WEBVTT - Tech and the UK Riots

0:00:00.280 --> 0:00:02.840
<v Speaker 1>Brought to you by the reinvented two thousand twelve camera.

0:00:03.160 --> 0:00:06.880
<v Speaker 1>It's ready. Are you hey there, Text Stuff listeners, This

0:00:06.920 --> 0:00:09.200
<v Speaker 1>is Jonathan Strickland and I have got a request for

0:00:09.240 --> 0:00:11.440
<v Speaker 1>all of you. Now, Chris and I have decided that

0:00:11.440 --> 0:00:13.720
<v Speaker 1>we're going to try and experiment. We're doing our first

0:00:13.920 --> 0:00:17.400
<v Speaker 1>crowd sourced episode of tech Stuff and we want to

0:00:17.400 --> 0:00:21.480
<v Speaker 1>know what your pick is for the worst video game

0:00:21.720 --> 0:00:25.600
<v Speaker 1>of all time. Now, nominations you can. You can make

0:00:25.680 --> 0:00:28.479
<v Speaker 1>one nomination. You nominate one game, and you need to

0:00:28.480 --> 0:00:30.639
<v Speaker 1>tell us the name of the game and the platform

0:00:30.760 --> 0:00:32.839
<v Speaker 1>it was on. And it could be any platform. It

0:00:32.840 --> 0:00:37.000
<v Speaker 1>could be an arcade game, it could be a PC, Mac, Xbox,

0:00:37.040 --> 0:00:41.360
<v Speaker 1>PS three, Nintendo handheld console. It can be web based

0:00:41.840 --> 0:00:43.839
<v Speaker 1>if you like. But just you let us know what

0:00:43.840 --> 0:00:45.560
<v Speaker 1>the platform is so we can make sure we count

0:00:45.600 --> 0:00:49.440
<v Speaker 1>that as the votes. So you can nominate your game

0:00:49.600 --> 0:00:53.920
<v Speaker 1>either through email, which is tech Stuff at how stuff

0:00:53.920 --> 0:00:58.320
<v Speaker 1>works dot com, or you can nominate through Twitter or Facebook.

0:00:58.720 --> 0:01:01.560
<v Speaker 1>And we're gonna put a cut off date on this.

0:01:01.680 --> 0:01:03.640
<v Speaker 1>I want to have the episode go up by the

0:01:03.720 --> 0:01:07.720
<v Speaker 1>end of September of eleven. So let's say you need

0:01:07.800 --> 0:01:12.960
<v Speaker 1>to get your nominations in by September eleven, So if

0:01:12.959 --> 0:01:15.880
<v Speaker 1>you get those nominations into us, we will make sure

0:01:15.920 --> 0:01:19.240
<v Speaker 1>we include those in the process and we will have

0:01:19.280 --> 0:01:22.640
<v Speaker 1>an episode where we give you the worst video games

0:01:22.800 --> 0:01:25.800
<v Speaker 1>of all time based upon the votes of our listeners.

0:01:26.040 --> 0:01:30.840
<v Speaker 1>Thanks a lot. Can't wait to hear from you. Get

0:01:30.840 --> 0:01:34.000
<v Speaker 1>in touch with technology with tech Stuff from how stuff

0:01:34.040 --> 0:01:43.280
<v Speaker 1>works dot com. Hello, everyone, welcome to tex Stuff. My

0:01:43.360 --> 0:01:45.319
<v Speaker 1>name is Chris Poulette and I am an editor at

0:01:45.360 --> 0:01:47.880
<v Speaker 1>how stuff works dot com sitting in a a cross from

0:01:47.880 --> 0:01:51.400
<v Speaker 1>me as always a senior writer, Jonathan Strickland. You just

0:01:51.520 --> 0:01:53.960
<v Speaker 1>call out my name and you know wherever I am,

0:01:54.040 --> 0:02:02.280
<v Speaker 1>I'll come running a yes. So that's sort of pertinent. Yeah,

0:02:02.320 --> 0:02:04.640
<v Speaker 1>it's pertinent to our discussion. But before we get into it,

0:02:04.720 --> 0:02:13.120
<v Speaker 1>let's start off with a little listener mail. This listener

0:02:13.160 --> 0:02:15.679
<v Speaker 1>mail comes from Michael, who says, Hi, Chris and Jonathan,

0:02:15.880 --> 0:02:17.960
<v Speaker 1>I've been listening to your podcast for about seven months

0:02:17.960 --> 0:02:20.000
<v Speaker 1>and enjoy them immensely, and I figured I should write

0:02:20.000 --> 0:02:22.400
<v Speaker 1>in to not only tell you this, but also suggest

0:02:22.480 --> 0:02:25.280
<v Speaker 1>an idea for a podcast topic. I'm writing this email

0:02:25.280 --> 0:02:27.680
<v Speaker 1>on the day after more riots in London and as

0:02:27.720 --> 0:02:30.040
<v Speaker 1>I watched the Rolling News coverage I keep hearing people

0:02:30.040 --> 0:02:32.680
<v Speaker 1>suggesting that social media was integral to the way the

0:02:32.760 --> 0:02:35.520
<v Speaker 1>looting and violence played out. They say Twitter is being

0:02:35.600 --> 0:02:37.560
<v Speaker 1>used to plan and suggest places to go and loot,

0:02:37.760 --> 0:02:40.600
<v Speaker 1>and that BlackBerry messengers being used to privately distribute this

0:02:40.680 --> 0:02:43.360
<v Speaker 1>info to hundreds of people at a time, as is

0:02:43.400 --> 0:02:46.120
<v Speaker 1>the way with the mainstream media. They're quick to jump

0:02:46.160 --> 0:02:49.200
<v Speaker 1>to conclusions that only social media could have possibly caused

0:02:49.240 --> 0:02:52.440
<v Speaker 1>these displays of thuggery and violence, and forget the fact

0:02:52.480 --> 0:02:55.000
<v Speaker 1>that social media can be used for both harm and

0:02:55.120 --> 0:02:59.680
<v Speaker 1>for good. In recent months, the Arab Spring has similar commentary.

0:02:59.720 --> 0:03:02.880
<v Speaker 1>Twitter has been blocked in certain countries and many rallies

0:03:02.919 --> 0:03:05.680
<v Speaker 1>have been organized using only Twitter. What do you guys

0:03:05.720 --> 0:03:08.600
<v Speaker 1>make of this? As social media been as integral as

0:03:08.600 --> 0:03:10.720
<v Speaker 1>everyone is saying it has been, What about in the

0:03:10.800 --> 0:03:13.600
<v Speaker 1>days before social media? What tech was used back then

0:03:13.639 --> 0:03:16.280
<v Speaker 1>to organize protests and uprisings? Is all of this in

0:03:16.400 --> 0:03:18.400
<v Speaker 1>urban myth? I hope you'll be able to explain this

0:03:18.480 --> 0:03:21.240
<v Speaker 1>to all of us peaceful tech stuff listeners. Thanks for

0:03:21.280 --> 0:03:24.680
<v Speaker 1>all the fun, Michael. Michael, we are going to talk

0:03:24.720 --> 0:03:28.200
<v Speaker 1>about technology and its role in the recent London and

0:03:28.280 --> 0:03:32.160
<v Speaker 1>well really riots across the United Kingdom. UM. And by recent,

0:03:32.200 --> 0:03:34.519
<v Speaker 1>I mean we are recording this in early August of

0:03:34.560 --> 0:03:37.600
<v Speaker 1>twenty eleven, So as of the recording of this podcast,

0:03:37.640 --> 0:03:41.040
<v Speaker 1>there are still disturbances in the UK that are related

0:03:41.080 --> 0:03:46.920
<v Speaker 1>to these riots and hopefully they will be resolved soon. UM. Yeah. UM.

0:03:47.040 --> 0:03:51.240
<v Speaker 1>Of course we have brought up similar topics UM in

0:03:51.280 --> 0:03:55.040
<v Speaker 1>the past. We talked about how Twitter was being used

0:03:55.080 --> 0:03:59.840
<v Speaker 1>in Iran UM to help people communicate with one another.

0:04:00.120 --> 0:04:03.760
<v Speaker 1>I think we also mentioned Egypt, Egypt, Yep and UM

0:04:03.800 --> 0:04:06.520
<v Speaker 1>and some of the other countries to where people were

0:04:06.680 --> 0:04:12.000
<v Speaker 1>using social media fit specifically Facebook and Twitter UM to

0:04:12.200 --> 0:04:16.800
<v Speaker 1>help them organize their efforts. UM. And I would I

0:04:16.839 --> 0:04:20.120
<v Speaker 1>would say that, I mean it's it's certainly in those cases.

0:04:20.160 --> 0:04:22.920
<v Speaker 1>I mean even the United States government sort of gotten involved,

0:04:23.600 --> 0:04:28.000
<v Speaker 1>UM because supporting UM the efforts of people to use

0:04:28.080 --> 0:04:30.680
<v Speaker 1>these services right right. As a matter of fact, Twitter

0:04:30.800 --> 0:04:33.840
<v Speaker 1>was planning on going undergoing some maintenance and taking down

0:04:33.839 --> 0:04:39.839
<v Speaker 1>the service UM following the Iranian elections and their unrest

0:04:39.920 --> 0:04:43.520
<v Speaker 1>that followed the protests, and the Obama administration requested that

0:04:43.600 --> 0:04:47.720
<v Speaker 1>they hold off on that maintenance. Yes, yes, which Twitter

0:04:47.800 --> 0:04:54.479
<v Speaker 1>agreed to do. UM. I would say that integral might

0:04:54.560 --> 0:04:57.400
<v Speaker 1>be kind of a strong word. I might say that

0:04:57.440 --> 0:05:01.920
<v Speaker 1>it that that using these technology ease um may have

0:05:01.960 --> 0:05:05.119
<v Speaker 1>been integral to the way they were carried out. Yeah,

0:05:05.200 --> 0:05:11.279
<v Speaker 1>it's the We have to separate the reasons for the

0:05:11.400 --> 0:05:15.479
<v Speaker 1>unrest and the methodology they used to carry it out.

0:05:15.520 --> 0:05:18.279
<v Speaker 1>We have to separate those two things, because the technology

0:05:18.279 --> 0:05:21.960
<v Speaker 1>did not cause these riots. And in fact, to to

0:05:22.000 --> 0:05:24.600
<v Speaker 1>try and sum up what these riots were caused by

0:05:24.640 --> 0:05:26.800
<v Speaker 1>in a sound bite or two is doing it a

0:05:27.080 --> 0:05:31.320
<v Speaker 1>terrible disservice. The first of all, I cannot even pretend

0:05:31.320 --> 0:05:37.040
<v Speaker 1>to understand the full social and political culture in the

0:05:37.160 --> 0:05:41.800
<v Speaker 1>UK that kind of led up to this event. We

0:05:41.800 --> 0:05:45.720
<v Speaker 1>we know, of course that the precipitating event was the

0:05:45.720 --> 0:05:49.599
<v Speaker 1>the the death of a man at the hands of

0:05:49.600 --> 0:05:54.200
<v Speaker 1>the police, the Metropolitan London Police UM, and that that

0:05:54.320 --> 0:05:57.400
<v Speaker 1>kind of was the spark that started everything. But the

0:05:57.480 --> 0:06:01.320
<v Speaker 1>riots of course far out a clip that initial event,

0:06:01.400 --> 0:06:04.200
<v Speaker 1>and it's clear, or at least it appears to be clear,

0:06:04.720 --> 0:06:07.520
<v Speaker 1>that the motivations behind the people who are carrying out

0:06:07.560 --> 0:06:12.120
<v Speaker 1>these riots have little if anything to do with that spark.

0:06:13.040 --> 0:06:16.599
<v Speaker 1>I get the sense that some of the rioters may

0:06:16.680 --> 0:06:21.800
<v Speaker 1>have had that event in mind um when they started,

0:06:22.400 --> 0:06:28.359
<v Speaker 1>but that other people may just be rioting to loot,

0:06:29.400 --> 0:06:31.599
<v Speaker 1>use it as an excuse to loot. And this happens

0:06:32.080 --> 0:06:34.400
<v Speaker 1>in a lot of cases when there is rioting. So

0:06:34.520 --> 0:06:38.080
<v Speaker 1>I I don't think everyone's motivation for participating is the same.

0:06:38.279 --> 0:06:40.880
<v Speaker 1>I think what you have is you have a population

0:06:40.920 --> 0:06:45.320
<v Speaker 1>of people who feel uh, some sort of deep resentment

0:06:45.360 --> 0:06:48.480
<v Speaker 1>and anger which even they may not even be necessarily

0:06:48.520 --> 0:06:52.880
<v Speaker 1>conscious of, or they may be unable to articulate that. Uh.

0:06:52.880 --> 0:06:57.280
<v Speaker 1>They some of them have been articulating their their feelings

0:06:57.520 --> 0:07:03.040
<v Speaker 1>towards the media, but in ways that seem maybe disingenuous

0:07:03.160 --> 0:07:07.480
<v Speaker 1>or at least it's it's hard to connect the feelings

0:07:07.520 --> 0:07:10.240
<v Speaker 1>with the actions, right because the actions we're talking about

0:07:10.280 --> 0:07:13.520
<v Speaker 1>in London in the UK in general are more about

0:07:13.960 --> 0:07:18.160
<v Speaker 1>very destructive behavior about looting, and the targets for this

0:07:18.360 --> 0:07:22.920
<v Speaker 1>behavior tend to be small businesses, family owned businesses. We're

0:07:22.960 --> 0:07:27.160
<v Speaker 1>not talking about institutions, right because you would say that, well,

0:07:27.200 --> 0:07:29.600
<v Speaker 1>this is a if this is truly a political statement,

0:07:30.000 --> 0:07:33.400
<v Speaker 1>then you would think you would target institutions that represent

0:07:33.560 --> 0:07:37.720
<v Speaker 1>whatever the opposing ideology is, right, Like if you were

0:07:37.800 --> 0:07:40.800
<v Speaker 1>going to attack say Parliament to represent the government, or

0:07:41.560 --> 0:07:43.960
<v Speaker 1>the police station because you didn't like the police right,

0:07:44.120 --> 0:07:48.680
<v Speaker 1>or or large banks because that represents the government as well.

0:07:49.080 --> 0:07:51.280
<v Speaker 1>Then you you know that then you could argue, well,

0:07:51.320 --> 0:07:54.840
<v Speaker 1>that's a very or at least a clearer political statement

0:07:55.080 --> 0:07:59.760
<v Speaker 1>than attacking a family owned, community based business. In that case,

0:07:59.800 --> 0:08:02.680
<v Speaker 1>what saying is that, well, we have rioters who are

0:08:02.680 --> 0:08:06.600
<v Speaker 1>attacking businesses within their own community, so they are ultimately

0:08:06.720 --> 0:08:11.560
<v Speaker 1>hurting their own community. This is not pushing forward any

0:08:11.560 --> 0:08:15.200
<v Speaker 1>sort of political ideology. This looks more like an example

0:08:15.240 --> 0:08:19.840
<v Speaker 1>of someone who desires certain things in their life that

0:08:19.880 --> 0:08:24.360
<v Speaker 1>they otherwise are unable to to obtain, and they're taking

0:08:24.400 --> 0:08:28.400
<v Speaker 1>the opportunity of chaos to slip in and grab those things.

0:08:28.400 --> 0:08:31.640
<v Speaker 1>So we're getting really philosophical here, but it's it's kind

0:08:31.640 --> 0:08:34.480
<v Speaker 1>of like, um, one of the great discussions I've seen

0:08:34.520 --> 0:08:38.400
<v Speaker 1>online kind of talked about how we have created this

0:08:38.400 --> 0:08:43.280
<v Speaker 1>this UH environment of consumerism. Right, consumerism is considered something

0:08:43.320 --> 0:08:47.480
<v Speaker 1>that's a good thing, you know, beck when after the

0:08:47.480 --> 0:08:51.319
<v Speaker 1>the nine eleven UH tragedy here in the United States,

0:08:51.720 --> 0:08:55.040
<v Speaker 1>we had government officials saying the best thing we can

0:08:55.080 --> 0:08:58.000
<v Speaker 1>do is go out there and business as usual, go

0:08:58.040 --> 0:09:01.120
<v Speaker 1>out and buy stuff, I mean by things. Was definitely

0:09:01.200 --> 0:09:04.439
<v Speaker 1>part of the strategy to continue to combat this terrorism,

0:09:04.480 --> 0:09:08.760
<v Speaker 1>which is saying that consumerism is like a foundation of

0:09:08.840 --> 0:09:11.080
<v Speaker 1>what our society is right now. So we have promoted

0:09:11.120 --> 0:09:13.959
<v Speaker 1>this idea that to make your life better, you should

0:09:13.960 --> 0:09:16.120
<v Speaker 1>go out and buy stuff. And I'm not saying whether

0:09:16.200 --> 0:09:18.679
<v Speaker 1>or not that's good or bad. I'm not passing judgment

0:09:18.720 --> 0:09:22.719
<v Speaker 1>on that. Because I'm a consumer. I have lots of

0:09:22.840 --> 0:09:26.319
<v Speaker 1>things that uh that if you were to step outside

0:09:26.320 --> 0:09:28.840
<v Speaker 1>and be objective, you'd say, all right, that's a luxury,

0:09:28.880 --> 0:09:32.160
<v Speaker 1>that's not a that's not something you have to have, right.

0:09:32.360 --> 0:09:34.520
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I've got those things. I've got some of

0:09:34.520 --> 0:09:37.760
<v Speaker 1>them sitting in front of me. Um. But the promotion

0:09:37.800 --> 0:09:42.280
<v Speaker 1>of consumerism to a a population of people who don't

0:09:42.280 --> 0:09:46.480
<v Speaker 1>have the the income to spend on that consumerism can

0:09:46.559 --> 0:09:50.959
<v Speaker 1>create a level of frustration and anger and greed. You've

0:09:51.000 --> 0:09:53.480
<v Speaker 1>got these people who are being told over and over again,

0:09:53.840 --> 0:09:57.360
<v Speaker 1>buying this will make you happy, you know, owning this

0:09:57.440 --> 0:09:59.960
<v Speaker 1>will make you a better person. That kind of mess

0:10:00.000 --> 0:10:02.040
<v Speaker 1>and she gets put forth, and then they have no

0:10:02.600 --> 0:10:06.800
<v Speaker 1>avenue where they can actually purchase said product, and then

0:10:06.840 --> 0:10:08.840
<v Speaker 1>they have this opportunity to just take things and be

0:10:08.960 --> 0:10:14.160
<v Speaker 1>part of this consumer uh environment. By passing the whole

0:10:14.960 --> 0:10:18.280
<v Speaker 1>being you know, earning the money and purchasing things on

0:10:18.320 --> 0:10:21.160
<v Speaker 1>your own, using your own money, that kind of thing. Now,

0:10:21.160 --> 0:10:23.200
<v Speaker 1>I'm not saying that's the cause of the riots either.

0:10:23.559 --> 0:10:28.600
<v Speaker 1>That's just one factor and it's such a complex issue

0:10:28.640 --> 0:10:32.160
<v Speaker 1>that you can't boil it down to because of this

0:10:32.160 --> 0:10:35.960
<v Speaker 1>this happened. It's far more complex. But I'm just that

0:10:36.080 --> 0:10:37.680
<v Speaker 1>was just my way of pointing out that this is

0:10:37.720 --> 0:10:41.520
<v Speaker 1>a really complicated problem. You can't just say, uh, oh,

0:10:41.559 --> 0:10:44.400
<v Speaker 1>it's technology's fault, and you can't even say it's just

0:10:44.440 --> 0:10:46.559
<v Speaker 1>the government's fault. There's so many I mean, there are

0:10:46.600 --> 0:10:49.560
<v Speaker 1>personal choices that are involved here too. You can't you

0:10:49.640 --> 0:10:54.560
<v Speaker 1>cannot absolve the rioters from personal responsibility either. But at

0:10:54.600 --> 0:10:56.720
<v Speaker 1>the same time, you can't just say, oh, these are

0:10:56.760 --> 0:10:58.920
<v Speaker 1>these are bad people, because if you just say they're

0:10:58.920 --> 0:11:02.080
<v Speaker 1>bad people, you're just missing them and you're ultimately saying

0:11:02.440 --> 0:11:05.000
<v Speaker 1>this is always going to happen because some people are

0:11:05.000 --> 0:11:09.080
<v Speaker 1>just bad. So you resolved yourself to future riots, you know,

0:11:09.160 --> 0:11:13.760
<v Speaker 1>there's no solution there because you've just made a label. Well, um,

0:11:13.800 --> 0:11:16.240
<v Speaker 1>I'm sorry, my soapbox is getting a little unsteady livings

0:11:16.240 --> 0:11:21.760
<v Speaker 1>step down here. So, so as far as technologies role. Um.

0:11:21.800 --> 0:11:24.240
<v Speaker 1>You know that the web services that people are using,

0:11:24.280 --> 0:11:29.360
<v Speaker 1>you know, Twitter and Facebook and and specifically smartphone BlackBerry.

0:11:29.840 --> 0:11:34.960
<v Speaker 1>Um in this case, uh have been blamed by some

0:11:35.120 --> 0:11:40.800
<v Speaker 1>in the media. I think, Um, but again, these technologies, Yeah,

0:11:41.559 --> 0:11:45.800
<v Speaker 1>but these I mean, I think it's important, as Michael

0:11:45.800 --> 0:11:49.680
<v Speaker 1>points out, to note that these these services are basically

0:11:50.120 --> 0:11:52.960
<v Speaker 1>neither good nor evil. They're just tools that can be

0:11:53.080 --> 0:11:56.480
<v Speaker 1>used for anything, right. Um. I mean in a lot

0:11:56.559 --> 0:11:59.680
<v Speaker 1>of cases, they're used to you know, communicate with friends

0:11:59.760 --> 0:12:04.880
<v Speaker 1>or or you know, used for consumers to find new deals.

0:12:04.880 --> 0:12:07.160
<v Speaker 1>That happens a lot on Twitter, especially you know, hey,

0:12:07.760 --> 0:12:11.040
<v Speaker 1>uh mentioned this tweet and get a thing, or to

0:12:11.160 --> 0:12:13.440
<v Speaker 1>disseminate news or to disseminate news. I mean, they can

0:12:13.480 --> 0:12:15.600
<v Speaker 1>be used for all kinds of things. Um. They can

0:12:15.640 --> 0:12:19.319
<v Speaker 1>also be used to communicate hate speech. Um. It's not

0:12:19.360 --> 0:12:22.160
<v Speaker 1>the again, it's not the tools fault. Yeah, no, it's

0:12:22.200 --> 0:12:25.920
<v Speaker 1>it's just it's just a medium of communication, right. So,

0:12:26.040 --> 0:12:29.920
<v Speaker 1>and and in the uh um Iranian elections and the

0:12:30.240 --> 0:12:34.120
<v Speaker 1>aftermath that followed, people were using uh these tools to

0:12:34.240 --> 0:12:39.000
<v Speaker 1>organize themselves and stay a step ahead of the authorities

0:12:39.000 --> 0:12:41.719
<v Speaker 1>who are trying to shut them down. So it was

0:12:41.840 --> 0:12:45.560
<v Speaker 1>very much like a flash mob might be again another

0:12:45.720 --> 0:12:47.920
<v Speaker 1>another something you can use these tools for that can

0:12:47.960 --> 0:12:50.920
<v Speaker 1>be a lot of fun um. But they were using

0:12:50.920 --> 0:12:54.320
<v Speaker 1>it basically to arrange to be in a certain place

0:12:54.360 --> 0:12:57.320
<v Speaker 1>at a certain time. They would meet, you know, they

0:12:57.320 --> 0:12:58.880
<v Speaker 1>would all take their own path to get there. They

0:12:58.920 --> 0:13:01.480
<v Speaker 1>would meet, they would do a demonstration, and then they

0:13:01.480 --> 0:13:04.240
<v Speaker 1>would leave to organize again in another location. And by

0:13:04.280 --> 0:13:06.959
<v Speaker 1>the time the authorities were able to catch up with them,

0:13:07.080 --> 0:13:09.360
<v Speaker 1>or they thought they would catch up with them, they

0:13:09.360 --> 0:13:12.560
<v Speaker 1>were gone. The crowd. Crowd had dispersed, and that wasn't

0:13:12.640 --> 0:13:15.400
<v Speaker 1>you know, I mean, And they were getting their point

0:13:15.440 --> 0:13:17.760
<v Speaker 1>across by getting a lot of media attention and and

0:13:18.120 --> 0:13:21.760
<v Speaker 1>showing solidarity that they were also being very careful not

0:13:21.840 --> 0:13:24.800
<v Speaker 1>to become an easy target, right right, And in the

0:13:24.960 --> 0:13:27.000
<v Speaker 1>in this case, you know, a lot of people in

0:13:27.040 --> 0:13:29.480
<v Speaker 1>the media said, this is a good thing. Look how

0:13:29.880 --> 0:13:32.560
<v Speaker 1>advanced this is, and how this wouldn't have been when

0:13:32.679 --> 0:13:35.840
<v Speaker 1>possible without it, And it really you would have had

0:13:35.880 --> 0:13:39.920
<v Speaker 1>to have met with everyone and agreed to everything upfront.

0:13:39.960 --> 0:13:43.360
<v Speaker 1>So no, technology is not essential to making this happen,

0:13:43.400 --> 0:13:45.839
<v Speaker 1>but it does make it a whole lot easier. And

0:13:46.760 --> 0:13:50.200
<v Speaker 1>that you again also raises the question of for for

0:13:51.240 --> 0:13:53.960
<v Speaker 1>especially for countries where you have civil disobedience in response

0:13:54.000 --> 0:13:56.760
<v Speaker 1>to some sort of oppressive government. However, you wanted to

0:13:56.800 --> 0:14:01.599
<v Speaker 1>find that the question comes comes up like, well, why

0:14:01.600 --> 0:14:04.480
<v Speaker 1>why now, right? Why does this happen now as opposed

0:14:04.480 --> 0:14:06.719
<v Speaker 1>to ten years ago? And part of that is that

0:14:06.840 --> 0:14:10.319
<v Speaker 1>technology has made it easier for people to organize these

0:14:10.400 --> 0:14:13.040
<v Speaker 1>kind of protests and to communicate with one another and

0:14:13.120 --> 0:14:17.080
<v Speaker 1>to get the word out so that the world at

0:14:17.160 --> 0:14:20.920
<v Speaker 1>large knows what's going on. It's not just a regional thing.

0:14:21.480 --> 0:14:23.560
<v Speaker 1>And so in a way you could say that technology

0:14:23.600 --> 0:14:27.640
<v Speaker 1>has helped uh these sort of things happen, but again

0:14:27.680 --> 0:14:30.120
<v Speaker 1>it's not it's just because technology is a tool that's

0:14:30.160 --> 0:14:32.400
<v Speaker 1>been used, and it's not that the desire wasn't there

0:14:32.400 --> 0:14:34.680
<v Speaker 1>ten years ago. It's just that maybe the opportunity was

0:14:35.400 --> 0:14:39.040
<v Speaker 1>had a higher barrier to it, and so getting over

0:14:39.080 --> 0:14:42.640
<v Speaker 1>that barrier was was what was preventing these sort of

0:14:43.160 --> 0:14:48.080
<v Speaker 1>uh outbreaks of civil disobedience if you prefer, from happening. Yeah,

0:14:48.080 --> 0:14:50.920
<v Speaker 1>these these tools are far more available to people now

0:14:50.960 --> 0:14:53.960
<v Speaker 1>than they were in the pasture. Um So now in

0:14:53.960 --> 0:14:57.640
<v Speaker 1>the case with the UK riots, that to differentiate them

0:14:57.680 --> 0:15:01.040
<v Speaker 1>between those and the political uh protests that we've seen

0:15:01.120 --> 0:15:04.280
<v Speaker 1>other places of the world. The big problem here is

0:15:04.280 --> 0:15:06.160
<v Speaker 1>that a lot of the people who are who have

0:15:06.200 --> 0:15:09.240
<v Speaker 1>been using these or at least the publicized uses of

0:15:09.560 --> 0:15:13.120
<v Speaker 1>social media and blackberries and things like that, have been

0:15:13.360 --> 0:15:18.640
<v Speaker 1>for people in the riots to coordinate attacks on certain businesses.

0:15:18.960 --> 0:15:20.920
<v Speaker 1>So essentially, what happens is you've got a couple of

0:15:20.920 --> 0:15:22.800
<v Speaker 1>people who are casing a place and they see that

0:15:22.840 --> 0:15:25.360
<v Speaker 1>there's not a very strong police presence in a particular

0:15:25.360 --> 0:15:27.840
<v Speaker 1>part of London, so they send out the word and

0:15:27.880 --> 0:15:30.400
<v Speaker 1>in that word gets sent out wider and wider and wider,

0:15:30.440 --> 0:15:32.040
<v Speaker 1>and then next thing you know, you've got a full,

0:15:32.600 --> 0:15:36.000
<v Speaker 1>full blown riot on your hands. People breaking into those

0:15:36.040 --> 0:15:39.520
<v Speaker 1>businesses because they know based on those messages that there's

0:15:39.560 --> 0:15:41.800
<v Speaker 1>not a real police presence, so there's not there's not

0:15:41.840 --> 0:15:45.480
<v Speaker 1>really much of a chance of getting caught, so they

0:15:45.520 --> 0:15:49.400
<v Speaker 1>take the advantage of the situation and they break in

0:15:49.480 --> 0:15:53.160
<v Speaker 1>and they looked essentially and uh, then you've got some

0:15:53.200 --> 0:15:57.320
<v Speaker 1>people who go even further than that, who are burning buildings,

0:15:57.760 --> 0:16:01.480
<v Speaker 1>which I can't even get into the psychology of that.

0:16:01.520 --> 0:16:04.200
<v Speaker 1>I mean, it's so foreign to me that not only

0:16:04.240 --> 0:16:10.360
<v Speaker 1>are you like, I don't understand the motivations behind it.

0:16:10.400 --> 0:16:12.680
<v Speaker 1>I don't know if it's anger. I don't know if

0:16:12.760 --> 0:16:17.400
<v Speaker 1>it's just something else that is really indefinable and I

0:16:17.440 --> 0:16:19.400
<v Speaker 1>can't pretend to understand. So I'm not really going to

0:16:19.520 --> 0:16:22.400
<v Speaker 1>go into it. But at any rate, UM, you've got

0:16:22.440 --> 0:16:26.440
<v Speaker 1>the the use of this technology to organize these uh

0:16:26.480 --> 0:16:29.680
<v Speaker 1>and organizes really kind of kind of too strong a word.

0:16:29.680 --> 0:16:32.080
<v Speaker 1>It's more like a call to arms saying, hey, guys,

0:16:32.120 --> 0:16:34.200
<v Speaker 1>if you want free stuff, come here and break in

0:16:34.240 --> 0:16:36.440
<v Speaker 1>and you can take it from this place. It's not

0:16:36.520 --> 0:16:40.040
<v Speaker 1>really so much organizing as it is just uh snatching

0:16:40.120 --> 0:16:43.720
<v Speaker 1>up an opportunity because the police are otherwise occupied and

0:16:43.760 --> 0:16:47.120
<v Speaker 1>you've got a very mobile group out there. I mean,

0:16:47.160 --> 0:16:49.520
<v Speaker 1>these are all for the most part, you know, if

0:16:49.520 --> 0:16:51.960
<v Speaker 1>you see the news, they all talk about being youths.

0:16:52.440 --> 0:16:55.080
<v Speaker 1>So they're young people, you know, in their teens and

0:16:55.120 --> 0:16:58.160
<v Speaker 1>twenties mostly. I've I've heard some as young as ten.

0:16:58.720 --> 0:17:01.640
<v Speaker 1>So you've got the yeah, young people who are in

0:17:01.680 --> 0:17:05.560
<v Speaker 1>a city that has a lot of UH ways of

0:17:05.560 --> 0:17:10.679
<v Speaker 1>getting around, particularly using the underground system that the tube. UM.

0:17:10.800 --> 0:17:14.560
<v Speaker 1>So there's been talking about possibly shutting down just the

0:17:14.560 --> 0:17:19.399
<v Speaker 1>the uh the cell networks around tube stations. So in

0:17:19.400 --> 0:17:22.000
<v Speaker 1>other words, turning those towers off or shutting it down

0:17:22.000 --> 0:17:25.160
<v Speaker 1>so that people can't communicate when they're near a tube station,

0:17:25.200 --> 0:17:27.720
<v Speaker 1>because part of it is that, you know, they want

0:17:27.720 --> 0:17:30.359
<v Speaker 1>to stay as mobile as possible so they can jump

0:17:30.400 --> 0:17:33.080
<v Speaker 1>on the next opportunity. And if you you know, so,

0:17:33.119 --> 0:17:35.720
<v Speaker 1>that means they're normally staying pretty close to the various

0:17:35.720 --> 0:17:37.480
<v Speaker 1>tube stations in order to be able to get to

0:17:37.520 --> 0:17:40.480
<v Speaker 1>whatever part of London is going to be the next target.

0:17:40.800 --> 0:17:42.960
<v Speaker 1>And if you shut that down then you really kind

0:17:42.960 --> 0:17:47.159
<v Speaker 1>of uh, the theory is that you would you would

0:17:47.160 --> 0:17:49.480
<v Speaker 1>silence them. The same sort of thing with some of

0:17:49.520 --> 0:17:53.040
<v Speaker 1>those social networks and the services. There's been some discussion

0:17:53.240 --> 0:17:57.359
<v Speaker 1>in British government about what to do about the the

0:17:57.400 --> 0:18:00.720
<v Speaker 1>text messaging and the BlackBerry messaging and and using social

0:18:00.760 --> 0:18:02.840
<v Speaker 1>networks like Twitter and Facebook. What do you do about

0:18:02.840 --> 0:18:06.160
<v Speaker 1>that and how do you stop those from being tools

0:18:06.320 --> 0:18:12.160
<v Speaker 1>of destruction? And uh, there's a lot of debate on that. Yeah,

0:18:12.160 --> 0:18:13.760
<v Speaker 1>I was I was gonna say, let's talk a little

0:18:13.760 --> 0:18:17.840
<v Speaker 1>bit about the tools specifically, UM, Facebook and Twitter sort

0:18:17.840 --> 0:18:20.760
<v Speaker 1>of no brainers, um, And they're easy for people to

0:18:20.840 --> 0:18:24.480
<v Speaker 1>use there, they're available via smartphones and and all sorts

0:18:24.520 --> 0:18:28.720
<v Speaker 1>of devices of course, UM, but they're not encrypted in

0:18:28.760 --> 0:18:33.119
<v Speaker 1>any way. UM. So it's it's easy enough to post

0:18:33.119 --> 0:18:35.879
<v Speaker 1>those messages, but it's also easy enough for people in

0:18:35.960 --> 0:18:39.560
<v Speaker 1>law enforcement to keep their eyes on it. UM. In fact,

0:18:39.640 --> 0:18:42.600
<v Speaker 1>I have seen some reports that went so far as

0:18:42.640 --> 0:18:48.919
<v Speaker 1>to suggest that they believe that people were posting messages

0:18:49.280 --> 0:18:54.720
<v Speaker 1>deliberately intended to mislead the authorities to going to another

0:18:54.760 --> 0:19:00.159
<v Speaker 1>location and then the real target was somewhere else that

0:19:00.200 --> 0:19:02.960
<v Speaker 1>they wanted to hit. UM, that the writers wanted to

0:19:03.000 --> 0:19:06.320
<v Speaker 1>attack UM. And I just I don't know whether that's

0:19:06.320 --> 0:19:08.800
<v Speaker 1>accurate or not. That was that that is a a

0:19:09.359 --> 0:19:11.160
<v Speaker 1>uh you know, I thought that they had had at

0:19:11.160 --> 0:19:12.600
<v Speaker 1>one point. And I just want to point out that

0:19:12.680 --> 0:19:15.399
<v Speaker 1>Facebook has said that, you know, their policy is that

0:19:15.440 --> 0:19:19.720
<v Speaker 1>they don't allow uh, hate speech or messages that condone

0:19:19.840 --> 0:19:22.840
<v Speaker 1>violence or or our call to violence or anything like

0:19:22.840 --> 0:19:25.560
<v Speaker 1>that on their network, so that if they, if anyone

0:19:26.000 --> 0:19:29.439
<v Speaker 1>working for Facebook sees that, they will remove that post.

0:19:30.000 --> 0:19:33.800
<v Speaker 1>So at least Facebook already is saying that, you know, uh,

0:19:33.960 --> 0:19:37.399
<v Speaker 1>we don't need government intervention necessarily because we already do

0:19:37.480 --> 0:19:40.920
<v Speaker 1>that this ourselves. So though one might wonder how effective

0:19:40.920 --> 0:19:43.240
<v Speaker 1>that can be, I mean, how this that that raises

0:19:43.320 --> 0:19:45.200
<v Speaker 1>another question that we'll get to in a minute about

0:19:45.200 --> 0:19:48.760
<v Speaker 1>how viable would a solution be to to limit or

0:19:48.800 --> 0:19:52.399
<v Speaker 1>shut down these social networking services. But that's we'll have

0:19:52.440 --> 0:19:55.879
<v Speaker 1>to get into that discussion before, I mean, after we

0:19:55.920 --> 0:20:00.720
<v Speaker 1>talk about all the different specific services, the most interesting

0:20:01.240 --> 0:20:06.720
<v Speaker 1>one to me as the BlackBerry messenger. UM. Apparently, according

0:20:06.760 --> 0:20:13.520
<v Speaker 1>to Offcom, Blackberries are more common phones among teens in

0:20:13.560 --> 0:20:17.320
<v Speaker 1>the United Kingdom between the ages of thirteen and eighteen.

0:20:17.400 --> 0:20:23.800
<v Speaker 1>It's more about thirty seven percent of kids have a BlackBerry. Now.

0:20:23.840 --> 0:20:27.840
<v Speaker 1>I think it's funny because again, on many occasions, you

0:20:27.920 --> 0:20:31.480
<v Speaker 1>and I have talked about how uh BlackBerry has been

0:20:31.520 --> 0:20:36.919
<v Speaker 1>sort of left behind by other handset manufacturers and and

0:20:37.440 --> 0:20:44.000
<v Speaker 1>operating system manufacturers, most specifically Android and Apple's iOS. But um,

0:20:44.040 --> 0:20:47.560
<v Speaker 1>you know, even the Windows phone is more of a

0:20:47.600 --> 0:20:51.640
<v Speaker 1>consumer device, so I don't think of the BlackBerry as

0:20:51.680 --> 0:20:55.400
<v Speaker 1>being a consumer device. But apparently it is especially popular

0:20:55.440 --> 0:20:57.760
<v Speaker 1>among this age group in the United Kingdom. And the

0:20:57.800 --> 0:21:03.120
<v Speaker 1>reason this is interesting is simply because the BlackBerry, since

0:21:03.160 --> 0:21:07.160
<v Speaker 1>it is intended originally to be uh an enterprise level

0:21:07.200 --> 0:21:14.000
<v Speaker 1>basically a corporate messaging service. Um it's encrypted, so uh,

0:21:14.080 --> 0:21:15.959
<v Speaker 1>you know, and you may not see that with the

0:21:16.040 --> 0:21:20.720
<v Speaker 1>text messaging UM on your local phone or smartphone. So

0:21:21.200 --> 0:21:25.399
<v Speaker 1>those messages are going over an encrypted private network Blackberries network,

0:21:26.000 --> 0:21:31.560
<v Speaker 1>and therefore the police cannot see what these people who

0:21:31.560 --> 0:21:34.400
<v Speaker 1>are using those devices are are saying. It could be

0:21:34.440 --> 0:21:38.000
<v Speaker 1>talking about, you know, anything, but they could also be

0:21:38.119 --> 0:21:43.760
<v Speaker 1>used for uh coordination of activities by people who are

0:21:43.800 --> 0:21:49.240
<v Speaker 1>involved with the riots. So um, the the British government

0:21:49.280 --> 0:21:53.280
<v Speaker 1>is particularly concerned about that. I have noticed, um, because

0:21:53.320 --> 0:21:56.360
<v Speaker 1>they cannot see what's going on now. Apparently there are

0:21:56.440 --> 0:21:59.320
<v Speaker 1>laws that say, um, you know they have said we

0:21:59.359 --> 0:22:03.960
<v Speaker 1>are in London is a very camera heavy city. Yeah. Um,

0:22:04.000 --> 0:22:07.520
<v Speaker 1>they're saying that, you know, we we can identify you,

0:22:07.920 --> 0:22:09.680
<v Speaker 1>and we can see that you are involved with this

0:22:09.960 --> 0:22:14.160
<v Speaker 1>and committing these acts. We will bring you to justice. Um.

0:22:14.200 --> 0:22:17.880
<v Speaker 1>Apparently there are some laws that say that, um, they

0:22:17.920 --> 0:22:23.320
<v Speaker 1>can't just subpoena all these messaging records without knowing in

0:22:23.400 --> 0:22:26.879
<v Speaker 1>fact that it is that person up front, and then

0:22:26.920 --> 0:22:29.880
<v Speaker 1>getting the phone records from that person to confirm whether

0:22:29.960 --> 0:22:32.200
<v Speaker 1>or not he or she was involved. Seems kind of interesting.

0:22:32.240 --> 0:22:34.680
<v Speaker 1>I know it's more complicated than that, but then you're

0:22:34.720 --> 0:22:38.320
<v Speaker 1>you're you're you're arguing like that. The argument seems to be,

0:22:38.720 --> 0:22:41.400
<v Speaker 1>you can't get the evidence that they did committed something

0:22:41.480 --> 0:22:44.160
<v Speaker 1>unless you can prove that they committed something already, which

0:22:44.160 --> 0:22:47.200
<v Speaker 1>is a catch twenty two, right, Um, unless you're just

0:22:47.240 --> 0:22:49.760
<v Speaker 1>saying that you wanted more corroborating evidence and you already

0:22:49.760 --> 0:22:54.320
<v Speaker 1>had plenty of evidence to start with, or the alternative

0:22:54.359 --> 0:22:57.440
<v Speaker 1>as you can say, Well, how how strict is that

0:22:57.520 --> 0:22:59.879
<v Speaker 1>if you get an accusation, is that enough for it

0:23:00.040 --> 0:23:03.920
<v Speaker 1>to be to to get a request for the information? Because, uh,

0:23:03.960 --> 0:23:05.399
<v Speaker 1>the way it's word it, it it sounds like you have

0:23:05.440 --> 0:23:07.760
<v Speaker 1>to have more than just an accusation, because otherwise otherwise

0:23:07.800 --> 0:23:11.760
<v Speaker 1>there's no there's no teeth to that at all, right right, um.

0:23:11.840 --> 0:23:14.960
<v Speaker 1>And and apparently Research in Motion, which is the Canadian

0:23:15.000 --> 0:23:18.240
<v Speaker 1>company that UH is behind the BlackBerry I said it

0:23:18.280 --> 0:23:23.000
<v Speaker 1>will cooperate with authorities, which UH caused a group of

0:23:23.240 --> 0:23:28.600
<v Speaker 1>hackers called Team Poison to UH take over the BlackBerry

0:23:28.600 --> 0:23:31.440
<v Speaker 1>blog basically break in, and they posted a message saying

0:23:31.440 --> 0:23:35.840
<v Speaker 1>that um if rim as Research in Motion is known

0:23:35.920 --> 0:23:40.080
<v Speaker 1>popularly UH cooperates with the police, then they will, you know,

0:23:40.280 --> 0:23:44.159
<v Speaker 1>stage an attack against. Team Poison also has a history

0:23:44.200 --> 0:23:47.880
<v Speaker 1>with other anti sec hacker groups like Anonymous and lull

0:23:47.960 --> 0:23:51.040
<v Speaker 1>sec Uh. They're in a way, they're almost like rivals

0:23:51.080 --> 0:23:54.119
<v Speaker 1>to lull sec Um. That's kind of that's probably putting

0:23:54.119 --> 0:23:56.600
<v Speaker 1>it a little too black and white. It's just like

0:23:56.640 --> 0:23:59.200
<v Speaker 1>any of these groups. It's kind of hazy because I mean,

0:23:59.240 --> 0:24:04.160
<v Speaker 1>the very each of the groups themselves are pretty crazy. Um.

0:24:04.200 --> 0:24:08.159
<v Speaker 1>And to add on to this, the the idea that

0:24:08.200 --> 0:24:11.960
<v Speaker 1>the government is looking into the possibility of of limiting

0:24:12.040 --> 0:24:15.960
<v Speaker 1>or shutting down these services has gathered a lot of

0:24:15.960 --> 0:24:19.120
<v Speaker 1>criticism early early on, and there are many reasons why

0:24:19.160 --> 0:24:25.120
<v Speaker 1>the criticisms have been directed at this this potential route

0:24:25.160 --> 0:24:28.240
<v Speaker 1>of action, which I should add, you know, the government

0:24:28.280 --> 0:24:30.600
<v Speaker 1>never said that it was going to do this, is

0:24:30.600 --> 0:24:34.560
<v Speaker 1>that it was looking at it, considering it, which means

0:24:34.560 --> 0:24:36.320
<v Speaker 1>that they could have come to the same conclusions that

0:24:36.400 --> 0:24:38.919
<v Speaker 1>everyone else has, or that a lot of the vocal

0:24:39.200 --> 0:24:42.119
<v Speaker 1>opponents have come to. One of those is just that,

0:24:42.960 --> 0:24:46.320
<v Speaker 1>you know, using this as a blanket approach means that

0:24:46.400 --> 0:24:50.440
<v Speaker 1>you are are eliminating the social rights of innocent people.

0:24:51.200 --> 0:24:52.800
<v Speaker 1>You know, if you were to just shut down these

0:24:52.800 --> 0:24:56.880
<v Speaker 1>services and the all all across the board, then innocent

0:24:56.920 --> 0:24:58.840
<v Speaker 1>people who have nothing to do with the riots would

0:24:58.840 --> 0:25:02.400
<v Speaker 1>also have that avenue of communication taken away from them,

0:25:02.440 --> 0:25:05.320
<v Speaker 1>and so that begins to raise a question of are

0:25:05.359 --> 0:25:08.920
<v Speaker 1>you violating the civil rights of innocent people? Uh? If

0:25:08.960 --> 0:25:11.760
<v Speaker 1>you are trying to identify people and block them based

0:25:11.840 --> 0:25:15.639
<v Speaker 1>upon the identity, that raises the question of how how

0:25:16.280 --> 0:25:20.520
<v Speaker 1>viable is this operation? Because one, you have to identify everyone,

0:25:20.520 --> 0:25:23.400
<v Speaker 1>so that's a huge job. Two you have to block them,

0:25:23.440 --> 0:25:25.040
<v Speaker 1>and then three you have to deal with the fact

0:25:25.080 --> 0:25:28.720
<v Speaker 1>that there are ways around bands and being blocked their

0:25:28.800 --> 0:25:33.159
<v Speaker 1>web proxies. They're changing your your IP address on your device,

0:25:33.240 --> 0:25:36.680
<v Speaker 1>there using other services that weren't covered under the band

0:25:36.760 --> 0:25:39.280
<v Speaker 1>in the first place. There's lots of different ways around it,

0:25:39.359 --> 0:25:42.000
<v Speaker 1>and it's like playing whack a mole. You know, on

0:25:42.040 --> 0:25:45.119
<v Speaker 1>the highest setting, you know, you knocked down one avenue

0:25:45.160 --> 0:25:49.160
<v Speaker 1>of communication, in five more sprung up, So it may

0:25:49.200 --> 0:25:52.439
<v Speaker 1>not even be viable unless again, unless you did an

0:25:52.440 --> 0:25:54.359
<v Speaker 1>all or nothing kind of approach. But in that case,

0:25:54.480 --> 0:25:57.159
<v Speaker 1>you're blanketing everyone. And then how do you respond to

0:25:57.240 --> 0:26:00.200
<v Speaker 1>how do you make an emergency phone call? If they've

0:26:00.200 --> 0:26:02.240
<v Speaker 1>shut down the cell phone system like it means that

0:26:02.480 --> 0:26:05.560
<v Speaker 1>you've cut down the communication of everybody, so it may

0:26:05.640 --> 0:26:09.880
<v Speaker 1>just not even be possible much less you can all

0:26:09.960 --> 0:26:15.720
<v Speaker 1>argue the social reasons, but just the technological UH implementation

0:26:16.000 --> 0:26:19.080
<v Speaker 1>is so complex that it may be off the board. Yeah,

0:26:19.119 --> 0:26:21.760
<v Speaker 1>there are just too many people, including the authorities, who

0:26:21.800 --> 0:26:25.560
<v Speaker 1>are relying on these networks UM for that to be feasible.

0:26:25.720 --> 0:26:27.360
<v Speaker 1>But I do want to before we get too far

0:26:27.400 --> 0:26:32.199
<v Speaker 1>into it. These and this is illustrative of h of

0:26:32.280 --> 0:26:36.000
<v Speaker 1>Michael's point to UM there are people who are using

0:26:36.119 --> 0:26:40.720
<v Speaker 1>the exact same services to organize cleanup efforts or even

0:26:40.760 --> 0:26:44.359
<v Speaker 1>to alert that there's trouble brewing. So in some cases

0:26:44.400 --> 0:26:46.680
<v Speaker 1>it's it's some cases you have people who are using

0:26:46.720 --> 0:26:50.640
<v Speaker 1>these same services saying, we need, you know, to bring

0:26:50.640 --> 0:26:52.879
<v Speaker 1>attention to this because there's trouble coming this way. And

0:26:52.880 --> 0:26:54.879
<v Speaker 1>then there's others who are saying, well, the troubles happened,

0:26:55.000 --> 0:26:59.560
<v Speaker 1>let's organize a clean up effort to deal with the damages.

0:27:00.040 --> 0:27:02.280
<v Speaker 1>And it's where you're getting that whole spirit of of

0:27:02.560 --> 0:27:04.920
<v Speaker 1>London and Spirit of UK kind of thing coming out,

0:27:05.359 --> 0:27:09.280
<v Speaker 1>where it's all these these community members banding together to

0:27:09.400 --> 0:27:14.359
<v Speaker 1>rebuild the communities after the destructive riots, and and some

0:27:14.440 --> 0:27:18.399
<v Speaker 1>of these riots have been yes, unthinkably destructive. I mean

0:27:18.400 --> 0:27:20.520
<v Speaker 1>I look at the pictures and I'm thinking this looks

0:27:20.560 --> 0:27:22.600
<v Speaker 1>like if you had shown this picture to me in

0:27:22.600 --> 0:27:24.159
<v Speaker 1>black and white, I would have said, oh, it's a

0:27:24.160 --> 0:27:27.160
<v Speaker 1>photo of London after the Blitz. I mean, that's how

0:27:27.200 --> 0:27:30.240
<v Speaker 1>bad some of these communities have been hit. Yeah, and

0:27:30.600 --> 0:27:33.080
<v Speaker 1>I've seen it compared UM just on some of the

0:27:33.119 --> 0:27:36.680
<v Speaker 1>people that I followed on social networks. You know, people

0:27:36.720 --> 0:27:39.479
<v Speaker 1>have said that it's sort of in cleaning it up.

0:27:39.480 --> 0:27:41.159
<v Speaker 1>It's sort of like the spirit of the Blitz, like

0:27:41.200 --> 0:27:45.400
<v Speaker 1>the you know, pushing back and and and helping clean

0:27:45.520 --> 0:27:48.480
<v Speaker 1>up UM. One one article that I had read on

0:27:48.520 --> 0:27:53.240
<v Speaker 1>the BBC news site UM mentioned Dan Thompson, who's an

0:27:53.320 --> 0:27:56.600
<v Speaker 1>artist and U. He started a Twitter account called at

0:27:56.720 --> 0:28:01.080
<v Speaker 1>riot clean Up UM, and Riot clean Up had when

0:28:01.080 --> 0:28:03.040
<v Speaker 1>I first checked it out, more than eighty six thousand

0:28:03.080 --> 0:28:06.080
<v Speaker 1>followers are down as of this recording to a little

0:28:06.160 --> 0:28:11.520
<v Speaker 1>under about eighty five UM, which suggests to me that

0:28:11.560 --> 0:28:14.920
<v Speaker 1>things may be quieting down a little bit. UM. But yeah, basically,

0:28:14.920 --> 0:28:17.600
<v Speaker 1>and it had spawned other groups to to start their

0:28:17.600 --> 0:28:20.040
<v Speaker 1>own riot clean ups and in other cities, not just

0:28:20.359 --> 0:28:24.399
<v Speaker 1>in London, but people were talking about specific areas where

0:28:24.920 --> 0:28:28.159
<v Speaker 1>UH people needed help UM cleaning up some of the

0:28:28.240 --> 0:28:32.000
<v Speaker 1>mess and the rubble from UH you know, buildings that

0:28:32.040 --> 0:28:36.560
<v Speaker 1>had been broken into and in some cases destroyed. UM.

0:28:36.760 --> 0:28:39.720
<v Speaker 1>And I think that generally what I had read was

0:28:39.800 --> 0:28:44.280
<v Speaker 1>that efforts like this had made people feel like, uh,

0:28:44.320 --> 0:28:47.120
<v Speaker 1>you know, the people a lot of it. Again, people

0:28:47.120 --> 0:28:51.160
<v Speaker 1>that I've read um about on social media were very

0:28:51.240 --> 0:28:55.040
<v Speaker 1>very disturbed and upset. Um, some going so far as

0:28:55.040 --> 0:28:56.760
<v Speaker 1>to say that they were not very proud of their

0:28:56.760 --> 0:29:01.560
<v Speaker 1>country because their uh, their countrymen were doing these things, um,

0:29:01.600 --> 0:29:04.840
<v Speaker 1>which is a very sad statement. UM. But I think

0:29:04.880 --> 0:29:07.000
<v Speaker 1>these kinds of things like the riot clean up account

0:29:07.200 --> 0:29:11.120
<v Speaker 1>are doing a lot to help people feel like they

0:29:11.120 --> 0:29:14.240
<v Speaker 1>can rally and and feel better about themselves and about

0:29:14.280 --> 0:29:16.640
<v Speaker 1>the areas they live in and take care of some

0:29:16.720 --> 0:29:20.920
<v Speaker 1>of the things that were damaged. Um. And hopefully to

0:29:20.920 --> 0:29:24.360
<v Speaker 1>to not give the sense to people who don't use

0:29:24.400 --> 0:29:29.480
<v Speaker 1>Twitter or Facebook or these higher technology uh services that no,

0:29:29.600 --> 0:29:32.080
<v Speaker 1>they're not all you know, they can be used for

0:29:32.120 --> 0:29:35.239
<v Speaker 1>good things, you know, because yeah, I mean, something like

0:29:35.280 --> 0:29:39.200
<v Speaker 1>this gets pressed and people who don't use them don't

0:29:39.280 --> 0:29:42.640
<v Speaker 1>understand that, you know, the technology is not necessarily to

0:29:42.720 --> 0:29:47.120
<v Speaker 1>blame but can be used to enable those people. If

0:29:47.160 --> 0:29:49.800
<v Speaker 1>we took the technology out of this story entirely, the

0:29:49.840 --> 0:29:53.040
<v Speaker 1>thing They're probably still would have been riots, they just

0:29:53.240 --> 0:29:57.080
<v Speaker 1>may not have been as intense and as numerous as

0:29:57.120 --> 0:30:00.720
<v Speaker 1>they have been over the last few days. Um, it

0:30:00.800 --> 0:30:03.840
<v Speaker 1>certainly enabled people to be more agile in their mood. Rights, right, yeah,

0:30:03.840 --> 0:30:07.200
<v Speaker 1>the technology aided, but it did not cause this, and

0:30:07.480 --> 0:30:12.040
<v Speaker 1>the and to suggest otherwise as being pretty naive and shortsighted. Um.

0:30:12.160 --> 0:30:17.600
<v Speaker 1>The the takeaway I get is that what you need

0:30:17.680 --> 0:30:21.760
<v Speaker 1>to do is look at the underlying problems that allowed

0:30:21.760 --> 0:30:25.880
<v Speaker 1>this situation to even start, and it may very well

0:30:25.920 --> 0:30:29.120
<v Speaker 1>be that there is no solution to those underlying problems.

0:30:29.240 --> 0:30:32.360
<v Speaker 1>It might well be that the problems that exist are

0:30:33.280 --> 0:30:39.880
<v Speaker 1>so so ingrained in our society that there's no real

0:30:39.920 --> 0:30:44.200
<v Speaker 1>way to solve them, which is is unfortunate. It's also

0:30:44.840 --> 0:30:48.280
<v Speaker 1>possibly true, but without actually looking at it, we can't

0:30:48.320 --> 0:30:51.360
<v Speaker 1>really come to that conclusion. And to just jump on

0:30:51.440 --> 0:30:56.360
<v Speaker 1>the technology aspect of this story is to ignore the

0:30:56.560 --> 0:31:04.120
<v Speaker 1>deeper causes that are fueling the riots in the first place. Right. So, yeah,

0:31:04.160 --> 0:31:06.200
<v Speaker 1>the technology part is a problem. I mean, you want

0:31:06.400 --> 0:31:08.840
<v Speaker 1>the government has to do something right, and in fact,

0:31:08.880 --> 0:31:11.000
<v Speaker 1>by the time when we're recording this podcast, they're already

0:31:11.320 --> 0:31:14.000
<v Speaker 1>been some pretty significant strides and the riots do seem

0:31:14.080 --> 0:31:18.040
<v Speaker 1>to be uh to be calming down now, it's seem

0:31:18.080 --> 0:31:22.040
<v Speaker 1>to be under control. But the government had was in

0:31:22.120 --> 0:31:25.280
<v Speaker 1>a tough position because it had to respond. It had

0:31:25.280 --> 0:31:28.520
<v Speaker 1>all these innocent people who are being targeted and through

0:31:28.520 --> 0:31:31.520
<v Speaker 1>no fault of their own, and they had very few

0:31:32.840 --> 0:31:37.440
<v Speaker 1>uh resources at their disposal to be able to respond

0:31:37.480 --> 0:31:40.120
<v Speaker 1>to the this issue. And one of the you know,

0:31:40.240 --> 0:31:45.200
<v Speaker 1>they're looking for a quick and and relatively easy solution

0:31:45.320 --> 0:31:48.560
<v Speaker 1>to a very complex problem. And I'm not saying that

0:31:48.800 --> 0:31:51.920
<v Speaker 1>the government was just focusing on technology or just focusing

0:31:51.920 --> 0:31:54.360
<v Speaker 1>on a quick solution, but that was one of the

0:31:54.400 --> 0:31:57.480
<v Speaker 1>things they had. The government had to consider. So, you know,

0:31:57.560 --> 0:31:59.680
<v Speaker 1>when you're looking at something as widespread as that and

0:31:59.720 --> 0:32:05.000
<v Speaker 1>so apparently out of control, and and it's due to

0:32:05.400 --> 0:32:09.600
<v Speaker 1>very complex factors that are have been boiling up for generations,

0:32:10.760 --> 0:32:13.520
<v Speaker 1>there's no real easy solution in the first place. So

0:32:13.800 --> 0:32:17.120
<v Speaker 1>I think I think one the government said that they

0:32:17.120 --> 0:32:20.120
<v Speaker 1>were looking at that, I think if they had thought

0:32:20.120 --> 0:32:23.000
<v Speaker 1>about it a little bit longer or talked with some experts,

0:32:23.000 --> 0:32:25.720
<v Speaker 1>they would have realized very quickly that that that shutting

0:32:25.720 --> 0:32:28.800
<v Speaker 1>this down is not really a viable choice. Um And

0:32:28.880 --> 0:32:32.240
<v Speaker 1>to the media jumping on the announcement. I think that

0:32:32.360 --> 0:32:34.800
<v Speaker 1>made it more than what it was as far as

0:32:34.840 --> 0:32:37.560
<v Speaker 1>that the technology aspect and what to do about it

0:32:37.600 --> 0:32:40.800
<v Speaker 1>is concerned. It drew a lot of attention to it

0:32:40.960 --> 0:32:44.080
<v Speaker 1>and probably made more of a mountain out of it

0:32:44.120 --> 0:32:45.640
<v Speaker 1>than it should have been. But at the same time,

0:32:45.680 --> 0:32:48.080
<v Speaker 1>I mean, it was very obvious that the technology was

0:32:48.080 --> 0:32:49.800
<v Speaker 1>playing a role. I mean, there's no way of getting

0:32:49.840 --> 0:32:53.360
<v Speaker 1>around it. It's just that again, Uh, if the technology

0:32:53.360 --> 0:32:55.360
<v Speaker 1>hadn't been there, I think we would have still seen

0:32:55.600 --> 0:32:58.440
<v Speaker 1>a disturbance, it just wouldn't have been as coordinated. So

0:32:59.040 --> 0:33:03.200
<v Speaker 1>you can't you shutting down the means of communication wouldn't

0:33:03.320 --> 0:33:07.800
<v Speaker 1>necessarily solve any problems. So thank you so much Michael

0:33:07.840 --> 0:33:10.520
<v Speaker 1>for for sending that question in. And I mean, I

0:33:10.600 --> 0:33:12.400
<v Speaker 1>think this is a good companion piece to our other

0:33:12.400 --> 0:33:18.080
<v Speaker 1>one about using technology in various forms of protests UM,

0:33:18.120 --> 0:33:21.040
<v Speaker 1>because this is kind of like the the opposite right,

0:33:21.200 --> 0:33:25.240
<v Speaker 1>using them in order to cause uh damage and maybe

0:33:25.280 --> 0:33:28.480
<v Speaker 1>for personal gain, as opposed to trying to actually make

0:33:28.680 --> 0:33:31.680
<v Speaker 1>social and political changes. Because I get the feeling that

0:33:31.720 --> 0:33:34.640
<v Speaker 1>these riots really didn't have a goal outside of mayhem

0:33:34.720 --> 0:33:38.880
<v Speaker 1>and looting, UM, at least not one that was clear

0:33:38.960 --> 0:33:44.320
<v Speaker 1>to the average observer. I know that I'm still struggling

0:33:44.320 --> 0:33:46.960
<v Speaker 1>to understand it, and I probably will for quite some time.

0:33:47.480 --> 0:33:52.400
<v Speaker 1>Uh so, great question. If you guys have any suggestions

0:33:52.440 --> 0:33:55.680
<v Speaker 1>for future tech Stuff topics, we highly recommend you get

0:33:55.680 --> 0:33:57.760
<v Speaker 1>in touch with us and let us know. You can

0:33:57.800 --> 0:34:00.080
<v Speaker 1>find us on Twitter and Facebook, assuming you're going but

0:34:00.200 --> 0:34:03.719
<v Speaker 1>hasn't blocked it. Uh. The handle there is tech Stuff

0:34:04.000 --> 0:34:07.880
<v Speaker 1>hs W, and you can email us. Our address is

0:34:08.160 --> 0:34:11.040
<v Speaker 1>tech stuff at how stuff Works dot com. Chris and

0:34:11.040 --> 0:34:15.759
<v Speaker 1>I will talk to you again really soon. Be sure

0:34:15.760 --> 0:34:18.680
<v Speaker 1>to check out our new video podcast, Stuff from the Future.

0:34:19.040 --> 0:34:21.359
<v Speaker 1>Join how Stuff Work staff as we explore the most

0:34:21.360 --> 0:34:26.200
<v Speaker 1>promising and perplexing possibilities of tomorrow. The How Stuff Works

0:34:26.200 --> 0:34:34.280
<v Speaker 1>iPhone app has arrived. Download it today on iTunes, brought

0:34:34.280 --> 0:34:37.480
<v Speaker 1>to you by the reinvented two thousand twelve camera. It's ready,

0:34:37.640 --> 0:34:38.080
<v Speaker 1>are you