WEBVTT - Brady Re-Retires, LeBron Closing in on Record & 100k Celebration

0:00:00.440 --> 0:00:02.800
<v Speaker 1>If your football team had one option in their playbook,

0:00:03.000 --> 0:00:05.800
<v Speaker 1>the results probably wouldn't be great. The same could be

0:00:05.840 --> 0:00:09.440
<v Speaker 1>said for your investments. Cibo index options like SPX and

0:00:09.600 --> 0:00:12.920
<v Speaker 1>xsp can help expand your investing strategies with cash settlement

0:00:13.080 --> 0:00:15.840
<v Speaker 1>and potential tax advantages. If you're ready for a more

0:00:15.920 --> 0:00:19.160
<v Speaker 1>dynamic game plan, head to Better with Options dot Com.

0:00:19.280 --> 0:00:22.880
<v Speaker 1>Cebo life is better with options, Your investments.

0:00:22.440 --> 0:00:23.119
<v Speaker 2>Could be too.

0:00:23.520 --> 0:00:26.159
<v Speaker 1>There are risks associated with CBO company products. Review the

0:00:26.160 --> 0:00:34.080
<v Speaker 1>disclosures and disclaimers at CBO dot com slash us Underscore disclaimers.

0:00:42.760 --> 0:00:46.120
<v Speaker 3>Welcome. In episode one twenty five, What's Right with Nick Wright?

0:00:46.440 --> 0:00:50.120
<v Speaker 3>The podcast the YouTube show, and I want to spend

0:00:50.159 --> 0:00:52.760
<v Speaker 3>a moment here right off the top talking about the

0:00:52.800 --> 0:00:55.440
<v Speaker 3>YouTube portion of that because we set a goal out

0:00:56.280 --> 0:00:59.160
<v Speaker 3>I don't know, a few months ago to try to

0:00:59.360 --> 0:01:02.880
<v Speaker 3>buy the end football season get to one hundred thousand

0:01:02.960 --> 0:01:08.280
<v Speaker 3>subscribers on YouTube, and I was very confident we were

0:01:08.280 --> 0:01:12.279
<v Speaker 3>gonna get there initially. I then became a little less

0:01:12.360 --> 0:01:18.679
<v Speaker 3>confident eventually, and then over the last month we have

0:01:18.760 --> 0:01:23.200
<v Speaker 3>had rapid growth thanks to the folks watching right now,

0:01:23.640 --> 0:01:28.640
<v Speaker 3>the folks that promoted it, and we officially got there

0:01:29.200 --> 0:01:34.840
<v Speaker 3>shortly after Monday show. It is a legitimate, awesome accomplishment

0:01:35.280 --> 0:01:38.520
<v Speaker 3>for everybody involved in this show, from the folks at

0:01:38.520 --> 0:01:41.280
<v Speaker 3>Blue Duck that produce it, that make it more than

0:01:41.360 --> 0:01:45.520
<v Speaker 3>just a podcast, for Demanse, who's grown into co hosting

0:01:45.560 --> 0:01:48.480
<v Speaker 3>it and become a real personality on it. For me

0:01:49.120 --> 0:01:52.400
<v Speaker 3>as a passion project of mine to go kind of

0:01:52.440 --> 0:01:55.640
<v Speaker 3>hand in glove with what I do on television, and

0:01:55.680 --> 0:01:58.880
<v Speaker 3>the fact that now no matter where we go from

0:01:58.880 --> 0:02:02.120
<v Speaker 3>here on this, because to be totally candid, there are

0:02:02.120 --> 0:02:05.560
<v Speaker 3>some potential changes coming to the show one degree or

0:02:05.600 --> 0:02:09.720
<v Speaker 3>another because Demanse is moving to Los Angeles sometime after

0:02:09.760 --> 0:02:12.600
<v Speaker 3>the Super Bowl. What that means as far as how

0:02:12.600 --> 0:02:14.840
<v Speaker 3>we're gonna do it is his seat going to be

0:02:14.840 --> 0:02:18.840
<v Speaker 3>filled by my wife, by his little sister, by his

0:02:19.040 --> 0:02:22.320
<v Speaker 3>littlest sister who was really really positioning for the job.

0:02:22.400 --> 0:02:25.000
<v Speaker 3>But I don't think, Hey, I don't think she's getting

0:02:25.040 --> 0:02:28.160
<v Speaker 3>the call. If demand's gonna do it somewhat some of

0:02:28.200 --> 0:02:32.160
<v Speaker 3>the time remotely from LA that's not fully fleshed out yet,

0:02:32.320 --> 0:02:34.440
<v Speaker 3>But the fact that I got to partner with him,

0:02:34.919 --> 0:02:38.040
<v Speaker 3>and in the timeframe of have we been doing this

0:02:38.120 --> 0:02:40.800
<v Speaker 3>a full year, I think it's just under a full

0:02:40.880 --> 0:02:44.480
<v Speaker 3>year because we weren't doing it last football season. We

0:02:44.680 --> 0:02:48.800
<v Speaker 3>started March of last year April of last year, and

0:02:48.960 --> 0:02:52.120
<v Speaker 3>to now be it one hundred thousand subscribers in less

0:02:52.120 --> 0:02:57.800
<v Speaker 3>than one year, it's just tremendous. It's gratifying, it's awesome.

0:02:58.200 --> 0:03:01.720
<v Speaker 3>We greatly appreciate it. And what I would like to

0:03:01.760 --> 0:03:05.320
<v Speaker 3>do as a thank you to the folks who watch

0:03:05.400 --> 0:03:09.919
<v Speaker 3>us on YouTube Monday of next week, we can maybe

0:03:09.960 --> 0:03:13.480
<v Speaker 3>do at the very top of the show a traditional show,

0:03:13.960 --> 0:03:16.960
<v Speaker 3>but then for the bulk of the show, I want

0:03:16.960 --> 0:03:18.600
<v Speaker 3>it to be what we do at the end of

0:03:18.639 --> 0:03:21.160
<v Speaker 3>the shows, which is the listener Q and A. I

0:03:21.200 --> 0:03:24.120
<v Speaker 3>will jump in the chat during the show and just

0:03:24.280 --> 0:03:28.519
<v Speaker 3>kind of respond to whatever topics people want to, kind

0:03:28.520 --> 0:03:31.760
<v Speaker 3>of old school live radio style, when we had a

0:03:31.800 --> 0:03:34.280
<v Speaker 3>text line and a call in line and people could

0:03:34.360 --> 0:03:36.440
<v Speaker 3>call in or text in. You won't be able to

0:03:36.480 --> 0:03:39.760
<v Speaker 3>call into the show, but you guys can put in

0:03:39.800 --> 0:03:42.000
<v Speaker 3>your comments. Today. We will do that at the end

0:03:42.080 --> 0:03:45.680
<v Speaker 3>of the show. But maybe Monday show will do the

0:03:45.840 --> 0:03:48.560
<v Speaker 3>entirety of the show like that or ninety percent of it,

0:03:48.880 --> 0:03:52.280
<v Speaker 3>and then Thursday we will be doing the show live

0:03:52.400 --> 0:03:56.080
<v Speaker 3>from the Super Bowl in Arizona, and so all of that.

0:03:56.520 --> 0:04:00.720
<v Speaker 3>We're very happy. I'm incredibly grateful, incredibly than What do

0:04:00.760 --> 0:04:01.520
<v Speaker 3>you got going.

0:04:01.320 --> 0:04:04.200
<v Speaker 2>On for you? Oh?

0:04:04.200 --> 0:04:08.600
<v Speaker 3>Our friends at Blue Duck Media. Let's oh, we're popping bottles.

0:04:09.160 --> 0:04:13.320
<v Speaker 3>Oh we got some champagne. How about that? Look at

0:04:13.360 --> 0:04:16.760
<v Speaker 3>that what you said it is. I'm sure it's a

0:04:16.800 --> 0:04:19.640
<v Speaker 3>beautiful bottle of champagne. It's a little early for me

0:04:19.720 --> 0:04:22.599
<v Speaker 3>to be drinking. I know people like champagne at breakfast

0:04:22.680 --> 0:04:25.720
<v Speaker 3>with Mimosa's not really my thing. But I'll just set

0:04:25.760 --> 0:04:29.680
<v Speaker 3>that here and we can. You know what, maybe maybe

0:04:29.720 --> 0:04:33.000
<v Speaker 3>I'll let you. I don't know. I feel like maybe

0:04:33.040 --> 0:04:36.040
<v Speaker 3>that could be a good like fourth date thing for

0:04:36.080 --> 0:04:39.080
<v Speaker 3>you with somebody. Yeah, just bring it over. When you

0:04:39.120 --> 0:04:40.880
<v Speaker 3>picked the young lady up, be like, hey, I brought

0:04:40.960 --> 0:04:43.640
<v Speaker 3>you this. Yeah, just give her a bottle of fancy champagne.

0:04:43.640 --> 0:04:45.720
<v Speaker 3>That could just give her the bottle. Well that's what

0:04:45.800 --> 0:04:48.360
<v Speaker 3>you do, Like, yeah, you give them and then if

0:04:48.360 --> 0:04:50.599
<v Speaker 3>she wants to toast with you or something, that's fine.

0:04:51.200 --> 0:04:53.839
<v Speaker 3>But this is great. We really appreciate it. Now let's

0:04:53.880 --> 0:04:56.520
<v Speaker 3>get to the actual show. Here is what missed the

0:04:56.600 --> 0:05:00.520
<v Speaker 3>cut in today's show. The Texans make a great decision

0:05:00.560 --> 0:05:03.800
<v Speaker 3>and hired Demiko Ryans, the Texans legend. He gets a

0:05:03.839 --> 0:05:06.640
<v Speaker 3>six year contract. I think it's a great hire. Smart

0:05:06.640 --> 0:05:09.560
<v Speaker 3>by them. Josh Allen too injured to play in the

0:05:09.600 --> 0:05:12.960
<v Speaker 3>Pro Bowl, allegedly not too injured to play Pebble Beach

0:05:13.040 --> 0:05:16.560
<v Speaker 3>in golf. That's fun. And Patrick Mahomes will be on

0:05:16.880 --> 0:05:21.200
<v Speaker 3>First Things First later today. We actually recorded that yesterday

0:05:21.800 --> 0:05:25.839
<v Speaker 3>and that is going to air at four pm Eastern

0:05:26.400 --> 0:05:30.880
<v Speaker 3>sharp on First Things First, our first television interview with

0:05:31.040 --> 0:05:37.279
<v Speaker 3>Patrick Mahomes, as I have randomly thanks to the my

0:05:37.520 --> 0:05:40.479
<v Speaker 3>Here's what's funny, and then we'll get to the actual show.

0:05:41.360 --> 0:05:44.520
<v Speaker 3>So the chiefs evidently love me. I figured they should,

0:05:44.560 --> 0:05:49.320
<v Speaker 3>but I didn't quite know it. But sports media, it's

0:05:49.480 --> 0:05:51.279
<v Speaker 3>just so funny how things work out.

0:05:51.360 --> 0:05:51.600
<v Speaker 2>Man.

0:05:52.000 --> 0:05:56.880
<v Speaker 3>It feels like ninety percent of my industry, the sports

0:05:57.000 --> 0:06:02.880
<v Speaker 3>television talkers are fighting for the same corner. I am

0:06:02.960 --> 0:06:08.799
<v Speaker 3>going to be the loudest and most prominent Cowboys supporter

0:06:09.360 --> 0:06:11.320
<v Speaker 3>or I Am going to be the loudest and most

0:06:11.360 --> 0:06:16.640
<v Speaker 3>prominent Cowboys detractor. Everyone fighting for that same piece of

0:06:16.680 --> 0:06:22.239
<v Speaker 3>real estate. Meanwhile, I'm surveying all the available real estate

0:06:22.240 --> 0:06:26.039
<v Speaker 3>and I'm like, hmm, there's this team that happens to

0:06:26.080 --> 0:06:29.760
<v Speaker 3>play in my hometown, that has a guy that all

0:06:29.800 --> 0:06:32.080
<v Speaker 3>of us seem to acknowledge might end up being the

0:06:32.120 --> 0:06:37.960
<v Speaker 3>greatest player ever, and that real estate is totally unguarded. Yeah,

0:06:37.960 --> 0:06:42.840
<v Speaker 3>and so four years ago I staked my claim being

0:06:42.880 --> 0:06:46.280
<v Speaker 3>a lifelong Kansas city and always loving the Chiefs and

0:06:46.320 --> 0:06:49.600
<v Speaker 3>believing in Mahomes. And for the last I guess five

0:06:49.680 --> 0:06:51.880
<v Speaker 3>years ago, I did it. For the last five years,

0:06:52.400 --> 0:06:55.279
<v Speaker 3>I've had my crew ready on alert that hey, guys,

0:06:55.680 --> 0:06:57.760
<v Speaker 3>we might have to fight for this corner one day,

0:06:58.120 --> 0:07:01.560
<v Speaker 3>we might have to repel some attack. And somehow the

0:07:01.720 --> 0:07:05.400
<v Speaker 3>entirety of sports media has just seated me the ground.

0:07:06.080 --> 0:07:08.640
<v Speaker 3>They've all just decided like, oh no, Nick is the

0:07:08.680 --> 0:07:12.080
<v Speaker 3>Mahomes guy. All be the Josh Allen guy, All be

0:07:12.280 --> 0:07:15.920
<v Speaker 3>the Justin Herbert guy. We even there was fighting over

0:07:16.240 --> 0:07:20.120
<v Speaker 3>who gets to be the Tua tongue of Iloa person. Meanwhile,

0:07:20.520 --> 0:07:24.800
<v Speaker 3>the Patrick Mahomes corner was just given to me. It's unbelievable.

0:07:24.800 --> 0:07:26.440
<v Speaker 3>You were trying to say something. I apologize.

0:07:26.520 --> 0:07:29.600
<v Speaker 4>Uh No, I forgot No what a predicament you would

0:07:29.600 --> 0:07:31.560
<v Speaker 4>have been in a Mahomes went to the Cowboys.

0:07:31.960 --> 0:07:35.600
<v Speaker 3>Well, well, here's the thing. I would have respected the talent.

0:07:36.320 --> 0:07:39.760
<v Speaker 3>But the reason I'm a Mahomes guy is because he

0:07:39.800 --> 0:07:42.560
<v Speaker 3>plays for my hometown team City. Yeah. And then man,

0:07:42.640 --> 0:07:46.280
<v Speaker 3>his dad went on, you know one of my best

0:07:46.320 --> 0:07:48.680
<v Speaker 3>friends in the world guy a host radio in Chicago

0:07:48.760 --> 0:07:51.720
<v Speaker 3>named Danny Parkins. He does afternoons on the Score. Also,

0:07:51.760 --> 0:07:54.720
<v Speaker 3>there's a great podcast that you guys should subscribe to

0:07:54.800 --> 0:07:57.640
<v Speaker 3>with another great friend of mine named Andrew Philipponi called

0:07:57.680 --> 0:08:01.120
<v Speaker 3>First in Pod. The people that produce that podcast not

0:08:01.200 --> 0:08:03.080
<v Speaker 3>quite as great as the folks at Blue Duck. In

0:08:03.160 --> 0:08:06.400
<v Speaker 3>order to find that podcast, you literally have to type

0:08:06.400 --> 0:08:11.640
<v Speaker 3>in first with the number one st space ampersand space

0:08:11.880 --> 0:08:14.400
<v Speaker 3>pod if you tie. If you spell out first in Pod,

0:08:14.520 --> 0:08:17.800
<v Speaker 3>it doesn't show up. Not great for subscriber growth, but

0:08:17.920 --> 0:08:20.720
<v Speaker 3>it's a great pod. He had Patrick mahomes dad on

0:08:20.760 --> 0:08:24.600
<v Speaker 3>the show two days ago. Okay, and Patrick Mahomes's dad

0:08:24.600 --> 0:08:27.360
<v Speaker 3>said that the Chicago Bears told Patrick they were drafting

0:08:27.400 --> 0:08:30.880
<v Speaker 3>him at three, committed to drafting him at three, and

0:08:30.920 --> 0:08:33.760
<v Speaker 3>then traded up from three to two and drafted Mitch Trubisky,

0:08:34.160 --> 0:08:37.439
<v Speaker 3>which is why Mahomes when he scored a touchdown against

0:08:37.480 --> 0:08:40.480
<v Speaker 3>the Bears, counted on his fingers one to ten one

0:08:40.520 --> 0:08:43.760
<v Speaker 3>other Patrick Mahomes. Fact that is, this is not like

0:08:43.840 --> 0:08:47.120
<v Speaker 3>breaking news, but it seems like my guess is the

0:08:47.240 --> 0:08:51.160
<v Speaker 3>vast majority of the audience does not know this. I

0:08:51.240 --> 0:08:56.160
<v Speaker 3>bet even the producers might not remember this. Everybody knows

0:08:56.280 --> 0:08:59.319
<v Speaker 3>the Chiefs had Alex Smith when they drafted Patrick Mahomes, right,

0:09:00.280 --> 0:09:03.319
<v Speaker 3>I think people know that Chiefs team was quite good.

0:09:03.960 --> 0:09:06.520
<v Speaker 3>So how did they end up having the tenth pick

0:09:06.559 --> 0:09:10.959
<v Speaker 3>of the draft. It was because during the draft they

0:09:11.080 --> 0:09:15.800
<v Speaker 3>traded up for Patrick Mahomes. So that then brings the question,

0:09:16.200 --> 0:09:22.040
<v Speaker 3>does anyone here remember or know who traded away the

0:09:22.160 --> 0:09:27.840
<v Speaker 3>pick that became Patrick Mahomes. The answer to that question

0:09:28.960 --> 0:09:35.440
<v Speaker 3>is the Buffalo Bills. Nobody ever thinks about that little

0:09:35.520 --> 0:09:40.000
<v Speaker 3>What if the Bills, who needed a quarterback, were on

0:09:40.080 --> 0:09:45.080
<v Speaker 3>the clock with a chance to take Patrick bleeping Mahomes

0:09:45.559 --> 0:09:49.880
<v Speaker 3>and traded the pick to Kansas City. What they got back,

0:09:49.960 --> 0:09:53.160
<v Speaker 3>it should be noted, was the Chiefs first rounder, which

0:09:53.160 --> 0:09:56.160
<v Speaker 3>in that year's draft was like the twenty seventh pick,

0:09:56.440 --> 0:09:59.800
<v Speaker 3>and the Bills with that pick ended up taking Tradevious White,

0:09:59.800 --> 0:10:03.400
<v Speaker 3>who an awesome player towards ACL last year but was

0:10:03.440 --> 0:10:05.920
<v Speaker 3>an all pro level corner, and they got the Chiefs

0:10:06.040 --> 0:10:08.400
<v Speaker 3>next year first round pick, which they ended up trading,

0:10:08.400 --> 0:10:11.080
<v Speaker 3>and the next year they drafted Josh Allen. So there

0:10:11.240 --> 0:10:14.440
<v Speaker 3>was when people remembered this the brief narrative of oh,

0:10:14.720 --> 0:10:19.240
<v Speaker 3>both teams won. Spoiler alert, folks, Only one team wins

0:10:19.280 --> 0:10:22.000
<v Speaker 3>when you trade away the pick that becomes Patrick Mahomes,

0:10:22.040 --> 0:10:24.480
<v Speaker 3>the team that got Patrick Mahomes. There is a bit

0:10:24.520 --> 0:10:30.120
<v Speaker 3>of you know, the Dallas Mavericks traded up in the

0:10:30.200 --> 0:10:31.280
<v Speaker 3>draft for Luke A.

0:10:31.320 --> 0:10:31.760
<v Speaker 2>D Ancic.

0:10:32.240 --> 0:10:35.520
<v Speaker 3>They traded away a future first round pick and the

0:10:35.559 --> 0:10:39.520
<v Speaker 3>fifth pick of the draft, which became Trey Young, nice player.

0:10:40.080 --> 0:10:42.280
<v Speaker 3>People were like, oh, both teams won. No, both teams

0:10:42.280 --> 0:10:45.480
<v Speaker 3>did not win. The one team got a nice player.

0:10:45.800 --> 0:10:48.040
<v Speaker 3>The other team got a guy who's gonna be one

0:10:48.080 --> 0:10:50.000
<v Speaker 3>of the greatest players in the history of the league.

0:10:50.400 --> 0:10:54.120
<v Speaker 3>Same thing happened in this situation. One team got a

0:10:54.280 --> 0:10:58.080
<v Speaker 3>nice player in Josh Allen. Eventually the other team got

0:10:58.440 --> 0:11:00.360
<v Speaker 3>the guy who might go down as the great player in.

0:11:00.360 --> 0:11:02.880
<v Speaker 2>The history, the second best quarterback in the league.

0:11:03.559 --> 0:11:06.439
<v Speaker 3>Who Josh Allen. Oh wow, no respect for Joe Burrow,

0:11:06.600 --> 0:11:09.080
<v Speaker 3>no respect for Jalen Hurts. There again, by the way,

0:11:09.320 --> 0:11:12.160
<v Speaker 3>second straight year. And then we'll get to the actual show. Sorry,

0:11:13.600 --> 0:11:15.440
<v Speaker 3>I think we're fifteen minutes in. We haven't even gotten

0:11:15.440 --> 0:11:16.160
<v Speaker 3>to the rundown yet.

0:11:16.400 --> 0:11:16.559
<v Speaker 2>Uh.

0:11:17.240 --> 0:11:24.079
<v Speaker 3>Second straight year the Buffalo Bills finish in seventh or

0:11:24.120 --> 0:11:26.560
<v Speaker 3>eighth place. And I know that you might be like,

0:11:26.600 --> 0:11:28.040
<v Speaker 3>how do you call it seventh or eighth place? Well,

0:11:28.040 --> 0:11:32.120
<v Speaker 3>here's what I know. They were in the final eight teams, right,

0:11:33.240 --> 0:11:37.120
<v Speaker 3>they lost for the second straight year to the team

0:11:37.640 --> 0:11:40.600
<v Speaker 3>that then lost it in the next round. So if

0:11:40.640 --> 0:11:43.600
<v Speaker 3>we got to figure out of the four teams that

0:11:43.679 --> 0:11:46.559
<v Speaker 3>made the division around, if we were to put places

0:11:46.600 --> 0:11:49.000
<v Speaker 3>on them, well, the guys who would finish in the

0:11:49.040 --> 0:11:51.560
<v Speaker 3>bottom of that would be the two teams that lost

0:11:51.600 --> 0:11:53.800
<v Speaker 3>to the two teams that then lost the next round.

0:11:54.040 --> 0:11:56.360
<v Speaker 3>Last year they lost to the Chiefs, who then immediately

0:11:56.360 --> 0:11:58.520
<v Speaker 3>lost to the Bengals. This year they lost to the Bengals,

0:11:58.559 --> 0:12:00.760
<v Speaker 3>who then immediately lost to the Chiefs. I guess now

0:12:00.800 --> 0:12:03.800
<v Speaker 3>we can start the show now that I got my cursory.

0:12:04.120 --> 0:12:07.680
<v Speaker 3>Josh Allen Buffalo Bill slander in that no one saw coming, DeLanda,

0:12:07.800 --> 0:12:08.920
<v Speaker 3>what are we starting with today?

0:12:08.960 --> 0:12:12.079
<v Speaker 4>Twenty minutes in Story of the Week as zero subscribers,

0:12:12.120 --> 0:12:14.600
<v Speaker 4>Tom Brady unretired at one hundred thousand.

0:12:14.720 --> 0:12:15.760
<v Speaker 2>He unretired.

0:12:16.040 --> 0:12:17.320
<v Speaker 3>He retired, retired.

0:12:17.400 --> 0:12:19.360
<v Speaker 4>Sorry, what a journey has been for all of us,

0:12:20.080 --> 0:12:23.000
<v Speaker 4>much less fun for Brady obviously. Yeah, he probably didn't

0:12:23.000 --> 0:12:24.960
<v Speaker 4>have this type of ending in mind. If he could

0:12:25.000 --> 0:12:26.679
<v Speaker 4>do it all over, do you think he would make

0:12:26.720 --> 0:12:28.880
<v Speaker 4>the same decisions over the last few years.

0:12:29.360 --> 0:12:36.160
<v Speaker 3>Okay, So this is where I am going to show.

0:12:38.200 --> 0:12:40.320
<v Speaker 3>I'm gonna take this in a far different direction than

0:12:40.360 --> 0:12:44.720
<v Speaker 3>I think people expect. So the narrative is that Tom

0:12:44.760 --> 0:12:50.840
<v Speaker 3>Brady sacrificed things that might have included his marriage in

0:12:51.000 --> 0:12:54.800
<v Speaker 3>order to pursue football. There is an amazing Seth Wickersham

0:12:54.880 --> 0:12:58.680
<v Speaker 3>article that came out yesterday that really gives us more

0:12:58.720 --> 0:13:02.240
<v Speaker 3>details on what happened between he and Giselle than I

0:13:02.280 --> 0:13:05.000
<v Speaker 3>have seen anywhere. And Seth, who wrote a book on

0:13:05.040 --> 0:13:08.960
<v Speaker 3>the Patriots, who knows Tom, who's interviewed Tom a ton

0:13:09.000 --> 0:13:12.280
<v Speaker 3>of times, did Tom verstime all that stuff? Basically says

0:13:12.320 --> 0:13:15.359
<v Speaker 3>it was the football. It was what we all suspected

0:13:15.360 --> 0:13:20.160
<v Speaker 3>that the football. That she she was fed up with,

0:13:21.040 --> 0:13:24.760
<v Speaker 3>how committed he was to football, and how it never

0:13:24.800 --> 0:13:27.040
<v Speaker 3>seemed like it would end that it was you know

0:13:27.120 --> 0:13:30.880
<v Speaker 3>that when he won the Super Bowl in Tampa. Uh,

0:13:31.760 --> 0:13:33.800
<v Speaker 3>she said to him, what more do you have to prove?

0:13:34.000 --> 0:13:36.320
<v Speaker 3>And he kind of blew her off. And they write

0:13:36.320 --> 0:13:38.520
<v Speaker 3>in the article about how she would he would Tom

0:13:38.520 --> 0:13:41.360
<v Speaker 3>would wake up in the mornings ready to go attack

0:13:41.440 --> 0:13:43.600
<v Speaker 3>the day, and she would already be mad at him

0:13:43.640 --> 0:13:46.000
<v Speaker 3>and ask him is this a family day or a

0:13:46.080 --> 0:13:48.840
<v Speaker 3>Tommy day? And it talked about how.

0:13:48.720 --> 0:13:50.800
<v Speaker 2>Somebody other than Tom Brady said all this.

0:13:51.400 --> 0:13:54.920
<v Speaker 3>Seth Wickersham wrote all this, but Seth Wickersham wrote a

0:13:54.960 --> 0:13:58.559
<v Speaker 3>book on Brady before knows Brady is a great reporter.

0:13:59.040 --> 0:14:02.760
<v Speaker 3>It's it seemed. It's not like some tabloid stuff. This

0:14:02.880 --> 0:14:06.080
<v Speaker 3>is a real journalist that clearly has these relationships, that

0:14:06.240 --> 0:14:10.400
<v Speaker 3>knows these things. So here's where I'm going to say

0:14:10.520 --> 0:14:19.760
<v Speaker 3>the I think unpopular thing. If you are in the

0:14:19.880 --> 0:14:24.200
<v Speaker 3>running for the greatest in the history of the world,

0:14:24.240 --> 0:14:30.880
<v Speaker 3>it's something. There is an argument to be made that

0:14:31.000 --> 0:14:38.200
<v Speaker 3>your responsibility is to your own talent more so than

0:14:38.360 --> 0:14:42.640
<v Speaker 3>even your wife and children. Doesn't mean you can treat

0:14:42.640 --> 0:14:46.520
<v Speaker 3>them poorly, doesn't mean you neglect them any of those things.

0:14:47.200 --> 0:14:53.680
<v Speaker 3>But I okay, this is again where it's gonna sound

0:14:53.760 --> 0:14:57.840
<v Speaker 3>crazy to some people. I don't view this that differently

0:14:58.560 --> 0:15:03.080
<v Speaker 3>than if someone if the greatest astronaut in the world.

0:15:03.640 --> 0:15:08.200
<v Speaker 3>They were like, listen, man, you're the only person who

0:15:08.320 --> 0:15:11.680
<v Speaker 3>we can send to Mars. You're the only one who

0:15:11.760 --> 0:15:14.520
<v Speaker 3>can handle the job. You're going to be gone for

0:15:14.720 --> 0:15:20.280
<v Speaker 3>four years till you come back. There is an argument

0:15:20.400 --> 0:15:24.920
<v Speaker 3>to be made that that person has a responsibility to

0:15:25.200 --> 0:15:32.920
<v Speaker 3>society to take on that charge. And Tom Brady was

0:15:33.000 --> 0:15:39.600
<v Speaker 3>trying to do things no athlete had ever done. It

0:15:39.680 --> 0:15:42.440
<v Speaker 3>did not sit well with his wife. That is her prerogative,

0:15:42.440 --> 0:15:45.280
<v Speaker 3>and she is in a unique position because she was

0:15:45.560 --> 0:15:47.240
<v Speaker 3>one of the greatest in the history of the world.

0:15:47.240 --> 0:15:50.360
<v Speaker 3>Had heard thing, and she paused it all for the family.

0:15:50.880 --> 0:15:51.360
<v Speaker 2>Got it.

0:15:53.080 --> 0:15:58.000
<v Speaker 3>I think the kids will understand when they get older.

0:15:59.200 --> 0:16:05.600
<v Speaker 3>I think that there are certain things where it is

0:16:05.760 --> 0:16:10.800
<v Speaker 3>not the same as if you are a mediocre or

0:16:11.040 --> 0:16:15.320
<v Speaker 3>mid level corporate lawyer and you're working one hundred hours

0:16:15.360 --> 0:16:18.680
<v Speaker 3>a week to create no legacy at all because you're

0:16:18.720 --> 0:16:22.600
<v Speaker 3>obsessed with your job. You are the best ever at something.

0:16:23.040 --> 0:16:26.800
<v Speaker 3>You had a stated goal, I am going to play

0:16:26.880 --> 0:16:31.400
<v Speaker 3>until I'm forty five. You wanted to reach it. I

0:16:31.680 --> 0:16:38.040
<v Speaker 3>get it now, do I understand some people feel like, well,

0:16:38.360 --> 0:16:40.800
<v Speaker 3>but if he would have just retired two years ago,

0:16:41.680 --> 0:16:45.680
<v Speaker 3>maybe he's still married. Who knows. Certainly he has the

0:16:45.720 --> 0:16:48.360
<v Speaker 3>same number of championships. Yes, but you know what, he

0:16:48.400 --> 0:16:52.720
<v Speaker 3>doesn't have the ability to say yes, the peace of

0:16:52.760 --> 0:16:56.440
<v Speaker 3>mind to say I accomplished everything I said. I was

0:16:56.520 --> 0:16:59.320
<v Speaker 3>going to one of the things he said he was

0:16:59.360 --> 0:17:03.000
<v Speaker 3>going to do with playing until he's forty five. He

0:17:03.160 --> 0:17:08.639
<v Speaker 3>wanted to do that. And again, I'm not trying to

0:17:08.840 --> 0:17:12.040
<v Speaker 3>compare myself at all to Tom Brady. I am not

0:17:12.200 --> 0:17:16.240
<v Speaker 3>the greatest sportscaster in the history of the world. However,

0:17:16.320 --> 0:17:22.960
<v Speaker 3>what I will say is this. It has been over

0:17:23.000 --> 0:17:26.240
<v Speaker 3>the last decade of my life, and your mom and

0:17:26.280 --> 0:17:28.920
<v Speaker 3>I are coming up on our ten year wedding anniversary

0:17:29.320 --> 0:17:35.600
<v Speaker 3>and fifteen years together. An habitual burr in her saddle,

0:17:35.640 --> 0:17:41.280
<v Speaker 3>if you will, that there is no level of professional

0:17:41.320 --> 0:17:48.440
<v Speaker 3>accomplishment that I can achieve that results in me throttling down,

0:17:49.400 --> 0:17:52.399
<v Speaker 3>that results in me taking my foot off the gas.

0:17:52.160 --> 0:17:52.720
<v Speaker 2>A little bit.

0:17:53.760 --> 0:17:58.080
<v Speaker 3>There is. She is convinced that the majority of people

0:17:58.119 --> 0:18:04.040
<v Speaker 3>in my field don't watch all the games, and she's right.

0:18:04.720 --> 0:18:10.760
<v Speaker 3>She is convinced that I could probably keep up maybe

0:18:11.040 --> 0:18:16.959
<v Speaker 3>ninety five percent of the accomplishment, success all of it,

0:18:18.080 --> 0:18:23.080
<v Speaker 3>with fifty percent of the work and she's probably right,

0:18:24.800 --> 0:18:29.800
<v Speaker 3>but that's not how I'm wired, and that's not the

0:18:29.920 --> 0:18:33.320
<v Speaker 3>game that I've ever been in, the game that I've

0:18:33.480 --> 0:18:37.879
<v Speaker 3>always been trying to play is will there be a

0:18:38.040 --> 0:18:40.959
<v Speaker 3>moment in time? I've said this before and I'll say

0:18:40.960 --> 0:18:43.840
<v Speaker 3>it again. Will there be a single moment in time

0:18:44.280 --> 0:18:47.280
<v Speaker 3>where if you did a family feud style, ask one

0:18:47.359 --> 0:18:51.800
<v Speaker 3>hundred sports fans on the street, who is the best

0:18:51.840 --> 0:18:56.159
<v Speaker 3>sports talk guy, there is where I get the most votes.

0:18:57.160 --> 0:19:02.480
<v Speaker 3>I have not gotten there yet in the conversation. Now,

0:19:02.520 --> 0:19:04.760
<v Speaker 3>if you ask one hundred people, I get a few votes.

0:19:05.560 --> 0:19:09.440
<v Speaker 3>But I'm not Colin, I'm not skipped. I'm not Steven A.

0:19:10.800 --> 0:19:15.000
<v Speaker 3>And what can be frustrating for the our loved ones

0:19:15.320 --> 0:19:19.639
<v Speaker 3>when you are when that is your standard is even

0:19:19.840 --> 0:19:23.400
<v Speaker 3>if and when you get there, you probably then change

0:19:23.640 --> 0:19:28.080
<v Speaker 3>what you're chasing next, and it can be incredibly difficult

0:19:28.920 --> 0:19:33.000
<v Speaker 3>on the people around you. It can be not the

0:19:33.040 --> 0:19:37.200
<v Speaker 3>best thing for your children. I so and again, and

0:19:37.240 --> 0:19:40.919
<v Speaker 3>I'm not Brady, but I think we have some similarity

0:19:40.960 --> 0:19:46.240
<v Speaker 3>as far as drive goes. And these are the sacrifices

0:19:46.320 --> 0:19:49.960
<v Speaker 3>you make and the decisions that you make if you

0:19:50.280 --> 0:19:54.119
<v Speaker 3>truly want to be the very very best and you

0:19:54.320 --> 0:19:59.520
<v Speaker 3>hope that for your children. You there's a couple. There

0:19:59.520 --> 0:20:03.680
<v Speaker 3>are some positives that come along with the negatives. One

0:20:03.760 --> 0:20:08.480
<v Speaker 3>is usually some financial independence, that you can give them

0:20:08.480 --> 0:20:11.359
<v Speaker 3>some money, that you can help them out. Another is

0:20:11.840 --> 0:20:15.680
<v Speaker 3>the foot in the door professionally in places. And another

0:20:15.760 --> 0:20:22.560
<v Speaker 3>one is that they are inspired or take with them

0:20:23.480 --> 0:20:27.120
<v Speaker 3>the lessons of how hard you have to work at

0:20:27.200 --> 0:20:31.919
<v Speaker 3>anything to be great at anything. And so it's like

0:20:31.960 --> 0:20:35.320
<v Speaker 3>a push in a pull, Like while I was chasing

0:20:35.359 --> 0:20:38.440
<v Speaker 3>my job, you were spending your senior year of high

0:20:38.480 --> 0:20:41.760
<v Speaker 3>school without me. It was back and forth on the weekends.

0:20:42.119 --> 0:20:44.560
<v Speaker 3>That was not good for you. So I have to

0:20:44.720 --> 0:20:47.919
<v Speaker 3>own that that was a selfish decision by me for

0:20:48.040 --> 0:20:51.320
<v Speaker 3>what I wanted to do. That hurt you no, but

0:20:51.520 --> 0:20:53.880
<v Speaker 3>the and I know you don't blame me for that.

0:20:53.920 --> 0:20:55.960
<v Speaker 3>You don't have old any bitterness, but I old bitterness

0:20:56.000 --> 0:21:00.680
<v Speaker 3>against myself for it. The hope is in the long

0:21:00.800 --> 0:21:03.440
<v Speaker 3>run we at least make it even a bit. While

0:21:03.520 --> 0:21:09.800
<v Speaker 3>I've been chasing my job, I didn't with Diora, your sister,

0:21:10.640 --> 0:21:13.600
<v Speaker 3>like probably push her as hard as I should have

0:21:13.680 --> 0:21:15.960
<v Speaker 3>on a lot of the college and school stuff. I

0:21:16.119 --> 0:21:21.280
<v Speaker 3>was focused on me. And now she's navigating that, and

0:21:21.359 --> 0:21:23.720
<v Speaker 3>I help her as I can, and I don't know

0:21:23.840 --> 0:21:27.119
<v Speaker 3>I'm emotional right now, but like, I see the stuff

0:21:27.160 --> 0:21:30.040
<v Speaker 3>people are saying about Brady right now, and I think

0:21:30.080 --> 0:21:35.320
<v Speaker 3>a lot of it's bull like, oh, yep, sacrificed your

0:21:35.359 --> 0:21:37.920
<v Speaker 3>marriage to go eight and nine. And I just don't

0:21:37.920 --> 0:21:41.520
<v Speaker 3>think people understand these are not easy decisions. These are

0:21:41.560 --> 0:21:46.040
<v Speaker 3>not easy things, and people know, we know we are

0:21:46.119 --> 0:21:49.840
<v Speaker 3>at times putting ourselves first in a selfish way that

0:21:49.880 --> 0:21:52.840
<v Speaker 3>you're not supposed to as a parent. And it's what

0:21:53.000 --> 0:21:56.280
<v Speaker 3>I learned from my own dad, right my own dad,

0:21:57.560 --> 0:22:03.560
<v Speaker 3>who I have massive admiration or absolutely put me and

0:22:03.640 --> 0:22:08.560
<v Speaker 3>my sister at times on the back burner too negotiating

0:22:08.640 --> 0:22:13.040
<v Speaker 3>the best bargain possible for the Kansaty firefighters. And his legacy.

0:22:13.200 --> 0:22:16.439
<v Speaker 3>He's a great dad who I adore. His real life's

0:22:16.520 --> 0:22:19.399
<v Speaker 3>legacy is not the things he did for me and

0:22:19.440 --> 0:22:22.080
<v Speaker 3>my sister. His real legacy is the things he did

0:22:22.080 --> 0:22:27.320
<v Speaker 3>for those firefighters and their families. So like you, but

0:22:27.480 --> 0:22:31.239
<v Speaker 3>you you have those push and pull things and you

0:22:31.320 --> 0:22:34.959
<v Speaker 3>make decisions and you deal with the fallout of it.

0:22:35.320 --> 0:22:42.040
<v Speaker 3>And when I hope that what your sister missed out

0:22:42.080 --> 0:22:44.560
<v Speaker 3>on on maybe I could have helped her a little

0:22:44.560 --> 0:22:48.240
<v Speaker 3>more academically. She can I can make up for in

0:22:48.760 --> 0:22:52.359
<v Speaker 3>Maybe when she's pursuing her acting dream, she sees the

0:22:52.480 --> 0:22:55.000
<v Speaker 3>vigor and the resolve you have to pursue anything with.

0:22:55.880 --> 0:22:59.800
<v Speaker 3>And that's what I'm sure Brady. I'm sure that's what

0:23:00.080 --> 0:23:04.520
<v Speaker 3>Rady is hoping for his kids too, And it's really

0:23:04.640 --> 0:23:06.280
<v Speaker 3>sad that he and Gisel didn't make it.

0:23:07.920 --> 0:23:08.240
<v Speaker 2>Again.

0:23:08.320 --> 0:23:10.919
<v Speaker 3>We don't talk about these things, but it's public, and

0:23:11.000 --> 0:23:14.159
<v Speaker 3>I think it's I think it's out there, and I listen.

0:23:14.680 --> 0:23:19.760
<v Speaker 3>I hope, I hope somebody, if there's anybody that is

0:23:19.800 --> 0:23:25.639
<v Speaker 3>in Tom's orbit that is vibes with this podcast or

0:23:25.720 --> 0:23:29.440
<v Speaker 3>is aware of it, I hope somebody sends him these

0:23:29.480 --> 0:23:35.840
<v Speaker 3>last ten minutes, because I bro I get it, and

0:23:35.880 --> 0:23:39.879
<v Speaker 3>I and that farewell video of him alone on the

0:23:39.920 --> 0:23:46.679
<v Speaker 3>beach choking up. That's hard, man, because he hasn't because

0:23:47.359 --> 0:23:52.600
<v Speaker 3>it is now over and now he is just alone

0:23:52.760 --> 0:23:58.840
<v Speaker 3>with those decisions, and you do wonder was it worth it?

0:23:58.880 --> 0:24:00.679
<v Speaker 3>Did I make the right decision? And you don't know,

0:24:01.800 --> 0:24:06.320
<v Speaker 3>And so I empathize with you, man, And while you know,

0:24:06.520 --> 0:24:08.560
<v Speaker 3>I rooted against him about as much as I've ever

0:24:08.640 --> 0:24:12.800
<v Speaker 3>rooted against any athlete ever. I understand what he was

0:24:12.840 --> 0:24:15.639
<v Speaker 3>doing the last few years. I totally get it. All right,

0:24:15.720 --> 0:24:16.440
<v Speaker 3>let's move on to the.

0:24:16.359 --> 0:24:19.520
<v Speaker 2>Next thing, Brady and Lebron.

0:24:19.760 --> 0:24:21.320
<v Speaker 3>No, let's move on to Sean Payton.

0:24:21.400 --> 0:24:23.919
<v Speaker 4>Yep, all right, So Sean Payton is officially heading to

0:24:23.960 --> 0:24:27.560
<v Speaker 4>Denver once again, Denver has a coach plus a quarterback.

0:24:27.160 --> 0:24:29.480
<v Speaker 2>Who may end up in the Hall of Fame. Yep.

0:24:29.720 --> 0:24:31.439
<v Speaker 4>I know You're Chiefs are in the Super Bowl right now,

0:24:31.480 --> 0:24:33.639
<v Speaker 4>but you've got to be at least a little worried again.

0:24:34.080 --> 0:24:38.160
<v Speaker 3>It's just already start the reason the Chiefs aren't gonna

0:24:38.200 --> 0:24:40.840
<v Speaker 3>win the AFC for the thirty fifth straight year. I

0:24:40.920 --> 0:24:43.320
<v Speaker 3>like Sean Payton. I think Sean Payton's a very good coach.

0:24:43.600 --> 0:24:46.080
<v Speaker 3>I think this is a team that did not have

0:24:47.000 --> 0:24:50.600
<v Speaker 3>draft capital to lose, and they just spent a first

0:24:50.600 --> 0:24:54.560
<v Speaker 3>in a second on a coach. Now, I understand doing that,

0:24:55.320 --> 0:24:57.120
<v Speaker 3>and I do think Sean Payton will get the most

0:24:57.119 --> 0:24:58.120
<v Speaker 3>out of Russell Wilson.

0:24:58.400 --> 0:24:58.680
<v Speaker 2>Yep.

0:24:58.800 --> 0:25:02.400
<v Speaker 3>But I don't think that's good. Even if Sean Payton's

0:25:02.400 --> 0:25:07.640
<v Speaker 3>worth four wins, which is massive, not good enough. And

0:25:07.840 --> 0:25:13.200
<v Speaker 3>the idea that what happened to Russell Wilson was because

0:25:13.200 --> 0:25:16.440
<v Speaker 3>of bad coaching. I think that means you weren't watching

0:25:16.480 --> 0:25:18.520
<v Speaker 3>in the last few years in Seattle. It was a

0:25:18.560 --> 0:25:22.840
<v Speaker 3>steady decline the last few years in Seattle. People overrated

0:25:22.840 --> 0:25:26.760
<v Speaker 3>and overvalued that Broncos roster coming into the year. Yes,

0:25:26.840 --> 0:25:29.439
<v Speaker 3>this is a good hire. Yes, Sean Payton will do

0:25:29.480 --> 0:25:32.359
<v Speaker 3>a good job. But I'll be totally honest with you.

0:25:32.920 --> 0:25:38.399
<v Speaker 3>I am thrilled that Sean Payton did not wait for

0:25:38.520 --> 0:25:41.720
<v Speaker 3>the Chargers shop to open up potentially in a year

0:25:41.760 --> 0:25:45.720
<v Speaker 3>from now. Because Sean Payton plus Justin Herbert that concerns

0:25:45.760 --> 0:25:49.200
<v Speaker 3>me to a degree. Sean Payton plus Russell Wilson, the

0:25:49.280 --> 0:25:52.160
<v Speaker 3>Chiefs will be fine again. The Chiefs have not lost

0:25:52.160 --> 0:25:56.920
<v Speaker 3>to the Broncos since Obama was president. They're not all

0:25:56.960 --> 0:25:58.960
<v Speaker 3>of a sudden, That's true. We've had one and a

0:25:58.960 --> 0:26:03.119
<v Speaker 3>half presidents since then. The idea that the Broncos are

0:26:03.119 --> 0:26:05.399
<v Speaker 3>all of a sudden gonna be coming for the Chiefs,

0:26:05.400 --> 0:26:07.920
<v Speaker 3>I don't buy. All right, next, all right, you're.

0:26:07.760 --> 0:26:10.800
<v Speaker 4>Convinced no one in the media cares about Lebron breaking

0:26:10.800 --> 0:26:13.679
<v Speaker 4>the scoring record. If he had made that layup against Boston,

0:26:13.680 --> 0:26:16.600
<v Speaker 4>heed to be two points closer by the way. This

0:26:16.720 --> 0:26:18.840
<v Speaker 4>week he cracked the top four all time and assist

0:26:18.920 --> 0:26:19.960
<v Speaker 4>and no one seemed to care.

0:26:20.000 --> 0:26:21.480
<v Speaker 2>It didn't really seem like he cared either.

0:26:21.560 --> 0:26:24.600
<v Speaker 4>By the way, if the NBA was scripted, like people

0:26:24.600 --> 0:26:27.200
<v Speaker 4>were saying, the NFL, is, how would the NBA script

0:26:27.240 --> 0:26:29.080
<v Speaker 4>writers have Lebron break Kareem's record.

0:26:29.480 --> 0:26:33.320
<v Speaker 3>Well, so here's the thing, you got it. Here's the

0:26:33.440 --> 0:26:41.360
<v Speaker 3>NBA is not scripted. However the is no no, no, no, no.

0:26:42.160 --> 0:26:46.080
<v Speaker 3>Of course the NFL it was Aaron Foster was joking

0:26:46.119 --> 0:26:50.720
<v Speaker 3>around and nobody got it. But while it's not scripted,

0:26:50.800 --> 0:26:54.800
<v Speaker 3>Lebron can kind of script this out, yeah, because he

0:26:54.880 --> 0:26:59.200
<v Speaker 3>can decide which games he wants to play and one

0:26:59.240 --> 0:27:02.639
<v Speaker 3>thousand percent. So here's what I was very confident. Here's

0:27:02.680 --> 0:27:06.840
<v Speaker 3>what I know. Lebron James is not breaking this record

0:27:08.080 --> 0:27:13.560
<v Speaker 3>Saturday before the Super Bowl against the Warriors on national Televigenion.

0:27:13.920 --> 0:27:16.399
<v Speaker 3>And the reason he's not breaking it Saturday before the

0:27:16.440 --> 0:27:20.560
<v Speaker 3>Super Bowl is because then it gets no media attention

0:27:21.040 --> 0:27:26.040
<v Speaker 3>at all. Right, he's not doing that. He's just flatly

0:27:26.200 --> 0:27:29.119
<v Speaker 3>not doing that. He's not gonna have this record fall

0:27:29.200 --> 0:27:33.160
<v Speaker 3>and it's not bad anywhere. What okay with the guys,

0:27:33.520 --> 0:27:36.200
<v Speaker 3>here's I'm not a guy who's gonna end up playing

0:27:36.200 --> 0:27:38.200
<v Speaker 3>more games and more minutes than anyone in the league history.

0:27:38.240 --> 0:27:42.040
<v Speaker 3>I think he's just bald playing. So they play the

0:27:42.080 --> 0:27:47.880
<v Speaker 3>Pacers tonight, he's eighty nine away. I don't think he's

0:27:47.920 --> 0:27:51.840
<v Speaker 3>going to break it in New Orleans on the road.

0:27:52.000 --> 0:27:54.879
<v Speaker 3>So there's two games at home he could do it,

0:27:55.440 --> 0:28:00.680
<v Speaker 3>the Thunder game on Tuesday or the Bucks game on Thursday,

0:28:00.720 --> 0:28:05.880
<v Speaker 3>which is on national television. I am going to guess

0:28:06.520 --> 0:28:12.440
<v Speaker 3>Lebron targets breaking it for the Thunder game Tuesday night.

0:28:12.480 --> 0:28:18.000
<v Speaker 3>And here's why, because it then allows that full day

0:28:18.560 --> 0:28:22.359
<v Speaker 3>that to be a massive discussion point. The next day

0:28:22.600 --> 0:28:26.720
<v Speaker 3>it to be the only discussion point. And Thursday on

0:28:26.960 --> 0:28:30.200
<v Speaker 3>T and T on national TV, it's the first game

0:28:30.240 --> 0:28:32.879
<v Speaker 3>with him as the record holder, and it is a

0:28:33.000 --> 0:28:35.840
<v Speaker 3>huge story. Why would he not want to break it

0:28:35.960 --> 0:28:39.200
<v Speaker 3>Thursday on national TV? Because then the next day is

0:28:39.240 --> 0:28:41.760
<v Speaker 3>the day before the Super Bowl or the Friday before

0:28:41.760 --> 0:28:44.520
<v Speaker 3>the Super Bowl, it's not a huge topic, and then

0:28:44.560 --> 0:28:47.200
<v Speaker 3>we have the Super Bowl and it's forgotten. So I

0:28:47.400 --> 0:28:51.480
<v Speaker 3>think Lakers Thunder is the game. I would want tickets

0:28:51.520 --> 0:28:56.240
<v Speaker 3>for Lakers Thunder on February twenty seventh is when I

0:28:56.280 --> 0:28:57.720
<v Speaker 3>think this record is going.

0:28:57.520 --> 0:28:59.000
<v Speaker 2>Down, noe, So you can bet on this.

0:28:59.080 --> 0:29:03.080
<v Speaker 4>Actually, okay, Sees plus twenty hundred plus two hundred, Milwaukee

0:29:03.160 --> 0:29:05.880
<v Speaker 4>minus one twenty Golden State plus three forty.

0:29:05.960 --> 0:29:09.120
<v Speaker 3>Okay, Golden State is a zero percent chance. Yeah, he

0:29:09.160 --> 0:29:11.520
<v Speaker 3>would have to miss multiple games and he's not going

0:29:11.560 --> 0:29:14.600
<v Speaker 3>to They have no backs to backs.

0:29:14.920 --> 0:29:17.360
<v Speaker 4>What I find like, it's not even that this is

0:29:17.360 --> 0:29:19.520
<v Speaker 4>his plan, but it probably is.

0:29:19.600 --> 0:29:20.800
<v Speaker 2>I just find it kind.

0:29:20.600 --> 0:29:22.840
<v Speaker 4>Of like, how much more like, dude, you're Lebron James.

0:29:22.880 --> 0:29:24.920
<v Speaker 4>I feel like the Super Bowls gonna happen. You're gonna

0:29:24.960 --> 0:29:26.120
<v Speaker 4>get coverage no matter what.

0:29:27.280 --> 0:29:31.560
<v Speaker 3>We want more coverage. Yeah, dude, it's breaking. His record

0:29:31.640 --> 0:29:35.600
<v Speaker 3>is held, Kareem's broke Wilt's record. How about the if

0:29:35.600 --> 0:29:40.360
<v Speaker 3>the record is that important to everybody? Yeah, gets coverage

0:29:40.360 --> 0:29:42.680
<v Speaker 3>no matter what sports media's biased against Lebron. We all

0:29:42.720 --> 0:29:46.920
<v Speaker 3>know this. Okay, you just said it. The guy just

0:29:46.960 --> 0:29:49.840
<v Speaker 3>became top five assists all time. Nobody talked about it.

0:29:49.920 --> 0:29:50.960
<v Speaker 2>He said, I'm cool off that.

0:29:51.920 --> 0:29:54.960
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, but but it's the media's job to cover these things,

0:29:56.360 --> 0:30:00.840
<v Speaker 3>and you know the media, the media has just decided

0:30:01.200 --> 0:30:04.960
<v Speaker 3>to pretend Lebron's not having the year he is having Oh, Nick, Yeah,

0:30:05.000 --> 0:30:07.840
<v Speaker 3>but they're not winning enough. When he plays, they have

0:30:07.880 --> 0:30:09.640
<v Speaker 3>a better net rating than the Bucks. When he's off

0:30:09.680 --> 0:30:11.680
<v Speaker 3>the court, they have a worse net rating than the Hornets.

0:30:11.800 --> 0:30:14.280
<v Speaker 3>So when he plays, they're an A one contender. When

0:30:14.320 --> 0:30:16.880
<v Speaker 3>he doesn't, they're the worst seem in the league. Oh

0:30:16.920 --> 0:30:19.280
<v Speaker 3>but Nick, he should play more. He's played more games

0:30:19.280 --> 0:30:22.760
<v Speaker 3>this year than Steph or Durant. Like find a new

0:30:22.840 --> 0:30:26.000
<v Speaker 3>slants as they would say. Uh so I would bet

0:30:26.040 --> 0:30:28.120
<v Speaker 3>the OKC game. All right, next, all.

0:30:28.080 --> 0:30:30.120
<v Speaker 4>Right, the Super Bowl is ten days away and the

0:30:30.160 --> 0:30:33.600
<v Speaker 4>Eagles still haven't had a true test this year. It's unbelievable.

0:30:33.720 --> 0:30:36.680
<v Speaker 4>Let's be really nice to cruise of the championship on tested.

0:30:37.440 --> 0:30:39.560
<v Speaker 4>I don't want to say they're in danger of being frauds,

0:30:39.560 --> 0:30:42.480
<v Speaker 4>but do you think that they deserve being favored over Mahomes?

0:30:43.280 --> 0:30:46.400
<v Speaker 3>Listen, the Eagles have the advantage at every single spot

0:30:46.440 --> 0:30:49.480
<v Speaker 3>on the field except for quarterback. They have a better

0:30:49.520 --> 0:30:51.720
<v Speaker 3>offensive line, they have a better defensive line, They have

0:30:51.760 --> 0:30:54.120
<v Speaker 3>a better group of pass catchers, they have better running backs,

0:30:54.120 --> 0:30:56.720
<v Speaker 3>they have better secondary, better linebacker. Now, if you want

0:30:56.720 --> 0:30:59.040
<v Speaker 3>to break down pass catchers into wide receivers in one

0:30:59.080 --> 0:31:01.480
<v Speaker 3>group and tight end the other and the Chiefs also

0:31:01.480 --> 0:31:03.080
<v Speaker 3>have an edge of the tight end. But if we're

0:31:03.120 --> 0:31:05.840
<v Speaker 3>just saying overall pass catchers, your wide receivers and tight ends,

0:31:05.920 --> 0:31:09.560
<v Speaker 3>it's the Eagles by far. The question is twofold. One

0:31:09.680 --> 0:31:15.200
<v Speaker 3>is can Mahomes be magical? And the other is how

0:31:15.440 --> 0:31:19.719
<v Speaker 3>great is that Philly defense really on the big stage.

0:31:20.240 --> 0:31:25.840
<v Speaker 3>Well it's not their fault, but these are the quarterbacks

0:31:25.880 --> 0:31:32.720
<v Speaker 3>they have faced. Okay, golf cousins. Whoever the Commanders were

0:31:32.720 --> 0:31:37.800
<v Speaker 3>starting that week, the Prince in a rain storm? Remember

0:31:37.840 --> 0:31:45.720
<v Speaker 3>that one? Prince got Yeah, Kyler Cooper, Rush, Kenny Pickett,

0:31:46.080 --> 0:31:51.880
<v Speaker 3>Davis Mills, whoever the Commanders were starting that week? Was

0:31:52.160 --> 0:31:54.360
<v Speaker 3>was the Colts game Matt Ryan or was it? I

0:31:54.360 --> 0:31:56.560
<v Speaker 3>don't even remember who was starting that Colts game. I

0:31:56.560 --> 0:31:59.920
<v Speaker 3>gotta I'm gonna check right now. It might have been Ellnger.

0:32:00.000 --> 0:32:03.600
<v Speaker 3>At that point in time, it was Matt Ryan. They

0:32:03.680 --> 0:32:07.240
<v Speaker 3>played the Packers, so you know, you give them credit,

0:32:07.240 --> 0:32:09.440
<v Speaker 3>But if you remember that game, that's the game Aaron

0:32:09.520 --> 0:32:16.120
<v Speaker 3>Rodgers got hurt and Jordan Love came in the Malik Willis,

0:32:16.960 --> 0:32:24.200
<v Speaker 3>Daniel Jones, Justin Fields, Dak Prescott who scored forty. Whoever

0:32:24.200 --> 0:32:28.880
<v Speaker 3>the Saints were playing that week, Andy Dalton, Daniel Jones again,

0:32:29.960 --> 0:32:32.920
<v Speaker 3>Daniel Jones, I'm sorry, not even Daniel Jones that time.

0:32:33.160 --> 0:32:36.480
<v Speaker 3>That time it was Davis Webb, then Daniel Jones again,

0:32:37.280 --> 0:32:41.200
<v Speaker 3>then Brock Purty slash Josh Johnson slash Brock Purty on

0:32:41.200 --> 0:32:48.200
<v Speaker 3>one arm. So is the Eagles defense ready for Patrick Mahomes.

0:32:48.840 --> 0:32:52.200
<v Speaker 3>That's the question of the game. Because I give the

0:32:52.240 --> 0:33:00.480
<v Speaker 3>Eagles credit, however, they were not exactly prepared over the

0:33:00.520 --> 0:33:05.240
<v Speaker 3>course of the season to play elite quarterbacks. The Chiefs,

0:33:05.240 --> 0:33:09.320
<v Speaker 3>on the other hand, this year have played in nop

0:33:09.720 --> 0:33:11.760
<v Speaker 3>and not. I'm not gonna you know what, I will

0:33:11.800 --> 0:33:18.800
<v Speaker 3>list them all, Kyler Herbert, Matt Ryan, Brady Carr, Josh Allen,

0:33:19.360 --> 0:33:23.719
<v Speaker 3>Jimmy Garoppolo, Malik Willis, I think for that game, the

0:33:23.760 --> 0:33:31.360
<v Speaker 3>Prince Herbert again, Baker Mayfield, Joe Burrow, Russell Wilson, Davis Mills,

0:33:31.680 --> 0:33:37.360
<v Speaker 3>Gino Smith, Russell Wilson, Jared Sidham, the Prince again, Joe

0:33:37.360 --> 0:33:40.960
<v Speaker 3>Burrow again. So all the top quarterbacks in the league.

0:33:41.320 --> 0:33:43.040
<v Speaker 3>What do you mean a touch Toougher All of the

0:33:43.080 --> 0:33:46.959
<v Speaker 3>top quarterbacks except for Jalen. So we'll see, all right,

0:33:47.000 --> 0:33:48.720
<v Speaker 3>that was a very long first segment.

0:33:48.800 --> 0:33:51.080
<v Speaker 4>We got We actually got a poll. Some people disagree

0:33:51.080 --> 0:33:53.400
<v Speaker 4>with you. Did the wait not disagree with you? But

0:33:53.440 --> 0:33:55.560
<v Speaker 4>did the Eagles deserve to be favored against the Chiefs?

0:33:55.920 --> 0:33:58.800
<v Speaker 4>Fifty three percent say yes, forty seven percent say no.

0:33:58.960 --> 0:34:01.840
<v Speaker 3>Awesome, all rightppreciate that. We will take a quick break,

0:34:01.920 --> 0:34:05.120
<v Speaker 3>come back answer some of your questions in the sea block.

0:34:05.160 --> 0:34:07.160
<v Speaker 3>What's right?

0:34:11.400 --> 0:34:14.880
<v Speaker 5>Congratulations on the one hundred k subscribers on YouTube Daddy.

0:34:15.600 --> 0:34:17.800
<v Speaker 3>Maybe this means you could stop talking about Lebron.

0:34:18.000 --> 0:34:18.959
<v Speaker 2>It's getting kind of old.

0:34:19.680 --> 0:34:25.040
<v Speaker 5>So see, this episode is brought to you by Unstoppable.

0:34:25.200 --> 0:34:28.240
<v Speaker 5>Discover the inspiring true story about Anthony Roebliss, who defined

0:34:28.280 --> 0:34:31.719
<v Speaker 5>every expectation to become a national wrestling champion, and Unstoppable,

0:34:31.800 --> 0:34:34.800
<v Speaker 5>a new original movie from Amazon MGM Studios and director

0:34:34.800 --> 0:34:38.400
<v Speaker 5>William Goldenberg. Evoking the excitement and camaraderie of classic sports

0:34:38.480 --> 0:34:41.600
<v Speaker 5>dramas and thrilling wrestling matches. Unstoppable features an all star

0:34:41.680 --> 0:34:45.840
<v Speaker 5>ensemble cast including Jirelle Jerome, Jennifer Lopez, Don Cheadle, Michael Pania,

0:34:45.880 --> 0:34:50.160
<v Speaker 5>and Bobby Canavali. Watch Unstoppable now exclusively on Amazon Prime Video.

0:34:51.320 --> 0:34:54.799
<v Speaker 3>That's great. I appreciate that from Deanna your mom is

0:34:54.800 --> 0:34:58.080
<v Speaker 3>gonna fry you by the hair, the fact that there

0:34:58.120 --> 0:35:00.520
<v Speaker 3>seemed to be like a bag in the back. She

0:35:00.680 --> 0:35:03.200
<v Speaker 3>is gonna fry you for having that be on the

0:35:03.400 --> 0:35:04.000
<v Speaker 3>on the screen.

0:35:04.360 --> 0:35:04.960
<v Speaker 2>He has not.

0:35:05.840 --> 0:35:08.080
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, that's a good point. She's probably not watching. All right,

0:35:08.160 --> 0:35:10.480
<v Speaker 3>Let's get to the topics. Let's go thank you baby,

0:35:10.640 --> 0:35:11.000
<v Speaker 3>all right.

0:35:11.120 --> 0:35:14.040
<v Speaker 4>Brock Party is still being evaluated, but might miss more

0:35:14.080 --> 0:35:15.040
<v Speaker 4>than six months.

0:35:15.080 --> 0:35:17.719
<v Speaker 2>Bad news. But Kyle Shanahan said that there was no

0:35:17.800 --> 0:35:18.759
<v Speaker 2>scenario with Jimmy G.

0:35:18.880 --> 0:35:22.600
<v Speaker 4>Will come back to San Francisco. Trey Lance isn't good enough.

0:35:22.640 --> 0:35:25.800
<v Speaker 4>Maybe San Francisco Brady to come back out of retirement again.

0:35:26.160 --> 0:35:28.400
<v Speaker 3>And man Jeanie brought that up on the show yesterday,

0:35:28.440 --> 0:35:31.319
<v Speaker 3>by the way, like join a team mid season go

0:35:31.320 --> 0:35:32.319
<v Speaker 3>ahead though, Uh.

0:35:32.320 --> 0:35:34.480
<v Speaker 4>But a lot of people had Brady going to Vegas.

0:35:34.840 --> 0:35:37.760
<v Speaker 4>Could Josh McDaniels end up with Jimmy G instead.

0:35:37.800 --> 0:35:40.680
<v Speaker 3>I think that's what's gonna happen, right, except for this

0:35:42.040 --> 0:35:46.200
<v Speaker 3>Rogers Rogers DeVante. But they got the thing with Rogers,

0:35:46.200 --> 0:35:48.480
<v Speaker 3>you got to trade for him as opposed to just

0:35:48.680 --> 0:35:51.280
<v Speaker 3>like a first round pick, probably as opposed to signing

0:35:51.360 --> 0:35:55.120
<v Speaker 3>Jimmy G. Jimmy G would also be cheaper. But Devantae Adams,

0:35:55.200 --> 0:35:56.840
<v Speaker 3>I don't know is that gonna be in the show today.

0:35:56.840 --> 0:35:58.480
<v Speaker 3>I don't want to sleep on it too much. Yeah,

0:35:59.160 --> 0:36:01.600
<v Speaker 3>I don't think it's in here. DeVante Adams was asked

0:36:02.040 --> 0:36:04.720
<v Speaker 3>what neighborhood Rodgers gonna live in and he said mine.

0:36:04.920 --> 0:36:06.560
<v Speaker 2>Yeah.

0:36:06.640 --> 0:36:12.480
<v Speaker 3>Cutting Derek Carr to sign Jimmy G seems odd. It

0:36:13.000 --> 0:36:18.160
<v Speaker 3>seems like it's an exchanging one hundred dollars bill for

0:36:18.239 --> 0:36:22.760
<v Speaker 3>two fifties. Like, okay, I don't know why, but sure it.

0:36:22.840 --> 0:36:27.320
<v Speaker 3>But maybe it's because, again, Jimmy G knows McDaniel's system

0:36:27.400 --> 0:36:29.799
<v Speaker 3>to a degree. I guess because they were together in

0:36:29.800 --> 0:36:34.160
<v Speaker 3>New England. I think Brady retiring really threw a wrench

0:36:34.160 --> 0:36:37.759
<v Speaker 3>in the Raiders plan. Yeah, I really believe that. All right, next,

0:36:38.040 --> 0:36:38.640
<v Speaker 3>all right.

0:36:38.600 --> 0:36:40.960
<v Speaker 4>We sadly will not be having a gambling show this week,

0:36:41.040 --> 0:36:42.240
<v Speaker 4>sorry to break it to you guys.

0:36:42.080 --> 0:36:43.120
<v Speaker 3>But we will for next week.

0:36:43.200 --> 0:36:46.200
<v Speaker 2>Yep. But if you're betting on the Pro Bowl, please

0:36:46.239 --> 0:36:47.280
<v Speaker 2>seek hip. Okay.

0:36:47.880 --> 0:36:49.680
<v Speaker 4>There are tons of different ways to bet during the

0:36:49.719 --> 0:36:53.200
<v Speaker 4>big game, from spreads to props. What is your betting

0:36:53.239 --> 0:36:55.840
<v Speaker 4>strategy for the Super Bowl? Are there any props you

0:36:56.000 --> 0:36:57.640
<v Speaker 4>like to Are there any props that you like to

0:36:57.640 --> 0:37:01.319
<v Speaker 4>bet on every year, Datorade coin toss national anthem, all

0:37:01.400 --> 0:37:04.279
<v Speaker 4>like no, but here's listen, I'm definitely betting on the

0:37:04.280 --> 0:37:08.120
<v Speaker 4>coin toss. Why why wouldn't I? I'm either going to

0:37:08.200 --> 0:37:08.480
<v Speaker 4>hit her.

0:37:08.440 --> 0:37:08.719
<v Speaker 2>I'm not.

0:37:09.120 --> 0:37:11.719
<v Speaker 4>Well yeah, well no, okay, so hold on. That sounded bad,

0:37:11.840 --> 0:37:14.480
<v Speaker 4>uh huh, like obviously every bet that I place, So

0:37:14.480 --> 0:37:15.839
<v Speaker 4>I'm either going to hit or now. Yeah, but there's

0:37:15.840 --> 0:37:19.120
<v Speaker 4>a fifty to fifty. It's either it's very black and white.

0:37:19.280 --> 0:37:23.240
<v Speaker 3>Literally, well not literally, the coin's not black and white.

0:37:23.120 --> 0:37:25.160
<v Speaker 4>But it's but you get it, black and white. Heads

0:37:25.160 --> 0:37:27.680
<v Speaker 4>are tails, yeah, but it's will be black, tails would

0:37:27.680 --> 0:37:27.919
<v Speaker 4>be white.

0:37:27.960 --> 0:37:29.600
<v Speaker 3>But right now, we could do that. We can just

0:37:29.680 --> 0:37:31.160
<v Speaker 3>gamble on a coin. You want me to flip the

0:37:31.160 --> 0:37:31.680
<v Speaker 3>coin right now?

0:37:31.800 --> 0:37:31.960
<v Speaker 2>Yep?

0:37:32.160 --> 0:37:36.080
<v Speaker 3>Well okay, well now I'm worried about you. Maybe so

0:37:36.160 --> 0:37:39.560
<v Speaker 3>you just want to be something that you have no

0:37:39.880 --> 0:37:43.120
<v Speaker 3>edge in, no information on, just bet for the sake

0:37:43.120 --> 0:37:46.200
<v Speaker 3>of betting. We could just bet, like, what's the next

0:37:46.239 --> 0:37:47.680
<v Speaker 3>color of the next car? Is going to be?

0:37:47.719 --> 0:37:48.840
<v Speaker 2>Plus money? Is my question?

0:37:48.880 --> 0:37:51.799
<v Speaker 3>No, of course not. If it's plus money, the books

0:37:51.840 --> 0:37:53.880
<v Speaker 3>would go bankrupt. You can't give plus money on a

0:37:53.920 --> 0:37:56.360
<v Speaker 3>fifty to fifty thing, it's going to be minus money.

0:37:57.120 --> 0:37:59.120
<v Speaker 2>So obviously I wouldn't bet. I wouldn't bet like one

0:37:59.160 --> 0:38:00.479
<v Speaker 2>hundred bucks on a court toss.

0:38:00.800 --> 0:38:03.400
<v Speaker 3>Okay, all right, so here's here's my advice. Don't do

0:38:03.440 --> 0:38:06.360
<v Speaker 3>what Demanse is doing. Let's talk about Demonse's gambling for

0:38:06.400 --> 0:38:08.320
<v Speaker 3>a moment here, because Demanse.

0:38:08.080 --> 0:38:10.760
<v Speaker 2>Yes, eleven bucks that I got from a vanduel.

0:38:10.640 --> 0:38:15.080
<v Speaker 3>I understand. Let me finish Demanse's you know, was instagramming

0:38:15.800 --> 0:38:18.560
<v Speaker 3>look at the Yeah, this is how I went. Demanse

0:38:18.840 --> 0:38:25.759
<v Speaker 3>was instagramming his NBA teasers yesterday and then also an

0:38:25.880 --> 0:38:29.640
<v Speaker 3>NBA parlay, so it is worth noting that is eleven

0:38:29.680 --> 0:38:32.440
<v Speaker 3>dollars NBA parlay that he needed to go six for

0:38:32.600 --> 0:38:36.200
<v Speaker 3>six on. You do know you went oh for six.

0:38:36.000 --> 0:38:37.840
<v Speaker 2>Right because the nets are trash?

0:38:38.040 --> 0:38:40.440
<v Speaker 3>No, because all of your bets.

0:38:40.160 --> 0:38:43.160
<v Speaker 2>Were obviously if I missed all of them. Yeah, over.

0:38:44.400 --> 0:38:50.759
<v Speaker 3>But then Demanse also tweeted out a fifteen point or

0:38:50.840 --> 0:38:59.520
<v Speaker 3>fourteen point NBA teaser, which a fourteen point sixteen teaser

0:38:59.680 --> 0:39:02.880
<v Speaker 3>is minus two fifty. So here's the part of the

0:39:03.040 --> 0:39:07.080
<v Speaker 3>of gambling that Demanse's yet to grasp. And I blame

0:39:07.200 --> 0:39:16.319
<v Speaker 3>myself Demanse hates even money bets, can't stand minus money bets. Wait,

0:39:16.360 --> 0:39:18.440
<v Speaker 3>I have to wager. So you're telling me if I

0:39:18.480 --> 0:39:21.080
<v Speaker 3>bet twenty I would win fifteen gross.

0:39:21.239 --> 0:39:21.680
<v Speaker 2>No way.

0:39:23.000 --> 0:39:28.319
<v Speaker 3>However, he somehow somewhere in his brain it doesn't make

0:39:28.360 --> 0:39:32.799
<v Speaker 3>the connection when it comes to minus money bets. Well,

0:39:32.920 --> 0:39:36.000
<v Speaker 3>but if I just bet a massive amount of money,

0:39:36.719 --> 0:39:42.319
<v Speaker 3>now the return's great. So so he puts together a

0:39:42.520 --> 0:39:49.200
<v Speaker 3>sixteen fourteen point teaser and doesn't bet it correct.

0:39:48.920 --> 0:39:49.319
<v Speaker 2>No at that.

0:39:49.560 --> 0:39:55.240
<v Speaker 3>But he showed one thousand dollars to win four hundred

0:39:55.560 --> 0:39:57.960
<v Speaker 3>and put on ig keep an eye out on this.

0:39:58.480 --> 0:40:03.160
<v Speaker 3>I got scared him back, doubt and considering the eleven

0:40:03.200 --> 0:40:05.279
<v Speaker 3>dollars one would win me the same amount as one

0:40:05.320 --> 0:40:09.319
<v Speaker 3>thousand dollars one would screw it? Right, And one of

0:40:09.360 --> 0:40:14.600
<v Speaker 3>the legs of the sixteen teasers the nets plus twenty

0:40:14.719 --> 0:40:18.000
<v Speaker 3>three twenty three. How do you they were? I mean

0:40:18.040 --> 0:40:21.520
<v Speaker 3>they were down forty forty one thirteen. Yeah, oh my god,

0:40:21.719 --> 0:40:22.800
<v Speaker 3>I do you have been buddy?

0:40:23.600 --> 0:40:26.720
<v Speaker 4>Oh no, man, that's it's just crazy that I also

0:40:26.800 --> 0:40:28.239
<v Speaker 4>bet against the Celtics on that.

0:40:28.680 --> 0:40:29.600
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, which is wild.

0:40:29.800 --> 0:40:34.640
<v Speaker 3>Okay, this so please please please don't do NBA teasers.

0:40:34.800 --> 0:40:38.440
<v Speaker 3>I beg of you football teasers. There is some value

0:40:38.440 --> 0:40:42.520
<v Speaker 3>if you do them right. I've been gambling for twenty

0:40:42.600 --> 0:40:47.000
<v Speaker 3>five years, since I was thirteen years old, playing my

0:40:47.120 --> 0:40:51.319
<v Speaker 3>dad in nine ball for two bucks a ball. I've

0:40:51.400 --> 0:40:54.160
<v Speaker 3>never placed an NBA teaser in my life. They are

0:40:54.160 --> 0:40:55.160
<v Speaker 3>not good bets.

0:40:55.360 --> 0:40:56.279
<v Speaker 2>This go ahead.

0:40:56.480 --> 0:40:58.560
<v Speaker 4>This might make you feel a little bit better or not,

0:40:58.680 --> 0:41:01.680
<v Speaker 4>I don't know. But uh, those bets in that placed

0:41:01.760 --> 0:41:04.080
<v Speaker 4>last night helped me realize how much more I know

0:41:04.120 --> 0:41:06.600
<v Speaker 4>about football than I know about basketball.

0:41:06.080 --> 0:41:08.760
<v Speaker 3>Now, of course, because you've been watching it all season,

0:41:09.080 --> 0:41:11.680
<v Speaker 3>and if you so much more predictably, like the scoring

0:41:11.840 --> 0:41:16.400
<v Speaker 3>isn't so right, there's no betting the NBA is impossible,

0:41:17.320 --> 0:41:17.920
<v Speaker 3>and now it.

0:41:18.000 --> 0:41:20.000
<v Speaker 2>And the lines are kind of like they're they kind

0:41:20.000 --> 0:41:20.360
<v Speaker 2>of you.

0:41:20.920 --> 0:41:23.319
<v Speaker 3>Well, there's just so many ways to get screwed at

0:41:23.320 --> 0:41:26.680
<v Speaker 3>the end. Yeah, there are back door covers in football.

0:41:27.040 --> 0:41:30.480
<v Speaker 3>The entirety of NBA betting is back door covers, and

0:41:30.640 --> 0:41:33.960
<v Speaker 3>it's just so frustrating. And then teams down, you're you're

0:41:34.000 --> 0:41:37.000
<v Speaker 3>getting seven and a half and a team is down

0:41:37.200 --> 0:41:41.040
<v Speaker 3>seven with eight seconds left and decide to foul even

0:41:41.080 --> 0:41:44.080
<v Speaker 3>though that it's just so many yeah. Uh, But to

0:41:44.080 --> 0:41:46.120
<v Speaker 3>answer the question, my guide to betting the Super Bowl

0:41:46.200 --> 0:41:48.359
<v Speaker 3>is this, if you want to have a bunch of

0:41:48.360 --> 0:41:54.680
<v Speaker 3>different props. The juice the big on these prop bets

0:41:55.520 --> 0:42:01.000
<v Speaker 3>is so substantial that what some people try to do

0:42:01.239 --> 0:42:07.160
<v Speaker 3>is like bet uncorrelated props, so like I'll take Mahomes

0:42:07.320 --> 0:42:12.440
<v Speaker 3>overpassing touchdowns and Jalen Hurts overpassing yards and this, and

0:42:12.560 --> 0:42:16.239
<v Speaker 3>do things that don't tell a narrative story, with the

0:42:16.320 --> 0:42:19.080
<v Speaker 3>idea being I have you know the Chiefs have a

0:42:19.080 --> 0:42:20.759
<v Speaker 3>big game, all win this one. If the Eagles have

0:42:20.760 --> 0:42:23.080
<v Speaker 3>a big game, all win this one and leave yourself

0:42:23.200 --> 0:42:27.160
<v Speaker 3>very little chance to win both or right. That's a

0:42:27.400 --> 0:42:30.080
<v Speaker 3>terrible idea in my opinion when it comes to the

0:42:30.120 --> 0:42:32.760
<v Speaker 3>Super Bowl, because the juice is so high on these

0:42:33.280 --> 0:42:36.000
<v Speaker 3>that if you break even, if you make ten bets

0:42:36.000 --> 0:42:38.279
<v Speaker 3>and win five lose five, you're gonna lose a ton

0:42:38.280 --> 0:42:41.279
<v Speaker 3>of money because they're minus one twenty and minus won

0:42:41.360 --> 0:42:46.160
<v Speaker 3>twenty five bets. So the way I would recommend if

0:42:46.160 --> 0:42:50.080
<v Speaker 3>you want to bet Super Bowl props is figure out

0:42:50.160 --> 0:42:53.480
<v Speaker 3>how you the specific script of how you think the

0:42:53.560 --> 0:42:58.040
<v Speaker 3>game is going to go, and make six or seven

0:42:58.120 --> 0:43:05.120
<v Speaker 3>bets that follow that narrative script, understanding there is a

0:43:05.239 --> 0:43:12.000
<v Speaker 3>chance you go over. So Chiefs Niners Super Bowl. I

0:43:12.120 --> 0:43:17.960
<v Speaker 3>did that, Jimmy Garoppolo over interceptions, Patrick Mahomes over passing yards, Patrick,

0:43:18.160 --> 0:43:21.760
<v Speaker 3>you know, and the Chiefs to cover all that stuff.

0:43:22.640 --> 0:43:26.160
<v Speaker 3>And I hit almost every single bet, the Chiefs buck

0:43:26.280 --> 0:43:29.879
<v Speaker 3>super Bowl. I did that, and I literally lost every

0:43:29.880 --> 0:43:32.520
<v Speaker 3>single bet I played. So you've got to be prepared

0:43:32.560 --> 0:43:34.640
<v Speaker 3>for that. But that's how I would recommend it.

0:43:34.719 --> 0:43:37.880
<v Speaker 4>So you're saying, like, figure out a storyline that you

0:43:37.920 --> 0:43:39.520
<v Speaker 4>think is gonna happen, and.

0:43:40.000 --> 0:43:44.319
<v Speaker 3>Then build your bets accordingly, not randomly haphazardly. So if

0:43:44.360 --> 0:43:47.600
<v Speaker 3>you think the Eagles the Chiefs aren't gonna be able

0:43:47.600 --> 0:43:49.640
<v Speaker 3>to block the Eagles, and the Eagles are going to

0:43:49.719 --> 0:43:52.920
<v Speaker 3>run the ball down the Chief's throat, you bet under

0:43:52.920 --> 0:43:57.600
<v Speaker 3>on Mahomes touchdowns. You might bet under on Jail and

0:43:57.680 --> 0:44:03.400
<v Speaker 3>Hurts passing yards, you bet over on Philly rushing yards,

0:44:03.640 --> 0:44:06.399
<v Speaker 3>and you bet under on Chiefs rushing yards because they're

0:44:06.440 --> 0:44:09.120
<v Speaker 3>going to be trailing and having to throw the football. Right,

0:44:09.160 --> 0:44:13.239
<v Speaker 3>that's the narrative script. If you think Mahomes scripted, No

0:44:13.280 --> 0:44:15.560
<v Speaker 3>it's not scripted, but it's a script. You think it's

0:44:15.600 --> 0:44:19.520
<v Speaker 3>going to go that, uh and so, but we can

0:44:19.560 --> 0:44:21.640
<v Speaker 3>talk more about that in Monday's Gambling show. All right,

0:44:21.640 --> 0:44:22.279
<v Speaker 3>we've got a game.

0:44:23.640 --> 0:44:27.640
<v Speaker 4>Yes, this game one hundred k recap Yeah, aged just right.

0:44:28.080 --> 0:44:30.560
<v Speaker 4>We're playing two different games. Actually, no, it's same thing. Yeah,

0:44:30.600 --> 0:44:32.320
<v Speaker 4>we're celebrating reaching one hundred thousands.

0:44:33.840 --> 0:44:36.399
<v Speaker 3>Oh wow, make sure that I don't know. But it's

0:44:36.400 --> 0:44:39.280
<v Speaker 3>like it's like a fine wine ages, like wine and cheese.

0:44:39.360 --> 0:44:43.520
<v Speaker 4>Go ahead, we're celebrating reaching one hundred thousand subscribers. Let's

0:44:43.560 --> 0:44:46.000
<v Speaker 4>look back at your takes from episode one back in

0:44:46.040 --> 0:44:48.400
<v Speaker 4>March of last year and see how well they age. Okay,

0:44:48.520 --> 0:44:52.279
<v Speaker 4>it's called aged just right. Okay, First off, we got

0:44:52.320 --> 0:44:55.160
<v Speaker 4>Brady retirement. We had to re record our first show

0:44:55.239 --> 0:44:58.120
<v Speaker 4>due to some breaking news. Brady came out of retirement

0:44:58.160 --> 0:45:00.279
<v Speaker 4>after forty days to ruin our weekend.

0:45:00.920 --> 0:45:03.719
<v Speaker 2>You were a fan, you weren't a fan. Let's see it.

0:45:04.040 --> 0:45:06.320
<v Speaker 2>We're gonna show a little thing for the folks on YouTube.

0:45:06.360 --> 0:45:09.879
<v Speaker 3>And so this is the worst retirement ever. It's worse

0:45:09.960 --> 0:45:13.759
<v Speaker 3>than either of Jordan's anything far did Roger Clemens in

0:45:13.840 --> 0:45:18.839
<v Speaker 3>George's Box. It's worse than that worst retirement ever. Yeah,

0:45:18.840 --> 0:45:21.120
<v Speaker 3>I mean because it was a fake retirement. Yeah, I

0:45:21.120 --> 0:45:25.200
<v Speaker 3>think that AG's right. Uh, I stand by that take.

0:45:25.440 --> 0:45:28.000
<v Speaker 3>This was the worst. What I mean, he retired for

0:45:28.000 --> 0:45:29.000
<v Speaker 3>forty days.

0:45:28.960 --> 0:45:31.440
<v Speaker 4>So so since that one, it's that you're saying that

0:45:31.600 --> 0:45:32.560
<v Speaker 4>was the worst retirement.

0:45:32.600 --> 0:45:35.839
<v Speaker 2>This next question is easy. Yeah, this retirement was much

0:45:35.880 --> 0:45:36.360
<v Speaker 2>better than that.

0:45:36.400 --> 0:45:38.440
<v Speaker 3>Well, yeah, of course, because this retirement's gonna be a

0:45:38.440 --> 0:45:40.600
<v Speaker 3>real retirement. It's gonna take, it's gonna keep. All right,

0:45:40.600 --> 0:45:42.439
<v Speaker 3>it ends up not being a real well, that would

0:45:42.480 --> 0:45:45.320
<v Speaker 3>be wild, but that did happen with Jordan. Jordan unretired

0:45:45.400 --> 0:45:47.560
<v Speaker 3>years later, so we'll see, all right next.

0:45:47.480 --> 0:45:49.640
<v Speaker 4>All right, Kyrie has popped up quite a bit on

0:45:49.680 --> 0:45:52.440
<v Speaker 4>the show, and even in episode one, so let's see it.

0:45:52.640 --> 0:45:54.120
<v Speaker 3>All right, Kyrie Irving, what are we doing?

0:45:54.239 --> 0:45:54.880
<v Speaker 2>Kyrie Irving?

0:45:55.000 --> 0:45:58.920
<v Speaker 4>Is growing on you, exhausting you, or he's not relevant

0:45:58.920 --> 0:45:59.239
<v Speaker 4>at all?

0:45:59.440 --> 0:46:03.040
<v Speaker 3>Okay, this one's very easy. Exhausting. I don't think he's

0:46:03.040 --> 0:46:05.000
<v Speaker 3>gonna be eligible for home games, and I don't think

0:46:05.040 --> 0:46:06.880
<v Speaker 3>the Nets are getting out of round one, and they

0:46:06.880 --> 0:46:09.640
<v Speaker 3>can find other people to blame, but this is Kyrie's

0:46:09.719 --> 0:46:12.000
<v Speaker 3>choice from beginning to end.

0:46:12.400 --> 0:46:14.319
<v Speaker 2>Oh, that aged pretty well, I think it.

0:46:14.640 --> 0:46:16.320
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, you can go ahead and ask the rest of

0:46:16.320 --> 0:46:18.400
<v Speaker 3>the question, but I think that aged beautifully.

0:46:18.520 --> 0:46:21.840
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, but that was about five scandals ago. A year later,

0:46:22.080 --> 0:46:24.360
<v Speaker 4>the nets are looking good and he's been averaging twenty

0:46:24.360 --> 0:46:25.759
<v Speaker 4>seven to five and five this year.

0:46:26.200 --> 0:46:28.080
<v Speaker 2>Is it possible this take won't age?

0:46:28.080 --> 0:46:31.720
<v Speaker 3>Well, No, I don't think. No, I mean, and also

0:46:31.840 --> 0:46:34.160
<v Speaker 3>I mean because that was about last season. But also

0:46:34.520 --> 0:46:38.799
<v Speaker 3>it's just that, I mean, he's a spectacular talent. It's

0:46:38.800 --> 0:46:41.120
<v Speaker 3>not a winning player. Yes, say's a great example. You're

0:46:41.120 --> 0:46:43.359
<v Speaker 3>playing Boston. The fans are out to get you. They

0:46:43.360 --> 0:46:45.879
<v Speaker 3>swept you out of the playoffs last year. You don't

0:46:45.880 --> 0:46:48.479
<v Speaker 3>have Durant and you're down thirty nine to nine.

0:46:48.840 --> 0:46:52.200
<v Speaker 4>That's like scripted for Kyrie Irving to go off exactly right.

0:46:52.239 --> 0:46:54.520
<v Speaker 3>It's just like this should be, even if you don't win,

0:46:55.000 --> 0:46:57.200
<v Speaker 3>you know what I mean, for a night, be the

0:46:57.200 --> 0:46:59.439
<v Speaker 3>best player on the court, right, And instead the team

0:46:59.480 --> 0:47:02.000
<v Speaker 3>came out with no energy, no nothing, got their asses kicked.

0:47:02.000 --> 0:47:02.720
<v Speaker 3>All right? Next?

0:47:03.239 --> 0:47:03.600
<v Speaker 2>All right?

0:47:03.719 --> 0:47:06.440
<v Speaker 4>So you you asked me to keep you one promising

0:47:06.480 --> 0:47:08.440
<v Speaker 4>episode one, let's see it.

0:47:08.800 --> 0:47:11.080
<v Speaker 3>Well, first episode you're gonna stay to this.

0:47:11.280 --> 0:47:11.840
<v Speaker 2>I'm done.

0:47:12.000 --> 0:47:14.600
<v Speaker 3>I'm out on black and miles. You have to keep

0:47:14.600 --> 0:47:17.279
<v Speaker 3>me honest. If you catch me smoking a black and mild,

0:47:17.360 --> 0:47:18.280
<v Speaker 3>you have to tell the audience.

0:47:18.320 --> 0:47:19.560
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I mean this is on records.

0:47:19.719 --> 0:47:21.960
<v Speaker 3>This one's on record, so we're in so black and

0:47:21.960 --> 0:47:25.320
<v Speaker 3>miles out. That wasn't great? Yeah, I haven't done a

0:47:25.320 --> 0:47:26.919
<v Speaker 3>great job. You haven't done a great job.

0:47:27.640 --> 0:47:29.279
<v Speaker 2>Yeah. I definitely haven't been snitching on you.

0:47:29.360 --> 0:47:33.120
<v Speaker 3>No, and I haven't done a great job. You do

0:47:33.160 --> 0:47:33.600
<v Speaker 3>you miss it?

0:47:33.760 --> 0:47:34.000
<v Speaker 2>Yeah?

0:47:34.719 --> 0:47:36.960
<v Speaker 3>You're growing it back out? Okay, all right, last one.

0:47:37.000 --> 0:47:38.960
<v Speaker 3>I guess all right, do.

0:47:38.920 --> 0:47:41.040
<v Speaker 2>You remember our first argument on this show?

0:47:41.640 --> 0:47:43.279
<v Speaker 3>No?

0:47:43.280 --> 0:47:46.720
<v Speaker 2>No, what was it? D being a better score?

0:47:47.160 --> 0:47:49.520
<v Speaker 3>Oh? So dumb? Let me do we have video of it?

0:47:49.600 --> 0:47:49.799
<v Speaker 2>Yes?

0:47:50.280 --> 0:47:52.280
<v Speaker 3>Let me see this guy. That's a bad take.

0:47:52.800 --> 0:47:55.960
<v Speaker 4>Kevin Durant is easily a better score than Lebron James.

0:47:56.000 --> 0:47:58.439
<v Speaker 2>But you watch Kevin Durant play.

0:47:58.640 --> 0:47:59.480
<v Speaker 3>I wasn't listening.

0:48:02.280 --> 0:48:05.200
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I mean I forgot.

0:48:05.960 --> 0:48:08.600
<v Speaker 3>How is that aged? Now that Lebron's literally about to

0:48:08.600 --> 0:48:10.280
<v Speaker 3>become the greatest score in the history of the league,

0:48:10.360 --> 0:48:13.160
<v Speaker 3>I'm just curious. I'm just curious. He's about to pass

0:48:13.160 --> 0:48:15.279
<v Speaker 3>Scareing for all time points in the season. He's still

0:48:15.320 --> 0:48:18.160
<v Speaker 3>averaging thirty points a game, more available than Durant too.

0:48:18.320 --> 0:48:19.719
<v Speaker 3>How's your take age.

0:48:20.040 --> 0:48:22.600
<v Speaker 4>When when I say scoring, I mean three point like

0:48:22.680 --> 0:48:25.200
<v Speaker 4>all that stuff like Lebron obviously gets a lot of

0:48:25.200 --> 0:48:27.920
<v Speaker 4>these layups and foul calls and stuff, so well, he.

0:48:27.920 --> 0:48:30.000
<v Speaker 3>Doesn't get a lot of foul calls anymore. As illustrated

0:48:30.000 --> 0:48:32.720
<v Speaker 3>by that, Celtics seams to know. But so you mean shooting.

0:48:32.800 --> 0:48:36.000
<v Speaker 4>Katie's probably missed more time with injury than Lebron. Yeah, well,

0:48:36.040 --> 0:48:39.120
<v Speaker 4>it's important to be available for your teammates. Uh so

0:48:39.200 --> 0:48:43.400
<v Speaker 4>you mean shooting, not scoring? Shooting scoring? I mean, I

0:48:43.440 --> 0:48:46.600
<v Speaker 4>bet you, I bet you. If Lebron James at the

0:48:46.640 --> 0:48:48.560
<v Speaker 4>beginning of the season and Katie at the beginning of

0:48:48.560 --> 0:48:50.840
<v Speaker 4>the season, everybody they both just played to the end

0:48:50.840 --> 0:48:53.160
<v Speaker 4>of the season. Nobody gets hurt. Katie out scores Lebron

0:48:53.200 --> 0:48:55.040
<v Speaker 4>this season, and they're about same age with Katy's like

0:48:55.040 --> 0:48:58.959
<v Speaker 4>three years younger, four years younger or yeah, maybe five.

0:49:00.239 --> 0:49:05.279
<v Speaker 4>But uh okay, dude, peak peak scoring KD is better

0:49:05.320 --> 0:49:08.239
<v Speaker 4>than peak scoring Lebron to me, in my opinion, maybe I.

0:49:08.200 --> 0:49:10.520
<v Speaker 3>Have just record I mean record books says something differently,

0:49:10.560 --> 0:49:11.680
<v Speaker 3>but yeah, maybe.

0:49:11.400 --> 0:49:13.879
<v Speaker 2>That's longevity longevity.

0:49:14.360 --> 0:49:16.440
<v Speaker 3>How many points per game do you think Kevin Durant

0:49:16.440 --> 0:49:17.400
<v Speaker 3>averages for.

0:49:17.239 --> 0:49:19.880
<v Speaker 2>His career, oh, career, for his career.

0:49:20.760 --> 0:49:23.600
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, I'd say about twenty seven twenty eight.

0:49:23.840 --> 0:49:25.360
<v Speaker 3>How many do you think Lebron averages?

0:49:25.440 --> 0:49:25.920
<v Speaker 2>I don't know.

0:49:26.480 --> 0:49:30.319
<v Speaker 3>So Kevin Durant for his career is twenty seven point three,

0:49:31.719 --> 0:49:34.080
<v Speaker 3>and let's go ahead and check Lebron Dams for his

0:49:34.160 --> 0:49:39.120
<v Speaker 3>career is twenty seven point two. So they average the

0:49:39.160 --> 0:49:42.760
<v Speaker 3>exact same amount of points. And this year d Lebron

0:49:42.840 --> 0:49:45.759
<v Speaker 3>is averaging thirty point two and Katy's averaging twenty nine

0:49:45.800 --> 0:49:52.680
<v Speaker 3>point seven. So I don't know. Seems like, yeah, seems like,

0:49:52.719 --> 0:49:55.040
<v Speaker 3>what are you laughing about? What's so funny? I'm just curious?

0:49:55.080 --> 0:49:57.560
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, what with I think one of those numbers was

0:49:57.640 --> 0:49:58.520
<v Speaker 2>higher than the other one.

0:49:58.600 --> 0:50:00.920
<v Speaker 3>Twenty seven point three verse twenty point two. Yea who

0:50:01.080 --> 0:50:01.800
<v Speaker 3>runs a tenth.

0:50:01.640 --> 0:50:03.120
<v Speaker 2>Of a point twenty seven point three?

0:50:03.160 --> 0:50:05.480
<v Speaker 3>Was that Katie for an out? Yes, Katie is ahead

0:50:05.480 --> 0:50:08.200
<v Speaker 3>of him by a tenth of a point. My but

0:50:08.280 --> 0:50:11.400
<v Speaker 3>I knew that. My point is the the idea that

0:50:11.480 --> 0:50:15.560
<v Speaker 3>Durant's this generational score I agree with. But I would

0:50:15.560 --> 0:50:17.759
<v Speaker 3>think the guy who averages the exact same amount of

0:50:17.760 --> 0:50:20.279
<v Speaker 3>points and has done it far longer, I don't know.

0:50:20.400 --> 0:50:24.400
<v Speaker 3>And I wonder hold on career UH shooting percentage, career

0:50:24.400 --> 0:50:30.120
<v Speaker 3>shooting percentage by the way, Durant is forty nine point

0:50:30.200 --> 0:50:33.320
<v Speaker 3>eight and Lebron is fifty point five, so they average

0:50:33.320 --> 0:50:35.560
<v Speaker 3>the exact same amount of points, and Lebron's slightly more phishing.

0:50:35.560 --> 0:50:38.319
<v Speaker 3>I don't know seems relevant to me answer your questions. Next,

0:50:38.360 --> 0:50:38.799
<v Speaker 3>what's right?

0:50:44.160 --> 0:50:48.880
<v Speaker 6>Who wanted to congratulate you all on one hundred thousand subscribers,

0:50:48.920 --> 0:50:52.000
<v Speaker 6>It's Danny Parkins and occasional but not nearly frequent enough

0:50:52.000 --> 0:50:55.840
<v Speaker 6>contributor is Nick Congrats man, You truly are the Julius

0:50:55.880 --> 0:50:58.160
<v Speaker 6>Irving of your own show. And by that I mean,

0:50:58.520 --> 0:51:01.360
<v Speaker 6>by my account, you are the eleven most important person

0:51:02.000 --> 0:51:05.840
<v Speaker 6>for the show. Getting to one hundred thousand followers. A

0:51:06.160 --> 0:51:10.040
<v Speaker 6>Chance comes in at number ten, Kara at nine, Victor

0:51:10.160 --> 0:51:13.160
<v Speaker 6>at eight, Gabe Goodwin comes in at number seven. You

0:51:13.239 --> 0:51:16.200
<v Speaker 6>got the dog bump by having your very cute dog, Dexter.

0:51:16.520 --> 0:51:20.960
<v Speaker 6>Deanna coming in at number five, the set designer at Trentidge.

0:51:21.000 --> 0:51:23.279
<v Speaker 6>Then of course Matt Ford, the executive producer, one of

0:51:23.320 --> 0:51:25.839
<v Speaker 6>the best producers in the business. Wheezy comes in at

0:51:25.880 --> 0:51:29.160
<v Speaker 6>number two, Demonse at number one, So congrats Demonse and

0:51:29.400 --> 0:51:33.080
<v Speaker 6>crew and Julius Serving aka Nick wright Man. Maybe at

0:51:33.080 --> 0:51:35.160
<v Speaker 6>two hundred thousand you could crack your own top ten.

0:51:36.840 --> 0:51:39.560
<v Speaker 3>That's why you text me yesterday. Me is Matt, the

0:51:39.600 --> 0:51:46.640
<v Speaker 3>executive producer of the show. That's why why he didn't

0:51:46.640 --> 0:51:48.640
<v Speaker 3>tell me why he was asking me. Yeah, he asked me,

0:51:48.880 --> 0:51:50.480
<v Speaker 3>and Matt I told him I didn't know if it

0:51:50.520 --> 0:51:52.400
<v Speaker 3>was you were Gabe. I didn't know. I don't know

0:51:52.440 --> 0:51:54.799
<v Speaker 3>how the titles work at Blue Duck, So yeah, he

0:51:54.840 --> 0:51:55.160
<v Speaker 3>asked me.

0:51:55.200 --> 0:51:55.480
<v Speaker 2>All right.

0:51:55.520 --> 0:51:58.400
<v Speaker 3>By the way, speaking of hitting the one hundred thousand,

0:51:58.920 --> 0:52:00.520
<v Speaker 3>we did it at the top of the shoe. But

0:52:00.600 --> 0:52:03.279
<v Speaker 3>I do really really appreciate the folks, especially the folks

0:52:03.320 --> 0:52:05.520
<v Speaker 3>who've been here from the very beginning and the new

0:52:05.560 --> 0:52:07.200
<v Speaker 3>folks as well. It's a really a hell of an

0:52:07.200 --> 0:52:11.440
<v Speaker 3>accomplishment and it was kind of a pie in the

0:52:11.480 --> 0:52:13.719
<v Speaker 3>sky goal for us to hit within the first year.

0:52:14.160 --> 0:52:17.440
<v Speaker 3>I'm super excited about it. There's demons holding money and

0:52:17.520 --> 0:52:20.560
<v Speaker 3>a plaque right now he has neither. Ye all right,

0:52:20.600 --> 0:52:21.880
<v Speaker 3>you want to read the fan questions?

0:52:21.880 --> 0:52:25.000
<v Speaker 2>Go ahead, Okay.

0:52:24.680 --> 0:52:25.520
<v Speaker 3>Do you have them?

0:52:25.560 --> 0:52:30.040
<v Speaker 4>Just let's just go all right, Jady Watson said, Realistically,

0:52:30.080 --> 0:52:32.279
<v Speaker 4>what does mahomes resume have to look like to be

0:52:32.320 --> 0:52:33.080
<v Speaker 4>considered the goat?

0:52:34.880 --> 0:52:37.200
<v Speaker 3>I think he's allowed to be in the discussion. Once

0:52:37.239 --> 0:52:41.120
<v Speaker 3>he gets to four rings, I think, because right you are.

0:52:41.200 --> 0:52:43.439
<v Speaker 3>You still have some people that think Montana is better

0:52:43.440 --> 0:52:46.879
<v Speaker 3>than Brady. Montana's got four you have the I think

0:52:46.960 --> 0:52:50.920
<v Speaker 3>the fact of the matter is if he gets to

0:52:51.160 --> 0:52:55.280
<v Speaker 3>four rings and it has the you look across other sports,

0:52:55.360 --> 0:52:57.600
<v Speaker 3>like Jordan doesn't have the most rings, he is the

0:52:57.640 --> 0:53:00.560
<v Speaker 3>second most rings, and he's considered by many the goat,

0:53:00.680 --> 0:53:04.560
<v Speaker 3>right like the you don't always have to match the

0:53:04.680 --> 0:53:08.040
<v Speaker 3>ring count, but you can't be in the Rogers situation

0:53:08.200 --> 0:53:11.880
<v Speaker 3>where you have all these regular season accolades and only

0:53:11.960 --> 0:53:15.560
<v Speaker 3>one championship. So winning this year would put him, I think,

0:53:15.640 --> 0:53:17.600
<v Speaker 3>on track to do it. But he's also got to

0:53:17.600 --> 0:53:19.640
<v Speaker 3>play for a very long time. Go ahead.

0:53:19.680 --> 0:53:23.400
<v Speaker 4>People are so obsessed with that, like with not admitting

0:53:23.440 --> 0:53:26.680
<v Speaker 4>that they're witnessing greatness right now. I notice like they

0:53:26.840 --> 0:53:29.440
<v Speaker 4>like saying that the best was a long.

0:53:29.320 --> 0:53:31.960
<v Speaker 3>Time of course. Yeah, it's so irritating.

0:53:32.000 --> 0:53:34.359
<v Speaker 4>I totally not you th JD all right, next, but

0:53:34.480 --> 0:53:37.680
<v Speaker 4>bear bands said Nigga Devons. If Ravens like oh Lamar,

0:53:37.800 --> 0:53:39.719
<v Speaker 4>what are the chances the forty nine ers can get him?

0:53:39.840 --> 0:53:42.880
<v Speaker 4>Congrats one hundred thousand followers or subscribers. This is my

0:53:42.920 --> 0:53:44.920
<v Speaker 4>first time watching live, but I have watched most of

0:53:44.920 --> 0:53:45.279
<v Speaker 4>your post.

0:53:45.400 --> 0:53:48.560
<v Speaker 3>Well, thank you so much, bear Bands. I think the

0:53:48.960 --> 0:53:52.000
<v Speaker 3>the Niners have basically no chance of getting Lamar. Look,

0:53:52.080 --> 0:53:53.960
<v Speaker 3>they're not He's not going to be let go of it.

0:53:54.400 --> 0:53:57.560
<v Speaker 3>He might be traded. If he's traded, it will be

0:53:57.600 --> 0:54:01.000
<v Speaker 3>for a massive haul. And the Niners don't have the assets. Right,

0:54:01.080 --> 0:54:03.160
<v Speaker 3>So they traded picks for Trey Lance, and then they

0:54:03.200 --> 0:54:05.600
<v Speaker 3>traded picks for Christian McCaffery. Right, So I would say

0:54:05.600 --> 0:54:07.920
<v Speaker 3>the Niners have basically no chance of getting Lamar.

0:54:08.120 --> 0:54:10.280
<v Speaker 4>Next, all right, if you're, as George said to Demons,

0:54:10.480 --> 0:54:12.799
<v Speaker 4>get his significant cash bonus for hitting on a hundred

0:54:12.840 --> 0:54:14.760
<v Speaker 4>thousand subscribers, that's the real question.

0:54:14.880 --> 0:54:19.440
<v Speaker 3>Not yet he will he's getting that bonus, I commit

0:54:19.520 --> 0:54:22.879
<v Speaker 3>to everyone. Uh, he's getting that bonus when he gets

0:54:22.880 --> 0:54:25.080
<v Speaker 3>the plaque. It's gonna be a whole ceremony that he'll

0:54:25.120 --> 0:54:28.880
<v Speaker 3>do all at once. Okay, so, but I'm not welching,

0:54:29.000 --> 0:54:30.600
<v Speaker 3>but I have not yet paid it out.

0:54:30.640 --> 0:54:34.080
<v Speaker 4>Next, all right, sky Lukewalker said, does Demonse know? Does

0:54:34.080 --> 0:54:36.040
<v Speaker 4>Demond know he wouldn't have to wear two pairs of

0:54:36.040 --> 0:54:37.360
<v Speaker 4>pants if he didn't have big.

0:54:37.160 --> 0:54:39.800
<v Speaker 2>Holes in the knees. Yeah, dude, it's cold outside.

0:54:39.880 --> 0:54:42.400
<v Speaker 4>So I just I just prefer to mix it up

0:54:42.400 --> 0:54:43.680
<v Speaker 4>with you guys, and I want you guys to see

0:54:43.680 --> 0:54:45.600
<v Speaker 4>the same black jeans every time. I also don't want

0:54:45.600 --> 0:54:48.240
<v Speaker 4>to wear shorts, so I'm trying to give you it'll.

0:54:47.600 --> 0:54:50.360
<v Speaker 3>Preview of Demonse does not like when he gets roasted

0:54:50.400 --> 0:54:52.240
<v Speaker 3>for his sartorial decisions.

0:54:52.280 --> 0:54:55.080
<v Speaker 4>Oh no, at this point it's I actually, I actually

0:54:55.120 --> 0:54:57.359
<v Speaker 4>don't mind it. These guys just don't have as much

0:54:57.440 --> 0:55:00.880
<v Speaker 4>drip as me, and that's understood. But uh, but yeah,

0:55:01.600 --> 0:55:03.719
<v Speaker 4>it keeps me warm. And like I said, the black

0:55:03.760 --> 0:55:05.160
<v Speaker 4>pants need a break every once in a while. I

0:55:05.200 --> 0:55:07.280
<v Speaker 4>can't just keep wearing them, all right, last one, go ahead,

0:55:07.320 --> 0:55:10.720
<v Speaker 4>all right, Matt Ford as so, so it's the tails.

0:55:10.719 --> 0:55:12.600
<v Speaker 2>We'll flip a coin in the control room and sell

0:55:12.680 --> 0:55:16.360
<v Speaker 2>your bed. You want to do it, Let's put twenty.

0:55:16.200 --> 0:55:18.200
<v Speaker 3>Bucks on it, right, Why don't we put your whole bonus?

0:55:18.800 --> 0:55:19.319
<v Speaker 2>Let's do it.

0:55:19.480 --> 0:55:24.000
<v Speaker 3>No, see that is a problem. No, I would do it,

0:55:24.560 --> 0:55:28.120
<v Speaker 3>But that is a problem if you would say that.

0:55:29.080 --> 0:55:32.399
<v Speaker 3>Don't flip Wait, wait, flip the coin though. Hold I've

0:55:32.440 --> 0:55:35.960
<v Speaker 3>got heads, all right, flip it. This is for nothing.

0:55:36.280 --> 0:55:38.680
<v Speaker 3>Hold on, this is for absolutely nothing. For nothing. Let's

0:55:38.680 --> 0:55:41.880
<v Speaker 3>just see this could have been for wait, whoa wait.

0:55:41.400 --> 0:55:43.040
<v Speaker 2>I have a question. How are we flipping it?

0:55:43.080 --> 0:55:45.880
<v Speaker 3>Are we doing the flip catch and then whatever?

0:55:46.040 --> 0:55:48.040
<v Speaker 2>Straight up on the on the on the surface.

0:55:48.120 --> 0:55:52.360
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, we're doing flip flip. Yeah. Heads or tails?

0:55:52.400 --> 0:55:55.000
<v Speaker 2>Call it. I've still got heads. Let's go go, Matt.

0:55:55.120 --> 0:55:59.680
<v Speaker 3>Let's see. This is why people watch on YouTube. Hold on,

0:55:59.680 --> 0:56:01.640
<v Speaker 3>that one didn't count. Don't say what it is. You

0:56:01.640 --> 0:56:06.120
<v Speaker 3>didn't even catch it, Matt. It is pathetic there it

0:56:06.160 --> 0:56:10.320
<v Speaker 3>is heads or tails? What is it? What is it? Matt?

0:56:11.760 --> 0:56:16.600
<v Speaker 2>Let's go old a man man, see you look at it?

0:56:17.520 --> 0:56:20.360
<v Speaker 3>How mad he is? Look at how mad he is?

0:56:20.480 --> 0:56:22.880
<v Speaker 3>Great show, love you guys. See you guys on Monday

0:56:22.880 --> 0:56:27.680
<v Speaker 3>with a listener and viewer based show What's Right.