WEBVTT - We Get Back In Time

0:00:00.160 --> 0:00:07.240
<v Speaker 1>Brought to you by Toyota. Let's go places. Welcome to

0:00:07.400 --> 0:00:15.320
<v Speaker 1>Forward Thinking. Hey everyone, and welcome to Forward Thinking, the

0:00:15.400 --> 0:00:18.000
<v Speaker 1>podcast that looks the future and says, tell me, dr

0:00:18.120 --> 0:00:20.680
<v Speaker 1>where are we going this time? I'm Jonathan Strickland, I'm

0:00:20.760 --> 0:00:23.880
<v Speaker 1>Lauren Vocabon, and I'm Joe McCormick. Joe, I I've got

0:00:23.880 --> 0:00:27.400
<v Speaker 1>a question for you. Okay, I've really been thinking about

0:00:27.400 --> 0:00:30.159
<v Speaker 1>this for a while. What if I had if I

0:00:30.160 --> 0:00:33.559
<v Speaker 1>had to nail you down and say, what movie that

0:00:33.680 --> 0:00:36.480
<v Speaker 1>involves time travel do you feel really gets it right?

0:00:36.520 --> 0:00:40.080
<v Speaker 1>What's the best depiction of time travel in the movies?

0:00:40.240 --> 0:00:42.040
<v Speaker 1>What would you say? Well, I don't know if it's

0:00:42.080 --> 0:00:45.520
<v Speaker 1>possible to get time travel right in the movies, because

0:00:45.560 --> 0:00:48.800
<v Speaker 1>I'm not sure if it's possible to actually do it period.

0:00:49.200 --> 0:00:52.880
<v Speaker 1>The movie that that convinces me the most is a little,

0:00:52.960 --> 0:00:55.680
<v Speaker 1>uh indie sci fi movie called Primer. Have you all

0:00:55.720 --> 0:00:59.520
<v Speaker 1>seen this now? So? Yeah, so in your version, time

0:00:59.520 --> 0:01:02.560
<v Speaker 1>travel and evolves getting a storage unit. Yeah, so you

0:01:02.640 --> 0:01:05.160
<v Speaker 1>run a U haul and you put a little box

0:01:05.200 --> 0:01:08.080
<v Speaker 1>in it and you go sleep in the box, and um,

0:01:08.680 --> 0:01:12.480
<v Speaker 1>and then everything gets really confusing. But there there there

0:01:12.480 --> 0:01:14.679
<v Speaker 1>are a couple of things I really like about the

0:01:14.680 --> 0:01:18.800
<v Speaker 1>way it depicted time travel. Number one is that it

0:01:18.840 --> 0:01:22.840
<v Speaker 1>depicts it the technology, the technology aspect of machine they

0:01:22.880 --> 0:01:26.280
<v Speaker 1>build feels like a real project. You know, you see

0:01:26.319 --> 0:01:29.600
<v Speaker 1>the scenes where they're designing it, and it doesn't sound

0:01:29.680 --> 0:01:33.199
<v Speaker 1>like a bunch of sci fi magic talk. You feel

0:01:33.200 --> 0:01:36.720
<v Speaker 1>like these are these guys are they're real engineers who

0:01:36.720 --> 0:01:39.680
<v Speaker 1>were talking about the kinds of problems engineers encounter when

0:01:39.680 --> 0:01:42.360
<v Speaker 1>they're building a machine. Number two, The thing I like

0:01:42.480 --> 0:01:45.279
<v Speaker 1>about it is that it's the thing I said before,

0:01:45.440 --> 0:01:49.920
<v Speaker 1>It gets really confusing when once they keep using the machine,

0:01:50.200 --> 0:01:52.360
<v Speaker 1>it's hard to keep track of what's going on. It's

0:01:52.360 --> 0:01:54.880
<v Speaker 1>a movie that challenges you too, because if you if

0:01:54.920 --> 0:01:57.520
<v Speaker 1>you aren't willing to really pay attention and listen and

0:01:57.560 --> 0:02:00.520
<v Speaker 1>try and be engaged, you could be lost before there's

0:02:00.680 --> 0:02:02.720
<v Speaker 1>any time travel at all. In fact, you can be

0:02:02.760 --> 0:02:08.520
<v Speaker 1>lost before you realize what the heck they're trying to build. Yeah, definitely, Yeah,

0:02:08.600 --> 0:02:10.280
<v Speaker 1>all right, Lauren, what about you do you have? Do

0:02:10.280 --> 0:02:12.480
<v Speaker 1>you have a time travel like a favorite kind of

0:02:12.520 --> 0:02:15.840
<v Speaker 1>depiction of time travel? Well, I think that probably the

0:02:16.320 --> 0:02:20.720
<v Speaker 1>closest to what will eventually be reality is is what

0:02:20.760 --> 0:02:23.960
<v Speaker 1>the Simpsons portrayed in the Treehouse of Horrors episode Time

0:02:24.000 --> 0:02:27.800
<v Speaker 1>and Punishments, which of course was was kind of based

0:02:27.880 --> 0:02:30.640
<v Speaker 1>on the old Bradberry story. A sound of Thunder is

0:02:30.639 --> 0:02:32.720
<v Speaker 1>that the one where Homer goes back in time accidentally

0:02:32.720 --> 0:02:35.840
<v Speaker 1>steps on a on a butterfly and changes everything all right, right,

0:02:35.919 --> 0:02:38.800
<v Speaker 1>comes back to the to the present and uh and

0:02:38.800 --> 0:02:42.000
<v Speaker 1>and winds up in what seems to be this amazing

0:02:42.080 --> 0:02:47.519
<v Speaker 1>perfect dimension, right and well, but but but he goes

0:02:47.600 --> 0:02:49.720
<v Speaker 1>he goes like they're all like rich and fabulous, and

0:02:49.840 --> 0:02:52.240
<v Speaker 1>he's like, Marge, give me a donut, and she's like,

0:02:52.240 --> 0:02:54.920
<v Speaker 1>what's a donut? And then and then he leaves and

0:02:54.960 --> 0:03:00.359
<v Speaker 1>then starts again. My favorite part of that one is

0:03:00.400 --> 0:03:02.320
<v Speaker 1>where he goes back in time and just starts killing

0:03:02.360 --> 0:03:06.000
<v Speaker 1>things randomly. But that also does try to sort of

0:03:06.040 --> 0:03:09.360
<v Speaker 1>address a real issue that's possible with time travel. We're

0:03:09.480 --> 0:03:12.160
<v Speaker 1>time travel a reality, and you were to go way

0:03:12.200 --> 0:03:14.800
<v Speaker 1>back and change some small thing you have no idea

0:03:14.919 --> 0:03:18.720
<v Speaker 1>how much of an effect that might have in the future. True, Now,

0:03:18.880 --> 0:03:21.400
<v Speaker 1>before we get off too far down that road, because

0:03:21.400 --> 0:03:24.040
<v Speaker 1>we are going to address that, it's my turn, Yeah,

0:03:24.080 --> 0:03:28.560
<v Speaker 1>what's your job? Spill and Ted's excellent adventure because Sand

0:03:28.680 --> 0:03:32.480
<v Speaker 1>Demons High School football rules. Yeah. I actually was just

0:03:32.560 --> 0:03:35.280
<v Speaker 1>reading about how scientists at M I. T Are working

0:03:35.280 --> 0:03:39.240
<v Speaker 1>on a time traveling telephone booth. Yeah, yeah, yeah, it's uh,

0:03:38.840 --> 0:03:43.760
<v Speaker 1>it's it's phenomenal, powered by George Carlin magic. I was

0:03:43.800 --> 0:03:45.800
<v Speaker 1>about to say, I mean, this has to involve George

0:03:45.800 --> 0:03:49.440
<v Speaker 1>Carlin very short supply Now, well, I mean just because

0:03:49.440 --> 0:03:51.440
<v Speaker 1>he's passed away in this current time. If it's a

0:03:51.440 --> 0:03:55.280
<v Speaker 1>time machine, then that should that should be no problem, right, Okay, okay,

0:03:55.400 --> 0:03:58.480
<v Speaker 1>so time travel is really fun for the movies, especially

0:03:58.520 --> 0:04:01.760
<v Speaker 1>because it creates all these weird questions. We have no

0:04:01.880 --> 0:04:05.280
<v Speaker 1>experience with which to compare it to, so you can

0:04:05.360 --> 0:04:08.120
<v Speaker 1>you can almost try anything. Yes, And we of course

0:04:08.160 --> 0:04:11.800
<v Speaker 1>have talked about time in a previous episode. We were

0:04:11.840 --> 0:04:15.760
<v Speaker 1>really talking about time and general relativity and special relativity,

0:04:15.880 --> 0:04:18.280
<v Speaker 1>and so we're not going to go too far into that,

0:04:18.279 --> 0:04:20.240
<v Speaker 1>but we will give a little bit of a refresher

0:04:20.360 --> 0:04:22.160
<v Speaker 1>so that we can have at least a kind of

0:04:22.279 --> 0:04:25.000
<v Speaker 1>an agreed upon foundation upon which we will build our

0:04:25.360 --> 0:04:27.880
<v Speaker 1>contraption of time machine that will fall a part of

0:04:27.920 --> 0:04:30.720
<v Speaker 1>the moment's notice. Yeah, okay, so let's talk about time

0:04:30.760 --> 0:04:36.039
<v Speaker 1>travel today. Is it possible? Uh? If it is possible.

0:04:36.080 --> 0:04:40.200
<v Speaker 1>How might it work? And if it does actually work,

0:04:40.279 --> 0:04:42.120
<v Speaker 1>what would it mean. Well, it depends on how you

0:04:42.160 --> 0:04:44.480
<v Speaker 1>define it, because if you just define it as traveling

0:04:44.480 --> 0:04:52.040
<v Speaker 1>through time, technically we're all doing that, not where Yeah

0:04:52.320 --> 0:04:55.000
<v Speaker 1>that's a great term. Yeah, well it's true. You just

0:04:55.200 --> 0:04:58.159
<v Speaker 1>you know, you just have to be and you and

0:04:58.240 --> 0:05:00.520
<v Speaker 1>you and you would go through time. All right. So,

0:05:00.560 --> 0:05:03.799
<v Speaker 1>first of all, defining time we've mentioned in our previous episode,

0:05:03.800 --> 0:05:05.800
<v Speaker 1>it's really hard to do that without it becoming this

0:05:05.920 --> 0:05:11.320
<v Speaker 1>kind of crazy recursive, uh you know, tautological definition. So

0:05:12.000 --> 0:05:14.960
<v Speaker 1>Einstein said time is what you read on a clock. Yeah.

0:05:15.120 --> 0:05:18.279
<v Speaker 1>One one definition you could apply is say it's the

0:05:18.400 --> 0:05:21.560
<v Speaker 1>rate of change in the universe. And this is not

0:05:21.720 --> 0:05:25.920
<v Speaker 1>something that is as globally consistent or universally consistent. In

0:05:25.920 --> 0:05:29.320
<v Speaker 1>other words, it can you can actually have very localized

0:05:29.920 --> 0:05:32.240
<v Speaker 1>rates of change that are much different than on the

0:05:32.320 --> 0:05:36.680
<v Speaker 1>universal scale. As it turns out, time is in fact relative.

0:05:36.760 --> 0:05:40.480
<v Speaker 1>It is different depending upon your perspective. And that doesn't

0:05:40.520 --> 0:05:43.720
<v Speaker 1>just mean it seems relative to different people. You know,

0:05:43.839 --> 0:05:47.080
<v Speaker 1>based on how long it feels like this horrible movie

0:05:47.160 --> 0:05:50.320
<v Speaker 1>has been going on, or this lecture or something. It's

0:05:50.400 --> 0:05:55.880
<v Speaker 1>measurably relative like it actually changes depending on how close

0:05:55.960 --> 0:06:00.680
<v Speaker 1>you are to say, massive objects, or how fast you're going. Right,

0:06:01.440 --> 0:06:05.040
<v Speaker 1>that's a gravitational time dilation, yeah, exactly. Yeah. And and

0:06:05.080 --> 0:06:07.640
<v Speaker 1>both of these, you know, gravitational time dilation and the

0:06:08.000 --> 0:06:11.560
<v Speaker 1>speed at which you're traveling. Uh, those those two effects

0:06:11.560 --> 0:06:15.000
<v Speaker 1>are what make it um necessary for us to have

0:06:15.200 --> 0:06:19.479
<v Speaker 1>satellites that correct their time gradually, because, as it turns out,

0:06:20.279 --> 0:06:23.000
<v Speaker 1>the time on their clocks passes at a different rate

0:06:23.000 --> 0:06:25.240
<v Speaker 1>than the time of our clocks down here on the

0:06:25.279 --> 0:06:28.080
<v Speaker 1>ground level. Right. So, even if you were to take

0:06:28.160 --> 0:06:32.480
<v Speaker 1>a fast airplane trip and you had a very precise

0:06:32.600 --> 0:06:35.359
<v Speaker 1>clock on board the airplane when you landed, and you

0:06:35.440 --> 0:06:38.080
<v Speaker 1>compared that against another clock they have been started the

0:06:38.120 --> 0:06:41.280
<v Speaker 1>exact same time, has that same level of precision, you

0:06:41.279 --> 0:06:44.400
<v Speaker 1>would see that time had passed at slightly different rates,

0:06:44.440 --> 0:06:46.520
<v Speaker 1>not a lot. I mean, it's not like you land

0:06:46.560 --> 0:06:49.520
<v Speaker 1>and you you land an hour earlier than what you

0:06:49.520 --> 0:06:53.000
<v Speaker 1>you would have landed, uh if the hadn't gone well,

0:06:53.080 --> 0:06:55.120
<v Speaker 1>not just speed, but the fact that time is actually

0:06:55.120 --> 0:06:57.880
<v Speaker 1>passing in a a different rate for you. But it's it

0:06:57.960 --> 0:07:01.240
<v Speaker 1>is a tiny amount, it's it's measurable with satellites. It's

0:07:01.279 --> 0:07:04.400
<v Speaker 1>a little bit more important because one, the effect is

0:07:04.480 --> 0:07:08.360
<v Speaker 1>larger and tow we're depending upon satellites for things like GPS,

0:07:08.440 --> 0:07:11.840
<v Speaker 1>and if your time isn't exact, if you haven't corrected

0:07:11.880 --> 0:07:14.360
<v Speaker 1>for this time dilation, you're not going to get an

0:07:14.360 --> 0:07:17.080
<v Speaker 1>accurate reading of where you are on Earth based upon

0:07:17.080 --> 0:07:21.840
<v Speaker 1>those GPS readings. So we already see dilation and effect

0:07:22.040 --> 0:07:26.600
<v Speaker 1>on today. It's not like it's just hypothetical. Yeah, it's

0:07:26.680 --> 0:07:30.320
<v Speaker 1>definitely just an accepted fact of science. But despite the

0:07:30.360 --> 0:07:33.680
<v Speaker 1>fact that time is relative and influenced by things like

0:07:34.160 --> 0:07:37.680
<v Speaker 1>nearby massive objects and the speed at which an object

0:07:37.800 --> 0:07:40.800
<v Speaker 1>is traveling, one thing that we do seem to know

0:07:40.840 --> 0:07:43.080
<v Speaker 1>about it is that it only seems to move in

0:07:43.120 --> 0:07:47.600
<v Speaker 1>one direction, right, right. We don't seem to cause and

0:07:47.640 --> 0:07:50.840
<v Speaker 1>effect goes in one way. Right. You don't have a

0:07:51.120 --> 0:07:54.360
<v Speaker 1>a an effect and then later a cause happens. You

0:07:54.400 --> 0:07:57.320
<v Speaker 1>have a cause and then the effect happens. Sort of

0:07:57.360 --> 0:07:59.880
<v Speaker 1>the arrow of time. Yeah, and in points and only

0:08:00.000 --> 0:08:02.840
<v Speaker 1>one direction as far as we can determine, at least

0:08:02.840 --> 0:08:09.560
<v Speaker 1>intuitively mathematically, it's a different, different matter, I suppose. But

0:08:09.720 --> 0:08:13.480
<v Speaker 1>first I would also mention that time travel inherently has

0:08:13.480 --> 0:08:17.160
<v Speaker 1>a paradox attached to it, which is that you get

0:08:17.200 --> 0:08:21.520
<v Speaker 1>two different, completely different experiences of time, at least based

0:08:21.560 --> 0:08:24.679
<v Speaker 1>on the type of time travel where there's some time

0:08:24.760 --> 0:08:27.560
<v Speaker 1>passing for the traveler as well as for the rest

0:08:27.640 --> 0:08:30.040
<v Speaker 1>of the universe. So in other words, Joe, if you

0:08:30.120 --> 0:08:32.600
<v Speaker 1>decide to go back into the past and you're taking

0:08:32.640 --> 0:08:35.120
<v Speaker 1>some sort of trip where like let's say it's the

0:08:35.160 --> 0:08:39.480
<v Speaker 1>Tardest from Doctor Who, there's actually time that passes for

0:08:39.600 --> 0:08:42.800
<v Speaker 1>you as you take this journey. So you're leaving today

0:08:42.880 --> 0:08:45.680
<v Speaker 1>and you're going back two years into the past, and

0:08:45.679 --> 0:08:47.640
<v Speaker 1>it doesn't take that long. I mean, there's basically just

0:08:47.679 --> 0:08:50.480
<v Speaker 1>a series of whoo, whoop whoops, and then any land.

0:08:50.600 --> 0:08:54.560
<v Speaker 1>But it's not instantaneous, so you experience time moving forward

0:08:54.840 --> 0:08:58.079
<v Speaker 1>to an independent observer who I guess has been around

0:08:58.080 --> 0:09:00.640
<v Speaker 1>for a few centuries. Uh, they will remember the fact

0:09:00.640 --> 0:09:04.520
<v Speaker 1>that you arrived before you departed. So that's two different

0:09:04.920 --> 0:09:08.840
<v Speaker 1>experiences of time. My question would be, if there really

0:09:08.920 --> 0:09:12.960
<v Speaker 1>is this kind of movie style traveling backward through time

0:09:13.880 --> 0:09:20.079
<v Speaker 1>uh motion, where are you physically well? I mean, space

0:09:20.200 --> 0:09:23.600
<v Speaker 1>and time are very much connected. We have this whole

0:09:23.600 --> 0:09:26.480
<v Speaker 1>idea of the space time continuum. But where is not

0:09:26.559 --> 0:09:29.040
<v Speaker 1>so much of an issue as when Uh, as it

0:09:29.040 --> 0:09:31.360
<v Speaker 1>turns out, because at least with the Doctor's tartists, it

0:09:31.400 --> 0:09:34.760
<v Speaker 1>travels both through space and time. Uh. If you're in

0:09:34.800 --> 0:09:37.199
<v Speaker 1>a DeLorean going eighty eight miles per hours, somehow you're

0:09:37.240 --> 0:09:41.679
<v Speaker 1>magically in the right place, uh, the right region as

0:09:41.720 --> 0:09:44.840
<v Speaker 1>you as you would have been had somehow you've managed

0:09:44.880 --> 0:09:49.000
<v Speaker 1>to track the Earth. Yeah. That thing is what always

0:09:49.120 --> 0:09:50.960
<v Speaker 1>mixes me up about a lot of this time travels.

0:09:51.200 --> 0:09:54.079
<v Speaker 1>I mean, in addition to many other things like the

0:09:54.120 --> 0:09:56.880
<v Speaker 1>Dolorean doesn't just appear in the cold reaches of space

0:09:56.960 --> 0:10:00.160
<v Speaker 1>and parting I fly immediately perishes like Doc Brown. That's

0:10:00.160 --> 0:10:02.600
<v Speaker 1>a really smart guy. Um, but no, I mean, I mean,

0:10:02.679 --> 0:10:06.080
<v Speaker 1>with that kind of essential paradox, even the very small

0:10:06.240 --> 0:10:10.040
<v Speaker 1>differences and in time that happened between us and our satellites,

0:10:10.040 --> 0:10:12.800
<v Speaker 1>for example, are actually really hard to wrap your mind around.

0:10:13.720 --> 0:10:19.320
<v Speaker 1>So anything as large as time travel is is necessarily problematic.

0:10:19.840 --> 0:10:23.680
<v Speaker 1>Whack I think is the accepted scientific term. Yeah, quite

0:10:23.880 --> 0:10:29.680
<v Speaker 1>quite whack. Yes, it's wackness is uh is sufficient, It's

0:10:29.760 --> 0:10:33.000
<v Speaker 1>it's a it's enough of a wackness to actually detect

0:10:33.040 --> 0:10:37.040
<v Speaker 1>with the naked eye. Okay, so I've got a question,

0:10:37.360 --> 0:10:40.520
<v Speaker 1>does time travel is there any way, we could just

0:10:40.679 --> 0:10:42.760
<v Speaker 1>rule it out at the beginning to say no, we

0:10:42.880 --> 0:10:46.400
<v Speaker 1>just know it's not possible because it violates some law

0:10:46.480 --> 0:10:50.000
<v Speaker 1>that we are almost positive cannot be violated. All right,

0:10:50.040 --> 0:10:52.280
<v Speaker 1>To answer that question, first of all, spoiler alert, According

0:10:52.320 --> 0:10:55.600
<v Speaker 1>to at least some mathematical models, time travel is at

0:10:55.679 --> 0:10:59.960
<v Speaker 1>least hypothetically possible. But there's still some things that we

0:11:00.000 --> 0:11:03.160
<v Speaker 1>have to talk about. For example, the law of conservation.

0:11:03.200 --> 0:11:05.880
<v Speaker 1>Now we've heard this, right, the idea that you cannot

0:11:06.000 --> 0:11:09.560
<v Speaker 1>create nor destroy matter or energy. You can convert one

0:11:09.559 --> 0:11:13.520
<v Speaker 1>into the other, but you cannot actually destroy it or

0:11:13.559 --> 0:11:16.880
<v Speaker 1>create it, right, can't make energy disappear or matter. You

0:11:16.960 --> 0:11:21.320
<v Speaker 1>can convert energy into less useful states. Sure it's never

0:11:21.400 --> 0:11:24.480
<v Speaker 1>going away, right, right. So in other words, when we

0:11:24.600 --> 0:11:28.000
<v Speaker 1>are you know, we talk about how systems lose energy,

0:11:28.360 --> 0:11:31.400
<v Speaker 1>they don't really lose energy so much as they produce

0:11:31.480 --> 0:11:36.040
<v Speaker 1>other forms of energy that is useful. They're they're pooping

0:11:36.040 --> 0:11:40.040
<v Speaker 1>out heat. Essentially, heat which is hard to harness, is

0:11:40.080 --> 0:11:44.880
<v Speaker 1>just diffused. Right. So that law of conservation suggests that

0:11:44.920 --> 0:11:47.280
<v Speaker 1>there's a problem with time travel. And that problem is this,

0:11:47.880 --> 0:11:51.200
<v Speaker 1>if I send something into the past, whether it's a

0:11:51.240 --> 0:11:54.040
<v Speaker 1>person or an object or time, shame, whatever it is,

0:11:54.520 --> 0:11:58.079
<v Speaker 1>then that thing will suddenly be in a time where

0:11:58.080 --> 0:12:01.120
<v Speaker 1>it wasn't before. That seems to suggest that I am

0:12:01.160 --> 0:12:05.040
<v Speaker 1>actually creating more matter at that moment in time, and

0:12:05.080 --> 0:12:09.480
<v Speaker 1>that spacetime region then was there before. Does that violate

0:12:09.520 --> 0:12:12.680
<v Speaker 1>the law of conservation more so than even just creating

0:12:12.679 --> 0:12:16.000
<v Speaker 1>a really weird time sonic boom? Yeah. The fact that

0:12:16.240 --> 0:12:18.760
<v Speaker 1>the fact that something is there that wasn't there before.

0:12:18.800 --> 0:12:21.800
<v Speaker 1>You had a uh, let's say, a certain amount of

0:12:21.840 --> 0:12:24.800
<v Speaker 1>matter in that region, and now there's more matter, and

0:12:24.840 --> 0:12:28.360
<v Speaker 1>it wasn't that you converted energy, it's that you've produced it.

0:12:29.440 --> 0:12:32.920
<v Speaker 1>Mm hmm. I can tell you what the general answer

0:12:33.080 --> 0:12:35.360
<v Speaker 1>to this is about how they get around it, which

0:12:35.360 --> 0:12:38.600
<v Speaker 1>is the idea that in an infinite and unbounded universe,

0:12:39.160 --> 0:12:43.240
<v Speaker 1>you have regions where conservation takes place. But it's not

0:12:43.280 --> 0:12:46.640
<v Speaker 1>a global thing. It's not it's not applied across the

0:12:46.840 --> 0:12:50.439
<v Speaker 1>entirety of the universe. It's so it's it's kind of complicated,

0:12:50.440 --> 0:12:53.400
<v Speaker 1>but it's it's assuming that there is an infinite universe,

0:12:54.040 --> 0:12:59.040
<v Speaker 1>and therefore you're not really creating more matter because the

0:12:59.080 --> 0:13:04.679
<v Speaker 1>concept of infinite alone means infinite like like there's no

0:13:05.320 --> 0:13:09.840
<v Speaker 1>more to infinite. You've got that that that alone is

0:13:10.400 --> 0:13:13.000
<v Speaker 1>you know, it's meaningless. You're not creating a lack or

0:13:14.400 --> 0:13:18.040
<v Speaker 1>additional but localized it would be a problem. But if

0:13:18.080 --> 0:13:19.559
<v Speaker 1>you look at the universe as a whole, as a

0:13:19.600 --> 0:13:23.439
<v Speaker 1>system and considered infinitely and bounded, you don't apply that

0:13:23.440 --> 0:13:26.400
<v Speaker 1>that law in that instant. So that's the way of

0:13:26.400 --> 0:13:28.000
<v Speaker 1>getting around it. Yeah, it's kind of a lot of

0:13:28.040 --> 0:13:30.440
<v Speaker 1>the stuff we're gonna talk about today with these time

0:13:30.480 --> 0:13:33.200
<v Speaker 1>travel rules and the ways to get around it. It

0:13:33.360 --> 0:13:37.360
<v Speaker 1>reminds me a lot of if you've ever played a

0:13:37.360 --> 0:13:42.240
<v Speaker 1>a pencil and paper role playing game and you've got

0:13:42.280 --> 0:13:46.000
<v Speaker 1>one of those players who's trying to find a way

0:13:46.080 --> 0:13:49.400
<v Speaker 1>around every rule in the game, and that's the way

0:13:49.440 --> 0:13:52.800
<v Speaker 1>they play the game. I you guys have friends who

0:13:52.840 --> 0:13:54.920
<v Speaker 1>don't play the game that way. I thought, I thought

0:13:54.960 --> 0:13:57.160
<v Speaker 1>that was the entire point of the game. I've I've

0:13:57.440 --> 0:14:00.480
<v Speaker 1>had games where people didn't do that and they were magical.

0:14:01.880 --> 0:14:05.199
<v Speaker 1>But at any rate, So another thing we can talk about,

0:14:05.280 --> 0:14:09.040
<v Speaker 1>does it um? Is it? Is? It? Is it violating

0:14:09.200 --> 0:14:14.240
<v Speaker 1>space itself? Um? And according to some models of general relativity,

0:14:14.040 --> 0:14:17.679
<v Speaker 1>time travel is possible through something called a closed timelike

0:14:17.880 --> 0:14:22.760
<v Speaker 1>curve or c t C which are quote worldlines that

0:14:22.920 --> 0:14:25.080
<v Speaker 1>end at the same point in space and time as

0:14:25.120 --> 0:14:27.680
<v Speaker 1>they begin. And we'll talk more about what c t

0:14:27.880 --> 0:14:30.640
<v Speaker 1>C s are and how you might be able to

0:14:30.720 --> 0:14:33.920
<v Speaker 1>travel through time backwards through time in fact, because a

0:14:33.920 --> 0:14:36.720
<v Speaker 1>lot of people say, oh, time travel would be possible

0:14:36.720 --> 0:14:39.400
<v Speaker 1>if you're talking about traveling into the future, But traveling

0:14:39.400 --> 0:14:41.600
<v Speaker 1>into the past is problematic. I mean, especially if you

0:14:41.600 --> 0:14:45.080
<v Speaker 1>think about using special relativity. So you're just talking about

0:14:45.120 --> 0:14:49.680
<v Speaker 1>moving really really fast. So to you, time passes a

0:14:49.720 --> 0:14:52.760
<v Speaker 1>different rate than it does to someone on some other

0:14:53.080 --> 0:14:55.800
<v Speaker 1>you know, moving body, right, if they were to look

0:14:55.840 --> 0:14:58.680
<v Speaker 1>at you, you would appear to be moving in slow motion, right,

0:14:58.720 --> 0:15:02.040
<v Speaker 1>and you would see every things sped up back home. So,

0:15:02.160 --> 0:15:04.880
<v Speaker 1>for instance, if we're talking about here on Earth and

0:15:04.960 --> 0:15:09.320
<v Speaker 1>Joe leaves to go on an interstellar super fast joy ride,

0:15:09.840 --> 0:15:12.680
<v Speaker 1>he might go for a year and be traveling at

0:15:12.720 --> 0:15:15.000
<v Speaker 1>almost the speed of light and return to Earth and

0:15:15.040 --> 0:15:17.280
<v Speaker 1>it will be like two centuries have passed, but to

0:15:17.360 --> 0:15:20.280
<v Speaker 1>him a year has passed. Now to that that you

0:15:20.320 --> 0:15:23.360
<v Speaker 1>could argue is just like basically traveling into the future. Yeah,

0:15:23.360 --> 0:15:25.640
<v Speaker 1>it's like it's like traveling into the future for you Joe.

0:15:25.680 --> 0:15:27.480
<v Speaker 1>For for the rest of us, it's just like boy Joe,

0:15:27.600 --> 0:15:31.600
<v Speaker 1>you remember him? Whatever happened to that guy? And then

0:15:31.600 --> 0:15:35.440
<v Speaker 1>maybe someday or descendants would be like, oh, you're this

0:15:35.520 --> 0:15:39.600
<v Speaker 1>Joe guy who never shows up the things. But at

0:15:39.600 --> 0:15:42.840
<v Speaker 1>any rate, the CTCs would allow you to travel back

0:15:42.880 --> 0:15:46.080
<v Speaker 1>in time, assuming that they are actually in play in

0:15:46.120 --> 0:15:48.960
<v Speaker 1>this particular model general relativity, and we'll get into that

0:15:49.000 --> 0:15:51.840
<v Speaker 1>in a little bit. Okay, I've got one. Okay, what

0:15:51.920 --> 0:15:55.800
<v Speaker 1>about basic causality? I mean, can you you've heard of

0:15:55.800 --> 0:16:00.760
<v Speaker 1>the grandfather paradix? Obviously you have, Yeah, I wrote the

0:16:00.800 --> 0:16:05.800
<v Speaker 1>notes right. Well, okay, so the grandfather paradox is a

0:16:05.840 --> 0:16:08.720
<v Speaker 1>fun one. Uh. This this is a very common one.

0:16:08.800 --> 0:16:10.880
<v Speaker 1>That's that's mentioned. There are a lot of different variations

0:16:10.920 --> 0:16:12.960
<v Speaker 1>as well. But the the easy way of saying it

0:16:13.040 --> 0:16:15.560
<v Speaker 1>is imagine that time travel is in fact possible where

0:16:15.600 --> 0:16:18.520
<v Speaker 1>you can go back into time and then you go

0:16:18.680 --> 0:16:20.840
<v Speaker 1>back in time. You're an assassin and you have a

0:16:20.880 --> 0:16:23.200
<v Speaker 1>specific target that you have to hit in the past.

0:16:23.680 --> 0:16:26.600
<v Speaker 1>You travel back in time and your target is eighteen

0:16:26.680 --> 0:16:29.400
<v Speaker 1>years old, and you assassinate your target. But it turns

0:16:29.400 --> 0:16:32.440
<v Speaker 1>out your target was actually your grandfather, Your grandfather didn't

0:16:32.440 --> 0:16:34.840
<v Speaker 1>have kids until he was, you know, in his twenties.

0:16:35.240 --> 0:16:38.680
<v Speaker 1>So you have killed your grandfather before your your mother

0:16:38.760 --> 0:16:41.440
<v Speaker 1>or dad were born, which means that you wouldn't have

0:16:41.480 --> 0:16:43.480
<v Speaker 1>been born, which means you couldn't have gone into the past,

0:16:43.520 --> 0:16:46.320
<v Speaker 1>which means you couldn't have killed your grandfather. Thus the paradox.

0:16:46.600 --> 0:16:49.200
<v Speaker 1>Now we're not saying there's any reason this would need

0:16:49.320 --> 0:16:53.119
<v Speaker 1>to arise, but if traveling into the past really were possible,

0:16:54.120 --> 0:16:57.760
<v Speaker 1>why shouldn't you be able to do something like this? Well, again,

0:16:58.400 --> 0:17:01.480
<v Speaker 1>if through your action you end up negating the ability

0:17:01.560 --> 0:17:05.040
<v Speaker 1>to even go back in the first place, that's the paradox. Right,

0:17:05.080 --> 0:17:08.320
<v Speaker 1>You've created an incoherent loop, is what it's called. It's

0:17:08.400 --> 0:17:12.720
<v Speaker 1>it's something that could not continue. Uh once it happens

0:17:12.760 --> 0:17:16.280
<v Speaker 1>like once it once you were successful in doing whatever

0:17:16.320 --> 0:17:17.880
<v Speaker 1>the task is, and it doesn't have to be kill

0:17:17.920 --> 0:17:20.600
<v Speaker 1>your grandfather. That's the paradox. But there are a lot

0:17:20.640 --> 0:17:24.520
<v Speaker 1>of different variations. Generally speaking, what they're saying is, even

0:17:24.520 --> 0:17:27.760
<v Speaker 1>if time travel were possible, you probably couldn't go back

0:17:27.920 --> 0:17:32.080
<v Speaker 1>and change anything, because if you did, then it could

0:17:32.200 --> 0:17:35.240
<v Speaker 1>negate the possibility of you traveling back in time in

0:17:35.280 --> 0:17:38.600
<v Speaker 1>the first place. So There's an argument that extends from that,

0:17:38.680 --> 0:17:41.399
<v Speaker 1>saying that maybe there's no way to affect the past

0:17:41.440 --> 0:17:44.080
<v Speaker 1>at all. But that also seems like a problem to me,

0:17:44.200 --> 0:17:47.840
<v Speaker 1>because by appearing in a place, I mean, even if

0:17:47.880 --> 0:17:50.840
<v Speaker 1>you don't really do much of anything, you're still affecting it,

0:17:51.680 --> 0:17:53.760
<v Speaker 1>I mean, just by your state of existence there. Sure

0:17:53.800 --> 0:17:56.639
<v Speaker 1>it's accidentally stepping on a butterfly thing and creating a

0:17:56.680 --> 0:17:59.600
<v Speaker 1>universe where it rainstonuts. Yeah, it seems like it wouldn't

0:17:59.640 --> 0:18:03.840
<v Speaker 1>be possible to go to a place without having any effect. Well,

0:18:03.920 --> 0:18:07.199
<v Speaker 1>there's some interesting ways around this one too. One is

0:18:07.200 --> 0:18:09.680
<v Speaker 1>suggesting that you would be able to do whatever you wanted.

0:18:09.800 --> 0:18:12.600
<v Speaker 1>It's just whatever you did happens to be whatever has

0:18:12.640 --> 0:18:15.639
<v Speaker 1>happened anyway, That makes more sense to me. So in

0:18:15.680 --> 0:18:18.600
<v Speaker 1>other words, it's not that you are prevented from doing things,

0:18:18.680 --> 0:18:21.400
<v Speaker 1>it's that whatever you choose to do is what has

0:18:21.480 --> 0:18:24.960
<v Speaker 1>happened already and what led to the state of the

0:18:25.040 --> 0:18:26.920
<v Speaker 1>universe that allowed you to travel back in time in

0:18:26.960 --> 0:18:29.840
<v Speaker 1>the first place. And this becomes a coherent causal loop

0:18:30.040 --> 0:18:32.760
<v Speaker 1>where you end up having You can have variations on

0:18:32.800 --> 0:18:35.760
<v Speaker 1>this where the only way it could have happened is

0:18:35.840 --> 0:18:39.080
<v Speaker 1>if you had traveled into the past, which I love.

0:18:39.119 --> 0:18:42.040
<v Speaker 1>These two the very popular in science fiction. Well, yeah,

0:18:42.040 --> 0:18:43.680
<v Speaker 1>I mean one of the one of the big ones

0:18:43.800 --> 0:18:46.960
<v Speaker 1>that seems to emphasize the strangeness of this kind of

0:18:47.000 --> 0:18:49.639
<v Speaker 1>loop would be, what if you only know how to

0:18:49.720 --> 0:18:52.439
<v Speaker 1>invent a time machine because a time traveler from the

0:18:52.480 --> 0:18:54.879
<v Speaker 1>future came back and showed you how to invent a

0:18:54.920 --> 0:18:58.080
<v Speaker 1>time machine. Yeah, and there's another great example. In fact,

0:18:58.119 --> 0:19:01.040
<v Speaker 1>I'll go ahead and say it. Let's just say that, uh, Lauren,

0:19:01.400 --> 0:19:06.080
<v Speaker 1>you have created a way of uh, you've gone into

0:19:06.080 --> 0:19:07.879
<v Speaker 1>the future. You've got a time machine where you can

0:19:07.880 --> 0:19:11.640
<v Speaker 1>actually move into the future, and you you steal from

0:19:11.680 --> 0:19:15.639
<v Speaker 1>the future an amazing device, and this steal things all

0:19:15.640 --> 0:19:18.159
<v Speaker 1>the time, mostly from the future. Yeah. So it's a

0:19:18.200 --> 0:19:21.439
<v Speaker 1>really cute nutcracker that looks like a sure from an

0:19:21.440 --> 0:19:25.479
<v Speaker 1>antique store. I have a have a specific example. Lauren,

0:19:27.240 --> 0:19:34.560
<v Speaker 1>Lauren the chronographer kleptomaniac, steals a device it turns great

0:19:34.680 --> 0:19:38.639
<v Speaker 1>jelly into strawberry jam, and she travels back in time

0:19:38.800 --> 0:19:41.520
<v Speaker 1>to present day and starts to thus turn all the

0:19:41.560 --> 0:19:45.120
<v Speaker 1>grape jelly into strawberry jam. And she loves that. She's

0:19:45.160 --> 0:19:48.879
<v Speaker 1>fantastic guests And then as she's you know, she's traveled

0:19:48.920 --> 0:19:51.479
<v Speaker 1>far into the future to get this amazing device uh

0:19:51.840 --> 0:19:54.960
<v Speaker 1>on on her her deathbed, many many many years into

0:19:55.000 --> 0:19:58.600
<v Speaker 1>the future. She then gives this this device to a

0:19:58.640 --> 0:20:03.040
<v Speaker 1>little vagabond, and and the vagabond, it turns out, ends

0:20:03.080 --> 0:20:07.239
<v Speaker 1>up being the quote unquote inventor of this device. In

0:20:07.280 --> 0:20:10.480
<v Speaker 1>other words, this device was never actually invented. It only

0:20:10.560 --> 0:20:14.000
<v Speaker 1>exists in this loop of time. It turns out that

0:20:14.040 --> 0:20:17.520
<v Speaker 1>the adult version of this vagabond is the person from

0:20:17.520 --> 0:20:20.119
<v Speaker 1>whom Lawrence stole the device in the first place, and

0:20:20.160 --> 0:20:24.120
<v Speaker 1>this device only exists within this closed time loop. From

0:20:24.119 --> 0:20:27.000
<v Speaker 1>that perspective, yeah, that doesn't seem to make any sense,

0:20:27.000 --> 0:20:29.960
<v Speaker 1>because in that case, the device was never actually built.

0:20:30.560 --> 0:20:34.520
<v Speaker 1>It always just exactly Yeah. See, it's another one of

0:20:34.560 --> 0:20:37.720
<v Speaker 1>those kind of and if you've ever read any hind Line,

0:20:38.280 --> 0:20:41.679
<v Speaker 1>hind Line has got a billion stories that involved this

0:20:41.800 --> 0:20:45.720
<v Speaker 1>kind of of closed loop where nothing in the story

0:20:45.760 --> 0:20:48.760
<v Speaker 1>could have happened unless this other thing that hasn't happened

0:20:48.800 --> 0:20:51.760
<v Speaker 1>had already happened. It just gets more and more confusing

0:20:51.800 --> 0:20:53.840
<v Speaker 1>as it goes along. I think it's much more likely

0:20:54.000 --> 0:20:57.840
<v Speaker 1>that um that grape to strawberry jam converters are a

0:20:57.920 --> 0:21:02.360
<v Speaker 1>universal constant, and it therefore um that they have to exist.

0:21:02.400 --> 0:21:06.000
<v Speaker 1>There must exist, unmust they must at some point exist, right. UM.

0:21:06.119 --> 0:21:08.520
<v Speaker 1>I also am very fond of the theory that um

0:21:08.560 --> 0:21:11.959
<v Speaker 1>that the universe kind of kind of equalizes anything that

0:21:12.000 --> 0:21:13.840
<v Speaker 1>you would do and or try to do in the past,

0:21:13.920 --> 0:21:16.080
<v Speaker 1>Like if you went back and tried to shoot your grandfather,

0:21:16.280 --> 0:21:19.320
<v Speaker 1>um that the gun would misfire, or that that's suddenly

0:21:19.320 --> 0:21:21.840
<v Speaker 1>a strong breeze with the bullet off course, right, or

0:21:21.880 --> 0:21:24.199
<v Speaker 1>that that a weird reflection gun in your eyes and

0:21:24.240 --> 0:21:26.880
<v Speaker 1>messed up your aim. And but the the idea being

0:21:26.880 --> 0:21:29.479
<v Speaker 1>that the universe itself counteracts anything you try to do

0:21:29.600 --> 0:21:32.520
<v Speaker 1>and thus prevents it from happening. Uh. I can see

0:21:32.520 --> 0:21:34.920
<v Speaker 1>that if you're just saying like this is another way

0:21:34.920 --> 0:21:37.919
<v Speaker 1>of saying that whatever you go back and change is

0:21:37.960 --> 0:21:41.560
<v Speaker 1>what already happened. If you're talking about the universe having

0:21:41.600 --> 0:21:45.200
<v Speaker 1>like an active deterrent mechanism, that that seems only possible

0:21:45.240 --> 0:21:49.720
<v Speaker 1>if you're positing like time travel, police ghosts. I think

0:21:49.720 --> 0:21:52.399
<v Speaker 1>that Final Destination has proven beyond a doubt to us

0:21:52.440 --> 0:21:55.560
<v Speaker 1>that this kind of thing happens at the Great documentary series.

0:21:56.359 --> 0:21:59.320
<v Speaker 1>But also it doesn't necessarily have to be conscious. It

0:21:59.359 --> 0:22:01.919
<v Speaker 1>just has to Again, it's very similar to this is

0:22:01.960 --> 0:22:05.199
<v Speaker 1>what has happened, therefore, this is what will happen if

0:22:05.240 --> 0:22:08.240
<v Speaker 1>you were to go into the past. But another interesting

0:22:08.280 --> 0:22:11.359
<v Speaker 1>idea that tries, you know, one way you can try

0:22:11.400 --> 0:22:13.600
<v Speaker 1>and get around this. It's sort of similar to what

0:22:13.640 --> 0:22:15.760
<v Speaker 1>you were talking about with the Simpsons, Lauren, this idea

0:22:15.880 --> 0:22:20.080
<v Speaker 1>of parallel timelines. This is what it's like in Back

0:22:20.080 --> 0:22:22.399
<v Speaker 1>to the Future and a lot of stories. Yes, you

0:22:22.480 --> 0:22:25.280
<v Speaker 1>go back and you change something. It doesn't have to

0:22:25.320 --> 0:22:29.240
<v Speaker 1>be incorporated into the future you've already experienced. You create

0:22:29.280 --> 0:22:32.320
<v Speaker 1>a new future. Its branch to split off. So in

0:22:32.359 --> 0:22:37.280
<v Speaker 1>this sense, some people say, well, technically you're not altering

0:22:37.320 --> 0:22:40.600
<v Speaker 1>the past so much as avoiding the present. In other words,

0:22:40.840 --> 0:22:44.480
<v Speaker 1>in other words, the president present every day, the present

0:22:44.520 --> 0:22:47.840
<v Speaker 1>that you are from. Let's say, uh, you you have

0:22:48.000 --> 0:22:50.240
<v Speaker 1>left the present, You've gone into the past. You've made

0:22:50.280 --> 0:22:53.600
<v Speaker 1>a change in the past that would affect your present,

0:22:53.840 --> 0:22:56.439
<v Speaker 1>the one that you came from. It splits off the

0:22:56.480 --> 0:22:59.720
<v Speaker 1>timeline and now you are in a parallel timeline where

0:22:59.720 --> 0:23:02.960
<v Speaker 1>the the change that you made is fact. It's a

0:23:03.000 --> 0:23:07.760
<v Speaker 1>historical fact. And so therefore whatever your present, uh, will

0:23:07.840 --> 0:23:09.840
<v Speaker 1>be now it will be different from what it was

0:23:10.600 --> 0:23:13.200
<v Speaker 1>in the timeline you left. But the timeline you left

0:23:13.240 --> 0:23:15.320
<v Speaker 1>could theorectly still be going on. It's just now it

0:23:15.359 --> 0:23:17.760
<v Speaker 1>doesn't have you in it because you left UM, and

0:23:17.800 --> 0:23:19.560
<v Speaker 1>I guess you probably wouldn't be able to get back,

0:23:19.600 --> 0:23:22.639
<v Speaker 1>would Yeah, I mean that's not hypothetically. I mean I

0:23:22.680 --> 0:23:24.040
<v Speaker 1>think that if you can get over there in the

0:23:24.080 --> 0:23:27.320
<v Speaker 1>first place, then there is surely a clause and she

0:23:27.400 --> 0:23:29.960
<v Speaker 1>can get back if you were to go back even

0:23:30.160 --> 0:23:33.159
<v Speaker 1>further into your timeline so that you could stop yourself

0:23:33.200 --> 0:23:35.440
<v Speaker 1>when you appear the first time in order to change

0:23:35.480 --> 0:23:38.440
<v Speaker 1>the timeline and thus prevent yourself changing the timeline by

0:23:38.440 --> 0:23:41.679
<v Speaker 1>going back and changing it again. Maybe I don't know,

0:23:42.920 --> 0:23:45.480
<v Speaker 1>I need to have like some trees, you know, to

0:23:45.680 --> 0:23:48.720
<v Speaker 1>illustrate all this on UM. But yeah, again, some people

0:23:48.760 --> 0:23:51.120
<v Speaker 1>say that this this ends up being some sort of

0:23:51.600 --> 0:23:55.080
<v Speaker 1>universe hopping as opposed to time travel in the purest

0:23:55.160 --> 0:23:58.040
<v Speaker 1>sense of being able to go into the past and

0:23:58.160 --> 0:24:02.680
<v Speaker 1>change things around. O. Well, let's just say maybe one

0:24:02.680 --> 0:24:06.239
<v Speaker 1>of these things really can happen. Now we've accepted that

0:24:06.640 --> 0:24:10.320
<v Speaker 1>based on relativistic physics, you probably could travel into the future.

0:24:10.400 --> 0:24:13.080
<v Speaker 1>That's not really the problem. We're talking about traveling back

0:24:13.119 --> 0:24:17.199
<v Speaker 1>in time. How would you actually do it if one

0:24:17.280 --> 0:24:19.840
<v Speaker 1>of these models, any of them, at least one of

0:24:19.880 --> 0:24:23.199
<v Speaker 1>them works, what's the way you get there? Because this

0:24:23.240 --> 0:24:26.359
<v Speaker 1>is a thing that that legit physicists have legit thought about.

0:24:26.640 --> 0:24:29.679
<v Speaker 1>I mean there's some there's some not just physicists but

0:24:29.720 --> 0:24:34.359
<v Speaker 1>also philosophers who have really talked about, you know what,

0:24:34.359 --> 0:24:38.400
<v Speaker 1>what is the likelihood of this and if if it's possible,

0:24:38.440 --> 0:24:41.000
<v Speaker 1>how would it be possible? And some of the models

0:24:41.040 --> 0:24:46.200
<v Speaker 1>are uh, you know, hypothetically possible but not practical, right,

0:24:46.240 --> 0:24:49.159
<v Speaker 1>And actually I'd say all of them aren't because if

0:24:49.160 --> 0:24:51.119
<v Speaker 1>they were practical, we would have totally been doing them

0:24:51.160 --> 0:24:54.200
<v Speaker 1>already or at least tested them. But one of them

0:24:54.200 --> 0:24:57.600
<v Speaker 1>would be using what are called Care black holes k

0:24:57.880 --> 0:25:03.680
<v Speaker 1>e r R or care ring not caring care rings. Uh.

0:25:03.720 --> 0:25:06.679
<v Speaker 1>So this is after a physicist named Roy care who

0:25:06.760 --> 0:25:10.760
<v Speaker 1>proposed this back in nine and talked about the concept

0:25:10.760 --> 0:25:13.800
<v Speaker 1>of a rotating black hole. That would be a care

0:25:13.880 --> 0:25:16.240
<v Speaker 1>black hole. And if you're looking for size, it would

0:25:16.280 --> 0:25:18.199
<v Speaker 1>be about the size of Manhattan, but it would have

0:25:18.240 --> 0:25:21.119
<v Speaker 1>the mass of our sun, so would be incredibly dense.

0:25:21.359 --> 0:25:23.880
<v Speaker 1>You know, sun is obviously much larger than the Earth,

0:25:23.920 --> 0:25:25.600
<v Speaker 1>so for it to be reduced in size to the

0:25:25.640 --> 0:25:28.840
<v Speaker 1>size of Manhattan, but retain its mass incredibly dense. So

0:25:28.920 --> 0:25:30.719
<v Speaker 1>the idea of a caring is a ring of collapse

0:25:30.800 --> 0:25:35.000
<v Speaker 1>neutron stars that are spinning with enough rotational force that,

0:25:35.040 --> 0:25:38.280
<v Speaker 1>at least in theory, they would never create a singularity. Now,

0:25:38.280 --> 0:25:42.240
<v Speaker 1>the singularity is that that point of infinite density, that

0:25:42.359 --> 0:25:46.880
<v Speaker 1>point that has zero length, infinite mass, so you would

0:25:46.960 --> 0:25:49.560
<v Speaker 1>never be able to escape from it. Light itself cannot

0:25:49.640 --> 0:25:52.680
<v Speaker 1>escape from it. Uh. That's not the same as Event Horizon,

0:25:52.840 --> 0:25:56.200
<v Speaker 1>which is a great movie that we watched for tech stuff,

0:25:57.119 --> 0:25:59.760
<v Speaker 1>but it's also event horizon is also the zone around

0:25:59.760 --> 0:26:02.280
<v Speaker 1>a I call that's the point of no return. Yeah,

0:26:02.280 --> 0:26:04.000
<v Speaker 1>which is why it's a terrible idea to name your

0:26:04.080 --> 0:26:08.680
<v Speaker 1>spaceship after don't name don't name your don't name your

0:26:08.760 --> 0:26:13.240
<v Speaker 1>your cruise ship Iceberg, and don't name your your spaceship

0:26:13.240 --> 0:26:17.240
<v Speaker 1>event Horizon. But yeah, So the idea with the care

0:26:17.359 --> 0:26:20.359
<v Speaker 1>ring is that perhaps there would not be a singularity

0:26:20.400 --> 0:26:22.760
<v Speaker 1>at all. This rotational force would end up preventing that

0:26:22.800 --> 0:26:26.760
<v Speaker 1>from happening, and the ideas that you might and I

0:26:26.840 --> 0:26:29.840
<v Speaker 1>stress might be able to pass through such a thing

0:26:30.040 --> 0:26:33.960
<v Speaker 1>in a spacecraft. Uh, and not be spaghettified and crushed

0:26:34.200 --> 0:26:37.160
<v Speaker 1>and killed as a result. Uh. And the idea would

0:26:37.160 --> 0:26:39.280
<v Speaker 1>be that you would be spit out of the other end,

0:26:39.600 --> 0:26:41.879
<v Speaker 1>which essentially would be a what is what is in

0:26:42.320 --> 0:26:44.680
<v Speaker 1>theory called a white hole? I say in theory because

0:26:44.680 --> 0:26:48.120
<v Speaker 1>we haven't observed one, why these might not actually exist?

0:26:48.200 --> 0:26:50.280
<v Speaker 1>And yeah, yeah, one of the ideas of that a

0:26:50.359 --> 0:26:52.480
<v Speaker 1>white hole is essentially I mean, that's like the opposite

0:26:52.480 --> 0:26:55.000
<v Speaker 1>of black holes, where stuff is being spouted out, like

0:26:55.119 --> 0:26:58.679
<v Speaker 1>matter and energy is coming out of this. Uh, you

0:26:58.720 --> 0:27:00.760
<v Speaker 1>know it would be black hole be one end of it,

0:27:00.840 --> 0:27:02.359
<v Speaker 1>and white hole would be the other end of it.

0:27:02.720 --> 0:27:06.800
<v Speaker 1>But while we've observed the black holes, the white holes

0:27:06.840 --> 0:27:09.639
<v Speaker 1>are still something we don't really see. I'm trying to

0:27:09.720 --> 0:27:11.879
<v Speaker 1>wrap my brain around that. What would be the opposite

0:27:11.880 --> 0:27:13.439
<v Speaker 1>of a black hole. It seems like it could be

0:27:13.480 --> 0:27:16.280
<v Speaker 1>something like a little big bang kind of wouldn't it,

0:27:16.359 --> 0:27:20.280
<v Speaker 1>like like a continual big bang? Yeah, singularity expanding outward,

0:27:20.480 --> 0:27:22.200
<v Speaker 1>putting energy and mass. I would just think of it

0:27:22.280 --> 0:27:24.280
<v Speaker 1>was the other end of a pipe. Oh way, so

0:27:24.359 --> 0:27:27.960
<v Speaker 1>wormhole is kind of similar in a way. But um, again,

0:27:28.000 --> 0:27:30.840
<v Speaker 1>we haven't observed white holes, And one of the other

0:27:30.880 --> 0:27:32.919
<v Speaker 1>theories is that black holes are are kind of a

0:27:33.000 --> 0:27:36.760
<v Speaker 1>window into another universe, right, the idea being that there's

0:27:36.800 --> 0:27:39.639
<v Speaker 1>some sort of hole through our spacetime that connects to

0:27:39.720 --> 0:27:43.359
<v Speaker 1>some other perhaps space time. Perhaps it's something we can't

0:27:43.359 --> 0:27:46.880
<v Speaker 1>even fathom because it's so different from our universe. But

0:27:47.440 --> 0:27:50.360
<v Speaker 1>why The counter arguments against that is that, well, does

0:27:50.400 --> 0:27:53.320
<v Speaker 1>that mean our universe is exit only because we can't

0:27:53.359 --> 0:27:56.159
<v Speaker 1>find any entrances, We don't see any of the the

0:27:56.440 --> 0:27:58.399
<v Speaker 1>what we you would imagine would be the opposite of that,

0:27:58.440 --> 0:28:01.000
<v Speaker 1>where stuff is coming from somewhere else, although you could

0:28:01.080 --> 0:28:03.520
<v Speaker 1>argue maybe dark matter and dark energy or somewhere in there,

0:28:03.560 --> 0:28:07.320
<v Speaker 1>because we can't directly observe those at any rate. There's

0:28:07.359 --> 0:28:09.720
<v Speaker 1>the possibility that you could fly through one of these

0:28:09.720 --> 0:28:12.280
<v Speaker 1>black holes and thus travel through time, either in the

0:28:12.320 --> 0:28:14.720
<v Speaker 1>future or in the past, but you wouldn't necessarily be

0:28:14.760 --> 0:28:16.560
<v Speaker 1>able to control that at all, So it just be

0:28:16.680 --> 0:28:19.760
<v Speaker 1>kind of where every wherever and whenever you end up,

0:28:19.800 --> 0:28:22.400
<v Speaker 1>that's where and when you are. It's it's like when

0:28:22.400 --> 0:28:24.600
<v Speaker 1>the kid goes to make a suicide at the fountain

0:28:24.640 --> 0:28:27.240
<v Speaker 1>drink machine, except you're doing that with time and space. Yeah,

0:28:27.280 --> 0:28:29.560
<v Speaker 1>you just you gotta you gotta blindfold on. You don't

0:28:29.560 --> 0:28:31.919
<v Speaker 1>know how much lemonade versus Dr Pepper you're putting in

0:28:31.960 --> 0:28:36.760
<v Speaker 1>that mix. It could be delicious or it could be noxious. Yeah. Similarly,

0:28:36.800 --> 0:28:39.200
<v Speaker 1>there's the wormhole approach that I just mentioned. So wormhole

0:28:39.280 --> 0:28:42.080
<v Speaker 1>essentially is curvature of the space time into a tunnel,

0:28:42.560 --> 0:28:45.080
<v Speaker 1>where going in through one side and popping out the

0:28:45.120 --> 0:28:47.320
<v Speaker 1>other side, you would end up in a totally different

0:28:47.320 --> 0:28:50.400
<v Speaker 1>area of space time. Okay, so give us the real scoop. Wormholes.

0:28:50.440 --> 0:28:52.560
<v Speaker 1>They're in all these movies and they just they're just

0:28:52.720 --> 0:28:56.560
<v Speaker 1>magic tunnels basically, well in the movies their magic tunnels. Yeah, yeah,

0:28:56.600 --> 0:28:59.560
<v Speaker 1>what's the real deal with the wormhole? They exist? Uh?

0:28:59.600 --> 0:29:02.360
<v Speaker 1>In fact, wormholes, well we think they exist. Again we

0:29:02.360 --> 0:29:05.360
<v Speaker 1>we we haven't observed them, but mathematically, Einstein and Rosen,

0:29:05.480 --> 0:29:10.560
<v Speaker 1>who were two pretty smart dudes, uh said, said that

0:29:10.600 --> 0:29:13.120
<v Speaker 1>it's logical that they exist. Yeah, if you look at

0:29:13.160 --> 0:29:16.600
<v Speaker 1>it as like a teeny tiny lasting for a split

0:29:16.720 --> 0:29:21.920
<v Speaker 1>second basis in large particle accelerators, they technically exist. If

0:29:21.960 --> 0:29:24.000
<v Speaker 1>you didn't hear me rolling my eyes, I I just

0:29:24.080 --> 0:29:26.600
<v Speaker 1>rolled them really hard, Okay, Okay, and not that that

0:29:26.720 --> 0:29:30.520
<v Speaker 1>isn't true that is extremely true and and wonderful and beautiful,

0:29:30.640 --> 0:29:33.440
<v Speaker 1>and not particularly useful to the conversation that we're having

0:29:33.520 --> 0:29:35.520
<v Speaker 1>right now, because first of all, none of us are

0:29:35.560 --> 0:29:38.680
<v Speaker 1>Adam sized, and and second of all, we exist in

0:29:38.800 --> 0:29:44.040
<v Speaker 1>periods longer than um nanosection. So well, I'm just being pedantic.

0:29:44.160 --> 0:29:48.120
<v Speaker 1>So but yes, your point stands, Lauren, there is we

0:29:48.160 --> 0:29:50.600
<v Speaker 1>have never observed any kind of wormhole. In fact, there

0:29:50.640 --> 0:29:52.920
<v Speaker 1>may not be a style of wormhole where you could

0:29:52.920 --> 0:29:55.760
<v Speaker 1>create something that has stability that would allow you to

0:29:55.800 --> 0:29:59.120
<v Speaker 1>actually pass through it, that would have the size and

0:29:59.240 --> 0:30:02.480
<v Speaker 1>duration necessary for that to happen. Nor do we really

0:30:02.520 --> 0:30:04.640
<v Speaker 1>know what would happen if we were to pass through it. One,

0:30:04.800 --> 0:30:08.800
<v Speaker 1>don't you end up? Yes, you end up. You end

0:30:08.920 --> 0:30:12.280
<v Speaker 1>up being in the the arguably the least popular of

0:30:12.320 --> 0:30:15.400
<v Speaker 1>the Star Trek series on I guess Enterprise probably cases

0:30:15.440 --> 0:30:17.680
<v Speaker 1>a run for its money or or on a living

0:30:17.680 --> 0:30:21.640
<v Speaker 1>ship using the word frell a whole lot. But at

0:30:21.640 --> 0:30:25.720
<v Speaker 1>any rate, Uh, the the issue is, we don't know, one,

0:30:25.840 --> 0:30:28.320
<v Speaker 1>if it's even possible to create a wormhole or to

0:30:28.440 --> 0:30:30.800
<v Speaker 1>find a wormhole in nature that would allow us to

0:30:30.800 --> 0:30:32.840
<v Speaker 1>pass through it, we don't know what would happened to us.

0:30:32.880 --> 0:30:35.480
<v Speaker 1>If we did pass through it, and again you wouldn't

0:30:35.520 --> 0:30:38.200
<v Speaker 1>have the control, right unless you were able to fold

0:30:38.360 --> 0:30:43.040
<v Speaker 1>space time itself specifically to your desires, you would not

0:30:43.120 --> 0:30:45.719
<v Speaker 1>be able to determine where and when you would come

0:30:45.720 --> 0:30:47.680
<v Speaker 1>out the other side. Yet again, kind of like the

0:30:47.720 --> 0:30:49.880
<v Speaker 1>black hole. So it might be a way of traveling

0:30:49.880 --> 0:30:52.760
<v Speaker 1>through time, but again it may not be practical. Um.

0:30:52.880 --> 0:30:54.920
<v Speaker 1>And you know, in order to imagine this, this is

0:30:54.960 --> 0:30:57.040
<v Speaker 1>the always the hardest thing for me to imagine because

0:30:57.360 --> 0:30:59.280
<v Speaker 1>you have to think of space time. It's it's a

0:30:59.280 --> 0:31:03.840
<v Speaker 1>afford menstional construct as we understand it, right, Yeah, and

0:31:03.880 --> 0:31:06.520
<v Speaker 1>I've seen some pretty interesting like like gifts of this

0:31:06.640 --> 0:31:09.560
<v Speaker 1>on the internet. But but I understand that, um, that

0:31:09.560 --> 0:31:11.880
<v Speaker 1>that is not really inaccurate to pick I mean, I mean,

0:31:11.920 --> 0:31:14.240
<v Speaker 1>I have a hard enough time perceiving three dimensions and

0:31:14.360 --> 0:31:16.720
<v Speaker 1>when you add the fourth in there, and like yeah, yeah,

0:31:16.760 --> 0:31:19.720
<v Speaker 1>because it's easy enough if we reduced it to two. Right,

0:31:19.760 --> 0:31:22.880
<v Speaker 1>if we think of the standard example is you have

0:31:22.920 --> 0:31:26.040
<v Speaker 1>two people holding a sheet taught between them, and then

0:31:26.280 --> 0:31:28.000
<v Speaker 1>on top of the sheet you lay some sort of

0:31:28.000 --> 0:31:31.040
<v Speaker 1>object that has mass that that pulls the sheet down, right,

0:31:31.080 --> 0:31:34.040
<v Speaker 1>it curves, the sheet curves around the object, so even

0:31:34.040 --> 0:31:35.880
<v Speaker 1>when you're holding it tightly, you see it where it's

0:31:35.920 --> 0:31:38.120
<v Speaker 1>dipping down depending upon the mass or the weight of

0:31:38.120 --> 0:31:42.760
<v Speaker 1>the object. Uh, that determines how how much curve you get. Well,

0:31:42.800 --> 0:31:46.440
<v Speaker 1>the same thing happens in four dimensional space time, So

0:31:46.680 --> 0:31:51.800
<v Speaker 1>space itself curves around massive objects, and time does too. Uh.

0:31:51.840 --> 0:31:54.720
<v Speaker 1>It's just really hard to imagine that for one thing,

0:31:54.880 --> 0:31:57.400
<v Speaker 1>you know, even if you're able to imagine it in

0:31:57.520 --> 0:32:01.080
<v Speaker 1>some kind of abstract three dimensional way, adding a fourth dimension,

0:32:01.520 --> 0:32:04.320
<v Speaker 1>like you said, Lauren, really hard, I mean not, I

0:32:04.760 --> 0:32:07.680
<v Speaker 1>certainly it baffles me, sure, and especially once you get

0:32:07.760 --> 0:32:11.400
<v Speaker 1>past the concept of just a sheet curved by by

0:32:11.400 --> 0:32:14.880
<v Speaker 1>like a bowling ball for example. Um. Further, in order

0:32:14.920 --> 0:32:16.920
<v Speaker 1>to make a wormhole, you have to punch through the

0:32:16.960 --> 0:32:20.360
<v Speaker 1>sheet with the bowling ball to perhaps another parallel sheet

0:32:20.400 --> 0:32:21.960
<v Speaker 1>beneath it, or maybe a little bit of the sheet

0:32:22.000 --> 0:32:25.200
<v Speaker 1>that's on the floor underneath it, and then there's like

0:32:25.280 --> 0:32:28.160
<v Speaker 1>stars involved. And I don't and I don't follow. Technically

0:32:28.200 --> 0:32:30.640
<v Speaker 1>you could wrap the sheet around the bowling ball and

0:32:30.680 --> 0:32:32.320
<v Speaker 1>thus create a tunnel that way, although I don't know

0:32:32.320 --> 0:32:35.480
<v Speaker 1>that that makes it any more useful. Another way, maybe

0:32:35.520 --> 0:32:37.840
<v Speaker 1>thinking about it now, tell me if this is totally off.

0:32:37.960 --> 0:32:41.240
<v Speaker 1>Is Uh, you drill a hole in an apple, and

0:32:41.360 --> 0:32:44.400
<v Speaker 1>so if you imagine the two dimensional surface of this

0:32:44.480 --> 0:32:49.160
<v Speaker 1>apple is actually the three dimensional space world, and that

0:32:49.160 --> 0:32:51.920
<v Speaker 1>that third dimension of the apple is the fourth dimension

0:32:51.960 --> 0:32:55.440
<v Speaker 1>of time, you can sort of go through from one

0:32:55.480 --> 0:32:58.960
<v Speaker 1>side of the apple to the other. Yeah, you're I

0:32:59.000 --> 0:33:01.800
<v Speaker 1>can't wait for your time travel movie and you're you're

0:33:01.840 --> 0:33:05.640
<v Speaker 1>gonna call it the core and the discappointed to find

0:33:05.680 --> 0:33:08.320
<v Speaker 1>out there's already a movie called that, and there's already

0:33:08.360 --> 0:33:13.160
<v Speaker 1>a worm in there. That's true. So uh, anyway, wormholes

0:33:13.200 --> 0:33:16.320
<v Speaker 1>again very much hypothetical when it comes to time travel.

0:33:16.560 --> 0:33:20.240
<v Speaker 1>There's also the closed time like curves that we mentioned earlier.

0:33:20.520 --> 0:33:24.360
<v Speaker 1>So this is um an interesting concept. Comes back to

0:33:24.400 --> 0:33:27.760
<v Speaker 1>another another big thinker, right, it's it's not a it's

0:33:27.760 --> 0:33:30.440
<v Speaker 1>not a new concept. Some of the ways of explaining

0:33:30.440 --> 0:33:32.680
<v Speaker 1>how to make it work are very new, but it

0:33:32.760 --> 0:33:35.080
<v Speaker 1>might date back as far as like the nineteen forties

0:33:35.240 --> 0:33:39.640
<v Speaker 1>with um Kurt Girdle, who was a buddy of Albert Einstein,

0:33:40.000 --> 0:33:44.520
<v Speaker 1>pretty pretty smart and a little bit nutty mathematician who

0:33:44.800 --> 0:33:47.920
<v Speaker 1>was was talking about the geometry and movement of the

0:33:48.000 --> 0:33:51.720
<v Speaker 1>universe and and put forth the idea that these loops

0:33:52.080 --> 0:33:54.680
<v Speaker 1>might exist, like like if you had a long enough

0:33:54.800 --> 0:33:58.440
<v Speaker 1>journey um due to the way that that the universe

0:33:58.480 --> 0:34:02.040
<v Speaker 1>he thought might spin, that you could loop back on time,

0:34:02.480 --> 0:34:05.600
<v Speaker 1>right and Uh, then we have the entrance of string

0:34:05.680 --> 0:34:10.400
<v Speaker 1>theory into the idea of these closed timelike curves. So

0:34:10.520 --> 0:34:13.799
<v Speaker 1>string theory, it's we're not gonna go too far into it.

0:34:13.800 --> 0:34:15.760
<v Speaker 1>We could do a whole episode on string theory too.

0:34:16.000 --> 0:34:18.280
<v Speaker 1>But a string theory, you can imagine that all matter

0:34:18.320 --> 0:34:20.040
<v Speaker 1>in the universe and talking about all the way down

0:34:20.080 --> 0:34:23.439
<v Speaker 1>to sub atomic particles, is made up of these these

0:34:23.440 --> 0:34:27.520
<v Speaker 1>strings that are either either open ended or they're closed

0:34:27.560 --> 0:34:30.279
<v Speaker 1>in loops. Uh, and they vibrate in different ways, and

0:34:30.320 --> 0:34:34.040
<v Speaker 1>you know, superstring theory. Supersymmetrical string theory suggests that the

0:34:34.160 --> 0:34:37.319
<v Speaker 1>vibrations of the strings are what determine what kind of

0:34:37.760 --> 0:34:41.920
<v Speaker 1>subotomic particle gets represented. For instance, protons vibrate, the strings

0:34:42.000 --> 0:34:46.239
<v Speaker 1>vibrate one way, electrons they vibrate another way. Anyway. One

0:34:46.239 --> 0:34:50.520
<v Speaker 1>of the concepts here is that by using cosmic strings,

0:34:50.560 --> 0:34:54.399
<v Speaker 1>either two of them very close together or one sort

0:34:54.400 --> 0:34:56.719
<v Speaker 1>of attached to a black hole, you could put them

0:34:56.760 --> 0:35:00.440
<v Speaker 1>under such pressure that you create this closed time like curve.

0:35:00.560 --> 0:35:04.200
<v Speaker 1>In the universe, which if you were to travel using

0:35:04.239 --> 0:35:07.279
<v Speaker 1>this close time like curve, you could move back to

0:35:07.320 --> 0:35:10.399
<v Speaker 1>the point of origin in both space and time when

0:35:10.440 --> 0:35:13.319
<v Speaker 1>that curve was created. So you could travel back in

0:35:13.400 --> 0:35:17.120
<v Speaker 1>time up to the point when that curve was created.

0:35:17.120 --> 0:35:20.479
<v Speaker 1>You could not travel further back because the curve wasn't

0:35:20.520 --> 0:35:23.640
<v Speaker 1>around before then, right, unless a dinosaur did this for you,

0:35:23.640 --> 0:35:26.200
<v Speaker 1>you couldn't go back to the time of dinosaurs exactly.

0:35:26.280 --> 0:35:29.400
<v Speaker 1>So in other words, if I built one today the

0:35:29.480 --> 0:35:32.480
<v Speaker 1>furthest back I could travel would be today. I wouldn't

0:35:32.520 --> 0:35:35.040
<v Speaker 1>be able to go back to yesterday, but any time

0:35:35.360 --> 0:35:38.800
<v Speaker 1>from here forward, assuming I have a way of harnessing

0:35:38.840 --> 0:35:41.919
<v Speaker 1>that I could travel backward. Uh, this could become really

0:35:42.000 --> 0:35:45.560
<v Speaker 1>useful if you have a short term plan of making

0:35:45.600 --> 0:35:48.839
<v Speaker 1>a lot of mistakes, and you want to be able

0:35:48.880 --> 0:35:51.000
<v Speaker 1>to go back and try a lot of different options

0:35:51.040 --> 0:35:53.480
<v Speaker 1>before you settle on whichever one is going to be

0:35:53.280 --> 0:35:56.200
<v Speaker 1>the least harmful of all the mistakes you're gonna make.

0:35:56.520 --> 0:35:59.600
<v Speaker 1>Sort of like creating a safe point. Yes exactly, Yes,

0:35:59.640 --> 0:36:01.680
<v Speaker 1>you've got three doors ahead of you, and you know

0:36:01.760 --> 0:36:05.040
<v Speaker 1>two of them lead to certain death. But wait a second.

0:36:05.120 --> 0:36:07.399
<v Speaker 1>Every time you go back a few minutes. Is there

0:36:07.400 --> 0:36:09.560
<v Speaker 1>another one of you there that you have to kill

0:36:09.600 --> 0:36:12.680
<v Speaker 1>before you can make the decision? An excellent question. I

0:36:12.719 --> 0:36:15.840
<v Speaker 1>don't know the answer to that. Uh you know, again,

0:36:15.880 --> 0:36:18.520
<v Speaker 1>this ends up being very much hypothetical. Obviously, no one

0:36:18.560 --> 0:36:21.560
<v Speaker 1>has actually created one of these closed time like curves

0:36:21.600 --> 0:36:24.920
<v Speaker 1>that they could travel around it and go back into time.

0:36:24.920 --> 0:36:27.839
<v Speaker 1>And uh so it's again very much kind of a

0:36:28.080 --> 0:36:32.719
<v Speaker 1>philosophical and scholarly discussion, not a practical discussion. Okay, So

0:36:32.840 --> 0:36:36.160
<v Speaker 1>I wanna raise an issue, which is that all of

0:36:36.200 --> 0:36:40.080
<v Speaker 1>these things that seem even remotely close to plausible do

0:36:40.160 --> 0:36:42.719
<v Speaker 1>not happen to be the kind of machines you can

0:36:42.760 --> 0:36:46.200
<v Speaker 1>build in your garage, like in the very Victorian kind

0:36:46.200 --> 0:36:49.480
<v Speaker 1>of looking or or or primer like I brought up earlier.

0:36:49.560 --> 0:36:52.160
<v Speaker 1>You know, some people in their garage want to build

0:36:52.200 --> 0:36:55.520
<v Speaker 1>a time machine. It doesn't seem like that's the kind

0:36:55.600 --> 0:36:58.719
<v Speaker 1>of thing that lets you travel through time. This is

0:36:58.760 --> 0:37:01.520
<v Speaker 1>the closed time like her of where you wouldn't be

0:37:01.520 --> 0:37:03.799
<v Speaker 1>building one of those in your garage. But maybe you're

0:37:03.840 --> 0:37:08.000
<v Speaker 1>building a spaceship in your garage. Well, I guess you

0:37:08.000 --> 0:37:10.120
<v Speaker 1>could build a spaceship in your garage to go to

0:37:10.680 --> 0:37:15.040
<v Speaker 1>occur ring you know, yeah, something like that, but it's

0:37:15.040 --> 0:37:17.480
<v Speaker 1>not a time machine in the sense of, like you

0:37:17.719 --> 0:37:22.160
<v Speaker 1>set a dial to nineteen fifty seven. I wonder if

0:37:22.200 --> 0:37:26.960
<v Speaker 1>this is because time itself exists in a relativistic framework,

0:37:27.040 --> 0:37:31.520
<v Speaker 1>and you might need relativistic forces which means really really

0:37:31.600 --> 0:37:36.680
<v Speaker 1>huge or really really energetic, in order to manipulate it. Yeah,

0:37:36.719 --> 0:37:40.040
<v Speaker 1>there's some studies that have suggested that if you wanted

0:37:40.080 --> 0:37:42.440
<v Speaker 1>a time machine, you would have to harness the equivalent

0:37:42.480 --> 0:37:44.520
<v Speaker 1>amount of power that you would find in a galaxy

0:37:44.880 --> 0:37:48.120
<v Speaker 1>in order to make it work, which is not necessarily practical.

0:37:48.200 --> 0:37:50.759
<v Speaker 1>We think we have energy problems now, but when it

0:37:50.840 --> 0:37:52.320
<v Speaker 1>comes to you know, I want to go back to

0:37:52.400 --> 0:37:55.960
<v Speaker 1>last Thursday, but I need to harness the power of

0:37:56.000 --> 0:37:58.920
<v Speaker 1>an entire inner galaxy to do it. It's certainly not

0:37:58.960 --> 0:38:02.200
<v Speaker 1>convenient from your girl. Okay, So, folks, if you want

0:38:02.239 --> 0:38:05.000
<v Speaker 1>to know how what we have to do in order

0:38:05.040 --> 0:38:07.560
<v Speaker 1>to create time travel, go listen to our episode on

0:38:07.600 --> 0:38:10.600
<v Speaker 1>the Cards Show scale. We need to get to CARDASSHEV

0:38:10.800 --> 0:38:14.080
<v Speaker 1>level three and then we'll have time travel. Well, assuming

0:38:14.080 --> 0:38:18.400
<v Speaker 1>that no one else wants to do anything. Right. Hey, guys, guys,

0:38:18.600 --> 0:38:21.200
<v Speaker 1>I know you're really crazy about your iPhones. And your

0:38:21.280 --> 0:38:23.799
<v Speaker 1>kindles and your internets. But we're going to turn all

0:38:23.800 --> 0:38:25.600
<v Speaker 1>that off so I can go back to last off

0:38:25.640 --> 0:38:29.680
<v Speaker 1>the galact of irrigation systems and all the life support. Now,

0:38:29.719 --> 0:38:32.320
<v Speaker 1>what what if we what if all this this talk

0:38:32.440 --> 0:38:35.480
<v Speaker 1>is truly moot? What if? What if there is no

0:38:35.560 --> 0:38:39.879
<v Speaker 1>such thing as the future or the past, only the now? Well,

0:38:39.880 --> 0:38:44.000
<v Speaker 1>that was Girdle's idea, actually, he he suggested that the

0:38:44.080 --> 0:38:46.479
<v Speaker 1>end result of his model of the universe UM, which

0:38:46.520 --> 0:38:49.120
<v Speaker 1>which branched, by the way from from Einstein's theory of

0:38:49.280 --> 0:38:54.080
<v Speaker 1>general relativity UM, is that since time travel is hypothetically

0:38:54.120 --> 0:38:58.200
<v Speaker 1>possible within the realms of physics as we understand them,

0:38:58.280 --> 0:39:04.560
<v Speaker 1>therefore time it's as we understand it cannot exist. Yeah,

0:39:04.800 --> 0:39:07.720
<v Speaker 1>I mean, that's that's the The idea is that nothing

0:39:08.200 --> 0:39:10.360
<v Speaker 1>is ever really in the past or in the future

0:39:11.800 --> 0:39:16.680
<v Speaker 1>because time travel can exist, uh and and and therefore

0:39:17.040 --> 0:39:19.319
<v Speaker 1>the past and future don't exist. So, in other words,

0:39:19.320 --> 0:39:22.240
<v Speaker 1>it would be that you again a time time travel device,

0:39:22.280 --> 0:39:24.719
<v Speaker 1>but you'd have no destination to go to. There be

0:39:25.200 --> 0:39:27.160
<v Speaker 1>There'll be no place to go to because there is

0:39:27.200 --> 0:39:30.400
<v Speaker 1>no past in the sense of a a point in

0:39:30.480 --> 0:39:33.759
<v Speaker 1>space time that still is relevant. I'd argue there is

0:39:33.800 --> 0:39:36.960
<v Speaker 1>no present, that there is no now. Well, you know what,

0:39:37.040 --> 0:39:40.359
<v Speaker 1>Einstein would agree with you, in the sense that simultaneity

0:39:40.400 --> 0:39:43.760
<v Speaker 1>is as a concept that doesn't work in Einstein's model

0:39:43.840 --> 0:39:46.600
<v Speaker 1>with general relativity because it all depends upon your point

0:39:46.600 --> 0:39:49.319
<v Speaker 1>of reference subjective. Right, yeah, h well, andy, I mean

0:39:49.360 --> 0:39:51.759
<v Speaker 1>if you try to, I mean, if you actually just

0:39:51.800 --> 0:39:55.120
<v Speaker 1>sit down and try to think, Okay, what is happening now?

0:39:56.880 --> 0:40:00.400
<v Speaker 1>There there is no now and more sitting here. The

0:40:00.400 --> 0:40:03.759
<v Speaker 1>more you try to examine the idea of an instant

0:40:03.840 --> 0:40:07.160
<v Speaker 1>of now, it just slips through your It's another one

0:40:07.200 --> 0:40:09.440
<v Speaker 1>of those things where you know, in order you sit

0:40:09.480 --> 0:40:12.080
<v Speaker 1>there and think of it on the scale of all right,

0:40:12.160 --> 0:40:14.319
<v Speaker 1>let's take let's take a unit of time. Let's say

0:40:14.400 --> 0:40:16.400
<v Speaker 1>it's a minute. All right, well, let's let's break that down.

0:40:16.960 --> 0:40:19.480
<v Speaker 1>What's happening this very second? And then you think, wait,

0:40:19.560 --> 0:40:21.399
<v Speaker 1>you know, you can actually break a second down into

0:40:21.480 --> 0:40:24.320
<v Speaker 1>smaller and smaller slivers, and you just keep thinking that, well,

0:40:24.360 --> 0:40:27.200
<v Speaker 1>technically you can just keep reducing be half over and

0:40:27.320 --> 0:40:30.360
<v Speaker 1>over and over. Paradox Yeah. Yeah, you get to a

0:40:30.400 --> 0:40:33.560
<v Speaker 1>point where it's not perceptible by humans by any stretch

0:40:33.600 --> 0:40:36.719
<v Speaker 1>of the imagination, but it's still happening, and it's still

0:40:36.719 --> 0:40:39.399
<v Speaker 1>significant in a mathematical sense. Yeah. So then you think, well,

0:40:39.440 --> 0:40:42.040
<v Speaker 1>wait a minute, how did I ever get from? Especially

0:40:42.080 --> 0:40:44.680
<v Speaker 1>when you start getting really far away from units of

0:40:44.719 --> 0:40:47.080
<v Speaker 1>time that we can perceive, you think, how is anything

0:40:47.120 --> 0:40:51.320
<v Speaker 1>ever happening? Ever? Yeah, I mean when the past nanosecond

0:40:51.400 --> 0:40:56.040
<v Speaker 1>transitions to the next nanosecond, what's that? What's now in

0:40:56.120 --> 0:40:59.160
<v Speaker 1>between them? See, that's where a lot of other science

0:40:59.160 --> 0:41:01.719
<v Speaker 1>fiction comes in, where you have entire worlds that are

0:41:01.760 --> 0:41:05.600
<v Speaker 1>existing and and and growing and falling apart in the

0:41:05.640 --> 0:41:09.360
<v Speaker 1>time between the seconds. So it's a it's there existing

0:41:09.360 --> 0:41:11.600
<v Speaker 1>in a in a way that is imperceptible to the

0:41:11.600 --> 0:41:14.360
<v Speaker 1>rest of us because we we only see the seconds.

0:41:14.360 --> 0:41:17.760
<v Speaker 1>We can't see what's in between them. That's great stuff.

0:41:17.880 --> 0:41:20.560
<v Speaker 1>But anyway, that the point being that when it comes

0:41:20.600 --> 0:41:23.680
<v Speaker 1>down to is time travel possible? Will we ever see

0:41:23.680 --> 0:41:26.440
<v Speaker 1>time travel? There's still a lot of disagreement on it.

0:41:26.560 --> 0:41:29.839
<v Speaker 1>You know, mathematically, according to the laws of physics as

0:41:29.880 --> 0:41:33.640
<v Speaker 1>we understand them, including Einstein's theories of relativity, there's nothing

0:41:33.719 --> 0:41:38.000
<v Speaker 1>that expressly forbids it from being possible. Well, again, I

0:41:38.040 --> 0:41:40.279
<v Speaker 1>want to stick with what I said earlier, is that

0:41:41.400 --> 0:41:43.760
<v Speaker 1>I feel pretty good about time travel into the future.

0:41:43.840 --> 0:41:46.600
<v Speaker 1>I'm very skeptical about time travel into the past, well,

0:41:46.680 --> 0:41:49.560
<v Speaker 1>especially since you know, as far as we can say,

0:41:49.600 --> 0:41:52.600
<v Speaker 1>there's no there's no evidence that we can point to

0:41:52.719 --> 0:41:54.600
<v Speaker 1>that it's ever happened before. And you would imagine that

0:41:54.640 --> 0:41:56.759
<v Speaker 1>if it's in fact possible, someone from the future would

0:41:56.800 --> 0:41:59.640
<v Speaker 1>have traveled back in time. Their counter arguments against that too,

0:41:59.719 --> 0:42:03.480
<v Speaker 1>but you can find them posting on the internet. Let's

0:42:03.480 --> 0:42:05.799
<v Speaker 1>not go into that. I've done a whole podcast about that.

0:42:06.200 --> 0:42:10.200
<v Speaker 1>But uh yeah, so, but you know, the classic argument

0:42:10.320 --> 0:42:13.480
<v Speaker 1>is that if time travel ever is possible to go,

0:42:13.640 --> 0:42:15.359
<v Speaker 1>you know, if it's ever possible to travel back into

0:42:15.400 --> 0:42:19.799
<v Speaker 1>the past, then sometime travel traveler from the future needs

0:42:19.800 --> 0:42:21.960
<v Speaker 1>to come back to this time when we're recording this

0:42:22.160 --> 0:42:25.960
<v Speaker 1>right now and knock on our door right now. Oh,

0:42:26.080 --> 0:42:29.640
<v Speaker 1>son of up, Now that was me. I'm just kidding. No,

0:42:29.640 --> 0:42:32.920
<v Speaker 1>one was actually at the door. No, but that's the art.

0:42:33.160 --> 0:42:38.040
<v Speaker 1>If some horrible reptilian did bust in and say, I'm well,

0:42:38.120 --> 0:42:40.040
<v Speaker 1>that would be you two, I'd be like, hey, look

0:42:40.280 --> 0:42:43.799
<v Speaker 1>for the record, I did not make fun of retilience. Yeah,

0:42:43.800 --> 0:42:49.840
<v Speaker 1>I know that would be Yeah, so really, you're just

0:42:49.880 --> 0:42:52.719
<v Speaker 1>telling me I gotta get new co hosts. Uh all right,

0:42:53.000 --> 0:42:55.160
<v Speaker 1>So anyway, this, do you guys have anything else you

0:42:55.160 --> 0:42:56.719
<v Speaker 1>want to say about time travel? I mean, this is

0:42:56.760 --> 0:43:00.600
<v Speaker 1>this is one of those fun things to talk about, because, like,

0:43:01.040 --> 0:43:04.120
<v Speaker 1>you start feeling pretty confident, right, the stuff that you

0:43:04.160 --> 0:43:09.160
<v Speaker 1>can intuitively grasp, You're you're, you're, you're zooming along. You're like, okay,

0:43:09.160 --> 0:43:11.400
<v Speaker 1>this makes sense. Then you start getting into some of

0:43:11.400 --> 0:43:14.279
<v Speaker 1>the math and you think, okay, wait, intuitively that makes

0:43:14.280 --> 0:43:16.320
<v Speaker 1>no sense, even though the math itself works out. And

0:43:16.360 --> 0:43:18.520
<v Speaker 1>then the further you go, the more you're like, Okay,

0:43:18.520 --> 0:43:21.319
<v Speaker 1>now I don't even know what I'm thinking anymore. Our

0:43:21.400 --> 0:43:24.600
<v Speaker 1>intuitions are great when we need to get the groceries.

0:43:24.640 --> 0:43:26.680
<v Speaker 1>They are not very good when we need to solve

0:43:26.760 --> 0:43:30.560
<v Speaker 1>questions about time and space. Yeah, it's very true. Things

0:43:30.600 --> 0:43:33.400
<v Speaker 1>on the cosmological scale and on the quantum scale often

0:43:33.680 --> 0:43:38.200
<v Speaker 1>are they defy our intuition because our our experience is

0:43:38.239 --> 0:43:41.719
<v Speaker 1>not on that those scales. Yeah, there's no reason our

0:43:41.760 --> 0:43:45.560
<v Speaker 1>ancestors on this planet ever had to think about time travel.

0:43:46.200 --> 0:43:49.960
<v Speaker 1>The monolith just appeared and then let's you just go

0:43:50.080 --> 0:43:53.759
<v Speaker 1>from there. Well, anyway, that wraps up our discussion on

0:43:53.960 --> 0:43:58.600
<v Speaker 1>time travel. So the jury is still out. Technically, again, mathematically,

0:43:58.719 --> 0:44:02.960
<v Speaker 1>there's nothing that specifically says this is completely off limits. Practically,

0:44:03.280 --> 0:44:06.040
<v Speaker 1>could very well be that there's no practical way to

0:44:06.040 --> 0:44:09.000
<v Speaker 1>do it, and certainly we don't have any evidence of

0:44:09.040 --> 0:44:11.640
<v Speaker 1>it that we can point to. And even if there

0:44:11.719 --> 0:44:14.080
<v Speaker 1>is a practical way to do it, that that practical

0:44:14.200 --> 0:44:18.040
<v Speaker 1>is in extreme scare quotes, because because practical like blowing

0:44:18.120 --> 0:44:22.320
<v Speaker 1>up the galaxy is not necessarily right. That's that's not

0:44:22.320 --> 0:44:25.080
<v Speaker 1>not in my book. That doesn't fall under the category

0:44:25.080 --> 0:44:28.200
<v Speaker 1>of practical. But anyway, if you guys have any suggestions

0:44:28.239 --> 0:44:31.239
<v Speaker 1>for future episodes, you've got some sort of futuristic topic

0:44:31.320 --> 0:44:33.600
<v Speaker 1>you think we should tackle, let us know. Send us

0:44:33.600 --> 0:44:37.040
<v Speaker 1>an email or addresses f W Thinking at Discovery dot com,

0:44:37.160 --> 0:44:39.360
<v Speaker 1>or drop us a line on the social networks we

0:44:39.480 --> 0:44:43.160
<v Speaker 1>frequent Those include Facebook, Twitter, and Google Plus. We have

0:44:43.280 --> 0:44:45.960
<v Speaker 1>the handle f W thinking at all three of those,

0:44:46.360 --> 0:44:49.320
<v Speaker 1>and we will talk to you again in the future

0:44:49.360 --> 0:44:56.480
<v Speaker 1>May the Beast. For more on this topic and the

0:44:56.520 --> 0:45:10.439
<v Speaker 1>future of technology, visit Forward Thinking dot Com Problems brought

0:45:10.480 --> 0:45:13.000
<v Speaker 1>to you by Toyota. Let's go places