1 00:00:02,520 --> 00:00:07,040 Speaker 1: Bloomberg Audio Studios, podcasts, radio news. 2 00:00:07,760 --> 00:00:10,280 Speaker 2: We begin this sour with stock steady as investors prepare 3 00:00:10,320 --> 00:00:12,959 Speaker 2: for a week full of event risk. Muhammad al Aaron 4 00:00:13,000 --> 00:00:15,480 Speaker 2: of Queen's College, Cambridge writing a heavy data week on 5 00:00:15,560 --> 00:00:18,320 Speaker 2: tap for the US with the monthly jobs report, lots 6 00:00:18,360 --> 00:00:21,840 Speaker 2: of speaking engagements for policymakers, including Treasury Secretary Beston and 7 00:00:21,920 --> 00:00:25,759 Speaker 2: Fedcha Japewell, and the latest on tariffs and Doach. Mohammed 8 00:00:25,800 --> 00:00:28,280 Speaker 2: joins us now for more. Mohammed, Welcome to the program, Sir. 9 00:00:28,400 --> 00:00:30,920 Speaker 2: Where to begin? I think we start on Friday and 10 00:00:30,960 --> 00:00:34,479 Speaker 2: the rupture in Transatlantic relations and the breakdown in the 11 00:00:34,479 --> 00:00:37,000 Speaker 2: Oval Office. When you saw that and when you think 12 00:00:37,040 --> 00:00:40,680 Speaker 2: about the consequences it could have for the economic picture 13 00:00:40,960 --> 00:00:43,840 Speaker 2: in Europe, for military spending, and for what it could 14 00:00:43,840 --> 00:00:46,360 Speaker 2: mean for financial markets. To Muhammad, what are your thoughts 15 00:00:46,360 --> 00:00:46,880 Speaker 2: at the moment? 16 00:00:47,520 --> 00:00:50,320 Speaker 1: Thanks for having me, John. My thoughts is that Dad 17 00:00:50,800 --> 00:00:56,000 Speaker 1: feeds into some existing themes, both top down and bottom up, 18 00:00:56,480 --> 00:01:00,680 Speaker 1: and intensifies them. So top down, we've had issues of 19 00:01:00,720 --> 00:01:04,280 Speaker 1: fiscal realignment, and that's going to feed into fiscal realignment, 20 00:01:04,360 --> 00:01:08,360 Speaker 1: including putting pressure on the dead break in Germany, including 21 00:01:08,480 --> 00:01:10,560 Speaker 1: the question of how does it interact with what Dodge 22 00:01:10,600 --> 00:01:14,000 Speaker 1: is doing in the US. Secondly, it feeds into the 23 00:01:14,120 --> 00:01:16,680 Speaker 1: energy market and how you think about the energy market. 24 00:01:17,000 --> 00:01:20,400 Speaker 1: And third it feeds into the realignment of the global 25 00:01:20,480 --> 00:01:23,120 Speaker 1: order that also has a trade element to it and 26 00:01:23,160 --> 00:01:24,800 Speaker 1: a currency element to it. So we have all these 27 00:01:24,840 --> 00:01:28,640 Speaker 1: top down factors that are being amplified, and then the 28 00:01:28,640 --> 00:01:32,080 Speaker 1: bottom up factor that's being amplified is defense. And we 29 00:01:32,120 --> 00:01:36,120 Speaker 1: are seeing significant sector differences occurring as you would expect. 30 00:01:36,520 --> 00:01:40,319 Speaker 1: So I think every John not as unprecedented, which is 31 00:01:40,560 --> 00:01:43,640 Speaker 1: the words that the political science and the international relations 32 00:01:43,640 --> 00:01:47,240 Speaker 1: people are using, but in the field of economics and finance, 33 00:01:47,680 --> 00:01:50,080 Speaker 1: it is amplifying things that were there already. 34 00:01:50,440 --> 00:01:52,240 Speaker 2: So Mohammed, a number of weeks ago we said on 35 00:01:52,240 --> 00:01:54,280 Speaker 2: this program that the President of the United States may 36 00:01:54,280 --> 00:01:57,000 Speaker 2: well push the Europeans into doing things that might be 37 00:01:57,040 --> 00:01:59,600 Speaker 2: good for them. You wrote in the Financial Times about 38 00:01:59,600 --> 00:02:03,400 Speaker 2: a month ago the mounting risk to US exceptionalism. How 39 00:02:03,440 --> 00:02:06,120 Speaker 2: does some of these things across these dimensions play into 40 00:02:06,280 --> 00:02:07,960 Speaker 2: what you wrote about a month ago. 41 00:02:09,040 --> 00:02:11,360 Speaker 1: So, John, both the good news and the bad news 42 00:02:11,440 --> 00:02:16,560 Speaker 1: is we have a very action oriented administration has come in. 43 00:02:17,600 --> 00:02:22,240 Speaker 1: It has hit the ground running. If not sprinting, and 44 00:02:22,280 --> 00:02:25,359 Speaker 1: if you are a business, it feels like you're trying 45 00:02:25,440 --> 00:02:29,560 Speaker 1: to drink from a fire hose. There's energy issues, there's 46 00:02:29,560 --> 00:02:33,079 Speaker 1: immigration issues, there are trade issues that are public sector issues, 47 00:02:33,280 --> 00:02:37,440 Speaker 1: including public sector contract there are regulation issues, so you're 48 00:02:37,480 --> 00:02:42,080 Speaker 1: trying to absorb all this, and what we've seen is 49 00:02:42,240 --> 00:02:44,800 Speaker 1: sentiment has come down and there's been a weight and 50 00:02:44,840 --> 00:02:48,679 Speaker 1: see attitude because most of these things impact both your 51 00:02:49,080 --> 00:02:53,760 Speaker 1: income and your expenditure, so it's really hard to figure 52 00:02:53,800 --> 00:02:55,480 Speaker 1: out how all these things are going to play out. 53 00:02:55,560 --> 00:02:58,519 Speaker 1: Then there is the international relations side of it, your 54 00:02:58,560 --> 00:03:01,639 Speaker 1: trading side of it. So the worry that I have 55 00:03:02,720 --> 00:03:07,280 Speaker 1: is that the lack of ability by the public sector 56 00:03:07,360 --> 00:03:11,399 Speaker 1: to absorb all this results in a wait and see attitude. 57 00:03:11,919 --> 00:03:14,240 Speaker 1: That weight and sy attitude comes at a time when 58 00:03:14,280 --> 00:03:16,760 Speaker 1: we already have a bit of a whiff of stackflation 59 00:03:16,960 --> 00:03:20,919 Speaker 1: going on. And next thing, you know, people start questioning 60 00:03:21,080 --> 00:03:25,360 Speaker 1: US economic exceptionalism, and if they do, two things happen. 61 00:03:26,000 --> 00:03:29,280 Speaker 1: You start questioning the only reliable engine of growth for 62 00:03:29,320 --> 00:03:32,840 Speaker 1: the global economy, and you start questioning the shield that 63 00:03:32,960 --> 00:03:38,280 Speaker 1: markets have had against all sorts of geopolitical and political aspects. 64 00:03:38,680 --> 00:03:41,160 Speaker 3: That's a lot of hair on the American exceptionalism story. 65 00:03:41,160 --> 00:03:43,160 Speaker 3: And we've been talking to people about it for the 66 00:03:43,200 --> 00:03:46,200 Speaker 3: past couple of weeks about the concerns, the lack of certainty, 67 00:03:46,280 --> 00:03:49,040 Speaker 3: the on hold kind of nature of a lot of CEOs, 68 00:03:49,080 --> 00:03:51,440 Speaker 3: And yet when you ask them, they still say they 69 00:03:51,480 --> 00:03:54,000 Speaker 3: prefer to invest in the US over the rest of 70 00:03:54,000 --> 00:03:57,720 Speaker 3: the world. If Europe went through with a nine hundred 71 00:03:57,760 --> 00:04:02,240 Speaker 3: billion euro spending package defense and infrastructure, would that shift 72 00:04:02,280 --> 00:04:04,480 Speaker 3: for you? Would you see brighter shoots in Europe? 73 00:04:05,360 --> 00:04:08,920 Speaker 1: No, it wouldn't shift for me. I would still prefer 74 00:04:08,960 --> 00:04:12,280 Speaker 1: to US over Europe for the simple reason that Europe 75 00:04:12,320 --> 00:04:17,320 Speaker 1: doesn't have a genuine and durable growth engine. So maybe 76 00:04:17,360 --> 00:04:21,520 Speaker 1: defense contributes in the short term to growth, but they 77 00:04:21,600 --> 00:04:25,920 Speaker 1: need to get a handle on some really fundamental things. 78 00:04:26,400 --> 00:04:29,800 Speaker 1: I encourage everybody to read the Drug Report. The Drug 79 00:04:30,000 --> 00:04:32,520 Speaker 1: Report is a really good assessment of what has gone 80 00:04:32,600 --> 00:04:36,600 Speaker 1: wrong in terms of investment, in terms of competitiveness and productivity, 81 00:04:36,920 --> 00:04:40,039 Speaker 1: and what needs to go right, and that should be 82 00:04:40,120 --> 00:04:44,680 Speaker 1: your benchmark when you assess future growth prospects in Europe. 83 00:04:45,120 --> 00:04:48,640 Speaker 3: So what happens, Mohammed, if this American exceptionalism story is 84 00:04:48,760 --> 00:04:51,080 Speaker 3: challenged to the degree that you're laying out and a 85 00:04:51,120 --> 00:04:53,640 Speaker 3: lot of people are worried about. But there isn't a 86 00:04:53,680 --> 00:04:55,320 Speaker 3: brighter alternative in Europe. 87 00:04:56,800 --> 00:04:59,560 Speaker 1: That's the concern because remember I've always said the good 88 00:04:59,560 --> 00:05:02,240 Speaker 1: and the bad and the ugly of the global economy. 89 00:05:02,279 --> 00:05:05,359 Speaker 1: The good is the US, the baddest China, and the 90 00:05:05,440 --> 00:05:08,880 Speaker 1: ugly is Europe. And if you don't see China and 91 00:05:09,080 --> 00:05:11,960 Speaker 1: Europe converge up to the US, there's a risk that 92 00:05:12,000 --> 00:05:15,000 Speaker 1: the US will converge down to the other two. It 93 00:05:15,080 --> 00:05:17,920 Speaker 1: is a risk scenario. It is not the baseline I 94 00:05:18,000 --> 00:05:20,960 Speaker 1: want to stress. But in mid January, no one was 95 00:05:21,040 --> 00:05:24,720 Speaker 1: questioning US economic exceptionalism, and now, as you point out, 96 00:05:24,800 --> 00:05:27,360 Speaker 1: a lot more people are starting to worry about it. 97 00:05:28,200 --> 00:05:30,200 Speaker 4: Mohammad, what do you make of the tariffs? Do you 98 00:05:30,240 --> 00:05:32,760 Speaker 4: think they're actually going to come on tomorrow or do 99 00:05:32,800 --> 00:05:35,919 Speaker 4: you think the market consensus of that. Maybe China, of 100 00:05:35,960 --> 00:05:38,560 Speaker 4: course goes on, but there will be a pause, another 101 00:05:38,680 --> 00:05:41,320 Speaker 4: pause or a pass when it comes to Canada and Mexico. 102 00:05:41,440 --> 00:05:42,760 Speaker 4: Is the accurate way to view this? 103 00:05:44,200 --> 00:05:46,000 Speaker 1: I don't know, and Marie, I really don't know. I 104 00:05:46,000 --> 00:05:48,920 Speaker 1: don't think anybody knows about the president. But what has 105 00:05:48,960 --> 00:05:52,799 Speaker 1: become clear is that there are three sets of terriffs, 106 00:05:53,839 --> 00:05:57,240 Speaker 1: and that explain why the President was pursuing so many 107 00:05:57,279 --> 00:05:59,080 Speaker 1: objectives with tarifs. You know when he came out in 108 00:05:59,120 --> 00:06:01,960 Speaker 1: October and he said it's my favorite word. He said, 109 00:06:02,000 --> 00:06:06,560 Speaker 1: it can weige revenue, it can result in fairer trade, 110 00:06:07,240 --> 00:06:13,200 Speaker 1: it can put pressure on both adversaries and allies, and 111 00:06:13,240 --> 00:06:18,320 Speaker 1: in addition, it can protect US industry. And the initial 112 00:06:18,320 --> 00:06:21,120 Speaker 1: reaction of the economists was too many objectives for a 113 00:06:21,120 --> 00:06:24,200 Speaker 1: single tool, but we're seeing now what is happening. You 114 00:06:24,279 --> 00:06:27,840 Speaker 1: have a set of general tariffs that do the revenue 115 00:06:27,880 --> 00:06:31,080 Speaker 1: side and the reciprocity side, the fair trade side. You 116 00:06:31,120 --> 00:06:36,880 Speaker 1: have a set of sector specific tariff aluminium steel that 117 00:06:37,000 --> 00:06:40,039 Speaker 1: protect industry, and then you have a third set of 118 00:06:40,600 --> 00:06:44,360 Speaker 1: tariff's aim that particular countries to get particular outcomes. And 119 00:06:44,400 --> 00:06:46,080 Speaker 1: I think that that's the thing we're going to live 120 00:06:46,160 --> 00:06:48,839 Speaker 1: with for the next few months, is not the next 121 00:06:48,839 --> 00:06:52,040 Speaker 1: few years, which is a multifaceted trade policy. 122 00:06:52,480 --> 00:06:54,960 Speaker 2: Muhammad. For the first time in a long time, there 123 00:06:55,000 --> 00:06:57,720 Speaker 2: was a FED official in the last week that considered stagflation. 124 00:06:58,240 --> 00:07:01,120 Speaker 2: I'm sure you notice the same comments downside risk to 125 00:07:01,160 --> 00:07:04,680 Speaker 2: growth and upside risk to inflation. If we were to 126 00:07:04,720 --> 00:07:07,520 Speaker 2: have a FEDS Joe mantit the one into conflict. How 127 00:07:07,560 --> 00:07:09,760 Speaker 2: do you suppose would be the best way to approach 128 00:07:09,800 --> 00:07:10,440 Speaker 2: that situation. 129 00:07:12,240 --> 00:07:18,440 Speaker 1: It's tough. It's really tough. Stagflation is the nightmare of policymakers, 130 00:07:18,880 --> 00:07:21,320 Speaker 1: and it is the nightmare of FED with the dual mandate, 131 00:07:21,360 --> 00:07:24,880 Speaker 1: as you point out, So it's really tough. I worry, 132 00:07:25,040 --> 00:07:28,320 Speaker 1: like you had an introduction that we've had a reaction 133 00:07:28,480 --> 00:07:31,440 Speaker 1: we fed. So the FED is not going to be 134 00:07:31,480 --> 00:07:35,200 Speaker 1: getting ahead of this anytime soon. I hope it understands it, 135 00:07:35,680 --> 00:07:37,280 Speaker 1: but it's not going to be getting ahead of it 136 00:07:37,320 --> 00:07:41,560 Speaker 1: anytime soon. So the risk is John, that monetary policy 137 00:07:41,640 --> 00:07:45,560 Speaker 1: continues to amplify volatility rather than acting as an anchor 138 00:07:45,560 --> 00:07:47,800 Speaker 1: of stability. That's the risk we face right now. 139 00:07:47,960 --> 00:07:50,120 Speaker 3: Mommy, can you just give us a sense of the 140 00:07:50,160 --> 00:07:53,680 Speaker 3: trajectory of your belief that the economy can withstand all 141 00:07:53,680 --> 00:07:56,960 Speaker 3: of this in the United States? As the year has progressed, 142 00:07:57,040 --> 00:07:59,720 Speaker 3: I realized that it's the beginning of March. But how 143 00:07:59,840 --> 00:08:03,040 Speaker 3: much which more worried are you now than say two 144 00:08:03,120 --> 00:08:06,680 Speaker 3: weeks ago about a real calling into question of American 145 00:08:06,720 --> 00:08:09,600 Speaker 3: exceptionalism and a real rolling over of the US economy. 146 00:08:10,680 --> 00:08:12,480 Speaker 1: You know it's my nature. I've been worried for a while. 147 00:08:12,560 --> 00:08:18,200 Speaker 1: I put out an ft UP AD on February fourteenth 148 00:08:18,680 --> 00:08:22,720 Speaker 1: saying be careful that slowly we may see the erosion 149 00:08:22,920 --> 00:08:25,960 Speaker 1: of US economic exceptionalism, and that's bad news for everybody, 150 00:08:26,000 --> 00:08:29,320 Speaker 1: not just the US, for everybody. So I've been worried 151 00:08:29,320 --> 00:08:32,439 Speaker 1: for a while, and I've seen sort of three elements 152 00:08:32,480 --> 00:08:36,640 Speaker 1: that have made me worry. One is the way business 153 00:08:36,679 --> 00:08:40,720 Speaker 1: is reacting to all these policy changes, which increasingly is 154 00:08:40,800 --> 00:08:43,120 Speaker 1: wait and see. We think it's going to be fine, 155 00:08:43,160 --> 00:08:45,920 Speaker 1: but let's wait and see. Second, we know that the 156 00:08:46,000 --> 00:08:52,520 Speaker 1: lowest segments of the household income distribution is under enormous pressure, 157 00:08:53,440 --> 00:08:56,280 Speaker 1: and that has been a concern for a while. And 158 00:08:56,280 --> 00:08:58,560 Speaker 1: then the third issue is the risk of a FED 159 00:08:58,600 --> 00:09:02,680 Speaker 1: policy mistake. These things have been there and now they're 160 00:09:02,880 --> 00:09:05,240 Speaker 1: they've amplified because of what's been going on. 161 00:09:05,679 --> 00:09:08,280 Speaker 2: Muhammed, always appreciate your time. You're a good friend of 162 00:09:08,280 --> 00:09:09,960 Speaker 2: this program, a good friend of ours. We appreciate it. 163 00:09:09,960 --> 00:09:12,480 Speaker 2: Thank you, Sir Mohammed Aaron of Queen's College, Cambridge. There 164 00:09:12,559 --> 00:09:15,680 Speaker 2: on some of the challenges for officials worldwide and for 165 00:09:15,720 --> 00:09:16,760 Speaker 2: global markets as well,