WEBVTT - Day Three From Milken Global Conference

0:00:01.800 --> 0:00:04.400
<v Speaker 1>This is Bloomberg Business Week. I'm Carole Masser and I'm

0:00:04.440 --> 0:00:07.280
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Quick Takes Tim Stanibek. We're here every day bringing

0:00:07.280 --> 0:00:09.760
<v Speaker 1>you the latest news from the world of business and finance,

0:00:09.840 --> 0:00:13.600
<v Speaker 1>plus technology, politics, economics, all furnishing the power of Business

0:00:13.640 --> 0:00:17.119
<v Speaker 1>Week reporters and editors, not to mention our journalists and

0:00:17.120 --> 0:00:20.000
<v Speaker 1>analyst in more than one twenty countries. You can download

0:00:20.000 --> 0:00:23.439
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Business Weekend iTunes, SoundCloud, or Bloomberg dot Com. You

0:00:23.480 --> 0:00:25.400
<v Speaker 1>can also listen to our radio show at two pm

0:00:25.440 --> 0:00:28.360
<v Speaker 1>Eastern Time on Bloomberg Radio, or watch us on YouTube

0:00:28.400 --> 0:00:32.280
<v Speaker 1>search Bloomberg Global News. One of the feature conversations at

0:00:32.320 --> 0:00:35.600
<v Speaker 1>the Milken Institute this year was Kathy Wood, founder CEO

0:00:35.720 --> 0:00:38.360
<v Speaker 1>and ce IO of Ark and Vesh Ganner Company. About

0:00:38.360 --> 0:00:42.440
<v Speaker 1>seven years ago, she gave Bloomberg Radio the first interview.

0:00:42.880 --> 0:00:45.800
<v Speaker 1>She gave you the first interview myself in pim Fox.

0:00:46.080 --> 0:00:48.839
<v Speaker 1>Uh and uh. I remember it really well and I

0:00:48.920 --> 0:00:50.920
<v Speaker 1>gotta keep you know. We point out that she beat

0:00:51.040 --> 0:00:53.640
<v Speaker 1>just about every stock picker. She did, beat actually every

0:00:53.640 --> 0:00:57.760
<v Speaker 1>stock picker in she bet on the innovators in DNA development.

0:00:57.920 --> 0:01:00.760
<v Speaker 1>I mean, just an outperformance this year. We know it's

0:01:00.800 --> 0:01:03.600
<v Speaker 1>been tougher one of her names though, uh, you know

0:01:03.680 --> 0:01:05.479
<v Speaker 1>that she's been in We know Tesla. We'll talk about

0:01:05.480 --> 0:01:07.640
<v Speaker 1>that later, but she's also been in and out of

0:01:07.840 --> 0:01:10.000
<v Speaker 1>China in terms of her exposure. There so so much

0:01:10.040 --> 0:01:12.120
<v Speaker 1>to get into, and here's a little excerpt where we

0:01:12.160 --> 0:01:15.240
<v Speaker 1>talked about her investment strategy in China. Our first move

0:01:15.240 --> 0:01:18.840
<v Speaker 1>away from China was when China was you had a

0:01:18.920 --> 0:01:22.600
<v Speaker 1>very strong move and you know, the innovation there was

0:01:23.160 --> 0:01:25.959
<v Speaker 1>being deeply appreciated while ours was not. So that was

0:01:26.040 --> 0:01:29.920
<v Speaker 1>that kind of move um. The second time we moved

0:01:30.680 --> 0:01:33.959
<v Speaker 1>or then then we moved in why we saw the

0:01:34.000 --> 0:01:37.560
<v Speaker 1>reaction to COVID and we got more interested because it

0:01:37.680 --> 0:01:40.959
<v Speaker 1>was the most disciplined country in terms of both monetary

0:01:41.000 --> 0:01:45.400
<v Speaker 1>and fiscal policy, uh during the crisis, and I thought

0:01:45.840 --> 0:01:50.640
<v Speaker 1>that China had the possibility of becoming the Germany and

0:01:50.720 --> 0:01:54.320
<v Speaker 1>Switzerland of the world, you know, in terms of discipline

0:01:54.400 --> 0:01:59.920
<v Speaker 1>monetary um. As soon as jack Ma was banished effect

0:02:00.040 --> 0:02:04.760
<v Speaker 1>of Lee last November, we started pulling back because what

0:02:04.760 --> 0:02:08.839
<v Speaker 1>we're doing, and especially during February through May, where our

0:02:08.919 --> 0:02:11.600
<v Speaker 1>strategy just to give you a sense how volatile it is.

0:02:11.680 --> 0:02:15.160
<v Speaker 1>Our strategy from mid February through mid May. Most people

0:02:15.200 --> 0:02:18.760
<v Speaker 1>wouldn't admit this maybe, but this this is how volatile

0:02:19.520 --> 0:02:25.480
<v Speaker 1>transparency was down thirty peak to trough. So we have

0:02:25.680 --> 0:02:30.720
<v Speaker 1>come back. But during that period, what we do, as

0:02:30.760 --> 0:02:34.680
<v Speaker 1>we always do, we concentrated our portfolio towards our highest

0:02:34.680 --> 0:02:38.800
<v Speaker 1>conviction names. China was moving away because almost every week

0:02:38.880 --> 0:02:43.320
<v Speaker 1>and month there was a new regulatory move, crackdown and

0:02:43.680 --> 0:02:46.440
<v Speaker 1>uh so, so it was easy to do that. It

0:02:46.440 --> 0:02:48.880
<v Speaker 1>was great because I'm always scrambling looking for cash during

0:02:48.880 --> 0:02:52.960
<v Speaker 1>a correction. Okay, where is the confidence lower? Where? Where

0:02:53.040 --> 0:02:58.600
<v Speaker 1>where less buy into our favorites here? Uh now common prosperity?

0:02:58.680 --> 0:03:02.400
<v Speaker 1>So what have we done? No China in our flagship.

0:03:03.200 --> 0:03:06.560
<v Speaker 1>We do own some China in UM. A few of

0:03:06.560 --> 0:03:13.519
<v Speaker 1>our portfolio is the ones focused on autonomous UH technology

0:03:13.520 --> 0:03:18.160
<v Speaker 1>and robotics. But we're very particular, very low margin companies

0:03:18.200 --> 0:03:22.040
<v Speaker 1>because margin is clearly not appreciated by the government anymore.

0:03:22.360 --> 0:03:27.639
<v Speaker 1>Common prosperity UH and UH and very beneficially beneficial to

0:03:27.800 --> 0:03:31.040
<v Speaker 1>Tier three, tier four cities Common prosperity. So j D

0:03:31.200 --> 0:03:34.639
<v Speaker 1>Logistics JD dot Com can do. Does it stay this way?

0:03:34.639 --> 0:03:36.960
<v Speaker 1>Do you think in China for a while? Well, it's

0:03:36.960 --> 0:03:39.960
<v Speaker 1>hard to say. But China is certainly country. When they

0:03:40.000 --> 0:03:43.200
<v Speaker 1>make a decision, it's long longer term, it's longer term

0:03:43.200 --> 0:03:45.720
<v Speaker 1>planning right to President g certainly seems to be on

0:03:45.760 --> 0:03:49.480
<v Speaker 1>this mission, and I think he's very unsettled that the

0:03:49.560 --> 0:03:55.400
<v Speaker 1>three child policy is not working, and so there's a

0:03:55.480 --> 0:03:58.720
<v Speaker 1>big social engineering um. And by the way, this is

0:03:58.760 --> 0:04:02.720
<v Speaker 1>all very forecastable. I mean demographics. You know, they knew

0:04:02.800 --> 0:04:05.640
<v Speaker 1>fifty years ago what was going to happen, right, So

0:04:05.800 --> 0:04:10.040
<v Speaker 1>I think that that's part of it. And uh, you know,

0:04:10.120 --> 0:04:13.800
<v Speaker 1>there there is, there is, There are the haves and

0:04:13.840 --> 0:04:17.840
<v Speaker 1>the have not in China like there are like there

0:04:17.920 --> 0:04:20.719
<v Speaker 1>is around the world. I think China is taking it

0:04:20.800 --> 0:04:23.560
<v Speaker 1>more seriously because there's probably more social unrest than we

0:04:23.560 --> 0:04:26.400
<v Speaker 1>now appreciate. What I don't want to understand is they're

0:04:26.440 --> 0:04:30.360
<v Speaker 1>going after real estate, which is seventy of the consumer

0:04:30.440 --> 0:04:35.159
<v Speaker 1>savings in China, individual in China. And if if yes,

0:04:35.240 --> 0:04:40.159
<v Speaker 1>individual saving, if if the prices are going down, which

0:04:40.160 --> 0:04:43.520
<v Speaker 1>they have been, um, I think that could really hurt

0:04:44.360 --> 0:04:48.000
<v Speaker 1>consumer confidence. I think it already is. And then last weekend,

0:04:48.120 --> 0:04:53.039
<v Speaker 1>the weekend before the government, the national government went after

0:04:53.120 --> 0:04:56.960
<v Speaker 1>the regulators, regulators who had focused on the financial industry

0:04:57.279 --> 0:05:00.200
<v Speaker 1>as well as the financial institutions. And I'm just saying, Wow,

0:05:00.240 --> 0:05:02.960
<v Speaker 1>they're playing with fire the movie. Yeah, and talk about

0:05:02.960 --> 0:05:06.120
<v Speaker 1>a cyclical risk out there, think about that if we

0:05:06.160 --> 0:05:09.760
<v Speaker 1>lose China. At the margin, China has been responsible for

0:05:09.800 --> 0:05:14.719
<v Speaker 1>a tremendous amount of cyclical growth, right and commodity price inflation. Okay,

0:05:14.720 --> 0:05:17.520
<v Speaker 1>And that of course was Cathy Wood, founder CEO, chief

0:05:17.560 --> 0:05:20.880
<v Speaker 1>investment officer of ARC invest. So much to talk about,

0:05:20.920 --> 0:05:24.080
<v Speaker 1>but it is interesting to have watched her investments in

0:05:24.160 --> 0:05:27.320
<v Speaker 1>China specifically because she was in and then quickly got

0:05:27.360 --> 0:05:29.159
<v Speaker 1>out and it was you know, you and I have

0:05:29.160 --> 0:05:31.800
<v Speaker 1>had conversations with her on air too about just her

0:05:32.200 --> 0:05:34.360
<v Speaker 1>back and forth with it. But she's very much watching

0:05:34.360 --> 0:05:36.040
<v Speaker 1>what president she is up to. What I found really

0:05:36.080 --> 0:05:38.520
<v Speaker 1>fascinating about that is the signal that she saw when

0:05:38.600 --> 0:05:40.800
<v Speaker 1>jack Ma was um. I think she used the term

0:05:40.839 --> 0:05:43.479
<v Speaker 1>benched or at least pushed the travel. Did you see

0:05:43.480 --> 0:05:44.840
<v Speaker 1>the story There was a story in the Bloomberg I

0:05:44.880 --> 0:05:47.599
<v Speaker 1>think he traveled for the first time today, maybe out

0:05:47.600 --> 0:05:49.919
<v Speaker 1>of China, and that was to her a signal of

0:05:50.000 --> 0:05:52.000
<v Speaker 1>what was to come in China. And certainly since then

0:05:52.040 --> 0:05:54.640
<v Speaker 1>we've seen the government crackdown on nearly every industry. But

0:05:54.680 --> 0:05:56.600
<v Speaker 1>as she mentioned, she's not out of the country, she's

0:05:56.640 --> 0:05:59.520
<v Speaker 1>thinking about it differently in these different different cities that

0:05:59.520 --> 0:06:03.200
<v Speaker 1>aren't necessarily getting the headlines very specific investments. I did

0:06:03.240 --> 0:06:05.360
<v Speaker 1>think it was fascinating to what she said. She found

0:06:05.400 --> 0:06:08.719
<v Speaker 1>it surprising for President g to be targeting real estate

0:06:08.760 --> 0:06:14.200
<v Speaker 1>because so much of wealth Chinese individuals have bought property

0:06:14.360 --> 0:06:15.920
<v Speaker 1>and that's really a big part of their wealth, so

0:06:15.960 --> 0:06:19.040
<v Speaker 1>that if he is increasing oversight of it and reduces

0:06:19.080 --> 0:06:22.000
<v Speaker 1>the value that will hit into their wealth, and then

0:06:22.120 --> 0:06:24.599
<v Speaker 1>it kind of goes against the common prosperity idea that

0:06:24.640 --> 0:06:27.440
<v Speaker 1>he's on, right, because prosperity in the country is so

0:06:27.600 --> 0:06:31.440
<v Speaker 1>tied to real estate right, much more so, you would say,

0:06:31.440 --> 0:06:33.200
<v Speaker 1>than the U S, where we are much more involved

0:06:33.200 --> 0:06:37.040
<v Speaker 1>individuals in the equity market. This is Bloomberg Business Week

0:06:37.200 --> 0:06:41.200
<v Speaker 1>with Carol Masser and Bloomberg Quick Takes Tim Stinovic on

0:06:41.320 --> 0:06:45.080
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Radio. Kathy would, as we've mentioned, founder CEO CEO

0:06:45.160 --> 0:06:47.320
<v Speaker 1>of ARC invest, one of the featured speakers here at

0:06:47.360 --> 0:06:50.560
<v Speaker 1>Milk and she's been a long time investor in Tesla,

0:06:50.800 --> 0:06:52.640
<v Speaker 1>and that's one of the things we talked about. Check

0:06:52.680 --> 0:06:57.520
<v Speaker 1>it out and kind of thought we were behaving like

0:06:57.800 --> 0:07:02.760
<v Speaker 1>a value manager, long term time horizon and looking for

0:07:02.839 --> 0:07:06.960
<v Speaker 1>extreme values. Well, value investors are using price to book

0:07:07.080 --> 0:07:10.720
<v Speaker 1>and dividend yield and that sort of thing. We're using growth,

0:07:11.280 --> 0:07:14.600
<v Speaker 1>you know, we're using spectacular growth rates that no one

0:07:14.720 --> 0:07:19.320
<v Speaker 1>is expecting. And Tesla was our first proof of concept,

0:07:19.360 --> 0:07:22.679
<v Speaker 1>I would say, a very visible one where people are saying,

0:07:22.880 --> 0:07:25.960
<v Speaker 1>what are they talking about? And all we had done

0:07:26.120 --> 0:07:30.480
<v Speaker 1>was used rights law, which is the centerpiece of our

0:07:30.520 --> 0:07:34.440
<v Speaker 1>our research, to try and figure out how quickly cost

0:07:34.520 --> 0:07:41.440
<v Speaker 1>would decline in battery pack systems and therefore how how

0:07:41.520 --> 0:07:45.040
<v Speaker 1>much prices would fall for electric vehicles and how quickly

0:07:45.080 --> 0:07:47.760
<v Speaker 1>the uptake would be. And we saw, you know, on

0:07:47.880 --> 0:07:50.360
<v Speaker 1>Musk magnificent things happening in too. But it wasn't so

0:07:50.440 --> 0:07:54.160
<v Speaker 1>easy to be invested in Tesla early on. For us,

0:07:54.200 --> 0:07:57.560
<v Speaker 1>it was easy because you just believe the story or

0:07:58.040 --> 0:08:01.679
<v Speaker 1>we well, for the most porton call that we made

0:08:01.920 --> 0:08:08.800
<v Speaker 1>initially with Tesla was alright. Tesla's battery technology is unlike

0:08:08.880 --> 0:08:15.600
<v Speaker 1>any other auto manufacturers battery technology. Tesla was riding down

0:08:15.640 --> 0:08:20.680
<v Speaker 1>the cost curve of the consumer electronics industry. So laptop

0:08:20.800 --> 0:08:24.520
<v Speaker 1>cell phones image volumes, right, And when you get a

0:08:24.640 --> 0:08:28.240
<v Speaker 1>scaling like that, costs come down. It's called a learning

0:08:28.280 --> 0:08:32.000
<v Speaker 1>curve in in the tech industry. So, Ellen, you had

0:08:32.040 --> 0:08:38.000
<v Speaker 1>auto manufacturers and auto analysts laughing at him. Ellen is

0:08:38.040 --> 0:08:41.000
<v Speaker 1>building his car on top of cell phone batteries, Isn't

0:08:41.080 --> 0:08:45.040
<v Speaker 1>that funny? And what they didn't believe was that the

0:08:45.120 --> 0:08:50.120
<v Speaker 1>engineering was possible. So there was a It wasn't that,

0:08:50.240 --> 0:08:53.680
<v Speaker 1>they just didn't think it was possible, and he did. Uh.

0:08:53.720 --> 0:08:59.440
<v Speaker 1>And so even today, Uh, these cylindrical batteries that he's

0:08:59.480 --> 0:09:03.080
<v Speaker 1>been using, relative to lithium my own pouch lower cost

0:09:03.280 --> 0:09:06.559
<v Speaker 1>and will remain lower cost for at least three years,

0:09:06.559 --> 0:09:10.440
<v Speaker 1>we think, which means that any other auto manufacturer who

0:09:10.440 --> 0:09:14.520
<v Speaker 1>wants the same performance and the same range at the

0:09:14.559 --> 0:09:17.200
<v Speaker 1>same price, we'll have to lose money on every car sold.

0:09:19.640 --> 0:09:22.440
<v Speaker 1>So it keeps him in a really great position. And

0:09:22.480 --> 0:09:25.560
<v Speaker 1>that's only one of four, barring one entry. Well, but

0:09:25.640 --> 0:09:27.679
<v Speaker 1>that was the first call we had to make, so

0:09:28.800 --> 0:09:31.760
<v Speaker 1>elon Musk and Tesla. So there is a point that

0:09:31.800 --> 0:09:34.120
<v Speaker 1>you would get out. I know there's a story you've

0:09:34.120 --> 0:09:36.160
<v Speaker 1>talked about. You've put a mark on the stock price.

0:09:36.200 --> 0:09:38.599
<v Speaker 1>I think it was three thousand, Yeah, three thousand is

0:09:38.600 --> 0:09:40.800
<v Speaker 1>our base case, not our bull case, but our base case.

0:09:40.920 --> 0:09:43.040
<v Speaker 1>So we've talked Tesla, we've talked a little bit. Tell

0:09:43.080 --> 0:09:45.200
<v Speaker 1>me a bit more about bitcoin and where you see

0:09:45.240 --> 0:09:48.079
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I've never seen anything so debated. Obviously, we're

0:09:48.080 --> 0:09:51.640
<v Speaker 1>seeing more legitimization as we see regulators, certainly in the

0:09:51.720 --> 0:09:53.880
<v Speaker 1>US and around the world moving forward. Today was a

0:09:53.880 --> 0:09:57.400
<v Speaker 1>big day. Um, what is the long term play when

0:09:57.440 --> 0:10:02.080
<v Speaker 1>it comes to something like cryptocurrencies in bitcoin? So bitcoin specifically, Um,

0:10:04.080 --> 0:10:06.320
<v Speaker 1>we we got involved when it was a six billion

0:10:06.360 --> 0:10:09.920
<v Speaker 1>dollar market cap and here's Art Laugher again in in

0:10:10.240 --> 0:10:13.840
<v Speaker 1>My Life and in arts life. Um, it was a

0:10:13.880 --> 0:10:16.760
<v Speaker 1>six billion dollar cap. Fan. Now it's over a trillion,

0:10:16.840 --> 0:10:20.040
<v Speaker 1>which is But we were asking the question this was

0:10:20.080 --> 0:10:24.280
<v Speaker 1>two thousand fifteen. Could bitcoin serve the three rolls of money?

0:10:24.720 --> 0:10:27.079
<v Speaker 1>And we came to the conclusion that it was possible.

0:10:27.480 --> 0:10:32.200
<v Speaker 1>Art Laugher collaborated. He tore our original paper up and

0:10:32.240 --> 0:10:35.480
<v Speaker 1>as we were going through it, he said, this is

0:10:35.520 --> 0:10:40.640
<v Speaker 1>the first this is the rules based monus monetary system

0:10:40.720 --> 0:10:46.719
<v Speaker 1>I've been waiting for since we left the gold exchange standards, right,

0:10:47.120 --> 0:10:50.640
<v Speaker 1>And I said to him, oh, how big could this be?

0:10:51.160 --> 0:10:53.720
<v Speaker 1>And he said, well, how big is the U S

0:10:53.760 --> 0:10:57.120
<v Speaker 1>monetary base? And back then, remember this is six billion

0:10:57.160 --> 0:10:59.160
<v Speaker 1>dollar cap. Back then it was a four and a

0:10:59.200 --> 0:11:02.040
<v Speaker 1>half trillion all our monetary base today where they'd and

0:11:02.120 --> 0:11:04.240
<v Speaker 1>half trillion? All right? That was Kathy Would of course

0:11:04.280 --> 0:11:08.200
<v Speaker 1>of our invest CEO ce IO founder Tesla, which reports

0:11:08.240 --> 0:11:11.000
<v Speaker 1>after the clothes that stocks up just fractually. Bitcoin though

0:11:11.600 --> 0:11:14.720
<v Speaker 1>surging today right here, record high. Uh, And these are

0:11:14.760 --> 0:11:17.959
<v Speaker 1>things that she is very optimistic about. For more of

0:11:18.000 --> 0:11:20.000
<v Speaker 1>that interview, check it out at the Bloomberg and of

0:11:20.000 --> 0:11:23.960
<v Speaker 1>course on Bloomberg dot com. You're listening to Bloomberg Business

0:11:24.040 --> 0:11:27.880
<v Speaker 1>Week with Carol Messer and Bloomberg Quick Takes Tim Stenovich

0:11:28.360 --> 0:11:31.440
<v Speaker 1>on Bloomberg Radio. Well, here at the Milk and Institute

0:11:31.440 --> 0:11:35.200
<v Speaker 1>Global Conference, talking a lot about investors investing to make

0:11:35.280 --> 0:11:37.160
<v Speaker 1>things in a world better. It all falls under the

0:11:37.240 --> 0:11:39.720
<v Speaker 1>umbrella vs G and impact investing for the most part.

0:11:40.120 --> 0:11:41.920
<v Speaker 1>And on part with that is the story online of

0:11:41.960 --> 0:11:44.679
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Business Week. Yeah, it's by Mark Champion, and it's

0:11:44.720 --> 0:11:48.800
<v Speaker 1>about retrofitting buildings in the unsexy climate fix that the

0:11:48.840 --> 0:11:51.319
<v Speaker 1>world needs, installation in HVAC. Well, they don't get a

0:11:51.360 --> 0:11:54.040
<v Speaker 1>lot of hype, but making buildings energy efficient on a

0:11:54.120 --> 0:11:57.960
<v Speaker 1>large scale could slash carbon emissions. Joining us now lie

0:11:58.000 --> 0:12:01.000
<v Speaker 1>from the Bloomberg Interactive Broker Studios in New York is

0:12:01.120 --> 0:12:04.079
<v Speaker 1>Joel Webber, editor at Bloomberg Business Week. Joel, when we

0:12:04.080 --> 0:12:08.200
<v Speaker 1>think about climate change, we oftentimes think about industries and

0:12:08.320 --> 0:12:10.400
<v Speaker 1>governments and what they need to do in order to

0:12:10.400 --> 0:12:12.640
<v Speaker 1>curb emissions. What we don't often talk about are the

0:12:12.679 --> 0:12:15.680
<v Speaker 1>buildings that already exist in our built world, or even

0:12:15.720 --> 0:12:18.920
<v Speaker 1>buildings in general. Right, I think it's much more seductive

0:12:18.960 --> 0:12:22.960
<v Speaker 1>to think about, you know, an vehicle transformation, right and

0:12:23.000 --> 0:12:26.199
<v Speaker 1>like switching to electric vehicles, which you know sounds pretty

0:12:26.200 --> 0:12:28.280
<v Speaker 1>good because you get a new car, but you know,

0:12:28.320 --> 0:12:33.400
<v Speaker 1>living in an old building is actually uh potentially um

0:12:33.520 --> 0:12:36.760
<v Speaker 1>worldwide a thing that you know, if we if we

0:12:36.760 --> 0:12:43.800
<v Speaker 1>were able to optimize it, it it might have even larger impacts. Yeah,

0:12:43.840 --> 0:12:46.280
<v Speaker 1>it's really fascinating. It's funny. We caught up with um

0:12:46.320 --> 0:12:49.080
<v Speaker 1>the CEO of Siemens Us, and she's talked about, you know,

0:12:49.120 --> 0:12:52.240
<v Speaker 1>what they are doing in terms of air purification, like

0:12:52.240 --> 0:12:53.920
<v Speaker 1>this is a big part of their business, like coming

0:12:53.960 --> 0:12:57.800
<v Speaker 1>out of COVID and you do think about not sexy, right,

0:12:57.840 --> 0:12:59.840
<v Speaker 1>I mean, we all are focusing so much an alternative

0:13:00.040 --> 0:13:02.280
<v Speaker 1>energy and new methods and so on and so forth,

0:13:02.440 --> 0:13:04.480
<v Speaker 1>but there's some really basic things that we could be

0:13:04.520 --> 0:13:06.520
<v Speaker 1>doing that would make a difference. Job. So so to

0:13:06.559 --> 0:13:10.480
<v Speaker 1>bring it back to um mark champions story UM and

0:13:10.480 --> 0:13:13.160
<v Speaker 1>and also you know, to even step back further, we're

0:13:13.160 --> 0:13:15.680
<v Speaker 1>gonna hear a lot more about climate change in the

0:13:15.720 --> 0:13:18.000
<v Speaker 1>coming days and weeks because of what's gonna happen in

0:13:18.080 --> 0:13:21.280
<v Speaker 1>Glasgow with copy and so this is uh, you know,

0:13:21.320 --> 0:13:23.120
<v Speaker 1>a version of a story that kind of sets this

0:13:23.200 --> 0:13:26.360
<v Speaker 1>stage for that. UM. But what he talks about, UM,

0:13:26.400 --> 0:13:28.720
<v Speaker 1>I thought this was just a fascinating statistic, which is,

0:13:29.240 --> 0:13:34.040
<v Speaker 1>if we think out to fifty of the buildings that

0:13:34.080 --> 0:13:37.520
<v Speaker 1>are currently in existence will still be here in so

0:13:37.880 --> 0:13:42.640
<v Speaker 1>for us to make a transformative, a transformative societal and

0:13:42.720 --> 0:13:46.079
<v Speaker 1>global change in that time, we have to look at

0:13:46.160 --> 0:13:49.920
<v Speaker 1>what's existing and basically deal with it right and and

0:13:49.960 --> 0:13:52.360
<v Speaker 1>buildings are the epitome of that, because like how often

0:13:52.440 --> 0:13:56.520
<v Speaker 1>do you rip open walls and actually reinsulate, which would

0:13:56.559 --> 0:14:01.640
<v Speaker 1>maybe help you use less uh propane to heat your house, which,

0:14:01.760 --> 0:14:04.839
<v Speaker 1>by the way, that's going to have pretty interesting winter

0:14:05.000 --> 0:14:08.319
<v Speaker 1>coming as we kind of suddenly have temperatures cooled down

0:14:08.360 --> 0:14:10.160
<v Speaker 1>I know that, you know, being out in California, you

0:14:10.200 --> 0:14:11.880
<v Speaker 1>probably don't have to think about that so much right now.

0:14:11.880 --> 0:14:15.960
<v Speaker 1>But we're gonna stay here. Actually gonna say, it's been

0:14:16.000 --> 0:14:21.240
<v Speaker 1>a little chilly at night. It's getting brisk here here

0:14:21.280 --> 0:14:23.560
<v Speaker 1>in New York. It definitely feels like it's it's we're

0:14:23.600 --> 0:14:27.640
<v Speaker 1>rounding that corner. So, you know, how do you incentivize homeowners,

0:14:27.760 --> 0:14:31.840
<v Speaker 1>contractors in a bigger way, you know, commercial buildings to

0:14:31.880 --> 0:14:35.280
<v Speaker 1>actually deal with this, uh and incentivize them. And that's

0:14:35.280 --> 0:14:38.920
<v Speaker 1>something that like, you know, we haven't really wrestled with yet.

0:14:38.960 --> 0:14:41.840
<v Speaker 1>So it usually comes down to governments and countries, but

0:14:41.880 --> 0:14:45.240
<v Speaker 1>it doesn't trickle down below that. Well, how do you

0:14:45.240 --> 0:14:47.120
<v Speaker 1>do that? Is it? Is it tax incentives? Is it?

0:14:47.240 --> 0:14:49.560
<v Speaker 1>Is it telling homeowners, Hey, if you replace these windows

0:14:49.600 --> 0:14:52.280
<v Speaker 1>that were installed on your on your in your apartment

0:14:52.280 --> 0:14:55.000
<v Speaker 1>building in the nineteen seventies, you will get a tax

0:14:55.040 --> 0:14:57.200
<v Speaker 1>break because you'll not only save energy, but you will

0:14:57.200 --> 0:15:00.880
<v Speaker 1>be doing good for the climate. That's right in our Yeah,

0:15:00.920 --> 0:15:02.760
<v Speaker 1>and you know a lot of that stuff already exists.

0:15:02.800 --> 0:15:04.720
<v Speaker 1>But now it's like, how do you even sweeten the

0:15:04.760 --> 0:15:07.480
<v Speaker 1>pot more and turn up the volume on it so

0:15:07.520 --> 0:15:11.040
<v Speaker 1>that there's it becomes like a now just such a

0:15:11.080 --> 0:15:13.960
<v Speaker 1>no brainer. And then obviously, like you know, there's gonna

0:15:14.000 --> 0:15:16.360
<v Speaker 1>be new construction too, and so making sure that new

0:15:16.400 --> 0:15:20.320
<v Speaker 1>construction is uh, you know, completely up to stuff is

0:15:20.360 --> 0:15:21.960
<v Speaker 1>going to be part of that part of that game too,

0:15:22.040 --> 0:15:25.720
<v Speaker 1>and some of that has been rather lack still. Yeah,

0:15:25.760 --> 0:15:27.200
<v Speaker 1>I'm just going to it. I know you mentioned some

0:15:27.200 --> 0:15:29.920
<v Speaker 1>of these data points. Construction and operation of buildings accounts

0:15:29.920 --> 0:15:33.000
<v Speaker 1>for thirty of the world's energy use and of all

0:15:33.040 --> 0:15:36.960
<v Speaker 1>carbon emissions, according to the edition of the Global Status

0:15:36.960 --> 0:15:39.440
<v Speaker 1>Report for Buildings and Construction. I mean these are I

0:15:39.480 --> 0:15:42.440
<v Speaker 1>guess what some would say, Joel, you know, low hanging fruit, right,

0:15:42.480 --> 0:15:45.280
<v Speaker 1>and the technologies are there to make the difference that

0:15:45.320 --> 0:15:48.240
<v Speaker 1>will make these buildings, whether it's new or old, more

0:15:48.360 --> 0:15:51.000
<v Speaker 1>energy efficient. Yeah. You know. Another one that Mark talks

0:15:51.040 --> 0:15:55.160
<v Speaker 1>about in the story um takes us to Italy where

0:15:55.200 --> 0:15:58.680
<v Speaker 1>they introduced a credit called the super Bonus, and so

0:15:58.800 --> 0:16:01.760
<v Speaker 1>homeowners get to claim hun of the cost of an

0:16:01.840 --> 0:16:05.360
<v Speaker 1>energy retrofit and gets their taxes over a five year period.

0:16:05.680 --> 0:16:08.200
<v Speaker 1>So it's basically like, you know, you have to dumb

0:16:08.240 --> 0:16:11.040
<v Speaker 1>this down in order to make it work. I think

0:16:11.040 --> 0:16:13.800
<v Speaker 1>it's it's not just you can't. You can't just lean

0:16:13.880 --> 0:16:17.520
<v Speaker 1>on people from an altruistic standpoint. You have to actually

0:16:17.560 --> 0:16:20.640
<v Speaker 1>incentivize them. And I think that ten percent of the

0:16:20.680 --> 0:16:24.280
<v Speaker 1>cost of an energy regimic gets there because it's basically

0:16:24.320 --> 0:16:26.880
<v Speaker 1>like you're you're you're making it so easy that you

0:16:27.000 --> 0:16:30.280
<v Speaker 1>can't not do it. And when you think back to

0:16:30.320 --> 0:16:32.640
<v Speaker 1>that that stand of nine percent in the buildings were

0:16:33.080 --> 0:16:35.640
<v Speaker 1>inhabiting are basically gonna be the same ones that we

0:16:35.680 --> 0:16:38.760
<v Speaker 1>have in That's the kind of thing that could maybe

0:16:38.800 --> 0:16:42.680
<v Speaker 1>move that needle. Well. Homeowners are certainly a big part

0:16:42.680 --> 0:16:44.960
<v Speaker 1>of this discussion, but what's happening here at Melcoln too.

0:16:45.080 --> 0:16:47.000
<v Speaker 1>We're talking a lot about the return to office and

0:16:47.040 --> 0:16:50.320
<v Speaker 1>the way that executives are grappling with getting their employees

0:16:50.360 --> 0:16:52.160
<v Speaker 1>back to offices. So what about when it comes to

0:16:52.480 --> 0:16:55.280
<v Speaker 1>corporations and the buildings that they occupy in order to

0:16:55.280 --> 0:16:57.440
<v Speaker 1>make sure that those are energy efficient. And I will say,

0:16:57.480 --> 0:16:59.520
<v Speaker 1>just based on my own experience in New York, it

0:16:59.640 --> 0:17:03.640
<v Speaker 1>does seem like, uh, commercial buildings are pretty far ahead.

0:17:03.920 --> 0:17:08.000
<v Speaker 1>Again just anecdotally speaking in New York of residential well,

0:17:08.280 --> 0:17:11.720
<v Speaker 1>the scale of it. I think you have capital and

0:17:11.720 --> 0:17:15.240
<v Speaker 1>and you have often publicly traded companies that can come

0:17:15.240 --> 0:17:19.320
<v Speaker 1>in and and retrofit at at scale. And you know,

0:17:19.480 --> 0:17:21.240
<v Speaker 1>often when you're thinking about this on a on a

0:17:21.320 --> 0:17:24.520
<v Speaker 1>private matter, on a on a local level, you know,

0:17:24.560 --> 0:17:27.600
<v Speaker 1>that becomes a much more difficult proposition when you're dealing

0:17:27.600 --> 0:17:31.720
<v Speaker 1>with individual homeowners or apartment buildings or you know, New

0:17:31.800 --> 0:17:34.200
<v Speaker 1>York co ops. But you know, I think I think

0:17:34.280 --> 0:17:36.560
<v Speaker 1>one thing that's going to be interesting is is and

0:17:36.600 --> 0:17:38.639
<v Speaker 1>this I think goes to commercial as well as well

0:17:38.640 --> 0:17:44.560
<v Speaker 1>as residential. Is like as existing buildings have ongoing maintenance

0:17:44.600 --> 0:17:48.840
<v Speaker 1>and thing like having roofs redone that kind of stuff,

0:17:49.080 --> 0:17:52.080
<v Speaker 1>you're gonna you're gonna end up with moments that there

0:17:52.119 --> 0:17:55.159
<v Speaker 1>can be capital and fusion sort of organically and you know,

0:17:55.200 --> 0:17:58.520
<v Speaker 1>people maybe redoing a roof and then financing to get

0:17:58.560 --> 0:18:01.520
<v Speaker 1>solar on top of it, right or battery storages that

0:18:01.600 --> 0:18:05.440
<v Speaker 1>comes online. So you're gonna see organically moments in time

0:18:05.480 --> 0:18:08.879
<v Speaker 1>in the life cycle of of home, you know, residential

0:18:09.080 --> 0:18:13.640
<v Speaker 1>ownership or commercial ownership that incentivizes people to actually think

0:18:13.680 --> 0:18:15.880
<v Speaker 1>about how do you take this to the next level

0:18:16.200 --> 0:18:18.600
<v Speaker 1>and and do that retrofitting that you know you may

0:18:18.920 --> 0:18:22.960
<v Speaker 1>may have put off. Yeah, and Mark Star also gets

0:18:22.960 --> 0:18:26.440
<v Speaker 1>into making sure. Here we are with supplies, chain constraints,

0:18:26.560 --> 0:18:30.280
<v Speaker 1>labor constraints, and one of the individuals he interviewed for

0:18:30.359 --> 0:18:32.880
<v Speaker 1>a story, Uh, he says, how will we make enough

0:18:32.880 --> 0:18:35.919
<v Speaker 1>materials and skills capacity? Because if these things aren't fitted right,

0:18:35.960 --> 0:18:37.679
<v Speaker 1>it will be for nothing. So they've got to make

0:18:37.680 --> 0:18:39.639
<v Speaker 1>sure that the people have the right skills to do

0:18:39.680 --> 0:18:43.240
<v Speaker 1>these things differently. Uh and so yeah, and you know,

0:18:43.320 --> 0:18:50.080
<v Speaker 1>just good luck finding people right. Something. Just almost everybody

0:18:50.080 --> 0:18:52.160
<v Speaker 1>we've talked to here just says we can't get enough

0:18:52.160 --> 0:18:55.479
<v Speaker 1>workers and jobs right. But yet here we see an

0:18:55.480 --> 0:19:01.720
<v Speaker 1>opportunity with you know, potentially you know, high earning jobs

0:19:01.880 --> 0:19:03.959
<v Speaker 1>in a in a field that seems like I might

0:19:03.960 --> 0:19:05.919
<v Speaker 1>have growth potential. So you start connecting these things and

0:19:05.920 --> 0:19:08.679
<v Speaker 1>I think a lot of businesses we'll see the opportunity

0:19:08.720 --> 0:19:12.160
<v Speaker 1>that might lie in front of them. Here. Check out

0:19:12.200 --> 0:19:14.520
<v Speaker 1>marks story. It's on the Bloomberg and at Bloomberg dot com,

0:19:14.520 --> 0:19:17.159
<v Speaker 1>Slash business Week. Joel Webber, editor at Bloomberg Business Week

0:19:17.200 --> 0:19:20.680
<v Speaker 1>from the Bloomberg Interactor Broker Studios in New York. Joe Webber,

0:19:20.800 --> 0:19:22.520
<v Speaker 1>thank you so much. This is Bloomber Business Week and

0:19:22.560 --> 0:19:30.600
<v Speaker 1>this is Bloomberg Radio. You're listening to Bloomberg Business Week

0:19:30.760 --> 0:19:34.639
<v Speaker 1>with Carol Masser and Bloomberg Quick Takes Tim Stinovic on

0:19:34.760 --> 0:19:40.240
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Radio. So yes, day three at the Milk and

0:19:40.280 --> 0:19:43.720
<v Speaker 1>Institute Global Conference, talking with a lot of investors when

0:19:43.720 --> 0:19:46.240
<v Speaker 1>it comes to various aspects of the financial market. Yeah,

0:19:46.240 --> 0:19:48.000
<v Speaker 1>one of those investors we spoke to earlier this week

0:19:48.040 --> 0:19:50.720
<v Speaker 1>was Mark Jenkins, head of Global Credit at Carlisle. We

0:19:50.760 --> 0:19:52.680
<v Speaker 1>spoke to him just a couple of days ago, and

0:19:52.760 --> 0:19:55.520
<v Speaker 1>this excerpt of our interview. Jenkins talked all about his

0:19:55.560 --> 0:19:58.960
<v Speaker 1>outlook for credit markets and also how yes G factors

0:19:58.960 --> 0:20:01.240
<v Speaker 1>in check it out think what we've seen in the markets,

0:20:01.240 --> 0:20:04.240
<v Speaker 1>and and by the way, like we cover over credits

0:20:04.320 --> 0:20:07.520
<v Speaker 1>in our clos and you know, hundreds of credits in

0:20:07.520 --> 0:20:09.480
<v Speaker 1>our private books, so we have a good insight into

0:20:09.480 --> 0:20:11.960
<v Speaker 1>what's going on right now. You know, we still see

0:20:12.080 --> 0:20:15.639
<v Speaker 1>relatively strong revenue growth and we've seen very good um

0:20:15.680 --> 0:20:18.840
<v Speaker 1>you know, cost containment. You know, absently inflationary pressures we're

0:20:18.840 --> 0:20:20.879
<v Speaker 1>seeing right now. So as the numbers come in, we're

0:20:20.920 --> 0:20:23.320
<v Speaker 1>sure that's going to change. But generally the health of

0:20:23.359 --> 0:20:26.800
<v Speaker 1>our portfolios is quite good. UM. So you know, despite

0:20:26.800 --> 0:20:29.520
<v Speaker 1>everything you see, everything you read and the volatility in

0:20:29.560 --> 0:20:31.679
<v Speaker 1>the market, I would say in the private markets the

0:20:31.720 --> 0:20:34.199
<v Speaker 1>companies that we're dealing with, you know, there's some wage

0:20:34.240 --> 0:20:37.639
<v Speaker 1>and inflationary pressure for sure, but generally speaking, there in

0:20:37.760 --> 0:20:39.679
<v Speaker 1>very good shake. Well, and let me just follow up,

0:20:39.720 --> 0:20:42.560
<v Speaker 1>because I think in the environment we've been, you've had

0:20:42.880 --> 0:20:46.880
<v Speaker 1>interest rate starved investors, right, You've had an economy that's

0:20:46.920 --> 0:20:50.120
<v Speaker 1>been reopening, and credits are cheap that pretty much any

0:20:50.119 --> 0:20:52.840
<v Speaker 1>company that wanted to could tack the credit markets. So

0:20:52.880 --> 0:20:56.119
<v Speaker 1>what happens as we reopen we move along, if those

0:20:56.240 --> 0:20:59.480
<v Speaker 1>underlying premises that were pretty optimistic don't pan out, what

0:20:59.520 --> 0:21:01.560
<v Speaker 1>happens that d of mind. Well, here's a good thing

0:21:01.640 --> 0:21:03.960
<v Speaker 1>as a credit investor which I always like to point out,

0:21:04.000 --> 0:21:07.760
<v Speaker 1>which is what's happened in the past eighteen to twenty months,

0:21:07.840 --> 0:21:10.359
<v Speaker 1>is that the actual equity cushion that we have in

0:21:10.400 --> 0:21:14.440
<v Speaker 1>a lot of our investments is actually wider now or thicker,

0:21:14.480 --> 0:21:18.240
<v Speaker 1>if you will, than pre pandemic. So from a from

0:21:18.240 --> 0:21:21.560
<v Speaker 1>a marginal safety perspective, when you think about that, yes,

0:21:21.680 --> 0:21:23.879
<v Speaker 1>we worry about where the economy is going, to the

0:21:24.359 --> 0:21:27.320
<v Speaker 1>macro all those effects, but we really look to what's

0:21:27.320 --> 0:21:29.919
<v Speaker 1>that margin of safety today? And even if things go

0:21:29.960 --> 0:21:32.399
<v Speaker 1>down dramatically, how much of a margin's safety do we

0:21:32.480 --> 0:21:35.520
<v Speaker 1>still have? So when you look at debt to even daw,

0:21:35.600 --> 0:21:38.119
<v Speaker 1>it's quite high from historic level people talk to But

0:21:38.160 --> 0:21:40.720
<v Speaker 1>if you actually look at Eva Duck coverage ratios, they're

0:21:40.720 --> 0:21:45.200
<v Speaker 1>actually high from a historical perspective on a broad aggregate basis. Right,

0:21:45.240 --> 0:21:48.080
<v Speaker 1>it depends where you go, obviously, So all those things

0:21:48.119 --> 0:21:51.520
<v Speaker 1>together it makes us feel very comfortable with the environment

0:21:51.520 --> 0:21:53.520
<v Speaker 1>we're in. But we have to be more thoughtful with

0:21:53.520 --> 0:21:55.760
<v Speaker 1>respect to the under rights that we did. Carol brought

0:21:55.840 --> 0:21:58.479
<v Speaker 1>up sectors. You gotta ask what sectors you think are

0:21:58.520 --> 0:22:01.399
<v Speaker 1>particularly exciting to you right now? Well, we like, you know,

0:22:02.000 --> 0:22:04.400
<v Speaker 1>I think we're slightly different than on the equity side,

0:22:04.400 --> 0:22:06.080
<v Speaker 1>where we can drive a lot of value creations. So

0:22:06.119 --> 0:22:08.720
<v Speaker 1>what we look at our companies that allow that a

0:22:08.960 --> 0:22:12.119
<v Speaker 1>can be part of that um part of the value

0:22:12.200 --> 0:22:14.520
<v Speaker 1>chain with respect to cast agains for instance. Right, So

0:22:14.600 --> 0:22:16.520
<v Speaker 1>do you do you have a product or a service

0:22:16.600 --> 0:22:18.840
<v Speaker 1>that allows you to, you know, bring the cost of

0:22:18.840 --> 0:22:21.239
<v Speaker 1>what you offer down. That's that's point one. We're not

0:22:21.280 --> 0:22:24.399
<v Speaker 1>necessarily looking at companies that have this unbelievable top line growth.

0:22:24.720 --> 0:22:26.960
<v Speaker 1>But if it hasn't great that's good for us. And

0:22:27.000 --> 0:22:30.120
<v Speaker 1>then the difference between I think the investing we look

0:22:30.160 --> 0:22:31.960
<v Speaker 1>at is we're cash flow investors, so we're looking at

0:22:31.960 --> 0:22:34.719
<v Speaker 1>what are those near term cash flows because you know,

0:22:34.760 --> 0:22:38.040
<v Speaker 1>the duration of our investments are relatively short. So you know,

0:22:38.119 --> 0:22:40.000
<v Speaker 1>if you're in the tech sector where your cash flows

0:22:40.040 --> 0:22:42.399
<v Speaker 1>are pushed out ten or fifty years, that's probably not

0:22:42.440 --> 0:22:45.320
<v Speaker 1>that attractive to us, because you know, we need cash

0:22:45.320 --> 0:22:48.600
<v Speaker 1>flow for our loans. But if you're in a service

0:22:48.640 --> 0:22:52.480
<v Speaker 1>sector that provides something that you know, for instance, we

0:22:52.520 --> 0:22:56.520
<v Speaker 1>have a company that provides um uh software that allows

0:22:56.520 --> 0:23:00.680
<v Speaker 1>you to more efficiently manage healthcare claim and guess what,

0:23:00.800 --> 0:23:03.399
<v Speaker 1>that's a pretty attractive It's a small input cost for

0:23:03.440 --> 0:23:05.280
<v Speaker 1>a very big problem. So it sounds like it's not

0:23:05.280 --> 0:23:08.160
<v Speaker 1>necessarily the headline companies, right, or that it's those companies

0:23:08.160 --> 0:23:10.240
<v Speaker 1>maybe the mid tier or something that are really interesting

0:23:10.280 --> 0:23:12.040
<v Speaker 1>to you guys. Yeah, I think I think if you

0:23:12.040 --> 0:23:14.600
<v Speaker 1>look at private credit as a whole, generally you're not

0:23:14.880 --> 0:23:17.320
<v Speaker 1>dealing with what I would call the larger cap companies

0:23:17.480 --> 0:23:20.119
<v Speaker 1>that you see in the in the leverage loan space

0:23:20.119 --> 0:23:22.199
<v Speaker 1>and the banks indicated loan space. I mean, we do

0:23:22.280 --> 0:23:25.399
<v Speaker 1>deal with those companies at times, and we do have

0:23:25.480 --> 0:23:27.760
<v Speaker 1>large you know, one of the largest CLO managers in

0:23:27.760 --> 0:23:29.240
<v Speaker 1>the world, so we do have a lot of those.

0:23:29.680 --> 0:23:31.440
<v Speaker 1>But I think on the private credit side, more or

0:23:31.480 --> 0:23:34.560
<v Speaker 1>less you're looking at middle market companies and companies that have,

0:23:34.840 --> 0:23:37.640
<v Speaker 1>you know, that don't have access to the capital markets traditionally.

0:23:38.359 --> 0:23:40.679
<v Speaker 1>I'm wondering where you see private credit going over the

0:23:40.680 --> 0:23:43.359
<v Speaker 1>next ten to fifteen years if you think about where

0:23:43.400 --> 0:23:45.159
<v Speaker 1>it is right now versus where you think it will be.

0:23:45.240 --> 0:23:48.679
<v Speaker 1>I think private credit is like where private equity was

0:23:48.720 --> 0:23:50.920
<v Speaker 1>ten or fifteen years ago. I mean, if you think

0:23:50.960 --> 0:23:53.960
<v Speaker 1>about all of alternatives, which are roughly eight trillion dollars,

0:23:54.480 --> 0:23:57.680
<v Speaker 1>one trillion is in private credit. If you think about

0:23:57.720 --> 0:24:01.399
<v Speaker 1>all bonds and equities, it's about twenty five billion dollar markets.

0:24:01.440 --> 0:24:05.080
<v Speaker 1>So we're relatively small as a portion of the alternatives,

0:24:05.280 --> 0:24:08.120
<v Speaker 1>but we're even a smaller portion of the overall market itself.

0:24:08.520 --> 0:24:10.960
<v Speaker 1>And there's a number of drivers right now. One is

0:24:11.280 --> 0:24:15.480
<v Speaker 1>people are rotating from public into private for that pickup

0:24:15.640 --> 0:24:18.400
<v Speaker 1>because they need that incremental yield in a low right environment.

0:24:18.520 --> 0:24:21.840
<v Speaker 1>Number two is public companies. There's not as many public

0:24:21.840 --> 0:24:23.760
<v Speaker 1>companies as they're where it's ten years ago. As I'm sure.

0:24:23.760 --> 0:24:26.480
<v Speaker 1>You know, there's actually twice as many private companies and

0:24:26.480 --> 0:24:29.159
<v Speaker 1>they're staying private longer, you know. And I think the

0:24:29.240 --> 0:24:31.440
<v Speaker 1>third thing is is that you've seen a retrenchment from

0:24:31.440 --> 0:24:33.639
<v Speaker 1>the banks who have kind of got out of the

0:24:33.720 --> 0:24:37.360
<v Speaker 1>leverage lending space, mostly regulated out after the Great Financial Crisis.

0:24:37.680 --> 0:24:39.600
<v Speaker 1>And then finally you've got to grow the retail where

0:24:39.640 --> 0:24:42.919
<v Speaker 1>retail investors are saying, hey, I need to diversify my portfolio.

0:24:43.080 --> 0:24:46.600
<v Speaker 1>So you get all that together, we think, you know, alternatives.

0:24:46.880 --> 0:24:48.639
<v Speaker 1>I mean, there's a lot of demand factors and we

0:24:48.680 --> 0:24:50.760
<v Speaker 1>see growth at ten to fifteen percent a year. How

0:24:50.800 --> 0:24:52.800
<v Speaker 1>does E s G play into all of this, because

0:24:52.840 --> 0:24:54.399
<v Speaker 1>I feel like that's a big factor. I feel like

0:24:54.440 --> 0:24:57.600
<v Speaker 1>the legitimization of E s G is really happening. Yeah,

0:24:57.640 --> 0:24:59.360
<v Speaker 1>it is, it is, I mean, it's it's The good

0:24:59.359 --> 0:25:01.720
<v Speaker 1>thing is investors are demanding it. And that's the point

0:25:01.760 --> 0:25:04.000
<v Speaker 1>one if if if the customer demands it, then you

0:25:04.000 --> 0:25:06.040
<v Speaker 1>should respond to it. And I think we are all

0:25:06.080 --> 0:25:08.840
<v Speaker 1>of us across the industry. I think for us, we've

0:25:08.880 --> 0:25:11.440
<v Speaker 1>decided that we wanted to permeate all of our investments

0:25:11.480 --> 0:25:14.160
<v Speaker 1>as opposed to have a special impact fund, and so

0:25:14.320 --> 0:25:17.440
<v Speaker 1>we have ahead of v s D or Impact Mix Star.

0:25:17.560 --> 0:25:20.280
<v Speaker 1>I know she's been on your shows before and she's excellent,

0:25:20.400 --> 0:25:22.800
<v Speaker 1>and so she's done things like in credit in particular,

0:25:23.200 --> 0:25:25.320
<v Speaker 1>where I said, I want us to figure out how

0:25:25.400 --> 0:25:28.040
<v Speaker 1>we can measure the risk of our credit portfolio from

0:25:28.080 --> 0:25:30.159
<v Speaker 1>the E s G perspective. So we have an E

0:25:30.359 --> 0:25:33.520
<v Speaker 1>s G, a risk assessment profile that we use and

0:25:33.600 --> 0:25:35.920
<v Speaker 1>we look at all of our credits and we have

0:25:36.000 --> 0:25:38.359
<v Speaker 1>a risk assessment for that going into the investment, and

0:25:38.480 --> 0:25:40.639
<v Speaker 1>we have a risk assessment of what our portfolio looks like,

0:25:41.119 --> 0:25:44.240
<v Speaker 1>which is powerful and that you know, we just recently

0:25:44.280 --> 0:25:46.680
<v Speaker 1>put a two billion dollar credit facility in place from

0:25:47.080 --> 0:25:50.800
<v Speaker 1>Bank of America where it is tied to those targets,

0:25:51.040 --> 0:25:53.760
<v Speaker 1>and so the cost of that leverage facility, which benefits

0:25:53.800 --> 0:25:56.959
<v Speaker 1>our investors, is going down as a result of our

0:25:56.960 --> 0:26:00.960
<v Speaker 1>ability to measure that risk and manage that us such

0:26:00.960 --> 0:26:03.920
<v Speaker 1>an important part of our financial markets, the credit markets.

0:26:03.960 --> 0:26:06.880
<v Speaker 1>That was Mark Jenkins, head of Global Credit at Carlisle Group,

0:26:06.920 --> 0:26:09.440
<v Speaker 1>the private equity firm. We know them well, but it

0:26:09.560 --> 0:26:11.280
<v Speaker 1>is interesting to see, I mean, the debt markets can

0:26:11.320 --> 0:26:13.800
<v Speaker 1>tell you so much about the health of the corporate

0:26:14.000 --> 0:26:16.520
<v Speaker 1>economy and the corporate outlook and we know that it's

0:26:16.560 --> 0:26:19.600
<v Speaker 1>been really easy for so many corporations to tap into

0:26:20.160 --> 0:26:24.080
<v Speaker 1>low money, very accessible, but you do wonder what happens

0:26:24.119 --> 0:26:27.080
<v Speaker 1>on the other side of it the economic expectations don't

0:26:27.119 --> 0:26:29.040
<v Speaker 1>play out. I was also struck by his prediction that

0:26:29.080 --> 0:26:32.560
<v Speaker 1>private equity in today is basically the level he thinks

0:26:32.560 --> 0:26:34.600
<v Speaker 1>that private credit will be at ten of fifteen years

0:26:34.600 --> 0:26:37.560
<v Speaker 1>from now, which means it could just take off gangbusters

0:26:37.680 --> 0:26:39.720
<v Speaker 1>all right again, Mark Jenkins, head of Global Credit at

0:26:39.760 --> 0:26:43.960
<v Speaker 1>Carlisle Group. This is Bloomberg Business Week with Carol Masser

0:26:44.200 --> 0:26:48.840
<v Speaker 1>and Bloomberg Quick Takes Tim Stinovich from Bloomberg Radio. Well

0:26:48.960 --> 0:26:51.280
<v Speaker 1>later this month, at the G twenty summit in Rome,

0:26:51.480 --> 0:26:54.560
<v Speaker 1>a vast overhaul of corporate taxation will likely take another

0:26:54.600 --> 0:26:56.960
<v Speaker 1>step forward. Tim. Already we know what a hundred and

0:26:57.000 --> 0:26:59.600
<v Speaker 1>thirty six nations have resolved key differences over the level

0:27:00.040 --> 0:27:02.200
<v Speaker 1>of a global minimum rate, but there's still some things

0:27:02.240 --> 0:27:04.840
<v Speaker 1>to be worked out. It's something we talked extensively about

0:27:04.880 --> 0:27:07.520
<v Speaker 1>with Kate Barton. She's e WISE Global Vice Chair of

0:27:07.640 --> 0:27:10.359
<v Speaker 1>tax and she's been at the Milk and Institute Global Conference.

0:27:10.400 --> 0:27:12.959
<v Speaker 1>We caught up with her this morning. In this excerpt,

0:27:13.080 --> 0:27:16.159
<v Speaker 1>Barton discusses global corporate taxation on the table at the

0:27:16.240 --> 0:27:20.360
<v Speaker 1>upcoming twenty summit. I think what we're expecting in Rome

0:27:20.560 --> 0:27:23.760
<v Speaker 1>is just further ratification of the inclusive framework that was

0:27:23.840 --> 0:27:27.840
<v Speaker 1>just released in early October, and so this is talk

0:27:27.880 --> 0:27:30.280
<v Speaker 1>of the town right now. As you can imagine, to

0:27:30.440 --> 0:27:33.320
<v Speaker 1>have a hundred and thirty six countries agree to a

0:27:33.440 --> 0:27:37.040
<v Speaker 1>global minimum tax at a time when countries are very

0:27:37.280 --> 0:27:41.680
<v Speaker 1>nationalistic and very focused on their own fiscal situation. It's

0:27:41.720 --> 0:27:46.440
<v Speaker 1>really on landmark decision and agreement. Are your clients happy

0:27:46.440 --> 0:27:51.040
<v Speaker 1>about it? Our clients are really worried. So you know,

0:27:51.200 --> 0:27:54.000
<v Speaker 1>there's not enough detail for US tax folks yet to

0:27:54.080 --> 0:27:58.000
<v Speaker 1>be comfortable with how this is gonna work. So companies

0:27:58.119 --> 0:27:59.959
<v Speaker 1>right now are trying to model it out, but were

0:28:00.119 --> 0:28:02.879
<v Speaker 1>expecting a lot more detail to come out at the

0:28:03.040 --> 0:28:06.200
<v Speaker 1>end of October early November, and that will help a lot.

0:28:06.960 --> 0:28:09.320
<v Speaker 1>We need the questions answer, right, We know some details

0:28:09.320 --> 0:28:14.639
<v Speaker 1>a hundred thirty six countries minimum global tax profits over

0:28:15.359 --> 0:28:18.159
<v Speaker 1>though for some of the biggest tech companies, who are

0:28:18.200 --> 0:28:21.320
<v Speaker 1>the winners and who are the losers? Well, it depends

0:28:21.400 --> 0:28:25.480
<v Speaker 1>by country and by sectors, you can imagine. So let's

0:28:25.520 --> 0:28:28.320
<v Speaker 1>stick with pillar to which is the global minimum tax.

0:28:28.440 --> 0:28:32.240
<v Speaker 1>That's the one that's probably most detailed at this point. Um,

0:28:32.320 --> 0:28:35.600
<v Speaker 1>what we're expecting to happen next is the US is

0:28:35.640 --> 0:28:39.640
<v Speaker 1>sort of front running the implementation of this with the

0:28:39.920 --> 0:28:42.760
<v Speaker 1>Joe Biden proposals. A lot of what is in the

0:28:43.000 --> 0:28:48.920
<v Speaker 1>Reconciliation Act is actually really coalescing with thecent minimum tax.

0:28:49.040 --> 0:28:51.160
<v Speaker 1>So the US is one of the few countries that

0:28:51.240 --> 0:28:54.160
<v Speaker 1>actually has a minimum tax right now. But the issue

0:28:54.360 --> 0:28:57.080
<v Speaker 1>is bringing that rate up from when you cut through

0:28:57.120 --> 0:28:59.880
<v Speaker 1>all the deductions, is at thirteen and he would like

0:29:00.040 --> 0:29:03.360
<v Speaker 1>to bring it north of the percent. Well, here's part

0:29:03.400 --> 0:29:05.640
<v Speaker 1>of the problem in Kate, and I'm gonna play devil's advocate.

0:29:05.760 --> 0:29:09.240
<v Speaker 1>I mean, many would say that corporations, Global corporations have

0:29:09.280 --> 0:29:12.200
<v Speaker 1>been able to game the tax system by going to

0:29:12.320 --> 0:29:14.560
<v Speaker 1>countries that have a lower corporate tax rate and maybe

0:29:14.600 --> 0:29:17.320
<v Speaker 1>not having huge operations, but they're able to whether it's

0:29:17.400 --> 0:29:21.480
<v Speaker 1>I P. Intellectual property or something, and they benefit and

0:29:21.520 --> 0:29:24.200
<v Speaker 1>they end up playing a pretty low effective tax rate.

0:29:24.720 --> 0:29:26.720
<v Speaker 1>What these companies are trying to do is to prevent

0:29:26.800 --> 0:29:31.400
<v Speaker 1>this from happening, right, Um, what do you say to that, well,

0:29:31.520 --> 0:29:33.640
<v Speaker 1>or what do you what? What is the thinking here?

0:29:33.800 --> 0:29:37.080
<v Speaker 1>You know, countries have long had as a habit to

0:29:37.200 --> 0:29:40.240
<v Speaker 1>look at their headline corporate tax rate to sort of

0:29:40.320 --> 0:29:44.120
<v Speaker 1>invite companies to do business in their jurisdictions, especially smaller

0:29:44.200 --> 0:29:48.000
<v Speaker 1>countries like Ireland has really had a lower tax rate

0:29:48.040 --> 0:29:51.480
<v Speaker 1>twelve and a half percent, and that has invited companies in.

0:29:51.640 --> 0:29:53.400
<v Speaker 1>And then what they do is they tax the wage.

0:29:53.480 --> 0:29:56.320
<v Speaker 1>Journal that's been a longstanding policy and one of their

0:29:56.480 --> 0:29:59.040
<v Speaker 1>you know, countries feel like it's a sovereign right. So

0:29:59.200 --> 0:30:02.640
<v Speaker 1>now they will do is increase the attax rate for

0:30:02.760 --> 0:30:05.760
<v Speaker 1>companies over a certain revenue threshold. And I think we're

0:30:05.760 --> 0:30:08.440
<v Speaker 1>going to see that around the world. Every country will

0:30:08.520 --> 0:30:11.160
<v Speaker 1>decide what to do because what happens under these rules

0:30:11.200 --> 0:30:14.280
<v Speaker 1>that's so complicated. But in short, the country either moves

0:30:14.320 --> 0:30:18.360
<v Speaker 1>their rate up or the headquarters location, through some complex rules,

0:30:18.640 --> 0:30:22.240
<v Speaker 1>will tax the income at a minimum of fIF or higher.

0:30:22.720 --> 0:30:25.880
<v Speaker 1>So in some ways you're a stakeholder. What is on

0:30:26.000 --> 0:30:28.560
<v Speaker 1>the minds of our companies is they just don't want

0:30:28.600 --> 0:30:32.200
<v Speaker 1>double taxation. In some ways they're a stakeholder, but they

0:30:32.320 --> 0:30:35.200
<v Speaker 1>need to make sure that on every dollar or a profit,

0:30:35.360 --> 0:30:39.320
<v Speaker 1>they don't have to jurisdictions claiming taxing rates over that dollar.

0:30:39.440 --> 0:30:42.640
<v Speaker 1>So the coordination here is really important. I do want

0:30:42.680 --> 0:30:44.960
<v Speaker 1>to clarify something. I believe I've had ten percent of profits,

0:30:45.000 --> 0:30:47.760
<v Speaker 1>but it was of profits over a ten percent margin

0:30:47.840 --> 0:30:50.640
<v Speaker 1>from some of the biggest multinationals. Yes, So that's what

0:30:50.760 --> 0:30:53.200
<v Speaker 1>we call pillar one, and that's the one that is

0:30:53.560 --> 0:30:57.400
<v Speaker 1>still being remanded for further consideration. That's less, but that's

0:30:57.480 --> 0:31:00.440
<v Speaker 1>really important because that's what the high tech companies are

0:31:00.520 --> 0:31:03.520
<v Speaker 1>waiting for because that with that provision will come the

0:31:03.600 --> 0:31:07.240
<v Speaker 1>elimination of the digital services taxes, which, as you know,

0:31:07.320 --> 0:31:09.760
<v Speaker 1>many countries right now have those on the books and

0:31:09.840 --> 0:31:14.000
<v Speaker 1>some are looking to implement further all right, and that

0:31:14.080 --> 0:31:16.920
<v Speaker 1>of course with Kate Barton, E Wise, Global Vice Chair

0:31:17.120 --> 0:31:19.960
<v Speaker 1>of tax joining us here at the Milk and Institute

0:31:19.960 --> 0:31:23.960
<v Speaker 1>Global Conference. And you know, taxes. We always joke about it,

0:31:24.040 --> 0:31:27.800
<v Speaker 1>but you put tax or taxation in the headline of

0:31:27.800 --> 0:31:30.640
<v Speaker 1>a Bloomberg story, it often resonates very highly among our

0:31:31.040 --> 0:31:33.320
<v Speaker 1>our readers, and among will often be among the most

0:31:33.360 --> 0:31:36.200
<v Speaker 1>read stories. But this is a big deal about companies

0:31:36.240 --> 0:31:39.760
<v Speaker 1>who have you know, relocated overseas to take advantage of

0:31:39.800 --> 0:31:42.440
<v Speaker 1>a lower corporate tax rate, and yet they maybe don't

0:31:42.520 --> 0:31:45.040
<v Speaker 1>have much of an operation here, right, but sometimes I

0:31:45.240 --> 0:31:48.240
<v Speaker 1>p or in intellectual property or something is parked here

0:31:48.800 --> 0:31:51.719
<v Speaker 1>and enables enables them, especially when it comes to global revenues.

0:31:51.800 --> 0:31:53.240
<v Speaker 1>Right to tax at a lower tax rate. Yea. And

0:31:53.280 --> 0:31:55.200
<v Speaker 1>one of the challenges that comes along with that, of course,

0:31:55.280 --> 0:31:57.200
<v Speaker 1>is the United States. If it is traditionally in American

0:31:57.200 --> 0:31:59.160
<v Speaker 1>company in the United States misses out on that tax

0:31:59.240 --> 0:32:01.720
<v Speaker 1>revenue right, right. And then we always talk about the repatriation.

0:32:01.840 --> 0:32:04.840
<v Speaker 1>Right We've seen that with an administration where you get

0:32:04.920 --> 0:32:07.200
<v Speaker 1>kind of tax forgiveness, you can bring those profits back

0:32:07.240 --> 0:32:09.800
<v Speaker 1>to the United States. And and then companies say, listen,

0:32:09.840 --> 0:32:12.480
<v Speaker 1>we're gonna do We're gonna invest workers more, and they don't.

0:32:12.520 --> 0:32:14.760
<v Speaker 1>They do buy backs. When I was exactly when I

0:32:14.800 --> 0:32:17.080
<v Speaker 1>was preparing for this interview this morning, I was thinking

0:32:17.120 --> 0:32:18.400
<v Speaker 1>back to something that you say all the time when

0:32:18.400 --> 0:32:19.880
<v Speaker 1>it comes to this stuff, is just look at the

0:32:19.920 --> 0:32:22.040
<v Speaker 1>effective tax rate that a company. You know, every year

0:32:22.080 --> 0:32:24.800
<v Speaker 1>and every quarter that we can see or every year

0:32:24.880 --> 0:32:27.440
<v Speaker 1>in a company's anual report, the effective tax rate is

0:32:27.480 --> 0:32:30.360
<v Speaker 1>oftentimes even lower. Right Exactly, Companies find a way, and

0:32:30.400 --> 0:32:31.920
<v Speaker 1>most people would argue, listen, you don't want to make

0:32:31.960 --> 0:32:34.360
<v Speaker 1>it so prohibitive that companies are finding it difficult to

0:32:34.880 --> 0:32:39.600
<v Speaker 1>invest in their future business. But come on, you're saying,

0:32:40.120 --> 0:32:42.720
<v Speaker 1>maybe pay fair share, pay fair share, and maybe this

0:32:42.880 --> 0:32:45.120
<v Speaker 1>will create a much more level playing field so there

0:32:45.200 --> 0:32:48.320
<v Speaker 1>isn't so much competitions among countries. We shall see, and

0:32:48.360 --> 0:32:50.920
<v Speaker 1>we'll be watching that G twenty summit in Rome that's

0:32:50.960 --> 0:32:55.840
<v Speaker 1>happening later this month. Thanks for listening to Bloomberg Business Week.

0:32:56.000 --> 0:32:59.440
<v Speaker 1>Download the podcast on iTunes, SoundCloud, or Bloomberg dot com,

0:32:59.600 --> 0:33:01.240
<v Speaker 1>and you can also listen to our radio show at

0:33:01.280 --> 0:33:03.800
<v Speaker 1>two pm Eastern on Bloomberg Radio or watch us on

0:33:03.920 --> 0:33:07.760
<v Speaker 1>YouTube search Bloomberg Global News m