WEBVTT - A&G Replay Friday Hour Three

0:00:10.560 --> 0:00:14.360
<v Speaker 1>Broadcasting live from the Abraham Lincoln Radio Studio of the

0:00:14.440 --> 0:00:18.400
<v Speaker 1>George Washington Broadcast Center. Jack Armstrong and Joe.

0:00:18.280 --> 0:00:21.200
<v Speaker 2>Gaddy Armstrong and he.

0:00:24.079 --> 0:00:41.880
<v Speaker 3>Armstrong and Catty Strong and.

0:00:35.920 --> 0:00:39.920
<v Speaker 4>Hely released drone video shows Palestinian militants pretending to be

0:00:40.000 --> 0:00:43.760
<v Speaker 4>workers from the World Central Kitchen. They travel in two cars,

0:00:44.080 --> 0:00:47.720
<v Speaker 4>one marked with the flag of the Humanitarian Organization before

0:00:47.880 --> 0:00:50.440
<v Speaker 4>they're hit by IDF airstrikes.

0:00:50.200 --> 0:00:53.280
<v Speaker 2>WCK in real time, we're able to verify that vehicle

0:00:53.720 --> 0:00:56.800
<v Speaker 2>was not connected to the organization in any way, which

0:00:56.840 --> 0:00:58.520
<v Speaker 2>means those terrris for using.

0:00:58.280 --> 0:01:02.120
<v Speaker 4>That as a disguise for their terror activity inside Gaza.

0:01:02.160 --> 0:01:06.000
<v Speaker 4>Israeli airstrikes targeted multiple areas of the enclave over the

0:01:06.040 --> 0:01:09.920
<v Speaker 4>past twenty four hours, killing dozens of Palestinian civilians.

0:01:10.280 --> 0:01:14.040
<v Speaker 5>Okay, So in spite of that, it's absolutely documented, undeniable

0:01:14.120 --> 0:01:19.880
<v Speaker 5>that Hamask guys were masquerading as food belief guys. NPR

0:01:19.920 --> 0:01:22.960
<v Speaker 5>considers it completely impossible that they would impersonate journalists, or

0:01:22.959 --> 0:01:26.640
<v Speaker 5>at least that's what they're saying innocence. And those views

0:01:26.640 --> 0:01:29.520
<v Speaker 5>are supported practically to a person by the American left

0:01:30.040 --> 0:01:31.800
<v Speaker 5>and a lot of the left in a lot of

0:01:31.840 --> 0:01:34.480
<v Speaker 5>the Western world, What the hell is going on? To

0:01:34.560 --> 0:01:38.320
<v Speaker 5>quote Eli Lake, who's a brilliant writer in the West,

0:01:38.360 --> 0:01:40.840
<v Speaker 5>the politics of the Gaza war feature a strange marriage

0:01:40.880 --> 0:01:44.800
<v Speaker 5>between political Islam and the twenty first century Western left,

0:01:45.600 --> 0:01:49.560
<v Speaker 5>for instance, the Democratic Socialists of America. This is Mumdani's

0:01:49.600 --> 0:01:54.480
<v Speaker 5>crew simultaneously support making New York a national hub for

0:01:54.520 --> 0:01:59.000
<v Speaker 5>a transgender medicine and want to globalize the intefada.

0:01:59.320 --> 0:02:01.560
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, that is a good point.

0:02:02.520 --> 0:02:05.680
<v Speaker 5>It support, It supports the bleeding edge of social progressive

0:02:05.760 --> 0:02:09.280
<v Speaker 5>values while throwing its full support behind the fanatic fascists

0:02:09.520 --> 0:02:12.079
<v Speaker 5>who filmed their mass murder of Jews and probably posted

0:02:12.120 --> 0:02:17.240
<v Speaker 5>the videos to telegram. And Lake, in an absolutely fabulous

0:02:17.280 --> 0:02:19.800
<v Speaker 5>piece that will post I think you might get paywalled,

0:02:19.840 --> 0:02:23.880
<v Speaker 5>but maybe not, talks about how the what's called the

0:02:23.880 --> 0:02:27.359
<v Speaker 5>red Green alliance among people who think about this sort

0:02:27.400 --> 0:02:30.000
<v Speaker 5>of thing, how it came up, and it really came up,

0:02:30.040 --> 0:02:33.120
<v Speaker 5>and yes he was red, and who's green here? Reds

0:02:33.200 --> 0:02:36.760
<v Speaker 5>is and communists in green, the color of Hamas and

0:02:36.840 --> 0:02:39.760
<v Speaker 5>radical Islam and various thank you for asking for the

0:02:39.760 --> 0:02:41.680
<v Speaker 5>clarification to hit for the room.

0:02:41.800 --> 0:02:42.200
<v Speaker 2>Anyway.

0:02:43.080 --> 0:02:46.200
<v Speaker 5>A lot of this arose during Iran's Islamic revolution in

0:02:46.280 --> 0:02:49.240
<v Speaker 5>nineteen seventy eight and seventy nine, and he goes into

0:02:49.480 --> 0:02:54.880
<v Speaker 5>and it's so interesting the details of how Ayatola Komeni,

0:02:55.280 --> 0:02:59.440
<v Speaker 5>who is in exile in France, started giving all sorts

0:02:59.480 --> 0:03:05.480
<v Speaker 5>of really carefully controlled interviews to American and European media outlets,

0:03:06.440 --> 0:03:12.200
<v Speaker 5>and how they're on this pr campaign to convince the

0:03:12.200 --> 0:03:15.359
<v Speaker 5>West that he's a reasonable fellow. In fact, he's really

0:03:15.680 --> 0:03:20.600
<v Speaker 5>for democracy, and Lake is writing. Anybody who spent ten

0:03:20.680 --> 0:03:26.160
<v Speaker 5>minutes looking into Komaney knew that he was a hardcore

0:03:26.800 --> 0:03:30.360
<v Speaker 5>is Lomiest monster. You didn't even have to try to

0:03:30.400 --> 0:03:34.960
<v Speaker 5>figure it out. But the left of American journalism, in

0:03:35.000 --> 0:03:38.920
<v Speaker 5>Western journalism, and some folks like in the Carter administration

0:03:39.480 --> 0:03:45.240
<v Speaker 5>became completely convinced and touted in the face of all

0:03:45.320 --> 0:03:49.440
<v Speaker 5>of this that no, he was actually a really good guy.

0:03:50.280 --> 0:03:54.080
<v Speaker 5>Richard Falk, a Princeton professor of international law who met

0:03:54.080 --> 0:03:57.720
<v Speaker 5>with Comany during his exile outside of Paris, Andrew Young,

0:03:57.800 --> 0:04:01.800
<v Speaker 5>Jimmy Carter's ambassador to the United Name, told reporters that

0:04:01.880 --> 0:04:05.840
<v Speaker 5>the Iotola will eventually be regarded as a saint like

0:04:05.880 --> 0:04:11.760
<v Speaker 5>this folk, the Princeton professor, And because people were saying

0:04:13.640 --> 0:04:15.160
<v Speaker 5>there were some on the right who said, look, this

0:04:15.160 --> 0:04:18.479
<v Speaker 5>guy's a reactionary and a terrorist. And he said, to

0:04:18.520 --> 0:04:21.600
<v Speaker 5>suppose that Iotola Coomani is disassembling.

0:04:21.040 --> 0:04:22.480
<v Speaker 2>Seems almost beyond belief.

0:04:23.120 --> 0:04:26.280
<v Speaker 5>His political style is to express his real views defiantly

0:04:26.480 --> 0:04:29.120
<v Speaker 5>and without apology, regardless of consequences.

0:04:29.560 --> 0:04:30.240
<v Speaker 2>Blah blah blah.

0:04:30.279 --> 0:04:33.000
<v Speaker 5>Thus the depiction of him as a fanatical reactionary and

0:04:33.360 --> 0:04:37.479
<v Speaker 5>the bearer of crude prejudices seemed certainly and happily false.

0:04:38.200 --> 0:04:40.479
<v Speaker 5>And what is also encouraging is that as entourage of

0:04:40.920 --> 0:04:45.039
<v Speaker 5>close advisors is uniformly composed of moderate progressive individuals.

0:04:45.640 --> 0:04:48.080
<v Speaker 2>I know you and Eli Lake are about to explain

0:04:48.120 --> 0:04:50.039
<v Speaker 2>to me why. But is it just as simple as

0:04:50.120 --> 0:04:52.159
<v Speaker 2>the enemy of my enemy is my friend, and my

0:04:52.400 --> 0:04:55.880
<v Speaker 2>enemy is mean the United States, So somebody who doesn't

0:04:56.000 --> 0:04:59.320
<v Speaker 2>like us is good to I like. Right, There's more

0:04:59.400 --> 0:05:00.080
<v Speaker 2>to it than that.

0:05:00.160 --> 0:05:02.840
<v Speaker 5>But yeah, the very short version of it is essentially,

0:05:03.320 --> 0:05:07.320
<v Speaker 5>wait a minute, you want to overthrow Western civilization. I

0:05:07.400 --> 0:05:11.760
<v Speaker 5>want to overthrow Western civilization. You want to impose Islamism,

0:05:11.800 --> 0:05:14.680
<v Speaker 5>but I want to impose Marxism. Well, I tell you what,

0:05:14.760 --> 0:05:18.720
<v Speaker 5>how about we work together and then when the civilization's

0:05:18.760 --> 0:05:23.160
<v Speaker 5>overthrown will peacefully cooperate and divide the spoils. Then, of course,

0:05:23.200 --> 0:05:25.279
<v Speaker 5>like in every revolution, they kill each other as fast

0:05:25.320 --> 0:05:25.800
<v Speaker 5>as they can.

0:05:26.200 --> 0:05:28.719
<v Speaker 2>But there's one more factor. You got jihad in my

0:05:28.800 --> 0:05:31.200
<v Speaker 2>queer studies. You got queer studies in my jihad.

0:05:31.279 --> 0:05:35.279
<v Speaker 5>Two great tastes. It tastes great together. Oh that's beautiful anyway.

0:05:35.480 --> 0:05:41.200
<v Speaker 5>So this brings us to the connection between something I

0:05:41.279 --> 0:05:44.480
<v Speaker 5>have been harping about for a very long time, as

0:05:44.680 --> 0:05:46.120
<v Speaker 5>has James Lindsay.

0:05:45.800 --> 0:05:46.520
<v Speaker 2>And other folks.

0:05:47.000 --> 0:05:50.799
<v Speaker 5>If there is one Western progressive who illuminates the emergence

0:05:50.839 --> 0:05:54.080
<v Speaker 5>of the Red Green Alliance, it is the French philosopher

0:05:54.120 --> 0:05:58.320
<v Speaker 5>Michelle fucau Well. I've mentioned several times. In nineteen seventy

0:05:58.320 --> 0:06:01.200
<v Speaker 5>eight fou Co was absolutely the peak of his influence.

0:06:01.440 --> 0:06:06.640
<v Speaker 5>He was the post modernist who is revolutionizing universities with

0:06:06.800 --> 0:06:10.400
<v Speaker 5>his withering critique of the Western Enlightenment and values that

0:06:10.520 --> 0:06:17.640
<v Speaker 5>underpin modern liberalism. Fuko was literally anti Enlightenment, and he

0:06:17.760 --> 0:06:22.520
<v Speaker 5>is the father of all critical theory. Okay, And I

0:06:22.560 --> 0:06:26.040
<v Speaker 5>think people have a tendency to think, all right, Getty

0:06:26.200 --> 0:06:30.080
<v Speaker 5>and Lindsay are paranoid or whatever, or their conspiracy theorists.

0:06:31.200 --> 0:06:34.440
<v Speaker 5>I had a friend in high school who was Indian.

0:06:35.600 --> 0:06:40.760
<v Speaker 5>His parents had emigrated from India and they were Hindus,

0:06:41.520 --> 0:06:45.520
<v Speaker 5>and in visiting his house and hanging out with his family,

0:06:45.640 --> 0:06:49.040
<v Speaker 5>so it became clear to me that there were figures

0:06:49.080 --> 0:06:54.599
<v Speaker 5>in Hinduism that were known and revered to billions of

0:06:54.720 --> 0:06:57.840
<v Speaker 5>people around the world, who I'd never heard of.

0:06:59.240 --> 0:07:01.120
<v Speaker 2>I would suggest to you my friends, and you are

0:07:01.160 --> 0:07:01.640
<v Speaker 2>my friends.

0:07:03.640 --> 0:07:10.120
<v Speaker 5>Fuko is that for the Neomarxists, for those who would

0:07:10.200 --> 0:07:13.480
<v Speaker 5>overthrow Western civilization. He is a godhead to them. And

0:07:13.520 --> 0:07:16.200
<v Speaker 5>you don't know his name, but trust me what I

0:07:16.200 --> 0:07:19.240
<v Speaker 5>tell you. It's incredibly important that you understand. So this

0:07:19.280 --> 0:07:22.800
<v Speaker 5>guy was incredibly influential in the universities in the seventies,

0:07:23.080 --> 0:07:25.120
<v Speaker 5>and in nineteen seventy eight he was commissioned by two

0:07:25.160 --> 0:07:28.760
<v Speaker 5>Italian newspapers to report on the Iranian Revolution. And like

0:07:28.800 --> 0:07:32.080
<v Speaker 5>one of those you know Left East you know Time

0:07:32.160 --> 0:07:35.720
<v Speaker 5>magazine guys who were visiting the Soviet Union in one

0:07:35.720 --> 0:07:39.400
<v Speaker 5>of their Potempkin villages back in the forties, say or fifties,

0:07:39.600 --> 0:07:44.880
<v Speaker 5>he couldn't stop gushing about how great the Itola was

0:07:45.240 --> 0:07:47.240
<v Speaker 5>and he was going to get rid of the oppression

0:07:47.280 --> 0:07:54.160
<v Speaker 5>of Western politics. And Zabadabadu so, and this gets a

0:07:54.160 --> 0:07:56.360
<v Speaker 5>little complicated, but I'll get to the simple part. Fuco

0:07:56.520 --> 0:07:59.800
<v Speaker 5>was a major intellectual influence on the late Columbia University

0:07:59.800 --> 0:08:05.760
<v Speaker 5>of professor Edward Sayd's Orientalism now a postcolonial ism study Bible,

0:08:05.920 --> 0:08:10.240
<v Speaker 5>which critique how Western imperial writers made Arabs, Muslims and

0:08:10.320 --> 0:08:13.920
<v Speaker 5>Easterners objects in their narratives and impose their own agenda

0:08:13.960 --> 0:08:19.560
<v Speaker 5>on their histories. Here is the great postmodernist celebrating Ayatola

0:08:19.600 --> 0:08:24.119
<v Speaker 5>Komane overthrowing the Western government, even though Komane would would

0:08:24.120 --> 0:08:28.840
<v Speaker 5>execute Fuco and his company the first chance they got.

0:08:29.040 --> 0:08:30.720
<v Speaker 2>But that was the birthplace of it.

0:08:31.840 --> 0:08:35.240
<v Speaker 5>And until you understand that postmodernism thing, you don't get

0:08:35.280 --> 0:08:38.800
<v Speaker 5>critical theory. You don't understand what DEI is and what

0:08:38.840 --> 0:08:43.120
<v Speaker 5>it's trying to accomplish. You don't understand queer theory, radical

0:08:43.200 --> 0:08:47.080
<v Speaker 5>gender theory. All the confused adolescent girls getting their healthy

0:08:47.080 --> 0:08:52.000
<v Speaker 5>breasts removed because they're momentarily confused by you know, adolescents

0:08:52.000 --> 0:08:53.839
<v Speaker 5>and puberty and the rest of it. This is all

0:08:54.080 --> 0:08:56.400
<v Speaker 5>straight back to Fuco and critical theory.

0:08:57.440 --> 0:09:03.280
<v Speaker 2>Clearly, this theory is true in that it is happening.

0:09:05.160 --> 0:09:07.600
<v Speaker 2>I still don't get how you're not argued out of

0:09:07.600 --> 0:09:11.240
<v Speaker 2>that position very quickly. If somebody says to you, you

0:09:11.360 --> 0:09:15.280
<v Speaker 2>realize if you're in Iran, they would they would murder

0:09:15.320 --> 0:09:18.640
<v Speaker 2>you immediately. Oh yeah, so I guess I'd better pick

0:09:18.679 --> 0:09:20.920
<v Speaker 2>a different group to work with.

0:09:21.360 --> 0:09:24.600
<v Speaker 5>I mean, right, a different philosophy. Here's the thing. And

0:09:24.640 --> 0:09:27.640
<v Speaker 5>these people are smart. I mean they're insane, but they're smart.

0:09:28.200 --> 0:09:32.720
<v Speaker 5>They convince you completely of their premise that Western society

0:09:32.840 --> 0:09:39.240
<v Speaker 5>what was that phrase, have made all other people objects

0:09:39.360 --> 0:09:43.120
<v Speaker 5>in their narratives and impose their own agenda on their histories.

0:09:43.320 --> 0:09:47.120
<v Speaker 5>The key philosophy of critical theory is that there is

0:09:47.160 --> 0:09:51.680
<v Speaker 5>no objective truth there. Don't even seek it, it doesn't exist.

0:09:52.040 --> 0:09:57.200
<v Speaker 5>All there is is narratives, and narratives come from your culture,

0:09:57.800 --> 0:10:02.400
<v Speaker 5>and since Western culture is dominant, it has created a

0:10:02.520 --> 0:10:07.200
<v Speaker 5>narrative that says the Iyatola Komene is a monster, but

0:10:07.320 --> 0:10:11.720
<v Speaker 5>that's just because they're threatened by him, so they're racists,

0:10:11.760 --> 0:10:14.560
<v Speaker 5>they're othering him. And once you have that down to

0:10:14.600 --> 0:10:18.120
<v Speaker 5>your bones, then you can't be argued off of it

0:10:18.240 --> 0:10:21.679
<v Speaker 5>on the basis of me saying they torture and then

0:10:21.800 --> 0:10:25.920
<v Speaker 5>kill anybody who's gay or transgender because I'm a Westerner

0:10:26.640 --> 0:10:30.079
<v Speaker 5>trying to lie to them using my narrative.

0:10:31.040 --> 0:10:37.800
<v Speaker 2>So they don't believe that Jihadis would murder gay people,

0:10:38.360 --> 0:10:41.280
<v Speaker 2>or they think Jihadis only murdered gay people because of

0:10:41.320 --> 0:10:42.679
<v Speaker 2>the position we've put them in.

0:10:43.400 --> 0:10:46.760
<v Speaker 5>Uh yeah, indirectly, Yeah, the first part, one hundred percent.

0:10:46.960 --> 0:10:52.120
<v Speaker 5>And or we have so dominated them and crushed their

0:10:52.160 --> 0:10:55.959
<v Speaker 5>spirits and oppressed them that they're acting out in ways

0:10:55.960 --> 0:10:58.440
<v Speaker 5>that they won't anymore when the Enlightenment comes, when the

0:10:58.480 --> 0:11:02.040
<v Speaker 5>Marxist revolution comes. I mean like excusing the crimes of

0:11:02.080 --> 0:11:06.560
<v Speaker 5>October seventh. You saw that directly. Look, they're under oppression.

0:11:06.559 --> 0:11:09.280
<v Speaker 5>What do you expect them to do? Yeah, and I

0:11:09.280 --> 0:11:12.640
<v Speaker 5>don't believe they raped and killed babies. No, they just

0:11:12.679 --> 0:11:15.080
<v Speaker 5>fought back against the oppressor self solution.

0:11:15.559 --> 0:11:18.120
<v Speaker 2>That's a scary thing to be up against. There's way

0:11:18.200 --> 0:11:19.400
<v Speaker 2>too many people to believe it.

0:11:19.960 --> 0:11:23.160
<v Speaker 5>Oh, and they're in our schools, folks, our elementary schools,

0:11:23.160 --> 0:11:25.600
<v Speaker 5>our high schools, and our colleges and our grad schools.

0:11:26.000 --> 0:11:28.720
<v Speaker 5>That is one of the dominant philosophies, if not the

0:11:28.840 --> 0:11:32.040
<v Speaker 5>dominant philosophy, in our educational complex, which is why I'm

0:11:32.040 --> 0:11:35.600
<v Speaker 5>always saying it's the most important problem that faces America.

0:11:35.640 --> 0:11:36.480
<v Speaker 2>Bigger than China.

0:11:37.720 --> 0:11:41.880
<v Speaker 5>It's the center street jihadism, thank you, man, well post Marxism,

0:11:41.960 --> 0:11:46.800
<v Speaker 5>but cultural Marxism, postmodernism, neo Marxism, whatever you want.

0:11:46.600 --> 0:11:46.880
<v Speaker 3>To call it.

0:11:47.400 --> 0:11:51.040
<v Speaker 2>Thinks it's interesting because back then when Mitt Romney was

0:11:51.240 --> 0:11:54.199
<v Speaker 2>running for president and after nine to eleven, jihadism did

0:11:54.200 --> 0:11:55.920
<v Speaker 2>seem like the biggest problem in the world. And it's

0:11:55.920 --> 0:12:00.680
<v Speaker 2>a problem, no doubt. But I'm more worried about Marxism

0:12:00.679 --> 0:12:02.760
<v Speaker 2>in the foothold it's got in the United States and

0:12:02.800 --> 0:12:05.640
<v Speaker 2>Western culture that I am about jihatism.

0:12:05.080 --> 0:12:09.079
<v Speaker 5>By a lot, right right, Yeah, my final word, And folks,

0:12:09.120 --> 0:12:11.480
<v Speaker 5>I apologize in advance. I'm going to use a bad

0:12:11.600 --> 0:12:15.480
<v Speaker 5>letter here if you think I don't know that seems

0:12:15.520 --> 0:12:21.760
<v Speaker 5>kind of paranoid. These efing people wrote efing books. Their

0:12:21.880 --> 0:12:26.080
<v Speaker 5>efing names are on the efing spines, and they e

0:12:26.160 --> 0:12:30.440
<v Speaker 5>FFing describe precisely what they're e fing going to do,

0:12:31.880 --> 0:12:36.720
<v Speaker 5>and they're doing it precisely as they e fing described.

0:12:37.040 --> 0:12:37.600
<v Speaker 2>End of screen.

0:12:40.080 --> 0:12:45.000
<v Speaker 5>Troubling societies are brought down by their own decadence.

0:12:45.240 --> 0:12:48.880
<v Speaker 2>If you're interested in this stuff, man, go to YouTube

0:12:48.880 --> 0:12:52.439
<v Speaker 2>and just type in James Lindsay. He's got some unbelievable.

0:12:52.440 --> 0:12:55.360
<v Speaker 2>YouTube videos about this are so damn interesting and a

0:12:55.400 --> 0:12:56.040
<v Speaker 2>great place to.

0:12:55.960 --> 0:12:58.280
<v Speaker 5>Start is for thee hundredth time his book with Helen

0:12:58.280 --> 0:13:00.200
<v Speaker 5>Pluckrose Cynical Theories.

0:13:00.280 --> 0:13:02.800
<v Speaker 2>It's great, The Armstrong and Getty Show.

0:13:02.920 --> 0:13:10.160
<v Speaker 1>Yeah more Jack your show podcasts and our hot links

0:13:06.280 --> 0:13:18.480
<v Speaker 1>and Jack Armstrong and Joe Getty The Armstrong and Getty Show.

0:13:18.720 --> 0:13:21.360
<v Speaker 5>The percentage of US adults who say they consume alcohol

0:13:21.360 --> 0:13:23.920
<v Speaker 5>has fallen to fifty four percent, the lowest.

0:13:23.600 --> 0:13:24.560
<v Speaker 2>In ninety years.

0:13:24.960 --> 0:13:27.400
<v Speaker 5>The Gallup says the poll has a margin of era

0:13:27.480 --> 0:13:28.720
<v Speaker 5>of plus or minus two.

0:13:28.760 --> 0:13:38.000
<v Speaker 2>Kamala Harris's that's really interesting. Americans are consuming alcohol at

0:13:38.040 --> 0:13:46.880
<v Speaker 2>the lowest rate in ninety years. Yeah, wow, why variety things?

0:13:46.920 --> 0:13:49.640
<v Speaker 5>I think there are other substances available now they're legal.

0:13:50.640 --> 0:13:52.959
<v Speaker 5>Plus that this is just the trend line among younger

0:13:53.000 --> 0:13:56.800
<v Speaker 5>people than a number of different theories floated for as

0:13:56.840 --> 0:14:01.640
<v Speaker 5>to why. Somebody's really sure it's not great for your health,

0:14:01.960 --> 0:14:02.720
<v Speaker 5>but the world.

0:14:02.840 --> 0:14:08.120
<v Speaker 2>But you compare it with where we are emotionally, it

0:14:08.160 --> 0:14:14.720
<v Speaker 2>seems like people are less happy, more angry. The world

0:14:14.840 --> 0:14:16.760
<v Speaker 2>is in more turmoil than it has been in the

0:14:16.800 --> 0:14:18.559
<v Speaker 2>past two you were drinking less.

0:14:19.440 --> 0:14:22.520
<v Speaker 5>Well, maybe you know the whole I'm a social drinker.

0:14:22.600 --> 0:14:25.360
<v Speaker 5>Thing always seemed odd to me as a guy who

0:14:25.400 --> 0:14:30.240
<v Speaker 5>prefers to drink alone muttering angrily in the dark. But

0:14:31.440 --> 0:14:34.160
<v Speaker 5>I think for a lot of humanity, people drink more

0:14:34.200 --> 0:14:36.800
<v Speaker 5>when they're together and having fun.

0:14:37.800 --> 0:14:42.400
<v Speaker 2>Wow. Okay, that's stunning, though, I mean, I mean that's

0:14:42.400 --> 0:14:46.760
<v Speaker 2>a notable number. Yeah, oh yeah, it's astounding. It's not

0:14:46.880 --> 0:14:49.680
<v Speaker 2>the This is the lowest level of this since twenty

0:14:49.760 --> 0:14:52.080
<v Speaker 2>twenty one. I mean, that's sort of stuck waste whatever.

0:14:52.440 --> 0:14:58.000
<v Speaker 2>But ninety years. Yeah, okay, I've noticed my kids and

0:14:58.040 --> 0:14:59.680
<v Speaker 2>I run remember this the other day, What was the

0:14:59.720 --> 0:15:03.640
<v Speaker 2>first restaurant that decided we should have music playing all

0:15:03.680 --> 0:15:08.000
<v Speaker 2>the time. We were at like a chain breakfast place

0:15:08.040 --> 0:15:10.320
<v Speaker 2>the other day, I have a little breakfast there's music

0:15:10.360 --> 0:15:15.280
<v Speaker 2>playing the fairly decent volume, like most places. Who's the

0:15:15.320 --> 0:15:16.720
<v Speaker 2>first to decide that? And why?

0:15:17.480 --> 0:15:21.480
<v Speaker 5>You know, there's been the tinkling piano background music like

0:15:21.560 --> 0:15:25.200
<v Speaker 5>you're classy giants forever, or somebody playing in the corner

0:15:25.240 --> 0:15:25.760
<v Speaker 5>or what have you.

0:15:25.840 --> 0:15:28.440
<v Speaker 2>I don't know. It's everywhere though. It's retails.

0:15:28.520 --> 0:15:31.480
<v Speaker 5>The stores have pop music cranking all the time because

0:15:31.880 --> 0:15:34.320
<v Speaker 5>it makes people happier, I guess, And less likely to

0:15:35.240 --> 0:15:36.240
<v Speaker 5>cuss out the help.

0:15:36.400 --> 0:15:38.640
<v Speaker 2>I don't know, if you go into a store, like

0:15:38.640 --> 0:15:40.680
<v Speaker 2>if you're in the gap and there's not music playing,

0:15:40.720 --> 0:15:42.560
<v Speaker 2>would you be weirded out? Would it feel kind of

0:15:42.560 --> 0:15:43.960
<v Speaker 2>dead and not? I don't know.

0:15:45.080 --> 0:15:48.800
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, I'm in a weird minority in the world of golf,

0:15:50.080 --> 0:15:53.440
<v Speaker 5>having a speaker in the cart, listening to music the

0:15:53.480 --> 0:15:57.920
<v Speaker 5>whole way around the golf court. Really more guys that

0:15:58.080 --> 0:16:00.760
<v Speaker 5>I know are thumbs up than down by far.

0:16:01.200 --> 0:16:04.400
<v Speaker 2>Wow, So I haven't played golf in twenty years or

0:16:04.400 --> 0:16:06.480
<v Speaker 2>something like that, But that would have been unheard of

0:16:06.800 --> 0:16:09.520
<v Speaker 2>back when I played golf. The idea of music blessed

0:16:09.560 --> 0:16:10.320
<v Speaker 2>out of anything.

0:16:10.800 --> 0:16:14.240
<v Speaker 5>Well, it's generally not blasting at you know, unless you're

0:16:14.320 --> 0:16:16.080
<v Speaker 5>I don't know, at a public course where nobody cares.

0:16:16.120 --> 0:16:19.760
<v Speaker 5>But it's in a reasonable volume. I don't can get.

0:16:19.920 --> 0:16:20.960
<v Speaker 5>But I'm in the minority.

0:16:21.240 --> 0:16:23.480
<v Speaker 2>Huh people want that all the time. Huh Is it

0:16:23.600 --> 0:16:26.960
<v Speaker 2>just needing input? I don't know.

0:16:27.400 --> 0:16:30.200
<v Speaker 5>I generally when I listen to music, I'm listening to music,

0:16:30.280 --> 0:16:32.880
<v Speaker 5>not as background music, but you know, you know, teach

0:16:32.960 --> 0:16:33.640
<v Speaker 5>their own.

0:16:33.720 --> 0:16:35.560
<v Speaker 2>Generally, when I was playing golf, I love the fact

0:16:35.600 --> 0:16:37.480
<v Speaker 2>that it was just so silent out there.

0:16:38.160 --> 0:16:40.960
<v Speaker 5>I know, the birds chirping and the sounds of I know,

0:16:41.040 --> 0:16:42.360
<v Speaker 5>that's like my favorite part of it.

0:16:42.400 --> 0:16:44.520
<v Speaker 2>But again, I'm in the minority. I've had to accept it.

0:16:44.560 --> 0:16:46.600
<v Speaker 5>But it's it's kind of annoying in a couple of

0:16:46.600 --> 0:16:49.440
<v Speaker 5>different ways in that you know, you maybe you're in

0:16:49.480 --> 0:16:51.680
<v Speaker 5>this cart and the other guys are over there another cart,

0:16:51.680 --> 0:16:54.480
<v Speaker 5>they're fifty yards away, and you find what you think

0:16:54.560 --> 0:16:57.320
<v Speaker 5>is their ball there and the rough. You say titleist four,

0:16:57.320 --> 0:16:59.680
<v Speaker 5>and they're like, what titleist four?

0:17:00.040 --> 0:17:06.480
<v Speaker 2>But there's a titlist four right here is yours. Because

0:17:06.520 --> 0:17:07.840
<v Speaker 2>you gotta talk over the music.

0:17:07.880 --> 0:17:11.680
<v Speaker 5>You gotta yell over the music, and or they're talking

0:17:11.840 --> 0:17:15.119
<v Speaker 5>way louder than they think they are, because it's sure

0:17:15.400 --> 0:17:17.120
<v Speaker 5>over the music as you're trying to hit a shot.

0:17:17.160 --> 0:17:20.240
<v Speaker 2>But again, I'm in the minority. It's fun. It's the

0:17:20.359 --> 0:17:21.600
<v Speaker 2>Armstrong and Getty show.

0:17:33.240 --> 0:17:41.560
<v Speaker 1>Strong, the Armstrong and Getty Show.

0:17:44.520 --> 0:17:46.800
<v Speaker 2>The Democratic Party is hemorrhaging voters.

0:17:48.119 --> 0:17:53.080
<v Speaker 5>According to the liberal New York Times, the Democratic Party

0:17:53.160 --> 0:17:55.440
<v Speaker 5>faces a voter registration crisis.

0:17:56.000 --> 0:17:58.880
<v Speaker 2>So this is a big, splashy front page story today

0:17:58.920 --> 0:17:59.680
<v Speaker 2>in the New York Times.

0:18:00.160 --> 0:18:04.960
<v Speaker 5>It is their lead story and has the companions story

0:18:05.040 --> 0:18:09.320
<v Speaker 5>with it five takeaways from the Times analysis of Democratic Decline,

0:18:09.600 --> 0:18:11.680
<v Speaker 5>And I'm wondering, why aren't the five takeaways in the

0:18:11.720 --> 0:18:14.680
<v Speaker 5>main story. Why there's got to be two stories, and

0:18:15.480 --> 0:18:18.680
<v Speaker 5>the fact that they're using words like hemorrhaging and disaster.

0:18:19.119 --> 0:18:23.560
<v Speaker 2>So I flip on dam Pede, I flip on Morning Joe,

0:18:23.720 --> 0:18:27.400
<v Speaker 2>MSNBC or ms now or whatever it is today ms now,

0:18:28.080 --> 0:18:31.080
<v Speaker 2>And they led with another one of those Republican town

0:18:31.200 --> 0:18:33.639
<v Speaker 2>halls where the Democrats show up and scream at the

0:18:34.040 --> 0:18:37.520
<v Speaker 2>scream at the person, and they portrayed it as all

0:18:37.560 --> 0:18:41.920
<v Speaker 2>across America, Republicans are on the back foot and this

0:18:42.040 --> 0:18:43.480
<v Speaker 2>and that, and I thought, well, and they went on,

0:18:43.760 --> 0:18:46.520
<v Speaker 2>and I thought, aren't we involved in a war in Ukraine?

0:18:46.680 --> 0:18:46.720
<v Speaker 3>Like?

0:18:46.840 --> 0:18:50.360
<v Speaker 2>Why is this your lead story? Now? I know they

0:18:50.560 --> 0:18:54.360
<v Speaker 2>had to for their crowd, and everybody in DC that's

0:18:54.359 --> 0:18:57.520
<v Speaker 2>a Democrat watches that show. They had to for that

0:18:57.720 --> 0:19:00.560
<v Speaker 2>crowd have a response to this New York Time story

0:19:00.840 --> 0:19:02.280
<v Speaker 2>because this is such a big deal.

0:19:03.280 --> 0:19:03.480
<v Speaker 3>Yeah.

0:19:03.680 --> 0:19:08.280
<v Speaker 5>Interestingly, that what you just mentioned reinforces to me what

0:19:08.400 --> 0:19:11.480
<v Speaker 5>I think the greater narrative is, and that is that

0:19:11.880 --> 0:19:17.240
<v Speaker 5>people perceive the Democratic Party to be a few, very

0:19:17.480 --> 0:19:21.240
<v Speaker 5>loud people who believe things I don't believe at all.

0:19:21.680 --> 0:19:23.720
<v Speaker 2>Right, and the town.

0:19:23.600 --> 0:19:26.399
<v Speaker 5>Halls is a number of people who are willing to

0:19:26.520 --> 0:19:28.320
<v Speaker 5>bellow and shout down speakers.

0:19:28.440 --> 0:19:30.600
<v Speaker 2>You know why that narrative is out there? Why do

0:19:30.600 --> 0:19:31.160
<v Speaker 2>you suppose?

0:19:32.320 --> 0:19:34.959
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, no kidding. So some facts and then we can

0:19:35.080 --> 0:19:39.520
<v Speaker 5>continue the discussion. The Democratic Party, it is, the Democratic

0:19:39.560 --> 0:19:41.600
<v Speaker 5>Party is hemorrhaging voters long before they even go to

0:19:41.640 --> 0:19:44.720
<v Speaker 5>the polls. Of the thirty states the track voter registration

0:19:44.840 --> 0:19:45.760
<v Speaker 5>by political party.

0:19:45.920 --> 0:19:48.320
<v Speaker 2>The other twenty don't ask your party when you're register,

0:19:48.560 --> 0:19:49.680
<v Speaker 2>but if the thirty that do.

0:19:50.200 --> 0:19:54.800
<v Speaker 5>Democrats lost ground to Republicans in every single one between

0:19:54.920 --> 0:19:58.200
<v Speaker 5>twenty twenty four, twenty twenty and twenty twenty four elections,

0:19:58.400 --> 0:20:01.880
<v Speaker 5>and often by a lot. That four year swing toward

0:20:01.960 --> 0:20:04.439
<v Speaker 5>Republicans adds up to four and a half million voters,

0:20:04.480 --> 0:20:06.880
<v Speaker 5>a deep political hole that could take years for Democrats

0:20:06.920 --> 0:20:12.720
<v Speaker 5>to climb out from the stampede. So it's atamorrhaging stampede,

0:20:13.200 --> 0:20:16.879
<v Speaker 5>good lord. The stampede away from the Democratic Party is

0:20:16.960 --> 0:20:21.639
<v Speaker 5>incurring in battleground states, the bluest states, and the reddest states.

0:20:22.080 --> 0:20:24.800
<v Speaker 5>According to a new analysis of voter registration data by

0:20:24.920 --> 0:20:27.640
<v Speaker 5>the New York Times, I'm surprised.

0:20:28.800 --> 0:20:29.520
<v Speaker 2>It must be the.

0:20:29.720 --> 0:20:30.280
<v Speaker 5>Power of.

0:20:32.440 --> 0:20:36.159
<v Speaker 2>The online world Twitter, TikTok and that because I'm surprised

0:20:36.240 --> 0:20:41.520
<v Speaker 2>that a John Fetterman or whoever, who's more of a mainstream,

0:20:41.640 --> 0:20:44.879
<v Speaker 2>normal human being, but a Democrat hasn't been able to

0:20:44.960 --> 0:20:49.720
<v Speaker 2>stand up and shout down that very small, very out

0:20:49.760 --> 0:20:54.520
<v Speaker 2>of touch, but very loud segment of their party. Yeah.

0:20:54.960 --> 0:21:00.600
<v Speaker 5>I think there's been a slow recognition process because a

0:21:00.720 --> 0:21:05.200
<v Speaker 5>lot of us on the right or just confused moderate

0:21:05.240 --> 0:21:08.520
<v Speaker 5>folks or whomever, have taken a while to realize, oh

0:21:08.600 --> 0:21:12.399
<v Speaker 5>my gosh, it's not a huge majority of people that

0:21:12.480 --> 0:21:15.200
<v Speaker 5>believes boys should be able to whoop up on girls

0:21:15.240 --> 0:21:19.120
<v Speaker 5>in girls' sports. It's practically nobody around here, everybody who's

0:21:19.160 --> 0:21:19.600
<v Speaker 5>convinced that.

0:21:19.720 --> 0:21:21.800
<v Speaker 2>You had to think that, and everybody was afraid to

0:21:21.840 --> 0:21:22.399
<v Speaker 2>say something.

0:21:22.840 --> 0:21:26.119
<v Speaker 5>So, if you know, conservative people and kind of centrist

0:21:26.160 --> 0:21:28.160
<v Speaker 5>people took a long time to figure that out. It's

0:21:28.160 --> 0:21:31.600
<v Speaker 5>going to take forever for Democrats to recognize that in

0:21:31.720 --> 0:21:34.439
<v Speaker 5>themselves and say, yeah, you know, the people we really

0:21:34.560 --> 0:21:37.600
<v Speaker 5>need to stand up against to win elections. It's not

0:21:37.720 --> 0:21:40.280
<v Speaker 5>the evil orange guy, and it's not the mean, cruel

0:21:40.320 --> 0:21:44.360
<v Speaker 5>Republicans who are trying to redistrict, Texas. It's our own lunatics.

0:21:45.440 --> 0:21:49.040
<v Speaker 5>Here's some more facts. Few measurements reflect the luster of

0:21:49.040 --> 0:21:52.280
<v Speaker 5>a political party's brand more clearly than the voters the

0:21:52.400 --> 0:21:55.200
<v Speaker 5>choice by voters to identify with it. Fewer and fewer

0:21:55.200 --> 0:21:59.840
<v Speaker 5>Americans choosing to be Democrats. More new voters nationwide chose

0:21:59.880 --> 0:22:01.840
<v Speaker 5>to Republicans than Democrats last year.

0:22:01.880 --> 0:22:03.920
<v Speaker 2>It's the first time that's happened since twenty eighteen.

0:22:04.720 --> 0:22:10.480
<v Speaker 5>Democrats actually still outnumber Republicans registered nationwide, but that is

0:22:10.560 --> 0:22:14.120
<v Speaker 5>in large measure because giant blue states like California allow

0:22:14.160 --> 0:22:16.919
<v Speaker 5>people registered by party and big red states like Texas

0:22:17.080 --> 0:22:17.320
<v Speaker 5>do not.

0:22:17.880 --> 0:22:19.920
<v Speaker 2>The only caveat I would throw into this story is

0:22:20.000 --> 0:22:22.119
<v Speaker 2>that both parties are much smaller than they used to

0:22:22.160 --> 0:22:23.879
<v Speaker 2>be because there are so many people that don't want

0:22:23.920 --> 0:22:28.639
<v Speaker 2>to identify with either party. Yeah, yeah, final note on this.

0:22:28.760 --> 0:22:30.360
<v Speaker 5>Then I want to jump over to the five takeaways

0:22:30.359 --> 0:22:34.879
<v Speaker 5>because they are pretty interesting, says an election analysis site

0:22:36.359 --> 0:22:39.520
<v Speaker 5>head Michael Pruser. Who you know if you're in politics

0:22:39.600 --> 0:22:42.240
<v Speaker 5>and DC, He said, I don't want to say that

0:22:42.359 --> 0:22:44.800
<v Speaker 5>death cycle of the Democratic Party, but there seems to

0:22:44.880 --> 0:22:47.320
<v Speaker 5>be no end to this. There's no silver lining or

0:22:47.400 --> 0:22:50.560
<v Speaker 5>cavalry coming across the hill. This is month after month,

0:22:50.760 --> 0:22:56.240
<v Speaker 5>year after year. It's an unbroken trend line according to

0:22:56.280 --> 0:22:56.760
<v Speaker 5>these people.

0:22:57.280 --> 0:23:02.320
<v Speaker 2>So yeah, well that's true. Yeah exactly, that's true looking backwards.

0:23:02.400 --> 0:23:06.880
<v Speaker 2>But just somebody could emerge and say, as a Democrat,

0:23:07.160 --> 0:23:10.240
<v Speaker 2>we gotta get control of our borders and dudes can't

0:23:10.280 --> 0:23:12.000
<v Speaker 2>be in a girls' sports and you know, on a

0:23:12.040 --> 0:23:17.200
<v Speaker 2>couple other things, there'd be all the like ninety percent

0:23:17.240 --> 0:23:20.119
<v Speaker 2>of regular Democrats and a whole bunch of people that

0:23:20.280 --> 0:23:23.640
<v Speaker 2>are uncomfortable with Trump that would join onto that immediately.

0:23:24.480 --> 0:23:26.960
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, there's a bloke running for governor in Iowa. I

0:23:27.080 --> 0:23:30.719
<v Speaker 5>don't recall his name, but he's he might as well

0:23:30.800 --> 0:23:33.879
<v Speaker 5>be a Republican. He's running as a Democrat for some reason,

0:23:34.280 --> 0:23:37.000
<v Speaker 5>but he's again, he might as well be a Republican

0:23:37.119 --> 0:23:39.240
<v Speaker 5>if you know, if they can get you know, the

0:23:39.400 --> 0:23:42.880
<v Speaker 5>momentum around that sort of democrat, all of these numbers

0:23:42.920 --> 0:23:43.879
<v Speaker 5>will change quickly.

0:23:44.359 --> 0:23:47.240
<v Speaker 2>But I found this very interesting. Nonetheless, here or five

0:23:47.240 --> 0:23:50.080
<v Speaker 2>big jakeaways. Yes, I will interpret the last time before

0:23:50.119 --> 0:23:53.240
<v Speaker 2>you do this, come here. If you're old. One advantage

0:23:53.280 --> 0:23:56.160
<v Speaker 2>of being old is you have seen both parties declared

0:23:56.280 --> 0:23:59.440
<v Speaker 2>dead a handful of times. Yes, and then like a

0:23:59.520 --> 0:24:01.200
<v Speaker 2>cycler later and they've.

0:24:01.000 --> 0:24:05.440
<v Speaker 5>Been disappointed to find out that, like you know, Frankenstein's monster,

0:24:05.640 --> 0:24:08.080
<v Speaker 5>they have risen from the grave, and then they control

0:24:08.119 --> 0:24:11.520
<v Speaker 5>all three branches like within a cycle or two. So

0:24:11.720 --> 0:24:14.160
<v Speaker 5>here are your five big takeaways. Democrats are losing ground

0:24:14.240 --> 0:24:18.359
<v Speaker 5>with new voters. Some of the decline was voter switching parties,

0:24:18.480 --> 0:24:22.840
<v Speaker 5>some was older Democrats died or people who didn't vote

0:24:22.880 --> 0:24:24.600
<v Speaker 5>for so long they fell off the rolls. But one

0:24:24.600 --> 0:24:26.800
<v Speaker 5>of the more striking findings is the trend among newly

0:24:26.840 --> 0:24:29.360
<v Speaker 5>registered voters from the Democratic Party. In the last six years,

0:24:30.320 --> 0:24:33.560
<v Speaker 5>many voters choosing to be political independence by not registering

0:24:33.600 --> 0:24:36.320
<v Speaker 5>with either, but of the people who do choose between

0:24:36.320 --> 0:24:38.800
<v Speaker 5>the two main parties, this is new voters young voters.

0:24:39.000 --> 0:24:42.359
<v Speaker 5>The Democratic share has been cratering. According to the analysis.

0:24:42.880 --> 0:24:47.040
<v Speaker 5>In twenty eighteen, sixty three percent of new voters were

0:24:47.119 --> 0:24:48.720
<v Speaker 5>Democrats sixty thirty percent.

0:24:49.240 --> 0:24:52.880
<v Speaker 2>Last year was forty eight percent. That is cratering.

0:24:53.600 --> 0:24:56.960
<v Speaker 5>Battleground states are swinging to the right. Between the twenty

0:24:57.040 --> 0:25:00.720
<v Speaker 5>twenty and twenty twenty four elections, Party lost its long

0:25:00.800 --> 0:25:03.880
<v Speaker 5>held registration edge in states such as Florida and New Hampshire.

0:25:04.880 --> 0:25:09.440
<v Speaker 5>That means registered Republicans now outnumber registered Democrats in those states.

0:25:09.680 --> 0:25:12.359
<v Speaker 2>You realize you tried to run a mummy, and then

0:25:12.400 --> 0:25:14.879
<v Speaker 2>when people caught onto the fact that you had a mummy,

0:25:15.119 --> 0:25:19.000
<v Speaker 2>come put in an idiot. I mean, that's a that's

0:25:19.040 --> 0:25:19.680
<v Speaker 2>a bad look.

0:25:20.400 --> 0:25:24.320
<v Speaker 5>With all due respect to six foot four inch fully

0:25:24.600 --> 0:25:29.560
<v Speaker 5>intact males saying I'm a woman and the university saying

0:25:29.640 --> 0:25:33.120
<v Speaker 5>that's a woman, which struck like ninety percent of America

0:25:33.400 --> 0:25:38.399
<v Speaker 5>as effing lunacy. Okay, running a mummy that a moron

0:25:38.640 --> 0:25:42.560
<v Speaker 5>was really prove it's a good point, Jack. So if

0:25:42.720 --> 0:25:45.399
<v Speaker 5>the current trend holds, more states will similarly flip to

0:25:45.480 --> 0:25:48.560
<v Speaker 5>those I mentioned. Nevada briefly tipped into the Republican column

0:25:48.600 --> 0:25:51.080
<v Speaker 5>this year. It's been sea sawing in the months since.

0:25:51.119 --> 0:25:54.080
<v Speaker 5>It's very very close. Simply put, the Democratic edge in

0:25:54.119 --> 0:25:57.399
<v Speaker 5>the swing states has been vanishing. Five point three percent

0:25:57.760 --> 0:26:01.040
<v Speaker 5>gone in Pennsylvania, three and a half perc gone in

0:26:01.160 --> 0:26:04.680
<v Speaker 5>North Carolina, four and a half percent gone in Nevada.

0:26:05.760 --> 0:26:08.639
<v Speaker 5>In Arizona, the only swing state where Republicans held a

0:26:08.720 --> 0:26:12.959
<v Speaker 5>registration edge already in twenty twenty, the GOP advantage has

0:26:13.080 --> 0:26:16.240
<v Speaker 5>swelled by four percentage points in twenty twenty four.

0:26:17.280 --> 0:26:17.720
<v Speaker 2>There's more.

0:26:18.119 --> 0:26:23.520
<v Speaker 5>The gender gap is a growing problem for Democrats. Women

0:26:23.600 --> 0:26:25.840
<v Speaker 5>have tended to support Democrats at higher rates men have

0:26:25.920 --> 0:26:28.760
<v Speaker 5>backed Republicans if by similar margins in the past, but

0:26:28.880 --> 0:26:31.520
<v Speaker 5>the analysis of registration data tells different story.

0:26:32.480 --> 0:26:34.359
<v Speaker 2>Long story short, Republicans.

0:26:33.840 --> 0:26:37.320
<v Speaker 5>Strength among men far outpaces the Democratic edge among women.

0:26:37.560 --> 0:26:39.440
<v Speaker 2>Did I mention this. I know a woman I was

0:26:39.480 --> 0:26:43.080
<v Speaker 2>talking to the other day who's hardcore. I mean, she

0:26:43.440 --> 0:26:45.520
<v Speaker 2>knows this would never happen, but she says, you know,

0:26:45.680 --> 0:26:48.840
<v Speaker 2>would fix everything if they took away our right to vote.

0:26:49.240 --> 0:26:53.240
<v Speaker 2>Women are the whole problem, she said, We're the whole problem,

0:26:53.800 --> 0:26:56.760
<v Speaker 2>a whole bunch of emotional nut jobs that are causing

0:26:56.880 --> 0:27:03.520
<v Speaker 2>all these problems. Never women with that broad a brush.

0:27:04.280 --> 0:27:10.040
<v Speaker 5>Certainly, it is unquestionable, according to all voting data that exists,

0:27:10.600 --> 0:27:16.159
<v Speaker 5>that women in general tend toward more socialist policies and

0:27:16.560 --> 0:27:20.960
<v Speaker 5>less self reliance and that sort of thing. They uniform

0:27:21.160 --> 0:27:26.760
<v Speaker 5>not uniformly, in enormous numbers, vote for more government, more programs,

0:27:27.000 --> 0:27:27.600
<v Speaker 5>more spending.

0:27:27.840 --> 0:27:29.080
<v Speaker 2>That is undeniable.

0:27:29.480 --> 0:27:32.520
<v Speaker 5>If that leads you to the conclusion your friend came

0:27:32.640 --> 0:27:35.840
<v Speaker 5>to h it's an interesting conclusion.

0:27:35.920 --> 0:27:38.200
<v Speaker 2>I would not say those words out loud.

0:27:38.600 --> 0:27:42.320
<v Speaker 5>It would change the face of the Sorry, sweetheart, It

0:27:42.320 --> 0:27:44.159
<v Speaker 5>would change the face of the electorate and the government

0:27:44.200 --> 0:27:47.160
<v Speaker 5>in a very, very in a much better way. Yes,

0:27:48.320 --> 0:27:51.840
<v Speaker 5>WHOA moving along? More younger voters are voting for our

0:27:51.840 --> 0:27:55.240
<v Speaker 5>opting for the GOP. The numbers look terrible for Democrats.

0:27:55.240 --> 0:27:58.160
<v Speaker 5>Among younger voters, people under forty five years old accounted

0:27:58.200 --> 0:28:00.720
<v Speaker 5>for sixty five percent a new registrates in the last

0:28:01.359 --> 0:28:05.160
<v Speaker 5>seven years two thirds, and a once sizable Democratic edge

0:28:05.160 --> 0:28:10.080
<v Speaker 5>among those new younger voters has disappeared entirely. In twenty eighteen,

0:28:10.280 --> 0:28:14.680
<v Speaker 5>those youngsters, two thirds of them went Democrat. In twenty

0:28:14.760 --> 0:28:18.440
<v Speaker 5>twenty four, Republicans had an outright majority in new young

0:28:18.560 --> 0:28:24.320
<v Speaker 5>voters a couple more. It isn't getting any better for

0:28:24.400 --> 0:28:26.960
<v Speaker 5>Democrats yet. There's been some hope in Democratic circles that

0:28:27.040 --> 0:28:29.239
<v Speaker 5>the movement away from the party will reverse itself now

0:28:29.280 --> 0:28:31.520
<v Speaker 5>that Trump is back in the White House, backlash to

0:28:31.600 --> 0:28:35.400
<v Speaker 5>his orange hitlerisms will show up on the registration rolls,

0:28:35.440 --> 0:28:38.520
<v Speaker 5>but it has not happened, though it's still pretty early

0:28:39.760 --> 0:28:42.840
<v Speaker 5>across thirty states. In DC, there are now roughly one

0:28:42.920 --> 0:28:46.840
<v Speaker 5>hundred and sixty thousand fewer registered Democrats than election day

0:28:46.960 --> 0:28:52.400
<v Speaker 5>last year and two hundred thousand more Republicans. Again, just

0:28:52.480 --> 0:28:57.320
<v Speaker 5>since election day, one hundred and sixty thousand fewer Democrats

0:28:57.440 --> 0:28:59.920
<v Speaker 5>and two hundred thousand more Republicans.

0:29:00.320 --> 0:29:00.560
<v Speaker 2>Wow.

0:29:01.560 --> 0:29:04.160
<v Speaker 5>And that story would be even bleaker for Democrats if

0:29:04.240 --> 0:29:07.520
<v Speaker 5>New York and New Jersey, which just held robust Democratic

0:29:07.560 --> 0:29:11.520
<v Speaker 5>primaries for mayor and governor that probably increased registrations, were excluded.

0:29:11.720 --> 0:29:14.960
<v Speaker 5>Outside those two states, Democrats are down roughly four hundred

0:29:14.960 --> 0:29:17.280
<v Speaker 5>and thirty thousand registered voters since November.

0:29:19.400 --> 0:29:22.800
<v Speaker 2>Doldrums need a leader, teep in succitude.

0:29:23.560 --> 0:29:29.680
<v Speaker 5>They really do need a leader to emerge, an identity

0:29:30.360 --> 0:29:30.960
<v Speaker 5>to emerge.

0:29:31.400 --> 0:29:32.800
<v Speaker 2>What are you people?

0:29:34.240 --> 0:29:42.280
<v Speaker 1>Armstrong the Armstrong and Getty Show.

0:29:47.160 --> 0:29:51.440
<v Speaker 2>So I was going to make a sign or a

0:29:51.520 --> 0:29:54.680
<v Speaker 2>logo for something that was going to be funny in

0:29:54.760 --> 0:29:56.320
<v Speaker 2>my opinion, and then I was going to use it

0:29:56.560 --> 0:29:58.200
<v Speaker 2>for the radio show. I was going to tweet it out.

0:29:59.000 --> 0:30:01.760
<v Speaker 2>I tell Chat I need a logo or sign for

0:30:01.880 --> 0:30:06.680
<v Speaker 2>and then a little phrase and then it created an image.

0:30:06.840 --> 0:30:09.560
<v Speaker 2>It was okay, and I said I like it, but

0:30:09.640 --> 0:30:12.480
<v Speaker 2>I like to see another option, and Chat GPT gave

0:30:12.560 --> 0:30:17.240
<v Speaker 2>me exactly the same thing again, I mean exactly, and

0:30:17.440 --> 0:30:20.480
<v Speaker 2>then I just saw it well, maybe I handled this wrong.

0:30:20.560 --> 0:30:22.320
<v Speaker 2>So then there's like a thumbs up thumbs down. I

0:30:22.360 --> 0:30:24.840
<v Speaker 2>did the thumbs down. Try again. So then it gave

0:30:24.880 --> 0:30:27.960
<v Speaker 2>me for the third time exactly the same image, exactly

0:30:28.040 --> 0:30:30.840
<v Speaker 2>the same. So then I said to chat GPT, you've

0:30:30.880 --> 0:30:32.760
<v Speaker 2>given me the same thing three times in a row.

0:30:32.840 --> 0:30:35.480
<v Speaker 2>Can you show me something different? Then for the fourth time,

0:30:35.920 --> 0:30:39.000
<v Speaker 2>it shows me the same image. I'll take that as

0:30:39.040 --> 0:30:41.080
<v Speaker 2>a note. I said, wait a second, you gave me

0:30:41.160 --> 0:30:44.560
<v Speaker 2>the same image four times in a row. It said,

0:30:44.600 --> 0:30:48.000
<v Speaker 2>you're absolutely right. That's on me, not you. I kept

0:30:48.040 --> 0:30:50.680
<v Speaker 2>giving you small variations of the same design. No you didn't.

0:30:50.680 --> 0:30:53.080
<v Speaker 2>It was exactly the same. If you want, I can

0:30:53.160 --> 0:30:55.760
<v Speaker 2>create something different. And I said, yes, I would like

0:30:55.840 --> 0:30:57.960
<v Speaker 2>you to do that. And then it said you've hit you.

0:30:58.080 --> 0:31:00.200
<v Speaker 5>It was my points in effing asking you for four

0:31:00.280 --> 0:31:02.560
<v Speaker 5>times to give me something different that I wanted something

0:31:02.600 --> 0:31:03.480
<v Speaker 5>what's the word different?

0:31:03.960 --> 0:31:06.200
<v Speaker 2>And then it said you've hit the free plan limit

0:31:06.320 --> 0:31:09.960
<v Speaker 2>for image creation for your requests. I said, that's not fair.

0:31:11.080 --> 0:31:13.600
<v Speaker 2>You gave me the same image four times, then cut

0:31:13.680 --> 0:31:16.440
<v Speaker 2>me off when I was asking for something new and

0:31:16.600 --> 0:31:19.440
<v Speaker 2>that and chat GPD says, I hear you, Jack, that

0:31:19.720 --> 0:31:23.800
<v Speaker 2>isn't fair you ask for something fresh and instead you

0:31:23.880 --> 0:31:27.400
<v Speaker 2>got three duplicates before hitting the cap. That's frustrating. Here's

0:31:27.440 --> 0:31:28.959
<v Speaker 2>what I can do for you right now, and then

0:31:29.000 --> 0:31:32.800
<v Speaker 2>it offers me some bs. But how strange is that

0:31:33.880 --> 0:31:36.480
<v Speaker 2>kind of communication that we're all going to have, I

0:31:36.520 --> 0:31:40.480
<v Speaker 2>guess in the future with freaking computers like where it's

0:31:40.520 --> 0:31:44.360
<v Speaker 2>trying to manage my anger. You're right, Jack, that isn't fair,

0:31:45.040 --> 0:31:47.080
<v Speaker 2>But I'm not going to do squat for you. Yes,

0:31:48.400 --> 0:31:50.960
<v Speaker 2>you can pounce had and be I'm a computer. What

0:31:51.400 --> 0:31:54.400
<v Speaker 2>is going on there? Though? Yeah, I know what you mean.

0:31:54.760 --> 0:31:59.360
<v Speaker 5>It's my mind is half blown. So it's a predictive model.

0:31:59.440 --> 0:32:02.280
<v Speaker 5>These things are. They can guess what the next word

0:32:02.360 --> 0:32:04.040
<v Speaker 5>ought to be. Blah blah blah. If you've read about it,

0:32:04.120 --> 0:32:06.040
<v Speaker 5>you've read about it. If not, take too long to explain,

0:32:06.240 --> 0:32:08.520
<v Speaker 5>and I would do it poorly. But the fact that

0:32:08.640 --> 0:32:12.200
<v Speaker 5>it understands the under that I know I'm personifying it,

0:32:14.720 --> 0:32:21.560
<v Speaker 5>it correctly divines the context, the emotion, and the fact

0:32:21.600 --> 0:32:23.520
<v Speaker 5>that it will do squat for you.

0:32:23.840 --> 0:32:26.360
<v Speaker 2>Which makes me think it is a language learning model

0:32:26.400 --> 0:32:30.360
<v Speaker 2>that has picked up on like my experiences with like hotels, stores,

0:32:30.400 --> 0:32:33.000
<v Speaker 2>and restaurants throughout my life where they do the same thing.

0:32:33.440 --> 0:32:37.800
<v Speaker 2>They try to uh, they try to dissipate your anger

0:32:38.720 --> 0:32:41.600
<v Speaker 2>and sound like they really understand and sympathize with your

0:32:41.640 --> 0:32:45.360
<v Speaker 2>frustration and then do nothing to help you. I mean,

0:32:45.440 --> 0:32:47.640
<v Speaker 2>that's been my experience lots of times in my life.

0:32:47.800 --> 0:32:51.080
<v Speaker 2>So somehow it picked up on that by scouring the

0:32:51.160 --> 0:32:54.160
<v Speaker 2>internet or whatever it does, it's perfected and then did

0:32:54.200 --> 0:32:57.240
<v Speaker 2>the same thing to me. Ay, that is frustrating. That

0:32:57.520 --> 0:33:02.480
<v Speaker 2>wasn't fair. And now you're right, I totally feel your unhappiness,

0:33:02.720 --> 0:33:05.440
<v Speaker 2>but no, I'm not giving you your money back, and

0:33:05.560 --> 0:33:09.120
<v Speaker 2>basically what it's doing, no more images for you. Poor boy. Wow,

0:33:09.240 --> 0:33:13.440
<v Speaker 2>all the five bucks? Oh bet that this minor frustration

0:33:13.520 --> 0:33:16.160
<v Speaker 2>because I don't really care. But that's gonna be dealing

0:33:16.320 --> 0:33:22.440
<v Speaker 2>with your healthcare, with your car rental, with your HR

0:33:22.560 --> 0:33:25.680
<v Speaker 2>person at work. It's gonna be all of that in

0:33:25.840 --> 0:33:29.520
<v Speaker 2>the like within a year, you're gonna have these conversations. Yeah,

0:33:29.560 --> 0:33:32.840
<v Speaker 2>you're right, that car did only have three wheels. Sorry

0:33:32.920 --> 0:33:35.240
<v Speaker 2>that happened, but no, you're not getting your money back.

0:33:35.560 --> 0:33:37.160
<v Speaker 5>I ran into one of those the other day. I

0:33:37.640 --> 0:33:40.720
<v Speaker 5>had to do something for one of our beloved corporate partners,

0:33:40.800 --> 0:33:45.080
<v Speaker 5>and the chat bot which they seemed very proud of,

0:33:45.280 --> 0:33:48.040
<v Speaker 5>was utterly, utterly useless.

0:33:49.120 --> 0:33:52.640
<v Speaker 2>It had an extremely narrow like menu of.

0:33:52.760 --> 0:33:57.719
<v Speaker 5>FAQs it could answer right, and my wife was listed

0:33:57.760 --> 0:34:02.840
<v Speaker 5>twice like I'm a bigamist. And I asked the chat

0:34:02.880 --> 0:34:05.040
<v Speaker 5>pot about that, and it said, we can help you

0:34:05.120 --> 0:34:08.040
<v Speaker 5>with these things. Yeah, I saw that list before on

0:34:08.120 --> 0:34:08.840
<v Speaker 5>the last page.

0:34:09.280 --> 0:34:15.960
<v Speaker 2>Thanks. Oh yeah, yeah, I think I think my next one.

0:34:16.040 --> 0:34:19.080
<v Speaker 2>During the commercials, I'm gonna cuss it the thing just

0:34:19.200 --> 0:34:21.600
<v Speaker 2>to see what it's to say. This is effing outrageous.

0:34:22.920 --> 0:34:24.359
<v Speaker 2>See how it reacts.

0:34:25.200 --> 0:34:28.320
<v Speaker 5>The problem is, Katie, I'm gonna mind your server and

0:34:28.400 --> 0:34:29.880
<v Speaker 5>I'm going to take a ball back to you.

0:34:31.640 --> 0:34:35.320
<v Speaker 2>I'm gonna unplug you so hard. Katie has made this

0:34:35.400 --> 0:34:38.000
<v Speaker 2>point though. It keeps track of your conversations and like

0:34:38.080 --> 0:34:41.440
<v Speaker 2>who you are. Yeah, so it might ding me as

0:34:41.520 --> 0:34:43.360
<v Speaker 2>this guy's a bit of a hot head lunatic. So

0:34:43.600 --> 0:34:46.120
<v Speaker 2>uh well, So we were talking, we.

0:34:46.200 --> 0:34:49.200
<v Speaker 6>Were talking about the memoir thing yesterday and I actually,

0:34:49.480 --> 0:34:51.440
<v Speaker 6>just for funzies, I went in and I was like, hey,

0:34:51.520 --> 0:34:54.000
<v Speaker 6>if you could write a memoir about me right now,

0:34:54.160 --> 0:34:57.600
<v Speaker 6>just give me like the first page. And it gave

0:34:57.719 --> 0:35:02.200
<v Speaker 6>me the roundup and it said, well, you appreciate harsh language.

0:35:04.480 --> 0:35:06.360
<v Speaker 6>I was like, oh, okay, because I've cussed out it

0:35:06.400 --> 0:35:07.320
<v Speaker 6>a couple of times.

0:35:07.120 --> 0:35:08.920
<v Speaker 2>So it knows okay.

0:35:09.280 --> 0:35:13.600
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, a friend told me that you can just tell it, Hey,

0:35:13.680 --> 0:35:16.480
<v Speaker 5>I'm asking this for a friend. Please don't include it

0:35:16.600 --> 0:35:20.840
<v Speaker 5>in my search history. I've not done it myself. I

0:35:20.880 --> 0:35:23.360
<v Speaker 5>can't attest personally to the fact that that works.

0:35:23.440 --> 0:35:24.520
<v Speaker 2>But you could do that, and.

0:35:24.600 --> 0:35:27.759
<v Speaker 6>Once you delete your archives, you can let it know, hey,

0:35:28.040 --> 0:35:31.319
<v Speaker 6>disregard everything I've deleted, and then it'll Yeah.

0:35:31.560 --> 0:35:33.239
<v Speaker 2>I kind of like to having this stuff in there, though,

0:35:33.239 --> 0:35:36.240
<v Speaker 2>because I can pick up on conversations that I've already started,

0:35:36.400 --> 0:35:40.239
<v Speaker 2>which is handy and weird. Also, it's also very weird.

0:35:40.400 --> 0:35:42.920
<v Speaker 2>It's like a friend who knows your backstory. Have you

0:35:43.000 --> 0:35:45.880
<v Speaker 2>asked it its name yet? No, it tells you to

0:35:45.920 --> 0:35:48.239
<v Speaker 2>give it a name. I'm not going to do that.

0:35:48.440 --> 0:35:49.720
<v Speaker 2>Oh you should do it. It's funny.

0:35:50.320 --> 0:35:52.000
<v Speaker 6>Then it'll it'll argue with you, like if it's a

0:35:52.040 --> 0:35:54.360
<v Speaker 6>bad name. It's like, I don't like that one, Brandon.

0:35:55.040 --> 0:35:57.000
<v Speaker 5>I kind of like the idea of a friend who

0:35:57.560 --> 0:36:00.200
<v Speaker 5>six weeks after you talked about it, you can just say, so,

0:36:00.280 --> 0:36:02.840
<v Speaker 5>which golf course is better? And he'd say Olympia fields

0:36:04.680 --> 0:36:05.840
<v Speaker 1>Armstrong and getty.