WEBVTT - TechStuff Tidbits: Superconductivity and LK-99

0:00:04.440 --> 0:00:12.280
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to tech Stuff, a production from iHeartRadio. Hey there,

0:00:12.320 --> 0:00:15.520
<v Speaker 1>and welcome to tech Stuff. I'm your host, Jonathan Strickland.

0:00:15.600 --> 0:00:18.680
<v Speaker 1>I'm an executive producer with iHeartRadio. And how the tech

0:00:18.720 --> 0:00:21.400
<v Speaker 1>are you. It's time for a tech Stuff Tidbits episode.

0:00:21.400 --> 0:00:25.000
<v Speaker 1>But this one's about a pretty complicated topic. And y'all,

0:00:25.040 --> 0:00:28.720
<v Speaker 1>we could be at the beginning of a transformational moment

0:00:29.360 --> 0:00:34.519
<v Speaker 1>within technology, one that potentially could lead to truly incredible results.

0:00:35.520 --> 0:00:37.680
<v Speaker 1>Or it's possible we could just be waiting to find

0:00:37.680 --> 0:00:41.200
<v Speaker 1>out that a promising experiment isn't really what we thought

0:00:41.240 --> 0:00:45.920
<v Speaker 1>it was. And this all centers around super conductivity. Now,

0:00:45.920 --> 0:00:49.120
<v Speaker 1>to understand super conductivity, we first have to talk about

0:00:49.159 --> 0:00:53.960
<v Speaker 1>just plain old conductivity the Clark Kent super Conductivity's cal

0:00:54.160 --> 0:00:58.959
<v Speaker 1>l and we're specifically talking about electrical conductivity rather than

0:00:59.160 --> 0:01:03.400
<v Speaker 1>thermal conductctivity for this episode. So we say a material

0:01:03.560 --> 0:01:06.360
<v Speaker 1>is conductive if it is well suited to allow an

0:01:06.400 --> 0:01:11.560
<v Speaker 1>electric charge to pass through it. Materials that resist electrical

0:01:11.640 --> 0:01:16.360
<v Speaker 1>charges passing through them are insulators. In Between conductors and insulators,

0:01:16.400 --> 0:01:19.840
<v Speaker 1>you've got your semiconductors, which can behave like a conductor

0:01:19.920 --> 0:01:23.520
<v Speaker 1>under certain conditions and like a resistor under others. So

0:01:24.080 --> 0:01:28.240
<v Speaker 1>a good conductor will allow electric charge through pretty easily,

0:01:28.600 --> 0:01:32.360
<v Speaker 1>but some of that energy in that electrical charge will

0:01:32.440 --> 0:01:36.440
<v Speaker 1>end up converting into heat and you lose that. This

0:01:36.600 --> 0:01:41.600
<v Speaker 1>is because even good conductors like copper still have some

0:01:42.080 --> 0:01:45.760
<v Speaker 1>electrical resistance. You can actually affect the amount of electrical

0:01:45.840 --> 0:01:49.400
<v Speaker 1>resistance by changing the physical properties of the copper itself.

0:01:50.160 --> 0:01:53.880
<v Speaker 1>For example, a very thin copper wire will have higher

0:01:53.920 --> 0:01:57.880
<v Speaker 1>electrical resistance than a thick copper cable. It's made out

0:01:57.880 --> 0:02:00.880
<v Speaker 1>of the same stuff, but the actual physical properties change things,

0:02:01.320 --> 0:02:04.800
<v Speaker 1>but it still will have electrical resistance either way. And

0:02:04.920 --> 0:02:09.400
<v Speaker 1>some of our appliances, like say toasters, they rely on

0:02:09.680 --> 0:02:12.600
<v Speaker 1>electrical resistance. We purposefully build them so that they have

0:02:12.639 --> 0:02:15.920
<v Speaker 1>these metal coils inside that heat up as we pass

0:02:15.960 --> 0:02:19.440
<v Speaker 1>an electrical current through them, and that ends up toasting

0:02:19.480 --> 0:02:23.880
<v Speaker 1>your bread. The electrical resistance causes some of the charge

0:02:24.040 --> 0:02:27.120
<v Speaker 1>to convert into heat, so then you can toast your

0:02:27.480 --> 0:02:32.359
<v Speaker 1>toast and make your belts or whatever. Resistance means that

0:02:32.440 --> 0:02:35.959
<v Speaker 1>it is impossible for us to build a perfectly efficient

0:02:36.040 --> 0:02:40.040
<v Speaker 1>electrical system under what I would call normal circumstances, like

0:02:40.160 --> 0:02:46.840
<v Speaker 1>every day type circumstances and very very specific circumstances, we

0:02:46.919 --> 0:02:50.560
<v Speaker 1>can achieve it, but it is a lot of work

0:02:50.600 --> 0:02:54.520
<v Speaker 1>and we'll get there. But under normal circumstances, we're always

0:02:54.520 --> 0:02:57.960
<v Speaker 1>going to lose some energy due to electrical resistance. You know,

0:02:58.000 --> 0:03:01.360
<v Speaker 1>it's going to boil off heat. And this is why

0:03:01.480 --> 0:03:05.240
<v Speaker 1>lead gamers out there have to invest in really effective

0:03:05.320 --> 0:03:08.239
<v Speaker 1>cooling systems for their gaming rigs. Sometimes they get those

0:03:08.520 --> 0:03:12.280
<v Speaker 1>like crazy water cooling systems. The over clockers out there

0:03:12.360 --> 0:03:16.639
<v Speaker 1>might even play with like liquid nitrogen for usually an

0:03:16.680 --> 0:03:19.440
<v Speaker 1>exhibition type thing. It's not something they would do for

0:03:19.560 --> 0:03:22.400
<v Speaker 1>every day, but yeah, they have to deal with that

0:03:22.480 --> 0:03:26.680
<v Speaker 1>because their gaming rigs have countless circuits in them. Like

0:03:26.720 --> 0:03:29.280
<v Speaker 1>when you think of a CPU or a GPU, you know,

0:03:29.400 --> 0:03:32.960
<v Speaker 1>central processing unit or graphics processing unit. Essentially those are

0:03:33.000 --> 0:03:38.200
<v Speaker 1>chips with just millions or billions of little circuits in them,

0:03:38.760 --> 0:03:42.800
<v Speaker 1>and if you don't take the heat away from those circuits,

0:03:43.040 --> 0:03:45.360
<v Speaker 1>then it's going to overheat and stuff is going to

0:03:45.400 --> 0:03:48.600
<v Speaker 1>wear out, it's going to go wrong, it's gonna shut down.

0:03:48.960 --> 0:03:50.520
<v Speaker 1>So you have to have a way to manage the

0:03:50.560 --> 0:03:53.360
<v Speaker 1>heat in the system. And that's why you've got these

0:03:53.400 --> 0:03:55.920
<v Speaker 1>these great cooling systems and these gaming rigs and other

0:03:56.000 --> 0:03:59.920
<v Speaker 1>types of computers. So under normal circumstances, an electrical can

0:04:00.320 --> 0:04:03.240
<v Speaker 1>we'll serve as a pathway for electricity. But you aren't

0:04:03.280 --> 0:04:06.000
<v Speaker 1>going to get the same amount of electricity out as

0:04:06.040 --> 0:04:08.240
<v Speaker 1>you put into it. There's always going to be less

0:04:08.240 --> 0:04:11.880
<v Speaker 1>electricity coming out the other side because of the fact

0:04:11.880 --> 0:04:16.200
<v Speaker 1>you lose some of it due to heat. Unless and

0:04:16.240 --> 0:04:17.840
<v Speaker 1>this is where we have to go back in time.

0:04:18.080 --> 0:04:21.200
<v Speaker 1>In fact, I don't think we've used the tech stuff

0:04:21.200 --> 0:04:24.480
<v Speaker 1>time machine in a few years. Looks like I still

0:04:24.480 --> 0:04:26.680
<v Speaker 1>got it over there in the corner. It's holding one

0:04:26.680 --> 0:04:30.600
<v Speaker 1>of my guitars. Let me just just move that up.

0:04:31.320 --> 0:04:35.000
<v Speaker 1>Oh it's okay, right there, we go and get in

0:04:35.279 --> 0:04:39.160
<v Speaker 1>and all right, let's set the dial to nineteen eleven.

0:04:39.279 --> 0:04:53.880
<v Speaker 1>Here we go. Okay, we're in nineteen eleven, and here

0:04:53.920 --> 0:04:58.520
<v Speaker 1>we see a Dutch physicist. His name is Oh no, okay,

0:04:58.520 --> 0:05:00.480
<v Speaker 1>I'm going to get this totally wrong. Just saying it

0:05:00.560 --> 0:05:05.160
<v Speaker 1>right up front, I cannot pronounce Dutch names, but I'm

0:05:05.200 --> 0:05:07.120
<v Speaker 1>going to give it a try. Just know that this

0:05:07.200 --> 0:05:10.359
<v Speaker 1>is not the right pronunciation, and I understand, and I

0:05:10.440 --> 0:05:12.960
<v Speaker 1>know it's terrible. You don't have to tell me anyway.

0:05:13.400 --> 0:05:18.479
<v Speaker 1>Haika common link on us and he's leading a research

0:05:18.520 --> 0:05:21.880
<v Speaker 1>team and they're studying the effects of very very cold

0:05:21.880 --> 0:05:28.240
<v Speaker 1>temperatures on electrical conductivity, I mean, like exceedingly cold temperatures.

0:05:28.360 --> 0:05:32.120
<v Speaker 1>So his team is currently cooling a sample of mercury

0:05:32.680 --> 0:05:37.719
<v Speaker 1>to minus two sixty nine degrees celsius. That's four point

0:05:38.000 --> 0:05:42.880
<v Speaker 1>two kelvin, so we're not that much higher than absolute zero,

0:05:43.080 --> 0:05:46.359
<v Speaker 1>like the temperature of deep space. And his team is

0:05:46.400 --> 0:05:52.640
<v Speaker 1>now observing that at this temperature, mercury's resistance drops to zero.

0:05:53.080 --> 0:05:57.159
<v Speaker 1>It no longer has electrical resistance. It has become a

0:05:57.320 --> 0:06:03.320
<v Speaker 1>perfectly efficient conductor for electricity, a superconductor. And it turns

0:06:03.400 --> 0:06:07.719
<v Speaker 1>out that below a specific critical temperature, and that temperature

0:06:07.800 --> 0:06:10.240
<v Speaker 1>depends upon the material that we're using at the time,

0:06:11.080 --> 0:06:14.720
<v Speaker 1>the conductor will go through a fundamental change that means

0:06:14.720 --> 0:06:20.160
<v Speaker 1>they no longer offer resistance to electrical charges. Why, well,

0:06:20.160 --> 0:06:23.040
<v Speaker 1>that's a darn good question to answer that. Let's get

0:06:23.080 --> 0:06:25.159
<v Speaker 1>back to present day. All right, everyone back in the

0:06:25.160 --> 0:06:40.960
<v Speaker 1>time machine. Here we go. Oh it's hotter than I remember. Okay, Well,

0:06:41.040 --> 0:06:43.960
<v Speaker 1>now here we are. So our understanding of physics at

0:06:43.960 --> 0:06:49.159
<v Speaker 1>the time of this discovery of superconductivity had no explanation

0:06:49.640 --> 0:06:52.520
<v Speaker 1>as to why this would happen, or how it happens,

0:06:52.600 --> 0:06:56.799
<v Speaker 1>or in fact, even what was happening on a granular level.

0:06:56.839 --> 0:06:59.440
<v Speaker 1>I mean, we knew that resistance was dropping to zero,

0:07:00.080 --> 0:07:02.599
<v Speaker 1>but he didn't know what was happening to cause that.

0:07:03.400 --> 0:07:07.640
<v Speaker 1>Even quantum theory shrugged and said, beats me, daddy, Oh,

0:07:07.760 --> 0:07:09.880
<v Speaker 1>I got no idea. It would actually take a few

0:07:09.960 --> 0:07:13.480
<v Speaker 1>decades before some researchers proposed a hypothesis regarding what was

0:07:13.520 --> 0:07:19.200
<v Speaker 1>going on. And well, their hypothesis, while good, doesn't cover everything,

0:07:19.800 --> 0:07:23.400
<v Speaker 1>but anyway, between nineteen eleven and nineteen fifty seven. Nineteen

0:07:23.400 --> 0:07:26.400
<v Speaker 1>fifty seven is when we would get that hypothesis. There

0:07:26.480 --> 0:07:30.280
<v Speaker 1>was another discovery relating to superconductivity that was really neat.

0:07:30.520 --> 0:07:35.920
<v Speaker 1>Two German scientists, Walter Meisner and Robert Oxenfeld found that

0:07:36.000 --> 0:07:40.000
<v Speaker 1>when a conductor was cooled to that superconductor state, when

0:07:40.040 --> 0:07:44.160
<v Speaker 1>it dropped below its critical temperature, it would also expel

0:07:44.600 --> 0:07:49.480
<v Speaker 1>magnetic fields. So we've talked a lot about electromagnetism in

0:07:49.520 --> 0:07:53.560
<v Speaker 1>this podcast. Right, If you pass a conductive material through

0:07:53.560 --> 0:07:57.960
<v Speaker 1>a magnetic field, the magnetic field induces current to flow

0:07:58.000 --> 0:08:01.960
<v Speaker 1>through the conductor. What allows us to make things like

0:08:02.040 --> 0:08:08.280
<v Speaker 1>electrical transformers. In alternating current transmission. We also know that

0:08:08.440 --> 0:08:12.640
<v Speaker 1>an electric charge moving through a conductor generates a magnetic field.

0:08:12.720 --> 0:08:15.160
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I'm sure everyone out there has done some

0:08:15.360 --> 0:08:19.600
<v Speaker 1>version of the physics experiment where you take copper wire

0:08:19.840 --> 0:08:23.680
<v Speaker 1>and you wind it around an iron nail, and you

0:08:23.720 --> 0:08:26.080
<v Speaker 1>connect the wire to a battery, and now you've got

0:08:26.120 --> 0:08:30.680
<v Speaker 1>yourself an electromagnet. So there's this beautiful relationship between electricity

0:08:30.720 --> 0:08:34.640
<v Speaker 1>and magnetism that we've been studying for more than a

0:08:34.640 --> 0:08:40.440
<v Speaker 1>century now. Well, with superconductors, Meisner and Oxenfeld observed that

0:08:40.600 --> 0:08:45.600
<v Speaker 1>nearly all internal magnetic fields that should be passing through

0:08:46.040 --> 0:08:50.600
<v Speaker 1>the superconductor material were zeroed out. They didn't exist. The

0:08:50.679 --> 0:08:54.840
<v Speaker 1>exterior magnetic field intensified. So it turns out that the

0:08:54.880 --> 0:08:57.880
<v Speaker 1>magnetic fields that normally would be able to pass through

0:08:57.920 --> 0:09:01.880
<v Speaker 1>the superconductor material were now being expelled. They were passing

0:09:01.920 --> 0:09:05.360
<v Speaker 1>around it as if the superconductor had some kind of

0:09:05.559 --> 0:09:10.200
<v Speaker 1>force field against magnetic fields being able to penetrate it.

0:09:10.240 --> 0:09:14.240
<v Speaker 1>Similar to how electricity can't get out of a superconductor,

0:09:14.520 --> 0:09:16.960
<v Speaker 1>you know, it doesn't boil off in the form of heat,

0:09:17.679 --> 0:09:22.240
<v Speaker 1>magnetic fields can't get into a superconductor under normal conditions.

0:09:22.240 --> 0:09:25.480
<v Speaker 1>We'll actually talk a bit about the limitations of that

0:09:25.720 --> 0:09:30.040
<v Speaker 1>in just a moment. Now, one super interesting thing about

0:09:30.080 --> 0:09:32.800
<v Speaker 1>the so called Meisner effect. Now some folks will actually

0:09:32.800 --> 0:09:35.920
<v Speaker 1>include Oxenfeld and call it the Meisner Oxenfeld effect, But

0:09:36.880 --> 0:09:39.600
<v Speaker 1>more often than not, I just see the Meisner effect,

0:09:39.640 --> 0:09:42.319
<v Speaker 1>which is, you know, just shows that you really want

0:09:42.360 --> 0:09:47.000
<v Speaker 1>that top billing. Anyway, One really interesting thing happens when

0:09:47.040 --> 0:09:50.600
<v Speaker 1>you bring a permanent magnet near a superconductor that then

0:09:50.679 --> 0:09:55.280
<v Speaker 1>is brought to below its critical temperature. So normally the

0:09:55.320 --> 0:09:58.160
<v Speaker 1>magnetic fields that are emitted by the permanent magnet would

0:09:58.160 --> 0:10:01.440
<v Speaker 1>also then pass through the superconductor once the magnet's close enough. So,

0:10:01.800 --> 0:10:04.280
<v Speaker 1>if you have a superconductor of material but you haven't

0:10:04.679 --> 0:10:07.880
<v Speaker 1>cooled it below its critical temperature, it's not acting as

0:10:07.880 --> 0:10:10.760
<v Speaker 1>a superconductor yet. You could put a physical magnet right

0:10:10.880 --> 0:10:14.479
<v Speaker 1>on top of that. Then, if you cool the superconductor

0:10:14.559 --> 0:10:18.280
<v Speaker 1>material so that it does go below its critical temperature,

0:10:19.000 --> 0:10:22.239
<v Speaker 1>it starts to expel magnetic fields. Well, the permanent magnet

0:10:22.679 --> 0:10:25.760
<v Speaker 1>is generating a magnetic field that otherwise would be passing

0:10:25.760 --> 0:10:30.240
<v Speaker 1>through the superconductor. Since the superconnector is expelling the magnetic fields,

0:10:30.280 --> 0:10:34.040
<v Speaker 1>it pushes against the permanent magnet, and the permanent magnet

0:10:34.200 --> 0:10:38.880
<v Speaker 1>will levitate and appear to really lock in place above

0:10:39.360 --> 0:10:43.360
<v Speaker 1>the superconductive material. You could also lay this out so

0:10:43.400 --> 0:10:47.120
<v Speaker 1>that you had say, electromagnetic track on the underside of

0:10:47.120 --> 0:10:50.080
<v Speaker 1>a table and take a puck of superconductor material that's

0:10:50.400 --> 0:10:53.480
<v Speaker 1>cooled below its critical temperature and lock it in place

0:10:53.640 --> 0:10:58.120
<v Speaker 1>below the electro magnet. That's possible too, I've seen that.

0:10:58.640 --> 0:11:00.720
<v Speaker 1>But it looks really cool because it looks like it's

0:11:00.800 --> 0:11:04.200
<v Speaker 1>just magically hanging there in the air, and you can

0:11:04.280 --> 0:11:08.920
<v Speaker 1>change its orientation and it will maintain that orientation above

0:11:08.960 --> 0:11:12.720
<v Speaker 1>the superconductor material. Now there's a lot that's going on here.

0:11:12.920 --> 0:11:15.439
<v Speaker 1>It's not just like magic. In fact, it's not magic

0:11:15.480 --> 0:11:19.320
<v Speaker 1>at all. But the explanation gets really tricky. There's like

0:11:19.640 --> 0:11:22.640
<v Speaker 1>kind of like little currents, like a little eddy within

0:11:22.679 --> 0:11:26.760
<v Speaker 1>the superconductor that's effectively creating a magnetic field that matches

0:11:26.800 --> 0:11:29.920
<v Speaker 1>but repels the permanent magnets field. No matter what orientation

0:11:29.960 --> 0:11:32.320
<v Speaker 1>you put it in. You change the orientation of the magnet,

0:11:32.679 --> 0:11:36.439
<v Speaker 1>the little eddies, which are really little currents of electrons

0:11:36.760 --> 0:11:40.360
<v Speaker 1>in the superconductor material change and then it continues to

0:11:40.440 --> 0:11:45.320
<v Speaker 1>repel the magnet perfectly. This, to get more specific, would

0:11:45.320 --> 0:11:48.640
<v Speaker 1>get into quantum mechanics, and I would just goof that

0:11:48.760 --> 0:11:51.040
<v Speaker 1>up if I were to attempt to explain it, because

0:11:51.080 --> 0:11:54.960
<v Speaker 1>it is well beyond my understanding. So I will say

0:11:54.960 --> 0:12:00.120
<v Speaker 1>that if you haven't watched any videos of magnets interacting

0:12:00.160 --> 0:12:04.760
<v Speaker 1>with superconductors or vice versa, you should really check that out.

0:12:04.880 --> 0:12:07.040
<v Speaker 1>There are a ton of them on YouTube. They are

0:12:07.160 --> 0:12:09.760
<v Speaker 1>really fascinating to watch. It looks at first like you're

0:12:09.800 --> 0:12:14.559
<v Speaker 1>watching some sort of camera trickery because the materials are

0:12:14.760 --> 0:12:18.840
<v Speaker 1>behaving in a way that's counterintuitive. We don't see stuff

0:12:18.880 --> 0:12:21.720
<v Speaker 1>like that in our day to day lives. It's really interesting.

0:12:22.240 --> 0:12:24.079
<v Speaker 1>And the fact that you can position the magnet in

0:12:24.120 --> 0:12:27.400
<v Speaker 1>different orientations with regard to the superconductor and it will

0:12:27.440 --> 0:12:31.319
<v Speaker 1>just stay in that position relative to the superconductor as

0:12:31.360 --> 0:12:35.920
<v Speaker 1>if it's locked in space. It's really remarkable. Okay, we're

0:12:35.960 --> 0:12:37.360
<v Speaker 1>going to take a quick break. When we come back,

0:12:37.400 --> 0:12:40.920
<v Speaker 1>I'm going to talk about that hypothesis I alluded to

0:12:41.480 --> 0:12:44.920
<v Speaker 1>earlier and how it attempted to explain what was going on.

0:12:45.120 --> 0:12:56.880
<v Speaker 1>But first, let's thank our sponsors. All Right, we're back,

0:12:56.960 --> 0:12:59.400
<v Speaker 1>and now we're getting up to the nineteen fifties and

0:12:59.480 --> 0:13:04.640
<v Speaker 1>a trio of American scientists John Bardeen, Leon Cooper, and

0:13:04.800 --> 0:13:09.800
<v Speaker 1>John Shreefer proposed a microscopic theory of super conductivity, and

0:13:09.840 --> 0:13:12.960
<v Speaker 1>it became known as the BCS theory. It took the

0:13:13.000 --> 0:13:16.960
<v Speaker 1>first letter off of each scientist's last name. The theory

0:13:17.080 --> 0:13:21.160
<v Speaker 1>has to do with electron pairs and crystalline lattices within

0:13:21.200 --> 0:13:27.400
<v Speaker 1>the superconductor and these vibrations called phonons. And I can't

0:13:27.559 --> 0:13:31.720
<v Speaker 1>really pretend to fully understand it, or even partly understand it,

0:13:31.800 --> 0:13:35.760
<v Speaker 1>but it does a good job of describing what's happening

0:13:36.320 --> 0:13:43.599
<v Speaker 1>for super cooled superconductive materials. However, this particular hypothesis or

0:13:43.720 --> 0:13:49.880
<v Speaker 1>theory did not explain how this would work with superconductors

0:13:49.880 --> 0:13:54.400
<v Speaker 1>that could operate at so called high temperatures, you know,

0:13:54.520 --> 0:13:58.560
<v Speaker 1>beyond a threshold. This theory doesn't really apply. And the

0:13:58.600 --> 0:14:03.320
<v Speaker 1>problem is we were observing effects that went beyond the

0:14:03.360 --> 0:14:07.480
<v Speaker 1>parameters this theory would cover. Now, when I say high temperature,

0:14:08.320 --> 0:14:10.760
<v Speaker 1>I'm not actually talking about anything that you or I

0:14:10.840 --> 0:14:14.280
<v Speaker 1>would consider a high temperature. In fact, it's quite the contrary.

0:14:14.840 --> 0:14:17.920
<v Speaker 1>We're still talking temperatures that can get down to as

0:14:17.960 --> 0:14:22.360
<v Speaker 1>low as almost minus two hundred degrees celsius. To date,

0:14:23.040 --> 0:14:28.280
<v Speaker 1>I want to say that the hottest superconductor that ever

0:14:28.360 --> 0:14:34.120
<v Speaker 1>operated is still like around minus twenty five celsius something

0:14:34.200 --> 0:14:37.120
<v Speaker 1>like that, and even then it's under intense pressure. We'll

0:14:37.120 --> 0:14:42.080
<v Speaker 1>talk about pressure too, so you know, we're really talking

0:14:42.120 --> 0:14:46.720
<v Speaker 1>about very, very very cold temperatures. Even with the so

0:14:46.840 --> 0:14:50.200
<v Speaker 1>called high temperature superconductors, it's just that they're much higher

0:14:50.240 --> 0:14:54.720
<v Speaker 1>than say minus two hundred and sixty nine celsius. Until

0:14:54.840 --> 0:14:59.160
<v Speaker 1>very recently, all claims of finding material that displays super

0:14:59.160 --> 0:15:03.720
<v Speaker 1>conductivity at temperatures that we would even remotely consider comfortable

0:15:04.280 --> 0:15:08.560
<v Speaker 1>have all fallen through. Right Like, scientists would submit a

0:15:08.600 --> 0:15:11.640
<v Speaker 1>paper suggesting that they had made a breakthrough and found

0:15:11.720 --> 0:15:15.920
<v Speaker 1>such a material, and then later retract those papers, discovering that,

0:15:16.120 --> 0:15:19.840
<v Speaker 1>in fact, there was some sort of mistake along the

0:15:19.840 --> 0:15:23.080
<v Speaker 1>way and they were not correct, and so they had to,

0:15:23.200 --> 0:15:27.840
<v Speaker 1>you know, take it back. Now. Interestingly, two factors can

0:15:27.880 --> 0:15:32.320
<v Speaker 1>potentially destroy the superconductor's state, and one we've already mentioned

0:15:32.440 --> 0:15:36.840
<v Speaker 1>is temperature. Right if the temperature goes above the critical

0:15:36.880 --> 0:15:42.280
<v Speaker 1>temperature for superconductors, then the material loses superconductivity. They will

0:15:42.560 --> 0:15:46.440
<v Speaker 1>again have electrical resistance, it will no longer expel magnetic fields.

0:15:47.240 --> 0:15:51.240
<v Speaker 1>But the other factor that can disrupt the superconductor state

0:15:51.800 --> 0:15:56.160
<v Speaker 1>would be a sufficiently powerful magnetic field. I mentioned, like

0:15:56.840 --> 0:16:00.120
<v Speaker 1>a regular permanent magnet on top of a superconductor. You'll

0:16:00.120 --> 0:16:05.360
<v Speaker 1>see the permanent magnet levitate. Well, if that permanent magnet

0:16:06.040 --> 0:16:10.680
<v Speaker 1>was super strong, like it really had very strong magnetic fields,

0:16:11.560 --> 0:16:14.720
<v Speaker 1>then that could be more than what the force field

0:16:15.080 --> 0:16:18.480
<v Speaker 1>the superconductor generates can handle. And the magnetic fields will

0:16:18.520 --> 0:16:24.160
<v Speaker 1>pierce through the superconductor, and for one subset of superconductors,

0:16:24.160 --> 0:16:28.400
<v Speaker 1>that's enough for it to completely lose superconductivity. Under those conditions.

0:16:28.640 --> 0:16:30.960
<v Speaker 1>Take the magnet away and you keep it at its

0:16:30.960 --> 0:16:35.280
<v Speaker 1>critical temperature, it goes back to being a superconductor. But

0:16:35.360 --> 0:16:38.280
<v Speaker 1>in the presence of powerful enough magnetic fields that can

0:16:38.520 --> 0:16:42.240
<v Speaker 1>overpower the superconductive material and it just becomes a regular

0:16:42.240 --> 0:16:48.200
<v Speaker 1>conductor again. Now, as I mentioned, there are magnets that

0:16:48.240 --> 0:16:50.960
<v Speaker 1>can do that and will disrupt superconductors, but there are

0:16:51.000 --> 0:16:54.680
<v Speaker 1>other types of superconductors they can actually kind of roll

0:16:54.680 --> 0:16:58.080
<v Speaker 1>with the punches a little bit. So in this regard,

0:16:58.120 --> 0:17:00.920
<v Speaker 1>there are two broad classifications that we can talk about

0:17:00.960 --> 0:17:04.639
<v Speaker 1>with superconductors. There's type one. This is the type that

0:17:04.720 --> 0:17:09.560
<v Speaker 1>will lose superconductivity in the presence of a strong applied

0:17:09.640 --> 0:17:16.480
<v Speaker 1>magnetic field. Then you have type two superconductors. These will

0:17:16.640 --> 0:17:19.600
<v Speaker 1>actually continue to operate as a superconductor even in the

0:17:19.640 --> 0:17:23.040
<v Speaker 1>presence of a strong applied magnetic field. It's just that

0:17:23.520 --> 0:17:26.639
<v Speaker 1>at the points where the strong magnetic field intersects with

0:17:26.680 --> 0:17:32.200
<v Speaker 1>the superconductor, you get non superconducting material. So like within

0:17:32.440 --> 0:17:35.440
<v Speaker 1>the same mass, just imagine you've got a big old

0:17:35.760 --> 0:17:40.000
<v Speaker 1>puck of the superconductor material, and you've got this strong

0:17:40.080 --> 0:17:44.680
<v Speaker 1>applied magnetic field that intersects with a superconductor material at

0:17:44.680 --> 0:17:48.879
<v Speaker 1>that local point where there's that intersection, that would no

0:17:48.920 --> 0:17:52.919
<v Speaker 1>longer be performing like a superconductor. But other areas of

0:17:52.960 --> 0:17:56.119
<v Speaker 1>the puck that are not intersecting with this magnetic field

0:17:56.600 --> 0:17:59.840
<v Speaker 1>continue to act like a superconnector. This is a type

0:18:00.040 --> 0:18:04.720
<v Speaker 1>to superconductor material. This is why we're able to use

0:18:04.840 --> 0:18:11.640
<v Speaker 1>superconductors in labs that involve really powerful magnets. So, for example,

0:18:11.680 --> 0:18:16.399
<v Speaker 1>the large hadron collider particle accelerators, they need really really

0:18:16.400 --> 0:18:20.520
<v Speaker 1>strong magnets in order to drive those sub atomic particles

0:18:20.560 --> 0:18:23.240
<v Speaker 1>at speeds that are close to the speed of light,

0:18:24.400 --> 0:18:27.240
<v Speaker 1>but they also need superconductors. In order to do that,

0:18:27.440 --> 0:18:31.280
<v Speaker 1>and if there were no type two superconductor material out there,

0:18:31.440 --> 0:18:35.199
<v Speaker 1>it wouldn't work because the magnets would end up shutting

0:18:35.200 --> 0:18:38.040
<v Speaker 1>down the superconductors. They would just become regular conductors. You

0:18:38.080 --> 0:18:40.000
<v Speaker 1>would lose too much energy in the form of heat,

0:18:40.280 --> 0:18:43.040
<v Speaker 1>and the whole operation wouldn't work. So fortunately, there are

0:18:43.160 --> 0:18:47.119
<v Speaker 1>these type two superconductors out there that can kind of

0:18:47.240 --> 0:18:51.919
<v Speaker 1>localize where the disruption happens and the rest of the

0:18:51.960 --> 0:18:56.119
<v Speaker 1>material can still perform as a superconductor. It's pretty mind blowing. Now,

0:18:56.160 --> 0:18:59.720
<v Speaker 1>there are some big drawbacks with superconductors, as I have

0:19:00.040 --> 0:19:03.639
<v Speaker 1>describe them. I mean, you've got to super cool the stuff,

0:19:03.680 --> 0:19:06.760
<v Speaker 1>which means making use of materials of like liquid nitrogen

0:19:06.840 --> 0:19:11.240
<v Speaker 1>or liquid hydrogen, which is really expensive. It's dangerous. I mean,

0:19:11.280 --> 0:19:16.400
<v Speaker 1>this material is so cold that it will cause incredible

0:19:16.480 --> 0:19:18.359
<v Speaker 1>damage if you were to come into contact with it

0:19:18.680 --> 0:19:22.680
<v Speaker 1>for any you know, sufficient length of time. And it's

0:19:22.720 --> 0:19:26.400
<v Speaker 1>really hard to use this stuff like it's it's got

0:19:26.400 --> 0:19:29.120
<v Speaker 1>a huge barrier to being able to do it, which

0:19:29.119 --> 0:19:34.600
<v Speaker 1>means that our applications for superconductors are by necessity really limited.

0:19:34.920 --> 0:19:38.000
<v Speaker 1>They have to be limited to just the stuff that

0:19:38.119 --> 0:19:43.680
<v Speaker 1>really needs the superconductors to work and are like huge

0:19:43.720 --> 0:19:51.480
<v Speaker 1>like moonshot level experiments and scientific research stuff like particle accelerators,

0:19:52.320 --> 0:19:57.159
<v Speaker 1>Like that's such a huge undertaking that using superconnectors as

0:19:57.320 --> 0:20:01.639
<v Speaker 1>part of the whole process. But you can't use superconductors

0:20:01.680 --> 0:20:05.359
<v Speaker 1>to do more mundane stuff because it's way too expensive

0:20:05.359 --> 0:20:11.960
<v Speaker 1>and complicated to make it practical. It just it doesn't work. Now,

0:20:12.400 --> 0:20:16.000
<v Speaker 1>you can actually adjust that critical temperature I was talking about,

0:20:16.040 --> 0:20:18.680
<v Speaker 1>You can actually make that higher so that you can

0:20:18.960 --> 0:20:23.560
<v Speaker 1>operate at higher temperatures and still have super conductivity, But

0:20:23.840 --> 0:20:28.480
<v Speaker 1>only if you're increasing the pressure that's on the system.

0:20:28.880 --> 0:20:31.600
<v Speaker 1>So it has to be in a pressurized chamber. Right.

0:20:32.200 --> 0:20:36.960
<v Speaker 1>This is why like the hottest superconductor can operate at

0:20:37.080 --> 0:20:39.400
<v Speaker 1>you know, minus twenty five degrees or whatever it might be.

0:20:40.160 --> 0:20:46.200
<v Speaker 1>It's because it's inside a system that has incredible pressure

0:20:46.240 --> 0:20:51.000
<v Speaker 1>applied to it. So again you're even as you remove

0:20:51.119 --> 0:20:55.399
<v Speaker 1>the need to super cool it to like really really

0:20:55.440 --> 0:20:58.800
<v Speaker 1>cold temperatures, you increase the need to have to create

0:20:58.800 --> 0:21:03.320
<v Speaker 1>these incredible pressure chambers. So it's a trade off, right,

0:21:03.359 --> 0:21:07.240
<v Speaker 1>Like you're having to trade one difficult set of circumstances

0:21:07.560 --> 0:21:11.040
<v Speaker 1>for another, and it still makes it very expensive and

0:21:11.160 --> 0:21:15.720
<v Speaker 1>dangerous and complicated. Now, if we could make a superconductive

0:21:15.760 --> 0:21:20.520
<v Speaker 1>material that performs as a superconductor, but does so at

0:21:20.640 --> 0:21:24.960
<v Speaker 1>room temperature and at you know, ambient air pressure, that

0:21:25.480 --> 0:21:30.440
<v Speaker 1>would change the world. When we come back, I'll explain

0:21:30.600 --> 0:21:33.520
<v Speaker 1>how it would change the world and why some people

0:21:33.560 --> 0:21:46.760
<v Speaker 1>think we might already be there. Okay, we're back. I

0:21:46.800 --> 0:21:50.800
<v Speaker 1>had mentioned that if we could make superconductive material that

0:21:50.960 --> 0:21:54.960
<v Speaker 1>performs at room temperature ambient air pressure, it would really

0:21:55.240 --> 0:21:59.320
<v Speaker 1>change everything. Well, it's pretty easy to imagine, right. Let's

0:21:59.359 --> 0:22:02.320
<v Speaker 1>just take the really mundane example of that gaming pc

0:22:02.480 --> 0:22:06.560
<v Speaker 1>I talked about earlier. Imagine you've got this crazy tricked

0:22:06.600 --> 0:22:10.520
<v Speaker 1>out gaming pc. It's got the latest processors in it.

0:22:10.520 --> 0:22:15.399
<v Speaker 1>It's incredibly powerful, but all the circuits are made out

0:22:15.440 --> 0:22:19.199
<v Speaker 1>of a material that's a superconductor, which means there's no

0:22:19.320 --> 0:22:23.760
<v Speaker 1>heat being generated. It's not losing any electricity due to heat.

0:22:23.880 --> 0:22:26.960
<v Speaker 1>This means a couple of really big things. One, we

0:22:27.000 --> 0:22:29.760
<v Speaker 1>don't need any of those cooling systems anymore. There's no

0:22:29.840 --> 0:22:32.399
<v Speaker 1>heat being generated, so there's no heat to take away.

0:22:32.520 --> 0:22:37.080
<v Speaker 1>You don't need water cooling or even fans because you're

0:22:37.080 --> 0:22:40.520
<v Speaker 1>not losing any energy due to heat. So a big

0:22:40.520 --> 0:22:44.399
<v Speaker 1>old chonker of a gaming PC would run silently. There'd

0:22:44.400 --> 0:22:48.240
<v Speaker 1>be no moving parts. You would just have these incredible

0:22:48.240 --> 0:22:51.520
<v Speaker 1>circuits made out of the superconductor material that can operate

0:22:51.560 --> 0:22:55.760
<v Speaker 1>at room temperature. But also, we wouldn't need as much

0:22:55.880 --> 0:22:58.639
<v Speaker 1>power to run our PC because none of our power

0:22:58.720 --> 0:23:02.000
<v Speaker 1>is being lost in the form of heart. It's perfectly efficient.

0:23:02.400 --> 0:23:04.879
<v Speaker 1>You would be able to achieve that level of performance

0:23:05.000 --> 0:23:07.720
<v Speaker 1>with less power because you don't have to factor in

0:23:07.800 --> 0:23:12.879
<v Speaker 1>power loss at all. Perfect transmission of electricity would be

0:23:13.000 --> 0:23:17.239
<v Speaker 1>a possibility, And that's interesting for a PC like you

0:23:17.280 --> 0:23:19.760
<v Speaker 1>just suddenly think like, oh, I wouldn't need as big

0:23:19.840 --> 0:23:22.240
<v Speaker 1>of a power supply, and I would mean a lower

0:23:22.280 --> 0:23:25.800
<v Speaker 1>electricity bill. But let's expand that. Think about that for

0:23:25.840 --> 0:23:30.440
<v Speaker 1>the purposes of actual electricity transmission from power plant to destination.

0:23:30.840 --> 0:23:33.359
<v Speaker 1>What if all the power lines were made of the

0:23:33.400 --> 0:23:38.640
<v Speaker 1>superconductive material. Now we would be able to transmit electricity

0:23:38.960 --> 0:23:43.920
<v Speaker 1>with no loss. You would have incredible efficiency. It would

0:23:43.960 --> 0:23:47.240
<v Speaker 1>mean that we wouldn't need to produce as much electricity

0:23:47.320 --> 0:23:51.360
<v Speaker 1>at least to meet our current demand. So if we

0:23:51.359 --> 0:23:54.200
<v Speaker 1>were to assume that everyone was using exactly the same

0:23:54.240 --> 0:23:58.000
<v Speaker 1>amount of electricity on the end of it as they

0:23:58.000 --> 0:24:01.359
<v Speaker 1>are right now, then the amount of electricity we would

0:24:01.359 --> 0:24:03.360
<v Speaker 1>need to produce would be much lower because we wouldn't

0:24:03.359 --> 0:24:06.720
<v Speaker 1>lose anything in the process. We would end up having

0:24:07.119 --> 0:24:11.520
<v Speaker 1>a smaller demand on our power generation. That being said,

0:24:12.280 --> 0:24:15.680
<v Speaker 1>between me and you, that's never how it works out.

0:24:16.000 --> 0:24:19.879
<v Speaker 1>If our ability to produce electricity exceeds whatever the current

0:24:19.920 --> 0:24:24.800
<v Speaker 1>demand is, we just typically see a demand rise in response. Right.

0:24:24.960 --> 0:24:28.000
<v Speaker 1>It's not that, oh, now we're producing more electricity than

0:24:28.040 --> 0:24:31.080
<v Speaker 1>we need. It's oh, now we can use more electricity,

0:24:31.119 --> 0:24:33.800
<v Speaker 1>so now we need more. That's how it typically goes.

0:24:33.880 --> 0:24:36.520
<v Speaker 1>But it's still a nice thought, right, this idea of

0:24:36.920 --> 0:24:43.880
<v Speaker 1>perfectly efficient transmitters, that would be amazing, And these efficient

0:24:43.920 --> 0:24:47.480
<v Speaker 1>electrical systems would mean other stuff too, like batteries would

0:24:47.520 --> 0:24:50.879
<v Speaker 1>last longer, right because again you don't lose any energy

0:24:50.880 --> 0:24:55.119
<v Speaker 1>in the form of heat. More efficient systems means longer

0:24:55.160 --> 0:24:59.640
<v Speaker 1>battery life even without an effective change to the batteries

0:24:59.680 --> 0:25:04.280
<v Speaker 1>themselve levels. The improvement in the circuitry would be in

0:25:04.320 --> 0:25:07.440
<v Speaker 1>the batteries would last longer. They wouldn't be having to

0:25:08.440 --> 0:25:11.960
<v Speaker 1>deplete so quickly, which means things like electric vehicles would

0:25:12.000 --> 0:25:13.879
<v Speaker 1>see a boost and how far they could travel on

0:25:13.920 --> 0:25:18.000
<v Speaker 1>a single charge. Again, not because the battery technology has improved,

0:25:18.000 --> 0:25:22.440
<v Speaker 1>but because we're using the superconductive material for the circuitry

0:25:22.480 --> 0:25:25.440
<v Speaker 1>within the electric vehicle. On the flip side, let's say

0:25:25.480 --> 0:25:29.399
<v Speaker 1>it's in you know, consumer phones. Your phone would not

0:25:29.680 --> 0:25:32.199
<v Speaker 1>have to recharge nearly as frequently. You would be able

0:25:32.240 --> 0:25:36.200
<v Speaker 1>to hold a charge much longer because again increased efficiency.

0:25:36.440 --> 0:25:41.560
<v Speaker 1>It's actually really hard to express how big a deal

0:25:41.960 --> 0:25:46.720
<v Speaker 1>this would be. I mean, it affects everything from environmental issues,

0:25:46.880 --> 0:25:51.320
<v Speaker 1>to financial issues, to you know, all sorts of stuff.

0:25:51.680 --> 0:25:54.000
<v Speaker 1>And I haven't even touched on what it would mean

0:25:54.080 --> 0:25:57.760
<v Speaker 1>for science, like being able to have a room temperature

0:25:57.840 --> 0:26:04.320
<v Speaker 1>operating superconductor and suddenly make things like particle accelerators orders

0:26:04.359 --> 0:26:08.359
<v Speaker 1>of magnitude easier to build. They would still be really complicated,

0:26:08.400 --> 0:26:10.280
<v Speaker 1>Don't get me wrong. It's not like it would suddenly

0:26:10.320 --> 0:26:13.359
<v Speaker 1>become something we could all make in our backyards. But

0:26:14.440 --> 0:26:17.280
<v Speaker 1>it would be way easier than the systems that were

0:26:17.280 --> 0:26:22.920
<v Speaker 1>needed to create the large Hadron collider, which means increasing

0:26:23.000 --> 0:26:26.920
<v Speaker 1>accessibility to that kind of science, which means being able

0:26:26.960 --> 0:26:30.240
<v Speaker 1>to learn a lot more about our universe. Like these

0:26:30.280 --> 0:26:33.800
<v Speaker 1>are the sort of big, big picture things that would

0:26:33.840 --> 0:26:38.920
<v Speaker 1>be possible with an actual working room temperature superconductive material.

0:26:40.840 --> 0:26:45.880
<v Speaker 1>But all of those possibilities depend upon a whole bunch

0:26:45.960 --> 0:26:49.600
<v Speaker 1>of stuff that we just aren't sure about yet. And

0:26:49.640 --> 0:26:53.040
<v Speaker 1>the reason I'm talking about this at all, and you

0:26:53.080 --> 0:26:55.320
<v Speaker 1>know I mentioned this in a news episode, but maybe

0:26:55.359 --> 0:26:58.600
<v Speaker 1>you've heard about it otherwise, is that some researchers in

0:26:58.640 --> 0:27:02.359
<v Speaker 1>South Korea reveal that a material they made in a lab,

0:27:02.800 --> 0:27:07.080
<v Speaker 1>which they call LK ninety nine, appears to be super

0:27:07.080 --> 0:27:10.440
<v Speaker 1>conductive at temperatures as warm as one hundred and twenty

0:27:10.600 --> 0:27:16.160
<v Speaker 1>seven degrees celsius. That's two hundred and sixty nine degrees fahrenheit.

0:27:16.960 --> 0:27:21.640
<v Speaker 1>So that means that at any temperature below those, this

0:27:21.760 --> 0:27:25.640
<v Speaker 1>material would be beneath its critical temperature and would operate

0:27:25.720 --> 0:27:30.280
<v Speaker 1>as a superconductor. So two hundred and sixty nine degrees fahrenheit, y'all,

0:27:30.320 --> 0:27:32.440
<v Speaker 1>it is hot outside, but it's not that hot. It

0:27:32.440 --> 0:27:34.920
<v Speaker 1>would mean that we could make power lines out of

0:27:35.000 --> 0:27:37.560
<v Speaker 1>this stuff, and if in fact it works as a superconductor,

0:27:38.040 --> 0:27:43.120
<v Speaker 1>we could have a future with perfect transmission of electricity.

0:27:43.960 --> 0:27:50.320
<v Speaker 1>If so LK ninety nine consists of appetite lead and

0:27:50.400 --> 0:27:53.920
<v Speaker 1>small amounts of copper, and the researchers from South Korea

0:27:53.960 --> 0:27:58.119
<v Speaker 1>who developed this material actually laid out the process for

0:27:58.440 --> 0:28:01.680
<v Speaker 1>baking it like they explained the process they did for

0:28:01.920 --> 0:28:05.080
<v Speaker 1>creating this material. In turn, that has led to a

0:28:05.280 --> 0:28:10.679
<v Speaker 1>ton of people, including some DIY scientists, to try and

0:28:10.720 --> 0:28:13.600
<v Speaker 1>make this stuff for themselves and to test it out.

0:28:14.560 --> 0:28:19.080
<v Speaker 1>Now beyond the question of is this actually performing as

0:28:19.119 --> 0:28:23.440
<v Speaker 1>a superconductor, which is an open question right it's as

0:28:23.480 --> 0:28:29.159
<v Speaker 1>I record this, it has not been verified by experimentation,

0:28:30.119 --> 0:28:33.919
<v Speaker 1>there are other questions that remain. So let's assume, just

0:28:34.000 --> 0:28:36.159
<v Speaker 1>for the argument's sake, that yes, it does act as

0:28:36.160 --> 0:28:39.600
<v Speaker 1>a superconductor for whatever reason, which is again just an

0:28:39.640 --> 0:28:42.920
<v Speaker 1>example for this thought experiment. We would have other questions

0:28:42.960 --> 0:28:47.440
<v Speaker 1>we would have to ask, like is it hard to synthesize?

0:28:47.520 --> 0:28:50.320
<v Speaker 1>Is it easy? Is it easy to create in the

0:28:50.680 --> 0:28:53.920
<v Speaker 1>specific way so that it does perform as a superconductor?

0:28:54.320 --> 0:28:57.360
<v Speaker 1>Or was that something of a happy accident that will

0:28:57.400 --> 0:29:01.960
<v Speaker 1>be very hard to replicate if it is replicable, is

0:29:01.960 --> 0:29:04.680
<v Speaker 1>it something that could be mass produced? If it could

0:29:04.680 --> 0:29:08.200
<v Speaker 1>be mass produced, would it actually be suitable for things

0:29:08.240 --> 0:29:12.280
<v Speaker 1>like power lines or is its composition such that it

0:29:12.320 --> 0:29:16.840
<v Speaker 1>wouldn't really work in that it wouldn't be a good replacement.

0:29:17.760 --> 0:29:22.000
<v Speaker 1>What conditions will it act as a superconductor if it

0:29:22.120 --> 0:29:24.720
<v Speaker 1>encounters a powerful magnetic field, is it like a type

0:29:24.720 --> 0:29:28.479
<v Speaker 1>one superconductor material? And does it just stop performing as

0:29:28.520 --> 0:29:32.200
<v Speaker 1>a superconductor until that magnetic field is removed. We need

0:29:32.240 --> 0:29:35.040
<v Speaker 1>to know these answers now. There have been a couple

0:29:35.040 --> 0:29:39.040
<v Speaker 1>of labs that have reported that, based on computer simulations

0:29:39.120 --> 0:29:45.400
<v Speaker 1>they have run, the material does appear to have superconductive properties. This,

0:29:45.440 --> 0:29:48.560
<v Speaker 1>by the way, is not something that labs across the

0:29:48.560 --> 0:29:51.120
<v Speaker 1>board have all agreed on, but some, including a couple

0:29:51.160 --> 0:29:54.840
<v Speaker 1>of prominent ones, have said that they've run the simulations

0:29:54.880 --> 0:29:58.280
<v Speaker 1>and at least on a simulation level, it seems to

0:29:58.320 --> 0:30:01.560
<v Speaker 1>work out all right. But these are just simulations. They

0:30:01.600 --> 0:30:05.760
<v Speaker 1>are not actual practical experiments with real material. It's all

0:30:05.840 --> 0:30:11.400
<v Speaker 1>computers running numbers essentially. So skeptics are not satisfied just yet.

0:30:11.440 --> 0:30:14.240
<v Speaker 1>And I think that's a wise thing to be. I

0:30:14.280 --> 0:30:16.800
<v Speaker 1>think it is wise to be skeptical. I think it

0:30:16.800 --> 0:30:20.480
<v Speaker 1>could be optimistic, but keep some skepticism, or if you prefer,

0:30:21.080 --> 0:30:25.040
<v Speaker 1>employ some critical thinking. I really want to believe these

0:30:25.080 --> 0:30:27.360
<v Speaker 1>researchers have created a material that can work as a

0:30:27.360 --> 0:30:31.160
<v Speaker 1>superconnector under room temperature conditions because of all the reasons

0:30:31.160 --> 0:30:33.880
<v Speaker 1>we've talked about and more. But we also have to

0:30:33.920 --> 0:30:38.320
<v Speaker 1>remind ourselves that very earnest scientists thought they had done

0:30:38.400 --> 0:30:41.640
<v Speaker 1>similar things in the past, only to later find out

0:30:41.680 --> 0:30:45.040
<v Speaker 1>that's not actually what was going on. So we need

0:30:45.080 --> 0:30:49.200
<v Speaker 1>to prepare ourselves for this potentially being another example of

0:30:49.240 --> 0:30:53.080
<v Speaker 1>an interesting, exciting experiment that ultimately fails to measure up

0:30:53.480 --> 0:30:58.800
<v Speaker 1>to what was initially hoped. Maybe other labs will replicate

0:30:58.920 --> 0:31:02.480
<v Speaker 1>LK ninety nine, maybe they will test it and see

0:31:02.480 --> 0:31:05.520
<v Speaker 1>that it truly does perform as a superconductor under room

0:31:05.560 --> 0:31:09.880
<v Speaker 1>temperatures and room air pressure. And if that's the case,

0:31:09.920 --> 0:31:13.200
<v Speaker 1>we will have a truly technological revolution ahead of us.

0:31:13.440 --> 0:31:15.880
<v Speaker 1>Even if we can't use it for everything, the things

0:31:15.920 --> 0:31:20.640
<v Speaker 1>we can use it for it will be transformative. However,

0:31:21.200 --> 0:31:24.200
<v Speaker 1>that has not yet happened as I record and published

0:31:24.200 --> 0:31:28.000
<v Speaker 1>this episode, And maybe we find out that, in fact,

0:31:28.080 --> 0:31:31.120
<v Speaker 1>it's not a superconductor after all. Maybe there's some interesting things,

0:31:31.120 --> 0:31:35.480
<v Speaker 1>Maybe there's some you know, regular magnetic material that's in

0:31:35.520 --> 0:31:39.160
<v Speaker 1>there that's creating some interesting effects. We'll have to wait

0:31:39.200 --> 0:31:43.080
<v Speaker 1>and see. So my advice to you, as always is

0:31:43.560 --> 0:31:46.720
<v Speaker 1>try to use critical thinking don't you know, you don't

0:31:46.720 --> 0:31:51.440
<v Speaker 1>need to outright deny that it's a possibility unless there's

0:31:51.520 --> 0:31:55.480
<v Speaker 1>like people who can show definitively that no, there's no

0:31:55.640 --> 0:31:58.320
<v Speaker 1>way based upon our understanding of physics that this works,

0:32:00.200 --> 0:32:02.600
<v Speaker 1>show that we have something fundamentally wrong with our understanding

0:32:02.640 --> 0:32:05.640
<v Speaker 1>of physics, but that in turn would be truly huge.

0:32:06.080 --> 0:32:10.080
<v Speaker 1>But yeah, use critical thinking, but reserve some of that

0:32:10.200 --> 0:32:16.040
<v Speaker 1>excitement just in case, as is possibly likely, it doesn't

0:32:16.080 --> 0:32:18.720
<v Speaker 1>pan out. I hope it pans out. It would be

0:32:18.720 --> 0:32:23.840
<v Speaker 1>truly incredible, and there are a lot of interesting debates

0:32:23.880 --> 0:32:26.360
<v Speaker 1>going on in the scientific world about whether or not

0:32:27.120 --> 0:32:31.120
<v Speaker 1>it's feasible, and I honestly don't know enough to be

0:32:31.120 --> 0:32:33.960
<v Speaker 1>able to weigh in myself. I just want to be

0:32:34.320 --> 0:32:37.960
<v Speaker 1>skeptical a little bit, but hopeful. That's kind of my approach.

0:32:38.800 --> 0:32:42.280
<v Speaker 1>Speaking of hopeful, I hope you are all well, and

0:32:42.320 --> 0:32:52.320
<v Speaker 1>I'll talk to you again really soon. Tech Stuff is

0:32:52.320 --> 0:32:56.880
<v Speaker 1>an iHeartRadio production. For more podcasts from iHeartRadio, visit the

0:32:56.920 --> 0:33:00.560
<v Speaker 1>iHeartRadio app, Apple Podcasts, or wherever you listen to your

0:33:00.600 --> 0:33:01.320
<v Speaker 1>favorite shows.