WEBVTT - Possible Trump Indictment with Matt Whitaker

0:00:00.040 --> 0:00:03.560
<v Speaker 1>We are awaiting the possibility of a Trump indictment. It

0:00:03.600 --> 0:00:07.160
<v Speaker 1>would be the first criminal case filed against a former president,

0:00:07.400 --> 0:00:10.760
<v Speaker 1>unprecedented in American history, and it all hinges on the

0:00:10.760 --> 0:00:14.040
<v Speaker 1>alleged falsification of business records for one hundred and thirty

0:00:14.080 --> 0:00:17.319
<v Speaker 1>thousand dollars payment to Stormy Daniels. We've heard from people

0:00:17.360 --> 0:00:20.600
<v Speaker 1>like Nancy Pelosi and people on the left and they say, oh, well,

0:00:20.640 --> 0:00:23.680
<v Speaker 1>Donald Trump's not above the law. Well, sure, you know,

0:00:23.760 --> 0:00:25.920
<v Speaker 1>I'd agree with that. No one's above the law, but

0:00:25.920 --> 0:00:28.520
<v Speaker 1>he's also not below it. He's not the first person

0:00:28.560 --> 0:00:31.240
<v Speaker 1>in America to pay someone off with an NDA, and

0:00:31.280 --> 0:00:33.440
<v Speaker 1>he's certainly not going to be the last. We all

0:00:33.479 --> 0:00:36.080
<v Speaker 1>know why they're doing this. They look at Trump as

0:00:36.120 --> 0:00:38.879
<v Speaker 1>a trophy and they're willing to burn down the country

0:00:38.960 --> 0:00:40.800
<v Speaker 1>and the rule of law to try to get him.

0:00:41.000 --> 0:00:43.919
<v Speaker 1>They've been pursuing this switch hunt from Donald Trump from

0:00:43.920 --> 0:00:47.240
<v Speaker 1>the day that he announced his candidacy for presidency. They'll

0:00:47.240 --> 0:00:49.320
<v Speaker 1>stop at nothing to try to get him. I mean,

0:00:49.360 --> 0:00:51.680
<v Speaker 1>I don't have any faith in government anymore, do you.

0:00:51.920 --> 0:00:55.240
<v Speaker 1>They've corrupted the Department of Justice, They've corrupted the FBI.

0:00:55.840 --> 0:00:58.000
<v Speaker 1>I don't believe there's an eco application of the law

0:00:58.000 --> 0:01:01.200
<v Speaker 1>in this country, certainly not out of the Manhattan DA's

0:01:01.280 --> 0:01:04.560
<v Speaker 1>office in New York City. We'll talk to former Acting

0:01:04.720 --> 0:01:08.480
<v Speaker 1>Attorney General Matt Whittaker, he was the acting Attorney General

0:01:08.520 --> 0:01:11.360
<v Speaker 1>under President Trump about all of this, what he thinks

0:01:11.440 --> 0:01:14.160
<v Speaker 1>about the case. We'll get into the details of the case,

0:01:14.200 --> 0:01:16.480
<v Speaker 1>what you need to know about it, and also what

0:01:16.520 --> 0:01:19.000
<v Speaker 1>does this all mean for both former President Trump but

0:01:19.000 --> 0:01:22.120
<v Speaker 1>also the country moving forward. What sort of precedent does

0:01:22.160 --> 0:01:24.839
<v Speaker 1>this set in America? So stay tuned. You're not gonna

0:01:24.840 --> 0:01:32.720
<v Speaker 1>want to miss this conversation with Matt Whittaker. Matt Whittaker,

0:01:32.720 --> 0:01:34.800
<v Speaker 1>it's been a while since we've caught up. I wish

0:01:34.800 --> 0:01:38.199
<v Speaker 1>I was under a different circumstances than this clown show

0:01:38.440 --> 0:01:41.120
<v Speaker 1>that we're going to be talking about here. Well, yes,

0:01:41.240 --> 0:01:44.360
<v Speaker 1>I agree. You know, typically people called me on their

0:01:44.360 --> 0:01:47.840
<v Speaker 1>worst possible days, and so you know, obviously you're not

0:01:47.920 --> 0:01:51.800
<v Speaker 1>calling for legal advice, so that's good. But yeah, it's

0:01:52.560 --> 0:01:55.120
<v Speaker 1>you know, what's going on right now with Donald Trump

0:01:55.160 --> 0:01:59.160
<v Speaker 1>and the Manhattan DA is unprecedented and it's a little crazy.

0:01:59.160 --> 0:02:02.120
<v Speaker 1>I'm sure most people listening are just shaking their heads.

0:02:02.520 --> 0:02:06.000
<v Speaker 1>We're awaiting this possible indictment. This is the first criminal

0:02:06.040 --> 0:02:08.799
<v Speaker 1>case that would be filed against a former president. Are

0:02:08.840 --> 0:02:11.200
<v Speaker 1>they going to do it? The inner workings of a

0:02:11.200 --> 0:02:15.079
<v Speaker 1>grand jury are very interesting. You know, we had Michael

0:02:15.120 --> 0:02:19.440
<v Speaker 1>Cohen's former lawyer who went in on Monday and I

0:02:19.480 --> 0:02:24.760
<v Speaker 1>think maybe gave the prosecutor and his team a little

0:02:24.760 --> 0:02:27.760
<v Speaker 1>bit of pause. I mean, you know, you ultimately you

0:02:27.840 --> 0:02:31.120
<v Speaker 1>have to get a supermajority of the grand jury to

0:02:31.360 --> 0:02:35.440
<v Speaker 1>vote for the indictment, and your star witness is a

0:02:35.480 --> 0:02:39.560
<v Speaker 1>convicted felon and somebody whose whole goal in life is to,

0:02:40.280 --> 0:02:43.040
<v Speaker 1>you know, get Donald Trump and to punish Donald Trump.

0:02:43.360 --> 0:02:45.320
<v Speaker 1>I just don't think that makes a very attractive case,

0:02:45.360 --> 0:02:47.640
<v Speaker 1>certainly to a trial jury, but I think even to

0:02:47.680 --> 0:02:51.240
<v Speaker 1>a grand jury. If I'm you know, a citizen of

0:02:51.320 --> 0:02:54.160
<v Speaker 1>this country and I'm looking at this fact pattern, and

0:02:54.200 --> 0:02:56.640
<v Speaker 1>I'm looking at all the legal jumps which we'll talk

0:02:56.680 --> 0:02:58.520
<v Speaker 1>about in a little bit that they're going to have

0:02:58.560 --> 0:03:02.200
<v Speaker 1>to make to make this case, I'm not sure there's

0:03:02.240 --> 0:03:06.200
<v Speaker 1>a choice Lisa, that you know you have. Either what

0:03:06.440 --> 0:03:08.400
<v Speaker 1>they can voting you to vote a true bill on

0:03:08.440 --> 0:03:11.200
<v Speaker 1>the indictment, which means they vote to approve the indictment,

0:03:11.240 --> 0:03:14.200
<v Speaker 1>and the process moves forward or they can no billet.

0:03:14.320 --> 0:03:17.240
<v Speaker 1>And it's very rare for a grand jury to no

0:03:17.480 --> 0:03:20.800
<v Speaker 1>bill an indictment presented to them by a prosecutor. But

0:03:20.880 --> 0:03:25.760
<v Speaker 1>it happens, and and and it shows that they're actually engaged.

0:03:25.800 --> 0:03:28.080
<v Speaker 1>I mean, it's often been said that a grand jury

0:03:28.080 --> 0:03:31.679
<v Speaker 1>wouldn't diet a ham sandwich. And I don't necessarily agree

0:03:31.760 --> 0:03:33.960
<v Speaker 1>with that extreme a case, but it's a very low bar.

0:03:34.040 --> 0:03:37.640
<v Speaker 1>It's probable cause standard, not what you know, again we'll

0:03:37.680 --> 0:03:39.960
<v Speaker 1>talk about later. The trial jury is gonna have to

0:03:40.000 --> 0:03:43.200
<v Speaker 1>consider which is a beyond a reasonable doubt standard. So

0:03:44.040 --> 0:03:47.800
<v Speaker 1>I think it's going to be a close call even

0:03:47.800 --> 0:03:51.480
<v Speaker 1>to get an indictment tomorrow. And if they do get

0:03:51.520 --> 0:03:53.520
<v Speaker 1>an indictment, I mean it's going to be it's going

0:03:53.600 --> 0:03:56.120
<v Speaker 1>to be complete and utter chaos for a while. You know.

0:03:56.200 --> 0:03:59.080
<v Speaker 1>And we're talking about a grand jury in New York City,

0:03:59.400 --> 0:04:02.200
<v Speaker 1>a liberal city. So what does that kind of grand

0:04:02.280 --> 0:04:04.760
<v Speaker 1>jury look like. Well, it's going to look like the

0:04:04.880 --> 0:04:07.520
<v Speaker 1>citizens of New York City, citizens of Manhattan. So it's

0:04:07.520 --> 0:04:09.760
<v Speaker 1>going to skew left. You know, a lot of them

0:04:09.760 --> 0:04:12.720
<v Speaker 1>are not, you know, big fans of Donald Trump. But

0:04:12.880 --> 0:04:14.720
<v Speaker 1>I hope we at least that we're not in a

0:04:14.800 --> 0:04:19.320
<v Speaker 1>situation in our country where people just like lose their

0:04:19.520 --> 0:04:22.839
<v Speaker 1>reason and common sense. You know, when I give closings

0:04:22.880 --> 0:04:27.000
<v Speaker 1>at trials, I always talk to the jury about just

0:04:27.120 --> 0:04:29.039
<v Speaker 1>you know, that they did not check their reason and

0:04:29.080 --> 0:04:32.080
<v Speaker 1>common sense at the door. And I think these grand juries,

0:04:32.080 --> 0:04:34.520
<v Speaker 1>certainly the grand jurors can certainly use their reason and

0:04:34.560 --> 0:04:38.440
<v Speaker 1>common sense to look at the facts and decide whether

0:04:38.880 --> 0:04:41.080
<v Speaker 1>they think that's a crime. I think there's a lot

0:04:41.120 --> 0:04:43.720
<v Speaker 1>of people that don't think it's a crime. Certainly, a

0:04:43.760 --> 0:04:46.640
<v Speaker 1>lot of people that don't think it's a felony. You know,

0:04:47.120 --> 0:04:50.760
<v Speaker 1>whether or not he altered a business record, you know,

0:04:50.880 --> 0:04:53.680
<v Speaker 1>that's a misdemeanor under New York law. And I don't

0:04:53.720 --> 0:04:56.680
<v Speaker 1>see that the elevated the way they're trying to elevate

0:04:56.720 --> 0:04:59.640
<v Speaker 1>this to a felony is going to be successful to me. Ultimately,

0:04:59.760 --> 0:05:01.800
<v Speaker 1>we can we can get it in that as well. Yeah,

0:05:02.000 --> 0:05:03.840
<v Speaker 1>you know, of course, the allegation is that there was

0:05:03.880 --> 0:05:06.719
<v Speaker 1>a falsification of business records for this one hundred and

0:05:06.720 --> 0:05:11.120
<v Speaker 1>thirty thousand dollars payment to Stormy Daniels. From your legal perspective,

0:05:11.400 --> 0:05:13.880
<v Speaker 1>does it look like a crime was committed here? Yeah,

0:05:13.960 --> 0:05:16.039
<v Speaker 1>I mean, that's that's a great question. I mean, you

0:05:16.080 --> 0:05:19.280
<v Speaker 1>know sort of these these you know that that's going

0:05:19.320 --> 0:05:21.520
<v Speaker 1>to be a question that the jury is going to

0:05:21.600 --> 0:05:23.840
<v Speaker 1>have to wrestle with if it goes to trial, and

0:05:23.880 --> 0:05:25.640
<v Speaker 1>that that an appellate court is going to have to

0:05:25.680 --> 0:05:28.080
<v Speaker 1>decide what the law is on that is, you know,

0:05:28.080 --> 0:05:32.480
<v Speaker 1>it is characterizing something as a legal fee, um, you know,

0:05:32.520 --> 0:05:35.840
<v Speaker 1>the same as a you know, as a settlement expense.

0:05:35.920 --> 0:05:37.440
<v Speaker 1>You know, I think that's a I think that's probably

0:05:37.440 --> 0:05:39.960
<v Speaker 1>a closer call than a lot of people maybe originally

0:05:40.000 --> 0:05:43.320
<v Speaker 1>would think until they kind of consider it, um, you

0:05:43.360 --> 0:05:45.719
<v Speaker 1>know what this was for, you know, I mean, and

0:05:45.760 --> 0:05:47.839
<v Speaker 1>then you know, what they're really trying to say is

0:05:47.880 --> 0:05:50.960
<v Speaker 1>that it was a campaign expense. And I can tell

0:05:51.000 --> 0:05:53.680
<v Speaker 1>you that, you know, while I was acting Attorney General,

0:05:53.920 --> 0:05:56.480
<v Speaker 1>the Southern District in New York looked at this fack pattern.

0:05:56.520 --> 0:05:59.440
<v Speaker 1>It's the exact same back pattern on the idea of

0:05:59.480 --> 0:06:03.840
<v Speaker 1>a campaign finance violation, and they determined that it wasn't

0:06:03.880 --> 0:06:05.960
<v Speaker 1>a campaign finance violation. I'll tell you why. I think

0:06:05.960 --> 0:06:08.440
<v Speaker 1>it's you know, it's a really interesting question. First, a

0:06:08.440 --> 0:06:10.800
<v Speaker 1>little history. You know, they they tried to do this,

0:06:11.000 --> 0:06:15.160
<v Speaker 1>you know, remember John Edwards paid you know, his UM

0:06:17.000 --> 0:06:19.560
<v Speaker 1>fair a fair partner if you will, on which call.

0:06:19.640 --> 0:06:25.080
<v Speaker 1>But it was also on his campaign a settlement out

0:06:25.080 --> 0:06:29.400
<v Speaker 1>of his campaign fund, not his personal funds. And DJ

0:06:29.560 --> 0:06:32.360
<v Speaker 1>prosecutor John Edwards, and John Edwards was acquitted at trial

0:06:33.120 --> 0:06:36.279
<v Speaker 1>UM and it was it was pretty clear from that

0:06:36.320 --> 0:06:39.000
<v Speaker 1>acquittal that you know, some of these things, you know,

0:06:39.000 --> 0:06:44.160
<v Speaker 1>a personal flash campaign expense, you know, might not rise

0:06:44.240 --> 0:06:46.760
<v Speaker 1>to that level of the campaign finance violation. But I

0:06:46.800 --> 0:06:50.000
<v Speaker 1>will tell you this, what really is is at the

0:06:50.080 --> 0:06:52.760
<v Speaker 1>heart of this issue is this is the idea of

0:06:52.760 --> 0:06:56.280
<v Speaker 1>a settlement agreement. Whether Donald Trump was intimate with Stormy Gans,

0:06:56.320 --> 0:07:00.760
<v Speaker 1>I believe President Trump I don't think he was. But

0:07:00.920 --> 0:07:03.440
<v Speaker 1>you know, either way, it doesn't matter for the for

0:07:03.680 --> 0:07:06.200
<v Speaker 1>the purposes of what I'm going to explain, and that

0:07:06.320 --> 0:07:09.720
<v Speaker 1>is is that certainly, in twenty sixteen, in the fall,

0:07:09.920 --> 0:07:14.480
<v Speaker 1>he was running for president, he was a candidate. Certainly,

0:07:14.560 --> 0:07:17.760
<v Speaker 1>a settlement to keep somebody quiet from speaking out, you know,

0:07:17.880 --> 0:07:21.240
<v Speaker 1>could be argued to, you know, have benefited his campaign,

0:07:21.520 --> 0:07:24.679
<v Speaker 1>but not everything that benefits your campaign is a campaign expense.

0:07:24.920 --> 0:07:27.040
<v Speaker 1>If you're a candidate and you go to lunch during

0:07:27.080 --> 0:07:29.720
<v Speaker 1>a campaign stop, and you pay for your own lunch.

0:07:29.760 --> 0:07:32.960
<v Speaker 1>That's certainly not a campaign violation. And so on the

0:07:32.960 --> 0:07:38.400
<v Speaker 1>other hand, you know, it's also a personal expense that

0:07:38.520 --> 0:07:41.960
<v Speaker 1>you know, because obviously it didn't just affect his campaign,

0:07:42.200 --> 0:07:44.560
<v Speaker 1>it affected his personal life. It affect his relationship with

0:07:44.600 --> 0:07:47.520
<v Speaker 1>his wife, relationship with his kids, a relationship with his business.

0:07:47.560 --> 0:07:50.480
<v Speaker 1>So this at best, it's a it's a it's a

0:07:50.560 --> 0:07:54.920
<v Speaker 1>combo personal and campaign expense, and under the law, that

0:07:54.960 --> 0:07:58.080
<v Speaker 1>doesn't make it a campaign expense and therefore a violation

0:07:58.080 --> 0:08:00.120
<v Speaker 1>of campaign finance law. And I can give you a

0:08:00.160 --> 0:08:02.800
<v Speaker 1>stronger argument, and that is that the Federal Election Commission

0:08:03.000 --> 0:08:05.120
<v Speaker 1>looked at this exact same fact pattern as well, in

0:08:05.160 --> 0:08:07.720
<v Speaker 1>addition to Southern District from New York, and they also

0:08:07.800 --> 0:08:11.680
<v Speaker 1>concluded that this was not a campaign finance violation. So

0:08:11.880 --> 0:08:14.680
<v Speaker 1>you know, in my mind, this is a very aggressive

0:08:14.760 --> 0:08:19.960
<v Speaker 1>and it takes this campaign finance violation, this felony to

0:08:20.040 --> 0:08:22.920
<v Speaker 1>get this what was otherwise a misdemeanor. We were talking about,

0:08:22.960 --> 0:08:26.520
<v Speaker 1>this qualtification of business records to be elevated to a felony.

0:08:26.520 --> 0:08:29.800
<v Speaker 1>And therefore, you know, actually do some you know, some

0:08:29.920 --> 0:08:35.560
<v Speaker 1>real meaningful you know, legal damage to you know, the

0:08:35.559 --> 0:08:38.680
<v Speaker 1>president well and campaign finance violations, you know, typically it

0:08:38.760 --> 0:08:40.679
<v Speaker 1>ends up in a fine. I mean New York City's

0:08:40.760 --> 0:08:44.680
<v Speaker 1>Mayor Eric Adams is currently facing likely fines for accepting

0:08:44.800 --> 0:08:49.480
<v Speaker 1>legal campaign contributions, improperly accounting for them, and then also

0:08:49.520 --> 0:08:53.840
<v Speaker 1>ignoring request for documentation by state election authorities. Certainly don't

0:08:53.880 --> 0:08:56.760
<v Speaker 1>think he's going to be facing a felony by Alvin Bragg.

0:08:56.920 --> 0:09:00.360
<v Speaker 1>And that's really where this thing gets really dubious is because,

0:09:00.559 --> 0:09:04.000
<v Speaker 1>let's stay on its face, it would potentially be a misdemeanor,

0:09:04.000 --> 0:09:06.640
<v Speaker 1>but the statute of limitations are up for a misdemeanor

0:09:06.760 --> 0:09:09.120
<v Speaker 1>on this particular case with Trump, So they're reaching for

0:09:09.160 --> 0:09:11.480
<v Speaker 1>a felony. And for that, I mean they must prove

0:09:11.480 --> 0:09:15.280
<v Speaker 1>beyond a reasonable doubt not only did he intend, you know, declare,

0:09:15.760 --> 0:09:18.080
<v Speaker 1>they have to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that he

0:09:18.120 --> 0:09:22.000
<v Speaker 1>intended by this falsification of records to conceal the commission

0:09:22.440 --> 0:09:26.200
<v Speaker 1>of another crime in the process, I mean a felony here.

0:09:26.440 --> 0:09:29.319
<v Speaker 1>I'm not an attorney, you are, but just from a

0:09:29.320 --> 0:09:32.040
<v Speaker 1>common sense standpoint, seems like a reach on what they're

0:09:32.040 --> 0:09:34.480
<v Speaker 1>accusing him of. It is. And the other thing is,

0:09:34.559 --> 0:09:36.559
<v Speaker 1>you know, I'm not prone to what about is m

0:09:36.640 --> 0:09:39.679
<v Speaker 1>I don't think it really furthers the art argument very often,

0:09:39.720 --> 0:09:41.200
<v Speaker 1>but in this case it kind of. I do do

0:09:41.200 --> 0:09:43.319
<v Speaker 1>it sometimes I'm not going to, I know, but I

0:09:45.000 --> 0:09:50.199
<v Speaker 1>mean Hillary Clinton was fined for hiding the Fusion GPS

0:09:50.360 --> 0:09:54.440
<v Speaker 1>research in the Russian collusion, you know, the dossier as

0:09:54.480 --> 0:09:57.640
<v Speaker 1>as payments to a law firm, and certainly that's a

0:09:57.720 --> 0:09:59.920
<v Speaker 1>falsification of a business record. And you don't see album

0:10:00.080 --> 0:10:03.920
<v Speaker 1>Brag showing any interest in going after her for that crime,

0:10:04.360 --> 0:10:06.559
<v Speaker 1>you know. So, and then you know, we have this

0:10:06.600 --> 0:10:09.120
<v Speaker 1>whole statute of limitations issue as well. So you have

0:10:09.200 --> 0:10:11.880
<v Speaker 1>the felony issue that we're talking about right now, and

0:10:11.920 --> 0:10:14.480
<v Speaker 1>then you have a statute of limitations challenge that's going

0:10:14.520 --> 0:10:17.319
<v Speaker 1>to be very interesting how they contort themselves because the

0:10:17.360 --> 0:10:21.560
<v Speaker 1>alleged behavior happened seven years ago, and the statue limitations

0:10:21.559 --> 0:10:23.960
<v Speaker 1>for even a felony it's five years, misdemeanors two years.

0:10:23.960 --> 0:10:27.679
<v Speaker 1>That's clearly passed time wise, and so you know, I

0:10:27.679 --> 0:10:31.920
<v Speaker 1>think this case, as we break it down, just becomes

0:10:32.120 --> 0:10:37.160
<v Speaker 1>a huge leap to you know, and under the guise

0:10:37.200 --> 0:10:39.880
<v Speaker 1>of that, they were just wanted to target Donald Trump

0:10:39.920 --> 0:10:42.000
<v Speaker 1>and we're going to prosecute him no matter what, and

0:10:42.000 --> 0:10:44.320
<v Speaker 1>so you mentioned for the felony they're trying to say,

0:10:44.800 --> 0:10:47.600
<v Speaker 1>as my understanding is that because he's been outside of

0:10:47.640 --> 0:10:50.360
<v Speaker 1>the state of New York that somehow that like pauses

0:10:50.400 --> 0:10:53.840
<v Speaker 1>the statute of limitations for the felony charges. That correct.

0:10:54.320 --> 0:10:57.160
<v Speaker 1>I forget what the what it's exactly called. So my

0:10:57.280 --> 0:11:02.120
<v Speaker 1>actual understanding of their argument is that the payments to

0:11:02.160 --> 0:11:05.640
<v Speaker 1>Michael Cohen were over a couple of years, and that

0:11:05.720 --> 0:11:08.839
<v Speaker 1>they're barely within the last payment is within that five years.

0:11:09.679 --> 0:11:13.480
<v Speaker 1>I think that I haven't heard the extra jurisdictional argument.

0:11:13.559 --> 0:11:17.320
<v Speaker 1>Maybe there's one that's one as well. But I read

0:11:17.360 --> 0:11:21.240
<v Speaker 1>a nice piece by your colleague Andy MacArthur, or maybe

0:11:21.200 --> 0:11:23.480
<v Speaker 1>it was John Turley, one of them wrote kind of

0:11:23.480 --> 0:11:26.680
<v Speaker 1>a breakdown of sort of this idea of how to

0:11:26.720 --> 0:11:29.040
<v Speaker 1>get within the five years, and still believe that it

0:11:29.080 --> 0:11:32.800
<v Speaker 1>was a little, uh specul to try to get it

0:11:32.840 --> 0:11:35.000
<v Speaker 1>within that window of five years, because I thought I

0:11:35.040 --> 0:11:37.600
<v Speaker 1>was reading an article from him as well, and I

0:11:37.640 --> 0:11:39.600
<v Speaker 1>forget what it was called, but there's like a certain

0:11:39.640 --> 0:11:42.920
<v Speaker 1>word for it that they can But anyways, well you

0:11:42.920 --> 0:11:47.560
<v Speaker 1>can toll the states, right, Yes, I don't. I don't.

0:11:47.800 --> 0:11:50.960
<v Speaker 1>I just it's going to be a novel theory under

0:11:51.000 --> 0:11:53.280
<v Speaker 1>a New York law. I just I think it's I

0:11:53.280 --> 0:11:55.480
<v Speaker 1>don't you know, usually if you're just in another state,

0:11:55.600 --> 0:11:57.080
<v Speaker 1>that's not I mean, if you're out of the country,

0:11:57.080 --> 0:12:00.400
<v Speaker 1>I might pull but in another state, I don't, that's not.

0:12:00.440 --> 0:12:02.640
<v Speaker 1>I'm not familiar with that because but again, this is

0:12:02.640 --> 0:12:05.600
<v Speaker 1>they're going to use every aggressive technique to try to,

0:12:05.800 --> 0:12:08.319
<v Speaker 1>you know, prosecute Donald Trump. That's pretty clear to me

0:12:08.400 --> 0:12:10.080
<v Speaker 1>right now. But I mean it seems like even in

0:12:10.120 --> 0:12:13.240
<v Speaker 1>this conversation even trying to come up with what they

0:12:13.240 --> 0:12:15.680
<v Speaker 1>would possibly do, I mean, we're even reaching and trying

0:12:15.679 --> 0:12:17.840
<v Speaker 1>to figure out how they would reach. So it's like,

0:12:18.360 --> 0:12:21.200
<v Speaker 1>you know, and and and they have to get to

0:12:21.280 --> 0:12:24.000
<v Speaker 1>a point of beyond a reasonable doubt here, and so

0:12:24.080 --> 0:12:26.640
<v Speaker 1>I just feel like if we're even having a you know,

0:12:26.720 --> 0:12:29.800
<v Speaker 1>trouble trying to figure out, you know, how they're reaching,

0:12:30.760 --> 0:12:33.839
<v Speaker 1>I mean, how do they reach that standard? I don't know.

0:12:34.600 --> 0:12:38.720
<v Speaker 1>This is I've I've found myself in trying to explain

0:12:38.880 --> 0:12:43.200
<v Speaker 1>this whole situation several times just resorting to the I

0:12:43.200 --> 0:12:46.000
<v Speaker 1>don't know, because it doesn't make any sense. It's unprecedented.

0:12:46.040 --> 0:12:49.560
<v Speaker 1>So we're you know, we're in brand new uncharted territory.

0:12:49.640 --> 0:12:52.079
<v Speaker 1>At the same time, you know, some of these legal

0:12:52.120 --> 0:12:55.839
<v Speaker 1>theories and ideas that they're trying to use just don't

0:12:55.840 --> 0:12:58.000
<v Speaker 1>make any sense to me. And you know, again, I'm

0:12:58.040 --> 0:13:02.200
<v Speaker 1>used to where you bring a case because you not

0:13:02.200 --> 0:13:04.240
<v Speaker 1>only believe in the case, but it's it's one of

0:13:04.240 --> 0:13:09.079
<v Speaker 1>your priorities, it helps your community, and um, and it's

0:13:09.120 --> 0:13:12.160
<v Speaker 1>you're gonna you're you're certain of that you're gonna have

0:13:12.280 --> 0:13:15.679
<v Speaker 1>a really good chance of winning the case or getting

0:13:15.720 --> 0:13:19.839
<v Speaker 1>a plea. This seems like completely opposite of all those tenants. Um,

0:13:20.360 --> 0:13:23.600
<v Speaker 1>it's not going to help the citizens of Manhattan at all.

0:13:24.000 --> 0:13:27.600
<v Speaker 1>It's certainly not making their lives better. Uh, you know.

0:13:27.760 --> 0:13:31.080
<v Speaker 1>And at the same time, uh, it just does not

0:13:31.200 --> 0:13:34.560
<v Speaker 1>seem like that the chance of winning this case is

0:13:34.760 --> 0:13:36.960
<v Speaker 1>at best a coin flip. I think it's actually worse

0:13:36.960 --> 0:13:39.360
<v Speaker 1>than that. I think the probability is probably less than

0:13:39.360 --> 0:13:42.160
<v Speaker 1>twenty percent that they can actually get this to a conviction,

0:13:42.480 --> 0:13:50.040
<v Speaker 1>conviction that'll stick quick commercial break more with Matt Whittaker. Here,

0:13:50.120 --> 0:13:52.880
<v Speaker 1>people like Nancy Pelosi and the left and they say, oh, well,

0:13:52.920 --> 0:13:55.040
<v Speaker 1>you know, Trump isn't above the law. You know, sure,

0:13:55.480 --> 0:13:58.080
<v Speaker 1>I agree that no one's above the law, but I

0:13:58.080 --> 0:14:01.439
<v Speaker 1>agree with that below it either you know, and he's

0:14:01.800 --> 0:14:04.320
<v Speaker 1>he's not below the equal application of the law. And

0:14:04.400 --> 0:14:06.439
<v Speaker 1>it's hard to imagine that this is if this was

0:14:06.520 --> 0:14:10.240
<v Speaker 1>just you know, any other person, even any other political candidate,

0:14:10.920 --> 0:14:13.400
<v Speaker 1>that they would be trying to reach for a felony

0:14:13.520 --> 0:14:16.760
<v Speaker 1>or even trying to potentially indict that individual on this.

0:14:17.320 --> 0:14:20.960
<v Speaker 1>I completely agree with you. I think this is may

0:14:21.280 --> 0:14:23.880
<v Speaker 1>cause I know something. There's instant speculation that this would

0:14:23.920 --> 0:14:27.080
<v Speaker 1>cause a quote unquote war, but you're going to see.

0:14:27.880 --> 0:14:32.160
<v Speaker 1>I'm worried if this is successful, that there is going

0:14:32.160 --> 0:14:35.560
<v Speaker 1>to be a real desire or let's just say it,

0:14:35.640 --> 0:14:39.040
<v Speaker 1>for revenge for the right and their prosecutors to start

0:14:39.080 --> 0:14:41.000
<v Speaker 1>targeting the left. And I don't think that. I don't

0:14:41.000 --> 0:14:42.320
<v Speaker 1>think that should be done. I don't think it should

0:14:42.320 --> 0:14:43.920
<v Speaker 1>be done on either side. I don't think there should

0:14:43.920 --> 0:14:48.040
<v Speaker 1>be a targeting of individuals by the state. And that's

0:14:48.640 --> 0:14:52.360
<v Speaker 1>unfortunately what the Democrats appear to one. I mean, they

0:14:52.480 --> 0:14:57.920
<v Speaker 1>just continue to pursue this path, and I don't think

0:14:57.960 --> 0:14:59.720
<v Speaker 1>I don't think they're going to end with Donald Trump.

0:14:59.760 --> 0:15:03.160
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I just think all conservatives and it's certainly

0:15:03.160 --> 0:15:07.760
<v Speaker 1>all you know, high profile political office holders, and you know,

0:15:07.920 --> 0:15:11.480
<v Speaker 1>pundits are our fair game. And in this in Alvin

0:15:11.480 --> 0:15:16.000
<v Speaker 1>Braggs and George Soils and the liberal left worldview, and

0:15:16.200 --> 0:15:19.320
<v Speaker 1>you know, I guess to some extent, you know, it's

0:15:19.360 --> 0:15:21.640
<v Speaker 1>just like all other lawfare. It's just one of the

0:15:21.720 --> 0:15:25.200
<v Speaker 1>tools in the battle between the sides. But I just

0:15:25.360 --> 0:15:30.760
<v Speaker 1>it's it's when we make the political criminal, I think

0:15:30.760 --> 0:15:32.960
<v Speaker 1>we all lose. And I think our founding fathers will

0:15:33.000 --> 0:15:36.200
<v Speaker 1>be very concerned about what's happening right now. Well, and

0:15:36.600 --> 0:15:39.240
<v Speaker 1>what's worrisome too is I mean, look, the left looks

0:15:39.280 --> 0:15:41.920
<v Speaker 1>at Trump like a trophy. You know, they're all trying

0:15:41.960 --> 0:15:44.120
<v Speaker 1>to get that trophy to get up. But you know,

0:15:44.120 --> 0:15:47.280
<v Speaker 1>in the process, they've set the country on fire, you know,

0:15:47.360 --> 0:15:49.640
<v Speaker 1>I mean they've destroyed the rule of law. They've corrupted

0:15:49.680 --> 0:15:53.440
<v Speaker 1>the FBI, they've corrupted the Department of Justice. Americans have

0:15:53.520 --> 0:15:56.120
<v Speaker 1>no faith in institutions or a government anymore. So in

0:15:56.200 --> 0:15:59.600
<v Speaker 1>the process of trying to get Donald Trump since twenty sixteen,

0:15:59.720 --> 0:16:02.480
<v Speaker 1>they've destroyed the country. And the process isn't that what

0:16:02.560 --> 0:16:05.080
<v Speaker 1>marks us to do? Ultimately? I mean, you know, they

0:16:05.160 --> 0:16:08.360
<v Speaker 1>undermine the institutions, and they you know, they they they're

0:16:08.360 --> 0:16:11.480
<v Speaker 1>always quick to you know, point the finger at those

0:16:11.480 --> 0:16:14.200
<v Speaker 1>of us on the right and suggest that somehow we're

0:16:14.320 --> 0:16:16.320
<v Speaker 1>we started or we did it. I mean, I don't

0:16:16.360 --> 0:16:19.240
<v Speaker 1>think I think trying to you know, sort of uh

0:16:19.560 --> 0:16:25.400
<v Speaker 1>dismantle the permanent uh, you know, bureaucratic state is actually

0:16:25.480 --> 0:16:28.200
<v Speaker 1>a good goal. Um. You know, I was, you know,

0:16:28.240 --> 0:16:30.800
<v Speaker 1>I don't think there's any reason we started shouldn't start

0:16:30.920 --> 0:16:34.120
<v Speaker 1>having serious discussions about moving the government out of Washington,

0:16:34.240 --> 0:16:37.800
<v Speaker 1>DC and into the states, you know, distributing the government

0:16:38.080 --> 0:16:43.840
<v Speaker 1>to the people instead of consolidating power within one national capital. Um.

0:16:44.920 --> 0:16:46.480
<v Speaker 1>I just you know, I just think I think we

0:16:46.560 --> 0:16:49.320
<v Speaker 1>I think we need to really roll up our sleeves

0:16:49.360 --> 0:16:53.640
<v Speaker 1>and and and rethink how we get back to these

0:16:53.800 --> 0:16:57.440
<v Speaker 1>basic and fundamental um tenets of our founding, you know,

0:16:57.440 --> 0:17:01.120
<v Speaker 1>our constitutional separation of powers, not only between the three

0:17:01.160 --> 0:17:03.880
<v Speaker 1>branches of federal government, between the between the federal government

0:17:03.880 --> 0:17:05.919
<v Speaker 1>and the states. And I think we also need to

0:17:05.960 --> 0:17:08.879
<v Speaker 1>look at how, you know, the rule of law. I

0:17:08.880 --> 0:17:12.639
<v Speaker 1>think we need to look at how we can make

0:17:12.720 --> 0:17:20.040
<v Speaker 1>these powerful positions that prosecutors have accountable. And especially when

0:17:20.040 --> 0:17:23.280
<v Speaker 1>you have these places like Manhattan where it's just one

0:17:23.359 --> 0:17:27.800
<v Speaker 1>party rule, it's it's destabilizing our country, and you know,

0:17:27.880 --> 0:17:30.199
<v Speaker 1>and it's also distracting our country at least. So this

0:17:30.240 --> 0:17:32.160
<v Speaker 1>is what I worry about. You know, we had massive

0:17:32.760 --> 0:17:38.000
<v Speaker 1>banking challenges, we have you know, serious national security challenges

0:17:38.400 --> 0:17:41.600
<v Speaker 1>China and Russia and North Korea. And you know, we

0:17:41.680 --> 0:17:45.960
<v Speaker 1>know that we have alliances with other countries that they're

0:17:46.040 --> 0:17:49.280
<v Speaker 1>begging us to engage and protect and work with them.

0:17:49.320 --> 0:17:53.720
<v Speaker 1>I'm thinking of Australia and Japan, India our prime examples

0:17:53.720 --> 0:17:58.160
<v Speaker 1>of that. The world is not a safe place, and

0:17:58.600 --> 0:18:01.320
<v Speaker 1>you know, the United States has to lead and right now,

0:18:02.200 --> 0:18:04.560
<v Speaker 1>Joe Biden and the Democrats it's a clown show and

0:18:04.720 --> 0:18:07.120
<v Speaker 1>all they want to do is prosecute Donald Trump. It's

0:18:07.160 --> 0:18:09.439
<v Speaker 1>it's really sad well, and in part that might be

0:18:09.480 --> 0:18:12.120
<v Speaker 1>why they're doing it, you know, as well, to try

0:18:12.160 --> 0:18:14.639
<v Speaker 1>to distract from the fact that you know, the country

0:18:14.720 --> 0:18:16.920
<v Speaker 1>is falling apart. And it seems right now to your point,

0:18:17.040 --> 0:18:20.560
<v Speaker 1>centralization a government that has taken place, has you know,

0:18:20.640 --> 0:18:23.240
<v Speaker 1>destroyed the country. You know what happens to a country

0:18:23.320 --> 0:18:26.119
<v Speaker 1>when you lose the rule of law, which is the

0:18:26.160 --> 0:18:29.360
<v Speaker 1>direction we're heading in in America right now. Yeah, I mean,

0:18:29.400 --> 0:18:32.040
<v Speaker 1>I think it's not good. I mean, because then it

0:18:32.080 --> 0:18:34.840
<v Speaker 1>becomes you know, essentially which you have in China, where

0:18:34.840 --> 0:18:38.919
<v Speaker 1>there's a there's a powerful elite that decide everything. You know,

0:18:38.960 --> 0:18:41.440
<v Speaker 1>they decide what the law is, they decide who the

0:18:41.640 --> 0:18:44.679
<v Speaker 1>law applies to, who the law doesn't apply to, and

0:18:44.720 --> 0:18:48.080
<v Speaker 1>then there's a you know, obviously a consolidation of power

0:18:49.240 --> 0:18:54.560
<v Speaker 1>and um and wealth among those people in control. It's

0:18:54.600 --> 0:18:56.480
<v Speaker 1>not it's not good, but you know, this is what

0:18:56.880 --> 0:18:59.159
<v Speaker 1>you know. Democrats would always love to take other people's

0:18:59.160 --> 0:19:02.159
<v Speaker 1>money and you know, and and pretend like they you know,

0:19:02.200 --> 0:19:04.200
<v Speaker 1>they're wealthy, well, and that's the thing, and they push

0:19:04.280 --> 0:19:06.800
<v Speaker 1>things like you know, socialism, but you know, all that

0:19:06.840 --> 0:19:10.040
<v Speaker 1>really does is empower the elite. So if you're Bernie

0:19:10.040 --> 0:19:12.359
<v Speaker 1>Stander or you're you're fine, you're part of the ruling class.

0:19:12.359 --> 0:19:15.439
<v Speaker 1>It's everyone else that gets screwed. Let's say that this

0:19:15.440 --> 0:19:18.600
<v Speaker 1>this goes down. You know, Trump is indicted. What sort

0:19:18.640 --> 0:19:21.280
<v Speaker 1>of legal recourse does he have and all of this

0:19:21.560 --> 0:19:24.120
<v Speaker 1>to try to continue to fight it? What's the process there?

0:19:24.440 --> 0:19:27.000
<v Speaker 1>Knowing Donald Trump as I know him, he's going to

0:19:27.040 --> 0:19:30.440
<v Speaker 1>fight with everything he has. I hope he's got a

0:19:30.440 --> 0:19:32.520
<v Speaker 1>good team of lawyers. I know some of them. I

0:19:32.520 --> 0:19:35.000
<v Speaker 1>don't know all of them, um, but you know there's

0:19:35.000 --> 0:19:37.399
<v Speaker 1>going to be a lot of motions. If he's dined,

0:19:37.440 --> 0:19:39.720
<v Speaker 1>there's gonna be a lot of emotions, um. And those

0:19:39.840 --> 0:19:43.800
<v Speaker 1>motions if they're denied or could be appealed depending on

0:19:44.480 --> 0:19:46.960
<v Speaker 1>what you know, what the characterization is. And then you

0:19:47.000 --> 0:19:51.320
<v Speaker 1>know there's obviously potentially federal appeals that could be done,

0:19:51.400 --> 0:19:54.959
<v Speaker 1>especially in this campaign finance area we were discussing earlier.

0:19:54.960 --> 0:19:56.439
<v Speaker 1>And so there's there's going to be a lot of

0:19:56.440 --> 0:19:58.840
<v Speaker 1>twists and turns to this and a lot of opportunities

0:19:58.880 --> 0:20:00.600
<v Speaker 1>for us to talk about Elisa. So they look forward

0:20:00.600 --> 0:20:02.680
<v Speaker 1>to come back on the future. It seems like it's

0:20:03.200 --> 0:20:06.280
<v Speaker 1>potentially inevitable. But you know, and also I think what

0:20:06.359 --> 0:20:08.520
<v Speaker 1>are the concerns too, is you know, they've tried to

0:20:08.960 --> 0:20:11.880
<v Speaker 1>make working for Trump so toxic. Can he get great

0:20:11.960 --> 0:20:15.520
<v Speaker 1>legal help right now? Yeah? I mean certainly, I think

0:20:15.560 --> 0:20:18.480
<v Speaker 1>that has been a challenge for him, is to find

0:20:18.600 --> 0:20:22.440
<v Speaker 1>really good people that you know, are willing to I guess,

0:20:22.720 --> 0:20:27.159
<v Speaker 1>you know, put everything on the line to defend the

0:20:27.240 --> 0:20:28.720
<v Speaker 1>rule of law. But I think, you know, again, I

0:20:28.760 --> 0:20:31.719
<v Speaker 1>think the guy certainly working on the Special Council's investigation

0:20:32.160 --> 0:20:34.040
<v Speaker 1>is a great lawyer, and I think there will be others,

0:20:34.119 --> 0:20:36.399
<v Speaker 1>and there's plenty of you know, good lawyers in New

0:20:36.480 --> 0:20:38.760
<v Speaker 1>York City that could help him on this case. And

0:20:38.800 --> 0:20:40.520
<v Speaker 1>so I think you'll find I think you'll find the

0:20:40.640 --> 0:20:43.640
<v Speaker 1>right person. But his you know, his fighting spirit is indomitable,

0:20:43.680 --> 0:20:46.280
<v Speaker 1>and so I think that you know, that will be um,

0:20:46.960 --> 0:20:48.679
<v Speaker 1>that will be good in the long term. If he

0:20:48.800 --> 0:20:51.240
<v Speaker 1>is indicted, what are the next steps then that he

0:20:51.240 --> 0:20:54.800
<v Speaker 1>would be facing in the process. Well, so if he's indicted,

0:20:54.840 --> 0:21:00.439
<v Speaker 1>the next steps are a restaurant will be issued or

0:21:00.480 --> 0:21:03.520
<v Speaker 1>a notice to appear. Um, you know, if Alvin Bragg

0:21:03.640 --> 0:21:05.760
<v Speaker 1>has any class, you will just give them a notice

0:21:05.760 --> 0:21:08.760
<v Speaker 1>to appear. There will then be you know, the initial

0:21:08.800 --> 0:21:13.439
<v Speaker 1>parents the processing, which involves mugshot, fingerprinting and the like,

0:21:13.760 --> 0:21:17.080
<v Speaker 1>and then there will be a trial schedule set and

0:21:17.200 --> 0:21:21.320
<v Speaker 1>a discovery order that's put in place to for the

0:21:21.359 --> 0:21:23.399
<v Speaker 1>governments from overall the evidence that they have in their

0:21:23.440 --> 0:21:28.320
<v Speaker 1>possession and all exam exculpatory evidence as well, and then

0:21:29.200 --> 0:21:31.280
<v Speaker 1>you know, we just had to trial. You know, I

0:21:31.280 --> 0:21:33.000
<v Speaker 1>think there'll be a lot of motions, like I said,

0:21:33.040 --> 0:21:35.400
<v Speaker 1>a lot of appeals in the middle of all that,

0:21:35.480 --> 0:21:37.840
<v Speaker 1>and then ultimately we'll go, you know there'll be a

0:21:37.880 --> 0:21:40.200
<v Speaker 1>plea or a trial. I don't expect that this will

0:21:40.200 --> 0:21:43.600
<v Speaker 1>be a plea um, but you know, again, we'll just

0:21:43.960 --> 0:21:48.800
<v Speaker 1>each each moment provides just a really interesting, unprecedented moment

0:21:48.800 --> 0:21:52.119
<v Speaker 1>in American history that will tell our children, our grandchildren about.

0:21:52.400 --> 0:21:54.480
<v Speaker 1>It's just, you know, it just I don't know, it

0:21:54.480 --> 0:21:57.000
<v Speaker 1>doesn't even feel like America anymore. It's just it's really

0:21:57.040 --> 0:21:59.919
<v Speaker 1>sad to see all this happened. It just feels like

0:22:00.040 --> 0:22:03.399
<v Speaker 1>where our country's almost lost. Matt Whittaker. Liberty Andjustice with

0:22:03.440 --> 0:22:05.720
<v Speaker 1>Matt Whittaker is your podcast? Is there anything you'd like

0:22:05.760 --> 0:22:08.520
<v Speaker 1>to leave us with before we go? Everybody needs to

0:22:08.520 --> 0:22:11.760
<v Speaker 1>participate in our republic. We can just all stand by

0:22:11.800 --> 0:22:14.119
<v Speaker 1>the sidelines. We need to all find a way to

0:22:14.119 --> 0:22:16.840
<v Speaker 1>get involved, no matter in your political persuasion at all.

0:22:16.880 --> 0:22:20.600
<v Speaker 1>I just think we all need to participate in civic life.

0:22:20.720 --> 0:22:22.919
<v Speaker 1>And I think that's what our founding fathers expected, and

0:22:22.920 --> 0:22:24.199
<v Speaker 1>I think we all need to live up to that

0:22:24.240 --> 0:22:26.159
<v Speaker 1>in our own way. Well, I appreciate it, Matt. I

0:22:26.160 --> 0:22:28.480
<v Speaker 1>know you're a busy guy. Everyone wants to talk to you.

0:22:28.520 --> 0:22:30.760
<v Speaker 1>I appreciate you taking the time to come on the show.

0:22:30.960 --> 0:22:32.960
<v Speaker 1>Hope to catch up with you, Sue, and under better

0:22:32.960 --> 0:22:35.680
<v Speaker 1>circumstances my pleasure least look forward to talking to you soon.

0:22:41.160 --> 0:22:44.480
<v Speaker 1>So that was Matt Whittaker, a former acting Attorney General

0:22:44.720 --> 0:22:48.840
<v Speaker 1>under our former President Donald Trump. You know, tough conversation, right,

0:22:49.000 --> 0:22:52.560
<v Speaker 1>This is some depressing stuff, but it's happening, so you know,

0:22:52.600 --> 0:22:53.919
<v Speaker 1>we got to talk about it and we have to

0:22:53.960 --> 0:22:56.320
<v Speaker 1>cover it. I appreciate you guys for listening to the

0:22:56.359 --> 0:22:59.040
<v Speaker 1>show every Monday and Thursday, but you can listen throughout

0:22:59.040 --> 0:23:00.480
<v Speaker 1>the week. I want to thank John and cast you On,

0:23:00.560 --> 0:23:03.199
<v Speaker 1>my producer, for putting it together. Please leave us a

0:23:03.200 --> 0:23:06.320
<v Speaker 1>review on Apple podcasts, leave us a rating, a review,

0:23:06.480 --> 0:23:08.760
<v Speaker 1>ways of love reading those until next time. Thanks so

0:23:08.840 --> 0:23:09.480
<v Speaker 1>much for listening.