WEBVTT - MLB: Leading Off July 15th, 2022 (Ep. 553)

0:00:00.240 --> 0:00:03.400
<v Speaker 1>The o's and m's can't be stopped. Let's play ball.

0:00:15.720 --> 0:00:18.439
<v Speaker 1>Welcome in everybody to Fantasy pros. This is leading off,

0:00:18.440 --> 0:00:21.000
<v Speaker 1>brought to you by bet MGM, the King of sports Books.

0:00:21.000 --> 0:00:22.840
<v Speaker 1>It's me Joey p joe Piece app Here with you

0:00:23.120 --> 0:00:25.680
<v Speaker 1>is the Welsh as always, and it's you. It's a

0:00:25.720 --> 0:00:28.319
<v Speaker 1>fun Friday. We got the All Star break looming, a

0:00:28.360 --> 0:00:31.080
<v Speaker 1>few more games to hit up some good ones as well.

0:00:31.400 --> 0:00:33.360
<v Speaker 1>We had a picture's duel last night in San Francisco

0:00:33.440 --> 0:00:36.239
<v Speaker 1>that was certainly fun. And we have our Home Run

0:00:36.320 --> 0:00:39.640
<v Speaker 1>Derby participants and I am remiss. I said we would

0:00:39.680 --> 0:00:41.919
<v Speaker 1>get to how we're doing the home Run Derby contest thing,

0:00:42.320 --> 0:00:43.880
<v Speaker 1>and then I forgot to do it. Because I'm old

0:00:43.920 --> 0:00:46.240
<v Speaker 1>and I'm c nile and Welsh. I think it's time

0:00:46.280 --> 0:00:48.400
<v Speaker 1>to start me on some of that special medication.

0:00:48.840 --> 0:00:50.440
<v Speaker 2>I was gonna ask, because I mean, the first thing

0:00:50.440 --> 0:00:51.560
<v Speaker 2>out the top, what are we doing?

0:00:51.560 --> 0:00:55.800
<v Speaker 3>Are we drafting? And it's gone, it's gone.

0:00:55.840 --> 0:00:57.880
<v Speaker 1>So here here's what we're gonna do. I'm just gonna

0:00:57.880 --> 0:00:58.960
<v Speaker 1>do this right at the top of the show so

0:00:59.040 --> 0:01:01.760
<v Speaker 1>I don't forget. So here is what the Lonky Penguin

0:01:01.800 --> 0:01:03.400
<v Speaker 1>put together for us. I put in the show sheets

0:01:03.400 --> 0:01:06.680
<v Speaker 1>so I wouldn't forget again. So here's what's gonna happen.

0:01:06.680 --> 0:01:09.920
<v Speaker 1>Everybody's gonna select who they think will win and who

0:01:09.959 --> 0:01:12.319
<v Speaker 1>they think will finish second. So you pick your one

0:01:12.640 --> 0:01:15.120
<v Speaker 1>and your two finishers. So you pick your finals. I

0:01:15.120 --> 0:01:17.360
<v Speaker 1>think these two people in the final, this person is

0:01:18.280 --> 0:01:21.600
<v Speaker 1>the home run champ. Then everybody predicts a total number

0:01:21.600 --> 0:01:24.000
<v Speaker 1>of home runs for the entire contest as a whole.

0:01:24.400 --> 0:01:27.280
<v Speaker 1>Anyone who picks the winner gets one point. If you

0:01:27.319 --> 0:01:29.399
<v Speaker 1>pick the winner and the runner up person in the

0:01:29.400 --> 0:01:33.280
<v Speaker 1>correct order, correct order, you get two points. And whoever

0:01:33.319 --> 0:01:36.080
<v Speaker 1>picks the correct first and second place hitters and is

0:01:36.120 --> 0:01:39.399
<v Speaker 1>the closest to the total number gets three points. So

0:01:39.400 --> 0:01:41.640
<v Speaker 1>we're doing it on a sliding scale. Does that make

0:01:41.680 --> 0:01:43.319
<v Speaker 1>sense that I lay it out well or is it

0:01:43.360 --> 0:01:44.320
<v Speaker 1>too complicated?

0:01:44.680 --> 0:01:47.000
<v Speaker 3>As clear as mud, I think we're good. I think

0:01:47.040 --> 0:01:50.560
<v Speaker 3>we're good. So I failed, So no, no, I got it.

0:01:50.600 --> 0:01:53.240
<v Speaker 3>You get three points.

0:01:52.120 --> 0:01:55.600
<v Speaker 1>So if I think it's Sodo and Julio at the end,

0:01:56.440 --> 0:01:58.600
<v Speaker 1>then Sodo and Julio my ones and two picks. If

0:01:58.640 --> 0:02:01.200
<v Speaker 1>I'm right, I get a point for each of those things.

0:02:01.200 --> 0:02:04.200
<v Speaker 1>And if I get the highest total with those right, guys,

0:02:04.560 --> 0:02:06.720
<v Speaker 1>then I get three points. So it's basically like a

0:02:06.720 --> 0:02:10.080
<v Speaker 1>sliding scale of points. I think it's fun. If you

0:02:10.160 --> 0:02:12.560
<v Speaker 1>have questions, hit up Wonky Penguin on Discord and she's

0:02:12.600 --> 0:02:14.480
<v Speaker 1>running it. So that's I'm just passing the buck.

0:02:15.440 --> 0:02:16.520
<v Speaker 3>And what do we do it? Do we do it

0:02:16.560 --> 0:02:19.959
<v Speaker 3>in the home run the home run room on call room?

0:02:20.240 --> 0:02:22.280
<v Speaker 1>I believe we do it in the home run call room.

0:02:22.400 --> 0:02:23.280
<v Speaker 1>I will make my go.

0:02:23.320 --> 0:02:25.440
<v Speaker 2>There's a tag right there that Wonky just put the

0:02:25.440 --> 0:02:28.840
<v Speaker 2>tag in the chat. It's one uh and then the

0:02:29.040 --> 0:02:30.160
<v Speaker 2>HR call tag.

0:02:30.000 --> 0:02:33.440
<v Speaker 1>For all three there you go, use one HR call

0:02:33.480 --> 0:02:35.200
<v Speaker 1>tag for all three in the order. So you put

0:02:35.240 --> 0:02:37.359
<v Speaker 1>the name the name, so the first name you thinks first,

0:02:37.520 --> 0:02:39.280
<v Speaker 1>the second name you think a second, and then the

0:02:39.360 --> 0:02:40.960
<v Speaker 1>number I guess is the next thing.

0:02:41.000 --> 0:02:42.400
<v Speaker 3>So that's yeah, that's.

0:02:42.240 --> 0:02:44.239
<v Speaker 1>Pretty easy, right, Wonky? Did I do it right? Did I?

0:02:44.320 --> 0:02:44.600
<v Speaker 3>Maybe?

0:02:44.680 --> 0:02:44.840
<v Speaker 1>Right?

0:02:45.000 --> 0:02:47.800
<v Speaker 2>Maybe maybe somebody, if you guys aren't checking out the discord,

0:02:47.880 --> 0:02:50.639
<v Speaker 2>maybe somebody could throw an example in there for the

0:02:50.680 --> 0:02:52.480
<v Speaker 2>people that come in and want to put their picks in.

0:02:52.520 --> 0:02:55.200
<v Speaker 2>Maybe someone could show exactly what their picks are so

0:02:55.240 --> 0:02:56.239
<v Speaker 2>we could see how it works.

0:02:56.360 --> 0:02:58.280
<v Speaker 1>But it's good. There you go, there, Wonke if you

0:02:58.280 --> 0:03:00.079
<v Speaker 1>want to give an example here, I could flash that

0:03:00.120 --> 0:03:02.160
<v Speaker 1>so everybody sees on the YouTube channel so they could

0:03:02.200 --> 0:03:03.760
<v Speaker 1>check really know how they're doing it. I'm sure she's

0:03:03.800 --> 0:03:06.240
<v Speaker 1>already done this in the home run channel because she's

0:03:06.280 --> 0:03:09.280
<v Speaker 1>running that ship. Speaking of running the ship, Gorbyn burns

0:03:09.360 --> 0:03:11.960
<v Speaker 1>ten strikeouts and a no decision against the Giants rodn

0:03:12.320 --> 0:03:14.240
<v Speaker 1>with seven. I watched him with this game last night.

0:03:14.320 --> 0:03:16.720
<v Speaker 1>I was actually awake, if you could believe it, which

0:03:16.760 --> 0:03:20.320
<v Speaker 1>is really odd for me. And yeah, it was very good,

0:03:20.919 --> 0:03:23.919
<v Speaker 1>very entertaining. Pitcher's duel Tristan McKenzie struck out twelve guys.

0:03:24.080 --> 0:03:26.200
<v Speaker 1>You know, Mackenzie's had a really nice season, starting to

0:03:26.760 --> 0:03:30.760
<v Speaker 1>develop into the picture you think he could be. You know,

0:03:30.840 --> 0:03:32.360
<v Speaker 1>the frame I think will always be a little bit

0:03:32.360 --> 0:03:33.960
<v Speaker 1>of an issue. He's a little bit heavier than he

0:03:34.040 --> 0:03:36.280
<v Speaker 1>was last year. But I know it hasn't been all

0:03:36.440 --> 0:03:38.400
<v Speaker 1>roses with mackenzie. But if you liked what you've seen

0:03:38.400 --> 0:03:40.120
<v Speaker 1>out of him more often than not, I think the

0:03:40.160 --> 0:03:41.440
<v Speaker 1>answer is guest this year, right.

0:03:41.640 --> 0:03:43.640
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I think it's a pretty big yess on that.

0:03:44.120 --> 0:03:47.120
<v Speaker 2>Bag and I were going through some gambling bets yesterday

0:03:47.120 --> 0:03:49.000
<v Speaker 2>and we were just all over this game. With the

0:03:49.040 --> 0:03:52.360
<v Speaker 2>strikeout prop and the first five and then the actual

0:03:52.440 --> 0:03:54.840
<v Speaker 2>run line because you know, just beating up on the

0:03:54.880 --> 0:03:58.520
<v Speaker 2>Tigers and Mackenzie in general. McKenzie three two ERA after

0:03:58.560 --> 0:04:00.880
<v Speaker 2>that performance almost nine k per.

0:04:00.880 --> 0:04:03.280
<v Speaker 3>Nine little bit inflated left on base.

0:04:03.160 --> 0:04:05.520
<v Speaker 2>Percentage, which you would like to see adjust. It's a

0:04:05.520 --> 0:04:08.160
<v Speaker 2>little over eighty three percent. But one hundred innings on

0:04:08.160 --> 0:04:11.720
<v Speaker 2>the air with seven wins and not an insanely different

0:04:11.760 --> 0:04:14.640
<v Speaker 2>era to x fit, it's a great season. We're gonna

0:04:14.640 --> 0:04:16.680
<v Speaker 2>come out. He's gonna be one of those guys next year.

0:04:16.760 --> 0:04:18.960
<v Speaker 2>Who's gonna be one of those what is it like

0:04:19.080 --> 0:04:22.080
<v Speaker 2>eighty to one twenty sleeper pitchers that we're betting on

0:04:22.160 --> 0:04:24.360
<v Speaker 2>that's gonna take the next big jump, because he's taking

0:04:24.400 --> 0:04:25.840
<v Speaker 2>the next big jump this year.

0:04:25.920 --> 0:04:28.360
<v Speaker 3>So just exponential moves.

0:04:28.160 --> 0:04:29.840
<v Speaker 1>And here you go, this is what it looks like.

0:04:30.240 --> 0:04:35.400
<v Speaker 1>Exclamation point hr dash call and got Pete Alonso Kama

0:04:35.560 --> 0:04:38.039
<v Speaker 1>Juan Soto Coama five hundred and seventy two, which actually

0:04:38.040 --> 0:04:39.480
<v Speaker 1>sounds pretty good. Think I might just do that.

0:04:39.880 --> 0:04:41.240
<v Speaker 3>And that's gonna exact one.

0:04:41.360 --> 0:04:43.080
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I'm just gonna steal that exact one. See how

0:04:43.080 --> 0:04:45.640
<v Speaker 1>it goes happen. Something wouldn't be hilarious, is like dead on.

0:04:46.080 --> 0:04:48.120
<v Speaker 1>And that was just the example one think I might

0:04:48.160 --> 0:04:48.720
<v Speaker 1>do that just.

0:04:48.880 --> 0:04:50.479
<v Speaker 2>And everybody's got to make sure when you're doing it,

0:04:50.520 --> 0:04:52.640
<v Speaker 2>make sure you pay attention to the bracket so you're

0:04:52.720 --> 0:04:54.120
<v Speaker 2>moving the right players.

0:04:54.480 --> 0:04:56.800
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, you know, look at the we'll talk about the

0:04:56.800 --> 0:04:58.960
<v Speaker 1>bracket in a second show. Io Tani reach base three

0:04:59.000 --> 0:05:01.440
<v Speaker 1>times and the Angel loss, So what else is new?

0:05:01.480 --> 0:05:03.240
<v Speaker 1>But he did move ahead of Aaron Judge and the

0:05:03.320 --> 0:05:06.520
<v Speaker 1>MVP voting on the or not voting in the MVP

0:05:06.600 --> 0:05:09.320
<v Speaker 1>odds pardon me over on Fanduels. So there you go.

0:05:09.360 --> 0:05:13.279
<v Speaker 1>That's very exciting. Carlos carrasco six scoreless things against the Cubs,

0:05:13.960 --> 0:05:16.839
<v Speaker 1>Louis Robert and Homer Hit drove in five runs. And

0:05:17.279 --> 0:05:20.800
<v Speaker 1>our boy Max Meyer is going to make his MLB

0:05:21.240 --> 0:05:24.960
<v Speaker 1>debut on Saturday. I just did a video yesterday morning saying, hey,

0:05:25.040 --> 0:05:26.840
<v Speaker 1>go pick up this guy before he gets called up.

0:05:27.240 --> 0:05:27.839
<v Speaker 3>It's too late.

0:05:28.000 --> 0:05:30.120
<v Speaker 1>It's too late. The video hasn't even come out yet,

0:05:30.160 --> 0:05:32.239
<v Speaker 1>so now it sounds like I'm like living in the past.

0:05:32.279 --> 0:05:34.520
<v Speaker 1>But you know what, at the time, I was right,

0:05:34.839 --> 0:05:37.680
<v Speaker 1>and he's still available in like sixty five percent of leagues.

0:05:37.760 --> 0:05:38.320
<v Speaker 1>Or something like that.

0:05:38.360 --> 0:05:39.840
<v Speaker 3>I mean, here's got to be plenty of this guy up.

0:05:39.920 --> 0:05:42.440
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, he hasn't gone and actually performed his start yet.

0:05:42.480 --> 0:05:45.080
<v Speaker 2>I mean place if you're paying attention to prospects or

0:05:45.120 --> 0:05:47.960
<v Speaker 2>you're consuming any Fantasy Baseball content, people are going to

0:05:48.040 --> 0:05:50.560
<v Speaker 2>kind of be on it. But there doesn't mean there's

0:05:50.600 --> 0:05:52.800
<v Speaker 2>a you know, fifty sixty percent of an audience set

0:05:52.800 --> 0:05:55.640
<v Speaker 2>out there that isn't. And Meyer's a relatively I known,

0:05:55.640 --> 0:05:57.600
<v Speaker 2>actually a little bit better X fit this year than

0:05:57.640 --> 0:06:01.239
<v Speaker 2>his era, which is in the threes over ten. Came

0:06:01.279 --> 0:06:03.640
<v Speaker 2>back from the injury. You know, he's had some dominant,

0:06:03.640 --> 0:06:07.320
<v Speaker 2>dominant performances with a couple spots. But you know, we

0:06:07.320 --> 0:06:09.279
<v Speaker 2>we talked about it, like early early in the year,

0:06:09.480 --> 0:06:11.680
<v Speaker 2>there's a guy that was going up against the rehab

0:06:11.760 --> 0:06:14.720
<v Speaker 2>starts of Ronald Acunya and Joan Mancata and striking these

0:06:14.720 --> 0:06:17.680
<v Speaker 2>guys out left and right. So, as you know, I'm very,

0:06:17.760 --> 0:06:20.479
<v Speaker 2>very excited about Max Meyer, and he was one of

0:06:20.520 --> 0:06:21.359
<v Speaker 2>the big pickups.

0:06:21.360 --> 0:06:23.840
<v Speaker 3>And this is one of the.

0:06:23.400 --> 0:06:27.320
<v Speaker 2>Last obvious leaves to fall of the pickups that you

0:06:27.360 --> 0:06:30.520
<v Speaker 2>need to do. I just did a on my rank update,

0:06:30.560 --> 0:06:32.720
<v Speaker 2>I do twenty five prospects that haven't been called up

0:06:32.760 --> 0:06:35.520
<v Speaker 2>to look for and he's at the top of the list.

0:06:35.680 --> 0:06:36.800
<v Speaker 3>And now now.

0:06:36.600 --> 0:06:39.839
<v Speaker 2>It's like an open season of us just being surprised

0:06:39.839 --> 0:06:42.159
<v Speaker 2>guys like a story are up. Now we just have

0:06:42.279 --> 0:06:44.640
<v Speaker 2>to you know, maybe Corbyn Carroll at some point he's

0:06:44.720 --> 0:06:47.560
<v Speaker 2>up at Triple A hitting homers left and right. The

0:06:47.600 --> 0:06:49.880
<v Speaker 2>pool is very very different of prospects that are going

0:06:49.920 --> 0:06:51.159
<v Speaker 2>to be coming up next.

0:06:51.440 --> 0:06:55.000
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, and uh, look, Meyer, his only delay was because

0:06:55.000 --> 0:06:57.360
<v Speaker 1>of the injury. Wasn't anything wrong or anything like that.

0:06:57.440 --> 0:07:00.080
<v Speaker 1>It was just simply, you know, the delay because of

0:07:00.160 --> 0:07:02.120
<v Speaker 1>the injury. And that's actually a.

0:07:02.080 --> 0:07:04.039
<v Speaker 3>Couple wonked starts though too.

0:07:04.120 --> 0:07:05.960
<v Speaker 1>I think that was because of the injury, don't you think,

0:07:06.040 --> 0:07:07.920
<v Speaker 1>like it's kind of like now favoring something and it

0:07:08.040 --> 0:07:10.560
<v Speaker 1>was like okay, and that's all turns out he's on

0:07:10.600 --> 0:07:11.240
<v Speaker 1>the eyel.

0:07:11.160 --> 0:07:13.160
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, but it all kind of like accumulated to like

0:07:13.240 --> 0:07:16.640
<v Speaker 2>this like month, you know, overlay that kind of was

0:07:16.640 --> 0:07:18.320
<v Speaker 2>into each other because they're not going to bring him

0:07:18.360 --> 0:07:20.640
<v Speaker 2>up if he was struggling, and then he just needed

0:07:20.640 --> 0:07:22.560
<v Speaker 2>to get right after the injury. They I think they

0:07:22.560 --> 0:07:25.680
<v Speaker 2>gave him one or two starts after the injury.

0:07:25.320 --> 0:07:27.720
<v Speaker 3>And now boom, we're good to go. But I'm optimistic.

0:07:27.760 --> 0:07:30.640
<v Speaker 2>I'm very optimistic on really everything on him, but I'm

0:07:30.680 --> 0:07:32.440
<v Speaker 2>not you know, I don't. I don't expect to see

0:07:32.440 --> 0:07:34.280
<v Speaker 2>any props on him as none of the books have

0:07:34.320 --> 0:07:36.840
<v Speaker 2>been giving first time rookies any numbers.

0:07:36.880 --> 0:07:37.600
<v Speaker 3>Just FYI.

0:07:37.920 --> 0:07:39.760
<v Speaker 1>And look now the innings totals on as much of

0:07:39.760 --> 0:07:41.680
<v Speaker 1>an issue too, because he's missed about a month, so

0:07:42.120 --> 0:07:44.120
<v Speaker 1>all of a sudden, good point. Not is concerned about

0:07:44.120 --> 0:07:46.120
<v Speaker 1>the end of the year for Maximyer. So like the

0:07:46.200 --> 0:07:48.520
<v Speaker 1>investment I make in him is very important because like

0:07:48.560 --> 0:07:50.600
<v Speaker 1>now I'm like actually a little bit if he's on

0:07:50.640 --> 0:07:53.040
<v Speaker 1>the way WI, I'm more aggressive because he can actually

0:07:53.040 --> 0:07:55.960
<v Speaker 1>help me. In August end September, it was just great points.

0:07:56.480 --> 0:07:59.040
<v Speaker 1>The first pitch of the game from the Angels, Lefty

0:07:59.080 --> 0:08:00.680
<v Speaker 1>read Debtmer's hit home the all two V on the

0:08:00.720 --> 0:08:02.720
<v Speaker 1>left knee. He stayed in the game for a little

0:08:02.720 --> 0:08:04.160
<v Speaker 1>while and then ended up coming out, So we'll keep

0:08:04.200 --> 0:08:06.560
<v Speaker 1>an eye on that. Uh. We actually have a leading

0:08:06.560 --> 0:08:10.080
<v Speaker 1>off mailbag question from our discord channel Edwalking Penguin has

0:08:10.400 --> 0:08:12.560
<v Speaker 1>has asked, so you keep asking every day, are we

0:08:12.600 --> 0:08:15.040
<v Speaker 1>allowed to drop Jared Walsh yet Welsh? Are we allowed

0:08:15.040 --> 0:08:16.680
<v Speaker 1>to drop drop Walsh. That's hard.

0:08:16.840 --> 0:08:18.800
<v Speaker 2>Oh that could be like the bot, like you know

0:08:18.800 --> 0:08:21.160
<v Speaker 2>those Twitter accounts like has Vinne passe Quentino been called

0:08:21.200 --> 0:08:21.600
<v Speaker 2>up today?

0:08:21.760 --> 0:08:24.080
<v Speaker 3>There should be a Twitter handle? Can we drop Jared?

0:08:24.320 --> 0:08:25.040
<v Speaker 1>Drop Jared Walsh?

0:08:25.080 --> 0:08:28.320
<v Speaker 2>Yet I think like sure, I mean, if you if

0:08:28.360 --> 0:08:30.840
<v Speaker 2>you want like the overarching, sure you could drop him.

0:08:30.960 --> 0:08:32.720
<v Speaker 3>I would say.

0:08:32.520 --> 0:08:34.679
<v Speaker 2>There's context to a lot of stuff out there. He's

0:08:34.720 --> 0:08:37.679
<v Speaker 2>hitting two forty thirteen homers forty one RBI. That's not

0:08:37.760 --> 0:08:40.040
<v Speaker 2>the worst thing in the world. There are worst players

0:08:40.080 --> 0:08:43.200
<v Speaker 2>being rostered. The k percentage has gone over thirty. He

0:08:43.320 --> 0:08:46.079
<v Speaker 2>is not walking lowess walk percentage, second lowest walk percentage

0:08:46.120 --> 0:08:49.280
<v Speaker 2>of his career, which I'm worried about. But yeah, I

0:08:49.320 --> 0:08:51.280
<v Speaker 2>think in like ten and twelve man leagues, there are

0:08:51.320 --> 0:08:54.840
<v Speaker 2>probably other serviceable assets that are sitting around. You could

0:08:54.840 --> 0:08:57.040
<v Speaker 2>maybe take shots. You could have taken a shot out

0:08:57.080 --> 0:08:58.960
<v Speaker 2>like a Vinie pas Quentino. I bet, I bet there

0:08:59.000 --> 0:09:01.320
<v Speaker 2>was somebody that had that exact decision of like, ooh

0:09:01.840 --> 0:09:03.719
<v Speaker 2>do I want to pick up Vinnie? But the only

0:09:03.800 --> 0:09:05.199
<v Speaker 2>drop of a person to have his Walsh and I

0:09:05.240 --> 0:09:07.079
<v Speaker 2>don't want to give up. So I think he's in

0:09:07.120 --> 0:09:09.160
<v Speaker 2>that space. If you hold on. I think you could

0:09:09.160 --> 0:09:11.080
<v Speaker 2>still get twenty five homers out of him. He could

0:09:11.080 --> 0:09:12.360
<v Speaker 2>have a little bit of pick up. I think the

0:09:12.440 --> 0:09:15.200
<v Speaker 2>team in general could have a rally around in the

0:09:15.240 --> 0:09:18.800
<v Speaker 2>second half. But I would be okay if you needed.

0:09:18.559 --> 0:09:20.320
<v Speaker 3>To and don't. Yeah, I don't. Look at his batting

0:09:20.360 --> 0:09:21.160
<v Speaker 3>average in July.

0:09:21.080 --> 0:09:25.040
<v Speaker 1>Please yeah, point zero eight one DA in July. So

0:09:25.160 --> 0:09:27.320
<v Speaker 1>has not been good. And I'm waiting for Jared Walsher

0:09:27.400 --> 0:09:28.920
<v Speaker 1>to end up on another team and become like CJ.

0:09:29.040 --> 0:09:30.800
<v Speaker 1>Cronwer just as it really, you know, it's like, oh,

0:09:30.800 --> 0:09:33.160
<v Speaker 1>look at that. No, look he's a good player. Not kidding.

0:09:33.400 --> 0:09:35.720
<v Speaker 1>So the Angels do bring up these guys and then

0:09:35.760 --> 0:09:37.360
<v Speaker 1>they don't perform, so they think and then all of

0:09:37.400 --> 0:09:40.360
<v Speaker 1>a sudden they're gone somewhere else and they blossom. Something's

0:09:40.360 --> 0:09:42.400
<v Speaker 1>weird in the water there in Anaheim. I don't know

0:09:42.400 --> 0:09:45.000
<v Speaker 1>what it is, but something's definitely strange in the water

0:09:45.040 --> 0:09:49.760
<v Speaker 1>for Baltimore in Seattle, Baltimore up to their highest mark

0:09:49.800 --> 0:09:53.360
<v Speaker 1>since nineteen ninety nine in terms of wind streaks, and

0:09:53.400 --> 0:09:56.400
<v Speaker 1>then the Mariners are up to their eleventh straight win

0:09:56.480 --> 0:09:59.960
<v Speaker 1>as well. Just crazy what these two teams are doing,

0:10:00.600 --> 0:10:02.560
<v Speaker 1>and we don't know Baseball is a game of streaks. Now.

0:10:02.600 --> 0:10:04.040
<v Speaker 1>I don't think any of us think the Oriols are

0:10:04.080 --> 0:10:06.920
<v Speaker 1>a playoff team, but Seattle right now is in the

0:10:06.920 --> 0:10:08.559
<v Speaker 1>thick of the wild card. Do you think this is

0:10:08.600 --> 0:10:10.040
<v Speaker 1>a team that can hang in it the way they're

0:10:10.080 --> 0:10:12.120
<v Speaker 1>currently structured, especially in the rotation.

0:10:13.559 --> 0:10:15.880
<v Speaker 2>I think they got to make moves. I mean about

0:10:15.880 --> 0:10:17.160
<v Speaker 2>that out a ton they got to make. I think

0:10:17.160 --> 0:10:18.719
<v Speaker 2>they need to bring on a move or two. That's

0:10:18.760 --> 0:10:20.719
<v Speaker 2>why I think you asked me when we were talking

0:10:20.720 --> 0:10:23.640
<v Speaker 2>about the Luis Castillo trade rumors a week or so ago.

0:10:23.960 --> 0:10:27.440
<v Speaker 3>My number one of who should was the Mariners. They should.

0:10:27.480 --> 0:10:28.959
<v Speaker 3>They should be the active ones.

0:10:29.080 --> 0:10:31.280
<v Speaker 2>They've got the pieces, they should go out and they

0:10:31.280 --> 0:10:33.400
<v Speaker 2>should try to build up on this team. The difference

0:10:33.440 --> 0:10:37.000
<v Speaker 2>between for better for worse between the Mariners and the Orioles.

0:10:37.120 --> 0:10:40.760
<v Speaker 2>The Orioles have this plethora of young talent that they

0:10:40.800 --> 0:10:43.679
<v Speaker 2>could a obviously trade from, but b they could bring up.

0:10:43.720 --> 0:10:45.320
<v Speaker 2>You know, they've done a really good job of like

0:10:45.360 --> 0:10:48.440
<v Speaker 2>slowly bringing up the young guys at least doing really well.

0:10:49.000 --> 0:10:51.080
<v Speaker 2>You got dl Hall, You've got Gunner Henderson. You could

0:10:51.080 --> 0:10:53.800
<v Speaker 2>have an influx from that space. So something you could

0:10:53.800 --> 0:10:56.680
<v Speaker 2>potentially think about maybe bring in one more veteran bat

0:10:57.280 --> 0:10:59.120
<v Speaker 2>if you want to trade for bullpen. I think that's

0:10:59.120 --> 0:11:01.160
<v Speaker 2>always the best used to go if you can't get

0:11:01.200 --> 0:11:03.160
<v Speaker 2>starting pitchers, but you've got dl Hall that can come up.

0:11:03.200 --> 0:11:05.679
<v Speaker 2>You've got Gunner Henderson to be an influx of you know,

0:11:05.760 --> 0:11:08.120
<v Speaker 2>just one of those really positive young bats to come in.

0:11:08.640 --> 0:11:10.800
<v Speaker 3>Mariners don't really have that. I don't think mariners at

0:11:10.800 --> 0:11:11.360
<v Speaker 3>this point.

0:11:11.480 --> 0:11:13.520
<v Speaker 2>You know, they've kind of I mean f Kelnick if

0:11:13.520 --> 0:11:16.080
<v Speaker 2>that's gonna work, well, I don't know. Both should be

0:11:16.120 --> 0:11:17.840
<v Speaker 2>more active in the trade market, and I think they

0:11:17.840 --> 0:11:20.720
<v Speaker 2>should start now, because the worst thing you can do

0:11:21.320 --> 0:11:23.679
<v Speaker 2>is try to be competing against teams like the Dodgers

0:11:23.679 --> 0:11:26.240
<v Speaker 2>and the Yankees around the trade deadline. So you should

0:11:26.240 --> 0:11:27.520
<v Speaker 2>be active at this moment.

0:11:27.920 --> 0:11:31.040
<v Speaker 1>All right, here's the home run derby set up right here.

0:11:31.160 --> 0:11:33.520
<v Speaker 1>Pete Alonso is plus two hundred to win. Klle shwover

0:11:33.600 --> 0:11:35.680
<v Speaker 1>plus two fifty, so too at plus five. That's where

0:11:35.720 --> 0:11:39.319
<v Speaker 1>my money's going. Lon Lacunia at plus six hundred. Julio

0:11:39.360 --> 0:11:41.320
<v Speaker 1>is at ten to one, hosier A mirrors twelve to one,

0:11:41.640 --> 0:11:44.520
<v Speaker 1>Corey Seeger twelve, Pools twenty to one. I would not

0:11:44.520 --> 0:11:47.559
<v Speaker 1>bet on Poohles because it's so hard for you know,

0:11:47.880 --> 0:11:50.520
<v Speaker 1>the physical demand of the time limit is very difficult

0:11:50.520 --> 0:11:53.679
<v Speaker 1>on the older player. As far as the I think

0:11:53.720 --> 0:11:56.440
<v Speaker 1>it's pretty simple for me. It's Juio's my favorite long shot.

0:11:56.679 --> 0:12:00.199
<v Speaker 1>Sodo's my favorite favorite of the three. That's how I

0:12:00.200 --> 0:12:02.280
<v Speaker 1>would approach this, putting money on things. How would you

0:12:02.320 --> 0:12:02.719
<v Speaker 1>approach it?

0:12:02.760 --> 0:12:04.320
<v Speaker 3>Who is your favorite? Sodo?

0:12:04.120 --> 0:12:06.240
<v Speaker 1>Who at five to one? Because I'm gonna make more

0:12:06.240 --> 0:12:07.920
<v Speaker 1>money on it, and to me, he's just as good

0:12:07.920 --> 0:12:10.880
<v Speaker 1>of a shot as Alonzo Schwarber. That's a really you know,

0:12:10.920 --> 0:12:13.439
<v Speaker 1>I mean, you know, twice as much money on the

0:12:13.480 --> 0:12:14.160
<v Speaker 1>same investment.

0:12:14.200 --> 0:12:15.800
<v Speaker 2>Should we look should we get into looking at park

0:12:15.840 --> 0:12:18.600
<v Speaker 2>factors for lefties versus righty's in this one?

0:12:18.679 --> 0:12:21.199
<v Speaker 1>Something that can tend I mean it's batting practice, speeds

0:12:21.280 --> 0:12:22.880
<v Speaker 1>on't how much that matters.

0:12:24.080 --> 0:12:26.800
<v Speaker 2>When I look at this, I mean, like the homer

0:12:26.800 --> 0:12:29.120
<v Speaker 2>in me wants to take Julio Rodriguez at one thousand

0:12:29.200 --> 0:12:32.400
<v Speaker 2>to one. You're sitt here middle line safe bet. Like

0:12:32.440 --> 0:12:36.520
<v Speaker 2>you said, it's probably Sodo, but Pede Alonzo I think

0:12:36.600 --> 0:12:39.079
<v Speaker 2>is ultimately the bet. You know, if I had to, well,

0:12:39.160 --> 0:12:43.840
<v Speaker 2>I probably unveiling what I'm gonna have contest, I suppose,

0:12:43.880 --> 0:12:46.720
<v Speaker 2>but I think it's hard to bet against Sodo. Maybe

0:12:46.760 --> 0:12:49.800
<v Speaker 2>park factors come in too. I'm surprised to see Schwarber

0:12:50.880 --> 0:12:54.400
<v Speaker 2>at almost even money with Alonzo double where Sodo is

0:12:54.480 --> 0:12:56.040
<v Speaker 2>right now, that's really really interesting.

0:12:56.080 --> 0:12:58.080
<v Speaker 3>But I would me personally, I've.

0:12:57.960 --> 0:13:00.679
<v Speaker 2>Eliminated the long the three long shots at the bottom.

0:13:01.000 --> 0:13:02.319
<v Speaker 3>If I'm making my choice on.

0:13:02.400 --> 0:13:04.600
<v Speaker 1>That, Corey Seeger would be hilarious winner, right, go back

0:13:04.640 --> 0:13:07.200
<v Speaker 1>to Dodger Stadium, right, I mean, that wouldn't be like, oh,

0:13:07.960 --> 0:13:11.200
<v Speaker 1>that would be the story line, good story holding up

0:13:11.240 --> 0:13:13.240
<v Speaker 1>the thing there. I mean, this is all bar ballpark.

0:13:13.280 --> 0:13:16.400
<v Speaker 2>If there's somebody that you to manage that ballpark for sure,

0:13:16.440 --> 0:13:18.760
<v Speaker 2>that is something I hadn't even thought about or considered.

0:13:19.080 --> 0:13:20.800
<v Speaker 1>This is one of the biggest things I thought about

0:13:20.800 --> 0:13:22.360
<v Speaker 1>when I saw him, was like, Oh, that's really interesting

0:13:22.360 --> 0:13:24.920
<v Speaker 1>because that's a guy who's very familiar with the batter's

0:13:24.960 --> 0:13:27.840
<v Speaker 1>eye quote unquote in that area more than anybody else

0:13:27.840 --> 0:13:29.640
<v Speaker 1>in this contest. That's kind of interesting to me.

0:13:30.080 --> 0:13:33.559
<v Speaker 2>Would you consider doing multi bets on this if you

0:13:33.600 --> 0:13:35.120
<v Speaker 2>were going to place it? Like, are you are you

0:13:35.200 --> 0:13:37.120
<v Speaker 2>like a one better for the home rund Derby or

0:13:37.120 --> 0:13:38.240
<v Speaker 2>do you go I'm.

0:13:38.080 --> 0:13:40.280
<v Speaker 3>Gonna take I t fiftree guys.

0:13:40.559 --> 0:13:42.280
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I would take fifty bucks, and I would put

0:13:42.320 --> 0:13:45.440
<v Speaker 1>like ten on the biggest long shot, you know, and.

0:13:45.360 --> 0:13:48.720
<v Speaker 2>Then maybe one on the favorite a little bit more.

0:13:48.920 --> 0:13:51.640
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, like, yeah, you do that kind of thing. Like again,

0:13:51.679 --> 0:13:53.400
<v Speaker 1>I'm using a multiple. You won't put a hundred on it.

0:13:53.400 --> 0:13:56.000
<v Speaker 1>Then it's much easier to spread it around. But in

0:13:56.080 --> 0:13:58.120
<v Speaker 1>terms of percentages, if I was at one hundred dollars

0:13:58.160 --> 0:13:59.840
<v Speaker 1>spent on the derby and I wanted to have some fun,

0:14:00.320 --> 0:14:03.320
<v Speaker 1>I would put fifty percent on the guy that I

0:14:03.360 --> 0:14:07.120
<v Speaker 1>thought was really my guy, and then I would take

0:14:07.200 --> 0:14:09.640
<v Speaker 1>the last fifty and do thirty twenty over too.

0:14:09.760 --> 0:14:11.719
<v Speaker 2>I was gonna say, I might use something like if

0:14:11.720 --> 0:14:14.600
<v Speaker 2>I had one hundred and fifty on Alonzo, maybe twenty

0:14:14.600 --> 0:14:17.880
<v Speaker 2>five on Soto and twenty five on Julio, something something

0:14:17.880 --> 0:14:19.920
<v Speaker 2>along those lines to play around with.

0:14:20.000 --> 0:14:21.520
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, but you gotta see, as the thing is like,

0:14:21.640 --> 0:14:23.400
<v Speaker 1>to make that work, you've got to put it on

0:14:23.400 --> 0:14:25.080
<v Speaker 1>one of the long shots that's.

0:14:25.120 --> 0:14:27.360
<v Speaker 3>Well hilous Julio's ten to one, Huos.

0:14:27.040 --> 0:14:28.760
<v Speaker 1>At ten to one, and Cory seeger is at twelve

0:14:28.800 --> 0:14:31.680
<v Speaker 1>to one. I kind of think Sodo Julio Seeger is

0:14:31.680 --> 0:14:34.960
<v Speaker 1>the most intriguing from the Bettings perspective, like that, that

0:14:35.000 --> 0:14:36.640
<v Speaker 1>would be the trio I would be looking at. I

0:14:36.640 --> 0:14:38.280
<v Speaker 1>don't know the more I might talk myself into the

0:14:38.280 --> 0:14:39.560
<v Speaker 1>Corey Seager thing. By the end of this show.

0:14:39.560 --> 0:14:41.360
<v Speaker 3>Who sounds like you have? It sounds like you have.

0:14:41.840 --> 0:14:45.240
<v Speaker 1>I haven't yet. Still mulling, still mulling. All right, this

0:14:45.320 --> 0:14:48.600
<v Speaker 1>day in baseball, here you go, twenty eight years ago today,

0:14:48.680 --> 0:14:51.760
<v Speaker 1>Albert Bell's cork bat was confiscated by Empires, and so

0:14:51.920 --> 0:14:55.440
<v Speaker 1>began the greatest MLB heights in history, where Jason Grimsley

0:14:55.480 --> 0:14:58.280
<v Speaker 1>climbed through the ceiling of the Tribe clubhouse into the

0:14:58.360 --> 0:15:01.720
<v Speaker 1>umpire's room, stole a corkbat, and replaced it with Paul

0:15:01.760 --> 0:15:05.600
<v Speaker 1>Sorrento's bat, which happened to be stamped with Paul Sorrento's name,

0:15:05.800 --> 0:15:08.400
<v Speaker 1>So that did not work out very well.

0:15:08.520 --> 0:15:10.760
<v Speaker 3>I'm oh, I remember this.

0:15:11.280 --> 0:15:14.960
<v Speaker 1>I remember this very well. Hilarious and once again in

0:15:15.000 --> 0:15:17.520
<v Speaker 1>an era where we don't have social media, imagine the

0:15:17.640 --> 0:15:21.600
<v Speaker 1>Jason Grimsly crawl like die Hard crawling through the air

0:15:21.680 --> 0:15:25.640
<v Speaker 1>shaft John McClain style switched. He actually did this, He

0:15:25.720 --> 0:15:28.240
<v Speaker 1>actually did this. He actually climbed through, got through the

0:15:28.320 --> 0:15:31.520
<v Speaker 1>drop ceiling, switched the bat. But they did all that,

0:15:31.560 --> 0:15:34.040
<v Speaker 1>but they didn't think, oh wait, it's got Paul Sorrento's

0:15:34.120 --> 0:15:35.760
<v Speaker 1>name on it. Probably not.

0:15:35.800 --> 0:15:38.440
<v Speaker 2>The bat drops Sorrento's bat, gets up in there in

0:15:38.480 --> 0:15:40.400
<v Speaker 2>the vent, puts his head back out in the vent

0:15:40.440 --> 0:15:42.600
<v Speaker 2>and goes yip be kayem.

0:15:42.800 --> 0:15:44.720
<v Speaker 3>And then that's so good. That's a good bit.

0:15:44.800 --> 0:15:47.000
<v Speaker 1>I like it. It's so good, so good. All right,

0:15:47.000 --> 0:15:50.560
<v Speaker 1>here's a good one too. Who is the oldest player

0:15:50.560 --> 0:15:52.720
<v Speaker 1>in the history of baseball to win the Rookie of

0:15:52.720 --> 0:15:55.240
<v Speaker 1>the Year award? I thought we did the youngest MVP

0:15:55.480 --> 0:15:57.880
<v Speaker 1>earlier this week, and that was fun. Who was the

0:15:57.920 --> 0:16:00.560
<v Speaker 1>oldest player to win Rookie of the Year. I did

0:16:00.600 --> 0:16:02.200
<v Speaker 1>not know the answer to this, so I have a

0:16:02.240 --> 0:16:04.760
<v Speaker 1>guls disclosure. Go ahead, take your well, you ruined.

0:16:04.600 --> 0:16:06.600
<v Speaker 3>It, ruined it yesterday. I know I ruined it yesterday.

0:16:06.600 --> 0:16:09.680
<v Speaker 2>Immediately, I don't think mine's right, because my my, as

0:16:09.720 --> 0:16:12.200
<v Speaker 2>you just said that, I realized this might be something

0:16:12.280 --> 0:16:15.400
<v Speaker 2>of an international player, and if it is, then I'm wrong.

0:16:16.600 --> 0:16:18.480
<v Speaker 2>The player that jumped to my mind because I remember

0:16:18.560 --> 0:16:22.160
<v Speaker 2>him being an older rookie, was Ryan Howard with the Phillies.

0:16:22.320 --> 0:16:24.440
<v Speaker 1>It's not Ryan Howard, okay, because I.

0:16:24.440 --> 0:16:26.040
<v Speaker 3>Feel like it was like twenty six or twenty seven

0:16:26.080 --> 0:16:26.480
<v Speaker 3>or whatever.

0:16:26.680 --> 0:16:29.440
<v Speaker 2>It's got to be an international guy, right, someone like

0:16:29.480 --> 0:16:30.680
<v Speaker 2>it came over at like thirty.

0:16:30.880 --> 0:16:32.200
<v Speaker 1>I'm not going to tell you if it is or

0:16:32.240 --> 0:16:34.240
<v Speaker 1>it isn't. All I'm gonna tell you is it's not

0:16:34.360 --> 0:16:37.160
<v Speaker 1>Ryan Howard. There you go. So there you have it, folks.

0:16:37.160 --> 0:16:38.400
<v Speaker 1>If you think you know the answer, drop it in

0:16:38.400 --> 0:16:41.320
<v Speaker 1>the chat over Fantasy Bros MLB again. Who's the oldest

0:16:41.360 --> 0:16:43.520
<v Speaker 1>person to ever win Rookie of the Year in the

0:16:43.520 --> 0:16:45.880
<v Speaker 1>major leagues. Here's your heroes from yesterday in the stack.

0:16:45.920 --> 0:16:49.400
<v Speaker 1>Calum Corbyn burns ten k's seven innings, one earn, no decision,

0:16:49.640 --> 0:16:52.720
<v Speaker 1>Tyler Anderson strong again six scoreless innings, only four k's

0:16:52.720 --> 0:16:56.160
<v Speaker 1>but still getting those quality starts. Braxton Garrett six scoreless

0:16:56.160 --> 0:16:58.640
<v Speaker 1>of his own. Luis Castillo seven innings and a very

0:16:58.720 --> 0:17:01.600
<v Speaker 1>nice audition eight strikeouts, four walks, but he did go

0:17:01.680 --> 0:17:04.840
<v Speaker 1>seven and Tristan McKenzie with the eight innings, twelve k's.

0:17:04.920 --> 0:17:07.359
<v Speaker 1>Lewis Robert three for five with a bomb, Brandon Nemo

0:17:07.359 --> 0:17:09.560
<v Speaker 1>three four of the home run, Sam Haggerty three for four,

0:17:09.560 --> 0:17:12.040
<v Speaker 1>with a dinger. Andre Samanez two for three with a Homer,

0:17:12.320 --> 0:17:15.680
<v Speaker 1>Zebbi Salva Sable excuse me two for five with the homer.

0:17:15.720 --> 0:17:18.879
<v Speaker 1>Matt Carpenter Mayor got his home run for Matt Carpenter Gros,

0:17:19.240 --> 0:17:22.320
<v Speaker 1>Trent Grisham, Bobby Witt also had good days also at

0:17:22.320 --> 0:17:24.560
<v Speaker 1>Homer's Andrew Vaughan two for five with a dinger and

0:17:24.640 --> 0:17:26.960
<v Speaker 1>Gavin Lux two for five with the dinger as well.

0:17:27.359 --> 0:17:29.720
<v Speaker 1>I see a lot of eachi ro guesses in there.

0:17:30.359 --> 0:17:33.200
<v Speaker 1>Each he ro is incorrect. Just in case you are

0:17:33.200 --> 0:17:33.679
<v Speaker 1>looking at that.

0:17:33.880 --> 0:17:36.640
<v Speaker 2>It wasn't eat you like twenty seven when he came over,

0:17:36.680 --> 0:17:38.640
<v Speaker 2>and I feel like this is someone in their thirties.

0:17:40.359 --> 0:17:43.680
<v Speaker 1>It is each row is old, but each row wasn't

0:17:43.680 --> 0:17:46.120
<v Speaker 1>even the oldest Japanese player. That gives you a little

0:17:46.119 --> 0:17:51.000
<v Speaker 1>bit of an extra fun thing here to contemplate. So he,

0:17:51.320 --> 0:17:53.879
<v Speaker 1>I thought each ros where my head went immediately It

0:17:53.960 --> 0:17:55.440
<v Speaker 1>was not the answer to the question.

0:17:55.520 --> 0:17:58.640
<v Speaker 3>So seven when he came home, not Jackie Robins.

0:17:59.040 --> 0:18:00.840
<v Speaker 1>Each row is twenty seven, but there was older people

0:18:00.840 --> 0:18:03.600
<v Speaker 1>than him, if you can believe it. So there you go. Also,

0:18:03.720 --> 0:18:06.560
<v Speaker 1>who was twenty seven was? I want to say it

0:18:06.600 --> 0:18:09.040
<v Speaker 1>was Jose Abrau was also around twenty six or twenty

0:18:09.080 --> 0:18:10.720
<v Speaker 1>SE's twenty seven, twenty fourteen.

0:18:11.480 --> 0:18:13.160
<v Speaker 3>Also not the oldest Decie Matt Suey.

0:18:13.840 --> 0:18:16.560
<v Speaker 1>Nope, no, but he's not a Decie Matt Suey either.

0:18:16.640 --> 0:18:19.639
<v Speaker 1>It's not Jackie Robinson at twenty eight years old. Uh.

0:18:19.800 --> 0:18:22.040
<v Speaker 1>There was a Japanese import that was even older to

0:18:22.040 --> 0:18:24.760
<v Speaker 1>win the Rookie of the Year, just as FYI, I'm

0:18:24.760 --> 0:18:27.679
<v Speaker 1>not saying that's the answer. I'm just throwing that out there,

0:18:27.680 --> 0:18:29.200
<v Speaker 1>and it wasn't to Dekie Matt Suey. Here are the

0:18:29.240 --> 0:18:33.280
<v Speaker 1>losers from yesterday. Sunny Gray six earned runs, Marco Gonzalez

0:18:33.320 --> 0:18:36.920
<v Speaker 1>five earned runs, Blake Snell five earned runs. Though, Blake Snell,

0:18:37.000 --> 0:18:40.239
<v Speaker 1>you sox walks to six walks. I mean, that's your

0:18:40.280 --> 0:18:42.320
<v Speaker 1>vintage Blake Snell. This is why I never draft. Blake

0:18:42.359 --> 0:18:45.960
<v Speaker 1>Snell drives me crazy. Kyle Freeland four innings, five earned,

0:18:46.040 --> 0:18:48.679
<v Speaker 1>Riley Green over four with the four k's. He had

0:18:48.720 --> 0:18:51.080
<v Speaker 1>the Golden sombrero, as did Brandon marsh over four with

0:18:51.080 --> 0:18:53.960
<v Speaker 1>the four k's. Max Munsey over four with three batting

0:18:54.040 --> 0:18:56.399
<v Speaker 1>just one fifty eight eight homers in seventy two games.

0:18:56.560 --> 0:18:58.720
<v Speaker 1>Rest of the season. Max Munsey or Jared Walsh. Wowsh

0:18:58.720 --> 0:19:01.280
<v Speaker 1>would you rather have? Max?

0:19:01.359 --> 0:19:04.359
<v Speaker 2>Monzi has the lowest qualified babbob of any player right now?

0:19:05.160 --> 0:19:12.280
<v Speaker 2>But jee, I think it's hard, like anybody else.

0:19:12.119 --> 0:19:14.480
<v Speaker 1>Like anybody else, that's the right answer. Gian Carlos Stanton

0:19:14.480 --> 0:19:15.240
<v Speaker 1>over five with a K.

0:19:15.440 --> 0:19:16.160
<v Speaker 3>I don't have an answer.

0:19:16.240 --> 0:19:18.199
<v Speaker 2>I literally, legit, do not have any I could not

0:19:18.320 --> 0:19:20.760
<v Speaker 2>answer that question for you because they're both so bad.

0:19:21.119 --> 0:19:22.240
<v Speaker 3>The babbit up on Monday.

0:19:22.240 --> 0:19:24.320
<v Speaker 1>I would just say, based on the fact that he's

0:19:24.320 --> 0:19:25.640
<v Speaker 1>on a better team, that's it.

0:19:26.200 --> 0:19:27.400
<v Speaker 3>Maybe, that's maybe.

0:19:27.480 --> 0:19:29.600
<v Speaker 1>And I don't even think that's a good answer. Luke

0:19:29.680 --> 0:19:31.720
<v Speaker 1>void Oh for four to two k's, Jeter downs Oh

0:19:31.760 --> 0:19:34.480
<v Speaker 1>four to two k's gian Carlos Stanton over five with

0:19:34.640 --> 0:19:37.360
<v Speaker 1>a strikeout. Uh. In case you were wondering, No, it's

0:19:37.400 --> 0:19:42.879
<v Speaker 1>not Fernando Valenzuela and not Hideo Nomo Kasazaki. Very good guess.

0:19:42.880 --> 0:19:46.040
<v Speaker 1>He is older than Echiro and did win this award,

0:19:46.359 --> 0:19:49.080
<v Speaker 1>So that is an excellent guest. But you're all wrong. Uh.

0:19:49.200 --> 0:19:52.080
<v Speaker 1>The name of the person is somebody from nineteen fifty.

0:19:52.760 --> 0:19:56.600
<v Speaker 1>Sam Jethrow from nineteen fifty with the Boston Braves is

0:19:56.680 --> 0:19:58.840
<v Speaker 1>the correct answer. This is the name that I never

0:19:58.920 --> 0:20:01.240
<v Speaker 1>heard of, and and I'm a pretty big dork when

0:20:01.280 --> 0:20:04.159
<v Speaker 1>it comes to baseball history. Sam Jethro played in the

0:20:04.160 --> 0:20:06.520
<v Speaker 1>Negro Leagues for a while but then came up with

0:20:07.080 --> 0:20:10.639
<v Speaker 1>Boston and then played a professional eighteen seasons from nineteen

0:20:10.640 --> 0:20:13.240
<v Speaker 1>thirty eight to nineteen fifty eight, fifty to fifty eight

0:20:13.320 --> 0:20:16.880
<v Speaker 1>in the major leagues, and then he also had four

0:20:16.920 --> 0:20:19.959
<v Speaker 1>seasons in Major League Baseball, eight in Triple A and

0:20:20.040 --> 0:20:22.640
<v Speaker 1>eight in the Negro Leagues. But he was older. Kasazaki

0:20:22.680 --> 0:20:25.560
<v Speaker 1>was thirty two. Sam Jethrow was thirty three years old.

0:20:25.960 --> 0:20:28.080
<v Speaker 1>So there you go. I thought that was a fun,

0:20:28.160 --> 0:20:30.520
<v Speaker 1>crazy fact. I thought it was a Thiro And then

0:20:30.520 --> 0:20:33.000
<v Speaker 1>I was like, oh, kas Matsui was older, Oh Kasazuki

0:20:33.080 --> 0:20:36.680
<v Speaker 1>rather Nope, nope, nope, it was none of those guys.

0:20:36.720 --> 0:20:40.400
<v Speaker 1>So there you go. So Sam Jethrow I named it

0:20:40.480 --> 0:20:43.200
<v Speaker 1>once again. Never heard Jethro tull I know, but no,

0:20:43.520 --> 0:20:45.840
<v Speaker 1>Sam Jeffro didn't know that. All right, let's get to

0:20:45.920 --> 0:20:48.600
<v Speaker 1>the home run board today and it's gonna be depressing

0:20:48.640 --> 0:20:53.080
<v Speaker 1>because Mike Marris got twenty nine. Now, very depressing on

0:20:53.119 --> 0:20:56.240
<v Speaker 1>that Carpenter. Yeah, Matt Carpenter. I give him credit. On

0:20:56.240 --> 0:20:59.119
<v Speaker 1>the Carpenter that's for sure. High Cubby's still at the

0:20:59.160 --> 0:21:02.080
<v Speaker 1>top of thirty five. I still plenty of time left, though.

0:21:02.119 --> 0:21:04.200
<v Speaker 1>We got a bunch of people in the twenty eight

0:21:04.359 --> 0:21:07.640
<v Speaker 1>to twenty actually twenty eight to thirty two range, So

0:21:07.720 --> 0:21:10.000
<v Speaker 1>this bad boy ain't over yet. Welsh. I don't know

0:21:10.000 --> 0:21:11.760
<v Speaker 1>if you've seen this, but I want to play this

0:21:11.880 --> 0:21:15.359
<v Speaker 1>because this is something going around social media. So this

0:21:15.440 --> 0:21:18.280
<v Speaker 1>is finish baseball. Do you see this? Uh check out

0:21:18.280 --> 0:21:21.679
<v Speaker 1>this clip here of this guy. So apparently again we'll

0:21:21.720 --> 0:21:25.239
<v Speaker 1>go over this year again. But apparently in Finland they

0:21:25.240 --> 0:21:27.120
<v Speaker 1>have their own style of baseball which is a little

0:21:27.119 --> 0:21:30.119
<v Speaker 1>bit different. And there's like a river with a camera,

0:21:30.600 --> 0:21:32.160
<v Speaker 1>so there's like a river camp. So if you if

0:21:32.160 --> 0:21:33.639
<v Speaker 1>you go, when you miss it, well there you go,

0:21:33.640 --> 0:21:36.600
<v Speaker 1>boo boom. I'd like to add this into our Major

0:21:36.680 --> 0:21:37.240
<v Speaker 1>League base.

0:21:37.160 --> 0:21:38.480
<v Speaker 3>I think this is pretty solid.

0:21:38.760 --> 0:21:38.960
<v Speaker 1>Yeah.

0:21:39.040 --> 0:21:42.920
<v Speaker 3>No, I like obstacles in general. I think there's this. Yeah,

0:21:42.960 --> 0:21:43.680
<v Speaker 3>every game.

0:21:43.520 --> 0:21:45.119
<v Speaker 1>There's an elimination baseball challenge.

0:21:45.240 --> 0:21:47.480
<v Speaker 2>There's a trap door in the field that no one

0:21:47.520 --> 0:21:50.479
<v Speaker 2>knows about. Maybe there's a trampoline. It's all hidden, so

0:21:50.600 --> 0:21:53.120
<v Speaker 2>guys are moving around. Maybe someone flies up. Maybe there's

0:21:53.119 --> 0:21:54.480
<v Speaker 2>a water maybe a moat.

0:21:54.600 --> 0:21:54.840
<v Speaker 1>Im.

0:21:56.280 --> 0:21:56.960
<v Speaker 3>Wouldn't that be great?

0:21:57.040 --> 0:21:59.680
<v Speaker 2>Remember the old Astro stadium that had the hill you

0:21:59.720 --> 0:22:02.720
<v Speaker 2>would go. But if there was grass, then a moat

0:22:02.800 --> 0:22:05.240
<v Speaker 2>and then more grass at the back side of that,

0:22:05.240 --> 0:22:06.000
<v Speaker 2>that would be fun.

0:22:06.080 --> 0:22:07.439
<v Speaker 1>And to answer that, this is why you watch on

0:22:07.440 --> 0:22:09.560
<v Speaker 1>the YouTube channels. He could watch this man diving and

0:22:09.600 --> 0:22:12.480
<v Speaker 1>then falling off of a cliff basically into water. My

0:22:12.560 --> 0:22:14.760
<v Speaker 1>cousin says he would play here in this of course

0:22:14.800 --> 0:22:18.160
<v Speaker 1>he would. And uh, why is there a camera there? Why?

0:22:18.200 --> 0:22:20.760
<v Speaker 1>I'll tell you why, because that's gonna happen eventually. That's

0:22:20.760 --> 0:22:22.080
<v Speaker 1>the want to make sure you grab it. Here is

0:22:22.119 --> 0:22:24.879
<v Speaker 1>one more time, because that is this is spectacular. Look

0:22:24.880 --> 0:22:28.800
<v Speaker 1>at him go to stop there he goes slash right

0:22:28.800 --> 0:22:31.920
<v Speaker 1>in there. That's tremendous. I love that good stuff right there.

0:22:32.200 --> 0:22:33.760
<v Speaker 2>I should have some signs in the water. By the way,

0:22:33.760 --> 0:22:36.840
<v Speaker 2>they're missing advertising in the water. There's like a water

0:22:36.920 --> 0:22:38.720
<v Speaker 2>filled tashool company splash.

0:22:38.800 --> 0:22:40.399
<v Speaker 1>So it was brought to you by I don't know

0:22:40.600 --> 0:22:42.239
<v Speaker 1>in Finland, what would it be brought to you by

0:22:42.359 --> 0:22:45.080
<v Speaker 1>canned fish of something? I would I would imagine shout

0:22:45.080 --> 0:22:48.240
<v Speaker 1>out to Tom Viola, our own Tommy v for throwing

0:22:48.240 --> 0:22:50.159
<v Speaker 1>that in the chat here with me today because I

0:22:50.160 --> 0:22:52.000
<v Speaker 1>had seen it. He's like, hey, I can put it

0:22:52.320 --> 0:22:55.479
<v Speaker 1>on on Streammark you want to? Said yes, yes, I do.

0:22:56.080 --> 0:22:58.400
<v Speaker 1>He also play a wacky system of bases too, where

0:22:58.400 --> 0:23:00.199
<v Speaker 1>the first base is not where our first base. It's

0:23:00.240 --> 0:23:04.320
<v Speaker 1>a whole thing. Finish baseball. It's lightning. Catch it in

0:23:04.320 --> 0:23:06.320
<v Speaker 1>a bottle. All right, Let's go to betmgm, the King

0:23:06.359 --> 0:23:09.080
<v Speaker 1>of sportsbooks. Bet ten dollars win two hundred when you

0:23:09.119 --> 0:23:12.000
<v Speaker 1>sign up today at betmgm dot com or the bet

0:23:12.119 --> 0:23:14.760
<v Speaker 1>mgm app again that promo code leading off one word,

0:23:15.080 --> 0:23:18.000
<v Speaker 1>bet ten dollars win two hundred. The Derby's around the corner.

0:23:18.200 --> 0:23:21.399
<v Speaker 1>Make some wagers, by the way, also Otani or he passed?

0:23:21.440 --> 0:23:24.199
<v Speaker 1>He said it it's gonna go away. It is, you

0:23:24.240 --> 0:23:26.280
<v Speaker 1>missed it. I hope you're on the journey with us.

0:23:26.720 --> 0:23:30.080
<v Speaker 1>Aaron Judge is minus one oh seven one and a

0:23:30.080 --> 0:23:33.119
<v Speaker 1>half total bases against Boston Gean Carlos Stanton one and

0:23:33.160 --> 0:23:35.480
<v Speaker 1>a half total bases plus one thirty against Boston tight,

0:23:35.520 --> 0:23:38.960
<v Speaker 1>which is fascinating. Robbie Ray strikeout total on FanDuel is

0:23:39.000 --> 0:23:41.479
<v Speaker 1>at six and a half. I like the over on

0:23:41.520 --> 0:23:44.240
<v Speaker 1>that one. Our projections have him at eight tonight against

0:23:44.240 --> 0:23:46.800
<v Speaker 1>the Texas Rangers. Minus one forty still worth it and

0:23:46.880 --> 0:23:49.080
<v Speaker 1>minus one twenty four is the juice on Sandel Contra

0:23:49.119 --> 0:23:51.160
<v Speaker 1>at the six and a half on fanduels K's as well.

0:23:51.480 --> 0:23:53.479
<v Speaker 1>A Contra has been so good Welsh, what have you

0:23:53.480 --> 0:23:56.560
<v Speaker 1>looked at today that's got you excited for the prop market? Yeah?

0:23:56.560 --> 0:24:00.600
<v Speaker 2>I like that Stanton one. I also like that Robbie

0:24:00.640 --> 0:24:02.640
<v Speaker 2>ray one. Actually a lot more than I'm looking at it,

0:24:02.920 --> 0:24:04.600
<v Speaker 2>ju stop, but I still like three that.

0:24:04.680 --> 0:24:04.919
<v Speaker 3>I like.

0:24:05.400 --> 0:24:08.760
<v Speaker 2>Xander Bogart's total bases one and a half over it

0:24:08.840 --> 0:24:12.280
<v Speaker 2>is plus one forty six, got a lifetime fifteen for

0:24:12.359 --> 0:24:14.720
<v Speaker 2>thirty three versus Montgomery.

0:24:14.240 --> 0:24:17.080
<v Speaker 3>And in five of his last games he has multi

0:24:17.200 --> 0:24:19.440
<v Speaker 3>hit games. Mister Zander Bogarts does also.

0:24:19.520 --> 0:24:21.919
<v Speaker 2>I believe three of his last four he's got a

0:24:21.960 --> 0:24:24.640
<v Speaker 2>double in games, So very very good matchup for him.

0:24:24.960 --> 0:24:27.800
<v Speaker 2>You got Stanton, I got Judge Judge one and a

0:24:27.840 --> 0:24:31.840
<v Speaker 2>half total bases essentially even money one oh five and Kopek,

0:24:31.880 --> 0:24:34.680
<v Speaker 2>who has struggled the tiny bit as of recent four

0:24:34.680 --> 0:24:38.040
<v Speaker 2>and a half strikeouts versus Minnesota today. He struck out

0:24:38.080 --> 0:24:42.120
<v Speaker 2>five and seven in the two previous matchups versus Minnesota.

0:24:42.200 --> 0:24:44.560
<v Speaker 2>I think there's an overall general worry about him, and

0:24:44.600 --> 0:24:46.960
<v Speaker 2>like the downtick and k's, but this is a relatively

0:24:46.960 --> 0:24:49.479
<v Speaker 2>good matchup. It's a low number for someone that has

0:24:49.560 --> 0:24:53.520
<v Speaker 2>hit this twice before. The five k's, Michael Kopek Judge

0:24:53.520 --> 0:24:55.200
<v Speaker 2>total bases and Xander total bases.

0:24:55.240 --> 0:24:56.720
<v Speaker 3>Those are my three all right.

0:24:57.119 --> 0:25:00.560
<v Speaker 1>Looking at the DFS slate tonight, to me, you know,

0:25:00.560 --> 0:25:02.200
<v Speaker 1>I gotta be really careful because you got a full

0:25:02.200 --> 0:25:04.200
<v Speaker 1>slate of games tonight. Robbie Ray is a really good

0:25:04.240 --> 0:25:07.480
<v Speaker 1>investment at nine point nine point eight k over on DraftKings.

0:25:07.560 --> 0:25:10.760
<v Speaker 1>Kershaw nine point four also good. Darvish is even cheaper.

0:25:10.800 --> 0:25:12.359
<v Speaker 1>I would fade away from Woodrof at the ten to

0:25:12.359 --> 0:25:14.520
<v Speaker 1>two on the road, I think that's tough, man. I'll

0:25:14.520 --> 0:25:16.480
<v Speaker 1>take the Ellen Kevin Gossman last night he pitched well,

0:25:16.480 --> 0:25:18.080
<v Speaker 1>but they couldn't score any runs for it was so

0:25:18.200 --> 0:25:20.760
<v Speaker 1>brutal against that joke of a beast squad. Yeah, the

0:25:20.800 --> 0:25:23.320
<v Speaker 1>total Beast just a joke. So I'll double down with

0:25:23.359 --> 0:25:25.800
<v Speaker 1>Manoa tonight too. So Manoa, Ray and Kershaw is how

0:25:25.800 --> 0:25:28.320
<v Speaker 1>I would go and just try to do combinations of them.

0:25:28.320 --> 0:25:29.920
<v Speaker 1>If you want to do a combination with Darvish against

0:25:29.960 --> 0:25:32.880
<v Speaker 1>Arizona two. I think that's always advisable. So though those

0:25:32.880 --> 0:25:34.840
<v Speaker 1>four pictures are the ones, I would just hyper focus

0:25:35.160 --> 0:25:37.040
<v Speaker 1>try to get the right combination of those guys in

0:25:37.080 --> 0:25:38.640
<v Speaker 1>cash and I think I would just drop that same

0:25:38.680 --> 0:25:41.600
<v Speaker 1>lineup in tournaments tonight because I think it tracks the same.

0:25:41.960 --> 0:25:44.639
<v Speaker 1>On the FanDuel side, Alec Manoah's nine point six a

0:25:44.640 --> 0:25:47.280
<v Speaker 1>lot cheaper. He's a thousand dollars cheaper than Robbie Ray.

0:25:47.280 --> 0:25:48.639
<v Speaker 1>So I'm just gonna go to it and fade the

0:25:48.640 --> 0:25:51.000
<v Speaker 1>rest of the guys because everybody else, if you want,

0:25:51.280 --> 0:25:54.399
<v Speaker 1>you could do Ray Kershaw darvish Woodriff. Just have a

0:25:54.440 --> 0:25:57.600
<v Speaker 1>lineup that's gonna give you about ten point seven left

0:25:57.600 --> 0:26:00.560
<v Speaker 1>in it and just interchange those pictures. If you're gonna

0:26:00.560 --> 0:26:03.400
<v Speaker 1>play multi entry tonight, that's the approach, and you're gonna

0:26:03.440 --> 0:26:05.760
<v Speaker 1>have to do that tonight, I think on the FanDuel side,

0:26:05.760 --> 0:26:07.160
<v Speaker 1>So that's why I actually think DK is a little

0:26:07.160 --> 0:26:09.840
<v Speaker 1>bit more user friendly tonight in that sense. I'm going

0:26:09.880 --> 0:26:11.959
<v Speaker 1>with Vad Guerrero Junior though for my home run call

0:26:12.040 --> 0:26:14.640
<v Speaker 1>over the weekend, So let's go and then I'll make

0:26:14.680 --> 0:26:18.440
<v Speaker 1>my official choices on Monday show for the home run Derby.

0:26:18.440 --> 0:26:20.320
<v Speaker 1>We'll save all that and we'll do some fun stuff

0:26:20.320 --> 0:26:22.239
<v Speaker 1>on Monday as well. Where you're going for your home

0:26:22.320 --> 0:26:23.600
<v Speaker 1>run call this weekend?

0:26:23.600 --> 0:26:25.600
<v Speaker 3>Here, Welsh, I'm gonna go with Judge.

0:26:25.600 --> 0:26:29.280
<v Speaker 2>I'm gonna go super lame and cheap, but great matchup,

0:26:29.280 --> 0:26:31.879
<v Speaker 2>by the way, just career wise against Nathan Yuvaldi, who's

0:26:31.880 --> 0:26:34.760
<v Speaker 2>returning from not pitching for over a month. So Aaron

0:26:34.800 --> 0:26:38.439
<v Speaker 2>Judge almost a three eighty average against the Valdi career wise.

0:26:38.920 --> 0:26:41.560
<v Speaker 2>Valdi's been out. I imagine he'll get some heavy strikeouts,

0:26:41.600 --> 0:26:43.920
<v Speaker 2>but Judge takes advantage and why not just take him

0:26:43.920 --> 0:26:44.600
<v Speaker 2>into the weekend?

0:26:45.359 --> 0:26:47.360
<v Speaker 3>Get me some homers. That's where I'm going.

0:26:47.680 --> 0:26:50.440
<v Speaker 1>There, you go, get us some homers. And Mayor took

0:26:50.480 --> 0:26:52.880
<v Speaker 1>Mookie Betts, so we'll see how that goes. So he's

0:26:52.880 --> 0:26:55.280
<v Speaker 1>taking on with Red, so he made his little Matt Carpenter.

0:26:55.320 --> 0:26:57.560
<v Speaker 1>Now he's going back up to the big guys. Now

0:26:58.200 --> 0:27:00.560
<v Speaker 1>Mayor is in process of moving, so I don't know

0:27:00.600 --> 0:27:02.359
<v Speaker 1>how that's going to affect his home run calls. So

0:27:02.640 --> 0:27:04.560
<v Speaker 1>this is your opportunity, everybody, to go past Mayor for

0:27:04.640 --> 0:27:07.000
<v Speaker 1>the next few weeks. I want you to take advantage

0:27:07.000 --> 0:27:10.040
<v Speaker 1>of this opportunity. On Monday. I'd love to come and

0:27:10.080 --> 0:27:12.480
<v Speaker 1>talk about the Futures Game and some of those guys

0:27:12.520 --> 0:27:14.439
<v Speaker 1>that you saw play some really good names in that

0:27:14.480 --> 0:27:16.119
<v Speaker 1>game too. Who are you excited to see in the

0:27:16.119 --> 0:27:16.680
<v Speaker 1>Futures Game?

0:27:16.720 --> 0:27:19.920
<v Speaker 2>Wellsh like, oh man, I mean, there's a litany of guys.

0:27:19.960 --> 0:27:23.040
<v Speaker 2>Mason winn is one of my just favorite young prospects.

0:27:23.040 --> 0:27:25.240
<v Speaker 2>You got Tovar, Elie day La Cruz is out there,

0:27:25.240 --> 0:27:27.760
<v Speaker 2>Corbyn Carroll is going to be on view. I would

0:27:27.800 --> 0:27:32.320
<v Speaker 2>tell you though, Juri Perez against this crew is one

0:27:32.320 --> 0:27:34.080
<v Speaker 2>of the youngest players there is going to be maybe

0:27:34.080 --> 0:27:36.240
<v Speaker 2>one of the most exciting big six foot seven pitcher

0:27:36.280 --> 0:27:38.800
<v Speaker 2>for the Marlins. You know, he is theoretically going to

0:27:38.800 --> 0:27:40.840
<v Speaker 2>be going up against some of the best in baseball,

0:27:41.119 --> 0:27:43.480
<v Speaker 2>and that type of competition has me really excited.

0:27:43.520 --> 0:27:44.639
<v Speaker 3>So I'm very excited about that.

0:27:44.720 --> 0:27:46.399
<v Speaker 2>And the MLB Draft, I just want to remind you

0:27:46.520 --> 0:27:48.359
<v Speaker 2>is on Sunday, So Monday, as we come in, the

0:27:48.400 --> 0:27:49.640
<v Speaker 2>first round will be over.

0:27:50.040 --> 0:27:52.520
<v Speaker 3>And we got some interesting stuff that is.

0:27:52.600 --> 0:27:55.760
<v Speaker 2>Being rumored around that the Orioles might not take the

0:27:55.800 --> 0:27:58.600
<v Speaker 2>top player in the draft and they might pass for

0:27:58.680 --> 0:27:59.760
<v Speaker 2>some cash savings.

0:28:00.040 --> 0:28:00.840
<v Speaker 3>So we'll see how that.

0:28:01.000 --> 0:28:04.320
<v Speaker 2>Uh, we'll see how that ends up affecting the entire

0:28:04.400 --> 0:28:05.200
<v Speaker 2>draft on Sun.

0:28:05.040 --> 0:28:06.520
<v Speaker 1>Monday is gonna be a good show if you play

0:28:06.600 --> 0:28:08.520
<v Speaker 1>Dynasty here, because we're gonna we're gonna have a lot

0:28:08.520 --> 0:28:10.040
<v Speaker 1>of that stuff and a lot of that coverage here

0:28:10.040 --> 0:28:12.120
<v Speaker 1>for you between the Futures game, between the MLB Draft,

0:28:12.160 --> 0:28:14.840
<v Speaker 1>which is gonna be super fun, and it's always super

0:28:14.840 --> 0:28:17.040
<v Speaker 1>fun here. So there you have it. I hope everybody

0:28:17.080 --> 0:28:19.720
<v Speaker 1>enjoys their weekend, enjoys a little break too. You have

0:28:19.760 --> 0:28:22.280
<v Speaker 1>a little fun, all star festivities, everything going on there.

0:28:22.359 --> 0:28:25.000
<v Speaker 1>So enjoy the families this weekend, enjoy whatever you got

0:28:25.040 --> 0:28:28.560
<v Speaker 1>going on with your friends, or enjoy the silence. It's

0:28:28.600 --> 0:28:31.040
<v Speaker 1>just nice to have as well. Sometimes that'll do for us.

0:28:31.040 --> 0:28:32.879
<v Speaker 1>But the story of the game goes on for the Welsh.

0:28:32.920 --> 0:28:35.800
<v Speaker 1>I'm Joey P. We'll see you next time. Kids, Watch

0:28:35.800 --> 0:28:36.360
<v Speaker 1>out for the Lake.