WEBVTT - Kim Stanley Robinson imagines utopia in 2025

0:00:00.240 --> 0:00:05.119
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to Zero. I am Akshatrati this week imagining Utopia

0:00:05.280 --> 0:00:22.200
<v Speaker 1>in twenty twenty five. I love reading science fiction, and

0:00:22.239 --> 0:00:24.200
<v Speaker 1>one of the sci fi writers who has had an

0:00:24.239 --> 0:00:27.720
<v Speaker 1>impact on me in recent years is Kim Stanley Robinson.

0:00:28.600 --> 0:00:31.680
<v Speaker 1>Stan is perhaps best known for his Mars trilogy, published

0:00:31.680 --> 0:00:34.920
<v Speaker 1>in the nineteen nineties, but Zero listeners are likely to

0:00:34.960 --> 0:00:37.839
<v Speaker 1>know him for his writings over the past decade on

0:00:37.960 --> 0:00:41.360
<v Speaker 1>what climate futures here on Earth might look like. Be

0:00:41.479 --> 0:00:44.839
<v Speaker 1>it the underwater metropolis he imagined in his novel New

0:00:44.920 --> 0:00:48.520
<v Speaker 1>York twenty one forty, or how a United Nations agency

0:00:49.040 --> 0:00:52.400
<v Speaker 1>and its dark wing of eco terrorists tackle the climate

0:00:52.479 --> 0:00:57.280
<v Speaker 1>crisis in his book The Ministry for the Future. Stan

0:00:57.360 --> 0:00:59.480
<v Speaker 1>has been a guest on Zero before, but I wanted

0:00:59.480 --> 0:01:02.600
<v Speaker 1>to speak with him again because that book, The Ministry

0:01:02.600 --> 0:01:06.880
<v Speaker 1>for the Future has been on my mind recently. Although

0:01:06.920 --> 0:01:09.600
<v Speaker 1>it was published in twenty twenty, The story in the

0:01:09.640 --> 0:01:12.920
<v Speaker 1>book kicks off in the year twenty twenty five, and

0:01:12.959 --> 0:01:16.640
<v Speaker 1>well here we are. The book opens just after a

0:01:16.720 --> 0:01:20.040
<v Speaker 1>fictional COP twenty nine summit, as a deadly heat wave

0:01:20.440 --> 0:01:24.000
<v Speaker 1>hits India. The plot follows the choices faced by United

0:01:24.080 --> 0:01:27.600
<v Speaker 1>Nations officials in a new department called the Ministry for

0:01:27.640 --> 0:01:31.199
<v Speaker 1>the Future, as they try to cope with the spiraling

0:01:31.240 --> 0:01:35.120
<v Speaker 1>impacts of a warming planet. With twenty twenty five upon us,

0:01:35.319 --> 0:01:37.360
<v Speaker 1>I wanted to see how Stan was feeling about the

0:01:37.400 --> 0:01:40.560
<v Speaker 1>book's version of this timeline and find out what he

0:01:40.640 --> 0:01:44.120
<v Speaker 1>thought about the unpredictable direction real life events have taken

0:01:44.400 --> 0:01:47.520
<v Speaker 1>since he wrote it. We talked about the value of

0:01:47.520 --> 0:01:49.920
<v Speaker 1>science fiction as a way to see into the future,

0:01:50.120 --> 0:01:53.720
<v Speaker 1>as well as sci fi's dangers, and why a writer

0:01:53.960 --> 0:01:58.280
<v Speaker 1>who admires science and technology so much still remains enamored

0:01:58.560 --> 0:02:01.360
<v Speaker 1>with the unglamorous work of a body like the Yuan.

0:02:15.480 --> 0:02:16.360
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to the show.

0:02:16.520 --> 0:02:18.040
<v Speaker 2>Thank you, Aukshott. It's good to be back.

0:02:18.320 --> 0:02:20.880
<v Speaker 1>So I listened to our conversation from a couple of

0:02:21.000 --> 0:02:23.800
<v Speaker 1>years ago, and I have to say you sounded optimistic,

0:02:24.680 --> 0:02:26.840
<v Speaker 1>and in twenty twenty three there were good reasons to

0:02:26.880 --> 0:02:30.840
<v Speaker 1>be optimistic. We talked about how after the Paris Agreement,

0:02:31.160 --> 0:02:33.440
<v Speaker 1>when the world was headed towards maybe four or five

0:02:33.480 --> 0:02:38.120
<v Speaker 1>degrees celsius of warming, we had these forces come together,

0:02:38.320 --> 0:02:42.560
<v Speaker 1>including the US turning around and having a climate law passed,

0:02:43.160 --> 0:02:47.200
<v Speaker 1>and there was a general sense of coherence in the

0:02:47.240 --> 0:02:51.440
<v Speaker 1>world trying to do something about climate change at a scale. Finally,

0:02:52.120 --> 0:02:54.200
<v Speaker 1>So now here we are sitting at the start of

0:02:54.240 --> 0:02:57.919
<v Speaker 1>twenty twenty five, the exact time period when the Ministry

0:02:57.919 --> 0:03:01.880
<v Speaker 1>for the Future sort of gets started on his journey,

0:03:02.200 --> 0:03:05.520
<v Speaker 1>and I thought it might be interesting to just revisit

0:03:05.960 --> 0:03:10.800
<v Speaker 1>and update our outlooks of where we are, sort of

0:03:10.840 --> 0:03:13.480
<v Speaker 1>a check in. We are in the future you were

0:03:13.520 --> 0:03:16.240
<v Speaker 1>imagining today it is here.

0:03:16.320 --> 0:03:19.440
<v Speaker 2>How are you feeling well? I want to say first

0:03:19.440 --> 0:03:22.880
<v Speaker 2>that you're in a better position to judge the situation

0:03:23.080 --> 0:03:25.840
<v Speaker 2>than I am, given your work, and that you're talking

0:03:25.840 --> 0:03:29.520
<v Speaker 2>to everybody, and I'd be very interested to hear your impressions.

0:03:30.040 --> 0:03:34.400
<v Speaker 2>As for me here in Davis, California, just looking out

0:03:34.440 --> 0:03:39.600
<v Speaker 2>at the world, I have this sense that everything is accelerating.

0:03:40.080 --> 0:03:42.760
<v Speaker 2>And that was already true in twenty twenty two. I

0:03:42.760 --> 0:03:44.960
<v Speaker 2>had realized that the dates that I had put in

0:03:45.000 --> 0:03:48.720
<v Speaker 2>Ministry for the Future were all wrong, and that I

0:03:48.760 --> 0:03:51.560
<v Speaker 2>had set things out happening in the far future of

0:03:51.680 --> 0:03:53.960
<v Speaker 2>a few decades from now that were going to happen

0:03:54.280 --> 0:03:57.440
<v Speaker 2>one way or another in the twenty twenty So the

0:03:57.520 --> 0:04:01.800
<v Speaker 2>acceleration seems to stay. You'll be speeding up, and I

0:04:01.880 --> 0:04:05.160
<v Speaker 2>mean by this, both bad things and good things. And

0:04:05.240 --> 0:04:08.080
<v Speaker 2>I suppose I should address what looks to be the

0:04:08.120 --> 0:04:12.880
<v Speaker 2>big reversal, which is the unexpected reelection of Donald Trump.

0:04:13.320 --> 0:04:15.600
<v Speaker 2>At least it wasn't expected by me. I had it

0:04:15.680 --> 0:04:19.479
<v Speaker 2>called exactly backwards. And I'm still shocked and dismayed. But

0:04:19.960 --> 0:04:22.680
<v Speaker 2>I'll point out that my novel Ministry for the Future

0:04:22.920 --> 0:04:26.200
<v Speaker 2>was written during Trump years. I was very angry then,

0:04:26.400 --> 0:04:29.760
<v Speaker 2>and it postulated a world in which the United States

0:04:29.839 --> 0:04:33.239
<v Speaker 2>was not a major player in dealing with climate change.

0:04:33.279 --> 0:04:36.040
<v Speaker 2>It was really the other nations of the world driving

0:04:36.080 --> 0:04:39.479
<v Speaker 2>the process out of necessity, and the United States being

0:04:39.480 --> 0:04:44.320
<v Speaker 2>a somewhat big rich kid and narcissistic child in the background,

0:04:44.400 --> 0:04:47.920
<v Speaker 2>being dragged along into the adult world of reality. And

0:04:48.000 --> 0:04:51.800
<v Speaker 2>maybe that's again a little bit true. But a lot

0:04:51.800 --> 0:04:55.360
<v Speaker 2>of things happened between twenty twenty and twenty twenty four

0:04:56.080 --> 0:04:59.640
<v Speaker 2>that are now path dependent in their own good way.

0:05:00.160 --> 0:05:03.040
<v Speaker 2>The good things have been speeding up as well as

0:05:03.120 --> 0:05:07.799
<v Speaker 2>the bad things. It's simply cheaper to build new clean

0:05:07.880 --> 0:05:12.280
<v Speaker 2>energy than old dirty energy, and this is crucial in

0:05:12.320 --> 0:05:16.760
<v Speaker 2>a capitalist world that every source of investment that isn't

0:05:16.800 --> 0:05:19.760
<v Speaker 2>government is looking for some kind of highest rate of return,

0:05:20.480 --> 0:05:23.400
<v Speaker 2>and if there is a higher rate of return that

0:05:23.520 --> 0:05:26.800
<v Speaker 2>can come to doing a green project rather than a

0:05:26.839 --> 0:05:31.720
<v Speaker 2>dirty project, then it will get done. So some guardrails

0:05:31.760 --> 0:05:34.679
<v Speaker 2>have changed a little. The I rebuild that the Biaden

0:05:34.680 --> 0:05:38.000
<v Speaker 2>administration got pasted was very important because it shows that

0:05:38.680 --> 0:05:41.920
<v Speaker 2>it's not just a matter of carbon quantitative easying of

0:05:41.960 --> 0:05:44.839
<v Speaker 2>the central banks and the government's cooking up new money,

0:05:44.880 --> 0:05:47.920
<v Speaker 2>which I think is important and really needs to happen,

0:05:48.120 --> 0:05:51.719
<v Speaker 2>but also simply legislation that legislators of the world, when

0:05:51.720 --> 0:05:56.520
<v Speaker 2>they vote in climate action, economic activities, and investments in

0:05:56.680 --> 0:06:00.000
<v Speaker 2>private businesses in their nation, states that good things can

0:06:00.160 --> 0:06:01.440
<v Speaker 2>happen and that they multiply.

0:06:02.120 --> 0:06:05.240
<v Speaker 1>I think you're right in that, yes, clean energy has

0:06:05.279 --> 0:06:10.200
<v Speaker 1>become cheaper than dirty energy, and that fact has sunk in.

0:06:10.640 --> 0:06:13.839
<v Speaker 1>But there are ways in which dirty energy is made

0:06:13.920 --> 0:06:17.840
<v Speaker 1>cheaper artificially to keep its life going, and we're going

0:06:17.880 --> 0:06:20.159
<v Speaker 1>to see a lot more of that. But I just

0:06:20.200 --> 0:06:22.719
<v Speaker 1>wanted to come back to the ministry because to me,

0:06:22.920 --> 0:06:26.440
<v Speaker 1>it is a good framework to start from. The climate

0:06:26.480 --> 0:06:31.640
<v Speaker 1>problem is a problem created of inequality, and there is

0:06:31.680 --> 0:06:35.680
<v Speaker 1>no way to solve it without bringing more equality to

0:06:35.800 --> 0:06:38.839
<v Speaker 1>bear on the planet. That is in the form of

0:06:39.360 --> 0:06:44.600
<v Speaker 1>wealth transfer, in technology transfer, in creating a carbon space

0:06:44.680 --> 0:06:50.599
<v Speaker 1>for developing countries to use, and COP meetings are the

0:06:50.680 --> 0:06:55.160
<v Speaker 1>place where that conversation around inequality comes to bear, and

0:06:55.480 --> 0:06:58.919
<v Speaker 1>the ministry for the future is created through the COP framework.

0:06:59.200 --> 0:07:02.839
<v Speaker 1>As you imagine. And you've been a regular listener of

0:07:02.960 --> 0:07:06.640
<v Speaker 1>this show, and I'm guessing you've followed the coverage of

0:07:06.680 --> 0:07:10.120
<v Speaker 1>what happened at COP twenty nine. How do you think

0:07:10.200 --> 0:07:13.960
<v Speaker 1>this year's COP stacks up against what you imagine cops

0:07:14.000 --> 0:07:14.520
<v Speaker 1>to be doing.

0:07:15.520 --> 0:07:20.040
<v Speaker 2>Well, it's pretty in line with the previous cops and

0:07:20.640 --> 0:07:23.200
<v Speaker 2>with what I portrayed in my book, which is a

0:07:23.240 --> 0:07:26.440
<v Speaker 2>process that is you might call necessary but not sufficient,

0:07:27.160 --> 0:07:30.520
<v Speaker 2>or a set of public promises in a society of

0:07:30.520 --> 0:07:34.400
<v Speaker 2>the spectacle where at least it gets discussed every years

0:07:34.720 --> 0:07:37.680
<v Speaker 2>in a way that the world pays attention to. So

0:07:38.000 --> 0:07:41.840
<v Speaker 2>I still think the COP process is crucial, but it's

0:07:41.920 --> 0:07:46.520
<v Speaker 2>not enough because it's built on a consensus model, so

0:07:46.560 --> 0:07:51.480
<v Speaker 2>it's necessarily glacially slow. So necessary but not sufficient. And

0:07:51.520 --> 0:07:53.679
<v Speaker 2>the other things have to happen that we're all doing

0:07:53.920 --> 0:07:57.440
<v Speaker 2>in individual nation states and in the internationally, just in

0:07:57.560 --> 0:08:02.080
<v Speaker 2>terms of trade and international relations that are more tangible

0:08:02.120 --> 0:08:05.160
<v Speaker 2>than the promises made at COP and their good things

0:08:05.200 --> 0:08:08.080
<v Speaker 2>can happen. Now, I want to point out that in

0:08:08.120 --> 0:08:10.960
<v Speaker 2>my Ministry for the Future, it starts as a tiny,

0:08:11.040 --> 0:08:14.920
<v Speaker 2>little functionary agency that is trying to rally year round

0:08:14.960 --> 0:08:19.600
<v Speaker 2>support to get COP promises adhere to. And in a way,

0:08:19.960 --> 0:08:23.400
<v Speaker 2>it's kind of an invention that creates a point of

0:08:23.480 --> 0:08:26.840
<v Speaker 2>view for a novel that is legible in that there's

0:08:26.920 --> 0:08:30.920
<v Speaker 2>characters with a plot. But at the same time, last September,

0:08:31.520 --> 0:08:34.960
<v Speaker 2>the UN out of the Secretary General's Office, issued a

0:08:35.120 --> 0:08:38.840
<v Speaker 2>Pact for the Future during their Summit of the Future,

0:08:38.920 --> 0:08:42.560
<v Speaker 2>which was their name for Climate Week last September. And

0:08:42.640 --> 0:08:46.079
<v Speaker 2>they're appointing an Envoy for the Future.

0:08:46.600 --> 0:08:49.760
<v Speaker 1>So well, you know that that sounds a lot like

0:08:50.040 --> 0:08:53.080
<v Speaker 1>the Ministry for the Future run by the UN in

0:08:53.160 --> 0:08:57.120
<v Speaker 1>your book. So did the book inspire this pact?

0:08:57.640 --> 0:09:00.959
<v Speaker 2>Yes, they tell me that it did it. They thought, oh,

0:09:00.960 --> 0:09:03.280
<v Speaker 2>what a good idea. And I have to say that

0:09:03.559 --> 0:09:07.640
<v Speaker 2>the UN's story is weirdly, you know, in some senses

0:09:07.760 --> 0:09:12.640
<v Speaker 2>the secret masters of the Universe in their black helicopters

0:09:12.640 --> 0:09:15.360
<v Speaker 2>and ultra powerful and then also at the same time

0:09:15.480 --> 0:09:20.440
<v Speaker 2>and maybe more accurately, another place of promises where all

0:09:20.440 --> 0:09:23.680
<v Speaker 2>the nation states go to talk to each other without

0:09:23.760 --> 0:09:27.120
<v Speaker 2>any power in particular of its own. The UN has

0:09:27.160 --> 0:09:29.680
<v Speaker 2>a lot of consensus, but it also has the post

0:09:29.720 --> 0:09:34.320
<v Speaker 2>World War two structure that means that it is not

0:09:34.920 --> 0:09:38.719
<v Speaker 2>a gigantically effective agency. So a novel that says, oh

0:09:38.720 --> 0:09:40.760
<v Speaker 2>my gosh, we got something done in the world by

0:09:40.800 --> 0:09:43.880
<v Speaker 2>something coming out of the UN. Naturally, my novel is

0:09:44.000 --> 0:09:49.560
<v Speaker 2>popular there amongst those young diplomats, and they're feeling like

0:09:49.920 --> 0:09:52.040
<v Speaker 2>the world is spinning out of their control, like all

0:09:52.080 --> 0:09:54.760
<v Speaker 2>of us, feel they're doing the best that they can,

0:09:54.880 --> 0:09:57.560
<v Speaker 2>and they think this is maybe one tool to focus

0:09:57.600 --> 0:10:01.040
<v Speaker 2>on the future, to focus on the narrative of the

0:10:01.200 --> 0:10:05.840
<v Speaker 2>member states nation states becoming member states in something larger

0:10:05.920 --> 0:10:10.840
<v Speaker 2>that manages to cope successfully with climate change. So yes,

0:10:11.040 --> 0:10:14.320
<v Speaker 2>by telling that story from that point of view, I

0:10:14.480 --> 0:10:17.480
<v Speaker 2>have inspired that particular group of people.

0:10:18.160 --> 0:10:21.000
<v Speaker 1>And fiction does have real consequences. We talked about some

0:10:21.040 --> 0:10:25.040
<v Speaker 1>of them in our last conversation. Another one that happened

0:10:25.720 --> 0:10:29.400
<v Speaker 1>is that Oxford University launched the Ministry for the Future

0:10:29.559 --> 0:10:34.319
<v Speaker 1>at Hartford College. There's supposed to be some real life

0:10:34.320 --> 0:10:38.360
<v Speaker 1>efforts being put underneath that. What do you hope those

0:10:38.400 --> 0:10:41.199
<v Speaker 1>can accomplish well?

0:10:41.440 --> 0:10:44.120
<v Speaker 2>It's a wonderful thing for me to see because Oxford

0:10:44.320 --> 0:10:48.520
<v Speaker 2>is a very powerful collection of smart and energetic people

0:10:48.600 --> 0:10:51.000
<v Speaker 2>who are very devoted to the cause of trying to

0:10:51.040 --> 0:10:54.040
<v Speaker 2>help the world. So an Oxford Ministry for the Future

0:10:54.120 --> 0:10:57.600
<v Speaker 2>is kind of a gathering space. It's not quite a

0:10:57.640 --> 0:11:01.560
<v Speaker 2>research center, not quite a think tank, series of public events,

0:11:01.600 --> 0:11:07.079
<v Speaker 2>and what I hope is that it will workshop ideas

0:11:07.120 --> 0:11:11.640
<v Speaker 2>for how to create a new political economy that's adequate

0:11:11.840 --> 0:11:14.880
<v Speaker 2>to coping with climate change. So they want it to

0:11:14.920 --> 0:11:18.080
<v Speaker 2>be a place of public outreach, of changing hearts and minds,

0:11:18.120 --> 0:11:21.520
<v Speaker 2>of explaining the story, of organizing the narrative and repeating

0:11:21.559 --> 0:11:24.280
<v Speaker 2>it and over and over again. It's not exactly a collaboration,

0:11:24.440 --> 0:11:27.439
<v Speaker 2>but I am a sort of senior advisor, instant le emeritus.

0:11:28.200 --> 0:11:31.679
<v Speaker 2>I'm hoping to a push to make sure that we

0:11:32.000 --> 0:11:34.480
<v Speaker 2>make it something that is of interest to the audiences

0:11:34.480 --> 0:11:35.959
<v Speaker 2>who come to it or hear about it.

0:11:36.960 --> 0:11:42.199
<v Speaker 1>So, as a science nerd, I have always seen technology

0:11:42.360 --> 0:11:47.720
<v Speaker 1>growth as a way to imagine futures, not just near futures,

0:11:47.720 --> 0:11:50.840
<v Speaker 1>but long futures. And that's why I love reading science fiction.

0:11:51.280 --> 0:11:53.600
<v Speaker 1>That's why I love reading the work you've put out

0:11:53.640 --> 0:11:56.960
<v Speaker 1>over the years. But there is a side of me,

0:11:57.080 --> 0:11:59.440
<v Speaker 1>as a journalist who sort of focused on the now,

0:11:59.480 --> 0:12:02.200
<v Speaker 1>who is to think about the near future because that's

0:12:02.240 --> 0:12:06.840
<v Speaker 1>my job that I'm noticing. Maybe it is politics, maybe

0:12:06.840 --> 0:12:08.679
<v Speaker 1>it is social media. Maybe it is the way we

0:12:08.720 --> 0:12:14.199
<v Speaker 1>consume media in general. That we as a people are

0:12:14.400 --> 0:12:18.520
<v Speaker 1>imagining the future less and less, or we are imagining

0:12:18.520 --> 0:12:22.600
<v Speaker 1>the future much nearer, that our horizons are not as

0:12:22.720 --> 0:12:26.120
<v Speaker 1>far as they used to be. Is that a perception

0:12:26.360 --> 0:12:28.760
<v Speaker 1>that is accurate or is it just in my mind?

0:12:29.640 --> 0:12:34.040
<v Speaker 2>I think climate change, since the pandemic is at least

0:12:34.240 --> 0:12:38.720
<v Speaker 2>ten times more prominent in everybody's minds, the world mind

0:12:38.880 --> 0:12:43.520
<v Speaker 2>than it was before. If a pandemic can punch us

0:12:43.600 --> 0:12:46.640
<v Speaker 2>in the nose, kill one out of every thousand persons,

0:12:47.080 --> 0:12:49.520
<v Speaker 2>and that's a success because it could have been far worse.

0:12:49.559 --> 0:12:53.280
<v Speaker 2>But we organize quickly to make up these vaccines. Climate

0:12:53.360 --> 0:12:56.719
<v Speaker 2>change could do that and make it even worse. It's

0:12:57.000 --> 0:13:00.199
<v Speaker 2>the poly crisis, as Adam Tooz calls it, all of

0:13:00.280 --> 0:13:04.839
<v Speaker 2>the crises of pollution of pandemics coming out of the

0:13:05.080 --> 0:13:09.840
<v Speaker 2>natural world, and then also the various political complications of

0:13:09.880 --> 0:13:14.600
<v Speaker 2>our own making. So there's a poly crisis. Well, I

0:13:14.880 --> 0:13:19.000
<v Speaker 2>feel like attention to that in the twenty twenties is

0:13:19.080 --> 0:13:23.480
<v Speaker 2>such that the farther futures are and this is finally

0:13:23.480 --> 0:13:26.400
<v Speaker 2>getting to answer in your questions. You don't think about, oh,

0:13:26.400 --> 0:13:28.400
<v Speaker 2>what will happen when we go to the stars, which

0:13:28.440 --> 0:13:30.800
<v Speaker 2>is always impossible. You don't even think about, oh, what

0:13:30.880 --> 0:13:33.120
<v Speaker 2>about the greatness that will happen when we all live

0:13:33.120 --> 0:13:35.640
<v Speaker 2>two hundred and fifty years and it's the year twenty

0:13:35.640 --> 0:13:38.760
<v Speaker 2>four hundred? Who can think that? When we are having

0:13:38.840 --> 0:13:41.960
<v Speaker 2>trouble thinking our way through the twenty first century. So

0:13:42.120 --> 0:13:45.840
<v Speaker 2>science fiction has collapsed to near future science fiction is

0:13:45.880 --> 0:13:46.679
<v Speaker 2>one way to call it.

0:13:47.280 --> 0:13:51.640
<v Speaker 1>And that difficulty of having sort of the world mind

0:13:51.880 --> 0:13:55.280
<v Speaker 1>or so many pieces of information held together to try

0:13:55.320 --> 0:13:59.960
<v Speaker 1>and make sense of the moment often collapses for individuals

0:14:00.440 --> 0:14:03.800
<v Speaker 1>in sort of the vibe, the emotion that is driving you,

0:14:04.000 --> 0:14:06.760
<v Speaker 1>and one that I think can be classed as the

0:14:06.800 --> 0:14:09.480
<v Speaker 1>emotion of twenty twenty five is we are starting off

0:14:09.520 --> 0:14:13.240
<v Speaker 1>on a bleak note. So is there a way if

0:14:13.280 --> 0:14:16.000
<v Speaker 1>I were to force you to imagine a utopia? Because

0:14:16.000 --> 0:14:19.600
<v Speaker 1>I know you do that sometimes for twenty twenty five?

0:14:19.720 --> 0:14:22.840
<v Speaker 2>What could it be an interesting question? And I think

0:14:22.880 --> 0:14:29.200
<v Speaker 2>it's possible there will be a realization that you can't

0:14:29.360 --> 0:14:33.720
<v Speaker 2>count on the leadership of the United States, and I

0:14:33.800 --> 0:14:36.440
<v Speaker 2>mean by that the leadership of the United States in

0:14:36.480 --> 0:14:38.880
<v Speaker 2>the world, but also the leadership of the United States

0:14:38.920 --> 0:14:41.760
<v Speaker 2>in terms of the incoming administration, which is looking to

0:14:41.800 --> 0:14:44.960
<v Speaker 2>be a kind of clown show. What would be the

0:14:45.160 --> 0:14:49.640
<v Speaker 2>utopian story is how there's always been idiots at the

0:14:49.680 --> 0:14:52.840
<v Speaker 2>top of the system and the governments of the world,

0:14:52.880 --> 0:14:57.400
<v Speaker 2>the bureaucrats, the technocrats, the scientists, the teachers. Society is resilient.

0:14:57.600 --> 0:15:01.880
<v Speaker 2>Civil society is real in which we help each other

0:15:01.920 --> 0:15:07.200
<v Speaker 2>out in daily life, transcend fools at the top shouting

0:15:07.240 --> 0:15:09.640
<v Speaker 2>and trying to wreck the system. So we have a

0:15:09.640 --> 0:15:14.000
<v Speaker 2>soap opera, But is the soap opera actually wreaking the

0:15:14.120 --> 0:15:18.200
<v Speaker 2>damage that it pretends that it wants to wreak. Everybody

0:15:18.240 --> 0:15:22.000
<v Speaker 2>actually wants their daily life to continue as best it

0:15:22.200 --> 0:15:26.200
<v Speaker 2>can in a positive direction. Everybody's stressed out, everybody's in

0:15:26.200 --> 0:15:28.880
<v Speaker 2>the precariat. The last thing you need is for the

0:15:28.920 --> 0:15:32.040
<v Speaker 2>soap app that the talk to actually be meaningful. And

0:15:32.080 --> 0:15:36.000
<v Speaker 2>if life goes on for everybody in their ordinary daily existence,

0:15:36.760 --> 0:15:40.200
<v Speaker 2>substantially the same. Because of the path dependencies of all

0:15:40.240 --> 0:15:44.400
<v Speaker 2>of our systems and the kind of resiliency of civil

0:15:44.440 --> 0:15:48.120
<v Speaker 2>society that in itself will be a victory. And I'm

0:15:48.120 --> 0:15:50.040
<v Speaker 2>not saying it's a sure thing by any means. This

0:15:50.120 --> 0:15:52.800
<v Speaker 2>is sort of an experiment. And how strong is the

0:15:52.840 --> 0:15:55.800
<v Speaker 2>American system If there is a group at the top

0:15:55.880 --> 0:15:58.760
<v Speaker 2>trying to wreck it, deliberately trying to wreck it, we'll

0:15:58.760 --> 0:16:02.640
<v Speaker 2>see we are in a corrupt political system and there's

0:16:02.880 --> 0:16:06.400
<v Speaker 2>huge challenges to democracy. On the other hand, votes are

0:16:06.440 --> 0:16:09.880
<v Speaker 2>still votes, and it's not entirely possible to buy them.

0:16:10.600 --> 0:16:15.239
<v Speaker 2>So it's a mix, right, It's a you can't actually

0:16:16.480 --> 0:16:21.600
<v Speaker 2>give up. You can't actually start celebrating. The twenty twenties

0:16:21.640 --> 0:16:24.480
<v Speaker 2>were always going to be a kind of crux in

0:16:24.560 --> 0:16:27.440
<v Speaker 2>human history, and they still are. And it might be

0:16:27.680 --> 0:16:31.000
<v Speaker 2>that the crux goes on for a decade longer than that.

0:16:31.320 --> 0:16:33.200
<v Speaker 2>It's not at all inevitable that things are going to

0:16:33.200 --> 0:16:35.760
<v Speaker 2>be all right, given the tendency of the forces of

0:16:35.800 --> 0:16:41.760
<v Speaker 2>disordered rising. But the situation is not impossible either, And

0:16:41.880 --> 0:16:44.720
<v Speaker 2>I guess you know is that the utopian statement the

0:16:44.720 --> 0:16:46.600
<v Speaker 2>good result is not impossible. Yet.

0:16:49.240 --> 0:16:51.160
<v Speaker 1>We've sort of talked about some of the things that

0:16:51.200 --> 0:16:54.680
<v Speaker 1>are big in front of our minds and on the

0:16:54.720 --> 0:16:58.400
<v Speaker 1>front pages of headlines. But they're also smaller things that

0:16:58.440 --> 0:17:00.680
<v Speaker 1>could become big that I would like to touch on.

0:17:00.800 --> 0:17:03.360
<v Speaker 1>So one that I know both you and I have

0:17:03.480 --> 0:17:08.520
<v Speaker 1>been interested in is Colombia's efforts to try and move

0:17:08.560 --> 0:17:13.439
<v Speaker 1>away from fossil fuels. Now, Columbia extracts coal and oil

0:17:13.560 --> 0:17:17.280
<v Speaker 1>and gas, and its economy has been dependent on it

0:17:17.320 --> 0:17:20.160
<v Speaker 1>for quite some time. But it is the first sort

0:17:20.160 --> 0:17:23.320
<v Speaker 1>of big and it's not very big, but it's still

0:17:23.440 --> 0:17:27.480
<v Speaker 1>a big ish producer of fossil fuels that has signed

0:17:27.520 --> 0:17:30.840
<v Speaker 1>up to the Fossil Fuel Non Proliferation Treaty. We had

0:17:30.880 --> 0:17:35.479
<v Speaker 1>Minister Susanna Muhammad, who has the Environment Ministry under her

0:17:35.720 --> 0:17:38.879
<v Speaker 1>talk on this podcast. And I know you've been thinking

0:17:38.960 --> 0:17:42.480
<v Speaker 1>about how this is going to play out, you wrote

0:17:42.480 --> 0:17:44.959
<v Speaker 1>to me after listening to that episode. So when you

0:17:45.119 --> 0:17:47.199
<v Speaker 1>try and imagine a future where a country has to

0:17:47.840 --> 0:17:52.800
<v Speaker 1>build its entire economy anew to move away from the

0:17:52.960 --> 0:17:56.760
<v Speaker 1>old stuff because the old stuff just can't continue at

0:17:56.760 --> 0:18:00.000
<v Speaker 1>current pace, how do you think that happened?

0:18:00.520 --> 0:18:02.840
<v Speaker 2>Well, thank you for that. I'm really interested in it.

0:18:02.920 --> 0:18:08.080
<v Speaker 2>The Petro states, those nations that depend on more than

0:18:08.119 --> 0:18:11.080
<v Speaker 2>fifty percent of their income on selling their fossil fuels.

0:18:11.760 --> 0:18:14.200
<v Speaker 2>They have also signed the Paris Agreement, and so they're

0:18:14.240 --> 0:18:16.840
<v Speaker 2>in a double bind. They are on the one hand

0:18:16.840 --> 0:18:19.440
<v Speaker 2>promising to stop selling fossil fuels. On the other hand,

0:18:19.480 --> 0:18:22.600
<v Speaker 2>that will bankrupt them and they could become failed states.

0:18:23.040 --> 0:18:26.240
<v Speaker 2>And we're talking about well more than a billion people

0:18:26.280 --> 0:18:30.840
<v Speaker 2>these petro states. What happens then we can't afford in

0:18:31.280 --> 0:18:34.720
<v Speaker 2>social senses to have failed states left right and center.

0:18:34.800 --> 0:18:38.159
<v Speaker 2>They need help. How could it come? Well, there's the

0:18:38.240 --> 0:18:40.800
<v Speaker 2>Loss and Damage Fund, there's a Paris Agreement itself, and

0:18:40.880 --> 0:18:45.520
<v Speaker 2>this Fossil Fuel's Non Proliferation Treaty is really important as

0:18:45.560 --> 0:18:49.200
<v Speaker 2>a framework that if a nation like Columbia, who is

0:18:49.240 --> 0:18:52.080
<v Speaker 2>a great example because they're the fifth biggest coal producer

0:18:52.119 --> 0:18:54.560
<v Speaker 2>on Earth, if they say we want to stop, help us.

0:18:54.800 --> 0:18:57.760
<v Speaker 2>Help needs to come. So at that point you need

0:18:57.800 --> 0:19:01.520
<v Speaker 2>a system that is arranged sort of like the cop

0:19:01.560 --> 0:19:05.520
<v Speaker 2>processes Lost in Damage or like the International Monetary Fund's

0:19:05.920 --> 0:19:09.880
<v Speaker 2>Special Drawing Rights, which is a mechanism to help countries

0:19:09.920 --> 0:19:12.320
<v Speaker 2>that are in trouble in paying their debts to get

0:19:12.359 --> 0:19:16.000
<v Speaker 2>them the money that they need. And so this system

0:19:16.040 --> 0:19:18.880
<v Speaker 2>would have to have these aspects of it that I've

0:19:19.000 --> 0:19:22.000
<v Speaker 2>considered and I throw it out there for others to consider.

0:19:22.359 --> 0:19:25.200
<v Speaker 2>It would need to be a discounted compensation. They can't

0:19:25.240 --> 0:19:27.200
<v Speaker 2>be paid as much as they would be for fossil

0:19:27.200 --> 0:19:30.239
<v Speaker 2>fuels as they stand on the market now that's like

0:19:30.320 --> 0:19:34.080
<v Speaker 2>one six hundred trillion dollars. What you would need is

0:19:34.119 --> 0:19:37.280
<v Speaker 2>a discounted system. They take a haircut. Also, it would

0:19:37.320 --> 0:19:40.160
<v Speaker 2>have to be amortized so that they get paid out

0:19:40.200 --> 0:19:42.520
<v Speaker 2>over a century like it would have been if the

0:19:42.560 --> 0:19:45.879
<v Speaker 2>fossil fuels had been burned, and then every country that

0:19:45.960 --> 0:19:49.520
<v Speaker 2>signs on would be getting a steady payment that would

0:19:49.560 --> 0:19:53.920
<v Speaker 2>also be entailed. You'd be signing something like the Extractive

0:19:54.280 --> 0:20:01.840
<v Speaker 2>Industry's Transparency Initiative eiiti that already exists, just like the

0:20:01.880 --> 0:20:05.560
<v Speaker 2>Fossil Fuels Non Proliferation Treaty and the IMF Special Drawing

0:20:05.640 --> 0:20:08.440
<v Speaker 2>Rights and the cop Loss and Damage Fund that three

0:20:08.520 --> 0:20:12.200
<v Speaker 2>hundred billion dollars was just promised into. When a nation

0:20:12.359 --> 0:20:14.679
<v Speaker 2>signed on that line, they would then have an income

0:20:14.760 --> 0:20:19.000
<v Speaker 2>stream that they had promised to keep from being corrupted,

0:20:19.440 --> 0:20:21.840
<v Speaker 2>and that it would be devoted to green projects and

0:20:21.880 --> 0:20:24.520
<v Speaker 2>the clean transition. And that way there would be a

0:20:25.000 --> 0:20:29.040
<v Speaker 2>a financial inducement for signing the Fossil Fuels Non Proliferation

0:20:29.119 --> 0:20:33.320
<v Speaker 2>Treaty and then also the physical and financial help to

0:20:33.560 --> 0:20:37.040
<v Speaker 2>make that transition possible and save these countries from falling

0:20:37.080 --> 0:20:42.119
<v Speaker 2>into dysfunction by way of bankruptcy and social disorder. It

0:20:42.200 --> 0:20:45.280
<v Speaker 2>seems to me it has to happen. And I've talked

0:20:45.320 --> 0:20:48.520
<v Speaker 2>to people about it at OECD and in other places,

0:20:48.640 --> 0:20:53.000
<v Speaker 2>other venues, other people in places of power, including the UN,

0:20:53.359 --> 0:20:57.440
<v Speaker 2>and I have to say it usually gets a cool

0:20:57.480 --> 0:21:01.280
<v Speaker 2>response or a visible shutter of oh my god. You know,

0:21:01.480 --> 0:21:04.200
<v Speaker 2>the Saudi's suggested something like that, even though they're rich

0:21:04.240 --> 0:21:07.439
<v Speaker 2>as creases, et cetera. Well, none of the past is

0:21:07.480 --> 0:21:11.400
<v Speaker 2>really relevant now in this respect, We've got seventy five

0:21:11.440 --> 0:21:13.960
<v Speaker 2>percent of the fossil fuels on this earth owned by

0:21:14.160 --> 0:21:18.320
<v Speaker 2>nation states that have governments that are responsible to their people,

0:21:18.840 --> 0:21:22.320
<v Speaker 2>and accommodation simply must be made. And when the question

0:21:22.400 --> 0:21:25.280
<v Speaker 2>then follows, oh, well, where could that much money come from,

0:21:25.840 --> 0:21:29.119
<v Speaker 2>you just answer quantitative easing. You point to two thousand

0:21:29.119 --> 0:21:31.280
<v Speaker 2>and eight, you point to twenty twenty. At the start

0:21:31.280 --> 0:21:35.760
<v Speaker 2>of the pandemic, trillions were generated. I'm gonna say out

0:21:35.760 --> 0:21:39.280
<v Speaker 2>of thin air, because the mechanisms involved are complicated, but

0:21:39.400 --> 0:21:43.080
<v Speaker 2>in fact, federal governments, central banks make up new money

0:21:43.080 --> 0:21:46.720
<v Speaker 2>all the time. The money can be made. And I'll

0:21:46.840 --> 0:21:50.480
<v Speaker 2>end with this, John Maynard Keynes really the most important

0:21:50.600 --> 0:21:54.080
<v Speaker 2>economists for our current moment. I would say, anything that

0:21:54.119 --> 0:21:56.160
<v Speaker 2>we have to do, we can afford to do.

0:22:05.920 --> 0:22:08.680
<v Speaker 1>After the break, more of my conversation with sci fi

0:22:08.720 --> 0:22:11.640
<v Speaker 1>writer Kim Stanley Robinson. And by the way, if you've

0:22:11.640 --> 0:22:14.120
<v Speaker 1>been enjoying this episode, please take a moment to rate

0:22:14.160 --> 0:22:17.080
<v Speaker 1>and review the show on Apple Podcasts and Spotify. It

0:22:17.200 --> 0:22:26.119
<v Speaker 1>helps other listeners find the show. Well. There is a

0:22:26.240 --> 0:22:30.040
<v Speaker 1>yearning in the politics today of the past, of a

0:22:30.119 --> 0:22:36.240
<v Speaker 1>period where I don't know, gender, racial, wealth, hierarchies were enforced.

0:22:36.960 --> 0:22:41.360
<v Speaker 1>And it feels contradictory to me because you know, if

0:22:41.400 --> 0:22:43.399
<v Speaker 1>I were to be born anytime in history and I

0:22:43.400 --> 0:22:45.720
<v Speaker 1>had the choice, I would be born today because it's

0:22:45.760 --> 0:22:47.840
<v Speaker 1>a pretty good time to be born. You have a

0:22:47.840 --> 0:22:50.520
<v Speaker 1>whole set of diseases that we know how to defeat.

0:22:51.040 --> 0:22:55.920
<v Speaker 1>You have the ability to be able to travel across continents,

0:22:56.000 --> 0:22:58.119
<v Speaker 1>you have the ability to be able to speak to

0:22:58.160 --> 0:23:01.680
<v Speaker 1>anybody in any corner of the world for almost free,

0:23:02.359 --> 0:23:05.920
<v Speaker 1>and yet there is this yearning for the past. How

0:23:05.960 --> 0:23:08.480
<v Speaker 1>do you make sense of this yearning for the past

0:23:08.520 --> 0:23:12.120
<v Speaker 1>where none of these good things existed.

0:23:12.920 --> 0:23:16.840
<v Speaker 2>Well, it's a kind of a mistake. It's nostalgia, the

0:23:17.320 --> 0:23:20.560
<v Speaker 2>ache of the lost home, nostalgia in Greek. Nostalgia is

0:23:20.560 --> 0:23:22.920
<v Speaker 2>a very powerful feeling. I feel it myself, but it's

0:23:22.920 --> 0:23:27.520
<v Speaker 2>almost always a category error. What are you regretting your youth?

0:23:28.400 --> 0:23:32.000
<v Speaker 2>Your childhood? The world itself was just as messed up then,

0:23:32.000 --> 0:23:33.800
<v Speaker 2>and as you point out, it was often in many

0:23:33.880 --> 0:23:37.840
<v Speaker 2>material ways, much worse than now. But you don't know that.

0:23:38.040 --> 0:23:41.280
<v Speaker 2>Your lived experience is when you were younger, you were healthier,

0:23:41.560 --> 0:23:43.800
<v Speaker 2>Your life lay before you as a set of open

0:23:43.840 --> 0:23:47.600
<v Speaker 2>possibilities or a struggle to be had. But in any case,

0:23:47.880 --> 0:23:51.919
<v Speaker 2>nostalgia for the past is always a kind of delusion

0:23:52.040 --> 0:23:56.840
<v Speaker 2>that one has because the future is scary. Individually, you're

0:23:56.880 --> 0:23:59.840
<v Speaker 2>going to end up falling apart somehow and dying. The

0:24:00.040 --> 0:24:03.680
<v Speaker 2>future never looks particularly good for the individual. For the collective,

0:24:03.840 --> 0:24:07.199
<v Speaker 2>you can imagine that things will go on for our descendants,

0:24:07.240 --> 0:24:08.879
<v Speaker 2>and that they will be in a better world, and

0:24:08.920 --> 0:24:13.760
<v Speaker 2>that's the solace of being human. I myself am very

0:24:13.840 --> 0:24:16.080
<v Speaker 2>much in love with science right now. I should be

0:24:16.119 --> 0:24:19.120
<v Speaker 2>dead at this point. Medical science has saved me now twice.

0:24:19.600 --> 0:24:24.160
<v Speaker 2>I'm very grateful. I'm very cognizant that science is a

0:24:24.200 --> 0:24:26.760
<v Speaker 2>force for good, is a Utaon'tian effort in the world

0:24:26.760 --> 0:24:29.159
<v Speaker 2>that is making us all of our necessities and all

0:24:29.200 --> 0:24:33.240
<v Speaker 2>of our toys, and that when people are anti science,

0:24:33.359 --> 0:24:36.120
<v Speaker 2>when they speak against it, when they get sick, they'll

0:24:36.200 --> 0:24:39.320
<v Speaker 2>run to a scientist. So it isn't real. It's another

0:24:39.720 --> 0:24:42.960
<v Speaker 2>not a nostalgia, but a denial of reality that there's

0:24:43.000 --> 0:24:45.439
<v Speaker 2>this collective force in the world, a group of people

0:24:45.680 --> 0:24:50.439
<v Speaker 2>following a method that is enormously productive and is saving

0:24:50.480 --> 0:24:53.280
<v Speaker 2>our lives and keeping us going, and who knows what

0:24:53.359 --> 0:24:55.840
<v Speaker 2>it might accomplish in the future as a collective effort.

0:24:55.920 --> 0:24:58.439
<v Speaker 1>As somebody who trained in the sciences, I find it

0:24:58.640 --> 0:25:02.680
<v Speaker 1>are that most woments around the world do not have

0:25:03.359 --> 0:25:09.000
<v Speaker 1>more people with training in the sciences in the cabinet

0:25:09.520 --> 0:25:13.159
<v Speaker 1>of the highest level. But we might see some of

0:25:13.200 --> 0:25:15.840
<v Speaker 1>that coming through in the White House this time. There's

0:25:15.880 --> 0:25:19.679
<v Speaker 1>a bunch of Silicon Valley people who are yes investors,

0:25:19.720 --> 0:25:24.080
<v Speaker 1>but have science trainings, who want to come in with

0:25:24.280 --> 0:25:30.520
<v Speaker 1>ideas that may seem quite dangerous and are there dangers

0:25:30.560 --> 0:25:33.680
<v Speaker 1>of sci fi thinking that you could articulate.

0:25:34.119 --> 0:25:37.840
<v Speaker 2>Well, you've got to destrand that there's scientists and there's engineers.

0:25:38.320 --> 0:25:42.040
<v Speaker 2>So Silicon Valley is not a bunch of scientists. It's

0:25:42.080 --> 0:25:45.200
<v Speaker 2>a bunch of computer programmers. They're engineers, and they've read

0:25:45.200 --> 0:25:50.080
<v Speaker 2>science fiction and they have often become rich by being lucky,

0:25:50.560 --> 0:25:53.720
<v Speaker 2>and then they think they're smart. And so that crowd

0:25:53.960 --> 0:25:58.119
<v Speaker 2>in power is dangerous because they can be nice people.

0:25:58.600 --> 0:26:01.760
<v Speaker 2>It's suspicious how well that ninety five percent of them

0:26:01.760 --> 0:26:05.359
<v Speaker 2>are men. That's a sign that something's wrong in that

0:26:05.520 --> 0:26:09.040
<v Speaker 2>whole social world. But in any case, that crowd is

0:26:09.080 --> 0:26:12.600
<v Speaker 2>not to be trusted because often politically and philosophically they're

0:26:12.640 --> 0:26:15.600
<v Speaker 2>intensely naive. They seize on one idea and then that

0:26:15.720 --> 0:26:18.000
<v Speaker 2>explains everything, and because they're rich, they think they know

0:26:18.080 --> 0:26:21.840
<v Speaker 2>it all. Now, I am overgeneralizing here, and in my

0:26:21.920 --> 0:26:26.600
<v Speaker 2>own personal acquaintanceships with billionaires, because I am near Silicon

0:26:26.680 --> 0:26:29.200
<v Speaker 2>Valley and I am a science fiction writer, I've met

0:26:29.240 --> 0:26:32.960
<v Speaker 2>a few. They are very often nice guys. They are

0:26:33.080 --> 0:26:37.560
<v Speaker 2>very often meaning well. They are very often Democrats rather

0:26:37.600 --> 0:26:40.280
<v Speaker 2>than Republicans. So you have to go to soap opera

0:26:40.359 --> 0:26:45.240
<v Speaker 2>land to get a kind of a unicorn figure like

0:26:45.320 --> 0:26:51.080
<v Speaker 2>Elon Musk, who is particularly wealthy but particularly volatile and unhelpful,

0:26:51.160 --> 0:26:54.800
<v Speaker 2>you might say in his narcissism. Not all of the

0:26:54.840 --> 0:26:58.360
<v Speaker 2>Silicon Valley computer billionaires who go to Washington are going

0:26:58.400 --> 0:27:00.399
<v Speaker 2>to be narcissists. A lot of them are going to

0:27:00.440 --> 0:27:02.920
<v Speaker 2>be solid citizens, saying I've got more money than I need.

0:27:03.000 --> 0:27:05.800
<v Speaker 2>Why don't we have progressive taxation? And also, why don't

0:27:05.840 --> 0:27:08.280
<v Speaker 2>you try plan A, B, and C that we have

0:27:08.400 --> 0:27:13.080
<v Speaker 2>carefully tested and it might work. So again, the technocrats,

0:27:13.200 --> 0:27:16.199
<v Speaker 2>the billionaires, none of them can be trusted to be

0:27:16.280 --> 0:27:20.200
<v Speaker 2>the solution. In a way. It's like saying AI will

0:27:20.200 --> 0:27:26.240
<v Speaker 2>solve a problems. These are artificial intelligences. These individual humans.

0:27:26.280 --> 0:27:29.560
<v Speaker 2>They're natural, but they're artificial in the sense of why

0:27:29.560 --> 0:27:33.040
<v Speaker 2>are they so wealthy? The solution always comes from elsewhere,

0:27:33.040 --> 0:27:35.240
<v Speaker 2>But actually it's a more collective thing. Really.

0:27:35.560 --> 0:27:41.840
<v Speaker 1>Now, last question, fun question. If there was a wish

0:27:41.920 --> 0:27:44.919
<v Speaker 1>that could be granted to you, it could be anything

0:27:44.920 --> 0:27:49.280
<v Speaker 1>a climate fake, some investment, a particular technology, a policy change,

0:27:49.560 --> 0:27:53.360
<v Speaker 1>diplomatic breakthrough, societal change, whatever. What would you ask for

0:27:53.560 --> 0:27:54.480
<v Speaker 1>in twenty twenty five?

0:27:55.640 --> 0:28:01.159
<v Speaker 2>Wow, I mean this is so hard. This is I

0:28:01.160 --> 0:28:07.840
<v Speaker 2>would ask for three more wishes to come true. Yeah,

0:28:08.040 --> 0:28:11.760
<v Speaker 2>I'll go back to the just the political economy level

0:28:11.840 --> 0:28:14.440
<v Speaker 2>because really this is Bloomberg Green, and I want to

0:28:14.480 --> 0:28:18.200
<v Speaker 2>say again, thanks to Bloomberg Green. I followed it intensely

0:28:18.280 --> 0:28:21.080
<v Speaker 2>through the last COP twenty nine by far the best

0:28:21.119 --> 0:28:23.679
<v Speaker 2>reporting of COP twenty nine that I'm aware of, and

0:28:23.800 --> 0:28:27.760
<v Speaker 2>just keeping people aware of the world of politics and economy,

0:28:27.880 --> 0:28:31.520
<v Speaker 2>of business and government in interaction with each other. It's

0:28:31.560 --> 0:28:34.760
<v Speaker 2>it's really crucial stuff. So at that level, I would

0:28:34.800 --> 0:28:39.520
<v Speaker 2>say the European Union shows what happens when nation states

0:28:39.720 --> 0:28:44.360
<v Speaker 2>become member states, and so the European Union is powerful

0:28:44.480 --> 0:28:47.720
<v Speaker 2>even though it includes many little countries that are in

0:28:47.840 --> 0:28:51.000
<v Speaker 2>economic trouble, but they're part of a larger hole. They

0:28:51.040 --> 0:28:55.440
<v Speaker 2>hang together. It's fractious, it's difficult, it's hard to work it,

0:28:55.960 --> 0:28:58.600
<v Speaker 2>but it's a change of consciousness in that when you're

0:28:58.640 --> 0:29:02.520
<v Speaker 2>a member state, you have a different financial, legal, and

0:29:02.760 --> 0:29:07.840
<v Speaker 2>emotional set of circumstances that guide you. If something like

0:29:07.880 --> 0:29:12.040
<v Speaker 2>the UN or the WTO or the OECD taken seriously,

0:29:12.360 --> 0:29:15.280
<v Speaker 2>as if those organizations had teeth and you had to

0:29:15.360 --> 0:29:18.280
<v Speaker 2>do what was agreed there because you were a member

0:29:18.360 --> 0:29:22.840
<v Speaker 2>in good standing, well that would make a huge difference now,

0:29:23.040 --> 0:29:26.280
<v Speaker 2>who's most likely to ignore and flaunt that forever The

0:29:26.400 --> 0:29:31.480
<v Speaker 2>United States of America. The US has this slim majority

0:29:31.520 --> 0:29:33.440
<v Speaker 2>that lives in a fantasy of, Oh, we can go

0:29:33.520 --> 0:29:37.160
<v Speaker 2>it all alone. We're the best, not the best, can't

0:29:37.200 --> 0:29:40.760
<v Speaker 2>go it alone. These fantasies hopefully will lose at the

0:29:40.800 --> 0:29:47.479
<v Speaker 2>ballot box after the probably spectacularly stupid political events at

0:29:47.480 --> 0:29:50.360
<v Speaker 2>the top over the next couple of years, and then

0:29:50.560 --> 0:29:52.880
<v Speaker 2>maybe that would be like the last flaring out of

0:29:53.080 --> 0:29:58.040
<v Speaker 2>some resentful minority that's losing its power to the world majority.

0:29:58.080 --> 0:30:01.560
<v Speaker 2>Who knows, But here's my wish that every nation state

0:30:01.840 --> 0:30:06.880
<v Speaker 2>took its membership in the larger organizations dead seriously as

0:30:06.920 --> 0:30:09.880
<v Speaker 2>a guide to action, and then climate change would have

0:30:09.960 --> 0:30:12.560
<v Speaker 2>a chance to be solved by us.

0:30:13.480 --> 0:30:15.880
<v Speaker 1>Well, I didn't see it coming that. You want the

0:30:15.960 --> 0:30:20.560
<v Speaker 1>G twenty to be a real power. Thank you Stam,

0:30:22.360 --> 0:30:23.360
<v Speaker 1>Thank you Akshat.

0:30:23.440 --> 0:30:24.240
<v Speaker 2>It's been a pleasure.

0:30:31.280 --> 0:30:33.480
<v Speaker 1>Thank you for listening to zero. And now for the

0:30:33.560 --> 0:30:48.000
<v Speaker 1>sound of the week. That's the sound of the trailer

0:30:48.040 --> 0:30:51.880
<v Speaker 1>of a nineteen eighty three film called Endgame, which takes

0:30:51.920 --> 0:30:54.840
<v Speaker 1>place in a fictional twenty twenty five, but of course

0:30:54.960 --> 0:30:57.560
<v Speaker 1>it sounds a lot like nineteen eighty three and clearly

0:30:57.720 --> 0:31:01.680
<v Speaker 1>no one imagined electric vehicles would be a thing. If

0:31:01.720 --> 0:31:03.640
<v Speaker 1>you liked this episode, please take a moment to rate

0:31:03.720 --> 0:31:06.480
<v Speaker 1>or review the show on Apple Podcasts and Spotify. Share

0:31:06.520 --> 0:31:09.040
<v Speaker 1>this episode with a friend or with someone who works

0:31:09.080 --> 0:31:12.440
<v Speaker 1>for the United Nations. Zero's producer is Mighty Lee Rao

0:31:12.640 --> 0:31:15.640
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg's Head of podcast is Saige Bauman, and Head of

0:31:15.640 --> 0:31:18.800
<v Speaker 1>Talk is Brendan nunim Our. Theme music is composed by

0:31:18.800 --> 0:31:23.120
<v Speaker 1>Wonder Lee. Special thanks to Schwan Wagner, Shan Chan, Ethan Steinberg,

0:31:23.160 --> 0:31:26.160
<v Speaker 1>and Jessica beck I, am Aksha Thrati back So