WEBVTT - Animals Throwing Stuff, Part 3

0:00:03.000 --> 0:00:05.360
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to Stuff to Blow Your Mind production of My

0:00:05.480 --> 0:00:14.840
<v Speaker 1>Heart Radio. Hey you welcome to Stuff to Blow your Mind.

0:00:15.040 --> 0:00:17.799
<v Speaker 1>My name is Robert Lamb and I'm Joe McCormick, and

0:00:17.840 --> 0:00:21.040
<v Speaker 1>we're back with part three in our series on throwing

0:00:21.160 --> 0:00:24.880
<v Speaker 1>behavior in animals, especially non human animals. But we'll be

0:00:24.920 --> 0:00:28.639
<v Speaker 1>talking about throwing of the human variety some today. Now.

0:00:28.680 --> 0:00:33.240
<v Speaker 1>In previous episodes, we discussed a paper documenting a kind

0:00:33.280 --> 0:00:35.120
<v Speaker 1>of throwing or what appeared to be a kind of

0:00:35.120 --> 0:00:39.960
<v Speaker 1>throwing in octopuses in Australia, which used their siphons to

0:00:40.240 --> 0:00:43.720
<v Speaker 1>blast clouds of silt in their neighbor's faces when they

0:00:43.760 --> 0:00:46.800
<v Speaker 1>get a little too close. We discussed the ability of

0:00:46.880 --> 0:00:50.080
<v Speaker 1>elephants to throw with their trunks, and we talked about

0:00:50.120 --> 0:00:54.280
<v Speaker 1>mongoose is doing brutal reverse granny shots to bypass the

0:00:54.320 --> 0:00:58.120
<v Speaker 1>defenses of armored millipedes and as Mick Jagger would say,

0:00:58.160 --> 0:01:02.440
<v Speaker 1>get the meat. Uh. Today, our discussion continues with a

0:01:02.520 --> 0:01:06.720
<v Speaker 1>very important consideration. Well, when I told my wife that

0:01:06.920 --> 0:01:09.679
<v Speaker 1>this was the topic we're going to be covering, uh,

0:01:09.760 --> 0:01:12.039
<v Speaker 1>the question she asked was, well, what about air bud?

0:01:12.080 --> 0:01:14.840
<v Speaker 1>Are you going to talk about air bud? Handle the

0:01:14.920 --> 0:01:18.479
<v Speaker 1>air bud question a very important facet of this issue. Yes,

0:01:18.800 --> 0:01:22.720
<v Speaker 1>Airbud is, of course a motion picture about a dog

0:01:23.160 --> 0:01:26.880
<v Speaker 1>that plays competitive basketball based on the At this point,

0:01:26.920 --> 0:01:29.960
<v Speaker 1>I think classic sports movie trope. There's nothing in the

0:01:30.040 --> 0:01:33.240
<v Speaker 1>rule book that says a blank can't play whatever the

0:01:33.280 --> 0:01:35.200
<v Speaker 1>sport happens to be, and you can put into that

0:01:35.240 --> 0:01:40.160
<v Speaker 1>blank basically any animal, whatever animal seems doable from a

0:01:40.200 --> 0:01:44.480
<v Speaker 1>movie making standpoint and acceptable to the human imagination. And

0:01:44.520 --> 0:01:46.600
<v Speaker 1>I guess you could ultimately go beyond the realm of

0:01:46.800 --> 0:01:49.720
<v Speaker 1>humans into other things as long as you could somehow

0:01:49.720 --> 0:01:52.240
<v Speaker 1>cobble together a script around it. Yeah, I don't know

0:01:52.280 --> 0:01:54.400
<v Speaker 1>if I've ever seen another one of these. I think

0:01:54.440 --> 0:01:56.840
<v Speaker 1>I saw air Bud when I was a kid, But uh,

0:01:56.960 --> 0:01:58.960
<v Speaker 1>I know it's a tradition right there. You know, there's

0:01:58.960 --> 0:02:03.760
<v Speaker 1>a million movies like Aramy the Football Horse. Well, yeah,

0:02:03.800 --> 0:02:06.320
<v Speaker 1>I think one of the earliest, if not the earliest,

0:02:06.360 --> 0:02:08.040
<v Speaker 1>examples of this. And I could be wrong, because this

0:02:08.120 --> 0:02:11.000
<v Speaker 1>is not a subgenre that that I have personally explored

0:02:11.000 --> 0:02:12.840
<v Speaker 1>a lot. But I do remember seeing parts of this

0:02:12.840 --> 0:02:16.519
<v Speaker 1>one on TV the nineteen seventy six movie Guts, which

0:02:16.560 --> 0:02:19.120
<v Speaker 1>also had Ed Asner and don not sent it to

0:02:19.120 --> 0:02:22.000
<v Speaker 1>give you an idea of the you know, the caliber

0:02:22.040 --> 0:02:23.679
<v Speaker 1>of talent that was that was involved in this, But

0:02:23.720 --> 0:02:26.200
<v Speaker 1>it was about a terrible NFL team. I think there's

0:02:26.200 --> 0:02:30.359
<v Speaker 1>something like the California Atomics or something, and they end

0:02:30.440 --> 0:02:34.000
<v Speaker 1>up deciding to field a donkey as a kicker in

0:02:34.040 --> 0:02:37.519
<v Speaker 1>the game, and uh, um, I guess it works out

0:02:37.560 --> 0:02:39.959
<v Speaker 1>for them. Again, there's a there's nothing in the rule

0:02:40.000 --> 0:02:43.239
<v Speaker 1>book that says a donkey can't play in NFL. Yeah,

0:02:43.280 --> 0:02:46.560
<v Speaker 1>I I imagine movies like this must just encourage and

0:02:46.880 --> 0:02:49.880
<v Speaker 1>uh an overly stringent form of legalism when it comes

0:02:49.919 --> 0:02:55.040
<v Speaker 1>to professional sports. Yeah, Like does it say games must

0:02:55.040 --> 0:02:58.480
<v Speaker 1>take place on planet Earth and so forth? Yeah? Yeah,

0:02:58.480 --> 0:03:01.040
<v Speaker 1>they will the at this point really the future proof things.

0:03:01.040 --> 0:03:03.320
<v Speaker 1>But if we're going just based on these films, it

0:03:03.320 --> 0:03:06.400
<v Speaker 1>would seem that for a while they didn't have all

0:03:06.440 --> 0:03:09.320
<v Speaker 1>the loopholes filled in on this and um, and people

0:03:09.320 --> 0:03:11.960
<v Speaker 1>were just constantly rolling out new animals, Like it doesn't

0:03:12.000 --> 0:03:14.919
<v Speaker 1>anything about about art varks. So art varks are in

0:03:15.000 --> 0:03:19.880
<v Speaker 1>play in Professional Curly, yes, okay, But outside of Gusts

0:03:20.040 --> 0:03:23.359
<v Speaker 1>and air Bud, you also have movies like two thousand's

0:03:23.440 --> 0:03:26.600
<v Speaker 1>m v P Most Valuable Primate, in which a chimpanzee

0:03:26.600 --> 0:03:31.079
<v Speaker 1>play soccer. There are also I think thirteen additional Air

0:03:31.120 --> 0:03:35.800
<v Speaker 1>Bud sequels and spinoffs. Humans are also primates. All existing

0:03:35.800 --> 0:03:41.040
<v Speaker 1>soccer players are primates. Well, tell the producers of m

0:03:41.120 --> 0:03:44.520
<v Speaker 1>v P Most Valuable Primemate about that. Um, maybe they

0:03:44.560 --> 0:03:46.360
<v Speaker 1>maybe they actually touched on in the scramplay, but I

0:03:46.440 --> 0:03:48.800
<v Speaker 1>doubt it. But I'm sorry you were saying. How many

0:03:48.840 --> 0:03:53.200
<v Speaker 1>air Bud movies are there? Thirteen by my count, that

0:03:53.280 --> 0:04:00.000
<v Speaker 1>includes the Air Buddies uh like spinoff series and interestingly enough,

0:04:00.200 --> 0:04:04.200
<v Speaker 1>two thousands sixes Air Buddies. That was Don Knott's final film.

0:04:04.240 --> 0:04:07.360
<v Speaker 1>He voiced a bloodhound in it. Oh, now, I don't know.

0:04:07.480 --> 0:04:10.080
<v Speaker 1>Does that that means animals talk in Air Buddies. I

0:04:10.080 --> 0:04:13.240
<v Speaker 1>don't know if animals talked in air Bud. Perhaps you remember,

0:04:13.840 --> 0:04:17.240
<v Speaker 1>I don't mean I'm inclined to think not. I think

0:04:17.279 --> 0:04:21.039
<v Speaker 1>the dog in air Bud was silent. But yeah, well,

0:04:21.080 --> 0:04:23.280
<v Speaker 1>by by the time they get into the Buddies movies,

0:04:23.360 --> 0:04:26.360
<v Speaker 1>which by the way, descended into titles like Space Buddies

0:04:26.400 --> 0:04:29.400
<v Speaker 1>and Santa Buddies. As far as I can tell, these

0:04:29.440 --> 0:04:31.760
<v Speaker 1>are just an excuse to have a screen full of

0:04:31.760 --> 0:04:34.640
<v Speaker 1>Golden Retriever Puppies for eighty minutes. I think it is

0:04:35.839 --> 0:04:42.240
<v Speaker 1>absolutely crass mercenary filmmaking. It's just ultimate cute exploitation. Um.

0:04:42.400 --> 0:04:45.719
<v Speaker 1>But this was also the series that in a episode

0:04:45.720 --> 0:04:48.240
<v Speaker 1>long ago, we suggested should do a crossover with the

0:04:48.279 --> 0:04:54.120
<v Speaker 1>Clive Barker verse and create hell Buddies. Now. There's also

0:04:54.279 --> 0:04:57.520
<v Speaker 1>just real quick a few other mentions. There's Soccer Dog,

0:04:57.600 --> 0:05:01.479
<v Speaker 1>the movie, There's two thousand fives the Karate Dog, And

0:05:01.520 --> 0:05:06.320
<v Speaker 1>then there's the movie Ed in which a chimpanzee plays baseball. Oh,

0:05:06.320 --> 0:05:11.080
<v Speaker 1>and then there's Matilda about a boxing kangaroo. That one, Uh,

0:05:11.440 --> 0:05:14.000
<v Speaker 1>that one has interested me because I noticed it stars

0:05:14.000 --> 0:05:17.400
<v Speaker 1>Elliott Gould and it was also one of the films

0:05:17.440 --> 0:05:20.279
<v Speaker 1>you could pull up on the Criterion Collections UH streaming

0:05:20.320 --> 0:05:24.479
<v Speaker 1>service at least several months back. Boxing Kangaroo? Is that

0:05:24.520 --> 0:05:29.719
<v Speaker 1>a waltzing Matilda Joe? Um, I imagine so, and it's

0:05:29.760 --> 0:05:32.960
<v Speaker 1>it's I looked a little bit into this related to

0:05:33.000 --> 0:05:35.400
<v Speaker 1>this podcast episode, and I quickly realized, oh, well, the

0:05:35.400 --> 0:05:39.480
<v Speaker 1>boxing kangaroo is a whole thing unto itself. UM. That

0:05:39.680 --> 0:05:43.400
<v Speaker 1>does have some basis in kangaroo behavior, but often in

0:05:43.560 --> 0:05:47.480
<v Speaker 1>like a misinterpretation of kangaroo defensive behavior, but it has

0:05:47.560 --> 0:05:49.200
<v Speaker 1>kind of like a life of its own outside of

0:05:49.200 --> 0:05:51.600
<v Speaker 1>this particular picture. Might be something to come back to

0:05:51.680 --> 0:05:53.920
<v Speaker 1>in the future. Now, one more thing about the air

0:05:54.000 --> 0:05:56.839
<v Speaker 1>Bud franchise. You know, before they get to air Buddies,

0:05:56.920 --> 0:06:00.200
<v Speaker 1>I think you were saying that the Golden retriever end

0:06:00.320 --> 0:06:02.640
<v Speaker 1>up doing a bunch of different sports, and they've all

0:06:02.680 --> 0:06:04.760
<v Speaker 1>got puns in the titles. So the one where air

0:06:04.800 --> 0:06:09.040
<v Speaker 1>Bud does baseball is called air Bud Seventh Inning Fetch.

0:06:11.440 --> 0:06:14.240
<v Speaker 1>You gotta get some puns in there, all right. But

0:06:14.240 --> 0:06:17.320
<v Speaker 1>but bringing it all back around to today's episode, Okay,

0:06:17.760 --> 0:06:19.719
<v Speaker 1>some of these we can just instantly dismissed for now.

0:06:19.839 --> 0:06:22.839
<v Speaker 1>We don't need to concern ourselves with boxing kangaroos or

0:06:23.440 --> 0:06:27.120
<v Speaker 1>karate dogs because these do not involve throwing. You know,

0:06:27.320 --> 0:06:29.719
<v Speaker 1>we're gonna focus on the sports that involve throwing a ball.

0:06:30.279 --> 0:06:34.599
<v Speaker 1>Um Gus, that's impressive, but he's a kicker. Despite just

0:06:34.720 --> 0:06:36.400
<v Speaker 1>participating in a game that has a lot of throwing

0:06:36.400 --> 0:06:38.720
<v Speaker 1>in it doesn't seem to be throwing anything. So we

0:06:38.760 --> 0:06:40.800
<v Speaker 1>really only have to worry about the concept of dogs

0:06:40.800 --> 0:06:44.640
<v Speaker 1>playing scoring games with balls and chimpanzees playing scoring games

0:06:44.640 --> 0:06:49.280
<v Speaker 1>with battles. Real quick, let's talk about dogs, um and

0:06:49.279 --> 0:06:53.400
<v Speaker 1>and you may have additional expertise on this uh to

0:06:53.440 --> 0:06:57.039
<v Speaker 1>throw in here experience uh from being a dog owner.

0:06:57.040 --> 0:06:59.640
<v Speaker 1>But as far as dogs go, they can obviously be

0:06:59.680 --> 0:07:01.600
<v Speaker 1>trained to do a lot of different things, often very

0:07:01.640 --> 0:07:05.479
<v Speaker 1>impressive things, including chasing, after catching, and fetching balls and sticks,

0:07:05.960 --> 0:07:08.640
<v Speaker 1>and as is evident in many videos online, they can

0:07:08.680 --> 0:07:12.000
<v Speaker 1>also be trained to bounce basketballs into baskets off of

0:07:12.040 --> 0:07:15.960
<v Speaker 1>their their noses, off of their snouts. That always, I

0:07:16.000 --> 0:07:19.080
<v Speaker 1>don't know, Like a basketball is a fairly massive object.

0:07:19.120 --> 0:07:22.120
<v Speaker 1>I would think booping a basketball in mid flight with

0:07:22.160 --> 0:07:26.120
<v Speaker 1>the snout would really kind of hurt. Yeah, I'm not sure,

0:07:26.400 --> 0:07:30.320
<v Speaker 1>but I looked around. And as far as dogs throwing,

0:07:30.960 --> 0:07:33.760
<v Speaker 1>I'm not so certain about this. Drops. Yes, they can.

0:07:33.840 --> 0:07:36.360
<v Speaker 1>You know, you'll see plenty of examples of dogs catching

0:07:36.400 --> 0:07:40.400
<v Speaker 1>things dropping them. Um, But I'm not sure. I'm not

0:07:40.400 --> 0:07:43.560
<v Speaker 1>sure you really have anything like throwing even kind of

0:07:44.280 --> 0:07:46.840
<v Speaker 1>you know, a tossing aside of a stick or a ball, well,

0:07:46.880 --> 0:07:49.760
<v Speaker 1>not targeted throwing. I mean, I think what's quite common

0:07:49.800 --> 0:07:53.680
<v Speaker 1>for dogs is something more like what the mongoose did

0:07:53.720 --> 0:07:58.800
<v Speaker 1>with the millipede. Dogs will especially dogs that have been

0:07:58.800 --> 0:08:02.840
<v Speaker 1>trained in kind of unused torual environments with say a

0:08:02.840 --> 0:08:06.440
<v Speaker 1>a puzzle type treat retrieval toy. You know, so you

0:08:06.520 --> 0:08:10.520
<v Speaker 1>have like some kind of toy where the treat is

0:08:10.600 --> 0:08:13.160
<v Speaker 1>hidden inside, and the dog has to manipulate the toy

0:08:13.200 --> 0:08:16.440
<v Speaker 1>to get the treat out of the middle. In those cases,

0:08:16.440 --> 0:08:19.440
<v Speaker 1>I've seen dogs throwing the toy in order to try

0:08:19.440 --> 0:08:22.720
<v Speaker 1>to extract the treat, but it's very haphazard. They're not

0:08:22.800 --> 0:08:25.120
<v Speaker 1>like hitting a target. They're more just kind of like

0:08:25.240 --> 0:08:28.520
<v Speaker 1>throwing it wildly by tossing their head and it'll bounce

0:08:28.560 --> 0:08:31.000
<v Speaker 1>off the wall or something, and maybe the treat will

0:08:31.040 --> 0:08:34.560
<v Speaker 1>tumble out. Mm hmm. Now, I also found some some

0:08:34.679 --> 0:08:38.480
<v Speaker 1>discussions and some papers about the possibility that a dog

0:08:38.600 --> 0:08:41.719
<v Speaker 1>using a chewing stick is essentially a form of tool use,

0:08:41.840 --> 0:08:43.800
<v Speaker 1>and this would also apply to any other animal that

0:08:43.960 --> 0:08:47.400
<v Speaker 1>uses a stick in such a fashion. Uh So that's

0:08:47.400 --> 0:08:51.040
<v Speaker 1>an interesting idea to consider. Mm hmm. Yeah, you can

0:08:51.120 --> 0:08:52.920
<v Speaker 1>make that argument, I guess by the same token, you

0:08:52.920 --> 0:08:55.360
<v Speaker 1>could say like a bear scratching its butt against a

0:08:55.400 --> 0:08:59.640
<v Speaker 1>tree would be a form of tool use. Chimps, however,

0:09:00.400 --> 0:09:03.760
<v Speaker 1>chimps are a different case entirely so We're not saying

0:09:03.800 --> 0:09:07.320
<v Speaker 1>that chimpanzees should be encouraged to play baseball or soccer

0:09:07.440 --> 0:09:10.280
<v Speaker 1>or any other professional sport, or any sport for that matter,

0:09:10.559 --> 0:09:13.480
<v Speaker 1>but they have certainly demonstrated their use of tools in

0:09:13.679 --> 0:09:17.080
<v Speaker 1>both captivity and in the wild. And this includes the

0:09:17.120 --> 0:09:20.760
<v Speaker 1>targeted use of throwing objects. Now, one of the objects

0:09:20.840 --> 0:09:23.600
<v Speaker 1>or or substances I guess observed to be thrown a lot,

0:09:23.800 --> 0:09:26.400
<v Speaker 1>and this is something that is of course well documented online.

0:09:26.440 --> 0:09:29.840
<v Speaker 1>In fact, when we were researching other aspects of animals

0:09:29.840 --> 0:09:32.360
<v Speaker 1>throwing things, some of the search engines I I was

0:09:32.440 --> 0:09:36.760
<v Speaker 1>using were very excited to give me content of animals

0:09:36.760 --> 0:09:41.520
<v Speaker 1>throwing feces, potentially particularly chimps throwing feces. I was not

0:09:41.640 --> 0:09:44.360
<v Speaker 1>looking for this information at the time, by the Internet

0:09:44.480 --> 0:09:47.439
<v Speaker 1>really wanted to serve it to me. Now, this kind

0:09:47.440 --> 0:09:49.280
<v Speaker 1>of goes back into something we talked about earlier though,

0:09:49.320 --> 0:09:51.559
<v Speaker 1>the question if you're doing something with something that came

0:09:51.600 --> 0:09:54.199
<v Speaker 1>from your own body, is it truly tool use? I

0:09:54.240 --> 0:09:55.920
<v Speaker 1>don't know. I mean, I guess when I was thinking

0:09:55.920 --> 0:09:58.680
<v Speaker 1>about substances that come out of an animal's own body,

0:09:59.360 --> 0:10:02.280
<v Speaker 1>I was thinking about like things like spider silk, or

0:10:02.520 --> 0:10:06.920
<v Speaker 1>like the urdicating hairs that come off of a tarantiala's back.

0:10:07.600 --> 0:10:12.080
<v Speaker 1>Where the ways in which these substances are used are

0:10:12.200 --> 0:10:15.959
<v Speaker 1>not very generalized, They're not very free form. Instead, they

0:10:15.960 --> 0:10:22.959
<v Speaker 1>seem to be pretty tightly controlled, instinctually determined behavioral patterns,

0:10:23.360 --> 0:10:25.480
<v Speaker 1>whereas I don't know, you could say, maybe like a

0:10:25.559 --> 0:10:28.640
<v Speaker 1>chimpanzee pooping and then throwing its poop at someone or

0:10:28.679 --> 0:10:32.200
<v Speaker 1>something that that seems to be a little more free form. Yeah,

0:10:32.280 --> 0:10:34.560
<v Speaker 1>I guess also, and this is not something that any

0:10:34.559 --> 0:10:36.520
<v Speaker 1>of the papers I looked at got into, but I

0:10:36.520 --> 0:10:41.040
<v Speaker 1>guess there there's a difference between poop directly delivered to

0:10:41.080 --> 0:10:43.600
<v Speaker 1>the hand and then thrown, and like poop that is

0:10:43.640 --> 0:10:46.520
<v Speaker 1>just like say, in a creature's habitat or in its

0:10:46.520 --> 0:10:49.520
<v Speaker 1>general area that it then picks up. Uh maybe not

0:10:49.559 --> 0:10:52.880
<v Speaker 1>even its own poop. Um, So I guess we'd have

0:10:52.920 --> 0:10:55.120
<v Speaker 1>to consider that as well. Now, I do think we

0:10:55.120 --> 0:10:57.599
<v Speaker 1>should be clear that feces are not the only objects

0:10:57.679 --> 0:11:01.240
<v Speaker 1>that that apes like chimpanzees throw, but is a feces

0:11:01.240 --> 0:11:04.880
<v Speaker 1>are often observed to be thrown, especially in captivity. I

0:11:04.920 --> 0:11:09.240
<v Speaker 1>think yes, yeah, definitely. Uh, the sources I was looking at,

0:11:09.240 --> 0:11:14.679
<v Speaker 1>they're definitely mentioning this because in captivity, especially historically, there

0:11:14.679 --> 0:11:17.800
<v Speaker 1>are often less things for the animal to interact with.

0:11:18.240 --> 0:11:21.280
<v Speaker 1>The poop is something that will happen eventually, will be

0:11:21.320 --> 0:11:24.720
<v Speaker 1>in the enclosure, and therefore is available to pick up, manipulate,

0:11:24.720 --> 0:11:27.760
<v Speaker 1>and throw if desired, whereas in the wild there are

0:11:27.960 --> 0:11:31.199
<v Speaker 1>other competitors out there, the other things that could pick up,

0:11:31.320 --> 0:11:34.600
<v Speaker 1>like sticks, like rocks that could be thrown, and we

0:11:34.640 --> 0:11:37.680
<v Speaker 1>have seen them throw such objects both in captivity but

0:11:37.800 --> 0:11:40.480
<v Speaker 1>also in the wild, and so it seems to be

0:11:40.520 --> 0:11:43.880
<v Speaker 1>a situation where they're they're far more incidents of poop

0:11:43.920 --> 0:11:46.440
<v Speaker 1>throwing in captivity versus the wild, though they have been

0:11:46.440 --> 0:11:48.960
<v Speaker 1>observed to throw poop in the wild as well. So yeah,

0:11:48.960 --> 0:11:52.400
<v Speaker 1>I guess I would not disqualify something from counting as

0:11:52.440 --> 0:11:55.920
<v Speaker 1>tool used just because it consists of an animal's own

0:11:55.960 --> 0:11:58.199
<v Speaker 1>excreta or something that came out of their body. I mean,

0:11:58.320 --> 0:12:00.720
<v Speaker 1>you could use poop, I suppose a tool for all

0:12:00.800 --> 0:12:04.840
<v Speaker 1>kinds of things. Yeah, yeah, this is kind of a tangent,

0:12:04.920 --> 0:12:08.439
<v Speaker 1>but I was looking around and back in seventeen, a

0:12:08.480 --> 0:12:10.960
<v Speaker 1>team from the University of Calgary hosted a competition to

0:12:11.000 --> 0:12:14.280
<v Speaker 1>make use of astronaut waste, and the winning submission was

0:12:14.320 --> 0:12:19.440
<v Speaker 1>titled Astroplastic from Colon to Colony, in which the d

0:12:19.600 --> 0:12:23.200
<v Speaker 1>n A of an E. Coli bacteria was modified so

0:12:23.240 --> 0:12:26.880
<v Speaker 1>that it removed acids from human feces and they did

0:12:26.880 --> 0:12:29.160
<v Speaker 1>not use actual poop in the experiment, used like a

0:12:29.200 --> 0:12:32.880
<v Speaker 1>mixture of things to simulate poop. But the idea was

0:12:32.920 --> 0:12:36.560
<v Speaker 1>here that this, uh, this, this modified E. COOLi would

0:12:36.679 --> 0:12:40.160
<v Speaker 1>produce a plastic that can then be used in a

0:12:40.200 --> 0:12:43.080
<v Speaker 1>three D printer to produce simple tools like wrenches and

0:12:43.080 --> 0:12:46.480
<v Speaker 1>screw drivers. So the aim here would be sort of twofold.

0:12:46.760 --> 0:12:49.840
<v Speaker 1>So say you're going to Mars on an extended mission.

0:12:50.240 --> 0:12:52.240
<v Speaker 1>This way you don't have to bring those tools with you,

0:12:52.240 --> 0:12:54.439
<v Speaker 1>you don't have to pay for the cost of getting

0:12:54.440 --> 0:12:58.680
<v Speaker 1>those tools into orbit and then two Mars and then

0:12:58.720 --> 0:13:02.240
<v Speaker 1>likewise you have to worry less about getting rid of

0:13:02.320 --> 0:13:06.680
<v Speaker 1>human waste on the journey. Uh. That that's quite brilliant. Yes,

0:13:06.840 --> 0:13:09.360
<v Speaker 1>I one day hope to have all kinds of plastic

0:13:09.400 --> 0:13:14.079
<v Speaker 1>tools and toys made out of poop. Now, um, this

0:13:14.120 --> 0:13:15.760
<v Speaker 1>is this is sort of another aside, but this is

0:13:15.800 --> 0:13:19.559
<v Speaker 1>goods Back to chimps specifically, Uh, you might even get

0:13:19.559 --> 0:13:24.280
<v Speaker 1>into the question of why did chimps throw poop um specifically,

0:13:24.320 --> 0:13:27.679
<v Speaker 1>even if they have a choice of their objects to throw.

0:13:28.000 --> 0:13:31.199
<v Speaker 1>And I found this rather fascinating older paper. This from

0:13:32.240 --> 0:13:36.280
<v Speaker 1>it is UM, a Russian paper titled UM a neglected

0:13:36.320 --> 0:13:39.720
<v Speaker 1>form of quasi aggression in apes Possible relevance for the

0:13:39.720 --> 0:13:43.319
<v Speaker 1>origins of humor. This is the current anthropology and I'm

0:13:43.360 --> 0:13:45.720
<v Speaker 1>just going to read a quote from it here. According

0:13:45.800 --> 0:13:48.400
<v Speaker 1>to people working at the Pavlov Center, at least four

0:13:48.440 --> 0:13:51.760
<v Speaker 1>adult chimpanzee mails and one adult female would also throw

0:13:51.800 --> 0:13:55.079
<v Speaker 1>feces at people, expressing joy when the target was hit

0:13:55.120 --> 0:13:59.600
<v Speaker 1>by making a playface, hooting, clapping, and stamping around. They

0:13:59.600 --> 0:14:02.920
<v Speaker 1>did not, however, throw feces at persons of whom they

0:14:02.960 --> 0:14:06.360
<v Speaker 1>were afraid. We have received the same information from people

0:14:06.360 --> 0:14:09.400
<v Speaker 1>in charge of chimpanzees at the St. Petersburg and Moscow

0:14:09.520 --> 0:14:12.640
<v Speaker 1>zoos at the Moscow Zoo. The same behavior was observed

0:14:12.640 --> 0:14:18.440
<v Speaker 1>in orangutanks. So at least in these cases, the chimpanzees

0:14:18.440 --> 0:14:21.400
<v Speaker 1>seem to get a real hoot out of hitting somebody

0:14:21.440 --> 0:14:25.160
<v Speaker 1>with some poop. Yeah, And and again this is older research,

0:14:25.280 --> 0:14:27.920
<v Speaker 1>and I detect at least a little bit of anthropomorphizing here,

0:14:27.960 --> 0:14:32.040
<v Speaker 1>But the distinction about fear was very interesting. So maybe

0:14:32.080 --> 0:14:34.880
<v Speaker 1>in this we do see the roots of something like humor.

0:14:35.520 --> 0:14:40.040
<v Speaker 1>But elsewhere primatologists do seem to agree that throwing poop, stones, sticks,

0:14:40.280 --> 0:14:43.280
<v Speaker 1>et cetera in primates is often a an act of

0:14:43.320 --> 0:14:46.200
<v Speaker 1>communication which matches up with some of the things we've

0:14:46.200 --> 0:14:49.360
<v Speaker 1>been discussing elsewhere in this series, and that we will

0:14:49.400 --> 0:14:51.280
<v Speaker 1>get to in a little bit when we talked about

0:14:51.360 --> 0:14:56.080
<v Speaker 1>human evolution. Yeah, and with chimps, it's not even uh,

0:14:56.120 --> 0:14:59.440
<v Speaker 1>it's it's not even a case of like necessarily purely

0:14:59.480 --> 0:15:01.920
<v Speaker 1>spontane is communication. Like it's easy to I think, to

0:15:01.960 --> 0:15:03.880
<v Speaker 1>make that leap. You think of like an animal trying

0:15:03.920 --> 0:15:07.800
<v Speaker 1>to say something, not having the ability to say it,

0:15:08.040 --> 0:15:11.080
<v Speaker 1>or having difficulty relaying that message, and then sort of

0:15:11.120 --> 0:15:13.720
<v Speaker 1>sort of spontaneously picking something up and throwing it, or

0:15:13.720 --> 0:15:15.440
<v Speaker 1>perhaps it already has something in his hand and it

0:15:15.520 --> 0:15:18.640
<v Speaker 1>throws it. And this would still be very fascinating. I mean,

0:15:18.720 --> 0:15:21.520
<v Speaker 1>even if you think of like a zoo environment, for example,

0:15:21.880 --> 0:15:25.800
<v Speaker 1>the chimp is attempting interspecies communication. Uh, even if that

0:15:25.880 --> 0:15:29.480
<v Speaker 1>interspecies communication consists of throwing a rock or some poop

0:15:29.520 --> 0:15:32.800
<v Speaker 1>at somebody, But it's not always spontaneous. Sometimes it is

0:15:32.880 --> 0:15:37.080
<v Speaker 1>premeditated in the case of of stone throwing that's been observed.

0:15:37.120 --> 0:15:40.200
<v Speaker 1>One of the the more famous examples of this was

0:15:40.720 --> 0:15:45.440
<v Speaker 1>Santino the chimpanzee born in nine eight, who made headlines

0:15:45.840 --> 0:15:48.760
<v Speaker 1>multiple times, and I think sometimes the news cycle would

0:15:48.760 --> 0:15:51.720
<v Speaker 1>come back around to him because in addition to being

0:15:52.120 --> 0:15:56.600
<v Speaker 1>a pretty talented artist, he also has some issues with people,

0:15:57.280 --> 0:16:00.520
<v Speaker 1>like to collect stones ahead of time so that he

0:16:00.520 --> 0:16:05.960
<v Speaker 1>could throw them at visitors to the Fruvik Zoo in Sweden.

0:16:06.320 --> 0:16:09.440
<v Speaker 1>Now that's really interesting that the collecting of stones in

0:16:09.520 --> 0:16:12.120
<v Speaker 1>advance aspect, because of course that indicates some kind of

0:16:12.160 --> 0:16:17.120
<v Speaker 1>forethought or premeditation or planning, like seeing the stone as

0:16:17.160 --> 0:16:20.560
<v Speaker 1>a tool for future use in a moment when it

0:16:20.680 --> 0:16:25.160
<v Speaker 1>is not currently needed for that use. Yeah, and apparently

0:16:25.240 --> 0:16:28.280
<v Speaker 1>wasn't an isolated incident. It said that he planned hundreds

0:16:28.320 --> 0:16:31.680
<v Speaker 1>of stone throwing attacks on zoo visitors over the years.

0:16:32.120 --> 0:16:36.720
<v Speaker 1>Um Sadly, he escaped from his enclosure in December two

0:16:37.080 --> 0:16:39.720
<v Speaker 1>and was subsequently shot along with some other escape piece,

0:16:39.720 --> 0:16:44.120
<v Speaker 1>which was a pretty controversial incident. Recently, there's a fair

0:16:44.120 --> 0:16:46.720
<v Speaker 1>amount of coverage about that, but not I don't think

0:16:46.720 --> 0:16:50.040
<v Speaker 1>everybody necessarily connected that this was the same chump that

0:16:50.080 --> 0:16:52.640
<v Speaker 1>had made headlines in the past for the throwing of

0:16:52.760 --> 0:16:56.000
<v Speaker 1>rocks and for art apparently and for our Yeah, you

0:16:56.040 --> 0:16:59.880
<v Speaker 1>can find videos of him online doing some uh some painting,

0:17:00.240 --> 0:17:03.240
<v Speaker 1>manipulating of pigments on the on on a on a

0:17:03.280 --> 0:17:07.280
<v Speaker 1>canvas to create some interesting works. Well, sad in for Santino,

0:17:07.440 --> 0:17:19.919
<v Speaker 1>but let an interesting life. Thank thank Now There's another

0:17:20.119 --> 0:17:23.399
<v Speaker 1>interesting wrinkle in stone throwing with chumps that I was

0:17:23.440 --> 0:17:26.880
<v Speaker 1>reading about, because in the wild, chimps will also engage

0:17:26.880 --> 0:17:30.760
<v Speaker 1>in what is called accumulative stone throwing, as reported by

0:17:30.760 --> 0:17:34.440
<v Speaker 1>cool at All in Nature Scientific Reports back in twos sixteen,

0:17:35.000 --> 0:17:40.119
<v Speaker 1>Modern chimpanzees will will actually create stone accumulation sites that

0:17:40.200 --> 0:17:45.000
<v Speaker 1>are reminiscent of human cairns, of of human um assemblages

0:17:45.080 --> 0:17:49.840
<v Speaker 1>of stone, something that we often associate with like deliberate

0:17:50.880 --> 0:17:54.880
<v Speaker 1>cultured acts of of human behavior, uh something. And this

0:17:54.960 --> 0:17:59.200
<v Speaker 1>is both from from an archaeological standpoint, when archaeologists find

0:17:59.200 --> 0:18:02.080
<v Speaker 1>examples of domes that have been gathered together in one area,

0:18:02.560 --> 0:18:05.919
<v Speaker 1>and also I think we just individually encountered this as well,

0:18:06.160 --> 0:18:09.320
<v Speaker 1>whether you see piles of stones that are put there

0:18:09.359 --> 0:18:11.320
<v Speaker 1>for a purpose, like perhaps you're on a nature walk

0:18:11.359 --> 0:18:14.600
<v Speaker 1>and these stones are are gathered together to help mark

0:18:14.680 --> 0:18:17.480
<v Speaker 1>the path you're supposed to be on, or you often

0:18:17.480 --> 0:18:22.879
<v Speaker 1>see this done out of for for pure amusement. Um

0:18:23.119 --> 0:18:25.479
<v Speaker 1>At times you'll just find places where humans have been

0:18:25.480 --> 0:18:28.160
<v Speaker 1>around multiple stones and there's like kind of this irresistible

0:18:28.240 --> 0:18:32.120
<v Speaker 1>urge to arrange them or stack them up. Yeah, and

0:18:32.200 --> 0:18:35.120
<v Speaker 1>so it's interesting, but I also am hesitant to make

0:18:35.400 --> 0:18:37.800
<v Speaker 1>the speculative leap here. I mean, I know, I was

0:18:37.840 --> 0:18:40.119
<v Speaker 1>reading about this paper, and I know what some people

0:18:40.200 --> 0:18:43.719
<v Speaker 1>have said about the you know, the accumulation of stones,

0:18:43.760 --> 0:18:46.600
<v Speaker 1>like throwing stones into the into a hollow tree or

0:18:46.640 --> 0:18:50.440
<v Speaker 1>something until they really pile up. That suggests, well, maybe

0:18:50.440 --> 0:18:54.119
<v Speaker 1>they're creating some kind of like ritual monument, like you know,

0:18:54.200 --> 0:18:56.280
<v Speaker 1>like humans would create a care and for some kind

0:18:56.320 --> 0:18:59.879
<v Speaker 1>of purpose to be observed and to mean something. I

0:19:00.320 --> 0:19:02.720
<v Speaker 1>don't think there's really evidence present to jump to that

0:19:02.800 --> 0:19:05.280
<v Speaker 1>kind of conclusion, because that seems like a different order

0:19:05.320 --> 0:19:09.199
<v Speaker 1>of uh, that symbolic behavior that, as far as I know,

0:19:09.359 --> 0:19:12.520
<v Speaker 1>is probably only the province of humans. But I guess

0:19:12.560 --> 0:19:14.359
<v Speaker 1>we could always be surprised. It seems kind of a

0:19:14.359 --> 0:19:18.199
<v Speaker 1>speculative leap to me, but it's still really interesting behavior. Nonetheless,

0:19:18.240 --> 0:19:21.760
<v Speaker 1>I mean, the the the chimpanzee is piling up the

0:19:21.800 --> 0:19:25.600
<v Speaker 1>stones for some interesting reason, even if it's not to

0:19:25.720 --> 0:19:31.080
<v Speaker 1>like create a symbolic marker for other chimpanzees to see. Yeah. Yeah,

0:19:31.480 --> 0:19:35.280
<v Speaker 1>So this particular paper they're drawing on various surveys and accounts,

0:19:35.280 --> 0:19:37.879
<v Speaker 1>and they found four populations in West Africa where chimps

0:19:37.960 --> 0:19:41.480
<v Speaker 1>quote habitually bang and throw rocks against trees or toss

0:19:41.520 --> 0:19:45.560
<v Speaker 1>them into tree cavities, resulting in conspicuous stone accumulations at

0:19:45.600 --> 0:19:49.000
<v Speaker 1>these sites. Um. They point out that chimps, along with

0:19:49.080 --> 0:19:52.080
<v Speaker 1>capuchin monkeys and long tailed macaques, are known to use

0:19:52.119 --> 0:19:55.880
<v Speaker 1>stones as hammers to crack open encased foods. Uh. They

0:19:55.920 --> 0:19:58.959
<v Speaker 1>point out that stone throwing and chimpanzees was first described

0:19:58.960 --> 0:20:02.439
<v Speaker 1>by Jane Goodall documented aimed throwing of sticks and rocks

0:20:02.480 --> 0:20:07.199
<v Speaker 1>by male chimpanzees during agonistic displays, and this behavior was

0:20:07.320 --> 0:20:10.359
<v Speaker 1>later described by researchers for other non human primates as well,

0:20:10.400 --> 0:20:15.440
<v Speaker 1>including Japanese macaques, wild baboons, and capuchin monkeys. Yeah. Female

0:20:15.440 --> 0:20:17.840
<v Speaker 1>bearded capuchins have also been observed to throw rocks during

0:20:17.880 --> 0:20:21.439
<v Speaker 1>courtship interactions. Um, which I guess this is would be

0:20:21.440 --> 0:20:24.760
<v Speaker 1>like tenderly throwing pebbles against a window to get their

0:20:24.800 --> 0:20:29.520
<v Speaker 1>lover's interest at night without awakening the parents downstairs, or

0:20:29.560 --> 0:20:33.040
<v Speaker 1>maybe not I like it, but human metaphors aside, I mean, like,

0:20:33.200 --> 0:20:36.040
<v Speaker 1>it is interesting that they would throw rocks at each

0:20:36.040 --> 0:20:40.480
<v Speaker 1>other for apparent purposes other than threats or intimidation. Yeah, again,

0:20:40.520 --> 0:20:44.240
<v Speaker 1>coming back into like the communication aspect of it. Um.

0:20:44.280 --> 0:20:47.600
<v Speaker 1>Now I mentioned the using using some sort of nutcracking

0:20:47.880 --> 0:20:51.720
<v Speaker 1>um behavior with rocks that can sometimes lead to those

0:20:51.800 --> 0:20:55.000
<v Speaker 1>rocks accumulating in certain places, which is a different type

0:20:55.040 --> 0:20:58.879
<v Speaker 1>of accumulation versus what we're talking with the chimps here um. Also,

0:20:59.040 --> 0:21:02.360
<v Speaker 1>the paper points out that Japanese macaques engage in stone handling,

0:21:02.640 --> 0:21:06.960
<v Speaker 1>which isn't tool of use but solitary object play behavior,

0:21:07.520 --> 0:21:10.680
<v Speaker 1>and it actually results in use wear patterns on the stones,

0:21:11.240 --> 0:21:14.800
<v Speaker 1>and the stones will then end up accumulating at quote

0:21:14.840 --> 0:21:19.879
<v Speaker 1>unquote PlayStations. So just sort of like handling manipulating a stone,

0:21:19.960 --> 0:21:23.960
<v Speaker 1>not really doing anything in particular with it. Yeah, yeah,

0:21:24.480 --> 0:21:26.200
<v Speaker 1>which is I get. You know, it's like the monolith

0:21:26.240 --> 0:21:30.080
<v Speaker 1>hasn't really kicked in yet, but but they're but they're

0:21:30.119 --> 0:21:34.520
<v Speaker 1>handling the stone. But chimpanzees are well beyond all of

0:21:34.520 --> 0:21:37.720
<v Speaker 1>these like, the chimpanzees are second only to humans in

0:21:37.760 --> 0:21:40.679
<v Speaker 1>the variants of their tool usage. They make use of

0:21:40.720 --> 0:21:44.359
<v Speaker 1>simple sticks, stone hammer, stone cleavers, to linked to to

0:21:44.480 --> 0:21:48.800
<v Speaker 1>cut foods. Uh. They've even been observed to hunt sleeping

0:21:48.840 --> 0:21:52.040
<v Speaker 1>bush babies with wooden spears. So this is I think

0:21:52.040 --> 0:21:57.680
<v Speaker 1>only been observed in female chimpanzees. But they'll take take

0:21:57.720 --> 0:22:00.119
<v Speaker 1>a stick and sort of sort of sharpen it at

0:22:00.119 --> 0:22:02.600
<v Speaker 1>their their teeth or chew on it, you know, to

0:22:02.640 --> 0:22:06.040
<v Speaker 1>get a something like a point, and then use that

0:22:06.080 --> 0:22:08.520
<v Speaker 1>stick to stab into the hollows of trees where there's

0:22:08.520 --> 0:22:11.240
<v Speaker 1>a sleeping bush baby and spirit and pull it back

0:22:11.240 --> 0:22:15.000
<v Speaker 1>out to eat. There's so many surprising little little cases

0:22:15.040 --> 0:22:17.000
<v Speaker 1>of of tool uisu pro to a tool used to

0:22:17.000 --> 0:22:22.879
<v Speaker 1>behavior in chimpanzees like this. Now, this this paper basically

0:22:22.920 --> 0:22:27.560
<v Speaker 1>comes down to two hypotheses about why the chimps do this.

0:22:28.440 --> 0:22:30.760
<v Speaker 1>The first, and I think the main hypothesis is that

0:22:30.840 --> 0:22:35.760
<v Speaker 1>they accumulate stone throwing behavior as a modification of male

0:22:35.880 --> 0:22:39.240
<v Speaker 1>chimpanzee display. This would make it mean that it would

0:22:39.280 --> 0:22:42.480
<v Speaker 1>be kind of like a an addition to their hand

0:22:42.520 --> 0:22:46.760
<v Speaker 1>and foot drumming, uh, which is you know, ritualized behavior

0:22:46.800 --> 0:22:50.000
<v Speaker 1>found in all known chimpanzee populations and the use of

0:22:50.040 --> 0:22:53.600
<v Speaker 1>the stones. Throwing the stones um into a pile, into

0:22:53.640 --> 0:22:55.600
<v Speaker 1>the hollow of the tree, et cetera, would be a

0:22:55.640 --> 0:23:00.800
<v Speaker 1>way of enhancing um this particular activity. That's and oh yes,

0:23:00.920 --> 0:23:03.200
<v Speaker 1>so like hitting a pile of stones with a stone

0:23:03.240 --> 0:23:05.960
<v Speaker 1>would probably make a louder sound than just throwing a

0:23:06.000 --> 0:23:09.320
<v Speaker 1>stone off into the dirt. Yeah, I I don't think.

0:23:09.960 --> 0:23:12.040
<v Speaker 1>I don't. I would not feel comfortable going as far

0:23:12.080 --> 0:23:15.360
<v Speaker 1>to say that they're making music, uh, though I think

0:23:15.400 --> 0:23:19.880
<v Speaker 1>I saw some headlines that that we're going in that direction. Uh.

0:23:19.880 --> 0:23:23.440
<v Speaker 1>They also say that the second area to consider this

0:23:23.520 --> 0:23:26.200
<v Speaker 1>that they could also not be male drumming. But if

0:23:26.200 --> 0:23:28.280
<v Speaker 1>it's not that it would mean that it quote may

0:23:28.359 --> 0:23:32.200
<v Speaker 1>need to be considered in a more symbolic context. And

0:23:32.200 --> 0:23:33.639
<v Speaker 1>and I think this is where things would get a

0:23:33.640 --> 0:23:36.720
<v Speaker 1>little foggier, a little potentially more nebulous, because you're getting

0:23:36.720 --> 0:23:41.040
<v Speaker 1>into this area where there is a connection between quote

0:23:41.280 --> 0:23:45.080
<v Speaker 1>ritualized animal behavior and the repeated stereotype behavior is commonly

0:23:45.119 --> 0:23:49.280
<v Speaker 1>observed during human rituals unquote, which granted that could cover

0:23:49.320 --> 0:23:51.560
<v Speaker 1>a great deal of ground. This is what I was

0:23:51.600 --> 0:23:53.840
<v Speaker 1>alluding to earlier that I mean, it seems like an

0:23:53.840 --> 0:23:56.840
<v Speaker 1>interesting possibility, but I think I'd need more evidence that

0:23:56.840 --> 0:23:59.240
<v Speaker 1>that's really the right way to think about it. Yeah,

0:23:59.240 --> 0:24:01.080
<v Speaker 1>And I think I think it's basically what the authors

0:24:01.119 --> 0:24:04.160
<v Speaker 1>here we're leaning towards. Like, It's like, if it's not

0:24:04.920 --> 0:24:07.080
<v Speaker 1>just part of the hand and foot drumming of the

0:24:07.080 --> 0:24:10.280
<v Speaker 1>male chimps, then it's something else, and that's something else

0:24:10.320 --> 0:24:15.080
<v Speaker 1>will require more research and more observation. Yeah, but a

0:24:15.119 --> 0:24:17.959
<v Speaker 1>really interesting behavior either way. Yeah. And one thing they

0:24:18.080 --> 0:24:20.840
<v Speaker 1>point out is that it could have some great importance

0:24:20.880 --> 0:24:24.240
<v Speaker 1>not only for our understanding of how chimps behave, but

0:24:24.320 --> 0:24:28.199
<v Speaker 1>also archaeologically. When we find piles of stones and things that,

0:24:28.240 --> 0:24:32.680
<v Speaker 1>again we can often easily associate with with human intention,

0:24:33.080 --> 0:24:35.760
<v Speaker 1>it could be something else. It could be chimps in

0:24:35.760 --> 0:24:39.560
<v Speaker 1>in a or or you know, some other human ancestor

0:24:39.640 --> 0:24:43.840
<v Speaker 1>engaging in some sort of display that involves accumulating throwing rocks. Yeah.

0:24:43.840 --> 0:24:47.080
<v Speaker 1>Well it forces us to be humble about interpreting archaeological

0:24:47.119 --> 0:24:49.439
<v Speaker 1>evidence because I think we we we tend to always

0:24:49.480 --> 0:24:52.479
<v Speaker 1>want to say, oh, if we find a non natural

0:24:52.520 --> 0:24:55.159
<v Speaker 1>assemblage of stones or something like that, you assume it

0:24:55.240 --> 0:24:58.840
<v Speaker 1>must have an almost kind of like industrial purpose. You know,

0:24:58.920 --> 0:25:02.400
<v Speaker 1>it's used for wrecked survival benefit, maybe in the manufacture

0:25:02.560 --> 0:25:06.080
<v Speaker 1>of tools or something like that, which which of course

0:25:06.119 --> 0:25:08.920
<v Speaker 1>could be possible. Or the other side is people tend

0:25:08.960 --> 0:25:11.919
<v Speaker 1>to jump to religion, you say, is ritual use. But

0:25:12.000 --> 0:25:14.040
<v Speaker 1>then there are these cases that we observe in non

0:25:14.160 --> 0:25:16.720
<v Speaker 1>human primates today where it's like, it's not even clear

0:25:16.720 --> 0:25:20.359
<v Speaker 1>what this is for. Yeah, but I wanted to now

0:25:20.400 --> 0:25:25.879
<v Speaker 1>address the topic of the evolution of throwing in humans

0:25:26.480 --> 0:25:29.600
<v Speaker 1>because to the extent that animals throw, and we know

0:25:29.760 --> 0:25:32.679
<v Speaker 1>from everything we've looked at in these episodes that many

0:25:32.720 --> 0:25:36.160
<v Speaker 1>many non human animals do throw, they don't throw like

0:25:36.359 --> 0:25:41.119
<v Speaker 1>we do. No animal out there comes anywhere close to

0:25:41.160 --> 0:25:46.280
<v Speaker 1>the combined levels of force and target precision that humans

0:25:46.320 --> 0:25:49.800
<v Speaker 1>are capable of. And to further explore this, I was

0:25:49.840 --> 0:25:53.760
<v Speaker 1>looking at an interesting paper by Michael P. Lombardo and

0:25:53.920 --> 0:25:57.600
<v Speaker 1>robert O. Deaner published in the Quarterly Review of Biology

0:25:59.119 --> 0:26:02.560
<v Speaker 1>called Born to Throw The Ecological Causes that shaped the

0:26:02.560 --> 0:26:05.680
<v Speaker 1>Evolution of Throwing in Humans. Now, I'm not going to

0:26:05.760 --> 0:26:08.120
<v Speaker 1>address all the sub topics in this paper, but wanted

0:26:08.160 --> 0:26:10.640
<v Speaker 1>to pull out some highlights that I found really interesting.

0:26:11.560 --> 0:26:15.080
<v Speaker 1>So the authors begin by identifying two major turning points

0:26:15.640 --> 0:26:18.840
<v Speaker 1>in the relationship between human anatomy and human behavior that

0:26:19.119 --> 0:26:22.160
<v Speaker 1>sort of drove the evolution of the modern human body.

0:26:22.440 --> 0:26:26.080
<v Speaker 1>And they identified the shift to bipedal locomotion, of course

0:26:26.160 --> 0:26:29.600
<v Speaker 1>is is well known, but also the development of forceful

0:26:29.800 --> 0:26:33.399
<v Speaker 1>overhand throwing, and they argued that the former has gotten

0:26:33.400 --> 0:26:35.760
<v Speaker 1>a lot more attention than the ladder, but the ladder

0:26:35.840 --> 0:26:40.080
<v Speaker 1>might be considered equally important, if not more so. There

0:26:40.119 --> 0:26:44.280
<v Speaker 1>are other animals that throw in various scenarios, as we've documented,

0:26:44.560 --> 0:26:47.400
<v Speaker 1>but humans are the only primates that can be observed

0:26:47.440 --> 0:26:51.600
<v Speaker 1>to regularly throw targeted projectiles in order to kill or

0:26:51.680 --> 0:26:56.080
<v Speaker 1>cause injury to another animal. And I think also it's

0:26:56.119 --> 0:26:59.359
<v Speaker 1>worth noticing not only how much better we are throwing

0:26:59.359 --> 0:27:02.520
<v Speaker 1>than other ammals, but how this is pretty much the

0:27:02.600 --> 0:27:05.400
<v Speaker 1>only feat of physical strength. They're one of the only

0:27:05.400 --> 0:27:10.680
<v Speaker 1>feats of physical strength where we surpass our closest primate relatives.

0:27:10.720 --> 0:27:14.479
<v Speaker 1>So compared to other primates like chimpanzees and guerillas, humans

0:27:14.480 --> 0:27:18.040
<v Speaker 1>are incredibly weak. The author's site some research. It's older

0:27:18.080 --> 0:27:22.920
<v Speaker 1>research from ninety six, attempting to quantify the difference between

0:27:22.960 --> 0:27:25.440
<v Speaker 1>the you know, like the arm strength of a chimpanzee

0:27:25.560 --> 0:27:29.520
<v Speaker 1>versus an adult human. And this, this older study concludes that,

0:27:29.640 --> 0:27:33.320
<v Speaker 1>controlling for body size, an adult male chimpanzee is on

0:27:33.400 --> 0:27:37.520
<v Speaker 1>average roughly four times stronger than I fit adult human male.

0:27:38.119 --> 0:27:41.199
<v Speaker 1>Now this is probably a very approximate, guest, but I

0:27:41.240 --> 0:27:44.960
<v Speaker 1>think it is utterly uncontroversial to say that chimps are

0:27:45.119 --> 0:27:48.320
<v Speaker 1>way way stronger than humans. At chimpanzee could probably just

0:27:48.440 --> 0:27:52.320
<v Speaker 1>rip your head off. Oh yeah, And I've seen some

0:27:52.480 --> 0:27:54.960
<v Speaker 1>images of of hand. I can't recall of it was

0:27:55.520 --> 0:27:59.520
<v Speaker 1>a hairless gorilla or a hairless chimpanzee, but it allows

0:27:59.520 --> 0:28:01.879
<v Speaker 1>you to really see the muscle definition, and it was.

0:28:02.040 --> 0:28:06.680
<v Speaker 1>It was terrifying how how ripped this creature was. However,

0:28:07.280 --> 0:28:11.320
<v Speaker 1>despite being several times stronger than human on average in

0:28:11.320 --> 0:28:14.960
<v Speaker 1>a general since their muscles are just stronger, a chimpanzee

0:28:15.040 --> 0:28:19.720
<v Speaker 1>is several times weaker than even an adolescent human when

0:28:19.720 --> 0:28:23.280
<v Speaker 1>it comes to forceful overhand throwing. Uh. And I was

0:28:23.320 --> 0:28:26.640
<v Speaker 1>looking to try to find uh this comparison quantified. I

0:28:26.680 --> 0:28:29.119
<v Speaker 1>did find it in the work of a Harvard researcher

0:28:29.600 --> 0:28:32.680
<v Speaker 1>named Neil Thomas Roach, who studies the evolution of high

0:28:32.720 --> 0:28:35.520
<v Speaker 1>speed throwing. I'm going to come back to some research

0:28:35.560 --> 0:28:38.160
<v Speaker 1>he was involved in. In a minute, but just quickly here,

0:28:38.280 --> 0:28:42.400
<v Speaker 1>Roach cites figures that even an adult male chimpanzee who

0:28:42.400 --> 0:28:45.040
<v Speaker 1>has specifically been trained to throw a ball, so this

0:28:45.080 --> 0:28:48.000
<v Speaker 1>is not just a naive chimpanzee has never done this before.

0:28:48.200 --> 0:28:51.120
<v Speaker 1>This is one who you know, has humans have trained

0:28:51.160 --> 0:28:54.400
<v Speaker 1>them to throw as hard as they can. One who

0:28:54.440 --> 0:28:57.320
<v Speaker 1>has been trained can only achieve top throwing speeds of

0:28:57.360 --> 0:29:01.400
<v Speaker 1>about twenty miles per hour, whereas I'm humans, twelve to

0:29:01.520 --> 0:29:06.240
<v Speaker 1>thirteen year old recreational baseball pictures can achieve pitches above

0:29:06.320 --> 0:29:10.880
<v Speaker 1>sixty miles per hour, and professional adult baseball players can

0:29:10.920 --> 0:29:14.160
<v Speaker 1>throw fastballs in the like nine to one mile per

0:29:14.160 --> 0:29:18.880
<v Speaker 1>hour range. So isn't that bizarre. A chimpanzee might be

0:29:19.000 --> 0:29:23.440
<v Speaker 1>simultaneously three or four times stronger than you in general,

0:29:23.840 --> 0:29:27.440
<v Speaker 1>but you are probably right now at least three times

0:29:27.480 --> 0:29:31.560
<v Speaker 1>stronger than the chimp when it comes to throwing. Wow,

0:29:31.720 --> 0:29:36.400
<v Speaker 1>that's a massive blow to any chimpanzee playing baseball. Movies

0:29:36.400 --> 0:29:40.920
<v Speaker 1>out there are basketball movies like it doesn't make sense exactly. Yeah,

0:29:41.000 --> 0:29:43.840
<v Speaker 1>so like Chimp Rookie of the Year, that movie that's

0:29:44.000 --> 0:29:47.960
<v Speaker 1>based on false premise. Yeah, but I think this makes

0:29:48.000 --> 0:29:49.920
<v Speaker 1>more sense the more you think about the act of

0:29:50.000 --> 0:29:53.760
<v Speaker 1>throwing in granular details. So throwing comes so naturally and

0:29:53.800 --> 0:29:57.720
<v Speaker 1>so easily to us as a species, it takes real,

0:29:57.840 --> 0:30:03.240
<v Speaker 1>deliberate effort to understand an extremely difficult and complex behavior.

0:30:03.400 --> 0:30:09.280
<v Speaker 1>Forceful targeted throwing is It requires split second mental calculations

0:30:09.320 --> 0:30:13.960
<v Speaker 1>regarding force, angle, and timing, as well as coordination of

0:30:14.200 --> 0:30:18.200
<v Speaker 1>lots of precise and rapid movements by many different parts

0:30:18.240 --> 0:30:20.600
<v Speaker 1>of the body. So think about all this stuff. Think

0:30:20.600 --> 0:30:23.400
<v Speaker 1>about everything your muscles and your brain have to do

0:30:23.560 --> 0:30:26.719
<v Speaker 1>together to throw a rock and hit something, especially if

0:30:26.720 --> 0:30:29.720
<v Speaker 1>the thing is moving. You have to track the target,

0:30:30.280 --> 0:30:34.280
<v Speaker 1>anticipate future motion of the target, take into account the

0:30:34.320 --> 0:30:37.920
<v Speaker 1>physical features of the projectile, for example, like its weight

0:30:38.000 --> 0:30:40.680
<v Speaker 1>and its shape and so forth, which will affect how

0:30:40.720 --> 0:30:43.520
<v Speaker 1>it travels. You have to understand the object you're throwing

0:30:43.560 --> 0:30:48.320
<v Speaker 1>to throw it effectively. Um, you have to understand how

0:30:48.400 --> 0:30:51.280
<v Speaker 1>exactly to drawback and extend the arm for the throw,

0:30:51.640 --> 0:30:54.560
<v Speaker 1>how to grip the object in preparation for the throw,

0:30:55.000 --> 0:30:58.640
<v Speaker 1>exactly how and when to release the projectile from the grip.

0:30:58.680 --> 0:31:02.200
<v Speaker 1>And that's like a you know, tiny, tiny window, and

0:31:02.320 --> 0:31:04.680
<v Speaker 1>you have to time all of those muscular movements and

0:31:04.760 --> 0:31:07.720
<v Speaker 1>exactly the right sequence, which might all take place in

0:31:07.880 --> 0:31:11.640
<v Speaker 1>less than a second. Of throwing behaviors are one of

0:31:11.680 --> 0:31:15.800
<v Speaker 1>the fastest motions produced by the muscular skeletal system of

0:31:15.840 --> 0:31:18.680
<v Speaker 1>the human body. Yeah, which which makes it all the

0:31:18.720 --> 0:31:21.120
<v Speaker 1>more depressing when you throw a cat toy and the

0:31:21.160 --> 0:31:23.680
<v Speaker 1>cat doesn't chase after it and doesn't take the press like,

0:31:23.720 --> 0:31:26.240
<v Speaker 1>did you not see what I just did? But but

0:31:26.280 --> 0:31:28.280
<v Speaker 1>in the case of throwing a cat toy, you know,

0:31:28.320 --> 0:31:31.200
<v Speaker 1>I'm not trying to actually make the toy go anywhere specific.

0:31:31.600 --> 0:31:34.800
<v Speaker 1>But if I'm say bowling, which I guess I don't

0:31:34.800 --> 0:31:36.800
<v Speaker 1>know if you would call bowling throwing, I guess it's

0:31:36.840 --> 0:31:39.760
<v Speaker 1>sort of like their ticket counts. But but when I'm

0:31:39.760 --> 0:31:42.760
<v Speaker 1>doing that, that's one of those rare insces where I'll

0:31:42.960 --> 0:31:46.080
<v Speaker 1>I'll occasionally stop and think and try and sort of

0:31:46.080 --> 0:31:49.800
<v Speaker 1>focus on what all I'm doing to to carry out

0:31:49.800 --> 0:31:52.000
<v Speaker 1>this physical act. And yet it's, like you said, there's

0:31:52.040 --> 0:31:54.320
<v Speaker 1>so many things going on that we don't even really

0:31:54.320 --> 0:31:58.600
<v Speaker 1>have conscious control of, or or not privy to, or

0:31:58.680 --> 0:32:00.320
<v Speaker 1>and if we think too much about it, we're just

0:32:00.320 --> 0:32:02.720
<v Speaker 1>going to drop it on her toe. Anyway. Uh, It's

0:32:02.760 --> 0:32:07.200
<v Speaker 1>it's really quite amazing. That's another interesting aspect of throwing

0:32:07.360 --> 0:32:09.880
<v Speaker 1>that I think a lot of people can attest from

0:32:09.920 --> 0:32:13.040
<v Speaker 1>their own experience. When you think too much about throwing,

0:32:13.080 --> 0:32:15.480
<v Speaker 1>you tend to get worse at it. Isn't that strange?

0:32:15.600 --> 0:32:18.640
<v Speaker 1>Like that you tend to throw more accurately when you

0:32:18.720 --> 0:32:21.440
<v Speaker 1>kind of turn off your analytical brain and just let

0:32:21.480 --> 0:32:33.560
<v Speaker 1>your intuitions take over than thank you, Thank you so anyway,

0:32:33.600 --> 0:32:36.240
<v Speaker 1>the fact that we are so much better adapted for

0:32:36.320 --> 0:32:41.000
<v Speaker 1>targeted overhand throwing than other primates, even are most closely

0:32:41.040 --> 0:32:47.120
<v Speaker 1>related primates like chimpanzees, suggests specific selection pressure on our ancestors,

0:32:47.200 --> 0:32:51.320
<v Speaker 1>favoring the development of skeletal, muscular as well as neurological

0:32:51.320 --> 0:32:54.720
<v Speaker 1>adaptations that allow us to excel at throwing to the

0:32:54.760 --> 0:32:58.640
<v Speaker 1>extent that we do. We seem quite clearly biologically shaped

0:32:58.680 --> 0:33:02.320
<v Speaker 1>for throwing, and that requires changes in in multiple parts

0:33:02.320 --> 0:33:05.920
<v Speaker 1>of the body, the muscles and the skeleton of like

0:33:06.000 --> 0:33:08.120
<v Speaker 1>the arm and the shoulder and the torso, but also

0:33:08.200 --> 0:33:12.080
<v Speaker 1>the brain and the nervous system. Now, lest you think,

0:33:12.360 --> 0:33:15.520
<v Speaker 1>I don't know how useful in real world struggle could

0:33:15.520 --> 0:33:19.160
<v Speaker 1>throwing b I think this is uncontroversial, but the authors

0:33:19.160 --> 0:33:24.120
<v Speaker 1>do spend a fair amount of time just providing evidence that, like,

0:33:24.160 --> 0:33:26.680
<v Speaker 1>you know, they do observations of pre modern practices in

0:33:26.760 --> 0:33:30.360
<v Speaker 1>hunting and warfare to show the prevalence and utility of

0:33:30.400 --> 0:33:34.720
<v Speaker 1>targeted overhand throwing. They're like, yes, it's incredibly useful. Uh.

0:33:34.760 --> 0:33:37.600
<v Speaker 1>They say that human quote, hunters and warriors used human

0:33:37.680 --> 0:33:42.200
<v Speaker 1>muscle power to propel bolas, boomerangs, darts and knives, sticks, stones,

0:33:42.240 --> 0:33:46.239
<v Speaker 1>and spears thrown with or without the aid of auto lattels. Uh.

0:33:46.280 --> 0:33:48.239
<v Speaker 1>If you're interested in the autolattle. By the way, we

0:33:48.280 --> 0:33:50.480
<v Speaker 1>did an episode of Invention on that a long time

0:33:50.480 --> 0:33:52.479
<v Speaker 1>ago that I think was was one of my favorites.

0:33:52.520 --> 0:33:55.600
<v Speaker 1>I remember that being really interesting. Yeah. Anyway, many of

0:33:55.640 --> 0:33:59.000
<v Speaker 1>the technologies that replaced these practices in hunting and warfare

0:33:59.040 --> 0:34:03.520
<v Speaker 1>have simply replaced the muscular power with mechanical or chemical

0:34:03.560 --> 0:34:06.200
<v Speaker 1>sources of energy to power the throw. And that can

0:34:06.240 --> 0:34:08.759
<v Speaker 1>be everything from the tension of a bow string to

0:34:08.880 --> 0:34:13.480
<v Speaker 1>the combustion of gunpowder in in a firearm. Um. So

0:34:13.560 --> 0:34:17.560
<v Speaker 1>the question is how did our hominin ancestors make the

0:34:17.680 --> 0:34:22.719
<v Speaker 1>leap from something like the occasional low specialization, low utility

0:34:22.760 --> 0:34:25.759
<v Speaker 1>tossing behaviors we see in our closest primate relatives like

0:34:25.840 --> 0:34:31.520
<v Speaker 1>chimpanzees to the kind of habitual, powerful, targeted overhand throwing

0:34:31.840 --> 0:34:36.280
<v Speaker 1>that is characteristic of humans today. Now, like many questions

0:34:36.280 --> 0:34:39.200
<v Speaker 1>in evolutionary anthropology, we don't know the answer to this

0:34:39.239 --> 0:34:41.160
<v Speaker 1>one for sure. This is not one where somebody can

0:34:41.200 --> 0:34:44.640
<v Speaker 1>tell you the answer. But there are a few hypotheses

0:34:44.719 --> 0:34:47.120
<v Speaker 1>that are informed by some interesting evidence that we can

0:34:47.120 --> 0:34:49.719
<v Speaker 1>take a look at. Now, before we can figure out

0:34:49.760 --> 0:34:53.360
<v Speaker 1>how that advance from sort of occasional, low utility throwing

0:34:53.680 --> 0:34:56.680
<v Speaker 1>to human style throwing might have occurred, it's worth discussing

0:34:56.719 --> 0:35:01.799
<v Speaker 1>the major hypothesized uses of overhand throwing in an ancestral

0:35:01.840 --> 0:35:05.879
<v Speaker 1>hominin environment. Hunting is a very obvious one, right, being

0:35:05.920 --> 0:35:08.440
<v Speaker 1>able to throw a rock or a stick with force

0:35:08.440 --> 0:35:11.840
<v Speaker 1>and hit a prey animal would be extremely useful. But

0:35:12.080 --> 0:35:16.560
<v Speaker 1>the authors also call out interest specific and agonistic encounters,

0:35:16.600 --> 0:35:19.600
<v Speaker 1>which means conflict with other members of the same species.

0:35:20.160 --> 0:35:22.360
<v Speaker 1>And then finally, I thought this one was really fascinating,

0:35:22.400 --> 0:35:25.719
<v Speaker 1>and uh, this one may help explain and and help

0:35:25.760 --> 0:35:29.279
<v Speaker 1>you see how this this bridge could have been crossed behaviorally.

0:35:29.960 --> 0:35:35.360
<v Speaker 1>The practice of power scavenging, which means not just regular scavenging,

0:35:35.360 --> 0:35:38.439
<v Speaker 1>not just wandering around looking for a dead animal to

0:35:38.440 --> 0:35:43.200
<v Speaker 1>to feast upon. Power scavenging means waiting for other predators

0:35:43.239 --> 0:35:46.640
<v Speaker 1>to take down a prey animal and then chasing those

0:35:46.680 --> 0:35:50.960
<v Speaker 1>predators away from the kill and taking it for yourself. Yeah,

0:35:51.000 --> 0:35:54.720
<v Speaker 1>there was a There was a fabulous BBC documentary several

0:35:54.800 --> 0:35:58.799
<v Speaker 1>years back kindled Human Planet, that was narrated by John Hurt,

0:35:59.280 --> 0:36:03.120
<v Speaker 1>and it had to do with various human practices of

0:36:03.120 --> 0:36:07.320
<v Speaker 1>often hunting or source scavenging that that have been practiced

0:36:07.320 --> 0:36:10.040
<v Speaker 1>to some degree into the modern age, and one of

0:36:10.080 --> 0:36:13.920
<v Speaker 1>them involved stealing part of the kill from a lion,

0:36:15.040 --> 0:36:18.280
<v Speaker 1>which would be an example of power scavenging something where

0:36:18.440 --> 0:36:20.080
<v Speaker 1>you want to get in there like that the lion

0:36:20.160 --> 0:36:23.680
<v Speaker 1>has done the I guess the hard part and has

0:36:23.680 --> 0:36:26.600
<v Speaker 1>brought down prey, but now you're gonna do an also

0:36:26.719 --> 0:36:29.719
<v Speaker 1>hard thing. You want to get in there, drive the

0:36:30.080 --> 0:36:32.920
<v Speaker 1>predator away long enough to get yourself a little bit

0:36:32.960 --> 0:36:36.440
<v Speaker 1>of the meat as well. Right. Um. So, for this hypothesis,

0:36:36.480 --> 0:36:39.439
<v Speaker 1>the authors cite a work by Bingham and Susa from

0:36:39.480 --> 0:36:42.160
<v Speaker 1>two thousand nine which makes the case that during the

0:36:42.200 --> 0:36:45.759
<v Speaker 1>time of transition from Australia Epithes Senes to the emergence

0:36:45.800 --> 0:36:49.080
<v Speaker 1>of the Homo genus to which we belong. Uh climate

0:36:49.120 --> 0:36:52.000
<v Speaker 1>conditions in Africa may have given rise to these little

0:36:52.080 --> 0:36:58.000
<v Speaker 1>like isolated savannah environments containing hominins. But these environments also

0:36:58.080 --> 0:37:03.280
<v Speaker 1>quote lacked dangerous predators and power scavengers like lions and hyenas,

0:37:03.280 --> 0:37:06.960
<v Speaker 1>but contained smaller and less dangerous predators such as leopards

0:37:07.000 --> 0:37:12.280
<v Speaker 1>and cheetahs. So if that's correct, it's it's maybe easy

0:37:12.320 --> 0:37:16.319
<v Speaker 1>to imagine how with leopards and cheetahs you could more

0:37:16.360 --> 0:37:19.560
<v Speaker 1>more plausibly chase them away, or early hominance could have

0:37:19.640 --> 0:37:22.960
<v Speaker 1>chased them away from a kill by throwing things at them,

0:37:23.160 --> 0:37:26.000
<v Speaker 1>even without very specialized weapons, maybe just by like throwing

0:37:26.080 --> 0:37:30.080
<v Speaker 1>rocks or or unmodified sticks. And this could be thought

0:37:30.120 --> 0:37:32.680
<v Speaker 1>of as a kind of high risk, high reward strategy.

0:37:32.800 --> 0:37:36.680
<v Speaker 1>Like with power scavenging. You can get a big meat

0:37:36.800 --> 0:37:40.319
<v Speaker 1>pay day with relatively little energy investment since you don't

0:37:40.360 --> 0:37:43.799
<v Speaker 1>have to like chase the prey animal down yourself, but

0:37:44.000 --> 0:37:46.600
<v Speaker 1>it's dangerous. You do have to confront one or more

0:37:46.640 --> 0:37:49.839
<v Speaker 1>predators for the kill, and this type of strategy might

0:37:49.960 --> 0:37:52.359
<v Speaker 1>not be worth the risk if you have to fight

0:37:52.400 --> 0:37:55.520
<v Speaker 1>a leopard with your hands or with handheld weapons. But

0:37:55.719 --> 0:37:57.680
<v Speaker 1>if you can just throw rocks at it from a

0:37:57.719 --> 0:38:00.000
<v Speaker 1>distance until it runs away, that could be a really

0:38:00.000 --> 0:38:04.360
<v Speaker 1>a good deal. Yeah. And and again not necessarily drive

0:38:04.440 --> 0:38:08.200
<v Speaker 1>it off completely, but just create an opening during which

0:38:08.200 --> 0:38:10.239
<v Speaker 1>you can carry out some power scavenging and then get

0:38:10.239 --> 0:38:13.560
<v Speaker 1>out of there. Yeah. Now, another question to look at

0:38:13.640 --> 0:38:16.400
<v Speaker 1>is what is the earliest we have, like totally clear

0:38:16.480 --> 0:38:20.120
<v Speaker 1>physical evidence to establish the use of thrown projectiles by

0:38:20.200 --> 0:38:24.400
<v Speaker 1>humans um the author's right quote unambiguous archaeological evidence of

0:38:24.440 --> 0:38:27.440
<v Speaker 1>the use of modified throwing weapons manufactured by members of

0:38:27.480 --> 0:38:31.799
<v Speaker 1>the genus Homo are the stone spear points, manufactured approximately

0:38:31.800 --> 0:38:35.360
<v Speaker 1>three hundred thousand years ago in Africa. Hunting spears with

0:38:35.440 --> 0:38:37.680
<v Speaker 1>their center of gravity one third of the way from

0:38:37.719 --> 0:38:40.520
<v Speaker 1>the tips, suggesting that they were thrown were found in

0:38:40.560 --> 0:38:43.360
<v Speaker 1>Germany and date from three hundred thousand to four hundred

0:38:43.400 --> 0:38:47.560
<v Speaker 1>thousand years ago. These two examples are evidence that manufactured

0:38:47.560 --> 0:38:50.759
<v Speaker 1>weapons were thrown by members of the Homo genus at

0:38:50.840 --> 0:38:54.359
<v Speaker 1>least three hundred thousand years ago. But while it's harder

0:38:54.400 --> 0:38:56.640
<v Speaker 1>to be certain about what happened before that, the authors

0:38:56.680 --> 0:38:59.960
<v Speaker 1>infer that human ancestors were probably throwing sticks and rocks

0:39:00.040 --> 0:39:02.000
<v Speaker 1>going back a couple of million years, so there was

0:39:02.040 --> 0:39:07.400
<v Speaker 1>probably use of throwing of less modified or unmodified objects

0:39:07.400 --> 0:39:10.600
<v Speaker 1>from the environment before. We have evidence of these modified

0:39:10.600 --> 0:39:13.640
<v Speaker 1>throwing weapons from like three D four hundred thousand years ago.

0:39:14.400 --> 0:39:17.200
<v Speaker 1>And one idea I came across in trying to locate

0:39:17.239 --> 0:39:21.760
<v Speaker 1>the origins of habitual forceful throwing is based on studies

0:39:21.800 --> 0:39:24.200
<v Speaker 1>of anatomy, and this brings us back to that researcher

0:39:24.480 --> 0:39:27.760
<v Speaker 1>I talked about a minute ago, the anthropologist Neil Thomas Roach,

0:39:28.440 --> 0:39:32.239
<v Speaker 1>who along with some colleagues studied the bodies and behavior

0:39:32.760 --> 0:39:37.759
<v Speaker 1>of practiced human throwers like baseball pitchers and uh, and

0:39:37.840 --> 0:39:44.000
<v Speaker 1>let's see the citation here is Roach, Vincadason, Rainbow, and

0:39:44.120 --> 0:39:49.120
<v Speaker 1>Lieberman from published in the journal Nature, and the paper

0:39:49.120 --> 0:39:52.239
<v Speaker 1>title is Elastic Energy Storage in the Shoulder and the

0:39:52.280 --> 0:39:56.200
<v Speaker 1>Evolution of high speed Throwing in Homo And basically, these

0:39:56.239 --> 0:40:00.640
<v Speaker 1>authors contend that the anatomical difference that may humans so

0:40:00.680 --> 0:40:04.760
<v Speaker 1>good at throwing is our ability to store elastic energy

0:40:04.920 --> 0:40:07.400
<v Speaker 1>in our shoulders. So it's not just like the strength

0:40:07.440 --> 0:40:10.360
<v Speaker 1>of the muscles, but the fact that the human body

0:40:10.400 --> 0:40:14.000
<v Speaker 1>is designed to sort of cock back the arm before

0:40:14.040 --> 0:40:18.320
<v Speaker 1>a forceful throw, and a human essentially creates a bio

0:40:18.360 --> 0:40:22.480
<v Speaker 1>mechanical sling shot by stretching the tendons and the ligaments

0:40:22.520 --> 0:40:26.040
<v Speaker 1>surrounding the scapula or the shoulder blade, and this tension

0:40:26.080 --> 0:40:28.520
<v Speaker 1>could be thought of as analogous to the tension in

0:40:28.520 --> 0:40:32.080
<v Speaker 1>a bowstring. It allows very rapid extension of the arm

0:40:32.120 --> 0:40:35.600
<v Speaker 1>after the wind up. Now, how come we can do

0:40:35.640 --> 0:40:39.719
<v Speaker 1>this and our nearest relatives like chimpanzees cannot. The researchers

0:40:39.719 --> 0:40:43.520
<v Speaker 1>here argued that there are basically three important anatomical changes

0:40:43.560 --> 0:40:48.120
<v Speaker 1>that are found altogether around two million years ago uh

0:40:48.160 --> 0:40:52.879
<v Speaker 1>in the species Homo erectus. So these three changes are

0:40:53.120 --> 0:40:56.800
<v Speaker 1>the expansion of the waste and this sort of lets

0:40:56.840 --> 0:41:00.920
<v Speaker 1>the torso rotate above the hips, which generates more rotational force.

0:41:01.000 --> 0:41:04.120
<v Speaker 1>So when you're like cocking your arm back to throw overhand,

0:41:04.440 --> 0:41:08.200
<v Speaker 1>you typically you twist your torso, and that change in

0:41:07.960 --> 0:41:10.800
<v Speaker 1>uh in Homo erectus allowed them to twist their torso

0:41:10.880 --> 0:41:13.920
<v Speaker 1>like that. The second is a lower positioning of the

0:41:13.960 --> 0:41:18.279
<v Speaker 1>shoulders on the torso, and this changes the orientation of

0:41:18.280 --> 0:41:21.520
<v Speaker 1>the muscles around the shoulder, again helping us to store

0:41:21.600 --> 0:41:24.880
<v Speaker 1>more energy in the wind up of an overhand throw. Again,

0:41:24.880 --> 0:41:28.839
<v Speaker 1>this is found in Homo erectus, and then the twisting

0:41:29.000 --> 0:41:32.160
<v Speaker 1>of the humorous bone, which is the upper arm bone,

0:41:32.600 --> 0:41:34.960
<v Speaker 1>and that twisting is yet another way to stretch the

0:41:34.960 --> 0:41:37.960
<v Speaker 1>bow string, storing up even more energy in the wind

0:41:38.040 --> 0:41:41.360
<v Speaker 1>up uh. And you can see these differences. There's a

0:41:41.360 --> 0:41:43.600
<v Speaker 1>diagram they include. You might be able to look up

0:41:43.640 --> 0:41:47.200
<v Speaker 1>for yourself if you see a comparison of like a

0:41:47.239 --> 0:41:50.440
<v Speaker 1>muscle diagram or the scapula of a chimpanzee and a human,

0:41:50.920 --> 0:41:53.719
<v Speaker 1>and you can see some of these differences, particularly the

0:41:53.800 --> 0:41:57.319
<v Speaker 1>lower position of the shoulder on the human body. You know,

0:41:57.440 --> 0:42:00.759
<v Speaker 1>you look at the upper musculature of a chimpanzee and

0:42:00.760 --> 0:42:02.560
<v Speaker 1>you're like, well, I really would not want to be

0:42:02.920 --> 0:42:06.040
<v Speaker 1>clubbed by this animal. And I imagine that animal can

0:42:06.080 --> 0:42:09.479
<v Speaker 1>really like climb a tree really well. But there's there's

0:42:09.680 --> 0:42:12.200
<v Speaker 1>some kind of different twisting of the shoulder and the

0:42:12.440 --> 0:42:15.920
<v Speaker 1>pectoral muscle in the human body that apparently allows us

0:42:15.960 --> 0:42:19.040
<v Speaker 1>to to perform this cocking back or wind up behavior

0:42:19.120 --> 0:42:21.799
<v Speaker 1>before and overhand throws so much better than a chimp can.

0:42:22.680 --> 0:42:25.640
<v Speaker 1>This also means, according to this illustration, the chimpanzee nipple

0:42:25.719 --> 0:42:29.320
<v Speaker 1>is also just a little bit higher. It's true comparatively,

0:42:30.520 --> 0:42:34.400
<v Speaker 1>um so roach and colleagues argue that these anatomical changes

0:42:34.480 --> 0:42:39.200
<v Speaker 1>that favor throwing coincide with archaeological evidence showing increased hunting

0:42:39.239 --> 0:42:43.200
<v Speaker 1>activity in these hominins, so like more processed animal bones,

0:42:43.200 --> 0:42:47.400
<v Speaker 1>that occupied sites, stone tool work, and so forth. So

0:42:47.480 --> 0:42:50.799
<v Speaker 1>that would make a link between the this these anatomical

0:42:50.880 --> 0:42:54.000
<v Speaker 1>changes that favor the ability to throw, and what human

0:42:54.040 --> 0:42:56.960
<v Speaker 1>ancestors were eating. The Homo erectus was apparently dining on

0:42:57.040 --> 0:43:00.920
<v Speaker 1>more meat. Now, coming back to that paper by Lombardo

0:43:00.960 --> 0:43:04.399
<v Speaker 1>and Dianer. From that they examine a number of other

0:43:04.440 --> 0:43:08.080
<v Speaker 1>different things, like talking about the prevalence and effectiveness of

0:43:08.120 --> 0:43:11.200
<v Speaker 1>overhand throwing in warfare and hunting, and they also look

0:43:11.239 --> 0:43:14.600
<v Speaker 1>at things like sex differences in throwing behavior. For example,

0:43:14.640 --> 0:43:18.080
<v Speaker 1>in chimpanzees, there's some evidence that male chimpanzees tend to

0:43:18.120 --> 0:43:22.200
<v Speaker 1>throw more uh and relative levels of lethality and targeted

0:43:22.200 --> 0:43:24.200
<v Speaker 1>throwing behaviors and so forth. But to come to the

0:43:24.200 --> 0:43:28.320
<v Speaker 1>conclusion regarding that transition, like how did the leap happen

0:43:28.480 --> 0:43:32.319
<v Speaker 1>from you know, sort of occasional, non specialized throwing like

0:43:32.400 --> 0:43:36.680
<v Speaker 1>we see in chimpanzees today to the habitual, targeted, forceful

0:43:36.760 --> 0:43:41.280
<v Speaker 1>overhand throwing that humans can do uh. The conclusion, they argue,

0:43:41.560 --> 0:43:44.479
<v Speaker 1>is that this adaptation grew out of quote a way

0:43:44.560 --> 0:43:48.560
<v Speaker 1>for throwers to manipulate the behavior of targeted individuals during

0:43:48.640 --> 0:43:54.120
<v Speaker 1>interest specific agonistic interactions, and then later transitioned into you

0:43:54.239 --> 0:43:58.160
<v Speaker 1>steering power, scavenging and hunting by hominans, perhaps in the

0:43:58.200 --> 0:44:03.120
<v Speaker 1>Australi epithesenes. So why do they think it's started with

0:44:03.400 --> 0:44:08.040
<v Speaker 1>manipulating the behavior of of other hominins within the same

0:44:08.120 --> 0:44:12.319
<v Speaker 1>species and agonistic interactions. Well, I think we can get

0:44:12.360 --> 0:44:15.719
<v Speaker 1>some clues by looking at our closest primate relatives. Again,

0:44:16.120 --> 0:44:18.719
<v Speaker 1>this this in no way clinches the argument. We don't

0:44:18.719 --> 0:44:21.200
<v Speaker 1>know for sure, but it's an interesting line of evidence.

0:44:21.239 --> 0:44:24.399
<v Speaker 1>So they say, if you look at our relatives like chimpanzees,

0:44:24.480 --> 0:44:28.080
<v Speaker 1>Binobo's guerrillas and so forth, these animals have all been

0:44:28.120 --> 0:44:32.279
<v Speaker 1>observed throwing. But when and how do they throw? Well,

0:44:32.480 --> 0:44:35.799
<v Speaker 1>do they throw to hunt? The answer there seems like

0:44:36.080 --> 0:44:40.400
<v Speaker 1>either no or almost never. There are almost no claimed

0:44:40.440 --> 0:44:43.920
<v Speaker 1>observations that any of these animals use projectiles for hunting,

0:44:44.360 --> 0:44:47.480
<v Speaker 1>with basically one possible exception, and that's a report by

0:44:47.560 --> 0:44:51.680
<v Speaker 1>Jane Goodall actually in nineteen eighty six, where to read

0:44:51.760 --> 0:44:55.120
<v Speaker 1>from the paper here quote Goodall reported three observations of

0:44:55.160 --> 0:44:59.640
<v Speaker 1>throwing by hunting chimpanzees. In two instances, stones thrown by

0:44:59.640 --> 0:45:02.440
<v Speaker 1>an male may have been intended to cause the prey

0:45:02.600 --> 0:45:06.239
<v Speaker 1>adult bush pigs to run rather than to harm them.

0:45:06.280 --> 0:45:10.920
<v Speaker 1>In another instance, six male chimpanzees hunting baboons through stones

0:45:11.000 --> 0:45:14.319
<v Speaker 1>at male baboons that were attacking the hunters. None of

0:45:14.360 --> 0:45:18.080
<v Speaker 1>these accounts closely resembles the highly skilled aimed throwing used

0:45:18.080 --> 0:45:22.560
<v Speaker 1>by human hunters, so even if these instances count, they

0:45:22.600 --> 0:45:26.200
<v Speaker 1>appear to be somewhat ambiguous and relatively unique. There are

0:45:26.239 --> 0:45:31.000
<v Speaker 1>basically no other reports of apes throwing to hunt uh,

0:45:31.040 --> 0:45:33.680
<v Speaker 1>and instead, apes and monkeys seem to be used throwing

0:45:33.840 --> 0:45:37.840
<v Speaker 1>as part of communication behavior during encounters with other members

0:45:37.880 --> 0:45:41.080
<v Speaker 1>of the same species or sometimes with other animals such

0:45:41.080 --> 0:45:46.239
<v Speaker 1>as humans. Most often, it's used for agonistic interactions, a

0:45:46.320 --> 0:45:49.120
<v Speaker 1>kind of threat display that you might throw rocks or

0:45:49.160 --> 0:45:52.600
<v Speaker 1>sticks at another member of the same ape species or

0:45:52.640 --> 0:45:56.520
<v Speaker 1>another animal to sort of drive them away or intimidate them. So,

0:45:56.560 --> 0:45:59.800
<v Speaker 1>if a chimpanzee is trying to display dominance or intimidate

0:45:59.840 --> 0:46:02.560
<v Speaker 1>an other one, or trying to get an interloper away

0:46:02.560 --> 0:46:05.000
<v Speaker 1>from the group, throwing rocks and sticks is a common

0:46:05.000 --> 0:46:08.799
<v Speaker 1>behavior there, but it's also not just aggressive interactions those

0:46:08.800 --> 0:46:11.160
<v Speaker 1>are the most common. There are also, in fewer cases

0:46:11.440 --> 0:46:15.400
<v Speaker 1>more benign examples, like particularly in binobos and some monkeys

0:46:15.760 --> 0:46:18.840
<v Speaker 1>were throwing can be a bid to initiate play or

0:46:18.920 --> 0:46:22.759
<v Speaker 1>some other type of non threatening communication. Yeah, pebbles on

0:46:22.760 --> 0:46:25.600
<v Speaker 1>the window again here. So for the most part, it

0:46:25.640 --> 0:46:29.200
<v Speaker 1>seems chimps don't really hunt or power scavenge by throwing.

0:46:29.320 --> 0:46:33.000
<v Speaker 1>They throw most often as a threatening display toward other

0:46:33.120 --> 0:46:35.960
<v Speaker 1>chimps or to communicate in some way. But you can

0:46:36.000 --> 0:46:40.400
<v Speaker 1>see how this behavior could bridge over into power scavenging

0:46:40.480 --> 0:46:44.120
<v Speaker 1>if you're generally throwing to threaten, so you know it

0:46:44.239 --> 0:46:47.520
<v Speaker 1>starts off with agonistic interactions, and then maybe sometimes you

0:46:47.600 --> 0:46:51.120
<v Speaker 1>throw to threaten a predator that is there with with

0:46:51.160 --> 0:46:54.040
<v Speaker 1>a kill, and instead you drive the predator away and

0:46:54.040 --> 0:46:57.480
<v Speaker 1>you take the meat. This creates an association between throwing

0:46:57.480 --> 0:47:00.360
<v Speaker 1>to threaten and to meet reward that could increase singly

0:47:00.440 --> 0:47:04.560
<v Speaker 1>lead to throwing to hunt directly, especially if you were

0:47:04.600 --> 0:47:08.400
<v Speaker 1>able to create modified projectiles such as spears. So it

0:47:08.440 --> 0:47:12.000
<v Speaker 1>makes me wonder like if those specific chimpanzees observed by

0:47:12.080 --> 0:47:15.160
<v Speaker 1>Jane Goodall, if they were in fact using rocks to

0:47:15.400 --> 0:47:18.719
<v Speaker 1>hunt or aid in hunting in some way. You kind

0:47:18.719 --> 0:47:20.600
<v Speaker 1>of have to wonder if maybe they're on the bleeding

0:47:20.760 --> 0:47:23.960
<v Speaker 1>edge of chimp technology in some way, like the one.

0:47:24.239 --> 0:47:26.279
<v Speaker 1>Those are the ones who, if left alone for a

0:47:26.280 --> 0:47:29.880
<v Speaker 1>few hundred thousand years, might evolve to select anatomical traits

0:47:29.920 --> 0:47:33.120
<v Speaker 1>that favor throwing and you know, modify objects from their

0:47:33.200 --> 0:47:38.000
<v Speaker 1>environment to make their throwing more effective. Yeah, yeah, that's

0:47:38.120 --> 0:47:42.120
<v Speaker 1>fascinating this so you can see the links here between,

0:47:42.200 --> 0:47:46.759
<v Speaker 1>like this sort of growing understanding to some degree that

0:47:47.640 --> 0:47:50.319
<v Speaker 1>being able to throw an object at another creature is

0:47:50.400 --> 0:47:54.960
<v Speaker 1>a way to alter its behavior or disrupt its behavior

0:47:55.000 --> 0:47:59.239
<v Speaker 1>at a distance, and then that that potential extra step

0:47:59.280 --> 0:48:02.600
<v Speaker 1>and realize that this also can harm the animal, and

0:48:02.600 --> 0:48:06.439
<v Speaker 1>then there are ways to enhance the materials so as

0:48:06.480 --> 0:48:10.680
<v Speaker 1>to increase harm. Uh. Yeah, that's fascinating. So what do

0:48:10.719 --> 0:48:13.200
<v Speaker 1>I think about their hypothesis here? I wouldn't say I'm

0:48:13.200 --> 0:48:16.160
<v Speaker 1>a hundred percent convinced, but it seems very plausible. They

0:48:16.200 --> 0:48:19.640
<v Speaker 1>make a pretty good case alright, So hopefully this episode

0:48:19.760 --> 0:48:23.640
<v Speaker 1>will help us, you know, Spook, you will help mess

0:48:23.680 --> 0:48:25.160
<v Speaker 1>you up the next time you need to try and

0:48:25.200 --> 0:48:30.320
<v Speaker 1>throw something with intention and direction, maybe your next softball game,

0:48:31.120 --> 0:48:33.960
<v Speaker 1>maybe the next time you you go to beer somebody

0:48:34.640 --> 0:48:37.319
<v Speaker 1>at an outdoor party. They'll just be that moment of

0:48:37.360 --> 0:48:41.080
<v Speaker 1>doubt where you you run through the evolutionary history of

0:48:41.080 --> 0:48:43.320
<v Speaker 1>getting to this point and then you miss your target,

0:48:43.800 --> 0:48:48.680
<v Speaker 1>overthink it and then slice. All right, Well, we we'd

0:48:48.680 --> 0:48:50.000
<v Speaker 1>love to hear from anyone out there if you have

0:48:50.040 --> 0:48:53.440
<v Speaker 1>any thoughts and feedback related to this episode or other

0:48:53.440 --> 0:48:57.760
<v Speaker 1>episodes in this uh this series about humans throwing things,

0:48:57.800 --> 0:49:01.239
<v Speaker 1>animals throwing things, um right in, We'd love to hear

0:49:01.280 --> 0:49:03.239
<v Speaker 1>from you, and of course we could we could potentially

0:49:03.520 --> 0:49:06.680
<v Speaker 1>keep going with this topic. So we're gonna we're gonna

0:49:06.680 --> 0:49:10.239
<v Speaker 1>discuss after we wrap this episode and see if we're

0:49:10.280 --> 0:49:12.839
<v Speaker 1>going to part four now or if we're gonna come

0:49:12.840 --> 0:49:14.279
<v Speaker 1>back in the future. I don't know. We don't have

0:49:14.280 --> 0:49:17.240
<v Speaker 1>to tune in Thursday to see what happens. In the meantime,

0:49:17.280 --> 0:49:19.360
<v Speaker 1>we'll remind you that Stuff to Blow Your Mind is

0:49:19.400 --> 0:49:23.160
<v Speaker 1>a science podcast that publishes core episodes on Tuesdays and Thursdays,

0:49:23.160 --> 0:49:25.600
<v Speaker 1>and the Stuff to Blow Your Mind podcast feed on Monday's,

0:49:25.640 --> 0:49:27.759
<v Speaker 1>we do listener mail. On Wednesday's, we do a short

0:49:27.800 --> 0:49:30.759
<v Speaker 1>form artifact or monster Fact episode, and on Fridays we

0:49:30.880 --> 0:49:34.440
<v Speaker 1>set aside most serious concerns to discuss a weird movie

0:49:34.520 --> 0:49:38.240
<v Speaker 1>on Weird House Cinema. Huge thanks to our audio producer

0:49:38.400 --> 0:49:40.799
<v Speaker 1>J J. Pauseway. If you would like to get in

0:49:40.840 --> 0:49:43.399
<v Speaker 1>touch with us with feedback on this episode or any other,

0:49:43.480 --> 0:49:45.520
<v Speaker 1>to suggest a topic for the future, or just to

0:49:45.520 --> 0:49:48.240
<v Speaker 1>say hello, you can email us at contact at Stuff

0:49:48.280 --> 0:49:58.759
<v Speaker 1>to Blow Your Mind dot com Stuff to Blow your Mind.

0:49:58.800 --> 0:50:01.560
<v Speaker 1>It's production of I Heart Radio. For more podcasts for

0:50:01.600 --> 0:50:03.600
<v Speaker 1>my heart Radio, this is the i heart Radio app,

0:50:03.760 --> 0:50:14.919
<v Speaker 1>Apple Podcasts or wherever you listen me to your favorite shows.