>nothing to do with politics. There is a product, not

0:38:25.640 --> 0:38:29.000
<v Speaker 1>a product of politics, but a product of a forty

0:38:29.080 --> 0:38:33.839
<v Speaker 1>year demographic trend in this country for people to move

0:38:33.920 --> 0:38:37.360
<v Speaker 1>into communities with people more like themselves. We are living

0:38:37.760 --> 0:38:43.200
<v Speaker 1>in much more homogeneous communities uh than we ever did before.

0:38:43.440 --> 0:38:48.080
<v Speaker 1>And so a lot of the polarization that is a curve,

0:38:48.160 --> 0:38:50.359
<v Speaker 1>which is really what you're talking about, is the root

0:38:50.440 --> 0:38:53.839
<v Speaker 1>problem with the electoral college has been caused by these

0:38:53.840 --> 0:38:59.600
<v Speaker 1>sort of inexorcible demographic uh trends. You know, I'm not

0:38:59.640 --> 0:39:04.200
<v Speaker 1>sure changing the electoral college deals with that rude issue.

0:39:05.800 --> 0:39:09.719
<v Speaker 1>Let's talk about your role specifically in two thousand. How

0:39:09.719 --> 0:39:14.839
<v Speaker 1>would you describe it? What? What were you there to do? Uh? Well,

0:39:14.880 --> 0:39:18.680
<v Speaker 1>I was the general council of the Bush Cheney campaign.

0:39:19.400 --> 0:39:24.759
<v Speaker 1>And um uh I had because I have worked elections

0:39:24.760 --> 0:39:27.640
<v Speaker 1>and for the political party committees, done a lot of

0:39:27.719 --> 0:39:34.359
<v Speaker 1>recounts on the congressional and state level, and so when

0:39:34.400 --> 0:39:39.080
<v Speaker 1>we got ourselves in a recount, um, you know, I

0:39:39.120 --> 0:39:41.680
<v Speaker 1>had helped prepare a lot of the basic materials that

0:39:41.719 --> 0:39:45.120
<v Speaker 1>you always do four recounts, and then I went down

0:39:45.160 --> 0:39:49.440
<v Speaker 1>to to Florida to help run the operations. What is

0:39:49.480 --> 0:39:53.480
<v Speaker 1>your perspective on the impact that event had on our

0:39:53.520 --> 0:39:57.919
<v Speaker 1>election system? The most immediate impact was that in two

0:39:57.960 --> 0:40:03.279
<v Speaker 1>thousand three, Congress actually asked the massive infusion of of

0:40:03.360 --> 0:40:09.400
<v Speaker 1>money into the election systems. Almost all communities bought new machines,

0:40:09.920 --> 0:40:15.960
<v Speaker 1>new technology at that point, and so it really, for

0:40:16.000 --> 0:40:20.480
<v Speaker 1>a period of time upgraded the mechanics of voting in

0:40:20.520 --> 0:40:23.800
<v Speaker 1>the country. And the problem is is that those machines

0:40:24.680 --> 0:40:29.120
<v Speaker 1>don't have a huge long shelf life, and most jurisdictions

0:40:29.280 --> 0:40:33.839
<v Speaker 1>in the country now or are running running pretty long

0:40:33.920 --> 0:40:37.319
<v Speaker 1>in the tooth on the equipment that they're using. Not

0:40:37.440 --> 0:40:40.759
<v Speaker 1>only that been, but they can be hacked, and they

0:40:40.800 --> 0:40:43.520
<v Speaker 1>can't be often well, I don't know. I did a

0:40:43.600 --> 0:40:48.279
<v Speaker 1>documentary called I Voted, and it showed how easy it

0:40:48.400 --> 0:40:51.160
<v Speaker 1>was to hack some of those systems. Some University of

0:40:51.200 --> 0:40:55.160
<v Speaker 1>Michigan students did it in a couple of days. Furthermore,

0:40:55.239 --> 0:40:58.560
<v Speaker 1>there's no way to verify and double check some of

0:40:58.600 --> 0:41:03.160
<v Speaker 1>the results. So electronic voting is kind of problematic, don't

0:41:03.160 --> 0:41:05.120
<v Speaker 1>you think, Well, I have a pride. Do have a

0:41:05.200 --> 0:41:09.560
<v Speaker 1>problem with the touch screen machines in which there's no

0:41:09.600 --> 0:41:13.040
<v Speaker 1>paper trail. Yeah, I certainly agree with that. I think

0:41:13.040 --> 0:41:15.319
<v Speaker 1>it's a real mistake. And and we're in a we're

0:41:15.360 --> 0:41:19.520
<v Speaker 1>in a bad way with our voting systems. I mean, uh,

0:41:19.640 --> 0:41:23.040
<v Speaker 1>it's really tough to get communities who have to build

0:41:23.120 --> 0:41:28.480
<v Speaker 1>schools and roads and feed people to appropriate money for

0:41:28.480 --> 0:41:32.760
<v Speaker 1>for elections equipment that's used every other year, maybe twice.

0:41:33.920 --> 0:41:38.319
<v Speaker 1>It's just it's just not a top priority of the

0:41:38.360 --> 0:41:43.319
<v Speaker 1>state and local governments that actually do the funding for

0:41:43.320 --> 0:41:48.680
<v Speaker 1>for machines. So that's that's a problematic issue. And plus

0:41:49.080 --> 0:41:53.160
<v Speaker 1>the the most of the technology was put in place

0:41:53.200 --> 0:41:57.640
<v Speaker 1>before there are iPads, so there are generations of improvements

0:41:58.400 --> 0:42:00.800
<v Speaker 1>that could take place that really are not a top

0:42:00.840 --> 0:42:05.960
<v Speaker 1>priority in state and local government funding. We started the

0:42:06.000 --> 0:42:10.040
<v Speaker 1>conversation Ben, You're saying that it's that we're protected against

0:42:10.120 --> 0:42:15.200
<v Speaker 1>voter fraud. It happens very rarely. The Republican battle cry

0:42:15.520 --> 0:42:21.359
<v Speaker 1>is fraud. The Democratic battle cry is suppression. So where

0:42:21.360 --> 0:42:24.880
<v Speaker 1>do where do we stand in this kind of you know,

0:42:25.120 --> 0:42:30.439
<v Speaker 1>yin yang world of of one side focusing on one

0:42:30.440 --> 0:42:33.279
<v Speaker 1>thing and the other side focusing on another. Well, I

0:42:33.400 --> 0:42:37.080
<v Speaker 1>think it's I think it's not ideal. I think it's

0:42:37.160 --> 0:42:42.760
<v Speaker 1>a function or a symptom of of the polarization that's

0:42:42.920 --> 0:42:47.440
<v Speaker 1>part of the electorate and part of part of society,

0:42:47.600 --> 0:42:53.160
<v Speaker 1>and it is those are messages to the base voters

0:42:53.680 --> 0:42:57.480
<v Speaker 1>and not to the people in the middle who are

0:42:57.520 --> 0:43:01.920
<v Speaker 1>not fierce partisans. So that's not a way that you're

0:43:01.920 --> 0:43:06.120
<v Speaker 1>going to expand the electorate. How do you restore faith

0:43:06.160 --> 0:43:10.600
<v Speaker 1>in democracy? In your view, that is a that is

0:43:10.640 --> 0:43:13.359
<v Speaker 1>a complicated question in this day and age. I mean,

0:43:13.440 --> 0:43:17.839
<v Speaker 1>I suppose it ultimately goes to the quality of our

0:43:17.960 --> 0:43:23.240
<v Speaker 1>leaders on a national level, and I think it also

0:43:23.400 --> 0:43:27.160
<v Speaker 1>goes to the way we act in our local communities.

0:43:27.400 --> 0:43:31.000
<v Speaker 1>In other words, the way I think you achieve the

0:43:31.080 --> 0:43:35.520
<v Speaker 1>goal of restoring faith in the system is to be

0:43:35.640 --> 0:43:38.680
<v Speaker 1>able to change the terms of the debate away from

0:43:38.680 --> 0:43:46.760
<v Speaker 1>really polarized rhetoric and actions. And I I think, um,

0:43:46.800 --> 0:43:50.319
<v Speaker 1>although this I would be curious about other views on this,

0:43:50.520 --> 0:43:53.280
<v Speaker 1>but I think that that is more likely to occur

0:43:53.880 --> 0:43:58.719
<v Speaker 1>on a local level, where it strikes me that uh,

0:43:59.040 --> 0:44:03.120
<v Speaker 1>people working with their neighbors are more more likely to

0:44:03.200 --> 0:44:06.319
<v Speaker 1>come up with solutions to problems and folks on the

0:44:06.400 --> 0:44:10.360
<v Speaker 1>national level who are retreating to their sort of polarized bunkers.

0:44:11.960 --> 0:44:17.400
<v Speaker 1>And finally, do you have faith in in our election process?

0:44:17.480 --> 0:44:22.600
<v Speaker 1>Do you feel like it will withstand any potential challenges

0:44:23.400 --> 0:44:28.560
<v Speaker 1>from the president to others if the election doesn't go

0:44:29.080 --> 0:44:32.560
<v Speaker 1>their way. Well, I mean, I ultimately do. I think

0:44:32.600 --> 0:44:36.719
<v Speaker 1>it can be a difficult period uh post election if

0:44:36.719 --> 0:44:41.040
<v Speaker 1>it's closed, to be sure, But I do take faith

0:44:41.600 --> 0:44:45.360
<v Speaker 1>in having known so many of the officials on a

0:44:45.400 --> 0:44:49.440
<v Speaker 1>local level and a state level who actually are the

0:44:49.480 --> 0:44:53.840
<v Speaker 1>election system in this country. And uh, while when you

0:44:53.920 --> 0:44:58.359
<v Speaker 1>have ten thousand five jurisdictions in a million volunteers, there

0:44:58.400 --> 0:45:02.799
<v Speaker 1>will be mistakes, but I certainly do have faith in

0:45:02.840 --> 0:45:07.520
<v Speaker 1>their good intents to to get this done in in

0:45:07.840 --> 0:45:11.879
<v Speaker 1>a really professional, in good way. And I suppose it's

0:45:11.920 --> 0:45:18.880
<v Speaker 1>also important to remember every state's law does have proceedings

0:45:19.280 --> 0:45:23.520
<v Speaker 1>to allow for recounts and contests, especially when the results

0:45:23.520 --> 0:45:28.960
<v Speaker 1>are closed, and every candidate, whether you like him or not,

0:45:29.719 --> 0:45:33.600
<v Speaker 1>has the right to or like her or not. Because

0:45:33.640 --> 0:45:36.520
<v Speaker 1>I was going to get to that, remember that Hillary

0:45:36.560 --> 0:45:43.320
<v Speaker 1>Clinton's campaign UH intervened in Jill Stein's recounts in three

0:45:43.360 --> 0:45:47.359
<v Speaker 1>states Pennsylvania, Michigan, and Wisconsin last year at the end

0:45:47.400 --> 0:45:53.800
<v Speaker 1>of November, so that contesting elections is permitted by state

0:45:53.880 --> 0:45:58.200
<v Speaker 1>law is one of those things candidates are allowed to do.

0:45:58.400 --> 0:46:02.600
<v Speaker 1>Hillary Clinton did it. Stacy Abrams has not yet conceded

0:46:03.120 --> 0:46:08.640
<v Speaker 1>the Georgia governor's race. Never conceded, so that when impliciting

0:46:08.719 --> 0:46:12.640
<v Speaker 1>your question is that Donald Trump won't concede. That's been

0:46:12.640 --> 0:46:17.080
<v Speaker 1>done before two and uh, you know, the system moves on.

0:46:23.120 --> 0:46:25.719
<v Speaker 1>You know. After talking with Ben, I was inspired to

0:46:25.880 --> 0:46:29.680
<v Speaker 1>rewatch recount, which I'm actually in for a nano second,

0:46:30.080 --> 0:46:32.360
<v Speaker 1>and I have to say, given the times we're in,

0:46:32.560 --> 0:46:35.480
<v Speaker 1>it was pretty weird. There was actually one moment that

0:46:35.520 --> 0:46:38.520
<v Speaker 1>stood out that I had to share. Johnny Apples says

0:46:38.600 --> 0:46:40.800
<v Speaker 1>that we have a week to resolve this before the

0:46:40.840 --> 0:46:43.920
<v Speaker 1>American people will lose that patient. In this scene, al

0:46:44.000 --> 0:46:47.280
<v Speaker 1>Gore's team is debating how to conduct the recount, whether

0:46:47.320 --> 0:46:50.960
<v Speaker 1>they should go into Democratic friendly counties and Hank count

0:46:51.040 --> 0:46:54.400
<v Speaker 1>the paper ballots, and Warren Christopher, who was the Democratic

0:46:54.440 --> 0:46:56.920
<v Speaker 1>face of the recount and a former Secretary of State

0:46:57.239 --> 0:47:00.359
<v Speaker 1>played in the movie by John Hurt, says they need

0:47:00.400 --> 0:47:04.600
<v Speaker 1>to be careful about how they proceed because the world

0:47:04.719 --> 0:47:10.960
<v Speaker 1>is watching. We are theoretically it's last great democracy. We

0:47:11.040 --> 0:47:13.360
<v Speaker 1>cannot resolve this in a way that is worthy of

0:47:13.400 --> 0:47:16.319
<v Speaker 1>the office we seek. What kind of hope do we

0:47:16.360 --> 0:47:21.279
<v Speaker 1>give other countries wish to share our values? We all

0:47:21.320 --> 0:47:29.160
<v Speaker 1>know how that turned out, But an important reminder come Tuesday. Okay, everyone,

0:47:29.280 --> 0:47:33.160
<v Speaker 1>My final plea, do make a plan. Whether you're dropping

0:47:33.160 --> 0:47:36.319
<v Speaker 1>your mail in ballot off at an official location, make

0:47:36.360 --> 0:47:38.640
<v Speaker 1>sure it's not past the deadline in your state to

0:47:38.719 --> 0:47:41.880
<v Speaker 1>actually put it in the mail, voting early in person,

0:47:42.360 --> 0:47:45.759
<v Speaker 1>or heading to the polls on November three, Bring a

0:47:45.840 --> 0:47:50.120
<v Speaker 1>sandwich or the snack of your choice, listen to a podcast,

0:47:51.280 --> 0:47:54.280
<v Speaker 1>and if you have any lingering questions, go to vote

0:47:54.280 --> 0:47:58.279
<v Speaker 1>dot org for voting details specific to your state. For

0:47:58.360 --> 0:48:02.000
<v Speaker 1>election coverage and interesting and fund non political items. To

0:48:02.680 --> 0:48:05.680
<v Speaker 1>sign up for my morning newsletter wake up Call by

0:48:05.719 --> 0:48:09.480
<v Speaker 1>going to Katie Couric dot com. Oh and one last thing,

0:48:09.920 --> 0:48:12.879
<v Speaker 1>some advice to calm those election night nerves from our

0:48:12.880 --> 0:48:16.960
<v Speaker 1>friend Jesse Littlewood at Common Cause. It's important to remember

0:48:16.960 --> 0:48:20.120
<v Speaker 1>that election night is not results night. It's when we

0:48:20.239 --> 0:48:23.320
<v Speaker 1>count every vote that we decide the results of the election.

0:48:24.120 --> 0:48:25.960
<v Speaker 1>We would all like to know the results of the

0:48:25.960 --> 0:48:28.840
<v Speaker 1>election as soon as possible, and we should strive to

0:48:28.920 --> 0:48:31.239
<v Speaker 1>do that, but it's more important to be accurate than

0:48:31.320 --> 0:48:35.520
<v Speaker 1>it is to be fast. Okay, listeners, Good luck out there.

0:48:35.880 --> 0:48:45.680
<v Speaker 1>I'll see you next week. On the other side. Turnout

0:48:45.760 --> 0:48:48.840
<v Speaker 1>is a production of I Heart Media and Katie Curreic Media.

0:48:49.160 --> 0:48:53.200
<v Speaker 1>The executive producers are Katie Curic and Courtney Littz. Supervising

0:48:53.239 --> 0:48:58.719
<v Speaker 1>producers Lauren Hansen. Associate producers Derek Clements, Eliza Costas and

0:48:58.800 --> 0:49:03.360
<v Speaker 1>Emily Pento. Editing by Derrick Clements and Lauren Hansen, Mixing

0:49:03.440 --> 0:49:08.160
<v Speaker 1>by Derrick Clements. Our researcher is Gabriel Loser and special

0:49:08.160 --> 0:49:12.000
<v Speaker 1>thanks to my right hand woman, Adriana Fasio. You can

0:49:12.040 --> 0:49:17.439
<v Speaker 1>follow me all my election coverage at Katie Correct. Meanwhile, yes,

0:49:17.640 --> 0:49:21.000
<v Speaker 1>I'm Katie Correct. Thanks so much for listening everyone. We'll

0:49:21.040 --> 0:49:30.960
<v Speaker 1>see you next time. Kenny jameson here Bread Time, All

0:49:30.960 --> 0:49:48.000
<v Speaker 1>Star in Wolf series champ Hope Vida in California. Mama,

0:49:48.160 --> 0:49:58.759
<v Speaker 1>what does the chicken say? Gratte draffe, giraffe, giraffe. You're

0:49:58.800 --> 0:50:00.600
<v Speaker 1>not gonna get it all right. Just make sure you

0:50:00.719 --> 0:50:02.680
<v Speaker 1>know the big stuff, like making sure your kids are

0:50:02.719 --> 0:50:05.000
<v Speaker 1>buckled correctly in the right seat for their agent's eyes.

0:50:05.239 --> 0:50:09.120
<v Speaker 1>Get it right visits n h S a dot gov

0:50:09.480 --> 0:50:12.080
<v Speaker 1>slash The Right Seat brought to you by the National

0:50:12.160 --> 0:50:15.959
<v Speaker 1>Highway Traffic Safety Administration in the ad Council. After thirty years,

0:50:16.080 --> 0:50:18.320
<v Speaker 1>it's time to return to the halls of West Beverly

0:50:18.440 --> 0:50:20.320
<v Speaker 1>High and hang out at the peach pit. On the

0:50:20.400 --> 0:50:23.680
<v Speaker 1>podcast nine O two one o MG, visit Jenny Garth

0:50:23.760 --> 0:50:26.280
<v Speaker 1>and Tory Spelling for a rewatch of the hit series

0:50:26.360 --> 0:50:29.000
<v Speaker 1>Beverly Hills nine O two one oh. From the very beginning,

0:50:29.239 --> 0:50:32.280
<v Speaker 1>we get to tell the fans all of the behind

0:50:32.360 --> 0:50:34.680
<v Speaker 1>the scenes stories to actually happen, so they know what

0:50:34.800 --> 0:50:37.520
<v Speaker 1>happened on camera obviously, but we can tell them all

0:50:37.680 --> 0:50:39.839
<v Speaker 1>the good stuff that happened off camera. Listen to nine

0:50:39.880 --> 0:50:42.279
<v Speaker 1>O two one o MG on the I Heart Radio app,

0:50:42.280 --> 0:50:44.800
<v Speaker 1>Apple Podcasts, or wherever you get your podcasts.