WEBVTT - The Statcast Cheat Code: Fantasy Baseball Advanced Stats Deep Dive with Eric Cross (Ep. 1348)

0:00:05.280 --> 0:00:08.240
<v Speaker 1>What's going on? Everybody. Welcome into Fantasy Pros. This is

0:00:08.280 --> 0:00:11.440
<v Speaker 1>the Fantasy Baseball Podcast. I'm your host, Joe Rico, and

0:00:11.480 --> 0:00:14.640
<v Speaker 1>today we're gonna take a look into statcast highlights. Some

0:00:14.680 --> 0:00:16.439
<v Speaker 1>guys at the top of leaderboards, some names that you

0:00:16.520 --> 0:00:18.479
<v Speaker 1>might not expect to see a top of leaderboards, some

0:00:18.640 --> 0:00:21.160
<v Speaker 1>maybe you will. But we're going to go through seven

0:00:21.239 --> 0:00:23.840
<v Speaker 1>key statistics, both for hitters and pitchers today and I

0:00:23.880 --> 0:00:26.920
<v Speaker 1>am joined by a phenomenal guest, a dear old friend

0:00:26.920 --> 0:00:29.880
<v Speaker 1>from the fantasy space, Eric Cross. You can find him

0:00:29.880 --> 0:00:32.680
<v Speaker 1>as the lead MLB writer at Rotoballer. He hosts the

0:00:32.680 --> 0:00:35.280
<v Speaker 1>tool Shed podcast and he was also the twenty twenty

0:00:35.280 --> 0:00:38.800
<v Speaker 1>one FSWA Baseball Writer of the Year. Eric. Great to

0:00:38.800 --> 0:00:40.199
<v Speaker 1>have you on the show. I think this first time

0:00:40.200 --> 0:00:42.480
<v Speaker 1>I've had you on the Fantasy Pros podcast. We've obviously

0:00:42.520 --> 0:00:43.920
<v Speaker 1>done a lot of shows over the years, but first

0:00:43.920 --> 0:00:45.960
<v Speaker 1>time on this network. Great to have you on. My friend.

0:00:45.960 --> 0:00:47.559
<v Speaker 1>How you been doing, Yeah.

0:00:47.360 --> 0:00:50.360
<v Speaker 2>And doing great, Joe, hopefully you're doing great as well.

0:00:50.440 --> 0:00:52.120
<v Speaker 2>I know you guys have been dealing with some some

0:00:52.240 --> 0:00:55.440
<v Speaker 2>crazy stuff up there over the last few weeks. But yeah,

0:00:55.520 --> 0:00:57.080
<v Speaker 2>I mean we were just talking before we hit record.

0:00:57.120 --> 0:00:59.080
<v Speaker 2>It's been a crazy few weeks for all of us.

0:00:59.120 --> 0:01:01.959
<v Speaker 2>I feel it's weird to think that we're almost into

0:01:02.000 --> 0:01:05.399
<v Speaker 2>August now and summer's already you know, over half over,

0:01:05.520 --> 0:01:07.240
<v Speaker 2>and then baseball seasons and like the you know, the

0:01:07.280 --> 0:01:10.000
<v Speaker 2>final third, final stretch run here. But yeah, I'm really

0:01:10.040 --> 0:01:12.160
<v Speaker 2>excited to hop on and it's always good talking with

0:01:12.240 --> 0:01:14.160
<v Speaker 2>you and dig into some stack cast.

0:01:15.520 --> 0:01:17.640
<v Speaker 1>Eric is one of the one of the absolute best.

0:01:17.760 --> 0:01:19.880
<v Speaker 1>More known for the prospect space, you should follow him

0:01:19.880 --> 0:01:22.920
<v Speaker 1>at Aeric Cross MLB. I still do Airic Cross zero

0:01:23.000 --> 0:01:26.040
<v Speaker 1>four in my head. The old Eric Cross MLB is

0:01:26.040 --> 0:01:28.720
<v Speaker 1>where you can follow him phenomenal prospect and dynasty work.

0:01:28.959 --> 0:01:30.280
<v Speaker 1>Today we're going to go a little bit more on

0:01:30.319 --> 0:01:33.080
<v Speaker 1>the redraft sphere, but also we probably get some dynasty

0:01:33.120 --> 0:01:35.679
<v Speaker 1>takes as well, knowing Eric and his expertise, and we're

0:01:35.680 --> 0:01:38.839
<v Speaker 1>going to start off today looking at the heading side,

0:01:38.880 --> 0:01:41.399
<v Speaker 1>and we're going to start with the average exit velocity

0:01:41.480 --> 0:01:44.120
<v Speaker 1>leader board. A lot of names that you would expect

0:01:44.200 --> 0:01:46.800
<v Speaker 1>at the top O'Neil Cruz ninety six miles an hour,

0:01:47.040 --> 0:01:50.360
<v Speaker 1>James Wood ninety five point two, Jordan Alvarez ninety four

0:01:50.400 --> 0:01:53.840
<v Speaker 1>point six, Ellie Della Cruz, Aaron Judge. Those names are

0:01:53.880 --> 0:01:56.000
<v Speaker 1>all expected to be at the top of these leader boards,

0:01:56.040 --> 0:01:58.160
<v Speaker 1>and then we get into some interesting names as we

0:01:58.160 --> 0:02:02.680
<v Speaker 1>continue to go down. Jordan Walker, Una Taka Murakami, Jack Cagleon,

0:02:03.160 --> 0:02:06.360
<v Speaker 1>Dominic can Zone also on the top of the leaderboard.

0:02:06.440 --> 0:02:10.320
<v Speaker 1>Looking at the top fifteen names here, Eric is average

0:02:10.360 --> 0:02:12.360
<v Speaker 1>exit velocity is something that you pay a lot of

0:02:12.400 --> 0:02:15.480
<v Speaker 1>attention to in your analysis, and also looking at this

0:02:15.560 --> 0:02:18.000
<v Speaker 1>list of names, who are the guys that really stand

0:02:18.040 --> 0:02:20.920
<v Speaker 1>out to you that you'd like to break down today. Yeah, no,

0:02:21.080 --> 0:02:22.120
<v Speaker 1>I definitely.

0:02:21.720 --> 0:02:22.680
<v Speaker 3>Pay attention to it.

0:02:23.040 --> 0:02:25.120
<v Speaker 2>I mean I don't think it's you know, the be

0:02:25.280 --> 0:02:27.200
<v Speaker 2>all end all, so to speak, because obviously there's a

0:02:27.240 --> 0:02:30.840
<v Speaker 2>lot more that goes into, you know, evaluating a player's powers,

0:02:30.960 --> 0:02:33.200
<v Speaker 2>you know, looking at obviously hard hit rate, barrel rate,

0:02:33.560 --> 0:02:36.040
<v Speaker 2>some bad at ball angles as well, which actually kind

0:02:36.040 --> 0:02:39.240
<v Speaker 2>of ties into the name that immediately stood out to me,

0:02:39.400 --> 0:02:41.160
<v Speaker 2>and you know, he's in the midst of having a

0:02:41.240 --> 0:02:41.919
<v Speaker 2>breakout year.

0:02:42.080 --> 0:02:44.320
<v Speaker 3>Finally, Jordan Walker.

0:02:44.520 --> 0:02:46.320
<v Speaker 2>It feels like he's been around forever and he's still

0:02:46.320 --> 0:02:48.360
<v Speaker 2>only twenty four years old, which is just crazy to

0:02:48.400 --> 0:02:48.880
<v Speaker 2>think about.

0:02:49.680 --> 0:02:50.639
<v Speaker 3>But yeah, he's just.

0:02:50.680 --> 0:02:53.639
<v Speaker 2>Near in the top of every every leaderboard that has

0:02:53.680 --> 0:02:55.840
<v Speaker 2>to do with just hitting the ball hard.

0:02:56.760 --> 0:02:59.359
<v Speaker 3>He's either at the top or near the top. You know.

0:02:59.360 --> 0:03:01.160
<v Speaker 2>I think average TV's actually the one he ranks the

0:03:01.240 --> 0:03:04.400
<v Speaker 2>highest and ninety eighth percentile at ninety three point nine

0:03:04.440 --> 0:03:07.160
<v Speaker 2>miles an hour. But it's it's been really fun to

0:03:07.240 --> 0:03:10.280
<v Speaker 2>watch his kind of breakout season this year. I mean,

0:03:10.520 --> 0:03:12.720
<v Speaker 2>I mean, especially those of us that kind of followed

0:03:12.760 --> 0:03:14.800
<v Speaker 2>him through you know, the prospect ranks and when he

0:03:14.840 --> 0:03:16.920
<v Speaker 2>was drafted, like there's always a lot of hype, and

0:03:16.960 --> 0:03:19.440
<v Speaker 2>he was a very highly ranked prospect and then he

0:03:19.480 --> 0:03:21.520
<v Speaker 2>had that you know, two homer game and we were

0:03:21.520 --> 0:03:24.280
<v Speaker 2>down there at First Pitch, Florida. That's in spring training,

0:03:24.320 --> 0:03:27.120
<v Speaker 2>and the hype only grew and then unfortunately hasn't only

0:03:27.160 --> 0:03:29.880
<v Speaker 2>gone so well up until this year. But I mean

0:03:30.160 --> 0:03:32.880
<v Speaker 2>just looking at how hard he's hitting the ball and

0:03:32.919 --> 0:03:36.120
<v Speaker 2>then tying it in with the better batted ball angles

0:03:36.480 --> 0:03:39.680
<v Speaker 2>he has this year. The air rate is up, you know,

0:03:39.720 --> 0:03:42.520
<v Speaker 2>the pole rate is up, pole air rate as well,

0:03:42.920 --> 0:03:45.800
<v Speaker 2>just really allowing him to kind of take advantage of

0:03:46.080 --> 0:03:48.400
<v Speaker 2>the elite root he's always had, Like he's always hit

0:03:48.400 --> 0:03:49.840
<v Speaker 2>the ball hard. I mean last year it was ninety

0:03:49.840 --> 0:03:52.120
<v Speaker 2>two point three miles an hours, like he's always hit

0:03:52.160 --> 0:03:54.320
<v Speaker 2>the ball hard, it's just he's hitting the ball hard

0:03:54.400 --> 0:03:58.440
<v Speaker 2>at better angles to kind of maximize that power. And

0:03:58.440 --> 0:04:01.119
<v Speaker 2>then he hit the ball over the fence much more consistently.

0:04:01.280 --> 0:04:04.760
<v Speaker 2>So I think there was some skepticism earlier in the year, like, oh, wait,

0:04:04.760 --> 0:04:06.640
<v Speaker 2>you know it's going to fall off, He'll revert back

0:04:06.680 --> 0:04:09.640
<v Speaker 2>to the old Walker. But hey, we're about the I think,

0:04:09.680 --> 0:04:12.000
<v Speaker 2>pushing the two third mark of the season here, so

0:04:12.520 --> 0:04:15.680
<v Speaker 2>and he's on about like what a thirty five you know,

0:04:15.720 --> 0:04:18.599
<v Speaker 2>Homer twenty two steel pace with a twoity nine average.

0:04:18.640 --> 0:04:20.800
<v Speaker 2>So yeah, I'm I think at this point we can

0:04:20.839 --> 0:04:24.120
<v Speaker 2>start saying that, you know, the breakout for Walker is legit,

0:04:24.360 --> 0:04:26.720
<v Speaker 2>and you know this, you know this elite versions here

0:04:26.760 --> 0:04:27.119
<v Speaker 2>to stay.

0:04:29.000 --> 0:04:30.960
<v Speaker 1>Is this something I guess you kind of answered it.

0:04:31.279 --> 0:04:34.160
<v Speaker 1>So heading into next year, assuming Walker finishes out as

0:04:34.200 --> 0:04:37.560
<v Speaker 1>like a second round first round value, is that where

0:04:37.560 --> 0:04:40.160
<v Speaker 1>he will end up being ranked when it comes to redraft,

0:04:40.240 --> 0:04:42.520
<v Speaker 1>startup dynasty leagues? Is this a guy that you think

0:04:42.560 --> 0:04:45.280
<v Speaker 1>is worthy of a first round pick going forward, regardless

0:04:45.320 --> 0:04:45.799
<v Speaker 1>of format.

0:04:47.600 --> 0:04:49.120
<v Speaker 3>I don't know if I would say first round.

0:04:49.120 --> 0:04:51.400
<v Speaker 2>I think there's just so many other names that are

0:04:51.440 --> 0:04:54.359
<v Speaker 2>in consideration that, I think people will feel a little

0:04:54.400 --> 0:04:58.040
<v Speaker 2>bit safer about taking you know, like Junior, Cameronaro, Nick Kurtz,

0:04:58.120 --> 0:05:00.359
<v Speaker 2>guys like that, and then obviously all you other studs

0:05:00.400 --> 0:05:02.560
<v Speaker 2>that are already up there and have been for a

0:05:02.560 --> 0:05:04.839
<v Speaker 2>couple of years now. But I think second round, like

0:05:05.080 --> 0:05:06.880
<v Speaker 2>you know, early to the mid part of the second round,

0:05:06.880 --> 0:05:08.960
<v Speaker 2>so like in the fifteen teamer, I can see the

0:05:08.960 --> 0:05:11.880
<v Speaker 2>ADP being in the vicinity of like, you know, nineteen

0:05:11.960 --> 0:05:13.960
<v Speaker 2>to twenty two, somewhere in that range kind of the

0:05:14.000 --> 0:05:16.560
<v Speaker 2>middle part of that round. You know, maybe bumped up

0:05:16.560 --> 0:05:18.960
<v Speaker 2>a few spots in a dynasty format because of the

0:05:19.000 --> 0:05:21.960
<v Speaker 2>age and you know, the long term projection. But you know,

0:05:22.120 --> 0:05:25.200
<v Speaker 2>I feel confident that, you know, in those gains that

0:05:25.200 --> 0:05:27.880
<v Speaker 2>he's had this year, I mean, it can always revert back.

0:05:27.920 --> 0:05:29.880
<v Speaker 2>I mean, I think vladimirker Road Junior. I hate to

0:05:29.880 --> 0:05:32.560
<v Speaker 2>bring him up, but he's like a perfect you know,

0:05:33.080 --> 0:05:36.120
<v Speaker 2>you know, you know case right where he still hits

0:05:36.120 --> 0:05:38.039
<v Speaker 2>small hard, but now the angle has halping been great

0:05:38.080 --> 0:05:39.760
<v Speaker 2>this year and it's kind of gone back down in

0:05:39.760 --> 0:05:43.479
<v Speaker 2>the terms of you know, home runs. So yeah, it's

0:05:43.880 --> 0:05:47.640
<v Speaker 2>really exciting, but you know, hopefully he can keep these

0:05:47.640 --> 0:05:49.279
<v Speaker 2>sticking going for By, I can see, I can see

0:05:49.279 --> 0:05:51.279
<v Speaker 2>second round long term for him.

0:05:52.160 --> 0:05:54.880
<v Speaker 1>I would do unspeakable things to have vladimirker Ro Junior

0:05:54.880 --> 0:05:57.080
<v Speaker 1>with an eleven degree launch angle and hitting the ball

0:05:57.120 --> 0:05:59.480
<v Speaker 1>in the air more. I hope that it comes eventually,

0:06:00.400 --> 0:06:03.320
<v Speaker 1>doesn't look like it's coming imminently. I agree that the

0:06:03.400 --> 0:06:06.120
<v Speaker 1>talent is there for Vlatty to hit you. The forty

0:06:06.120 --> 0:06:09.120
<v Speaker 1>homers give you the thirty five plus MVP type of season.

0:06:09.240 --> 0:06:11.599
<v Speaker 1>I mean, he had an MVP type of season in

0:06:11.640 --> 0:06:13.640
<v Speaker 1>twenty one and then had another one in twenty four.

0:06:13.680 --> 0:06:17.520
<v Speaker 1>But the last year in particular has been awful for Vlatty.

0:06:17.560 --> 0:06:20.640
<v Speaker 1>But Jordan Walker, on a brighter note, has just been phenomenal.

0:06:20.680 --> 0:06:23.080
<v Speaker 1>If anybody picked him up at the end of you know,

0:06:23.240 --> 0:06:25.800
<v Speaker 1>the first couple of weeks waiver wires or fab or

0:06:25.960 --> 0:06:27.680
<v Speaker 1>maybe he was their last pick in their draft, he

0:06:27.800 --> 0:06:31.000
<v Speaker 1>is really truly paid off and another guy going down

0:06:31.040 --> 0:06:33.159
<v Speaker 1>this leaderboard. He appears on a lot of the leaderboards

0:06:33.160 --> 0:06:36.360
<v Speaker 1>we're gonna talk about today. But Munataka Murakami, I think

0:06:36.520 --> 0:06:40.120
<v Speaker 1>nobody was really expecting this level of production. Maybe they were,

0:06:40.520 --> 0:06:43.520
<v Speaker 1>but a forty plus homer pace without being a huge

0:06:43.640 --> 0:06:46.560
<v Speaker 1>negative in the batting average area. I think that a

0:06:46.600 --> 0:06:49.320
<v Speaker 1>lot of people are surprised with Murakami's pace, and I

0:06:49.360 --> 0:06:51.039
<v Speaker 1>think a lot of it comes down to just how

0:06:51.080 --> 0:06:53.919
<v Speaker 1>hard he hits the ball ninety three point eight miles

0:06:53.960 --> 0:06:58.000
<v Speaker 1>an hour, average exit velocity, nineteen percent barrel, fifteen percent

0:06:58.080 --> 0:06:59.599
<v Speaker 1>heart hit rate. It covers up a lot of the

0:06:59.640 --> 0:07:01.840
<v Speaker 1>other laws in terms of the contact rates and the

0:07:01.880 --> 0:07:04.680
<v Speaker 1>swing and miss. Is Murakami a guy that you were

0:07:04.720 --> 0:07:06.680
<v Speaker 1>in on coming into the season, and do you think

0:07:06.680 --> 0:07:09.400
<v Speaker 1>that this is kind of the baseline expectation for him

0:07:09.440 --> 0:07:12.080
<v Speaker 1>going forward? Still just twenty six years old. Is this

0:07:12.120 --> 0:07:13.960
<v Speaker 1>a guy that you would put down for forty home

0:07:14.040 --> 0:07:16.480
<v Speaker 1>runs every single season and a two thirty type of

0:07:16.480 --> 0:07:18.800
<v Speaker 1>batting average? I guess is this the new Kyle Schwarber.

0:07:19.760 --> 0:07:22.160
<v Speaker 2>I mean it might be because once you factor in

0:07:23.000 --> 0:07:25.000
<v Speaker 2>the high walk rate that he brings as well, I

0:07:25.080 --> 0:07:27.360
<v Speaker 2>mean nearly twenty percent walker rate too.

0:07:27.520 --> 0:07:30.280
<v Speaker 3>So yeah, he's a guy entering the year I was.

0:07:30.520 --> 0:07:32.520
<v Speaker 2>I was so all over the place on him, and

0:07:32.760 --> 0:07:35.240
<v Speaker 2>I'm sure I wasn't the only one, because it's a

0:07:35.640 --> 0:07:38.840
<v Speaker 2>very kind of all over the place profile. And I

0:07:38.880 --> 0:07:42.440
<v Speaker 2>think everything that we kind of thoughts about Murakami all

0:07:42.480 --> 0:07:45.280
<v Speaker 2>the pros, all the cons they've all been on a

0:07:45.320 --> 0:07:47.720
<v Speaker 2>full display, like to the max. So I'm both on

0:07:47.840 --> 0:07:51.120
<v Speaker 2>positive and the negative end of the spectrum. But in

0:07:51.200 --> 0:07:53.800
<v Speaker 2>terms of power, I mean, he's a guy that just

0:07:54.200 --> 0:07:56.679
<v Speaker 2>everywhere you look. I mean, his rates are even better

0:07:56.960 --> 0:07:59.400
<v Speaker 2>than Jordan Walker's. I think he's higher than Jordan Walker

0:07:59.520 --> 0:08:02.120
<v Speaker 2>in uh. I think they're both basically the same here

0:08:02.160 --> 0:08:03.840
<v Speaker 2>in average TV, but he's a little bit higher in

0:08:03.920 --> 0:08:05.880
<v Speaker 2>terms of barrel and hard.

0:08:05.680 --> 0:08:08.240
<v Speaker 3>Hit and just not doesn't chase.

0:08:08.360 --> 0:08:10.280
<v Speaker 2>I think that that's the that's the key with Murakami

0:08:11.000 --> 0:08:13.480
<v Speaker 2>that I kind of mentioned with others too, Like these

0:08:13.560 --> 0:08:16.560
<v Speaker 2>kind of the big quality of contact guys that have

0:08:16.720 --> 0:08:20.240
<v Speaker 2>questionable contact rates, if they don't chase a lot, I

0:08:20.240 --> 0:08:24.680
<v Speaker 2>feel that's a better kind of recipe for them, at

0:08:24.760 --> 0:08:29.560
<v Speaker 2>least maintaining an average that isn't completely like Joey Gallo

0:08:30.080 --> 0:08:33.880
<v Speaker 2>Chris Davis levels of terrible right like two thirty average

0:08:34.000 --> 0:08:37.920
<v Speaker 2>from Murakami. I mean, I feel like six seven years

0:08:37.920 --> 0:08:41.439
<v Speaker 2>ago we would have been, you know, looking at that average, uh,

0:08:41.559 --> 0:08:43.800
<v Speaker 2>not as favorably, and I don't think we're looking at

0:08:43.880 --> 0:08:46.320
<v Speaker 2>favorably now, But two thirty isn't as bad as it

0:08:46.400 --> 0:08:48.600
<v Speaker 2>used to be. It's kind of like how batting averages

0:08:48.679 --> 0:08:50.600
<v Speaker 2>have kind of come down a little bit, and you know,

0:08:50.679 --> 0:08:53.040
<v Speaker 2>ob you know, more walks and OBP kind of on

0:08:53.120 --> 0:08:55.319
<v Speaker 2>that focus too. So if he can just keep it

0:08:55.400 --> 0:08:58.560
<v Speaker 2>right where he is two thirty and doesn't drop down

0:08:58.600 --> 0:09:00.559
<v Speaker 2>to you know, like two hundred or or even have

0:09:00.720 --> 0:09:03.040
<v Speaker 2>them forbid lower than that, I think you can still

0:09:03.480 --> 0:09:07.120
<v Speaker 2>be okay with that average. You can definitely build your

0:09:07.160 --> 0:09:10.160
<v Speaker 2>teams around that. I mean, especially if you have confidence

0:09:10.320 --> 0:09:12.640
<v Speaker 2>in your drafting abilities, you can absolutely work around a

0:09:12.679 --> 0:09:15.000
<v Speaker 2>two thirty average, especially when that two thirty average is

0:09:15.040 --> 0:09:17.880
<v Speaker 2>giving you, yeah, thirty five forty home runs. I mean,

0:09:17.880 --> 0:09:20.800
<v Speaker 2>he's on pace for I think, like, damn your fifty

0:09:20.800 --> 0:09:23.160
<v Speaker 2>home runs this season, and I mean I think I

0:09:23.160 --> 0:09:25.320
<v Speaker 2>think it's legit. I mean, you look at the elite

0:09:25.760 --> 0:09:29.079
<v Speaker 2>quality of contact, The bat speed is there, the angles

0:09:29.080 --> 0:09:31.280
<v Speaker 2>are there. So yeah, and especially if you play in

0:09:31.280 --> 0:09:34.400
<v Speaker 2>an OBP format, he absolutely he's a he's a top

0:09:34.480 --> 0:09:36.520
<v Speaker 2>probably thirty to forty.

0:09:36.200 --> 0:09:38.880
<v Speaker 3>Guy you know later this year and next year as well.

0:09:38.920 --> 0:09:41.280
<v Speaker 2>But even in an average league, if he keeps that

0:09:41.320 --> 0:09:43.440
<v Speaker 2>two thirty, I think you're gonna see Murk Commedy kind

0:09:43.440 --> 0:09:45.480
<v Speaker 2>of settle in as yeah, maybe even the next shore Ber.

0:09:45.480 --> 0:09:49.920
<v Speaker 2>I that'sh lofty praise, no doubt about that. But the profile,

0:09:50.360 --> 0:09:52.720
<v Speaker 2>you know, you can see it. There's some similarities for sure.

0:09:53.720 --> 0:09:55.800
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, with Murk Commy, the thing is he just knows

0:09:55.880 --> 0:09:58.240
<v Speaker 1>what pitches he wants to swing at. He only has

0:09:58.280 --> 0:10:01.360
<v Speaker 1>a forty one percent swing rate, which is very, very low,

0:10:01.400 --> 0:10:04.240
<v Speaker 1>but he doesn't chase. He seems when he swings damn

0:10:04.280 --> 0:10:06.160
<v Speaker 1>near every time he's hitting the ball out of the yard.

0:10:06.160 --> 0:10:08.240
<v Speaker 1>And it's just really unfortunate that he did have to

0:10:08.240 --> 0:10:11.160
<v Speaker 1>miss time earlier and got hurt. I wonder what a

0:10:11.200 --> 0:10:13.040
<v Speaker 1>full season's worth of stats would have looked like. There

0:10:13.080 --> 0:10:14.760
<v Speaker 1>probably would have been a little bit of a regression

0:10:14.800 --> 0:10:17.640
<v Speaker 1>period for him, but still, if we were looking at

0:10:17.679 --> 0:10:19.440
<v Speaker 1>one hundred and forty games, this might have been a

0:10:19.480 --> 0:10:22.280
<v Speaker 1>forty five fifty home run guy. And I wonder where

0:10:22.280 --> 0:10:25.079
<v Speaker 1>people will draft him next year as a first basement.

0:10:25.080 --> 0:10:27.560
<v Speaker 1>First base is gonna be pretty deep, but Murakami is

0:10:27.559 --> 0:10:29.840
<v Speaker 1>a pretty interesting name, for sure. I wanted to at

0:10:29.960 --> 0:10:32.200
<v Speaker 1>least ask about Dominic Canzone as well, because he's a

0:10:32.200 --> 0:10:34.120
<v Speaker 1>guy that doesn't seem to get a ton of love

0:10:34.679 --> 0:10:37.719
<v Speaker 1>in the fantasy world. If you look at roster percentages.

0:10:37.760 --> 0:10:40.480
<v Speaker 1>If you deeper NFBC type of leagues, he's rostered. But

0:10:40.480 --> 0:10:43.480
<v Speaker 1>the average ten twelve team players don't seem that interested

0:10:43.520 --> 0:10:45.360
<v Speaker 1>in Canzone. And you look at last year eighty two

0:10:45.400 --> 0:10:48.040
<v Speaker 1>games of a one to forty one WRC plus he

0:10:48.120 --> 0:10:51.280
<v Speaker 1>hit three hundred. Well, this year so one thirty seven

0:10:51.400 --> 0:10:54.040
<v Speaker 1>WRC plus he's hitting two fifty seven. He's got a

0:10:54.040 --> 0:10:56.520
<v Speaker 1>good on bass where he's got the fifteen homers. He

0:10:56.600 --> 0:10:59.800
<v Speaker 1>hits the ball incredibly hard, fourteen percent barrel, ninety two

0:10:59.800 --> 0:11:03.280
<v Speaker 1>and half average Egson velocity, and the bat speed has

0:11:03.320 --> 0:11:05.520
<v Speaker 1>gone up from seventy three point one to seventy four

0:11:05.520 --> 0:11:08.320
<v Speaker 1>point eight this year. I'm a huge Canzone fan. Is

0:11:08.320 --> 0:11:10.960
<v Speaker 1>this a guy that deserves his flowers from a fantasy

0:11:10.960 --> 0:11:13.080
<v Speaker 1>point of view more than he gets eric? Because one

0:11:13.160 --> 0:11:17.000
<v Speaker 1>forty WRC plus and back to back seasons very rare

0:11:17.160 --> 0:11:18.520
<v Speaker 1>for any player to accomplish that.

0:11:19.320 --> 0:11:22.120
<v Speaker 2>Oh yeah, absolutely, And I think just in general he

0:11:22.160 --> 0:11:25.240
<v Speaker 2>deserves more flowers, right, But I think I think the

0:11:25.559 --> 0:11:28.360
<v Speaker 2>little bit of the skepticism and probably the reason why. Look,

0:11:28.440 --> 0:11:31.360
<v Speaker 2>you've got like a Yahoo roster rate where I'm not

0:11:31.360 --> 0:11:32.920
<v Speaker 2>sure where it's at now, but it's probably not like

0:11:33.000 --> 0:11:35.280
<v Speaker 2>super high, maybe like what fifty years percent if I

0:11:35.280 --> 0:11:36.040
<v Speaker 2>had the guests.

0:11:35.840 --> 0:11:37.760
<v Speaker 3>Right now, but he's because they aren't.

0:11:37.800 --> 0:11:42.079
<v Speaker 2>For whatever reason, Seattle's is not playing him much against lefties,

0:11:42.120 --> 0:11:44.960
<v Speaker 2>and in his very limited time this year against lefties,

0:11:45.120 --> 0:11:47.120
<v Speaker 2>he hasn't been in bad. It's two fifty four to

0:11:47.200 --> 0:11:51.160
<v Speaker 2>forty seven for sixty four slash line, two bombs, nine walks,

0:11:51.240 --> 0:11:53.040
<v Speaker 2>nine k's, and thirty eight point appearances.

0:11:53.080 --> 0:11:55.520
<v Speaker 3>I mean that's extremely small sample size.

0:11:55.280 --> 0:11:59.720
<v Speaker 2>Absolutely, but you know he hasn't been like terrible against lefties,

0:11:59.720 --> 0:12:01.720
<v Speaker 2>but you know he has thirty eight play appearances against

0:12:01.720 --> 0:12:03.840
<v Speaker 2>them and then two hundred and thirty eight against righties.

0:12:03.840 --> 0:12:05.880
<v Speaker 2>So I feel like that's probably a little bit of

0:12:05.920 --> 0:12:09.199
<v Speaker 2>the hold up for some fantasy managers. But yeah, I've

0:12:09.240 --> 0:12:12.080
<v Speaker 2>been a kN Zone fan for a bit now. He

0:12:12.200 --> 0:12:15.120
<v Speaker 2>was kind of like that borderline top one hundred prospect

0:12:15.240 --> 0:12:17.360
<v Speaker 2>back in the day that this at some point like

0:12:17.360 --> 0:12:18.800
<v Speaker 2>all right, this is probably not gonna work out, and

0:12:19.080 --> 0:12:20.959
<v Speaker 2>maybe think he'd be out of the league by now.

0:12:21.000 --> 0:12:23.599
<v Speaker 2>But one of those late twenties bloomers. We saw it

0:12:23.640 --> 0:12:25.840
<v Speaker 2>a little bit last year and in the second half

0:12:25.840 --> 0:12:27.719
<v Speaker 2>when he hit three hundred but eleven bombs in the

0:12:27.760 --> 0:12:29.959
<v Speaker 2>second half of the season and then that kind of

0:12:30.000 --> 0:12:32.240
<v Speaker 2>got a little bit of the intrigue going again for

0:12:32.320 --> 0:12:34.560
<v Speaker 2>him this year, and he's just built on it, you know,

0:12:34.720 --> 0:12:37.959
<v Speaker 2>the five h two slog, fifteen bombs, I mean full

0:12:38.000 --> 0:12:40.160
<v Speaker 2>season pace. He's on pace for probably like thirty five

0:12:40.160 --> 0:12:43.200
<v Speaker 2>home runs. Obviously he won't get there, but yeah, I

0:12:43.200 --> 0:12:45.880
<v Speaker 2>mean he's been really, really, you know, exciting in terms

0:12:45.920 --> 0:12:48.960
<v Speaker 2>of the quality of contact bat speed. You know, contact

0:12:49.080 --> 0:12:51.720
<v Speaker 2>rates aren't great, but they're not terrible. They're they're higher

0:12:51.800 --> 0:12:55.080
<v Speaker 2>than than the umbercamis for instance, but yeah, there's not

0:12:55.240 --> 0:12:58.319
<v Speaker 2>any like glaring red flag in the profile. There's some

0:12:58.400 --> 0:13:01.360
<v Speaker 2>below average patric Shore, and this is guy that's always

0:13:01.440 --> 0:13:04.120
<v Speaker 2>hit the ball hardly. Last year as well, he was hot,

0:13:04.200 --> 0:13:06.240
<v Speaker 2>kind of high up there, and all the quality of

0:13:06.280 --> 0:13:09.600
<v Speaker 2>contact leaderboards as well. So I'm just hoping Seattle can

0:13:10.000 --> 0:13:11.880
<v Speaker 2>maybe give him, you know, throw him a few more

0:13:12.000 --> 0:13:14.720
<v Speaker 2>you know, starts against lefties and moving forward, we'll see.

0:13:14.760 --> 0:13:18.080
<v Speaker 2>But yeah, definitely a very intriguing name here with can Zone.

0:13:18.960 --> 0:13:21.560
<v Speaker 1>And another thing about him too is that most people

0:13:21.760 --> 0:13:24.560
<v Speaker 1>struggle a little bit at T Mobile Safego Field. I

0:13:24.559 --> 0:13:26.319
<v Speaker 1>always mix up the name. I think it's T Mobile now,

0:13:26.360 --> 0:13:27.199
<v Speaker 1>not Safego anymore.

0:13:27.360 --> 0:13:27.920
<v Speaker 3>I still call it.

0:13:28.360 --> 0:13:30.000
<v Speaker 2>I still call a lot of the parks like what

0:13:30.000 --> 0:13:31.839
<v Speaker 2>they were like twenty years ago. It's like if I

0:13:31.880 --> 0:13:33.960
<v Speaker 2>can't remember, like, oh yeah it's Safego or this and that,

0:13:34.040 --> 0:13:36.079
<v Speaker 2>I'm like, they just changed so much nowadays.

0:13:36.120 --> 0:13:37.360
<v Speaker 3>This is a card to keep track.

0:13:37.840 --> 0:13:39.640
<v Speaker 1>Whatever they were when I was a kid. That's pretty

0:13:39.679 --> 0:13:42.480
<v Speaker 1>much what they're going to remain to be. Yep, But

0:13:42.640 --> 0:13:45.640
<v Speaker 1>Tan Zone, you know, considering it's a really pitcher friendly ballpark,

0:13:45.679 --> 0:13:46.880
<v Speaker 1>I think a lot of people will be surprised to

0:13:46.920 --> 0:13:48.960
<v Speaker 1>see that he has a nine thirty eight ops at home,

0:13:49.400 --> 0:13:51.880
<v Speaker 1>the one seventy three WRC plus and on the road

0:13:51.920 --> 0:13:55.559
<v Speaker 1>it's not bad, a seven twenty seven ops ninety seven

0:13:55.679 --> 0:13:58.199
<v Speaker 1>WRC plus, But just to excel in a pitcher friendly

0:13:58.240 --> 0:14:00.640
<v Speaker 1>park the way he has. He's a guy i'd really

0:14:00.720 --> 0:14:03.160
<v Speaker 1>love to see get five hundred and fifty played appearances

0:14:03.160 --> 0:14:04.520
<v Speaker 1>and just see what he can do. This is not

0:14:04.520 --> 0:14:06.720
<v Speaker 1>gonna be the year where that happens. Hope that we

0:14:06.720 --> 0:14:09.120
<v Speaker 1>will over the next couple of seasons. We are going

0:14:09.160 --> 0:14:11.080
<v Speaker 1>to keep it going. In a second and talk about

0:14:11.120 --> 0:14:13.800
<v Speaker 1>the heart hit percentage leader board. First, I want to

0:14:13.800 --> 0:14:16.840
<v Speaker 1>remind you guys about my Playbook. You'll instantly identify the

0:14:16.840 --> 0:14:19.760
<v Speaker 1>best pickups available in your league, win every trade with

0:14:19.760 --> 0:14:22.240
<v Speaker 1>our trade analyzer, and see the most optimal lineup every

0:14:22.320 --> 0:14:25.240
<v Speaker 1>day based on our projections and your specific scoring settings.

0:14:25.440 --> 0:14:29.120
<v Speaker 1>Sink your leagues at fantasypros dot com slash MLB my Playbook,

0:14:29.200 --> 0:14:31.880
<v Speaker 1>or download the Fantasy Pros at for personalized expert advice.

0:14:32.120 --> 0:14:34.280
<v Speaker 1>You can also get a little peak behind the curtain.

0:14:34.640 --> 0:14:37.600
<v Speaker 1>Unlock every premium Fantasy Pros tool for three full days

0:14:37.640 --> 0:14:41.960
<v Speaker 1>at fantasypros dot com slash free. Now there are going

0:14:42.040 --> 0:14:44.720
<v Speaker 1>to be quite a bit of overlap on these leaderboards,

0:14:44.720 --> 0:14:47.680
<v Speaker 1>but let's move into the heart hit percentage department. At

0:14:47.680 --> 0:14:50.120
<v Speaker 1>the top again, James Wood fifty nine point seven, just

0:14:50.160 --> 0:14:52.960
<v Speaker 1>having an incredible year. But number two is O'Neil Cruz

0:14:53.040 --> 0:14:55.560
<v Speaker 1>at fifty nine point two, and I think, considering his

0:14:55.680 --> 0:14:59.080
<v Speaker 1>injury in the misstime, haven't really discussed him a lot

0:14:59.080 --> 0:15:01.360
<v Speaker 1>on the channel outside of the early portion of the year.

0:15:01.360 --> 0:15:04.640
<v Speaker 1>But sixty four games he has fourteen homers twenty one steals.

0:15:04.920 --> 0:15:07.520
<v Speaker 1>Hitting two sixty four is maybe the craziest thing after

0:15:07.560 --> 0:15:10.560
<v Speaker 1>he hit two hundred last year. I wonder what the

0:15:10.600 --> 0:15:14.360
<v Speaker 1>future evaluation looks like for O'Neil Cruz, Eric because the

0:15:14.440 --> 0:15:17.360
<v Speaker 1>underlying data has always been good. This year, it's a

0:15:17.400 --> 0:15:20.560
<v Speaker 1>sixteen percent barrel, fifty nine percent hard hit. Rady obviously

0:15:20.640 --> 0:15:22.680
<v Speaker 1>hits the crap out of the ball. Bats beeat is great.

0:15:23.400 --> 0:15:26.160
<v Speaker 1>Under the surface though, this is essentially the same guy

0:15:26.240 --> 0:15:28.360
<v Speaker 1>that we've seen over the last couple of years, and

0:15:28.720 --> 0:15:31.240
<v Speaker 1>these things seem to click this season. But I wonder

0:15:31.840 --> 0:15:33.400
<v Speaker 1>what you make of him for the rest of this

0:15:33.480 --> 0:15:36.120
<v Speaker 1>year and what his draft price will look like next year.

0:15:36.160 --> 0:15:37.800
<v Speaker 1>This is a guy who's been a first second round

0:15:37.840 --> 0:15:40.680
<v Speaker 1>pick and fantasy before and last year he was orderlining

0:15:40.720 --> 0:15:42.520
<v Speaker 1>outside of the top of one hundred. So what does

0:15:42.560 --> 0:15:44.960
<v Speaker 1>your evaluation tell you of O'Neal Cruz at this point?

0:15:46.040 --> 0:15:48.640
<v Speaker 2>Man, he might be like one of the you know,

0:15:48.760 --> 0:15:52.840
<v Speaker 2>three or foremost polarizing hitters in baseball. And you mentioned

0:15:52.840 --> 0:15:54.280
<v Speaker 2>just what I was about to bring up in that,

0:15:54.640 --> 0:15:56.320
<v Speaker 2>you know, when you look under the hood, I mean, yeah,

0:15:56.360 --> 0:15:59.080
<v Speaker 2>like the slash line is a lot better this year.

0:15:59.440 --> 0:16:02.840
<v Speaker 3>You know, ever, just up sixty four points. OBP is

0:16:02.920 --> 0:16:06.200
<v Speaker 3>up fifty two points, slug is up ninety four points.

0:16:06.400 --> 0:16:08.960
<v Speaker 2>So that's great and anybody that got him for that,

0:16:09.040 --> 0:16:10.840
<v Speaker 2>you know, like that top one hundred or just a

0:16:10.880 --> 0:16:13.720
<v Speaker 2>said price type that weird you just were talking about.

0:16:13.880 --> 0:16:15.960
<v Speaker 2>You probably feel pretty good even with the miss time.

0:16:16.000 --> 0:16:18.480
<v Speaker 2>It's it's still a pretty good investment that you made.

0:16:18.840 --> 0:16:21.400
<v Speaker 2>But at the same time, the metrics under the hood

0:16:21.400 --> 0:16:24.720
<v Speaker 2>are basically more or less the same as last year.

0:16:24.760 --> 0:16:26.520
<v Speaker 2>I mean, he's still I mean last year he was

0:16:26.560 --> 0:16:27.800
<v Speaker 2>he was hitting the crap out of the ball. Last

0:16:27.840 --> 0:16:29.640
<v Speaker 2>year he's been above a fifty percent hard hit rate

0:16:29.920 --> 0:16:32.360
<v Speaker 2>each of the last three years. The strikeout rate is

0:16:32.360 --> 0:16:35.360
<v Speaker 2>actually higher than last year by two and a half percent.

0:16:35.800 --> 0:16:37.800
<v Speaker 2>Thirty two percent last year, thirty four and a half

0:16:37.800 --> 0:16:40.600
<v Speaker 2>percent this year. Contact rates are kind of the same

0:16:40.640 --> 0:16:43.160
<v Speaker 2>as well. You're talking like mid seventies, you know, seventy five,

0:16:43.520 --> 0:16:46.320
<v Speaker 2>seventy six percent contact rate in zone.

0:16:46.720 --> 0:16:47.800
<v Speaker 3>You know, overall, he's.

0:16:47.760 --> 0:16:49.760
<v Speaker 2>Like the low to mid sixties, and it's actually the

0:16:49.760 --> 0:16:52.000
<v Speaker 2>with rates gone up to thirty seven point eight percent.

0:16:52.640 --> 0:16:55.560
<v Speaker 2>So at the same time, like I feel like he's

0:16:55.640 --> 0:16:57.680
<v Speaker 2>just you know, had you know this have a profile.

0:16:57.720 --> 0:17:00.280
<v Speaker 2>Obviously he's kind of prone the you know, pretty notables

0:17:00.280 --> 0:17:02.280
<v Speaker 2>and valleys. I just feel like those the peaks have

0:17:02.320 --> 0:17:05.040
<v Speaker 2>this s been times better this year, and he either

0:17:05.040 --> 0:17:07.920
<v Speaker 2>looks like Aaron Judge or like Joey a late career

0:17:08.000 --> 0:17:10.280
<v Speaker 2>Joey Gallo, and I feel there's like no in between

0:17:10.320 --> 0:17:12.440
<v Speaker 2>with this guy. He's either you know, the best player

0:17:12.440 --> 0:17:14.640
<v Speaker 2>in Fantasy for three weeks, then he's almost a guy

0:17:14.680 --> 0:17:17.439
<v Speaker 2>you want to bench for three weeks. So whatever the

0:17:17.480 --> 0:17:20.639
<v Speaker 2>price tige is and assuming that he can, you know,

0:17:20.680 --> 0:17:23.520
<v Speaker 2>finish the season strong, I feel like it's gonna be

0:17:23.560 --> 0:17:26.520
<v Speaker 2>another pretty high price tage. Maybe not first second round,

0:17:26.520 --> 0:17:29.560
<v Speaker 2>but I guess say like that third fourth round territory

0:17:29.600 --> 0:17:31.679
<v Speaker 2>where the ADP is like, you know, maybe in the

0:17:31.720 --> 0:17:34.560
<v Speaker 2>forties or something like that, And am I gonna want

0:17:34.560 --> 0:17:35.160
<v Speaker 2>to go after that?

0:17:35.840 --> 0:17:36.359
<v Speaker 3>Probably not.

0:17:36.400 --> 0:17:38.840
<v Speaker 2>He's super exciting and when he's on it's really fun

0:17:38.840 --> 0:17:42.320
<v Speaker 2>to watch, but I just can't go with a guy

0:17:42.359 --> 0:17:46.320
<v Speaker 2>that's like that inconsistent that early as like one of

0:17:46.400 --> 0:17:49.280
<v Speaker 2>my three or four core pieces and you know, probably

0:17:49.280 --> 0:17:51.119
<v Speaker 2>one of my two or three core hitting pieces for

0:17:51.200 --> 0:17:53.480
<v Speaker 2>my team. So yeah, I feel like that, you know,

0:17:53.480 --> 0:17:56.240
<v Speaker 2>it's just the ebbs and flows of O'Neil Cruz and

0:17:56.600 --> 0:17:58.760
<v Speaker 2>whatever the price as to be next year, I'm probably

0:17:58.760 --> 0:17:59.720
<v Speaker 2>not gonna be buying into that.

0:18:00.760 --> 0:18:03.240
<v Speaker 1>He's in a class of player and it's like Dylan

0:18:03.359 --> 0:18:05.720
<v Speaker 1>Cruz is probably are at Dylan Cruise. Dylan Cease is

0:18:05.720 --> 0:18:07.480
<v Speaker 1>probably the best pitching comp I can give.

0:18:07.560 --> 0:18:08.320
<v Speaker 3>Oh. I like that.

0:18:09.160 --> 0:18:11.440
<v Speaker 1>He'll have the good years, he'll have the bad years,

0:18:11.800 --> 0:18:14.240
<v Speaker 1>and Dylan Cease next year probably gonna be a second

0:18:14.280 --> 0:18:15.960
<v Speaker 1>or third round pick and I won't want anything to

0:18:15.960 --> 0:18:18.600
<v Speaker 1>do with him because of the inconsistencies. And it's the

0:18:18.600 --> 0:18:21.680
<v Speaker 1>same thing with O'Neil Cruz. I didn't buy him this year.

0:18:21.720 --> 0:18:23.359
<v Speaker 1>I was out, but this would have been the year

0:18:23.440 --> 0:18:26.199
<v Speaker 1>to buy O'Neal Cruz. I was really skeptical of the

0:18:26.240 --> 0:18:28.840
<v Speaker 1>skills set. I mean, even this year, the strikeout rates

0:18:28.880 --> 0:18:31.200
<v Speaker 1>at thirty five percent. There are holes in his game,

0:18:31.840 --> 0:18:34.480
<v Speaker 1>but ADP was around one hundred. Next year, if I

0:18:34.520 --> 0:18:36.000
<v Speaker 1>had to guess today, is ADP is going to be

0:18:36.000 --> 0:18:38.679
<v Speaker 1>around thirty or so thirty five And I think that

0:18:38.720 --> 0:18:40.760
<v Speaker 1>would probably be a tap out range for me. As

0:18:40.840 --> 0:18:43.120
<v Speaker 1>much as he is an enticing player, and I think

0:18:43.160 --> 0:18:45.000
<v Speaker 1>the skill set, if he puts it all together one year,

0:18:45.240 --> 0:18:47.000
<v Speaker 1>this could be a guy who wins an MVP. But

0:18:47.400 --> 0:18:50.480
<v Speaker 1>the inconsistencies are are great, and I don't expect the

0:18:50.480 --> 0:18:53.320
<v Speaker 1>two to sixty four batting average that happened terribly often

0:18:53.359 --> 0:18:55.720
<v Speaker 1>projections don't really either, so it'll be more of a

0:18:55.760 --> 0:18:57.800
<v Speaker 1>fade heading into next year, but it'll be really interesting

0:18:57.840 --> 0:19:01.080
<v Speaker 1>to see where the price ends up. Now we've talked

0:19:01.119 --> 0:19:02.920
<v Speaker 1>about a lot of guys who are having good seasons

0:19:02.920 --> 0:19:04.600
<v Speaker 1>so far. Let's talk about a guy who is, but

0:19:04.720 --> 0:19:07.040
<v Speaker 1>not quite to the same extent of these other guys,

0:19:07.040 --> 0:19:08.320
<v Speaker 1>and part of it is just due to volume, and

0:19:08.359 --> 0:19:12.160
<v Speaker 1>that's Bryce Eldrick. Sixty games, ten homers, one stolen base,

0:19:12.200 --> 0:19:14.680
<v Speaker 1>two sixty five batting average. It's a little bit more modest,

0:19:15.000 --> 0:19:17.760
<v Speaker 1>but again he does appear on our leaderboard here for

0:19:17.840 --> 0:19:21.000
<v Speaker 1>heart hit percentage a fifty four point eight percent heart

0:19:21.080 --> 0:19:25.440
<v Speaker 1>hit rate. He has a thirteen percent barrel rate, ninety

0:19:25.480 --> 0:19:27.840
<v Speaker 1>two and a half mile an hour average egsit velocity

0:19:27.840 --> 0:19:30.000
<v Speaker 1>and bat speed. Something that I've really paid a lot

0:19:30.040 --> 0:19:32.040
<v Speaker 1>more attention to this year was seventy one point five

0:19:32.040 --> 0:19:35.080
<v Speaker 1>miles an hour last year, only thirty games in the BIGS.

0:19:35.400 --> 0:19:37.879
<v Speaker 1>It's up more than two full miles an hour to

0:19:37.960 --> 0:19:41.359
<v Speaker 1>seventy three point eight. Bryce Eldridge has been a really

0:19:41.400 --> 0:19:44.399
<v Speaker 1>good hitter this year, despite the early struggles when he

0:19:44.440 --> 0:19:46.959
<v Speaker 1>first got called up. What's your long term EVL tell

0:19:47.000 --> 0:19:49.399
<v Speaker 1>you here. Is this a superstar in the making? Is

0:19:49.920 --> 0:19:52.520
<v Speaker 1>the park too much to overcome? Here in San Francisco?

0:19:52.880 --> 0:19:54.720
<v Speaker 1>What do you think of Bryce Eldris Eric.

0:19:55.520 --> 0:19:59.000
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I don't know if I would go superstar, but

0:19:59.400 --> 0:20:01.359
<v Speaker 2>I think star for sure. I think he can be

0:20:01.880 --> 0:20:04.600
<v Speaker 2>a guy that's, you know, a top ten first baseman

0:20:04.600 --> 0:20:06.400
<v Speaker 2>for fantasy, maybe even a guy that kind of gets

0:20:06.400 --> 0:20:09.959
<v Speaker 2>in that top five range at times because that power

0:20:10.119 --> 0:20:13.479
<v Speaker 2>is legit. And yeah, the ballpark isn't great, but you know,

0:20:13.720 --> 0:20:16.520
<v Speaker 2>this is probably the best left handed power bat San

0:20:16.560 --> 0:20:19.919
<v Speaker 2>frans developed. And I can't even say how long a

0:20:19.960 --> 0:20:23.040
<v Speaker 2>long a long time. So is his type of power

0:20:23.160 --> 0:20:26.280
<v Speaker 2>kind of I think transcends all fields, you know, especially

0:20:26.280 --> 0:20:29.760
<v Speaker 2>when you combine the quality of contact, which is elite.

0:20:29.800 --> 0:20:32.119
<v Speaker 2>I mean, fifty five percent hard hit rate for a rookie,

0:20:32.320 --> 0:20:35.600
<v Speaker 2>super super impressed. I mean it's impressive regardless, but especially

0:20:35.720 --> 0:20:38.840
<v Speaker 2>so for a rookie average TV barrel, right, it's all there.

0:20:39.000 --> 0:20:40.480
<v Speaker 2>X slug is one of the best in the league

0:20:40.840 --> 0:20:42.880
<v Speaker 2>as well, and then you know you pair that with

0:20:43.040 --> 0:20:45.480
<v Speaker 2>some pretty good battered the ball angles as well, And

0:20:45.520 --> 0:20:47.640
<v Speaker 2>that's really always been the case for him. He's always

0:20:47.680 --> 0:20:49.359
<v Speaker 2>been a guy that not only is one of the

0:20:49.359 --> 0:20:52.280
<v Speaker 2>strongest guys on the field, but he knows how to

0:20:52.320 --> 0:20:55.359
<v Speaker 2>maximize that power in games, get to that pollside pop

0:20:55.680 --> 0:20:59.000
<v Speaker 2>and really just elevate consistently. And we've seen that this year,

0:20:59.320 --> 0:21:01.919
<v Speaker 2>you know, twenty percent pole air rate, forty three percent

0:21:01.960 --> 0:21:04.720
<v Speaker 2>poll rate, and a sixty two percent air rate. So

0:21:05.400 --> 0:21:07.840
<v Speaker 2>and the contact rates are are decent too. I mean

0:21:08.080 --> 0:21:11.360
<v Speaker 2>he's kind of far from an all or nothing masher.

0:21:11.359 --> 0:21:14.240
<v Speaker 2>I mean he's actually above average contact in the zone

0:21:14.840 --> 0:21:17.760
<v Speaker 2>and overall by by a little bit, doesn't chase too much.

0:21:17.840 --> 0:21:20.200
<v Speaker 2>So yeah, I mean he's cooled off a bit lately,

0:21:20.240 --> 0:21:22.120
<v Speaker 2>which is kind of you know, made the slash line

0:21:22.200 --> 0:21:23.360
<v Speaker 2>kind of tick down a little bit.

0:21:23.440 --> 0:21:24.760
<v Speaker 3>But you know, he's a rookie.

0:21:24.960 --> 0:21:27.959
<v Speaker 2>That's to be expected, just learning you know, the major leagues,

0:21:27.960 --> 0:21:29.920
<v Speaker 2>and you know, obviously pitchers adjusting to him.

0:21:29.960 --> 0:21:30.920
<v Speaker 3>He needs to adjust back.

0:21:31.000 --> 0:21:34.000
<v Speaker 2>But I think there's the building blocks are here to

0:21:34.800 --> 0:21:38.360
<v Speaker 2>you know, have Eldridge kind of really solidify himself as

0:21:38.359 --> 0:21:40.119
<v Speaker 2>one of the best power bats in the game and

0:21:40.160 --> 0:21:42.200
<v Speaker 2>one of the best fantasy first.

0:21:42.000 --> 0:21:42.720
<v Speaker 3>Basement in the game.

0:21:42.840 --> 0:21:45.200
<v Speaker 2>I think if he can get it going again and

0:21:45.280 --> 0:21:48.080
<v Speaker 2>having a nice end of the season and maybe looking

0:21:48.119 --> 0:21:51.040
<v Speaker 2>at let's say like low twenties home runs.

0:21:51.080 --> 0:21:53.400
<v Speaker 3>They say, he pops another you know, ten to twelve.

0:21:53.440 --> 0:21:56.040
<v Speaker 2>Over the final two months of the season, he's hitting like,

0:21:56.119 --> 0:21:59.280
<v Speaker 2>you know, two seventy, you know, with plenty of bombs.

0:21:59.320 --> 0:22:00.760
<v Speaker 2>I think you can see him maybe be like a

0:22:00.840 --> 0:22:03.639
<v Speaker 2>back end top one hundred guy next year. Maybe not

0:22:03.680 --> 0:22:06.400
<v Speaker 2>a guy that you want as you're starting first baseman,

0:22:06.440 --> 0:22:09.280
<v Speaker 2>but a guy that you'd be like really excited about

0:22:09.320 --> 0:22:12.400
<v Speaker 2>getting as like your corner infielder or even as your

0:22:12.400 --> 0:22:14.439
<v Speaker 2>back end starter if you wanted to wait at that

0:22:14.480 --> 0:22:17.320
<v Speaker 2>position and kind of attack other spots. So yeah, I

0:22:17.359 --> 0:22:20.400
<v Speaker 2>think the long term outlook is pretty bright here. And

0:22:20.680 --> 0:22:23.120
<v Speaker 2>he's still only twenty one years old. That's really really impressive.

0:22:23.119 --> 0:22:25.800
<v Speaker 2>But yeah, I think there's a lot of legitimacy into

0:22:25.880 --> 0:22:27.200
<v Speaker 2>in what he's doing right now.

0:22:28.320 --> 0:22:30.720
<v Speaker 1>You really got me thinking about the last great lefty

0:22:30.760 --> 0:22:34.359
<v Speaker 1>that they developed, and it's I mean, Pablo Sandoval was

0:22:34.400 --> 0:22:36.840
<v Speaker 1>a switch hitter, I guess, so that doesn't really count.

0:22:36.920 --> 0:22:40.200
<v Speaker 1>Maybe Brandon Belt like Brandon Crawford.

0:22:40.320 --> 0:22:43.280
<v Speaker 2>Like, it's not been great, right exactly, And they haven't

0:22:43.280 --> 0:22:45.920
<v Speaker 2>really developed a lot of great hitters in general. They've

0:22:45.920 --> 0:22:48.480
<v Speaker 2>helped some some good pitchers, but yeah, it's been it's

0:22:48.480 --> 0:22:51.359
<v Speaker 2>been a bit since they've had like a rookie with

0:22:51.560 --> 0:22:54.679
<v Speaker 2>this much upside, with this much excitement, with this much power.

0:22:54.760 --> 0:22:56.600
<v Speaker 2>So yeah, I think it's gonna be really fun to

0:22:56.600 --> 0:22:58.880
<v Speaker 2>see what he turns into over the next couple of years.

0:22:59.680 --> 0:23:01.480
<v Speaker 1>The other names that really stuck out to me at

0:23:01.520 --> 0:23:04.240
<v Speaker 1>the bottom of this leaderboard Jake Bowers, who's had an

0:23:04.240 --> 0:23:07.320
<v Speaker 1>incredible season, and Brandon Nimo, who as of late has

0:23:07.359 --> 0:23:09.879
<v Speaker 1>been just on fire and is going to end up

0:23:09.920 --> 0:23:12.600
<v Speaker 1>with a very Brandon Nemo type of slash line to

0:23:12.720 --> 0:23:15.320
<v Speaker 1>end the season. I think at this point ten homers

0:23:15.320 --> 0:23:16.879
<v Speaker 1>and four steels, but he's really picked it up as

0:23:16.880 --> 0:23:19.880
<v Speaker 1>of late. One fifteen WRC plus. What are your thoughts

0:23:19.960 --> 0:23:23.000
<v Speaker 1>on these two? Bowers as well, who's just been kind

0:23:23.040 --> 0:23:25.440
<v Speaker 1>of a league winner. Honestly, I hate to use that term,

0:23:25.440 --> 0:23:29.720
<v Speaker 1>but Bowers was three essentially and he's given you eighteen homers,

0:23:29.760 --> 0:23:32.080
<v Speaker 1>six deals in the two fifty six batting average, and

0:23:32.119 --> 0:23:35.159
<v Speaker 1>again just the gains in the average exit velocity, the

0:23:35.200 --> 0:23:37.760
<v Speaker 1>heart hit rate, the barrel rate. What are your thoughts

0:23:37.840 --> 0:23:41.840
<v Speaker 1>on those two guys in particular, more fringy fantasy assets

0:23:41.880 --> 0:23:45.480
<v Speaker 1>I think than people would assume they're more fringy fantasy assets,

0:23:45.520 --> 0:23:47.440
<v Speaker 1>I should say, But guys have been really good this year.

0:23:48.160 --> 0:23:50.960
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, absolutely. In Nimo's case.

0:23:51.160 --> 0:23:53.680
<v Speaker 2>He's been you know, sneaky good for a while now.

0:23:54.200 --> 0:23:55.560
<v Speaker 2>He's actually a guy that I get a lot of

0:23:55.600 --> 0:23:58.399
<v Speaker 2>shares of every year, like him and like Ian Happ

0:23:58.560 --> 0:24:01.200
<v Speaker 2>or just two elfielders. I at least one of those

0:24:01.200 --> 0:24:03.480
<v Speaker 2>two guys on i'd say over half of my teams,

0:24:03.560 --> 0:24:07.000
<v Speaker 2>because they're not flashy by any means. They're they're kind of,

0:24:07.080 --> 0:24:09.400
<v Speaker 2>you know, for lack of a better term, they're kind

0:24:09.400 --> 0:24:12.240
<v Speaker 2>of boring, but they just give you some pretty solid,

0:24:12.240 --> 0:24:15.240
<v Speaker 2>like the outfield three level production every single year for

0:24:15.240 --> 0:24:18.479
<v Speaker 2>the most part. So yeah, Nimo, look at he's kind

0:24:18.480 --> 0:24:20.080
<v Speaker 2>of a guy that's harder to hit the ball, a

0:24:20.119 --> 0:24:22.840
<v Speaker 2>lot harder the last handful of years. Early in his

0:24:22.880 --> 0:24:25.880
<v Speaker 2>career he was you know, like upper thirties, low forties

0:24:25.880 --> 0:24:27.960
<v Speaker 2>and like terms of hard hit rate, But the last

0:24:28.040 --> 0:24:30.199
<v Speaker 2>four years have been his best four years, you know,

0:24:30.560 --> 0:24:33.600
<v Speaker 2>above forty seven percent every year in hard hit rate

0:24:33.600 --> 0:24:35.719
<v Speaker 2>and this year it's fifty two percent. You know, all

0:24:35.760 --> 0:24:38.120
<v Speaker 2>while still you know, being a good contact guy, keeping

0:24:38.320 --> 0:24:41.000
<v Speaker 2>in the k rate and check. You know, you kind

0:24:41.000 --> 0:24:42.280
<v Speaker 2>of see that shift when you look at like his

0:24:42.359 --> 0:24:43.920
<v Speaker 2>walker rate, it's kind of gone down the last couple

0:24:43.920 --> 0:24:45.760
<v Speaker 2>of years. So he's been definitely been more aggressive and

0:24:46.240 --> 0:24:47.960
<v Speaker 2>hunting out those pitches to hit. But you see the

0:24:48.000 --> 0:24:50.240
<v Speaker 2>home run total, it's been higher than it was in

0:24:50.280 --> 0:24:53.040
<v Speaker 2>the past. So yeah, I mean, the overall numbers aren't

0:24:53.040 --> 0:24:54.920
<v Speaker 2>really great this year with him all you mentioned ten

0:24:54.960 --> 0:24:57.640
<v Speaker 2>home runs, four steals, But I think he's really starting

0:24:57.640 --> 0:24:59.600
<v Speaker 2>to kind of find his stride and I think you're

0:24:59.600 --> 0:25:01.520
<v Speaker 2>gonna see a pretty solid end of the season and

0:25:01.640 --> 0:25:03.359
<v Speaker 2>I have him in a few weeks, so hopefully that

0:25:03.440 --> 0:25:06.240
<v Speaker 2>is the case. And luckily I also got Jake Bauers

0:25:06.400 --> 0:25:08.800
<v Speaker 2>in a couple of deeper leagues as well, And it's

0:25:09.200 --> 0:25:11.040
<v Speaker 2>just because I thought the playing time could be there,

0:25:11.080 --> 0:25:13.000
<v Speaker 2>and then last year he gave you you know, it's like, oh,

0:25:13.000 --> 0:25:14.200
<v Speaker 2>this guy can give you a little bit of power,

0:25:14.200 --> 0:25:16.560
<v Speaker 2>a little bit of speed and maybe find his way

0:25:16.560 --> 0:25:19.239
<v Speaker 2>into you know, four starts a week or something like that.

0:25:19.280 --> 0:25:20.280
<v Speaker 2>So I got him like a lot of like a

0:25:20.320 --> 0:25:23.040
<v Speaker 2>lot of dcs and deeper formats like that just has

0:25:23.040 --> 0:25:24.840
<v Speaker 2>some depth, and it's been probably one of my better

0:25:24.920 --> 0:25:27.560
<v Speaker 2>draft picks I made, you know, this year because you

0:25:27.600 --> 0:25:30.600
<v Speaker 2>look across the board. I mean, you know, the contact

0:25:30.680 --> 0:25:33.359
<v Speaker 2>orate a little low care, it's a little hot. Nothing

0:25:33.400 --> 0:25:36.520
<v Speaker 2>that's like you know, super red flag or anything like that.

0:25:36.640 --> 0:25:38.600
<v Speaker 2>But he's just hitting the crap out of the ball.

0:25:38.680 --> 0:25:41.600
<v Speaker 2>The bat speed is there, he's one of the top guys.

0:25:41.640 --> 0:25:43.920
<v Speaker 2>There's a bat speed. He doesn't chase. Again, that kind

0:25:43.920 --> 0:25:46.320
<v Speaker 2>of what I mentioned earlier. He doesn't chase, so he's

0:25:46.359 --> 0:25:48.720
<v Speaker 2>able to maintain that good average, and you know, when

0:25:48.760 --> 0:25:51.000
<v Speaker 2>he does make contact, he does a lot of damage

0:25:51.040 --> 0:25:53.720
<v Speaker 2>on it and draws a lot of walks too. So yeah,

0:25:53.840 --> 0:25:56.719
<v Speaker 2>I think I think Bowers is a pretty fun kind

0:25:56.720 --> 0:25:59.480
<v Speaker 2>of one of those late career breakouts. Again, I mean

0:25:59.720 --> 0:26:01.879
<v Speaker 2>kind of bounced around, didn't really do much, you know,

0:26:01.920 --> 0:26:04.200
<v Speaker 2>the last handful of years. Even two years ago he

0:26:04.440 --> 0:26:07.159
<v Speaker 2>was hitting one ninety nine. But yeah, I like Bowers

0:26:07.200 --> 0:26:09.480
<v Speaker 2>a lot. I think this is you know, pretty legit.

0:26:09.600 --> 0:26:12.200
<v Speaker 2>Just seeing some of the gains he's had this year.

0:26:12.720 --> 0:26:16.040
<v Speaker 2>I think they're all legitimate and tangible changes here that

0:26:16.119 --> 0:26:18.479
<v Speaker 2>he's had. And yeah, I think both these guys are

0:26:18.520 --> 0:26:22.400
<v Speaker 2>are pretty solid and both definitely undervalued, no doubt about that.

0:26:23.560 --> 0:26:26.760
<v Speaker 1>So NIMMO thirty three. Bowers about to be thirty one.

0:26:27.640 --> 0:26:29.960
<v Speaker 1>You think these are real tangible changes? Are they real

0:26:30.080 --> 0:26:32.360
<v Speaker 1>enough that you'll be investing again next year? You think

0:26:32.359 --> 0:26:34.400
<v Speaker 1>whether it's redraft or potentially in Dynasty.

0:26:35.000 --> 0:26:37.080
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I mean, I'm I'm always going to invest in

0:26:37.119 --> 0:26:38.760
<v Speaker 2>Nemo as I mentioned him in Half, or guys that

0:26:38.760 --> 0:26:40.720
<v Speaker 2>I'm going to target until they start falling off a

0:26:40.720 --> 0:26:43.200
<v Speaker 2>cliff and there was a production even if they're old

0:26:43.280 --> 0:26:46.399
<v Speaker 2>and they're like almost like the the Tony Gonzales of

0:26:46.440 --> 0:26:48.840
<v Speaker 2>fantasy baseball. You used to draft twenty Ganzalez and fantasy

0:26:48.880 --> 0:26:50.720
<v Speaker 2>football even when he was older, it was like, oh,

0:26:50.960 --> 0:26:53.240
<v Speaker 2>he's too old, but he'll give you. Yeah, man, another

0:26:53.359 --> 0:26:56.080
<v Speaker 2>eleven hundred yards and eight touchdowns. This kind of like, wow,

0:26:56.119 --> 0:26:58.720
<v Speaker 2>I equate these guys or the Nemos and Half. So yeah,

0:26:58.720 --> 0:27:01.479
<v Speaker 2>I'm definitely gonna keep you know, target happened. Yeah, Bowers

0:27:01.560 --> 0:27:03.480
<v Speaker 2>is gonna be a guy that you know, he wasn't.

0:27:03.480 --> 0:27:05.440
<v Speaker 2>I don't have no idea what his ADP was this year,

0:27:05.480 --> 0:27:08.720
<v Speaker 2>I forget, but it wasn't high obviously, So probably a

0:27:08.760 --> 0:27:14.000
<v Speaker 2>guy that might go, oh lord, I mean if this continues,

0:27:14.480 --> 0:27:17.960
<v Speaker 2>maybe like the one seventy five range. Kind of hard

0:27:17.960 --> 0:27:20.320
<v Speaker 2>to say with him, but whatever, it is assuming it's

0:27:20.359 --> 0:27:23.240
<v Speaker 2>not like you know, top one twenty five, top one fifty,

0:27:23.280 --> 0:27:25.680
<v Speaker 2>which I don't think it would be. Definitely, if I

0:27:25.680 --> 0:27:27.640
<v Speaker 2>can get him as like my outfield, you know, three

0:27:27.760 --> 0:27:30.200
<v Speaker 2>four kind of in the end similar range to Nemo

0:27:30.320 --> 0:27:33.159
<v Speaker 2>next year, I definitely will because I say he's you know,

0:27:33.200 --> 0:27:35.320
<v Speaker 2>the hard hit rate has been just ticking up here.

0:27:35.640 --> 0:27:38.280
<v Speaker 2>The walk rate's good, keeps the k rate relatively in check.

0:27:38.760 --> 0:27:41.080
<v Speaker 2>So yeah, definitely a lot of you know, changes from

0:27:41.119 --> 0:27:42.679
<v Speaker 2>him this year that you can be that you can

0:27:42.720 --> 0:27:44.400
<v Speaker 2>feel good about investing in next year.

0:27:45.920 --> 0:27:49.120
<v Speaker 1>We got one more hitting category I want to look at,

0:27:49.200 --> 0:27:51.760
<v Speaker 1>and it's one that I mentioned earlier. It's been a

0:27:51.840 --> 0:27:54.160
<v Speaker 1>really important one for me, and it's average bat speed,

0:27:54.280 --> 0:27:57.000
<v Speaker 1>especially guys who have made gains from one year to

0:27:57.000 --> 0:27:59.080
<v Speaker 1>the next. If you look at the bat speed leader board,

0:27:59.359 --> 0:28:02.280
<v Speaker 1>Junior came in at the top, Jordan Walker, O'Neil Cruz,

0:28:02.359 --> 0:28:05.120
<v Speaker 1>Nick Kurtz, all of those names are to be expected,

0:28:05.119 --> 0:28:08.359
<v Speaker 1>I think, and then number five Cam Smith. I mean

0:28:08.440 --> 0:28:10.520
<v Speaker 1>talked about him on the show last week with Paul

0:28:10.520 --> 0:28:12.879
<v Speaker 1>Sporr as a guy that I think I'm gonna be

0:28:12.920 --> 0:28:15.439
<v Speaker 1>really interested in next year. He has the raw tools,

0:28:15.480 --> 0:28:18.439
<v Speaker 1>he swings very hard eleven percent barrel forty four percent

0:28:18.520 --> 0:28:21.560
<v Speaker 1>hard hit rate. The average exit velocity is not quite

0:28:21.600 --> 0:28:23.560
<v Speaker 1>there yet at eighty nine, but it's still a jump

0:28:23.640 --> 0:28:26.440
<v Speaker 1>over the eighty seven to nine last year. But Eric,

0:28:26.480 --> 0:28:28.959
<v Speaker 1>he's gained three ticks on his bat speed, And this

0:28:29.040 --> 0:28:31.960
<v Speaker 1>feels like Jordan Walker, a year ago guy who had

0:28:32.000 --> 0:28:34.000
<v Speaker 1>maybe not been fully written off, but a guy that

0:28:34.160 --> 0:28:37.800
<v Speaker 1>wasn't really that exciting in the fantasy community anymore, certainly

0:28:38.040 --> 0:28:40.320
<v Speaker 1>from a redraft point of view. Ham Smith was a

0:28:40.400 --> 0:28:43.240
<v Speaker 1>ninety WRC plus last year. He's been in eighty this season,

0:28:43.320 --> 0:28:46.480
<v Speaker 1>but still got some fantasy jews twelve homers, ten steals.

0:28:46.920 --> 0:28:48.440
<v Speaker 1>He's a guy that I'm gonna be really interested in.

0:28:48.440 --> 0:28:50.000
<v Speaker 1>What do you think is there any chance that he

0:28:50.080 --> 0:28:52.880
<v Speaker 1>becomes the Jordan Walker of twenty twenty seven, assuming we

0:28:52.920 --> 0:28:53.440
<v Speaker 1>have baseball?

0:28:55.000 --> 0:28:55.640
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I mean.

0:28:55.520 --> 0:28:58.360
<v Speaker 2>Hopefully we have baseball, and I don't know what we

0:28:58.400 --> 0:29:00.960
<v Speaker 2>would do without that, but that'd be a scary world.

0:29:01.360 --> 0:29:03.360
<v Speaker 2>But yeah, I mean, I don't know if i'd say

0:29:03.360 --> 0:29:05.840
<v Speaker 2>the next Jordan Walker, but I think there's definitely like

0:29:06.080 --> 0:29:08.840
<v Speaker 2>that similar intrigue there, like you kind of mentioned, and

0:29:09.000 --> 0:29:11.160
<v Speaker 2>I think what needs to be remembered about Cam Smith

0:29:11.200 --> 0:29:13.280
<v Speaker 2>that I feel like it's lost in the shuffle here

0:29:13.320 --> 0:29:15.480
<v Speaker 2>when you talk about him. This is a guy that

0:29:15.640 --> 0:29:19.080
<v Speaker 2>was drafted two years ago. He was drafted in twenty

0:29:19.120 --> 0:29:22.640
<v Speaker 2>twenty four. He had thirty two games in the minor leagues,

0:29:23.720 --> 0:29:26.240
<v Speaker 2>all of which with the Cubs. Then he got traded

0:29:26.280 --> 0:29:29.040
<v Speaker 2>over to Houston that offseason and they brought him right

0:29:29.120 --> 0:29:32.080
<v Speaker 2>up to the majors, so there was not a lot

0:29:32.160 --> 0:29:34.680
<v Speaker 2>of developmental time. And yes, this was a guy that played,

0:29:34.960 --> 0:29:37.800
<v Speaker 2>you know, at Florida State in the ACC you know,

0:29:37.840 --> 0:29:42.520
<v Speaker 2>good competition, and was in an advanced collegiate bat but still,

0:29:43.040 --> 0:29:46.240
<v Speaker 2>thirty two games is barely even enough to say you

0:29:46.240 --> 0:29:48.600
<v Speaker 2>were in the minor leagues. So and he's SOT only

0:29:48.640 --> 0:29:52.120
<v Speaker 2>twenty three. I mean he'll be twenty four next spring

0:29:52.200 --> 0:29:55.320
<v Speaker 2>training in late February, so still very young. I think

0:29:55.360 --> 0:29:57.760
<v Speaker 2>all those things need to be remembered. And then when

0:29:57.760 --> 0:29:59.440
<v Speaker 2>you look at you know, the bat speed is the

0:29:59.440 --> 0:30:01.640
<v Speaker 2>one that stands right out, and I think I think

0:30:02.200 --> 0:30:04.680
<v Speaker 2>he's he's a good fielder two, which helps keep him

0:30:04.720 --> 0:30:07.040
<v Speaker 2>in the lineup for Houston. So that's something you can

0:30:07.120 --> 0:30:09.960
<v Speaker 2>kind of be confident about. And everything in terms of

0:30:10.040 --> 0:30:13.640
<v Speaker 2>like the strength and athleticism are really exciting. He's like

0:30:13.680 --> 0:30:16.800
<v Speaker 2>a good runner ninety three percentile sprint speed as well.

0:30:17.000 --> 0:30:19.080
<v Speaker 2>He's a guy you could even push twenty twenty this year.

0:30:19.120 --> 0:30:21.760
<v Speaker 2>But you know, the slash line not so great. It

0:30:21.960 --> 0:30:24.720
<v Speaker 2>kind of similar to what it was last year. But yeah,

0:30:24.760 --> 0:30:27.720
<v Speaker 2>this definitely a guy to maybe take a flyer on.

0:30:28.040 --> 0:30:30.640
<v Speaker 2>I don't think the price tag next year will be

0:30:30.680 --> 0:30:33.720
<v Speaker 2>that bad. I mean assuming maybe you know, this year

0:30:33.800 --> 0:30:35.400
<v Speaker 2>kind of keeps going the way it has some up

0:30:35.480 --> 0:30:38.800
<v Speaker 2>some downs for him. Maybe he finishes with like nineteen bombs,

0:30:38.880 --> 0:30:41.800
<v Speaker 2>sixteen seventeen steals, hitting two ten, two twenty.

0:30:42.160 --> 0:30:44.160
<v Speaker 3>I feel like he'll be a guy that you'd be taking.

0:30:43.960 --> 0:30:46.200
<v Speaker 2>In like that two point fifty ish range is like

0:30:46.240 --> 0:30:49.880
<v Speaker 2>your outfield five, but that's actually an area. It's assuming

0:30:49.920 --> 0:30:52.880
<v Speaker 2>that is the area that I like this. That's kind

0:30:52.880 --> 0:30:54.640
<v Speaker 2>of the guy I like to target as like my

0:30:55.000 --> 0:30:58.280
<v Speaker 2>last outfielder. Like, all right, this guy has some upside.

0:30:58.640 --> 0:31:01.080
<v Speaker 2>You know, maybe there's a war here or there comes

0:31:01.120 --> 0:31:02.920
<v Speaker 2>of you know, something to do with the profile or

0:31:03.320 --> 0:31:05.960
<v Speaker 2>maybe injuries or whatever it may be. But if they

0:31:06.040 --> 0:31:08.720
<v Speaker 2>click bam, maybe they can give you like outfield three

0:31:08.800 --> 0:31:10.800
<v Speaker 2>level production. I think that's exactly what you're looking at

0:31:10.840 --> 0:31:13.560
<v Speaker 2>here with Cam Smith. So yeah, definitely a guy that

0:31:13.880 --> 0:31:18.040
<v Speaker 2>is very, very intriguing. This year might not it might

0:31:18.040 --> 0:31:20.280
<v Speaker 2>not click this year for him, but you know, I mean,

0:31:20.320 --> 0:31:22.880
<v Speaker 2>Houston's a pretty good organization in terms of their player development,

0:31:23.120 --> 0:31:25.120
<v Speaker 2>so that that gives you all a little more confidence

0:31:25.160 --> 0:31:27.360
<v Speaker 2>that they can help him figure this out. So yeah,

0:31:27.400 --> 0:31:30.360
<v Speaker 2>definitely a name to still keep on your radar and

0:31:30.600 --> 0:31:33.120
<v Speaker 2>maybe even target later on your drafts next year.

0:31:34.440 --> 0:31:36.160
<v Speaker 1>Yeah. I mean the more I look at him, the

0:31:36.160 --> 0:31:38.760
<v Speaker 1>more I keep talking myself into him, and I think

0:31:38.800 --> 0:31:40.840
<v Speaker 1>he will be a guy that is a heavy target.

0:31:41.000 --> 0:31:44.120
<v Speaker 1>Is his woba's two eighty six, which is not special,

0:31:44.160 --> 0:31:47.280
<v Speaker 1>expected WOLBA three point thirty four, which is ahead of

0:31:47.280 --> 0:31:49.640
<v Speaker 1>the likes of Ivon Herrera, Kyle Tucker, who I know

0:31:49.720 --> 0:31:52.720
<v Speaker 1>is not having a great year, Manny Machado. He ranked

0:31:52.720 --> 0:31:55.760
<v Speaker 1>sixty seventh among all qualified hitters and expected WOLBA, so

0:31:56.400 --> 0:31:58.760
<v Speaker 1>definitely not perfect, but I think he's a guy that

0:31:58.800 --> 0:32:01.600
<v Speaker 1>I will have some interest in, depending on that price.

0:32:02.120 --> 0:32:04.760
<v Speaker 1>Garrett Mitchell is another guy who is also really kind

0:32:04.760 --> 0:32:06.600
<v Speaker 1>of shocking to see at the top of this leader board.

0:32:06.640 --> 0:32:08.280
<v Speaker 1>If you look at the production of the other guys

0:32:08.320 --> 0:32:11.440
<v Speaker 1>around him, it's a couple of disappointing names here, Vladdie,

0:32:11.440 --> 0:32:14.120
<v Speaker 1>who I won't get into again for my own mental health.

0:32:14.120 --> 0:32:17.440
<v Speaker 1>I just can't do it again. But Garrett Mitchell is

0:32:17.480 --> 0:32:19.920
<v Speaker 1>having quietly a really good year, and especially as of late,

0:32:19.960 --> 0:32:22.000
<v Speaker 1>he has turned things around despite a thirty two percent

0:32:22.040 --> 0:32:25.680
<v Speaker 1>strikeout rate, eight homers, seven steals, a two to seventy

0:32:25.680 --> 0:32:29.360
<v Speaker 1>seven batting average, forty five runs, forty eight rbi. But

0:32:29.440 --> 0:32:31.760
<v Speaker 1>that barrel rate. I mean, we've seen flashes of a

0:32:31.800 --> 0:32:34.240
<v Speaker 1>double digit barrel rate from him before, but he's gone

0:32:34.240 --> 0:32:37.640
<v Speaker 1>from seven percent to fourteen this year, average eggsit velocity

0:32:37.680 --> 0:32:40.360
<v Speaker 1>from ninety to ninety two to six, hard hit rate

0:32:40.360 --> 0:32:42.840
<v Speaker 1>from forty two to fifty, and then that pesky bat

0:32:42.880 --> 0:32:46.120
<v Speaker 1>speed seventy six point one to seventy seven point four.

0:32:46.160 --> 0:32:48.040
<v Speaker 1>He's made gains in each of the last three seasons,

0:32:48.080 --> 0:32:50.600
<v Speaker 1>and I wonder how much the strikeout rate is going

0:32:50.640 --> 0:32:53.040
<v Speaker 1>to hold him back considering just how hard he hits

0:32:53.080 --> 0:32:55.360
<v Speaker 1>the ball. Is this a guy that you think could

0:32:55.360 --> 0:32:58.120
<v Speaker 1>have a legit type of fantasy breakout eric or does

0:32:58.120 --> 0:33:00.080
<v Speaker 1>the swing and miss kind of hold him back from that?

0:33:01.320 --> 0:33:01.560
<v Speaker 3>Man?

0:33:02.560 --> 0:33:04.880
<v Speaker 2>Garrett Mitchell has always been intriguing to me. I mean,

0:33:04.920 --> 0:33:07.800
<v Speaker 2>I think there's definitely that breakout potential there where.

0:33:07.840 --> 0:33:08.960
<v Speaker 3>If he can even.

0:33:09.280 --> 0:33:12.680
<v Speaker 2>Make this modest improvements to you know, the contact rate

0:33:12.720 --> 0:33:16.040
<v Speaker 2>the strikeout rate, and get those two I get the

0:33:16.080 --> 0:33:18.440
<v Speaker 2>key rate closure to thirty percent, get the contact rate

0:33:18.480 --> 0:33:22.160
<v Speaker 2>closure to like even like seventy percent, he could just

0:33:22.320 --> 0:33:24.920
<v Speaker 2>really really take off because that's always been the one

0:33:24.960 --> 0:33:27.080
<v Speaker 2>area of his game that really lacked. He's always been

0:33:27.120 --> 0:33:29.480
<v Speaker 2>a guy that has good, you know, good power, good speed,

0:33:29.920 --> 0:33:31.760
<v Speaker 2>you know, a pretty good, you know, really good defender

0:33:31.840 --> 0:33:33.840
<v Speaker 2>as well. It's like every other part of this game

0:33:33.880 --> 0:33:37.160
<v Speaker 2>was always pretty exciting, but it's that one pesky little

0:33:37.240 --> 0:33:39.920
<v Speaker 2>the hit tool has always been kind of holding him back.

0:33:39.960 --> 0:33:42.640
<v Speaker 2>And another area too that kind of has been holding

0:33:42.680 --> 0:33:44.840
<v Speaker 2>him back has been this the angles that he hits

0:33:44.840 --> 0:33:47.480
<v Speaker 2>the ball at. I mean, he's pounding the ball, and yeah,

0:33:47.520 --> 0:33:49.800
<v Speaker 2>the barrel rates really good and over double last year,

0:33:49.840 --> 0:33:52.440
<v Speaker 2>but he's got a fifty three percent ground ball rate

0:33:52.480 --> 0:33:55.200
<v Speaker 2>and only a ten zero point eight percent pull air rate.

0:33:55.360 --> 0:33:58.920
<v Speaker 2>So there's definitely, you know, a lot of good here,

0:33:58.960 --> 0:34:01.760
<v Speaker 2>but sometimes even this one or two bad parts of

0:34:01.800 --> 0:34:05.600
<v Speaker 2>the profile can overshadow you know, six or seven good parts, right,

0:34:05.600 --> 0:34:08.960
<v Speaker 2>and especially when that one bad is just making contact

0:34:09.120 --> 0:34:10.360
<v Speaker 2>does matter how hard to hit the ball. If you

0:34:10.400 --> 0:34:13.239
<v Speaker 2>can't make contact, you know you're not gonna do overly well.

0:34:13.280 --> 0:34:16.120
<v Speaker 2>But obviously this year, you know, he's hitting two seventy seven,

0:34:16.239 --> 0:34:19.359
<v Speaker 2>So it's just a weird profile, Like I would bet

0:34:19.400 --> 0:34:21.480
<v Speaker 2>every dollar I have he a't gonna hit you know,

0:34:21.640 --> 0:34:24.080
<v Speaker 2>two seventy seven for the rest of the year or

0:34:24.200 --> 0:34:27.959
<v Speaker 2>next year, not without some drastic improvements in those areas

0:34:28.000 --> 0:34:31.600
<v Speaker 2>I just mentioned. But yeah, he's one that's always been

0:34:31.640 --> 0:34:35.000
<v Speaker 2>intriguing to me, And I don't know it's I don't

0:34:35.160 --> 0:34:38.800
<v Speaker 2>I'm not a big fan of investing heavily in this profile.

0:34:38.840 --> 0:34:41.239
<v Speaker 2>And I think if this continues and he ends the

0:34:41.320 --> 0:34:44.000
<v Speaker 2>year maybe you know, close to fifteen home runs and

0:34:44.000 --> 0:34:46.839
<v Speaker 2>steals with a decent slash line that price I could

0:34:46.960 --> 0:34:48.600
<v Speaker 2>kind of boost up a little bit, maybe even in

0:34:48.600 --> 0:34:50.359
<v Speaker 2>the top two hundred for next year.

0:34:50.360 --> 0:34:51.879
<v Speaker 3>It's kind of hard to say with him. I can't

0:34:51.880 --> 0:34:52.120
<v Speaker 3>get a.

0:34:52.120 --> 0:34:54.799
<v Speaker 2>Good rid of where he would possibly end up next

0:34:54.840 --> 0:34:55.960
<v Speaker 2>year in terms of ADP.

0:34:56.200 --> 0:34:57.759
<v Speaker 3>But he's really intriguing.

0:34:57.880 --> 0:35:01.799
<v Speaker 2>But I would just love to see any any improvement

0:35:02.080 --> 0:35:04.680
<v Speaker 2>in terms of this making contact. I think he could

0:35:04.760 --> 0:35:07.879
<v Speaker 2>really take off, make some more contact, elevate a bit more.

0:35:08.239 --> 0:35:09.960
<v Speaker 2>This could be like a top one hundred player like that.

0:35:10.080 --> 0:35:12.360
<v Speaker 2>Upside is absolutely there, so we'll see.

0:35:13.680 --> 0:35:15.400
<v Speaker 1>I agree, Yeah, we'll have to see how he finishes

0:35:15.440 --> 0:35:17.839
<v Speaker 1>out the year. I think I can see him being

0:35:17.840 --> 0:35:20.920
<v Speaker 1>overvalued as a middle of the order bat in Milwaukee,

0:35:21.040 --> 0:35:24.280
<v Speaker 1>a very good, perennially undervalued lineup. So maybe he doesn't

0:35:24.320 --> 0:35:26.680
<v Speaker 1>go as high as I think. But I'm a little

0:35:26.680 --> 0:35:29.040
<v Speaker 1>bit worried. I agree with the with the profile. You know,

0:35:29.120 --> 0:35:32.279
<v Speaker 1>the zone contact that's seventy seven percent is not good.

0:35:32.320 --> 0:35:34.759
<v Speaker 1>The swinging strike rate at fifteen percent is not my

0:35:34.840 --> 0:35:37.560
<v Speaker 1>favorite either. He can overcome it if he raises the ball.

0:35:37.600 --> 0:35:40.239
<v Speaker 1>I agree there as well, but that's not trended in

0:35:40.280 --> 0:35:42.320
<v Speaker 1>the right direction this year with a fifty three percent

0:35:42.360 --> 0:35:44.600
<v Speaker 1>ground ball right. So we'll have to see what happens

0:35:44.600 --> 0:35:46.920
<v Speaker 1>with Garrett Mitchell. But he's been I guys that shouldn't

0:35:46.920 --> 0:35:49.480
<v Speaker 1>be on waiver wires today. He should be rostered for

0:35:49.480 --> 0:35:52.480
<v Speaker 1>sure right now. But how things will look going forward,

0:35:52.480 --> 0:35:54.600
<v Speaker 1>we'll have to see. We'll be We're gonna keep it.

0:35:54.760 --> 0:35:55.319
<v Speaker 3>Well, that's right.

0:35:55.800 --> 0:35:58.640
<v Speaker 2>Can we just like combine like him and like Luis

0:35:58.680 --> 0:36:02.040
<v Speaker 2>a Riaz or Wilson like you can bind like the

0:36:02.080 --> 0:36:04.680
<v Speaker 2>two profiles in the one that would be like maybe the.

0:36:04.600 --> 0:36:06.879
<v Speaker 3>Best hitter in baseball or one of them. So yeah,

0:36:07.360 --> 0:36:08.359
<v Speaker 3>I wish, I wish.

0:36:08.480 --> 0:36:11.600
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, we'll we'll see what happens with Gary Mitchell, because

0:36:11.600 --> 0:36:13.479
<v Speaker 1>he's still just twenty seven years old. It'll be twenty

0:36:13.480 --> 0:36:16.239
<v Speaker 1>eight soon, but still several good years ahead of him,

0:36:16.280 --> 0:36:18.839
<v Speaker 1>I'm sure, and hopefully some good stuff ahead of us

0:36:18.880 --> 0:36:21.160
<v Speaker 1>on this show. We're going to talk pitchers in a second,

0:36:21.160 --> 0:36:22.640
<v Speaker 1>but first I want to remind you guys about our

0:36:22.640 --> 0:36:26.279
<v Speaker 1>presenting sponsor, hard Rock Bet. Some sports fans call this

0:36:26.400 --> 0:36:30.279
<v Speaker 1>the slow period, but I disagree. There's no basketball, there's

0:36:30.280 --> 0:36:33.040
<v Speaker 1>no hockey, there's no World Cup, there's no NFL. It's

0:36:33.120 --> 0:36:36.200
<v Speaker 1>baseball time. We focus in here on baseball all the time,

0:36:36.239 --> 0:36:38.680
<v Speaker 1>but specifically right now, everybody should be. There's a full

0:36:38.719 --> 0:36:40.759
<v Speaker 1>slate nearly every day for you to bet on your

0:36:40.760 --> 0:36:43.600
<v Speaker 1>favorite teams and players, build epic same game parlays, and

0:36:43.600 --> 0:36:45.880
<v Speaker 1>even live bet every inning from first pitch to the

0:36:45.920 --> 0:36:48.480
<v Speaker 1>final out. Free to step into the batter's box, sign

0:36:48.560 --> 0:36:50.239
<v Speaker 1>up with hard Rock Bet today in place a five

0:36:50.320 --> 0:36:52.160
<v Speaker 1>dollars bet. If it wins, you get one hundred and

0:36:52.160 --> 0:36:54.279
<v Speaker 1>fifty and bonus bets on top of your winnings. That's right,

0:36:54.320 --> 0:36:56.360
<v Speaker 1>an extra one hundred and fifty into your account. They

0:36:56.360 --> 0:36:58.920
<v Speaker 1>are also new promos every single day, no sweat bets,

0:36:58.960 --> 0:37:02.359
<v Speaker 1>profit boost, bonus and more. Open the hard Rock Bet

0:37:02.400 --> 0:37:04.960
<v Speaker 1>app now and see what you've got today. Hard Rock

0:37:05.000 --> 0:37:07.080
<v Speaker 1>Bet is Florida's only legal sportsbook, but you don't have

0:37:07.080 --> 0:37:08.799
<v Speaker 1>to be in Florida to join the party. Hard Rock

0:37:08.840 --> 0:37:13.240
<v Speaker 1>Bet is also live in Arizona, Ohio, New Jersey, Indiana, Tennessee, Virginia, Illinois, Colorado,

0:37:13.239 --> 0:37:15.760
<v Speaker 1>and Michigan, with more states on the way. So download

0:37:15.800 --> 0:37:19.840
<v Speaker 1>hard Rock Bet and swing for the fences today. Payable

0:37:19.840 --> 0:37:22.200
<v Speaker 1>in bonus bets, not a cash offer offered by the

0:37:22.200 --> 0:37:25.040
<v Speaker 1>Seminol Tribe of Florida. In Florida offered by Seminal hard

0:37:25.080 --> 0:37:28.000
<v Speaker 1>Rock Digital LLC and all other states. Must be twenty

0:37:28.000 --> 0:37:32.360
<v Speaker 1>one plus and physically present in Arizona, Colorado, Florida, Illinois, Indiana, Michigan,

0:37:32.360 --> 0:37:35.480
<v Speaker 1>New Jersey, Ohio, Tennessee, or Virginia to play. Terms and

0:37:35.520 --> 0:37:38.600
<v Speaker 1>conditions apply. Concerned about gambling in Florida called one A

0:37:38.680 --> 0:37:40.920
<v Speaker 1>three to three play wise in Indiana. If you are

0:37:41.000 --> 0:37:43.239
<v Speaker 1>someone who knows a gambling problem and wants help, Call

0:37:43.280 --> 0:37:45.840
<v Speaker 1>one eight hundred and nine with it in Arizona, Ohio

0:37:45.880 --> 0:37:48.880
<v Speaker 1>and Virginia Call one eight hundred mis reset gambling problem

0:37:48.960 --> 0:37:52.000
<v Speaker 1>called one eight hundred gambler. Eric. We are going to

0:37:52.000 --> 0:37:54.680
<v Speaker 1>talk some pitchers, and we'll start it off here with

0:37:54.960 --> 0:37:58.360
<v Speaker 1>opposing barrel percentage allowed. We were going to talk barrel

0:37:58.360 --> 0:38:01.200
<v Speaker 1>percentage with the hitters, but I think you know, it's

0:38:01.239 --> 0:38:03.319
<v Speaker 1>the same general leader boards, and I think going through

0:38:03.360 --> 0:38:05.520
<v Speaker 1>the three we have probably covers it. It's a lot

0:38:05.520 --> 0:38:07.600
<v Speaker 1>of the same names. Let's switch over to pitchers and

0:38:07.640 --> 0:38:09.960
<v Speaker 1>look at the barrel percentage allowed and probably to the

0:38:09.960 --> 0:38:12.560
<v Speaker 1>surprise of nobody, Jacob Mizerowski, like he is on top

0:38:12.560 --> 0:38:14.560
<v Speaker 1>of nearly every leaderboard this year, is on top of

0:38:14.600 --> 0:38:17.480
<v Speaker 1>this one. He's only allowed seven barrels the entirety of

0:38:17.520 --> 0:38:18.120
<v Speaker 1>the season.

0:38:18.480 --> 0:38:19.320
<v Speaker 3>It's insane.

0:38:19.400 --> 0:38:22.279
<v Speaker 1>Number shoe Heeyo Tani at number two. I know he's

0:38:22.320 --> 0:38:24.560
<v Speaker 1>been shut down right now, but he was, you know,

0:38:24.600 --> 0:38:26.439
<v Speaker 1>in the running for the cy Young there as well

0:38:26.440 --> 0:38:28.799
<v Speaker 1>before he was shut down. Just phenomenal work. And then

0:38:28.840 --> 0:38:31.239
<v Speaker 1>we get to Land and Roope and Trevor McDonald, a

0:38:31.239 --> 0:38:33.200
<v Speaker 1>pair of Giants pitchers. And we'll start with Land and

0:38:33.280 --> 0:38:36.680
<v Speaker 1>Roupe who's coming off of a third consecutive really good start.

0:38:36.719 --> 0:38:39.120
<v Speaker 1>The first one was before the break against the Blue Jays,

0:38:39.440 --> 0:38:41.320
<v Speaker 1>and the two coming out of the break Seattle and Kansas,

0:38:41.360 --> 0:38:43.080
<v Speaker 1>have both been really good. He's sitting on a three

0:38:43.239 --> 0:38:46.160
<v Speaker 1>ninety three ERA, a three thirty one FIP, A one

0:38:46.160 --> 0:38:47.759
<v Speaker 1>to twenty four whip. It's been a little bit of

0:38:47.760 --> 0:38:49.799
<v Speaker 1>an up and down year for him, but it really

0:38:49.800 --> 0:38:51.279
<v Speaker 1>comes down to the blow ups. The blow ups have

0:38:51.360 --> 0:38:54.120
<v Speaker 1>been horrible, and every other start pretty much has been good.

0:38:54.120 --> 0:38:56.480
<v Speaker 1>When he's not allowing five walks and eight are and runs,

0:38:56.480 --> 0:38:58.440
<v Speaker 1>he's good. Who would have thought, But that's pretty much

0:38:58.480 --> 0:38:59.799
<v Speaker 1>been the case with land and Roope this year, and

0:38:59.800 --> 0:39:01.040
<v Speaker 1>I think I think Eric a lot of it comes

0:39:01.040 --> 0:39:03.400
<v Speaker 1>down to the quality of contact against, which is the

0:39:03.400 --> 0:39:06.040
<v Speaker 1>point of this leaderboard. Here, four percent barrel rate and

0:39:06.160 --> 0:39:09.080
<v Speaker 1>a thirty percent hard hit rate while also getting fifty

0:39:09.080 --> 0:39:11.240
<v Speaker 1>percent ground balls, it just feels like a good recipe

0:39:11.239 --> 0:39:13.879
<v Speaker 1>for success. What do you think about Landing Roup. I've

0:39:13.920 --> 0:39:16.520
<v Speaker 1>talked with two Giants fans in recent weeks, Justin Mason

0:39:16.520 --> 0:39:20.480
<v Speaker 1>and Casey Bubba. Bubba is a fan. Mason is not

0:39:20.600 --> 0:39:21.839
<v Speaker 1>so split the time for us here.

0:39:22.960 --> 0:39:25.040
<v Speaker 3>I think I'm gonna lean more towards being a fan.

0:39:25.239 --> 0:39:27.040
<v Speaker 2>And he's the guy I actually has throwed him up

0:39:27.040 --> 0:39:30.360
<v Speaker 2>today in the connect my daily recap right up that

0:39:30.400 --> 0:39:33.960
<v Speaker 2>I do over on my Patreon, because he's definitely really intriguing.

0:39:34.040 --> 0:39:36.880
<v Speaker 2>And you see a pretty common theme here on like

0:39:36.920 --> 0:39:39.480
<v Speaker 2>the barrel rate allow leader boards, where it's either a

0:39:40.000 --> 0:39:42.799
<v Speaker 2>they're just super freaking nasty like miss Hierowski.

0:39:43.080 --> 0:39:44.440
<v Speaker 3>You know, it's hard to barrel of the pictures going

0:39:44.440 --> 0:39:44.799
<v Speaker 3>like what one.

0:39:44.760 --> 0:39:47.240
<v Speaker 2>Hundred and twelve miles an hour wherever he's thrown these days,

0:39:47.400 --> 0:39:50.120
<v Speaker 2>but or they have a good sinker, you know, And

0:39:50.200 --> 0:39:53.400
<v Speaker 2>that's definitely the case here with Root. But he's definitely

0:39:53.480 --> 0:39:56.719
<v Speaker 2>more than just like a sinker pitched the contact guy.

0:39:57.000 --> 0:39:59.000
<v Speaker 2>He's got a pretty good whiff rate on his two

0:39:59.040 --> 0:40:01.880
<v Speaker 2>most used secondary in the curve and the change up.

0:40:01.920 --> 0:40:04.560
<v Speaker 2>Both of those are over thirty percent. And yeah, that's

0:40:04.560 --> 0:40:07.520
<v Speaker 2>definitely a recipe for success, especially for these guys where

0:40:07.920 --> 0:40:10.040
<v Speaker 2>they're not blowing you away with velocity.

0:40:10.040 --> 0:40:11.640
<v Speaker 3>I mean, he's not like throwing soft.

0:40:11.680 --> 0:40:13.440
<v Speaker 2>He's you know, he's around like ninety three ninety four,

0:40:13.960 --> 0:40:15.000
<v Speaker 2>so it's kind of like kind of middle of the

0:40:15.040 --> 0:40:17.640
<v Speaker 2>road velocity these days. But he's not gonna rear back

0:40:17.640 --> 0:40:19.359
<v Speaker 2>and this, you know, rear back and throw ninety eight

0:40:19.400 --> 0:40:22.000
<v Speaker 2>by or anything like that. He's gotta you know, kind

0:40:22.000 --> 0:40:25.480
<v Speaker 2>of more so pitch in certain areas of the zone,

0:40:25.560 --> 0:40:28.839
<v Speaker 2>get those ground balls, you know, get the weak contact

0:40:29.000 --> 0:40:31.239
<v Speaker 2>and kind of succeed that way.

0:40:31.520 --> 0:40:32.879
<v Speaker 3>But he can still miss some bats too.

0:40:32.880 --> 0:40:34.800
<v Speaker 2>He's got a you know, it's I think it's around

0:40:34.840 --> 0:40:37.399
<v Speaker 2>average wiff rate, but it gets a good amount of chase,

0:40:37.440 --> 0:40:38.640
<v Speaker 2>So thirty percent chase rate.

0:40:38.680 --> 0:40:39.439
<v Speaker 3>That's good to see.

0:40:39.520 --> 0:40:41.680
<v Speaker 2>So he's the guy that had I think his yeah,

0:40:41.719 --> 0:40:45.120
<v Speaker 2>his XCIRA is three point three six right now.

0:40:45.480 --> 0:40:47.360
<v Speaker 3>So even though the era has kind of been hovering

0:40:47.400 --> 0:40:47.600
<v Speaker 3>in the.

0:40:48.040 --> 0:40:50.400
<v Speaker 2>Upper threes, as it has each of the last two years,

0:40:50.440 --> 0:40:54.320
<v Speaker 2>for him, there's some intrigue here in some I guess

0:40:54.360 --> 0:40:57.600
<v Speaker 2>optimism that he could be a little bit more than this.

0:40:57.800 --> 0:40:59.960
<v Speaker 2>I don't think he's gonna be like, you know, low

0:41:00.200 --> 0:41:02.719
<v Speaker 2>web two point zero or anything like that, but you know,

0:41:02.840 --> 0:41:05.200
<v Speaker 2>could route be a guy that's like, you know, back

0:41:05.360 --> 0:41:08.360
<v Speaker 2>end top fifty, top sixty ish arm in that range,

0:41:08.360 --> 0:41:12.319
<v Speaker 2>maybe your SP four or five range next year, I think. So,

0:41:12.480 --> 0:41:14.520
<v Speaker 2>I think there's definitely a lot of reasons to be

0:41:14.800 --> 0:41:17.359
<v Speaker 2>you know, optimistic about that being the case, and he's

0:41:17.360 --> 0:41:18.759
<v Speaker 2>got you know, the.

0:41:18.600 --> 0:41:20.000
<v Speaker 3>K rates ticked up a little bit this year.

0:41:20.000 --> 0:41:23.000
<v Speaker 2>It keeps the walk rate under ten percent, which is

0:41:23.040 --> 0:41:25.240
<v Speaker 2>kind of about league average these days with walk rates

0:41:25.280 --> 0:41:27.520
<v Speaker 2>going up. So yeah, a lot a lot to like here.

0:41:27.680 --> 0:41:29.560
<v Speaker 2>He ranks pretty high on the on the average ev

0:41:29.680 --> 0:41:33.560
<v Speaker 2>allowed leaderboard as well. So yeah, I guess I'm not

0:41:33.680 --> 0:41:36.640
<v Speaker 2>like in, you know, super thrilled by him, but I

0:41:36.640 --> 0:41:38.920
<v Speaker 2>guess I would definitely lean more towards, you know, kind

0:41:38.920 --> 0:41:41.399
<v Speaker 2>of buying into what we've been seeing from him this year.

0:41:42.600 --> 0:41:44.839
<v Speaker 1>I have to as of late, he's been a guy

0:41:44.880 --> 0:41:47.879
<v Speaker 1>that I've invested in. Now. You can't time the blow

0:41:47.960 --> 0:41:49.560
<v Speaker 1>ups with him. They've they've been three or four of

0:41:49.600 --> 0:41:51.359
<v Speaker 1>than this year, and you might get stuck with one

0:41:51.360 --> 0:41:53.680
<v Speaker 1>of those in your lineup. It can happen to any pitcher,

0:41:53.719 --> 0:41:55.479
<v Speaker 1>but it seems to happen a little more a little

0:41:55.520 --> 0:41:58.160
<v Speaker 1>bit more regularity with landing route. So it's something to

0:41:58.239 --> 0:41:59.480
<v Speaker 1>keep an eye on. But I do think that the

0:41:59.480 --> 0:42:01.600
<v Speaker 1>skills are really really good here, and I think that

0:42:01.640 --> 0:42:04.160
<v Speaker 1>we could see I've not a full blown breakout next year,

0:42:04.160 --> 0:42:05.600
<v Speaker 1>but if he continues to put the ball on the

0:42:05.600 --> 0:42:09.040
<v Speaker 1>ground with you know, the terrible contact he's allowing against

0:42:09.040 --> 0:42:12.120
<v Speaker 1>thirty percent hard hit, four percent barrel rate, eighty six

0:42:12.200 --> 0:42:14.239
<v Speaker 1>mile an hour average exit velocity. I think it's a

0:42:14.400 --> 0:42:17.279
<v Speaker 1>it's a good recipe for success for Landon Rupe and

0:42:17.320 --> 0:42:20.200
<v Speaker 1>his teammate Trevor McDonald isn't nearly as interesting. But he

0:42:20.239 --> 0:42:22.880
<v Speaker 1>did have a period earlier in the season where he

0:42:22.960 --> 0:42:25.200
<v Speaker 1>was looking really good. There was a five or six

0:42:25.239 --> 0:42:27.680
<v Speaker 1>start stretch where he was a hot pick up and

0:42:27.719 --> 0:42:31.319
<v Speaker 1>then it blew up by all teams. The Toronto Blue Jays.

0:42:31.360 --> 0:42:33.000
<v Speaker 1>You can't hit water if they fell out of a

0:42:33.000 --> 0:42:34.840
<v Speaker 1>boat right now. They got eight runs on him a

0:42:34.880 --> 0:42:37.719
<v Speaker 1>couple of weeks ago, But other than that, it's been

0:42:37.719 --> 0:42:40.239
<v Speaker 1>a really good run for him since maybe mid May.

0:42:40.320 --> 0:42:42.680
<v Speaker 1>I know you wouldn't. You wouldn't see that looking at

0:42:42.840 --> 0:42:45.600
<v Speaker 1>just the era and the whip. But any interest at

0:42:45.600 --> 0:42:48.279
<v Speaker 1>all in Trevor McDonald, whether it's down the stretch this

0:42:48.400 --> 0:42:51.200
<v Speaker 1>year as a dynasty piece, potentially still just twenty five

0:42:51.280 --> 0:42:51.800
<v Speaker 1>years old.

0:42:51.719 --> 0:42:52.120
<v Speaker 2>Eric.

0:42:53.960 --> 0:42:55.440
<v Speaker 3>Not not a lot.

0:42:55.719 --> 0:42:58.120
<v Speaker 2>You know, maybe is like one of the back end

0:42:58.160 --> 0:43:01.000
<v Speaker 2>guys you know on my team for a redraft league,

0:43:01.040 --> 0:43:02.879
<v Speaker 2>and or even like a dynasty league team.

0:43:03.440 --> 0:43:05.759
<v Speaker 3>He's probably going to be that's the thing with him.

0:43:06.080 --> 0:43:08.040
<v Speaker 2>If you're looking for a guy that just another good

0:43:08.160 --> 0:43:10.880
<v Speaker 2>arm or another like depth piece to have, he's.

0:43:10.680 --> 0:43:12.080
<v Speaker 3>A guy in a dynasty league.

0:43:12.200 --> 0:43:14.120
<v Speaker 2>It won't cost much to get him, and even in

0:43:14.200 --> 0:43:16.759
<v Speaker 2>redraft with the price will not be high unless he

0:43:16.800 --> 0:43:19.400
<v Speaker 2>has like a phenomenal end of the season. But just

0:43:19.560 --> 0:43:24.160
<v Speaker 2>in general, I'm not super intrigued by McDonald. He does

0:43:24.560 --> 0:43:28.000
<v Speaker 2>phenomenal work and getting ground balls and limiting you know,

0:43:28.080 --> 0:43:31.480
<v Speaker 2>limiting hard contact allowed, limiting barrels obviously being on these

0:43:31.560 --> 0:43:33.400
<v Speaker 2>leader boards, you know, and a lot that has to

0:43:33.440 --> 0:43:36.240
<v Speaker 2>do with the sinker he uses, which he throws nearly

0:43:36.400 --> 0:43:38.759
<v Speaker 2>sixty percent of the time. And he actually has a

0:43:38.800 --> 0:43:40.759
<v Speaker 2>couple of good wif freight offerings in the slider and

0:43:40.920 --> 0:43:43.080
<v Speaker 2>change up, but just because he doesn't really go to them,

0:43:43.280 --> 0:43:47.000
<v Speaker 2>you know, super frequently. I mean they're combined about forty percent.

0:43:47.080 --> 0:43:50.279
<v Speaker 2>But that sinker being such a prevalent part of his

0:43:50.440 --> 0:43:53.279
<v Speaker 2>arsenal and kind of what he's all about. I mean,

0:43:53.680 --> 0:43:55.560
<v Speaker 2>the k rates is not going to be there. I

0:43:55.640 --> 0:43:58.000
<v Speaker 2>mean it's an eighteen and a half percent k rate.

0:43:58.280 --> 0:44:01.040
<v Speaker 2>It was higher last year three percent. I guess that

0:44:01.120 --> 0:44:03.440
<v Speaker 2>if he gets back to that range, all right, I

0:44:03.920 --> 0:44:06.279
<v Speaker 2>could see myself being a little bit more intrigued, but

0:44:07.000 --> 0:44:09.440
<v Speaker 2>being this being a blow average K rate guy, it's

0:44:09.440 --> 0:44:14.240
<v Speaker 2>just there's such a low level of you know, margin

0:44:14.280 --> 0:44:16.840
<v Speaker 2>for error here where you need the ratios to be

0:44:16.920 --> 0:44:18.400
<v Speaker 2>really good. That's why I was kind of like not

0:44:18.480 --> 0:44:21.680
<v Speaker 2>into Rubleski earlier in the year when he wasn't striking

0:44:21.719 --> 0:44:24.080
<v Speaker 2>guys out, but now all of a sudden, Hey, he's

0:44:24.080 --> 0:44:26.280
<v Speaker 2>striking guys out lately. Not to get on a tangent

0:44:26.480 --> 0:44:28.520
<v Speaker 2>by him, but just the fact that kind of like

0:44:28.600 --> 0:44:30.839
<v Speaker 2>McDonald's and that's in that range where I'm like, all right,

0:44:30.840 --> 0:44:33.440
<v Speaker 2>he's not give me ks. So if the era and

0:44:33.480 --> 0:44:36.440
<v Speaker 2>whip aren't like Ellie's solid, he's not really given you

0:44:36.520 --> 0:44:39.520
<v Speaker 2>much value. So I guess as a back end depth

0:44:39.560 --> 0:44:42.959
<v Speaker 2>guy maybe, but outside of that, not super intrigued by him.

0:44:43.239 --> 0:44:45.480
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I think that's totally fair. I just wanted to

0:44:45.680 --> 0:44:47.720
<v Speaker 1>see if there might be something there because I earlier

0:44:47.719 --> 0:44:49.040
<v Speaker 1>in the year I was kind of a fan. But

0:44:49.760 --> 0:44:51.680
<v Speaker 1>I don't blame anybody for not wanting a guy on

0:44:51.719 --> 0:44:53.600
<v Speaker 1>their team with an eighteen p K rate in a

0:44:53.640 --> 0:44:57.080
<v Speaker 1>five year. I cannot hold that against you. Speaking of

0:44:57.160 --> 0:44:59.880
<v Speaker 1>five bra, let's talk about Freddy Peralta, because if it's

0:44:59.880 --> 0:45:02.560
<v Speaker 1>all heading into the season that he was gonna shave

0:45:02.600 --> 0:45:04.440
<v Speaker 1>a few points off his barrel, right, the hard hit

0:45:04.520 --> 0:45:07.200
<v Speaker 1>rate was still in the thirties, average exit velocity was

0:45:07.400 --> 0:45:11.280
<v Speaker 1>still eighty seven eighty eight. Just knowing those couple of stats,

0:45:11.280 --> 0:45:13.000
<v Speaker 1>I would have said, Yeah, Freddy Perrult is probably doing

0:45:13.000 --> 0:45:16.839
<v Speaker 1>what Freddy Pewlt always does. He's been miserable, awful, unstartable,

0:45:16.880 --> 0:45:19.560
<v Speaker 1>five OHO one era A one forty six whip. The

0:45:19.560 --> 0:45:21.960
<v Speaker 1>strikeouts have come down to twenty two percent, The swinging

0:45:22.000 --> 0:45:25.000
<v Speaker 1>strike rates are going down every single year. The stuff,

0:45:25.280 --> 0:45:27.279
<v Speaker 1>which at one point was well above average, is now

0:45:27.360 --> 0:45:30.520
<v Speaker 1>ninety six. What the hell happened to Freddy Prawlt to

0:45:30.520 --> 0:45:30.799
<v Speaker 1>this year?

0:45:30.880 --> 0:45:36.279
<v Speaker 2>Eric, Dude, that's a phenomenal question. Like, he's a guy

0:45:36.280 --> 0:45:39.680
<v Speaker 2>that's just been especially I think the strikeout department so

0:45:39.880 --> 0:45:42.719
<v Speaker 2>consistent for so long. I mean before this year, I

0:45:42.760 --> 0:45:44.479
<v Speaker 2>mean this year. I mean he's right around a league

0:45:44.520 --> 0:45:46.920
<v Speaker 2>average k rate right now twenty two and a half percent.

0:45:47.440 --> 0:45:50.640
<v Speaker 2>But before this year, he had been above twenty seven

0:45:50.680 --> 0:45:53.640
<v Speaker 2>percent every year of his career, and he debuted back

0:45:53.680 --> 0:45:56.959
<v Speaker 2>in twenty eighteen, So we're talking about what was eight

0:45:57.000 --> 0:45:59.719
<v Speaker 2>straight years above a twenty seven percent k rate. A

0:45:59.719 --> 0:46:02.560
<v Speaker 2>few those years were about thirty percent. Last year was

0:46:02.560 --> 0:46:06.680
<v Speaker 2>twenty eight point two, and you figured, like, man, this

0:46:06.719 --> 0:46:08.560
<v Speaker 2>guy was gonna just be one of those guys that

0:46:08.600 --> 0:46:13.400
<v Speaker 2>continues to pump out like SP two level production for

0:46:13.440 --> 0:46:15.680
<v Speaker 2>the next few years at least. I mean, he's thirty,

0:46:16.000 --> 0:46:19.560
<v Speaker 2>which is for a pitcher, is not old whatsoever. Just

0:46:19.600 --> 0:46:21.680
<v Speaker 2>look at, you know, all the guys that have aged

0:46:21.719 --> 0:46:24.120
<v Speaker 2>like fine wine, like the Wheelers and Chris Sales of

0:46:24.160 --> 0:46:26.759
<v Speaker 2>the world. So I was, you know, I was a

0:46:26.800 --> 0:46:28.920
<v Speaker 2>Parlta guy, and he's got that. I had a lot

0:46:28.920 --> 0:46:32.160
<v Speaker 2>of shares of him previous years, and thankfully it worked out.

0:46:32.200 --> 0:46:34.560
<v Speaker 2>Even though I was targeting him this year, I didn't

0:46:34.560 --> 0:46:36.680
<v Speaker 2>get I think I might have had one share of

0:46:36.760 --> 0:46:39.759
<v Speaker 2>Pralta if that just because he just didn't work out

0:46:39.840 --> 0:46:41.520
<v Speaker 2>in my draft that he kind of felt to where

0:46:41.560 --> 0:46:44.120
<v Speaker 2>I was willing to take him. But yeah, it's weird

0:46:44.160 --> 0:46:47.400
<v Speaker 2>because he's It's not like anything is drastically changed with

0:46:47.440 --> 0:46:50.839
<v Speaker 2>how he's approaching, you know, attacking hitters, because like you'll

0:46:50.840 --> 0:46:53.800
<v Speaker 2>get his pitch mix last year and this year nearly identical,

0:46:53.880 --> 0:46:56.920
<v Speaker 2>Like the top three pitches are, you know, foreseeing change

0:46:56.960 --> 0:46:59.600
<v Speaker 2>up curveball that I have nearly identical usage rates this year

0:46:59.600 --> 0:47:00.359
<v Speaker 2>to last year.

0:47:00.719 --> 0:47:04.040
<v Speaker 3>It's just the with rates, which are still decent.

0:47:04.120 --> 0:47:06.239
<v Speaker 2>And I mean it's not they're bad with rates, but

0:47:06.280 --> 0:47:09.359
<v Speaker 2>they're all kind of lower than what he had last year.

0:47:09.400 --> 0:47:11.200
<v Speaker 2>So and with that being such a big part of

0:47:11.239 --> 0:47:14.320
<v Speaker 2>his game, Yeah, I think there's any kind of downteck

0:47:14.360 --> 0:47:17.360
<v Speaker 2>that shows like how thin the line is sometimes in

0:47:17.440 --> 0:47:21.120
<v Speaker 2>this sport where you know, even hitters or pitchers just

0:47:21.160 --> 0:47:24.479
<v Speaker 2>like whether it be like, uh, you know, command gets

0:47:24.480 --> 0:47:27.000
<v Speaker 2>a little bit worse, or you're not missing quite as

0:47:27.040 --> 0:47:28.960
<v Speaker 2>many bats, or on the hitting side of that, your

0:47:29.000 --> 0:47:31.880
<v Speaker 2>launch angle goes down a little bit. The smallest change

0:47:31.920 --> 0:47:35.000
<v Speaker 2>can sometimes be like huge for your overall production. And

0:47:35.120 --> 0:47:38.200
<v Speaker 2>we're seeing that in spades this year with Freddy. I mean,

0:47:38.200 --> 0:47:40.799
<v Speaker 2>look at last year, his five most use offerings look

0:47:40.800 --> 0:47:42.840
<v Speaker 2>got like the run value on Savant.

0:47:43.280 --> 0:47:44.560
<v Speaker 3>You know, we're all positive it.

0:47:44.600 --> 0:47:47.760
<v Speaker 2>Was plus nine plus nine plus four plus three plus one.

0:47:48.040 --> 0:47:51.760
<v Speaker 2>This year negative one, negative five, negative three, negative one

0:47:51.840 --> 0:47:55.200
<v Speaker 2>and zero. So every pitch for him has just gotten

0:47:55.560 --> 0:47:57.799
<v Speaker 2>either a little bit worse or a lot worse. And

0:47:58.080 --> 0:48:00.319
<v Speaker 2>I mean I still have confidence that he can bounce back.

0:48:00.520 --> 0:48:04.120
<v Speaker 2>I don't think we're done seeing impactful Freddie Freeman. So

0:48:04.239 --> 0:48:07.120
<v Speaker 2>if the price tag drops next year in drafts, which

0:48:07.160 --> 0:48:10.360
<v Speaker 2>I'm assuming it will, I'll be definitely into if I

0:48:10.360 --> 0:48:13.040
<v Speaker 2>can get Freddy is like my SPA three four next year,

0:48:13.040 --> 0:48:16.040
<v Speaker 2>which I think actually might be the case. I'm absolutely

0:48:16.080 --> 0:48:18.759
<v Speaker 2>gonna be intrigued because in this world where it's so

0:48:18.800 --> 0:48:20.759
<v Speaker 2>what have you done for me lately, some of these

0:48:20.760 --> 0:48:22.920
<v Speaker 2>guys kind of fall off the radar too much, and

0:48:23.000 --> 0:48:25.600
<v Speaker 2>I'll be definitely be looking to scoop up Freddy next year.

0:48:25.600 --> 0:48:26.320
<v Speaker 3>If that's the case.

0:48:27.320 --> 0:48:29.840
<v Speaker 1>I think so too. I mean, XCRA is not my

0:48:29.960 --> 0:48:33.040
<v Speaker 1>favorite of the era estimators, but three eighty six is

0:48:33.040 --> 0:48:35.760
<v Speaker 1>still a solid number, even with the struggles. A thirteen

0:48:35.800 --> 0:48:38.520
<v Speaker 1>percent strike up to walk rate is not terrible for

0:48:38.600 --> 0:48:40.759
<v Speaker 1>a bottom out type of season like it has been.

0:48:41.239 --> 0:48:44.160
<v Speaker 1>Still relatively young, like you said, so you know, like

0:48:44.200 --> 0:48:46.960
<v Speaker 1>I mentioned earlier with Dylan Csnonial Cruz, you know type

0:48:46.960 --> 0:48:49.359
<v Speaker 1>of players you buy in the cheap years. I don't

0:48:49.360 --> 0:48:52.680
<v Speaker 1>think Peralta is necessarily in the same vein as Dylan

0:48:52.760 --> 0:48:54.799
<v Speaker 1>ceased because he's been pretty consistent in his career, but

0:48:55.280 --> 0:48:56.799
<v Speaker 1>it'll be the same type of thing where if he

0:48:56.880 --> 0:48:58.719
<v Speaker 1>is around pick one hundred and twenty. Next year one

0:48:58.800 --> 0:49:01.160
<v Speaker 1>hundred and forty going to be on all of my teams,

0:49:01.160 --> 0:49:04.440
<v Speaker 1>most likely barring news that there's been an injury or

0:49:04.480 --> 0:49:06.840
<v Speaker 1>something like that that we haven't heard about. But barring

0:49:06.880 --> 0:49:10.120
<v Speaker 1>anything unforeseen, I do think Freddy Perlta will bounce back.

0:49:10.120 --> 0:49:12.239
<v Speaker 1>But it's just odd to see that despite the fact

0:49:12.239 --> 0:49:14.080
<v Speaker 1>that he is twelfth in the league in barrels allowed

0:49:14.080 --> 0:49:16.640
<v Speaker 1>barrel percentage, it has not really paid off for him.

0:49:17.400 --> 0:49:20.439
<v Speaker 1>A couple more leaderboards real quick, We're gonna do heart

0:49:20.560 --> 0:49:23.600
<v Speaker 1>hit rate, and the first name that stuck out to

0:49:23.600 --> 0:49:27.120
<v Speaker 1>me was Spencer Arraghetty landon Roupe at number one. His

0:49:27.280 --> 0:49:29.120
<v Speaker 1>sosardo number two we'll talk about in a little bit.

0:49:29.120 --> 0:49:32.399
<v Speaker 1>But Spencer Araghedtty only allowing a thirty percent heard hit

0:49:32.480 --> 0:49:35.760
<v Speaker 1>rate after forty five percent last year, I would have said, Okay,

0:49:35.800 --> 0:49:38.880
<v Speaker 1>this might be the trick. Average exit velocity is down,

0:49:39.239 --> 0:49:42.399
<v Speaker 1>barrel rate is down, and yet he's still sitting here

0:49:42.440 --> 0:49:44.640
<v Speaker 1>with a four to thirty four ERA in a one

0:49:44.680 --> 0:49:46.799
<v Speaker 1>to thirty one whip. Those are better metrics than we

0:49:46.840 --> 0:49:49.719
<v Speaker 1>saw last year, but it feels like Errighedy always has

0:49:49.760 --> 0:49:52.239
<v Speaker 1>these really sky high expectations, and we saw a couple

0:49:52.280 --> 0:49:54.719
<v Speaker 1>of good starts from him earlier in this year. What

0:49:54.760 --> 0:49:56.759
<v Speaker 1>do you make of the heart hit rate improvements and

0:49:57.000 --> 0:49:58.959
<v Speaker 1>what we've seen from him this season? Is there another

0:49:59.080 --> 0:50:00.960
<v Speaker 1>level for Aarraghetty or is he one of these guys

0:50:00.960 --> 0:50:03.440
<v Speaker 1>that we're kind of wish casting on that isn't actually

0:50:03.440 --> 0:50:03.880
<v Speaker 1>that great.

0:50:05.080 --> 0:50:06.640
<v Speaker 3>I feel like it's more the ladder.

0:50:06.760 --> 0:50:09.399
<v Speaker 2>I mean, there's always been that intrigue with Irragatty because

0:50:09.400 --> 0:50:12.360
<v Speaker 2>he's like kind of shown flashes of, you know, pretty

0:50:12.360 --> 0:50:15.120
<v Speaker 2>solid upside at times, but he just feel like one

0:50:15.120 --> 0:50:17.320
<v Speaker 2>of those guys is just never gonna fully put together.

0:50:17.480 --> 0:50:18.400
<v Speaker 3>And I hate to say that.

0:50:18.440 --> 0:50:21.000
<v Speaker 2>He's still only twenty six, so there's definitely some time

0:50:21.040 --> 0:50:22.080
<v Speaker 2>for him, and obviously.

0:50:21.760 --> 0:50:23.520
<v Speaker 3>Houston great place for him to be.

0:50:23.600 --> 0:50:26.120
<v Speaker 2>They've definitely done a lot of good with pitching and

0:50:26.480 --> 0:50:28.759
<v Speaker 2>gotten the most out of guys and gotten more out

0:50:28.760 --> 0:50:32.200
<v Speaker 2>of them than I think anybody even expected. But with him,

0:50:32.200 --> 0:50:35.560
<v Speaker 2>like the walk rate just remains super high. And even

0:50:35.600 --> 0:50:37.839
<v Speaker 2>though the k rate went up this year, a lot

0:50:37.840 --> 0:50:39.839
<v Speaker 2>of the whift rates on his offerings are actually down,

0:50:39.880 --> 0:50:42.239
<v Speaker 2>which is kind of weird to see, but you know,

0:50:42.320 --> 0:50:44.320
<v Speaker 2>the whift rate overall is down, but he's got the

0:50:44.360 --> 0:50:46.799
<v Speaker 2>k rate up a little bit. But I think there's

0:50:46.800 --> 0:50:50.560
<v Speaker 2>just so many things working against him where he'll improve

0:50:50.600 --> 0:50:52.839
<v Speaker 2>in one area a year over year, but then go

0:50:53.360 --> 0:50:57.040
<v Speaker 2>he'll revert back in another area. So it's almost like,

0:50:57.080 --> 0:51:00.319
<v Speaker 2>you know, the improvements kind of get canceled out, and

0:51:00.440 --> 0:51:02.000
<v Speaker 2>you know, with the other metrics that are going the

0:51:02.000 --> 0:51:04.279
<v Speaker 2>opposite way. And you know, maybeybe if he was a

0:51:04.280 --> 0:51:05.640
<v Speaker 2>guy that could, you know, be around the zone a

0:51:05.640 --> 0:51:08.200
<v Speaker 2>little bit more, I'd be a little bit more intrigued.

0:51:08.239 --> 0:51:10.600
<v Speaker 2>But you know, at this point, the only Baty's really,

0:51:10.640 --> 0:51:12.160
<v Speaker 2>the only pitch he's really missing a lot of bats

0:51:12.160 --> 0:51:15.880
<v Speaker 2>with this year is the curveball. You know, the sinkers

0:51:15.920 --> 0:51:18.120
<v Speaker 2>getting hit around a bit, and there's not a lot

0:51:18.120 --> 0:51:21.040
<v Speaker 2>of good whip rates elsewhere, So I don't know. I mean,

0:51:21.280 --> 0:51:23.920
<v Speaker 2>it's great to see him limiting hard contact. That's great,

0:51:24.120 --> 0:51:26.560
<v Speaker 2>but also to that hasn't really been a lot of

0:51:26.600 --> 0:51:28.560
<v Speaker 2>other things to get excited about. The chase rates not

0:51:28.640 --> 0:51:31.960
<v Speaker 2>great again, the walk rate's pretty high. I don't know,

0:51:32.320 --> 0:51:35.200
<v Speaker 2>x Cira is even higher than his four thirty four

0:51:35.400 --> 0:51:38.640
<v Speaker 2>surface the ra. So this guy that's always been like

0:51:38.680 --> 0:51:41.400
<v Speaker 2>that one three to one four whip rate range, So

0:51:42.120 --> 0:51:43.759
<v Speaker 2>I don't know. He kind of feels like a poor

0:51:43.840 --> 0:51:45.960
<v Speaker 2>man's mackenzie Gore. And I'm not really a mackenzie Gore

0:51:46.000 --> 0:51:49.399
<v Speaker 2>a guy either, So I'm not really super intrigued here.

0:51:49.440 --> 0:51:52.120
<v Speaker 3>Maybe maybe with some tweaks I could see.

0:51:51.960 --> 0:51:54.960
<v Speaker 2>Something be unlocked, but until then I'll let them be

0:51:55.000 --> 0:51:56.279
<v Speaker 2>on somebody else's team.

0:51:56.600 --> 0:51:59.120
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, when rich mackenzie Gore is not worth being on

0:51:59.160 --> 0:52:00.840
<v Speaker 1>your team is most of the time I'm poor man's

0:52:00.960 --> 0:52:04.920
<v Speaker 1>McKenzie as well. I have to agree. There. One more

0:52:04.920 --> 0:52:06.239
<v Speaker 1>guy I want to talk about in this area in

0:52:06.280 --> 0:52:10.840
<v Speaker 1>particular is Nick Martinez, who's having one of these shocking

0:52:10.960 --> 0:52:13.359
<v Speaker 1>type of years. Edwardao Rodriguez is also kind of doing

0:52:13.400 --> 0:52:17.160
<v Speaker 1>it in the National League, but the insane like era

0:52:17.360 --> 0:52:20.040
<v Speaker 1>level surface stats that are not supported at all below

0:52:20.080 --> 0:52:22.520
<v Speaker 1>the surface a two fifty nine ERA and a one

0:52:22.560 --> 0:52:25.600
<v Speaker 1>to twelve whip with a nine percent strikeout to walk rate.

0:52:25.760 --> 0:52:28.919
<v Speaker 1>He's only striking out thirteen percent of batters. And yet

0:52:28.960 --> 0:52:31.080
<v Speaker 1>we look here at the leader board of hard hit

0:52:31.160 --> 0:52:33.120
<v Speaker 1>rates and he's only allowed one hundred and twenty hard

0:52:33.160 --> 0:52:36.080
<v Speaker 1>hits the entirety of the season thirty two percent. It

0:52:36.160 --> 0:52:38.759
<v Speaker 1>is the seventh best or sixth best mark among all

0:52:38.840 --> 0:52:42.040
<v Speaker 1>qualified starters. I feel like that's probably a big reason

0:52:42.080 --> 0:52:44.280
<v Speaker 1>why he's having success. But he usually has a pretty

0:52:44.320 --> 0:52:46.719
<v Speaker 1>low heart hit rate, and while he's usually pretty good,

0:52:46.880 --> 0:52:48.640
<v Speaker 1>it's not usually this good. Eric, do you think that

0:52:48.680 --> 0:52:51.800
<v Speaker 1>this is just pure dumb luck or is there something

0:52:51.840 --> 0:52:54.600
<v Speaker 1>tangible that Nick Martinez is doing this year that you

0:52:54.600 --> 0:52:56.480
<v Speaker 1>think could lead to more sustained success.

0:52:57.760 --> 0:52:59.799
<v Speaker 2>I think there's a lot of luck that's gone in

0:53:00.280 --> 0:53:03.880
<v Speaker 2>Nick Martinez a season. It's funny too, like every year,

0:53:03.960 --> 0:53:06.000
<v Speaker 2>I'm sure, I'm sure you do this too, Joe and

0:53:06.120 --> 0:53:08.640
<v Speaker 2>Plinty of other people like us, where it's like you'll

0:53:08.640 --> 0:53:10.560
<v Speaker 2>see a guy it'll be like mid season you'll be like,

0:53:11.280 --> 0:53:14.319
<v Speaker 2>holy crap, like this guy is doing that, and like

0:53:14.520 --> 0:53:16.520
<v Speaker 2>Nick Martinez was one of like I had that realization.

0:53:16.560 --> 0:53:19.160
<v Speaker 2>I think it was like mid to late June, like

0:53:19.200 --> 0:53:20.840
<v Speaker 2>you know, maybe a little bout a month ago or so,

0:53:20.920 --> 0:53:23.040
<v Speaker 2>where I'm like, man, he's like one of like the

0:53:23.080 --> 0:53:25.880
<v Speaker 2>lowest era guys in the American League. He's nine and

0:53:26.000 --> 0:53:29.040
<v Speaker 2>two right now, and it's like, man, this guy is

0:53:29.080 --> 0:53:32.080
<v Speaker 2>having a really phenomenal season. I mean Tampa Bay, I

0:53:32.120 --> 0:53:34.760
<v Speaker 2>mean they seem to always work there kind of voodoo magic.

0:53:34.840 --> 0:53:38.600
<v Speaker 2>But I don't see this make maintaining. He's definitely a

0:53:38.680 --> 0:53:41.160
<v Speaker 2>guy like you know, sell if you're in leagues to

0:53:41.200 --> 0:53:44.520
<v Speaker 2>have trades. Obviously the NFBC doesn't, but Yahoo leagues or

0:53:44.760 --> 0:53:47.200
<v Speaker 2>ESPN leagues or like a Dynasty league on fan tracks

0:53:47.280 --> 0:53:51.520
<v Speaker 2>or whatever. This is like a prime sell high candidate

0:53:51.600 --> 0:53:54.520
<v Speaker 2>because you know, like all the all the era indicators

0:53:54.560 --> 0:53:58.319
<v Speaker 2>are like two runs highers xc ra's four sixty two,

0:53:59.080 --> 0:54:03.720
<v Speaker 2>and it's just yeah, it's just everything does not signal

0:54:03.800 --> 0:54:05.600
<v Speaker 2>that this is legit. I mean, it's it's gone on

0:54:05.640 --> 0:54:07.279
<v Speaker 2>a lot longer than I thought, and I thought this

0:54:07.360 --> 0:54:10.680
<v Speaker 2>era would kind of go up from where it was

0:54:10.760 --> 0:54:13.719
<v Speaker 2>earlier in the season. But the thing with think Martinez,

0:54:13.760 --> 0:54:15.879
<v Speaker 2>he doesn't miss any bats, but he also doesn't only

0:54:15.920 --> 0:54:18.799
<v Speaker 2>walk anybody either. Two of the last three years he's

0:54:18.800 --> 0:54:21.799
<v Speaker 2>had to walk right under five percent. This year it's

0:54:21.840 --> 0:54:26.279
<v Speaker 2>four point four percent. So yeah, he's a fine guy

0:54:26.360 --> 0:54:27.839
<v Speaker 2>for the Rays to have and a guy that can

0:54:27.880 --> 0:54:30.799
<v Speaker 2>eat innings. But for fantasy, I mean, as soon as

0:54:30.800 --> 0:54:33.719
<v Speaker 2>that Eira starts going up, even if it's just up

0:54:33.840 --> 0:54:37.760
<v Speaker 2>a run to the mid threes, it's having that really

0:54:37.840 --> 0:54:40.320
<v Speaker 2>and not even below average. It's like a really poor,

0:54:40.960 --> 0:54:43.800
<v Speaker 2>you know, thirteen point seven percent straight up rate. He

0:54:44.120 --> 0:54:47.000
<v Speaker 2>becomes almost a guy that's not even worth using. So yeah,

0:54:47.040 --> 0:54:48.480
<v Speaker 2>I can't see this continue.

0:54:49.200 --> 0:54:51.239
<v Speaker 1>It's a full fade for me next year, whatever the

0:54:51.280 --> 0:54:54.680
<v Speaker 1>price ends up being. I mean, the market's pretty sharp

0:54:54.719 --> 0:54:56.239
<v Speaker 1>these days. So maybe he's not going to be a

0:54:56.280 --> 0:54:58.120
<v Speaker 1>top hunterd pick or anything. I don't expect that. But

0:54:58.200 --> 0:55:00.799
<v Speaker 1>wherever he goes, I think it'll probably be too high.

0:55:00.800 --> 0:55:03.239
<v Speaker 1>This just it feels like dumb luck. It really does.

0:55:03.280 --> 0:55:07.040
<v Speaker 1>The eighty five percent strand rate fairly low. Babbi. It's

0:55:07.120 --> 0:55:10.279
<v Speaker 1>not supported in reality. I mean it has been so far,

0:55:10.520 --> 0:55:12.760
<v Speaker 1>so who am I to say it's not supporting reality?

0:55:12.760 --> 0:55:14.800
<v Speaker 1>But I don't think this is something we can expect

0:55:14.840 --> 0:55:17.680
<v Speaker 1>to maintain throughout the rest of the season. One more

0:55:17.760 --> 0:55:20.040
<v Speaker 1>leaderboard I want to go through with you, and it's expected, wOBA,

0:55:20.040 --> 0:55:21.160
<v Speaker 1>And I think a lot of people will say, what

0:55:21.160 --> 0:55:23.480
<v Speaker 1>the hell's expected, wOBA? Why we have a new stat here?

0:55:23.880 --> 0:55:25.640
<v Speaker 1>It's becoming more prevalent, and I think it's something that

0:55:25.640 --> 0:55:28.440
<v Speaker 1>we really should pay attention to. It essentially measures a

0:55:28.480 --> 0:55:30.880
<v Speaker 1>hitter's skill or a pictuer skill and the skills he

0:55:30.920 --> 0:55:35.360
<v Speaker 1>allows against based on exit velocity. Launch angle, strikeout to

0:55:35.400 --> 0:55:38.520
<v Speaker 1>walk rate, sprint speed. It goes beyond the box score,

0:55:38.520 --> 0:55:40.279
<v Speaker 1>and it's become a stat that I look at quite

0:55:40.280 --> 0:55:42.360
<v Speaker 1>a bit. You look at the top of the leaderboard.

0:55:42.400 --> 0:55:43.839
<v Speaker 1>It makes a lot of sense too. I like looking

0:55:43.880 --> 0:55:45.880
<v Speaker 1>at a leaderboard and it's like, Yeah, these guys should

0:55:45.880 --> 0:55:48.360
<v Speaker 1>be at the top of the best pitcher's leaderboard. Essentially,

0:55:48.400 --> 0:55:51.920
<v Speaker 1>it's miss Rowski, Zach Wheeler, Shoheo, Tani, Paul Skins, and

0:55:51.960 --> 0:55:54.919
<v Speaker 1>then Azus Walzardo, which is where we'll stop here because

0:55:54.960 --> 0:55:58.319
<v Speaker 1>Azu Wzzardo has turned things around over the last month

0:55:58.440 --> 0:56:00.640
<v Speaker 1>or so and he's been really, really good. We haven't

0:56:00.640 --> 0:56:03.800
<v Speaker 1>seen one of those patented Hadesu Sozardo blow ups since

0:56:04.000 --> 0:56:07.040
<v Speaker 1>early June, but it always feels like it's coming. There

0:56:07.120 --> 0:56:11.520
<v Speaker 1>is three four five starts this year where he's allowed

0:56:11.520 --> 0:56:14.080
<v Speaker 1>at least five earned runs, and what it feels like,

0:56:14.360 --> 0:56:16.239
<v Speaker 1>even going back to last year, is that Lozardo will

0:56:16.239 --> 0:56:18.520
<v Speaker 1>give you five clean ones and then they'll give up

0:56:18.600 --> 0:56:20.839
<v Speaker 1>seven earned runs and just destroy all the good will

0:56:20.880 --> 0:56:24.240
<v Speaker 1>he's earned. But this talent level, I think it doesn't

0:56:24.239 --> 0:56:26.480
<v Speaker 1>indicate that he should have these type of blow ups.

0:56:26.680 --> 0:56:28.560
<v Speaker 1>He's got really good strike out to walk greats, really

0:56:28.600 --> 0:56:31.799
<v Speaker 1>good expected stats, great stuff. And yet we're looking at

0:56:31.840 --> 0:56:33.520
<v Speaker 1>a guy who's had a sub one whip in his

0:56:33.560 --> 0:56:37.560
<v Speaker 1>career exactly one time. So is as Wizardo a little

0:56:37.560 --> 0:56:40.239
<v Speaker 1>bit overrated? Is he just unlucky with these blow ups?

0:56:40.680 --> 0:56:43.439
<v Speaker 1>I truly don't really know what to make of him anymore, Eric,

0:56:43.480 --> 0:56:45.239
<v Speaker 1>But right now he's been great. I just I just

0:56:45.280 --> 0:56:47.879
<v Speaker 1>don't know how long that could last without seven earn

0:56:47.960 --> 0:56:49.880
<v Speaker 1>runs hitting, hitting my fantasy teams.

0:56:50.920 --> 0:56:53.520
<v Speaker 2>Man, I feel like he's like the only guy in

0:56:53.560 --> 0:56:57.200
<v Speaker 2>baseball that's both underrated and overrated, if that makes any sense,

0:56:57.239 --> 0:57:02.879
<v Speaker 2>Because Lozardo, I mean, I can never figure this guy out.

0:57:03.000 --> 0:57:06.080
<v Speaker 2>You look at you go to Savant. Outside of you know,

0:57:06.280 --> 0:57:07.640
<v Speaker 2>being one of the worst in the league in terms

0:57:07.680 --> 0:57:10.560
<v Speaker 2>of extension, there's a lot of red on there in

0:57:10.680 --> 0:57:14.520
<v Speaker 2>terms of you know, missing bats, she's getting chase strikeouts,

0:57:14.600 --> 0:57:17.240
<v Speaker 2>quality of contact allowed, ground balls. Like this is a

0:57:17.280 --> 0:57:19.520
<v Speaker 2>guy where you if you just looked at the Savant sliders,

0:57:19.560 --> 0:57:21.520
<v Speaker 2>you'd be like, all right, this guy is a cy

0:57:21.600 --> 0:57:24.000
<v Speaker 2>young candidate. He's one of the best pitchers in baseball,

0:57:24.040 --> 0:57:26.680
<v Speaker 2>and at times he has looked that way. And then

0:57:26.840 --> 0:57:29.120
<v Speaker 2>you mentioned he just has like this either one start

0:57:29.200 --> 0:57:31.200
<v Speaker 2>or a couple of start stretchs that just wipes out

0:57:31.680 --> 0:57:33.880
<v Speaker 2>all the good. And I'm sure you probably just chinks

0:57:33.880 --> 0:57:35.080
<v Speaker 2>to him saying that he hasn't a U bloupe in

0:57:35.080 --> 0:57:38.200
<v Speaker 2>a while, and he's like eight eight earned and two

0:57:38.200 --> 0:57:41.080
<v Speaker 2>and a third is next time out. But he's a

0:57:41.120 --> 0:57:44.040
<v Speaker 2>guy where I feel like, I mean, even I Likelizardo.

0:57:44.080 --> 0:57:46.600
<v Speaker 2>I've always had de dating back to his prospect days

0:57:46.640 --> 0:57:50.040
<v Speaker 2>with the Athletics handful of years back. I've always been

0:57:50.120 --> 0:57:53.360
<v Speaker 2>super intrigued by Lizardo, but I kind of stayed away

0:57:53.400 --> 0:57:56.560
<v Speaker 2>earlier in his career because just the durability kind of

0:57:56.600 --> 0:57:58.920
<v Speaker 2>scared me off. But now since he's kind of been

0:57:59.120 --> 0:58:00.600
<v Speaker 2>you know, kind of putting that hid them, he's been

0:58:00.600 --> 0:58:02.280
<v Speaker 2>pretty healthy for the last.

0:58:02.120 --> 0:58:02.960
<v Speaker 3>Couple of years.

0:58:03.320 --> 0:58:06.400
<v Speaker 2>It's just he's super inconsistent, like you mentioned, And I

0:58:06.400 --> 0:58:10.240
<v Speaker 2>feel like there's always at least one, usually multiple people

0:58:10.280 --> 0:58:12.800
<v Speaker 2>in every league. I'm in that just like Wizardo. More so,

0:58:13.320 --> 0:58:14.840
<v Speaker 2>I couldn't even tell you the last time I had

0:58:14.840 --> 0:58:17.600
<v Speaker 2>a share of Hazel Cizarro. I'd be intrigued if he

0:58:17.640 --> 0:58:20.360
<v Speaker 2>fell into a ranger. You know, I'm more comfortable in

0:58:20.400 --> 0:58:23.080
<v Speaker 2>taking him, but you know, you look at the profile,

0:58:23.320 --> 0:58:26.080
<v Speaker 2>it's really really sexy for lack of a better term,

0:58:26.120 --> 0:58:29.400
<v Speaker 2>and you know, this year, it's just red across the board. Hopefully,

0:58:29.720 --> 0:58:32.160
<v Speaker 2>you know, finally, and he's still twenty eight. I was like,

0:58:32.200 --> 0:58:33.919
<v Speaker 2>he should be like in his early thirties at this point.

0:58:33.960 --> 0:58:36.360
<v Speaker 2>But so hopefully this is like, you know, maybe a

0:58:36.360 --> 0:58:39.320
<v Speaker 2>little bit of a late twenties like finally putting it

0:58:39.360 --> 0:58:42.080
<v Speaker 2>all together type of thing that we've seen, you know,

0:58:42.120 --> 0:58:44.760
<v Speaker 2>other guys have in the past. I'm hoping because if

0:58:44.800 --> 0:58:47.720
<v Speaker 2>you can just get a consistent Lozardo for a full

0:58:47.800 --> 0:58:51.400
<v Speaker 2>year without all the blow ups, I think you could

0:58:51.800 --> 0:58:54.720
<v Speaker 2>look at you know, this guy has fantasy ace potential,

0:58:54.880 --> 0:58:58.000
<v Speaker 2>so you know, maybe this is him finally realizing it,

0:58:58.080 --> 0:59:00.280
<v Speaker 2>and you know, if he finished the season strong and

0:59:00.560 --> 0:59:03.320
<v Speaker 2>you know, kind of maintains that low three era bunch

0:59:03.360 --> 0:59:05.920
<v Speaker 2>of strikeouts, maybe gets that whipped a little bit lower,

0:59:06.320 --> 0:59:08.640
<v Speaker 2>like to the you know, one fifteen to one twenty range.

0:59:09.160 --> 0:59:10.920
<v Speaker 2>Probably a guy that maybe he isn't drafted as an

0:59:10.920 --> 0:59:12.560
<v Speaker 2>ACE next year, but I bet you he'd be an

0:59:12.560 --> 0:59:15.600
<v Speaker 2>SB two territory for sure, and probably high end SB

0:59:15.680 --> 0:59:16.520
<v Speaker 2>two territories.

0:59:16.560 --> 0:59:17.520
<v Speaker 3>So we'll see.

0:59:17.520 --> 0:59:20.560
<v Speaker 2>But I'm sorry, I feel a little bit better about Lozardo,

0:59:20.640 --> 0:59:22.840
<v Speaker 2>but I want to see him finish the year strong

0:59:22.880 --> 0:59:24.439
<v Speaker 2>and then maybe i'll invest next year.

0:59:25.200 --> 0:59:27.000
<v Speaker 1>It's kind of where I'm at too. We'll see if

0:59:27.040 --> 0:59:29.360
<v Speaker 1>he ends up with the four point two ERA and

0:59:30.240 --> 0:59:33.680
<v Speaker 1>twenty five whip, then we'll see maybe that'll keep the

0:59:33.680 --> 0:59:36.680
<v Speaker 1>price down. But he's he's a very, very polarizing player.

0:59:36.720 --> 0:59:38.960
<v Speaker 1>I think he is probably the most underrated and overrated

0:59:38.960 --> 0:59:42.320
<v Speaker 1>player simultaneously in the BIGS. Peyton Totley is the next

0:59:42.320 --> 0:59:45.280
<v Speaker 1>thing I want to talk about here. I have been

0:59:45.320 --> 0:59:47.720
<v Speaker 1>so impressed and I'm also so shocked that he didn't

0:59:47.720 --> 0:59:49.080
<v Speaker 1>make the team at a camp and start the year

0:59:49.120 --> 0:59:52.160
<v Speaker 1>in the rotation. But three thirty one ERA over eighty

0:59:52.240 --> 0:59:55.000
<v Speaker 1>nine innings, a one to ten whip, twenty six percent

0:59:55.000 --> 0:59:57.400
<v Speaker 1>strikeout right, and if you go to the offerings, this

0:59:57.600 --> 1:00:00.479
<v Speaker 1>four seemer has a sixteen percent swing and miss Hutter

1:00:00.600 --> 1:00:03.000
<v Speaker 1>has a seventeen percent curveball twenty two percent.

1:00:03.600 --> 1:00:04.400
<v Speaker 3>It's a deep arsenal.

1:00:04.440 --> 1:00:06.680
<v Speaker 1>If you look at stuff ratings, all of his pitches

1:00:06.680 --> 1:00:09.520
<v Speaker 1>great out at least average. It's one fourteen stuff plus

1:00:09.960 --> 1:00:14.160
<v Speaker 1>one ten pitching plus. I think Peyton Toley is maybe

1:00:14.160 --> 1:00:16.520
<v Speaker 1>the next superstar. Lefty is that overstating it a little

1:00:16.520 --> 1:00:19.000
<v Speaker 1>bit here. If you look at the XOBO leaderboard, he

1:00:19.280 --> 1:00:22.760
<v Speaker 1>is top ten in baseball so far and he's actually eighth,

1:00:22.800 --> 1:00:25.760
<v Speaker 1>sitting between Dylan Cees and Cam Schlitler right now. Pretty

1:00:25.800 --> 1:00:27.840
<v Speaker 1>good company to have. So is he should we be

1:00:27.840 --> 1:00:30.880
<v Speaker 1>talking about him potentially in those like Cy Young conversations

1:00:30.880 --> 1:00:32.200
<v Speaker 1>for this year if he finishes right.

1:00:33.320 --> 1:00:35.200
<v Speaker 2>I don't know if he'll get enough volume to finish

1:00:35.280 --> 1:00:38.400
<v Speaker 2>those conversations, but it is pretty fun that he's right

1:00:38.440 --> 1:00:40.800
<v Speaker 2>in the between two guys that are kind of leading

1:00:40.840 --> 1:00:43.200
<v Speaker 2>the way in terms of the the American League SI

1:00:43.240 --> 1:00:45.920
<v Speaker 2>Young picture at this point in time with season with Splitler,

1:00:46.000 --> 1:00:49.280
<v Speaker 2>so yeah, with with Peyton Totley, obviously with me being

1:00:49.280 --> 1:00:51.200
<v Speaker 2>a Red Sox fan, he's a guy who's you know,

1:00:51.320 --> 1:00:53.480
<v Speaker 2>career through the minors. I followed more closely and I

1:00:53.520 --> 1:00:55.360
<v Speaker 2>got to see him a little bit up here in

1:00:55.760 --> 1:00:59.480
<v Speaker 2>Double A. You know, was that last year year before,

1:00:59.800 --> 1:01:02.520
<v Speaker 2>and he's a guy that was just really really exciting

1:01:02.520 --> 1:01:04.840
<v Speaker 2>from the get go, guy that I was really pumped

1:01:04.840 --> 1:01:06.600
<v Speaker 2>to see the Red Sox get in the draft, and

1:01:06.800 --> 1:01:10.560
<v Speaker 2>he's just continued to even exceed all the lofty expectations

1:01:10.600 --> 1:01:12.160
<v Speaker 2>that were put upon him when he was drafted and

1:01:12.480 --> 1:01:13.960
<v Speaker 2>then when he became one of the best, you know,

1:01:14.000 --> 1:01:16.400
<v Speaker 2>prospects in the game on the pitching side. So I

1:01:16.400 --> 1:01:18.479
<v Speaker 2>think there's a lot to like here. I mean, he's

1:01:18.640 --> 1:01:23.160
<v Speaker 2>very fastball heavy, you know, four seams, sinker cutter, that's

1:01:23.200 --> 1:01:27.080
<v Speaker 2>about eighty eight, eighty nine percent whatever it is of

1:01:27.120 --> 1:01:29.880
<v Speaker 2>his arsenal that he'll mix in a curve and a changeup.

1:01:29.920 --> 1:01:32.080
<v Speaker 2>But you know, the thing is that he mentioned this

1:01:32.120 --> 1:01:35.160
<v Speaker 2>past offseason that he wanted to be a more well

1:01:35.280 --> 1:01:38.480
<v Speaker 2>rounded guy with his arsenal, and he's definitely been more

1:01:38.720 --> 1:01:40.800
<v Speaker 2>well rounded this year. At times, he'll get kind of

1:01:40.800 --> 1:01:43.720
<v Speaker 2>get back into that four seam heavy approach, but hey,

1:01:43.760 --> 1:01:46.200
<v Speaker 2>it's a really good four seamer, as you mentioned, so

1:01:46.720 --> 1:01:49.040
<v Speaker 2>it's not a bad pitch to go too often. But

1:01:49.640 --> 1:01:52.200
<v Speaker 2>that curve ball getting mixed in is really exciting because

1:01:52.240 --> 1:01:54.040
<v Speaker 2>that that's a forty six percent.

1:01:53.720 --> 1:01:55.560
<v Speaker 3>Whip rate on the curveball.

1:01:55.880 --> 1:01:58.240
<v Speaker 2>A guy that can miss bats, he can you know,

1:01:58.240 --> 1:02:01.920
<v Speaker 2>he can limit the hard contact. He you know, keeps

1:02:01.920 --> 1:02:03.919
<v Speaker 2>the walk rate and check only a seven percent walk

1:02:04.000 --> 1:02:07.760
<v Speaker 2>rate too, and all the era indicators and everything like

1:02:07.800 --> 1:02:10.120
<v Speaker 2>that kind of backs up what he's showing on the

1:02:10.160 --> 1:02:13.560
<v Speaker 2>surface and just like you know, for me again watching

1:02:13.800 --> 1:02:16.320
<v Speaker 2>basically everyone of his starts, being a fan of the team.

1:02:16.080 --> 1:02:19.280
<v Speaker 3>He pitches for. He's legit, like he passes the eye

1:02:19.320 --> 1:02:19.760
<v Speaker 3>test to.

1:02:19.920 --> 1:02:23.600
<v Speaker 2>Where he has that that bulldog demeanor that you just

1:02:23.720 --> 1:02:26.720
<v Speaker 2>love to see. Like he's out there, he knows he's good,

1:02:27.320 --> 1:02:29.760
<v Speaker 2>and he knows how to attack and then what he

1:02:29.800 --> 1:02:33.120
<v Speaker 2>wants to do in any given start. So yeah, I

1:02:33.120 --> 1:02:35.960
<v Speaker 2>think this's the the just the beginning of a really

1:02:36.000 --> 1:02:39.680
<v Speaker 2>really good career for Peyton Totley. And yeah, if he

1:02:39.680 --> 1:02:42.480
<v Speaker 2>finishes the season kind of similarly with how he's been

1:02:42.560 --> 1:02:44.640
<v Speaker 2>the last few months after he got caught up in

1:02:44.800 --> 1:02:47.160
<v Speaker 2>late April, you know, I mean, maybe he's getting up

1:02:47.240 --> 1:02:49.520
<v Speaker 2>near one hundred and thirty hundred and forty innings, a

1:02:49.560 --> 1:02:53.160
<v Speaker 2>low three era, you know, one ten whip, above average

1:02:53.800 --> 1:02:56.040
<v Speaker 2>k rate, and a good walk rate. It's probably a

1:02:56.080 --> 1:02:58.840
<v Speaker 2>guy that pushes top one hundred ADP next year, maybe

1:02:58.840 --> 1:03:02.200
<v Speaker 2>even cracks that seventy five to ninety range where he's

1:03:02.240 --> 1:03:02.880
<v Speaker 2>like in round.

1:03:02.720 --> 1:03:03.800
<v Speaker 3>Six or seven something like that.

1:03:03.960 --> 1:03:06.360
<v Speaker 2>So yeah, I think that the price cycle will be high,

1:03:06.400 --> 1:03:08.040
<v Speaker 2>but I'll be investing if I can get him next

1:03:08.120 --> 1:03:09.120
<v Speaker 2>year as.

1:03:09.000 --> 1:03:09.720
<v Speaker 3>My SP two.

1:03:09.800 --> 1:03:12.360
<v Speaker 2>If I especially if I go the sp one that is,

1:03:12.760 --> 1:03:15.800
<v Speaker 2>you know, pretty safe, pretty chalky, where I'm like, all right,

1:03:15.840 --> 1:03:19.160
<v Speaker 2>I can maybe go the younger upside guy. Hey, if

1:03:19.200 --> 1:03:20.800
<v Speaker 2>that worked a lot this year, if you were getting

1:03:20.800 --> 1:03:23.640
<v Speaker 2>like Chase Burns is your SP two or even Missier Rowski,

1:03:24.120 --> 1:03:26.800
<v Speaker 2>Nolan McLean, all these guys you know, for the most part,

1:03:27.040 --> 1:03:27.720
<v Speaker 2>were worked out.

1:03:27.800 --> 1:03:30.600
<v Speaker 3>So I'm not a post of that strategy in general.

1:03:30.640 --> 1:03:33.280
<v Speaker 2>And I think Peyton Toley will be in that range

1:03:33.760 --> 1:03:36.000
<v Speaker 2>a couple one hundred ish ADP next year and I'll

1:03:36.000 --> 1:03:36.560
<v Speaker 2>be buying in.

1:03:37.680 --> 1:03:40.000
<v Speaker 1>I can totally see it, and I agree that I've

1:03:40.000 --> 1:03:41.720
<v Speaker 1>fallen in love with the guy. And for me to

1:03:41.760 --> 1:03:43.439
<v Speaker 1>fall in love with the Red Sox player, it takes

1:03:43.520 --> 1:03:46.520
<v Speaker 1>quite a bit for any player here, but just seeing

1:03:46.560 --> 1:03:49.080
<v Speaker 1>him get interviewed and he's got such a great personality.

1:03:49.240 --> 1:03:52.520
<v Speaker 1>Oh yeah, love, I love the mustache. It's something that

1:03:52.600 --> 1:03:54.960
<v Speaker 1>should be more prevalent. And what it reminds me of

1:03:55.520 --> 1:03:59.800
<v Speaker 1>is Ron Swanson from Parks and Recreation. Ohm's character that

1:03:59.920 --> 1:04:01.680
<v Speaker 1>is so spot on.

1:04:02.160 --> 1:04:04.600
<v Speaker 2>But yeah, just like Peyton Toley, he's a guy that's

1:04:04.600 --> 1:04:07.040
<v Speaker 2>already become one of my favorite players in baseball, and

1:04:07.080 --> 1:04:09.880
<v Speaker 2>I think he's already become a huge fan favorite here

1:04:10.000 --> 1:04:13.280
<v Speaker 2>in Boston and just in New England in general, everyone

1:04:13.320 --> 1:04:14.080
<v Speaker 2>seems to love him.

1:04:14.120 --> 1:04:15.000
<v Speaker 3>The stash is great.

1:04:15.400 --> 1:04:17.880
<v Speaker 2>He's a guy that I mean, I'm not comparing him

1:04:17.920 --> 1:04:20.960
<v Speaker 2>to this guy, but his demeanor is almost kind of

1:04:20.960 --> 1:04:23.320
<v Speaker 2>reminds me of Pedro back in the day, where it's like,

1:04:23.880 --> 1:04:27.200
<v Speaker 2>in between starts, you know Pedro and totally they're They're

1:04:27.400 --> 1:04:30.640
<v Speaker 2>very laid back, they're a goofball. There's a good, high

1:04:30.720 --> 1:04:34.400
<v Speaker 2>spirit guy that's laughing, joking. But when it's their data pitch,

1:04:34.840 --> 1:04:37.880
<v Speaker 2>they lock in. They're there to do their job and

1:04:38.200 --> 1:04:40.600
<v Speaker 2>strike out and get batters out. So I love that

1:04:40.640 --> 1:04:42.840
<v Speaker 2>mentality where you give me loose, you have the four

1:04:42.880 --> 1:04:45.320
<v Speaker 2>or five days between starts, but on on game day

1:04:45.360 --> 1:04:47.520
<v Speaker 2>when it's his turn in the rotation, he locks in.

1:04:47.560 --> 1:04:49.800
<v Speaker 2>And obviously the talent is pretty damn could as well.

1:04:49.920 --> 1:04:52.280
<v Speaker 2>So yeah, everything about Peyton Toley I love. He's just

1:04:52.280 --> 1:04:53.480
<v Speaker 2>one of my favorite players already.

1:04:54.240 --> 1:04:57.760
<v Speaker 1>He's terrific and it pains me to love an ALIAS

1:04:57.800 --> 1:04:59.640
<v Speaker 1>player who's not a blue Jay, but that's what he's done,

1:04:59.640 --> 1:05:02.240
<v Speaker 1>and he's done in the span of half a year.

1:05:02.800 --> 1:05:05.320
<v Speaker 1>He's a pretty endearing guy. Eric, I've kept you way

1:05:05.320 --> 1:05:07.800
<v Speaker 1>longer than I anticipated, But I just got one more

1:05:08.160 --> 1:05:10.680
<v Speaker 1>group of players. I'll let you pick it whoever you like.

1:05:11.320 --> 1:05:13.480
<v Speaker 1>But looking at this top fifteen leader board, you know

1:05:13.880 --> 1:05:17.040
<v Speaker 1>the seasons, the schal Hitler's, the Schoobles, the Burns. Is

1:05:17.160 --> 1:05:20.240
<v Speaker 1>you m modo? No surprise is there? The names that

1:05:20.280 --> 1:05:21.560
<v Speaker 1>might be a little bit surprised. And the people are

1:05:21.640 --> 1:05:25.880
<v Speaker 1>Casey Mice, Parker Messic and Reed Deptmers. My is having

1:05:25.920 --> 1:05:28.480
<v Speaker 1>a really good season, Messik having a really good season

1:05:28.520 --> 1:05:31.040
<v Speaker 1>as well. Deptmers Eh kind of what we've come to

1:05:31.080 --> 1:05:33.360
<v Speaker 1>grow accustomed to with Reed Deptmer some good and some bad.

1:05:33.840 --> 1:05:36.120
<v Speaker 1>Are these three guys that you think by twenty twenty

1:05:36.160 --> 1:05:39.760
<v Speaker 1>seven will be breakout type of starting pitchers just based

1:05:39.800 --> 1:05:42.760
<v Speaker 1>on the fact that they are amongst the ninetieth percentile

1:05:42.880 --> 1:05:43.920
<v Speaker 1>XUOBBA leaders.

1:05:44.480 --> 1:05:44.680
<v Speaker 3>Yeah.

1:05:45.200 --> 1:05:47.120
<v Speaker 2>The name here that kind of six up the most

1:05:47.200 --> 1:05:49.200
<v Speaker 2>to me that I feel like it's still flying under

1:05:49.240 --> 1:05:52.000
<v Speaker 2>the radar even though he's a rookie with a sub

1:05:52.040 --> 1:05:55.560
<v Speaker 2>three er, And that's Parker Messek with Cleveland. I mean,

1:05:55.800 --> 1:05:58.280
<v Speaker 2>he's a guy where I mean I think the big

1:05:58.320 --> 1:06:01.320
<v Speaker 2>reason why he's undervalued he doesn't throw hard. He's in

1:06:01.360 --> 1:06:04.080
<v Speaker 2>that ninety three ninety four mile an hour range. But

1:06:04.520 --> 1:06:07.400
<v Speaker 2>he's got a deep arsenal and he limits you know,

1:06:07.520 --> 1:06:09.400
<v Speaker 2>he does a lot of things, well, he doesn't.

1:06:09.640 --> 1:06:10.720
<v Speaker 3>It's almost like, what's that.

1:06:10.920 --> 1:06:13.840
<v Speaker 2>That term like the jack of all trades but a

1:06:13.840 --> 1:06:15.200
<v Speaker 2>master of nunners whatever that is.

1:06:15.440 --> 1:06:16.520
<v Speaker 3>I might have butchered that a little bit.

1:06:16.600 --> 1:06:18.800
<v Speaker 2>But he doesn't like a lot of things well without

1:06:18.920 --> 1:06:22.440
<v Speaker 2>just truly standing out in anyone area. But you know

1:06:22.480 --> 1:06:26.160
<v Speaker 2>he limits hard contact. Well, he's inn above average k rate,

1:06:26.480 --> 1:06:28.560
<v Speaker 2>you know, a good walk rate as well, all the

1:06:28.560 --> 1:06:32.200
<v Speaker 2>eerra indicators are pretty low in like the low threes

1:06:32.760 --> 1:06:34.960
<v Speaker 2>as well. He can miss bats, he can get the

1:06:35.080 --> 1:06:37.280
<v Speaker 2>chase rate, you know, chase rates you know, above above

1:06:37.360 --> 1:06:40.040
<v Speaker 2>thirty percent. You know, limits contact in the zone fairly

1:06:40.080 --> 1:06:41.920
<v Speaker 2>well too. So yeah, I think he's a guy that

1:06:42.080 --> 1:06:45.240
<v Speaker 2>just gets undervalued. I mean everyone kind of looks at

1:06:45.320 --> 1:06:48.320
<v Speaker 2>Gavin Williams, who's a lot more appealing and fun to watch,

1:06:48.360 --> 1:06:51.400
<v Speaker 2>but Messic's really solid. So yeah, he's definitely a god.

1:06:51.440 --> 1:06:53.680
<v Speaker 2>That's you know, I'll be investiga. I feel like the

1:06:53.720 --> 1:06:56.800
<v Speaker 2>price tag will always be you know, fairly reasonable. You know,

1:06:56.800 --> 1:06:58.960
<v Speaker 2>obviously it'll be a lot higher next year than this year,

1:06:59.040 --> 1:07:00.920
<v Speaker 2>but you know, I don't think it's going to be

1:07:00.920 --> 1:07:02.480
<v Speaker 2>to the point where it's crazy. I think it will

1:07:02.520 --> 1:07:05.080
<v Speaker 2>still be pretty reasonable. And yeah, I think this being

1:07:05.080 --> 1:07:08.640
<v Speaker 2>on this leaderboard is another example, kind of with all

1:07:08.680 --> 1:07:10.920
<v Speaker 2>the other things I just said of is how solid

1:07:11.240 --> 1:07:15.200
<v Speaker 2>Parker Mesic is another success story from this Cleveland org.

1:07:15.360 --> 1:07:18.640
<v Speaker 2>I mean, add him to the long, long list of

1:07:18.640 --> 1:07:21.400
<v Speaker 2>success stories on the pitching side for this Cleveland team.

1:07:21.440 --> 1:07:23.840
<v Speaker 2>And yeah, I'm definitely going to be an investing in

1:07:23.920 --> 1:07:24.640
<v Speaker 2>him moving forward.

1:07:25.680 --> 1:07:27.840
<v Speaker 1>Something that's become a bigger part of my process is

1:07:27.880 --> 1:07:30.040
<v Speaker 1>the depth of the arsenal, and over the last couple

1:07:30.080 --> 1:07:32.720
<v Speaker 1>of years, stuff plus has kind of taken the world

1:07:32.720 --> 1:07:37.320
<v Speaker 1>by storm. We've had it publicly since twenty twenty two ish,

1:07:37.400 --> 1:07:40.400
<v Speaker 1>twenty twenty one, something like that, And I feel like

1:07:40.440 --> 1:07:42.680
<v Speaker 1>over the last four years or so, it's become very

1:07:42.720 --> 1:07:45.200
<v Speaker 1>prevalent in analysis, and it's something that I use. Don't

1:07:45.200 --> 1:07:47.800
<v Speaker 1>get me wrong, but a guy like Parker Messik throws

1:07:47.800 --> 1:07:49.800
<v Speaker 1>six pitches, not a single one of them grades out

1:07:49.800 --> 1:07:51.720
<v Speaker 1>as average, And I think a lot of people would say,

1:07:51.720 --> 1:07:54.200
<v Speaker 1>all right, he doesn't throw it terribly hard. The stuff's

1:07:54.240 --> 1:07:56.960
<v Speaker 1>not that great. We throw them away. No no interest

1:07:57.000 --> 1:07:58.920
<v Speaker 1>here long term, not that I'm saying that, but I

1:07:58.920 --> 1:08:01.680
<v Speaker 1>feel like the average might say that. But then you

1:08:01.760 --> 1:08:05.240
<v Speaker 1>look at the swinging strike rates on the individual pitches

1:08:05.720 --> 1:08:09.000
<v Speaker 1>the usage behind them, and there's four pitches that have

1:08:09.080 --> 1:08:11.640
<v Speaker 1>at least a twelve percent swinging strike rate. The sinker

1:08:11.680 --> 1:08:14.440
<v Speaker 1>and the curveball are not as high, but he locates

1:08:14.480 --> 1:08:16.600
<v Speaker 1>them well. And when you have six pitches that you

1:08:16.680 --> 1:08:19.519
<v Speaker 1>can go to with regularity, it doesn't matter to me

1:08:19.560 --> 1:08:21.880
<v Speaker 1>as much if you're huge stuff. God, you know, not

1:08:21.920 --> 1:08:24.919
<v Speaker 1>everybody can be Strider with the one thirty seven fastball

1:08:24.960 --> 1:08:26.800
<v Speaker 1>and the one thirty two slider and then that's it

1:08:26.840 --> 1:08:30.000
<v Speaker 1>and you're good. Foster Griffin, Davis Martin. There's a lot

1:08:30.000 --> 1:08:32.280
<v Speaker 1>of guys this year who've had success with the depth

1:08:32.280 --> 1:08:34.400
<v Speaker 1>of the arsenal, even if they're not the typical stuff.

1:08:34.439 --> 1:08:34.599
<v Speaker 4>God.

1:08:34.680 --> 1:08:37.360
<v Speaker 1>So something else to keep in mind. But Eric, like

1:08:37.400 --> 1:08:39.719
<v Speaker 1>I said, I kept you way longer than anticipated. Apologies

1:08:39.760 --> 1:08:41.280
<v Speaker 1>on that front, but it's just because I love talking

1:08:41.280 --> 1:08:43.520
<v Speaker 1>with you so much. I love getting in these conversations.

1:08:43.720 --> 1:08:45.599
<v Speaker 1>Thank you so much for taking the time today. Please

1:08:45.680 --> 1:08:47.760
<v Speaker 1>let everybody know where they can keep up with your work.

1:08:47.800 --> 1:08:49.679
<v Speaker 1>You're really doing great stuff in the Dynasty space.

1:08:50.200 --> 1:08:52.599
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, thanks man, always a pledge. I always enjoy talking

1:08:52.600 --> 1:08:54.840
<v Speaker 2>with you, Sally. This this hour, just this flu bay.

1:08:54.920 --> 1:08:56.960
<v Speaker 2>We could have gone another hour, I feel. But yeah,

1:08:57.000 --> 1:09:00.519
<v Speaker 2>I always appreciate talking with you and just chatting, chatting baseball,

1:09:00.800 --> 1:09:02.879
<v Speaker 2>you know. Follow me on Twitter at Eric Cross MLB.

1:09:03.400 --> 1:09:05.759
<v Speaker 2>I do a couple of articles a week over on rollabar,

1:09:05.960 --> 1:09:07.920
<v Speaker 2>and then obviously all my stuff on my Patreon. All

1:09:07.920 --> 1:09:11.200
<v Speaker 2>my rankings are on there. I do close to daily

1:09:11.280 --> 1:09:14.200
<v Speaker 2>write ups, a piece called I call cross examination, where

1:09:14.439 --> 1:09:16.759
<v Speaker 2>I'll just look at you know. Usually it's twelve thirteen

1:09:16.800 --> 1:09:19.280
<v Speaker 2>players between the majors and minors that you did well

1:09:19.560 --> 1:09:21.920
<v Speaker 2>the previous day or not so well sometimes and I

1:09:21.960 --> 1:09:24.160
<v Speaker 2>guess I just wrote up like Landing Group was one

1:09:24.160 --> 1:09:24.960
<v Speaker 2>of the guys I wrote up.

1:09:24.880 --> 1:09:26.080
<v Speaker 3>Today after I start yesterday.

1:09:26.120 --> 1:09:27.519
<v Speaker 2>So it's a fun little piece I look at where

1:09:27.520 --> 1:09:30.760
<v Speaker 2>I can just dive into some players each day. But yeah,

1:09:30.760 --> 1:09:33.000
<v Speaker 2>I appreciate you having me on and hopefully we can

1:09:33.200 --> 1:09:34.320
<v Speaker 2>have a nice end of the season here.

1:09:35.400 --> 1:09:38.400
<v Speaker 1>Absolutely, my friend. Hopefully we all win our leagues over

1:09:38.400 --> 1:09:40.200
<v Speaker 1>the next couple of months. Looking forward to seeing you

1:09:40.240 --> 1:09:41.920
<v Speaker 1>out in the desert. I assume you'll be at f

1:09:41.960 --> 1:09:44.720
<v Speaker 1>PAZ again. Oh yeah, I don't know how many years

1:09:44.720 --> 1:09:46.360
<v Speaker 1>you've been going. This will be my fifth year though,

1:09:46.400 --> 1:09:48.400
<v Speaker 1>so I'll really looking forward to it. Make sure you

1:09:48.439 --> 1:09:50.400
<v Speaker 1>guys are checking that out. If you guys have never

1:09:50.439 --> 1:09:53.240
<v Speaker 1>been out there before. It's a great weekend of baseball

1:09:53.320 --> 1:09:56.600
<v Speaker 1>and beer and panels and beer and a lot of

1:09:56.600 --> 1:09:58.479
<v Speaker 1>fun stuff. So make sure you guys are checking that

1:09:58.520 --> 1:10:01.799
<v Speaker 1>one out. But we will bet on Monday for leading

1:10:01.800 --> 1:10:03.920
<v Speaker 1>off leave It's myself in the Welsh, but I'll have

1:10:03.920 --> 1:10:05.639
<v Speaker 1>to double check. It's a bit of a rotating cast

1:10:05.640 --> 1:10:08.240
<v Speaker 1>of characters here throughout the rest of July, but that

1:10:08.400 --> 1:10:10.400
<v Speaker 1>will do it for us for today. Make sure you

1:10:10.400 --> 1:10:12.840
<v Speaker 1>guys are subscribed to the podcast, like comment to all

1:10:12.840 --> 1:10:15.439
<v Speaker 1>that great stuff for Eric Cross, I am Joel Rico.

1:10:15.520 --> 1:10:17.160
<v Speaker 1>We'll talk to you next time right here on the

1:10:17.160 --> 1:10:19.760
<v Speaker 1>Fantasy Pros Baseball Podcast. Take it easy, everybody.

1:10:19.960 --> 1:10:23.160
<v Speaker 4>Thanks for listening to the Fantasy Pros Fantasy Baseball Podcast.

1:10:23.400 --> 1:10:25.759
<v Speaker 4>If you love the show, the best freeway to support

1:10:25.840 --> 1:10:28.760
<v Speaker 4>us is by leaving a positive review on Apple Podcasts

1:10:28.800 --> 1:10:32.519
<v Speaker 4>or Spotify, Follow us on x, Instagram, and TikTok at

1:10:32.520 --> 1:10:35.479
<v Speaker 4>Fantasy Pros, and subscribe to our YouTube channel at YouTube

1:10:35.479 --> 1:10:37.799
<v Speaker 4>dot com. Slash Fantasy pros MLB