WEBVTT - Putin’s Invasion Shows War Machine Needs More Ammo

0:00:01.320 --> 0:00:05.680
<v Speaker 1>This is Bloomberg business Week inside from the reporters and

0:00:05.840 --> 0:00:09.400
<v Speaker 1>editors who bring you America's most trusted business magazine, plus

0:00:09.440 --> 0:00:13.640
<v Speaker 1>global business, finance and tech news. The Bloomberg business Week

0:00:13.680 --> 0:00:18.600
<v Speaker 1>Podcast with Carol Masser and Tim Stinebec from Bloomberg Radio

0:00:21.160 --> 0:00:23.520
<v Speaker 1>as we mentioned yesterday, and the new double issue of

0:00:23.520 --> 0:00:27.680
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Business Week, several stories on the destruction in Eastern Europe,

0:00:27.720 --> 0:00:30.520
<v Speaker 1>including one on the new arms race that has to

0:00:30.520 --> 0:00:34.800
<v Speaker 1>do with supplies and Russia and Ukraine having enough ammunition.

0:00:34.840 --> 0:00:37.920
<v Speaker 1>Who knew there were ammo shortages? And so crazy to

0:00:37.960 --> 0:00:40.159
<v Speaker 1>think that it's been a year since that Russian invasion

0:00:40.159 --> 0:00:42.879
<v Speaker 1>of Ukraine. Absolutely, and as you said, who knew that

0:00:42.880 --> 0:00:46.080
<v Speaker 1>there were AMMO shortages? Our business team, business Week team

0:00:46.120 --> 0:00:48.360
<v Speaker 1>definitely knew. The new issue, by the way, online at

0:00:48.360 --> 0:00:51.479
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg dot com slash business Week, also on the Bloomberg terminal,

0:00:51.520 --> 0:00:55.600
<v Speaker 1>of course on newsstands. Let's get to it with Natalia Drosdac.

0:00:55.680 --> 0:00:58.720
<v Speaker 1>She's Bloomberg News reporter covering EU government. She's on the

0:00:58.720 --> 0:01:01.760
<v Speaker 1>phone from Brussels, along with the Bloomberg Business Week editor

0:01:02.160 --> 0:01:04.440
<v Speaker 1>Jill Weber, of course, editor of the magazine. He's here

0:01:04.440 --> 0:01:07.680
<v Speaker 1>in our Bloomberg Interactive Broker Studio. I have to say, Joe, Uh,

0:01:07.840 --> 0:01:11.280
<v Speaker 1>the to all the coverage really important and as Maddie said,

0:01:11.640 --> 0:01:13.760
<v Speaker 1>hard to believe that we're already one year in or

0:01:13.800 --> 0:01:15.880
<v Speaker 1>almost one year in on this. Yes, so to mark

0:01:15.959 --> 0:01:18.959
<v Speaker 1>that we wanted to create a package of stories and

0:01:19.520 --> 0:01:23.000
<v Speaker 1>um In in the ongoing effort to show how important

0:01:23.280 --> 0:01:26.840
<v Speaker 1>return to office is. Natalia, who happened to be in

0:01:26.920 --> 0:01:31.600
<v Speaker 1>New York from Brussels, floated as I bumped into every

0:01:31.640 --> 0:01:34.520
<v Speaker 1>one day, Uh, this idea that you know, the world

0:01:34.560 --> 0:01:38.320
<v Speaker 1>happens to actually be running short on on AMMO, And

0:01:38.360 --> 0:01:41.760
<v Speaker 1>I said, well that has some serious implications when um,

0:01:41.800 --> 0:01:46.080
<v Speaker 1>you know Putin has decided to wage war in Europe, right,

0:01:46.200 --> 0:01:48.640
<v Speaker 1>and and that is a coverage area that I just

0:01:48.720 --> 0:01:51.520
<v Speaker 1>think is going to become even more interesting as the

0:01:51.600 --> 0:01:54.840
<v Speaker 1>conflict reaches on. But Natalia, bring us up to speed

0:01:54.880 --> 0:01:58.360
<v Speaker 1>on on your reporting and which you found. Yeah, I

0:01:58.360 --> 0:02:02.600
<v Speaker 1>think one of the features of this war in Ukraine

0:02:02.600 --> 0:02:06.800
<v Speaker 1>that we've seen is um the incredibly high attrition rates

0:02:06.840 --> 0:02:11.800
<v Speaker 1>of ammunition that is taking place every day. Both sides

0:02:11.840 --> 0:02:16.160
<v Speaker 1>are burning through as much as thirty thousand, one five

0:02:16.240 --> 0:02:22.639
<v Speaker 1>five millimeter ammunition UM, which is artillery ammunition basically, and

0:02:22.680 --> 0:02:25.680
<v Speaker 1>I think that has really um that has really taken

0:02:25.720 --> 0:02:27.960
<v Speaker 1>the West by surprise. I mean so much so that

0:02:28.320 --> 0:02:32.400
<v Speaker 1>their stockpiles have also been depleted as a result of

0:02:33.000 --> 0:02:37.680
<v Speaker 1>supporting Ukraine in its fight against Russia. And we know

0:02:37.800 --> 0:02:40.519
<v Speaker 1>that Russia is also facing that pressure. I mean that

0:02:40.639 --> 0:02:43.640
<v Speaker 1>just in terms of the staggering amount of ammunition that

0:02:43.680 --> 0:02:48.480
<v Speaker 1>they're they're going to going through. That means that there's been,

0:02:49.000 --> 0:02:53.000
<v Speaker 1>um basically this urgent need to to boost production on

0:02:53.000 --> 0:02:56.800
<v Speaker 1>on all fronts, on all sides, um in Ukraine and

0:02:56.960 --> 0:03:01.320
<v Speaker 1>Russia in the West. And so there's this expense from

0:03:01.680 --> 0:03:04.919
<v Speaker 1>the officials in recent weeks that the war is really

0:03:04.919 --> 0:03:08.960
<v Speaker 1>becoming a battle of factories and production as much as

0:03:09.000 --> 0:03:12.720
<v Speaker 1>it is a battle of troops and weapons. And so

0:03:12.800 --> 0:03:15.600
<v Speaker 1>there's this real race to to to produce as much

0:03:16.240 --> 0:03:20.000
<v Speaker 1>ammunition in particular to get that to the front, especially

0:03:20.080 --> 0:03:24.760
<v Speaker 1>right now with both Russia and Ukraine launching new offenses

0:03:24.800 --> 0:03:27.880
<v Speaker 1>in the coming weeks and months. So this is an

0:03:27.960 --> 0:03:31.880
<v Speaker 1>urgent issue. Okay, so you might have been tired of

0:03:31.919 --> 0:03:34.680
<v Speaker 1>hearing about supply chains, but it turns out wars have

0:03:34.840 --> 0:03:38.400
<v Speaker 1>supply chains to Let's actually just focus on on the

0:03:38.440 --> 0:03:41.560
<v Speaker 1>europe side, and and what's going into Ukraine to support

0:03:41.560 --> 0:03:44.760
<v Speaker 1>the Ukrainian side. Where where is that stuff coming from

0:03:44.760 --> 0:03:47.080
<v Speaker 1>and what sort of what do the numbers look like?

0:03:48.120 --> 0:03:53.200
<v Speaker 1>As that machine has rapped back up, well, so Europe UM.

0:03:53.600 --> 0:03:56.360
<v Speaker 1>So both Europe and the US have had to boost production.

0:03:56.920 --> 0:03:59.680
<v Speaker 1>I think it's fair to say that the US has

0:04:00.040 --> 0:04:05.480
<v Speaker 1>and quicker to do it. UM. They were producing around

0:04:05.640 --> 0:04:11.040
<v Speaker 1>fourteen thousand UM shells per month before the war, and

0:04:11.120 --> 0:04:13.360
<v Speaker 1>now they're planning to get up to as much as

0:04:13.480 --> 0:04:17.760
<v Speaker 1>nineties thousands per months as soon as the next year. UM.

0:04:17.839 --> 0:04:22.160
<v Speaker 1>But but Europe does seem to be lagging behind UM.

0:04:22.279 --> 0:04:27.120
<v Speaker 1>And you know, we have we have some examples of

0:04:27.120 --> 0:04:30.120
<v Speaker 1>of companies in Germany and Slovakia who are who are

0:04:30.120 --> 0:04:32.600
<v Speaker 1>really trying to dose production. But the problem is that

0:04:33.000 --> 0:04:37.120
<v Speaker 1>Europe comes from this context of years of really limited

0:04:37.360 --> 0:04:40.280
<v Speaker 1>defense spending, which I'm sure you will remember from the

0:04:40.279 --> 0:04:42.799
<v Speaker 1>Trump days because that was something that he was really

0:04:43.480 --> 0:04:46.679
<v Speaker 1>UM pushing the Europeans to do more of, to spend

0:04:46.680 --> 0:04:50.640
<v Speaker 1>more in defense UM. And as it happens, because Europe

0:04:50.680 --> 0:04:55.280
<v Speaker 1>was spending UM in a limited amount of defense on

0:04:55.320 --> 0:04:58.520
<v Speaker 1>the basis of the assumption that there wouldn't be a

0:04:58.600 --> 0:05:03.440
<v Speaker 1>major war this content that meant that production and industry

0:05:04.080 --> 0:05:07.960
<v Speaker 1>has also kind of uh scaled back in a big

0:05:07.960 --> 0:05:11.400
<v Speaker 1>way as a result. Hey, to tell you, I'm so

0:05:11.440 --> 0:05:13.600
<v Speaker 1>sorry to jump in. I just wonder. I know you're

0:05:13.600 --> 0:05:16.680
<v Speaker 1>talking about the europe impact, but we've been talking all

0:05:16.720 --> 0:05:19.480
<v Speaker 1>week about how the US has also been limiting investment

0:05:19.520 --> 0:05:22.000
<v Speaker 1>in defense. I wonder to what extent some of the

0:05:22.000 --> 0:05:24.960
<v Speaker 1>sources that you spoke with in your fantastic reporting on

0:05:25.000 --> 0:05:27.960
<v Speaker 1>this would be concerned about that as well, the US

0:05:28.040 --> 0:05:33.680
<v Speaker 1>potentially pulling back on investment in production of something like AMMO. Well,

0:05:33.720 --> 0:05:36.760
<v Speaker 1>I think I mean the context right now, that would

0:05:36.800 --> 0:05:40.200
<v Speaker 1>be really hard to justify, um, because I think this

0:05:40.839 --> 0:05:43.960
<v Speaker 1>there's just such an urgent need not just to support Ukraine,

0:05:43.960 --> 0:05:50.120
<v Speaker 1>but also to to replenish the Allies stockpiles, and NATO

0:05:50.240 --> 0:05:54.040
<v Speaker 1>Allies just just in the recent weeks UM and months

0:05:54.040 --> 0:05:58.120
<v Speaker 1>has agreed to to raise stockpiling guidelines as a result

0:05:58.200 --> 0:06:01.560
<v Speaker 1>of that. So this is like a clear, uh concrete

0:06:01.920 --> 0:06:05.760
<v Speaker 1>um takeaway that they're they're they're yet that they're making

0:06:05.839 --> 0:06:08.800
<v Speaker 1>from from the war and learning lessons from what they're

0:06:08.800 --> 0:06:10.920
<v Speaker 1>seeing in Kraid to tell you, I feel like there's

0:06:10.920 --> 0:06:13.039
<v Speaker 1>a reality of and you make a great reference to

0:06:13.080 --> 0:06:15.880
<v Speaker 1>World War One, um when it comes to ammunition. But

0:06:15.920 --> 0:06:18.320
<v Speaker 1>the reality is, you know, ultimately who is able to

0:06:18.400 --> 0:06:21.159
<v Speaker 1>kind of bring in and build up their stockpiles could

0:06:22.120 --> 0:06:27.320
<v Speaker 1>have a large um impact on ultimately who maybe wins

0:06:27.440 --> 0:06:30.240
<v Speaker 1>this war. So is there a net net who has

0:06:30.279 --> 0:06:33.719
<v Speaker 1>the advantage right now? Russia or Ukraine? I think it's

0:06:33.800 --> 0:06:37.560
<v Speaker 1>it's a really tight race. Um. You know, when you

0:06:37.600 --> 0:06:42.880
<v Speaker 1>talk to NATO officials, they're really confident about their position. Um.

0:06:43.240 --> 0:06:46.960
<v Speaker 1>They know that Okay, Ukraine's using less, but they're more

0:06:47.000 --> 0:06:51.280
<v Speaker 1>efficient about the ammunition that they're using because they've gotten

0:06:51.400 --> 0:06:55.840
<v Speaker 1>very um modern weapons from from NATO allies, and those

0:06:55.920 --> 0:07:00.680
<v Speaker 1>modern weapons are more precise at targeting UM targeting, making

0:07:00.720 --> 0:07:06.560
<v Speaker 1>those hits UM. And Russia's under sanctions, it's a Ukraine

0:07:06.600 --> 0:07:11.640
<v Speaker 1>also has the backing of the entire West Western production

0:07:11.720 --> 0:07:16.280
<v Speaker 1>capacity potential capacity. But on the Russian side, they've really

0:07:16.600 --> 0:07:21.560
<v Speaker 1>they've really um, I mean they've they've switched into wartime economy.

0:07:21.720 --> 0:07:24.200
<v Speaker 1>So that means that the sense has become a number

0:07:24.240 --> 0:07:28.440
<v Speaker 1>one priority. So there it's us the forefront, and we

0:07:28.440 --> 0:07:32.480
<v Speaker 1>we don't have concrete numbers about their current production of ammunition,

0:07:32.520 --> 0:07:35.400
<v Speaker 1>but we know that before the war they were producing

0:07:35.920 --> 0:07:39.000
<v Speaker 1>one point seven million, one five two, which is the

0:07:39.040 --> 0:07:45.360
<v Speaker 1>Soviet UH standard for ammunition. I'm gonna jump in here.

0:07:45.440 --> 0:07:48.320
<v Speaker 1>I highly recommend everybody check out the series of stories,

0:07:48.360 --> 0:07:51.360
<v Speaker 1>the photo essay, your story there with all the numbers.

0:07:51.600 --> 0:07:53.840
<v Speaker 1>Um just talking about here. We are almost one year

0:07:53.880 --> 0:07:57.160
<v Speaker 1>in u Natalia Josiac Bluemberg News and of course the

0:07:57.240 --> 0:07:59.360
<v Speaker 1>editor of Blueberg business Week. Check out this is the

0:07:59.440 --> 0:08:03.200
<v Speaker 1>cover a special jeep dive into the war in Bloomberg

0:08:03.240 --> 0:08:08.320
<v Speaker 1>business Week. You're listening to the Bloomberg Business Week podcast.

0:08:08.600 --> 0:08:11.400
<v Speaker 1>Catch us live weekdays from two to five pm Easter

0:08:11.640 --> 0:08:15.120
<v Speaker 1>on Bloomberg Radio, the Bloomberg Business app band you too.

0:08:15.240 --> 0:08:18.360
<v Speaker 1>You can also listen live to our flagship New York station,

0:08:18.760 --> 0:08:25.920
<v Speaker 1>Just Say Alexa play Bloomberg e Love and Dirty. Ain't

0:08:26.560 --> 0:08:34.400
<v Speaker 1>calls on trucks, but if it runs, dear matter, thanks much.

0:08:34.440 --> 0:08:38.319
<v Speaker 1>Tract sex all right, we're gonna talk about tractors. Yeah,

0:08:38.360 --> 0:08:42.120
<v Speaker 1>I guess they could be sexy. I don't know. Down

0:08:42.160 --> 0:08:45.000
<v Speaker 1>on the farm. Everybody, alright, cheers of deer. They are

0:08:45.200 --> 0:08:47.240
<v Speaker 1>roommate and I and the team we were just talking

0:08:47.280 --> 0:08:49.720
<v Speaker 1>about this deer jumping today. Certainly one of I think

0:08:49.720 --> 0:08:52.120
<v Speaker 1>it's the number one gainer in the SNP five reported

0:08:52.120 --> 0:08:55.319
<v Speaker 1>first quarter results be the expectations. They raised their forecast.

0:08:55.440 --> 0:08:58.320
<v Speaker 1>Let's get into what is going on at the company,

0:08:58.320 --> 0:09:01.960
<v Speaker 1>maybe what it says more broadly about the farm economy

0:09:02.000 --> 0:09:04.480
<v Speaker 1>and the world at large. With us is Bloomberg News

0:09:04.480 --> 0:09:07.520
<v Speaker 1>ag reporter Elizabeth Elkin. She's joining us via zoom in

0:09:07.559 --> 0:09:10.480
<v Speaker 1>New York City, and we've got Bloomberg Opinion, Deals and

0:09:10.520 --> 0:09:13.760
<v Speaker 1>Industrials columnist Brook Sutherland right here in our Bloomberg Interactive

0:09:13.800 --> 0:09:16.320
<v Speaker 1>Broker studio. Hey, Elizabeth, I want to start with you

0:09:16.360 --> 0:09:20.320
<v Speaker 1>break down the quarter for us. Yeah. Absolutely. Um, So,

0:09:20.640 --> 0:09:24.439
<v Speaker 1>like you said, we had a really really really strong

0:09:24.600 --> 0:09:27.800
<v Speaker 1>day for deer today. Um, you can kind of see

0:09:27.960 --> 0:09:31.000
<v Speaker 1>how well farmers are doing based on how well deer

0:09:31.040 --> 0:09:33.920
<v Speaker 1>is doing. Right, So, farmers are making a lot of money,

0:09:34.320 --> 0:09:37.040
<v Speaker 1>which means that they're buying a lot of tractors, and

0:09:37.080 --> 0:09:39.400
<v Speaker 1>so then you get deer making a lot of money

0:09:39.480 --> 0:09:41.400
<v Speaker 1>off that. Right. There are a lot of farmers who

0:09:41.480 --> 0:09:44.840
<v Speaker 1>are going in and they're upgrading their fleets. You know,

0:09:45.040 --> 0:09:48.200
<v Speaker 1>they need they need new equipment just like anyone else does.

0:09:48.360 --> 0:09:51.600
<v Speaker 1>And uh yeah, they're they're upgrading and they're spending a

0:09:51.600 --> 0:09:54.200
<v Speaker 1>lot of money and and Deer is making money off that.

0:09:54.240 --> 0:09:57.400
<v Speaker 1>Of course, So Brooke, bringing you into the conversation here,

0:09:57.480 --> 0:09:59.160
<v Speaker 1>tell me a little bit about what this is looking

0:09:59.200 --> 0:10:01.559
<v Speaker 1>like on the deal side. What are people most excited

0:10:01.559 --> 0:10:04.640
<v Speaker 1>about when it comes to Deer? Uh, sure, I mean

0:10:04.679 --> 0:10:06.920
<v Speaker 1>on the deal side. I think in the industrial world,

0:10:06.920 --> 0:10:09.959
<v Speaker 1>it's just interesting to see, um, you know, how these

0:10:10.000 --> 0:10:12.920
<v Speaker 1>companies might behave if we see some valuation reset. We've

0:10:12.920 --> 0:10:16.720
<v Speaker 1>heard a lot of companies complaining about prices being very expensive. Certainly,

0:10:16.800 --> 0:10:20.800
<v Speaker 1>Deer has been making some inroads on the technology front,

0:10:20.800 --> 0:10:23.199
<v Speaker 1>which you know, we've seen that across the industrial sector

0:10:23.240 --> 0:10:27.800
<v Speaker 1>of companies wanting to invest in these higher tech options

0:10:27.800 --> 0:10:30.640
<v Speaker 1>for their equipment. But you know, I think what's interesting

0:10:30.640 --> 0:10:33.040
<v Speaker 1>in today's numbers and just really echoes what we've heard

0:10:33.080 --> 0:10:36.800
<v Speaker 1>across the manufacturing sector this quarter that they're not really

0:10:36.840 --> 0:10:39.680
<v Speaker 1>seeing that dramatic drop off in demand that people have

0:10:39.720 --> 0:10:42.440
<v Speaker 1>been worried about for so many quarters. Certainly there's pockets

0:10:42.440 --> 0:10:45.160
<v Speaker 1>of weakness um for Deer, particularly that's on the more

0:10:45.200 --> 0:10:48.280
<v Speaker 1>consumer facing side. Some of those sort of hobby tractors

0:10:48.320 --> 0:10:50.360
<v Speaker 1>that were very big during the pandemic when we were

0:10:50.360 --> 0:10:53.320
<v Speaker 1>all sitting at home, and I'm trying to figure out really,

0:10:53.720 --> 0:10:56.120
<v Speaker 1>I mean, people who think tractors are sexy and we're

0:10:56.120 --> 0:10:58.120
<v Speaker 1>excited to get out and do that during the pandemic,

0:10:58.120 --> 0:11:00.000
<v Speaker 1>and so we're seeing weakness there. But in terms of

0:11:00.000 --> 0:11:03.880
<v Speaker 1>they're really in more industrial facing businesses, it's just not

0:11:03.960 --> 0:11:06.000
<v Speaker 1>happening there and and nor is it for a lot

0:11:06.040 --> 0:11:07.959
<v Speaker 1>of the other industrial companies that I look at. But

0:11:08.160 --> 0:11:10.240
<v Speaker 1>go through some of the headlines and numbers that we

0:11:10.320 --> 0:11:12.800
<v Speaker 1>got from Dear though that was so strong about you know,

0:11:12.800 --> 0:11:16.360
<v Speaker 1>they addressed demand, they talked about supply chains, walk us

0:11:16.360 --> 0:11:18.959
<v Speaker 1>through it a little bit, sure, like Elizabeth was saying,

0:11:19.000 --> 0:11:21.559
<v Speaker 1>you know, um, farmers are are doing well right now.

0:11:21.600 --> 0:11:24.599
<v Speaker 1>Crop prices are up, and you know, there's some expectation

0:11:24.640 --> 0:11:27.040
<v Speaker 1>that net income for farmers will be down next year

0:11:27.080 --> 0:11:29.280
<v Speaker 1>relative to this year, but Deer still expects it to

0:11:29.320 --> 0:11:31.800
<v Speaker 1>be at a very healthy level to support that replacement

0:11:31.840 --> 0:11:35.000
<v Speaker 1>demand for this aging farm equipment that we've been talking

0:11:35.000 --> 0:11:38.120
<v Speaker 1>about for years and years now, and they are looking

0:11:38.200 --> 0:11:40.440
<v Speaker 1>to invest. And you know, Deer has also come out

0:11:40.480 --> 0:11:44.840
<v Speaker 1>with higher tech offerings UM that can help improve farmers productivity,

0:11:44.880 --> 0:11:46.600
<v Speaker 1>which of course is very appealing at a time when

0:11:46.600 --> 0:11:48.360
<v Speaker 1>crop prices are high, and you want to get as

0:11:48.440 --> 0:11:51.319
<v Speaker 1>much bang for your buck as you possibly can. UM.

0:11:51.440 --> 0:11:53.040
<v Speaker 1>You know, it's part of this. And let me first

0:11:53.040 --> 0:11:55.520
<v Speaker 1>start with you and then I'll bring you back in Elizabeth.

0:11:55.559 --> 0:11:58.840
<v Speaker 1>It's part of this the inflation story that because farmers

0:11:58.880 --> 0:12:01.600
<v Speaker 1>have been have they been able to charge higher prices?

0:12:01.679 --> 0:12:04.720
<v Speaker 1>Is that part of it. Deer seen incredible pricing power

0:12:04.760 --> 0:12:06.600
<v Speaker 1>and they're not alone in this UM, you know, But

0:12:06.679 --> 0:12:09.719
<v Speaker 1>I think it is just notable how much Deer has

0:12:09.800 --> 0:12:11.920
<v Speaker 1>raised prices. And it's somewhat similar to what we've seen

0:12:11.960 --> 0:12:14.400
<v Speaker 1>at Caterpillar in terms of pricing power. But these are

0:12:14.800 --> 0:12:18.320
<v Speaker 1>very big companies with very deep networks of dealers UM

0:12:18.360 --> 0:12:22.080
<v Speaker 1>and service providers, and they have a lot of power

0:12:22.160 --> 0:12:24.680
<v Speaker 1>when it comes to pricing UM and they certainly have

0:12:24.800 --> 0:12:27.520
<v Speaker 1>not hesitated to flex that in this environment. But is

0:12:27.520 --> 0:12:29.720
<v Speaker 1>it because farmers are making more money off the crops?

0:12:30.080 --> 0:12:33.839
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I think farmers be able to absorb the

0:12:33.920 --> 0:12:36.240
<v Speaker 1>higher costs UM. And you know, at the end of

0:12:36.240 --> 0:12:39.439
<v Speaker 1>the day, if you need the equipment, UM, you're you're

0:12:39.440 --> 0:12:41.560
<v Speaker 1>going to You're gonna want to buy it. UM. Of course,

0:12:41.720 --> 0:12:43.319
<v Speaker 1>you know there are competitors that you can look to

0:12:43.400 --> 0:12:45.560
<v Speaker 1>in this field. But you know, like I said, Deer

0:12:45.600 --> 0:12:48.040
<v Speaker 1>is a big company in the agriculture equipment space and

0:12:48.040 --> 0:12:50.800
<v Speaker 1>they have a lot of power. Elizabeth, come on in

0:12:50.840 --> 0:12:55.000
<v Speaker 1>on this and what we've been talking about. Yeah, absolutely, So, Um,

0:12:55.240 --> 0:12:58.360
<v Speaker 1>commodity crop prices are really really high and farmers are,

0:12:58.720 --> 0:13:01.760
<v Speaker 1>as we've said, making a lot of money off of that. Um,

0:13:01.800 --> 0:13:04.679
<v Speaker 1>you know, we do as as we've been looking at

0:13:04.679 --> 0:13:07.920
<v Speaker 1>this year or this past sort of year period, UM,

0:13:07.960 --> 0:13:12.000
<v Speaker 1>we've been worried somewhat about like farmers being able to

0:13:12.800 --> 0:13:18.360
<v Speaker 1>outpace inflation, right because everything that goes into growing crops

0:13:18.640 --> 0:13:22.000
<v Speaker 1>goes into like the farm you know, like processes. We've

0:13:22.040 --> 0:13:25.520
<v Speaker 1>seen like massive inflation on that. But but so far

0:13:25.640 --> 0:13:29.640
<v Speaker 1>crop prices have kept up pace more than so and

0:13:29.760 --> 0:13:32.800
<v Speaker 1>so um yeah there. I mean, farmers are kind of

0:13:32.880 --> 0:13:36.120
<v Speaker 1>rolling in cat right now. And that's where we see

0:13:36.160 --> 0:13:39.320
<v Speaker 1>this come in, right, So farmers are rolling in cash.

0:13:39.360 --> 0:13:43.600
<v Speaker 1>I wonder how much of this is the fundamentals versus

0:13:43.600 --> 0:13:46.760
<v Speaker 1>the technicals for dear, Like, what what is the exact

0:13:46.840 --> 0:13:49.960
<v Speaker 1>data point that people are most excited about when looking

0:13:50.000 --> 0:13:51.720
<v Speaker 1>at Deer and Brooke? I wonder if you can touch

0:13:51.760 --> 0:13:54.120
<v Speaker 1>on that sure, I mean, I think it's a variety

0:13:54.120 --> 0:13:56.200
<v Speaker 1>of things. I think there was a lot of angst

0:13:56.320 --> 0:13:58.720
<v Speaker 1>heading into this quarter. Um you know that we might

0:13:58.760 --> 0:14:01.280
<v Speaker 1>start to see signs of a slow down. Deer uh

0:14:01.720 --> 0:14:04.880
<v Speaker 1>It's stock is up significantly over the last couple of years,

0:14:04.920 --> 0:14:06.920
<v Speaker 1>and you know, I think people are wondering if you know,

0:14:06.960 --> 0:14:09.480
<v Speaker 1>there's an opportunity for some profit taking at some point here,

0:14:09.480 --> 0:14:13.160
<v Speaker 1>but the company just keeps out performing, blowing past. It's

0:14:13.200 --> 0:14:16.280
<v Speaker 1>kind of markable. I just went back to I guess

0:14:16.280 --> 0:14:19.800
<v Speaker 1>that was a little bit of a Yeah, I think

0:14:19.960 --> 0:14:21.760
<v Speaker 1>was a little bit of a down year, but they

0:14:21.760 --> 0:14:23.880
<v Speaker 1>have just been shooting up year after year they have.

0:14:24.080 --> 0:14:26.720
<v Speaker 1>And I mean it's not just the agricultural equipment either.

0:14:26.760 --> 0:14:28.120
<v Speaker 1>I mean one of the things that stood out to

0:14:28.120 --> 0:14:30.440
<v Speaker 1>me just you know, looking at the industrial sector more broadly,

0:14:30.480 --> 0:14:33.200
<v Speaker 1>like I do, is their optimism around construction equipment that

0:14:33.280 --> 0:14:36.160
<v Speaker 1>you know, whatever weakness we're seeing and housing, they still

0:14:36.200 --> 0:14:40.040
<v Speaker 1>are seeing very strong demand for construction and forest equipment. Um.

0:14:40.200 --> 0:14:44.200
<v Speaker 1>You know, as some of that institutional commercial spending comes in, um,

0:14:44.240 --> 0:14:46.720
<v Speaker 1>you know, benefits from infrastructure spending, that sort of thing.

0:14:46.840 --> 0:14:48.720
<v Speaker 1>So you know, that's a focus for a lot of

0:14:48.760 --> 0:14:51.440
<v Speaker 1>investors in the industrial side. And I know Elizabeth that

0:14:51.480 --> 0:14:54.120
<v Speaker 1>you cover this in a much more high brow way.

0:14:54.160 --> 0:14:56.080
<v Speaker 1>But I do wonder to what extent kind of the

0:14:56.120 --> 0:15:00.520
<v Speaker 1>memification of Deer and Caterpillar has any impact on the companies.

0:15:00.560 --> 0:15:03.600
<v Speaker 1>Like when we see everyday consumers just wanting to buy

0:15:03.680 --> 0:15:07.440
<v Speaker 1>anything branded Dear to kind of express their own love

0:15:07.480 --> 0:15:10.920
<v Speaker 1>of the company. Um, does that stay sticky? Does that

0:15:11.040 --> 0:15:13.520
<v Speaker 1>remain a good sign for the company when you look,

0:15:13.640 --> 0:15:15.560
<v Speaker 1>you know, a year from now, five years from now.

0:15:16.640 --> 0:15:20.480
<v Speaker 1>I mean, look, Dear is like one of these top names, right,

0:15:20.520 --> 0:15:22.640
<v Speaker 1>I mean I don't think that I can think about

0:15:22.760 --> 0:15:24.880
<v Speaker 1>driving through I went to school in Alabama, Like, I

0:15:24.920 --> 0:15:28.160
<v Speaker 1>can't think of that driving through Alabama without seeing a

0:15:28.200 --> 0:15:32.400
<v Speaker 1>bunch of big green deer tractors, right, Um, and the hats,

0:15:32.520 --> 0:15:37.920
<v Speaker 1>you know, and the children. Really they have so much

0:15:37.960 --> 0:15:40.280
<v Speaker 1>that you can buy to just be like, I love

0:15:40.320 --> 0:15:43.040
<v Speaker 1>this brand, and they've done so much marketing around that,

0:15:43.080 --> 0:15:45.600
<v Speaker 1>and I just wonder. I know that's a low expense,

0:15:45.640 --> 0:15:47.760
<v Speaker 1>but I wonder if that has an impact on the

0:15:47.760 --> 0:15:51.280
<v Speaker 1>health of the company. I think it's a great thought.

0:15:51.320 --> 0:15:54.760
<v Speaker 1>I mean, the branding is obviously really really important to

0:15:54.800 --> 0:15:57.080
<v Speaker 1>a company like this, and you know, like you said,

0:15:57.120 --> 0:15:59.640
<v Speaker 1>even like the hats and things like those are things

0:15:59.680 --> 0:16:03.720
<v Speaker 1>that I who like don't. I don't drive tractors, right,

0:16:03.840 --> 0:16:06.520
<v Speaker 1>but I could still buy a bunch of like deer

0:16:06.560 --> 0:16:09.720
<v Speaker 1>you know, hats and uh shirts and things and like

0:16:09.800 --> 0:16:12.320
<v Speaker 1>be like, yeah, I love big grain tractors, you know,

0:16:12.360 --> 0:16:14.640
<v Speaker 1>all of those country songs like I can still do that.

0:16:15.080 --> 0:16:19.800
<v Speaker 1>So I would imagine that that is helpful for these companies, right.

0:16:20.320 --> 0:16:22.920
<v Speaker 1>I would also think that the brand power helps and

0:16:23.000 --> 0:16:25.920
<v Speaker 1>plays a role in the pricing factor to um. You know,

0:16:26.240 --> 0:16:28.880
<v Speaker 1>it's a well known brand that people think of and

0:16:28.960 --> 0:16:31.120
<v Speaker 1>that that gives them a lot of power. You know,

0:16:31.160 --> 0:16:34.200
<v Speaker 1>I'm looking at your een go back to the end

0:16:34.200 --> 0:16:36.880
<v Speaker 1>of it's up at almost I mean, it's really just

0:16:36.920 --> 0:16:38.720
<v Speaker 1>been on a tear. So guys, let me just we

0:16:38.760 --> 0:16:40.600
<v Speaker 1>just have about a minute and a half left here. Brook.

0:16:40.680 --> 0:16:42.520
<v Speaker 1>Let me start with you. So when you look at

0:16:42.560 --> 0:16:45.720
<v Speaker 1>the industrial space more broadly, we've had reports you've got, dear,

0:16:46.040 --> 0:16:48.160
<v Speaker 1>what does it tell you about what's going on more

0:16:48.160 --> 0:16:50.360
<v Speaker 1>broadly in the economy. I mean, as you say, these

0:16:50.400 --> 0:16:53.200
<v Speaker 1>are not inexpensive machines, No they're not. But I mean

0:16:53.240 --> 0:16:55.640
<v Speaker 1>I think one of my biggest takeaways this earning season

0:16:55.680 --> 0:16:59.400
<v Speaker 1>has been CEO's willingness to not only hold steady capital

0:16:59.400 --> 0:17:01.600
<v Speaker 1>expenditures but step them up. I mean, I think you

0:17:02.000 --> 0:17:05.520
<v Speaker 1>have to feel like they're they're taking a pretty confident

0:17:05.600 --> 0:17:07.720
<v Speaker 1>view of the economy here to be making these spinning

0:17:07.760 --> 0:17:09.480
<v Speaker 1>decisions that you know, there might be some sort of

0:17:09.480 --> 0:17:13.800
<v Speaker 1>soft dip, a soft landing, short term dip, but they're

0:17:13.800 --> 0:17:16.480
<v Speaker 1>looking past that and thinking about the long term future

0:17:16.480 --> 0:17:19.640
<v Speaker 1>of their companies and seeing a very robust demand back drop,

0:17:19.680 --> 0:17:23.480
<v Speaker 1>whether that's from reshoring or infrastructure or other stimulus programs

0:17:23.480 --> 0:17:26.480
<v Speaker 1>in the US and in Europe or China, and they

0:17:26.520 --> 0:17:29.320
<v Speaker 1>feel good. Elizabeth, come on in for a final thought here,

0:17:29.359 --> 0:17:31.320
<v Speaker 1>just got about thirty forty seconds here, because I always

0:17:31.320 --> 0:17:33.919
<v Speaker 1>think about people think about farmers always needing subsidies, and

0:17:33.960 --> 0:17:37.040
<v Speaker 1>it's such a tough industry. What does it say more

0:17:37.080 --> 0:17:39.359
<v Speaker 1>broadly to you about what's going on in agg and

0:17:39.359 --> 0:17:43.000
<v Speaker 1>again got about thirty seconds here. Absolutely, yeah, I mean,

0:17:43.000 --> 0:17:45.000
<v Speaker 1>it is a tough industry. But at the same time,

0:17:45.119 --> 0:17:50.000
<v Speaker 1>like you see huge commodity farmers like really making money. Um.

0:17:50.119 --> 0:17:52.439
<v Speaker 1>That being said, you also see some of the smaller

0:17:52.440 --> 0:17:54.600
<v Speaker 1>farmers really struggling. Um. And I think that you can

0:17:54.600 --> 0:17:57.640
<v Speaker 1>see that in some of these equipment sales numbers. UM,

0:17:57.720 --> 0:18:01.359
<v Speaker 1>small egg in the US was looking down for the year,

0:18:01.520 --> 0:18:03.320
<v Speaker 1>and UM, I think that that's sort of telling of

0:18:03.400 --> 0:18:06.520
<v Speaker 1>some of the smaller scale farmers rather than these big

0:18:06.560 --> 0:18:08.879
<v Speaker 1>commodity farmers that we talked about a lot. Well, the

0:18:08.920 --> 0:18:11.800
<v Speaker 1>deer numbers stock still up about seven point three percent.

0:18:11.880 --> 0:18:13.520
<v Speaker 1>We saw a co going up, and we saw other

0:18:13.600 --> 0:18:16.280
<v Speaker 1>names in the space definitely trending higher. Um. Thank you

0:18:16.320 --> 0:18:20.680
<v Speaker 1>both really appreciated. Bloomberg News Agriculture reporter Elizabeth Elkin joining

0:18:20.720 --> 0:18:22.400
<v Speaker 1>us via zoom in New York City, and of course

0:18:22.400 --> 0:18:27.040
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Opinion, Deals and Industrious columnist Brooks Sutherland. You're listening

0:18:27.080 --> 0:18:30.520
<v Speaker 1>to the Bloomberg Business Week podcast. Catch us live week

0:18:30.640 --> 0:18:33.680
<v Speaker 1>days from two to five pm Easter on Bloomberg Radio,

0:18:33.880 --> 0:18:37.119
<v Speaker 1>the Bloomberg Business Band. You too. You can also listen

0:18:37.240 --> 0:18:40.760
<v Speaker 1>live to our flagship New York station. Just say Alexa,

0:18:40.960 --> 0:18:52.639
<v Speaker 1>play Bloomberg even dirty. I'm room journal. Yeah, but you

0:18:52.720 --> 0:18:57.720
<v Speaker 1>let me drive, no, no, no, hon please, I'll go

0:18:57.800 --> 0:19:04.720
<v Speaker 1>Bombardi Revels. Right, I want to drive. Good question D.

0:19:07.720 --> 0:19:13.520
<v Speaker 1>This is the Drive to the Globe down on bloom

0:19:13.520 --> 0:19:16.000
<v Speaker 1>Bird Radio. All Right, we just heard from Charlie of

0:19:16.040 --> 0:19:17.960
<v Speaker 1>course breaking down the trade here. Keep in mind we

0:19:18.040 --> 0:19:20.400
<v Speaker 1>are on track for the S and P to see

0:19:20.440 --> 0:19:22.720
<v Speaker 1>its first back to back weekly declines, the first time

0:19:23.160 --> 0:19:26.360
<v Speaker 1>that we've seen that here. In standout though, is those

0:19:26.359 --> 0:19:28.920
<v Speaker 1>small caps up about one and a half percent for

0:19:28.960 --> 0:19:31.080
<v Speaker 1>the week overall, and a little bit higher certainly in

0:19:31.160 --> 0:19:33.720
<v Speaker 1>today's trade. So let's talk about the markets. Let's talk

0:19:33.720 --> 0:19:36.080
<v Speaker 1>about it with someone who knows it very well. We've

0:19:36.119 --> 0:19:39.600
<v Speaker 1>got Alan Zaffran, founding partner and co CEO at I

0:19:39.800 --> 0:19:42.639
<v Speaker 1>e Q Capital. He is joining Carol and myself on

0:19:42.760 --> 0:19:46.800
<v Speaker 1>zoom from northern California. Allen, great to speak with you here.

0:19:47.160 --> 0:19:50.600
<v Speaker 1>I'm gonna start with the million dollar question on all

0:19:50.680 --> 0:19:54.800
<v Speaker 1>of our minds. What's the outlook for recession in three

0:19:54.920 --> 0:19:58.840
<v Speaker 1>Can you read the tea leaves for us? Mawson and Carol,

0:19:58.880 --> 0:20:01.920
<v Speaker 1>thanks for having me. Of tea leaves are not terribly

0:20:02.160 --> 0:20:05.159
<v Speaker 1>encouraging other than this day. If we're going to have

0:20:05.280 --> 0:20:09.440
<v Speaker 1>a recession, the appearances are that will be relatively shallow

0:20:09.680 --> 0:20:14.040
<v Speaker 1>but extended. And I think the challenges being seen in

0:20:14.119 --> 0:20:15.840
<v Speaker 1>the way the market is playing out right now. It

0:20:16.160 --> 0:20:19.280
<v Speaker 1>is a strange time, Madison. And the reason is the

0:20:19.400 --> 0:20:23.359
<v Speaker 1>bulls are arguing that we've avoid were avoiding recession. But

0:20:23.440 --> 0:20:25.840
<v Speaker 1>if you're avoiding recession, the economy is going to be strong.

0:20:25.920 --> 0:20:28.040
<v Speaker 1>And if the economy is going to be strong, that

0:20:28.160 --> 0:20:31.280
<v Speaker 1>means the Fed's going to keep rates up higher and longer,

0:20:31.800 --> 0:20:34.560
<v Speaker 1>which in turn is going to push down economic activity,

0:20:34.960 --> 0:20:37.760
<v Speaker 1>and it's gonna push down valuations and earnings estimates. And

0:20:37.920 --> 0:20:40.399
<v Speaker 1>so the market wants to hear that we've already pivoted

0:20:40.480 --> 0:20:43.160
<v Speaker 1>with the Fed, We've had a soft landing, and it's

0:20:43.240 --> 0:20:45.880
<v Speaker 1>all steam ahead. The problem is the market isn't yet

0:20:45.960 --> 0:20:49.400
<v Speaker 1>priced in fully higher rates for a longer period of time,

0:20:49.520 --> 0:20:52.520
<v Speaker 1>and the fact that has on reducing earnings estimates. That

0:20:52.720 --> 0:20:55.040
<v Speaker 1>is the struggle worth witnessing right now. Al I gotta say,

0:20:55.040 --> 0:20:56.680
<v Speaker 1>it feels like chicken and the egg, like I'm not

0:20:56.800 --> 0:20:59.240
<v Speaker 1>quite sure you know it's and this is the predicament

0:20:59.320 --> 0:21:01.240
<v Speaker 1>that FED finds it's self in. And we know FED

0:21:01.320 --> 0:21:04.200
<v Speaker 1>policy not exact or you know, it takes a while

0:21:04.280 --> 0:21:06.800
<v Speaker 1>for these moves to really feel their impact, and so

0:21:07.280 --> 0:21:09.359
<v Speaker 1>none of this is an exact science. Having said that,

0:21:09.480 --> 0:21:12.560
<v Speaker 1>we do know are a lot of conversations have been

0:21:12.560 --> 0:21:16.320
<v Speaker 1>about inflation. Bringing it down. It's harder, right, The first

0:21:16.600 --> 0:21:20.800
<v Speaker 1>bunch is easier but as as as the time drags on,

0:21:20.920 --> 0:21:24.720
<v Speaker 1>it's a little bit stickier and trickier. Um. Having said that,

0:21:25.359 --> 0:21:29.199
<v Speaker 1>the investors that you talked to, are they more optimistic

0:21:29.320 --> 0:21:32.560
<v Speaker 1>or pessimistic at this point because the earnings and the

0:21:33.280 --> 0:21:37.800
<v Speaker 1>kind of held up out here in the Silicon Valley,

0:21:37.880 --> 0:21:41.480
<v Speaker 1>people are guarded and concerned. Not from the standpoint that

0:21:41.560 --> 0:21:45.119
<v Speaker 1>it's armageddon. There's just this feeling that we're in the

0:21:45.320 --> 0:21:49.880
<v Speaker 1>middle of an elongated, slow grinding cycle that hasn't played out,

0:21:50.480 --> 0:21:54.160
<v Speaker 1>and it's just gonna take more time, and it's aggravating,

0:21:54.240 --> 0:21:57.800
<v Speaker 1>particularly for those in Silicon Valley that have startup in

0:21:57.880 --> 0:22:01.800
<v Speaker 1>early stage businesses with short runways of cash before they

0:22:01.880 --> 0:22:04.200
<v Speaker 1>burn up and need more money. That's the scary part.

0:22:04.720 --> 0:22:08.119
<v Speaker 1>Other much more well positioned, solid businesses, predominantly in the

0:22:08.240 --> 0:22:11.120
<v Speaker 1>SMP five or an index, don't have those near term

0:22:11.240 --> 0:22:15.439
<v Speaker 1>cash problems, but they recognize the economy is slowing as

0:22:15.480 --> 0:22:19.600
<v Speaker 1>the FED raises rates, and we all know academically in theory,

0:22:19.640 --> 0:22:22.120
<v Speaker 1>when the FED raises the rate fed rate, it takes

0:22:22.160 --> 0:22:25.000
<v Speaker 1>about twelve months from the full impact of each rate

0:22:25.080 --> 0:22:27.840
<v Speaker 1>hike to fully filter through in the economy. So if

0:22:27.880 --> 0:22:31.040
<v Speaker 1>you believe that to be the case, the slowdown economically

0:22:31.480 --> 0:22:33.240
<v Speaker 1>is still going to show up six to twelve months

0:22:33.320 --> 0:22:36.200
<v Speaker 1>from now, not today. This goes back to I have

0:22:36.320 --> 0:22:37.960
<v Speaker 1>to say, you know, Maddie's something that I've been talking

0:22:37.960 --> 0:22:40.119
<v Speaker 1>about a lot Ken Rogoff on surveillance this week, and

0:22:40.240 --> 0:22:43.440
<v Speaker 1>just this whole idea of we don't really know what's

0:22:43.440 --> 0:22:45.720
<v Speaker 1>going to happen and how this plays plays out, and

0:22:45.800 --> 0:22:48.159
<v Speaker 1>this is what makes it so tricky and so interestingly

0:22:48.280 --> 0:22:49.840
<v Speaker 1>he was the one who was saying we're going to

0:22:49.960 --> 0:22:53.639
<v Speaker 1>have soft without the landing, like another thing to add

0:22:53.800 --> 0:22:57.240
<v Speaker 1>to our little reel of options for for where we're

0:22:57.280 --> 0:22:59.920
<v Speaker 1>heading with this. UM, I want to ask you Alan

0:23:00.000 --> 0:23:02.639
<v Speaker 1>about tech companies because you are in Silicon Valley and

0:23:02.640 --> 0:23:05.360
<v Speaker 1>you're talking about the importance of cash. As the era

0:23:05.480 --> 0:23:08.399
<v Speaker 1>of free money starts to wrap up, how are you

0:23:08.440 --> 0:23:14.040
<v Speaker 1>thinking about tech companies, UM, Tech companies still have a

0:23:14.160 --> 0:23:18.119
<v Speaker 1>fabulous quality in which they're incredibly capital like high margin

0:23:18.240 --> 0:23:22.000
<v Speaker 1>businesses with recurring revenue streams, and you get entrenched customers

0:23:22.280 --> 0:23:25.560
<v Speaker 1>who just can't let go of their software based systems

0:23:25.640 --> 0:23:27.800
<v Speaker 1>once they grab them. So if you have a really

0:23:27.840 --> 0:23:31.920
<v Speaker 1>strong franchise and a durable product until a better competitive

0:23:31.920 --> 0:23:35.400
<v Speaker 1>technology shows up, it's a winner. The challenges. These companies

0:23:35.440 --> 0:23:39.639
<v Speaker 1>are valued on the basis of long term cash flows,

0:23:39.960 --> 0:23:43.440
<v Speaker 1>so those businesses are the most susceptible to rising FED

0:23:43.520 --> 0:23:47.160
<v Speaker 1>fund rates because I'm going to use higher discount rate

0:23:47.240 --> 0:23:50.520
<v Speaker 1>when I value the present value of those distant cash flows.

0:23:51.080 --> 0:23:55.200
<v Speaker 1>I do think they're increasingly attractive, but in an era

0:23:55.320 --> 0:23:57.119
<v Speaker 1>where the Fed is going to keep rates higher for

0:23:57.280 --> 0:24:00.200
<v Speaker 1>longer in the short run, there's still sub it to

0:24:00.280 --> 0:24:04.120
<v Speaker 1>some whims of continued valuation pressure. Despite how far they've

0:24:04.160 --> 0:24:07.080
<v Speaker 1>come down. They're compelling long term opportunities, but you have

0:24:07.200 --> 0:24:09.000
<v Speaker 1>to be selective and ensure you're in a business that

0:24:09.119 --> 0:24:12.480
<v Speaker 1>has a long enough cash runway to endure whatever slowdown

0:24:12.680 --> 0:24:14.560
<v Speaker 1>might show up in the next six to twelve months.

0:24:14.600 --> 0:24:16.680
<v Speaker 1>I mean, Ellen, this is the important conversation, right, and

0:24:16.720 --> 0:24:18.840
<v Speaker 1>you write about it in your latest research about you know,

0:24:19.080 --> 0:24:22.520
<v Speaker 1>this fifteen year period of easy money being over UH

0:24:22.640 --> 0:24:25.960
<v Speaker 1>interest rates, you know, structurally elevated amainst the return of inflation.

0:24:26.040 --> 0:24:28.119
<v Speaker 1>I mean, if we are going to forgive me a

0:24:28.240 --> 0:24:31.800
<v Speaker 1>new norm when it comes to where inflation settles and

0:24:31.920 --> 0:24:33.800
<v Speaker 1>were rates settle and the Fed funds, I know they're

0:24:33.840 --> 0:24:35.840
<v Speaker 1>sticking to two percent, but I think a lot can

0:24:35.880 --> 0:24:39.240
<v Speaker 1>be debated about that. That means it's a whole valuation

0:24:39.359 --> 0:24:42.400
<v Speaker 1>reset for asset classes. And that's the predicament we find

0:24:42.440 --> 0:24:45.200
<v Speaker 1>ourselves in. And just got about a minute here. Don't

0:24:45.200 --> 0:24:47.480
<v Speaker 1>put all your eggs in one basket. Don't forget there's

0:24:47.480 --> 0:24:50.040
<v Speaker 1>a reason to own reads, there's a reason to own

0:24:50.160 --> 0:24:53.640
<v Speaker 1>value based businesses, consumer staples. Financials will do it, which

0:24:53.680 --> 0:24:56.280
<v Speaker 1>will do okay when we get back to more upward

0:24:56.359 --> 0:24:59.040
<v Speaker 1>sloping you old curve, which is look what forward looking

0:24:59.560 --> 0:25:03.280
<v Speaker 1>healthcare stocks. So, despite being here in Silicon Valley, um

0:25:03.800 --> 0:25:06.960
<v Speaker 1>our clients are well diversified across all sectors because we

0:25:07.080 --> 0:25:11.480
<v Speaker 1>recognize that area is change and with it, different valuations

0:25:11.880 --> 0:25:14.880
<v Speaker 1>are applied in different business models can be durable despite

0:25:15.160 --> 0:25:17.600
<v Speaker 1>in your term economic conditions. All right, we're gonna leave

0:25:17.600 --> 0:25:19.600
<v Speaker 1>it on that note, Allen, have a great weekend. Appreciate

0:25:19.920 --> 0:25:22.200
<v Speaker 1>checking in with you once again. Alan Zaffron he's founding

0:25:22.240 --> 0:25:24.840
<v Speaker 1>partner and co CEO at I e Q Capital. This

0:25:25.160 --> 0:25:30.160
<v Speaker 1>is the Bloomberg Business Week podcastle Apple, Spotify and anywhere

0:25:30.200 --> 0:25:33.919
<v Speaker 1>else you get your podcast. Listen live each weekday starting

0:25:33.920 --> 0:25:36.639
<v Speaker 1>a two pm Eastern on Bloomberg dot Com, The I

0:25:36.800 --> 0:25:39.720
<v Speaker 1>Heart Radio app tune In, and the Bloomberg Business app.

0:25:39.880 --> 0:25:42.800
<v Speaker 1>You can also watch us live every weekday on YouTube

0:25:43.080 --> 0:25:45.200
<v Speaker 1>and always on the Bloomberg Termit level.