Speaker 1: Thanks to all of you for being one of those.
Speaker 1: Right down are toll free telephone number if you want
Speaker 1: to be a part of the program as eight hundred
Speaker 1: and ninety four one Sean if you want to join us.
Speaker 1: All right, there is a lot to get to today.
Speaker 1: Let's start with the President saying the Iranians don't seem
Speaker 1: to realize they have no cards other than a short
Speaker 1: term extortion of the world by using international waterways, and
Speaker 1: that is you know, they're just playing with fire, and
Speaker 1: they're so stupid, and it's obvious they haven't learned a
Speaker 1: thing from Midnight Hammer or Epic Fury or the death
Speaker 1: of you know, three tiers of leadership. And you know,
Speaker 1: while I would have preferred a negotiated settlement, as the
Speaker 1: days go on and the President's recognizing this that the
Speaker 1: odds of this, this negotiation tomorrow being successful, if they
Speaker 1: keep this attitude, then there's no way that this this
Speaker 1: ceasefire going to hold and is not going to do well.
Speaker 1: They move, you know, they move the bar. They've gone
Speaker 1: after Kuwait. They are using their proxies. They have tried
Speaker 1: it to add Lebanon to the deal. The President was
Speaker 1: willing to make the call to bb net and Yahoo
Speaker 1: and say, hey, can we just for the time being
Speaker 1: put a hold on Lebanon And that's being negotiated, but
Speaker 1: that was never part of the original deal. The president
Speaker 1: also putting up on truth. The RAN is doing a
Speaker 1: very poor job, dishonorable, some would say, of allowing oil
Speaker 1: to go through the Straight of horror moves this is
Speaker 1: not the agreement that we have. You know, He's all
Speaker 1: but saying to them, you people are stupid, and okay,
Speaker 1: we're going to get back to where we were at
Speaker 1: the beginning of this week, which is he's going to
Speaker 1: take out your bridges, your infrastructure, all legitimate military targets
Speaker 1: in spite of what the media would have and I
Speaker 1: think at the end of the day, for those that
Speaker 1: are upset that the President gave Piece a chance or
Speaker 1: is giving Piece of chance, you really can't blame the
Speaker 1: president for trying. It would be it would be my preference,
Speaker 1: It would be my choice if at all possible, if
Speaker 1: they're willing to hand over the dust, the nuclear dust,
Speaker 1: in other words, the sixty percent of rich uranium and
Speaker 1: open the straight of hor movez and and give up
Speaker 1: building these these these longer range ballistic missiles and stop
Speaker 1: moomenting terror in the region. I think that would be
Speaker 1: the best outcome possible. But you have to know what
Speaker 1: you're dealing with here, and uh, you know, so there's
Speaker 1: a lot to this that that is happening now. On
Speaker 1: the other hand, the President had expressed, had expressed earlier
Speaker 1: this week, some optimism about the possibility of a new
Speaker 1: deal that's going to take place. These talks will take
Speaker 1: place in Pakistan. The President gave you know, Steve witkof
Speaker 1: Chared Kushner and everybody I guess Kadie Vance is involved,
Speaker 1: has given them, you know, very stringent guidelines. And it's
Speaker 1: going to be our way or it's going to be
Speaker 1: the highway. They're the ones that have been the number
Speaker 1: one state sponsor of terror. They're the ones that can't
Speaker 1: be trusted. They're the ones that may be good quote negotiators,
Speaker 1: but they're not good at keeping deals.
Speaker 2: Uh.
Speaker 1: And as the President said, we have the best weapons
Speaker 1: ever made and they're ready if Iran doesn't agree to
Speaker 1: the deal. And so that's that's the point that we're at.
Speaker 1: We're at a tipping point again. They pushed it as
Speaker 1: far as I think that they're going to be allowed
Speaker 1: to push it. And if at any moment the fighting
Speaker 1: begins and the bridges get blown up and the infrastructure
Speaker 1: gets blown up, none of that will surprise me. As
Speaker 1: they have no cards, as the President has been saying,
Speaker 1: and you know, the President accused Iran of being better
Speaker 1: at handling the fake news media than they are at fighting,
Speaker 1: and the Iranian negotiators saying that US talks won't begin
Speaker 1: until Lebanon Sea is a ceasefire.
Speaker 3: You know.
Speaker 1: Again, the other problem we have is who are we
Speaker 1: really talking to. I don't think we have a really
Speaker 1: good indication of who it is that we're talking to.
Speaker 1: Now there are two there are two camps, two thoughts
Speaker 1: processes out there, and I am not at all disturbed
Speaker 1: at the President's decision to try to give this last
Speaker 1: round of negotiations a chance. You know, I know the
Speaker 1: left and the isolationists, the people that are basically the
Speaker 1: modern day appeasers, they are the Neville chamberlains in our time.
Speaker 1: And I don't think anybody's really paying attention to them anyway.
Speaker 1: And but anyway, I think those people, you know, they
Speaker 1: don't understand there's two. It's hardly worth arguing with people
Speaker 1: about a couple of things. It's not worth my time
Speaker 1: to argue with people that don't see the wisdom in
Speaker 1: preventing the Iranians from getting nuclear weapons based on their
Speaker 1: history of doing nothing but fomenting terror and pursuing weapons
Speaker 1: of mass destruction and killing innocent men, women and show
Speaker 1: tens and tens of thousands of them. Uh. And and
Speaker 1: this this ambition that they've had fueled by money given
Speaker 1: to them by the likes of Barack Obama and Joe
Speaker 1: Biden and others. What have they done with that money?
Speaker 1: Do they help the people in their country? Know that
Speaker 1: those are the people that if they don't women don't
Speaker 1: don't dress properly, get beaten or killed, or they take
Speaker 1: gays and lesbians and put them on the top of
Speaker 1: tall buildings and push them off. That that is the
Speaker 1: rigid deocracy that people have been living under. It is
Speaker 1: tyranny at the worst level in modern day. And so
Speaker 1: you know, there there are those people that say that
Speaker 1: there's never going to be a means of negotiating. Well,
Speaker 1: the only the only stipulation that might exist to that
Speaker 1: is we're not negotiating with the old regime. There has
Speaker 1: been regime change in Iran. In other words, the top
Speaker 1: tier leadership was wiped out in the opening moments of
Speaker 1: Epic Fury. The next tier leadership that was going to
Speaker 1: replace the supreme leader, they were wiped out in one shot,
Speaker 1: so they don't exist any longer. And then you've had
Speaker 1: every major leader everyone involved, from their intelligence apparatus to
Speaker 1: the Iranian Revolutionary Guard apparatus and their leaders, and the
Speaker 1: cuts force leaders and police headquarters, they've all been wiped out,
Speaker 1: you know, ministry of everything has been wiped out. So
Speaker 1: you know, for those that argue, well Oram's getting exactly
Speaker 1: what they want out of the ceasefire, I don't think
Speaker 1: they're getting anything but a little bit of time to
Speaker 1: save themselves if they are smarter than the leadership that
Speaker 1: has already been killed. Otherwise they're going to end up
Speaker 1: in hell with the rest of those leaders where they belong. Now,
Speaker 1: President Trump, I have confidence will make sure the regime
Speaker 1: short term, you know, negotiating window will not be it
Speaker 1: will not be the last strategic victory for them. It's
Speaker 1: just not going to work that way. I can't see
Speaker 1: any deal happening that doesn't include the following the straight
Speaker 1: or hor Mouze is going to be open for the
Speaker 1: free flow of oil at market prices, or is going
Speaker 1: to be more hell to pay. I can't imagine any
Speaker 1: deal scenario.
Speaker 3: Now.
Speaker 1: Some people have argued, you might be able to entomb
Speaker 1: because we know the location of the sixty percent enriched
Speaker 1: uranium as the President affectionately refers to it as dust,
Speaker 1: and they're in canisters. They're very deep underground, deep under
Speaker 1: these nuclear facilities, enrichment facilities that we destroyed. We do
Speaker 1: have the means of getting that. I think using the
Speaker 1: Libyan model, which when Libya gave up the nuclear ambition,
Speaker 1: it was Americans that went in and took out any
Speaker 1: remaining nuclear material. I think that would be the proper
Speaker 1: model to follow. But this temporary fourteen day halt is
Speaker 1: it is simply what it is. Is nothing that the
Speaker 1: Iranians are going to be able to do in terms
Speaker 1: of rebuilding their defense forces that have been destroyed in
Speaker 1: fourteen days. It's just not going to happen. It's a
Speaker 1: matter of whether or not the Iranians are serious about negotiations.
Speaker 1: Have has this new leadership learned anything from the failed
Speaker 1: and dead old leadership. That's the only question that will
Speaker 1: be answered how it ends. It's going to end one
Speaker 1: way or the other. It's gonna and either they do
Speaker 1: it willingly, or they do it they do it the
Speaker 1: easy way. They're going to do it the hard way.
Speaker 1: Iran will will probably try to string us along, probably
Speaker 1: try to sell us a bad deal that will be
Speaker 1: shot down in fairly short order, and then we'll go
Speaker 1: in and then we'll crush Iran, and then when we
Speaker 1: do leave, they won't be able to think about rebuilding anything,
Speaker 1: if they even exist anymore in its current configuration. Meeting
Speaker 1: of the theocracy of religious fanatics. I mean, it's that simple. Now.
Speaker 1: The President has threatened bigger, better, stronger military, more lethal
Speaker 1: force if Iran doesn't comply with our deal points. And
Speaker 1: I look at this and it's fairly straightforward. It's just
Speaker 1: kind of hard to argue with people that really don't
Speaker 1: seem to be able to think beyond the current moment,
Speaker 1: or those people that purposely distort the Trump doctrine. The
Speaker 1: Trump doctrine has never been isolationism. I don't know where
Speaker 1: this interpretation has come from among some because if you
Speaker 1: look at President Trump's past actions and then ask yourself
Speaker 1: very simple questions you can only come to one conclusion.
Speaker 1: The Trump doctrine is not isolationism. You know, the President
Speaker 1: wiped out the Isis Caliphate. Now ask yourself, is the
Speaker 1: world a safer better place because of that? I think
Speaker 1: the answer is obviously yes. When the President took out
Speaker 1: solo money on that tarmac, was that the right to decision?
Speaker 1: He was the worst terrorist in the world, who'd killed
Speaker 1: many Americans and many others? Was that a good decision?
Speaker 1: Is the world safer without the likes of General Solomoni?
Speaker 1: The answer to me is obviously yes. The same with Bagdaddy.
Speaker 1: Is the world better safer because he's gone? I believe
Speaker 1: the answers yes, Is the world better now? In his
Speaker 1: second term? When he took out their nuclear enrichment facilities
Speaker 1: with fourteen bunker buster bombs? I think the answers obviously yes.
Speaker 1: I think the President made the right decision. Is Is
Speaker 1: there some cleanup, some aftermath, some finish work to be done?
Speaker 1: I think yeah, but that would be expected. And that's
Speaker 1: you know, the President so far has been ahead of
Speaker 1: schedule in terms of our military objectives, and I think
Speaker 1: that's something we should applaud. Now, we still have a
Speaker 1: lot of other issues. We've got to deal with that.
Speaker 1: On the other side of this, I believe that we're
Speaker 1: gonna have to deal with the issue of NATO. We
Speaker 1: have disgraced UK Prime Minister their keres Neville Chamberlain Starmer
Speaker 1: blaming you know, Donald Trump and Vladimir Putin for a
Speaker 1: high sky high oil prices. Well, why don't they blame
Speaker 1: themselves for allowing themselves to be so dependent on this
Speaker 1: new green energy nonsense that they've invested billions and billions
Speaker 1: of dollars all throughout Europe for you know, Starmer. You know, frankly,
Speaker 1: if we're going to be blunt, who'd be speaking German
Speaker 1: today if it weren't for the USA, you know, rescuing
Speaker 1: Great Britain from the Nazis. And you got to give
Speaker 1: a tip of the hat to the likes of Winston Churchill,
Speaker 1: one of my historic heroes, I think, I mean, a
Speaker 1: man of bending moral clarity and courage and bravery. You
Speaker 1: to find all of it. And it's like the Brits
Speaker 1: have no recollection of World War Two in Nazi Germany,
Speaker 1: which is breathtaking to me. Anyway, Starmer is now blaming
Speaker 1: President Trump and Vladimir Putin for the fact that oil
Speaker 1: prices have gone up here. It will be temporary. It's
Speaker 1: not going to be permanent, you know. Never mind that
Speaker 1: Starmer and his Labor Party. You know, they've hobbled their
Speaker 1: own oil industry and infrastructure because of their clinging to
Speaker 1: radical socialism and climate alarmism. You know, if you go
Speaker 1: back to when Margaret Thatcher was Prime Minister in the eighties,
Speaker 1: Britain's North Sea oil industry was booming, but the UK's
Speaker 1: radical environmentalists convinced subsequent prime ministers to cut Britain's oil
Speaker 1: production by over seventy percent. And they can't ratchet that
Speaker 1: up anytime soon. And WHOA, what a shock The cost
Speaker 1: of their energy went through the roof. Climate alarmism has
Speaker 1: failed everywhere it's been tried. And then Starmer now is
Speaker 1: pointing fingers and talking about, you know, global conflicts, a
Speaker 1: wreaking havoc on the on the cost of oil.
Speaker 3: That's your problem.
Speaker 1: You didn't have to be so reliant and dependent on
Speaker 1: foreign sources of energy the life flood of the world's economy.
Speaker 1: Just like the moment in his first term when Donald
Speaker 1: Trump gave then Chancellor Merkel of Germany the White flag
Speaker 1: of surrender because instead of doing business with the US
Speaker 1: and getting their liquefied natural gas and oil from US,
Speaker 1: he did a multi multi billion dollar deal with Vladimir
Speaker 1: Putin in Russia. Again, NATO designed to protect in large
Speaker 1: part Europe from the threat that Russia poses the region. Anyway,
Speaker 1: you know, we have Neville Chamberlain Starmer repeatedly now criticizing Trump.
Speaker 1: And you have Spain, and you have Great Britain, and
Speaker 1: you have McCrone and France and Italy as well. All
Speaker 1: these countries they have neglected national security, national defense. They
Speaker 1: have embraced radical socialism, climate alarmism, and they have allowed
Speaker 1: unfettered illegal immigration into their countries without assimilation. And I
Speaker 1: never thought my lifetime that I'd ever hear that Great
Speaker 1: Britain has nearly one hundred Juria courts, but they do.
Speaker 1: I never thought they'd have no go zones in France,
Speaker 1: but they do in other parts of Europe and anyway,
Speaker 1: and now they risk the NATO alliance, you know, being
Speaker 1: destroyed because of their unwillingness to help US against the
Speaker 1: world's number one state sponsor a terror.
Speaker 3: That's all on them, all right.
Speaker 1: I'm really ticked off at Neville, Chamberlain's Starmer here and
Speaker 1: McCrone and Spain and even what's her name, Georgia. I'm
Speaker 1: so mad at Italy too. You know, they wouldn't even
Speaker 1: let our planes.
Speaker 3: I'm sorry, what Georgia Maloney?
Speaker 1: Maloney, Yes, Madam Maloney. That's not the Irish version anyway.
Speaker 1: So you know Starmer's attacking the president. It's just the
Speaker 1: people in Europe. You would think, you know, when's the
Speaker 1: last time mcrone ever went to the graveside at Normandy.
Speaker 1: When is the last time, you know he thought about
Speaker 1: World War Two? When is the last time? But those
Speaker 1: that are incapable are so intellectually dumb or lazy. I
Speaker 1: can't decide which it is, or maybe it's a combination
Speaker 1: or both that don't understand the nature of evil. You know,
Speaker 1: people ask me, well, well, why don't you debate this person?
Speaker 1: Because I have no desire to try to educate stupid people.
Speaker 1: You cannot convince people, some of them, these critics. Now
Speaker 1: you have a whole You have whole groups of people
Speaker 1: that want Donald Trump to fail. Obviously, the Democrats want
Speaker 1: Trump to fail. The legacy media wants Trump to fail.
Speaker 1: You have isolationists they're the modern day appeasement movement. As
Speaker 1: far as I'm concerned, I don't want forever wars. Trump
Speaker 1: is not going to get us into a forever war.
Speaker 1: That is how this is going to end. It's gonna end.
Speaker 1: They're going to do it the easy way are They're
Speaker 1: going to do it the hard ware. The Iranians have
Speaker 1: a chance. So far, they're kind of blowing it. We'll
Speaker 1: see how things go tomorrow. If they don't go well,
Speaker 1: I would say it's game on, and the President will
Speaker 1: go back to his earlier strategy, which is he's gonna
Speaker 1: obliterate everything, and then at that point they won't be
Speaker 1: a regime left and hopefully the people of Iran can
Speaker 1: take back their country and rebuild their country. You know,
Speaker 1: But to listen to the likes of Macrone and Starmer
Speaker 1: Maloney and the rest of them criticizing the President, just
Speaker 1: discuss me, especially in light of they'd all be speaking
Speaker 1: German if it wasn't for the United States. That infuriates me.
Speaker 1: Hundreds of ships now lined up outside the Strait of Hormuz.
Speaker 1: As of this morning, Iran had been renegging on its promise.
Speaker 1: The President addressed that, and he ripped Iran for failing
Speaker 1: to comply, and the President accused Tehran of violating the
Speaker 1: day's old ceasefire agreement. He said opening the strait was
Speaker 1: the US condition to suspend the forty day bombing of
Speaker 1: Iran and followed Trump's threats of world, you know, widescale destruction,
Speaker 1: and Iran's doing a very poor job. Dishonorable, some would say,
Speaker 1: as it relates to allowing oil to go through the
Speaker 1: Straight of Hormuz, that is not the agreement we have.
Speaker 1: So the Iranians will walk into these negotiations tomorrow if
Speaker 1: we get to tomorrow before the bombing begins again, and
Speaker 1: they're not going to have any cards to play at all,
Speaker 1: and the President even put that on a truth post.
Speaker 1: One senior Iranian official says major parts of the ceasefire
Speaker 1: negotiated with President Trump must be implemented before deeper negotiations
Speaker 1: begin on Saturday. The demands from the Iranian parliament speaker
Speaker 1: underscored the tenuous nature of talks. Dan the warr said
Speaker 1: two of the measures mutually agreed upon between the parties
Speaker 1: have yet to be implemented, a ceasefire in Lebanon that
Speaker 1: was never part of the original agreement. However, the President said, Okay,
Speaker 1: you want that to be a part of the agreement,
Speaker 1: let me call Prime Minister Nan Yaho and Prime Minister
Speaker 1: Nan Yah who's willing to sit down with the leaders
Speaker 1: of Lebanon so that they can have a ceasefire. So
Speaker 1: this ceasefire can continue anyway. And then he went on
Speaker 1: to say that the other matter is the release of
Speaker 1: blocked assets prior to the commencement, and we're not releasing assets,
Speaker 1: and that was part of their deal, not part of
Speaker 1: the US's deal. If they want to literally blow up
Speaker 1: this deal and with it their entire country, they're free
Speaker 1: to do so. I'd prefer not in that way, but
Speaker 1: it seems like it's headed in that direction. And it
Speaker 1: seems like they've learned nothing from Midnight Hammer, the destruction
Speaker 1: of three tiers of leadership, epic fury, the destruction of
Speaker 1: their military. Now the President will have no choice, but
Speaker 1: you can't say he didn't give them every opportunity for
Speaker 1: peace anyway. As Iran is using their proxies to attack
Speaker 1: both nations with the US. You know, Kuwait's military revealed
Speaker 1: that it was targeted by hostile drones from Iran. Oh okay,
Speaker 1: we're going to include Lebanon, but you're going to be
Speaker 1: free to fire you know, uh, missiles at Kuwait using
Speaker 1: your drones. That's not going to work, you know, it's
Speaker 1: I don't know. Well, we'll we'll, we'll find out. How's this,
Speaker 1: how this all plays out. Bahrain's crown princes urging around
Speaker 1: to reopen the streets before it's too late. Urduwan of
Speaker 1: Turkey not exactly somebody I trust, but he's even urging
Speaker 1: the Iranians to use these these talks to secure a
Speaker 1: lasting piece. And then Spain has just failed spectacularly. I
Speaker 1: can't see the US involved militarily in any type of
Speaker 1: alliance with Spain moving forward.
Speaker 3: I just can't. I don't.
Speaker 1: I don't see how it's going to be possible after
Speaker 1: their actions. You know, they wouldn't stand with the US
Speaker 1: when we needed them to stand with the US. I
Speaker 1: just can't see that. It's just not consistent with what
Speaker 1: the President's trump that I know, and I know very well.
Speaker 1: So we'll find out. We're watching and even hoping. And
Speaker 1: when I say that, I hope that we can have
Speaker 1: a negotiated settlement, I really do. I think the President
Speaker 1: wants it too, because he knows the damage he's about
Speaker 1: to inflict on them, and it's going to be massive. Linda,
Speaker 1: did you hear about Fang Fang's boyfriend blaming MAGA for
Speaker 1: the new sexual harassment claims against him. I hear there's
Speaker 1: a lot about to come out. I know my sources
Speaker 1: may be wrong, but my sources are telling me a
Speaker 1: lot is about to come out on Eric Swollwell, mister
Speaker 1: Fang Fang, and he is forcefully rejecting recently raised allegations
Speaker 1: of misconduct against him as a politically motivated smear campaign,
Speaker 1: describing them as a MAGA conspiracy theory, only weeks before
Speaker 1: the state's primary election. Meanwhile, the other Democratic candidates are saying, sorry,
Speaker 1: we don't support you. James Carville, who has lost his mind,
Speaker 1: might be getting a visit from the Secret Service. He said,
Speaker 1: he warned Trump, You're going to get killed within the
Speaker 1: next year. Okay, this is a little bit deeper than
Speaker 1: I love Trump arrangement syndrome.
Speaker 3: I have it.
Speaker 1: I want more of it. I pray to God Almighty
Speaker 1: that I'm more Trump arrangement syndrome. I feel blessed by
Speaker 1: the Holy Spirit. I hate Trump, I hate this man.
Speaker 1: I hate him with a passion.
Speaker 2: If you listen to this, you listen good, because what
Speaker 2: I'm getting ready to say is what a lot of
Speaker 2: people in this country speak for. Who I speak for
Speaker 2: and I speak for a lot of people. You hear me,
Speaker 2: you Fati, this is what we believe.
Speaker 3: You're right.
Speaker 2: I got Trump rangement syndrome. I hate the mother, and
Speaker 2: you know what, I don't want to get rid of it.
Speaker 3: I don't want to get better. I want to get worse.
Speaker 3: I want to hate ay more.
Speaker 2: I pray to God in heaven, God, reign, the righteous
Speaker 2: reign of Trump.
Speaker 1: Me.
Speaker 2: Pray for me.
Speaker 3: Lord, I'm your vessel on this earth.
Speaker 2: Pray for the Listen to this. We want more. We
Speaker 2: want to hate to shun of a so much that
Speaker 2: week can't he straight?
Speaker 1: Now he's saying he predicted Trump wouldn't be president by
Speaker 1: next year, threatened democratic retribution against the actions during a
Speaker 1: random politicon on that channel, whatever that channel is. I
Speaker 1: have no idea. And he says, Uh, you're not going
Speaker 1: to be president a year from now. You're too soft
Speaker 1: a man, you're weak, your support is draining. You're going
Speaker 1: to get killed. Why would James Carville ever say something
Speaker 1: like that when we're living in an assassination culture.
Speaker 3: Why do I think think he's I don't think he's
Speaker 3: practicing forgiveness. I don't know.
Speaker 1: I mean he sounds he's okay if you want to
Speaker 1: preview of coming attractions and you're still young, but that's
Speaker 1: what you're going to sound like if you keep up
Speaker 1: what you're doing.
Speaker 3: Listen, I'm going to live by the words of George Carlin,
Speaker 3: who told me that when I'm old, I get a pass.
Speaker 3: I'm allowed to add crazy and it's funny. I'm looking
Speaker 3: forward to that.
Speaker 1: Okay, what you just heard is going to be you
Speaker 1: if you cling to your interpretation and refuse Jesus's own
Speaker 1: words of you know, to give us as we forgive.
Speaker 1: I'm just interpreting seventy times.
Speaker 3: I'm not doing that time seven. I don't care if
Speaker 3: it's in the Bible.
Speaker 1: Well, you think you're going to get to the pearly
Speaker 1: gates and negotiate with God, drive me up a wall.
Speaker 3: I'm not negotiating.
Speaker 1: Somebody commented that I'm being unfair to you by bringing
Speaker 1: all of this up. I'm not being unfair your words.
Speaker 3: You're very unfair the interpretation. You know that word interpretation
Speaker 3: is okay, what does it mean? Go ahead, Tom, you
Speaker 3: know what. We'll get to this later in the program.
Speaker 1: By the way, Kamala Harris is telling Al Sharpton she's
Speaker 1: thinking about running again.
Speaker 3: I'm all for that.
Speaker 1: I wanted to run, James to introducing you.
Speaker 3: You and I go back over quote century and if
Speaker 3: there's anyone that has had a over communication is you
Speaker 3: and I. So are you gonna run again in twenty eight?
Speaker 3: So okay? You know I tried to be subtle, but
Speaker 3: I just figured i'd go right O.
Speaker 1: That's the subtle in rem now shop it could ever be.
Speaker 3: We love you for many things, but not being subtled.
Speaker 1: Listen, I might, I might.
Speaker 3: I'm thinking about him. I'm thinking about him.
Speaker 1: Run Kamala, run, Run, Gavin, run this guy. James tell Rico,
Speaker 1: I should have endorsed him and not Chasmin Crockett. He
Speaker 1: saw to mandate climate change instruction in Texas schools. Once
Speaker 1: Texas voters learn, you know that there's more than two,
Speaker 1: there are six genders. What was the comment he made
Speaker 1: about God? He made a comment about God too. That
Speaker 1: was absolutely bonkers. He's out of his mind. Double digit
Speaker 1: majority New York City voters say the Big Apple under
Speaker 1: Marxist Kami Mamdani is on the wrong track. That shouldn't
Speaker 1: be a shock. We'll get into this later. A sixth
Speaker 1: Somalia family member has pled guilty in that massive fraud.
Speaker 1: And by the way, this person met with Keith dellisonke
Speaker 1: Dellison's got a lot of explaining to do at the
Speaker 1: end of the day. Uh, pretty crazy stuff that's going
Speaker 1: on out there. Now, this is interesting, Linda, pay close attention.
Speaker 1: You're gonna like this. Joe Biden. Jill is reportedly settling
Speaker 1: scores against Hunter and the Obamas in a Scorched Earth memoir. Well,
Speaker 1: I might actually now get interested in this book. Apparently
Speaker 1: she's gonna, you know, bash Hunter zero experience and slam
Speaker 1: Barack and Michelle Obama for betraying her husband. Is tell
Speaker 1: all the view from the East Wing, expected to reveal
Speaker 1: all the Oval Office secrets and bear her true feelings
Speaker 1: about her husband's decision to bow out of the twenty
Speaker 1: twenty four presidential race.
Speaker 3: I think she's going to bet against Hunter in the
Speaker 3: cage fight. What do you think? I'm thinking she's going
Speaker 3: for the Trump's news today.
Speaker 1: I'd love to have her on my podcast and her
Speaker 1: Biden has quietly pulled up stakes and left the country apparently.
Speaker 1: And I've always one thing I said is you always
Speaker 1: had a good lawyer and Abby Lowell. Apparently Abby Lowell
Speaker 1: has had to file a lawsuit against them. And I
Speaker 1: know what you want me to talk about today, I'm
Speaker 1: not going there. I know what you want. Everyone else
Speaker 1: wants to do.
Speaker 3: You read.
Speaker 1: You're such a wise ass, you know, you know putting
Speaker 1: up with you this week has been hard, and it's
Speaker 1: been a fast week, maybe because I've been annoyed