WEBVTT - Trump Attacks FBI Raid on Michael Cohen's Law Office

0:00:03.480 --> 0:00:07.560
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to the Bloomberg Law Podcast. I'm June Grosso. Every

0:00:07.640 --> 0:00:10.440
<v Speaker 1>day we bring you insight and analysis into the most

0:00:10.480 --> 0:00:13.440
<v Speaker 1>important legal news of the day. You can find more

0:00:13.480 --> 0:00:18.040
<v Speaker 1>episodes of the Bloomberg Law Podcast on Apple Podcasts, SoundCloud

0:00:18.320 --> 0:00:22.640
<v Speaker 1>and on Bloomberg dot com, Slash Podcasts, and FBI rate

0:00:22.680 --> 0:00:25.640
<v Speaker 1>on his personal lawyer's office. Cut close to home for

0:00:25.720 --> 0:00:29.200
<v Speaker 1>Donald Trump, prompting an angry reaction from the President at

0:00:29.200 --> 0:00:34.240
<v Speaker 1>the White House last night at a meeting with military officials.

0:00:34.400 --> 0:00:37.559
<v Speaker 1>Why don't I just fire mother? Well, I think it's

0:00:37.600 --> 0:00:40.159
<v Speaker 1>a disgrace what's going on. We'll see what happens, but

0:00:40.200 --> 0:00:42.920
<v Speaker 1>I think it's really a sad situation when you look

0:00:42.920 --> 0:00:45.600
<v Speaker 1>at what happened that many people have said you should

0:00:45.680 --> 0:00:49.120
<v Speaker 1>fire him. Joining me is Jimmy Garoula, a professor at

0:00:49.120 --> 0:00:53.040
<v Speaker 1>Notre Dame Law School. Jimmy, how big an escalation was

0:00:53.120 --> 0:00:57.840
<v Speaker 1>this raid for the Justice Department? Well, it's significant, there,

0:00:57.840 --> 0:00:59.960
<v Speaker 1>there's no question about it. And first of all, it's

0:01:00.120 --> 0:01:04.280
<v Speaker 1>very rare. It's quite unusual for the Department of Justice

0:01:04.319 --> 0:01:08.400
<v Speaker 1>to authorize the search warrant of an attorney who is

0:01:09.080 --> 0:01:13.000
<v Speaker 1>the legal representative of someone who is under investigation by

0:01:13.040 --> 0:01:16.399
<v Speaker 1>the Department of Justice. So again it's it's very rare.

0:01:16.920 --> 0:01:19.320
<v Speaker 1>It's rare, but this was done from what we know

0:01:19.560 --> 0:01:23.800
<v Speaker 1>by the book. Absolutely, there's no question about it. You know, first,

0:01:23.880 --> 0:01:27.520
<v Speaker 1>I think it speaks well of UH Special Counsel Mueller

0:01:27.640 --> 0:01:32.839
<v Speaker 1>because he apparently came across evidence of of a potential

0:01:33.000 --> 0:01:36.120
<v Speaker 1>crime and he believed that that and for that evidence

0:01:36.160 --> 0:01:39.240
<v Speaker 1>was outside of the scope of his mandate with respect

0:01:39.280 --> 0:01:43.120
<v Speaker 1>to investigating the Russia meddling in the two thousand and

0:01:43.160 --> 0:01:46.880
<v Speaker 1>sixteen election, and rather than investigating it himself, he brought

0:01:46.880 --> 0:01:50.160
<v Speaker 1>it to the attention of the Deputy Attorney General, Rod Rosenstein,

0:01:50.520 --> 0:01:52.960
<v Speaker 1>and it was Rod Rosenstein that referred the matter to

0:01:53.200 --> 0:01:56.640
<v Speaker 1>the U. S. Attorney's Office in in in Manhattan. So

0:01:56.680 --> 0:02:00.120
<v Speaker 1>it was actually the the federal prosecutors in Manhattan that

0:02:00.240 --> 0:02:06.040
<v Speaker 1>conducted the search warrant. Does this say anything about Mueller

0:02:06.200 --> 0:02:10.840
<v Speaker 1>making strategic moves to help preserve his investigation even if

0:02:10.919 --> 0:02:14.240
<v Speaker 1>Trump removes him. Might the U. S. Attorney in Manhattan

0:02:14.280 --> 0:02:17.720
<v Speaker 1>be involved? Now? Well, I think he's certainly very cognizant

0:02:17.919 --> 0:02:22.359
<v Speaker 1>of his credibility and preserving his credibility, and that whatever

0:02:22.400 --> 0:02:26.079
<v Speaker 1>he ultimately concludes, whether he decides that crimes have been

0:02:26.120 --> 0:02:29.959
<v Speaker 1>committed or crimes have not been committed. The public is

0:02:29.960 --> 0:02:31.600
<v Speaker 1>going to have to buy in on this, and that's

0:02:31.639 --> 0:02:35.080
<v Speaker 1>gonna turn in large part on whether or not he

0:02:35.160 --> 0:02:38.400
<v Speaker 1>has credibility with respect to the way that he's conducted

0:02:38.520 --> 0:02:41.560
<v Speaker 1>his his investigation. And I think this actually weighs in

0:02:41.639 --> 0:02:45.040
<v Speaker 1>favor of Mueller because it shows again that he's adhering

0:02:45.160 --> 0:02:49.200
<v Speaker 1>very closely to to his mandate, the formal authority that

0:02:49.240 --> 0:02:52.800
<v Speaker 1>he's been given, and he's not exceeding exceeding the bounds

0:02:52.919 --> 0:02:57.119
<v Speaker 1>of that authority. What does it tell you that Rod Rosenstein,

0:02:57.160 --> 0:03:00.720
<v Speaker 1>who has been under so much pressure for so long

0:03:01.280 --> 0:03:04.040
<v Speaker 1>from President Trump, and it seems as if, you know,

0:03:04.280 --> 0:03:06.520
<v Speaker 1>we talk about Mueller being dismissed, and in that we

0:03:06.560 --> 0:03:09.560
<v Speaker 1>always talk about Rod Rosenstein being dismissed. What does it

0:03:09.600 --> 0:03:12.040
<v Speaker 1>tell you that he said, Okay, we're gonna take this

0:03:12.160 --> 0:03:15.400
<v Speaker 1>and we're gonna send this to the Southern District. Well,

0:03:15.400 --> 0:03:18.359
<v Speaker 1>what it tells me is that is that he's a prosecutor,

0:03:18.520 --> 0:03:20.800
<v Speaker 1>that's that's adhering to the rule of law, and that

0:03:20.880 --> 0:03:26.680
<v Speaker 1>he's not he's not capitulating to political pressure. So, despite

0:03:26.800 --> 0:03:31.880
<v Speaker 1>the harsh criticisms by President Trump of Rosenstein, in in

0:03:31.880 --> 0:03:36.200
<v Speaker 1>in in the public forum, uh air publicly. Uh. He's

0:03:36.400 --> 0:03:38.840
<v Speaker 1>doing his job. And so if he believes that there's

0:03:38.880 --> 0:03:42.840
<v Speaker 1>evidence of a crime, then then he's investigating uh, that evidence,

0:03:42.960 --> 0:03:47.040
<v Speaker 1>rather than than cow towing to political pressure by the president,

0:03:47.120 --> 0:03:50.080
<v Speaker 1>and he shouldn't do that. So it seems as if,

0:03:50.320 --> 0:03:53.920
<v Speaker 1>as from everything we've said and learned, that this is

0:03:54.120 --> 0:03:59.200
<v Speaker 1>a separate investigation. But could there be information that is

0:03:59.280 --> 0:04:03.880
<v Speaker 1>found in the attorney's office that helps Moller. There's there's

0:04:03.920 --> 0:04:06.600
<v Speaker 1>no question about it. And so I think that President

0:04:06.640 --> 0:04:10.280
<v Speaker 1>Trump is vulnerable in two important ways. I mean, first

0:04:10.600 --> 0:04:14.640
<v Speaker 1>with respect to the the the now ongoing investigation out

0:04:14.640 --> 0:04:19.320
<v Speaker 1>of the Manhattan Prosecutor's office regarding Michael Cohen. Certainly, during

0:04:19.360 --> 0:04:23.520
<v Speaker 1>that investigation, they could uncover evidence that implicates that is

0:04:23.560 --> 0:04:27.560
<v Speaker 1>incriminating of the president. And that's not far fetched considering

0:04:27.600 --> 0:04:31.680
<v Speaker 1>the fact that that Cohen portrays himself, he's very proud

0:04:31.680 --> 0:04:34.440
<v Speaker 1>of the fact that he's the so called fixer for

0:04:34.480 --> 0:04:37.800
<v Speaker 1>the president in terms of fixing any problems that that

0:04:37.920 --> 0:04:41.400
<v Speaker 1>confront President Trump. And so certainly there could be information

0:04:41.480 --> 0:04:44.880
<v Speaker 1>discovered during that investigation that implicates the president. But perhaps

0:04:44.920 --> 0:04:48.679
<v Speaker 1>even more more dangerous in terms of exposing the president

0:04:48.839 --> 0:04:53.240
<v Speaker 1>even graver legal jeopardy. And that is the president's reaction

0:04:53.279 --> 0:04:56.080
<v Speaker 1>to all of this, because if he overreacts and he

0:04:56.160 --> 0:05:00.040
<v Speaker 1>fires Rosenstein, if he overreacts and he fires Mueller, and

0:05:00.080 --> 0:05:03.320
<v Speaker 1>then we've got the Saturday Night massacre situation being replayed

0:05:04.000 --> 0:05:08.919
<v Speaker 1>UH today and that could result potentially in impeachment efforts

0:05:08.920 --> 0:05:12.760
<v Speaker 1>against the president. Let's just discuss briefly a Saturday Night

0:05:12.800 --> 0:05:16.480
<v Speaker 1>masker situation. How many people would he have to fire?

0:05:17.080 --> 0:05:21.000
<v Speaker 1>Would you also have to fire the head of the FBI? Well,

0:05:21.080 --> 0:05:25.320
<v Speaker 1>he would start if he wants to get rid of Mueller. Again,

0:05:25.360 --> 0:05:30.560
<v Speaker 1>the Special Council Statute authorizes the Deputy Attorney General to

0:05:31.160 --> 0:05:36.120
<v Speaker 1>fire the Special Council forecause, and so that would be Rosenstein,

0:05:36.160 --> 0:05:38.760
<v Speaker 1>that would They would have that that authority. So if

0:05:38.880 --> 0:05:42.559
<v Speaker 1>Rosenstein refuses to do that, and then the president could

0:05:42.600 --> 0:05:46.080
<v Speaker 1>fire Rosenstein and then he would have to replace him.

0:05:46.240 --> 0:05:49.000
<v Speaker 1>And so the question would be who who would Rosenstein

0:05:49.080 --> 0:05:52.240
<v Speaker 1>be replaced? Rosenstein be replaced with and then he would

0:05:52.360 --> 0:05:54.479
<v Speaker 1>order the president would order that person to fire Mueller.

0:05:54.760 --> 0:05:57.080
<v Speaker 1>What if that person refuses to do so, and then

0:05:57.080 --> 0:06:00.760
<v Speaker 1>it could continue down the chain of command and in

0:06:00.880 --> 0:06:04.680
<v Speaker 1>that fashion, or maybe the other option would be for

0:06:04.720 --> 0:06:08.159
<v Speaker 1>the President to fire Sessions and then place uh, try

0:06:08.200 --> 0:06:10.320
<v Speaker 1>to get a new attorney general in place that wouldn't

0:06:10.320 --> 0:06:14.279
<v Speaker 1>be refused from the Russia investigation. But the problem with

0:06:14.360 --> 0:06:16.159
<v Speaker 1>that is is that it's going to be very difficult

0:06:16.200 --> 0:06:19.560
<v Speaker 1>I think if that occurs, if Sessions is fired, to

0:06:19.640 --> 0:06:22.680
<v Speaker 1>get a new to get the Senate to confirm a

0:06:22.720 --> 0:06:28.640
<v Speaker 1>new attorney general. And he did criticize Sessions yesterday as well,

0:06:28.680 --> 0:06:32.640
<v Speaker 1>and this his his feelings about Sessions seemed to seesaw

0:06:32.720 --> 0:06:34.800
<v Speaker 1>back and forth. But we're out of time. Jimmy, I

0:06:34.839 --> 0:06:37.760
<v Speaker 1>thank you so much for being on. That's Jimmy Garoule,

0:06:37.760 --> 0:06:44.960
<v Speaker 1>a professor at Notre Dame Law School. Buyer is inching

0:06:45.040 --> 0:06:49.120
<v Speaker 1>closer to completing a sixty six billion dollar acquisition of Monsanto.

0:06:49.480 --> 0:06:53.400
<v Speaker 1>The last major hurdle is approval from US anti trust regulators,

0:06:53.400 --> 0:06:55.839
<v Speaker 1>and Buyer is close to getting that. According to a

0:06:55.880 --> 0:06:58.640
<v Speaker 1>person familiar with the matter, Buyer has the green light

0:06:58.680 --> 0:07:01.440
<v Speaker 1>from almost two thirds of the jurisdictions it needs to

0:07:01.480 --> 0:07:04.280
<v Speaker 1>sign off on the biggest transaction yet and the seeds

0:07:04.320 --> 0:07:08.040
<v Speaker 1>and crop chemicals industry joining me. Is Bloomberg Intelligence, Your

0:07:08.080 --> 0:07:11.960
<v Speaker 1>litigation analyst Jennifer Read jen. This deal has been about

0:07:11.960 --> 0:07:15.240
<v Speaker 1>two years in the making. What have the Justice Department's

0:07:15.280 --> 0:07:18.680
<v Speaker 1>concerns been to slow it down? You know, first of all,

0:07:18.720 --> 0:07:20.960
<v Speaker 1>a lot of that time is just in the investigation

0:07:21.040 --> 0:07:24.080
<v Speaker 1>of these deals, because this is a really complex industry,

0:07:24.160 --> 0:07:26.280
<v Speaker 1>and they entered into this deal at a time when

0:07:26.280 --> 0:07:28.360
<v Speaker 1>there was a lot of consolidation. If you remember now

0:07:28.480 --> 0:07:30.360
<v Speaker 1>and do Pomp we're emerging in KEMP China and cent

0:07:30.440 --> 0:07:32.960
<v Speaker 1>Genta were emerging. So it really takes a lot of

0:07:33.000 --> 0:07:36.600
<v Speaker 1>time to weed through the issues. And these companies, in particular,

0:07:36.800 --> 0:07:41.480
<v Speaker 1>one Buyer is stronger in chemicals, agricultural chemicals, and Monsanto

0:07:41.600 --> 0:07:44.160
<v Speaker 1>stronger in agricultural seeds, and there are ways in which

0:07:44.200 --> 0:07:47.840
<v Speaker 1>these products work together and can be actually even tied

0:07:47.880 --> 0:07:50.280
<v Speaker 1>together in certain ways that I think that the Department

0:07:50.280 --> 0:07:53.240
<v Speaker 1>of Justice needed to ensure that whatever they did here

0:07:53.240 --> 0:07:56.440
<v Speaker 1>and whatever the remedy might be, would would fix any

0:07:56.560 --> 0:07:59.960
<v Speaker 1>issues that might allow these companies to sort of unlaw

0:08:00.000 --> 0:08:03.920
<v Speaker 1>off league tie these products together. So the Wall Street

0:08:04.000 --> 0:08:08.960
<v Speaker 1>Journal first reported on the possibility or the likelihood of

0:08:09.000 --> 0:08:13.240
<v Speaker 1>approval from the US antitrust regulators. What are some of

0:08:13.280 --> 0:08:15.720
<v Speaker 1>the agreements that seemed to be in place to move

0:08:15.800 --> 0:08:19.040
<v Speaker 1>the antitrust regulators to approve it. You know, there's a

0:08:19.080 --> 0:08:22.520
<v Speaker 1>lot happening here because the European regulators had already required

0:08:22.560 --> 0:08:25.880
<v Speaker 1>almost all of buyer's seed business to be divested, so

0:08:26.040 --> 0:08:28.880
<v Speaker 1>you know, pretty much practically eliminating that overlap. And I

0:08:28.880 --> 0:08:32.040
<v Speaker 1>believe there was also um some of their chemicals had

0:08:32.080 --> 0:08:34.960
<v Speaker 1>to get chemical agricultural chemicals needed to be divested too.

0:08:35.280 --> 0:08:38.520
<v Speaker 1>Now what the US said is look perhaps and down DuPont.

0:08:38.600 --> 0:08:41.520
<v Speaker 1>What European regulators required was also good enough for US

0:08:41.559 --> 0:08:43.920
<v Speaker 1>because this tends to be a global market. But in

0:08:43.920 --> 0:08:46.439
<v Speaker 1>this case, the competitive dynamic is a little different in

0:08:46.480 --> 0:08:49.920
<v Speaker 1>the US because we do allow genetically modified seeds, whereas

0:08:49.920 --> 0:08:52.280
<v Speaker 1>in a lot of countries in Europe these are not allowed.

0:08:52.320 --> 0:08:55.040
<v Speaker 1>So you've got a different dynamic there. And they needed

0:08:55.040 --> 0:08:58.160
<v Speaker 1>to ensure that they had everything covered. And it looks

0:08:58.200 --> 0:09:01.600
<v Speaker 1>like they are requiring the companies to sell more seed

0:09:01.679 --> 0:09:05.720
<v Speaker 1>and chemical assets, as well as possibly either sell or

0:09:05.840 --> 0:09:12.000
<v Speaker 1>licensed digital farming assets. The Justice Department, we know, as

0:09:12.040 --> 0:09:14.559
<v Speaker 1>we've talked about, the Justice Department is challenging the A

0:09:14.720 --> 0:09:17.040
<v Speaker 1>T and T time Warner merger and there's currently a

0:09:17.080 --> 0:09:20.400
<v Speaker 1>trial before a judge in d C. Can you tell

0:09:20.480 --> 0:09:24.840
<v Speaker 1>about the Trump administration's approach to antitrust From looking at

0:09:24.880 --> 0:09:27.720
<v Speaker 1>these two deals, you know, we're beginning to a little

0:09:27.720 --> 0:09:29.520
<v Speaker 1>bit and I think it's still early. But the thing

0:09:29.559 --> 0:09:33.599
<v Speaker 1>that's really interesting is that when UM President Trump was

0:09:33.640 --> 0:09:35.840
<v Speaker 1>elected and started thinking about who he might put in

0:09:35.880 --> 0:09:38.640
<v Speaker 1>place the Department of Justice, and the guy he put in,

0:09:38.920 --> 0:09:41.280
<v Speaker 1>Makondel Rahim to head up anti trust, was kind of

0:09:41.320 --> 0:09:44.360
<v Speaker 1>considered a Republican and a traditional Republican, and I think

0:09:44.360 --> 0:09:46.599
<v Speaker 1>a lot of people thought it might bring back a

0:09:46.720 --> 0:09:48.320
<v Speaker 1>time when it was a little bit more like what

0:09:48.480 --> 0:09:51.360
<v Speaker 1>enforcement was from mergers under George Bush, a little easier,

0:09:51.600 --> 0:09:54.320
<v Speaker 1>letting some of these deals go through UM where where

0:09:54.360 --> 0:09:57.040
<v Speaker 1>maybe the Democrats might not have And what we're seeing

0:09:57.160 --> 0:09:59.320
<v Speaker 1>is that that's not really the case. We're seeing tough

0:09:59.400 --> 0:10:02.360
<v Speaker 1>enforcement year with the obviously with respect to A T

0:10:02.480 --> 0:10:04.840
<v Speaker 1>and T they're suing to block, and with respect to

0:10:04.840 --> 0:10:08.400
<v Speaker 1>Buyern Monsanto, they're looking for some really major remedies here.

0:10:08.800 --> 0:10:11.680
<v Speaker 1>So what does that tell you about other mergers that

0:10:11.720 --> 0:10:16.560
<v Speaker 1>are currently pending. You mentioned Sinclair Tribune, Etna, CVS, Signa,

0:10:16.640 --> 0:10:19.600
<v Speaker 1>Express Scripts, Disney Fox. Well, I think that they're all

0:10:19.640 --> 0:10:21.560
<v Speaker 1>going to need to expect the same that they're not

0:10:21.640 --> 0:10:24.000
<v Speaker 1>just going to escape through um, you know on this

0:10:24.120 --> 0:10:27.080
<v Speaker 1>sort of uh you know less a fair attitude. That's

0:10:27.120 --> 0:10:29.760
<v Speaker 1>not going to be that. They're going to get scrutinized carefully.

0:10:29.760 --> 0:10:31.400
<v Speaker 1>They're going to have to and they're going to have

0:10:31.440 --> 0:10:35.040
<v Speaker 1>to remedy any possible harms and and it's not necessarily

0:10:35.040 --> 0:10:38.839
<v Speaker 1>going to be easy and it's not going to be behavioral. Well,

0:10:38.880 --> 0:10:41.200
<v Speaker 1>that's what it seems like now if they're in front

0:10:41.240 --> 0:10:43.560
<v Speaker 1>of the Department of Justice, it seems fairly clear the

0:10:43.559 --> 0:10:46.079
<v Speaker 1>behavioral remedies aren't going to be accepted. This was one

0:10:46.080 --> 0:10:48.360
<v Speaker 1>of the problems in the A T and T deal

0:10:48.480 --> 0:10:52.400
<v Speaker 1>and what they'll require something structural. However, that's not necessarily

0:10:52.440 --> 0:10:55.160
<v Speaker 1>the case, at least we don't know yet. Before the FTC,

0:10:55.800 --> 0:11:01.160
<v Speaker 1>the FTC has always preferred a structural remedy over behavioral remedy,

0:11:01.160 --> 0:11:04.000
<v Speaker 1>but they have accepted purely behavioral remedies in the past.

0:11:04.240 --> 0:11:06.439
<v Speaker 1>Now we're going to soon have an entirely new crop

0:11:06.480 --> 0:11:10.320
<v Speaker 1>of FTC commissioners coming in five actually that will come

0:11:10.320 --> 0:11:12.720
<v Speaker 1>in and the existing two will leave, and we'll see

0:11:12.760 --> 0:11:14.520
<v Speaker 1>what they have to say about this and what they'll

0:11:14.559 --> 0:11:17.439
<v Speaker 1>do going forward. You know, as you mentioned there's been

0:11:17.640 --> 0:11:22.080
<v Speaker 1>this wave of consolidation in seed and crop chemical firms

0:11:22.080 --> 0:11:26.239
<v Speaker 1>in the past three years. So why and farmers are concerned,

0:11:26.280 --> 0:11:31.160
<v Speaker 1>they've expressed concern. Why allow even more consolidation. Well, you know,

0:11:31.240 --> 0:11:33.640
<v Speaker 1>the thing is, that's what the remedy is meant to do.

0:11:33.920 --> 0:11:36.280
<v Speaker 1>When there is a remedy of one of these deals,

0:11:36.320 --> 0:11:39.040
<v Speaker 1>it's meant to replace the competition that's been lost by

0:11:39.120 --> 0:11:41.160
<v Speaker 1>virtue of the deal. And when you think of it

0:11:41.240 --> 0:11:44.880
<v Speaker 1>that way, it's not really consolidation. And here what has

0:11:44.920 --> 0:11:47.839
<v Speaker 1>happened is that a company that wasn't in seeds before

0:11:47.880 --> 0:11:50.600
<v Speaker 1>but wasn't chemicals, that's b a SF is going to

0:11:50.640 --> 0:11:53.080
<v Speaker 1>be acquiring a lot of these assets, if not all

0:11:53.120 --> 0:11:57.079
<v Speaker 1>of them, and becomes a vertically integrated large seed and

0:11:57.200 --> 0:12:00.560
<v Speaker 1>chemical company akin to Dow DuPont and by mon Santo.

0:12:00.679 --> 0:12:03.000
<v Speaker 1>So so in a way, what they have done with

0:12:03.040 --> 0:12:05.680
<v Speaker 1>this remedy is preserved the competition that is lost by

0:12:05.760 --> 0:12:11.079
<v Speaker 1>virtue of the deal. In most cases, is EU approval

0:12:11.480 --> 0:12:15.640
<v Speaker 1>stricter than US approval or vice versa. You know, I

0:12:15.640 --> 0:12:18.439
<v Speaker 1>think it's merger dependent, but in general, sort of in

0:12:18.520 --> 0:12:21.400
<v Speaker 1>a macro sense, I think the European regulators are thought

0:12:21.400 --> 0:12:24.520
<v Speaker 1>of as more stringent and more difficult and more demanding

0:12:24.520 --> 0:12:27.200
<v Speaker 1>than the U S regulators um. But it remains to

0:12:27.240 --> 0:12:30.120
<v Speaker 1>be seen because we are seeing, you know, a tough

0:12:30.160 --> 0:12:32.640
<v Speaker 1>regulator right now in the Department of Justice with at

0:12:32.720 --> 0:12:34.440
<v Speaker 1>least a T and T in with this deal. So

0:12:34.480 --> 0:12:37.240
<v Speaker 1>we'll see what happens going forward. Now, will they be

0:12:37.360 --> 0:12:41.200
<v Speaker 1>able to close after they get US approval. They're still

0:12:41.200 --> 0:12:43.520
<v Speaker 1>waiting for some other approvals, but I think those will

0:12:43.559 --> 0:12:46.320
<v Speaker 1>fall in line. I believe Russia and India, possibly a

0:12:46.320 --> 0:12:49.600
<v Speaker 1>few others, but those will likely fall in line once

0:12:49.640 --> 0:12:52.559
<v Speaker 1>this US approval comes through. What happens in the US

0:12:52.679 --> 0:12:54.840
<v Speaker 1>is the Department of Justice will have to put out

0:12:55.080 --> 0:12:58.520
<v Speaker 1>a package for public comment for sixty days explaining what

0:12:58.559 --> 0:13:00.760
<v Speaker 1>their concerns were here and why, what the remedy is

0:13:00.800 --> 0:13:04.800
<v Speaker 1>and why it'll alleviate these concerns. After sixty days, a

0:13:04.880 --> 0:13:06.560
<v Speaker 1>judge has to sign off on this, and then it

0:13:06.600 --> 0:13:10.400
<v Speaker 1>becomes final. Let's jump over to the A, T and

0:13:10.480 --> 0:13:14.240
<v Speaker 1>T time Warner Merger for a moment. That trial is

0:13:14.400 --> 0:13:17.800
<v Speaker 1>ongoing in d C and nless. I heard the judge

0:13:17.840 --> 0:13:22.000
<v Speaker 1>asked both sides to cut down their witness list. He

0:13:22.080 --> 0:13:24.680
<v Speaker 1>seems to be very interested in moving this along quick

0:13:24.800 --> 0:13:27.760
<v Speaker 1>more quickly, and it has been very slow, starting with

0:13:27.800 --> 0:13:29.960
<v Speaker 1>a snow delay in the very first week which sort

0:13:29.960 --> 0:13:32.400
<v Speaker 1>of put them behind. But he does realize that the

0:13:32.400 --> 0:13:34.640
<v Speaker 1>parties are running up against a deadline and that they

0:13:34.720 --> 0:13:37.760
<v Speaker 1>want to get his decision before June, and in order

0:13:37.800 --> 0:13:39.400
<v Speaker 1>to do that, he's got a lot to get through.

0:13:39.400 --> 0:13:41.160
<v Speaker 1>And he said thinks his opinion is going to be

0:13:41.160 --> 0:13:46.120
<v Speaker 1>two hundred pages. Oh, I'm not sure probably, but that's

0:13:46.120 --> 0:13:48.880
<v Speaker 1>what he says. So in about a minute, what's the

0:13:48.960 --> 0:13:53.120
<v Speaker 1>highlight of the testimony that you've heard there? You know?

0:13:53.160 --> 0:13:55.719
<v Speaker 1>I think to me they're two highlights here. One the

0:13:55.800 --> 0:13:59.760
<v Speaker 1>judge made a comment about this arbitration offer that, um,

0:13:59.800 --> 0:14:01.600
<v Speaker 1>a T and t's put on the table. It's similar

0:14:01.600 --> 0:14:03.840
<v Speaker 1>to something that Comcast an NBC you had to do

0:14:03.880 --> 0:14:06.320
<v Speaker 1>in order to get their deal through. And he was

0:14:06.440 --> 0:14:09.280
<v Speaker 1>asking the Department of Justice obviously thinks it's insufficient. And

0:14:09.280 --> 0:14:12.720
<v Speaker 1>he was asking a witness who express express some concerns

0:14:12.760 --> 0:14:15.000
<v Speaker 1>over that arbitration. Could it be changed? How could it

0:14:15.000 --> 0:14:17.040
<v Speaker 1>be approved that that you would accept it? So the

0:14:17.080 --> 0:14:18.920
<v Speaker 1>means he's thinking about that, and I think that's a

0:14:18.920 --> 0:14:22.400
<v Speaker 1>positive sign for a T and T. And what was

0:14:22.440 --> 0:14:25.400
<v Speaker 1>the second one. Well, the second one for me was

0:14:25.520 --> 0:14:29.320
<v Speaker 1>the fact that UM, the judge did allow some documents

0:14:29.400 --> 0:14:33.320
<v Speaker 1>of UM A, T and T Direct TV employees UM

0:14:33.360 --> 0:14:38.520
<v Speaker 1>in which they expressed concern about when the Comcast, NBCU

0:14:38.840 --> 0:14:42.600
<v Speaker 1>behavioral concessions were to expire, and they expressed concern about

0:14:42.640 --> 0:14:46.040
<v Speaker 1>what those companies might do, which basically support the Department

0:14:46.040 --> 0:14:47.960
<v Speaker 1>of Justices case. So that was a score for the

0:14:47.960 --> 0:14:50.120
<v Speaker 1>Department of Justice. Always great to have you here, jenn

0:14:50.240 --> 0:14:54.160
<v Speaker 1>that's Jennifer E, Senior Litigation Atlas for Bloomberg Intelligence. Thanks

0:14:54.160 --> 0:14:57.440
<v Speaker 1>for listening to the Bloomberg Law podcast. You can subscribe

0:14:57.480 --> 0:15:00.600
<v Speaker 1>and listen to the show on Apple Podcasts, un cloud,

0:15:00.640 --> 0:15:04.520
<v Speaker 1>and on Bloomberg dot com slash podcast. I'm June Brosso.

0:15:05.000 --> 0:15:12.160
<v Speaker 1>This is Bloomberg m HM.