WEBVTT - Bill Rhodes: China Will Squeeze Shadow Banking to Avoid Crisis

0:00:04.760 --> 0:00:08.080
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to the Bloomberg pim L Podcast. I'm pim Fox.

0:00:08.119 --> 0:00:11.200
<v Speaker 1>Along with my co host Lisa Abramowitz. Each day we

0:00:11.280 --> 0:00:14.480
<v Speaker 1>bring you the most important, noteworthy, and useful interviews for

0:00:14.520 --> 0:00:16.880
<v Speaker 1>you and your money, whether at the grocery store or

0:00:16.920 --> 0:00:20.680
<v Speaker 1>the trading floor. Find the Bloomberg pi L podcast on iTunes,

0:00:20.840 --> 0:00:30.560
<v Speaker 1>SoundCloud and at Bloomberg dot com. Well Lisa Abramowitz. French

0:00:30.680 --> 0:00:36.519
<v Speaker 1>elections now British elections. UH conflict between Russia and the

0:00:36.640 --> 0:00:42.000
<v Speaker 1>United States, countries wanting to leave the European Union. Oil

0:00:42.320 --> 0:00:46.120
<v Speaker 1>in the Middle East, Russia and Syria and the United

0:00:46.159 --> 0:00:48.959
<v Speaker 1>States and Saudi Arabia. Let me give you the other list.

0:00:49.080 --> 0:00:51.240
<v Speaker 1>Let's go all the way to Asia. Now, other things

0:00:51.280 --> 0:00:55.000
<v Speaker 1>we can worry about. UH, problems on the Korean Peninsula,

0:00:55.080 --> 0:00:58.720
<v Speaker 1>North and South Korea and China, as well as Japan

0:00:58.840 --> 0:01:02.080
<v Speaker 1>and the Asian Trade Block. I can't make sense of it.

0:01:02.320 --> 0:01:05.640
<v Speaker 1>You know why that is? Okay, that's right because we've

0:01:05.680 --> 0:01:07.559
<v Speaker 1>got Bill Rhodes. He is the president and the chief

0:01:07.600 --> 0:01:10.960
<v Speaker 1>executive of William R. Rhodes Global Advisors, and a Bill

0:01:11.040 --> 0:01:12.720
<v Speaker 1>you know, just in giving you that list, that's like

0:01:12.760 --> 0:01:15.720
<v Speaker 1>a free for all. Um, Where where do you start?

0:01:15.840 --> 0:01:19.039
<v Speaker 1>Let's start with China and and the Korea, because you

0:01:19.080 --> 0:01:22.200
<v Speaker 1>know that that area of the world very well. It's

0:01:22.240 --> 0:01:26.120
<v Speaker 1>great to be with you guys here again. And I

0:01:26.160 --> 0:01:29.280
<v Speaker 1>think as far as China goes, the most recent news

0:01:29.400 --> 0:01:31.720
<v Speaker 1>of courses that their first quarter came at a six

0:01:31.760 --> 0:01:36.119
<v Speaker 1>point nine percent people that expect GDP g d p uh,

0:01:36.520 --> 0:01:39.720
<v Speaker 1>people that expected somewhere between six point seven and six

0:01:39.760 --> 0:01:43.559
<v Speaker 1>point eight. The problem is it's driven by tremendous increases

0:01:43.600 --> 0:01:48.400
<v Speaker 1>in debt. Their debt burden as we speak is somewhere

0:01:48.440 --> 0:01:51.600
<v Speaker 1>between two d and fifty and two percent of g

0:01:51.720 --> 0:01:56.400
<v Speaker 1>d p UH. The difference with those numbers is basically,

0:01:56.520 --> 0:01:59.680
<v Speaker 1>if you count the inner bank exposures of the banks,

0:01:59.680 --> 0:02:02.040
<v Speaker 1>it's too weighty, if you know, and it's to fifty.

0:02:02.200 --> 0:02:04.480
<v Speaker 1>But that's like double it was a few years ago.

0:02:04.840 --> 0:02:08.280
<v Speaker 1>And it continues to grow because the government is pushing

0:02:08.400 --> 0:02:12.040
<v Speaker 1>as much uh, you know, liquidity into the market and

0:02:12.160 --> 0:02:15.639
<v Speaker 1>allowing credit to grow significantly with the state owned banking

0:02:15.680 --> 0:02:19.200
<v Speaker 1>system because they want to make sure the economy is

0:02:19.320 --> 0:02:22.240
<v Speaker 1>red hot when they have the nineteenth Party Congress is

0:02:22.240 --> 0:02:26.320
<v Speaker 1>full because this only happens every five years, and they

0:02:26.360 --> 0:02:29.720
<v Speaker 1>want to make sure that President Shi Jin ping gets

0:02:29.760 --> 0:02:34.880
<v Speaker 1>all his favorites on the Standing Committee of the Politburo,

0:02:35.639 --> 0:02:38.280
<v Speaker 1>and Uh, this is all it counts at this point,

0:02:38.639 --> 0:02:42.600
<v Speaker 1>is to get that done, uh, which will ensure that

0:02:42.720 --> 0:02:47.120
<v Speaker 1>he's got at least another five years, and who knows,

0:02:47.720 --> 0:02:50.239
<v Speaker 1>he may decide the first one since Don Joe Pain

0:02:50.360 --> 0:02:53.760
<v Speaker 1>to extend it beyond that. Uh. And so that's all

0:02:53.840 --> 0:02:57.639
<v Speaker 1>it counts. But the problem here is shadow banking continues

0:02:57.760 --> 0:03:02.920
<v Speaker 1>to be basically regulated. It's growing very rapidly. That's helping

0:03:03.000 --> 0:03:07.240
<v Speaker 1>fund this tremendous credit boom. Uh. They haven't done much

0:03:07.280 --> 0:03:12.560
<v Speaker 1>to close the zombie companies and steal coal, shipbuilding and

0:03:12.639 --> 0:03:16.120
<v Speaker 1>other areas, which they need to do because eventually this

0:03:16.200 --> 0:03:18.400
<v Speaker 1>is going to catch up to them, probably next year.

0:03:18.720 --> 0:03:22.320
<v Speaker 1>So the real question is what happens after the Party

0:03:22.360 --> 0:03:25.800
<v Speaker 1>Congress is fall. Will they start squeezing the economy? Yeah,

0:03:25.800 --> 0:03:27.880
<v Speaker 1>you know, Bill, I want to pick up on what

0:03:27.880 --> 0:03:30.400
<v Speaker 1>you're saying that probably next year they're going to have

0:03:30.480 --> 0:03:33.600
<v Speaker 1>to start grappling with this. You are a an international

0:03:33.639 --> 0:03:36.840
<v Speaker 1>banker at City Group for five decades and you dealt

0:03:36.880 --> 0:03:41.120
<v Speaker 1>with a lot of workouts, don't Well, it's it's it's

0:03:41.160 --> 0:03:43.880
<v Speaker 1>important to have that kind of background because you helped

0:03:44.280 --> 0:03:47.520
<v Speaker 1>negotiate workouts in a host of different countries, from Argentina,

0:03:47.520 --> 0:03:50.560
<v Speaker 1>Brazils at Maco, Mexico. Uh, you know, South Korea, you

0:03:50.640 --> 0:03:52.960
<v Speaker 1>name it. What are you looking for? You just got

0:03:53.000 --> 0:03:55.480
<v Speaker 1>back from China. What are you looking for to understand

0:03:55.560 --> 0:03:59.640
<v Speaker 1>exactly where we are with respect to when China's credit

0:03:59.680 --> 0:04:02.760
<v Speaker 1>bubble will come crossing town? Well, I think they're gonna

0:04:02.800 --> 0:04:06.440
<v Speaker 1>have to start squeezing starting the end of this year.

0:04:06.920 --> 0:04:09.640
<v Speaker 1>And they have a first rate central bank, to People's

0:04:09.640 --> 0:04:12.720
<v Speaker 1>Bank of China, uh, and some of the best economists

0:04:12.720 --> 0:04:16.440
<v Speaker 1>in Asia there. The head of it, UH, Joe shah Shuan,

0:04:16.560 --> 0:04:18.720
<v Speaker 1>has been kept over three years, which is a very

0:04:18.760 --> 0:04:21.360
<v Speaker 1>smart move of Shi Jinping. He should have retired three

0:04:21.440 --> 0:04:25.679
<v Speaker 1>years ago because he is trying to keep this thing moving.

0:04:26.360 --> 0:04:30.120
<v Speaker 1>UH and UH. Also when we talk about China, the

0:04:30.160 --> 0:04:31.960
<v Speaker 1>People's Bank of China, we have to talk about the

0:04:32.120 --> 0:04:36.039
<v Speaker 1>n m B because, as you know, our president, the

0:04:36.120 --> 0:04:41.479
<v Speaker 1>Chinese currency exactly. Our president had had talked again and

0:04:41.520 --> 0:04:45.279
<v Speaker 1>again about manipulation by the Chinese of their currency and

0:04:45.320 --> 0:04:47.640
<v Speaker 1>the first thing he was going to do was take

0:04:47.680 --> 0:04:52.000
<v Speaker 1>action to declare them manipulator. And the truth is that

0:04:52.120 --> 0:04:54.640
<v Speaker 1>the Chinese, through the People's Bank of China has spent

0:04:54.720 --> 0:04:58.200
<v Speaker 1>a trillion dollars over the last year to maintain the

0:04:58.240 --> 0:05:01.479
<v Speaker 1>stability of the ren MB, so they're not pushing it down,

0:05:01.800 --> 0:05:04.840
<v Speaker 1>they're actually keeping it stable or pushing it up. Well,

0:05:04.880 --> 0:05:07.560
<v Speaker 1>I just I want to just press you on the

0:05:07.640 --> 0:05:10.919
<v Speaker 1>credit issue before we go on, because it's this is

0:05:10.920 --> 0:05:12.880
<v Speaker 1>the big question that a lot of people have, which

0:05:12.920 --> 0:05:16.320
<v Speaker 1>is if China's credit system blows up, that will disrupt

0:05:16.360 --> 0:05:19.919
<v Speaker 1>the entire financial system of the world. Are we close

0:05:19.960 --> 0:05:23.640
<v Speaker 1>to that point? Well, my own feeling is that the

0:05:23.720 --> 0:05:26.560
<v Speaker 1>Chinese will be pragmatic enough that when they get through

0:05:26.600 --> 0:05:33.359
<v Speaker 1>this nineteen Party Congress, they'll start basically uh squeezing the

0:05:33.400 --> 0:05:38.359
<v Speaker 1>banking system, start controlling the shadow banking system, UH, working

0:05:38.400 --> 0:05:43.360
<v Speaker 1>more to uh to to basically control the bubble in

0:05:43.400 --> 0:05:49.200
<v Speaker 1>real estate municipalities UH, and start moving more rapidly and

0:05:49.320 --> 0:05:52.320
<v Speaker 1>closing down some of these zombie companies. So I think

0:05:52.320 --> 0:05:54.840
<v Speaker 1>you're going to see a major surge starting at the

0:05:54.920 --> 0:05:57.680
<v Speaker 1>end of this year through next year in this area

0:05:57.720 --> 0:06:01.080
<v Speaker 1>because the Chinese no they have a problem them UH

0:06:01.120 --> 0:06:03.240
<v Speaker 1>and UH. I think they will work at it. The

0:06:03.320 --> 0:06:06.320
<v Speaker 1>question is do they start early enough and what will

0:06:06.360 --> 0:06:09.800
<v Speaker 1>be the impact if their growth rate goes from near

0:06:09.880 --> 0:06:14.440
<v Speaker 1>seven percent where it is today and drops down to five. Uh,

0:06:14.480 --> 0:06:16.080
<v Speaker 1>you know the effect in the world. As a world

0:06:16.160 --> 0:06:20.200
<v Speaker 1>second largest economy, the largest importer of commodities in the world,

0:06:20.640 --> 0:06:23.120
<v Speaker 1>so they have the largest banking system in the in

0:06:23.160 --> 0:06:25.640
<v Speaker 1>the world. Now they passed Europe. So you've got to

0:06:25.640 --> 0:06:28.280
<v Speaker 1>take a look at all of these and watch very carefully.

0:06:28.800 --> 0:06:31.839
<v Speaker 1>Once you have that party Congress what they do with

0:06:31.880 --> 0:06:36.120
<v Speaker 1>the economy. Can you do Brexit and the new the

0:06:36.160 --> 0:06:38.200
<v Speaker 1>snap election that's just been called, can you do that

0:06:38.240 --> 0:06:43.000
<v Speaker 1>in fifteen seconds. I'm not surprised that Prime Minister May

0:06:43.000 --> 0:06:45.400
<v Speaker 1>has done it because she needs the strongest hand she

0:06:45.440 --> 0:06:49.080
<v Speaker 1>can get in this negotiation, because this negotiation is going

0:06:49.120 --> 0:06:52.120
<v Speaker 1>to be tough, and uh, you know she was counting

0:06:52.160 --> 0:06:55.440
<v Speaker 1>on some good feelings from Chancellor Merkel and others. But

0:06:55.440 --> 0:06:58.320
<v Speaker 1>remember Chancellor Merkel has to go into an election. God

0:06:58.360 --> 0:07:01.239
<v Speaker 1>only knows what's going to happen in France because everyone

0:07:01.360 --> 0:07:03.840
<v Speaker 1>thought two weeks ago or three weeks ago there was

0:07:03.839 --> 0:07:05.920
<v Speaker 1>going to be a runoff in the second round between

0:07:06.000 --> 0:07:09.400
<v Speaker 1>Makron and the le Pen, But now you have the

0:07:09.480 --> 0:07:12.640
<v Speaker 1>Left surging and it's really not clear what's gonna happen

0:07:12.760 --> 0:07:16.400
<v Speaker 1>in the first round, so I think that all bets

0:07:16.400 --> 0:07:19.480
<v Speaker 1>are off. With regards to the French election, I think

0:07:19.520 --> 0:07:22.640
<v Speaker 1>with Merkele she will win, but it may be a

0:07:22.640 --> 0:07:25.480
<v Speaker 1>tougher election than people think. Exactly. Well, I will keep

0:07:25.720 --> 0:07:28.240
<v Speaker 1>will keep getting in touch with you because you have

0:07:28.280 --> 0:07:31.600
<v Speaker 1>a lot of fantastic insights. Bill Rhodes is the author

0:07:31.680 --> 0:07:34.640
<v Speaker 1>of Banker to the World, and he has been for

0:07:34.840 --> 0:07:38.920
<v Speaker 1>decades as a former banker at City Group. Bill Rhodes

0:07:38.960 --> 0:07:41.680
<v Speaker 1>is the president, chief executive officer of William R. Rhodes

0:07:41.680 --> 0:07:56.160
<v Speaker 1>Global Advisors. My grandfather used to say to me, just

0:07:56.240 --> 0:07:59.280
<v Speaker 1>because your paranoid doesn't mean they're not out to get you.

0:07:59.400 --> 0:08:03.000
<v Speaker 1>And somebody who might ascribe to that theory of the

0:08:03.040 --> 0:08:06.480
<v Speaker 1>world is Michael sal Loov. He's head of products, particularly

0:08:06.520 --> 0:08:10.640
<v Speaker 1>with mobile security focus for Checkpoints Software Technologies. He's former

0:08:10.680 --> 0:08:13.400
<v Speaker 1>CEO and co founder of Lacoon Mobile Security, which was

0:08:13.400 --> 0:08:18.560
<v Speaker 1>acquired by Checkpoints Software. The company is based in San Carlos, California,

0:08:18.600 --> 0:08:20.560
<v Speaker 1>as well as Tel Aviv. Michael sat, thank you so

0:08:20.640 --> 0:08:23.680
<v Speaker 1>much for joining us. I want to start with talking

0:08:23.800 --> 0:08:27.400
<v Speaker 1>about what companies that you work with are doing to

0:08:27.560 --> 0:08:31.600
<v Speaker 1>make sure that their mobile devices and all of those

0:08:31.680 --> 0:08:34.520
<v Speaker 1>used by the employees are secure and our company is

0:08:34.520 --> 0:08:39.120
<v Speaker 1>doing enough. Good morning, Lisa Um. So indeed, you know,

0:08:39.160 --> 0:08:43.560
<v Speaker 1>we've seen quite am impressive adoption of mobile devices in

0:08:43.600 --> 0:08:46.040
<v Speaker 1>the in the corporate environment. I think all of us

0:08:46.040 --> 0:08:51.080
<v Speaker 1>are using those the smartphones, Android ius um as our

0:08:51.160 --> 0:08:55.200
<v Speaker 1>primary sort of computing platform for for doing mobile and

0:08:55.320 --> 0:08:59.360
<v Speaker 1>most of the companies today basically they actually invested heavily

0:08:59.360 --> 0:09:02.480
<v Speaker 1>in the manage those devices, but very few of them

0:09:02.840 --> 0:09:07.319
<v Speaker 1>have adopted solutions to to secure the device itself from

0:09:07.320 --> 0:09:10.559
<v Speaker 1>from hackers. Well, tell us a little bit about some

0:09:10.640 --> 0:09:13.560
<v Speaker 1>of the things that could happen if you don't spend

0:09:13.640 --> 0:09:18.560
<v Speaker 1>time and money securing your network. Right, So, you know,

0:09:18.559 --> 0:09:24.160
<v Speaker 1>cybercriminals and they recognize the trend and they see the

0:09:24.200 --> 0:09:28.360
<v Speaker 1>mobile devices probably the weakest link in all of the

0:09:28.400 --> 0:09:33.280
<v Speaker 1>i T infrastructure, mainly because I T professionals or security professionals,

0:09:33.280 --> 0:09:36.920
<v Speaker 1>they don't have good visibility into what's going on on

0:09:36.960 --> 0:09:39.760
<v Speaker 1>those devices. And you can add to that the fact

0:09:39.800 --> 0:09:43.320
<v Speaker 1>that most of those devices are actually they have dual use, right,

0:09:43.400 --> 0:09:46.760
<v Speaker 1>they are used by the the owners both for corporate

0:09:47.520 --> 0:09:51.000
<v Speaker 1>communication but also for personal use. So you know, once

0:09:51.080 --> 0:09:53.960
<v Speaker 1>cyber criminals hack into that device, they can actually do

0:09:54.000 --> 0:09:59.000
<v Speaker 1>almost everything, starting from like is dropping on all of

0:09:59.000 --> 0:10:04.280
<v Speaker 1>your about communication passwords that you would type, you know,

0:10:04.600 --> 0:10:08.360
<v Speaker 1>get access to your calendar, contact lists, and probably some

0:10:08.400 --> 0:10:10.320
<v Speaker 1>of the scarier things is the fact that they can

0:10:10.440 --> 0:10:13.640
<v Speaker 1>use the Microsoft the microphone and the and the camera

0:10:14.520 --> 0:10:17.920
<v Speaker 1>to drop on you even you know, when when the

0:10:17.920 --> 0:10:20.959
<v Speaker 1>follows in your pocket, when the screen is closed. Wait wait, wait,

0:10:21.000 --> 0:10:23.000
<v Speaker 1>back up, back up. Okay. So we've heard a lot

0:10:23.040 --> 0:10:25.080
<v Speaker 1>about these sort of worst case scenarios, you know, the

0:10:25.160 --> 0:10:27.320
<v Speaker 1>dolls that are spying on your children and telling them

0:10:27.360 --> 0:10:29.320
<v Speaker 1>what to do with microphones and stuff like that. She

0:10:29.440 --> 0:10:32.560
<v Speaker 1>never believes me that. Well, no, no, I believe. I believe.

0:10:32.679 --> 0:10:35.240
<v Speaker 1>I'm trying to figure out how common is this. I mean,

0:10:35.600 --> 0:10:37.440
<v Speaker 1>is this just you know, a one in a you

0:10:37.480 --> 0:10:39.880
<v Speaker 1>know billion chance that somebody's going to do this, or

0:10:40.000 --> 0:10:42.760
<v Speaker 1>are there growing teams of people actively trying to hack

0:10:42.800 --> 0:10:45.520
<v Speaker 1>in activate the microphone and steal everything that you have

0:10:45.559 --> 0:10:49.200
<v Speaker 1>in your bank. So I think that the microphone scenario

0:10:49.360 --> 0:10:53.680
<v Speaker 1>is actually very targeted scenario. But the truth to be told.

0:10:54.480 --> 0:10:57.880
<v Speaker 1>First of all, in a survey that we've conducted a

0:10:57.880 --> 0:11:02.840
<v Speaker 1>few few weeks ago, together with dimensional data, they they

0:11:02.880 --> 0:11:06.839
<v Speaker 1>have dimensional research I'm sorry, they've actually the company is

0:11:06.880 --> 0:11:10.040
<v Speaker 1>actually recognized about of the company is recognized that they

0:11:10.040 --> 0:11:13.120
<v Speaker 1>already had a breach from a mobile device, and twenty

0:11:13.200 --> 0:11:16.959
<v Speaker 1>five said that they actually have no clue, right that

0:11:17.000 --> 0:11:20.920
<v Speaker 1>they don't have visibility from our own research, basically from

0:11:20.920 --> 0:11:24.840
<v Speaker 1>customers that are using our our mobile threat prevention product,

0:11:24.880 --> 0:11:27.400
<v Speaker 1>and we have more than eight hundred customers those days

0:11:27.600 --> 0:11:31.680
<v Speaker 1>that are using the product. Every every company that they

0:11:31.760 --> 0:11:34.920
<v Speaker 1>have more than five hundred employees, they had a mobile breach.

0:11:35.200 --> 0:11:39.480
<v Speaker 1>So that's definitely quite common. Is that? Is that? Okay,

0:11:39.480 --> 0:11:42.560
<v Speaker 1>we're just sinking in with that any company that has

0:11:42.600 --> 0:11:46.440
<v Speaker 1>more than five people, it's not okay, Well that the

0:11:46.480 --> 0:11:48.959
<v Speaker 1>truth is out right, Okay, so we got so this

0:11:49.080 --> 0:11:51.560
<v Speaker 1>is now you're trying to combat this. So you're trying

0:11:51.559 --> 0:11:55.360
<v Speaker 1>to offer up some solutions, right for for companies to

0:11:55.480 --> 0:11:59.719
<v Speaker 1>prevent this from becoming a total mess. Yeah that's not

0:11:59.760 --> 0:12:03.840
<v Speaker 1>true it yeah, yeah, okay, So give us some idea,

0:12:03.960 --> 0:12:06.679
<v Speaker 1>like how much would something like that cost? I mean,

0:12:06.760 --> 0:12:10.120
<v Speaker 1>is is that is that expensive? Is that on a

0:12:10.200 --> 0:12:13.600
<v Speaker 1>perform basis? How does that work? So it's actually it's

0:12:13.640 --> 0:12:18.080
<v Speaker 1>not that expensive, you know, for you know, from if

0:12:18.120 --> 0:12:21.920
<v Speaker 1>we're talking about list price. It's basically it's basically four

0:12:21.960 --> 0:12:28.640
<v Speaker 1>dollars per month per per device. Now, you know tech,

0:12:28.880 --> 0:12:32.800
<v Speaker 1>you know, an average company with with let's say, like

0:12:32.800 --> 0:12:36.160
<v Speaker 1>you know, five thousand or three thousand employees, it's not

0:12:36.240 --> 0:12:39.480
<v Speaker 1>that expensive. And also of course you know those things,

0:12:40.600 --> 0:12:43.000
<v Speaker 1>those type of software, they have discounts, you know, based

0:12:43.000 --> 0:12:45.640
<v Speaker 1>on volumes. Yeah, Michael, how do you have a sense

0:12:45.720 --> 0:12:50.000
<v Speaker 1>of where a lot of these hackers come from? Um,

0:12:50.040 --> 0:12:52.120
<v Speaker 1>you know, it's it's usually sort of like you know,

0:12:52.200 --> 0:12:57.640
<v Speaker 1>the the usual suspects. So a lot of those groups

0:12:58.120 --> 0:13:02.520
<v Speaker 1>are emerging from China, you know, for example, last that's

0:13:02.559 --> 0:13:06.960
<v Speaker 1>the same last November, we've uncovered a group which preached

0:13:07.000 --> 0:13:11.160
<v Speaker 1>about one point three million devices. They were Chinese. Some

0:13:11.320 --> 0:13:14.720
<v Speaker 1>of those groups are actually emerging from from Russia, so

0:13:14.800 --> 0:13:18.720
<v Speaker 1>we've seen traces that the same guys that hacked DNC

0:13:19.040 --> 0:13:22.160
<v Speaker 1>they also have capabilities in the in the mobile in

0:13:22.160 --> 0:13:26.640
<v Speaker 1>the smartphone space. No, it's it's pretty much equivalent to

0:13:26.679 --> 0:13:29.760
<v Speaker 1>what we're seeing, you know, everywhere else in in the cyberspace.

0:13:30.520 --> 0:13:33.400
<v Speaker 1>Thank you very much for joining us. Michael shall Love

0:13:33.880 --> 0:13:37.240
<v Speaker 1>is the head of Products Mobile Security for a checkpoint

0:13:37.480 --> 0:13:41.000
<v Speaker 1>software and I guess that you know offers a little

0:13:41.000 --> 0:13:43.839
<v Speaker 1>bit of a window into what you should at least

0:13:43.840 --> 0:13:47.600
<v Speaker 1>be aware could happen to your phone. Just because your

0:13:47.600 --> 0:13:50.240
<v Speaker 1>paranoid doesn't mean they're not advocate. Just that's all I'm

0:13:50.240 --> 0:14:06.920
<v Speaker 1>gonna say. Okay, Well, the rental car companies Hurts Global

0:14:06.960 --> 0:14:11.439
<v Speaker 1>Holdings and Avis Budget Group, they have bonds which trade,

0:14:11.480 --> 0:14:15.000
<v Speaker 1>and boy, they are not trading like hotcakes. They are

0:14:15.400 --> 0:14:17.960
<v Speaker 1>sort of like lemons, at least according to Molly Smith,

0:14:18.000 --> 0:14:21.560
<v Speaker 1>our Bloomberg corporate finance reporter who joins US now and

0:14:21.600 --> 0:14:26.440
<v Speaker 1>you can follow Molly on Twitter at Molly Smith News.

0:14:26.960 --> 0:14:30.400
<v Speaker 1>Molly Smith tell us the tale of Hurts Global and

0:14:30.560 --> 0:14:34.880
<v Speaker 1>Avis Budget and I just want to note that you

0:14:35.600 --> 0:14:40.400
<v Speaker 1>are in the enviable position of actually being charged more

0:14:40.480 --> 0:14:42.880
<v Speaker 1>if you were ever to rent a car from either

0:14:42.960 --> 0:14:45.960
<v Speaker 1>of these organizations because they have that twenty five year

0:14:46.000 --> 0:14:50.960
<v Speaker 1>old and below penalty. That's true. I am charged with

0:14:50.960 --> 0:14:55.000
<v Speaker 1>that penalty being I think or something like that security

0:14:55.040 --> 0:15:00.960
<v Speaker 1>deposit charge for us under the age of UM. But

0:15:01.040 --> 0:15:03.880
<v Speaker 1>that's true. Yeah, the bonds are really getting hit lately. Um.

0:15:03.920 --> 0:15:06.360
<v Speaker 1>You could see it starting from a bit earlier this month,

0:15:06.640 --> 0:15:09.520
<v Speaker 1>and it's really coming in line with the decline in

0:15:09.880 --> 0:15:13.280
<v Speaker 1>used car prices, which is really the assets essentially that

0:15:13.400 --> 0:15:17.200
<v Speaker 1>back these bonds and loans that are issued by these companies.

0:15:17.280 --> 0:15:19.840
<v Speaker 1>So when those prices are coming down on the cars,

0:15:20.200 --> 0:15:24.600
<v Speaker 1>you know, so are these um securitizations from the companies,

0:15:24.640 --> 0:15:27.240
<v Speaker 1>And you're seeing that now reflected in the bond prices.

0:15:27.280 --> 0:15:30.160
<v Speaker 1>Previously was an equity issue, you know, you saw a

0:15:30.200 --> 0:15:32.760
<v Speaker 1>bit more of the stock sell off earlier, but the

0:15:32.760 --> 0:15:35.440
<v Speaker 1>creditors now starting to get weary as well well. And

0:15:35.480 --> 0:15:38.360
<v Speaker 1>just to be clear, this isn't just the investors in

0:15:38.440 --> 0:15:42.640
<v Speaker 1>the securitized bonds, but also in the straight corporate debt

0:15:42.680 --> 0:15:45.680
<v Speaker 1>that Hurts and Avis have issued. Which is interesting because

0:15:45.680 --> 0:15:48.520
<v Speaker 1>these companies have levered up on several fronts. Right they've

0:15:49.000 --> 0:15:52.360
<v Speaker 1>sold off the residuals, there are the income that they

0:15:52.360 --> 0:15:55.960
<v Speaker 1>get from rentals to go to the securitized bond holders,

0:15:56.000 --> 0:15:58.680
<v Speaker 1>as well as sold corporate debt to raise money for

0:15:58.840 --> 0:16:03.560
<v Speaker 1>their operations. Have these companies addressed the ongoing and growing

0:16:03.640 --> 0:16:06.400
<v Speaker 1>concern that the resale market for autos is falling out

0:16:06.400 --> 0:16:08.680
<v Speaker 1>of bed and it's going to profoundly challenge their whole

0:16:08.680 --> 0:16:11.800
<v Speaker 1>business model. Well, I think that's exactly the challenge that

0:16:11.840 --> 0:16:15.440
<v Speaker 1>they're facing now and possibly having to re evaluate their

0:16:15.480 --> 0:16:19.280
<v Speaker 1>residual value assumptions and what they had previously made. Both

0:16:19.320 --> 0:16:21.960
<v Speaker 1>Hurts and Avis were forecasting no more than a two

0:16:21.960 --> 0:16:25.040
<v Speaker 1>to three percent decline and used car prices. You're now

0:16:25.080 --> 0:16:29.080
<v Speaker 1>already seeing um GMS forecasting those prices to fall seven

0:16:29.080 --> 0:16:32.800
<v Speaker 1>percent this year. Ally Financial UM, which is an auto

0:16:32.880 --> 0:16:37.200
<v Speaker 1>financing lender UM their prices already fell seven percent in

0:16:37.240 --> 0:16:41.640
<v Speaker 1>the first quarter, So um the decline is definitely steeper

0:16:41.680 --> 0:16:45.560
<v Speaker 1>and faster than these companies had anticipated. Not just looking

0:16:45.640 --> 0:16:49.160
<v Speaker 1>four point eight billion dollars worth of debt. Let's just

0:16:49.240 --> 0:16:52.440
<v Speaker 1>take Hurts Global for h for a moment, But this

0:16:52.520 --> 0:16:57.320
<v Speaker 1>INCURDS includes I beg your pardon, um, revolving revolvers that

0:16:57.360 --> 0:17:00.280
<v Speaker 1>are available, term loans that out that our outstanding, as

0:17:00.320 --> 0:17:03.000
<v Speaker 1>well as a bond principle. So well, although you should

0:17:03.000 --> 0:17:05.240
<v Speaker 1>note that it's up right, I mean it was that

0:17:05.240 --> 0:17:07.359
<v Speaker 1>that if you look at just for example of Hurts,

0:17:07.359 --> 0:17:09.720
<v Speaker 1>they're short and long term debt has increased from eleven

0:17:09.720 --> 0:17:11.840
<v Speaker 1>point three billion dollars in two thousand and eleven to

0:17:11.920 --> 0:17:14.320
<v Speaker 1>thirteen point five billion dollars, so they've been actually increasing

0:17:14.320 --> 0:17:16.800
<v Speaker 1>their debts, so it actually matters quite a bit anyway,

0:17:16.840 --> 0:17:22.639
<v Speaker 1>carry on, okay, Okay. I anyway, I was looking at

0:17:22.680 --> 0:17:28.240
<v Speaker 1>four point eight billion right on the Bloomberg and is

0:17:28.280 --> 0:17:31.439
<v Speaker 1>that considered a lot for for these kinds of companies.

0:17:31.480 --> 0:17:34.560
<v Speaker 1>I mean, these are assets and you may you may,

0:17:34.680 --> 0:17:36.360
<v Speaker 1>you may find that people are going to buy them,

0:17:36.440 --> 0:17:40.320
<v Speaker 1>and it may be good paper. You don't know, right well,

0:17:40.320 --> 0:17:44.200
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I think really what's more concerning to the

0:17:44.240 --> 0:17:46.600
<v Speaker 1>creditors right now and the analysts that look at it's

0:17:46.600 --> 0:17:48.600
<v Speaker 1>not so much the absolute amount of debt, but when

0:17:48.600 --> 0:17:51.320
<v Speaker 1>you're looking at it on a net leverage ratio basis.

0:17:51.359 --> 0:17:53.760
<v Speaker 1>So Hurts is really trying to keep that within a

0:17:53.800 --> 0:17:56.320
<v Speaker 1>two and a half to three and a half times range,

0:17:56.359 --> 0:17:58.680
<v Speaker 1>and they're as of year end it was at five

0:17:58.720 --> 0:18:02.160
<v Speaker 1>points six times. They're um net debt to adjusted earnings.

0:18:02.200 --> 0:18:05.160
<v Speaker 1>So really, like then they've acknowledged that, you know, their

0:18:05.200 --> 0:18:07.879
<v Speaker 1>CFO on conference cause they know that they are really

0:18:08.040 --> 0:18:11.560
<v Speaker 1>at elevated leverage levels and something that they are working

0:18:11.600 --> 0:18:15.719
<v Speaker 1>to reduce. But so far that clearly has not happened. Well.

0:18:15.760 --> 0:18:19.280
<v Speaker 1>And investment and as you said in stockholders, investors in

0:18:19.280 --> 0:18:21.480
<v Speaker 1>the company, owners of the investor have already kind of

0:18:21.560 --> 0:18:24.919
<v Speaker 1>voted with their money and the stock is down so

0:18:24.960 --> 0:18:27.800
<v Speaker 1>far this year, right and Avis also down more than

0:18:28.560 --> 0:18:31.320
<v Speaker 1>this year as well. You have to wonder why Hurts

0:18:31.359 --> 0:18:34.919
<v Speaker 1>and Avis still buy new cars, hold them for a

0:18:35.040 --> 0:18:38.680
<v Speaker 1>year during their highest appreciation period of time, and then

0:18:38.680 --> 0:18:40.760
<v Speaker 1>try to resell them. Is there any talk about changing

0:18:40.800 --> 0:18:44.439
<v Speaker 1>that model. Well, the idea right now, as they're starting

0:18:44.480 --> 0:18:47.320
<v Speaker 1>to buy more new cars versus used in the fleet,

0:18:47.520 --> 0:18:50.480
<v Speaker 1>is really to take advantage of the heavy discounting going

0:18:50.520 --> 0:18:53.000
<v Speaker 1>on at the new car level. And while I mean

0:18:53.000 --> 0:18:55.320
<v Speaker 1>they are trying to drive their acquisition costs down in

0:18:55.400 --> 0:18:57.760
<v Speaker 1>other ways by some of them are switching more to

0:18:57.840 --> 0:19:00.880
<v Speaker 1>what's called the risk versus a program vehicle, a risk

0:19:01.000 --> 0:19:05.280
<v Speaker 1>vehicle in which case the companies like Hurts an Avis

0:19:05.280 --> 0:19:08.720
<v Speaker 1>own the vehicle outright, they're making the assumptions about the

0:19:08.760 --> 0:19:12.320
<v Speaker 1>residual um price when you know, when it comes time

0:19:12.320 --> 0:19:15.960
<v Speaker 1>to sell the car. Versus a program car, the companies

0:19:16.000 --> 0:19:19.959
<v Speaker 1>get on a buyback agreement from the manufacturers, so they

0:19:20.000 --> 0:19:22.520
<v Speaker 1>don't have to assume any of that price risk. So

0:19:22.680 --> 0:19:25.520
<v Speaker 1>the program cars in that sense do cost a bit more.

0:19:25.840 --> 0:19:29.560
<v Speaker 1>Hence why the rental car companies are somewhat shifting, shifting

0:19:29.600 --> 0:19:32.760
<v Speaker 1>a little bit more towards the risk vehicles to drive

0:19:32.760 --> 0:19:35.560
<v Speaker 1>down the acquisition costs a little bit more. Is that

0:19:35.680 --> 0:19:38.480
<v Speaker 1>is that going to affect you know, how the business

0:19:38.560 --> 0:19:40.320
<v Speaker 1>actually run, the kind of car you get when you,

0:19:40.320 --> 0:19:42.000
<v Speaker 1>you know, you show up at a at a rental

0:19:42.000 --> 0:19:44.840
<v Speaker 1>car company. Well, at least for Hurts right now, the

0:19:44.840 --> 0:19:47.640
<v Speaker 1>fleet is like a bit lopsided. And we talked about

0:19:47.680 --> 0:19:49.800
<v Speaker 1>this little bit in the story that you know, they

0:19:50.280 --> 0:19:53.240
<v Speaker 1>were trying to you know, reduce the size and age

0:19:53.240 --> 0:19:57.439
<v Speaker 1>of their fleet previously by buying smaller, cheaper cars, but

0:19:57.480 --> 0:19:59.840
<v Speaker 1>they didn't turn out to be so popular. Americans tent

0:20:00.040 --> 0:20:02.919
<v Speaker 1>prefer bigger cars, especially when they're renting, when they're on

0:20:02.920 --> 0:20:04.600
<v Speaker 1>the road, you know, they have more things to carry.

0:20:04.680 --> 0:20:06.879
<v Speaker 1>So I think right now that's really what they're in

0:20:06.920 --> 0:20:09.560
<v Speaker 1>the middle of doing, of correcting their fleet, and that's

0:20:09.560 --> 0:20:12.040
<v Speaker 1>something that analysts are looking for coming up. Thank you

0:20:12.119 --> 0:20:14.240
<v Speaker 1>so much. This is a really important story to sort

0:20:14.280 --> 0:20:16.320
<v Speaker 1>of highlights some of the growing distress that we've been

0:20:16.359 --> 0:20:19.359
<v Speaker 1>hearing about and seeing in the auto sector. Molly Smith,

0:20:19.400 --> 0:20:21.560
<v Speaker 1>we really appreciate you joining us. Molly Smith is a

0:20:21.600 --> 0:20:25.359
<v Speaker 1>corporate finance reporter for Bloomberg. Talking about Avis and Hurts

0:20:25.400 --> 0:20:29.040
<v Speaker 1>and their bonds tumbling to new lows as we see

0:20:29.240 --> 0:20:44.480
<v Speaker 1>resale values of vehicles decline. Medical bills have been straining

0:20:44.560 --> 0:20:48.159
<v Speaker 1>employers for a long time. But the question really is

0:20:48.440 --> 0:20:52.119
<v Speaker 1>how much does Obamacare change that? How much does the

0:20:52.200 --> 0:20:56.160
<v Speaker 1>failure of the GOP's proposal UH to repeal and replace

0:20:56.280 --> 0:20:58.320
<v Speaker 1>Obamacare affect all of this. I want to bring in

0:20:58.400 --> 0:21:02.240
<v Speaker 1>Joe Jackson, who's chairman and executive officer of wage Works,

0:21:02.280 --> 0:21:05.000
<v Speaker 1>which is based in San Mateo, California. And if everyone

0:21:05.080 --> 0:21:08.840
<v Speaker 1>has ever deducted or put aside money for medical expenses,

0:21:08.840 --> 0:21:11.439
<v Speaker 1>they've dealt with wage Works and filling out those forms,

0:21:11.440 --> 0:21:12.840
<v Speaker 1>I know that I have, Joe, Thank you so much

0:21:12.880 --> 0:21:16.359
<v Speaker 1>for joining us right now. How much are you keeping

0:21:16.440 --> 0:21:20.840
<v Speaker 1>track of what happens on the national healthcare level? How

0:21:20.920 --> 0:21:25.080
<v Speaker 1>much does that affect your revenues and your business? Well,

0:21:25.480 --> 0:21:28.320
<v Speaker 1>thank you for having me, Lisa. I think we spend

0:21:28.400 --> 0:21:31.320
<v Speaker 1>quite a bit of time kind of tracking and um

0:21:32.440 --> 0:21:36.560
<v Speaker 1>UH keeping close to the the puts and takes that

0:21:36.600 --> 0:21:41.560
<v Speaker 1>were put into the recent healthcare bill. UM. We continue

0:21:41.600 --> 0:21:45.080
<v Speaker 1>to have folks in Washington UM monitor the meetings that

0:21:45.080 --> 0:21:49.679
<v Speaker 1>are taking place UM. But I think overall, what we

0:21:49.800 --> 0:21:55.600
<v Speaker 1>tell folks at wage Works is that the whether or

0:21:55.600 --> 0:21:59.080
<v Speaker 1>not the bill were to pass UM are products that

0:21:59.160 --> 0:22:03.600
<v Speaker 1>we provide. Working families across the countries are thriving today

0:22:03.600 --> 0:22:06.800
<v Speaker 1>and will continue to thrive no matter whether there's a

0:22:06.800 --> 0:22:09.239
<v Speaker 1>new healthcare bill, which I believe that there will be

0:22:09.280 --> 0:22:13.159
<v Speaker 1>at some point in time, or um if if there's not.

0:22:14.080 --> 0:22:16.960
<v Speaker 1>The key thing is that out of pocket healthcare expenses

0:22:17.000 --> 0:22:20.719
<v Speaker 1>continue to go up each year, and working families across

0:22:20.720 --> 0:22:24.480
<v Speaker 1>the country the only defense mechanism that they have UM

0:22:24.640 --> 0:22:27.600
<v Speaker 1>to offset those increases and out of pocket expenses is

0:22:27.640 --> 0:22:31.600
<v Speaker 1>to use health savings account put pre tax dollars into

0:22:31.640 --> 0:22:35.680
<v Speaker 1>a flexible spending account UM that allows them to pay

0:22:35.720 --> 0:22:38.879
<v Speaker 1>for those expenses using pre tax dollars, which is really

0:22:38.880 --> 0:22:42.520
<v Speaker 1>a benefit for working families Joe Jackson. Then how come

0:22:42.600 --> 0:22:45.320
<v Speaker 1>the government seems to make it so difficult and so

0:22:45.520 --> 0:22:50.159
<v Speaker 1>complicated for everybody to share the same kinds of benefits

0:22:50.200 --> 0:22:53.840
<v Speaker 1>that you are describing. Because you've got the flexible spending

0:22:53.880 --> 0:22:56.560
<v Speaker 1>accounts the f s as, then you have the health

0:22:56.800 --> 0:22:59.880
<v Speaker 1>savings accounts, the h s A S oh and yes,

0:23:00.160 --> 0:23:03.520
<v Speaker 1>Health Reimbursement Arrangements the h r a S and then

0:23:03.560 --> 0:23:07.600
<v Speaker 1>you've got transit programs. Why can't they just simplify this

0:23:07.720 --> 0:23:11.360
<v Speaker 1>and expand these programs you you say they work, Why

0:23:11.480 --> 0:23:15.000
<v Speaker 1>just not expand something that is already doing pretty well well?

0:23:15.040 --> 0:23:18.160
<v Speaker 1>I think there is expansion across the board. I think

0:23:18.200 --> 0:23:21.800
<v Speaker 1>in health savings accounts a lot of what was proposed

0:23:21.800 --> 0:23:24.719
<v Speaker 1>in the recent healthcare bill would go a long way

0:23:24.800 --> 0:23:27.240
<v Speaker 1>to expand the amount of dollars that can be contributed

0:23:27.320 --> 0:23:29.960
<v Speaker 1>to a health savings account. Uh. There were some other

0:23:30.320 --> 0:23:32.679
<v Speaker 1>what if they pulled off the caps for example? I

0:23:32.680 --> 0:23:35.000
<v Speaker 1>mean they keep talking about tearing up the script and

0:23:35.240 --> 0:23:37.280
<v Speaker 1>you know, making the government. What would you like if

0:23:37.320 --> 0:23:39.800
<v Speaker 1>you could write your own bill, Let's say, what would

0:23:39.800 --> 0:23:43.560
<v Speaker 1>it contain? Well? I think from from our industry standpoint,

0:23:43.920 --> 0:23:46.560
<v Speaker 1>I think you make a good point. I think working

0:23:46.600 --> 0:23:50.040
<v Speaker 1>Americans should be allowed to contribute whatever the amount that suits.

0:23:50.040 --> 0:23:52.359
<v Speaker 1>Their family would be required to cover their out of

0:23:52.400 --> 0:23:57.080
<v Speaker 1>pocket expenses, so eliminating the caps um making the product

0:23:57.160 --> 0:24:00.920
<v Speaker 1>more efficient, products more efficient to be utilized is uh.

0:24:00.960 --> 0:24:05.800
<v Speaker 1>You also have sections of the US and in different populations.

0:24:06.119 --> 0:24:09.720
<v Speaker 1>Some are spenders where a flexible spending account where the

0:24:09.760 --> 0:24:13.480
<v Speaker 1>dollars are available to be spent in total on January one,

0:24:13.520 --> 0:24:15.720
<v Speaker 1>at the beginning of each plan year. They find that

0:24:15.800 --> 0:24:20.200
<v Speaker 1>a lot more attractive to cover their requirements UM savings

0:24:20.200 --> 0:24:22.640
<v Speaker 1>accounts are becoming more and more popular from a health

0:24:22.640 --> 0:24:28.520
<v Speaker 1>saving standpoint. If you think about um UH individuals that

0:24:29.440 --> 0:24:32.439
<v Speaker 1>are are retiring, that the amount of money that is

0:24:32.440 --> 0:24:34.720
<v Speaker 1>going to for example of sixty five year old couple

0:24:34.800 --> 0:24:39.000
<v Speaker 1>today that retire UH, their healthcare costs are going to

0:24:39.080 --> 0:24:42.200
<v Speaker 1>average through their lifetime about three hundred and seventy seven

0:24:42.240 --> 0:24:45.560
<v Speaker 1>thousand dollars. That's expected to be about five hundred and

0:24:45.560 --> 0:24:49.560
<v Speaker 1>seventy thousand dollars in the near future. So from our perspective,

0:24:50.119 --> 0:24:53.080
<v Speaker 1>we believe and and I say this many times too

0:24:53.200 --> 0:24:55.760
<v Speaker 1>folks that we speak with, that I think in three

0:24:55.760 --> 0:24:58.120
<v Speaker 1>to five years people are going to have a four

0:24:58.160 --> 0:25:00.480
<v Speaker 1>oh one K account for retirement. They're going to have

0:25:00.560 --> 0:25:03.000
<v Speaker 1>a healthcare account, whether it's a savings or a spending

0:25:03.040 --> 0:25:06.360
<v Speaker 1>account for retirement. And I think the recent health care

0:25:06.400 --> 0:25:10.200
<v Speaker 1>bill has a lot of UH pluses that are going

0:25:10.240 --> 0:25:13.480
<v Speaker 1>to impact both flexible savings accounts and health savings accounts.

0:25:14.000 --> 0:25:16.760
<v Speaker 1>And I think that you know more of that as

0:25:16.800 --> 0:25:20.280
<v Speaker 1>you described as whether it's UH expanding the cap, expanding

0:25:20.320 --> 0:25:24.120
<v Speaker 1>the use of an eligibility for these accounts. I think

0:25:24.119 --> 0:25:25.679
<v Speaker 1>all of that is going to play well for our

0:25:25.720 --> 0:25:28.800
<v Speaker 1>industry and our business going forward. So talking about your business,

0:25:28.920 --> 0:25:32.600
<v Speaker 1>Joe wage Works manages some of these flexible spending accounts

0:25:32.640 --> 0:25:36.440
<v Speaker 1>health savings accounts for companies. How do you make money?

0:25:36.480 --> 0:25:39.680
<v Speaker 1>Is it the companies pay you to manage this this

0:25:39.840 --> 0:25:43.359
<v Speaker 1>arrangement or are there other sources of revenue for you? Well, no,

0:25:43.560 --> 0:25:47.119
<v Speaker 1>primarily it's the employers. We have a little over a

0:25:47.160 --> 0:25:50.959
<v Speaker 1>hundred thousand employers that we work with today. Primarily they

0:25:50.960 --> 0:25:55.000
<v Speaker 1>would pay us a per participant, per month fee for

0:25:55.160 --> 0:25:59.320
<v Speaker 1>the plan. Year are big time of re enrollment season,

0:25:59.359 --> 0:26:02.479
<v Speaker 1>which is in open enrollment. We spend a lot of

0:26:02.480 --> 0:26:07.239
<v Speaker 1>time and effort educating, providing awareness programs to people so

0:26:07.320 --> 0:26:10.439
<v Speaker 1>they're aware that of the value these products provide them.

0:26:10.480 --> 0:26:12.800
<v Speaker 1>I mean, if you're an employee today and you don't

0:26:12.800 --> 0:26:15.200
<v Speaker 1>take advantage of a health savings account or a flexible

0:26:15.200 --> 0:26:18.359
<v Speaker 1>spending account in essence, you're really leaving money on the table.

0:26:18.440 --> 0:26:21.880
<v Speaker 1>Are more people using these um more and more every year?

0:26:22.320 --> 0:26:26.080
<v Speaker 1>H s A s are fastest growing product. Our hs

0:26:26.119 --> 0:26:29.920
<v Speaker 1>A business grew last year a little over fifty uh

0:26:30.000 --> 0:26:35.240
<v Speaker 1>Flexible spending accounts continue to grow especially uh IN was

0:26:35.320 --> 0:26:41.200
<v Speaker 1>really a catalyst when the government basically eliminated the antiquated

0:26:41.280 --> 0:26:43.960
<v Speaker 1>user or lose it policy for flexible spending accounts, and

0:26:44.000 --> 0:26:46.320
<v Speaker 1>now you're able to carry over up to five d

0:26:46.480 --> 0:26:49.000
<v Speaker 1>dollars in your account each year. So that's really spurred

0:26:49.000 --> 0:26:52.760
<v Speaker 1>the growth of flexible spending accounts. But with c h

0:26:53.040 --> 0:26:55.160
<v Speaker 1>right there, I mean right there, right, I mean, why

0:26:55.440 --> 0:26:59.280
<v Speaker 1>it's five? I mean, come on, let's I mean, I understand,

0:26:59.359 --> 0:27:02.240
<v Speaker 1>you know that the country and the geography of the world,

0:27:02.320 --> 0:27:05.000
<v Speaker 1>and and you know we're coast to coast and worldwide.

0:27:05.680 --> 0:27:08.160
<v Speaker 1>We know that there are these vast differences. But I mean,

0:27:08.320 --> 0:27:11.600
<v Speaker 1>come on, and and I'm not saying that it's your role,

0:27:11.680 --> 0:27:13.800
<v Speaker 1>so you know, please, don't, you know, take it that way.

0:27:13.800 --> 0:27:16.320
<v Speaker 1>But it's like, come on, five hundred bucks. I mean,

0:27:16.600 --> 0:27:18.640
<v Speaker 1>you know, if you're gonna end up with some kind

0:27:18.640 --> 0:27:21.520
<v Speaker 1>of serious medical issue, what is it a thousand a

0:27:21.600 --> 0:27:25.000
<v Speaker 1>day in a hospital? And none of this really goes

0:27:25.080 --> 0:27:28.480
<v Speaker 1>to I mean, why not would you support a single

0:27:28.480 --> 0:27:31.800
<v Speaker 1>payer system for example? Um? No, I don't think that

0:27:31.800 --> 0:27:35.680
<v Speaker 1>that's really the uh you know again, I wouldn't speak

0:27:35.680 --> 0:27:38.240
<v Speaker 1>towards whether a single payer or the process we have

0:27:38.280 --> 0:27:40.600
<v Speaker 1>in place worked. I would tell you I'm shoulder to

0:27:40.680 --> 0:27:43.960
<v Speaker 1>shoulder with you in your comments with regard to the

0:27:44.000 --> 0:27:47.199
<v Speaker 1>five dollars. If you have a chronic condition today, the

0:27:47.240 --> 0:27:49.800
<v Speaker 1>average out of pocket expenses that you're going to incur

0:27:49.920 --> 0:27:53.280
<v Speaker 1>each year is about four thousand dollars, So you know,

0:27:53.400 --> 0:27:56.040
<v Speaker 1>the five dollar carryover doesn't seem like a lot. But

0:27:56.119 --> 0:27:59.119
<v Speaker 1>we worked for about eighteen months with Treasury in the

0:27:59.160 --> 0:28:03.000
<v Speaker 1>I R. S UH to help get that provision path.

0:28:03.200 --> 0:28:04.760
<v Speaker 1>I I guess I was just trying to get from

0:28:04.800 --> 0:28:07.640
<v Speaker 1>you the understanding of what is the other side, whoever

0:28:07.680 --> 0:28:10.479
<v Speaker 1>the other side is, what are they thinking when you

0:28:10.560 --> 0:28:14.359
<v Speaker 1>have these conversations with them? Well, I think it always

0:28:14.400 --> 0:28:18.760
<v Speaker 1>involves a tax code which is obviously very complicated and

0:28:18.880 --> 0:28:21.879
<v Speaker 1>very time consuming, and trying to make changes done. I

0:28:21.920 --> 0:28:23.760
<v Speaker 1>would tell you we continue. In fact, I have my

0:28:23.840 --> 0:28:28.960
<v Speaker 1>chief compliance officer in Washington today who's having uh, you know,

0:28:29.119 --> 0:28:31.800
<v Speaker 1>daily meeting. Oh wow, I wouldn't. I gotta say, I

0:28:31.840 --> 0:28:35.240
<v Speaker 1>do not envy him at all, but I'm so glad

0:28:35.240 --> 0:28:37.320
<v Speaker 1>you were able to spend time with us. Joe Jackson

0:28:37.400 --> 0:28:39.760
<v Speaker 1>is the chairman and the chief executive of wage Works,

0:28:40.360 --> 0:28:43.360
<v Speaker 1>giving us some detailed information and some updates on some

0:28:43.480 --> 0:28:49.480
<v Speaker 1>aspects of the bill to replace Obamacare might actually help consumers.

0:28:49.480 --> 0:28:58.080
<v Speaker 1>Maybe expand some of those health savings accounts. Thanks for

0:28:58.160 --> 0:29:00.760
<v Speaker 1>listening to the Bloomberg P and L podcast. You can

0:29:00.800 --> 0:29:05.240
<v Speaker 1>subscribe and listen to interviews at iTunes, SoundCloud, or whatever

0:29:05.520 --> 0:29:09.040
<v Speaker 1>podcast platform you prefer. I'm Pim Fox. I'm out there

0:29:09.080 --> 0:29:12.040
<v Speaker 1>on Twitter at pim Fox. I'm out there on Twitter

0:29:12.240 --> 0:29:15.160
<v Speaker 1>at Lisa Abramo. It's one before the podcast. You can

0:29:15.200 --> 0:29:17.720
<v Speaker 1>always catch us worldwide on Bloomberg Radio