1 00:00:01,400 --> 00:00:04,960 Speaker 1: Welcome to Crash Course, a podcast about business, political, and 2 00:00:05,000 --> 00:00:08,280 Speaker 1: social disruption and what we can learn from it. I'm 3 00:00:08,320 --> 00:00:13,840 Speaker 1: Tim O'Bryant. Today's crash Course. Polling versus the twenty twenty 4 00:00:13,840 --> 00:00:18,040 Speaker 1: four election. Polling, the very inexact science that is the 5 00:00:18,079 --> 00:00:22,520 Speaker 1: lifeblood of political analysis and guesswork is very much with us, 6 00:00:23,160 --> 00:00:26,759 Speaker 1: built upon a series of queries that asks respondents essentially, 7 00:00:27,400 --> 00:00:30,280 Speaker 1: what do you think about X? Polling aims to make 8 00:00:30,320 --> 00:00:34,279 Speaker 1: the intangible concrete. It is the stuff from which predictions 9 00:00:34,280 --> 00:00:37,720 Speaker 1: are made, the data that fuels a political marketplace, aiming 10 00:00:37,760 --> 00:00:42,519 Speaker 1: to artfully respond to voters preferences and priorities. But polling, 11 00:00:43,120 --> 00:00:47,440 Speaker 1: via its siblings, focus groups and messaging, also aspires to 12 00:00:47,520 --> 00:00:52,599 Speaker 1: shape voters preferences two in the best interpretation, understand and 13 00:00:52,640 --> 00:00:56,840 Speaker 1: serve them with greater clarity in the worst interpretation. Messaging 14 00:00:56,880 --> 00:01:01,600 Speaker 1: makes voters more malleable, more easily swayed. The modern polling 15 00:01:01,640 --> 00:01:04,080 Speaker 1: era may have begun in the late nineteen fifties when 16 00:01:04,120 --> 00:01:07,040 Speaker 1: Joe Kennedy retained the services of a polster named Lou 17 00:01:07,040 --> 00:01:10,120 Speaker 1: Harris to help him market his son John. Just like 18 00:01:10,160 --> 00:01:15,640 Speaker 1: another consumer product, today, polls beget messaging, which begets spin 19 00:01:16,120 --> 00:01:20,800 Speaker 1: which sometimes begets disinformation and other dark arts. It's tough 20 00:01:20,840 --> 00:01:23,960 Speaker 1: out there, and the twenty twenty four presidential race will 21 00:01:23,959 --> 00:01:27,480 Speaker 1: be a cage match. Joining me today is Frank Once. 22 00:01:27,880 --> 00:01:31,440 Speaker 1: Frank is a political and communication strategist and polster who 23 00:01:31,480 --> 00:01:34,840 Speaker 1: has spent much of his career working for Republicans. He 24 00:01:34,959 --> 00:01:37,200 Speaker 1: also has been a polster for some of the biggest 25 00:01:37,240 --> 00:01:40,760 Speaker 1: media companies in the country and specializes in leveraging the 26 00:01:40,800 --> 00:01:45,600 Speaker 1: emotional content of language to win campaigns. Welcome to Crash Course, Frank. 27 00:01:45,840 --> 00:01:49,080 Speaker 2: Thank you, and can I just start by saying I've 28 00:01:49,120 --> 00:01:53,040 Speaker 2: listened to your introduction, yes, and there are forwards that 29 00:01:53,080 --> 00:01:58,440 Speaker 2: I want to address right off the bat, disruption, prediction, disinformation, 30 00:01:58,800 --> 00:02:03,800 Speaker 2: and leverage the issue disruption is absolutely accurate from you, 31 00:02:04,680 --> 00:02:07,440 Speaker 2: even in the fact that I've just disrupted your conversation 32 00:02:07,600 --> 00:02:10,760 Speaker 2: right now. But the goal of the work that I 33 00:02:10,840 --> 00:02:15,960 Speaker 2: do is not disruption. It's actually understanding. It's comprehension. My 34 00:02:16,120 --> 00:02:19,040 Speaker 2: job is to understand the people that I'm researching, to 35 00:02:19,160 --> 00:02:21,920 Speaker 2: understand what they really want from what they're telling me. 36 00:02:22,440 --> 00:02:25,040 Speaker 2: It's the exact opposite of disruption. If I do my 37 00:02:25,120 --> 00:02:29,080 Speaker 2: job well, it's not disruption. There are no surprises there's 38 00:02:29,120 --> 00:02:33,920 Speaker 2: predictability and stability. Second prediction, I should not be doing 39 00:02:33,919 --> 00:02:36,520 Speaker 2: it and polsters should not be doing it. Yes, that's 40 00:02:36,560 --> 00:02:39,639 Speaker 2: what we're called upon to do. That's actually the least 41 00:02:39,680 --> 00:02:43,079 Speaker 2: important aspect of what a polster should do, and frankly, 42 00:02:43,240 --> 00:02:46,119 Speaker 2: the less predictions they do, the better off the profession 43 00:02:46,120 --> 00:02:52,960 Speaker 2: would be. Third information, which I am absolutely resolute in 44 00:02:53,040 --> 00:02:55,679 Speaker 2: the accuracy of what I tell you. In the accuracy 45 00:02:55,720 --> 00:02:57,560 Speaker 2: of what I put out doesn't mean I've got one 46 00:02:57,600 --> 00:03:01,680 Speaker 2: hundred percent record of success, but we have to be 47 00:03:02,040 --> 00:03:05,640 Speaker 2: the opponents, the most hostile people to any kind of 48 00:03:05,720 --> 00:03:09,880 Speaker 2: misinformation or disinformation. And finally, it's the idea of leverage. 49 00:03:10,240 --> 00:03:15,720 Speaker 2: To me, leverage is about knowledge, and I want to 50 00:03:15,760 --> 00:03:18,040 Speaker 2: know more than anyone in that room. I want to 51 00:03:18,120 --> 00:03:21,480 Speaker 2: understand not how people think, but what they believe and 52 00:03:21,520 --> 00:03:24,840 Speaker 2: why they communicate what they say. I don't look at 53 00:03:24,919 --> 00:03:28,520 Speaker 2: it as leverage. I look at it as wisdom to 54 00:03:28,680 --> 00:03:33,600 Speaker 2: hopefully reduce the conflicts and the surprises, and to help 55 00:03:33,840 --> 00:03:38,800 Speaker 2: either candidates or governments or businesses or anyone be able 56 00:03:38,840 --> 00:03:42,560 Speaker 2: to fully understand so they can keep their promises, they 57 00:03:42,600 --> 00:03:44,680 Speaker 2: can do the jobs that they were set out to do. 58 00:03:45,280 --> 00:03:49,720 Speaker 2: And most importantly, they will reinstill a level of trust 59 00:03:50,440 --> 00:03:53,360 Speaker 2: and confidence that what they say and what they mean 60 00:03:54,160 --> 00:03:55,320 Speaker 2: is what they actually do. 61 00:03:56,200 --> 00:03:59,320 Speaker 1: Well, Frank, I love that you put your linguist Scalpel 62 00:03:59,320 --> 00:04:01,360 Speaker 1: the use on the introduction. It's a great way actually 63 00:04:01,360 --> 00:04:04,200 Speaker 1: to start the show. Disruption is more about the ethos 64 00:04:04,240 --> 00:04:06,880 Speaker 1: of the show that we sort of look at disruptive 65 00:04:06,880 --> 00:04:09,160 Speaker 1: events to glean an understanding of them. So it was 66 00:04:09,240 --> 00:04:13,560 Speaker 1: less about polsters being disruptive agents. But certainly the other 67 00:04:13,600 --> 00:04:18,160 Speaker 1: three words that you've focused on, leverage, disinformation, and prediction. 68 00:04:18,440 --> 00:04:20,480 Speaker 1: I think those are good themes for us to weave 69 00:04:20,480 --> 00:04:22,720 Speaker 1: in and out of our conversation today because it is 70 00:04:22,800 --> 00:04:25,599 Speaker 1: the essence I think of where campaigns are won and 71 00:04:25,680 --> 00:04:28,120 Speaker 1: lost and where polling is right now in terms of 72 00:04:28,240 --> 00:04:31,760 Speaker 1: navigating around those rocks. And you've set this up wonderfully. 73 00:04:32,160 --> 00:04:36,080 Speaker 1: You've been around. You worked for Pap Buchanan, you worked 74 00:04:36,080 --> 00:04:39,719 Speaker 1: for Nude Gingrich, you worked for Rudy Giuliani, more recently, 75 00:04:39,800 --> 00:04:43,080 Speaker 1: Kevin McCarthy. You worked for the Bushes. You've represented a 76 00:04:43,120 --> 00:04:44,320 Speaker 1: lot of people and. 77 00:04:44,440 --> 00:04:46,440 Speaker 2: Never worked for the pulp On. Never work for the 78 00:04:46,440 --> 00:04:49,320 Speaker 2: Bushes ever, And this is an example. 79 00:04:49,480 --> 00:04:51,600 Speaker 1: Can you work for the Bush, White House in terms 80 00:04:51,600 --> 00:04:53,760 Speaker 1: of health and craft their method. Well, then let's get 81 00:04:53,760 --> 00:04:57,000 Speaker 1: to that later. Well let's handle that chronologically. I could 82 00:04:57,000 --> 00:04:57,680 Speaker 1: readdress this. 83 00:04:57,680 --> 00:04:59,599 Speaker 2: Though I don't want you to cut this out of 84 00:04:59,600 --> 00:05:03,000 Speaker 2: the show. Okay, this is a perfect example of misinformation. 85 00:05:03,640 --> 00:05:08,120 Speaker 1: Somebody notice that, because misinformation would be I intended to 86 00:05:08,200 --> 00:05:10,599 Speaker 1: say you worked for the Bushes to fake out my 87 00:05:10,680 --> 00:05:14,000 Speaker 1: audience and have them believe bad things about you, knowing 88 00:05:14,040 --> 00:05:16,680 Speaker 1: that you didn't work for the Bushes. I honestly thought 89 00:05:16,680 --> 00:05:18,880 Speaker 1: you did, and I thought you advised them on climate 90 00:05:18,960 --> 00:05:19,760 Speaker 1: change initiatives. 91 00:05:20,160 --> 00:05:22,680 Speaker 2: But that's why this is so important. Don't cut this 92 00:05:22,760 --> 00:05:26,960 Speaker 2: from the show, please, because somebody wrote that more than 93 00:05:27,000 --> 00:05:31,080 Speaker 2: twenty years ago to hurt my reputation, to say that 94 00:05:31,160 --> 00:05:35,000 Speaker 2: this was done in a negative way. And that's exactly 95 00:05:35,040 --> 00:05:35,680 Speaker 2: the problem. 96 00:05:37,040 --> 00:05:39,320 Speaker 1: Back the matter. You actually never did work for the Bushes, 97 00:05:40,040 --> 00:05:41,120 Speaker 1: for either one of them. 98 00:05:41,680 --> 00:05:44,000 Speaker 2: No, they have no idea who I am. 99 00:05:44,240 --> 00:05:46,280 Speaker 1: They never retain to work on anything. 100 00:05:47,080 --> 00:05:48,760 Speaker 2: No, and that's why no. 101 00:05:48,720 --> 00:05:51,400 Speaker 1: One in their White House retained you. No one acting 102 00:05:51,440 --> 00:05:52,839 Speaker 1: as their representatives retain you. 103 00:05:53,360 --> 00:05:55,880 Speaker 2: Absolutely, there are people that I know, but I never 104 00:05:55,960 --> 00:05:59,880 Speaker 2: worked for George W. Book direct, directly or. 105 00:05:59,839 --> 00:06:02,200 Speaker 1: In so that's what I was wondering, and that's right, qut. 106 00:06:02,279 --> 00:06:05,120 Speaker 2: And this is really important for the listeners to hear this. 107 00:06:05,560 --> 00:06:08,200 Speaker 2: Don't believe the crap that you read on the web. 108 00:06:08,760 --> 00:06:11,279 Speaker 2: Don't believe social media. I know by the names that 109 00:06:11,360 --> 00:06:14,400 Speaker 2: you used. You said Papu Canon and not Ross Paro. 110 00:06:15,160 --> 00:06:17,120 Speaker 2: And the fact is I was much more engaged in 111 00:06:17,120 --> 00:06:20,080 Speaker 2: the Ross Paro campaign. But I know the article. I 112 00:06:20,120 --> 00:06:22,480 Speaker 2: know where this comes from. So I know the list 113 00:06:22,520 --> 00:06:25,640 Speaker 2: of people that you give. I've worked for so many. 114 00:06:26,839 --> 00:06:30,000 Speaker 1: Let's slow for one second. There's no ill intent on 115 00:06:30,040 --> 00:06:32,359 Speaker 1: my part in warming up your client list. It's not 116 00:06:32,440 --> 00:06:34,680 Speaker 1: to cherry pick any of them. It was more just 117 00:06:34,720 --> 00:06:37,240 Speaker 1: to convey to the audience that you have a long 118 00:06:37,320 --> 00:06:40,520 Speaker 1: track record doing this and you've represented notable people. And 119 00:06:40,600 --> 00:06:42,839 Speaker 1: if I've messed any of that up, I'm happy to 120 00:06:42,839 --> 00:06:47,040 Speaker 1: clarify it. But it wasn't meant to misrepresent your bona 121 00:06:47,040 --> 00:06:48,279 Speaker 1: fides or your CV. 122 00:06:49,200 --> 00:06:51,880 Speaker 2: But when it was put out initially, there was no 123 00:06:51,960 --> 00:06:55,320 Speaker 2: acknowledgment that I worked with a Biden Weight House directly 124 00:06:55,800 --> 00:06:59,720 Speaker 2: on COVID language. There is no discussion that I work 125 00:06:59,760 --> 00:07:04,719 Speaker 2: with the Clinton White House on global trade, specifically NAFTA. 126 00:07:05,320 --> 00:07:09,760 Speaker 2: There's no comment about sitting down with so many leaders 127 00:07:09,760 --> 00:07:13,600 Speaker 2: from across the globe, because I know where this comes from. 128 00:07:14,280 --> 00:07:17,680 Speaker 2: And I love the fact that this begins with this 129 00:07:17,760 --> 00:07:23,680 Speaker 2: conversation me too, because it tells the listener be careful 130 00:07:23,840 --> 00:07:26,800 Speaker 2: of what you read, be careful of what you see, 131 00:07:27,160 --> 00:07:29,679 Speaker 2: because it may not be accurate at all. 132 00:07:30,400 --> 00:07:33,520 Speaker 1: So is it inaccurate to describe you as a Republican pulster? 133 00:07:33,720 --> 00:07:35,800 Speaker 1: Do you feel you're a bipartisan pulster? 134 00:07:36,680 --> 00:07:38,160 Speaker 2: They've stopped calling me a Republican? 135 00:07:38,280 --> 00:07:40,680 Speaker 1: No, no, no, no, But what do you consider yourself? 136 00:07:41,200 --> 00:07:45,040 Speaker 2: I consider myself a nonpartisan by partisan means you work 137 00:07:45,120 --> 00:07:48,360 Speaker 2: for both sides, not partisan means you don't take sides. 138 00:07:48,880 --> 00:07:52,680 Speaker 2: I have relationships with the Republicans absolutely, and I was 139 00:07:52,720 --> 00:07:56,520 Speaker 2: a partisan polster ten years ago, twenty years ago, but 140 00:07:56,760 --> 00:08:00,520 Speaker 2: beginning with the Donald Trump election in twenty sixteen, I've 141 00:08:00,640 --> 00:08:04,920 Speaker 2: actually publicly eschewed partisanship and even the word itself. You 142 00:08:04,960 --> 00:08:08,800 Speaker 2: can say I'm a language guy. Even the word partisan itself, 143 00:08:08,880 --> 00:08:12,240 Speaker 2: it's not accurate for what I do because in the end, 144 00:08:12,360 --> 00:08:15,040 Speaker 2: it's not my job to represent Republicans or make them 145 00:08:15,040 --> 00:08:18,160 Speaker 2: look good. It's not my job to speak ill of Democrats. 146 00:08:18,200 --> 00:08:21,480 Speaker 2: It's my job to be honest and accurate to every 147 00:08:21,600 --> 00:08:22,800 Speaker 2: question you ask me. 148 00:08:23,480 --> 00:08:26,000 Speaker 1: So, in the interest of accuracy and the chronology, I 149 00:08:26,040 --> 00:08:30,120 Speaker 1: think we should have a new timestamp BT and AT, 150 00:08:30,680 --> 00:08:33,640 Speaker 1: you know, before Trump and after Trump. So the Frank 151 00:08:33,800 --> 00:08:38,880 Speaker 1: Lunce of the BT era was a partisan polster who 152 00:08:38,960 --> 00:08:45,319 Speaker 1: worked largely, perhaps almost exclusively, for Republicans. The Frank Lunce 153 00:08:45,360 --> 00:08:49,520 Speaker 1: of the AT period is spreading his net more broadly 154 00:08:49,600 --> 00:08:52,160 Speaker 1: and working for people he believes in. Is that accurate? 155 00:08:52,880 --> 00:08:56,280 Speaker 2: That is accurate, and it's not just domestically. We're doing 156 00:08:56,320 --> 00:08:59,240 Speaker 2: this interview with me in London, which shows you how 157 00:08:59,280 --> 00:09:02,800 Speaker 2: great technology is that you and I can communicate five 158 00:09:02,880 --> 00:09:06,840 Speaker 2: thousand miles apart from each other in real time. And 159 00:09:06,920 --> 00:09:11,040 Speaker 2: my perspective is much more global. Having traveled to I 160 00:09:11,080 --> 00:09:15,319 Speaker 2: will hit my fiftieth country this year. It does give 161 00:09:15,360 --> 00:09:18,320 Speaker 2: me a different perspective, not just as a pholster or 162 00:09:18,360 --> 00:09:21,520 Speaker 2: as a communicator, but as a human being. Now that 163 00:09:21,600 --> 00:09:25,680 Speaker 2: I've visited every continent except for Antarctica, it teaches me 164 00:09:26,000 --> 00:09:28,600 Speaker 2: that there is a different way of speaking, that there's 165 00:09:28,640 --> 00:09:31,720 Speaker 2: a different way of life, and that the priorities are 166 00:09:31,760 --> 00:09:34,880 Speaker 2: the things I take for granted as an American are 167 00:09:35,000 --> 00:09:38,920 Speaker 2: simply not the same as those from an Asian country 168 00:09:39,000 --> 00:09:42,120 Speaker 2: or an African country, for example, and that it makes 169 00:09:42,160 --> 00:09:45,800 Speaker 2: me not only more tolerant of other cultures and other societies, 170 00:09:46,160 --> 00:09:49,360 Speaker 2: but it makes me more curious to understand, to learn 171 00:09:49,360 --> 00:09:52,400 Speaker 2: about what they have to offer to a humankind on 172 00:09:52,440 --> 00:09:53,479 Speaker 2: a global scale. 173 00:09:53,880 --> 00:09:56,240 Speaker 1: Since we've invoked Trump already, I was going to get 174 00:09:56,240 --> 00:09:58,040 Speaker 1: to that a little later, but I think it could 175 00:09:58,080 --> 00:10:00,080 Speaker 1: also still be a useful departure point right now. Well, 176 00:10:00,760 --> 00:10:03,920 Speaker 1: what was the intervention in your worldview and in your 177 00:10:03,920 --> 00:10:06,520 Speaker 1: life as a pulser in a human being when Donald 178 00:10:06,520 --> 00:10:09,760 Speaker 1: Trump entered your mindscape? As I understand it, it actually 179 00:10:09,800 --> 00:10:11,960 Speaker 1: took a physical toll on you. You had a stroke 180 00:10:12,760 --> 00:10:15,480 Speaker 1: a few years ago. I've seen in some public statements 181 00:10:15,480 --> 00:10:19,600 Speaker 1: you attributed that in part to the stress philosophically and 182 00:10:19,640 --> 00:10:24,480 Speaker 1: emotionally and physically you experienced when Donald Trump ascended into 183 00:10:24,480 --> 00:10:25,079 Speaker 1: the White House. 184 00:10:26,240 --> 00:10:28,400 Speaker 2: I think that's fair. I think that's accurate. But go 185 00:10:28,520 --> 00:10:32,520 Speaker 2: back even further. I'm the person who interviewed Donald Trump 186 00:10:32,679 --> 00:10:36,840 Speaker 2: in Des Moines, Iowa, in twenty fifteen when Donald Trump 187 00:10:36,920 --> 00:10:41,000 Speaker 2: was condemning John McCain, and I intervened to say, wait 188 00:10:41,040 --> 00:10:44,080 Speaker 2: a minute, John McCain's a war hero, and Donald Trump 189 00:10:44,120 --> 00:10:47,880 Speaker 2: famously said, talking over me, he's not a war hero. 190 00:10:48,280 --> 00:10:51,160 Speaker 2: He was captured. I like the ones who weren't captured. 191 00:10:51,559 --> 00:10:54,079 Speaker 2: That was my interview. You hear me, but you don't 192 00:10:54,120 --> 00:10:57,560 Speaker 2: see me on camera. And from that moment on, I 193 00:10:57,679 --> 00:10:58,760 Speaker 2: had a problem with him. 194 00:10:58,960 --> 00:11:02,560 Speaker 1: He rather than what what was the specific problem you 195 00:11:02,600 --> 00:11:03,280 Speaker 1: had with him? 196 00:11:03,800 --> 00:11:08,280 Speaker 2: I didn't think he told the truth. To mean nothing matters. No, 197 00:11:08,920 --> 00:11:10,400 Speaker 2: you're gonna use that word. I know. 198 00:11:10,559 --> 00:11:12,600 Speaker 1: I'm asking is did you consider him a liar? 199 00:11:13,960 --> 00:11:15,760 Speaker 2: I considered that he didn't tell the truth. 200 00:11:16,440 --> 00:11:17,240 Speaker 1: What's the difference? 201 00:11:18,240 --> 00:11:19,200 Speaker 2: A huge difference. 202 00:11:19,440 --> 00:11:20,240 Speaker 1: Explain that one. 203 00:11:21,040 --> 00:11:25,040 Speaker 2: If I call someone a liar, I'm immediately asking you 204 00:11:25,080 --> 00:11:28,800 Speaker 2: to judge me by that accusation. If I'm saying he 205 00:11:28,840 --> 00:11:34,040 Speaker 2: doesn't tell the truth, you're simply analyzing the statements and 206 00:11:34,080 --> 00:11:37,200 Speaker 2: the delivery of the person that we're focused on. I 207 00:11:37,240 --> 00:11:40,720 Speaker 2: don't want to be accusing someone of lying, because I 208 00:11:40,760 --> 00:11:43,719 Speaker 2: know that that causes people not to listen, causes them 209 00:11:43,760 --> 00:11:47,199 Speaker 2: to shut up. But if I say is he telling 210 00:11:47,240 --> 00:11:49,840 Speaker 2: the truth? If I turn it as a question, it 211 00:11:49,920 --> 00:11:53,240 Speaker 2: is much more likely that I will contemplate what I've said. 212 00:11:53,880 --> 00:11:56,800 Speaker 2: You are more likely to take what I say and 213 00:11:56,960 --> 00:11:59,960 Speaker 2: accept it because I'm not being accused a to him. 214 00:12:00,360 --> 00:12:02,640 Speaker 1: But I was just talking about your own decision. You 215 00:12:02,679 --> 00:12:04,920 Speaker 1: said you were turned off because you believed he wasn't 216 00:12:04,920 --> 00:12:07,680 Speaker 1: telling the truth. You were making your own subjective value 217 00:12:07,720 --> 00:12:08,440 Speaker 1: judgment about it. 218 00:12:09,720 --> 00:12:11,880 Speaker 2: Yes, I'm just not willing to use your language to 219 00:12:11,920 --> 00:12:12,760 Speaker 2: describe it now. 220 00:12:12,840 --> 00:12:15,040 Speaker 1: I was just series about how you parts the difference 221 00:12:15,040 --> 00:12:18,079 Speaker 1: between the two in terms of your own view of him. 222 00:12:18,400 --> 00:12:21,360 Speaker 1: But we can probably get stuck on that one forever now. 223 00:12:21,559 --> 00:12:24,640 Speaker 2: Actually, but here's the thing, Okay, I listen to every 224 00:12:24,679 --> 00:12:29,640 Speaker 2: word when a politician is speaking, when a business person 225 00:12:29,720 --> 00:12:32,679 Speaker 2: is speaking, when a cultural icon is speaking, I pay 226 00:12:32,720 --> 00:12:36,760 Speaker 2: attention to what they say. It's in listening to how 227 00:12:36,880 --> 00:12:40,040 Speaker 2: people formulate their statements and the words that they use. 228 00:12:40,760 --> 00:12:43,600 Speaker 2: And I used to just let it go when it 229 00:12:43,640 --> 00:12:46,400 Speaker 2: was about me. I would never correct someone. And now 230 00:12:46,400 --> 00:12:49,840 Speaker 2: I realize that on a podcast like this that it 231 00:12:49,960 --> 00:12:54,240 Speaker 2: is essential that the listeners hear the words that I 232 00:12:54,440 --> 00:12:59,240 Speaker 2: wish to speak, absolutely, because that is clarifying either my 233 00:12:59,400 --> 00:13:02,600 Speaker 2: story or my beliefs, or my principles, my. 234 00:13:02,640 --> 00:13:05,160 Speaker 1: Priorities, your place in the world did go. 235 00:13:05,480 --> 00:13:06,200 Speaker 2: That's perfect. 236 00:13:06,640 --> 00:13:09,680 Speaker 1: Yeah, that is an ideal outcome. I hope that listeners 237 00:13:10,240 --> 00:13:12,040 Speaker 1: come up close to you and your place in the 238 00:13:12,040 --> 00:13:14,400 Speaker 1: world and how you see it, and I appreciate you 239 00:13:14,480 --> 00:13:17,160 Speaker 1: course correcting as we move along. So we've arrived at 240 00:13:17,160 --> 00:13:19,120 Speaker 1: this Trump moment. But this is such a rich subject 241 00:13:19,200 --> 00:13:21,520 Speaker 1: and let's not tie it all to Trump just yet. 242 00:13:21,760 --> 00:13:24,040 Speaker 1: Let's talk a little bit about the pre Trump era 243 00:13:24,160 --> 00:13:27,440 Speaker 1: in your life. I think you sort of enter polling 244 00:13:27,480 --> 00:13:30,000 Speaker 1: as a main part of your life around the early nineties, 245 00:13:30,000 --> 00:13:33,080 Speaker 1: more or less. And how was the world that you 246 00:13:33,240 --> 00:13:39,280 Speaker 1: entered then polling and messaging and then actualizing those things 247 00:13:39,280 --> 00:13:43,360 Speaker 1: and campaigns and strategy positions. How was that world different 248 00:13:43,400 --> 00:13:44,600 Speaker 1: than the one we're in right now. 249 00:13:44,640 --> 00:13:49,160 Speaker 2: Frank, Oh, that's good. That's a tough question to answer 250 00:13:49,240 --> 00:13:52,200 Speaker 2: because there's so many facets of it. And even in 251 00:13:52,240 --> 00:13:55,440 Speaker 2: my own life. I learned how to do survey research 252 00:13:55,960 --> 00:13:59,160 Speaker 2: in nineteen eighty when I was eighteen years old, and 253 00:13:59,200 --> 00:14:02,720 Speaker 2: I was supposed from nineteen eighty till about nineteen ninety four. 254 00:14:03,320 --> 00:14:05,440 Speaker 2: And it was a breakfast that I have a new 255 00:14:05,559 --> 00:14:08,880 Speaker 2: Kingridge in April of ninety four, where he said to me, 256 00:14:09,000 --> 00:14:12,680 Speaker 2: gave me two pieces of advice. Pollsters are a dime 257 00:14:12,720 --> 00:14:15,360 Speaker 2: a dozen You can find a dozen of them in 258 00:14:15,400 --> 00:14:19,920 Speaker 2: the Republican Party. No big deal, nothing special. I want 259 00:14:19,960 --> 00:14:22,920 Speaker 2: you to be a wordsmith. I want you to use 260 00:14:23,000 --> 00:14:27,440 Speaker 2: polling to study how to communicate difficult principles and how 261 00:14:27,480 --> 00:14:30,600 Speaker 2: to explain the conservative philosophy in a way that we 262 00:14:30,720 --> 00:14:34,400 Speaker 2: win not for the next election, but for the next generation. 263 00:14:35,240 --> 00:14:38,320 Speaker 2: And I followed that. That was when I started focusing 264 00:14:38,360 --> 00:14:41,040 Speaker 2: on language. The other advice he gave me was learn 265 00:14:41,080 --> 00:14:44,280 Speaker 2: Spanish because it's going to become the most important subgroup 266 00:14:44,600 --> 00:14:47,960 Speaker 2: and no Republican polster really understands it. That one I 267 00:14:48,000 --> 00:14:50,640 Speaker 2: didn't do because guy, Frankly, I'm an idiot when it 268 00:14:50,640 --> 00:14:53,760 Speaker 2: comes to language. And my first big client in life 269 00:14:53,920 --> 00:14:56,920 Speaker 2: were people running for office in Puerto Rico, the governor, 270 00:14:57,240 --> 00:15:01,000 Speaker 2: the Resident Commissioner. Yet I couldn't speak the language. And 271 00:15:01,080 --> 00:15:04,080 Speaker 2: from that point on, I'm always trying to figure out 272 00:15:04,160 --> 00:15:07,720 Speaker 2: how to say it, how to communicate it, how to 273 00:15:07,800 --> 00:15:12,200 Speaker 2: show it, how to present it. Everything from my PowerPoint 274 00:15:12,320 --> 00:15:15,720 Speaker 2: slides to the videos that I create to the interviews 275 00:15:15,760 --> 00:15:20,280 Speaker 2: like this one. It's always trying to clarify and simplify 276 00:15:20,680 --> 00:15:21,360 Speaker 2: the language. 277 00:15:21,680 --> 00:15:24,000 Speaker 1: But come back to me different idea of what was 278 00:15:24,080 --> 00:15:28,320 Speaker 1: different than compared to now, what's the great change you've 279 00:15:28,360 --> 00:15:31,560 Speaker 1: witnessed over say, the last thirty years, give or take 280 00:15:31,600 --> 00:15:31,920 Speaker 1: a few. 281 00:15:32,800 --> 00:15:36,040 Speaker 2: The greatest change in polling is that people want to 282 00:15:36,080 --> 00:15:39,960 Speaker 2: know why not what so nobody is asking is the 283 00:15:40,000 --> 00:15:42,760 Speaker 2: direction of a country positive or negative? They want to 284 00:15:42,800 --> 00:15:46,280 Speaker 2: know why positive and why negative. They want to understand 285 00:15:46,400 --> 00:15:51,680 Speaker 2: the reaction that certain politicians have on the electorate, not 286 00:15:51,760 --> 00:15:55,960 Speaker 2: who they trust necessarily, but why they have trust or distrust. 287 00:15:56,600 --> 00:15:59,560 Speaker 2: What is the root cause of some of the challenges 288 00:15:59,600 --> 00:16:02,920 Speaker 2: we face. So just asking people what's the most important 289 00:16:02,960 --> 00:16:06,760 Speaker 2: issue in America today is irrelevant in twenty twenty three. 290 00:16:07,440 --> 00:16:11,280 Speaker 2: What is relevant is the root cause of that concern? 291 00:16:11,720 --> 00:16:14,880 Speaker 2: Is it economic anxiety? Is it loss of faith and 292 00:16:14,920 --> 00:16:18,400 Speaker 2: trust in the system? Do we now believe that democracy 293 00:16:18,640 --> 00:16:24,200 Speaker 2: or capitalism don't work. It's trying to understand the second degree, 294 00:16:24,240 --> 00:16:27,720 Speaker 2: the third degree of any issue, because in the end, 295 00:16:27,800 --> 00:16:30,720 Speaker 2: if we don't understand the root cause, we don't understand 296 00:16:30,760 --> 00:16:31,440 Speaker 2: how to fix it. 297 00:16:32,520 --> 00:16:35,320 Speaker 1: You have always been attuned, though, to the idea of emotion, 298 00:16:35,520 --> 00:16:40,760 Speaker 1: the emotional quotient that underlies people's preferences and choices. I 299 00:16:40,760 --> 00:16:45,200 Speaker 1: think you've spoken very specifically and articulately about that over 300 00:16:45,240 --> 00:16:47,080 Speaker 1: the years. I have a feeling you're going to say 301 00:16:47,080 --> 00:16:49,080 Speaker 1: that that's also been pulled off of some weird spot 302 00:16:49,120 --> 00:16:51,200 Speaker 1: on the Internet, and it doesn't really reflect who you are. 303 00:16:51,760 --> 00:16:54,920 Speaker 1: But I bring it up not to zikatcha, but just 304 00:16:55,000 --> 00:16:58,280 Speaker 1: as an attempt to get at your statement of purpose 305 00:16:58,520 --> 00:17:00,800 Speaker 1: in terms of what you see the essence of I 306 00:17:00,840 --> 00:17:04,119 Speaker 1: think this is a an accurate quote. Eighty percent of 307 00:17:04,160 --> 00:17:07,359 Speaker 1: our life is emotion and only twenty percent is intellect. 308 00:17:07,880 --> 00:17:10,120 Speaker 1: I am much more interested in how you feel than 309 00:17:10,119 --> 00:17:13,320 Speaker 1: how you think, or another one along the same lines. 310 00:17:13,560 --> 00:17:16,760 Speaker 1: It's all emotion, but there's nothing wrong with emotion. When 311 00:17:16,800 --> 00:17:19,560 Speaker 1: we are in love, we are not rational. We are emotional. 312 00:17:19,800 --> 00:17:21,760 Speaker 1: My job is to look for the words that trigger 313 00:17:21,840 --> 00:17:24,919 Speaker 1: the emotion. We know that words and emotion together are 314 00:17:24,920 --> 00:17:29,040 Speaker 1: the most powerful force known to mankind. So explain to me. 315 00:17:29,720 --> 00:17:32,240 Speaker 1: Do you also think that that was a relatively novel 316 00:17:32,320 --> 00:17:36,199 Speaker 1: insight within the polling community, This idea of move it 317 00:17:36,240 --> 00:17:40,520 Speaker 1: beyond simply issue based polling and get at this emotional 318 00:17:40,560 --> 00:17:42,080 Speaker 1: motivator for voters. 319 00:17:42,800 --> 00:17:46,480 Speaker 2: Other people have done that long before me. What I 320 00:17:46,600 --> 00:17:49,800 Speaker 2: learned and where I'm different is to find the language 321 00:17:50,280 --> 00:17:57,640 Speaker 2: that best articulates or best connects to emotion, passion intensity. 322 00:17:58,880 --> 00:18:01,920 Speaker 2: I know right now, for example, that there is probably 323 00:18:02,000 --> 00:18:06,080 Speaker 2: thirty percent of Americans, thirty percent that don't believe in 324 00:18:06,080 --> 00:18:09,240 Speaker 2: our electoral system, and I'm trying to figure out how 325 00:18:09,280 --> 00:18:13,760 Speaker 2: to speak to them because I believe that the right person, 326 00:18:13,920 --> 00:18:17,639 Speaker 2: the accurate person, won in twenty twenty. For example, I 327 00:18:17,680 --> 00:18:20,640 Speaker 2: believe that what happened on January sixth, twenty twenty one, 328 00:18:21,080 --> 00:18:25,320 Speaker 2: was a tragedy an embarrassment. I can't believe that some 329 00:18:25,359 --> 00:18:29,919 Speaker 2: people try to downplay the events of that day. I 330 00:18:29,960 --> 00:18:34,640 Speaker 2: need to understand what is triggering this level of anger 331 00:18:35,200 --> 00:18:39,560 Speaker 2: and more importantly, distrust. I can work with anger. I 332 00:18:39,600 --> 00:18:42,879 Speaker 2: can work with disappointment. I can work with fear. I 333 00:18:42,920 --> 00:18:45,240 Speaker 2: can work with anxiety, and when I say I can 334 00:18:45,280 --> 00:18:48,040 Speaker 2: work with it, I can understand it and craft a 335 00:18:48,160 --> 00:18:53,800 Speaker 2: language to address it. But I cannot do anything about mistrust. 336 00:18:54,600 --> 00:18:58,240 Speaker 2: I cannot do anything if the public believes that those 337 00:18:58,280 --> 00:19:02,359 Speaker 2: who are telling the truth are lying and the liars 338 00:19:02,560 --> 00:19:05,760 Speaker 2: are actually truth tellers. And that's the situation that we're 339 00:19:05,760 --> 00:19:08,200 Speaker 2: in right now. And the reason why I was so 340 00:19:08,240 --> 00:19:11,080 Speaker 2: eager to do this podcast is that that, to me, 341 00:19:11,200 --> 00:19:15,480 Speaker 2: is the single greatest disruption in American society. Today. It's 342 00:19:15,480 --> 00:19:19,760 Speaker 2: not economic, it's not financial, it's not even political. It's 343 00:19:19,800 --> 00:19:23,359 Speaker 2: the fact that there's so little in our lives that 344 00:19:23,400 --> 00:19:27,560 Speaker 2: we now trust, and that we believe that the institutions 345 00:19:27,640 --> 00:19:31,080 Speaker 2: and the people who run them that matter most are untruthful. 346 00:19:31,760 --> 00:19:34,720 Speaker 2: And if that's the case, our democracy is in jeopardy, 347 00:19:35,000 --> 00:19:38,720 Speaker 2: our economic freedom is in jeopardy. And I can't fix 348 00:19:38,760 --> 00:19:42,200 Speaker 2: it because I don't know how to instill trust when 349 00:19:42,280 --> 00:19:42,919 Speaker 2: it is lost. 350 00:19:43,400 --> 00:19:45,800 Speaker 1: Do you know this is actually a phenomenon that was 351 00:19:45,880 --> 00:19:49,760 Speaker 1: gaining traction before Trump even landed in the White House, 352 00:19:49,840 --> 00:19:53,359 Speaker 1: a fraying of trust in US institutions. I think it 353 00:19:53,800 --> 00:19:57,359 Speaker 1: accelerated around the financial crisis. Certainly a lot of the 354 00:19:57,520 --> 00:20:00,960 Speaker 1: analysis of people's faith and institutions and the idea of 355 00:20:01,359 --> 00:20:05,840 Speaker 1: public authority had taken noticeable downturns in the mid two 356 00:20:05,840 --> 00:20:08,960 Speaker 1: thousands and surveys compared to prior to that era. I 357 00:20:08,960 --> 00:20:10,960 Speaker 1: would suggest or think that it had to do with 358 00:20:11,000 --> 00:20:14,480 Speaker 1: how devastating the financial crisis was for a lot of people, 359 00:20:14,840 --> 00:20:17,840 Speaker 1: And then I think it's accelerated since then. But one 360 00:20:17,880 --> 00:20:21,639 Speaker 1: of the interesting constants that's gone along with that during 361 00:20:21,680 --> 00:20:23,800 Speaker 1: that period and it remains so today, is that people 362 00:20:23,920 --> 00:20:28,600 Speaker 1: still trust their own personal network, they trust their family, 363 00:20:28,800 --> 00:20:31,640 Speaker 1: they trust their friends, they trust people they have direct 364 00:20:31,720 --> 00:20:34,560 Speaker 1: contact with. And that's a hard thing to leverage in 365 00:20:34,600 --> 00:20:37,480 Speaker 1: terms of rebuilding trust for people. Is it has to 366 00:20:37,520 --> 00:20:41,840 Speaker 1: happen at this very granular local level. When we run 367 00:20:41,880 --> 00:20:44,040 Speaker 1: campaigns that are national league, when we run companies that 368 00:20:44,080 --> 00:20:48,639 Speaker 1: have national footprints. I think some of the solution involves 369 00:20:48,800 --> 00:20:52,800 Speaker 1: a lot of very granular direct contact among people, and 370 00:20:52,880 --> 00:20:54,800 Speaker 1: I think that that's going to be an ongoing challenge 371 00:20:54,800 --> 00:20:57,520 Speaker 1: for the political process. And this is also to me 372 00:20:57,840 --> 00:20:59,879 Speaker 1: why it's so interesting to do an episode of polling, 373 00:21:01,320 --> 00:21:04,520 Speaker 1: because I think the accuracy of polls and their ability 374 00:21:04,520 --> 00:21:08,359 Speaker 1: to actually drive into people's needs in a broad based 375 00:21:08,400 --> 00:21:12,120 Speaker 1: way and marry that understanding to personal interaction and then 376 00:21:12,160 --> 00:21:16,199 Speaker 1: to policy in order to get better civic result is 377 00:21:16,240 --> 00:21:18,160 Speaker 1: the challenge in front of us all right now. 378 00:21:18,720 --> 00:21:20,800 Speaker 2: It's one of the reasons why I do focus groups, 379 00:21:21,320 --> 00:21:23,760 Speaker 2: and I stopped doing it for about a year after 380 00:21:24,840 --> 00:21:29,159 Speaker 2: January sixth because people were so rude and so vicious 381 00:21:29,200 --> 00:21:30,760 Speaker 2: and so mean to each other. 382 00:21:31,119 --> 00:21:33,200 Speaker 1: And occurring within the focus groups. 383 00:21:33,240 --> 00:21:36,199 Speaker 2: You mean, within the focus groups. I'm about to publish 384 00:21:37,000 --> 00:21:40,199 Speaker 2: some of the worst ones. There were seven sessions that 385 00:21:40,280 --> 00:21:42,200 Speaker 2: I did that were so awful. 386 00:21:42,000 --> 00:21:44,960 Speaker 1: In that this is post January sixth, this is. 387 00:21:44,960 --> 00:21:48,439 Speaker 2: Right around there, this is post election twenty twenty. That 388 00:21:48,520 --> 00:21:51,439 Speaker 2: the group's never made air that from the beginning to 389 00:21:51,520 --> 00:21:53,919 Speaker 2: the end, people yelled at each other, they didn't listen, 390 00:21:53,960 --> 00:21:57,560 Speaker 2: they didn't want to listen. They were accusatory and just mean. 391 00:21:58,600 --> 00:22:00,600 Speaker 2: And the various networks that I I did it for 392 00:22:01,680 --> 00:22:04,000 Speaker 2: said to me, we can't put this on the air. 393 00:22:04,119 --> 00:22:07,240 Speaker 2: This is a I don't want to use the language. 394 00:22:07,240 --> 00:22:12,560 Speaker 2: But rams would hit and no, and it was embarrassing 395 00:22:12,640 --> 00:22:15,080 Speaker 2: to me, and I finally decided that now was the 396 00:22:15,119 --> 00:22:18,080 Speaker 2: time to put it out. So if you're a listener 397 00:22:18,119 --> 00:22:20,240 Speaker 2: to this program, just know if you type in my 398 00:22:20,359 --> 00:22:23,240 Speaker 2: name and Straight Arrow News, you'll be able to see 399 00:22:23,520 --> 00:22:27,199 Speaker 2: snippets of these sessions. I just warn you, it's going 400 00:22:27,280 --> 00:22:29,399 Speaker 2: to break your heart and it's going to scare the 401 00:22:29,400 --> 00:22:31,639 Speaker 2: hell out of you. Because this is the country that 402 00:22:31,680 --> 00:22:32,399 Speaker 2: we have become. 403 00:22:32,520 --> 00:22:35,240 Speaker 1: Why was it important to you to publicize those focus 404 00:22:35,280 --> 00:22:36,119 Speaker 1: groups gone wrong? 405 00:22:36,800 --> 00:22:39,760 Speaker 2: Because my health is not that great, which I've acknowledged, 406 00:22:40,359 --> 00:22:43,480 Speaker 2: and because I'm trying to put out as much information 407 00:22:44,000 --> 00:22:47,879 Speaker 2: and facts as I can to show people that we 408 00:22:48,040 --> 00:22:54,840 Speaker 2: are dangerously close to coming apart, and I don't want 409 00:22:54,840 --> 00:22:58,840 Speaker 2: to play the role of divider. I want to play 410 00:22:58,880 --> 00:23:04,720 Speaker 2: the role of truth teller so that we can consider 411 00:23:05,520 --> 00:23:07,600 Speaker 2: a different approach to how we talk to each other, 412 00:23:07,920 --> 00:23:10,600 Speaker 2: how we treat each other, and most importantly for the 413 00:23:10,680 --> 00:23:15,040 Speaker 2: next generation, our commitment to civics and decency, so that 414 00:23:15,080 --> 00:23:18,159 Speaker 2: this doesn't get any worse in an election cycle that 415 00:23:18,240 --> 00:23:20,639 Speaker 2: I'm afraid is going to be the worst of modern times. 416 00:23:21,640 --> 00:23:24,560 Speaker 1: Frank, we're going to take a break on that note, 417 00:23:24,720 --> 00:23:26,520 Speaker 1: and we will come right back after we hear from 418 00:23:26,520 --> 00:23:36,399 Speaker 1: one of our sponsors. We're back with Frank Luntz, a 419 00:23:36,440 --> 00:23:40,520 Speaker 1: prominent polster and political strategist and always full of insights. 420 00:23:41,040 --> 00:23:44,919 Speaker 1: Frank has been simultaneously educating me, correcting the record, and 421 00:23:44,960 --> 00:23:48,080 Speaker 1: having a great conversation with me in the previous session. 422 00:23:48,119 --> 00:23:51,399 Speaker 1: So we'll continue on that path. You know, I wanted 423 00:23:51,480 --> 00:23:54,159 Speaker 1: to talk again about this epiphany you had. You know, 424 00:23:54,200 --> 00:23:56,480 Speaker 1: I topped off the show talking about Joe Kennedy had 425 00:23:56,480 --> 00:23:59,320 Speaker 1: this insight in which he famously said he wanted to 426 00:23:59,720 --> 00:24:02,920 Speaker 1: sell his son John like a box of soap flakes, 427 00:24:03,160 --> 00:24:06,080 Speaker 1: laundry detergent, and the rap on John Kennedy at the 428 00:24:06,080 --> 00:24:08,399 Speaker 1: time was he hadn't paid his dues in the Senate, 429 00:24:08,680 --> 00:24:11,480 Speaker 1: he didn't have a lot of experience, but the family's 430 00:24:11,520 --> 00:24:15,840 Speaker 1: marketing prowess and money allowed for the celebrification, if that's 431 00:24:15,840 --> 00:24:19,040 Speaker 1: the word, a celebrification of the presidency, and that that 432 00:24:19,119 --> 00:24:21,040 Speaker 1: really launched us into an era when you could go 433 00:24:21,040 --> 00:24:24,480 Speaker 1: above the party apparatus, go beyond the resume, and bring 434 00:24:24,520 --> 00:24:27,760 Speaker 1: a candidate directly in front of voters if he or 435 00:24:27,840 --> 00:24:30,680 Speaker 1: she was packaged the right way. We saw that obviously 436 00:24:30,720 --> 00:24:35,520 Speaker 1: with Ronald Reagan, a formidably telligenic candidate, and then in 437 00:24:35,560 --> 00:24:39,239 Speaker 1: the Trump era with social media, Trump went around all 438 00:24:39,280 --> 00:24:41,520 Speaker 1: the gatekeepers. He was able to go to his supporters 439 00:24:41,560 --> 00:24:45,639 Speaker 1: directly through social media, and he is the personification of 440 00:24:45,720 --> 00:24:48,880 Speaker 1: a certain form of celebrity the United States. I think 441 00:24:48,920 --> 00:24:51,879 Speaker 1: his celebrity was built on sand. He was the entrepreneurial 442 00:24:51,880 --> 00:24:54,159 Speaker 1: guru from the masses, while in the real world he 443 00:24:54,200 --> 00:24:58,159 Speaker 1: was a serial bankruptcy artist. Nonetheless, I think there is 444 00:24:58,200 --> 00:25:01,680 Speaker 1: a strand you could tie from John CA Kennedy to 445 00:25:01,880 --> 00:25:05,160 Speaker 1: Donald Trump in terms of the political process, and polling 446 00:25:05,240 --> 00:25:07,359 Speaker 1: is so tied up in that right. Polling is an 447 00:25:07,440 --> 00:25:10,760 Speaker 1: element of how you package the candidate. Maybe the core element. 448 00:25:11,440 --> 00:25:13,800 Speaker 1: Have you had thoughts about any of that. I know 449 00:25:13,840 --> 00:25:16,240 Speaker 1: you've said in various places you've tried to reckon with 450 00:25:16,880 --> 00:25:19,119 Speaker 1: the life you led as upholster prior to Trump. We 451 00:25:19,160 --> 00:25:21,800 Speaker 1: talked about that earlier and the life you're trying to lead. Now, 452 00:25:22,640 --> 00:25:24,399 Speaker 1: tell me what you think of that long list of 453 00:25:24,440 --> 00:25:26,160 Speaker 1: particular as I just put on your doorstep. 454 00:25:27,160 --> 00:25:29,959 Speaker 2: It's an interesting list, and I would have stopped at 455 00:25:29,960 --> 00:25:33,000 Speaker 2: Bill Clinton, Who's the one who taught me that there's 456 00:25:33,240 --> 00:25:36,679 Speaker 2: a difference in how people hear you depending on words 457 00:25:36,680 --> 00:25:39,679 Speaker 2: you use. It was Bill Clinton who first came up 458 00:25:39,680 --> 00:25:43,400 Speaker 2: with the idea that we're going to have revenue enhancements. 459 00:25:43,520 --> 00:25:46,760 Speaker 2: That's what we call them. Any normal human being would 460 00:25:46,760 --> 00:25:51,320 Speaker 2: have called them tax increases, but that kills the popularity, 461 00:25:51,600 --> 00:25:55,720 Speaker 2: so they're now revenue enhancements. I know. In nineteen ninety four, 462 00:25:56,440 --> 00:26:01,080 Speaker 2: new gingridg focused on the Crime Bill to essentially ridiculed 463 00:26:01,080 --> 00:26:06,000 Speaker 2: Democrats for supporting midnight basketball, dance, lessons for convicts, all 464 00:26:06,040 --> 00:26:10,159 Speaker 2: sorts of programs that the public would hate. And then 465 00:26:10,200 --> 00:26:13,479 Speaker 2: I saw how it was used George W. Bush versus 466 00:26:13,520 --> 00:26:17,160 Speaker 2: Al Gore in two thousand. We've had a steady progression 467 00:26:17,880 --> 00:26:20,879 Speaker 2: of candidates on both sides of the aisle that have 468 00:26:21,080 --> 00:26:24,880 Speaker 2: used polling arguably to know what matters to the public, 469 00:26:25,040 --> 00:26:28,640 Speaker 2: but in some ways to know how to manipulate that public. 470 00:26:29,200 --> 00:26:31,000 Speaker 2: And that's one of the reasons why I got further 471 00:26:31,200 --> 00:26:35,639 Speaker 2: and further and further away from politics, from elections, because 472 00:26:35,680 --> 00:26:36,920 Speaker 2: I didn't want to be part of that. 473 00:26:37,520 --> 00:26:41,480 Speaker 1: Because you felt that the polling process was corrupting both 474 00:26:41,880 --> 00:26:44,480 Speaker 1: policymaking and the packaging of candidates. 475 00:26:44,880 --> 00:26:47,920 Speaker 2: I thought it was making American politics way too negative. 476 00:26:48,840 --> 00:26:52,639 Speaker 2: And the irony of that is, I'm now so pessimistic, 477 00:26:52,800 --> 00:26:58,280 Speaker 2: I'm now so frightened of the future candidly, and I 478 00:26:58,320 --> 00:27:01,640 Speaker 2: should have spoken up much earlier challenge this situation. That's 479 00:27:01,680 --> 00:27:04,760 Speaker 2: probably my greatest regret of my career is that I 480 00:27:04,800 --> 00:27:08,200 Speaker 2: saw some of these trends happening and I didn't speak up. 481 00:27:08,480 --> 00:27:10,119 Speaker 1: Why Why didn't you speak up? 482 00:27:10,480 --> 00:27:15,000 Speaker 2: I don't know. Because my friends were in politics, they 483 00:27:15,000 --> 00:27:17,480 Speaker 2: were in business, and I don't want to make their 484 00:27:17,520 --> 00:27:18,879 Speaker 2: lives any more difficult. 485 00:27:19,359 --> 00:27:21,639 Speaker 1: Was it the paycheck? You were making a good living? 486 00:27:21,960 --> 00:27:23,680 Speaker 1: Was that hard to walk away from. 487 00:27:23,640 --> 00:27:25,040 Speaker 2: It's easy to walk away from it. 488 00:27:25,119 --> 00:27:26,680 Speaker 1: Money does, so that wasn't a factor. 489 00:27:27,240 --> 00:27:29,600 Speaker 2: Money is not a factor. Power is not a factor. 490 00:27:29,920 --> 00:27:32,960 Speaker 2: Fame is not a factor. It's just simply easier to do. 491 00:27:33,480 --> 00:27:34,800 Speaker 1: So, did you feel like you were part of a 492 00:27:34,840 --> 00:27:36,800 Speaker 1: community you didn't want to leave. You mentioned that too, 493 00:27:36,840 --> 00:27:39,680 Speaker 1: that your friends were in politics. I'm just interesting because 494 00:27:39,680 --> 00:27:42,600 Speaker 1: at some point you did make a decision to step away, 495 00:27:42,600 --> 00:27:45,000 Speaker 1: and that's an interesting process for anybody to go through. 496 00:27:45,680 --> 00:27:48,840 Speaker 2: Yes, And I don't recommend it to anybody because people 497 00:27:48,960 --> 00:27:51,800 Speaker 2: around you, your friends, will tell you do the right thing, 498 00:27:52,280 --> 00:27:55,600 Speaker 2: and they're correct. But there is a cost to doing 499 00:27:55,600 --> 00:27:58,320 Speaker 2: the right thing, to calling out people, particularly on your 500 00:27:58,359 --> 00:28:01,719 Speaker 2: side of the aisle, particularly clients of yours. If you 501 00:28:01,760 --> 00:28:05,040 Speaker 2: start to call out people who you are aligned with, 502 00:28:05,680 --> 00:28:10,080 Speaker 2: allied with, even friends, guess what you pay a price, 503 00:28:10,400 --> 00:28:15,480 Speaker 2: not financially, emotionally, personally, And at the time I didn't want. 504 00:28:15,320 --> 00:28:19,320 Speaker 1: To pay that because you get exiled from the community. 505 00:28:18,280 --> 00:28:23,040 Speaker 2: Because you find yourself at odds with your friends. You're 506 00:28:23,080 --> 00:28:26,200 Speaker 2: the host of this show. Have you not called somebody 507 00:28:26,240 --> 00:28:29,960 Speaker 2: out who you like very much on your podcast and 508 00:28:30,000 --> 00:28:32,119 Speaker 2: then had to explain to them while you took them on, 509 00:28:32,640 --> 00:28:36,600 Speaker 2: while you publicly criticize them. Because if you haven't, then 510 00:28:36,600 --> 00:28:38,880 Speaker 2: you don't know what it's like to go through the process. 511 00:28:39,120 --> 00:28:41,640 Speaker 2: And I did, and I took a whole lot of 512 00:28:41,720 --> 00:28:44,840 Speaker 2: craft for it, and there were times when I regretted it, 513 00:28:45,360 --> 00:28:49,160 Speaker 2: But after three years now of having done it, I'm 514 00:28:49,200 --> 00:28:51,400 Speaker 2: glad I did. I just wish I'd done it sooner. 515 00:28:52,360 --> 00:28:54,840 Speaker 1: What was the first glimmer you've got of that? And again, 516 00:28:54,880 --> 00:28:58,400 Speaker 1: let's talk about BT Before Trump, was there a moment 517 00:28:58,440 --> 00:29:00,720 Speaker 1: where you felt like your work as a pulser was 518 00:29:00,760 --> 00:29:03,880 Speaker 1: going sideways, that it wasn't contributing to the world in 519 00:29:03,880 --> 00:29:04,920 Speaker 1: the way that you wanted it to. 520 00:29:05,560 --> 00:29:09,120 Speaker 2: Absolutely, and that's the issue of climate change, the work 521 00:29:09,160 --> 00:29:13,560 Speaker 2: that I did that media people still cite today still 522 00:29:13,720 --> 00:29:18,160 Speaker 2: after twenty three years. I began my polling as an 523 00:29:18,160 --> 00:29:22,320 Speaker 2: opponent of the climate issue. I raised questions about the science. 524 00:29:22,760 --> 00:29:26,760 Speaker 2: I tried to understand. I challenged those who were so 525 00:29:27,440 --> 00:29:29,960 Speaker 2: absolutely convinced that it was happening. And this is back 526 00:29:30,000 --> 00:29:32,760 Speaker 2: in two thousand and two thousand and one, and to 527 00:29:32,800 --> 00:29:36,800 Speaker 2: this day there are still people who pretend as though 528 00:29:36,960 --> 00:29:39,640 Speaker 2: I still feel this way, as a way to attack. 529 00:29:39,320 --> 00:29:41,880 Speaker 1: Me, when in fact you later testified in front of 530 00:29:41,960 --> 00:29:44,520 Speaker 1: Congress that you thought you were wrong in the early 531 00:29:44,560 --> 00:29:48,320 Speaker 1: two thousands, your position on climate Chang was wrong, and 532 00:29:48,360 --> 00:29:50,560 Speaker 1: that you wouldn't say the same things currently that you 533 00:29:50,560 --> 00:29:51,480 Speaker 1: said about it then. 534 00:29:52,200 --> 00:29:54,760 Speaker 2: Exactly, And that, by the way, that testimony was five 535 00:29:54,880 --> 00:29:55,400 Speaker 2: years ago. 536 00:29:56,080 --> 00:29:58,120 Speaker 1: You brought up climate change at a moment when you 537 00:29:58,200 --> 00:30:01,560 Speaker 1: started to feel like your work is Polster was going sideways. 538 00:30:01,960 --> 00:30:05,400 Speaker 1: What about your work at that time made you uncomfortable 539 00:30:05,400 --> 00:30:06,040 Speaker 1: about polling? 540 00:30:07,200 --> 00:30:11,680 Speaker 2: Because I was learning that I was wrong and the 541 00:30:11,720 --> 00:30:15,520 Speaker 2: work that i'd done was really, really good. And now 542 00:30:15,640 --> 00:30:18,320 Speaker 2: it's the work that I've done since then. And I'm 543 00:30:18,320 --> 00:30:23,160 Speaker 2: going to give you two great examples. The community that 544 00:30:23,320 --> 00:30:26,600 Speaker 2: is concerned about climate that believes it's a crisis or 545 00:30:26,640 --> 00:30:30,400 Speaker 2: climate chaos, however you want to communicate it, continues to 546 00:30:30,520 --> 00:30:34,520 Speaker 2: use the word sustainability, that we need a sustainable environment. 547 00:30:35,120 --> 00:30:38,880 Speaker 2: The problem with sustainability is that it's status quo. So 548 00:30:38,920 --> 00:30:42,360 Speaker 2: when I started to look at the climate science and 549 00:30:42,400 --> 00:30:45,240 Speaker 2: realize that I made a mistake, I wanted to come 550 00:30:45,320 --> 00:30:47,520 Speaker 2: up with language that I would address the things that 551 00:30:47,680 --> 00:30:52,440 Speaker 2: I had written about. And so I realized that being cleaner, safer, 552 00:30:52,760 --> 00:30:57,800 Speaker 2: healthier was better than being sustainable, because sustainability is the 553 00:30:57,840 --> 00:31:02,520 Speaker 2: status quote. Cleaner, safer, healthier means better. Trying to get 554 00:31:02,560 --> 00:31:06,600 Speaker 2: the climate community to use better language is just about impossible. 555 00:31:07,320 --> 00:31:11,760 Speaker 2: A second example is that the public absolutely cares about 556 00:31:11,760 --> 00:31:16,680 Speaker 2: the next generation, cares about their children. To focus on 557 00:31:16,760 --> 00:31:20,040 Speaker 2: how this climate issue is going to affect them is 558 00:31:20,080 --> 00:31:24,800 Speaker 2: the most powerful way to reach the public. But the 559 00:31:24,880 --> 00:31:28,920 Speaker 2: same climate activists want to talk about what it's doing 560 00:31:28,960 --> 00:31:33,120 Speaker 2: to the planet. The planet is too big. Their children 561 00:31:33,400 --> 00:31:35,920 Speaker 2: is just the right focal point. 562 00:31:36,000 --> 00:31:38,440 Speaker 1: So there's some frank consulting work going on right there. 563 00:31:38,440 --> 00:31:40,880 Speaker 1: If you want to win the climate change battle, focus 564 00:31:40,960 --> 00:31:43,600 Speaker 1: on its impact on the people you love, and not 565 00:31:43,640 --> 00:31:46,360 Speaker 1: a big, amorphous planet that you can't get your arms around. 566 00:31:46,480 --> 00:31:48,480 Speaker 1: You can get your arms around your kid, you can't 567 00:31:48,480 --> 00:31:51,640 Speaker 1: get your arms around the planet exactly. You can use 568 00:31:51,680 --> 00:31:54,680 Speaker 1: that in your campaign, Frank, I'll let you so. Also, 569 00:31:54,680 --> 00:31:56,360 Speaker 1: to get back to just correcting the record on this, 570 00:31:56,400 --> 00:31:59,280 Speaker 1: that whole climate change work during a period when people 571 00:31:59,320 --> 00:32:01,640 Speaker 1: were calling it lie warming, and you offered advice by 572 00:32:01,640 --> 00:32:04,560 Speaker 1: calling it climate change instead, none of that was in 573 00:32:04,560 --> 00:32:07,080 Speaker 1: the service of the Bush administration. I must have had 574 00:32:07,080 --> 00:32:08,440 Speaker 1: that wrong when I brought that up earlier. 575 00:32:09,120 --> 00:32:11,400 Speaker 2: It's been written about, so I'm not surprised that you 576 00:32:11,520 --> 00:32:17,479 Speaker 2: said it. I never not once met George W. Bush 577 00:32:17,680 --> 00:32:20,360 Speaker 2: in the White House and anythings that he did, and 578 00:32:20,360 --> 00:32:23,400 Speaker 2: he actually shook his hand at a Republican events. He 579 00:32:23,440 --> 00:32:25,920 Speaker 2: had no idea who I was. He never ad my stuff. 580 00:32:26,640 --> 00:32:29,280 Speaker 2: I was doing this at the time for the business community. 581 00:32:29,800 --> 00:32:32,440 Speaker 2: But that isn't sexy enough. That doesn't sell. 582 00:32:32,800 --> 00:32:34,840 Speaker 1: And no one from the White House, no one representing 583 00:32:34,840 --> 00:32:39,080 Speaker 1: the Bushes had retained your services. No, okay, No, Well, 584 00:32:39,120 --> 00:32:41,200 Speaker 1: that's good for people to know that, and we should 585 00:32:41,200 --> 00:32:43,160 Speaker 1: try to excize that from the public record, and we 586 00:32:43,160 --> 00:32:46,560 Speaker 1: can do that now through this show forever on this 587 00:32:46,680 --> 00:32:49,920 Speaker 1: issue of Trump's intervention in your worldview and how it 588 00:32:50,000 --> 00:32:52,480 Speaker 1: was such an eye opener for you, and you said 589 00:32:52,520 --> 00:32:54,320 Speaker 1: earlier in the top of the show that it was 590 00:32:54,360 --> 00:32:57,240 Speaker 1: because he didn't tell the truth and you lost faith 591 00:32:57,280 --> 00:32:59,760 Speaker 1: in him as a political actor and a person. I 592 00:32:59,760 --> 00:33:03,960 Speaker 1: guess out of that. One of the curious phenomenons watching 593 00:33:04,040 --> 00:33:06,720 Speaker 1: right now is that trump Ism and the uses and 594 00:33:06,760 --> 00:33:11,480 Speaker 1: abuses of propaganda and social division I think pervades a 595 00:33:11,480 --> 00:33:15,200 Speaker 1: lot of the Republican messaging right now. When I look 596 00:33:15,240 --> 00:33:18,000 Speaker 1: at what I think are some of the foundations going 597 00:33:18,040 --> 00:33:22,200 Speaker 1: into twenty twenty four of Republican messaging, I look at 598 00:33:22,480 --> 00:33:25,520 Speaker 1: the backlash against immigration, I look at some of the 599 00:33:25,560 --> 00:33:31,440 Speaker 1: anti woke statements, and obviously those pushes touch on real things. 600 00:33:31,480 --> 00:33:34,320 Speaker 1: People have concerns about the border. People have real concerns 601 00:33:34,320 --> 00:33:37,760 Speaker 1: about an unmanaged border. People are concerned that perhaps college 602 00:33:37,800 --> 00:33:42,960 Speaker 1: curriculums are getting overtaken by people who have ideology in 603 00:33:43,000 --> 00:33:45,400 Speaker 1: the front of their minds rather than learning. But as 604 00:33:45,400 --> 00:33:49,160 Speaker 1: to whether or not either of these things amount to 605 00:33:49,200 --> 00:33:52,360 Speaker 1: the kind of a crisis, the candidates, like RHN de Stantists, 606 00:33:52,360 --> 00:33:56,320 Speaker 1: for example, pedal constantly in their messaging. I think it's 607 00:33:56,360 --> 00:33:59,840 Speaker 1: an interesting referendum around whether or not the GOP right 608 00:33:59,840 --> 00:34:02,960 Speaker 1: now now has the right messages lined up going into 609 00:34:02,960 --> 00:34:05,120 Speaker 1: twenty twenty four. And I was wondering what you thought 610 00:34:05,120 --> 00:34:05,480 Speaker 1: about that. 611 00:34:06,400 --> 00:34:08,719 Speaker 2: So allow me to tell you a story about an 612 00:34:08,760 --> 00:34:12,840 Speaker 2: interaction with Trump that had such an impact on me, 613 00:34:13,000 --> 00:34:16,319 Speaker 2: and I've not spoken about it until now. I was 614 00:34:16,400 --> 00:34:18,680 Speaker 2: fortunate enough to be invited to write on Air Force 615 00:34:18,760 --> 00:34:22,239 Speaker 2: one between Los Angeles and Las Vegas. Trump is doing 616 00:34:22,239 --> 00:34:25,480 Speaker 2: a speech. So being sat in the very back of 617 00:34:25,520 --> 00:34:27,759 Speaker 2: the plane, the plane takes off, they come and said 618 00:34:27,840 --> 00:34:30,200 Speaker 2: for me. I brought to the front of the plane 619 00:34:30,239 --> 00:34:34,160 Speaker 2: and there's the President sits me down. It's just myself 620 00:34:34,800 --> 00:34:37,719 Speaker 2: the president, the Republican leader at the time, House Leader 621 00:34:37,800 --> 00:34:41,120 Speaker 2: Kevin McCarthy, and we begin to have a conversation about 622 00:34:41,160 --> 00:34:43,879 Speaker 2: language and messaging, and he says to me, what would 623 00:34:43,920 --> 00:34:45,920 Speaker 2: you tell me? What have you heard out there? And 624 00:34:46,000 --> 00:34:49,320 Speaker 2: I said, you're trying to get a border wall built. 625 00:34:49,880 --> 00:34:52,400 Speaker 2: But their Democrats are not going to build a wall. 626 00:34:53,080 --> 00:34:57,960 Speaker 2: They will build a security barrier. They will build something 627 00:34:58,680 --> 00:35:01,880 Speaker 2: that makes it more difficult for people to come across illegally, 628 00:35:02,360 --> 00:35:04,759 Speaker 2: but they won't build a wall. So Trump hears this 629 00:35:05,160 --> 00:35:08,920 Speaker 2: and his response to me is, but Frank, I've been 630 00:35:08,920 --> 00:35:12,280 Speaker 2: saying build a wall, build a wall. All my supporters 631 00:35:12,400 --> 00:35:14,839 Speaker 2: know that chance, they chanted at every event I do. 632 00:35:15,960 --> 00:35:20,120 Speaker 2: That's a horrible chance. Build the security barrier, build the 633 00:35:20,280 --> 00:35:22,399 Speaker 2: security And I said, sir, that's not what I mean. 634 00:35:23,400 --> 00:35:28,080 Speaker 2: In Washington as policy called it a security barrier, and 635 00:35:28,120 --> 00:35:30,600 Speaker 2: then in your rallies, you can call it a wall. 636 00:35:31,040 --> 00:35:33,399 Speaker 2: So he doesn't like that answer, so he calls Jared 637 00:35:33,480 --> 00:35:36,680 Speaker 2: Kushner to come in first. Then he calls Steven Miller 638 00:35:36,719 --> 00:35:39,960 Speaker 2: to come in, and then he says, hey, guys, Frank says, 639 00:35:40,160 --> 00:35:43,160 Speaker 2: we got a new chance, build a security barrier. And 640 00:35:43,200 --> 00:35:45,480 Speaker 2: I said, sir, that is not what I mean, and 641 00:35:45,520 --> 00:35:50,319 Speaker 2: I was genuinely angry. So we get to Vegas, it's 642 00:35:50,320 --> 00:35:53,000 Speaker 2: a very short flight. He does this thing. I'm invited 643 00:35:53,040 --> 00:35:55,520 Speaker 2: to come back to Washington, d C. Because it's where 644 00:35:55,520 --> 00:35:59,640 Speaker 2: I'm heading anyway, and once again we get into the 645 00:35:59,680 --> 00:36:03,719 Speaker 2: same conversations. I'm about to acknowledge something I've never admitted 646 00:36:03,800 --> 00:36:07,960 Speaker 2: before until now. I was so agitated that he was 647 00:36:08,000 --> 00:36:12,200 Speaker 2: making fun of me, that he was cheapening the advice, 648 00:36:12,239 --> 00:36:15,480 Speaker 2: that he was politicizing something that I thought was very 649 00:36:15,480 --> 00:36:19,080 Speaker 2: important to policy, that the only way that I could 650 00:36:19,120 --> 00:36:22,200 Speaker 2: respond is simply to close my eyes and fall asleep. 651 00:36:22,680 --> 00:36:25,400 Speaker 2: So I must be the first person ever the Jews 652 00:36:25,440 --> 00:36:28,880 Speaker 2: spoken to who fell asleep on Air Force one in 653 00:36:28,960 --> 00:36:31,880 Speaker 2: front of the president. It was the way that I 654 00:36:31,920 --> 00:36:36,040 Speaker 2: took myself out of the conversation. Your point is well taken. 655 00:36:36,400 --> 00:36:39,720 Speaker 2: The Republican Party used to be the party of Ronald Reagan. 656 00:36:39,880 --> 00:36:45,680 Speaker 2: The eleventh commandment shall not criticize another Republican. Now that's 657 00:36:45,719 --> 00:36:48,960 Speaker 2: the focus of most Republicans. That the focus of primaries. 658 00:36:49,000 --> 00:36:51,400 Speaker 2: That's all you see in these presidents of the debates 659 00:36:51,680 --> 00:36:54,840 Speaker 2: is candidates feeding up on each other instead of focusing 660 00:36:54,920 --> 00:36:57,839 Speaker 2: on what's wrong with the Democrats. They're focusing on what's 661 00:36:57,880 --> 00:37:01,440 Speaker 2: wrong with each other, their personal attack, their visious attacks. 662 00:37:01,760 --> 00:37:06,520 Speaker 2: And I credit the origination of that to Donald Trump 663 00:37:06,680 --> 00:37:10,360 Speaker 2: in twenty fifteen and twenty sixteen, and now it's become 664 00:37:10,440 --> 00:37:12,280 Speaker 2: commonplace for the Republican Party. 665 00:37:13,280 --> 00:37:16,800 Speaker 1: So that's internessine warfare that would have happened in the past. 666 00:37:17,360 --> 00:37:20,360 Speaker 1: What about the message that's going outside of the party 667 00:37:20,400 --> 00:37:24,239 Speaker 1: to voters. How do you see that situated strategically within 668 00:37:24,280 --> 00:37:25,359 Speaker 1: the GOP right now? 669 00:37:26,120 --> 00:37:29,319 Speaker 2: It's the exact opposite of where I came to politics. 670 00:37:29,880 --> 00:37:34,240 Speaker 2: Ronald Reagan. His language was about its morning in America. 671 00:37:34,280 --> 00:37:38,320 Speaker 2: His language was about doesn't matter who we are, but 672 00:37:38,440 --> 00:37:41,120 Speaker 2: where we came from. What matters is where we're going. 673 00:37:41,560 --> 00:37:44,880 Speaker 2: So his was a future focused and an uplifting message. 674 00:37:45,120 --> 00:37:48,640 Speaker 2: And Donald Trump is exactly the opposite. He even uses 675 00:37:48,680 --> 00:37:52,400 Speaker 2: the word revenge, and it's all about the kind of 676 00:37:52,480 --> 00:37:55,440 Speaker 2: politics of having a gripe. There's a word for it. 677 00:37:55,480 --> 00:37:58,600 Speaker 2: I can't come up with it right now, but it's resentment. 678 00:37:58,680 --> 00:38:01,520 Speaker 2: It's the politics of resents, and it's the politics of 679 00:38:01,520 --> 00:38:04,400 Speaker 2: getting even, and I don't think that's healthy for a country. 680 00:38:04,440 --> 00:38:07,000 Speaker 2: I think we've seen the impact of that. He's not 681 00:38:07,120 --> 00:38:10,440 Speaker 2: alone I believe the Democrats do it as well, but clearly, 682 00:38:10,480 --> 00:38:13,240 Speaker 2: with social media at an all time high in terms 683 00:38:13,239 --> 00:38:18,440 Speaker 2: of impact, we now get our information to affirm us 684 00:38:18,560 --> 00:38:23,080 Speaker 2: rather than to inform us, and that's where the politics 685 00:38:23,080 --> 00:38:26,360 Speaker 2: of resentment comes in, and I think that we're now 686 00:38:26,440 --> 00:38:30,600 Speaker 2: in danger of losing the ability to talk to each 687 00:38:30,640 --> 00:38:31,880 Speaker 2: other as a result. 688 00:38:32,120 --> 00:38:34,840 Speaker 1: The conundrum in that, too, Frank, is that the politics 689 00:38:34,840 --> 00:38:38,320 Speaker 1: of resentment have proven to be an effective path to power, 690 00:38:39,040 --> 00:38:43,799 Speaker 1: even if they create problematic results divisions within society, a 691 00:38:43,880 --> 00:38:48,840 Speaker 1: lack of policy. As a power acquisition strategy, it's worked, 692 00:38:48,920 --> 00:38:51,400 Speaker 1: and Trump demonstrated that in spades, which is why I 693 00:38:51,400 --> 00:38:53,719 Speaker 1: think you have some of these Trump light candidates like 694 00:38:54,360 --> 00:38:58,560 Speaker 1: Ramaswami or the Sciantists trying to walk in his shoes 695 00:38:58,600 --> 00:38:59,680 Speaker 1: without his charisma. 696 00:39:00,400 --> 00:39:02,280 Speaker 2: I want to take the restraint to that just before 697 00:39:02,320 --> 00:39:06,120 Speaker 2: the break, yep, which is that I agree with that, 698 00:39:06,280 --> 00:39:09,040 Speaker 2: and it's why over the last twelve months I've started 699 00:39:09,040 --> 00:39:12,360 Speaker 2: to say to people and this came after the events 700 00:39:12,360 --> 00:39:15,040 Speaker 2: of January sixth, twenty twenty one, so it's only within 701 00:39:15,080 --> 00:39:19,440 Speaker 2: the last really two years that there's some things that 702 00:39:19,520 --> 00:39:22,759 Speaker 2: are more important than the next election that you can 703 00:39:22,920 --> 00:39:27,400 Speaker 2: absolutely win votes win seats and maybe even win an election, 704 00:39:28,520 --> 00:39:33,399 Speaker 2: do the politics of resentment and woke, but you will 705 00:39:33,440 --> 00:39:38,239 Speaker 2: be very sorry about the country you have because you 706 00:39:38,280 --> 00:39:41,840 Speaker 2: may win that election, but you're lost in an entire generation. 707 00:39:42,760 --> 00:39:48,000 Speaker 2: And I'm now telling people overtly publicly that be very 708 00:39:48,040 --> 00:39:52,120 Speaker 2: careful about what you say to get elected, because it'll 709 00:39:52,120 --> 00:39:54,560 Speaker 2: come back to haunt you after the election. 710 00:39:55,719 --> 00:39:57,319 Speaker 1: On that note, I'm going to take a break, Brank, 711 00:39:57,360 --> 00:40:04,920 Speaker 1: and we'll come right back. We're back with Frank, once 712 00:40:05,040 --> 00:40:08,279 Speaker 1: a prominent polster, an observer of the political scene both 713 00:40:08,280 --> 00:40:12,160 Speaker 1: in the US and overseas. Frank, in the prior segment, 714 00:40:12,239 --> 00:40:14,680 Speaker 1: we were talking about where the GOP is with its 715 00:40:14,760 --> 00:40:17,960 Speaker 1: messaging in the wake of trump Ism. With trump Ism 716 00:40:18,000 --> 00:40:20,960 Speaker 1: still very present, tell me a little bit about how 717 00:40:21,000 --> 00:40:24,759 Speaker 1: you see democratic messaging right now, how the Biden White 718 00:40:24,800 --> 00:40:26,839 Speaker 1: House is playing this. One of the things that's left 719 00:40:26,880 --> 00:40:29,400 Speaker 1: out at me and all of this is that the 720 00:40:29,400 --> 00:40:32,440 Speaker 1: Biden White House has struggled mightily to get credit for 721 00:40:32,520 --> 00:40:35,880 Speaker 1: the economy, for GDP growth and job growth that's occurred 722 00:40:35,920 --> 00:40:38,920 Speaker 1: since he assumed office. But when you look at the polling, 723 00:40:39,440 --> 00:40:42,719 Speaker 1: that's getting very little traction. That's curious to me, and 724 00:40:42,760 --> 00:40:45,120 Speaker 1: I'm also interested in any other thoughts you have about 725 00:40:45,400 --> 00:40:47,319 Speaker 1: the Democratic Party's messaging right now. 726 00:40:47,920 --> 00:40:52,000 Speaker 2: Well, the public blames the Biden administration for inflation. Whether 727 00:40:52,080 --> 00:40:56,759 Speaker 2: or not that's legitimate, that's a question for economists. But 728 00:40:56,880 --> 00:41:00,440 Speaker 2: when inflation started to pick up, his exact word in 729 00:41:00,560 --> 00:41:05,600 Speaker 2: response is that inflation is transitory. Tell that to someone 730 00:41:05,840 --> 00:41:09,160 Speaker 2: who lives paycheck to paycheck. Tell that to the twenty 731 00:41:09,200 --> 00:41:12,520 Speaker 2: three percent of Americans that literally don't know if they're 732 00:41:12,520 --> 00:41:14,480 Speaker 2: going to be able to pay their bills at the 733 00:41:14,600 --> 00:41:17,080 Speaker 2: end of the week. And they felt that the administration 734 00:41:17,200 --> 00:41:19,759 Speaker 2: paid no attention to it. And in fact, we went 735 00:41:19,800 --> 00:41:23,320 Speaker 2: through our first Thanksgiving and our first Christmas when people 736 00:41:23,320 --> 00:41:25,640 Speaker 2: couldnot afford to buy the dinners, they could not afford 737 00:41:25,719 --> 00:41:29,200 Speaker 2: to travel because food prices were high, gas prices were high, 738 00:41:29,520 --> 00:41:34,040 Speaker 2: insurance prices went up, housing prices, want everything, And there 739 00:41:34,080 --> 00:41:36,719 Speaker 2: was no sense of understanding from the White House for 740 00:41:36,880 --> 00:41:41,440 Speaker 2: months as this went forward. So that was part of it. 741 00:41:41,600 --> 00:41:44,480 Speaker 2: And the other part of it is the president offered 742 00:41:45,080 --> 00:41:49,440 Speaker 2: to be postpartisan. He actually ran as a and I 743 00:41:49,520 --> 00:41:52,680 Speaker 2: quote a uniter, but for the first year of his 744 00:41:52,760 --> 00:41:56,920 Speaker 2: administration there was nothing about unity. He rarely met with 745 00:41:57,080 --> 00:42:00,440 Speaker 2: the Republican leaders of Congress. He rarely gave aged in 746 00:42:00,520 --> 00:42:04,719 Speaker 2: any kind of constructive conversation at a time when we 747 00:42:04,880 --> 00:42:08,239 Speaker 2: desperately needed Democrats Republicans to be in the same room 748 00:42:08,560 --> 00:42:11,920 Speaker 2: at the same time hammering out their differences. Because in 749 00:42:11,960 --> 00:42:15,560 Speaker 2: the end, we're a fifty to fifty country. You ask 750 00:42:15,600 --> 00:42:18,640 Speaker 2: people to identify themselves as a Republican or Democrat, it's 751 00:42:18,760 --> 00:42:23,240 Speaker 2: almost dead. Even so, we have to give people the voice. 752 00:42:24,440 --> 00:42:28,239 Speaker 2: We have to recognize that the majority should not run 753 00:42:28,360 --> 00:42:31,799 Speaker 2: rough shot over the minority in Congress or the White 754 00:42:31,800 --> 00:42:35,600 Speaker 2: House versus Congress. And that did not happen. And now 755 00:42:35,680 --> 00:42:38,600 Speaker 2: the reason why Biden isn't getting credits has nothing to 756 00:42:38,640 --> 00:42:41,560 Speaker 2: do with his policy and everything to do with his age. 757 00:42:41,840 --> 00:42:44,120 Speaker 2: And I know that listeners right now just by saying 758 00:42:44,160 --> 00:42:47,799 Speaker 2: that their hands explode. But all you have to do 759 00:42:47,880 --> 00:42:51,600 Speaker 2: is look at the police. Joe Biden is old, and 760 00:42:51,640 --> 00:42:54,680 Speaker 2: he's asking us to vote for him, not as an 761 00:42:54,680 --> 00:42:57,719 Speaker 2: eighty one year old, He's asking us to vote for 762 00:42:57,800 --> 00:43:00,480 Speaker 2: him as an eighty six year old. He would be 763 00:43:00,560 --> 00:43:03,279 Speaker 2: eighty six at the end of his term. So the 764 00:43:03,320 --> 00:43:06,080 Speaker 2: public is looking at him and they say, thank you 765 00:43:07,000 --> 00:43:10,960 Speaker 2: for the Chips Act, thank you for fixing infrastructure, thank 766 00:43:11,000 --> 00:43:15,400 Speaker 2: you for making these investments, thank you for writing the ship, 767 00:43:15,480 --> 00:43:19,479 Speaker 2: for adding some stability. But sir, it's time to go, 768 00:43:20,280 --> 00:43:22,480 Speaker 2: and he's not listening to them, and the members of 769 00:43:22,520 --> 00:43:28,640 Speaker 2: Congress are certainly not engaged. They sound so political, so partisan, 770 00:43:29,080 --> 00:43:33,560 Speaker 2: so angry, that there's no sense of You mentioned early 771 00:43:33,640 --> 00:43:37,960 Speaker 2: in this program, JFK I brought up Bill Clinton, Barack Obama. 772 00:43:38,400 --> 00:43:42,200 Speaker 2: These are three Democratic leaders who understood that you had 773 00:43:42,239 --> 00:43:46,520 Speaker 2: to focus on hope and opportunity rather than anger and despair. 774 00:43:47,760 --> 00:43:51,360 Speaker 2: So I'm very critical of both political parties for missing 775 00:43:51,920 --> 00:43:57,960 Speaker 2: a special moment to reignite our faith in the future 776 00:43:58,280 --> 00:44:02,239 Speaker 2: and to reconnect us both to our governing institutions and 777 00:44:02,280 --> 00:44:04,520 Speaker 2: the people who run them. They're both failing. 778 00:44:05,120 --> 00:44:08,880 Speaker 1: So you've identified Biden's age and inflation as two of 779 00:44:08,880 --> 00:44:12,400 Speaker 1: the things undercutting his ability to reposition himself. Is that 780 00:44:12,520 --> 00:44:15,600 Speaker 1: something that polling and messaging can cure. 781 00:44:17,000 --> 00:44:21,120 Speaker 2: Well, it's interesting because Jeffrey Katzenberg, who I'm so eager 782 00:44:21,200 --> 00:44:26,600 Speaker 2: to meet. He's a Hollywood mogul, producer, very active in 783 00:44:26,760 --> 00:44:29,839 Speaker 2: entertainment and very successful, but he ought to stay out 784 00:44:29,840 --> 00:44:32,839 Speaker 2: of politics because he's encouraging Joe Biden to lean into 785 00:44:32,880 --> 00:44:36,600 Speaker 2: the age, to say, I've got the experience. He's telling 786 00:44:36,680 --> 00:44:40,360 Speaker 2: Joe Biden to promote the fact that he's old not 787 00:44:40,480 --> 00:44:44,440 Speaker 2: to use that language, and he doesn't understand that the 788 00:44:44,480 --> 00:44:48,160 Speaker 2: American people do not want a president in their eighties. 789 00:44:48,800 --> 00:44:51,960 Speaker 1: Democrats, I would point out that if Donald Trump gets elected, 790 00:44:51,960 --> 00:44:55,120 Speaker 1: he'd be eighty one at the end of his first term, 791 00:44:55,480 --> 00:44:58,960 Speaker 1: so it's interesting the second term, well, right at the 792 00:44:59,040 --> 00:45:01,600 Speaker 1: end of the second term. That was just wishful thinking 793 00:45:01,680 --> 00:45:04,960 Speaker 1: on my part. So the age problem doesn't accrue to 794 00:45:05,000 --> 00:45:07,640 Speaker 1: Donald Trump in the way that it accrues to Biden, 795 00:45:08,320 --> 00:45:10,880 Speaker 1: So it's not simply a factor of chronology. Frank, I 796 00:45:10,880 --> 00:45:14,120 Speaker 1: think that Biden doesn't present physically in the same way 797 00:45:14,160 --> 00:45:16,880 Speaker 1: that Trump does on the campaign trail, you know, the 798 00:45:16,920 --> 00:45:20,880 Speaker 1: way each of them articulates and carries themselves. I think 799 00:45:21,120 --> 00:45:24,280 Speaker 1: there's a visible quotient with Biden, isn't there with Trump 800 00:45:24,400 --> 00:45:28,400 Speaker 1: just yet? Though Trump's become notably more mushmouth and notably 801 00:45:28,440 --> 00:45:31,680 Speaker 1: more unhinged in his tour right now, I do think 802 00:45:31,760 --> 00:45:34,919 Speaker 1: it's bonkers that anyone would think that Donald Trump would 803 00:45:34,920 --> 00:45:37,280 Speaker 1: be a more reliable steward of the ship of State 804 00:45:37,920 --> 00:45:42,080 Speaker 1: than Joe Bidenful. 805 00:45:40,920 --> 00:45:43,680 Speaker 2: Be careful your partisanship is showing. 806 00:45:44,200 --> 00:45:46,840 Speaker 1: No, it's not my partisanship. It's just my rational desire 807 00:45:47,000 --> 00:45:50,440 Speaker 1: to have adults in the room making decisions as opposed 808 00:45:50,480 --> 00:45:51,920 Speaker 1: to little kids on pogo sticks. 809 00:45:52,680 --> 00:45:55,359 Speaker 2: By the way, maybe give you the best example. Here's 810 00:45:55,400 --> 00:46:00,440 Speaker 2: another example of language. Your comments, and I know how 811 00:46:00,480 --> 00:46:03,520 Speaker 2: you feel, and there are tens of millions of people 812 00:46:03,520 --> 00:46:05,279 Speaker 2: who agree with you and they want to get in 813 00:46:05,280 --> 00:46:08,280 Speaker 2: that dig. But that's not how you succeed. The phrase 814 00:46:08,320 --> 00:46:15,560 Speaker 2: you use. We need leaders who are reasonable, sensible, and responsible. Reasonable, sensible, 815 00:46:15,640 --> 00:46:19,440 Speaker 2: responsible is far better than children on pogo sticks totally. 816 00:46:19,440 --> 00:46:21,719 Speaker 1: But I'm not running for office, Frank, I'm just in. 817 00:46:21,680 --> 00:46:23,240 Speaker 2: A jar hosting podcast. 818 00:46:23,280 --> 00:46:25,800 Speaker 1: I'm hosting a podcast, and I really do want leaders 819 00:46:25,840 --> 00:46:33,640 Speaker 1: who are responsible in reason, intelligent, reasonable, aren't bouncing around 820 00:46:33,640 --> 00:46:35,640 Speaker 1: on pogo sticks either. I would like it all as 821 00:46:35,680 --> 00:46:39,719 Speaker 1: one package. Tell me. We've had some noticeable crackups and 822 00:46:39,800 --> 00:46:44,200 Speaker 1: polling in this recent say Trump cycle, right like the 823 00:46:44,320 --> 00:46:48,120 Speaker 1: poles didn't indicate that Trump would beat Hillary Clinton. The 824 00:46:48,200 --> 00:46:50,879 Speaker 1: twenty twenty poles suggested there might be a blue wave, 825 00:46:50,960 --> 00:46:53,600 Speaker 1: it didn't occur. The twenty twenty two poles suggested to 826 00:46:53,680 --> 00:46:56,359 Speaker 1: be a red wave that didn't occur. You know, we've 827 00:46:56,360 --> 00:46:59,360 Speaker 1: talked a lot about the emotional side of campaigning, but 828 00:46:59,480 --> 00:47:03,040 Speaker 1: on the day to drive inside on the statistical side 829 00:47:03,040 --> 00:47:06,200 Speaker 1: and the analytical side of polling. Do you think this 830 00:47:06,320 --> 00:47:08,040 Speaker 1: is just power for the course, Sometimes you get it 831 00:47:08,080 --> 00:47:10,560 Speaker 1: wrong because there are margins of errors and people interpret 832 00:47:10,560 --> 00:47:13,200 Speaker 1: the data in different ways. Or do you think something's 833 00:47:13,239 --> 00:47:15,840 Speaker 1: gone off in terms of the methodology around polling. 834 00:47:16,719 --> 00:47:19,960 Speaker 2: I actually think the latter, And this is why I 835 00:47:20,000 --> 00:47:24,320 Speaker 2: say to other pollsters in my profession, stop making projections, 836 00:47:24,760 --> 00:47:29,160 Speaker 2: because every time you do, you embarrass yourself. Twenty sixteen, 837 00:47:29,200 --> 00:47:31,840 Speaker 2: the problem there was not people lying to the pollsters. 838 00:47:32,280 --> 00:47:35,640 Speaker 2: It was that some people refused to cooperate. And I 839 00:47:35,760 --> 00:47:40,000 Speaker 2: ran into this on election night. I have always trusted 840 00:47:40,040 --> 00:47:44,239 Speaker 2: the exit polls because in my lifetime they were right 841 00:47:44,320 --> 00:47:47,279 Speaker 2: better than ninety five percent of the time. If the 842 00:47:47,360 --> 00:47:51,280 Speaker 2: exit polls showed a candidate winning, let's say you thirty 843 00:47:51,280 --> 00:47:54,359 Speaker 2: three centate races, the exit polls were right thirty two 844 00:47:54,400 --> 00:47:58,240 Speaker 2: out of thirty three times. Every time in twenty sixteen 845 00:47:58,280 --> 00:48:00,960 Speaker 2: they were wrong. And the reason why, it's not that 846 00:48:01,000 --> 00:48:03,840 Speaker 2: people said they voted for the Democrat. It's that Trump 847 00:48:04,000 --> 00:48:07,799 Speaker 2: voters refused to participate they thought the exit polls were 848 00:48:07,840 --> 00:48:10,799 Speaker 2: part of the conspiracy, were part of the New York 849 00:48:10,840 --> 00:48:14,480 Speaker 2: Times and CNN and other institutions who they did not 850 00:48:14,719 --> 00:48:19,000 Speaker 2: like trying to control the election outcome. So Trump voters 851 00:48:19,000 --> 00:48:22,400 Speaker 2: would push past an exit pollster and go to the 852 00:48:22,440 --> 00:48:25,480 Speaker 2: parking lot and drive home. And because they have to 853 00:48:25,520 --> 00:48:29,719 Speaker 2: interview every tenth person or every fifteenth person, they would 854 00:48:29,719 --> 00:48:32,160 Speaker 2: then talk to the next person who came out, and 855 00:48:32,239 --> 00:48:34,719 Speaker 2: it was fifty to fifty whether that was Clinton or 856 00:48:34,760 --> 00:48:38,440 Speaker 2: whether that was Trump. Enough Trump people did not participate 857 00:48:38,520 --> 00:48:41,960 Speaker 2: that it biased the results by about three percent. Well 858 00:48:42,000 --> 00:48:46,200 Speaker 2: guess what. Three percent wasn't enough to allow the Democrats 859 00:48:46,200 --> 00:48:48,120 Speaker 2: to look like they were winning control of the Senate, 860 00:48:48,600 --> 00:48:50,759 Speaker 2: to make it look like the Democrats were going to 861 00:48:50,760 --> 00:48:53,640 Speaker 2: have a good night. And we realized by about nine 862 00:48:53,680 --> 00:48:58,279 Speaker 2: pm that evening that the exit polls were wrong. But 863 00:48:58,360 --> 00:49:02,720 Speaker 2: I emphasize it, it's not because people lie, it's because 864 00:49:02,800 --> 00:49:06,520 Speaker 2: they don't participate. The same thing happened in twenty twenty. 865 00:49:06,680 --> 00:49:10,400 Speaker 2: I remember ABC News had a survey in Wisconsin that 866 00:49:10,440 --> 00:49:14,040 Speaker 2: had Trump losing by some ridiculous number, and it was 867 00:49:14,080 --> 00:49:17,480 Speaker 2: an embarrassment. All the polls in certain states were off. 868 00:49:18,040 --> 00:49:21,160 Speaker 2: And that's because they were trying to overcompensate for what 869 00:49:21,239 --> 00:49:26,120 Speaker 2: happened in twenty sixteen. Use polling to understand why people 870 00:49:26,160 --> 00:49:29,839 Speaker 2: think the way they do. Use polling almost as an 871 00:49:30,080 --> 00:49:35,080 Speaker 2: X ray, to a diagnostic of what's right and what's wrong, 872 00:49:35,200 --> 00:49:38,440 Speaker 2: whether in a business or politics or some sort of 873 00:49:38,480 --> 00:49:42,640 Speaker 2: social issue. But stop making guesses about the future, because 874 00:49:42,640 --> 00:49:43,920 Speaker 2: you're going to get it wrong. 875 00:49:44,480 --> 00:49:47,360 Speaker 1: In that landscape. Do you think any of the current 876 00:49:47,400 --> 00:49:50,920 Speaker 1: polling around Trump. He has double digit leads within the 877 00:49:50,960 --> 00:49:53,759 Speaker 1: Republican field, and he and Biden are polling more or 878 00:49:53,840 --> 00:49:57,279 Speaker 1: less even, and it had to head national matchup. Do 879 00:49:57,360 --> 00:50:00,920 Speaker 1: you have any observations about the qu of that polling 880 00:50:01,000 --> 00:50:01,399 Speaker 1: right now? 881 00:50:02,400 --> 00:50:05,080 Speaker 2: I don't trust the outlying poll There's one survey that 882 00:50:05,080 --> 00:50:07,880 Speaker 2: has Trump beating Bien by ten points. I don't believe it. 883 00:50:08,800 --> 00:50:11,920 Speaker 2: I tend to use the real Clear Politics average of 884 00:50:12,040 --> 00:50:15,799 Speaker 2: polls because that gets rid of the outliers that are 885 00:50:15,840 --> 00:50:19,280 Speaker 2: too democratic and to Republican. I think for the most 886 00:50:19,320 --> 00:50:23,560 Speaker 2: part that real clear average is what will happen. But 887 00:50:23,640 --> 00:50:27,839 Speaker 2: I emphasize to the listener that we don't elect our 888 00:50:27,880 --> 00:50:31,800 Speaker 2: president by popular vote. We elect them by electoral college, 889 00:50:32,320 --> 00:50:34,520 Speaker 2: and if you win the right votes in the right 890 00:50:34,600 --> 00:50:39,000 Speaker 2: states that can allow you to lose the popular vote 891 00:50:39,040 --> 00:50:43,319 Speaker 2: by one, two or even three percent. Hillary Clinton got 892 00:50:43,480 --> 00:50:46,880 Speaker 2: millions of votes more than Donald Trump in twenty sixteen, 893 00:50:47,000 --> 00:50:53,080 Speaker 2: so the polling was actually rather accurate. It just didn't 894 00:50:53,120 --> 00:50:56,000 Speaker 2: record it in those individual states, and the same thing 895 00:50:56,000 --> 00:50:57,839 Speaker 2: could happen again in twenty twenty four. 896 00:50:58,640 --> 00:51:00,640 Speaker 1: I always like to ask people at the end of 897 00:51:00,640 --> 00:51:03,760 Speaker 1: the show what they've learned, you know, what their own 898 00:51:03,920 --> 00:51:07,960 Speaker 1: educational moment was. What have you learned about polling and 899 00:51:08,080 --> 00:51:11,240 Speaker 1: messaging in the Trump era that you didn't know before. 900 00:51:12,600 --> 00:51:16,440 Speaker 2: I teach all across the globe, and my students teach 901 00:51:16,520 --> 00:51:19,720 Speaker 2: me and explain to me the results of the polling 902 00:51:19,760 --> 00:51:23,600 Speaker 2: that I do across the globe. My African students the 903 00:51:23,640 --> 00:51:28,359 Speaker 2: African Leadership University taught me that we have completely neglected 904 00:51:28,440 --> 00:51:34,279 Speaker 2: an entire continent, the kindest, warmest, most hopeful people on 905 00:51:34,320 --> 00:51:37,320 Speaker 2: the face of the earth, and the West has ignored 906 00:51:37,360 --> 00:51:41,480 Speaker 2: them or forgotten them. I've learned from my students at 907 00:51:41,520 --> 00:51:46,520 Speaker 2: West Point about responsibility and service and civility and decency, 908 00:51:47,400 --> 00:51:51,000 Speaker 2: and that if they can do it at the military academies, 909 00:51:51,239 --> 00:51:54,520 Speaker 2: why can't the rest of America do it. I've learned 910 00:51:54,520 --> 00:51:59,120 Speaker 2: from my students at Raleigh College in the UK that 911 00:51:59,360 --> 00:52:03,000 Speaker 2: education can work. You don't have to do woke, you 912 00:52:03,000 --> 00:52:07,000 Speaker 2: don't have to do cancel culture, That students can feel 913 00:52:07,080 --> 00:52:11,440 Speaker 2: safe to articulate an opposing point of view and professors 914 00:52:11,560 --> 00:52:14,719 Speaker 2: not only don't punish them, but they actually welcome it 915 00:52:15,040 --> 00:52:19,200 Speaker 2: in a responsible fashion. I've learned from my students at 916 00:52:19,480 --> 00:52:24,520 Speaker 2: USC that so much of what's being taught in high 917 00:52:24,560 --> 00:52:28,960 Speaker 2: schools is not being remembered in college, and that if 918 00:52:28,960 --> 00:52:32,120 Speaker 2: you allow students to write people off because you disagree 919 00:52:32,160 --> 00:52:36,880 Speaker 2: with them, or you have something against a position they stand, 920 00:52:37,360 --> 00:52:41,000 Speaker 2: then you're not hearing every point of view. My students 921 00:52:41,080 --> 00:52:44,880 Speaker 2: teach me that I have to listen, I have to explore, 922 00:52:45,360 --> 00:52:49,759 Speaker 2: I have to ask, and never ever ever be satisfied 923 00:52:49,760 --> 00:52:52,480 Speaker 2: with the first answer you get, because there's a reason 924 00:52:52,600 --> 00:52:56,359 Speaker 2: behind that and a reason behind that reason. And it's 925 00:52:56,480 --> 00:52:58,920 Speaker 2: like the peeling of an onion. If you can get 926 00:52:58,960 --> 00:53:03,480 Speaker 2: to the center, may be painful, it may make your cry, 927 00:53:04,360 --> 00:53:07,160 Speaker 2: but if you get to the core, you can actually 928 00:53:07,280 --> 00:53:10,920 Speaker 2: do good. You can actually fix a problem. If you 929 00:53:11,080 --> 00:53:16,640 Speaker 2: understand why, you can learn how. And that's what it's 930 00:53:16,640 --> 00:53:16,960 Speaker 2: taught me. 931 00:53:18,480 --> 00:53:20,680 Speaker 1: Frank, we're out of time, I feel like we could 932 00:53:20,719 --> 00:53:21,320 Speaker 1: have kept going. 933 00:53:22,040 --> 00:53:22,960 Speaker 2: Thank you for having me. 934 00:53:24,160 --> 00:53:27,760 Speaker 1: Frank Luntz is a political and communications consultant and polster. 935 00:53:28,160 --> 00:53:32,480 Speaker 1: You can find him at fi LUNs dot com. Here 936 00:53:32,520 --> 00:53:37,239 Speaker 1: at crash Course, we believe the collisions can be messy, impressive, challenging, surprising, 937 00:53:37,480 --> 00:53:41,160 Speaker 1: and always instructive. In today's Crash Course, I learned that 938 00:53:41,239 --> 00:53:44,120 Speaker 1: facts matter very much to Frank Luntz, as they should. 939 00:53:44,320 --> 00:53:46,319 Speaker 1: They should matter to all of us, because in an 940 00:53:46,320 --> 00:53:50,640 Speaker 1: era full of disinformation, facts still matter. What did you learn? 941 00:53:51,040 --> 00:53:53,080 Speaker 1: We'd love to hear from you. You can tweet at 942 00:53:53,080 --> 00:53:56,359 Speaker 1: the Bloomberg Opinion handle at Opinion or me at Tim 943 00:53:56,400 --> 00:54:00,359 Speaker 1: O'Brien using the hashtag Bloomberg Crash Course. You can also 944 00:54:00,400 --> 00:54:03,239 Speaker 1: subscribe to our show wherever you're listening right now and 945 00:54:03,320 --> 00:54:05,880 Speaker 1: leave us a review. It helps more people find the show. 946 00:54:06,640 --> 00:54:10,360 Speaker 1: This episode was produced by the indispensable Anna Maazarakus, Moses 947 00:54:10,400 --> 00:54:14,520 Speaker 1: Adam and me. Our supervising producer is Magnus Hendrickson, and 948 00:54:14,600 --> 00:54:18,520 Speaker 1: we had editing help from Stage Bauman, Katie Boys, Jeff Grocott, 949 00:54:18,680 --> 00:54:22,480 Speaker 1: Mike Nitze, and Christine Vanden Bilert. Blake Maples does our 950 00:54:22,520 --> 00:54:25,759 Speaker 1: sound engineering and our original theme song was composed by 951 00:54:25,840 --> 00:54:29,520 Speaker 1: Luis Gara. I'm Tim O'Brien. We'll be back next week 952 00:54:29,680 --> 00:54:30,720 Speaker 1: with another crash course.