WEBVTT - Bloomberg Wall Street Week - October 28, 2022

0:00:00.520 --> 0:00:03.760
<v Speaker 1>This is Bloomberg Wall Street Week. We turn our attention

0:00:03.840 --> 0:00:06.199
<v Speaker 1>to the markets this week at U S CPI numbers

0:00:06.440 --> 0:00:10.280
<v Speaker 1>reinforcing concerns about inflation. The financial stories that chiep are

0:00:10.360 --> 0:00:13.400
<v Speaker 1>worth a really different reaction to Mark. It's more indications

0:00:13.400 --> 0:00:15.960
<v Speaker 1>of just how hot the U. S economy really is

0:00:16.040 --> 0:00:19.439
<v Speaker 1>through the eyes of the most influential voices Larry Summers,

0:00:19.480 --> 0:00:22.279
<v Speaker 1>the former Treatory Secretary, Katherine Keening, CEO of d n

0:00:22.400 --> 0:00:26.160
<v Speaker 1>Y Mom, Sam's l Sharman, and founder of Equatic Group Investment.

0:00:26.200 --> 0:00:30.280
<v Speaker 1>In Bloomberg Wall Street Week with David Weston from Bloomberg Radio.

0:00:30.680 --> 0:00:34.479
<v Speaker 1>New governments face old problems, and this time it doesn't

0:00:34.520 --> 0:00:37.199
<v Speaker 1>look like tech will give us the solutions. This is

0:00:37.200 --> 0:00:41.000
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Wall Street Week. I'm David Weston, this week's special

0:00:41.000 --> 0:00:44.280
<v Speaker 1>contributor Larry Summers on the new GDP numbers and what

0:00:44.400 --> 0:00:48.200
<v Speaker 1>they lack. It confirmed what I think we knew that

0:00:48.680 --> 0:00:52.560
<v Speaker 1>despite two negative quarters, the economy was not in any

0:00:52.600 --> 0:00:56.560
<v Speaker 1>real sense in recession. And Sam's l on why he

0:00:56.640 --> 0:01:01.280
<v Speaker 1>has more opportunities than ever for good investments. Think about

0:01:01.560 --> 0:01:06.000
<v Speaker 1>the impact of the doubling and interest rates in eight weeks.

0:01:19.640 --> 0:01:22.640
<v Speaker 1>This week, Global All Street saw three new or sort

0:01:22.680 --> 0:01:26.240
<v Speaker 1>of new governments installed, with Rishie Sunak officially taking over

0:01:26.240 --> 0:01:28.760
<v Speaker 1>as the new Prime Minister of Great Britain and promising

0:01:28.800 --> 0:01:33.080
<v Speaker 1>to make nice with the markets. I will place economic

0:01:33.120 --> 0:01:38.319
<v Speaker 1>stability and confidence at the heart of this government's agenda.

0:01:38.720 --> 0:01:44.240
<v Speaker 1>This will mean difficult decisions to come. Not to be outdone.

0:01:44.360 --> 0:01:47.319
<v Speaker 1>Italy also got a new prime minister, and Georgia Maloney

0:01:47.400 --> 0:01:51.279
<v Speaker 1>wasted no time in taking issue with the ECB raising rates.

0:01:52.160 --> 0:01:54.840
<v Speaker 1>It's considered by many to be a rash choice that

0:01:54.960 --> 0:01:58.559
<v Speaker 1>could have repercussions on bank lending to households and businesses.

0:01:59.000 --> 0:02:01.520
<v Speaker 1>And although China a re up to President g for

0:02:01.560 --> 0:02:04.280
<v Speaker 1>a third term, he made his own changes to his

0:02:04.320 --> 0:02:07.200
<v Speaker 1>senior team, surrounding himself with people who see eye to

0:02:07.280 --> 0:02:10.240
<v Speaker 1>eye with him, which cornels each Farsat says is a

0:02:10.320 --> 0:02:14.080
<v Speaker 1>fundamental shift of a different sort. The message is quite

0:02:14.160 --> 0:02:17.200
<v Speaker 1>clear that technocrats are on their way out, the loyalists

0:02:17.240 --> 0:02:20.079
<v Speaker 1>are on their way in. But as much as governments

0:02:20.080 --> 0:02:23.400
<v Speaker 1>may change, the problems they face remain the same. As

0:02:23.400 --> 0:02:27.040
<v Speaker 1>the United States reported stronger GDP growth than expected despite

0:02:27.160 --> 0:02:30.480
<v Speaker 1>higher interest rates, and the ECB hyped another seventy five

0:02:30.520 --> 0:02:33.840
<v Speaker 1>basis points with President Leguards, saying she continues to focus

0:02:33.840 --> 0:02:38.360
<v Speaker 1>on inflation even though the European economy is slowing. The

0:02:38.480 --> 0:02:43.280
<v Speaker 1>risks to the inflation outlook are primarily on the upside.

0:02:43.560 --> 0:02:46.360
<v Speaker 1>The major risk in the short term is a further

0:02:46.600 --> 0:02:51.359
<v Speaker 1>rise in retail energy prices. Over the medium term, inflation

0:02:51.520 --> 0:02:54.520
<v Speaker 1>may turn up to be higher than expected. And if

0:02:54.520 --> 0:02:57.200
<v Speaker 1>Global Wall Street was hoping that tech might help us

0:02:57.240 --> 0:02:59.280
<v Speaker 1>climb out of these doldrums, it was in for a

0:02:59.360 --> 0:03:02.440
<v Speaker 1>letdown this week as the earnings of several big tech

0:03:02.480 --> 0:03:06.760
<v Speaker 1>companies disappointed, particularly in their guidance about what may come next.

0:03:07.400 --> 0:03:10.000
<v Speaker 1>There's big tech names, as they have reported this week.

0:03:10.280 --> 0:03:12.799
<v Speaker 1>You know, look at Microsoft, look at Alphabet today. They

0:03:12.919 --> 0:03:17.200
<v Speaker 1>really have underperformed in a big way. But in the end,

0:03:17.240 --> 0:03:19.679
<v Speaker 1>equity markets shook it all off, with the SMP five

0:03:20.120 --> 0:03:21.799
<v Speaker 1>up for the second week in a row, this time

0:03:21.840 --> 0:03:25.040
<v Speaker 1>by almost four percent, and even the NASDAK rose above

0:03:25.080 --> 0:03:28.280
<v Speaker 1>those disappointing earnings, overcoming a bad week for the Fangs

0:03:28.320 --> 0:03:31.120
<v Speaker 1>and for the Golden Dragon China Index, and turning what

0:03:31.160 --> 0:03:33.280
<v Speaker 1>was a loss as of Thursday into a nice two

0:03:33.280 --> 0:03:35.160
<v Speaker 1>point two percent gained by the end of the week,

0:03:35.400 --> 0:03:37.520
<v Speaker 1>while the yield and the ten years, settled in just

0:03:37.680 --> 0:03:40.600
<v Speaker 1>over four percent by the end of Friday, down from

0:03:40.600 --> 0:03:42.720
<v Speaker 1>about four point to five percent at the beginning of

0:03:42.760 --> 0:03:45.440
<v Speaker 1>the week. Here to sort out a fascinating back and

0:03:45.520 --> 0:03:48.320
<v Speaker 1>forth in markets are Peter Krauts, chair and CEO of

0:03:48.320 --> 0:03:52.400
<v Speaker 1>Aperture Investors, and Monamahagen, she has senior investment strategist at

0:03:52.520 --> 0:03:54.520
<v Speaker 1>Edward Jones. So, Waning, let me pick on you first.

0:03:54.760 --> 0:03:56.920
<v Speaker 1>What did the markets do this weekend? Why did they

0:03:56.960 --> 0:03:58.840
<v Speaker 1>do it? Yeah? Thanks, David. Look, this week was a

0:03:58.840 --> 0:04:01.000
<v Speaker 1>bit of a tug of war. On one side of

0:04:01.040 --> 0:04:03.720
<v Speaker 1>that tug of war, we saw the big cap tech earnings.

0:04:03.720 --> 0:04:06.680
<v Speaker 1>They were um, in a word, disappointing in fact, and

0:04:06.720 --> 0:04:09.800
<v Speaker 1>you noted this upfront. It wasn't necessarily the three Q results.

0:04:09.840 --> 0:04:13.280
<v Speaker 1>It was the guidance across the board between advertising revenue,

0:04:13.360 --> 0:04:16.920
<v Speaker 1>between cloud computing demand. We're seeing the soft thing there

0:04:17.200 --> 0:04:19.920
<v Speaker 1>and that really dragged down the NASDAC. But on the

0:04:19.960 --> 0:04:21.560
<v Speaker 1>other side of this tug of war, we saw the

0:04:21.600 --> 0:04:24.359
<v Speaker 1>Dow up nearly six percent this week. Now what was

0:04:24.440 --> 0:04:27.640
<v Speaker 1>driving that? While we are certainly starting to hear a

0:04:27.680 --> 0:04:31.320
<v Speaker 1>little bit more optimism about a federal reserve that maybe

0:04:31.400 --> 0:04:34.000
<v Speaker 1>looking to raise rates at a more moderate pace. Now,

0:04:34.040 --> 0:04:37.040
<v Speaker 1>of course, next week's meeting, UH, the seventy basis point

0:04:37.040 --> 0:04:39.960
<v Speaker 1>the point seven five percent rate hike UM almost baked

0:04:40.000 --> 0:04:43.120
<v Speaker 1>into the cake. It's probably going to happen. But really

0:04:43.160 --> 0:04:46.880
<v Speaker 1>all eyes will then focus on that December rate hike meeting.

0:04:47.240 --> 0:04:49.599
<v Speaker 1>Um will they go fifty basis points or will they

0:04:49.640 --> 0:04:51.960
<v Speaker 1>go seventy five? And in fact we heard a little

0:04:51.960 --> 0:04:54.640
<v Speaker 1>bit more from some Fed governors that perhaps a more

0:04:54.680 --> 0:04:58.680
<v Speaker 1>moderate rate of rate hikes probably makes sense here, just

0:04:58.760 --> 0:05:02.680
<v Speaker 1>given UM giving them an opportunity to pause, assess the economy.

0:05:02.720 --> 0:05:05.839
<v Speaker 1>See what's happening so interesting moves in the market this week.

0:05:06.040 --> 0:05:08.920
<v Speaker 1>We do think, more broadly, some of those inflationary trends

0:05:08.960 --> 0:05:10.679
<v Speaker 1>that we have been seeing, some of the four looking

0:05:10.720 --> 0:05:14.320
<v Speaker 1>indicators are starting to show some signs of rolling over.

0:05:14.680 --> 0:05:17.080
<v Speaker 1>That gives the Fed a little bit more comfort and

0:05:17.160 --> 0:05:19.920
<v Speaker 1>perhaps going at a more moderate pace. We certainly saw

0:05:19.960 --> 0:05:22.280
<v Speaker 1>that from the Bank of Canada this week this as well,

0:05:22.279 --> 0:05:25.480
<v Speaker 1>who went fifty basis points rather than the expected seventy

0:05:26.040 --> 0:05:28.080
<v Speaker 1>theater what do we say, are we heard from Ona?

0:05:28.320 --> 0:05:30.800
<v Speaker 1>We're hearing some optimism about the Fed? Where are we

0:05:30.800 --> 0:05:33.120
<v Speaker 1>hearing that from? I don't remember the Fed giving us

0:05:33.200 --> 0:05:36.479
<v Speaker 1>much optimism. I think the Fed is giving us any optimism.

0:05:37.080 --> 0:05:41.000
<v Speaker 1>I think that this is an interesting case of are

0:05:41.000 --> 0:05:44.400
<v Speaker 1>you actually listening to the people who have the power

0:05:44.600 --> 0:05:47.159
<v Speaker 1>to move the interest rates? If you're actually listening to

0:05:47.200 --> 0:05:49.839
<v Speaker 1>the Fed, I think it's pretty clear the Feds moving

0:05:50.480 --> 0:05:54.479
<v Speaker 1>to squash inflation, and they're not going to stop until

0:05:54.520 --> 0:05:59.120
<v Speaker 1>inflation goes down. Inflation sticky, and it's not gonna move

0:05:59.200 --> 0:06:02.120
<v Speaker 1>so quickly. And so the likelihood is that we see

0:06:02.200 --> 0:06:05.640
<v Speaker 1>high rates or higher rates, and that those rates probably

0:06:05.680 --> 0:06:07.840
<v Speaker 1>top out sometime in twenty three and they don't go

0:06:07.920 --> 0:06:12.760
<v Speaker 1>down until well into or perhaps twenty four. And I

0:06:12.800 --> 0:06:16.200
<v Speaker 1>don't think the market is completely digested that, and they're

0:06:16.240 --> 0:06:20.400
<v Speaker 1>looking for scintillas of hope that are floating around in

0:06:20.440 --> 0:06:23.640
<v Speaker 1>the market that I would call sentiment but not fact.

0:06:24.360 --> 0:06:26.159
<v Speaker 1>What do you make of it all? And at the

0:06:26.160 --> 0:06:28.680
<v Speaker 1>FED I think wants some consistent data over time that

0:06:28.760 --> 0:06:31.039
<v Speaker 1>shows that the inflation really coming down. You said there

0:06:31.080 --> 0:06:34.479
<v Speaker 1>are a little bit of indications around the edges. Yeah,

0:06:34.520 --> 0:06:36.360
<v Speaker 1>you know. Look, Peter has a point there. They want

0:06:36.440 --> 0:06:39.200
<v Speaker 1>clear and consistent evidence of inflation moderating, and in fact,

0:06:39.440 --> 0:06:42.800
<v Speaker 1>they don't want to indicate anything too prematurely. They started

0:06:42.839 --> 0:06:44.760
<v Speaker 1>to see that in June and we saw markets start

0:06:44.800 --> 0:06:47.719
<v Speaker 1>to rally, you know, financial conditions start to ease rather

0:06:47.800 --> 0:06:49.880
<v Speaker 1>than tighten, which is what they really want to see

0:06:49.880 --> 0:06:52.960
<v Speaker 1>in markets in order to push inflationary pressures down. So

0:06:53.000 --> 0:06:54.800
<v Speaker 1>we're gonna pick out exactly that when we come back.

0:06:54.839 --> 0:06:57.240
<v Speaker 1>Mono Hodgen and Peter Crust will stay with us as

0:06:57.320 --> 0:06:59.400
<v Speaker 1>we turn to some investment advice. They carry us towards

0:06:59.400 --> 0:07:01.200
<v Speaker 1>the end of the year. That's coming up next on

0:07:01.320 --> 0:07:06.880
<v Speaker 1>Wall Street Week on Bloomberg. This is Bloomberg Wall Street

0:07:06.880 --> 0:07:16.760
<v Speaker 1>Week with David Weston from Bloomberg Radio. Tom Alone will

0:07:16.800 --> 0:07:19.360
<v Speaker 1>tell whether Black Monday enters the history book as the

0:07:19.400 --> 0:07:23.800
<v Speaker 1>day American confidence was so shaken that a premature recession resulted,

0:07:24.920 --> 0:07:27.640
<v Speaker 1>or merely as the day of the computers went wild

0:07:28.520 --> 0:07:31.880
<v Speaker 1>and through the wonders of so called program trading turned

0:07:31.880 --> 0:07:36.200
<v Speaker 1>a normal correction into an early Halloween. That of course

0:07:36.320 --> 0:07:38.520
<v Speaker 1>was the one and only Lewis Rocks on Wall Street Week,

0:07:38.800 --> 0:07:41.840
<v Speaker 1>the friday before another Halloween like we're having when this

0:07:41.920 --> 0:07:44.840
<v Speaker 1>coming Monday. But that one was back in seven just

0:07:44.920 --> 0:07:47.880
<v Speaker 1>after so called Black Monday, when the Dow Jones lost

0:07:48.960 --> 0:07:51.600
<v Speaker 1>in a single day and people back then we're trying

0:07:51.640 --> 0:07:54.360
<v Speaker 1>to figure out what went wrong. The number one movie

0:07:54.360 --> 0:07:57.320
<v Speaker 1>in America that week was Fatal Attraction and the number

0:07:57.320 --> 0:08:00.040
<v Speaker 1>one song, well, it was bad by Michael Jackson. We

0:08:00.080 --> 0:08:02.320
<v Speaker 1>still have with us now, Peter Krause of Aperture Investors

0:08:02.360 --> 0:08:05.080
<v Speaker 1>and Monamohydgen of Edward Jones. So, Peter, when I come

0:08:05.120 --> 0:08:06.560
<v Speaker 1>to you, I mean, it's not a Black Monday. We

0:08:06.560 --> 0:08:08.880
<v Speaker 1>haven't seen that by any means, Thank goodness. And I

0:08:08.920 --> 0:08:11.560
<v Speaker 1>remember that day, by the way, I do too. I

0:08:11.600 --> 0:08:14.720
<v Speaker 1>was practicing law back in Washington. But but give us

0:08:14.720 --> 0:08:17.120
<v Speaker 1>some investment advice here. You started in that direction with

0:08:17.160 --> 0:08:20.240
<v Speaker 1>small caps and duration. If you're putting money to work

0:08:20.320 --> 0:08:22.120
<v Speaker 1>right now, where does it make sense to do that

0:08:22.200 --> 0:08:25.120
<v Speaker 1>given all the uncertainty? Well, I look, I think Mona

0:08:25.440 --> 0:08:29.240
<v Speaker 1>said it as well. There's three places that are in distress.

0:08:29.640 --> 0:08:34.120
<v Speaker 1>One is long duration fixed income. So whether it's treasuries

0:08:34.240 --> 0:08:36.800
<v Speaker 1>or high yield or long duration bonds that have been

0:08:36.840 --> 0:08:41.120
<v Speaker 1>absolutely crushed this year, those securities are likely going to

0:08:41.160 --> 0:08:45.160
<v Speaker 1>provide attractive yields going forward. They're not going to reduce

0:08:45.200 --> 0:08:47.360
<v Speaker 1>their volatility. They're still going to have a fair bit

0:08:47.400 --> 0:08:50.120
<v Speaker 1>of price volatility to them. But you know this is

0:08:50.160 --> 0:08:52.240
<v Speaker 1>a time when you can start to think about getting

0:08:52.280 --> 0:08:55.600
<v Speaker 1>a little longer and moving out of the very short duration,

0:08:55.640 --> 0:08:57.880
<v Speaker 1>which by the way, is also paying very well, and

0:08:57.960 --> 0:09:02.160
<v Speaker 1>you can buy short duration investment grade bonds at five

0:09:02.200 --> 0:09:04.600
<v Speaker 1>percent or even five and a percent, so that looks

0:09:04.640 --> 0:09:07.520
<v Speaker 1>pretty attractive as well. But I think leaking out a

0:09:07.600 --> 0:09:11.200
<v Speaker 1>little bit into duration makes sense. And the equity side,

0:09:12.000 --> 0:09:14.400
<v Speaker 1>you know, I think you can't abandon the growth world.

0:09:14.440 --> 0:09:17.160
<v Speaker 1>I mean, the tech world today or the tech news

0:09:17.160 --> 0:09:19.680
<v Speaker 1>in the last few days is obviously very negative. But

0:09:20.840 --> 0:09:24.240
<v Speaker 1>there are companies that are not necessarily tech, but our

0:09:24.280 --> 0:09:28.600
<v Speaker 1>growth companies. They're either consumer oriented where their industrial companies

0:09:28.600 --> 0:09:32.040
<v Speaker 1>that have fast growth, and not paying attention to those

0:09:32.160 --> 0:09:34.360
<v Speaker 1>is going to miss a trick that whether they're small

0:09:34.400 --> 0:09:37.000
<v Speaker 1>cap or mid cap or even large cap, but most

0:09:37.040 --> 0:09:38.960
<v Speaker 1>likely you're going to find them in the small cap space.

0:09:39.480 --> 0:09:42.280
<v Speaker 1>So I look at aperture. Our view is small caps

0:09:42.280 --> 0:09:44.920
<v Speaker 1>are very interesting space. The beta is cheap, and it's

0:09:44.920 --> 0:09:47.040
<v Speaker 1>a place where we're probably going to see the first

0:09:47.200 --> 0:09:50.360
<v Speaker 1>move when this market recovers. Well, that's what you said earlier,

0:09:50.440 --> 0:09:52.720
<v Speaker 1>the small caps come back first, Mona. Do you agree

0:09:52.800 --> 0:09:54.480
<v Speaker 1>with that? And if they come back first, what comes

0:09:54.520 --> 0:09:56.880
<v Speaker 1>back second? What comes back thirds, because that indicates where

0:09:56.880 --> 0:09:58.000
<v Speaker 1>you want to be and where you don't want to

0:09:58.000 --> 0:10:01.199
<v Speaker 1>be right now. Yeah, absolutely, you know, Peter's absolutely right.

0:10:01.240 --> 0:10:03.520
<v Speaker 1>When you look historically, coming out of any sort of

0:10:03.520 --> 0:10:06.240
<v Speaker 1>downturn or recessionary period, the thing that tends to lead

0:10:06.360 --> 0:10:09.360
<v Speaker 1>us out our small cap names. And interestingly, this time around,

0:10:09.600 --> 0:10:12.640
<v Speaker 1>small caps do tend to also be more domestically oriented.

0:10:12.679 --> 0:10:14.800
<v Speaker 1>And perhaps when you look across the globe, you're seeing

0:10:15.080 --> 0:10:18.800
<v Speaker 1>a European economy more exposed to the geopolitical issues oil

0:10:18.840 --> 0:10:22.200
<v Speaker 1>and energy crisis. You're seeing an Asian economy more exposed

0:10:22.200 --> 0:10:25.400
<v Speaker 1>to a Chinese economy that may be slowing. So in fact,

0:10:25.559 --> 0:10:28.200
<v Speaker 1>the small cap universe is starting to look more and

0:10:28.240 --> 0:10:31.760
<v Speaker 1>more interesting as well. We probably will have some months

0:10:31.760 --> 0:10:35.320
<v Speaker 1>of volatility ahead as we stabilize get through a potential downturn,

0:10:35.360 --> 0:10:39.080
<v Speaker 1>but I think that is a place to start thinking about. UM. Similarly,

0:10:39.240 --> 0:10:42.000
<v Speaker 1>you know, across equities and fixed income, we talked about

0:10:42.000 --> 0:10:45.160
<v Speaker 1>complementing equities, so you know, think about the stuff that

0:10:45.240 --> 0:10:48.880
<v Speaker 1>has been more quote unquote beaten up this year. UM,

0:10:48.920 --> 0:10:51.080
<v Speaker 1>there is values starting to merge in a lot of that.

0:10:51.160 --> 0:10:54.680
<v Speaker 1>And again when you look historically the twelve months after

0:10:54.960 --> 0:10:58.880
<v Speaker 1>the FED the final FED rate hike, equities broadly are

0:10:59.040 --> 0:11:01.720
<v Speaker 1>up on average, and this is back till since FED

0:11:01.880 --> 0:11:05.400
<v Speaker 1>right tiking cycle since ninety on average up about sixteen

0:11:05.480 --> 0:11:07.960
<v Speaker 1>percent after that peak FED funds rate. So if you

0:11:08.000 --> 0:11:12.360
<v Speaker 1>think it's coming sometime in February March, maybe earlier UM,

0:11:12.400 --> 0:11:16.120
<v Speaker 1>there's certainly an interesting opportunity starting to form. And of course,

0:11:16.679 --> 0:11:19.520
<v Speaker 1>with inequities, the other parts of the market, aside from

0:11:19.559 --> 0:11:22.000
<v Speaker 1>small caps that tend to perform well coming out of

0:11:22.000 --> 0:11:24.800
<v Speaker 1>a downturn, or the more cyclical and growth parts of

0:11:24.800 --> 0:11:27.800
<v Speaker 1>the market, and when growth is slowing, you know, investors

0:11:27.880 --> 0:11:31.319
<v Speaker 1>pen to gravitate towards finding growth in their portfolios. So

0:11:31.760 --> 0:11:34.480
<v Speaker 1>everything that we've talked about and Peter and I have

0:11:34.559 --> 0:11:37.800
<v Speaker 1>probably reiterated a couple of times now, but think about duration,

0:11:37.920 --> 0:11:42.480
<v Speaker 1>think about quality. Growth opportunities are certainly forming. Like I

0:11:42.520 --> 0:11:47.720
<v Speaker 1>also think that don't misunderstand arising economy or a rising

0:11:47.760 --> 0:11:49.960
<v Speaker 1>market that you might have in the next few months.

0:11:50.040 --> 0:11:54.040
<v Speaker 1>For a market that is absent volatility, there's still plenty

0:11:54.080 --> 0:11:58.200
<v Speaker 1>of shoes to drop, and credit and leverage lending is

0:11:58.240 --> 0:12:00.480
<v Speaker 1>one of them. And we don't know how the market

0:12:00.559 --> 0:12:02.679
<v Speaker 1>is going to react to defaults. We haven't seen a

0:12:02.760 --> 0:12:07.000
<v Speaker 1>significant default cycle really since Frankly two thousand and three,

0:12:07.080 --> 0:12:10.400
<v Speaker 1>two thousand and four oh eight was a liquidity crisis,

0:12:10.440 --> 0:12:12.959
<v Speaker 1>and you know two thousand and twenty was very short,

0:12:13.400 --> 0:12:17.720
<v Speaker 1>so you could have some defaults here in corporate uh

0:12:17.840 --> 0:12:21.640
<v Speaker 1>and in you know, other types of securities, real estate UM.

0:12:21.679 --> 0:12:23.720
<v Speaker 1>And I think that that's going to have some effect

0:12:23.760 --> 0:12:26.480
<v Speaker 1>on the volatility, but investors have to have to live

0:12:26.480 --> 0:12:28.920
<v Speaker 1>through that volatility. They can't get knocked out of the

0:12:28.960 --> 0:12:31.559
<v Speaker 1>market because if you do that, you're gonna miss the opportunity.

0:12:31.880 --> 0:12:34.880
<v Speaker 1>We'll talk about the overall structure of the paradigm as

0:12:34.920 --> 0:12:36.840
<v Speaker 1>it were, of investing. We are going. It looks like

0:12:36.920 --> 0:12:40.640
<v Speaker 1>from a world low inflation, low rates, into higher inflation

0:12:40.720 --> 0:12:43.719
<v Speaker 1>and perhaps significantly higher rates. At the same time, there

0:12:43.760 --> 0:12:45.439
<v Speaker 1>was a good long period of time when it was

0:12:45.440 --> 0:12:47.439
<v Speaker 1>basically there was no alternative, so people went into a

0:12:47.480 --> 0:12:50.400
<v Speaker 1>lot of alternates, a lot of riskier things. What happens

0:12:50.400 --> 0:12:52.360
<v Speaker 1>in this new world, because it's not like the old

0:12:52.400 --> 0:12:55.920
<v Speaker 1>world necessarily, Yeah, you know, that's that's spot on, and

0:12:55.960 --> 0:12:58.679
<v Speaker 1>in fact, we all know the Tina acronym. There is

0:12:58.720 --> 0:13:01.760
<v Speaker 1>no alternative that served us well, probably from the Great

0:13:01.760 --> 0:13:05.079
<v Speaker 1>financial crisis through the pandemic um, we saw a lot

0:13:05.120 --> 0:13:08.360
<v Speaker 1>of investors pushed out the risk curve um in order

0:13:08.400 --> 0:13:11.000
<v Speaker 1>to get that return that they were seeking. And of course,

0:13:11.080 --> 0:13:15.720
<v Speaker 1>as raise rates rose pretty rapidly through two what we

0:13:15.800 --> 0:13:18.040
<v Speaker 1>did see is a lot of more speculative parts of

0:13:18.040 --> 0:13:20.640
<v Speaker 1>the market have started to see the air let out

0:13:20.640 --> 0:13:22.600
<v Speaker 1>of those tires as well. You know, think about this

0:13:22.679 --> 0:13:26.439
<v Speaker 1>back market earlier this year, the Meme stock market, uh,

0:13:26.520 --> 0:13:30.120
<v Speaker 1>even crypto to some extent, we've seen large you know,

0:13:30.160 --> 0:13:34.520
<v Speaker 1>compression and valuations, large downturn in values overall in a

0:13:34.559 --> 0:13:37.640
<v Speaker 1>lot of those more speculative bubbles, and in fact, that

0:13:37.720 --> 0:13:40.560
<v Speaker 1>probably sets us up for a more interesting time in

0:13:40.600 --> 0:13:43.280
<v Speaker 1>the next ten years. You know. The one nice thing

0:13:43.280 --> 0:13:46.480
<v Speaker 1>that's happened over this kind of downturn and markets this

0:13:46.559 --> 0:13:50.120
<v Speaker 1>year is that valuation compression has come in beyond what

0:13:50.160 --> 0:13:54.320
<v Speaker 1>we've typically seen historically. So the SMP PE multiple, for example,

0:13:54.320 --> 0:13:58.079
<v Speaker 1>has come down over um this year already. So the

0:13:58.200 --> 0:14:01.920
<v Speaker 1>valuation correction in our view has likely already happened, and

0:14:01.960 --> 0:14:04.920
<v Speaker 1>that sets us up nicely. But to your point, in

0:14:04.920 --> 0:14:08.040
<v Speaker 1>an environment where it will probably not return to zero rates,

0:14:08.120 --> 0:14:12.079
<v Speaker 1>but with growth at two percent inflation hopefully returning somewhere

0:14:12.080 --> 0:14:14.839
<v Speaker 1>in that two to three percent UM yields may also

0:14:14.920 --> 0:14:17.600
<v Speaker 1>be somewhere in that two to three percent range, and

0:14:17.640 --> 0:14:20.600
<v Speaker 1>so in that scenario, you think about discounting your cash

0:14:20.640 --> 0:14:23.360
<v Speaker 1>flows at a higher rate, and so really that does

0:14:23.440 --> 0:14:27.080
<v Speaker 1>put more pressure to prove your business models, especially those

0:14:27.120 --> 0:14:30.560
<v Speaker 1>business models that expect cash flows in the out years UM.

0:14:30.600 --> 0:14:33.200
<v Speaker 1>But the more steady parts of the market that have

0:14:33.440 --> 0:14:36.880
<v Speaker 1>proven business models, that have proven cash flows, those valuations

0:14:36.880 --> 0:14:39.080
<v Speaker 1>are starting to look attractive here, and I think that's

0:14:39.720 --> 0:14:41.640
<v Speaker 1>really what investors will have to think about in this

0:14:41.680 --> 0:14:43.960
<v Speaker 1>new environment. Thank you so much. It's really great to

0:14:44.000 --> 0:14:45.800
<v Speaker 1>have you both with it as a Peter Crest of

0:14:45.920 --> 0:14:52.280
<v Speaker 1>Aftercure Investors and Hydgen of Edward Jones. Coming up, famed

0:14:52.280 --> 0:14:55.120
<v Speaker 1>investor Sam's l He's a veteran of Wall Street Week

0:14:55.280 --> 0:14:57.240
<v Speaker 1>and he's back now to give us his advice on

0:14:57.360 --> 0:15:00.480
<v Speaker 1>investing in these difficult markets and why he is seeing

0:15:00.520 --> 0:15:03.880
<v Speaker 1>more opportunities than ever. That's next out Wall Street Week

0:15:04.080 --> 0:15:16.840
<v Speaker 1>on Bluebird. Okay, what a difference a few rate hikes make.

0:15:17.320 --> 0:15:20.360
<v Speaker 1>Not that long ago, when interest rates were at record lows,

0:15:20.720 --> 0:15:22.800
<v Speaker 1>the easy days where they not money on you and

0:15:22.840 --> 0:15:25.120
<v Speaker 1>you don't have much inflation and you don't have much

0:15:25.160 --> 0:15:29.160
<v Speaker 1>time inness those are past. You almost couldn't avoid making

0:15:29.160 --> 0:15:32.000
<v Speaker 1>a deal and setting new records for M and A.

0:15:32.240 --> 0:15:35.680
<v Speaker 1>We are continuing to see a just tremendous momentum in

0:15:35.840 --> 0:15:38.880
<v Speaker 1>U S, M and A. But things have changed. Money

0:15:38.960 --> 0:15:43.160
<v Speaker 1>isn't free anymore. We have got to get inflation behind us.

0:15:43.400 --> 0:15:45.520
<v Speaker 1>I wish there were a painless way to do that.

0:15:45.840 --> 0:15:49.600
<v Speaker 1>There isn't and credit is cutting into that record deal flow.

0:15:50.040 --> 0:15:52.760
<v Speaker 1>I'm looking now at credit spreads in the mid four

0:15:52.840 --> 0:15:56.600
<v Speaker 1>hundreds and they just look too expensive to me. So

0:15:56.720 --> 0:15:59.320
<v Speaker 1>what does that mean for the dealmaker? And are there

0:15:59.320 --> 0:16:02.480
<v Speaker 1>many deal that still makes sense in this new world?

0:16:02.840 --> 0:16:06.040
<v Speaker 1>There's still more room for we think these spreads to tighten.

0:16:06.280 --> 0:16:09.240
<v Speaker 1>Probably at this point, you know, best opportunities are in

0:16:09.320 --> 0:16:15.800
<v Speaker 1>the non investment grade market. And now return to a dealmaker.

0:16:15.880 --> 0:16:18.280
<v Speaker 1>Par Excellan Sophia Sam's l He is the chairman and

0:16:18.360 --> 0:16:21.600
<v Speaker 1>founder of Equity Group Investment Sam. Welcome to Wall Street Week.

0:16:21.680 --> 0:16:24.240
<v Speaker 1>I know you've been on this program in the past. Okay,

0:16:24.520 --> 0:16:26.920
<v Speaker 1>so let's talk about what investor does in this new

0:16:27.040 --> 0:16:30.800
<v Speaker 1>environment of increased inflation and increased interest rates. First of all,

0:16:30.880 --> 0:16:33.320
<v Speaker 1>tell me what's going on with your company? Are you

0:16:33.360 --> 0:16:37.800
<v Speaker 1>seeing less deal flow now just the opposite. We're seeing

0:16:37.800 --> 0:16:44.400
<v Speaker 1>more deal flow. We're seeing more situations where companies are

0:16:44.560 --> 0:16:49.640
<v Speaker 1>having difficulty, uh figuring out what to do. Uh. We're

0:16:49.680 --> 0:16:56.360
<v Speaker 1>seeing situations where nine months ago, financing a transaction of

0:16:56.800 --> 0:17:00.440
<v Speaker 1>X y Z size was nothing. You know, it was

0:17:00.720 --> 0:17:05.440
<v Speaker 1>you know, as you said, money was free. Uh what's

0:17:05.600 --> 0:17:09.920
<v Speaker 1>changed dramatically? I mean, think about the impact of the

0:17:10.040 --> 0:17:14.159
<v Speaker 1>doubling of interest rates in eight weeks double you know,

0:17:14.160 --> 0:17:18.560
<v Speaker 1>it's just eight weeks earlier. Uh, interest rates were you know,

0:17:18.680 --> 0:17:20.720
<v Speaker 1>two and a half to three and now they're five

0:17:20.760 --> 0:17:25.480
<v Speaker 1>and a half to six. That's enormous uh change, and

0:17:26.160 --> 0:17:30.639
<v Speaker 1>it's gonna slow down everybody's activity. It's gonna for sure,

0:17:31.320 --> 0:17:36.440
<v Speaker 1>uh impact getting deals done. But in our particular case,

0:17:36.560 --> 0:17:42.000
<v Speaker 1>because frankly, I've oftentime told the world that you know,

0:17:42.480 --> 0:17:46.199
<v Speaker 1>when I'm liquid, the stock market can't go down. It

0:17:46.280 --> 0:17:49.359
<v Speaker 1>only goes down when I'm ire liquid. And here I

0:17:49.400 --> 0:17:52.359
<v Speaker 1>am sitting there with a level of liquidity I've never

0:17:52.440 --> 0:17:57.080
<v Speaker 1>experienced in my life because my focus for the last

0:17:57.200 --> 0:18:00.840
<v Speaker 1>three and a half years has been nothing more important

0:18:00.840 --> 0:18:04.439
<v Speaker 1>men equality. So you've got a significant deal flow if

0:18:04.440 --> 0:18:06.520
<v Speaker 1>anything is bigger than it was before. What about the

0:18:06.600 --> 0:18:08.719
<v Speaker 1>quality of deals? Are they different from what they were

0:18:08.760 --> 0:18:12.439
<v Speaker 1>for example, preach prandemic. I think they are because I

0:18:12.520 --> 0:18:18.639
<v Speaker 1>think they're a little more realistic. I think in pre pandemic,

0:18:19.280 --> 0:18:23.840
<v Speaker 1>when money was free, Um, there were transaction. I mean,

0:18:23.880 --> 0:18:27.480
<v Speaker 1>the whole spack market was. You know, we did as

0:18:27.520 --> 0:18:31.600
<v Speaker 1>back and chose not to take it to the next

0:18:31.680 --> 0:18:35.720
<v Speaker 1>level because when we did this back spac seemed like

0:18:35.760 --> 0:18:41.960
<v Speaker 1>a very interesting way to in effect monetize opportunity. Uh.

0:18:42.000 --> 0:18:47.639
<v Speaker 1>It very quickly became a highly speculative scenario dependent on

0:18:48.160 --> 0:18:52.520
<v Speaker 1>preposterous valuations that ultimately led to the crash of the

0:18:52.560 --> 0:18:57.520
<v Speaker 1>whole spack market. Uh. You know, world has changed a

0:18:57.520 --> 0:19:03.560
<v Speaker 1>lot since then, and the change is basically modifying what

0:19:03.600 --> 0:19:07.080
<v Speaker 1>you can do. On the other hand, there's always demand

0:19:07.119 --> 0:19:11.199
<v Speaker 1>for capital. Uh, and there's always that demand is always

0:19:11.240 --> 0:19:13.920
<v Speaker 1>on the on the the shoulders of those that have

0:19:14.320 --> 0:19:17.679
<v Speaker 1>preserved the coidity. So let's tell about some specific investment

0:19:17.680 --> 0:19:19.840
<v Speaker 1>of serious energy. Yeah, I mean you even know energy

0:19:19.920 --> 0:19:22.439
<v Speaker 1>terribly well, yes, you see opportunities of energy right now,

0:19:22.440 --> 0:19:24.879
<v Speaker 1>There's been a lot of tumult in the marketplace because

0:19:24.920 --> 0:19:28.800
<v Speaker 1>of Russia and Ukraine, and all sorts of reasons. Yeah,

0:19:28.200 --> 0:19:33.320
<v Speaker 1>I mean we continue to do something in the energy space,

0:19:34.080 --> 0:19:36.560
<v Speaker 1>not as much as I would have thought when we

0:19:36.640 --> 0:19:42.240
<v Speaker 1>when this period began, the volatility and the energy space

0:19:42.280 --> 0:19:45.640
<v Speaker 1>has been so extreme. Uh. I mean you just think

0:19:45.640 --> 0:19:49.920
<v Speaker 1>about it. Within a twelve month period, the price of oil. Uh,

0:19:50.040 --> 0:19:56.080
<v Speaker 1>you know, vascillated between thirty and twenty Uh. That's an

0:19:56.119 --> 0:20:02.400
<v Speaker 1>incredible level of volatility. Makes making an investments extraordinarily difficult

0:20:02.440 --> 0:20:05.000
<v Speaker 1>and challenging. Do you see a prospect of a little

0:20:05.040 --> 0:20:07.680
<v Speaker 1>less latil? Because you have on the one plus plus

0:20:07.960 --> 0:20:10.040
<v Speaker 1>trying to live with things. Now you've got the U. S. Government,

0:20:10.080 --> 0:20:12.240
<v Speaker 1>which it was now trying to regulate the price of oil.

0:20:12.280 --> 0:20:13.680
<v Speaker 1>It looks kind of like it is because it says

0:20:13.720 --> 0:20:16.480
<v Speaker 1>when it's gonna, see's gonna to buy, So it looks

0:20:16.480 --> 0:20:19.119
<v Speaker 1>like it's got a bit an ass price. Yeah, but

0:20:19.240 --> 0:20:22.199
<v Speaker 1>we also have an alleged we also have an administration

0:20:22.680 --> 0:20:27.639
<v Speaker 1>it's very anti oil and uh and and too in

0:20:27.680 --> 0:20:31.119
<v Speaker 1>my judgment that the anti oil provision is only going

0:20:31.200 --> 0:20:34.560
<v Speaker 1>to hurt the United States. I mean, we were producing

0:20:34.600 --> 0:20:38.040
<v Speaker 1>eleven million barrels a day of oil. I don't know

0:20:38.080 --> 0:20:40.280
<v Speaker 1>what we're doing now, but I think it's down two

0:20:40.359 --> 0:20:44.040
<v Speaker 1>or three million barrels a day. Uh, as we've cut

0:20:44.040 --> 0:20:48.880
<v Speaker 1>back on capital for the for for fracking, etcetera. Uh.

0:20:49.119 --> 0:20:51.840
<v Speaker 1>Not a healthy set of circumstances. Sam, it's great to

0:20:51.880 --> 0:20:53.679
<v Speaker 1>have you back on wallst Thank you so much. As

0:20:53.680 --> 0:20:56.440
<v Speaker 1>Sam's l he is a chairman and founder of Equity

0:20:56.480 --> 0:21:01.200
<v Speaker 1>Group Investments. Come up. We wrap up the week with

0:21:01.240 --> 0:21:05.480
<v Speaker 1>our special contributor Larry Summers at Harvard. That's next on

0:21:05.600 --> 0:21:10.480
<v Speaker 1>Wall Street Week on Bloomberg. This is Bloomberg Wall Street

0:21:10.520 --> 0:21:20.119
<v Speaker 1>Week with David Weston from Bloomberg Radio. Okay, this is

0:21:20.160 --> 0:21:22.080
<v Speaker 1>Wall Street Week on David Weston, and we are joined

0:21:22.119 --> 0:21:24.440
<v Speaker 1>once again by our very special contribute to Wall Street Week.

0:21:24.440 --> 0:21:27.360
<v Speaker 1>He is Larry Summers of Harvard. So, Larry, welcome back.

0:21:27.359 --> 0:21:29.399
<v Speaker 1>Great to have you. Let's start with those US GDP

0:21:29.560 --> 0:21:31.719
<v Speaker 1>numbers that came and showed we were back into growth,

0:21:31.800 --> 0:21:34.679
<v Speaker 1>modest growth. What did you see in those numbers that

0:21:34.680 --> 0:21:37.440
<v Speaker 1>would indicate where we are headed? I think it's hard

0:21:37.480 --> 0:21:40.840
<v Speaker 1>to know. It confirmed what I think we knew that

0:21:41.320 --> 0:21:45.200
<v Speaker 1>despite two negative quarters, the economy was not in any

0:21:45.240 --> 0:21:50.560
<v Speaker 1>real sense in recession at this point. But if you

0:21:50.640 --> 0:21:55.119
<v Speaker 1>look through the numbers to private domestic demand, which is

0:21:55.119 --> 0:21:59.800
<v Speaker 1>probably the best indicator of economic strength. It really wasn't

0:22:00.040 --> 0:22:04.119
<v Speaker 1>a strong well below one percent for the third quarter,

0:22:04.720 --> 0:22:07.240
<v Speaker 1>and so I think what we've now had for nine

0:22:07.280 --> 0:22:13.560
<v Speaker 1>months is essentially no GDP growth and inflation on core

0:22:13.680 --> 0:22:17.879
<v Speaker 1>measures probably stronger than it was at the beginning of

0:22:17.920 --> 0:22:22.439
<v Speaker 1>the nine months, suggesting that we've got real challenges ahead.

0:22:22.960 --> 0:22:26.680
<v Speaker 1>There continue to be arguments that inflation rates are going

0:22:26.760 --> 0:22:30.080
<v Speaker 1>to come down, but we haven't yet seen them, uh

0:22:30.119 --> 0:22:35.320
<v Speaker 1>come down. So I don't think the fundamental picture that

0:22:35.480 --> 0:22:40.679
<v Speaker 1>a soft landing remains an enormous and unlikely challenge is

0:22:40.880 --> 0:22:44.040
<v Speaker 1>very different than it was before we got these numbers. Well,

0:22:44.040 --> 0:22:46.880
<v Speaker 1>we're getting some political blowback now, as you know, shared Brown,

0:22:46.920 --> 0:22:49.000
<v Speaker 1>the Senator from a high royal letter to J. Powe

0:22:49.240 --> 0:22:52.760
<v Speaker 1>is followed by Mr. Hickerl Looper, Senator from Colorado, saying,

0:22:53.000 --> 0:22:55.320
<v Speaker 1>you know, we shouldn't give up these gains we've had,

0:22:55.320 --> 0:22:58.040
<v Speaker 1>an employment and progress we've made in the name of

0:22:58.119 --> 0:23:00.679
<v Speaker 1>fighting inflation. We're gonna seem more and more of that

0:23:00.680 --> 0:23:03.360
<v Speaker 1>political pressure, do you think so? I think the two points.

0:23:04.119 --> 0:23:09.400
<v Speaker 1>The first is that the political pressure is a counterproductive

0:23:09.440 --> 0:23:13.320
<v Speaker 1>strategy from the point of view of those who launch it. Frankly,

0:23:13.400 --> 0:23:17.680
<v Speaker 1>the FED doesn't listen, and if anything, feels more pressure

0:23:17.720 --> 0:23:21.840
<v Speaker 1>to prove its independence. So they don't influence short term

0:23:21.960 --> 0:23:25.800
<v Speaker 1>rates and what the FED actually does, but they do

0:23:26.320 --> 0:23:29.640
<v Speaker 1>raise questions in the mind of market participants, and they

0:23:29.720 --> 0:23:34.560
<v Speaker 1>raise long term rates. So political pressure is a fool's

0:23:34.640 --> 0:23:39.040
<v Speaker 1>game and actually probably makes financial conditions tighter than they

0:23:39.040 --> 0:23:43.640
<v Speaker 1>otherwise would be. And that's entirely apart from the merits

0:23:43.880 --> 0:23:48.479
<v Speaker 1>of the argument uh being made. I yield to no

0:23:48.560 --> 0:23:54.680
<v Speaker 1>one in how much I loathe unemployment and want unemployment

0:23:54.720 --> 0:23:58.440
<v Speaker 1>to be as low as it possibly can be over time.

0:23:59.000 --> 0:24:03.240
<v Speaker 1>The concern is that, as in the nineteen seventies, if

0:24:03.280 --> 0:24:07.040
<v Speaker 1>we don't contain inflation, we set the stage for much

0:24:07.119 --> 0:24:12.360
<v Speaker 1>more financial instability and unemployment. And that is the argument

0:24:12.440 --> 0:24:16.280
<v Speaker 1>that has to be made by those who are on

0:24:16.680 --> 0:24:21.040
<v Speaker 1>the dovish side. They say that the FED is gonna

0:24:21.400 --> 0:24:25.920
<v Speaker 1>be counterproductive and overdo it. A corollarrea of that view

0:24:26.600 --> 0:24:29.879
<v Speaker 1>is that they should think either that the FED should

0:24:29.880 --> 0:24:33.879
<v Speaker 1>abandoned its two percent target or that they're gonna push

0:24:33.920 --> 0:24:37.320
<v Speaker 1>inflation below two And I think it would be helpful

0:24:37.440 --> 0:24:42.600
<v Speaker 1>if every critic of the FED were asked exactly that question.

0:24:43.080 --> 0:24:46.520
<v Speaker 1>Are they really saying that two percent inflation should not

0:24:46.640 --> 0:24:50.119
<v Speaker 1>be the goal, in which case they should describe what

0:24:50.240 --> 0:24:53.320
<v Speaker 1>their attitude is towards inflation and how they expected to

0:24:53.400 --> 0:24:57.520
<v Speaker 1>work out over time. Or are they expressing the view

0:24:57.600 --> 0:25:00.720
<v Speaker 1>that the FED is acting so strongly that it's going

0:25:00.760 --> 0:25:04.119
<v Speaker 1>to produce so large a recession that inflation is going

0:25:04.200 --> 0:25:06.960
<v Speaker 1>to fall below two learn it's like a bit of

0:25:07.000 --> 0:25:09.119
<v Speaker 1>a longer view, as you did this week and some

0:25:09.240 --> 0:25:11.640
<v Speaker 1>of your tweets actually, and we had to study out

0:25:11.680 --> 0:25:14.600
<v Speaker 1>showing how much we lost in our children's education because

0:25:14.600 --> 0:25:18.000
<v Speaker 1>of the pandemic, something like six months, and you translated

0:25:18.040 --> 0:25:20.280
<v Speaker 1>that actually into what that really means for the economy.

0:25:20.440 --> 0:25:23.320
<v Speaker 1>Tell us about that problem. If we talk on this

0:25:23.400 --> 0:25:27.560
<v Speaker 1>show about financial capital, it is very important, but human

0:25:27.600 --> 0:25:32.280
<v Speaker 1>capital is even more important. And what a generation of

0:25:32.320 --> 0:25:36.000
<v Speaker 1>economic research has now shown is the human capital is

0:25:36.040 --> 0:25:39.880
<v Speaker 1>the most important determinant of our economy's long term growth

0:25:40.560 --> 0:25:45.280
<v Speaker 1>and most important determinant of the fairness and equity with

0:25:45.320 --> 0:25:49.920
<v Speaker 1>which incomes are distributed in our society. And so when

0:25:49.920 --> 0:25:55.600
<v Speaker 1>we see six months or a year's loss in children's achievements,

0:25:56.080 --> 0:26:00.080
<v Speaker 1>that's a five to ten decline in the value you

0:26:00.240 --> 0:26:05.400
<v Speaker 1>of human capital. For tens of millions of children, and

0:26:05.760 --> 0:26:08.200
<v Speaker 1>if you add up what that value is in terms

0:26:08.200 --> 0:26:12.560
<v Speaker 1>of the lost earnings down the road, it's comfortably into

0:26:13.000 --> 0:26:17.640
<v Speaker 1>the trillions of dollars, and not just a few trillions.

0:26:17.680 --> 0:26:23.440
<v Speaker 1>So we've gotten some really very very discouraging news and

0:26:23.640 --> 0:26:27.320
<v Speaker 1>it points up the importance of our doing much more

0:26:27.400 --> 0:26:32.439
<v Speaker 1>and much better on UH what we're doing in the

0:26:32.440 --> 0:26:36.960
<v Speaker 1>whole education system. We can't fix what happened. We can't

0:26:37.040 --> 0:26:40.840
<v Speaker 1>fix the non learning that took place when kids were

0:26:40.880 --> 0:26:45.040
<v Speaker 1>at home UH during COVID. We can do everything we

0:26:45.080 --> 0:26:51.200
<v Speaker 1>can to double down on learning going forward. And that's

0:26:51.240 --> 0:26:56.200
<v Speaker 1>about how our schools are organized. That's about who's staffing

0:26:56.280 --> 0:26:59.600
<v Speaker 1>and teaching in our schools. That's about making sure they're

0:26:59.600 --> 0:27:05.199
<v Speaker 1>out of resourced, and in my view, that's absolutely critically

0:27:05.320 --> 0:27:11.080
<v Speaker 1>about accountability for everyone, Accountability for those teaching and administering

0:27:11.560 --> 0:27:17.560
<v Speaker 1>UH in the system, and also accountability for UH the kids.

0:27:18.280 --> 0:27:21.359
<v Speaker 1>Whether it's the fact that close to of all the

0:27:21.400 --> 0:27:24.760
<v Speaker 1>grades in the IVY League are a straight A not

0:27:24.880 --> 0:27:29.840
<v Speaker 1>a minus, or whether it's social promotion in too many

0:27:29.880 --> 0:27:33.400
<v Speaker 1>of our schools, or whether it's the move away from

0:27:33.400 --> 0:27:38.119
<v Speaker 1>testing because we don't like the messages that tests said,

0:27:38.680 --> 0:27:43.240
<v Speaker 1>relative to our social aspiration, we have got to get

0:27:43.280 --> 0:27:49.560
<v Speaker 1>more serious about actual knowledge acquisition in our education system

0:27:49.600 --> 0:27:52.720
<v Speaker 1>at every level. Larry started the week with President she

0:27:52.960 --> 0:27:56.080
<v Speaker 1>coming out and unveiling his senior management team, if I

0:27:56.080 --> 0:27:58.320
<v Speaker 1>can put it that way, and we surprised something because

0:27:58.320 --> 0:28:00.640
<v Speaker 1>there were no perceived as modern at all. They were

0:28:00.640 --> 0:28:02.399
<v Speaker 1>really people who were very much aligned with him. He

0:28:02.400 --> 0:28:05.919
<v Speaker 1>also had a fairly aggressive speech on his economic policy

0:28:05.920 --> 0:28:08.120
<v Speaker 1>in China. What did you make of where China's head?

0:28:08.119 --> 0:28:11.600
<v Speaker 1>And certainly the markets didn't like it very much. I

0:28:11.640 --> 0:28:18.840
<v Speaker 1>think anybody who thought that the posture of Chinese policy

0:28:19.800 --> 0:28:25.200
<v Speaker 1>was politicized before the Party Congress but would be reformists

0:28:25.359 --> 0:28:31.400
<v Speaker 1>after the Party Congress got absolutely nothing to make their

0:28:31.520 --> 0:28:35.919
<v Speaker 1>views confirmed. They didn't get it with respect to COVID,

0:28:36.160 --> 0:28:39.280
<v Speaker 1>they didn't get it with respect to personnel, they didn't

0:28:39.320 --> 0:28:44.280
<v Speaker 1>get it with respect to rhetoric on the policy substance.

0:28:44.880 --> 0:28:49.520
<v Speaker 1>So given what happened, I wasn't surprised to see UH

0:28:49.800 --> 0:28:57.400
<v Speaker 1>markets respond with disappointment. Now, Ultimately what happens is gonna

0:28:57.600 --> 0:29:01.120
<v Speaker 1>depend not on what was said add and just which

0:29:01.160 --> 0:29:05.440
<v Speaker 1>personnelity appointments took place at this Party Congress. Ultimately, is

0:29:05.480 --> 0:29:09.680
<v Speaker 1>going to depend on how things in the Chinese economy

0:29:09.840 --> 0:29:13.280
<v Speaker 1>play out, and it's gonna depend on the judgments the

0:29:13.360 --> 0:29:17.120
<v Speaker 1>president she makes. Okay, Larry, thank you so very much.

0:29:17.120 --> 0:29:18.640
<v Speaker 1>Always great to have you with us. That's our very

0:29:18.680 --> 0:29:21.959
<v Speaker 1>special contributor for Wall Street, Larry Summers of Harvard. Finally,

0:29:22.080 --> 0:29:25.560
<v Speaker 1>one more thought, getting it right and getting it wrong.

0:29:26.240 --> 0:29:29.240
<v Speaker 1>Nothing feels better than having plans work out even better

0:29:29.360 --> 0:29:32.240
<v Speaker 1>than we'd hoped. Fiser betting big on m R n

0:29:32.320 --> 0:29:34.880
<v Speaker 1>A and coming up with a COVID vaccine. There's no

0:29:34.920 --> 0:29:37.479
<v Speaker 1>option of failing, and there's no way that we can

0:29:37.520 --> 0:29:40.280
<v Speaker 1>do it because failure is not option. And if not

0:29:40.400 --> 0:29:44.560
<v Speaker 1>Austin who or the Patriots going for the n draft

0:29:44.560 --> 0:29:47.959
<v Speaker 1>pick and coming up with Tom Brady. But what happens

0:29:47.960 --> 0:29:50.920
<v Speaker 1>when it goes wrong when you take a big public

0:29:50.960 --> 0:29:53.640
<v Speaker 1>position and get your head handed to you. Like President

0:29:53.680 --> 0:29:57.520
<v Speaker 1>Putin deciding to advant Ukraine expecting a quick and glorious win.

0:29:57.920 --> 0:30:02.640
<v Speaker 1>President is fa Link in Ukraine. This war is not

0:30:02.880 --> 0:30:06.400
<v Speaker 1>going as planned or for that matter, Kanye West, now

0:30:06.440 --> 0:30:08.960
<v Speaker 1>known as Yea, deciding not to be shy about his

0:30:09.000 --> 0:30:12.880
<v Speaker 1>anti Semitic sentiments and losing his mega deal with Adidas

0:30:12.960 --> 0:30:16.720
<v Speaker 1>in the process. In recent weeks he has made controversial statements,

0:30:16.760 --> 0:30:20.040
<v Speaker 1>including anti Semitic posts on social media that's turned his

0:30:20.200 --> 0:30:23.640
<v Speaker 1>easy line of sneakers into a lightning world for criticism,

0:30:23.680 --> 0:30:27.160
<v Speaker 1>which brings us to economic policy and getting cross wise

0:30:27.160 --> 0:30:30.120
<v Speaker 1>of the markets. Liz Trust made her first big move

0:30:30.160 --> 0:30:33.440
<v Speaker 1>as British Prime Minister be a new budget, which the

0:30:33.440 --> 0:30:38.080
<v Speaker 1>markets promptly and emphatically rejected, leading it to her quick departure.

0:30:38.360 --> 0:30:41.960
<v Speaker 1>I am resigning as leader of the Conservative Party. So

0:30:42.160 --> 0:30:45.320
<v Speaker 1>her successor, she Suna, started his tenure this week by

0:30:45.320 --> 0:30:48.680
<v Speaker 1>saying he'd make it up to the markets. I will

0:30:48.720 --> 0:30:53.920
<v Speaker 1>place economic stability and confidence at the heart of this

0:30:54.160 --> 0:30:58.640
<v Speaker 1>government's agenda. But consider the very different case of President

0:30:58.680 --> 0:31:01.240
<v Speaker 1>gy of China, who this got his way on having

0:31:01.240 --> 0:31:05.280
<v Speaker 1>a third term, surrounded himself with only his closest allies,

0:31:05.520 --> 0:31:09.480
<v Speaker 1>and forged ahead on his aggressive economic policy, which led

0:31:09.480 --> 0:31:12.720
<v Speaker 1>the markets to give another big thumbs down. As very

0:31:12.800 --> 0:31:15.600
<v Speaker 1>lovely of the Peterson insit explained it, one of the

0:31:15.640 --> 0:31:18.440
<v Speaker 1>big things that came out of this is that we're

0:31:18.440 --> 0:31:21.960
<v Speaker 1>going to stay the course with she Anomics, and that

0:31:22.040 --> 0:31:26.560
<v Speaker 1>means continued centralization of power. We're staying the course and

0:31:27.000 --> 0:31:29.520
<v Speaker 1>the course doesn't look that great from the market's point

0:31:29.560 --> 0:31:31.880
<v Speaker 1>of view. No one thinks President she is about to

0:31:31.880 --> 0:31:34.800
<v Speaker 1>pull a Liz Trust. So in the course of a week,

0:31:34.840 --> 0:31:38.080
<v Speaker 1>the markets won one and lost one, and the time

0:31:38.160 --> 0:31:40.120
<v Speaker 1>may be broken just over a week from now, when

0:31:40.160 --> 0:31:42.600
<v Speaker 1>Americans go to the polls in the mid term elections

0:31:42.960 --> 0:31:46.160
<v Speaker 1>with their opinion of President Biden's economic policies very much

0:31:46.200 --> 0:31:48.760
<v Speaker 1>on the ballot, Jared Bernstein from the White House wants

0:31:48.840 --> 0:31:51.440
<v Speaker 1>voters to focus on all the jobs that have been created.

0:31:51.600 --> 0:31:55.840
<v Speaker 1>Our top line objective here's to maintain the economic gains

0:31:55.880 --> 0:32:01.640
<v Speaker 1>we've made for working Americans while significantly easing price pressures. Time,

0:32:01.720 --> 0:32:04.440
<v Speaker 1>as they say, will tell, But from what we've seen

0:32:04.520 --> 0:32:07.560
<v Speaker 1>so far, what James Carville said thirty years ago remains

0:32:07.600 --> 0:32:10.280
<v Speaker 1>true in the United Kingdom, in the United States, and

0:32:10.440 --> 0:32:13.600
<v Speaker 1>I guess we'll see about China. It's the economy stupid

0:32:13.840 --> 0:32:15.560
<v Speaker 1>that does it. For this episode of Wall Street Week,

0:32:15.640 --> 0:32:18.400
<v Speaker 1>I'm David Weston. This is Bloomberg. See you next week.