WEBVTT - Tua vs Herbert, 49ers Break Brady & All-In Or Fold

0:00:00.360 --> 0:00:03.240
<v Speaker 1>This episode is brought to you by all State. Some

0:00:03.279 --> 0:00:06.080
<v Speaker 1>people just know they could save hundreds on car insurance

0:00:06.160 --> 0:00:08.840
<v Speaker 1>by checking all State first, Like you know, to check

0:00:08.880 --> 0:00:12.440
<v Speaker 1>the date of the big game first before you accidentally

0:00:12.440 --> 0:00:15.480
<v Speaker 1>buy tickets on your twentieth wedding anniversary and have to

0:00:15.480 --> 0:00:17.920
<v Speaker 1>spend the next twenty years of your marriage making up

0:00:17.920 --> 0:00:21.520
<v Speaker 1>for it. Yeah, checking first is smart, So check all

0:00:21.560 --> 0:00:23.880
<v Speaker 1>State first for a quote that could save you hundreds.

0:00:24.000 --> 0:00:26.600
<v Speaker 1>You're in good hands with All States savings. Very terms

0:00:26.640 --> 0:00:35.720
<v Speaker 1>apply All State Fire and Casualty Insurance Company and Affiliates, Northbrook, Illinois.

0:00:42.360 --> 0:00:45.000
<v Speaker 2>Welcome. In episode one oh six, What's Right with Nick

0:00:45.040 --> 0:00:49.160
<v Speaker 2>Wright breaking down Week fourteen in the NFL with little

0:00:49.159 --> 0:00:52.680
<v Speaker 2>World Cup mixed in an amazing NBA weekend as well.

0:00:52.720 --> 0:00:54.920
<v Speaker 2>We will not be getting to it, and in fact,

0:00:55.040 --> 0:00:58.440
<v Speaker 2>let's get right to what we're not discussing because one

0:00:58.440 --> 0:01:01.240
<v Speaker 2>of the little mini takes I had on there, Burrow

0:01:01.400 --> 0:01:05.440
<v Speaker 2>finally beating the Browns Deshaun Watson. Listen, it's a lot

0:01:05.440 --> 0:01:08.280
<v Speaker 2>of rust. But right now, if you're a Browns fan,

0:01:08.319 --> 0:01:10.959
<v Speaker 2>you got to be very nervous about how he's looked

0:01:11.000 --> 0:01:13.520
<v Speaker 2>in his first two games in seven hundred days and

0:01:13.560 --> 0:01:16.320
<v Speaker 2>that's just the on the field stuff. The Lakers defeat

0:01:16.319 --> 0:01:19.480
<v Speaker 2>the Mighty Pistons. That's a little more sarcastic than it

0:01:19.560 --> 0:01:22.400
<v Speaker 2>needed to be. Year twenty, Lebron James on the thirty

0:01:22.400 --> 0:01:25.280
<v Speaker 2>five point performance Patrick Beverly in that game. By the way,

0:01:25.680 --> 0:01:28.679
<v Speaker 2>talk trash to the guy who I hope his future

0:01:28.760 --> 0:01:32.520
<v Speaker 2>Laker traded for Patrick Beverly, boy On Bogdanovich. Boyon then

0:01:32.600 --> 0:01:35.720
<v Speaker 2>immediately hit five straight threes to make it a closer

0:01:35.760 --> 0:01:37.720
<v Speaker 2>game than it should have been. And then the last

0:01:37.760 --> 0:01:41.680
<v Speaker 2>thing that I that's on that list, Zion entering the

0:01:41.800 --> 0:01:45.160
<v Speaker 2>MVP discussion. Damn straight. He did last there on a

0:01:45.200 --> 0:01:48.560
<v Speaker 2>seven game winning streak. He's averaging thirty a night in

0:01:48.560 --> 0:01:52.360
<v Speaker 2>those seven games, back to back thirty five point games

0:01:53.000 --> 0:01:57.200
<v Speaker 2>against the previous top seeded Phoenix Suns. It is now

0:01:57.240 --> 0:02:01.280
<v Speaker 2>the top seeded New Orleans Pelicans and a kick ass

0:02:01.840 --> 0:02:05.680
<v Speaker 2>three sixty wind mill. They got Chris Paul and campaign

0:02:05.800 --> 0:02:09.120
<v Speaker 2>of all people all in their feelings. So all of

0:02:09.120 --> 0:02:12.119
<v Speaker 2>that not on the show. It is the stretch run

0:02:12.160 --> 0:02:16.520
<v Speaker 2>of the NFL season. Also the NFL once again you know,

0:02:16.840 --> 0:02:20.280
<v Speaker 2>testing us and testing our marriages. As I don't know

0:02:20.280 --> 0:02:24.320
<v Speaker 2>if you saw, but next Saturday, which is really the

0:02:24.400 --> 0:02:29.960
<v Speaker 2>final shopping Saturday before Christmas because the following Saturday is

0:02:30.120 --> 0:02:33.040
<v Speaker 2>Christmas Eve. I don't know if you saw it next week,

0:02:33.080 --> 0:02:39.360
<v Speaker 2>Deman's Saturday NFL tripleheader. It's real nice. They keep doing

0:02:39.400 --> 0:02:42.640
<v Speaker 2>this where they put these they stack these games on

0:02:42.720 --> 0:02:46.440
<v Speaker 2>the last shopping weekend before Christmas. It's just a brutality.

0:02:46.639 --> 0:02:49.880
<v Speaker 2>But that'll be week fifteen. This was week fourteen. And

0:02:49.919 --> 0:02:52.240
<v Speaker 2>by the way, we're live on YouTube. We appreciate if

0:02:52.280 --> 0:02:55.600
<v Speaker 2>you're viewing our YouTube subscribers have slowed a bit. We're

0:02:55.639 --> 0:02:58.240
<v Speaker 2>still not at ninety thousand, and we were hoping to

0:02:58.240 --> 0:03:00.280
<v Speaker 2>get to one hundred thousand by the end of the month.

0:03:00.520 --> 0:03:02.639
<v Speaker 2>That doesn't look like it's gonna happen, which is bad

0:03:02.680 --> 0:03:07.320
<v Speaker 2>news for Demonse's checkbook or Demonse's bank account. To bummer,

0:03:07.720 --> 0:03:09.519
<v Speaker 2>he was gonna get a thousand dollars bonus, but you

0:03:09.600 --> 0:03:11.640
<v Speaker 2>guys don't like him enough. I think it all turned

0:03:11.880 --> 0:03:14.880
<v Speaker 2>when Demonse and our and our social media team started

0:03:14.880 --> 0:03:19.160
<v Speaker 2>tweeting about quote Demanse stands unquote. I think it turned

0:03:19.160 --> 0:03:21.200
<v Speaker 2>people off. But that's either here or there. I now

0:03:21.240 --> 0:03:24.200
<v Speaker 2>invite Demonse in. I think we're starting with Sunday Night football.

0:03:24.280 --> 0:03:25.200
<v Speaker 2>Let's get right to it.

0:03:25.440 --> 0:03:28.000
<v Speaker 3>All right, justin Herbert got his revenge against the quarterback

0:03:28.040 --> 0:03:30.280
<v Speaker 3>that was drafted one spot ahead of him last night.

0:03:30.880 --> 0:03:33.600
<v Speaker 3>Remember when everybody was on the Dolphins bandwagon and we're

0:03:33.639 --> 0:03:35.200
<v Speaker 3>saying toua for MVP.

0:03:35.440 --> 0:03:36.840
<v Speaker 2>Who wasn't saying that? Demonse?

0:03:37.800 --> 0:03:38.200
<v Speaker 3>Uh you?

0:03:38.320 --> 0:03:41.000
<v Speaker 4>And who so just uh you?

0:03:41.320 --> 0:03:44.280
<v Speaker 2>Yeah? I was, I like not everyone was saying was

0:03:44.280 --> 0:03:48.600
<v Speaker 2>on the Dolphins bandwagon? But who reserved the right to

0:03:48.760 --> 0:03:50.400
<v Speaker 2>never change their opinion about too of?

0:03:50.480 --> 0:03:52.760
<v Speaker 3>But go ahead that I didn't see the reasoning behind that.

0:03:52.840 --> 0:03:54.720
<v Speaker 3>I feel like you didn't have that much evidence to

0:03:55.080 --> 0:03:55.400
<v Speaker 3>I had.

0:03:55.760 --> 0:03:57.760
<v Speaker 2>You know why you think I don't have that much evidence?

0:03:57.960 --> 0:03:59.840
<v Speaker 2>And I don't say this rudely.

0:03:59.560 --> 0:04:02.160
<v Speaker 4>Or disresp because I just started watching football this year.

0:04:02.400 --> 0:04:05.880
<v Speaker 2>Exactly right, Because if you'd only watched football this year,

0:04:06.160 --> 0:04:08.480
<v Speaker 2>you think Tua was awesome and you were and I'm

0:04:08.480 --> 0:04:11.200
<v Speaker 2>not taking a shot before you got this job, you

0:04:11.240 --> 0:04:14.840
<v Speaker 2>weren't a big NFL guy. What is so vexing to me?

0:04:15.240 --> 0:04:18.359
<v Speaker 2>So many of my colleagues pretended they had just started

0:04:18.400 --> 0:04:23.520
<v Speaker 2>watching football this year. Colleagues in sports media a pro

0:04:23.640 --> 0:04:27.320
<v Speaker 2>tip on when it comes to certain things. When it

0:04:27.320 --> 0:04:29.480
<v Speaker 2>comes to certain things you want to be more like Demanse,

0:04:30.360 --> 0:04:32.559
<v Speaker 2>but on other things you definitely want to be less

0:04:32.680 --> 0:04:36.880
<v Speaker 2>like Demanse, and your long term NFL analysis probably less

0:04:36.960 --> 0:04:37.479
<v Speaker 2>like Demonse.

0:04:37.600 --> 0:04:39.599
<v Speaker 3>But go ahead, all right, when he faced off against

0:04:39.600 --> 0:04:42.600
<v Speaker 3>the second best quarterback in football, you're reminded us why

0:04:42.720 --> 0:04:44.800
<v Speaker 3>man and he tried to try to move on from

0:04:44.800 --> 0:04:47.279
<v Speaker 3>the guy. So, even if it makes you a villain,

0:04:47.600 --> 0:04:50.240
<v Speaker 3>are you willing to say Toua is no better than

0:04:50.240 --> 0:04:51.279
<v Speaker 3>a backup quarterback?

0:04:51.360 --> 0:04:53.960
<v Speaker 2>Okay? No, So that's where I was wrong, and that

0:04:54.080 --> 0:04:57.080
<v Speaker 2>I said to as a backup who is clearly not

0:04:57.160 --> 0:05:02.120
<v Speaker 2>a backup. He is clearly simple, a middling starter. And

0:05:02.200 --> 0:05:07.600
<v Speaker 2>I said yesterday on Twitter that everyone I think knows

0:05:07.920 --> 0:05:10.359
<v Speaker 2>that Tua is, by the way, I love the fit today,

0:05:10.640 --> 0:05:15.159
<v Speaker 2>that Tua is far closer to the Derek Carr tier

0:05:15.240 --> 0:05:20.080
<v Speaker 2>of quarterbacks than the Justin Herbert tier of quarterbacks. Yet

0:05:20.240 --> 0:05:24.520
<v Speaker 2>folks tried to pretend otherwise because he has a nice

0:05:24.560 --> 0:05:27.000
<v Speaker 2>win loss record prior to this year, and people love

0:05:27.080 --> 0:05:30.560
<v Speaker 2>him some quarterback wins, and because the other reason is

0:05:30.640 --> 0:05:34.800
<v Speaker 2>this year his numbers were sensational, but yesterday was one

0:05:34.880 --> 0:05:37.080
<v Speaker 2>of the worst quarterback performances of the season.

0:05:37.200 --> 0:05:39.039
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I was about to say as that, because what

0:05:39.200 --> 0:05:41.120
<v Speaker 3>was it was the final? Was it four for twenty

0:05:41.240 --> 0:05:41.760
<v Speaker 3>that was the end?

0:05:41.760 --> 0:05:46.080
<v Speaker 2>Well, no, six, It ended better because once the Chargers

0:05:46.120 --> 0:05:49.279
<v Speaker 2>went up ten or went up nine, they were improving

0:05:49.360 --> 0:05:52.400
<v Speaker 2>on that final drive where Miami ended up getting a

0:05:52.480 --> 0:05:55.359
<v Speaker 2>field goal. So we finished ten for twenty eight, but

0:05:55.440 --> 0:05:59.440
<v Speaker 2>my guy started three for seventeen. That's a bad shooting

0:05:59.600 --> 0:06:03.320
<v Speaker 2>night the NBA. That should never happen with a quarterback,

0:06:03.880 --> 0:06:09.080
<v Speaker 2>Flatley should never happen with a quarterback. The Dolphins got

0:06:09.080 --> 0:06:12.440
<v Speaker 2>a gift touchdown on their own fumble that bounced to

0:06:12.520 --> 0:06:16.359
<v Speaker 2>Tyreek Kill and Tyreek was super sharp and saw it

0:06:16.400 --> 0:06:18.440
<v Speaker 2>and scooped it. He's the fastest man in the world.

0:06:18.760 --> 0:06:23.760
<v Speaker 2>And then Tyreek beat the Chargers corner on a sixty

0:06:23.839 --> 0:06:25.960
<v Speaker 2>yard bomb. Aside from that, for the first three and

0:06:26.000 --> 0:06:31.120
<v Speaker 2>a half quarters, the Dolphins offense did nothing, nothing, and

0:06:31.160 --> 0:06:34.360
<v Speaker 2>there were opportunities to be had. The Chargers were out

0:06:34.400 --> 0:06:39.400
<v Speaker 2>Derwin James, they've Joseph Day, they've been without Joey Bosa.

0:06:39.680 --> 0:06:42.839
<v Speaker 2>This was a very banged up Chargers team. And what

0:06:43.000 --> 0:06:45.880
<v Speaker 2>the Chargers and to their credit, and this is where

0:06:45.920 --> 0:06:48.920
<v Speaker 2>the concern is about Tua and the Dolphins and what

0:06:49.000 --> 0:06:53.080
<v Speaker 2>they were doing. Much like with young quarterbacks, it's like,

0:06:53.120 --> 0:06:55.960
<v Speaker 2>oh wait till there's film on them. With an offense

0:06:56.279 --> 0:07:00.560
<v Speaker 2>where everyone seems to be running wide open, there's going

0:07:00.600 --> 0:07:06.080
<v Speaker 2>to be a moment where some sharp defensive mind unlocks

0:07:06.080 --> 0:07:10.400
<v Speaker 2>something and then you have to adjust. So for the Dolphins,

0:07:10.880 --> 0:07:15.480
<v Speaker 2>that moment was last week. That sharp defensive mind was

0:07:16.120 --> 0:07:19.240
<v Speaker 2>the defensive coordinator for the San Francisco forty nine ers

0:07:19.360 --> 0:07:22.720
<v Speaker 2>for a long time great linebacker with the Texans, Tamiko Ryans,

0:07:23.440 --> 0:07:26.640
<v Speaker 2>where he said, what if we just jam the hell

0:07:26.680 --> 0:07:29.560
<v Speaker 2>out of their receivers at the line of scrimmage, throw

0:07:29.600 --> 0:07:32.440
<v Speaker 2>off their timing. Teams are afraid to do that.

0:07:32.680 --> 0:07:33.520
<v Speaker 4>Because they're so fast.

0:07:33.560 --> 0:07:36.000
<v Speaker 2>Because they're so fast, if you don't get a good jam,

0:07:36.160 --> 0:07:38.240
<v Speaker 2>they're gonna beat you. And even if you do get

0:07:38.240 --> 0:07:40.440
<v Speaker 2>a good jam, if two has enough time, they're gonna

0:07:40.440 --> 0:07:43.280
<v Speaker 2>beat you. But what if we jam them to throw

0:07:43.280 --> 0:07:46.559
<v Speaker 2>off their timing, plus try to create some pressure onto

0:07:46.640 --> 0:07:49.480
<v Speaker 2>a so even if our guy gets beat, he doesn't

0:07:49.520 --> 0:07:52.640
<v Speaker 2>have time to hit him downfield. Yes, there is a risk,

0:07:52.880 --> 0:07:55.960
<v Speaker 2>like the Tyree Hills sixty yard touchdown, but the reward

0:07:56.040 --> 0:07:59.160
<v Speaker 2>what teams had been doing is playing these guys so

0:07:59.320 --> 0:08:02.040
<v Speaker 2>far off that it's like, okay, we'll just take these

0:08:02.080 --> 0:08:06.640
<v Speaker 2>twelve yard games wide open, first read boom, second read boom.

0:08:07.400 --> 0:08:12.040
<v Speaker 2>The Niners did that and Tua was in shambles. So

0:08:12.160 --> 0:08:15.000
<v Speaker 2>the Chargers with the question there was though, oh, well

0:08:15.040 --> 0:08:18.920
<v Speaker 2>the Niners, that's the best defense in football. Can someone

0:08:18.920 --> 0:08:23.440
<v Speaker 2>else do it? Well? The Chargers JV defense, which has

0:08:23.680 --> 0:08:26.280
<v Speaker 2>is banged up, was without Derwin James, as I mentioned,

0:08:26.680 --> 0:08:29.440
<v Speaker 2>guys missing from that game left and right. They did

0:08:29.480 --> 0:08:35.800
<v Speaker 2>it too, and the Dolphins offense was totally inapt, totally inapt.

0:08:36.520 --> 0:08:40.560
<v Speaker 2>So you're the Dolphins, there is real level of concern.

0:08:40.679 --> 0:08:44.920
<v Speaker 2>Now you are eight and five. You know the Dolphins

0:08:44.960 --> 0:08:51.480
<v Speaker 2>play next week. It's it's the Saturday night Saturday night games. Nope,

0:08:51.720 --> 0:08:52.959
<v Speaker 2>this is a good guess. I don't know why I

0:08:53.000 --> 0:08:56.360
<v Speaker 2>threw that out to you, but you were in the

0:08:56.440 --> 0:08:59.960
<v Speaker 2>right vicinity. It's the Bills, Okay, So the Dolph Bills

0:09:00.080 --> 0:09:03.080
<v Speaker 2>team that right now, yeah, a Bills team that right

0:09:03.120 --> 0:09:07.199
<v Speaker 2>now is leaning heavily or on its defense. So the

0:09:07.280 --> 0:09:10.360
<v Speaker 2>Dolphins have the Bills, then they have the Packers, then

0:09:10.400 --> 0:09:17.880
<v Speaker 2>the Patriots, then the Jets. Bills Patriots Jets defensively, yeah,

0:09:18.040 --> 0:09:22.400
<v Speaker 2>are all far better than the team the Chargers tried

0:09:22.400 --> 0:09:25.560
<v Speaker 2>it out there last night, far better. And so do

0:09:25.640 --> 0:09:28.280
<v Speaker 2>I think the Dolphins are gonna miss the playoffs? I

0:09:28.400 --> 0:09:31.400
<v Speaker 2>don't do. I think, though, this thing could turn south

0:09:31.440 --> 0:09:34.360
<v Speaker 2>on them quick. I think it already has, because now

0:09:34.360 --> 0:09:36.680
<v Speaker 2>if they finish with the same record as the Chargers,

0:09:37.120 --> 0:09:40.559
<v Speaker 2>they lose that tie breaker. When you look at the

0:09:40.600 --> 0:09:44.640
<v Speaker 2>playoff seedings right now, the Dolphins are sixth at eight

0:09:44.640 --> 0:09:48.480
<v Speaker 2>and five, the Chargers seventh at seven and six, with

0:09:48.640 --> 0:09:52.760
<v Speaker 2>the Jets and the Patriots also having six losses, and

0:09:52.800 --> 0:09:56.240
<v Speaker 2>the Jets and the Patriots don't play each other again

0:09:56.320 --> 0:09:59.720
<v Speaker 2>this year. They both play the Bills one time, and

0:09:59.760 --> 0:10:04.959
<v Speaker 2>they both play the Dolphins ones, so there is going

0:10:05.080 --> 0:10:09.119
<v Speaker 2>to be an odd man out of the AFC playoffs.

0:10:09.520 --> 0:10:12.719
<v Speaker 2>Let's assume Baltimore and Cincinnati are in. It would take

0:10:12.760 --> 0:10:15.400
<v Speaker 2>a real collapse for either of those teams to fall out.

0:10:16.280 --> 0:10:19.880
<v Speaker 2>Let's assume there's only one AFC South playoff team. And

0:10:19.920 --> 0:10:23.920
<v Speaker 2>the reason I'm not simply assigning that to the Titans

0:10:24.000 --> 0:10:27.440
<v Speaker 2>is because Princeville was promise is pretty good yesterday. So

0:10:27.520 --> 0:10:30.480
<v Speaker 2>let's just but it'll only be one team either way. Okay,

0:10:31.600 --> 0:10:36.920
<v Speaker 2>that means there are three spots available for Dolphins. No,

0:10:36.960 --> 0:10:45.959
<v Speaker 2>I'm sorry, I misspoke. Two spots available for Dolphins, Chargers, Jets, Patriots.

0:10:47.000 --> 0:10:50.720
<v Speaker 2>The Dolphins right now are a game up on all

0:10:50.800 --> 0:10:52.600
<v Speaker 2>those teams in the lost colon. We'll see what the

0:10:52.600 --> 0:10:55.079
<v Speaker 2>Patriots do tonight. Could be the Dolphins eight and five

0:10:55.120 --> 0:10:57.240
<v Speaker 2>and they're all seven and six. Of the Patriots loose tonight,

0:10:57.640 --> 0:11:00.520
<v Speaker 2>you can't crate. You can't write them off. And but

0:11:00.520 --> 0:11:04.840
<v Speaker 2>it's close to it. Assuming the Patriots win, Dolphin's got

0:11:04.880 --> 0:11:08.959
<v Speaker 2>their work cut out for him. And by the way,

0:11:09.200 --> 0:11:13.439
<v Speaker 2>the other concern was always going to be what does

0:11:13.480 --> 0:11:16.560
<v Speaker 2>this offense to a most notably look like in the cold?

0:11:16.920 --> 0:11:20.400
<v Speaker 2>Yesterday was in La so the cold was not a

0:11:20.400 --> 0:11:23.200
<v Speaker 2>concern there. Let me, I gotta look again, I said,

0:11:23.200 --> 0:11:24.880
<v Speaker 2>who they were playing. But I want to see where

0:11:24.920 --> 0:11:28.600
<v Speaker 2>these games are being played. For Miami at Buffalo next

0:11:28.640 --> 0:11:32.800
<v Speaker 2>week that feels cold, ye, home for the Packers that's fine,

0:11:33.240 --> 0:11:36.160
<v Speaker 2>at the Patriots that seems cold, and then home for

0:11:36.200 --> 0:11:38.280
<v Speaker 2>the Jets. So two of the four games are in

0:11:38.320 --> 0:11:40.920
<v Speaker 2>the cold Miami. Even when it's cold there, it's not

0:11:41.440 --> 0:11:43.240
<v Speaker 2>you know, it's not cool enough to where it should

0:11:43.240 --> 0:11:46.000
<v Speaker 2>affect the game. All right, Now, I want to talk

0:11:46.040 --> 0:11:49.960
<v Speaker 2>a moment about the Chargers from last night. That game

0:11:50.120 --> 0:11:54.160
<v Speaker 2>last night is why. And I'm not ready to call

0:11:54.200 --> 0:11:56.240
<v Speaker 2>Herbert the second best quarterback in football that was in

0:11:56.280 --> 0:11:58.680
<v Speaker 2>the read right now. I think Joe Burrow has earned

0:11:58.720 --> 0:12:05.720
<v Speaker 2>that distinction. But justin Herbert is in the same conversation

0:12:06.040 --> 0:12:09.640
<v Speaker 2>as Joe Burrow, as Josh Allen as I got to

0:12:09.679 --> 0:12:11.240
<v Speaker 2>give him credit, and I think we'll get to him

0:12:11.320 --> 0:12:16.600
<v Speaker 2>later Jalen Hurts as guys that are playing at that level.

0:12:17.320 --> 0:12:24.679
<v Speaker 2>And there is a sickness going around where people in

0:12:24.760 --> 0:12:28.440
<v Speaker 2>the media get so wrapped up and quarterback wins with

0:12:28.600 --> 0:12:33.880
<v Speaker 2>no context, they decide not to believe what their eyes

0:12:33.920 --> 0:12:37.480
<v Speaker 2>are clearly telling them, which is that Herbert is a

0:12:37.600 --> 0:12:41.680
<v Speaker 2>special talent. And Herbert yesterday finally for the first time

0:12:41.720 --> 0:12:43.679
<v Speaker 2>all year, or at least the first time since week

0:12:43.720 --> 0:12:44.920
<v Speaker 2>won it might have been now I think it is

0:12:44.960 --> 0:12:49.319
<v Speaker 2>all year, started and finished the game with Keenan Allen

0:12:49.360 --> 0:12:52.040
<v Speaker 2>and Mike Williams, and the guy was out there dealing.

0:12:52.520 --> 0:12:56.160
<v Speaker 2>It also should be noted the Chargers are seven and six.

0:12:57.400 --> 0:13:01.120
<v Speaker 2>They are zero to three by a I'm buying twelve points,

0:13:01.160 --> 0:13:04.840
<v Speaker 2>so four points per game against the Chiefs and the Niners,

0:13:05.480 --> 0:13:08.400
<v Speaker 2>two losses to the Chiefs, one loss to the Niners. Those,

0:13:08.440 --> 0:13:10.319
<v Speaker 2>in my opinion, are two of the three best teams

0:13:10.320 --> 0:13:15.119
<v Speaker 2>in football. So they're seven and three with all those injuries.

0:13:15.400 --> 0:13:18.960
<v Speaker 2>So a few coaching issues against the whole league except

0:13:19.000 --> 0:13:23.720
<v Speaker 2>for my Super Bowl pick Chiefs Niners. Chargers are good

0:13:23.840 --> 0:13:27.840
<v Speaker 2>and they're scary. And I'm telling you this right now, I,

0:13:28.160 --> 0:13:32.160
<v Speaker 2>as an arrogant Chiefs fan, want nothing to do with

0:13:32.200 --> 0:13:34.599
<v Speaker 2>the Chargers in the playoffs. I don't want to have

0:13:34.640 --> 0:13:37.719
<v Speaker 2>to beat them a third time, so I would have

0:13:37.840 --> 0:13:42.480
<v Speaker 2>rather the Dolphins won last night. But that was Oh,

0:13:42.520 --> 0:13:45.040
<v Speaker 2>we got a right move, right, I just realized in

0:13:45.120 --> 0:13:48.400
<v Speaker 2>the gambling showed Chargers getting three and a half went

0:13:48.440 --> 0:13:49.199
<v Speaker 2>out right, all right?

0:13:49.280 --> 0:13:52.559
<v Speaker 3>Next are we the Chiefs putting that Hackett Russ and

0:13:52.640 --> 0:13:54.560
<v Speaker 3>the Broncos out of their misery?

0:13:54.960 --> 0:13:57.200
<v Speaker 4>But they did give us a game after going up

0:13:57.280 --> 0:13:57.840
<v Speaker 4>twenty seven.

0:13:57.960 --> 0:14:01.679
<v Speaker 3>Oh, on classic vintage Pat plays, most people turn the

0:14:01.720 --> 0:14:04.800
<v Speaker 3>game off. Then Mahomes played terribly and the Broncos had

0:14:04.800 --> 0:14:07.240
<v Speaker 3>a shot at the end. Do you think Mahomes is

0:14:07.280 --> 0:14:10.559
<v Speaker 3>playing bad against bad teams and just you know, filling

0:14:10.600 --> 0:14:12.360
<v Speaker 3>himself a little bit too much? And does it concern

0:14:12.440 --> 0:14:14.400
<v Speaker 3>you that the Chiefs don't play another real team into

0:14:14.440 --> 0:14:15.040
<v Speaker 3>the playoffs.

0:14:15.440 --> 0:14:18.040
<v Speaker 2>No, it doesn't concern me like the Chiefs. Right now,

0:14:18.320 --> 0:14:21.440
<v Speaker 2>I texted are the TV producers because I want to

0:14:21.480 --> 0:14:23.240
<v Speaker 2>do something with this. Let me see if they text

0:14:23.320 --> 0:14:28.640
<v Speaker 2>me back. This stat. No team in the league has

0:14:28.720 --> 0:14:33.400
<v Speaker 2>more victories against playoff teams teams that are currently in

0:14:33.440 --> 0:14:36.960
<v Speaker 2>the playoffs. The Chiefs are five and two against teams

0:14:36.960 --> 0:14:39.640
<v Speaker 2>that are currently in the playoffs. The loss is no

0:14:39.760 --> 0:14:42.640
<v Speaker 2>team has played more games and has a winning record

0:14:42.640 --> 0:14:44.840
<v Speaker 2>against teams that are currently in the playoffs. So the

0:14:44.920 --> 0:14:48.560
<v Speaker 2>Chiefs schedule very tough. We've talked about it. They're two

0:14:48.600 --> 0:14:51.440
<v Speaker 2>to zero against the Chargers. They beat the Bucks, they

0:14:51.480 --> 0:14:54.760
<v Speaker 2>beat the Titans, they beat the Niners. There's the five wins.

0:14:55.040 --> 0:14:57.560
<v Speaker 2>There are two losses are to the Bills and Bangals. Okay,

0:14:58.120 --> 0:15:00.840
<v Speaker 2>so no, I'm not worried about the Chiefs not being tested.

0:15:01.480 --> 0:15:05.640
<v Speaker 2>Yesterday's game was a pain in the ass in this regard.

0:15:06.280 --> 0:15:09.880
<v Speaker 2>Kansas City played for twenty five minutes and then thought

0:15:10.440 --> 0:15:13.280
<v Speaker 2>they could just coast home. And they could have, but

0:15:13.320 --> 0:15:17.920
<v Speaker 2>Patrick was caroless with the football. But this it is

0:15:18.280 --> 0:15:22.720
<v Speaker 2>a bit of evidence of how spoiled we've become with

0:15:22.840 --> 0:15:25.120
<v Speaker 2>the Kansas City Jeeves and Patrick Mahomes in this regard.

0:15:25.480 --> 0:15:31.880
<v Speaker 2>First of all, he is now an utterly impossible fifteen

0:15:32.120 --> 0:15:39.560
<v Speaker 2>and oh in his career in road divisional games, fifteen

0:15:39.640 --> 0:15:43.280
<v Speaker 2>and oh. No fan of the Chargers, Raiders or Broncos

0:15:43.600 --> 0:15:46.560
<v Speaker 2>has ever gone to one of their home stadiums and

0:15:46.640 --> 0:15:49.680
<v Speaker 2>seen Patrick Mahomes do anything other than beating them ten

0:15:49.760 --> 0:15:54.479
<v Speaker 2>and ohero in his career against the Broncos. Okay, Furthermore,

0:15:55.360 --> 0:16:01.160
<v Speaker 2>he had maybe the single best play of the season yesterday. Yeah,

0:16:01.200 --> 0:16:06.880
<v Speaker 2>the blind flip, the no look, I'm not off. Demanse

0:16:07.040 --> 0:16:11.320
<v Speaker 2>bet the under in that game and had under Mahomes

0:16:11.320 --> 0:16:18.520
<v Speaker 2>passing yards and Demanse. I gotta tell you, I I

0:16:18.680 --> 0:16:24.280
<v Speaker 2>don't like demands betting football, not because I think you've

0:16:24.320 --> 0:16:26.960
<v Speaker 2>been responsible with the amount of Like you lost all

0:16:27.000 --> 0:16:29.880
<v Speaker 2>your bets yesterday and did you lose even one hundred dollars?

0:16:32.640 --> 0:16:33.920
<v Speaker 4>Oh? Did you?

0:16:33.960 --> 0:16:34.120
<v Speaker 5>No?

0:16:34.280 --> 0:16:36.840
<v Speaker 2>It was less than right thereabouts.

0:16:37.000 --> 0:16:37.880
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, there be.

0:16:37.920 --> 0:16:41.640
<v Speaker 2>Maybe you pressed a little late and didn't tell me right,

0:16:41.680 --> 0:16:44.240
<v Speaker 2>which is so My point is, even when you have

0:16:44.280 --> 0:16:46.840
<v Speaker 2>a terrible day, you're being responsible with the amount that

0:16:46.920 --> 0:16:50.640
<v Speaker 2>you bet. Yeah, So that's not why I hate you gambling.

0:16:51.040 --> 0:16:55.360
<v Speaker 2>I hate you gambling because you start the day with

0:16:55.520 --> 0:16:59.400
<v Speaker 2>such excitement and in such a great mood, and you're

0:16:59.480 --> 0:17:03.640
<v Speaker 2>into all the games, and then because all your bets

0:17:03.680 --> 0:17:07.480
<v Speaker 2>are these seven or more legged parlays. As soon as

0:17:07.640 --> 0:17:10.240
<v Speaker 2>as soon as a parlay is dead, all of a sudden,

0:17:10.560 --> 0:17:14.280
<v Speaker 2>I look over demon day's half watching the game playing

0:17:14.320 --> 0:17:19.040
<v Speaker 2>Clash of Clans angry, and then that the four o'clock

0:17:19.119 --> 0:17:23.439
<v Speaker 2>windows starts, and that excitement is back. Briefly, He's like, Oh,

0:17:23.480 --> 0:17:25.800
<v Speaker 2>I've got all these things going, and then the moment

0:17:25.880 --> 0:17:30.360
<v Speaker 2>one of them's dead, he's just gone, just disappears for hours,

0:17:31.160 --> 0:17:33.280
<v Speaker 2>and it's just a bummer. It's like, oh, this is

0:17:33.359 --> 0:17:35.720
<v Speaker 2>fun days. But the days you win, you're with me

0:17:35.800 --> 0:17:40.000
<v Speaker 2>the whole time. You're into it all right. But back

0:17:40.040 --> 0:17:44.640
<v Speaker 2>to the game, Mames is flicked to Jerck McKinnon. It's

0:17:44.680 --> 0:17:47.000
<v Speaker 2>one of the best plays of the year by anyone,

0:17:47.520 --> 0:17:50.760
<v Speaker 2>and the touchdown pass that sealed the game to go

0:17:50.880 --> 0:17:55.840
<v Speaker 2>up thirty four to twenty one when he got annihilated

0:17:56.359 --> 0:17:59.359
<v Speaker 2>was another one of the best plays anyone has made

0:17:59.480 --> 0:18:03.600
<v Speaker 2>all year. Now, with that said, he was very careless

0:18:03.640 --> 0:18:06.879
<v Speaker 2>with the football and the three picks irritate you But

0:18:07.600 --> 0:18:11.560
<v Speaker 2>where I say we're spoiled is Mahomes is leading the

0:18:11.640 --> 0:18:16.919
<v Speaker 2>league in passing yards by more than four hundred and

0:18:17.040 --> 0:18:21.359
<v Speaker 2>fifty yards. Jalen Hurts, who everyone wants to give the

0:18:21.480 --> 0:18:25.760
<v Speaker 2>MVP two, Now he has one thousand more passing yards

0:18:25.800 --> 0:18:28.400
<v Speaker 2>than him. Now, I'm Hurts been excellent running the football.

0:18:29.040 --> 0:18:32.960
<v Speaker 2>When it comes to touchdown passes, Mahomes is at thirty three.

0:18:33.640 --> 0:18:37.520
<v Speaker 2>No one else has more than twenty seven. He leads

0:18:37.600 --> 0:18:43.800
<v Speaker 2>Hurts in touchdown passes by eleven. So this idea that

0:18:44.800 --> 0:18:47.760
<v Speaker 2>Mahomes now, was he careless with the football? Yes? And

0:18:47.840 --> 0:18:51.159
<v Speaker 2>did the Chiefs think after the Mahomes flick and then

0:18:51.200 --> 0:18:54.320
<v Speaker 2>the Russell pick six to go up twenty seven nothing,

0:18:54.640 --> 0:18:56.840
<v Speaker 2>the game was over? Sure? Go ahead.

0:18:56.840 --> 0:18:57.639
<v Speaker 4>I got a question for you.

0:18:57.720 --> 0:18:59.879
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, how do you think that game turns out of

0:19:00.080 --> 0:19:02.399
<v Speaker 3>Russ doesn't get his concussion because it seemed like they

0:19:02.400 --> 0:19:04.040
<v Speaker 3>were they were starting to get things going.

0:19:04.680 --> 0:19:07.800
<v Speaker 2>So here's where I think that's I don't think it

0:19:07.880 --> 0:19:10.399
<v Speaker 2>changes it at all, because the Chiefs were never in

0:19:10.840 --> 0:19:15.360
<v Speaker 2>risk of losing that football game. And this drive where

0:19:15.400 --> 0:19:18.359
<v Speaker 2>Russ got a concussion, they scored a touchdown anyway. Now

0:19:18.400 --> 0:19:20.960
<v Speaker 2>they had to do it on fourth down Like, that's

0:19:21.000 --> 0:19:24.040
<v Speaker 2>to me a better argument if Ripping comes in and

0:19:24.080 --> 0:19:25.760
<v Speaker 2>they because they were down at the goal line after

0:19:25.840 --> 0:19:28.960
<v Speaker 2>Russ is scramble if they don't score there, But they

0:19:29.040 --> 0:19:34.600
<v Speaker 2>scored there anyway, And so I fair enough, I'm not listen.

0:19:34.880 --> 0:19:37.960
<v Speaker 2>The Chiefs were never losing that game. Is it a

0:19:37.960 --> 0:19:41.679
<v Speaker 2>little irritating that Mahomes was careless at the very end

0:19:41.680 --> 0:19:45.720
<v Speaker 2>of the first half, Sure, but does it concern me

0:19:45.800 --> 0:19:48.640
<v Speaker 2>at all? Not in the least. The most important thing

0:19:48.720 --> 0:19:52.359
<v Speaker 2>for Kansas City the rest of the season is to

0:19:52.440 --> 0:19:56.399
<v Speaker 2>avoid what happened to the Niners yesterday, which is, in

0:19:56.440 --> 0:19:59.320
<v Speaker 2>a game you're blowing somebody out, one of their best

0:19:59.320 --> 0:20:01.639
<v Speaker 2>players gets injury. So I know we're talking about the

0:20:01.720 --> 0:20:04.280
<v Speaker 2>Niners in a minute, Deebo Samuel. I know everyone's like, oh,

0:20:04.280 --> 0:20:07.200
<v Speaker 2>they don't think it's broken. He's a high ankle sprain.

0:20:07.680 --> 0:20:10.879
<v Speaker 2>A high ankle sprain can knock a player out for

0:20:10.920 --> 0:20:15.480
<v Speaker 2>two months. High ankle sprain can be as bad as

0:20:15.520 --> 0:20:19.399
<v Speaker 2>a minor fracture. So the Chiefs got out of that

0:20:19.440 --> 0:20:22.760
<v Speaker 2>game healthy, and I'm sure irritated. Now I'll tell you

0:20:22.760 --> 0:20:24.920
<v Speaker 2>one last thing about the Chiefs. That defense got to

0:20:24.960 --> 0:20:29.399
<v Speaker 2>step up. The defense is back to well below average

0:20:29.560 --> 0:20:33.760
<v Speaker 2>in Mahomes' career. One year they have had a league

0:20:33.800 --> 0:20:37.360
<v Speaker 2>average defense and they won the SUPERWL Like the defense

0:20:37.400 --> 0:20:38.200
<v Speaker 2>needs to play better.

0:20:38.240 --> 0:20:40.480
<v Speaker 4>Did Denver get their season high on the Chiefs yesterday?

0:20:40.520 --> 0:20:46.240
<v Speaker 2>Well by a mile? Yeah? Absolutely? Four touchdowns offense is

0:20:46.320 --> 0:20:47.480
<v Speaker 2>looked all year? All right?

0:20:47.560 --> 0:20:51.359
<v Speaker 4>Next? All right? The goat showed up in the Bay yesterday. No,

0:20:51.520 --> 0:20:52.080
<v Speaker 4>not Brady.

0:20:52.080 --> 0:20:54.800
<v Speaker 3>We were talking about rock Party, not to mention the

0:20:54.840 --> 0:20:57.560
<v Speaker 3>best defense in football. They look better than they had

0:20:57.680 --> 0:21:00.560
<v Speaker 3>all years. So here's your shot to go to about

0:21:00.600 --> 0:21:01.359
<v Speaker 3>the forty nine ers?

0:21:01.840 --> 0:21:01.959
<v Speaker 2>Uh?

0:21:02.160 --> 0:21:04.320
<v Speaker 3>Is this the most confident you've been in San Francisco

0:21:04.440 --> 0:21:05.920
<v Speaker 3>since pinking them to win us to.

0:21:05.880 --> 0:21:07.040
<v Speaker 4>Go to the Super Bowl? Sorry?

0:21:07.359 --> 0:21:09.639
<v Speaker 3>And is it time to talk about Brady the podcaster

0:21:10.160 --> 0:21:12.080
<v Speaker 3>or are you still are you still holding out hope

0:21:12.119 --> 0:21:13.159
<v Speaker 3>for Brady the forty nine er?

0:21:13.760 --> 0:21:14.960
<v Speaker 2>Well, I don't know if it's gonna be a forty

0:21:15.000 --> 0:21:17.600
<v Speaker 2>nine er, but Brady's playing next year, and I don't know,

0:21:17.960 --> 0:21:21.280
<v Speaker 2>so I am certain. I've been saying that all year.

0:21:21.640 --> 0:21:24.080
<v Speaker 2>There's some people weren't even convinced he was finishing out

0:21:24.119 --> 0:21:26.800
<v Speaker 2>the season. Now there seems to be a lot more

0:21:26.920 --> 0:21:30.199
<v Speaker 2>discussion that Brady's playing next year. Now, where is it

0:21:30.240 --> 0:21:32.920
<v Speaker 2>gonna be. I don't know. San Francisco's on the board,

0:21:33.280 --> 0:21:35.760
<v Speaker 2>New England's on the board. There's a lot of teams

0:21:35.760 --> 0:21:38.879
<v Speaker 2>that are on the board, but Brady's playing. I don't

0:21:39.119 --> 0:21:43.560
<v Speaker 2>I still believe the Bucks are scary come the postseason. No,

0:21:43.760 --> 0:21:46.040
<v Speaker 2>you're not gonna be able to talk me off of

0:21:46.080 --> 0:21:50.639
<v Speaker 2>that that the Bucks are. They're gonna be the four seed.

0:21:50.920 --> 0:21:53.399
<v Speaker 2>They're probably going to be playing the Cowboys in that

0:21:53.440 --> 0:21:56.719
<v Speaker 2>first playoff game. Now, the Cowboys, you know, didn't exactly

0:21:56.800 --> 0:22:00.840
<v Speaker 2>have an overwhelming game themselves yesterday escaping again to the Texans.

0:22:01.240 --> 0:22:05.760
<v Speaker 2>But to me, the Cowboys, the Bucks are still scary

0:22:05.800 --> 0:22:08.919
<v Speaker 2>in the playoffs and the playoffs only people are once

0:22:08.960 --> 0:22:13.520
<v Speaker 2>again what'd you say exactly? People are once again trying

0:22:13.560 --> 0:22:17.680
<v Speaker 2>to convince themselves that Tampa might not win that division.

0:22:17.680 --> 0:22:20.080
<v Speaker 2>They're gonna win that division even if they lose next

0:22:20.080 --> 0:22:22.840
<v Speaker 2>week to the Bengals. The end of the season, they

0:22:22.880 --> 0:22:27.600
<v Speaker 2>play the Falcons, the Panthers, and one other bad team.

0:22:27.760 --> 0:22:30.120
<v Speaker 2>Let me see, Sorry, I just have to check Tampa

0:22:30.160 --> 0:22:34.000
<v Speaker 2>into the season. I know it's Falcons and Panthers, and

0:22:34.240 --> 0:22:36.720
<v Speaker 2>it's oh and the Cardinals, So they're gonna be fine

0:22:37.440 --> 0:22:42.520
<v Speaker 2>when it comes to San Francisco. This is why I

0:22:42.600 --> 0:22:44.720
<v Speaker 2>picked them to go to the super Bowl with a

0:22:44.800 --> 0:22:47.680
<v Speaker 2>quarterback I'd never seen because when I picked them, Trey

0:22:47.760 --> 0:22:50.600
<v Speaker 2>Lance was their quarterback and that was before they had

0:22:50.680 --> 0:22:54.640
<v Speaker 2>Christian mccaffe. They have the best defense in football. Their

0:22:54.680 --> 0:22:57.320
<v Speaker 2>skill position guys are as good as anybody. They have

0:22:57.359 --> 0:23:04.960
<v Speaker 2>an awesome offensive line, and yesterday looked bleeping awesome. Rock

0:23:05.080 --> 0:23:07.440
<v Speaker 2>Party was not just you know.

0:23:07.720 --> 0:23:10.119
<v Speaker 4>Uh after getting lit up on the first play of

0:23:10.119 --> 0:23:10.600
<v Speaker 4>the game.

0:23:10.480 --> 0:23:15.640
<v Speaker 2>I mean he got he he was dropping dimes. Rock

0:23:15.680 --> 0:23:19.440
<v Speaker 2>Purty played a better game. The best quarterback game the

0:23:19.560 --> 0:23:22.520
<v Speaker 2>Niners have had all year was by brock Purty yesterday.

0:23:22.800 --> 0:23:25.919
<v Speaker 2>That's better than anything Jimmy Garoppolo did all year. Now,

0:23:26.840 --> 0:23:29.320
<v Speaker 2>do I think he's gonna keep up that level? No,

0:23:29.680 --> 0:23:32.400
<v Speaker 2>If brock Purty's awesome, they will win the super Bowl.

0:23:33.040 --> 0:23:37.800
<v Speaker 2>That that's even exactly right now. I do think that,

0:23:38.480 --> 0:23:40.560
<v Speaker 2>you know, he'll have some bad moments. He hasn't had

0:23:40.560 --> 0:23:44.680
<v Speaker 2>bad moments yet. He'll regress somewhat, but all he has

0:23:44.800 --> 0:23:49.320
<v Speaker 2>to be is baseline competent. They have made the conference

0:23:49.400 --> 0:23:52.639
<v Speaker 2>championship game and the Super Bowl in the in the

0:23:52.680 --> 0:23:56.000
<v Speaker 2>three seasons prior to this with a quarterback who's never

0:23:56.080 --> 0:23:59.560
<v Speaker 2>had a single good playoff game, Jimmy Garoppolo in his

0:23:59.600 --> 0:24:01.840
<v Speaker 2>career in the playoffs is four touchdowns, six picks at

0:24:01.840 --> 0:24:04.399
<v Speaker 2>seventy five rating and averages one hundred and forty five

0:24:04.480 --> 0:24:06.680
<v Speaker 2>yards per game or one hundred and sixty five yards

0:24:06.680 --> 0:24:09.960
<v Speaker 2>per game, so that they don't need great quarterbacking in

0:24:10.000 --> 0:24:10.840
<v Speaker 2>San Francisco.

0:24:12.240 --> 0:24:13.840
<v Speaker 4>I think I'm gonna be the brock party guy.

0:24:14.480 --> 0:24:15.040
<v Speaker 2>What does that mean?

0:24:16.640 --> 0:24:18.480
<v Speaker 3>You said that, You think that he's gonna regress and

0:24:18.520 --> 0:24:20.280
<v Speaker 3>everything I'm calling it.

0:24:20.440 --> 0:24:21.679
<v Speaker 4>He's not gonna regress.

0:24:22.320 --> 0:24:23.040
<v Speaker 2>It will stay great.

0:24:23.040 --> 0:24:24.800
<v Speaker 3>This is just gonna be one of those situations, like

0:24:24.840 --> 0:24:26.800
<v Speaker 3>one of those you know, odd man out.

0:24:27.040 --> 0:24:31.119
<v Speaker 2>A Cinderella story. Yes he got of nowhere, Kurt Warner situation. Okay,

0:24:31.520 --> 0:24:35.840
<v Speaker 2>I again, I'm I think he will continue to look

0:24:36.280 --> 0:24:39.040
<v Speaker 2>pretty good in that offense. I do not think he's

0:24:39.040 --> 0:24:42.879
<v Speaker 2>gonna play the lot. Yesterday he played unbelievable, and I

0:24:42.880 --> 0:24:45.040
<v Speaker 2>mean he might win NFC Player of the Week like

0:24:45.280 --> 0:24:49.359
<v Speaker 2>he was unbelievable yesterday. All right. Last the Eagles.

0:24:49.000 --> 0:24:50.520
<v Speaker 3>Became the first team in the league to lock up

0:24:50.560 --> 0:24:53.480
<v Speaker 3>a playoffs spot after crushing the Giants forty eight to

0:24:53.560 --> 0:24:56.760
<v Speaker 3>twenty two, Jalen Hurts played a perfect game with three

0:24:56.800 --> 0:24:59.920
<v Speaker 3>total touchdowns while the guy in Kansas City threw three picks.

0:25:00.520 --> 0:25:00.639
<v Speaker 2>Uh.

0:25:00.960 --> 0:25:03.920
<v Speaker 3>Sounds to me like the MVP conversation is opened back

0:25:04.040 --> 0:25:06.960
<v Speaker 3>up with the best with the best record and most

0:25:06.960 --> 0:25:09.560
<v Speaker 3>dominant team in football? Are the Eagles going to lock

0:25:09.680 --> 0:25:11.480
<v Speaker 3>up Coach of the Year and MVP.

0:25:11.920 --> 0:25:15.600
<v Speaker 2>Okay, they're gonna win Coach of the Year and Hurts

0:25:15.680 --> 0:25:19.320
<v Speaker 2>right now is in the MVP discussion? But can we

0:25:19.400 --> 0:25:22.880
<v Speaker 2>please stop? I told you guys when you guys tried

0:25:22.920 --> 0:25:24.880
<v Speaker 2>a few weeks ago to say, oh, Mahomes is locked

0:25:24.920 --> 0:25:28.760
<v Speaker 2>up MVP because Josh Allen's fell off the map. Hey,

0:25:28.760 --> 0:25:33.520
<v Speaker 2>it was Allen, then it was Tua. Now it's Hurts. Hurts.

0:25:33.680 --> 0:25:35.520
<v Speaker 3>I feel like the one that should that should have

0:25:35.520 --> 0:25:38.080
<v Speaker 3>been the one right after Mahomes the entire time.

0:25:38.119 --> 0:25:40.400
<v Speaker 2>In fact, nobody thinks he's better and he's not having

0:25:40.400 --> 0:25:44.080
<v Speaker 2>a better season. Here's a question, Chiefs Eagles. Who is

0:25:44.119 --> 0:25:47.320
<v Speaker 2>the better offensive line? Eagles, Chiefs Eagles. Who is the

0:25:47.320 --> 0:25:50.680
<v Speaker 2>better running game? Eagles? Chiefs Eagles. Who is the better

0:25:50.680 --> 0:25:54.639
<v Speaker 2>wide receivers? Not even close Eagles, Chiefs Eagles. Who is

0:25:54.680 --> 0:25:58.760
<v Speaker 2>the better defense at every single level Eagles, Chiefs Eagles.

0:25:58.800 --> 0:26:02.000
<v Speaker 2>Who is the better quarterback Chiefs? And it's not debatable.

0:26:03.640 --> 0:26:07.880
<v Speaker 2>And yet, because the Eagles are eleven and one or

0:26:08.320 --> 0:26:10.440
<v Speaker 2>twelve and one and the Chiefs are ten and three

0:26:10.760 --> 0:26:14.840
<v Speaker 2>with the Chiefs having played a tougher schedule, We're gonna

0:26:14.880 --> 0:26:18.399
<v Speaker 2>say that win difference is the difference if they both

0:26:18.520 --> 0:26:22.880
<v Speaker 2>if the Chiefs finish fourteen and three and the Eagles

0:26:22.880 --> 0:26:26.119
<v Speaker 2>finish fifteen and two, both of which I think are like,

0:26:26.920 --> 0:26:31.080
<v Speaker 2>are you telling me that one win is going to

0:26:31.119 --> 0:26:33.840
<v Speaker 2>be the reason we deny the best player in the

0:26:33.880 --> 0:26:39.880
<v Speaker 2>league league MVP. Nobody can argue that anyone has been

0:26:40.080 --> 0:26:44.320
<v Speaker 2>more valuable to their team than Mahomes has been other

0:26:44.400 --> 0:26:48.639
<v Speaker 2>than Kelsey and Chris Jones. Who on the Chiefs is

0:26:48.680 --> 0:26:54.520
<v Speaker 2>having a great season. Nobody, nobody. They're number one running

0:26:54.560 --> 0:26:58.600
<v Speaker 2>backs on IR, They're number one receivers on IR. Their

0:26:58.640 --> 0:27:02.560
<v Speaker 2>defense is starting four rookie, four or five rookies. Give

0:27:02.600 --> 0:27:06.840
<v Speaker 2>me a break. They've played seven teams that are currently

0:27:06.840 --> 0:27:09.960
<v Speaker 2>in the playoffs. Give me a break. I'm not taking

0:27:09.960 --> 0:27:12.199
<v Speaker 2>anything away from Jailen Hurts. And you said you want

0:27:12.240 --> 0:27:14.240
<v Speaker 2>to be a rock party guy, you really want to

0:27:14.240 --> 0:27:17.040
<v Speaker 2>be a Jailen hurts kid. Yeah, you were watching yesterday

0:27:17.080 --> 0:27:19.879
<v Speaker 2>and you were you were kind of shading this. But

0:27:19.960 --> 0:27:22.560
<v Speaker 2>when you were still optimistic, you weren't gonna lose money,

0:27:22.840 --> 0:27:24.480
<v Speaker 2>you were gonna throw in a little shade my way

0:27:24.520 --> 0:27:28.880
<v Speaker 2>about my Eagle skepticism a little bit. And they looked

0:27:28.920 --> 0:27:34.000
<v Speaker 2>awesome yesterday. Uh. But and if we want to talk

0:27:34.040 --> 0:27:36.240
<v Speaker 2>about how I underrated the Eagles, so be it.

0:27:36.359 --> 0:27:38.200
<v Speaker 4>So this might be a very stupid question.

0:27:38.840 --> 0:27:41.600
<v Speaker 3>The whole the whole MVP thing, Like when the MVP

0:27:41.960 --> 0:27:44.600
<v Speaker 3>race is over, is that after the Super No, that's

0:27:44.600 --> 0:27:46.040
<v Speaker 3>so that's right before playoffs.

0:27:46.160 --> 0:27:49.440
<v Speaker 2>Yes, they will announce it until right before the Super Bowl,

0:27:49.800 --> 0:27:52.400
<v Speaker 2>but the voting happens after week.

0:27:52.640 --> 0:27:54.560
<v Speaker 3>I was gonna say, that's that's the difference. I mean,

0:27:55.040 --> 0:27:56.840
<v Speaker 3>you already think it's one, but like.

0:27:56.800 --> 0:27:59.680
<v Speaker 2>No, I don't think it's one. No, no, no, they're listen,

0:27:59.760 --> 0:28:03.760
<v Speaker 2>they're there are there's almost twenty five percent of the

0:28:03.760 --> 0:28:09.440
<v Speaker 2>season left. We've played thirteen games. There's four games left.

0:28:09.840 --> 0:28:11.800
<v Speaker 2>So it used to be so much easier with sixteen

0:28:11.800 --> 0:28:14.080
<v Speaker 2>game season. So just under twenty five percent of the

0:28:14.080 --> 0:28:17.400
<v Speaker 2>season left. There's let me put it this way, more

0:28:17.400 --> 0:28:20.800
<v Speaker 2>than twenty percent of the season left. Things could change

0:28:20.880 --> 0:28:24.560
<v Speaker 2>and Mahomes obviously did not help his case yesterday. However,

0:28:24.680 --> 0:28:28.040
<v Speaker 2>I would argue this, this is my other Mahomes MVP

0:28:28.240 --> 0:28:34.600
<v Speaker 2>argument any other quarterback that is judged by a regular

0:28:34.720 --> 0:28:41.520
<v Speaker 2>quarterback standard. When you get to ten and three, you're

0:28:41.600 --> 0:28:45.280
<v Speaker 2>up twenty seven to nothing on a team on the road,

0:28:45.960 --> 0:28:49.200
<v Speaker 2>and you have those two highlights in a game you

0:28:49.240 --> 0:28:52.240
<v Speaker 2>throw from nearly four hundred yards and three touchdowns, people

0:28:52.240 --> 0:28:56.680
<v Speaker 2>would have said those were his MVP moments, the insane

0:28:56.720 --> 0:28:59.560
<v Speaker 2>player Jack McKinnon. But were so numb to it with

0:28:59.680 --> 0:29:03.400
<v Speaker 2>Mahome Holmes that we try to find reasons that that's

0:29:03.480 --> 0:29:06.400
<v Speaker 2>not the case. And listen, I'm not taking anything away

0:29:06.400 --> 0:29:08.880
<v Speaker 2>from Jalen Hurts. I do not believe he's the league MVP.

0:29:09.160 --> 0:29:12.080
<v Speaker 2>He is right now the favorite right now. Hurts his

0:29:12.200 --> 0:29:16.239
<v Speaker 2>minus one oh five Mahomes is plus one fifty. All right, Oh,

0:29:16.880 --> 0:29:22.680
<v Speaker 2>did Jalen Hurts lock up MVP or pull? Answerers? What's

0:29:22.720 --> 0:29:26.000
<v Speaker 2>the respondents? Forty percent say yes, sixty percent say no.

0:29:26.360 --> 0:29:28.680
<v Speaker 2>Saying anyone locked up MVP is idiot.

0:29:29.120 --> 0:29:30.800
<v Speaker 4>Oh geez, sorry.

0:29:31.000 --> 0:29:34.920
<v Speaker 2>Well, you saying anyone locked it up at this point

0:29:34.960 --> 0:29:35.920
<v Speaker 2>is crazy.

0:29:36.160 --> 0:29:36.480
<v Speaker 4>Okay.

0:29:36.520 --> 0:29:40.720
<v Speaker 2>I'll just remind people in twenty twenty. Mahomes at this

0:29:40.800 --> 0:29:44.160
<v Speaker 2>point in the year was the defending League Super Bowl MVP.

0:29:44.720 --> 0:29:49.000
<v Speaker 2>The team was twelve and one and he had unbelievable numbers.

0:29:49.600 --> 0:29:50.760
<v Speaker 2>And then at the end of the year, when they

0:29:50.800 --> 0:29:53.120
<v Speaker 2>had everything locked up, his numbers trailed off a bit.

0:29:53.400 --> 0:29:56.640
<v Speaker 2>He sat in week seventeen and they gave it to

0:29:56.640 --> 0:29:59.800
<v Speaker 2>Aaron Rodgers a lock and change in the final four weeks.

0:30:00.080 --> 0:30:03.680
<v Speaker 2>And for Philly, let me just see what their national

0:30:03.720 --> 0:30:08.520
<v Speaker 2>TV games are, because all it's gonna take, fairly or unfairly,

0:30:09.160 --> 0:30:14.600
<v Speaker 2>is one really bad Jailen Hurts game, and folks are

0:30:14.640 --> 0:30:16.800
<v Speaker 2>going to Mahomes. I don't think it's gonna be on

0:30:16.880 --> 0:30:21.720
<v Speaker 2>national TV again all year. And so the numbers are

0:30:21.720 --> 0:30:25.840
<v Speaker 2>so overwhelming in Mahomes's favor. So if Jalen Hurds struggles

0:30:26.880 --> 0:30:29.640
<v Speaker 2>in two weeks from the four point thirty kickoff on

0:30:29.800 --> 0:30:34.479
<v Speaker 2>Fox against the Cowboys, Mahomes will run away. If they

0:30:34.560 --> 0:30:38.160
<v Speaker 2>finish sixteen and one, they'll probably give it to Jalen Hurts.

0:30:38.520 --> 0:30:42.120
<v Speaker 2>All Right, a little FETA forecast plus more Week fourteen

0:30:42.160 --> 0:30:45.960
<v Speaker 2>in the NFL Next What's Right Live on YouTube.

0:30:51.520 --> 0:30:54.320
<v Speaker 5>This episode is brought to you by Unstoppable Discover the

0:30:54.320 --> 0:30:57.680
<v Speaker 5>inspiring true story about Anthony Robless, who defined every expectation

0:30:57.760 --> 0:31:00.680
<v Speaker 5>to become a national wrestling champion in Unstopped, a new

0:31:00.680 --> 0:31:04.280
<v Speaker 5>original movie from Amazon MGM Studios and director William Goldenberg.

0:31:04.360 --> 0:31:07.520
<v Speaker 5>Evoking the excitement and camaraderie of classic sports dramas and

0:31:07.560 --> 0:31:11.000
<v Speaker 5>thrilling wrestling matches. Unstoppable features an all star ensemble cast

0:31:11.040 --> 0:31:14.560
<v Speaker 5>including Jerrelle Jerome, Jennifer Lopez, Don Cheatle, Michael Panya, and

0:31:14.600 --> 0:31:18.800
<v Speaker 5>Bobby Knavalli. Watch Unstoppable now exclusively on Amazon Prime Video.

0:31:20.200 --> 0:31:22.680
<v Speaker 2>All Right, welcome back in episode one oh six What's

0:31:22.760 --> 0:31:27.160
<v Speaker 2>Right with Nick Right? Podcasts and YouTube show like rate, subscribe, review,

0:31:27.240 --> 0:31:29.560
<v Speaker 2>click the bell on YouTube so you're notified every time

0:31:29.600 --> 0:31:33.160
<v Speaker 2>we're going live. By the way, uh, we typically go

0:31:33.240 --> 0:31:37.360
<v Speaker 2>live every Monday and Thursday at ten thirty am on YouTube.

0:31:37.360 --> 0:31:40.720
<v Speaker 2>We also post on Friday our gambling show. We're gonna

0:31:40.720 --> 0:31:42.960
<v Speaker 2>have a slightly different schedule this week. I'm not sure

0:31:43.000 --> 0:31:46.760
<v Speaker 2>exactly what the schedule is going to be because Thursday

0:31:47.280 --> 0:31:50.520
<v Speaker 2>there are some TV obligations that conflict with our podcast

0:31:50.560 --> 0:31:54.480
<v Speaker 2>recording time. So I'm not sure exactly what the schedule's

0:31:54.520 --> 0:31:56.920
<v Speaker 2>going to be this week. But that's another reason to

0:31:56.960 --> 0:31:59.320
<v Speaker 2>subscribe and to hit the bell, so you know, if

0:31:59.320 --> 0:32:02.320
<v Speaker 2>we're kind of in PROMPTU going live with any of

0:32:02.360 --> 0:32:05.440
<v Speaker 2>the shows on YouTube. But I want to get to

0:32:06.280 --> 0:32:10.200
<v Speaker 2>the FIFA forecast in just a moment. First though, I

0:32:10.280 --> 0:32:11.800
<v Speaker 2>just want to say before we get to the World

0:32:11.880 --> 0:32:16.000
<v Speaker 2>Cup there. Obviously I shouldn't say obviously, but many of

0:32:16.040 --> 0:32:21.080
<v Speaker 2>you may know, there's news this weekend that great longtime

0:32:21.360 --> 0:32:25.320
<v Speaker 2>American soccer journalist and many not just soccer, but he

0:32:25.400 --> 0:32:28.000
<v Speaker 2>focused on soccer at this point in his career. Grant

0:32:28.040 --> 0:32:33.440
<v Speaker 2>Wall died while covering the World Cup in Qatar. There

0:32:33.640 --> 0:32:38.320
<v Speaker 2>was over the weekend an outpouring of support for he

0:32:38.400 --> 0:32:42.560
<v Speaker 2>and his family for what was seemingly a truly shocking death.

0:32:42.640 --> 0:32:46.280
<v Speaker 2>There was also what I thought was some very uncomfortable

0:32:46.720 --> 0:32:51.160
<v Speaker 2>and really irresponsible speculation, and I'm not going to engage

0:32:51.160 --> 0:32:56.479
<v Speaker 2>in that on any level other than to say, you know,

0:32:56.680 --> 0:32:59.280
<v Speaker 2>thoughts and if you're the prayerful type, prayers with his family.

0:32:59.480 --> 0:33:01.680
<v Speaker 2>Guy was in the fifty years old, had just celebrated

0:33:01.720 --> 0:33:05.360
<v Speaker 2>his birthday, was covering the sport he loves and was

0:33:05.400 --> 0:33:10.480
<v Speaker 2>a brave, fearless journalist, and had run into some resistance

0:33:10.480 --> 0:33:14.400
<v Speaker 2>while he was over in Qatar and still did what

0:33:14.440 --> 0:33:16.600
<v Speaker 2>it seems like he always did at every level of

0:33:16.640 --> 0:33:19.239
<v Speaker 2>his career, which is do his job, do it at

0:33:19.240 --> 0:33:24.240
<v Speaker 2>a super high level, and do it fearlessly. I will

0:33:24.520 --> 0:33:29.640
<v Speaker 2>I so it's truly sad and truly a tragedy. And

0:33:29.680 --> 0:33:32.880
<v Speaker 2>you saw. I mean Lebron was asked about it because

0:33:33.280 --> 0:33:36.840
<v Speaker 2>he wrote the cover story for Sports Illustrating Lebron was

0:33:36.840 --> 0:33:38.880
<v Speaker 2>in high school. He wrote some of the best Sports

0:33:38.920 --> 0:33:41.560
<v Speaker 2>Illustrated cover stories ever, so he didn't just cover soccer,

0:33:41.560 --> 0:33:44.040
<v Speaker 2>but he had focused on soccer later in his career.

0:33:44.520 --> 0:33:49.040
<v Speaker 2>I will say, on a personal note, I always feel uncomfortable.

0:33:49.440 --> 0:33:55.000
<v Speaker 2>I shouldn't say uncomfortable, but I was on Twitter. I

0:33:55.040 --> 0:33:58.200
<v Speaker 2>saw when the news came across from US Soccer that

0:33:58.280 --> 0:34:03.120
<v Speaker 2>this had happened, and I I didn't. I never know

0:34:03.840 --> 0:34:08.400
<v Speaker 2>how to handle those things when it would have felt

0:34:09.000 --> 0:34:13.279
<v Speaker 2>perfunctory to send a tweet, but it also would have

0:34:13.280 --> 0:34:16.480
<v Speaker 2>felt ridiculous in the moment to tweet about anything else.

0:34:16.920 --> 0:34:21.680
<v Speaker 2>But I also, I think sometimes people when there's a tragedy,

0:34:22.480 --> 0:34:28.360
<v Speaker 2>like do a weird thing where they I think, unintentionally

0:34:29.480 --> 0:34:33.600
<v Speaker 2>like almost make it about how it relates to them,

0:34:34.080 --> 0:34:36.359
<v Speaker 2>Like oh, I interviewed him like that was, you know,

0:34:36.440 --> 0:34:39.800
<v Speaker 2>and so I kind of just sat out of it. Uh.

0:34:39.840 --> 0:34:41.399
<v Speaker 2>There were a lot of people though, that knew him

0:34:41.400 --> 0:34:43.880
<v Speaker 2>really well. He worked for Fox, he worked for ESPN,

0:34:44.520 --> 0:34:49.880
<v Speaker 2>and they were clearly deeply affected by his passing. And

0:34:50.960 --> 0:34:53.360
<v Speaker 2>he obviously was a great writer. And it's a loss

0:34:53.360 --> 0:34:57.040
<v Speaker 2>for everyone. And I, like I said, I don't want

0:34:57.120 --> 0:35:00.640
<v Speaker 2>I don't want to engage in any of the the speculation.

0:35:00.880 --> 0:35:07.200
<v Speaker 2>I know that his brother had some very concerning or

0:35:07.400 --> 0:35:10.840
<v Speaker 2>you know, damning concerns, I should say. I feel like

0:35:10.880 --> 0:35:14.160
<v Speaker 2>it goes without saying if any of those concerns are valid,

0:35:15.000 --> 0:35:22.000
<v Speaker 2>it's one of the greatest sports tragedies and crimes of

0:35:22.040 --> 0:35:26.600
<v Speaker 2>our lifetime. I I don't I guess that is me

0:35:26.680 --> 0:35:28.719
<v Speaker 2>engaging in the speculation. I don't mean to I have

0:35:28.760 --> 0:35:31.000
<v Speaker 2>no reason to believe though I don't know that anyone

0:35:31.040 --> 0:35:36.880
<v Speaker 2>has any reason to believe that what that those things happened. However,

0:35:37.000 --> 0:35:39.359
<v Speaker 2>so I I probably shouldn't have even said that part

0:35:39.360 --> 0:35:40.920
<v Speaker 2>of it. But it feels like a bit of the

0:35:40.960 --> 0:35:43.319
<v Speaker 2>elephant in the room when a direct family member of

0:35:43.360 --> 0:35:47.279
<v Speaker 2>his UH was saying that he did not believe that

0:35:47.680 --> 0:35:51.759
<v Speaker 2>Grant had just passed from being sick and So the

0:35:52.200 --> 0:35:54.960
<v Speaker 2>whatever it is, I hope his family it's you know,

0:35:55.360 --> 0:35:59.600
<v Speaker 2>comes to it, gets the truth, finds peace, gets the

0:35:59.760 --> 0:36:05.200
<v Speaker 2>full truth of the circumstances. And I would say one

0:36:05.239 --> 0:36:11.680
<v Speaker 2>other thing about Twitter in that moment, I it's okay

0:36:11.719 --> 0:36:15.120
<v Speaker 2>to sit things out other than if you want to

0:36:15.160 --> 0:36:18.880
<v Speaker 2>give condolences, and it's certainly not only okay, I would

0:36:18.880 --> 0:36:24.839
<v Speaker 2>say recommended to not recklessly speculate. I'm not talking about

0:36:24.880 --> 0:36:28.200
<v Speaker 2>his brother, I'm talking about the people, just other people

0:36:28.239 --> 0:36:32.920
<v Speaker 2>on Twitter recklessly speculate about something that none of us

0:36:32.960 --> 0:36:36.520
<v Speaker 2>have any way of knowing anything about, right, and just

0:36:36.640 --> 0:36:41.000
<v Speaker 2>adding to the noise of something that's totally unnecessary. Okay,

0:36:41.040 --> 0:36:42.719
<v Speaker 2>sorry to bring everyone down there, but I would have

0:36:42.719 --> 0:36:47.120
<v Speaker 2>felt odd talking about the World Cup without doing it

0:36:47.160 --> 0:36:50.400
<v Speaker 2>without at least acknowledging that. So, okay, Demonse, get us

0:36:50.400 --> 0:36:52.800
<v Speaker 2>back on track. Let's do a little feed for forecast.

0:36:53.120 --> 0:36:53.480
<v Speaker 2>All Right.

0:36:53.520 --> 0:36:56.920
<v Speaker 3>The quarterfinals came and went, and one thing is clear.

0:36:57.400 --> 0:37:00.560
<v Speaker 3>You need to stick to betting, congressional election and stay

0:37:00.560 --> 0:37:04.080
<v Speaker 3>out of football. Okay, Brazil got knocked out, and you

0:37:04.120 --> 0:37:06.719
<v Speaker 3>still ow mom a trip to Brazil. They're gonna show

0:37:06.760 --> 0:37:08.000
<v Speaker 3>a tweet, I'm assuming.

0:37:07.800 --> 0:37:10.960
<v Speaker 2>Oh okay, Yeah, So what's that about? All right? Well,

0:37:11.239 --> 0:37:13.959
<v Speaker 2>had I bet on Brazil to win the World Cup?

0:37:14.320 --> 0:37:14.480
<v Speaker 4>Yep?

0:37:14.640 --> 0:37:17.120
<v Speaker 2>And I had tweeted that if they win, I'm going

0:37:17.160 --> 0:37:20.680
<v Speaker 2>to use the money that I made betting on them

0:37:20.760 --> 0:37:24.279
<v Speaker 2>to go to Brazil. Your mom been tweeted, We're still

0:37:24.280 --> 0:37:26.719
<v Speaker 2>going to Brazil, getting itick right, you were gambling isn't

0:37:26.760 --> 0:37:30.719
<v Speaker 2>my problem and so so okay, so it looks like

0:37:30.719 --> 0:37:33.439
<v Speaker 2>we're still going to Brazil. It should be noted, though,

0:37:33.760 --> 0:37:37.040
<v Speaker 2>while you throw shade at me, yes, I was wrong

0:37:37.040 --> 0:37:43.919
<v Speaker 2>about Brazil winning it. I have been outstanding, super profitable

0:37:44.239 --> 0:37:47.759
<v Speaker 2>betting this World Cup. You were sitting with me Saturday

0:37:47.800 --> 0:37:52.120
<v Speaker 2>morning watching me win the France bet. I bet Morocco

0:37:52.400 --> 0:37:57.879
<v Speaker 2>live once. Once Morocco went up won nothing. They were

0:37:58.680 --> 0:38:04.319
<v Speaker 2>only like minus one fifteen, uh to win. To win

0:38:04.360 --> 0:38:06.000
<v Speaker 2>the World Cup, or you're not to win the World Cup?

0:38:06.000 --> 0:38:08.680
<v Speaker 2>Pardon me to win that match against Portugal in ninety minutes.

0:38:09.080 --> 0:38:11.880
<v Speaker 2>I bet France to win in ninety minutes at plus

0:38:11.960 --> 0:38:14.400
<v Speaker 2>one fifty. So I'm doing quite well gambling on the

0:38:14.400 --> 0:38:14.839
<v Speaker 2>World Cup.

0:38:14.880 --> 0:38:18.319
<v Speaker 3>But go ahead, all right, before you get into going

0:38:18.360 --> 0:38:21.000
<v Speaker 3>down on guitar, what's going down in guitar?

0:38:21.120 --> 0:38:23.560
<v Speaker 4>Sorry, let's talk about the star of the World Cup.

0:38:24.200 --> 0:38:28.120
<v Speaker 3>France's Kallian Embape Killian Imbape, that's his name, That's how

0:38:28.160 --> 0:38:33.399
<v Speaker 3>you say Kallian Killian Killian Kie Killian Andmbape is aletticism

0:38:33.480 --> 0:38:36.560
<v Speaker 3>and speed is unlike anything else. The Chiefs maybe the

0:38:36.600 --> 0:38:39.080
<v Speaker 3>highest scoring team in football, but there's still lacking a

0:38:39.080 --> 0:38:42.480
<v Speaker 3>true deep threat since Tyreek Hill. How many catches is

0:38:42.600 --> 0:38:45.840
<v Speaker 3>Mbope receiving if he if he signed with Kansas City.

0:38:45.920 --> 0:38:49.560
<v Speaker 2>Listen, I don't know. He is an unbelievable athlete and

0:38:49.600 --> 0:38:53.799
<v Speaker 2>we talked about last week. We talked about what Imbope

0:38:54.800 --> 0:38:59.359
<v Speaker 2>has if they win the World Cup. Nobody's won back

0:38:59.400 --> 0:39:02.759
<v Speaker 2>to back since Brazil and Pele. When Brazil did it,

0:39:02.800 --> 0:39:05.719
<v Speaker 2>they had a teenager be kind of the star and

0:39:05.840 --> 0:39:09.120
<v Speaker 2>score in the final. When France one four years ago,

0:39:09.360 --> 0:39:12.279
<v Speaker 2>they had a teenager score in the final. There's a

0:39:12.320 --> 0:39:16.680
<v Speaker 2>lot of similarities here, and that they're doing it without

0:39:16.719 --> 0:39:20.960
<v Speaker 2>Pogba and without Benzoma France is it's really special. But

0:39:21.840 --> 0:39:25.879
<v Speaker 2>what we have in this quarter final, in this semi

0:39:25.960 --> 0:39:30.520
<v Speaker 2>final is unbelievable. France Morocco. There's a long history between

0:39:30.560 --> 0:39:35.200
<v Speaker 2>France and Morocco and our book club book Little History

0:39:35.239 --> 0:39:39.319
<v Speaker 2>of the World has you know, Morocco once upon a

0:39:39.360 --> 0:39:43.799
<v Speaker 2>time went and about fourteen hundred years ago, fifteen hundred

0:39:43.840 --> 0:39:49.120
<v Speaker 2>years ago, went and conquered Portugal, then Spain, then into France.

0:39:50.200 --> 0:39:54.759
<v Speaker 2>In this World Cup, Morocco has beaten Spain, then Portugal.

0:39:54.920 --> 0:39:58.320
<v Speaker 2>Now they're trying to beat France. There's also some colonization history.

0:39:58.440 --> 0:40:05.600
<v Speaker 2>It's really fascinating. Morocco being here is phenomenal, utterly phenomenal.

0:40:05.920 --> 0:40:10.640
<v Speaker 2>The first African nation ever to make the semi final

0:40:10.680 --> 0:40:16.319
<v Speaker 2>of a World Cup. Okay, it's spectacular. On the now,

0:40:16.360 --> 0:40:19.000
<v Speaker 2>I think France is gonna be just to be totally candid.

0:40:19.480 --> 0:40:26.160
<v Speaker 2>On the other side, you have Argentina and Croatia. Argentina,

0:40:26.760 --> 0:40:30.120
<v Speaker 2>which made a final eight years ago, which is won

0:40:30.160 --> 0:40:36.240
<v Speaker 2>a couple when they had Maridona, and Croatia, which never

0:40:36.480 --> 0:40:40.960
<v Speaker 2>leads in any of these games yet keeps winning the games,

0:40:41.440 --> 0:40:46.919
<v Speaker 2>either an extra time or in penalty kicks. Croatia has

0:40:47.040 --> 0:40:52.000
<v Speaker 2>fewer people than Chicago, and they made the World Cup

0:40:52.040 --> 0:40:56.080
<v Speaker 2>final last year and then the semifinal this year. So

0:40:57.040 --> 0:41:01.040
<v Speaker 2>what would be Listen, I am rooting for an Argentina

0:41:01.440 --> 0:41:07.600
<v Speaker 2>France final. Okay, it would just be utterly spectacular to

0:41:07.680 --> 0:41:11.960
<v Speaker 2>see messi and in Bape, Messi trying to you know,

0:41:12.160 --> 0:41:14.040
<v Speaker 2>like I said, he made the final few years ago,

0:41:14.360 --> 0:41:18.480
<v Speaker 2>they lost in they losing penalties or extra time. They

0:41:18.520 --> 0:41:22.080
<v Speaker 2>lost an extra time I think to Germany. Messi didn't score.

0:41:23.239 --> 0:41:25.359
<v Speaker 2>I shouldn't say few years ago, two World Cups ago,

0:41:27.120 --> 0:41:31.040
<v Speaker 2>if Morocco were to do it. Though, here's the thing

0:41:31.080 --> 0:41:34.200
<v Speaker 2>about the World Cup. They've been playing it since nineteen thirty.

0:41:34.800 --> 0:41:37.080
<v Speaker 2>They skipped that there were no World Cups in the

0:41:37.080 --> 0:41:43.160
<v Speaker 2>forties thanks to World War Two. It hasn't been. There's

0:41:44.560 --> 0:41:48.600
<v Speaker 2>despite all of that, there have only been how many

0:41:48.680 --> 0:41:51.880
<v Speaker 2>is it eight nations? One, two, three, eight nations to

0:41:51.960 --> 0:41:56.239
<v Speaker 2>ever win it? Because here's and there's only been how

0:41:56.239 --> 0:42:00.680
<v Speaker 2>many nations fourteen nations, fifth, thirteen nations to ever even

0:42:00.760 --> 0:42:03.520
<v Speaker 2>make a final? Okay, so let me just go through

0:42:03.520 --> 0:42:05.200
<v Speaker 2>the history of it real quick. I had to pull

0:42:05.239 --> 0:42:08.240
<v Speaker 2>it up because this, unlike our list of NBA MVPs,

0:42:08.280 --> 0:42:13.200
<v Speaker 2>I don't have memorized. Brazil has won it five times,

0:42:14.640 --> 0:42:17.239
<v Speaker 2>came in second twice, so they've made seven finals. By

0:42:17.239 --> 0:42:20.560
<v Speaker 2>the way, it should be noted Brazil, what a total

0:42:20.640 --> 0:42:24.719
<v Speaker 2>disappointment for them since winning it in two that is,

0:42:25.520 --> 0:42:28.279
<v Speaker 2>in the World Cup since o two. They've been past

0:42:28.360 --> 0:42:34.560
<v Speaker 2>the quarterfinals only one time one so ninety four they win,

0:42:35.040 --> 0:42:37.799
<v Speaker 2>ninety eight they came in second, two thousand and two

0:42:37.920 --> 0:42:43.719
<v Speaker 2>they win. Since then six knocked out in the corners quarters,

0:42:43.760 --> 0:42:47.360
<v Speaker 2>pardon me, twenty ten knocked out in the quarters. Twenty

0:42:47.400 --> 0:42:51.600
<v Speaker 2>fourteen in Brazil make it to the Semis, lose seven

0:42:51.600 --> 0:42:56.360
<v Speaker 2>to one to Germany seven to one at home, twenty

0:42:56.640 --> 0:43:00.279
<v Speaker 2>eighteen knocked out in the quarters, and this year not doubt,

0:43:00.320 --> 0:43:02.600
<v Speaker 2>in the quarters in a game they had no business

0:43:02.680 --> 0:43:05.840
<v Speaker 2>losing up one to zero with minutes left, and find

0:43:05.880 --> 0:43:10.600
<v Speaker 2>to create a steal a loss from the jaws of victory.

0:43:11.719 --> 0:43:15.560
<v Speaker 2>But they've won five, runners up twice. Germany has won

0:43:15.760 --> 0:43:23.160
<v Speaker 2>four and been runners up four times. Germany's unbelievable run

0:43:23.520 --> 0:43:26.839
<v Speaker 2>was the seventies into the eighties. Germany one in seventy four,

0:43:27.760 --> 0:43:30.359
<v Speaker 2>runners up in eighty two and eighty six, and then

0:43:30.400 --> 0:43:34.520
<v Speaker 2>one in ninety. Italy, which didn't even qualify for the

0:43:34.560 --> 0:43:37.280
<v Speaker 2>World Cup this year, has won it four times. Kemlin

0:43:37.360 --> 0:43:42.759
<v Speaker 2>second twice. Argentina I mentioned to you with Maridana they

0:43:42.800 --> 0:43:46.279
<v Speaker 2>won it twice, runners up three times, including eight years ago.

0:43:46.760 --> 0:43:51.040
<v Speaker 2>Then there's France, which has won it twice, including a

0:43:51.080 --> 0:43:55.600
<v Speaker 2>twenty eighteen runner up, one other time and now, and

0:43:55.640 --> 0:43:59.280
<v Speaker 2>that's really it in modern us in modern World Cup history,

0:43:59.600 --> 0:44:03.479
<v Speaker 2>A died from Spain's victory in twenty ten. Spain also

0:44:03.520 --> 0:44:06.320
<v Speaker 2>won the Euros the four years surrounding it, it looked

0:44:06.320 --> 0:44:08.400
<v Speaker 2>like they were gonna be dynastic. They've done nothing in

0:44:08.440 --> 0:44:11.359
<v Speaker 2>the World Cup since then. England won it in sixty six,

0:44:11.440 --> 0:44:14.279
<v Speaker 2>hasn't been back to a final since. Uruguay won it

0:44:14.360 --> 0:44:18.280
<v Speaker 2>twice pre nineteen sixty haven't been back to a final

0:44:18.360 --> 0:44:22.720
<v Speaker 2>since the Netherlands has been to three finals, lost them all. Czechoslovakia,

0:44:22.760 --> 0:44:24.799
<v Speaker 2>which is in the country anymore, has been to two

0:44:24.840 --> 0:44:28.160
<v Speaker 2>finals in lost. Netherlands has been to three finals, lost

0:44:28.160 --> 0:44:31.040
<v Speaker 2>in mal I should say Czechoslovakia went to two finals

0:44:31.120 --> 0:44:33.799
<v Speaker 2>a thousand years ago, same with Hungary and Sweden. And

0:44:33.840 --> 0:44:40.280
<v Speaker 2>then there's Croatia. So Croatia would be just the ninth

0:44:40.400 --> 0:44:43.759
<v Speaker 2>team to ever win a World Cup. Morocco would be

0:44:43.920 --> 0:44:47.480
<v Speaker 2>just the fourteenth team to ever make a final, or

0:44:47.560 --> 0:44:49.319
<v Speaker 2>the ninth team to win the World Cup if they

0:44:49.400 --> 0:44:54.520
<v Speaker 2>finish it all, and then France with a victory, would

0:44:54.600 --> 0:44:59.359
<v Speaker 2>move behind only Italy, Germany and Brazil. France or Argentina,

0:44:59.400 --> 0:45:02.319
<v Speaker 2>by the way, would get to three, which would move

0:45:02.400 --> 0:45:06.240
<v Speaker 2>them solo possession of the fourth most World Cup titles

0:45:06.239 --> 0:45:09.080
<v Speaker 2>of all time. I hope we get France Argentine in

0:45:09.120 --> 0:45:11.280
<v Speaker 2>the final. There was a good eight minutes on World

0:45:11.280 --> 0:45:13.719
<v Speaker 2>Cup history. Now let's get back to football. What game

0:45:13.760 --> 0:45:14.440
<v Speaker 2>are we playing?

0:45:14.760 --> 0:45:17.560
<v Speaker 4>All right, we are playing all inner fold today.

0:45:17.719 --> 0:45:20.560
<v Speaker 3>Okay, everybody told you to sell your Baker's stock, but

0:45:20.640 --> 0:45:21.720
<v Speaker 3>you held on strong.

0:45:21.840 --> 0:45:23.120
<v Speaker 4>Now business is boomy.

0:45:23.400 --> 0:45:27.799
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, Baker will be a franchise quarterback the game.

0:45:31.800 --> 0:45:32.640
<v Speaker 2>I'm not ready to.

0:45:32.600 --> 0:45:33.239
<v Speaker 4>Go that far.

0:45:34.520 --> 0:45:40.200
<v Speaker 2>However, he gave himself a real shot at being the

0:45:40.320 --> 0:45:46.480
<v Speaker 2>quarterback in Los Angeles long term. Yeah, nobody knows what

0:45:47.360 --> 0:45:51.520
<v Speaker 2>the future roads for Stafford with a scary injury spinal

0:45:51.560 --> 0:45:55.520
<v Speaker 2>cord concern. It also, I feel a little awkward talking

0:45:55.520 --> 0:45:57.880
<v Speaker 2>about this, but I think it's worth noting his wife

0:45:57.920 --> 0:46:01.720
<v Speaker 2>four years ago was having aches, went to the doctor,

0:46:02.040 --> 0:46:05.000
<v Speaker 2>they found out she had a brain tumor. Now it

0:46:05.120 --> 0:46:08.960
<v Speaker 2>was benign. They did twelve hour surgery and she's fine.

0:46:10.520 --> 0:46:14.040
<v Speaker 2>But that's like, I don't want to I don't want

0:46:14.040 --> 0:46:16.040
<v Speaker 2>to call that a brush with death, but that is

0:46:16.080 --> 0:46:19.000
<v Speaker 2>something that level sets your family. It's like, oh, my god,

0:46:19.400 --> 0:46:21.600
<v Speaker 2>you have a brain tumor. You're gonna have to have

0:46:21.680 --> 0:46:24.959
<v Speaker 2>this surgery any You know it all obvious and that

0:46:25.800 --> 0:46:29.520
<v Speaker 2>plus now Stafford is a spinal cord condition, call it.

0:46:29.600 --> 0:46:32.080
<v Speaker 2>That's made a bunch of money, played for a long time,

0:46:32.120 --> 0:46:34.719
<v Speaker 2>won a Super Bowl. So I'm not certain how much

0:46:34.719 --> 0:46:38.960
<v Speaker 2>longer Stafford's going to play. So I think Baker's in

0:46:39.000 --> 0:46:41.399
<v Speaker 2>a good spot. And if you can play well over

0:46:41.440 --> 0:46:44.160
<v Speaker 2>this last month with this terrible Rams team, even if

0:46:44.160 --> 0:46:47.040
<v Speaker 2>it's not there, he has a decent chance of being

0:46:47.120 --> 0:46:50.040
<v Speaker 2>back in the mix for a starting quarterback job. But

0:46:50.120 --> 0:46:52.719
<v Speaker 2>I'm neither all in norfolding. I'm disobeying the rules of

0:46:52.800 --> 0:46:53.080
<v Speaker 2>the game.

0:46:53.120 --> 0:46:55.399
<v Speaker 3>Next though, before I start this next one, guys, don't

0:46:55.400 --> 0:46:57.839
<v Speaker 3>forget to answer or put questions in the chat for

0:46:57.880 --> 0:46:58.520
<v Speaker 3>after the break.

0:46:58.719 --> 0:47:01.359
<v Speaker 2>Oh yeah, absolutely add some questions to the chat. We'll

0:47:01.400 --> 0:47:02.000
<v Speaker 2>do those in the sea.

0:47:04.960 --> 0:47:08.000
<v Speaker 3>So Bubblo got lucky at home versus the Jests this week,

0:47:08.040 --> 0:47:10.759
<v Speaker 3>walking away with an eight point win. They hold on

0:47:10.800 --> 0:47:13.319
<v Speaker 3>to the one seed for now, but they have to

0:47:13.360 --> 0:47:17.080
<v Speaker 3>beat panicking after Josh Allen's seventh straight bad game. I

0:47:17.120 --> 0:47:19.440
<v Speaker 3>know you're happy about this, all in her fold. The

0:47:19.480 --> 0:47:21.200
<v Speaker 3>bills aren't easy out in the playoffs.

0:47:21.280 --> 0:47:24.120
<v Speaker 2>I'm gonna fold on that they're not an easy out.

0:47:24.320 --> 0:47:30.600
<v Speaker 2>But can everyone please acknowledge I was right about Josh Allen? Please?

0:47:30.880 --> 0:47:33.200
<v Speaker 2>What do you throw for one hundred and fifty yards yesterday?

0:47:33.880 --> 0:47:36.239
<v Speaker 2>Now that Bill's Devens looked awesome and kicked the hell

0:47:36.280 --> 0:47:38.319
<v Speaker 2>out of poor Mike White. He went out of that

0:47:38.360 --> 0:47:40.680
<v Speaker 2>game multiple times with an injury. One of the times

0:47:40.760 --> 0:47:42.640
<v Speaker 2>right when he went out, they stupidly called it Joe

0:47:42.719 --> 0:47:46.880
<v Speaker 2>Flacco pass he fumbles. The Bills were incredibly did you throw?

0:47:47.280 --> 0:47:48.600
<v Speaker 2>I don't think he threw a pick. I think it

0:47:48.600 --> 0:47:51.000
<v Speaker 2>was a fumble. The I don't think because flacouldn't in

0:47:51.080 --> 0:47:53.680
<v Speaker 2>long enough throw a pick. Maybe I'm wrong, producers and drinking,

0:47:53.760 --> 0:47:56.279
<v Speaker 2>I'm wrong, I doubt I am. I'm rarely really wrong

0:47:56.320 --> 0:47:59.360
<v Speaker 2>about anything. I think it was a fumble. Uh. But

0:48:01.800 --> 0:48:07.400
<v Speaker 2>for the second straight year, forget m VP. Josh Allen

0:48:07.480 --> 0:48:12.160
<v Speaker 2>is not a Pro Bowl right now. If we were

0:48:12.280 --> 0:48:18.000
<v Speaker 2>listing Pro Bowl quarterbacks in the a f C, it

0:48:18.040 --> 0:48:23.480
<v Speaker 2>would go Mahomes, then Borrow, then in my opinion, Herbert,

0:48:24.640 --> 0:48:29.280
<v Speaker 2>then Tua and then Josh Allen and you only get three.

0:48:30.280 --> 0:48:31.000
<v Speaker 2>That's five.

0:48:31.880 --> 0:48:35.280
<v Speaker 4>So wait, what what was that? List that you just gave.

0:48:35.400 --> 0:48:41.239
<v Speaker 2>Mahomes, then Burrow, then Justin Herbert Pro Bowl. It's like

0:48:41.280 --> 0:48:42.719
<v Speaker 2>all Star team. It's like all start.

0:48:43.239 --> 0:48:44.400
<v Speaker 4>So Jalen hurts.

0:48:44.400 --> 0:48:47.920
<v Speaker 2>No a f C. Oh no, sorry, do it by

0:48:47.960 --> 0:48:54.239
<v Speaker 2>conference like Eastern Conference All Stars. Yeah, so the the

0:48:54.360 --> 0:48:56.520
<v Speaker 2>n f C is a trickier one because it's Jalen.

0:48:56.560 --> 0:48:58.840
<v Speaker 2>And then it's like, who are we putting? You know

0:48:58.880 --> 0:49:00.440
<v Speaker 2>what I mean? If you were in the n'd be

0:49:00.480 --> 0:49:04.920
<v Speaker 2>a pro bowler. Yeah, but he's not. And so the

0:49:05.719 --> 0:49:09.359
<v Speaker 2>he last year wasn't a pro bowler either, and Pro

0:49:09.480 --> 0:49:12.600
<v Speaker 2>Bowls are not everything, but it is my little snapshot

0:49:12.600 --> 0:49:15.719
<v Speaker 2>of how good are you? And I tried. Everyone's like, oh,

0:49:15.760 --> 0:49:19.239
<v Speaker 2>you're scared of Justin. It's been the let He hasn't

0:49:19.280 --> 0:49:23.319
<v Speaker 2>been awesome since the Chiefs game or the first half

0:49:23.400 --> 0:49:26.359
<v Speaker 2>of the Packers game the week after that really was it?

0:49:26.600 --> 0:49:29.600
<v Speaker 2>And then they scored twenty points through for one hundred

0:49:29.640 --> 0:49:34.960
<v Speaker 2>fifty yards, like enough but not unfolding. They're not an

0:49:35.000 --> 0:49:35.480
<v Speaker 2>easy out.

0:49:35.520 --> 0:49:37.600
<v Speaker 4>Would you like the Chiefs to draw them in the playoffs?

0:49:37.880 --> 0:49:40.839
<v Speaker 2>I'd rather play them in the Bengals Yeah, of course,

0:49:40.880 --> 0:49:43.600
<v Speaker 2>tell you that much. I might rather play them than

0:49:43.640 --> 0:49:46.600
<v Speaker 2>the Chargers even though the Chiefs have beaten the Chargers.

0:49:46.680 --> 0:49:49.000
<v Speaker 2>So hard to beat a team three times, and all

0:49:49.040 --> 0:49:50.640
<v Speaker 2>those games have been close, you know what I mean,

0:49:50.760 --> 0:49:54.520
<v Speaker 2>Like the so no, they're not an easy out, but

0:49:56.120 --> 0:50:00.520
<v Speaker 2>they were wildly over rate. Josh Allen was wildly over rated,

0:50:00.560 --> 0:50:03.919
<v Speaker 2>and I told you guys that he's not gonna get

0:50:05.080 --> 0:50:08.040
<v Speaker 2>They've now expanded MVP voting to where you vote for

0:50:08.120 --> 0:50:12.080
<v Speaker 2>five guys. He's not on a ballot right now.

0:50:12.840 --> 0:50:13.799
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, he's not.

0:50:14.640 --> 0:50:17.120
<v Speaker 2>Be mahomes and hurts at the top of everyone's ballot,

0:50:17.719 --> 0:50:23.279
<v Speaker 2>right Burrow probably third, and then maybe people throw in

0:50:23.800 --> 0:50:27.040
<v Speaker 2>like Micah Parsons, you know, a defensive player. Maybe somebody

0:50:27.080 --> 0:50:29.839
<v Speaker 2>gives Geno Gino Boys terrible yes Day a fifth place vote.

0:50:29.840 --> 0:50:32.160
<v Speaker 2>Will see all they finished. He's not gonna show up.

0:50:32.840 --> 0:50:35.920
<v Speaker 2>See how what if the Chargers went out Herbert shows up?

0:50:35.960 --> 0:50:40.000
<v Speaker 2>Who knows? But I told you guys about Josh Allen. Next,

0:50:40.400 --> 0:50:40.920
<v Speaker 2>all right.

0:50:40.800 --> 0:50:44.680
<v Speaker 3>The Cowboys entered Sunday as the biggest favorite all season

0:50:44.719 --> 0:50:48.400
<v Speaker 3>against the one win Texans. It took a last minute

0:50:48.400 --> 0:50:51.160
<v Speaker 3>touchdowns for America's team to put it. Put off the comeback,

0:50:51.280 --> 0:50:52.960
<v Speaker 3>pull off, the comeback, sorry.

0:50:52.800 --> 0:50:53.680
<v Speaker 4>All in their fold.

0:50:53.760 --> 0:50:57.040
<v Speaker 3>This proves that the Cowboys need O'Dell Beckham to compete

0:50:57.040 --> 0:50:57.680
<v Speaker 3>in the playoffs.

0:50:57.760 --> 0:51:00.000
<v Speaker 4>No big pat on the back to your boy though

0:51:00.200 --> 0:51:00.799
<v Speaker 4>for what good?

0:51:01.160 --> 0:51:02.880
<v Speaker 2>Oh yeah, because you had the Texans.

0:51:02.960 --> 0:51:04.799
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, that was like my that should have been my

0:51:04.920 --> 0:51:05.520
<v Speaker 4>lock of the week.

0:51:05.560 --> 0:51:08.520
<v Speaker 2>Honestly, that should have you know what, check real quick

0:51:09.360 --> 0:51:12.200
<v Speaker 2>in the doc. I want to know because I had

0:51:12.200 --> 0:51:14.799
<v Speaker 2>a winning week. It wasn't as great as it could

0:51:14.800 --> 0:51:17.759
<v Speaker 2>have been, but I had a winning week. Demons, it

0:51:17.840 --> 0:51:21.880
<v Speaker 2>was plus sixteen and a half. That's a winner. Minnesota

0:51:21.920 --> 0:51:26.200
<v Speaker 2>minus two and a half, that's a loser. Tennessee minus four,

0:51:26.760 --> 0:51:31.759
<v Speaker 2>that's a loser. Denver plus nine and a half. That

0:51:31.920 --> 0:51:35.600
<v Speaker 2>was a winner. But you went against that in real like,

0:51:35.640 --> 0:51:36.480
<v Speaker 2>in real time.

0:51:37.480 --> 0:51:37.960
<v Speaker 4>What do you mean?

0:51:38.800 --> 0:51:41.880
<v Speaker 2>That doesn't make it. I'm so confused. You bet so

0:51:41.960 --> 0:51:45.839
<v Speaker 2>you didn't you bet the Chiefs in real life? Oh?

0:51:46.160 --> 0:51:49.720
<v Speaker 2>I bet money line? Okay, So two and two. That's terrible.

0:51:50.239 --> 0:51:52.720
<v Speaker 2>All right. Now to the Cowboys, whether they need Odell

0:51:52.800 --> 0:51:57.840
<v Speaker 2>or not, he's obviously not playing this year like that,

0:51:58.040 --> 0:51:59.520
<v Speaker 2>He's nobody.

0:51:59.320 --> 0:52:00.600
<v Speaker 4>Is available come playoff time.

0:52:00.760 --> 0:52:02.879
<v Speaker 2>I don't think so. I don't think so. I don't

0:52:02.920 --> 0:52:05.520
<v Speaker 2>think he's playing for anyone this year. The Cowboys issue

0:52:05.600 --> 0:52:09.240
<v Speaker 2>was not. They need another receiver. They took that game lightly,

0:52:10.440 --> 0:52:15.080
<v Speaker 2>dack Threw made some terrible decisions and they still escaped

0:52:15.120 --> 0:52:15.440
<v Speaker 2>with a win.

0:52:15.760 --> 0:52:18.840
<v Speaker 4>And Millis was dropping some dimes in there. Who Millis

0:52:18.920 --> 0:52:20.799
<v Speaker 4>or mill whatever, Davis Mills.

0:52:22.840 --> 0:52:27.360
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, listen, I'm not. I'm not. The Cowboys overlooked the Texans.

0:52:27.560 --> 0:52:29.520
<v Speaker 2>If they had lost, it would have been devastating. But

0:52:29.560 --> 0:52:31.799
<v Speaker 2>they didn't lose. I'm not that worried about it, all right.

0:52:31.840 --> 0:52:34.640
<v Speaker 3>Next, the prince that was promised once again had the

0:52:34.680 --> 0:52:37.840
<v Speaker 3>best game of his career against the division leading Titans.

0:52:38.280 --> 0:52:41.680
<v Speaker 3>Too bad, you lost your confidence in them all interfold.

0:52:41.800 --> 0:52:43.960
<v Speaker 4>It's time to ban Jack's betting bands.

0:52:44.080 --> 0:52:48.120
<v Speaker 2>I'm really mad at the proofer. They have cost me

0:52:48.400 --> 0:52:54.320
<v Speaker 2>so much in on the Trevor Lawrence stuff, so much.

0:52:54.880 --> 0:52:57.759
<v Speaker 2>They because what they've done is they let you go.

0:52:57.840 --> 0:53:00.920
<v Speaker 2>They haven't they they let me better them, and they

0:53:00.960 --> 0:53:04.560
<v Speaker 2>lose all these games. Then they banned me right when

0:53:04.600 --> 0:53:08.560
<v Speaker 2>they start covering. They've really just screwed me so far

0:53:08.600 --> 0:53:11.120
<v Speaker 2>this year when it comes to betting on the Jacks.

0:53:11.760 --> 0:53:17.560
<v Speaker 2>With that said, we just mentioned the Cowboys. Okay, very

0:53:17.600 --> 0:53:23.880
<v Speaker 2>intriguing game this weekend Cowboys at Jacks. Okay, now, I

0:53:23.960 --> 0:53:25.880
<v Speaker 2>don't think the Jags are gonna win that game. What

0:53:25.920 --> 0:53:28.960
<v Speaker 2>do you think the line is in that Demanse Cowboys

0:53:29.120 --> 0:53:30.520
<v Speaker 2>at the Jacks.

0:53:32.600 --> 0:53:35.600
<v Speaker 4>Let's call it Cowboys plus.

0:53:35.239 --> 0:53:38.480
<v Speaker 3>Three and a half given this recent performance against the Texans.

0:53:38.640 --> 0:53:44.440
<v Speaker 3>Favored by three Cowboys minus three Cowboys minus five.

0:53:46.080 --> 0:53:53.319
<v Speaker 2>The Titans play the Chargers this weekend. Okay, if, and

0:53:53.360 --> 0:53:59.680
<v Speaker 2>it's a big if, but if the Jaguars are able

0:53:59.719 --> 0:54:04.560
<v Speaker 2>to beat the Cowboys, they'd still have the Texans left

0:54:04.680 --> 0:54:07.879
<v Speaker 2>and they get the Titans the final week of the year.

0:54:08.719 --> 0:54:11.880
<v Speaker 2>It's a two game separation between the two. If the

0:54:12.040 --> 0:54:15.280
<v Speaker 2>Jags were to beat the Titans in week eighteen, okay,

0:54:15.640 --> 0:54:18.359
<v Speaker 2>they would hold the tiebreaker by virtue of sweeping them

0:54:18.360 --> 0:54:21.160
<v Speaker 2>in the division. I'm not saying the Jags are alive.

0:54:21.760 --> 0:54:25.239
<v Speaker 2>I'm simply saying they are not quite totally dead. And

0:54:25.280 --> 0:54:28.080
<v Speaker 2>you know what is definitely not totally dead. Let me

0:54:28.160 --> 0:54:31.560
<v Speaker 2>find it. Where is this from before the season? NFL

0:54:31.640 --> 0:54:36.520
<v Speaker 2>preseason Jags over six and a half, one of my

0:54:36.680 --> 0:54:40.640
<v Speaker 2>strong overs. How are we looking? Oh? Five and eight,

0:54:41.440 --> 0:54:42.800
<v Speaker 2>only need two more wins.

0:54:42.880 --> 0:54:44.799
<v Speaker 4>You think Trevor Lawren's gonna be able to finally beat

0:54:44.800 --> 0:54:47.360
<v Speaker 4>the Texans? Yeah?

0:54:47.480 --> 0:54:49.280
<v Speaker 2>I do think it's gonna be able to beat the Texans.

0:54:49.360 --> 0:54:50.960
<v Speaker 4>I think the game is gonna be really interesting.

0:54:51.360 --> 0:54:54.680
<v Speaker 2>Let's see how my preseason bets are looking real quick.

0:54:55.000 --> 0:54:58.360
<v Speaker 2>Baltimore over ten and a half looking great. They're at nine.

0:54:59.160 --> 0:55:01.160
<v Speaker 2>Indy over nine one and a half. That's a loss.

0:55:01.680 --> 0:55:02.680
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, it's a loss.

0:55:03.120 --> 0:55:06.840
<v Speaker 2>Jacksonville over six and a half. Needn't go two and

0:55:06.880 --> 0:55:09.560
<v Speaker 2>two down the stretch, we'll see, but still alive, right,

0:55:10.120 --> 0:55:12.480
<v Speaker 2>Kansas City over ten and a half, that's a lot.

0:55:13.440 --> 0:55:16.520
<v Speaker 2>New England under eight and a half, gonna come down

0:55:16.560 --> 0:55:19.520
<v Speaker 2>to the wire. They're six and six, the very tough

0:55:19.560 --> 0:55:22.680
<v Speaker 2>schedule at the end of the year. Giants under seven

0:55:22.719 --> 0:55:24.920
<v Speaker 2>and a half, they would have to lose out. The

0:55:25.000 --> 0:55:28.719
<v Speaker 2>fact though, that that is back alive by the by

0:55:28.800 --> 0:55:32.400
<v Speaker 2>the littlest of bits, because the tie doesn't count as

0:55:32.400 --> 0:55:34.000
<v Speaker 2>half a win when it comes to this. It's just

0:55:34.080 --> 0:55:35.799
<v Speaker 2>so they would have to lose out. But that one's

0:55:35.840 --> 0:55:39.760
<v Speaker 2>gonna lose. San Francisco over nine and a half, that's

0:55:40.360 --> 0:55:43.200
<v Speaker 2>they need one more win. And Tampa under eleven and

0:55:43.239 --> 0:55:49.040
<v Speaker 2>a half already locked in. How about that? How about that? Also,

0:55:49.600 --> 0:55:53.840
<v Speaker 2>let's keep looking at this real quick. The Kansas City,

0:55:53.880 --> 0:55:57.920
<v Speaker 2>Baltimore Indie, San Francisco parlay to'll all make the playoffs

0:55:57.960 --> 0:56:01.040
<v Speaker 2>A plus four forty. That's a loser because of Indy.

0:56:01.360 --> 0:56:06.319
<v Speaker 2>Indy's not getting there. Seattle, the Jets, Atlanta, and New

0:56:06.360 --> 0:56:11.120
<v Speaker 2>England all to miss the playoffs. Alive again. It's gonna

0:56:11.160 --> 0:56:13.279
<v Speaker 2>be hard, but it is alive again. But that one's

0:56:13.280 --> 0:56:17.440
<v Speaker 2>not looking great. Cleveland missing the playoffs minus one seventy locked,

0:56:17.840 --> 0:56:22.440
<v Speaker 2>Denver missing the playoffs plus one twenty locked locked locked ye,

0:56:23.000 --> 0:56:26.279
<v Speaker 2>New England missing the playoffs. We'll see. It's gonna come

0:56:26.320 --> 0:56:30.440
<v Speaker 2>down to the wire division winners. I'm gonna lose that

0:56:30.560 --> 0:56:34.239
<v Speaker 2>parlay I did Buffalo, Indye, Kansas City, Indy. That was

0:56:34.280 --> 0:56:37.640
<v Speaker 2>way too is on Indy. Indian screwed me on three

0:56:37.680 --> 0:56:42.120
<v Speaker 2>different bets. They're over there, make the playoffs and their

0:56:42.120 --> 0:56:45.080
<v Speaker 2>division winners. So that's three of my bets. And then

0:56:45.120 --> 0:56:47.879
<v Speaker 2>the Casey San Francisco super Bowl at fifty to one

0:56:48.440 --> 0:56:49.960
<v Speaker 2>my preseason wagers.

0:56:50.280 --> 0:56:53.239
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, that one's looking could look thirty good right now.

0:56:53.560 --> 0:56:57.520
<v Speaker 2>Fifty to one. Denver missing the playoffs. That was plus

0:56:57.600 --> 0:57:01.160
<v Speaker 2>money plus one twenty on Denver missing the playoffs all right.

0:57:01.239 --> 0:57:05.239
<v Speaker 3>Last one, USC quarterback Caleb Williams took home of the

0:57:05.280 --> 0:57:08.920
<v Speaker 3>Heisman Trophy over the weekend. It has one more year

0:57:08.960 --> 0:57:12.160
<v Speaker 3>of eligibility, but his talent is obviously out of this world.

0:57:12.200 --> 0:57:14.680
<v Speaker 3>Should team start tanking for him next season?

0:57:15.280 --> 0:57:16.040
<v Speaker 4>All in her fold.

0:57:16.680 --> 0:57:20.040
<v Speaker 3>Caleb Williams is the Victor Wimby of the twenty twenty

0:57:20.080 --> 0:57:20.920
<v Speaker 3>four NFL dress.

0:57:20.920 --> 0:57:24.520
<v Speaker 2>I'm gonna fold on that because there are no the NFL.

0:57:24.600 --> 0:57:28.160
<v Speaker 2>Football doesn't work like basketball, where it's just like transcendent prospect,

0:57:28.320 --> 0:57:32.160
<v Speaker 2>can't miss, absolutely won't miss, never misses. That doesn't quite

0:57:32.200 --> 0:57:35.479
<v Speaker 2>exist in the NFL. Even the can't miss guys sometimes miss.

0:57:35.880 --> 0:57:38.280
<v Speaker 2>But I like Caleb Williams a lot. He's the first

0:57:38.320 --> 0:57:41.560
<v Speaker 2>college quarterback to remind me of Mahomes since Mahomes, So

0:57:41.640 --> 0:57:43.440
<v Speaker 2>I do like him a lot. So I'm folding on

0:57:43.520 --> 0:57:46.600
<v Speaker 2>him being Wimby, But he might be the closest thing

0:57:46.600 --> 0:57:49.760
<v Speaker 2>in the NFL to a Wimby. All right, answer listener

0:57:49.840 --> 0:57:58.680
<v Speaker 2>questions Next What's right? All Right? Welcome back What's Right

0:57:58.680 --> 0:58:01.520
<v Speaker 2>with Nick Wright? Episode one of six. We are now

0:58:01.760 --> 0:58:06.200
<v Speaker 2>answering questions from our live YouTube audience. Demons, go ahead.

0:58:07.160 --> 0:58:10.479
<v Speaker 3>Joe says the MVP race is tightening. Hurts has eight

0:58:10.520 --> 0:58:13.480
<v Speaker 3>more rushing touchdowns than Mahomes. So don't say Mahomes has

0:58:13.520 --> 0:58:17.840
<v Speaker 3>eleven more passing touchdowns. Mahomes also has six more turnovers.

0:58:18.160 --> 0:58:20.600
<v Speaker 3>This is all that matters.

0:58:20.920 --> 0:58:24.640
<v Speaker 4>All, this all matters. Sorry, don't be such a homer, nick.

0:58:25.240 --> 0:58:29.640
<v Speaker 2>Guys, I'm not listening. I said that obviously Hurts as

0:58:29.680 --> 0:58:34.920
<v Speaker 2>better rushing numbers. Now, do I value quarterback rushing touchdowns

0:58:34.920 --> 0:58:36.880
<v Speaker 2>as much as I value quarterback passing touchdowns?

0:58:36.920 --> 0:58:37.240
<v Speaker 4>I don't.

0:58:37.920 --> 0:58:39.840
<v Speaker 2>I'm just gonna tell you, flat Lee, I don't do.

0:58:40.000 --> 0:58:42.960
<v Speaker 2>I think that a lot of those, not all of them,

0:58:43.000 --> 0:58:45.520
<v Speaker 2>but a lot of those Hurts rushing touchdowns could easily

0:58:45.560 --> 0:58:48.400
<v Speaker 2>have been Miles Sanders or a different running back. They

0:58:48.400 --> 0:58:50.200
<v Speaker 2>hand the ball off to it the goal line. Sure,

0:58:50.480 --> 0:58:54.440
<v Speaker 2>but listen. Of course, the MVP race is tightening. But

0:58:54.560 --> 0:58:57.760
<v Speaker 2>I reject the premise that Hurts us pulled into the lead.

0:58:57.880 --> 0:59:02.480
<v Speaker 2>Now Vegas says he has, but I the biggest Hurts fans.

0:59:02.800 --> 0:59:04.240
<v Speaker 2>I will make the point earlier.

0:59:04.440 --> 0:59:04.840
<v Speaker 4>I will.

0:59:05.240 --> 0:59:07.800
<v Speaker 2>Mahomes is going to throw for the most yards of

0:59:07.800 --> 0:59:10.840
<v Speaker 2>anyone in football, and add Hurts rushing yards to his

0:59:11.400 --> 0:59:15.120
<v Speaker 2>passing yards, put them, combine them, and Mahomes still has

0:59:15.160 --> 0:59:19.520
<v Speaker 2>more the total yards. But the Mahome's gonna throw for

0:59:19.520 --> 0:59:21.840
<v Speaker 2>the most touchdowns of football by a mile. Ad Hurts

0:59:21.920 --> 0:59:25.120
<v Speaker 2>rushing touchdowns, Mahomes is still gonna have more total touchdowns

0:59:25.160 --> 0:59:27.760
<v Speaker 2>than him by a mile. Does anyone think Hurts is

0:59:27.760 --> 0:59:28.640
<v Speaker 2>better than Mahomes?

0:59:28.880 --> 0:59:29.080
<v Speaker 4>No?

0:59:29.960 --> 0:59:34.960
<v Speaker 2>Does anyone think Mahomes has a better team. No, Hurts

0:59:35.000 --> 0:59:37.600
<v Speaker 2>has the better offensive line, the better running backs, the

0:59:37.600 --> 0:59:40.960
<v Speaker 2>better wide receivers, the far better defense. So don't give

0:59:41.000 --> 0:59:43.080
<v Speaker 2>me the eleven and one versus or twelve and one

0:59:43.160 --> 0:59:46.880
<v Speaker 2>versus ten and three. Don't give me that. Does anybody

0:59:46.960 --> 0:59:53.880
<v Speaker 2>think this moment that the Chiefs would swap Mahomes for Hurts?

0:59:54.720 --> 0:59:58.800
<v Speaker 2>Not in a million years would the Eagles swap Hurts

0:59:58.800 --> 1:00:02.040
<v Speaker 2>for Mahomes in a second? Now? Does that make him

1:00:02.040 --> 1:00:05.760
<v Speaker 2>the MVP? No? But that, plus the fact the team

1:00:05.880 --> 1:00:08.280
<v Speaker 2>is tied for the best record in the conference, had

1:00:08.400 --> 1:00:10.440
<v Speaker 2>tied for the second best record in the whole sport.

1:00:10.640 --> 1:00:13.080
<v Speaker 2>It's not like the Chiefs are eight eight and five.

1:00:13.760 --> 1:00:17.960
<v Speaker 2>They're ten and three, and Mahomes has been utterly sensational.

1:00:18.240 --> 1:00:20.360
<v Speaker 2>So let's all pump the brakes just a bit, all right?

1:00:20.360 --> 1:00:22.960
<v Speaker 3>Next, All right, Grand minister, ask, is it time to

1:00:23.040 --> 1:00:23.920
<v Speaker 3>keep that safe?

1:00:24.160 --> 1:00:24.360
<v Speaker 2>Yeah?

1:00:24.520 --> 1:00:27.320
<v Speaker 3>Is it time to keep that same energy, and finally

1:00:27.360 --> 1:00:29.480
<v Speaker 3>admit that the Titans are good with their own with

1:00:29.560 --> 1:00:31.919
<v Speaker 3>the only wins that aren't good, with only wins coming

1:00:31.920 --> 1:00:34.440
<v Speaker 3>against teams who or at least or last or a second.

1:00:35.520 --> 1:00:37.240
<v Speaker 3>You want to start this one over, chev Yeah, Grand

1:00:37.280 --> 1:00:40.080
<v Speaker 3>minister asks, is it time to keep that? Saying it's

1:00:40.080 --> 1:00:42.440
<v Speaker 3>about time to keep that, save energy, and finally admit

1:00:42.680 --> 1:00:45.160
<v Speaker 3>that the Titans aren't good with their only wins coming

1:00:45.200 --> 1:00:48.080
<v Speaker 3>against teams who are last or second in their division,

1:00:48.400 --> 1:00:49.040
<v Speaker 3>second to.

1:00:49.000 --> 1:00:50.880
<v Speaker 2>Last in their division. We're not going to do this

1:00:50.960 --> 1:00:55.160
<v Speaker 2>a third time. But I got you, buddy, I listen. Uh,

1:00:55.960 --> 1:01:03.960
<v Speaker 2>I don't think the Titans this weekend are that good.

1:01:04.800 --> 1:01:08.640
<v Speaker 2>I do think that they have an excellent coach, and

1:01:08.680 --> 1:01:10.920
<v Speaker 2>I do I hadn't thought about what he said. So

1:01:11.040 --> 1:01:15.720
<v Speaker 2>let's look at the Titans victories. The Titans beat the Raiders,

1:01:16.840 --> 1:01:21.120
<v Speaker 2>they beat the Colts. They beat the Commanders. Now, that's

1:01:21.160 --> 1:01:23.400
<v Speaker 2>a little unfair to call the Commander's second to last

1:01:23.400 --> 1:01:25.680
<v Speaker 2>in their division. They are, but the Commanders have proven

1:01:25.680 --> 1:01:27.919
<v Speaker 2>to be a good team or a good ish team.

1:01:28.160 --> 1:01:30.960
<v Speaker 2>They beat the Colts again. They beat the Texans, they

1:01:31.000 --> 1:01:33.640
<v Speaker 2>beat the Broncos, they beat the Packers, or these are

1:01:33.680 --> 1:01:37.120
<v Speaker 2>fair points say no, no, no, those are fair points. But

1:01:37.280 --> 1:01:41.160
<v Speaker 2>when he says keep the same energy, who hears ever

1:01:42.560 --> 1:01:45.760
<v Speaker 2>capped for the Texans Titans? No, I haven't thought the

1:01:45.800 --> 1:01:48.600
<v Speaker 2>Titans are great. I thought the Colts would win that division.

1:01:48.640 --> 1:01:55.000
<v Speaker 2>They haven't. Could the Titans fall apart? Chargers, Texans, Cowboys, Jags?

1:01:55.760 --> 1:02:01.640
<v Speaker 2>I mean, here's the thing on the Texans. They're gonna

1:02:01.640 --> 1:02:07.600
<v Speaker 2>win one game, like one more game, so they've got

1:02:07.720 --> 1:02:14.600
<v Speaker 2>the Chiefs, then Titans, Jags, Colls. They're gonna upset one

1:02:14.640 --> 1:02:17.800
<v Speaker 2>of those teams and they'll still get the number one

1:02:17.840 --> 1:02:21.920
<v Speaker 2>pick because everyone else in football has at least three wins.

1:02:22.680 --> 1:02:26.520
<v Speaker 2>So if the Titans could fall all the way out

1:02:26.560 --> 1:02:29.320
<v Speaker 2>of it, I don't expect them to, but they could.

1:02:29.320 --> 1:02:30.800
<v Speaker 2>But I never thought they were great. All right?

1:02:30.880 --> 1:02:35.200
<v Speaker 3>Next, all right, Trey Keasey said, Hey, Nigga Devantze love

1:02:35.320 --> 1:02:38.560
<v Speaker 3>the show. Win is Nick's disc golf car Disc Golf

1:02:38.560 --> 1:02:41.160
<v Speaker 3>Corner coming? And do the Patriots have a chance of

1:02:41.200 --> 1:02:44.200
<v Speaker 3>making the final wildcard spart Spot Thanks.

1:02:43.880 --> 1:02:47.000
<v Speaker 2>They definitely have a chance. They have to win tonight

1:02:48.080 --> 1:02:50.800
<v Speaker 2>and what they and then they have the Raiders. Their

1:02:50.920 --> 1:02:54.880
<v Speaker 2>problem is their final three games Bengals, Dolphins, Patriots, So

1:02:54.920 --> 1:02:58.520
<v Speaker 2>they need to win these next two, get to eight

1:02:58.560 --> 1:03:03.600
<v Speaker 2>and six, and then I don't know. If nine and

1:03:03.680 --> 1:03:07.120
<v Speaker 2>eight doesn't, they might have to get to ten and seven.

1:03:07.400 --> 1:03:11.160
<v Speaker 2>Oh boy, I don't think they're gonna make it. I

1:03:11.320 --> 1:03:18.560
<v Speaker 2>just I think they're probably gonna have to go five,

1:03:18.840 --> 1:03:21.240
<v Speaker 2>four and one down the stretch, and I don't think

1:03:21.240 --> 1:03:22.760
<v Speaker 2>they can go four and one down the stretch.

1:03:23.080 --> 1:03:26.600
<v Speaker 4>Okay, all right, last one, fair enough? Jack Ash?

1:03:26.800 --> 1:03:29.160
<v Speaker 3>Has Nick ever tried Call of Duty? And will he

1:03:29.280 --> 1:03:33.400
<v Speaker 3>ever make an appearance on Right Upside Downs Exquisite stream?

1:03:33.440 --> 1:03:36.360
<v Speaker 2>All right, that's Demanse's twitch stream was doing it this weekend.

1:03:37.240 --> 1:03:40.040
<v Speaker 2>People heard a little bit from me on it when

1:03:40.080 --> 1:03:44.920
<v Speaker 2>I was watching the World Cup game. So here's my question, Demanse,

1:03:45.480 --> 1:03:48.320
<v Speaker 2>can you twitch? We can twitch stream anything, right.

1:03:48.680 --> 1:03:50.520
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, it's about anything on the screen.

1:03:50.560 --> 1:03:52.520
<v Speaker 2>All right. So I'll never make an appearance on Call

1:03:52.560 --> 1:03:56.800
<v Speaker 2>of Duty, But if you want, and if you think

1:03:56.800 --> 1:04:02.320
<v Speaker 2>it'll help the buzz for your twitch stream, all crush

1:04:02.440 --> 1:04:07.400
<v Speaker 2>some fools and Madden on there. I'm an impeccable Madden player.

1:04:08.120 --> 1:04:11.000
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I don't really know how that dude does for content?

1:04:11.440 --> 1:04:14.200
<v Speaker 3>What do you mean does for have you just play?

1:04:14.320 --> 1:04:16.840
<v Speaker 3>You're not gonna play me that it'll.

1:04:16.680 --> 1:04:19.920
<v Speaker 2>Be I don't want to embarrass you, it'll expose your

1:04:20.040 --> 1:04:21.800
<v Speaker 2>lack of football strategy. Act.

1:04:21.800 --> 1:04:23.840
<v Speaker 3>They actually watched me play a pretty I lost, but

1:04:23.960 --> 1:04:25.800
<v Speaker 3>I played a pretty good game of Mad with the

1:04:25.880 --> 1:04:26.720
<v Speaker 3>Ravens the other day.

1:04:27.640 --> 1:04:30.800
<v Speaker 2>Did you just say I can't use your platform on Twitch?

1:04:31.400 --> 1:04:33.200
<v Speaker 2>Is that what you just implied? Like?

1:04:33.320 --> 1:04:35.160
<v Speaker 4>What would what would.

1:04:35.160 --> 1:04:36.880
<v Speaker 2>Were you saying? What would that do for you?

1:04:38.360 --> 1:04:42.800
<v Speaker 3>I just it's just like here's it's like, so it's

1:04:42.920 --> 1:04:44.320
<v Speaker 3>at that point it's your twitch stream.

1:04:44.840 --> 1:04:47.560
<v Speaker 2>No, it would be I would be doing a guest appearance. Listen.

1:04:48.040 --> 1:04:49.400
<v Speaker 2>I'm no media expert.

1:04:49.880 --> 1:04:51.200
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, but I.

1:04:51.160 --> 1:04:56.840
<v Speaker 2>Would think that if I were to like tweet out, hey,

1:04:57.680 --> 1:05:02.200
<v Speaker 2>hopping on Demonsee's Twitch stream, here's the length to beat

1:05:02.240 --> 1:05:06.760
<v Speaker 2>some people in Madden, and maybe even some FIFA people

1:05:06.840 --> 1:05:09.640
<v Speaker 2>might tune in. You could be on the headset if

1:05:09.680 --> 1:05:12.680
<v Speaker 2>you wanted, You could talk to him, and then maybe

1:05:12.680 --> 1:05:15.120
<v Speaker 2>it would raise awareness for your twitch string. That's all.

1:05:15.120 --> 1:05:18.000
<v Speaker 4>I'm totally no, no, no, totally down for that. But hopefully

1:05:18.080 --> 1:05:18.400
<v Speaker 4>you know.

1:05:19.880 --> 1:05:22.400
<v Speaker 3>Those guys are willing to come back and watch me

1:05:22.480 --> 1:05:24.280
<v Speaker 3>play Call of Duty later later course.

1:05:24.200 --> 1:05:27.040
<v Speaker 2>That's the idea. That would be the idea. Also, if

1:05:27.040 --> 1:05:28.280
<v Speaker 2>you just want me to stay out of it. I'll

1:05:28.280 --> 1:05:28.800
<v Speaker 2>stay out of it.

1:05:28.880 --> 1:05:30.640
<v Speaker 3>No, no, no, I want to play you in Madden because

1:05:30.680 --> 1:05:32.160
<v Speaker 3>I think that i'd be able to beat you in

1:05:32.200 --> 1:05:33.520
<v Speaker 3>front of it. Like I think that if there's like

1:05:33.520 --> 1:05:36.760
<v Speaker 3>a crowd watching, i'd probably like, i'd probably beat you.

1:05:36.880 --> 1:05:40.680
<v Speaker 2>Okay, well we can set that up. I really really

1:05:40.800 --> 1:05:44.080
<v Speaker 2>really don't like your chances, and I think that it

1:05:44.240 --> 1:05:48.480
<v Speaker 2>will make the audience, it will make it harder for

1:05:48.560 --> 1:05:51.640
<v Speaker 2>them to take your football analysis seriously when they see

1:05:51.680 --> 1:05:56.960
<v Speaker 2>how you call plays on Madden. I'm just telling you

1:05:57.320 --> 1:06:00.480
<v Speaker 2>only have Lamar Jackson drop back and roll out to

1:06:00.520 --> 1:06:04.640
<v Speaker 2>throw a pick. That's so crazy. You just had this.

1:06:04.720 --> 1:06:06.320
<v Speaker 4>You just had to be there. You just had to

1:06:06.360 --> 1:06:06.600
<v Speaker 4>be there.

1:06:06.640 --> 1:06:07.840
<v Speaker 2>What do you mean, I just had to be there.

1:06:07.840 --> 1:06:10.320
<v Speaker 3>I'm really like, I'm really good at running the football.

1:06:10.360 --> 1:06:12.200
<v Speaker 3>I only ran the ball with Lamar like twice. Like

1:06:12.280 --> 1:06:14.400
<v Speaker 3>the people that were on the stream that just commented

1:06:14.400 --> 1:06:16.720
<v Speaker 3>on here, they saw the game. It was a great

1:06:16.840 --> 1:06:19.400
<v Speaker 3>running game, very effective, might have thrown a pick, but

1:06:19.600 --> 1:06:23.080
<v Speaker 3>also caught a couple of picks, played stellar defense, scored

1:06:23.120 --> 1:06:25.480
<v Speaker 3>on the first drive, forced turnovers. We were doing all

1:06:25.520 --> 1:06:28.320
<v Speaker 3>of it, man, the whole nine Okay, I've picked up

1:06:28.320 --> 1:06:30.080
<v Speaker 3>a little bit more skill with this whole band thing

1:06:30.120 --> 1:06:31.000
<v Speaker 3>since we last played.

1:06:31.000 --> 1:06:34.280
<v Speaker 2>Okay, well listen. So if you're a twitch streamer I've

1:06:34.280 --> 1:06:38.400
<v Speaker 2>never done it, subscribe to Demanse's twitch stream. His name

1:06:38.440 --> 1:06:41.360
<v Speaker 2>on there is right with a no W like just

1:06:41.400 --> 1:06:45.840
<v Speaker 2>the direction right up side down is his twitch stream.

1:06:45.880 --> 1:06:48.640
<v Speaker 2>You can also just go to his twitter at demanse bird.

1:06:48.840 --> 1:06:50.880
<v Speaker 2>It's the pin tweet if you want to see the

1:06:50.920 --> 1:06:53.920
<v Speaker 2>link to that. All right, again, we've got a little

1:06:53.920 --> 1:06:55.800
<v Speaker 2>bit of a we're not sure about the schedule the

1:06:55.800 --> 1:06:58.040
<v Speaker 2>rest of the week. We're gonna figure that out. But

1:06:58.120 --> 1:07:01.360
<v Speaker 2>so subscribe and it hit a bell on YouTube so

1:07:01.400 --> 1:07:04.480
<v Speaker 2>you get updated when we're when we're live next. This

1:07:04.600 --> 1:07:06.040
<v Speaker 2>was episode one oh six, What's Up.