1
00:00:02,440 --> 00:00:06,760
Speaker 1: Bloomberg Audio Studios, podcasts, radio news.

2
00:00:07,120 --> 00:00:09,600
Speaker 2: And this week you might remember, Goldman Sachs came out

3
00:00:09,600 --> 00:00:12,280
Speaker 2: with a note saying that the streak of blockbuster gains

4
00:00:12,320 --> 00:00:15,560
Speaker 2: for the SMP five hundred it might be over. And

5
00:00:15,640 --> 00:00:17,799
Speaker 2: they say that we will only see around annual gains

6
00:00:17,840 --> 00:00:20,639
Speaker 2: around three percent over the next decade compared to the

7
00:00:20,680 --> 00:00:24,200
Speaker 2: average thirteen percent over the past decade. And we are

8
00:00:24,239 --> 00:00:27,800
Speaker 2: joined now by Goldman Sachs chief US equity strategist David Costin,

9
00:00:28,040 --> 00:00:31,040
Speaker 2: who led that call. He joins us. Now when you

10
00:00:31,080 --> 00:00:34,800
Speaker 2: think about this call, very controversial, David, and so I

11
00:00:34,840 --> 00:00:38,040
Speaker 2: am very curious about kind of what the caveat is here.

12
00:00:38,159 --> 00:00:40,879
Speaker 2: Is there kind of any upside that could be squeezed

13
00:00:40,880 --> 00:00:43,919
Speaker 2: out of the equity market that is outside of this

14
00:00:44,040 --> 00:00:44,680
Speaker 2: base case.

15
00:00:46,120 --> 00:00:48,160
Speaker 3: So let's talk about the base case for the next year,

16
00:00:48,320 --> 00:00:49,880
Speaker 3: and then we'll look at the base case for the

17
00:00:49,920 --> 00:00:54,320
Speaker 3: following nine years for full year decade of performance. So

18
00:00:54,400 --> 00:00:56,120
Speaker 3: the next year, we're looking at the S and P

19
00:00:56,200 --> 00:01:00,680
Speaker 3: five hundred rising around eight percent nine percent total return

20
00:01:00,920 --> 00:01:04,000
Speaker 3: to an index level of around six three hundred. And

21
00:01:04,000 --> 00:01:06,880
Speaker 3: the thought process behind that is the US economy is

22
00:01:06,920 --> 00:01:10,360
Speaker 3: growing in plation's coming down the fat is cutting rates.

23
00:01:10,600 --> 00:01:14,360
Speaker 3: Earnings are growing eleven percent in calendar twenty twenty five

24
00:01:14,440 --> 00:01:17,520
Speaker 3: and another seven percent in calendar twenty twenty six, and

25
00:01:17,560 --> 00:01:20,280
Speaker 3: that sets up with a valuation today of around twenty

26
00:01:20,360 --> 00:01:24,000
Speaker 3: two times earnings, slight compression in the multiple, that is

27
00:01:24,040 --> 00:01:26,559
Speaker 3: the building blocks to a return of the next twelve

28
00:01:26,600 --> 00:01:30,240
Speaker 3: months of roughly nine percent. So what we focused on

29
00:01:30,400 --> 00:01:35,560
Speaker 3: in this report was what's the probable total return that

30
00:01:35,640 --> 00:01:40,200
Speaker 3: an investor should anticipate for the cap weighted S and

31
00:01:40,240 --> 00:01:44,640
Speaker 3: P five hundred index, and the conclusion was a range

32
00:01:45,000 --> 00:01:48,960
Speaker 3: of somewhere between negative one percent and positive seven percent.

33
00:01:49,160 --> 00:01:52,520
Speaker 3: Midpoint of that is around three percent. What is the

34
00:01:52,640 --> 00:01:57,320
Speaker 3: driving force behind that thought process and that analytics, Well,

35
00:01:57,320 --> 00:02:00,480
Speaker 3: there are two issues. The first is valuation. We know

36
00:02:00,520 --> 00:02:03,400
Speaker 3: when the market trades at a high multiple, a high

37
00:02:03,480 --> 00:02:08,920
Speaker 3: valuation that the next ten years is typically low. Relative

38
00:02:09,040 --> 00:02:11,600
Speaker 3: to an environment where say the multiple is low at.

39
00:02:11,560 --> 00:02:12,960
Speaker 4: The beginning, you tend to get a.

40
00:02:12,800 --> 00:02:17,079
Speaker 3: Pretty strong return in the subsequent the substitute decade. So

41
00:02:17,240 --> 00:02:20,480
Speaker 3: we're sitting here with a cyclically adjusted pe multiple that's

42
00:02:20,520 --> 00:02:23,480
Speaker 3: different from a forward one year multiple based on the

43
00:02:23,520 --> 00:02:27,520
Speaker 3: cyclical adjusted earnings for the last decade of thirty eight times.

44
00:02:27,880 --> 00:02:31,359
Speaker 3: That's the ninety seventh percentile versus say, the last.

45
00:02:31,200 --> 00:02:34,320
Speaker 4: One hundred years. So it's a very very expensive starting point.

46
00:02:34,520 --> 00:02:38,200
Speaker 3: And what's new about the analysis is that we also

47
00:02:38,680 --> 00:02:42,960
Speaker 3: include a variable for concentration. We're in one of the

48
00:02:43,000 --> 00:02:48,200
Speaker 3: most highest concentration markets in one hundred years. Top ten stocks,

49
00:02:48,240 --> 00:02:51,360
Speaker 3: for example, comprise around thirty six percent of the index.

50
00:02:51,520 --> 00:02:56,000
Speaker 3: It's an extremely narrow concentration, and historically when you have

51
00:02:56,040 --> 00:02:59,800
Speaker 3: a high concentration market, you have a relatively muted return

52
00:02:59,800 --> 00:03:03,880
Speaker 3: in the subsequent ten years. Now, valuation and concentration are

53
00:03:03,919 --> 00:03:07,000
Speaker 3: two different variables, they're not correlated, and so there's two

54
00:03:07,080 --> 00:03:10,840
Speaker 3: different influences as to why we get a lower, relatively

55
00:03:10,919 --> 00:03:14,680
Speaker 3: modest return. Now, what are the implications for a portfolio manager, Matt,

56
00:03:14,680 --> 00:03:15,720
Speaker 3: The way you want to think.

57
00:03:15,520 --> 00:03:17,680
Speaker 4: About this is equal weighted.

58
00:03:18,440 --> 00:03:20,960
Speaker 3: The equal weighted return is likely to be probably five

59
00:03:21,040 --> 00:03:23,720
Speaker 3: hundred bases points greater. So instead of three percent for

60
00:03:23,800 --> 00:03:27,079
Speaker 3: an aggregate index, something like eight percent for the typical

61
00:03:27,360 --> 00:03:30,400
Speaker 3: equal weighted indexes. So that's the conclusion of the report.

62
00:03:30,520 --> 00:03:37,000
Speaker 5: Well, but the concentration is in I think very many

63
00:03:37,440 --> 00:03:42,119
Speaker 5: global champions, right, I mean, you have companies that dominate

64
00:03:42,440 --> 00:03:46,800
Speaker 5: their spaces globally. Plus we've got a few that are

65
00:03:47,320 --> 00:03:51,960
Speaker 5: likely to come on board soon. SpaceX for example, open

66
00:03:52,040 --> 00:03:56,080
Speaker 5: Ai may go public in the next decade. And if

67
00:03:56,120 --> 00:03:58,760
Speaker 5: I look David over the last decade, I actually stole

68
00:03:58,760 --> 00:04:00,760
Speaker 5: this chart from Data Trek. As I've pointed out before,

69
00:04:00,800 --> 00:04:05,920
Speaker 5: but the only time that we've had three percent returns

70
00:04:06,240 --> 00:04:10,720
Speaker 5: has been when we've had catastrophic events the Great Depression,

71
00:04:11,000 --> 00:04:15,280
Speaker 5: the oil shock, the financial crisis. Do you expect something

72
00:04:15,400 --> 00:04:18,120
Speaker 5: like that to come again over the next decade.

73
00:04:19,120 --> 00:04:21,920
Speaker 3: No, we're anticipating is a broadening of the market. The

74
00:04:22,000 --> 00:04:24,880
Speaker 3: relative performance of the typical stock versus.

75
00:04:24,600 --> 00:04:25,880
Speaker 4: An aggregate index.

76
00:04:26,240 --> 00:04:30,000
Speaker 3: We're focusing on is a strategy for how to perform

77
00:04:30,040 --> 00:04:33,279
Speaker 3: well when we deal with some of our largest institutional clients,

78
00:04:33,560 --> 00:04:38,560
Speaker 3: sovereign wealth funds, pension funds, endowments, insurance companies, family offices.

79
00:04:38,720 --> 00:04:41,240
Speaker 3: When they think about a ten year horizon, they think

80
00:04:41,279 --> 00:04:42,400
Speaker 3: about acid allocation.

81
00:04:42,480 --> 00:04:43,360
Speaker 4: Where are the risks?

82
00:04:43,720 --> 00:04:47,240
Speaker 3: And the idea of a very concentrated market is what

83
00:04:47,480 --> 00:04:50,440
Speaker 3: tends to be a risk that gets introduced. And that

84
00:04:50,560 --> 00:04:54,440
Speaker 3: is the emphasis of this report, and that's the thought process,

85
00:04:54,480 --> 00:04:56,640
Speaker 3: that's the analytics behind it. In the model that we

86
00:04:56,680 --> 00:04:59,320
Speaker 3: build we look at rates, we look at the economic environment,

87
00:04:59,360 --> 00:05:01,880
Speaker 3: we look at the offit ability in the row of companies,

88
00:05:01,920 --> 00:05:04,919
Speaker 3: and so all of these variables at the index level

89
00:05:05,040 --> 00:05:07,839
Speaker 3: relative to the typical stock. That's how we get to

90
00:05:07,880 --> 00:05:11,200
Speaker 3: a conclusion that it's a better strategy, a better return

91
00:05:11,279 --> 00:05:15,080
Speaker 3: strategy from our perspective, with an equal way to strategy.

92
00:05:15,360 --> 00:05:17,440
Speaker 1: Well, David, I want to talk about the cross asset

93
00:05:17,520 --> 00:05:19,400
Speaker 1: nature of this call too, because you say that it's

94
00:05:19,520 --> 00:05:22,320
Speaker 1: likely that bonds are going to outperform in this environment.

95
00:05:22,400 --> 00:05:24,760
Speaker 1: But reading through this call, I mean, if you're not

96
00:05:24,880 --> 00:05:27,520
Speaker 1: calling for a recession here, I assume the Fed doesn't

97
00:05:27,520 --> 00:05:30,360
Speaker 1: cut rates back to zero, wouldn't this be a call

98
00:05:30,440 --> 00:05:33,760
Speaker 1: for cash. Aren't cashields going to, say, relatively high and

99
00:05:33,800 --> 00:05:36,040
Speaker 1: you don't have any credit or duration risk there?

100
00:05:37,120 --> 00:05:38,640
Speaker 4: Well, I mean there's other strategies.

101
00:05:38,640 --> 00:05:40,640
Speaker 3: You can look at private credit, You could look at

102
00:05:40,960 --> 00:05:45,279
Speaker 3: private equity as a potential way of diversifying a portfolio

103
00:05:45,560 --> 00:05:49,920
Speaker 3: relative to right now, the idea of Treasury's tenure treasuries.

104
00:05:49,600 --> 00:05:50,760
Speaker 4: Yielding four point two percent.

105
00:05:51,400 --> 00:05:53,039
Speaker 3: So if you're at a start today and look out

106
00:05:53,080 --> 00:05:57,800
Speaker 3: with our centerpiece of the central case of our forecast

107
00:05:57,839 --> 00:06:00,000
Speaker 3: something like three percent. But if you look at the district,

108
00:06:00,720 --> 00:06:02,640
Speaker 3: look the idea of being at the high end. There

109
00:06:02,640 --> 00:06:04,520
Speaker 3: are a lot of reasons why you could be at

110
00:06:04,520 --> 00:06:07,839
Speaker 3: the higher end of our range closer to seven percent.

111
00:06:08,240 --> 00:06:09,400
Speaker 4: Identified a couple of those.

112
00:06:09,600 --> 00:06:12,000
Speaker 3: You know, you typically get around three and a half

113
00:06:12,080 --> 00:06:15,120
Speaker 3: percent of the constituents in the S and P five

114
00:06:15,200 --> 00:06:18,680
Speaker 3: hundred turnover every year, So we look out for a decade,

115
00:06:18,720 --> 00:06:20,560
Speaker 3: you're probably looking at a third of the index. There's

116
00:06:20,600 --> 00:06:23,039
Speaker 3: going to be new stocks that don't exist today in

117
00:06:23,080 --> 00:06:26,080
Speaker 3: the index. So there's certainly a lot of variables that

118
00:06:26,160 --> 00:06:28,960
Speaker 3: could happen. The economy could be growing more rapidly, more

119
00:06:29,000 --> 00:06:30,320
Speaker 3: slowly than.

120
00:06:30,240 --> 00:06:33,360
Speaker 4: A baseline forecast. Those are their issues.

121
00:06:33,440 --> 00:06:36,719
Speaker 3: AI in terms of artificial intelligence, could raise productivity. I

122
00:06:36,720 --> 00:06:38,480
Speaker 3: mean lots of reasons why it could be better than

123
00:06:38,480 --> 00:06:40,960
Speaker 3: our base case scenario, which is why we have a

124
00:06:41,080 --> 00:06:43,640
Speaker 3: range to the upside of the down here.

125
00:06:43,680 --> 00:06:45,200
Speaker 2: You know, one thing that struck me in this note,

126
00:06:45,240 --> 00:06:47,800
Speaker 2: as well as a one third chance that you have

127
00:06:47,960 --> 00:06:50,839
Speaker 2: the S and P five hundred lagging inflation through twenty

128
00:06:51,000 --> 00:06:54,360
Speaker 2: thirty four, what's the role of inflation here and what

129
00:06:54,440 --> 00:06:56,960
Speaker 2: is the risk that it could be higher? What if

130
00:06:56,960 --> 00:06:59,160
Speaker 2: the neutral rate is higher? What kind of impact would

131
00:06:59,160 --> 00:07:01,080
Speaker 2: that happen on equity market returns?

132
00:07:01,600 --> 00:07:04,440
Speaker 3: Well, so you think about inflation right now, the tips

133
00:07:04,760 --> 00:07:07,320
Speaker 3: break evens are around two point two percent, for example,

134
00:07:07,320 --> 00:07:10,560
Speaker 3: and so based on a scenario where you have a

135
00:07:10,600 --> 00:07:14,160
Speaker 3: return that could be negative one percent annualized versus positive

136
00:07:14,240 --> 00:07:16,920
Speaker 3: seven percent, kind of there's a distribution around that relatively

137
00:07:16,960 --> 00:07:22,000
Speaker 3: normal type distribution. The part tail of the distribution would

138
00:07:22,040 --> 00:07:25,240
Speaker 3: give you a prospect of a return that's less than inflation.

139
00:07:25,280 --> 00:07:27,760
Speaker 4: That's not the base case, but it's only a is

140
00:07:27,760 --> 00:07:28,360
Speaker 4: a scenario.

141
00:07:28,880 --> 00:07:30,760
Speaker 3: You know, when deal with portfolio managers, they want to

142
00:07:30,760 --> 00:07:33,480
Speaker 3: think about what are the risks that are introduced into

143
00:07:33,480 --> 00:07:36,280
Speaker 3: their portfolio. And the argument behind a broadening of the

144
00:07:36,320 --> 00:07:39,160
Speaker 3: market is an important construct. So one of the arguments

145
00:07:39,160 --> 00:07:41,600
Speaker 3: on why mid cap stocks are likely to do better

146
00:07:41,640 --> 00:07:44,400
Speaker 3: than than the rest of the market in the coming year.

147
00:07:44,520 --> 00:07:44,960
Speaker 4: They have the.

148
00:07:44,880 --> 00:07:47,120
Speaker 3: Best torque to the idea of the FED cutting rates.

149
00:07:47,120 --> 00:07:49,000
Speaker 3: They got twenty five percent of their balance sheet is

150
00:07:49,040 --> 00:07:51,600
Speaker 3: floating rate, so you have the FED cut rates, They

151
00:07:51,640 --> 00:07:56,160
Speaker 3: have less interest expense, they have higher earnings, positive rarnings, revisions, drives,

152
00:07:56,240 --> 00:08:00,240
Speaker 3: equity prices, and so those are tactical issues opportunity these

153
00:08:00,240 --> 00:08:02,160
Speaker 3: in the market so we think about tactics, we think

154
00:08:02,200 --> 00:08:06,239
Speaker 3: about strategy longer term. And that's the purpose of writing

155
00:08:06,400 --> 00:08:10,200
Speaker 3: the report and response to questions and clients about how

156
00:08:10,240 --> 00:08:14,080
Speaker 3: should we think about the perspective ten year forward returns inequities?

157
00:08:14,400 --> 00:08:16,080
Speaker 1: Right, David, we don't have a lot of time left.

158
00:08:16,080 --> 00:08:17,640
Speaker 1: I know I have a question. I know that Matt

159
00:08:17,680 --> 00:08:19,520
Speaker 1: has a question as well. So let me ask you

160
00:08:19,560 --> 00:08:22,120
Speaker 1: this quickly. I want to get existential about the business

161
00:08:22,120 --> 00:08:24,280
Speaker 1: that you're in because you think back to January and

162
00:08:24,360 --> 00:08:27,480
Speaker 1: actually Wall Street strategists, on average, we're expecting the S

163
00:08:27,560 --> 00:08:30,200
Speaker 1: and P five hundred to rise about two percent this year.

164
00:08:30,640 --> 00:08:33,040
Speaker 1: It's up twenty three percent. And I'll flip the question

165
00:08:33,120 --> 00:08:36,520
Speaker 1: to you, is it getting harder to model to forecast

166
00:08:36,600 --> 00:08:37,959
Speaker 1: where the index is going to go?

167
00:08:39,559 --> 00:08:43,040
Speaker 3: Well, it is challenging because a third of the index

168
00:08:43,280 --> 00:08:46,600
Speaker 3: is comprised right now of about ten stocks. That's not

169
00:08:46,720 --> 00:08:50,000
Speaker 3: just tech stocks. You have some healthcare socks, Eli Lilly,

170
00:08:50,080 --> 00:08:52,800
Speaker 3: You've got Berkshire, Hathaways in the top ten companies for example.

171
00:08:52,840 --> 00:08:56,520
Speaker 3: Depends on the day we're looking at it could be Visa, Broadcom,

172
00:08:56,600 --> 00:09:00,160
Speaker 3: different different constituents along with the big tech companies that

173
00:09:00,200 --> 00:09:03,240
Speaker 3: we're all familiar with, and so it's challenging to look

174
00:09:03,240 --> 00:09:05,760
Speaker 3: at the market. That's that component, and you can look

175
00:09:05,800 --> 00:09:07,840
Speaker 3: at the rest of the balance of the market. So

176
00:09:07,880 --> 00:09:10,160
Speaker 3: you think about those big stocks, they trade at thirty

177
00:09:10,160 --> 00:09:11,040
Speaker 3: one times earnings.

178
00:09:11,080 --> 00:09:13,880
Speaker 4: That's a two point seven percent or so earning yield.

179
00:09:13,880 --> 00:09:16,840
Speaker 3: It's a negative risk premium versus ten year treasuries. So

180
00:09:17,160 --> 00:09:20,000
Speaker 3: that's a concern about valuation. And then you have the

181
00:09:20,000 --> 00:09:23,160
Speaker 3: concentration item that I overlaid. Rest of the market has

182
00:09:23,200 --> 00:09:26,520
Speaker 3: a positive risk premium versus bonds, and so that's one

183
00:09:26,559 --> 00:09:29,240
Speaker 3: of the attractive components of why there's a broad end

184
00:09:29,280 --> 00:09:31,280
Speaker 3: of the market and why we anticipate that to persist.

185
00:09:32,040 --> 00:09:35,240
Speaker 5: David, I have an election night question for you.

186
00:09:35,320 --> 00:09:37,959
Speaker 4: When you, you.

187
00:09:36,440 --> 00:09:40,240
Speaker 5: Know, get home, put on your slippers, grab a scotch

188
00:09:40,280 --> 00:09:42,960
Speaker 5: and your pipe or whatever, and you settle down in

189
00:09:42,960 --> 00:09:45,320
Speaker 5: that lazy boy right click on Bloomberg TV.

190
00:09:46,200 --> 00:09:47,000
Speaker 4: What are the.

191
00:09:48,720 --> 00:09:52,360
Speaker 5: What are the indexes or the assets or what are

192
00:09:52,400 --> 00:09:55,400
Speaker 5: you going to be watching on election night as we

193
00:09:55,960 --> 00:09:59,120
Speaker 5: hopefully get a clearer picture of who's going to occupy.

194
00:09:58,720 --> 00:10:00,480
Speaker 4: The White House in the next four years.

195
00:10:01,520 --> 00:10:05,520
Speaker 3: Well, the election is obviously quite close in terms of

196
00:10:05,559 --> 00:10:07,560
Speaker 3: the polls and things like that. So I think there's

197
00:10:07,760 --> 00:10:11,320
Speaker 3: a couple of things that we look at. First, is

198
00:10:11,320 --> 00:10:16,240
Speaker 3: there a split Congress versus the presidency that would suggest

199
00:10:16,320 --> 00:10:19,880
Speaker 3: there's certain executive actions that can be taken, whether that's

200
00:10:19,920 --> 00:10:23,840
Speaker 3: respect to tariffs, whether it's respect to certain regulation aspects

201
00:10:24,080 --> 00:10:28,400
Speaker 3: that the presidency he or she could implement.

202
00:10:28,720 --> 00:10:30,559
Speaker 4: Whereas if there's a sweep on.

203
00:10:30,400 --> 00:10:34,079
Speaker 3: The Democrat or the Republican side either direction, there are

204
00:10:34,280 --> 00:10:37,600
Speaker 3: potential legislative aspects. So, Matt, that's sort of the first

205
00:10:38,040 --> 00:10:40,320
Speaker 3: question I want to think about. The second as we

206
00:10:40,360 --> 00:10:43,120
Speaker 3: think about, well, what are the impacts of potential tariffs,

207
00:10:43,120 --> 00:10:46,720
Speaker 3: what would they be? Well, US companies that are selling

208
00:10:46,800 --> 00:10:51,240
Speaker 3: domestically are likely to outperform US companies that export more

209
00:10:51,400 --> 00:10:53,280
Speaker 3: to the rest of the world because there could be

210
00:10:53,360 --> 00:10:58,200
Speaker 3: retaliatory tariffs. So that's one strategy that we might look at.

211
00:10:58,400 --> 00:11:01,640
Speaker 3: We might look at companies that have that sort of

212
00:11:01,679 --> 00:11:04,280
Speaker 3: an executive authority that you might want to think about.

213
00:11:04,320 --> 00:11:06,720
Speaker 3: And then we talk about that with portfolio managers, and

214
00:11:06,760 --> 00:11:09,480
Speaker 3: there's baskets that we have we trade on Bloomberg with

215
00:11:09,520 --> 00:11:12,199
Speaker 3: clients based on those two characteristics.

216
00:11:12,400 --> 00:11:13,800
Speaker 1: All right, so it sounds like you have a lot

217
00:11:13,840 --> 00:11:15,520
Speaker 1: to keep an eye on we all do, and we

218
00:11:15,640 --> 00:11:17,920
Speaker 1: really appreciate you taking the time today to walk through

219
00:11:17,960 --> 00:11:20,640
Speaker 1: that call heard around the world that is gold min Sachs,

220
00:11:20,720 --> 00:11:22,520
Speaker 1: chief US equity strategist