1 00:00:04,160 --> 00:00:05,880 Speaker 1: There Are No Girls on the Internet, as a production 2 00:00:05,920 --> 00:00:13,720 Speaker 1: of iHeartRadio and Unbossed Creative. I'm Bridget Todd and there 3 00:00:13,760 --> 00:00:18,360 Speaker 1: Are No Girls on the Internet. Welcome to There Are 4 00:00:18,360 --> 00:00:20,520 Speaker 1: No Girls on the Internet, where we explore the intersection 5 00:00:20,600 --> 00:00:24,079 Speaker 1: of technology, identity, and social media. And this is another 6 00:00:24,120 --> 00:00:26,239 Speaker 1: installment of our weekly news bound Up, where we dig 7 00:00:26,239 --> 00:00:28,280 Speaker 1: into the stories online that you might have missed so 8 00:00:28,400 --> 00:00:31,080 Speaker 1: you don't have to And just to quick heads up, 9 00:00:31,560 --> 00:00:35,480 Speaker 1: I'm totally fine, but I've just had a somewhat invasive 10 00:00:35,760 --> 00:00:40,200 Speaker 1: medical procedure. I have been given pain killers. I'm feeling great. 11 00:00:40,960 --> 00:00:43,240 Speaker 1: But if I found a little loopy, if the show 12 00:00:44,479 --> 00:00:46,960 Speaker 1: is a little off the rails, off the tracks, whatever 13 00:00:47,080 --> 00:00:50,279 Speaker 1: that expression is, please forgive us. That's what's going on. 14 00:00:51,240 --> 00:00:55,000 Speaker 1: So you know this, Mike, listeners know this. My favorite 15 00:00:55,000 --> 00:00:56,920 Speaker 1: thing in the world to talk about is scams. So 16 00:00:57,040 --> 00:01:00,480 Speaker 1: I want to start with some scams. No, not the 17 00:01:00,520 --> 00:01:04,200 Speaker 1: scam of your smart toilet or smart light switch or 18 00:01:05,000 --> 00:01:09,360 Speaker 1: smart cooling mattress crapping out on you because AWS was down. 19 00:01:09,400 --> 00:01:10,160 Speaker 1: Did you hear about that? 20 00:01:10,720 --> 00:01:13,119 Speaker 2: I did. Yeah, during that day earlier this week when 21 00:01:13,120 --> 00:01:15,160 Speaker 2: AWS was down, and like all of the Internet, I 22 00:01:15,240 --> 00:01:18,039 Speaker 2: just ground to a Halt. There were people who had 23 00:01:20,120 --> 00:01:25,319 Speaker 2: like Internet connected mattresses that when Haywire had just like 24 00:01:25,400 --> 00:01:26,399 Speaker 2: folded up on them. 25 00:01:26,720 --> 00:01:29,440 Speaker 1: I don't know if they folded up on anybody, but. 26 00:01:29,360 --> 00:01:31,200 Speaker 2: That's what I heard. They folded up on them. 27 00:01:31,200 --> 00:01:34,760 Speaker 1: They were crushed. I will say. It really made me 28 00:01:34,840 --> 00:01:37,480 Speaker 1: realize how much I have taken for granted that Amazon 29 00:01:37,520 --> 00:01:42,080 Speaker 1: Web Services runs everything, and maybe that's bad, maybe it's 30 00:01:42,120 --> 00:01:45,640 Speaker 1: not cool that this one company runs everything. And then 31 00:01:45,640 --> 00:01:48,320 Speaker 1: it also made me realize too how much stuff out 32 00:01:48,320 --> 00:01:51,840 Speaker 1: there is tech enabled these days. The mattress was probably 33 00:01:51,880 --> 00:01:55,560 Speaker 1: the weirdest thing. Imagine being like, oh, the Wi Fi 34 00:01:55,640 --> 00:01:58,200 Speaker 1: is out, so I can't use my smart pillow or whatever. 35 00:01:58,280 --> 00:02:00,440 Speaker 1: I just was really I had never heard of anything 36 00:02:00,520 --> 00:02:01,880 Speaker 1: like that. It really blew my mind. 37 00:02:02,440 --> 00:02:05,240 Speaker 2: Yeah, it's a good reminder that, like, maybe your mattress 38 00:02:05,240 --> 00:02:06,960 Speaker 2: doesn't need to be connected of the Internet. I have 39 00:02:06,960 --> 00:02:11,000 Speaker 2: an air conditioner, just like a window unit air conditioner 40 00:02:11,520 --> 00:02:14,760 Speaker 2: that is Wi Fi enabled. I didn't want that. I've 41 00:02:14,800 --> 00:02:17,440 Speaker 2: never connected it to Wi Fi. I don't know why 42 00:02:17,480 --> 00:02:19,760 Speaker 2: I would want that, but it was like a big 43 00:02:19,840 --> 00:02:22,080 Speaker 2: marketing point on the side of the box when I 44 00:02:22,160 --> 00:02:22,799 Speaker 2: bought this thing. 45 00:02:23,080 --> 00:02:25,240 Speaker 1: Oh, I mean you've heard me complain about this for 46 00:02:25,560 --> 00:02:28,040 Speaker 1: hours and hours, the saga of me trying to pick 47 00:02:28,360 --> 00:02:31,520 Speaker 1: a sunrise alarm clock. And I almost bought that alarm clock, 48 00:02:31,720 --> 00:02:35,120 Speaker 1: the Hatch clock, which I did want deeply and badly, 49 00:02:35,160 --> 00:02:38,120 Speaker 1: but it was way too expensive. I thought, Uh, it 50 00:02:38,240 --> 00:02:40,600 Speaker 1: might just be worth it. I'm so picky about my 51 00:02:40,680 --> 00:02:43,440 Speaker 1: alarm clocks. I want such particular features in an alarm clock. 52 00:02:43,800 --> 00:02:46,400 Speaker 1: And then I realized, oh no, you don't just plunk 53 00:02:46,440 --> 00:02:48,680 Speaker 1: down two hundred dollars or whatever on the clock. You 54 00:02:48,840 --> 00:02:53,040 Speaker 1: also have to pay a monthly subscription service fee to 55 00:02:53,200 --> 00:02:56,040 Speaker 1: use all the features. And you were like, you're not 56 00:02:56,120 --> 00:03:01,120 Speaker 1: getting an alarm clock subscription. No, A gritch too far. 57 00:03:01,520 --> 00:03:04,400 Speaker 2: No one should have an alarm clock subscription. I'm sorry 58 00:03:04,440 --> 00:03:11,040 Speaker 2: to the like subscription model alarm clock industry, but that's 59 00:03:11,080 --> 00:03:13,200 Speaker 2: not a thing we need. We have the technology to 60 00:03:13,280 --> 00:03:18,799 Speaker 2: deliver it for free. I cannot imagine what premium features 61 00:03:18,880 --> 00:03:21,640 Speaker 2: I would gain access to for nine ninety nine a 62 00:03:21,680 --> 00:03:22,919 Speaker 2: month or whatever it is. 63 00:03:22,960 --> 00:03:27,880 Speaker 1: They had, like rub Paul doing wake up affirmations. I mean, 64 00:03:27,919 --> 00:03:29,840 Speaker 1: I will say I'm not gonna lie and say I 65 00:03:29,880 --> 00:03:32,320 Speaker 1: was totally disinterested in some of these features. I was like, 66 00:03:32,360 --> 00:03:35,200 Speaker 1: down the rabbit hole on this alarm clock purchase, which 67 00:03:35,240 --> 00:03:36,440 Speaker 1: in the end I ended up buying one for like 68 00:03:36,440 --> 00:03:39,800 Speaker 1: thirty dollars A networked just fine. No, so obviously that 69 00:03:39,920 --> 00:03:43,080 Speaker 1: level of subscription complete scam. But I have a couple 70 00:03:43,120 --> 00:03:45,080 Speaker 1: of scam updates for you all. 71 00:03:45,600 --> 00:03:47,840 Speaker 2: That sounds great. What scam you want to start with? 72 00:03:47,920 --> 00:03:51,480 Speaker 1: First tea app and the Tea on her app Saga. 73 00:03:51,600 --> 00:03:54,400 Speaker 1: So we've been talking about this since the summertime, y'all 74 00:03:54,400 --> 00:03:58,040 Speaker 1: will recall that the t app was designed ostensibly for 75 00:03:58,120 --> 00:04:01,000 Speaker 1: women to be able to spill tea on the men 76 00:04:01,040 --> 00:04:04,240 Speaker 1: they were interested in potentially dating. It was really marketed 77 00:04:04,240 --> 00:04:06,640 Speaker 1: as the safety thing, right, a way for women to 78 00:04:06,760 --> 00:04:09,760 Speaker 1: vet men to make sure that abusers were not warning 79 00:04:09,800 --> 00:04:11,920 Speaker 1: their way into all of our hearts. But when you 80 00:04:11,960 --> 00:04:13,920 Speaker 1: look a little deeper, it really seemed like it was 81 00:04:13,960 --> 00:04:16,919 Speaker 1: more of an exploitation thing because this company did not 82 00:04:17,120 --> 00:04:20,520 Speaker 1: do the bear Bear Bear minimum to keep their users safe, 83 00:04:20,560 --> 00:04:24,720 Speaker 1: and then their user's information, including driver's licenses that were 84 00:04:24,839 --> 00:04:28,000 Speaker 1: used to verify people's genders to sign up, were leaked 85 00:04:28,040 --> 00:04:31,719 Speaker 1: by four Chan. We also covered the male version of 86 00:04:31,760 --> 00:04:34,720 Speaker 1: the t app for men to post tea about the 87 00:04:34,760 --> 00:04:37,520 Speaker 1: women that they were interested in dating, and they also 88 00:04:37,560 --> 00:04:41,240 Speaker 1: had their information leak. So everybody's getting their informational leaked 89 00:04:41,240 --> 00:04:45,080 Speaker 1: and exposed. Equality. We've done it, gender equality. What is 90 00:04:45,160 --> 00:04:47,960 Speaker 1: wild to me is that even as those leaks happened, 91 00:04:48,000 --> 00:04:49,840 Speaker 1: like when the Tea app was in the news and 92 00:04:49,880 --> 00:04:52,080 Speaker 1: the Tea on Her app was in the news because 93 00:04:52,240 --> 00:04:56,000 Speaker 1: of this massive, massive leak, both versions of the app 94 00:04:56,040 --> 00:05:00,040 Speaker 1: were incredibly popular, more popular than ever and so I 95 00:05:00,040 --> 00:05:02,120 Speaker 1: don't know what it says about us, but people were 96 00:05:02,160 --> 00:05:03,800 Speaker 1: continuing to use the apps. 97 00:05:04,080 --> 00:05:07,839 Speaker 2: Yeah, it's disappointing, but not that surprising. I think there's 98 00:05:07,880 --> 00:05:11,320 Speaker 2: a lot of digital nihilism out there where people just 99 00:05:11,760 --> 00:05:15,280 Speaker 2: feel like, well, my data is already out there, so 100 00:05:15,640 --> 00:05:20,719 Speaker 2: what's the harm of just completely exposing my photo of 101 00:05:20,760 --> 00:05:23,080 Speaker 2: my driver's license and my name and birth date to 102 00:05:23,440 --> 00:05:27,160 Speaker 2: my address and my address to all of the internet. 103 00:05:28,120 --> 00:05:30,640 Speaker 2: To be clear, there's people who are deeply misguided and 104 00:05:31,440 --> 00:05:34,279 Speaker 2: we need to help them realize that they're incorrect. I'd 105 00:05:34,279 --> 00:05:35,280 Speaker 2: suspect that's a lot of it. 106 00:05:35,480 --> 00:05:37,520 Speaker 1: So we have another update, which is that both the 107 00:05:37,600 --> 00:05:40,040 Speaker 1: Tea app and the Tea on Her app have been 108 00:05:40,160 --> 00:05:43,320 Speaker 1: removed from the Apple App Store. Four for media who 109 00:05:43,360 --> 00:05:47,040 Speaker 1: initially broke this Massive story said that Apple told Zam 110 00:05:47,040 --> 00:05:49,039 Speaker 1: in an email that it had removed the app as 111 00:05:49,080 --> 00:05:51,240 Speaker 1: well as the tea on her app, for failing to 112 00:05:51,279 --> 00:05:54,280 Speaker 1: meet the company's terms of use around content moderation and 113 00:05:54,440 --> 00:05:57,760 Speaker 1: user privacy. Apple also said that it received an excessive 114 00:05:57,839 --> 00:06:00,760 Speaker 1: number of complaints, including ones about the personal data of 115 00:06:00,920 --> 00:06:05,040 Speaker 1: miners being posted on the app. So pretty bad. Apple 116 00:06:05,080 --> 00:06:07,600 Speaker 1: said that it has parts of its guidelines that say 117 00:06:07,640 --> 00:06:10,680 Speaker 1: that apps are not allowed to share someone's personal data 118 00:06:10,680 --> 00:06:13,520 Speaker 1: without their permission, and that any app on their app 119 00:06:13,520 --> 00:06:17,320 Speaker 1: store needs to have a mechanism for reporting objectionable content. Mike, 120 00:06:17,440 --> 00:06:19,760 Speaker 1: do you have any idea how the t app is 121 00:06:19,800 --> 00:06:22,120 Speaker 1: responding to all of this being taken down off the 122 00:06:22,120 --> 00:06:22,680 Speaker 1: app store? 123 00:06:23,360 --> 00:06:27,720 Speaker 2: Uh? Are they posting on the teon app stores? 124 00:06:27,880 --> 00:06:31,320 Speaker 1: App? No, but that would be pretty good if they were. 125 00:06:31,640 --> 00:06:32,640 Speaker 2: Watch out for Apple. 126 00:06:33,160 --> 00:06:35,640 Speaker 1: This company will kick you off of their app store 127 00:06:35,640 --> 00:06:39,279 Speaker 1: without any warning. So Weirdly, the te app is still 128 00:06:39,360 --> 00:06:42,279 Speaker 1: just posting on social media like none of this ever happened. 129 00:06:42,440 --> 00:06:44,960 Speaker 1: Their most recent post and I checked this was their 130 00:06:44,960 --> 00:06:49,000 Speaker 1: most recent post as of US recording. This was on Instagram, 131 00:06:49,040 --> 00:06:51,880 Speaker 1: where they say the first ever girls only space that 132 00:06:51,960 --> 00:06:55,400 Speaker 1: truly amplifies women's voices and gives them an anonymous space 133 00:06:55,440 --> 00:06:58,280 Speaker 1: to share their experiences, find comfort, and get the info 134 00:06:58,360 --> 00:07:00,200 Speaker 1: they need on the men they're talking to. In the 135 00:07:00,279 --> 00:07:03,919 Speaker 1: name of all caps dating safety heart emoji. So the 136 00:07:04,000 --> 00:07:07,600 Speaker 1: te app is just posting through it, and I honestly 137 00:07:07,680 --> 00:07:11,320 Speaker 1: think that says a lot about the ethos of this 138 00:07:11,400 --> 00:07:14,320 Speaker 1: particular app. You know, the te app branded itself as 139 00:07:14,640 --> 00:07:18,600 Speaker 1: this tool that was all about women's empowerment and women's safety. 140 00:07:18,960 --> 00:07:21,680 Speaker 1: The founder shared this story, which turned out to be 141 00:07:22,480 --> 00:07:26,000 Speaker 1: I would, in my opinion, obvious bs about how he 142 00:07:26,080 --> 00:07:28,840 Speaker 1: decided to make the app because his mom had been 143 00:07:28,880 --> 00:07:30,960 Speaker 1: on a bunch of bad days with people who had 144 00:07:31,000 --> 00:07:33,960 Speaker 1: criminal records, and he just wanted to make a platform 145 00:07:34,000 --> 00:07:36,280 Speaker 1: for women to be able to stay safe. For for media, 146 00:07:36,400 --> 00:07:39,480 Speaker 1: talk to a woman who the founder had been trying 147 00:07:39,520 --> 00:07:41,960 Speaker 1: to come on board as the founder, and she's like, oh, 148 00:07:42,040 --> 00:07:44,000 Speaker 1: I never heard that story. That story is made up, 149 00:07:44,600 --> 00:07:47,280 Speaker 1: And I think, you know, it's this platform that was 150 00:07:47,320 --> 00:07:49,360 Speaker 1: trying to brand itself this way, but at the end 151 00:07:49,360 --> 00:07:52,840 Speaker 1: of the day, it was just another data hungry startup 152 00:07:52,960 --> 00:07:57,080 Speaker 1: trying to use feminism and women's safety as a marketing hook. 153 00:07:57,160 --> 00:07:59,120 Speaker 1: Like a lot of these stories, I feel they end 154 00:07:59,160 --> 00:08:02,520 Speaker 1: the same way a privacy scandal and then a takedown, 155 00:08:02,920 --> 00:08:05,000 Speaker 1: and I guess for the tea app, just like fronting 156 00:08:05,040 --> 00:08:07,440 Speaker 1: on social media pretending that everything is fine. 157 00:08:07,680 --> 00:08:10,560 Speaker 2: I have to wonder if there's even anybody behind that 158 00:08:10,600 --> 00:08:15,000 Speaker 2: social media account at this point, Like, given how just 159 00:08:15,040 --> 00:08:18,680 Speaker 2: piss poor they were about like security and building the 160 00:08:18,760 --> 00:08:22,360 Speaker 2: app itself, I have to imagine that an equal amount 161 00:08:22,440 --> 00:08:26,400 Speaker 2: of non care went into their social media work. And 162 00:08:26,480 --> 00:08:29,000 Speaker 2: like I would not be surprised if they just had 163 00:08:29,640 --> 00:08:36,600 Speaker 2: chat GPT spit out like a thousand little tweets worth 164 00:08:36,640 --> 00:08:39,880 Speaker 2: of content and then scheduled them for the rest of time. 165 00:08:39,960 --> 00:08:44,000 Speaker 2: And so it's just like a zombie account posting the 166 00:08:44,000 --> 00:08:46,160 Speaker 2: hope that a little bore data trickles it. 167 00:08:46,920 --> 00:08:50,679 Speaker 1: That's sweet, sweet data. Okay, So, speaking of obvious scams, 168 00:08:51,240 --> 00:08:53,480 Speaker 1: we told you in our episode about Charlie Kirk how 169 00:08:53,559 --> 00:08:56,839 Speaker 1: the literal day after Charlie Kirk was murdered, a site 170 00:08:56,880 --> 00:09:01,559 Speaker 1: sprang up promising to unmask anybody not being sufficiently mournful 171 00:09:01,760 --> 00:09:04,600 Speaker 1: in the wake of his death. And that site kind 172 00:09:04,600 --> 00:09:07,080 Speaker 1: of seemed like it was scamming people, Like from the jump, 173 00:09:07,200 --> 00:09:09,559 Speaker 1: I remember going to that site and being like, who 174 00:09:09,559 --> 00:09:14,360 Speaker 1: put their information? Into the site. Well, that site, initially 175 00:09:14,400 --> 00:09:19,000 Speaker 1: called Exposed Charlie's Murderers, promised to make a searchable trove 176 00:09:19,080 --> 00:09:23,520 Speaker 1: of names and workplaces for quote, the largest firing operation 177 00:09:23,760 --> 00:09:27,280 Speaker 1: in history. Charlie Kirk would have been so proud. According 178 00:09:27,280 --> 00:09:31,120 Speaker 1: to drop site News, the website listed six cryptocurrency blockchains 179 00:09:31,160 --> 00:09:35,120 Speaker 1: and asked supporters to fund a quote highly sophisticated enterprise 180 00:09:35,160 --> 00:09:38,719 Speaker 1: system that will be impervious to leftist attacks. Basically, it 181 00:09:38,760 --> 00:09:41,640 Speaker 1: sounds like whoever set this up just collected a bunch 182 00:09:41,679 --> 00:09:44,600 Speaker 1: of money and then dipped. Over a two day period, 183 00:09:44,679 --> 00:09:47,680 Speaker 1: the websites anonymous developers collected more than thirty thousand dollars 184 00:09:47,720 --> 00:09:51,959 Speaker 1: per coin tracker software used for crypto based taxes. Folks 185 00:09:51,960 --> 00:09:54,920 Speaker 1: went recall, they were initially called Exposed Charlie's Murderers, and 186 00:09:54,960 --> 00:09:58,320 Speaker 1: then they rebranded as the Charlie Kirk Data Foundation on 187 00:09:58,320 --> 00:10:01,680 Speaker 1: September fourteenth. Then the site it was deplatformed, and now 188 00:10:01,720 --> 00:10:07,040 Speaker 1: they've basically disappeared altogether. With that thirty thousand dollars of donation, 189 00:10:07,280 --> 00:10:09,839 Speaker 1: it really just seems like, according to this piece and 190 00:10:09,920 --> 00:10:12,520 Speaker 1: drop site News, THETIS took a bunch of people's money 191 00:10:12,520 --> 00:10:16,000 Speaker 1: and then bounced the group has not responded to several 192 00:10:16,040 --> 00:10:19,400 Speaker 1: inquiries from drop site about where their donations went and 193 00:10:19,440 --> 00:10:21,640 Speaker 1: whether or not they're still planning to create that big 194 00:10:21,760 --> 00:10:23,920 Speaker 1: database for all the firings. And a lot of the 195 00:10:23,960 --> 00:10:27,840 Speaker 1: folks who spent money on this enterprise are not happy. 196 00:10:28,360 --> 00:10:33,480 Speaker 2: I bez probably really upsetting to be a dope. I 197 00:10:33,520 --> 00:10:35,599 Speaker 2: love how they went from let's make a list of 198 00:10:35,720 --> 00:10:39,240 Speaker 2: leftists we don't like to let's build a highly sophisticated 199 00:10:39,440 --> 00:10:41,960 Speaker 2: enterprise system with your money, please. 200 00:10:41,880 --> 00:10:44,160 Speaker 1: And then wound up with just give us the money 201 00:10:44,160 --> 00:10:45,000 Speaker 1: and we'll be on our way. 202 00:10:45,160 --> 00:10:47,600 Speaker 2: Yeah, like, you know what this is. This is a scam. 203 00:10:47,640 --> 00:10:49,240 Speaker 2: Just just hand it over. 204 00:10:50,559 --> 00:10:53,120 Speaker 1: You know what it is. So yeah, people might have 205 00:10:53,160 --> 00:10:56,160 Speaker 1: gotten scammed thirty thousand dollars one hundred and ninety crypto 206 00:10:56,200 --> 00:10:57,840 Speaker 1: payments and what do they have to show for it 207 00:10:58,080 --> 00:11:01,960 Speaker 1: a ghost website and like a bunch angry donors. And again, 208 00:11:02,360 --> 00:11:04,280 Speaker 1: just like the t app, I think it is a 209 00:11:04,320 --> 00:11:08,880 Speaker 1: reminder that in this age of online outrage and online morality, 210 00:11:09,280 --> 00:11:14,120 Speaker 1: there is always someone ready to monetize your outrage, and 211 00:11:14,160 --> 00:11:18,440 Speaker 1: sometimes they will just vanish poof done gone. And just 212 00:11:18,440 --> 00:11:20,640 Speaker 1: like the t app, I mean, my big thing with 213 00:11:20,720 --> 00:11:23,280 Speaker 1: the tapp was that I could sense that it was 214 00:11:23,320 --> 00:11:27,479 Speaker 1: a company that I thought was trying to materially capitalize 215 00:11:27,520 --> 00:11:31,160 Speaker 1: on gender war's outrage, and so that was sort of 216 00:11:31,200 --> 00:11:34,360 Speaker 1: like how they were getting their their marketing. And so 217 00:11:34,520 --> 00:11:37,560 Speaker 1: I just think that any company that pops up, in 218 00:11:37,600 --> 00:11:41,480 Speaker 1: this case literally overnight, promising to turn your anger or 219 00:11:41,520 --> 00:11:45,240 Speaker 1: your fear into something more is probably a company worth 220 00:11:45,240 --> 00:11:47,160 Speaker 1: thinking twice about getting involved in. 221 00:11:48,040 --> 00:11:52,480 Speaker 2: That is such good advice, and there's not a lot 222 00:11:52,520 --> 00:11:56,559 Speaker 2: of like universal good advice in the day and age. 223 00:11:56,559 --> 00:12:00,679 Speaker 2: But I feel like anybody who is trying to encourage 224 00:12:00,720 --> 00:12:04,679 Speaker 2: you to push the gas on your outrage, that's like 225 00:12:04,720 --> 00:12:05,880 Speaker 2: a huge red flag. 226 00:12:06,440 --> 00:12:10,480 Speaker 1: Oh yes, Like, oh, you're outraged, you're angry, you're fearful. 227 00:12:10,760 --> 00:12:14,000 Speaker 1: We'll give us your driver's license and forty dollars. We 228 00:12:14,040 --> 00:12:16,320 Speaker 1: can take this to the next level. That should be. 229 00:12:16,440 --> 00:12:19,240 Speaker 1: That should be a big red flag for anybody across 230 00:12:19,320 --> 00:12:19,959 Speaker 1: the board. 231 00:12:19,920 --> 00:12:21,679 Speaker 2: Even before they get to the part where they make 232 00:12:21,720 --> 00:12:24,440 Speaker 2: that ask for the money. Just like you should lean 233 00:12:24,440 --> 00:12:26,760 Speaker 2: into that anger, you should lean into that fear. You're 234 00:12:26,920 --> 00:12:29,440 Speaker 2: right to feel those things. We need to punish the 235 00:12:29,480 --> 00:12:36,000 Speaker 2: people who have done this to you. That's just not 236 00:12:36,000 --> 00:12:38,160 Speaker 2: not something that somebody who's trying to help is gonna. 237 00:12:37,960 --> 00:12:42,520 Speaker 1: Say absolutely not. Speaking of not trying to help, big 238 00:12:42,600 --> 00:12:46,600 Speaker 1: text capitulation to the Trump administration continues. This time it 239 00:12:46,640 --> 00:12:50,319 Speaker 1: is Spotify and Ice. So we talked a while back 240 00:12:50,360 --> 00:12:53,400 Speaker 1: about how a number of musicians like Massive Attack, one 241 00:12:53,440 --> 00:12:56,319 Speaker 1: of my favorite groups Sylvia and Esso, one of your 242 00:12:56,360 --> 00:12:59,200 Speaker 1: favorite groups Mike Cagen, Gizzard and the Lizard Wizard, which 243 00:12:59,200 --> 00:13:01,959 Speaker 1: the first time you told me about that group, I 244 00:13:02,200 --> 00:13:04,440 Speaker 1: for the entirety of the conversation I did not know 245 00:13:04,440 --> 00:13:06,000 Speaker 1: if you were making it up. We're not. I said, Oh, 246 00:13:06,040 --> 00:13:08,200 Speaker 1: this is a real band. There's a band that you 247 00:13:08,240 --> 00:13:09,720 Speaker 1: are you trying to get one over on you with 248 00:13:09,720 --> 00:13:10,319 Speaker 1: this band name. 249 00:13:10,679 --> 00:13:12,520 Speaker 2: You have no idea how many albums they have. 250 00:13:14,200 --> 00:13:16,040 Speaker 1: I still don't know if they're a real band or not. 251 00:13:16,440 --> 00:13:21,840 Speaker 2: Oh they're real bad. They rock. They are awesome, talented 252 00:13:21,880 --> 00:13:27,360 Speaker 2: musicians who just like crank out music. Go listen to Rattlesnake. 253 00:13:27,640 --> 00:13:30,079 Speaker 1: Okay, well you're gonna like them even more now because 254 00:13:30,520 --> 00:13:33,200 Speaker 1: they have all taken their music off of Spotify. A 255 00:13:33,200 --> 00:13:37,000 Speaker 1: lot of these artists site Spotify founder Daniel x investment 256 00:13:37,120 --> 00:13:40,559 Speaker 1: in the AI military company at Helsing for why they 257 00:13:40,559 --> 00:13:44,160 Speaker 1: have removed their music from the platform, and now it's 258 00:13:44,160 --> 00:13:46,720 Speaker 1: gone from worse to worser, as they say online, because 259 00:13:46,760 --> 00:13:50,360 Speaker 1: Spotify is running these horrible ICE recruitment ads on their 260 00:13:50,400 --> 00:13:54,920 Speaker 1: non paid ad supported tier. The ads say in sanctuary cities, 261 00:13:55,120 --> 00:13:58,680 Speaker 1: you're ordered to stand down while dangerous illegals walk free, 262 00:13:58,880 --> 00:14:02,080 Speaker 1: and urge listeners to quote fulfill their mission and join 263 00:14:02,120 --> 00:14:05,600 Speaker 1: the mission to protect America by joining ICE. I should say, 264 00:14:05,640 --> 00:14:08,800 Speaker 1: it is not just Spotify either, YouTube, Pandora, HBO, Max 265 00:14:08,840 --> 00:14:12,480 Speaker 1: and others also have these ads on their platforms. 266 00:14:12,520 --> 00:14:15,480 Speaker 2: Pretty distasteful, right, it is distasteful. 267 00:14:15,720 --> 00:14:18,640 Speaker 1: Well, don't worry because a Spotify spokesperson says the ads 268 00:14:18,679 --> 00:14:22,440 Speaker 1: do not violate Spotify advertising policy and that Spotify has 269 00:14:22,520 --> 00:14:26,480 Speaker 1: no intention of discontinuing those ads. And the spokesperson says, 270 00:14:26,840 --> 00:14:29,880 Speaker 1: chill out, y'all, because if you don't want to hear 271 00:14:30,040 --> 00:14:33,800 Speaker 1: these ads, listeners are free to thumbs up or thumbs 272 00:14:33,840 --> 00:14:37,520 Speaker 1: down these ads, which would supposedly mean that I guess 273 00:14:37,520 --> 00:14:40,120 Speaker 1: these ads would play a little less often on your 274 00:14:40,160 --> 00:14:44,160 Speaker 1: personalized feed. To me, that simply does not address the problem. 275 00:14:44,160 --> 00:14:46,440 Speaker 1: And the fact that the spokesperson was like, oh, people 276 00:14:46,440 --> 00:14:48,800 Speaker 1: can just like say they don't like these ads. Via 277 00:14:48,840 --> 00:14:51,800 Speaker 1: thumbs down. It just shows to me how not seriously 278 00:14:51,840 --> 00:14:52,880 Speaker 1: Spotify is taking this. 279 00:14:53,280 --> 00:14:55,840 Speaker 2: I also love how the ads just become like another 280 00:14:55,880 --> 00:14:58,480 Speaker 2: form of content, like, oh, I love this ad, Give 281 00:14:58,520 --> 00:15:00,960 Speaker 2: me more of these ads. No one says that no 282 00:15:00,960 --> 00:15:01,600 Speaker 2: one wants that. 283 00:15:02,080 --> 00:15:05,120 Speaker 1: Stereo Gum reports at the record label Epitaph, which has 284 00:15:05,160 --> 00:15:08,640 Speaker 1: bands like Bad Religion and Pennywise, and then their sister 285 00:15:08,760 --> 00:15:12,200 Speaker 1: label Anti, which has musicians like Nico Kase, Nick Cave, 286 00:15:12,320 --> 00:15:15,120 Speaker 1: and Tom Waits, have both posted a message calling for 287 00:15:15,160 --> 00:15:18,920 Speaker 1: Spotify to remove these ads. So Snopes reached out to 288 00:15:18,960 --> 00:15:22,160 Speaker 1: the Department of Homeland Security, which oversees ICE, about these ads. 289 00:15:22,480 --> 00:15:26,040 Speaker 1: The assistant DJs secretary responded basically saying, Yeah, We're doing 290 00:15:26,080 --> 00:15:31,040 Speaker 1: a huge nationwide recruitment campaign, saying, quote, the ICE recruitment 291 00:15:31,080 --> 00:15:33,640 Speaker 1: campaign is a resounding success, with more than one hundred 292 00:15:33,640 --> 00:15:37,640 Speaker 1: and fifty applications rolling in from patriotic Americans answering the 293 00:15:37,680 --> 00:15:40,080 Speaker 1: call to defend the whole land by helping to arrest 294 00:15:40,360 --> 00:15:42,600 Speaker 1: and remove the worst of the worst from our country. 295 00:15:42,840 --> 00:15:45,880 Speaker 1: You know people who are being arrested lawfully at court 296 00:15:45,920 --> 00:15:49,200 Speaker 1: appointments or appointments with their attorney, or people who are 297 00:15:49,240 --> 00:15:52,720 Speaker 1: trying to pursue gainful employment to put food on their table, 298 00:15:52,760 --> 00:15:54,000 Speaker 1: you know, the worst of the worst people. 299 00:15:54,280 --> 00:15:56,880 Speaker 2: It's one of the most cruel and duplicitous things this 300 00:15:57,000 --> 00:16:01,360 Speaker 2: cruel and DUPLICITUS administration has done, in continues doing, is 301 00:16:01,640 --> 00:16:04,880 Speaker 2: attempting to smear all immigrants to this country as the 302 00:16:04,880 --> 00:16:07,520 Speaker 2: worst of the worst, as if everyone who's an immigrant 303 00:16:07,560 --> 00:16:10,640 Speaker 2: here is like a dangerous criminal, when the data is 304 00:16:10,640 --> 00:16:13,640 Speaker 2: pretty clear that immigrants in this country are less likely 305 00:16:13,680 --> 00:16:15,920 Speaker 2: to commit violent crimes than native port Americans. 306 00:16:16,440 --> 00:16:18,880 Speaker 1: Yes, and I think you know, first of all, don't 307 00:16:18,960 --> 00:16:21,840 Speaker 1: let anybody ever tell you that technology is neutral ever again, 308 00:16:22,280 --> 00:16:24,960 Speaker 1: because I think what these Spotify ads really show us 309 00:16:25,040 --> 00:16:28,160 Speaker 1: is how deeply entwined big tech has become with government 310 00:16:28,200 --> 00:16:31,760 Speaker 1: power and our current administration, even the most odious parts 311 00:16:31,800 --> 00:16:35,360 Speaker 1: of it. When you have platforms claiming neutrality while profiting 312 00:16:35,360 --> 00:16:38,760 Speaker 1: off of these ice recruitment ads, it's not neutral at all. 313 00:16:38,800 --> 00:16:41,520 Speaker 1: It is a choice for artists who see their music 314 00:16:41,520 --> 00:16:45,040 Speaker 1: as protests. That choice probably makes Spotify feel a lot 315 00:16:45,120 --> 00:16:47,640 Speaker 1: less like a platform for creativity and more like an 316 00:16:47,720 --> 00:16:51,040 Speaker 1: arm of the state. And I think the content of 317 00:16:51,120 --> 00:16:54,240 Speaker 1: these ads, in the ads, they're not even pretending to 318 00:16:54,240 --> 00:16:56,840 Speaker 1: be neutral. Right. They don't sound like ads that are 319 00:16:56,880 --> 00:17:01,440 Speaker 1: recruiting people to nonpartisan civil service or government jobs. They 320 00:17:01,520 --> 00:17:04,560 Speaker 1: sound like campaign ads for the Trump administration. The ads 321 00:17:04,560 --> 00:17:05,560 Speaker 1: are partisan as hell. 322 00:17:06,080 --> 00:17:10,720 Speaker 2: Yeah, they use the exact same language, and like most 323 00:17:10,720 --> 00:17:13,920 Speaker 2: messaging out of the Trump administration, they're full of lies, 324 00:17:14,960 --> 00:17:18,119 Speaker 2: lies about people, and lies about our cities being prime 325 00:17:18,200 --> 00:17:21,280 Speaker 2: ridden hell holes filled with the worst of the worst, 326 00:17:21,320 --> 00:17:22,080 Speaker 2: as they call it. 327 00:17:22,400 --> 00:17:25,600 Speaker 1: Yeah, there's nothing neutral about it. And people are leaving 328 00:17:25,720 --> 00:17:29,000 Speaker 1: Spotify in protests. And so if you are hearing this 329 00:17:29,119 --> 00:17:32,359 Speaker 1: and you're like, fuck Ice, fuck Spotify, just go to 330 00:17:32,440 --> 00:17:35,879 Speaker 1: bit dot lea slash cancel Spotify. They have an entire 331 00:17:35,960 --> 00:17:38,879 Speaker 1: page of resources to help organize folks who are interested 332 00:17:38,880 --> 00:17:41,119 Speaker 1: in bore hiding Spotify. We will put that in the 333 00:17:41,119 --> 00:17:45,560 Speaker 1: show notes more after a quick. 334 00:17:45,400 --> 00:17:57,080 Speaker 3: Break, let's get right back into it. 335 00:18:00,280 --> 00:18:03,159 Speaker 1: Speaking of ICE lies, I don't think anybody needs to 336 00:18:03,160 --> 00:18:07,360 Speaker 1: be reminded that Homeland Security Secretary Christy no is a liar. 337 00:18:07,680 --> 00:18:10,879 Speaker 1: But now she is lying on a specific black youth. 338 00:18:11,240 --> 00:18:14,520 Speaker 1: So she has been saying that drug cartels were placing 339 00:18:14,600 --> 00:18:19,160 Speaker 1: bounties on ICE agent's heads. Then the official DHS account 340 00:18:19,359 --> 00:18:22,920 Speaker 1: posted a video purporting to show a young black man 341 00:18:23,680 --> 00:18:27,480 Speaker 1: featuring an on screen message that reads Ice We're on 342 00:18:27,600 --> 00:18:30,280 Speaker 1: the way. Word in the streets cartels put a fifty 343 00:18:30,400 --> 00:18:34,160 Speaker 1: k bounty on y'all. Only the person in this video said, 344 00:18:34,359 --> 00:18:36,399 Speaker 1: I never said that. That was not what my video 345 00:18:36,440 --> 00:18:38,640 Speaker 1: was about. They stole my video and made this up. 346 00:18:39,119 --> 00:18:41,320 Speaker 1: So he said it was an old TikTok that he 347 00:18:41,400 --> 00:18:44,000 Speaker 1: made where he wasn't talking about Ice at all. He 348 00:18:44,080 --> 00:18:47,080 Speaker 1: was actually talking about Iran as a joke, and that 349 00:18:47,240 --> 00:18:50,600 Speaker 1: DHS took the video edited it to make it seem 350 00:18:50,640 --> 00:18:53,440 Speaker 1: like he was threatening Ice before disseminating it. Here's a 351 00:18:53,480 --> 00:18:54,800 Speaker 1: little bit of what he had to say. 352 00:18:55,200 --> 00:18:58,600 Speaker 4: And I've seen the caps and then I was like, wait, 353 00:18:58,720 --> 00:19:01,960 Speaker 4: I didn't do that. Still got the video saved on 354 00:19:02,080 --> 00:19:05,040 Speaker 4: my draft months ago. On TikTok bro, I was like, 355 00:19:05,080 --> 00:19:07,600 Speaker 4: I'm gonna pull it up right here. Now here's the 356 00:19:07,640 --> 00:19:12,280 Speaker 4: fucked up part. The federal government is involved with something 357 00:19:12,280 --> 00:19:16,679 Speaker 4: that I didn't do. Like what, So this is what 358 00:19:16,760 --> 00:19:22,520 Speaker 4: they reposted offline TikTok. That video got taken down, So 359 00:19:22,840 --> 00:19:29,640 Speaker 4: here's what they reposted on their page. Now that video 360 00:19:29,720 --> 00:19:33,320 Speaker 4: was going crazy him on Twitter. Bro, Now I'm a 361 00:19:33,480 --> 00:19:37,800 Speaker 4: threat to the government or something that I didn't do 362 00:19:38,280 --> 00:19:41,159 Speaker 4: bro I'm being called I want to be jy in, 363 00:19:41,400 --> 00:19:45,960 Speaker 4: I want to be gangster over a video that I 364 00:19:46,040 --> 00:19:48,000 Speaker 4: didn't caption or. 365 00:19:48,840 --> 00:19:49,600 Speaker 3: What do you post? 366 00:19:50,119 --> 00:19:52,520 Speaker 1: D just is sticking by what they said. A DHS 367 00:19:52,520 --> 00:19:56,359 Speaker 1: spokesperson told The Independent, this young man posted violent threats 368 00:19:56,400 --> 00:19:59,080 Speaker 1: of murder against our law enforcement. He then deleted it 369 00:19:59,080 --> 00:20:01,639 Speaker 1: when he was called out in attempted to deny all wrongdoing. 370 00:20:01,920 --> 00:20:04,680 Speaker 1: We have the receipts and the Internet is forever. DHS 371 00:20:04,760 --> 00:20:07,560 Speaker 1: did not edit, change, use AI or any other manner 372 00:20:07,760 --> 00:20:10,280 Speaker 1: to alter this video. So I don't know for sure, 373 00:20:10,320 --> 00:20:12,400 Speaker 1: and this is just my opinion about how they are 374 00:20:12,440 --> 00:20:15,600 Speaker 1: able to say this about this man's video. This man 375 00:20:15,640 --> 00:20:17,960 Speaker 1: has been so clear that it was aboudy Run. I 376 00:20:18,000 --> 00:20:21,800 Speaker 1: never mentioned ice. This video was months old. What they're 377 00:20:21,800 --> 00:20:24,560 Speaker 1: saying is not true. I think what DHS is saying 378 00:20:24,640 --> 00:20:28,159 Speaker 1: is that we did not use AI or edit the video, 379 00:20:28,520 --> 00:20:33,200 Speaker 1: but that putting text on somebody else's video. They're probably 380 00:20:33,359 --> 00:20:36,600 Speaker 1: banking on people not seeing that as editing because that 381 00:20:36,680 --> 00:20:40,200 Speaker 1: is so commonplace on TikTok. So they're saying we didn't 382 00:20:40,320 --> 00:20:43,240 Speaker 1: change what he does in the video via AI or 383 00:20:43,280 --> 00:20:47,200 Speaker 1: manipulate it. But in my opinion. What they're probably leaving 384 00:20:47,240 --> 00:20:50,440 Speaker 1: out pretty crucially is that certainly he did not put 385 00:20:50,480 --> 00:20:53,480 Speaker 1: that text on the screen about a fifty k bounty. 386 00:20:53,640 --> 00:20:55,879 Speaker 1: They added that, So I think that they're kind of 387 00:20:55,920 --> 00:20:57,520 Speaker 1: it kind of reminds me of the MS Doen with 388 00:20:57,560 --> 00:21:01,080 Speaker 1: the MS thirteen thing, where they very clearly went in 389 00:21:01,160 --> 00:21:06,000 Speaker 1: and typed MS thirteen on a tattoo for President Trump, 390 00:21:06,160 --> 00:21:08,919 Speaker 1: and then later in a debate, it was clear that 391 00:21:09,040 --> 00:21:12,920 Speaker 1: President Trump did not understand that somebody had obviously gone 392 00:21:12,960 --> 00:21:15,600 Speaker 1: in and written MS thirteen, but that was not the 393 00:21:15,680 --> 00:21:18,240 Speaker 1: literal image of a tattoo. And like, it's the semantics 394 00:21:18,240 --> 00:21:20,480 Speaker 1: that they get so stupid. But I think that's what's 395 00:21:20,520 --> 00:21:22,199 Speaker 1: going on here. If I had to say, this is 396 00:21:22,200 --> 00:21:23,320 Speaker 1: just my opinion, I. 397 00:21:23,280 --> 00:21:30,159 Speaker 2: Mean, it makes sense what you've described. It's insane that 398 00:21:30,160 --> 00:21:34,360 Speaker 2: that is something that the Department's Nansecurity could be credibly 399 00:21:34,359 --> 00:21:38,680 Speaker 2: accused of doing. But absolutely, I mean, they they used 400 00:21:38,720 --> 00:21:44,560 Speaker 2: that same kind of like gotcha technicalities about semantics and 401 00:21:44,600 --> 00:21:49,000 Speaker 2: court filings with judges, So why wouldn't they use with 402 00:21:49,040 --> 00:21:52,520 Speaker 2: the American public the words they had on the screen, 403 00:21:52,920 --> 00:21:56,159 Speaker 2: ice were on the way word in the street cartels 404 00:21:56,200 --> 00:21:58,959 Speaker 2: put a fifty K bounty on you all. So, like, 405 00:22:00,200 --> 00:22:03,200 Speaker 2: what we're supposed to believe is that this youth heard 406 00:22:03,359 --> 00:22:08,119 Speaker 2: somebody on the streets say that some unspecified cartels have 407 00:22:08,160 --> 00:22:12,400 Speaker 2: a bounty, and so he's hoping to collect that. He's 408 00:22:12,400 --> 00:22:18,920 Speaker 2: just gonna like attack an ICE officer and then show 409 00:22:19,000 --> 00:22:22,480 Speaker 2: up at some unspecified cartel headquarters and be like, where's 410 00:22:22,520 --> 00:22:26,800 Speaker 2: my fifty thousand dollars. That's what we're meant to believe 411 00:22:27,200 --> 00:22:28,080 Speaker 2: is a real thing. 412 00:22:28,760 --> 00:22:32,560 Speaker 1: Yeah, it doesn't quite pass the Smith test with me either, 413 00:22:32,800 --> 00:22:36,120 Speaker 1: I have to say. And who wouldn't want to join 414 00:22:36,160 --> 00:22:38,479 Speaker 1: the ranks of an organization like this? Who wouldn't want 415 00:22:38,520 --> 00:22:39,760 Speaker 1: to work with people like this? 416 00:22:40,280 --> 00:22:44,480 Speaker 2: God? Yeah, yeah, that's just the I mean, they talk 417 00:22:44,520 --> 00:22:47,439 Speaker 2: about going after the worst of the worst, they should 418 00:22:47,640 --> 00:22:49,800 Speaker 2: really look at their own ranks, like these are not 419 00:22:49,880 --> 00:22:50,800 Speaker 2: the best of the best. 420 00:22:51,040 --> 00:22:53,720 Speaker 1: They're not sending their best. Okay, So this is a 421 00:22:53,720 --> 00:22:56,160 Speaker 1: little bit of a tough story, so trigger warning up top, 422 00:22:56,320 --> 00:22:58,760 Speaker 1: But we have to talk about the climate going on 423 00:22:58,920 --> 00:23:04,040 Speaker 1: toward women stream right now. Weeks ago, streamers Bealcree and 424 00:23:04,200 --> 00:23:07,000 Speaker 1: qt Cinderella said that they were really worried about going 425 00:23:07,080 --> 00:23:09,879 Speaker 1: to TwitchCon this year, which is a big gathering of 426 00:23:10,000 --> 00:23:12,600 Speaker 1: live streamers and the people that watch them. They were 427 00:23:12,640 --> 00:23:17,040 Speaker 1: specifically concerned about things like lack security at events where 428 00:23:17,400 --> 00:23:21,000 Speaker 1: live streamers gather after some pretty high profile events where 429 00:23:21,200 --> 00:23:25,160 Speaker 1: folks were able to crash those events. They also pointed 430 00:23:25,160 --> 00:23:29,000 Speaker 1: to an increasing number of violent or harassing incidents, specifically 431 00:23:29,040 --> 00:23:32,479 Speaker 1: targeting women who make digital content and live stream content. 432 00:23:32,680 --> 00:23:35,919 Speaker 1: Twitch is CEO Dan Clancy, who runs TwitchCon, which is 433 00:23:35,920 --> 00:23:39,960 Speaker 1: owned by Amazon, said that the company takes security very seriously, 434 00:23:40,520 --> 00:23:43,920 Speaker 1: but unfortunately, on the first day of TwitchCon, the popular 435 00:23:43,960 --> 00:23:48,240 Speaker 1: streamer Amiru was assaulted during a meet and greet at 436 00:23:48,320 --> 00:23:50,840 Speaker 1: the event. So I saw the video of what happened. 437 00:23:50,880 --> 00:23:55,480 Speaker 1: It's horrifying. She's standing there, there's people around, and basically 438 00:23:55,520 --> 00:23:58,840 Speaker 1: this big guy rushes up to her and grabs her. 439 00:23:59,040 --> 00:24:01,240 Speaker 1: To me, I mean, I wasn't there, but to me, 440 00:24:01,280 --> 00:24:03,200 Speaker 1: it almost looked like he was trying to choke her, 441 00:24:03,480 --> 00:24:06,240 Speaker 1: but other people said that he was trying to grab 442 00:24:06,280 --> 00:24:09,680 Speaker 1: her to kiss her. Either way, it is terrifying. Her 443 00:24:09,720 --> 00:24:13,160 Speaker 1: security guard, who was standing nearby, shoves the man, and 444 00:24:13,200 --> 00:24:16,320 Speaker 1: then the man is just sort of allowed to visibly 445 00:24:16,440 --> 00:24:19,960 Speaker 1: kind of walk away. Twitch later clarifies that that man 446 00:24:20,160 --> 00:24:22,880 Speaker 1: was found, apprehended and removed from the event and banned 447 00:24:22,880 --> 00:24:26,919 Speaker 1: from future events. According to Tube Filter, they say that 448 00:24:26,960 --> 00:24:29,760 Speaker 1: it's worth noting that the security personnel who pushed that 449 00:24:30,040 --> 00:24:34,360 Speaker 1: man is not this streamer's preferred bodyguard, because her preferred 450 00:24:34,359 --> 00:24:37,480 Speaker 1: bodyguard was perma ban from twitch Con because at a 451 00:24:37,600 --> 00:24:40,959 Speaker 1: previous event he physically stopped a man who had been 452 00:24:41,000 --> 00:24:44,359 Speaker 1: stalking Amru around the convention. Now, she explained that her 453 00:24:44,440 --> 00:24:47,600 Speaker 1: bodyguard did not push, punch, or hurt the stalker in 454 00:24:47,640 --> 00:24:50,240 Speaker 1: any way. He just held him in place. But because 455 00:24:50,280 --> 00:24:53,800 Speaker 1: he physically engaged the stalker, he is no longer allowed 456 00:24:53,840 --> 00:24:57,160 Speaker 1: to work with her or protector at twitch con events. 457 00:24:57,320 --> 00:25:00,000 Speaker 1: So when she was assaulted at twitch Con this time around, 458 00:25:00,280 --> 00:25:03,520 Speaker 1: her preferred security guard was not there because these organizers 459 00:25:03,600 --> 00:25:08,360 Speaker 1: had banned him. So, in a statement, Amiru disputed much 460 00:25:08,400 --> 00:25:11,199 Speaker 1: of Twitch's account of what happened during this assault. She 461 00:25:11,200 --> 00:25:13,919 Speaker 1: said that they what they said was a blatant lie. 462 00:25:14,119 --> 00:25:16,720 Speaker 1: Here's what she had to say about the incident yesterday. 463 00:25:16,720 --> 00:25:19,000 Speaker 1: The man who assaulted me was allowed to cross multiple 464 00:25:19,080 --> 00:25:21,480 Speaker 1: barriers at twitch Con, and even in front of another 465 00:25:21,520 --> 00:25:24,119 Speaker 1: creator's meet and greet, tried to grab me and kiss me. 466 00:25:24,520 --> 00:25:26,800 Speaker 1: Fortunately he wasn't able to, but a lot of people 467 00:25:26,800 --> 00:25:28,679 Speaker 1: have pointed out that could have been a lot worse. 468 00:25:28,800 --> 00:25:30,720 Speaker 1: I'm obviously shaken up by what happened, and it's not 469 00:25:30,800 --> 00:25:32,479 Speaker 1: the first time that I've dealt with something like this, 470 00:25:32,920 --> 00:25:35,720 Speaker 1: But to tell you honestly, I'm a lot more hurt 471 00:25:35,720 --> 00:25:38,480 Speaker 1: and upset by how Twitch handled it during and after 472 00:25:38,560 --> 00:25:40,639 Speaker 1: the fact. I don't understand how he was allowed to 473 00:25:40,640 --> 00:25:43,200 Speaker 1: make it to me in the first place. The security 474 00:25:43,200 --> 00:25:46,000 Speaker 1: in the clip who reacts is my own security. It's true. 475 00:25:46,040 --> 00:25:48,439 Speaker 1: My favorite and usual security guard was banned for holding 476 00:25:48,520 --> 00:25:50,399 Speaker 1: a stalker's arm to bring him to police at a 477 00:25:50,440 --> 00:25:53,720 Speaker 1: past TWITCHCN. However, there were at least three or four 478 00:25:53,800 --> 00:25:57,520 Speaker 1: other TWITCHCN security staff in the area who did not react. 479 00:25:57,520 --> 00:25:59,400 Speaker 1: I left the guy walk away, as you can see 480 00:25:59,480 --> 00:26:01,240 Speaker 1: in the clips since they don't even appear in the 481 00:26:01,240 --> 00:26:03,720 Speaker 1: frame lol. She says that the people in the clip 482 00:26:03,720 --> 00:26:06,920 Speaker 1: who are checking on her are her own friends and staff, 483 00:26:07,240 --> 00:26:09,840 Speaker 1: and that none of the twitch con staff even came 484 00:26:09,880 --> 00:26:12,080 Speaker 1: to ask what was happening or that she was okay. 485 00:26:12,520 --> 00:26:14,840 Speaker 1: It gets worse because she says, my friend who was 486 00:26:14,880 --> 00:26:18,120 Speaker 1: present told me Twitch security were also behind the booth afterward, 487 00:26:18,560 --> 00:26:21,280 Speaker 1: joking about how they didn't see what happened and immediately 488 00:26:21,359 --> 00:26:24,439 Speaker 1: laughing and moving on to talk about something else. So 489 00:26:24,520 --> 00:26:26,439 Speaker 1: if no one was checking if I was okay or 490 00:26:26,520 --> 00:26:28,920 Speaker 1: needed anything, and they let the guy run away initially, 491 00:26:29,160 --> 00:26:31,199 Speaker 1: I have no idea what anyone hired to keep the 492 00:26:31,200 --> 00:26:34,200 Speaker 1: event safe was doing. In Twitch's statement, they said the 493 00:26:34,240 --> 00:26:37,399 Speaker 1: guy was immediately caught and attained. I'm sorry, but that 494 00:26:37,520 --> 00:26:40,120 Speaker 1: is a blatant lie. He was allowed to walk away 495 00:26:40,119 --> 00:26:41,960 Speaker 1: from my meet and greet and I didn't hear that 496 00:26:42,000 --> 00:26:44,639 Speaker 1: he was caught until hours after he attacked me. And 497 00:26:44,680 --> 00:26:46,880 Speaker 1: it felt like this only happened because of my manager 498 00:26:46,920 --> 00:26:50,600 Speaker 1: pressing for it, not because TWITCHCN staff present thought it 499 00:26:50,640 --> 00:26:54,520 Speaker 1: was a big deal. And yeah, I really feel for her. 500 00:26:54,600 --> 00:26:57,760 Speaker 1: It's horrifying that this has happened. You know, there have 501 00:26:57,800 --> 00:27:01,199 Speaker 1: been other incidents where people run up on celebrities or 502 00:27:01,240 --> 00:27:05,160 Speaker 1: public figures that they have parasocial relationships with and things 503 00:27:05,320 --> 00:27:09,000 Speaker 1: end much worse. You know, people like Christina Grimmy who 504 00:27:09,119 --> 00:27:11,520 Speaker 1: in twenty sixteen was doing a meet and greet and 505 00:27:11,720 --> 00:27:16,720 Speaker 1: was killed by a obsessive stalker who went up to 506 00:27:16,760 --> 00:27:19,439 Speaker 1: her meet and greet and murdered her, like, just in 507 00:27:19,480 --> 00:27:21,439 Speaker 1: front of all of her fans. And so what this 508 00:27:21,560 --> 00:27:24,719 Speaker 1: live streamer is saying is absolutely true. As horrifying as 509 00:27:24,760 --> 00:27:27,560 Speaker 1: what happened to her is, it genuinely could have been 510 00:27:27,560 --> 00:27:29,760 Speaker 1: a lot worse. And it sounds like what she's saying 511 00:27:29,840 --> 00:27:33,640 Speaker 1: is that TWITCHCN staff didn't do a ton to make 512 00:27:33,680 --> 00:27:37,000 Speaker 1: sure that she was okay afterward, and that TWITCHCN staff 513 00:27:37,160 --> 00:27:39,919 Speaker 1: really neglected to take this kind of thing seriously, to 514 00:27:39,920 --> 00:27:41,480 Speaker 1: the point where she says, I'm never coming back to 515 00:27:41,480 --> 00:27:43,360 Speaker 1: one of these things again, which honestly, I can't even 516 00:27:43,359 --> 00:27:43,880 Speaker 1: blame her. 517 00:27:44,440 --> 00:27:47,200 Speaker 2: Yeah, I don't blame her either. 518 00:27:47,760 --> 00:27:50,120 Speaker 1: It sounds to me that women in this community had 519 00:27:50,160 --> 00:27:53,200 Speaker 1: been warning about the way that this community treats women 520 00:27:53,400 --> 00:27:56,159 Speaker 1: contact graders for some time. Here's how NBC put it 521 00:27:56,400 --> 00:27:59,879 Speaker 1: to many fans online, her assault validated long running fears 522 00:28:00,040 --> 00:28:03,840 Speaker 1: that streamer safety at in person event, particularly scheduled meet 523 00:28:03,880 --> 00:28:06,399 Speaker 1: and greets where fans know exactly where a particular creator 524 00:28:06,440 --> 00:28:09,359 Speaker 1: will be ahead of time. Some streamers online claim that 525 00:28:09,400 --> 00:28:11,720 Speaker 1: they canceled their meet and greets or skipped this year's 526 00:28:11,720 --> 00:28:15,400 Speaker 1: Switchcon all together because of existing concerns about security, while 527 00:28:15,400 --> 00:28:17,760 Speaker 1: others said that they plan to shun future twitch Con 528 00:28:17,760 --> 00:28:22,200 Speaker 1: events in solidarity with Amiru. So I think that one 529 00:28:22,240 --> 00:28:23,920 Speaker 1: It's the tale as all the time that we talk 530 00:28:23,960 --> 00:28:26,680 Speaker 1: about on the show all the time, of women saying, hey, 531 00:28:27,119 --> 00:28:30,400 Speaker 1: this thing is happening in the community. It is potentially dangerous, 532 00:28:30,400 --> 00:28:33,920 Speaker 1: somebody needs to do something. It not being taken super seriously, 533 00:28:34,560 --> 00:28:37,480 Speaker 1: it being allowed to fester, the women sort of being 534 00:28:37,640 --> 00:28:39,600 Speaker 1: made to just deal with it on their own, and 535 00:28:39,640 --> 00:28:42,320 Speaker 1: this kind of thing happening. But I also do think, 536 00:28:42,480 --> 00:28:45,680 Speaker 1: if I'm just being real, I think that Twitch probably 537 00:28:45,760 --> 00:28:48,160 Speaker 1: is the kind of company where they make their real 538 00:28:48,240 --> 00:28:53,040 Speaker 1: money from their mega users, people who probably are more 539 00:28:53,200 --> 00:28:57,280 Speaker 1: likely to have a deep, unhealthy parasocial relationship with some 540 00:28:57,320 --> 00:28:59,840 Speaker 1: of their favorite contact creators, right, And so I have 541 00:29:00,200 --> 00:29:04,120 Speaker 1: feeling that Twitch perhaps does not want to alienate those 542 00:29:04,160 --> 00:29:06,600 Speaker 1: people because they are their cash cows. They are making 543 00:29:06,640 --> 00:29:08,520 Speaker 1: a ton of money from them, and so the company 544 00:29:08,600 --> 00:29:12,880 Speaker 1: probably can't really alienate the people who there are making 545 00:29:12,920 --> 00:29:15,160 Speaker 1: the company the most money, and that is just got 546 00:29:15,200 --> 00:29:16,760 Speaker 1: to be more likely to be the kind of people 547 00:29:16,800 --> 00:29:22,600 Speaker 1: who have unhealthy relationships or parasocial relationships with streamers, and 548 00:29:22,640 --> 00:29:25,240 Speaker 1: so that has to be part of the problem here. 549 00:29:25,320 --> 00:29:28,320 Speaker 1: Of like, Twitch probably doesn't want to just ban all 550 00:29:28,360 --> 00:29:31,440 Speaker 1: these people because there's tons of money to be made 551 00:29:31,480 --> 00:29:32,600 Speaker 1: from these people. 552 00:29:32,880 --> 00:29:37,760 Speaker 2: Certainly checks out with what we've seen just across tech 553 00:29:37,800 --> 00:29:42,040 Speaker 2: companies in general. And also you know the fact that 554 00:29:42,760 --> 00:29:46,959 Speaker 2: Twitch is the platform on which this all of this happens, right, 555 00:29:46,960 --> 00:29:49,040 Speaker 2: It's like it's a platform and it's also kind of 556 00:29:49,040 --> 00:29:55,480 Speaker 2: an ecosystem where these creators make their living and fans 557 00:29:55,600 --> 00:29:59,240 Speaker 2: and viewers. I think many, not all, but like many 558 00:29:59,360 --> 00:30:03,680 Speaker 2: spend a lot of their time watching streamers on this platform. 559 00:30:04,120 --> 00:30:08,840 Speaker 2: And so it's both like sort of tempting to call 560 00:30:08,840 --> 00:30:12,080 Speaker 2: it like a decentralized ecosystem where there are creators and 561 00:30:12,200 --> 00:30:15,440 Speaker 2: viewers and money flowing back and forth, but also like 562 00:30:15,640 --> 00:30:18,479 Speaker 2: very not decentralized, and there's really like one you know, 563 00:30:18,600 --> 00:30:22,320 Speaker 2: Twitch like runs the whole thing, And what a lot 564 00:30:22,320 --> 00:30:26,760 Speaker 2: of power to have over a community like this. 565 00:30:31,360 --> 00:30:45,640 Speaker 1: More after a quick break, let's get right back into it. 566 00:30:48,720 --> 00:30:52,080 Speaker 1: So open Ai just released their web browser called Atlas, 567 00:30:52,440 --> 00:30:55,280 Speaker 1: and I've been reading into it. I've not used it myself. 568 00:30:55,840 --> 00:30:58,400 Speaker 1: I'll get to why in a moment, but I think 569 00:30:58,480 --> 00:31:01,720 Speaker 1: folks should be a little bit wary of at List 570 00:31:01,800 --> 00:31:06,120 Speaker 1: because Atlas sounds to me like a privacy nightmare, even 571 00:31:06,160 --> 00:31:09,320 Speaker 1: in a landscape where a lot of browsers are bad 572 00:31:09,400 --> 00:31:11,480 Speaker 1: on privacy. According to a piece I read in the 573 00:31:11,480 --> 00:31:14,520 Speaker 1: Post called shashypt just came out with its own web browser. 574 00:31:14,680 --> 00:31:18,000 Speaker 1: Use it with caution. The browser from open ai out 575 00:31:18,080 --> 00:31:22,280 Speaker 1: surveils even Google Chrome, and that is saying something. It 576 00:31:22,280 --> 00:31:25,240 Speaker 1: doesn't just log which websites you visit. It also stores 577 00:31:25,600 --> 00:31:28,480 Speaker 1: quote memories of what you look at and what you 578 00:31:28,560 --> 00:31:31,560 Speaker 1: do on those sites. It can even grab control of 579 00:31:31,600 --> 00:31:35,880 Speaker 1: your mouth and browse for you. Yikes. Atlas works to 580 00:31:35,960 --> 00:31:39,080 Speaker 1: learn a ton about you if you grant permission during setup, 581 00:31:39,280 --> 00:31:41,880 Speaker 1: the browser build a trove of memories about the sites 582 00:31:41,920 --> 00:31:45,120 Speaker 1: that you visit and surfaces them when you need them, 583 00:31:45,320 --> 00:31:47,960 Speaker 1: so you could tell at Liss, for instance, open the 584 00:31:47,960 --> 00:31:50,800 Speaker 1: Halloween decorations I was looking at last week in some tabs, 585 00:31:51,080 --> 00:31:54,480 Speaker 1: and it could do it. Creepy. Atlass remembers not just 586 00:31:54,520 --> 00:31:58,720 Speaker 1: website addresses, but quote facts and insights from the sites themselves, 587 00:31:58,760 --> 00:32:01,400 Speaker 1: based on summaries of the content open ai makes on 588 00:32:01,480 --> 00:32:04,440 Speaker 1: its own surfers. So for instance, it might remember that 589 00:32:04,480 --> 00:32:06,640 Speaker 1: you have a trip coming up and that you prefer 590 00:32:06,800 --> 00:32:10,480 Speaker 1: Delta airlines and use Google Calendars, so these memories would 591 00:32:10,480 --> 00:32:14,360 Speaker 1: shape your experience across the browser. CHATGBT then tailor's its 592 00:32:14,400 --> 00:32:17,600 Speaker 1: responses to your Atlas memories in future chats, and the 593 00:32:17,640 --> 00:32:20,840 Speaker 1: browser's home screen offers personalized suggestions of things that you 594 00:32:20,840 --> 00:32:24,040 Speaker 1: should do next, such as find a vegetarian recipe. So, 595 00:32:24,240 --> 00:32:27,280 Speaker 1: if you are cool with trading this amount of your 596 00:32:27,320 --> 00:32:30,600 Speaker 1: privacy and data security for convenience, maybe all of this 597 00:32:30,640 --> 00:32:32,600 Speaker 1: doesn't sound so bad. Maybe you're like, oh, it will 598 00:32:32,640 --> 00:32:35,000 Speaker 1: be convenient for my browser to know that I only 599 00:32:35,040 --> 00:32:37,720 Speaker 1: fly Delta and surface me Delta flights only. 600 00:32:37,800 --> 00:32:40,800 Speaker 2: Right, I was just talking about digital nihilism. Sure, let's go. 601 00:32:42,800 --> 00:32:45,080 Speaker 1: I mean, on the one hand, I hear it, right, 602 00:32:45,120 --> 00:32:48,440 Speaker 1: I hear that how it would be very convenient. 603 00:32:48,440 --> 00:32:52,360 Speaker 2: These things would be super convenient. But at what cost? 604 00:32:52,480 --> 00:32:55,840 Speaker 1: Bridget I mean, is it really that much we're convenient? 605 00:32:56,080 --> 00:32:59,440 Speaker 1: Is it that hard to just go to Google flights 606 00:32:59,480 --> 00:33:02,120 Speaker 1: and then pick out the Delta flights yourself? Is it 607 00:33:02,560 --> 00:33:04,360 Speaker 1: really that big of a convenience? 608 00:33:04,440 --> 00:33:07,560 Speaker 2: Oh my god, I already looked up these Halloween decorations 609 00:33:07,640 --> 00:33:11,360 Speaker 2: last week. I'm supposed to do it again. Now, what 610 00:33:11,400 --> 00:33:12,360 Speaker 2: are computers for? 611 00:33:12,840 --> 00:33:15,200 Speaker 1: Like, even in these examples that they're giving us, where 612 00:33:15,240 --> 00:33:18,600 Speaker 1: clearly this is open aiyes, rosy version of it, where 613 00:33:18,600 --> 00:33:20,280 Speaker 1: it's going to save you so much time and effort. 614 00:33:20,320 --> 00:33:22,160 Speaker 1: It doesn't really sound like it saves you that much time. 615 00:33:22,200 --> 00:33:24,360 Speaker 1: I mean, we're ultimately just talking about getting keys on 616 00:33:24,360 --> 00:33:26,240 Speaker 1: a keyboard here and clicking a mouth. 617 00:33:26,640 --> 00:33:29,840 Speaker 2: Yeah. But anyway, so it would be convenient. So is 618 00:33:29,840 --> 00:33:32,160 Speaker 2: that the whole thing, just like the convenience of privacy? 619 00:33:32,560 --> 00:33:35,280 Speaker 1: Yeah, just can end the seglement right there. That's it. 620 00:33:35,400 --> 00:33:38,280 Speaker 1: Nothing else to say. Oh wait, only it does not 621 00:33:38,480 --> 00:33:41,560 Speaker 1: take much to imagine the kind of memories that you 622 00:33:41,640 --> 00:33:45,160 Speaker 1: might not want your search engine remembering about you forever. 623 00:33:45,640 --> 00:33:49,960 Speaker 1: And I gotta say this level of surveillance and remembering 624 00:33:50,200 --> 00:33:53,520 Speaker 1: is particularly fraught in our current social and political climate. 625 00:33:53,560 --> 00:33:56,720 Speaker 1: For instance, when Jeffrey Fowler from The Post asked open 626 00:33:56,760 --> 00:33:59,320 Speaker 1: ai if governments would be able to ask open ai 627 00:33:59,480 --> 00:34:02,840 Speaker 1: to hand over people's browsing data and memories, or what 628 00:34:02,960 --> 00:34:05,800 Speaker 1: happens if they're researching activities that are not legal in 629 00:34:05,840 --> 00:34:10,400 Speaker 1: certain states, such as abortion, open ai did not immediately 630 00:34:10,480 --> 00:34:14,279 Speaker 1: reply to his question, which, Yeah, for as convenient as 631 00:34:14,320 --> 00:34:17,239 Speaker 1: it would be to not have to sort through all 632 00:34:17,280 --> 00:34:19,799 Speaker 1: the non delta flights that are being serviced for me, 633 00:34:20,280 --> 00:34:21,759 Speaker 1: this feels bad to me. 634 00:34:22,480 --> 00:34:27,080 Speaker 2: Yeah, you could also imagine a lot of things beyond 635 00:34:27,280 --> 00:34:31,920 Speaker 2: abortion that you might not want the Trump administration knowing 636 00:34:32,080 --> 00:34:35,160 Speaker 2: about you engaging, and certainly abortion is high the list. 637 00:34:35,239 --> 00:34:35,640 Speaker 1: But like. 638 00:34:37,360 --> 00:34:42,359 Speaker 2: Who you voted for, what kind of questions you might 639 00:34:42,400 --> 00:34:47,920 Speaker 2: have about the Trump administration? Who knows what these creeps 640 00:34:48,160 --> 00:34:51,800 Speaker 2: might want to know about us? And I have seen 641 00:34:52,040 --> 00:34:55,680 Speaker 2: very little evidence to make me believe that open AI 642 00:34:55,920 --> 00:34:58,760 Speaker 2: or any other big tech company would not just happily 643 00:34:58,800 --> 00:34:59,399 Speaker 2: hand it over. 644 00:34:59,600 --> 00:35:02,920 Speaker 1: So that's bad. But there is one good thing that 645 00:35:03,000 --> 00:35:05,160 Speaker 1: has come from this, and this is a review of 646 00:35:05,200 --> 00:35:09,919 Speaker 1: Atlas from AI security pioneer does zd Susanna Cox? Can 647 00:35:10,000 --> 00:35:11,759 Speaker 1: I read this to you? Because it is phenomenal? 648 00:35:12,120 --> 00:35:12,760 Speaker 2: Yes? Please? 649 00:35:13,160 --> 00:35:15,920 Speaker 1: Do you love how much memory Chrome uses? But we 650 00:35:15,960 --> 00:35:19,200 Speaker 1: should spy on you more? And also as a bonus, 651 00:35:19,360 --> 00:35:23,240 Speaker 1: came with multiple security back doors. Well, great news. Open 652 00:35:23,280 --> 00:35:27,040 Speaker 1: ais new browser promises to deliver on all three. It's 653 00:35:27,040 --> 00:35:30,520 Speaker 1: called Atlas, and it finally answers the question can a 654 00:35:30,560 --> 00:35:35,000 Speaker 1: browser be even more insecure, privacy violating and bloated? Yes, 655 00:35:35,239 --> 00:35:38,800 Speaker 1: now it can. We've all been there reading the stupid 656 00:35:38,880 --> 00:35:42,840 Speaker 1: Internet with our boring eyeholes, using our own brains like 657 00:35:42,880 --> 00:35:46,239 Speaker 1: a bunch of literal primates, and thought there has to 658 00:35:46,320 --> 00:35:50,399 Speaker 1: be a better way. Well, now there is wish your 659 00:35:50,440 --> 00:35:54,719 Speaker 1: financial information was guarded with all the prompt injectable security 660 00:35:54,800 --> 00:35:59,480 Speaker 1: of AI agents. Guess what Atlas can make purchases? Want 661 00:35:59,480 --> 00:36:02,360 Speaker 1: to browser that reads everything you do and reports it 662 00:36:02,400 --> 00:36:05,480 Speaker 1: to big tech slash the government slash Sam Altman's a 663 00:36:05,520 --> 00:36:08,840 Speaker 1: personal media bank. Now you can have it all in Atlas, 664 00:36:08,880 --> 00:36:13,240 Speaker 1: the AI powered browser. Simply turn over all your financial information, 665 00:36:13,400 --> 00:36:16,200 Speaker 1: browsing habits, and details of your personal life to a 666 00:36:16,320 --> 00:36:19,600 Speaker 1: big company and start to feel smarter slash more productive, 667 00:36:19,600 --> 00:36:24,040 Speaker 1: slash cooler, slash more attractive, slash wealthier right away. Wow. 668 00:36:24,280 --> 00:36:25,000 Speaker 1: Thanks AI. 669 00:36:26,120 --> 00:36:27,799 Speaker 2: Wow that was art. That was really good. 670 00:36:28,120 --> 00:36:30,520 Speaker 1: So at least we got that review out of the 671 00:36:30,560 --> 00:36:31,000 Speaker 1: whole thing. 672 00:36:32,000 --> 00:36:32,839 Speaker 2: It's probably worth it. 673 00:36:33,200 --> 00:36:34,560 Speaker 1: I don't know if you know this about me, but 674 00:36:34,800 --> 00:36:38,120 Speaker 1: I really dig this report that comes out of UCLA 675 00:36:38,280 --> 00:36:42,759 Speaker 1: Center for Scholars and Storytellers every year called Teens and Screens. 676 00:36:43,200 --> 00:36:45,480 Speaker 1: It's one of the dorkiest things about me that when 677 00:36:45,520 --> 00:36:48,520 Speaker 1: this report comes out I comb through it. I just 678 00:36:48,520 --> 00:36:52,160 Speaker 1: find it so interesting. And basically this report offers insights 679 00:36:52,200 --> 00:36:56,200 Speaker 1: into the taste and preferences of young media consumers. 680 00:36:56,520 --> 00:36:59,759 Speaker 2: Oh that's really interesting. Why do you like this? Particular one. 681 00:36:59,800 --> 00:37:04,040 Speaker 1: So I just think that young media consumers, they can 682 00:37:04,080 --> 00:37:06,279 Speaker 1: really tell us a lot about where we're headed. And 683 00:37:06,320 --> 00:37:08,759 Speaker 1: they're also a niche, a niche group that I think 684 00:37:08,800 --> 00:37:11,440 Speaker 1: is very easy to not listen to, and so they'll 685 00:37:11,440 --> 00:37:14,840 Speaker 1: be telling us, Hey, we want XYZ, and it's just 686 00:37:14,960 --> 00:37:17,359 Speaker 1: very easy for people to be like, you don't want X, 687 00:37:17,400 --> 00:37:20,120 Speaker 1: you want Y. So something about this report, I just 688 00:37:20,160 --> 00:37:22,399 Speaker 1: think it really tells us a lot about what young 689 00:37:22,440 --> 00:37:25,680 Speaker 1: people are feeling and thinking about media, as opposed to 690 00:37:26,400 --> 00:37:29,120 Speaker 1: listing to people talk over them about what they want 691 00:37:29,160 --> 00:37:33,560 Speaker 1: from media. This year's report is titled get Real Relatability 692 00:37:33,600 --> 00:37:36,959 Speaker 1: on Demand because the finding show that teens and youth 693 00:37:37,280 --> 00:37:42,800 Speaker 1: are really craving things like relatability and authentic representations across 694 00:37:42,880 --> 00:37:45,840 Speaker 1: metrics as it pertains to media right now. So, the 695 00:37:45,880 --> 00:37:48,919 Speaker 1: study surveyed fifteen hundred Americans between the ages of ten 696 00:37:49,000 --> 00:37:51,719 Speaker 1: and twenty four about their media consumption, habits, and preferences. 697 00:37:51,800 --> 00:37:54,840 Speaker 1: According to Variety, the sample was proportionally reflective of the 698 00:37:54,920 --> 00:38:00,600 Speaker 1: United States gen Z population in terms of racial, ethnic, gender, sexuality, ability, economic, 699 00:38:00,640 --> 00:38:01,880 Speaker 1: and geographic diversity. 700 00:38:02,880 --> 00:38:08,239 Speaker 2: That is pretty cool. Uh So, how are young Americans 701 00:38:08,280 --> 00:38:09,239 Speaker 2: consuming media? 702 00:38:09,280 --> 00:38:12,319 Speaker 1: Well, I would say This was probably the most surprising 703 00:38:12,440 --> 00:38:16,240 Speaker 1: bit from the study, which is that surprisingly, young people 704 00:38:16,280 --> 00:38:19,360 Speaker 1: are not completely done with traditional media. I would have 705 00:38:19,400 --> 00:38:21,799 Speaker 1: thought that young people are only getting their media from 706 00:38:21,920 --> 00:38:24,880 Speaker 1: social media. Not the case. According to this study, fifty 707 00:38:24,960 --> 00:38:28,120 Speaker 1: three percent of young Americans discuss movies and television shows 708 00:38:28,120 --> 00:38:30,879 Speaker 1: with friends more than they discuss content that they watch 709 00:38:30,920 --> 00:38:33,759 Speaker 1: on social media, which really surprised me because I would 710 00:38:33,760 --> 00:38:36,760 Speaker 1: be thinking, Oh, what young people are consuming television and movies. 711 00:38:36,800 --> 00:38:40,080 Speaker 1: They're all this watching, They're all this watching with TikTok's right. No, 712 00:38:40,320 --> 00:38:44,040 Speaker 1: not so. They also really like animation, which I of 713 00:38:44,040 --> 00:38:47,960 Speaker 1: course love because I love animation. Gen Z shows a 714 00:38:48,000 --> 00:38:51,320 Speaker 1: distinct preference for animation. The percentage of adolescents who prefer 715 00:38:51,400 --> 00:38:54,560 Speaker 1: animated content over live action rose from forty two percent 716 00:38:54,640 --> 00:38:57,600 Speaker 1: last year to forty eight point five percent this year. 717 00:38:57,600 --> 00:39:00,640 Speaker 1: And that is not just for younger teens. Really, forty 718 00:39:00,640 --> 00:39:03,920 Speaker 1: eight percent of respondents aged nineteen to twenty four also 719 00:39:04,000 --> 00:39:07,880 Speaker 1: preferred animation. I I'm so curious what that is about. 720 00:39:08,239 --> 00:39:11,200 Speaker 1: I would say I also have a slight preference toward 721 00:39:11,239 --> 00:39:15,400 Speaker 1: animated content. I wish I could say what that was about. 722 00:39:15,440 --> 00:39:17,560 Speaker 1: I don't really know what it's about. With me, and 723 00:39:17,600 --> 00:39:20,680 Speaker 1: I'm so curious what this is about for the younger 724 00:39:20,719 --> 00:39:21,520 Speaker 1: folks surveyed. 725 00:39:22,000 --> 00:39:25,400 Speaker 2: Yeah, it's a good question. I also have always really 726 00:39:25,680 --> 00:39:29,200 Speaker 2: liked animation, and it's tempting the things that maybe the 727 00:39:29,239 --> 00:39:31,959 Speaker 2: young people are just like coming around to finally see 728 00:39:32,000 --> 00:39:34,879 Speaker 2: things the way that I do. But I suspect that's 729 00:39:35,000 --> 00:39:37,279 Speaker 2: probably not what's actually happening here. 730 00:39:37,840 --> 00:39:39,919 Speaker 1: You want to know something else young people are into? 731 00:39:40,160 --> 00:39:40,719 Speaker 1: According to this. 732 00:39:40,719 --> 00:39:43,720 Speaker 2: Study, Uh, what else are they into? 733 00:39:44,040 --> 00:39:47,240 Speaker 1: It's so wholesome just going to see movies with their friends. 734 00:39:47,680 --> 00:39:50,480 Speaker 1: Going to see a new movie in theaters would be 735 00:39:50,600 --> 00:39:54,080 Speaker 1: the top ranked weekend activity for a second year in 736 00:39:54,120 --> 00:39:56,960 Speaker 1: a row if cost were not a factor. And teens 737 00:39:56,960 --> 00:39:58,799 Speaker 1: are saying they would rather go see a new movie 738 00:39:58,800 --> 00:40:01,520 Speaker 1: in the theater with their friends over playing video games 739 00:40:01,560 --> 00:40:03,520 Speaker 1: with friends or going to concerts with friends. 740 00:40:03,719 --> 00:40:05,719 Speaker 2: Oh, they want to go see a movie. I get it. 741 00:40:05,760 --> 00:40:08,200 Speaker 2: Going to see a movie. Uh remember just a couple 742 00:40:08,200 --> 00:40:10,160 Speaker 2: of years ago, people were like, no one's ever gonna 743 00:40:10,200 --> 00:40:13,960 Speaker 2: go to the movies again. The theaters are dying. Seems 744 00:40:13,960 --> 00:40:15,000 Speaker 2: like that's not really happening. 745 00:40:15,320 --> 00:40:19,000 Speaker 1: In our episode with Stacy Spikes, the founder of movie Pass, 746 00:40:19,239 --> 00:40:21,680 Speaker 1: he dropped a surprising stat on me that going to 747 00:40:21,680 --> 00:40:24,600 Speaker 1: see movies in theater is still the number one leisure 748 00:40:24,640 --> 00:40:28,759 Speaker 1: activity of Americans, which again I also hear things like, oh, 749 00:40:28,880 --> 00:40:31,520 Speaker 1: scening is gonna kill movie theaters. Nobody's gonna go to 750 00:40:31,520 --> 00:40:34,120 Speaker 1: the movies anymore. I just went to see an theatrical 751 00:40:34,480 --> 00:40:37,279 Speaker 1: release of that new Paul Thomas Anderson movie One Battle 752 00:40:37,320 --> 00:40:39,680 Speaker 1: after Another. I went on an off time, I went 753 00:40:39,800 --> 00:40:44,720 Speaker 1: during I went weekday Mattine, completely packed, house full theater. 754 00:40:45,080 --> 00:40:47,640 Speaker 1: So from my total experiences, people are still going to 755 00:40:47,640 --> 00:40:49,239 Speaker 1: the movies, and the teens agree with me. 756 00:40:49,400 --> 00:40:51,359 Speaker 2: Oh you saw what a Battle after Another? I've seen 757 00:40:52,080 --> 00:40:54,760 Speaker 2: so many people talking about that. What did you think? 758 00:40:55,280 --> 00:40:57,839 Speaker 1: Hey, this is future bridget So just real quick, Mike 759 00:40:57,880 --> 00:41:01,239 Speaker 1: and I have a very quick spoiler free discussion of 760 00:41:01,280 --> 00:41:04,000 Speaker 1: the movie One Battle after Another. Here we share a 761 00:41:04,000 --> 00:41:07,759 Speaker 1: few basic overarching comments about the movie, but no real spoilers, 762 00:41:07,920 --> 00:41:09,759 Speaker 1: but just an FYI after trying to go win one 763 00:41:09,880 --> 00:41:12,840 Speaker 1: hundred percent fresh before seeing the movie. Okay, here we go. 764 00:41:13,440 --> 00:41:17,520 Speaker 1: So I love Paul Thomas Anderson. Boogie Knights is my 765 00:41:17,560 --> 00:41:19,480 Speaker 1: favorite movie of all time. If anybody asked me what 766 00:41:19,560 --> 00:41:21,399 Speaker 1: my favorite movie is, I will probably say Boogie Knights. 767 00:41:21,400 --> 00:41:25,359 Speaker 1: It's a masterpiece. So Paul Thomas Anderson is my guy. 768 00:41:25,600 --> 00:41:30,560 Speaker 1: I love him. I really liked one battle after another. 769 00:41:30,600 --> 00:41:34,080 Speaker 1: I thought it was a perfectly enjoyable movie. I thought 770 00:41:34,080 --> 00:41:36,200 Speaker 1: it was a good time. It was a long movie, 771 00:41:36,200 --> 00:41:39,879 Speaker 1: but it was one of those movies where you're never 772 00:41:40,760 --> 00:41:42,279 Speaker 1: You're never looking at your watch thinking how long I 773 00:41:42,280 --> 00:41:45,759 Speaker 1: have I've been in the theater. I don't know if 774 00:41:45,840 --> 00:41:50,000 Speaker 1: I would say how I felt about the movie matches 775 00:41:50,520 --> 00:41:53,640 Speaker 1: the hype that I feel like it got, and I 776 00:41:53,640 --> 00:41:55,600 Speaker 1: don't want to give anything away for folks who haven't 777 00:41:55,600 --> 00:41:58,640 Speaker 1: seen it. I have big Let's just say, I have 778 00:41:58,680 --> 00:42:03,320 Speaker 1: big questions about some of the way that the movie 779 00:42:03,880 --> 00:42:08,239 Speaker 1: deals with race, particularly black women. I think I don't 780 00:42:08,360 --> 00:42:10,880 Speaker 1: if folks haven't seen it. If you've seen it, I 781 00:42:10,920 --> 00:42:12,799 Speaker 1: want to talk about it with you, because a lot 782 00:42:12,800 --> 00:42:14,719 Speaker 1: of my friends have not seen it. There's one and 783 00:42:14,719 --> 00:42:15,840 Speaker 1: I don't want to give it a thing away, So 784 00:42:16,120 --> 00:42:18,399 Speaker 1: I'm speaking very cryptically and people people who haven't seen 785 00:42:18,400 --> 00:42:20,479 Speaker 1: it or like this is boring as hell. But there's 786 00:42:20,520 --> 00:42:23,000 Speaker 1: one particular character, and if you've seen the movie, you 787 00:42:23,000 --> 00:42:25,480 Speaker 1: know exactly who I'm talking about that I feel like 788 00:42:25,560 --> 00:42:29,120 Speaker 1: we are not really let into what the fuck is 789 00:42:29,160 --> 00:42:31,759 Speaker 1: going on with her? And why? And I feel like 790 00:42:32,040 --> 00:42:35,080 Speaker 1: I have a lot of questions And I don't think 791 00:42:35,080 --> 00:42:38,080 Speaker 1: it was the most loving depiction of black women I've 792 00:42:38,080 --> 00:42:40,319 Speaker 1: ever seen on screen. I'll put it that way. What 793 00:42:40,360 --> 00:42:42,240 Speaker 1: did you think about it? Uh? 794 00:42:42,280 --> 00:42:45,400 Speaker 2: Well, yeah, I also don't want to like surprise spoil 795 00:42:45,440 --> 00:42:48,279 Speaker 2: people who haven't seen it yet. I agree it was 796 00:42:48,360 --> 00:42:50,520 Speaker 2: It was a fun movie. It was funny, It was 797 00:42:50,560 --> 00:42:54,279 Speaker 2: well paced, It was like really well acted, just a 798 00:42:54,320 --> 00:42:58,560 Speaker 2: bunch of like great actors doing a phenomenal job with it. 799 00:42:59,280 --> 00:43:01,319 Speaker 2: If I were to criticize it, I would say that, 800 00:43:01,600 --> 00:43:06,200 Speaker 2: like it deals with some themes that feel like very 801 00:43:06,760 --> 00:43:10,120 Speaker 2: relevant right now. Uh, and I think that's part of 802 00:43:10,160 --> 00:43:12,520 Speaker 2: what's contributing to the hype. But I feel like it 803 00:43:12,560 --> 00:43:16,840 Speaker 2: deals with them kind of superficially. And uh, you know, 804 00:43:16,920 --> 00:43:19,799 Speaker 2: I after I left the theater, I was like, that 805 00:43:19,880 --> 00:43:22,759 Speaker 2: was fun. But then thinking back on it, I was like, well, 806 00:43:22,760 --> 00:43:24,920 Speaker 2: why did that character do that? Like, what was that 807 00:43:25,040 --> 00:43:26,600 Speaker 2: character's motivation? 808 00:43:26,760 --> 00:43:26,960 Speaker 1: Why? 809 00:43:28,600 --> 00:43:30,040 Speaker 2: And why is it important? Why do I as a 810 00:43:30,080 --> 00:43:35,919 Speaker 2: viewer like care about them? I Yeah, that was kind 811 00:43:35,920 --> 00:43:41,120 Speaker 2: of my impression was it was a fun, good action movie. 812 00:43:42,920 --> 00:43:46,440 Speaker 2: A lot to like about it, but not like it 813 00:43:46,480 --> 00:43:47,400 Speaker 2: wasn't a deep thinker. 814 00:43:47,560 --> 00:43:49,680 Speaker 1: Maybe because you can sneak in a recap episode and 815 00:43:49,680 --> 00:43:51,640 Speaker 1: we'll make it fit the text theme or fuck it, 816 00:43:51,680 --> 00:43:53,600 Speaker 1: maybe a we'll just have a one off, like I 817 00:43:53,640 --> 00:43:56,640 Speaker 1: want to talk about this movie episode and I'm owed 818 00:43:56,719 --> 00:43:59,239 Speaker 1: that I've been doing this over five years. 819 00:43:59,239 --> 00:44:02,600 Speaker 2: That can Oh that all right, Well, don't don't turn 820 00:44:02,680 --> 00:44:05,439 Speaker 2: against the little structures that we have here. 821 00:44:07,239 --> 00:44:09,279 Speaker 1: Oh you know that if you let me, it'll just 822 00:44:09,400 --> 00:44:13,920 Speaker 1: be like a straight You know, we rewatched Missus Doubt 823 00:44:13,920 --> 00:44:15,399 Speaker 1: Fire the other day and I was like, this might 824 00:44:15,400 --> 00:44:17,799 Speaker 1: make a good carecap. You were like, what about this 825 00:44:17,840 --> 00:44:21,080 Speaker 1: is technology? It's like nothing isn't an interesting movie. 826 00:44:21,320 --> 00:44:23,080 Speaker 2: Yeah, we have to draw the lines somewhere. 827 00:44:23,480 --> 00:44:28,520 Speaker 1: Okay, So back to the teens. Teens are really craving 828 00:44:28,800 --> 00:44:32,600 Speaker 1: relatable media and relatable stories right now. Thirty two percent 829 00:44:32,680 --> 00:44:36,600 Speaker 1: that they want to see relatable stories on screen more 830 00:44:36,680 --> 00:44:39,320 Speaker 1: so than in fantasy or aspirational stories. They want to 831 00:44:39,360 --> 00:44:43,000 Speaker 1: see stories with quote people with lives like mine. I 832 00:44:43,080 --> 00:44:46,799 Speaker 1: have to imagine that's why super wealthy, out of touch 833 00:44:46,840 --> 00:44:49,560 Speaker 1: celebrities is just not clicking with people anymore, particularly used 834 00:44:49,800 --> 00:44:51,840 Speaker 1: people like Kim Kardashian. I think that like in this 835 00:44:51,920 --> 00:44:54,319 Speaker 1: day and age, nobody really wants to see that, even 836 00:44:54,360 --> 00:44:57,160 Speaker 1: if you at one point you could connect with that Aspirationally, 837 00:44:57,760 --> 00:45:00,760 Speaker 1: young people are really not trying to see people living 838 00:45:00,760 --> 00:45:04,239 Speaker 1: these aspirational, out of touch stories. What they want is 839 00:45:04,280 --> 00:45:07,200 Speaker 1: people who have relatable lives and relatable stories and lives 840 00:45:07,280 --> 00:45:10,520 Speaker 1: like theirs. The fourteen to twenty four demographic, they show 841 00:45:10,600 --> 00:45:15,400 Speaker 1: significant preferences for stories about friendship. Specifically, almost sixty percent 842 00:45:15,440 --> 00:45:17,560 Speaker 1: say that they want to see more content where the 843 00:45:17,600 --> 00:45:20,680 Speaker 1: central relationship are friendship, and they are a little less 844 00:45:20,719 --> 00:45:25,839 Speaker 1: interested in romantic relationships on screen. Fifty four point nine 845 00:45:25,880 --> 00:45:28,839 Speaker 1: percent want to see more different gender friendships on screen, 846 00:45:28,880 --> 00:45:31,920 Speaker 1: while forty nine percent want to see same gender friendships, 847 00:45:32,239 --> 00:45:34,640 Speaker 1: and specifically, they want to see friendships where they have 848 00:45:34,760 --> 00:45:39,320 Speaker 1: healthy conflicts resolution. I really do feel like young people 849 00:45:39,320 --> 00:45:42,239 Speaker 1: are telling us something about about their lives and what 850 00:45:42,280 --> 00:45:44,640 Speaker 1: they want their lives and relationships to be like. They 851 00:45:44,640 --> 00:45:48,960 Speaker 1: want they want friendship and healthy friendships at the core 852 00:45:49,080 --> 00:45:52,239 Speaker 1: of their lives, and they want to see friends have conflict, 853 00:45:52,440 --> 00:45:54,920 Speaker 1: but where that conflict that when it does come up, 854 00:45:54,960 --> 00:45:57,279 Speaker 1: it's resolved in a healthy manner. And part of me 855 00:45:57,400 --> 00:46:00,440 Speaker 1: wonders if that's a reaction to our our current online 856 00:46:00,480 --> 00:46:03,359 Speaker 1: ecosystem where it seems like nothing could ever be be 857 00:46:03,680 --> 00:46:05,960 Speaker 1: no life could ever be managed in a healthy in 858 00:46:06,040 --> 00:46:06,719 Speaker 1: a healthy way. 859 00:46:07,160 --> 00:46:10,240 Speaker 2: Yeah, I'm sure there's a lot of very interesting stuff 860 00:46:10,239 --> 00:46:13,279 Speaker 2: to dig into there about Like, you know, one of 861 00:46:13,360 --> 00:46:17,680 Speaker 2: the functions that entertainment has served for years and years 862 00:46:17,800 --> 00:46:22,040 Speaker 2: is to show people something aspirational, right, Like, it's the 863 00:46:22,040 --> 00:46:24,399 Speaker 2: stuff that people want to see in entertainment. It's something 864 00:46:24,400 --> 00:46:27,760 Speaker 2: that they aspire to. And it sounds like for many 865 00:46:27,880 --> 00:46:33,480 Speaker 2: of the young people in this survey for the traditional 866 00:46:33,600 --> 00:46:37,759 Speaker 2: ideas of aspirational lifestyles of celebrities and wealthy people are 867 00:46:37,760 --> 00:46:40,880 Speaker 2: not resonating, and what they do aspire to is like 868 00:46:40,960 --> 00:46:45,799 Speaker 2: healthy friendships and healthy conflict resolution. Maybe because it's like 869 00:46:45,960 --> 00:46:48,800 Speaker 2: kind of scarce these days, or at least seems pretty scarce. 870 00:46:49,160 --> 00:46:50,719 Speaker 2: I think that's got to be part of it. 871 00:46:50,840 --> 00:46:54,759 Speaker 1: And they're really not interested in things like sex or 872 00:46:55,120 --> 00:46:59,960 Speaker 1: romantic relationships being depicted on screen. Romance actually ranked third 873 00:47:00,200 --> 00:47:02,560 Speaker 1: to last on the list of topics that you want 874 00:47:02,600 --> 00:47:05,680 Speaker 1: to see explored on screens, and sixty point nine percent 875 00:47:05,719 --> 00:47:09,359 Speaker 1: said that they want to see romantic relationship depicted as 876 00:47:09,480 --> 00:47:12,480 Speaker 1: quote more about the friendship between the couple than sex. 877 00:47:12,760 --> 00:47:15,080 Speaker 1: Forty eight point four percent said that there is too 878 00:47:15,160 --> 00:47:18,240 Speaker 1: much sex and sexual content in TV and movies. Toxic 879 00:47:18,320 --> 00:47:22,320 Speaker 1: relationships and love triangles also ranked among the most tiresome 880 00:47:22,480 --> 00:47:27,000 Speaker 1: or uninteresting tropes for young viewers. I know that there 881 00:47:27,000 --> 00:47:31,000 Speaker 1: has been a ton of talk about gen Z being 882 00:47:31,160 --> 00:47:33,880 Speaker 1: prudes or prudish or having an issue with sex, but 883 00:47:33,920 --> 00:47:36,279 Speaker 1: I'm sure some of that is true, and I want 884 00:47:36,320 --> 00:47:38,239 Speaker 1: to dig into that, but it does seem like what 885 00:47:38,280 --> 00:47:42,120 Speaker 1: they're telling us is that they want friendships, healthy friendships 886 00:47:42,120 --> 00:47:46,200 Speaker 1: with healthy conflict resolution at the heart, and they want genuine, 887 00:47:46,239 --> 00:47:49,160 Speaker 1: real connection. And I don't know, Maybe it's not that 888 00:47:49,320 --> 00:47:52,160 Speaker 1: gen Z is prudish. Maybe they're just tired of seeing 889 00:47:52,200 --> 00:47:56,560 Speaker 1: intimacy without intimacy right. Like what they're asking for is 890 00:47:56,600 --> 00:48:00,120 Speaker 1: not less love, but maybe like a different kind of 891 00:48:00,160 --> 00:48:03,160 Speaker 1: love that feels grounded in connection and friendship and care, 892 00:48:03,560 --> 00:48:06,600 Speaker 1: not just chemistry. And I say this as someone who 893 00:48:06,680 --> 00:48:09,600 Speaker 1: is fully like a horny person who is only really 894 00:48:09,600 --> 00:48:13,840 Speaker 1: interested in horny content. But the results of this survey 895 00:48:13,880 --> 00:48:16,000 Speaker 1: when it comes to wanting to see sex on screen, 896 00:48:16,280 --> 00:48:18,520 Speaker 1: could not have been more different than I felt. When 897 00:48:18,520 --> 00:48:20,520 Speaker 1: I was young, all I wanted to do was like 898 00:48:20,640 --> 00:48:24,000 Speaker 1: watch horny people on screen when I was a young person, 899 00:48:24,160 --> 00:48:27,359 Speaker 1: and that has not changed. So I have to say that. 900 00:48:27,440 --> 00:48:30,280 Speaker 1: But I also get where they're coming from. Of saying, hey, 901 00:48:30,600 --> 00:48:34,520 Speaker 1: I can get sexy content anywhere. I want to see real, 902 00:48:34,760 --> 00:48:39,360 Speaker 1: healthy media relationships and friendships on screen, not just horny content. 903 00:48:39,800 --> 00:48:44,480 Speaker 2: It makes sense. I mean sex is ubiquitous on the internet, right, 904 00:48:44,520 --> 00:48:47,840 Speaker 2: You're always like two clicks away, maybe three. 905 00:48:48,000 --> 00:48:50,360 Speaker 1: It's true. And again, when I was in high school, 906 00:48:50,400 --> 00:48:53,120 Speaker 1: my favorite film was The Talented Mister Ripley, which is 907 00:48:53,160 --> 00:48:56,759 Speaker 1: a film about horny hot people having horny hot antics. 908 00:48:57,120 --> 00:49:00,280 Speaker 1: But I can absolutely understand where these young people are 909 00:49:00,320 --> 00:49:00,839 Speaker 1: coming from. 910 00:49:01,040 --> 00:49:05,520 Speaker 2: Who would you say is the best friend in Talented 911 00:49:05,600 --> 00:49:06,320 Speaker 2: Mister Ripley. 912 00:49:06,560 --> 00:49:09,440 Speaker 1: Oh that's easy. Freddie played by the late Philip timour Hoffman. 913 00:49:09,520 --> 00:49:12,080 Speaker 1: May he rest in peace. Also, he's a real show 914 00:49:12,160 --> 00:49:15,920 Speaker 1: stealer in that movie. Every scene that he's that he's in, 915 00:49:16,080 --> 00:49:18,279 Speaker 1: he's like popping off the screen. He's one of my 916 00:49:18,320 --> 00:49:20,520 Speaker 1: favorite actors. Also fantastic and Billion Knights by the way, 917 00:49:20,520 --> 00:49:23,040 Speaker 1: a little callback. But yeah, if there was, if there were, 918 00:49:23,080 --> 00:49:26,239 Speaker 1: if there was a best friend in that movie, I 919 00:49:26,239 --> 00:49:28,840 Speaker 1: think you would have to go to Freddie. But even 920 00:49:28,920 --> 00:49:32,000 Speaker 1: Freddy is a hornball. The first time that you see Freddy, 921 00:49:32,280 --> 00:49:34,680 Speaker 1: the first he's it's It's one of my favorite character 922 00:49:34,800 --> 00:49:38,360 Speaker 1: being introduced in a movie ever. He's driving his tiny 923 00:49:38,400 --> 00:49:42,480 Speaker 1: supports car through a plaza in Italy Park someplace he's 924 00:49:42,480 --> 00:49:44,600 Speaker 1: not supposed to park, and then gets out and then 925 00:49:45,040 --> 00:49:47,640 Speaker 1: sleers on a woman walking by and says, don't you 926 00:49:47,680 --> 00:49:52,680 Speaker 1: want to fuck every woman you see? Just once? Bravo? 927 00:49:52,840 --> 00:49:53,840 Speaker 1: May he rest in peace? 928 00:49:54,040 --> 00:49:57,120 Speaker 2: Yeah? Interesting choice for best friend because he's pretty like 929 00:49:57,400 --> 00:50:01,360 Speaker 2: self motivated. He I don't think that he it is 930 00:50:01,440 --> 00:50:04,520 Speaker 2: motivated by any particular love of Dicky. He just hates Tom. 931 00:50:04,840 --> 00:50:09,120 Speaker 1: Yes, he just hates Tom. I think that when I 932 00:50:09,239 --> 00:50:12,319 Speaker 1: was growing up there was an intersection of being a 933 00:50:12,360 --> 00:50:17,560 Speaker 1: theater kid, a computer kid, and horny because when I 934 00:50:17,600 --> 00:50:19,680 Speaker 1: was growing up, there was another movie that came out 935 00:50:19,680 --> 00:50:22,720 Speaker 1: when I was just leaving high school called Closer, another 936 00:50:22,880 --> 00:50:24,920 Speaker 1: Jude Law movie now that i'm thinking about it, and 937 00:50:24,960 --> 00:50:29,160 Speaker 1: it was all about these grown up, sexy adults in 938 00:50:29,239 --> 00:50:33,400 Speaker 1: London having horny, sexy misunderstandings. All these movies that I 939 00:50:33,440 --> 00:50:35,720 Speaker 1: was when I was watching when I was young. Closer 940 00:50:35,760 --> 00:50:37,520 Speaker 1: I'm not even sure was a good movie. I think 941 00:50:37,560 --> 00:50:39,479 Speaker 1: I was just horny. 942 00:50:39,560 --> 00:50:42,879 Speaker 2: It also had a kick ass soundtrack, it did did? 943 00:50:42,920 --> 00:50:45,279 Speaker 1: I had it on CD? Man, I was if you 944 00:50:45,880 --> 00:50:50,080 Speaker 1: if you were a nerdy person who was falling in 945 00:50:50,160 --> 00:50:53,600 Speaker 1: the falling deep into the world of like fantasy through film, 946 00:50:53,680 --> 00:50:55,480 Speaker 1: what were the movies that you were obsessed with when 947 00:50:55,520 --> 00:50:57,279 Speaker 1: you were coming up? I need to know this. I'm sure. 948 00:50:57,320 --> 00:50:58,600 Speaker 1: I'm sure we have some overlap. 949 00:50:58,640 --> 00:51:01,080 Speaker 2: Do do you have any movie? Tank Girl? 950 00:51:01,960 --> 00:51:05,799 Speaker 1: Oh? My god, who do you think you're talking to? Man? 951 00:51:05,920 --> 00:51:09,240 Speaker 2: I remember, like me and a couple of my friends 952 00:51:10,160 --> 00:51:12,680 Speaker 2: we were having a sleepover at my friend's house. Like 953 00:51:12,719 --> 00:51:15,160 Speaker 2: that's how old we were. We were not driving, like 954 00:51:15,160 --> 00:51:17,600 Speaker 2: like our moms had dropped us off, and we went 955 00:51:17,680 --> 00:51:20,960 Speaker 2: to the video store. We rented Tank Girl and we 956 00:51:21,000 --> 00:51:24,960 Speaker 2: watched it like three times in a row. 957 00:51:25,440 --> 00:51:28,400 Speaker 1: The old heads. No, it was all about jet Girl. Actually, 958 00:51:28,840 --> 00:51:31,000 Speaker 1: oh yes, she was remember a tank Girl's friend. 959 00:51:31,080 --> 00:51:37,240 Speaker 2: Mm hmmm, I sure do friend. She was a good friend. 960 00:51:38,280 --> 00:51:41,839 Speaker 1: Yeah, gen Z would love that movie. It is It's 961 00:51:41,880 --> 00:51:46,000 Speaker 1: a it's an exploration of complex friendship on screen. We 962 00:51:46,160 --> 00:51:46,920 Speaker 1: need more of that. 963 00:51:47,360 --> 00:51:49,799 Speaker 2: Yeah, they probably would. They probably like that a lot 964 00:51:49,840 --> 00:51:52,680 Speaker 2: better than telling mister Ripley. They'd probably make them uncomfortable or. 965 00:51:52,760 --> 00:51:55,320 Speaker 1: I mean, even when I was reading this this survey, 966 00:51:55,760 --> 00:51:58,840 Speaker 1: I was like, Okay, well, youth don't like you know, 967 00:52:00,040 --> 00:52:03,360 Speaker 1: love triangles and toxic love and sex on screen, but 968 00:52:03,719 --> 00:52:07,960 Speaker 1: the terrible sort of reimagining of coal to mister Ripley Saltburn, 969 00:52:08,360 --> 00:52:12,200 Speaker 1: which I actually do kind of love. And there were 970 00:52:12,320 --> 00:52:15,040 Speaker 1: movies that were super horny that I think we're popular 971 00:52:15,080 --> 00:52:17,640 Speaker 1: with youth challengers. It's another one. So I don't know, 972 00:52:17,640 --> 00:52:19,840 Speaker 1: I will be curious to put that in conversation with 973 00:52:19,920 --> 00:52:22,040 Speaker 1: the survey of what do the youth want? What are 974 00:52:22,040 --> 00:52:22,439 Speaker 1: they into? 975 00:52:22,719 --> 00:52:26,120 Speaker 2: Yeah, and you know, as a science social scientist, I 976 00:52:26,400 --> 00:52:30,200 Speaker 2: like hate to burst the bubble and rain on the parade. 977 00:52:30,239 --> 00:52:34,279 Speaker 2: But like sometimes sometimes kids lie on surveys. 978 00:52:35,640 --> 00:52:37,760 Speaker 1: So kids are like, I would never want to see 979 00:52:37,800 --> 00:52:41,319 Speaker 1: sex on screen? Are you crazy? Yeah? Who would want 980 00:52:41,360 --> 00:52:41,799 Speaker 1: such a thing? 981 00:52:41,920 --> 00:52:44,360 Speaker 2: And maybe it's not lying, you know, but it's like 982 00:52:47,160 --> 00:52:50,520 Speaker 2: everybody has trouble with surveys, especially things about like preferences, 983 00:52:50,560 --> 00:52:53,440 Speaker 2: Like even adults, we don't know what we want. We 984 00:52:53,560 --> 00:52:57,960 Speaker 2: struggle to articulate what we want even if we know 985 00:52:58,000 --> 00:53:00,000 Speaker 2: what it is, and half the time we don't even 986 00:53:00,200 --> 00:53:03,280 Speaker 2: know what we want, and so asking like a fourteen 987 00:53:03,360 --> 00:53:06,000 Speaker 2: year old to report what kind of entertainment one. It's 988 00:53:06,040 --> 00:53:08,480 Speaker 2: super valuable to do And I no way mean to 989 00:53:08,520 --> 00:53:13,160 Speaker 2: diminish the surveys like so wonderful to like actually have 990 00:53:13,400 --> 00:53:17,799 Speaker 2: data on what they say. Uh, but like we do 991 00:53:17,840 --> 00:53:19,600 Speaker 2: need to interpret it with like a little bit of 992 00:53:19,600 --> 00:53:22,279 Speaker 2: a grain of salt that like, perhaps it is not 993 00:53:22,640 --> 00:53:26,919 Speaker 2: a clear window into the mind of the youth, and 994 00:53:27,719 --> 00:53:29,759 Speaker 2: in fact that there probably is a little bit of 995 00:53:29,840 --> 00:53:33,319 Speaker 2: like aspirational filtering in the way that they respond on 996 00:53:33,320 --> 00:53:34,200 Speaker 2: a survey like this. 997 00:53:34,719 --> 00:53:37,239 Speaker 1: There's a podcast that I love called uh Yeah, Dude 998 00:53:37,280 --> 00:53:40,440 Speaker 1: where they read surveys and they're always so funny and 999 00:53:40,960 --> 00:53:43,680 Speaker 1: the surveys. I always find this fascinating because it'll be 1000 00:53:43,880 --> 00:53:48,040 Speaker 1: it'll be the most basic question question on a survey. 1001 00:53:48,080 --> 00:53:55,720 Speaker 1: Do you own a toaster oven? No? Twenty percent? Yes, 1002 00:53:56,600 --> 00:53:59,440 Speaker 1: ten percent? I'm not sure. I can't answer. I don't know. 1003 00:54:00,320 --> 00:54:02,920 Speaker 1: Who are these people who's like, you know, they'll ask 1004 00:54:02,960 --> 00:54:07,200 Speaker 1: the most basic questions about their lives. Did you go 1005 00:54:07,239 --> 00:54:10,680 Speaker 1: out of the country this year? Yes? No, I couldn't 1006 00:54:10,719 --> 00:54:12,759 Speaker 1: say for sure. I don't know, Like what do you mean? 1007 00:54:14,120 --> 00:54:17,319 Speaker 1: What as as they ask somebody who designed surveys, what 1008 00:54:17,440 --> 00:54:18,200 Speaker 1: accounts for that. 1009 00:54:18,920 --> 00:54:21,239 Speaker 2: It could be any number of things, like maybe they 1010 00:54:21,280 --> 00:54:23,960 Speaker 2: genuinely don't know, maybe there's some cripple. 1011 00:54:24,000 --> 00:54:28,120 Speaker 1: Oh, they genuinely don't know. What are you talking about? 1012 00:54:28,640 --> 00:54:31,640 Speaker 2: All kinds of crazy shit happens in people's lives, right, 1013 00:54:31,760 --> 00:54:36,080 Speaker 2: Like you couldn't, especially when you're talking about population surveys 1014 00:54:36,080 --> 00:54:41,440 Speaker 2: where they sample like fifteen hundred people. All kinds of 1015 00:54:41,480 --> 00:54:44,920 Speaker 2: crazy shit is happening in that sample of people's lives. 1016 00:54:44,920 --> 00:54:47,080 Speaker 2: And so like some people be probably get some weird 1017 00:54:47,120 --> 00:54:51,480 Speaker 2: stuff going on that. You know, maybe they inherited a 1018 00:54:51,560 --> 00:54:54,640 Speaker 2: storage locker which may or may not contain a toaster oven, 1019 00:54:54,800 --> 00:54:57,680 Speaker 2: and so they don't know whether what is in there. Uh, 1020 00:54:58,080 --> 00:55:00,400 Speaker 2: maybe they just don't feel like answering the question. But 1021 00:55:00,440 --> 00:55:03,040 Speaker 2: it is important to include that when you're when you're 1022 00:55:03,080 --> 00:55:06,240 Speaker 2: designing the survey as the researcher, it's important to include 1023 00:55:06,280 --> 00:55:10,480 Speaker 2: that kind of option because otherwise, if you force those 1024 00:55:10,520 --> 00:55:13,799 Speaker 2: people to respond one of the other ways, uh, you're 1025 00:55:13,840 --> 00:55:16,320 Speaker 2: just kind of like gunking it up. If they truly 1026 00:55:16,360 --> 00:55:18,799 Speaker 2: don't know or like can't give a straight answer for 1027 00:55:18,840 --> 00:55:19,839 Speaker 2: whatever reason. 1028 00:55:20,040 --> 00:55:23,120 Speaker 1: Well, don't gunk up your surveys. People Words to live 1029 00:55:23,160 --> 00:55:26,560 Speaker 1: by Mike, Thank you for being here. Where can folks 1030 00:55:26,640 --> 00:55:28,440 Speaker 1: keep in touch with our podcast? 1031 00:55:28,840 --> 00:55:33,120 Speaker 2: You can leave comments right on Spotify. Maybe comment about 1032 00:55:33,120 --> 00:55:35,239 Speaker 2: what you think about their new policy about ice right 1033 00:55:35,239 --> 00:55:38,640 Speaker 2: there in the comments on Spotify, or what you think 1034 00:55:38,640 --> 00:55:44,040 Speaker 2: about our comments on the topic. You can write anything 1035 00:55:44,040 --> 00:55:46,440 Speaker 2: you want in the Spotify comments. You can also. 1036 00:55:46,239 --> 00:55:47,359 Speaker 1: Email read them all. 1037 00:55:47,560 --> 00:55:50,920 Speaker 2: She does uh. You can email us at Hello at 1038 00:55:50,920 --> 00:55:54,520 Speaker 2: tangote dot com. We're gonna do that mail bag episode 1039 00:55:55,080 --> 00:55:57,920 Speaker 2: pretty soon. The official window has closed, but if you 1040 00:55:57,960 --> 00:56:00,000 Speaker 2: email us something really good we can You can probably 1041 00:56:00,080 --> 00:56:03,400 Speaker 2: works about sneak it in. You can follow Bridget on 1042 00:56:03,600 --> 00:56:08,080 Speaker 2: TikTok and Instagram at Bridget Marie in DC, and you 1043 00:56:08,080 --> 00:56:10,759 Speaker 2: can follow the show on YouTube at There Are No 1044 00:56:10,840 --> 00:56:15,320 Speaker 2: Girls on the Internet and we look forward to interacting. 1045 00:56:15,360 --> 00:56:15,839 Speaker 2: We did there. 1046 00:56:16,280 --> 00:56:18,080 Speaker 1: Thanks so much for being here, Mike, Thanks to all 1047 00:56:18,120 --> 00:56:19,560 Speaker 1: of you for listening, and I will see you on 1048 00:56:19,600 --> 00:56:31,279 Speaker 1: the Internet. Got a story about an interesting thing in tech, 1049 00:56:31,440 --> 00:56:33,319 Speaker 1: or just want to say hi. You can reach us 1050 00:56:33,360 --> 00:56:35,719 Speaker 1: at Hello at tangody dot com. You can also find 1051 00:56:35,719 --> 00:56:38,600 Speaker 1: transcripts for today's episode at tenggody dot com. There Are 1052 00:56:38,600 --> 00:56:40,759 Speaker 1: No Girls on the Internet was created by me Bridget Todd. 1053 00:56:41,160 --> 00:56:44,560 Speaker 1: It's a production of iHeartRadio and unbossed creative Jonathan Strickland 1054 00:56:44,560 --> 00:56:47,319 Speaker 1: as our executive producer. Tari Harrison is our producer and 1055 00:56:47,400 --> 00:56:51,160 Speaker 1: sound engineer. Michael Amato is our contributing producer. I'm your host, 1056 00:56:51,160 --> 00:56:53,960 Speaker 1: Bridget Todd. If you want to help us grow, rate 1057 00:56:54,000 --> 00:56:57,759 Speaker 1: and review us on Apple Podcasts. For more podcasts from iHeartRadio, 1058 00:56:57,840 --> 00:57:00,520 Speaker 1: check out the iHeartRadio app Apple Podcaste you get your 1059 00:57:00,560 --> 00:57:01,040 Speaker 1: podcasts