WEBVTT - Tariff Uncertainty, AI Unease Rattle Tech Shares

0:00:02.560 --> 0:00:13.520
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Audio Studios, podcasts, radio news. Bloomberg Tech is alive

0:00:13.520 --> 0:00:17.360
<v Speaker 1>from coast to coast with Caroline Hyde in New York

0:00:17.640 --> 0:00:19.599
<v Speaker 1>and Vlow in San Francisco.

0:00:22.960 --> 0:00:24.520
<v Speaker 2>This is Bloomberg Tech coming up.

0:00:24.560 --> 0:00:28.320
<v Speaker 3>President Trump looks to rebuild his tariff trade policy after

0:00:28.320 --> 0:00:32.240
<v Speaker 3>the Supreme Court struck it down, reviving market jitters plus.

0:00:31.960 --> 0:00:35.000
<v Speaker 4>Bitcoin non immune to those tariff anxieties, sliding below sixty

0:00:35.000 --> 0:00:37.400
<v Speaker 4>five thousand dollars at one point for the second time

0:00:37.440 --> 0:00:38.200
<v Speaker 4>this month.

0:00:38.760 --> 0:00:41.960
<v Speaker 3>And today's the day for Paramount Skydines to submit its

0:00:42.040 --> 0:00:44.960
<v Speaker 3>best and final offer for Warner Brothers Discovery.

0:00:45.080 --> 0:00:46.400
<v Speaker 2>We'll discuss what to expect.

0:00:46.800 --> 0:00:49.920
<v Speaker 4>Let's turn our attention though, to well the anxieties that

0:00:50.040 --> 0:00:51.800
<v Speaker 4>beat up the nows that one hundred, to the extend

0:00:51.840 --> 0:00:53.519
<v Speaker 4>that it's at session Low's as we speak, and we're

0:00:53.520 --> 0:00:56.400
<v Speaker 4>currently off by one point three percent. You're seeing anxiety,

0:00:56.400 --> 0:00:58.920
<v Speaker 4>whether it's AI once again playing into those software names,

0:00:58.960 --> 0:01:00.800
<v Speaker 4>whether it's the tariff jit and what that means in

0:01:00.880 --> 0:01:03.520
<v Speaker 4>terms of long term uncertainty for these businesses. We are

0:01:03.600 --> 0:01:06.080
<v Speaker 4>pulling back on our risk on attitude, certainly in the

0:01:06.080 --> 0:01:07.959
<v Speaker 4>world of crypto as well, down two point nine percent.

0:01:08.000 --> 0:01:10.720
<v Speaker 4>Even his goal gets a little bit of a reprieve ed.

0:01:10.720 --> 0:01:11.880
<v Speaker 4>Were you watching underneatha hin?

0:01:12.480 --> 0:01:13.679
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, let's get to our top. Sorry.

0:01:13.720 --> 0:01:16.880
<v Speaker 3>President Trump is looking to rebuild his trade tariff trade

0:01:16.920 --> 0:01:20.120
<v Speaker 3>policy after the Supreme Court struck down his use of

0:01:20.160 --> 0:01:24.759
<v Speaker 3>the International Emergency Economic Powers Act or AIPA to impose

0:01:24.800 --> 0:01:29.080
<v Speaker 3>sweeping global tariffs. In response, his administration signed an executive

0:01:29.200 --> 0:01:32.679
<v Speaker 3>order to impose a ten percent tariff on imports using

0:01:32.720 --> 0:01:36.080
<v Speaker 3>an alternative legal authority, and over the weekend, the President

0:01:36.120 --> 0:01:38.800
<v Speaker 3>announced on truth Social that he intends to raise that

0:01:38.880 --> 0:01:42.560
<v Speaker 3>rate to fifteen percent or quote, a much higher tariff

0:01:42.600 --> 0:01:45.360
<v Speaker 3>and worse. Let's get the latest with Bloomberg Senior Tech

0:01:45.440 --> 0:01:49.040
<v Speaker 3>editor Mike Shephard. What's the state of play as of

0:01:49.120 --> 0:01:49.559
<v Speaker 3>right now?

0:01:50.360 --> 0:01:54.280
<v Speaker 5>Well, it is moving pretty quickly. Now. The administration's really

0:01:54.320 --> 0:01:58.000
<v Speaker 5>trying to ensure that all of the trade agreements that

0:01:58.200 --> 0:02:02.120
<v Speaker 5>reach with trading partners around the world over the past

0:02:02.240 --> 0:02:06.760
<v Speaker 5>year don't come undone. They spent the weekend really insisting

0:02:06.840 --> 0:02:11.320
<v Speaker 5>that the EU and other trade blocks and nations must

0:02:11.360 --> 0:02:14.639
<v Speaker 5>abide by those agreements, and they tried to offer some

0:02:14.680 --> 0:02:18.359
<v Speaker 5>assurance that the setback that was dealt to the administration

0:02:18.440 --> 0:02:22.320
<v Speaker 5>on Friday was temporary and that this fifteen percent tariff

0:02:22.360 --> 0:02:25.640
<v Speaker 5>we heard the President talk about on Saturday, by truth,

0:02:25.760 --> 0:02:29.240
<v Speaker 5>social was really just going to be a bridge to

0:02:29.360 --> 0:02:33.440
<v Speaker 5>more lasting tariffs that would be imposed eventually through other authorities.

0:02:33.639 --> 0:02:37.400
<v Speaker 5>Now those authorities are going to take months to investigate

0:02:37.440 --> 0:02:40.520
<v Speaker 5>and to actually execute and carry out, and that is

0:02:40.560 --> 0:02:43.239
<v Speaker 5>going to add a whole lot of uncertainty for those

0:02:43.280 --> 0:02:46.679
<v Speaker 5>trading partners, including the European Union, which is indicating that

0:02:46.760 --> 0:02:50.560
<v Speaker 5>it's holding off on a final approval and ratification by

0:02:50.600 --> 0:02:53.600
<v Speaker 5>the Parliament of the deal it struck with Trump last year,

0:02:53.840 --> 0:02:56.720
<v Speaker 5>and India, which had just reached a hard fought agreement

0:02:56.760 --> 0:02:59.760
<v Speaker 5>with the administration a few months ago. They are now

0:03:00.440 --> 0:03:03.320
<v Speaker 5>off a meeting that was scheduled for later this week

0:03:03.560 --> 0:03:06.200
<v Speaker 5>to iron out final details there. And then, of course,

0:03:06.360 --> 0:03:08.720
<v Speaker 5>ed there is China. The President is going to meet

0:03:08.760 --> 0:03:11.400
<v Speaker 5>the Chiesi in Ping in China a little more than

0:03:11.400 --> 0:03:13.400
<v Speaker 5>a month from right now, and the question is whether

0:03:14.080 --> 0:03:17.040
<v Speaker 5>Trump has lost some leverage heading into that meeting with she.

0:03:17.880 --> 0:03:20.680
<v Speaker 4>And we saw President Trump with pretty fighting talk for

0:03:20.840 --> 0:03:23.400
<v Speaker 4>perhaps some countries that thought they'd already cut deals or

0:03:23.400 --> 0:03:26.320
<v Speaker 4>at least made some progress on inbound investment. Just take

0:03:26.320 --> 0:03:29.440
<v Speaker 4>a listen to what was said regarding well Taiwan.

0:03:29.040 --> 0:03:33.600
<v Speaker 6>In particular, Taiwan came in based all our chip business.

0:03:33.720 --> 0:03:38.600
<v Speaker 6>They made chips thirty years longer, they made chip chip chip.

0:03:38.720 --> 0:03:43.160
<v Speaker 6>And now all those companies in Taiwan are building factories

0:03:43.640 --> 0:03:46.960
<v Speaker 6>in Arizona, Texas and various other places because they don't

0:03:46.960 --> 0:03:49.920
<v Speaker 6>want to pay tariffs. They're all pouring into the United States.

0:03:50.080 --> 0:03:52.920
<v Speaker 4>You spoke of China that, Mike, What of Taiwan. How

0:03:52.920 --> 0:03:55.120
<v Speaker 4>does this impact tech in particular?

0:03:55.680 --> 0:03:58.680
<v Speaker 5>Well, Caro, it's not just Taiwan. It's Japan, and it's

0:03:58.680 --> 0:04:01.880
<v Speaker 5>South Korea, and it is in the European Union. As

0:04:01.920 --> 0:04:06.400
<v Speaker 5>part of those trade agreements, the President had negotiated investments

0:04:06.480 --> 0:04:10.320
<v Speaker 5>in the US from those trading partners. Now the question is,

0:04:10.720 --> 0:04:14.640
<v Speaker 5>without the leverage of tariffs to enforce and to guarantee

0:04:14.680 --> 0:04:18.200
<v Speaker 5>that those investments get made, do they follow through? And

0:04:18.640 --> 0:04:21.159
<v Speaker 5>we even saw it just a few weeks ago, the

0:04:21.240 --> 0:04:24.640
<v Speaker 5>confrontation that was brewing with officials in Seoul over the

0:04:24.760 --> 0:04:28.400
<v Speaker 5>slow pace of ratification of the trade deal by South

0:04:28.480 --> 0:04:32.120
<v Speaker 5>Korea's legislature and concerns by the US that hey, maybe

0:04:32.160 --> 0:04:35.000
<v Speaker 5>there won't be enough follow through on the investment's promised

0:04:35.040 --> 0:04:38.679
<v Speaker 5>here in the US. We even heard Commerce Secretary Howard

0:04:38.720 --> 0:04:41.839
<v Speaker 5>Lutnik just last month at the opening of that Micron

0:04:41.920 --> 0:04:46.360
<v Speaker 5>plant alluding to possibly hire tariffs on goods from those

0:04:46.400 --> 0:04:49.279
<v Speaker 5>countries if they're companies. And he was alluding to the

0:04:49.320 --> 0:04:53.160
<v Speaker 5>memory chip makers carrow if they didn't step up their

0:04:53.279 --> 0:04:56.320
<v Speaker 5>investments here in the US, and he was referring obliquely

0:04:56.360 --> 0:04:59.359
<v Speaker 5>to Samsung and sk Heinix. But you can paint that

0:04:59.480 --> 0:05:02.960
<v Speaker 5>more broad lead to other possible tech investments in the US.

0:05:03.000 --> 0:05:06.240
<v Speaker 5>If they don't materialize, then what does the administration here

0:05:06.320 --> 0:05:07.360
<v Speaker 5>do as a consequence?

0:05:07.480 --> 0:05:09.800
<v Speaker 4>And leader of s k Heinez just today pledging to

0:05:09.839 --> 0:05:13.159
<v Speaker 4>boost memory chip output. Mike Shephard with all the latest

0:05:13.200 --> 0:05:15.039
<v Speaker 4>on tariff's Thank you so much. Look, let's get you

0:05:15.080 --> 0:05:18.159
<v Speaker 4>the wider impact at President Trump's tariff agenda. Jason Oxman

0:05:18.200 --> 0:05:21.040
<v Speaker 4>joins US Information Technology Industry Council CEO. Look, what are

0:05:21.040 --> 0:05:23.919
<v Speaker 4>the companies asking from you at the moment and what

0:05:23.960 --> 0:05:25.920
<v Speaker 4>are you advising in terms of the uncertainty?

0:05:27.320 --> 0:05:30.280
<v Speaker 7>Well, what they're asking for is certainty. And we saw

0:05:30.440 --> 0:05:33.400
<v Speaker 7>over the weekend that the President very quickly moved to

0:05:33.520 --> 0:05:38.240
<v Speaker 7>a separate jurisdiction for tariff legitimacy. But I think the

0:05:38.279 --> 0:05:42.000
<v Speaker 7>broader question is what's the long term going to look like. Companies,

0:05:42.000 --> 0:05:45.160
<v Speaker 7>as we've been discussing, need certainty in order to make

0:05:45.200 --> 0:05:48.599
<v Speaker 7>investment decisions. Our trading partners are looking for certainty. The

0:05:48.680 --> 0:05:51.240
<v Speaker 7>news about the suspension of the trade talks between the

0:05:51.320 --> 0:05:54.920
<v Speaker 7>US and India is of concern. The EU suspending moving

0:05:54.920 --> 0:05:56.960
<v Speaker 7>forward on the trade agreement between the EU and the

0:05:57.040 --> 0:06:01.520
<v Speaker 7>US also of concern. We're looking for is part of

0:06:01.560 --> 0:06:03.920
<v Speaker 7>a broader question of the strategy of the United States,

0:06:04.120 --> 0:06:07.120
<v Speaker 7>and the Trump administration has been very focused on encouraging

0:06:07.160 --> 0:06:11.719
<v Speaker 7>investment in manufacturing here, encouraging construction of data centers, encouraging

0:06:11.920 --> 0:06:14.880
<v Speaker 7>export of AI technology from the United States to the

0:06:14.920 --> 0:06:15.599
<v Speaker 7>rest of the world.

0:06:15.760 --> 0:06:18.000
<v Speaker 2>Tariff strategy has a lot to do with that.

0:06:18.160 --> 0:06:21.000
<v Speaker 7>Tariffs are good tactics and a lot of negotiation, but

0:06:21.040 --> 0:06:23.359
<v Speaker 7>they're not a boarder strategy to encourage the kind of

0:06:23.400 --> 0:06:25.800
<v Speaker 7>investment that we're looking for. So what the tech industry

0:06:25.839 --> 0:06:27.880
<v Speaker 7>is looking for going forward is a lot more certainty.

0:06:28.200 --> 0:06:30.280
<v Speaker 4>I just think of how in video is part of

0:06:30.320 --> 0:06:34.440
<v Speaker 4>your Information Technology Industry Council, and how they have earnings,

0:06:34.440 --> 0:06:37.000
<v Speaker 4>and how they need foreign investment to come in and

0:06:37.040 --> 0:06:39.159
<v Speaker 4>help build the data centers where the GPUs are going

0:06:39.160 --> 0:06:42.200
<v Speaker 4>in the United States. Jason, do you think ultimately we

0:06:42.320 --> 0:06:44.880
<v Speaker 4>will come to some sort of agreement. How long can

0:06:45.000 --> 0:06:47.800
<v Speaker 4>CEOs navigate in this era of uncertainty.

0:06:49.040 --> 0:06:51.719
<v Speaker 7>Well, we do have to come to some level of certainty.

0:06:51.760 --> 0:06:54.440
<v Speaker 7>And as you noted, foreign investment in the United States

0:06:54.520 --> 0:06:57.479
<v Speaker 7>is a significant part of the manufacturing story. We've seen

0:06:57.560 --> 0:07:01.320
<v Speaker 7>investment not only in semiconductor infrastructructure announced here in the

0:07:01.400 --> 0:07:05.000
<v Speaker 7>US from companies around the world Taiwan, Korean, elsewhere, but

0:07:05.080 --> 0:07:08.839
<v Speaker 7>we've also seen investments in large data center projects, hundreds

0:07:08.839 --> 0:07:12.080
<v Speaker 7>of billions of dollars of investment coming from outside of

0:07:12.080 --> 0:07:15.320
<v Speaker 7>the United States. That's very important. But equally important to

0:07:15.360 --> 0:07:17.640
<v Speaker 7>that is that tariffs can be a deterrent to the

0:07:17.680 --> 0:07:21.400
<v Speaker 7>necessary inputs into that infrastructure. Whether we're talking about the

0:07:21.440 --> 0:07:24.120
<v Speaker 7>construction of data centers and the inputs that are necessary

0:07:24.120 --> 0:07:26.520
<v Speaker 7>for the construction there, or what goes into the data

0:07:26.520 --> 0:07:29.360
<v Speaker 7>centers as semiconductors and other components, or we're talking about

0:07:29.400 --> 0:07:32.200
<v Speaker 7>the energy infrastructure, including upgrades that are necessary to the

0:07:32.200 --> 0:07:35.200
<v Speaker 7>transmission grade and the equipment that comes from around the world.

0:07:35.200 --> 0:07:37.360
<v Speaker 7>For that, that's important to make sure that tariffs don't

0:07:37.360 --> 0:07:39.800
<v Speaker 7>interfere with those kind of investments. And then the flip side,

0:07:39.840 --> 0:07:41.840
<v Speaker 7>of course, is anything that's made in the United States.

0:07:41.920 --> 0:07:44.240
<v Speaker 7>Ninety five percent of the world's consumers don't live in

0:07:44.280 --> 0:07:46.160
<v Speaker 7>the United States. It needs to be exported to the

0:07:46.200 --> 0:07:48.240
<v Speaker 7>rest of the world. I just came back from India

0:07:48.320 --> 0:07:51.000
<v Speaker 7>yesterday from the AI Impact Summit, and there's a lot

0:07:51.000 --> 0:07:53.760
<v Speaker 7>of conversation there about how AI from the United States

0:07:53.800 --> 0:07:55.960
<v Speaker 7>can be exported to the rest of the world. Tariff

0:07:56.000 --> 0:07:58.760
<v Speaker 7>infrastructure can interfere with that as well. We want to

0:07:58.760 --> 0:07:59.560
<v Speaker 7>make sure that works.

0:08:00.480 --> 0:08:02.360
<v Speaker 3>Jason, what big piece of news this morning is the

0:08:02.400 --> 0:08:06.840
<v Speaker 3>European Union basically freezing the ratification process on a deal

0:08:06.920 --> 0:08:10.400
<v Speaker 3>it already reached with the United States. Just in the

0:08:10.400 --> 0:08:14.280
<v Speaker 3>context of imports, the EU is twenty percent of US imports.

0:08:14.280 --> 0:08:17.840
<v Speaker 3>The collective wisdom of your council, how long do you

0:08:17.920 --> 0:08:21.559
<v Speaker 3>expect this uncertainty and this kind of halt to things

0:08:21.560 --> 0:08:22.920
<v Speaker 3>that already were in play.

0:08:24.560 --> 0:08:26.440
<v Speaker 7>Yeah, I think that's a great point ed and we

0:08:26.480 --> 0:08:29.240
<v Speaker 7>saw it in India as well. They had a delegation

0:08:29.400 --> 0:08:31.520
<v Speaker 7>schedule to come this week to the United States and

0:08:31.600 --> 0:08:34.880
<v Speaker 7>India and the US had a great on stage moment

0:08:35.360 --> 0:08:38.360
<v Speaker 7>in Delhi this week talking about moving AI forward.

0:08:39.240 --> 0:08:40.880
<v Speaker 2>How long will this last? I don't know.

0:08:40.920 --> 0:08:43.360
<v Speaker 7>The President announced the use of Section one twenty two

0:08:43.720 --> 0:08:46.040
<v Speaker 7>that has one hundred and fifty day cap on it. Obviously,

0:08:46.120 --> 0:08:48.520
<v Speaker 7>the administration is looking at what the tariff strategy is

0:08:48.559 --> 0:08:50.840
<v Speaker 7>going to be going forward. I think as far as

0:08:50.920 --> 0:08:53.880
<v Speaker 7>the tech industry is concerned resolving these issues both on

0:08:53.920 --> 0:08:56.280
<v Speaker 7>the physical trade issues that we've been talking about, but

0:08:56.400 --> 0:09:00.079
<v Speaker 7>also digital trade. The trade market between the US and

0:09:00.280 --> 0:09:03.480
<v Speaker 7>the EU in digital trade is close to a trillion dollars.

0:09:03.520 --> 0:09:06.079
<v Speaker 7>It's an enormously important market there too. We need that

0:09:06.200 --> 0:09:09.040
<v Speaker 7>uncertainty resolved as quickly as possible so we can move

0:09:09.080 --> 0:09:11.120
<v Speaker 7>forward with these trade deals, which in many cases have

0:09:11.160 --> 0:09:13.320
<v Speaker 7>already been negotiated. We're just waiting for them to be signed.

0:09:14.120 --> 0:09:17.560
<v Speaker 3>Jason, if you and your fellow Council members could be

0:09:17.600 --> 0:09:20.560
<v Speaker 3>in a room with the President today, what's the first

0:09:20.559 --> 0:09:22.480
<v Speaker 3>thing you'd ask him for or to do.

0:09:23.920 --> 0:09:27.360
<v Speaker 7>Yeah, I think it's recognition that tariffs are bad for

0:09:27.440 --> 0:09:31.559
<v Speaker 7>investment in the kind of things that the administration has prioritized.

0:09:31.760 --> 0:09:35.520
<v Speaker 7>Look since April, since Liberation Day last year, the landscape

0:09:35.559 --> 0:09:38.959
<v Speaker 7>has changed significantly for what the administration is hoping to advance.

0:09:39.080 --> 0:09:42.280
<v Speaker 7>The Administration has a very clear, very sound, very direct

0:09:42.320 --> 0:09:45.920
<v Speaker 7>strategy here, and that is to encourage AI adoption around

0:09:45.960 --> 0:09:49.120
<v Speaker 7>the world of American AI technology, and that requires investment

0:09:49.120 --> 0:09:51.960
<v Speaker 7>in manufacturing in the US, It requires investment in data

0:09:51.960 --> 0:09:55.240
<v Speaker 7>centers in the US, It requires a robust semiconductor industry

0:09:55.240 --> 0:09:58.240
<v Speaker 7>here in the US. And tariffs interfere with the ability

0:09:58.320 --> 0:10:02.559
<v Speaker 7>of manufacturers and and digital trade to take place between

0:10:02.640 --> 0:10:04.760
<v Speaker 7>here and the rest of the world. So the one

0:10:04.800 --> 0:10:07.640
<v Speaker 7>ask of the administration is as they re evaluate the

0:10:07.679 --> 0:10:11.360
<v Speaker 7>trade and teriff strategy, and I think this Supreme Court

0:10:11.360 --> 0:10:13.600
<v Speaker 7>decision gives them an opportunity to do that. You need

0:10:13.640 --> 0:10:15.360
<v Speaker 7>to look at what the broader goals are, what the

0:10:15.360 --> 0:10:18.480
<v Speaker 7>broader strategy is to encourage investment in AI and the US,

0:10:18.679 --> 0:10:21.559
<v Speaker 7>the adoption of AI technology around the world, and how

0:10:21.559 --> 0:10:24.200
<v Speaker 7>tariffs would interfere with the ability of that to be

0:10:24.240 --> 0:10:25.400
<v Speaker 7>a successful strategy.

0:10:25.880 --> 0:10:29.200
<v Speaker 3>That rationale is one reason why tech stocks rose Friday,

0:10:29.240 --> 0:10:32.199
<v Speaker 3>a reprieve for the supply chain in particular. Jason Oxman

0:10:32.520 --> 0:10:35.200
<v Speaker 3>of the Information Technology Industry Council, thank you very much.

0:10:35.520 --> 0:10:38.080
<v Speaker 3>Now coming up, all eyes are on Nvidia, which reports

0:10:38.160 --> 0:10:40.920
<v Speaker 3>earnings this week. We have the big preview of what

0:10:41.080 --> 0:10:44.080
<v Speaker 3>to expect with that stock now completely flat and trading

0:10:44.080 --> 0:10:46.800
<v Speaker 3>water a little bit ahead of the big moment Wednesday.

0:10:46.960 --> 0:11:01.719
<v Speaker 3>This is Bloomberg Tech. It's a big week. It's a

0:11:01.760 --> 0:11:04.719
<v Speaker 3>big and video week, posting earnings after market Wednesday. It's

0:11:04.720 --> 0:11:07.480
<v Speaker 3>a stock that's up about two percent year to date,

0:11:07.600 --> 0:11:11.200
<v Speaker 3>completely flat this Monday morning, and there is a lot of,

0:11:11.440 --> 0:11:14.560
<v Speaker 3>let's say not anxiety, but we're bracing for Wednesday because

0:11:14.559 --> 0:11:16.360
<v Speaker 3>the story with the stock is very different to what

0:11:16.360 --> 0:11:19.760
<v Speaker 3>it has been in the last two or three calendar years.

0:11:19.960 --> 0:11:22.680
<v Speaker 3>We're trading at twenty four times forward earnings historically on

0:11:22.720 --> 0:11:26.360
<v Speaker 3>a five year basis thirty eight times. The momentum's gone.

0:11:26.520 --> 0:11:28.840
<v Speaker 3>We are kind of on pause with that salesforce down

0:11:28.880 --> 0:11:31.199
<v Speaker 3>five percent. Later in the program, we're going to talk

0:11:31.200 --> 0:11:34.280
<v Speaker 3>about what's happening in software right now. Again, that story

0:11:34.280 --> 0:11:36.920
<v Speaker 3>carries through to earnings. They are putting AI into what

0:11:36.920 --> 0:11:39.320
<v Speaker 3>they're already good at. That insulates them a bit, but

0:11:39.320 --> 0:11:41.640
<v Speaker 3>they're caught up with what's having at a bigger picture

0:11:41.840 --> 0:11:42.800
<v Speaker 3>look at the market.

0:11:42.600 --> 0:11:45.360
<v Speaker 4>Right now current Yeah, same with Snowflake, same with Workday.

0:11:45.360 --> 0:11:47.360
<v Speaker 4>We've got a lot of software earnings to digest. But

0:11:47.520 --> 0:11:50.720
<v Speaker 4>and as President Trump does move to rebuild his Tarifa agenda.

0:11:50.920 --> 0:11:55.240
<v Speaker 4>Investors are navigating renewed trade uncertainty during that very busy

0:11:55.240 --> 0:11:57.440
<v Speaker 4>week in earnings, as you say, with then video and

0:11:57.480 --> 0:11:59.960
<v Speaker 4>Salesforce and focus comen Ryinik's been writing all about this

0:12:00.480 --> 0:12:04.280
<v Speaker 4>and how what are the investors you're talking to thinking

0:12:04.480 --> 0:12:07.800
<v Speaker 4>about that lack luster trading oomph that we've seen in

0:12:07.960 --> 0:12:10.160
<v Speaker 4>video of light The ed's so clearly spelled out.

0:12:11.320 --> 0:12:13.520
<v Speaker 8>Yeah, I think it's something that's really interesting to have

0:12:13.600 --> 0:12:16.360
<v Speaker 8>this sort of big macro overlay over in video that's

0:12:16.400 --> 0:12:18.640
<v Speaker 8>really weighing on the entire market. I mean, we're just

0:12:18.679 --> 0:12:20.760
<v Speaker 8>saying the shares are pretty much flat now. They were

0:12:20.800 --> 0:12:22.840
<v Speaker 8>up as much as two percent earlier today, so just

0:12:22.880 --> 0:12:25.920
<v Speaker 8>getting dragged down by all of this uncertainty with the

0:12:25.960 --> 0:12:28.480
<v Speaker 8>earnings coming up, I think the thing that everybody's watching

0:12:28.520 --> 0:12:31.160
<v Speaker 8>for is can they do enough to quell any of

0:12:31.200 --> 0:12:33.640
<v Speaker 8>these fears and calm the market. I mean, they have

0:12:33.760 --> 0:12:35.679
<v Speaker 8>lost a lot of momentum in their shares. They've been

0:12:35.679 --> 0:12:37.839
<v Speaker 8>trading sideways for a long time now, but there's still

0:12:37.840 --> 0:12:39.600
<v Speaker 8>the biggest stock in the S and P with the

0:12:39.640 --> 0:12:43.080
<v Speaker 8>nearly eight percent waiting. So however they move around.

0:12:42.800 --> 0:12:45.520
<v Speaker 9>Earnings is going to be really important, and they've lost

0:12:45.640 --> 0:12:48.040
<v Speaker 9>some of the buzz. You know, they usually would be

0:12:48.080 --> 0:12:49.360
<v Speaker 9>and raised and shares would gain.

0:12:49.640 --> 0:12:52.160
<v Speaker 8>We haven't seen that in the last few quarters, so

0:12:52.559 --> 0:12:56.160
<v Speaker 8>that reaction, the investor sentiment around this report is paramount.

0:12:57.280 --> 0:12:59.760
<v Speaker 3>The stock has fallen in each of the last two

0:12:59.760 --> 0:13:03.440
<v Speaker 3>postscerning sessions for Nvidia. By the way, salesforce what it's

0:13:03.480 --> 0:13:06.760
<v Speaker 3>worth is down thirty four percent year to date, and

0:13:07.040 --> 0:13:09.439
<v Speaker 3>I checked it and I was like, really, but it

0:13:09.480 --> 0:13:12.080
<v Speaker 3>is case and point of what's happening right now in

0:13:12.160 --> 0:13:15.199
<v Speaker 3>software and the impact of AI on software.

0:13:15.280 --> 0:13:16.200
<v Speaker 2>What are we bracing for?

0:13:17.960 --> 0:13:20.200
<v Speaker 8>I mean, this sell off has been so profound. I

0:13:20.200 --> 0:13:22.280
<v Speaker 8>mean you just said salesforce down thirty four percent. I

0:13:22.320 --> 0:13:25.319
<v Speaker 8>think it's about fifty percent from the most recent peak.

0:13:25.400 --> 0:13:28.280
<v Speaker 8>So that's a lot of money coming out of those

0:13:28.440 --> 0:13:31.760
<v Speaker 8>kinds of stocks, and you know, there's just so much

0:13:31.880 --> 0:13:34.760
<v Speaker 8>anxiety around that piece of the puzzle, and it seems

0:13:34.760 --> 0:13:37.160
<v Speaker 8>like investors are just not willing yet to buy the

0:13:37.240 --> 0:13:39.280
<v Speaker 8>dip and say, Okay, this is the point where they've

0:13:39.280 --> 0:13:41.560
<v Speaker 8>gotten cheap enough where we think there might be some

0:13:41.640 --> 0:13:44.840
<v Speaker 8>compelling stuff here going forward. And I think the thing

0:13:44.880 --> 0:13:48.680
<v Speaker 8>that's interesting when you're thinking about in VideA is would

0:13:48.720 --> 0:13:51.280
<v Speaker 8>they be able to quell any of those fears?

0:13:51.360 --> 0:13:53.160
<v Speaker 9>Right, they're kind of on the opposite side of the trade.

0:13:53.160 --> 0:13:56.840
<v Speaker 8>They're not software, there are hardware, So it seems like

0:13:56.840 --> 0:13:59.800
<v Speaker 8>there's not a lot of positive catalysts necessarily coming up

0:14:00.120 --> 0:14:02.640
<v Speaker 8>that would sort of relieve some of the anxiety in

0:14:02.720 --> 0:14:05.760
<v Speaker 8>the software trades. So you know, we're seeing a lot

0:14:05.760 --> 0:14:08.240
<v Speaker 8>of selling there and just kind of waiting to see

0:14:08.280 --> 0:14:11.160
<v Speaker 8>maybe what might be the next thing that gets hit

0:14:11.280 --> 0:14:13.960
<v Speaker 8>from the sort of fears of software AI disruption.

0:14:15.120 --> 0:14:17.480
<v Speaker 3>The most carmon Rhinicky, Thank you very much. Let's get

0:14:17.520 --> 0:14:20.880
<v Speaker 3>more on tech markets with Shanty Kellerman seven am Co

0:14:21.240 --> 0:14:24.520
<v Speaker 3>Chief investment Officer. You know, it wasn't that long ago

0:14:24.720 --> 0:14:27.440
<v Speaker 3>where we're sat at our desks the day of video

0:14:27.440 --> 0:14:30.160
<v Speaker 3>earnings and all of the literatures calling it a macro

0:14:30.280 --> 0:14:33.400
<v Speaker 3>level event such as the impact of a single name

0:14:33.440 --> 0:14:36.000
<v Speaker 3>on the market. Maybe we're a bit flippant then, but

0:14:36.520 --> 0:14:38.800
<v Speaker 3>calm and set us up nicely right of the state

0:14:38.840 --> 0:14:42.280
<v Speaker 3>of play. Is this a macro level event this Wednesday?

0:14:44.120 --> 0:14:45.760
<v Speaker 10>I don't see it as that. I think it's still

0:14:45.800 --> 0:14:48.480
<v Speaker 10>incredibly important given it's still largest stock in the SMP,

0:14:48.960 --> 0:14:50.960
<v Speaker 10>and it does give us insight into what are the

0:14:51.080 --> 0:14:53.680
<v Speaker 10>ordering patterns because you see all of that big tech

0:14:53.760 --> 0:14:56.920
<v Speaker 10>investment that's gone through with the stending plans of Amazon,

0:14:57.160 --> 0:15:00.760
<v Speaker 10>Meta Facebook, those are probably translated into some of the

0:15:00.840 --> 0:15:03.240
<v Speaker 10>Nvidia orders and it has big impact for the chips

0:15:03.360 --> 0:15:04.320
<v Speaker 10>providers as well.

0:15:04.640 --> 0:15:05.880
<v Speaker 11>So it certainly matters.

0:15:05.640 --> 0:15:08.280
<v Speaker 10>Quite a bit, but I think it'll take a really

0:15:08.320 --> 0:15:12.080
<v Speaker 10>big beat to see the stock actually move because expectations

0:15:12.080 --> 0:15:14.040
<v Speaker 10>are so high, and that's kind of similar for the

0:15:14.040 --> 0:15:17.800
<v Speaker 10>whole technology sector. We have. Valuations are very high, so

0:15:17.880 --> 0:15:20.440
<v Speaker 10>it's got to be earnings that's really going to drive

0:15:20.600 --> 0:15:22.480
<v Speaker 10>growth in the share price because it's hard to see

0:15:22.480 --> 0:15:24.160
<v Speaker 10>those valuations going much higher.

0:15:25.040 --> 0:15:26.520
<v Speaker 2>In the context of software.

0:15:26.600 --> 0:15:28.720
<v Speaker 3>You were in the camp and we had this discussion

0:15:28.800 --> 0:15:31.280
<v Speaker 3>last week with others that the sell off we've seen

0:15:31.320 --> 0:15:34.760
<v Speaker 3>AI related sell off, particularly in software, has been indiscriminate.

0:15:34.840 --> 0:15:37.920
<v Speaker 2>That word comes up a lot. What's your argument on that?

0:15:39.600 --> 0:15:40.880
<v Speaker 2>So I think for a.

0:15:40.840 --> 0:15:43.120
<v Speaker 10>Long time we've been saying we don't know necessarily know

0:15:43.160 --> 0:15:45.560
<v Speaker 10>who the AI winners and losers are, and it's kind

0:15:45.560 --> 0:15:48.640
<v Speaker 10>of like investors actually decided to put their money behind that.

0:15:48.840 --> 0:15:51.000
<v Speaker 10>With the recent sell off that we had and I

0:15:51.000 --> 0:15:53.680
<v Speaker 10>think people have realized that they don't necessarily know who

0:15:53.720 --> 0:15:55.520
<v Speaker 10>those winners are going to be and just sort of

0:15:55.760 --> 0:15:59.040
<v Speaker 10>indiscriminately sold a lot of the market. I think there

0:15:59.040 --> 0:16:01.760
<v Speaker 10>will be software company that can do incredibly well out

0:16:01.760 --> 0:16:05.640
<v Speaker 10>of this, because AI can dramatically reduce their past to

0:16:05.720 --> 0:16:08.440
<v Speaker 10>deliver programming. It can make things more efficient, you know,

0:16:08.480 --> 0:16:12.920
<v Speaker 10>reduce their expenses, deliver better experience. But executing all that

0:16:13.000 --> 0:16:15.440
<v Speaker 10>is really difficult, and not every software company is going

0:16:15.480 --> 0:16:16.320
<v Speaker 10>to be able to do it.

0:16:16.920 --> 0:16:19.360
<v Speaker 4>Will you learn much from just earnings and fundamentals this

0:16:19.440 --> 0:16:22.600
<v Speaker 4>time shouting? Could that be where investors decide to try

0:16:22.600 --> 0:16:24.200
<v Speaker 4>and catch upwarding nice so to speak.

0:16:25.560 --> 0:16:27.960
<v Speaker 10>I think it's hard to see people changing their minds

0:16:28.000 --> 0:16:31.320
<v Speaker 10>so quickly, only in the last few weeks, but the

0:16:31.480 --> 0:16:35.680
<v Speaker 10>technology sector does move incredibly fast, as we've seen. You know,

0:16:35.680 --> 0:16:38.520
<v Speaker 10>you can have those moments like Deepsek where things everything

0:16:38.560 --> 0:16:41.640
<v Speaker 10>seems to change overnight, but usually the selloffs are quick

0:16:41.680 --> 0:16:43.760
<v Speaker 10>and then it takes time to rebuild the momentum.

0:16:44.160 --> 0:16:47.320
<v Speaker 4>Chandy, what is your view? What are you in rooms

0:16:47.360 --> 0:16:50.600
<v Speaker 4>discussing that, yes, we are at this point where AI

0:16:50.720 --> 0:16:53.880
<v Speaker 4>is going to eat software instead of software eating the world,

0:16:54.240 --> 0:16:56.840
<v Speaker 4>or do you think companies will ultimately survive this shift

0:16:56.840 --> 0:16:58.120
<v Speaker 4>and be able to rebuild from within.

0:17:00.000 --> 0:17:01.800
<v Speaker 10>I think a lot of companies will be able to

0:17:01.840 --> 0:17:03.880
<v Speaker 10>survive it. I think the big thing we're looking at

0:17:04.040 --> 0:17:07.400
<v Speaker 10>is how much AI is starting to impact industries outside

0:17:07.440 --> 0:17:10.840
<v Speaker 10>of technology, and that's where valuations are lower. You're starting

0:17:10.880 --> 0:17:13.560
<v Speaker 10>to see it come into shopping. You're starting to see

0:17:13.560 --> 0:17:16.520
<v Speaker 10>it come into the wealth industry to make it easier

0:17:16.520 --> 0:17:20.119
<v Speaker 10>to comply with regulations, banking and finance certainly, and I

0:17:20.160 --> 0:17:22.720
<v Speaker 10>think that's where if some of those sectors can start

0:17:22.720 --> 0:17:25.959
<v Speaker 10>to demonstrate that they're using the technology well and adopting it,

0:17:26.000 --> 0:17:27.800
<v Speaker 10>then they'll really be rewarded.

0:17:29.280 --> 0:17:29.840
<v Speaker 2>Tariffs.

0:17:30.800 --> 0:17:33.520
<v Speaker 3>It's very hard to join all of the pieces of

0:17:33.560 --> 0:17:36.440
<v Speaker 3>bad news, so to speak, together, but the tech sectors

0:17:36.520 --> 0:17:38.960
<v Speaker 3>view on tariff policy uncertainty right now.

0:17:40.560 --> 0:17:46.400
<v Speaker 10>I think obviously lowers rates slightly on places like you know, Asia, China,

0:17:46.520 --> 0:17:49.919
<v Speaker 10>which helps some of those manufacturing bases, so maybe it

0:17:49.960 --> 0:17:52.600
<v Speaker 10>marginally reduces some of their costs. I think the long

0:17:52.720 --> 0:17:56.000
<v Speaker 10>term trend of technology companies trying to diversify their production

0:17:56.119 --> 0:17:59.040
<v Speaker 10>and having manufacturing you know in the US, in Mexico

0:17:59.160 --> 0:18:01.760
<v Speaker 10>and still an age as well going to India. I

0:18:01.760 --> 0:18:04.560
<v Speaker 10>don't think that's going to change because people don't think

0:18:04.640 --> 0:18:06.920
<v Speaker 10>the uncertainty is going to go away, and we still

0:18:06.960 --> 0:18:09.920
<v Speaker 10>will probably have an unpredictable policy environment. So you want

0:18:09.960 --> 0:18:12.520
<v Speaker 10>to be able to have all of your options open.

0:18:13.840 --> 0:18:16.520
<v Speaker 10>Probably it helps unbalance some of the you know, the software,

0:18:16.560 --> 0:18:20.000
<v Speaker 10>the things that are producing actual physical goods. But we'll

0:18:20.000 --> 0:18:22.280
<v Speaker 10>see how long this rate staves in place. You know,

0:18:22.440 --> 0:18:24.359
<v Speaker 10>we could all change in one hundred and fifty days

0:18:24.440 --> 0:18:24.879
<v Speaker 10>as we know.

0:18:26.160 --> 0:18:28.840
<v Speaker 4>Chanty Kellerman of seven AM, it's great to have you

0:18:28.880 --> 0:18:30.959
<v Speaker 4>on the show. Thank you very much. Indeed, Meanwhile, coming up,

0:18:31.000 --> 0:18:34.320
<v Speaker 4>Blue Ol Capital permanently shuts the gates on one of

0:18:34.359 --> 0:18:37.440
<v Speaker 4>its funds, making the private credit mark even more jittery

0:18:37.880 --> 0:18:40.480
<v Speaker 4>after existing AI concerns stick with us. This is Blomberg

0:18:40.560 --> 0:19:07.320
<v Speaker 4>Tech Morgan's standing investment management is looking away from AI

0:19:07.640 --> 0:19:10.600
<v Speaker 4>and adding to emerging market bets that are insulated from

0:19:10.640 --> 0:19:13.639
<v Speaker 4>the AI boom. Now, the firm's deputy chief investment officer

0:19:13.680 --> 0:19:16.480
<v Speaker 4>says it is positioning itself for a potential pullback in

0:19:16.520 --> 0:19:20.040
<v Speaker 4>the crowded tech trade following rising concerns over stretch valuations

0:19:20.320 --> 0:19:23.200
<v Speaker 4>and heavy capital spending by US tech giants.

0:19:23.680 --> 0:19:27.760
<v Speaker 3>Ed Blue Our Capital has permanently shut the gates on

0:19:27.920 --> 0:19:31.240
<v Speaker 3>one of its funds, preventing investors from withdrawing their cash,

0:19:31.560 --> 0:19:34.240
<v Speaker 3>and is selling assets to return investor capital. It's the

0:19:34.320 --> 0:19:37.439
<v Speaker 3>latest sign of frenzy in a one point eight trillion

0:19:37.480 --> 0:19:41.960
<v Speaker 3>dollar private credit market troubled with worry about overspending on AI.

0:19:42.080 --> 0:19:44.000
<v Speaker 2>But in most private credit reporters Cilus.

0:19:43.720 --> 0:19:46.280
<v Speaker 3>Brown joins us, if you look at kind of what's

0:19:46.359 --> 0:19:49.480
<v Speaker 3>happened in the public markets, how some of these names

0:19:49.520 --> 0:19:52.760
<v Speaker 3>and credit have traded, there is something behind that that's

0:19:52.840 --> 0:19:53.959
<v Speaker 3>related to technology.

0:19:54.240 --> 0:19:57.360
<v Speaker 12>Taken from there, yeah, I think it's I think it's

0:19:58.080 --> 0:20:01.800
<v Speaker 12>fundamentally important in what going in private credit, I mean

0:20:02.080 --> 0:20:05.480
<v Speaker 12>private credit and private equity to a certain extent as well.

0:20:06.400 --> 0:20:10.240
<v Speaker 12>They kind of prided themselves on selecting certain industries that

0:20:10.280 --> 0:20:14.760
<v Speaker 12>they considered to be anti cyclical, noncyclical, and that kind

0:20:14.800 --> 0:20:17.440
<v Speaker 12>of that kind of shrinks the pool. And one of

0:20:17.480 --> 0:20:21.840
<v Speaker 12>the kind of darlings of choice was software as a service.

0:20:21.960 --> 0:20:24.680
<v Speaker 12>And so you'll find with Blue al but Blue ally

0:20:24.720 --> 0:20:29.680
<v Speaker 12>is by no means an anomaly, a big concentration of

0:20:31.000 --> 0:20:34.280
<v Speaker 12>exposure to software and software as a service. And I

0:20:34.359 --> 0:20:37.919
<v Speaker 12>think with this kind of transformative, paradigmatic or whatever kind

0:20:37.960 --> 0:20:40.920
<v Speaker 12>of big word you want to use, effect or likely

0:20:41.000 --> 0:20:44.439
<v Speaker 12>effect that AI has on that industry makes it very

0:20:44.560 --> 0:20:49.080
<v Speaker 12>hard for investors to judge even I mean perhaps not

0:20:49.160 --> 0:20:51.560
<v Speaker 12>short term, but certain the mid term and long term

0:20:52.200 --> 0:20:54.480
<v Speaker 12>prospects for a lot of these businesses.

0:20:54.520 --> 0:20:59.720
<v Speaker 4>And judgment transparency. That's exactly what the private credit market

0:20:59.720 --> 0:21:02.040
<v Speaker 4>does have much of silas. And it's interesting that Bank

0:21:02.080 --> 0:21:04.080
<v Speaker 4>of America today is putting out a note saying there

0:21:04.160 --> 0:21:07.960
<v Speaker 4>is a significant level of misinformation weighing on Blue Out

0:21:08.000 --> 0:21:10.800
<v Speaker 4>stock and the private credit industry in general. So how

0:21:10.840 --> 0:21:14.960
<v Speaker 4>can they appease that and really talk to a more

0:21:15.000 --> 0:21:18.439
<v Speaker 4>transparent era when you're seeing them close funds and indeed

0:21:18.520 --> 0:21:19.840
<v Speaker 4>not allow people to access money.

0:21:21.040 --> 0:21:23.520
<v Speaker 12>You know, I think there's there's there's sort of there's

0:21:23.560 --> 0:21:26.760
<v Speaker 12>sort of several tectonic plates that are shifting under private credit.

0:21:27.080 --> 0:21:31.399
<v Speaker 12>I mean with blue al in particular and BDCs more generally.

0:21:31.840 --> 0:21:34.640
<v Speaker 12>I mean, they are kind of retail or ented funds,

0:21:34.720 --> 0:21:38.320
<v Speaker 12>and so there's a question about investor investor withdrawals and

0:21:38.440 --> 0:21:40.119
<v Speaker 12>kind of what happens if you've if you have a

0:21:40.200 --> 0:21:43.600
<v Speaker 12>kind of avalanche of withdrawals. At the same time, BDCs

0:21:43.680 --> 0:21:47.760
<v Speaker 12>have gating systems, which have you know, which blue Out

0:21:47.800 --> 0:21:50.520
<v Speaker 12>has blue Out, by the way, has redeemed every investor

0:21:50.520 --> 0:21:53.959
<v Speaker 12>withdrawal so far apart from this new one where it's shifting.

0:21:54.080 --> 0:21:58.080
<v Speaker 12>It's kind of slightly complicated, but it's shifting a legacy system. Uh,

0:21:58.960 --> 0:22:00.840
<v Speaker 12>you know, finding a way of shifting a legacy system

0:22:01.160 --> 0:22:03.800
<v Speaker 12>investors outside of that system. So you know that there

0:22:03.840 --> 0:22:06.280
<v Speaker 12>are kind of I don't know what Bank of America's

0:22:06.280 --> 0:22:08.480
<v Speaker 12>notes was specifically saying, but I mean, I think there's

0:22:08.520 --> 0:22:13.760
<v Speaker 12>been a lot of noise around blue OL recently regarding

0:22:13.920 --> 0:22:16.560
<v Speaker 12>investor with investor withdrawals and kind of what will happen

0:22:16.640 --> 0:22:20.600
<v Speaker 12>with jitteriness amongst amongst the retail client base, but that

0:22:20.880 --> 0:22:25.120
<v Speaker 12>undergirded by I think a kind of preponderance of software

0:22:25.200 --> 0:22:27.920
<v Speaker 12>exposure in the in the in the kind of in

0:22:28.040 --> 0:22:31.160
<v Speaker 12>the dawn of AI I think is concerning investors.

0:22:31.680 --> 0:22:34.919
<v Speaker 4>Certainly his most sadus ground all across that story for us,

0:22:35.240 --> 0:22:37.720
<v Speaker 4>thank you very much. Indeed, Now coming up, President Trump

0:22:37.800 --> 0:22:40.520
<v Speaker 4>looks to rebuild his global TARA policy after the Supreme

0:22:40.560 --> 0:22:43.800
<v Speaker 4>Court struck down his use of the IP law. That's

0:22:43.880 --> 0:22:45.680
<v Speaker 4>next the spring bed Tech.

0:22:59.400 --> 0:23:03.080
<v Speaker 3>Welcome Back, Toloomberg text and breaking news crossing the Bloomberg terminal,

0:23:03.240 --> 0:23:09.200
<v Speaker 3>PayPal is receiving takeover interest from different parties. According to

0:23:09.240 --> 0:23:14.680
<v Speaker 3>Bloomberg sources, the payments company has fielded meetings with some

0:23:14.840 --> 0:23:19.280
<v Speaker 3>of its banks amid unsolicited interests. In one case, a

0:23:19.480 --> 0:23:22.920
<v Speaker 3>large rival is looking at buying the whole of PayPal.

0:23:23.359 --> 0:23:27.199
<v Speaker 3>In other cases, according to the Bloomberg reporting, different parties

0:23:27.240 --> 0:23:30.159
<v Speaker 3>are interested in certain PayPal assets. This has stocked this

0:23:30.280 --> 0:23:32.480
<v Speaker 3>down thirty percent year to date. It's down almost fifty

0:23:32.480 --> 0:23:34.920
<v Speaker 3>percent over the last twelve months. And part of the

0:23:35.000 --> 0:23:37.440
<v Speaker 3>reporting is that the pressure on that stock in the

0:23:37.520 --> 0:23:40.880
<v Speaker 3>downward trajectory is what is leading to an environment where

0:23:41.160 --> 0:23:44.439
<v Speaker 3>that takeover interest is in place. PayPal declined to comment

0:23:44.640 --> 0:23:45.720
<v Speaker 3>on Bloomberg's reporting.

0:23:45.800 --> 0:23:49.240
<v Speaker 4>Kra involving one. Now, let's return to our top story

0:23:49.359 --> 0:23:52.720
<v Speaker 4>today and trade uncertainty as as President Trump reshapes his

0:23:52.760 --> 0:23:56.600
<v Speaker 4>global tarot policy signaling a potential fifteen percent rate. Now,

0:23:56.640 --> 0:23:59.320
<v Speaker 4>that debate is front and center in Washington for the

0:23:59.400 --> 0:24:01.960
<v Speaker 4>National Associate of Business Economics, as a gathering of leading

0:24:02.040 --> 0:24:05.119
<v Speaker 4>economists is underway and where the Supreme Court's ruling on

0:24:05.240 --> 0:24:08.399
<v Speaker 4>Trump's tariff authority is probably a key focus. Bloombag International

0:24:08.400 --> 0:24:10.760
<v Speaker 4>Economics and Policy editor Michael McKee joint us now and look,

0:24:10.960 --> 0:24:14.040
<v Speaker 4>the theme of the gathering is actually the great realignment

0:24:14.160 --> 0:24:19.119
<v Speaker 4>navigating AI demographic and geoeconomic shifts. Let's focus on geoeconomic

0:24:19.200 --> 0:24:20.120
<v Speaker 4>shifts first, Mike.

0:24:20.400 --> 0:24:25.920
<v Speaker 13>What's everyone discussing, Well, everybody's trying to figure out where

0:24:26.119 --> 0:24:27.879
<v Speaker 13>this is all going and what it will lead to,

0:24:28.080 --> 0:24:30.160
<v Speaker 13>and there's not a lot of consensus on it yet.

0:24:31.040 --> 0:24:34.200
<v Speaker 13>The Fed Governor Christopher Waller spoke this morning and said

0:24:34.480 --> 0:24:36.000
<v Speaker 13>it's very uncertain to them.

0:24:36.119 --> 0:24:37.760
<v Speaker 11>He's going to give a major speech tomorrow.

0:24:37.880 --> 0:24:42.399
<v Speaker 13>Also, Fed Governor Lisa Cook is talking on AI here tomorrow. Today,

0:24:42.440 --> 0:24:45.240
<v Speaker 13>we've got some workshops with people from AI companies. There's

0:24:45.320 --> 0:24:49.000
<v Speaker 13>one underway right now. Peter McCrory of and Thoropik, he

0:24:49.200 --> 0:24:53.399
<v Speaker 13>is their chief economists, is talking about their economic index

0:24:53.520 --> 0:24:56.920
<v Speaker 13>and their efforts to track the impacts that AI is

0:24:57.080 --> 0:25:00.600
<v Speaker 13>having on the labor market and basically saying the same

0:25:00.680 --> 0:25:04.120
<v Speaker 13>thing that everybody's saying. It's a major impact, but it's

0:25:04.240 --> 0:25:07.760
<v Speaker 13>uncertain where they're going for right now, and it's uncertain

0:25:07.920 --> 0:25:10.760
<v Speaker 13>what kind of effects it will have on productivity and

0:25:10.880 --> 0:25:14.280
<v Speaker 13>on the labor market. Although right now, what Anthropic is

0:25:14.320 --> 0:25:19.800
<v Speaker 13>seeing is there's a lot of impact on things like accounting,

0:25:20.400 --> 0:25:24.920
<v Speaker 13>things that can be automated. The idea that you can

0:25:25.200 --> 0:25:29.600
<v Speaker 13>get things to do the things that humans do on

0:25:29.720 --> 0:25:32.639
<v Speaker 13>a computer is what's changing. But so far they're not

0:25:32.720 --> 0:25:36.119
<v Speaker 13>seeing a major impact on what the relationship is between

0:25:36.200 --> 0:25:39.479
<v Speaker 13>humans and other humans. If you have a forward facing

0:25:39.640 --> 0:25:42.720
<v Speaker 13>job with the public, it's not clear what AI is

0:25:42.760 --> 0:25:45.200
<v Speaker 13>going to be able to do. He did note though,

0:25:45.400 --> 0:25:50.280
<v Speaker 13>that the speed at which AI can process tasks that

0:25:50.440 --> 0:25:54.119
<v Speaker 13>humans do is doubling every seven months, so anything they

0:25:54.200 --> 0:25:59.720
<v Speaker 13>say now is probably going to be somewhat obsolete. Fairly quickly, Mike.

0:25:59.600 --> 0:26:02.560
<v Speaker 3>You join the show on Friday post Supreme Court decision

0:26:03.000 --> 0:26:06.159
<v Speaker 3>IIPAS struck down. Then there's a series of truth social

0:26:06.240 --> 0:26:10.520
<v Speaker 3>posts over the weekend in quasi policy announcements and actions.

0:26:10.960 --> 0:26:12.680
<v Speaker 3>The net result, as far as I can understand it

0:26:12.840 --> 0:26:17.320
<v Speaker 3>is the overall weighted tariff rate is only slightly marginally lower.

0:26:18.160 --> 0:26:21.680
<v Speaker 3>On the ground there is that the understanding of everyone else,

0:26:21.840 --> 0:26:24.800
<v Speaker 3>or is there still great sort of policy uncertainty for tariffs?

0:26:27.600 --> 0:26:28.280
<v Speaker 2>Well, there's both.

0:26:28.560 --> 0:26:33.240
<v Speaker 13>It is the tariff that's going in place fifteen percent

0:26:33.600 --> 0:26:36.280
<v Speaker 13>Trump can do legally, so people are operating under the

0:26:36.280 --> 0:26:39.520
<v Speaker 13>assumption that for now that's going to be the average

0:26:39.560 --> 0:26:42.639
<v Speaker 13>weighted tariff, but it would change once they start bringing

0:26:42.680 --> 0:26:45.760
<v Speaker 13>in tariffs on sectors or countries based on some of

0:26:45.840 --> 0:26:50.080
<v Speaker 13>the other the other sections of the trade law they

0:26:50.119 --> 0:26:53.880
<v Speaker 13>can use, but those have to have investigations and they

0:26:53.920 --> 0:26:56.960
<v Speaker 13>have to be shown harm to various sectors or harm

0:26:57.080 --> 0:27:00.360
<v Speaker 13>from various countries, and so the tariff levels and when

0:27:00.400 --> 0:27:03.480
<v Speaker 13>they would be imposed still not certain. What it does

0:27:03.640 --> 0:27:06.960
<v Speaker 13>is just kind of push out the uncertainty that we

0:27:07.160 --> 0:27:11.080
<v Speaker 13>have seen. And as Governor Waller said today, it doesn't

0:27:11.160 --> 0:27:13.440
<v Speaker 13>change much of the Fed's thinking because the Fed is

0:27:13.520 --> 0:27:15.840
<v Speaker 13>trying to look through the tariffs. It'll be a one

0:27:15.920 --> 0:27:18.359
<v Speaker 13>time shot to inflation, but now it means it'll happen

0:27:18.480 --> 0:27:20.840
<v Speaker 13>later than perhaps they thought.

0:27:21.040 --> 0:27:22.520
<v Speaker 11>So they just have to wait for it.

0:27:22.880 --> 0:27:24.199
<v Speaker 2>And everybody's got to wait and.

0:27:24.240 --> 0:27:27.479
<v Speaker 13>See when the President puts these tariffs on to decide

0:27:27.560 --> 0:27:28.359
<v Speaker 13>what the impact is.

0:27:28.359 --> 0:27:28.680
<v Speaker 2>Going to be.

0:27:29.200 --> 0:27:31.800
<v Speaker 4>Uncertainty abound, whether it's AI or whether it's trade. Mike

0:27:31.880 --> 0:27:34.440
<v Speaker 4>McKee on the ground in Washington, thank you very much. Indeed,

0:27:34.520 --> 0:27:37.160
<v Speaker 4>let's get more on the trade impact investors are watching

0:27:37.200 --> 0:27:39.320
<v Speaker 4>on the broader earnings on the AI picture with Jed

0:27:39.400 --> 0:27:43.000
<v Speaker 4>Alibert of argent Capital management. So let's start with tariffs,

0:27:43.119 --> 0:27:46.399
<v Speaker 4>because that's the key headline everyone faces today. How do

0:27:46.480 --> 0:27:49.440
<v Speaker 4>you think companies navigate this? Does it change your investment

0:27:49.520 --> 0:27:50.160
<v Speaker 4>thesis at all?

0:27:52.560 --> 0:27:55.359
<v Speaker 14>Yeah, I think you guys covered it well overall. Slight

0:27:55.440 --> 0:27:57.520
<v Speaker 14>reduction in the effect of tariff right over the next

0:27:57.560 --> 0:28:00.920
<v Speaker 14>five months as that one thirty or one twenty two

0:28:00.960 --> 0:28:03.720
<v Speaker 14>investigation period goes for the next five months. But after that,

0:28:03.840 --> 0:28:10.040
<v Speaker 14>significant uncertainty the midterm elections will have an impact, and yeah,

0:28:10.119 --> 0:28:14.480
<v Speaker 14>we'll delay investment decisions. I think it'll make people think twice.

0:28:14.720 --> 0:28:17.520
<v Speaker 14>I think it'll probably make make decision processes slow down

0:28:17.520 --> 0:28:20.280
<v Speaker 14>a little bit. And then on the other hand, business

0:28:20.400 --> 0:28:24.720
<v Speaker 14>leaders investors have been getting used to President Trump and

0:28:24.800 --> 0:28:28.040
<v Speaker 14>his tactics and preferences and negotiating style over the last

0:28:29.080 --> 0:28:30.840
<v Speaker 14>you know, he's more than twelve months now here in

0:28:30.920 --> 0:28:33.119
<v Speaker 14>his second term, and so I think perhaps a bit

0:28:33.160 --> 0:28:34.920
<v Speaker 14>of normalcy set in. I guess I'm not giving you

0:28:34.960 --> 0:28:36.399
<v Speaker 14>a very good answer, but I think that there are

0:28:36.560 --> 0:28:38.760
<v Speaker 14>kind of push and pull in both directions.

0:28:38.840 --> 0:28:41.760
<v Speaker 4>So that you are confronted by ongoing uncertainty in a

0:28:41.840 --> 0:28:44.920
<v Speaker 4>geopolitical environment. But Jed, the eye of the storm has

0:28:44.920 --> 0:28:47.840
<v Speaker 4>been on software names and the uncertainty the AI injects there.

0:28:48.480 --> 0:28:50.400
<v Speaker 4>Are you seeing any sort of ability to buy the

0:28:50.440 --> 0:28:50.840
<v Speaker 4>dip yet?

0:28:52.840 --> 0:28:55.840
<v Speaker 14>I think that this private equity, private equity and also

0:28:55.920 --> 0:28:59.800
<v Speaker 14>strategic investor interest in PayPal is instructive and probably going

0:28:59.840 --> 0:29:02.480
<v Speaker 14>to happen quite a bit over the next twelve months.

0:29:02.800 --> 0:29:06.160
<v Speaker 14>The payment space of which PayPal's a member, has been

0:29:06.240 --> 0:29:08.680
<v Speaker 14>hit really really hard over the last one year and

0:29:08.880 --> 0:29:12.280
<v Speaker 14>even further back if you look and so yeah, I

0:29:12.320 --> 0:29:17.240
<v Speaker 14>think you'll see strategic investors, private equity backed investors start

0:29:17.320 --> 0:29:20.640
<v Speaker 14>to sniff around areas like payments, areas like software, And

0:29:20.680 --> 0:29:22.920
<v Speaker 14>it wouldn't surprise me one bit if you see a

0:29:22.960 --> 0:29:26.400
<v Speaker 14>pickup in M and A in those areas as investors

0:29:26.600 --> 0:29:29.360
<v Speaker 14>seek value and try to kind of pick through the

0:29:29.440 --> 0:29:31.920
<v Speaker 14>rubble in an area that's been fairly well bombed out.

0:29:31.800 --> 0:29:32.640
<v Speaker 11>In the last six months.

0:29:33.440 --> 0:29:37.640
<v Speaker 3>Jed, I appreciate you reacting to that breaking story. Basically,

0:29:38.000 --> 0:29:41.440
<v Speaker 3>sentiment out there is quite negative right now, tariffs, software,

0:29:42.360 --> 0:29:46.680
<v Speaker 3>geopolitical risk from the market participant side of the table,

0:29:47.280 --> 0:29:49.960
<v Speaker 3>particularly focused on the tech sector. Our things as dire

0:29:50.680 --> 0:29:53.400
<v Speaker 3>as the news headlines would have us suggests at the moment.

0:29:54.640 --> 0:29:57.680
<v Speaker 14>It's such a unique environment because We've seen a handful.

0:29:57.840 --> 0:30:01.880
<v Speaker 14>Most software companies report fairly good fourth quarter twenty twenty

0:30:01.960 --> 0:30:06.360
<v Speaker 14>five earnings. Most of them issue, you know, reasonably good

0:30:07.320 --> 0:30:09.560
<v Speaker 14>guidance for twenty twenty six or at least the first

0:30:09.600 --> 0:30:12.800
<v Speaker 14>quarter of twenty twenty six, and yet investors don't care

0:30:12.840 --> 0:30:15.440
<v Speaker 14>about that at all. Their concerns lie further down the

0:30:15.520 --> 0:30:18.080
<v Speaker 14>road a couple of years out as these AI tools

0:30:18.120 --> 0:30:21.520
<v Speaker 14>continue to develop. The last speaker talked about a doubling

0:30:21.560 --> 0:30:25.760
<v Speaker 14>of capacity or capability every seven months. If that continues

0:30:26.040 --> 0:30:28.600
<v Speaker 14>for the next couple of years on end, you will

0:30:28.720 --> 0:30:32.400
<v Speaker 14>certainly see some of the more point solutions software companies

0:30:33.360 --> 0:30:37.560
<v Speaker 14>struggle with AI, you know, capability competition.

0:30:38.360 --> 0:30:40.240
<v Speaker 11>And then there will be other software companies that have

0:30:40.320 --> 0:30:41.000
<v Speaker 11>really deep.

0:30:40.840 --> 0:30:45.080
<v Speaker 14>Tentacles inside organizations, really form the backbone of companies workloads

0:30:45.120 --> 0:30:48.000
<v Speaker 14>and processes and data storage and data analysis, and.

0:30:48.040 --> 0:30:49.040
<v Speaker 9>I think that they will thrive.

0:30:49.440 --> 0:30:50.560
<v Speaker 11>So it's a mixed picture.

0:30:52.000 --> 0:30:54.800
<v Speaker 3>Salesforce snowflake. They be a test of that, wouldn't they.

0:30:54.880 --> 0:30:57.920
<v Speaker 3>Jed Elberkevargent Capital Management, Thank you very much. I want

0:30:57.920 --> 0:30:59.640
<v Speaker 3>to go back to Paypower. The stocks up about six

0:30:59.680 --> 0:31:03.080
<v Speaker 3>percent right now. It been halted for volatility after a

0:31:03.160 --> 0:31:06.600
<v Speaker 3>big spike post that Bloomberg News report that it is

0:31:06.680 --> 0:31:10.960
<v Speaker 3>attracting takeover interest. The Bloomberg report details that one big

0:31:11.160 --> 0:31:14.440
<v Speaker 3>rival is considering buying all of PayPal. In other cases,

0:31:14.640 --> 0:31:18.720
<v Speaker 3>other potential bidders looking at certain assets, and PayPal has

0:31:18.800 --> 0:31:23.440
<v Speaker 3>been meeting with banks about this unsolicited interest. We know

0:31:23.560 --> 0:31:25.160
<v Speaker 3>this is a stock there's pin under pressure, not just

0:31:25.280 --> 0:31:27.760
<v Speaker 3>year to date, but over the last twelve months, down

0:31:27.760 --> 0:31:30.640
<v Speaker 3>about forty six percent in that twelve month period. Now

0:31:30.640 --> 0:31:34.240
<v Speaker 3>we're up seven percent in the session. PayPal declined to comment.

0:31:34.320 --> 0:31:36.080
<v Speaker 3>Will continue to track it carract We will.

0:31:35.960 --> 0:31:39.440
<v Speaker 4>Will also continue to track Bitcoin. It touched sixty five

0:31:39.520 --> 0:31:42.160
<v Speaker 4>thousand dollars, in fact went below it as tariff anxiety

0:31:42.240 --> 0:31:54.600
<v Speaker 4>is borne out on that next visit, Bloomberg Tech as

0:31:54.680 --> 0:31:57.120
<v Speaker 4>checking on these markets, which bounce off session loads on

0:31:57.120 --> 0:31:58.560
<v Speaker 4>the day, but was still down by one point two

0:31:58.600 --> 0:32:01.240
<v Speaker 4>percent on the nasdak as check. We've got about twenty

0:32:01.280 --> 0:32:05.240
<v Speaker 4>eight names in the green, more than seventy seventy three

0:32:05.320 --> 0:32:07.520
<v Speaker 4>are in the red right now, and another ugly day

0:32:07.560 --> 0:32:09.479
<v Speaker 4>for software. We'll get to that in a moment. Bitcoin

0:32:09.560 --> 0:32:11.360
<v Speaker 4>is off by almost three percent at one point in

0:32:11.440 --> 0:32:13.920
<v Speaker 4>the training session, and look on to the more broader

0:32:14.440 --> 0:32:18.320
<v Speaker 4>chart of bitcoin last couple of days. Again, anxiety just

0:32:18.400 --> 0:32:21.240
<v Speaker 4>the macro headwinds hit it to the tune of four

0:32:21.280 --> 0:32:23.360
<v Speaker 4>percent of the last true training days. But it sank

0:32:23.440 --> 0:32:26.080
<v Speaker 4>the low sixty five thousand dollars. What does that mean

0:32:26.120 --> 0:32:28.120
<v Speaker 4>in terms of support? But in by Digital Financial Report,

0:32:28.160 --> 0:32:30.680
<v Speaker 4>Emily Nicole joins us, how catch a break? How many?

0:32:32.680 --> 0:32:32.880
<v Speaker 5>Yeah?

0:32:32.920 --> 0:32:35.320
<v Speaker 15>It just keeps going, doesn't it. I mean weekends are

0:32:35.320 --> 0:32:38.600
<v Speaker 15>traditionally a very low liquidity time for bitcoin, especially it's

0:32:38.600 --> 0:32:40.360
<v Speaker 15>a market that trades twenty four to seven, so it

0:32:40.440 --> 0:32:42.640
<v Speaker 15>never switches off. And that does mean that we tend

0:32:42.680 --> 0:32:45.520
<v Speaker 15>to get these outsized price moves, particularly over weekends, and

0:32:45.640 --> 0:32:48.720
<v Speaker 15>that's what we saw earlier on in the Asia trading

0:32:48.800 --> 0:32:50.680
<v Speaker 15>day on Monday, or guests overnight for all of us

0:32:50.760 --> 0:32:53.440
<v Speaker 15>over on the on the western side, and that's what

0:32:53.520 --> 0:32:55.080
<v Speaker 15>we've been looking at stay as well. It's kind of

0:32:55.120 --> 0:32:57.320
<v Speaker 15>gone back above that sixty five thousand mark, but really

0:32:57.400 --> 0:32:58.480
<v Speaker 15>can't edge much higher.

0:33:00.120 --> 0:33:01.440
<v Speaker 2>Emily, is it clear in the markets?

0:33:01.480 --> 0:33:03.959
<v Speaker 3>We talk about this sixty thousand dollars support level, right

0:33:04.440 --> 0:33:06.680
<v Speaker 3>but is it clear in the market right now?

0:33:06.840 --> 0:33:09.280
<v Speaker 2>Like what the main driver is? Is it tariff?

0:33:09.520 --> 0:33:12.880
<v Speaker 3>Is it some sort of broader geopolitical anxiety that it's

0:33:13.000 --> 0:33:14.840
<v Speaker 3>getting people to push the button either way.

0:33:16.880 --> 0:33:19.760
<v Speaker 15>I mean, bitcoin's not impervious to what's going on with Tariff's, right.

0:33:19.760 --> 0:33:22.320
<v Speaker 15>It's a high risk asset, so when things like Donald

0:33:22.360 --> 0:33:25.840
<v Speaker 15>Trumps Tariff's post happen, that is going to impact Bitcoin negatively,

0:33:25.920 --> 0:33:27.320
<v Speaker 15>just as it did quite a lot of other asset

0:33:27.360 --> 0:33:30.360
<v Speaker 15>classes over the weekend. There is, however, this kind of

0:33:30.400 --> 0:33:32.880
<v Speaker 15>support level that we've been talking about, whether that's sixty thousand,

0:33:32.960 --> 0:33:35.320
<v Speaker 15>sixty five thousand we're in now really started to see

0:33:35.320 --> 0:33:38.800
<v Speaker 15>traders consolidate around that marks really don't want bitcoin to

0:33:38.840 --> 0:33:41.720
<v Speaker 15>go below sixty thousand because that that does mean that

0:33:41.800 --> 0:33:44.400
<v Speaker 15>kind of we're heading even further lower, and could that's

0:33:44.520 --> 0:33:47.040
<v Speaker 15>you know, when all bets can be off. So we're

0:33:47.040 --> 0:33:49.480
<v Speaker 15>really kind of seeing consolidation around that point. But as

0:33:49.520 --> 0:33:51.080
<v Speaker 15>you said, it's been a rocky few months, and there's

0:33:51.120 --> 0:33:53.240
<v Speaker 15>no telling whether it's going to continue to go down

0:33:53.360 --> 0:33:54.560
<v Speaker 15>or up at the moment.

0:33:55.360 --> 0:33:59.240
<v Speaker 3>Bloomberg's Emilie Nicole, thank you very much. Also falling today,

0:33:59.720 --> 0:34:03.040
<v Speaker 3>well basically everything but shares of software companies is the

0:34:03.120 --> 0:34:06.880
<v Speaker 3>AI fears that have been rattling stocks across industries continue

0:34:06.920 --> 0:34:09.520
<v Speaker 3>into a new week. Let's get more with Bloomberg Equacies

0:34:09.560 --> 0:34:11.960
<v Speaker 3>reports to rhyme for Sellerer. I guess the question, you know,

0:34:12.080 --> 0:34:13.840
<v Speaker 3>now that we're a couple of hours into the session,

0:34:14.080 --> 0:34:17.520
<v Speaker 3>is what's going on right I saw BFW headline overnight

0:34:17.520 --> 0:34:20.719
<v Speaker 3>about Anthropic and a new tool. Seems familiar, but that

0:34:20.880 --> 0:34:23.839
<v Speaker 3>was impacting trading in Europe. Is that just carrying over

0:34:23.920 --> 0:34:24.439
<v Speaker 3>to the US.

0:34:26.000 --> 0:34:28.640
<v Speaker 16>Well, we saw a lot of Anthropic related selling on

0:34:28.880 --> 0:34:31.480
<v Speaker 16>Friday after they announced a new security tool, which sent

0:34:31.560 --> 0:34:34.719
<v Speaker 16>cyber security stocks down pretty sharply, and we are seeing

0:34:34.760 --> 0:34:37.960
<v Speaker 16>a continuation of that trade today. There is really broad

0:34:38.080 --> 0:34:42.160
<v Speaker 16>based weakness within software. Basically nothing is up today and

0:34:42.239 --> 0:34:45.719
<v Speaker 16>it's just this sort of percolating concern about AI disruption.

0:34:46.120 --> 0:34:48.640
<v Speaker 16>What is this going to mean for growth, for profit margins,

0:34:48.719 --> 0:34:52.320
<v Speaker 16>for pricing power going forward? There is so much concern

0:34:52.560 --> 0:34:55.239
<v Speaker 16>and fear in the market right now, so much uncertainty.

0:34:55.640 --> 0:34:57.400
<v Speaker 16>Now we are going to get some results later on

0:34:57.480 --> 0:34:59.560
<v Speaker 16>this week, so that will hopefully provide a little bit

0:34:59.600 --> 0:35:02.560
<v Speaker 16>of cleary at least about how management teams are feeling about,

0:35:02.640 --> 0:35:05.040
<v Speaker 16>you know, the near term in the next coming quarters.

0:35:05.080 --> 0:35:10.560
<v Speaker 16>We have Salesforce Autodesk work day into a snowflake among

0:35:10.640 --> 0:35:12.840
<v Speaker 16>the company's reporting, So those will be very closely to

0:35:12.920 --> 0:35:15.040
<v Speaker 16>watch out to. But in the meantime, people are just

0:35:15.120 --> 0:35:18.399
<v Speaker 16>sort of, you know, selling everything they can and really

0:35:18.680 --> 0:35:21.560
<v Speaker 16>concerned about the latest headlines. It's less fundamentally driven than

0:35:21.600 --> 0:35:22.280
<v Speaker 16>centiment driven.

0:35:22.920 --> 0:35:26.040
<v Speaker 4>Brent phil sort of adding to that sentiment. He's over

0:35:26.400 --> 0:35:29.920
<v Speaker 4>at Jeffrey's downgrading workday into the earnings that come on Tuesday,

0:35:29.960 --> 0:35:32.399
<v Speaker 4>really talking about execution risk with the CEO and other

0:35:32.480 --> 0:35:37.400
<v Speaker 4>executive changes, Just in what way can we see executives

0:35:38.000 --> 0:35:41.960
<v Speaker 4>navigate what is just a hit from sometimes companies that

0:35:42.160 --> 0:35:45.080
<v Speaker 4>really have no historical proof point that what they're doing

0:35:45.160 --> 0:35:47.480
<v Speaker 4>and what they're building is significant to the industry in

0:35:47.520 --> 0:35:49.560
<v Speaker 4>which they seem to uphend from a share price perspective.

0:35:50.080 --> 0:35:53.200
<v Speaker 16>Yeah, they're an extremely difficult position right now, Taught. I've

0:35:53.200 --> 0:35:57.040
<v Speaker 16>spoken with portfolio managers and investors who basically say there's

0:35:57.120 --> 0:36:00.359
<v Speaker 16>nothing they can really hope to hear from management teams

0:36:00.360 --> 0:36:02.719
<v Speaker 16>that are going to ease these fears, because AI is

0:36:02.800 --> 0:36:07.279
<v Speaker 16>a you know, multi quarter, multi year disruption, you know,

0:36:07.480 --> 0:36:09.800
<v Speaker 16>entity out there, and so even if they say, you know,

0:36:09.920 --> 0:36:12.160
<v Speaker 16>we're feeling pretty good about this year, you know, what

0:36:12.200 --> 0:36:14.080
<v Speaker 16>does that mean? For five years from now, and it's

0:36:14.120 --> 0:36:16.840
<v Speaker 16>just going to be very difficult to sort of untie

0:36:16.920 --> 0:36:18.759
<v Speaker 16>all these knots that out there that have people just

0:36:18.840 --> 0:36:21.160
<v Speaker 16>sort of selling in mass Now. I will say a

0:36:21.239 --> 0:36:23.640
<v Speaker 16>lot of these stocks are at all time lows in

0:36:23.760 --> 0:36:27.279
<v Speaker 16>terms of their valuations. Companies like Salesforce and work Day.

0:36:27.280 --> 0:36:29.359
<v Speaker 16>I mean, they have basically never been cheaper, so there

0:36:29.440 --> 0:36:31.000
<v Speaker 16>is a lot that is being priced.

0:36:30.719 --> 0:36:31.360
<v Speaker 11>Into them right now.

0:36:31.480 --> 0:36:34.560
<v Speaker 16>So if they do indicate that maybe this disruption isn't

0:36:34.600 --> 0:36:37.080
<v Speaker 16>happening as quickly as some people are afraid of, or

0:36:37.120 --> 0:36:39.439
<v Speaker 16>if they can talk about ways they're able to sort

0:36:39.440 --> 0:36:41.920
<v Speaker 16>of ride the AI wave and turn it into a tailwind,

0:36:41.960 --> 0:36:44.000
<v Speaker 16>it is possible you see some kind of relief rally

0:36:44.080 --> 0:36:45.680
<v Speaker 16>in these stocks. But right now it just seems like

0:36:45.719 --> 0:36:48.760
<v Speaker 16>people are so cautious, and you know, they just continue

0:36:48.760 --> 0:36:50.600
<v Speaker 16>to sell. A lot of these names are down fifty

0:36:50.640 --> 0:36:52.120
<v Speaker 16>percent or more from their all time highs.

0:36:52.400 --> 0:36:55.759
<v Speaker 4>Everywhere's right, vaseelko all over the software trade. Thank you. Now,

0:36:55.880 --> 0:36:58.920
<v Speaker 4>while we are seeing heightened market on ease of late concern,

0:36:59.080 --> 0:37:01.239
<v Speaker 4>as Ryan said about the impact of these AI tools

0:37:01.320 --> 0:37:04.360
<v Speaker 4>dates back years and this as the popularity in demand

0:37:04.480 --> 0:37:06.880
<v Speaker 4>for some of them have taken even their own creators

0:37:06.920 --> 0:37:09.799
<v Speaker 4>by surprise. The most showing Gafari is here with us.

0:37:10.320 --> 0:37:12.800
<v Speaker 4>You've been looking at the impact most recently of clawed

0:37:12.920 --> 0:37:15.880
<v Speaker 4>code and how that really took the leaders of Anthropic

0:37:15.960 --> 0:37:16.560
<v Speaker 4>by surprise.

0:37:18.640 --> 0:37:19.080
<v Speaker 2>That's right.

0:37:19.200 --> 0:37:22.680
<v Speaker 17>So it was started as essentially a side project by

0:37:22.880 --> 0:37:25.480
<v Speaker 17>a staffer who I talked to who said that, you know,

0:37:25.680 --> 0:37:28.680
<v Speaker 17>it was being used internally by Anthropics engineers, and it

0:37:28.760 --> 0:37:31.440
<v Speaker 17>took on so quickly that CEO Dario Amedi sort of

0:37:31.480 --> 0:37:33.640
<v Speaker 17>asked him before releasing to the public, do you have

0:37:33.719 --> 0:37:35.160
<v Speaker 17>to force engineers.

0:37:34.719 --> 0:37:37.360
<v Speaker 9>To use this or why is everyone all of a

0:37:37.400 --> 0:37:38.320
<v Speaker 9>sudden adopting this?

0:37:38.520 --> 0:37:42.280
<v Speaker 17>And so that's sort of how this really surprised tool

0:37:43.040 --> 0:37:46.520
<v Speaker 17>ended up now not just affecting AI, but impacting other

0:37:46.600 --> 0:37:47.520
<v Speaker 17>industries as well.

0:37:48.840 --> 0:37:53.560
<v Speaker 3>Strean also late Friday we reported some kind of the

0:37:53.680 --> 0:37:55.920
<v Speaker 3>targets that open AI has. I call them targets, but

0:37:56.040 --> 0:37:59.160
<v Speaker 3>I guess forecasts for what revenue will be come the

0:37:59.280 --> 0:38:00.000
<v Speaker 3>end of this decade.

0:38:00.239 --> 0:38:04.000
<v Speaker 2>What do we need to know? That's right.

0:38:04.120 --> 0:38:09.120
<v Speaker 17>So you see their revenue targets have increased, and you know,

0:38:09.440 --> 0:38:11.200
<v Speaker 17>I think that right now, what we're seeing right is

0:38:11.280 --> 0:38:13.800
<v Speaker 17>these companies start to plan out there are mega fundraising

0:38:13.840 --> 0:38:14.480
<v Speaker 17>deals happening.

0:38:14.520 --> 0:38:15.360
<v Speaker 11>As we've reported on.

0:38:16.080 --> 0:38:19.320
<v Speaker 17>There are reported plans in the long term toward potential IPO,

0:38:19.520 --> 0:38:23.040
<v Speaker 17>so what we're seeing now is sort of opening eye share.

0:38:23.400 --> 0:38:27.080
<v Speaker 17>As we reported with investors, some of those adjusted forecasts.

0:38:27.480 --> 0:38:29.960
<v Speaker 3>Revenue to hit two hundred and eighty billion dollars in

0:38:30.080 --> 0:38:33.120
<v Speaker 3>twenty thirty, so wait around for that, Bloomberg Shering Gufari,

0:38:33.239 --> 0:38:35.800
<v Speaker 3>Thank you very much. Another piece of news, and Propic

0:38:35.920 --> 0:38:39.000
<v Speaker 3>CEO Dario ama Day will meet with US Defense Secretary

0:38:39.280 --> 0:38:40.600
<v Speaker 3>Pete Hegsef tomorrow.

0:38:40.960 --> 0:38:42.000
<v Speaker 2>According to a source.

0:38:42.120 --> 0:38:45.080
<v Speaker 3>This has contract talks between the AI startup and the

0:38:45.160 --> 0:38:49.960
<v Speaker 3>Pentagon remained deadlocked over the company's insistence on guardrails for

0:38:50.080 --> 0:38:52.760
<v Speaker 3>use of its technology. In a statement today, and Propic

0:38:52.800 --> 0:38:56.040
<v Speaker 3>said it was committed to using AI to support national

0:38:56.120 --> 0:38:57.240
<v Speaker 3>security CAROC.

0:38:57.280 --> 0:38:59.680
<v Speaker 4>Now coming up ed, we'll have the latest on efforts

0:39:00.239 --> 0:39:02.920
<v Speaker 4>to my Warner Brothers assets. Listen, bloom Bg Tech.

0:39:16.520 --> 0:39:18.120
<v Speaker 2>We have a normal.

0:39:17.880 --> 0:39:22.000
<v Speaker 5>Regulatory path ahead. There's nothing uniquely challenged about that process.

0:39:22.080 --> 0:39:24.120
<v Speaker 5>We're about it in the middle of it with the DoD,

0:39:24.520 --> 0:39:27.760
<v Speaker 5>with the European regulators, with regulators all over the around

0:39:27.800 --> 0:39:30.960
<v Speaker 5>the world, and with Data turney in general. This is

0:39:31.000 --> 0:39:32.440
<v Speaker 5>a process that we're very confident.

0:39:32.440 --> 0:39:33.560
<v Speaker 11>I think we're going to navigate.

0:39:35.760 --> 0:39:38.600
<v Speaker 3>That was Netflix Coco Ted Surrenders speaking to us last

0:39:38.640 --> 0:39:41.200
<v Speaker 3>week about its bid to take over Warner brother Discovery

0:39:41.320 --> 0:39:45.640
<v Speaker 3>Studios and streaming business. But already the regulatory landscape is shifting.

0:39:45.640 --> 0:39:50.120
<v Speaker 3>Bloomberg reporting Saturday, the Justice Department is investigating whether the

0:39:50.200 --> 0:39:53.759
<v Speaker 3>deal would give Netflix too much power over filmmakers and

0:39:53.880 --> 0:39:57.279
<v Speaker 3>other content creators. Let's get the latest with Bloomboos Lucas Shaw,

0:39:57.320 --> 0:40:00.480
<v Speaker 3>who leads the screen Time team and coverage of that industry.

0:40:00.920 --> 0:40:03.960
<v Speaker 3>A lot's changed in five days, but basically from Josh

0:40:04.000 --> 0:40:07.840
<v Speaker 3>Cisco's reporting, it looks like actually the DOJ probe or

0:40:07.920 --> 0:40:11.279
<v Speaker 3>review is wider than mister Surrandos told you and I

0:40:11.520 --> 0:40:13.520
<v Speaker 3>that it was kind of procedural and standard.

0:40:14.120 --> 0:40:16.080
<v Speaker 18>Yeah, there's been a lot of back and forth about

0:40:16.120 --> 0:40:19.960
<v Speaker 18>what exactly is happening with the DJ. A normal DOJ

0:40:20.160 --> 0:40:23.080
<v Speaker 18>probe would look at just what called Section seven. I believe,

0:40:23.120 --> 0:40:26.280
<v Speaker 18>without getting into the antitrust weeds, there is a belief

0:40:27.000 --> 0:40:29.759
<v Speaker 18>and based on the literature that is being sent to

0:40:30.440 --> 0:40:33.840
<v Speaker 18>creators and producers in Hollywood, that this probe expands beyond that.

0:40:34.719 --> 0:40:37.279
<v Speaker 18>I would say that I don't think that that much

0:40:37.360 --> 0:40:40.520
<v Speaker 18>has changed from that interview we did with Ted just

0:40:40.560 --> 0:40:41.200
<v Speaker 18>a few days ago.

0:40:41.200 --> 0:40:43.520
<v Speaker 11>I mean, yes, you had our reporting on the DJ.

0:40:43.680 --> 0:40:46.600
<v Speaker 18>You also had President Trump call on Netflix to fire

0:40:46.680 --> 0:40:49.120
<v Speaker 18>it's board members Susan Rice over some comments she made.

0:40:49.480 --> 0:40:52.360
<v Speaker 18>But what we're really coming down to is what is

0:40:52.400 --> 0:40:55.920
<v Speaker 18>going to be this next Paramount offer, which we're expecting soon.

0:40:56.200 --> 0:40:59.160
<v Speaker 4>And I'm expecting it to be higher, because.

0:40:59.400 --> 0:41:02.439
<v Speaker 18>Yeah, I mean, look, Paramount teas that it would get

0:41:02.520 --> 0:41:04.640
<v Speaker 18>to at least thirty one dollars to share. Their most

0:41:04.680 --> 0:41:07.600
<v Speaker 18>recent one was thirty dollars a share. There was some

0:41:07.719 --> 0:41:10.399
<v Speaker 18>reporting out there from variety of thirty two dollars a share.

0:41:10.520 --> 0:41:12.960
<v Speaker 18>We've heard conflicting reports about how high they would go.

0:41:13.560 --> 0:41:16.280
<v Speaker 18>I know from speaking to people in and around David Ellison,

0:41:16.320 --> 0:41:19.000
<v Speaker 18>who's the CEO and chairman of Paramount, that they feel

0:41:19.040 --> 0:41:21.279
<v Speaker 18>like they need to put forth an offer that will

0:41:21.320 --> 0:41:24.759
<v Speaker 18>make it hard for Netflix to match. Because Netflix shareholders

0:41:24.760 --> 0:41:26.680
<v Speaker 18>are getting a little restless about.

0:41:26.480 --> 0:41:31.480
<v Speaker 3>This, Lucas it's an ongoing process and reading the reporting,

0:41:31.520 --> 0:41:33.040
<v Speaker 3>it's going to go on for a long time, right,

0:41:33.160 --> 0:41:36.440
<v Speaker 3>But remind us of the differences and the bids. Simply

0:41:36.560 --> 0:41:40.320
<v Speaker 3>that for Netflix it's the studios and streaming platform. But

0:41:40.480 --> 0:41:43.880
<v Speaker 3>for paramount S Guidearts, it's the entirety of Warner Brothers Discovery.

0:41:44.600 --> 0:41:46.759
<v Speaker 11>Yeah, I mean you just laid it out, Warner brother

0:41:46.880 --> 0:41:47.279
<v Speaker 11>excuse me.

0:41:47.360 --> 0:41:49.960
<v Speaker 18>Paramount is going for the whole company that includes all

0:41:50.000 --> 0:41:54.239
<v Speaker 18>the cable networks you know, CNN, TBS, Discovery Channel and

0:41:54.400 --> 0:41:58.040
<v Speaker 18>so forth. There's been a debate between Warner Brothers Discovery

0:41:58.080 --> 0:42:01.680
<v Speaker 18>and Paramount as to the value of those global networks

0:42:01.719 --> 0:42:03.960
<v Speaker 18>that group that it would be be spun out as

0:42:04.200 --> 0:42:06.920
<v Speaker 18>because that's one of the big points of difference between

0:42:07.320 --> 0:42:09.840
<v Speaker 18>the Paaramount offer and the Netflix offer. You know, Paramount

0:42:09.840 --> 0:42:12.080
<v Speaker 18>believes that it's bit as superior because those networks aren't

0:42:12.080 --> 0:42:15.160
<v Speaker 18>worth that much. Warner Brothers thinks they're worth more, and

0:42:15.280 --> 0:42:18.160
<v Speaker 18>that has enabled Netflix to prevail thus far, even though

0:42:18.239 --> 0:42:20.919
<v Speaker 18>the immediate cash to Warner Brothers shareholders would be less.

0:42:21.400 --> 0:42:24.480
<v Speaker 4>What are investors saying, Lucas about where they swayed.

0:42:25.080 --> 0:42:27.400
<v Speaker 11>Well, it depends on which investors, right.

0:42:27.640 --> 0:42:30.960
<v Speaker 18>I've certainly spoken to some who are eager for Warner

0:42:31.040 --> 0:42:33.520
<v Speaker 18>Brothers to engage with Paramount, which is what's been happening

0:42:33.600 --> 0:42:36.360
<v Speaker 18>over the last week. I think there's some concern on

0:42:36.400 --> 0:42:38.680
<v Speaker 18>the part of investors about the regulatory risk for the

0:42:38.760 --> 0:42:42.080
<v Speaker 18>Netflix deal. They seem more concerned about the Netflix risk

0:42:42.160 --> 0:42:43.000
<v Speaker 18>and the paramount risk.

0:42:43.800 --> 0:42:44.879
<v Speaker 11>But then there are.

0:42:44.840 --> 0:42:46.960
<v Speaker 18>Plenty of other investors who I think have felt less

0:42:47.080 --> 0:42:49.080
<v Speaker 18>compelled to speak out because they're happy to follow the

0:42:49.120 --> 0:42:51.120
<v Speaker 18>Warner Brothers' lead, and I think most of them would

0:42:51.160 --> 0:42:54.000
<v Speaker 18>be happy for the thirty dollars to share, thirty two

0:42:54.040 --> 0:42:55.239
<v Speaker 18>dollars to share, whatever it may be.

0:42:56.239 --> 0:42:58.920
<v Speaker 3>Lucas very quickly, are just looking back on that interview

0:42:59.200 --> 0:43:01.920
<v Speaker 3>you asked in like, why does Netflix not want the

0:43:02.320 --> 0:43:04.880
<v Speaker 3>legacy cables? His answer straightforward, that's not the business we're in.

0:43:05.280 --> 0:43:08.120
<v Speaker 3>And we talked about the movie theaters. Those two points.

0:43:08.880 --> 0:43:11.440
<v Speaker 18>Yeah, well, look, Netflix has never had any interest in

0:43:11.520 --> 0:43:14.320
<v Speaker 18>the cable business because the cable business is shrinking and

0:43:14.520 --> 0:43:17.320
<v Speaker 18>Netflix and streaming are in many ways replacing it. The

0:43:17.400 --> 0:43:19.280
<v Speaker 18>movie theater one is the one that's been a bugaboo

0:43:19.280 --> 0:43:21.480
<v Speaker 18>for Netflix because people are having a hard time believing

0:43:21.920 --> 0:43:23.600
<v Speaker 18>Ted surround us when he says they're going to put

0:43:23.640 --> 0:43:25.480
<v Speaker 18>movies in theaters. But he has said it again and

0:43:25.600 --> 0:43:26.279
<v Speaker 18>again and again.

0:43:27.000 --> 0:43:29.919
<v Speaker 4>Bugaboo. Ah, that's got me in my head now, bloon. Vice, Luca, Sure,

0:43:30.320 --> 0:43:32.840
<v Speaker 4>thank you, very much. Indeed, look, that does it for

0:43:32.920 --> 0:43:34.960
<v Speaker 4>this edition of Bloomberg Tech. But let's check in in

0:43:35.160 --> 0:43:36.880
<v Speaker 4>on some of these key stocks. They're on the move.

0:43:36.960 --> 0:43:39.600
<v Speaker 4>We anticipate a big week for earnings Wednesdays in video,

0:43:39.680 --> 0:43:42.840
<v Speaker 4>salesforce coming out, as well as software names getting crushed.

0:43:42.880 --> 0:43:45.839
<v Speaker 4>So are payments, so we're delivery companies after that note

0:43:45.840 --> 0:43:47.399
<v Speaker 4>from Subtrini Research, it's a big one.

0:43:48.239 --> 0:43:50.040
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, And it sounds like from our guests, particularly on

0:43:50.080 --> 0:43:52.480
<v Speaker 3>the software side, the bar is still high for management

0:43:52.520 --> 0:43:55.279
<v Speaker 3>to actually change the directory of that sector. And of

0:43:55.320 --> 0:43:57.680
<v Speaker 3>course in video has fallen in each of the last

0:43:57.760 --> 0:44:00.680
<v Speaker 3>two post earning sessions recap on the podcast, we have

0:44:00.719 --> 0:44:02.320
<v Speaker 3>some really interesting people on the show today.

0:44:02.560 --> 0:44:03.279
<v Speaker 2>You know where to find it.

0:44:03.320 --> 0:44:05.520
<v Speaker 3>It's on the terminal as well as online on Apple,

0:44:05.840 --> 0:44:09.719
<v Speaker 3>Spotify and iHeart from San Francisco and a snowy New York.

0:44:10.160 --> 0:44:11.359
<v Speaker 2>This is Bloomberg Tech.