WEBVTT - Week 12 NFL Best Bets (Ep. 66)

0:00:13.760 --> 0:00:17.000
<v Speaker 1>Hey, everyone, Welcome back to another episode of the Betting

0:00:17.079 --> 0:00:19.880
<v Speaker 1>Pros NFL podcast. I'm your host, Dan Harris. You can

0:00:19.920 --> 0:00:22.840
<v Speaker 1>find me on Twitter at Dan Harris. Ad with me

0:00:23.079 --> 0:00:26.360
<v Speaker 1>is no one who you can find on Twitter nowhere.

0:00:26.600 --> 0:00:29.720
<v Speaker 1>That's right, Matt Parolt is not here with me on

0:00:29.800 --> 0:00:32.320
<v Speaker 1>week twelve. Don't worry. We're still going to be doing

0:00:32.360 --> 0:00:35.560
<v Speaker 1>the podcast going forward. It's a weird week Thanksgiving week.

0:00:35.800 --> 0:00:38.400
<v Speaker 1>We weren't able to sync up on Thanksgiving. Unfortunately, we

0:00:38.400 --> 0:00:40.360
<v Speaker 1>were supposed to be able to sync up today. My

0:00:40.479 --> 0:00:43.080
<v Speaker 1>schedule got a little hectic early. His schedule got a

0:00:43.120 --> 0:00:45.479
<v Speaker 1>little hectic late, so we weren't able to sink up.

0:00:45.560 --> 0:00:47.920
<v Speaker 1>Rather than scrap the entire thing or try to push

0:00:47.960 --> 0:00:51.280
<v Speaker 1>it out later on Saturday, I'm recording this by my

0:00:51.400 --> 0:00:54.920
<v Speaker 1>lonesome on Friday night. Now, if you guys have been

0:00:54.920 --> 0:00:57.960
<v Speaker 1>listening to this podcast for several weeks, then you know

0:00:58.000 --> 0:01:01.240
<v Speaker 1>already that Matt and I are in the Drafts Contest,

0:01:01.320 --> 0:01:03.960
<v Speaker 1>the Pro Pick Them Contest, and that we have to

0:01:04.000 --> 0:01:07.440
<v Speaker 1>take two bye weeks in our sixteen weeks. Okay, goes

0:01:07.440 --> 0:01:10.279
<v Speaker 1>through week sixteen. Matt had always said that he wanted

0:01:10.319 --> 0:01:13.440
<v Speaker 1>to take a bye week on Thanksgiving. I don't particularly

0:01:13.480 --> 0:01:15.840
<v Speaker 1>know why. You know, maybe it was that the Thursday

0:01:15.840 --> 0:01:17.800
<v Speaker 1>games are going to be weird, But we'd always penciled

0:01:17.840 --> 0:01:19.720
<v Speaker 1>it in for this week to be a bye week,

0:01:19.800 --> 0:01:23.040
<v Speaker 1>so we weren't even going to go through our picks

0:01:23.120 --> 0:01:25.080
<v Speaker 1>for the competition. Instead, we were just going to go

0:01:25.120 --> 0:01:27.679
<v Speaker 1>through our best bets anyway. So instead you're gonna get

0:01:27.840 --> 0:01:30.960
<v Speaker 1>kind of an abbreviated version of that. You're gonna get

0:01:31.040 --> 0:01:34.040
<v Speaker 1>my picks and games that I like. There aren't that many, frankly,

0:01:34.120 --> 0:01:35.840
<v Speaker 1>that I'm looking at playing this week. It's just not

0:01:35.920 --> 0:01:38.080
<v Speaker 1>a great week anyway, So it really wasn't a bad

0:01:38.120 --> 0:01:40.280
<v Speaker 1>week for Matt to want to take a bye regardless.

0:01:40.360 --> 0:01:42.240
<v Speaker 1>I will recap how we did in the Draft Kings

0:01:42.319 --> 0:01:44.440
<v Speaker 1>Championship and where we are, and then I'm gonna give

0:01:44.480 --> 0:01:47.000
<v Speaker 1>you my best bets. If you want to hear Matt's takes,

0:01:47.480 --> 0:01:50.240
<v Speaker 1>you must right now. If you're listening to this podcast,

0:01:50.400 --> 0:01:52.520
<v Speaker 1>you must be listening to the Daily Juice podcast. If

0:01:52.520 --> 0:01:55.680
<v Speaker 1>you're not, you're just missing out. Go to any place

0:01:55.720 --> 0:01:58.600
<v Speaker 1>you find podcasts, search for the Daily Juice. It's Matt

0:01:58.640 --> 0:02:01.600
<v Speaker 1>does a fifteen minute podcast breaking down his best bets

0:02:01.680 --> 0:02:04.600
<v Speaker 1>of the day in every sport that he can, and

0:02:04.640 --> 0:02:07.080
<v Speaker 1>he's going to give you his NFL picks. Also, don't

0:02:07.120 --> 0:02:10.040
<v Speaker 1>forget to tune in to his live stream on Sunday morning,

0:02:10.080 --> 0:02:13.840
<v Speaker 1>eleven am to twelve pm Eastern Time on our YouTube

0:02:13.880 --> 0:02:17.400
<v Speaker 1>channel YouTube dot com slash Betting Bros. He's gonna be there.

0:02:17.440 --> 0:02:19.239
<v Speaker 1>He does it for an hour. He gives his best

0:02:19.280 --> 0:02:22.200
<v Speaker 1>prop bets. I after I run through my projections on

0:02:22.240 --> 0:02:25.040
<v Speaker 1>Saturday night, I give him my best prop bets. So

0:02:25.080 --> 0:02:27.440
<v Speaker 1>we've got a lot of good stuff there. But for now,

0:02:27.760 --> 0:02:29.440
<v Speaker 1>we're going to go through each and every game. Now

0:02:29.440 --> 0:02:31.360
<v Speaker 1>we're gonna do it a little differently here. Okay, Usually

0:02:31.360 --> 0:02:33.480
<v Speaker 1>Matt and I go back and forth and we each

0:02:33.520 --> 0:02:36.239
<v Speaker 1>give our best bet based on the Draft Kings picks. Now,

0:02:36.440 --> 0:02:38.720
<v Speaker 1>the Draft Kings lines they come out on Wednesday. So

0:02:39.280 --> 0:02:41.720
<v Speaker 1>you if you've been paying attention this week, you know

0:02:42.240 --> 0:02:45.200
<v Speaker 1>there's been a lot of information that's come out over

0:02:45.200 --> 0:02:47.320
<v Speaker 1>the last couple of days, a lot of COVID news,

0:02:47.639 --> 0:02:50.360
<v Speaker 1>a lot of injuries. So the lines have moved pretty

0:02:50.400 --> 0:02:53.400
<v Speaker 1>significantly from the DraftKings lines. Anyway, So what I'm going

0:02:53.480 --> 0:02:55.760
<v Speaker 1>to do is this, we have a bet analyzer. Okay,

0:02:55.800 --> 0:02:58.880
<v Speaker 1>we have people from all around the industry people who

0:02:58.880 --> 0:03:02.400
<v Speaker 1>are making picks and submit their picks on the over under,

0:03:02.520 --> 0:03:05.359
<v Speaker 1>against the spread, even on the money line, and there's

0:03:05.400 --> 0:03:08.440
<v Speaker 1>an accuracy competition like they do at Fantasy Pros. When

0:03:08.480 --> 0:03:10.880
<v Speaker 1>you look at our bet analyzer, which right now is

0:03:10.919 --> 0:03:14.760
<v Speaker 1>at Bettingpros dot com, slash NFL slash bet hyphen Analyzer,

0:03:15.040 --> 0:03:17.079
<v Speaker 1>there may be a short URL to that, but that's

0:03:17.080 --> 0:03:19.880
<v Speaker 1>what I'm looking at. Anyway. That is going to show

0:03:19.919 --> 0:03:23.400
<v Speaker 1>you the consensus of how many analysts are picking one

0:03:23.440 --> 0:03:25.920
<v Speaker 1>side versus the other side. So what I'm gonna do

0:03:26.000 --> 0:03:29.160
<v Speaker 1>is I'm gonna go through each game based on the

0:03:29.280 --> 0:03:32.640
<v Speaker 1>order of how many analysts are sort of one sided

0:03:32.680 --> 0:03:34.839
<v Speaker 1>on that game, and we'll touch on each and every game.

0:03:34.920 --> 0:03:36.280
<v Speaker 1>I'll let you know if I have a lean on

0:03:36.360 --> 0:03:38.240
<v Speaker 1>it or if I don't. It's probably gonna be a

0:03:38.240 --> 0:03:40.720
<v Speaker 1>little quicker than our usual Betting Pros NFL podcast, But

0:03:41.080 --> 0:03:42.920
<v Speaker 1>you know whatever, you don't want to listen to me

0:03:42.960 --> 0:03:45.440
<v Speaker 1>talk for like an hour anyway before we get into it.

0:03:45.680 --> 0:03:49.840
<v Speaker 1>Reminder about discord Bettingpros dot com slash chat. We are

0:03:49.880 --> 0:03:54.120
<v Speaker 1>giving away an AJ Brown signed helmet. If you just

0:03:54.200 --> 0:03:56.200
<v Speaker 1>go in there, you go in, you'll see it there's

0:03:56.200 --> 0:03:58.600
<v Speaker 1>an aj Brown giveaway you just put in Betting Pros

0:03:58.640 --> 0:04:00.520
<v Speaker 1>you show that you're entered. I said it's going to

0:04:00.600 --> 0:04:01.760
<v Speaker 1>run through the end of November, so you got a

0:04:01.800 --> 0:04:04.120
<v Speaker 1>couple more days here, but go ahead again. Betting pro

0:04:04.200 --> 0:04:07.600
<v Speaker 1>dot Com slash chat talk about sports betting with tons

0:04:07.600 --> 0:04:11.120
<v Speaker 1>of people who are interested in in it as well. Second,

0:04:11.160 --> 0:04:12.880
<v Speaker 1>if you like prop bets, we have our prop bet

0:04:12.920 --> 0:04:15.080
<v Speaker 1>cheat cheat go to betting pros dot com slash props

0:04:15.120 --> 0:04:18.279
<v Speaker 1>that compares the consensus projections against some of the props

0:04:18.520 --> 0:04:21.480
<v Speaker 1>that are available in the market. All right, so we're

0:04:21.480 --> 0:04:23.720
<v Speaker 1>gonna get to every game here. Let me recap if

0:04:23.760 --> 0:04:25.520
<v Speaker 1>you have been following along, how we did in the

0:04:25.640 --> 0:04:29.520
<v Speaker 1>DraftKings Championship two and three last week. Super frustrating. Was

0:04:29.560 --> 0:04:32.000
<v Speaker 1>actually a good week for the contest. I'm not joking

0:04:32.040 --> 0:04:34.120
<v Speaker 1>about that. A two and three week moved you up

0:04:34.160 --> 0:04:37.359
<v Speaker 1>the standings in that contest. Still not great, we're better

0:04:37.400 --> 0:04:41.640
<v Speaker 1>than half. We're probably in, you know, the top fortieth percentile.

0:04:41.880 --> 0:04:44.400
<v Speaker 1>The most upsided picks last week were the Chiefs slaying

0:04:44.440 --> 0:04:46.320
<v Speaker 1>six and a half to the Raiders. We were on

0:04:46.360 --> 0:04:48.640
<v Speaker 1>that too, that loss, the Packers getting two and a

0:04:48.640 --> 0:04:50.799
<v Speaker 1>half from the Cults at that loss, the Eagles getting

0:04:50.800 --> 0:04:53.000
<v Speaker 1>three and a half from the Browns that loss, the

0:04:53.000 --> 0:04:55.919
<v Speaker 1>Falcons getting four and a half from the Saints that lost,

0:04:56.040 --> 0:04:58.560
<v Speaker 1>and the Dolphins laying three and a half to the

0:04:58.560 --> 0:05:01.960
<v Speaker 1>Broncos that loss. All five of the most heavily picked

0:05:02.000 --> 0:05:05.279
<v Speaker 1>games in the DraftKings super contests not super contests, sorry,

0:05:05.320 --> 0:05:07.680
<v Speaker 1>the Draft Kings Pro Pickum Championship, which by the way,

0:05:07.800 --> 0:05:11.120
<v Speaker 1>is just sharp betters. They all lost, which shows you

0:05:11.480 --> 0:05:14.320
<v Speaker 1>it's gonna happen sometimes, even if you're on the right side,

0:05:14.360 --> 0:05:16.320
<v Speaker 1>even if your models say you're on the right side,

0:05:16.480 --> 0:05:18.320
<v Speaker 1>even if your instinct says you're on the right side,

0:05:18.320 --> 0:05:20.320
<v Speaker 1>and a lot of people agree, it's not always going

0:05:20.400 --> 0:05:22.080
<v Speaker 1>to work out. So if you're having a bad week,

0:05:22.400 --> 0:05:25.599
<v Speaker 1>don't beat yourself up. So again, we lost on the Chiefs,

0:05:25.600 --> 0:05:27.640
<v Speaker 1>as I mentioned. We also lost on the Jaguars getting

0:05:27.680 --> 0:05:30.040
<v Speaker 1>ten and a half from the Steelers and the Pats

0:05:30.160 --> 0:05:31.720
<v Speaker 1>laying two and a half to the Texans. We did

0:05:31.800 --> 0:05:34.120
<v Speaker 1>hit on the Texans getting six and a half from

0:05:34.120 --> 0:05:36.320
<v Speaker 1>the Ravens and the Cowboys getting seven and a half

0:05:36.480 --> 0:05:39.400
<v Speaker 1>from the Vikings. So again, we're taking our bye week

0:05:39.440 --> 0:05:41.560
<v Speaker 1>this week, so we haven't even discussed what we liked

0:05:41.600 --> 0:05:44.279
<v Speaker 1>based on the lines. But again, we're gonna get into it,

0:05:44.360 --> 0:05:48.839
<v Speaker 1>so I'm just gonna start from the most lopsided picks

0:05:49.360 --> 0:05:51.840
<v Speaker 1>in our bet analyzer. So these are the games that

0:05:52.040 --> 0:05:55.440
<v Speaker 1>the vast majority of the people submitting picks agree upon.

0:05:55.839 --> 0:05:59.880
<v Speaker 1>The most one sided game is the Giants laying six

0:06:00.480 --> 0:06:04.560
<v Speaker 1>to the Bengals. Okay, eighty percent of the experts who

0:06:04.600 --> 0:06:09.039
<v Speaker 1>have put in picks are on the Giants. I don't

0:06:09.480 --> 0:06:12.480
<v Speaker 1>love the game, It's not one of my favorite plays

0:06:12.480 --> 0:06:15.840
<v Speaker 1>of the week, but I am also on that side. Now.

0:06:16.240 --> 0:06:18.839
<v Speaker 1>I think probably Alan Starting is a little bit better

0:06:18.920 --> 0:06:22.960
<v Speaker 1>than Ryan Finley for the Bengals, because goodness, we've seen

0:06:22.960 --> 0:06:25.760
<v Speaker 1>what Ryan Finley can do last game. We've saw what

0:06:25.839 --> 0:06:29.080
<v Speaker 1>he could do, you know, three games I believe, last year,

0:06:29.320 --> 0:06:32.320
<v Speaker 1>and it's not pretty. The Giants are rested, they're playing okay,

0:06:32.320 --> 0:06:34.839
<v Speaker 1>and goodness gracious, they are right in the hunt for

0:06:34.960 --> 0:06:38.039
<v Speaker 1>that NFC East. So given the fact that they are

0:06:38.120 --> 0:06:40.640
<v Speaker 1>pretty healthy, Wayne Goalman is going to be able to

0:06:40.720 --> 0:06:45.560
<v Speaker 1>run pretty easily over the Bengals run defense. Daniel Jones

0:06:45.600 --> 0:06:48.400
<v Speaker 1>playing okay, he is playing well enough. They're going to

0:06:48.400 --> 0:06:51.080
<v Speaker 1>be able to pass if they need to. Geo Bernard

0:06:51.440 --> 0:06:54.240
<v Speaker 1>may play in this game. He was recovering from a concussion.

0:06:54.480 --> 0:06:57.040
<v Speaker 1>But right now, you've seen the rumors, right, you've heard

0:06:57.040 --> 0:06:59.000
<v Speaker 1>of all the bad stuff that's going on with the Bengals.

0:06:59.040 --> 0:07:01.800
<v Speaker 1>It just seems like a tea that's in disarray. Six

0:07:01.839 --> 0:07:04.720
<v Speaker 1>points is a pretty heavy hang they're gonna be looking

0:07:04.760 --> 0:07:07.880
<v Speaker 1>at for the Giants. But I agree at six, I'm fine.

0:07:07.880 --> 0:07:10.240
<v Speaker 1>If it stays below a touchdown, I'm okay to go

0:07:10.280 --> 0:07:12.400
<v Speaker 1>with it. Not my favorite bet, but again our bet

0:07:12.400 --> 0:07:15.680
<v Speaker 1>analyzer goes eighty percent, and so if I am on

0:07:15.720 --> 0:07:18.120
<v Speaker 1>that same side. Although it's not one of my favorite plays.

0:07:18.440 --> 0:07:22.320
<v Speaker 1>The Seahawks against the Eagles, this is Monday Night football,

0:07:22.880 --> 0:07:27.000
<v Speaker 1>Seventy nine percent of our experts are with the Seahawks

0:07:27.120 --> 0:07:32.120
<v Speaker 1>at laying five and a half. So I don't love

0:07:32.160 --> 0:07:34.640
<v Speaker 1>this game. This is not a game I want to play.

0:07:34.640 --> 0:07:37.680
<v Speaker 1>And you know Matt's position, right, Matt will not play

0:07:37.800 --> 0:07:40.640
<v Speaker 1>a favorite if they're laying five and a half points.

0:07:40.760 --> 0:07:43.320
<v Speaker 1>He thinks that that is indicative that the books really

0:07:43.320 --> 0:07:45.880
<v Speaker 1>don't know. And again that's been out in Vegas for

0:07:46.120 --> 0:07:48.760
<v Speaker 1>I don't know a million years. He's got a lot

0:07:48.800 --> 0:07:51.400
<v Speaker 1>of that sort of inside information. He won't play a favorite.

0:07:51.880 --> 0:07:53.840
<v Speaker 1>I do not feel that way. I don't really care

0:07:53.880 --> 0:07:56.160
<v Speaker 1>if it's five and a half or five or six.

0:07:56.240 --> 0:07:58.920
<v Speaker 1>It means nothing to me either way. With that said,

0:07:59.560 --> 0:08:02.360
<v Speaker 1>I and staying away from this game. If you forced

0:08:02.360 --> 0:08:05.880
<v Speaker 1>me to pick a side, it would probably be the Eagles,

0:08:06.000 --> 0:08:09.280
<v Speaker 1>and that's disgusting. That's the thing. I can't confidently back

0:08:09.560 --> 0:08:13.040
<v Speaker 1>Carson Wentz in this game. There's just no way. Like

0:08:13.280 --> 0:08:16.360
<v Speaker 1>you've seen him play, he is playing as the worst

0:08:16.440 --> 0:08:21.320
<v Speaker 1>quarterback in football. Okay, no joke, he's His decision making

0:08:21.720 --> 0:08:24.520
<v Speaker 1>is awful. If you play fantasy is I hope you do.

0:08:24.640 --> 0:08:26.680
<v Speaker 1>If you are checking out betting bros. You just check

0:08:26.680 --> 0:08:29.520
<v Speaker 1>out Fantasy pros. If you play fantasy, you know, hasn't

0:08:29.560 --> 0:08:32.360
<v Speaker 1>been that terrible from a fantasy perspective, mainly because he

0:08:32.400 --> 0:08:34.480
<v Speaker 1>digs himself such a hole that he's got to scramble

0:08:34.480 --> 0:08:36.720
<v Speaker 1>around like a madman to get out of it, and

0:08:36.760 --> 0:08:38.920
<v Speaker 1>he winds up putting up some decent numbers. They are

0:08:38.920 --> 0:08:41.600
<v Speaker 1>getting healthier. It's possible zach Ertz will play in this game.

0:08:41.679 --> 0:08:44.160
<v Speaker 1>I haven't seen that he's been ruled out yet. But

0:08:44.200 --> 0:08:46.880
<v Speaker 1>of course you've got Dallas Goddard, Miles Sanders is back,

0:08:47.200 --> 0:08:50.960
<v Speaker 1>got Jalen Rager. Travis Fulgum hasn't been quite as involved lately,

0:08:51.280 --> 0:08:54.800
<v Speaker 1>but he is there. The offensive line still really beat up,

0:08:54.920 --> 0:08:57.400
<v Speaker 1>and that's kind of you know, Wentz does not play

0:08:57.400 --> 0:08:59.439
<v Speaker 1>well with pressure, and the Seahawks have been getting a

0:08:59.440 --> 0:09:04.240
<v Speaker 1>little more pressure lately. Seahawks almost you know, they very

0:09:04.320 --> 0:09:07.560
<v Speaker 1>rarely win more than one score games. So this is

0:09:07.559 --> 0:09:09.600
<v Speaker 1>not something where I expect the Seahawks to win by

0:09:09.760 --> 0:09:12.240
<v Speaker 1>you know, fourteen points or something like that. That's just

0:09:12.280 --> 0:09:14.360
<v Speaker 1>not really how they go. And I think you saw it.

0:09:14.360 --> 0:09:16.360
<v Speaker 1>I think you saw the way they played in their

0:09:16.400 --> 0:09:19.160
<v Speaker 1>last game. They want to sort of lean into the

0:09:19.320 --> 0:09:21.160
<v Speaker 1>run a little bit more, get back to the way

0:09:21.200 --> 0:09:24.440
<v Speaker 1>they used to be playing instead of just letting Russ

0:09:24.440 --> 0:09:27.320
<v Speaker 1>cook all the time as they were early on in

0:09:27.360 --> 0:09:29.360
<v Speaker 1>the year. So I think you're gonna see sort of

0:09:29.360 --> 0:09:31.079
<v Speaker 1>a you know, a game where they're not going to

0:09:31.120 --> 0:09:33.240
<v Speaker 1>completely run away with it. So I think the Eagles

0:09:33.280 --> 0:09:35.280
<v Speaker 1>are probably the right side. I think what you're going

0:09:35.360 --> 0:09:37.319
<v Speaker 1>to see if you break down, you're going to see

0:09:37.320 --> 0:09:39.319
<v Speaker 1>the majority of the money coming in on the Seahawks,

0:09:39.320 --> 0:09:41.680
<v Speaker 1>and you're probably going to see I'm sorry, you're gonna

0:09:41.679 --> 0:09:43.640
<v Speaker 1>see the majority of the bets coming in on the Seahawks.

0:09:43.679 --> 0:09:45.920
<v Speaker 1>But you're going to see the money more. Even than that,

0:09:45.960 --> 0:09:48.000
<v Speaker 1>you're going to see more. You know, whether or not

0:09:48.040 --> 0:09:49.439
<v Speaker 1>it's going to be the majority of the money coming

0:09:49.440 --> 0:09:51.280
<v Speaker 1>in on the Eagles. You're going to see plenty of

0:09:51.320 --> 0:09:53.320
<v Speaker 1>money coming in on the Eagles because I think that's

0:09:53.320 --> 0:09:55.120
<v Speaker 1>the sharp side. That is the side I would be

0:09:55.120 --> 0:09:56.960
<v Speaker 1>on if you force me to take a pick, but

0:09:57.040 --> 0:10:00.520
<v Speaker 1>I'm not going to. Next up, we have the Brown's

0:10:00.559 --> 0:10:04.520
<v Speaker 1>link seven to the Jaguars, and that's seventy seven percent

0:10:04.800 --> 0:10:06.880
<v Speaker 1>on Cleveland. Now I like this at six and a half.

0:10:06.920 --> 0:10:09.240
<v Speaker 1>That's where it was in the Draft Kings Championship. That's

0:10:09.280 --> 0:10:12.360
<v Speaker 1>where I was getting it when I took action on it.

0:10:12.400 --> 0:10:16.280
<v Speaker 1>But yeah, Cleveland is the right side for me. Even

0:10:16.320 --> 0:10:18.800
<v Speaker 1>at minus seven. It's one of my better bets of

0:10:18.920 --> 0:10:22.720
<v Speaker 1>the weekend. Look, you've got Mike Glennon playing, You've got

0:10:22.720 --> 0:10:27.079
<v Speaker 1>no DJ Shark, you've got no Chris Conley. I understand

0:10:27.120 --> 0:10:29.880
<v Speaker 1>it's gonna be James Robinson. Understand the Browns are just

0:10:29.880 --> 0:10:32.680
<v Speaker 1>gonna run the ball. But the Browns should be able

0:10:32.720 --> 0:10:36.559
<v Speaker 1>to do whatever they want offensively in this game. They

0:10:36.600 --> 0:10:39.600
<v Speaker 1>should put up plenty of points in this game. It's

0:10:39.640 --> 0:10:42.360
<v Speaker 1>really hard to see Mike Lennon being able to put up,

0:10:42.760 --> 0:10:45.559
<v Speaker 1>you know, that many points, regardless of how good James

0:10:45.679 --> 0:10:48.400
<v Speaker 1>Robinson is. It's not a crazy formula here, it's just

0:10:48.480 --> 0:10:52.000
<v Speaker 1>something where again you've seen Mike Glennon play enough. You've

0:10:52.040 --> 0:10:53.760
<v Speaker 1>seen him play with the Bears, you've seen him play

0:10:53.760 --> 0:10:59.360
<v Speaker 1>with the Bucks. He's not really a great NFL quarterback.

0:10:59.400 --> 0:11:01.760
<v Speaker 1>Doesn't matter that the games in Jacksonville. So for me,

0:11:02.160 --> 0:11:04.400
<v Speaker 1>of the games that we've discussed right now, I certainly

0:11:04.440 --> 0:11:07.719
<v Speaker 1>like the Browns even laying seven, better than any of

0:11:07.720 --> 0:11:09.880
<v Speaker 1>the other games that we've talked about. Next up is

0:11:09.960 --> 0:11:14.120
<v Speaker 1>the Chiefs laying three to the Bucks with seventy six

0:11:14.160 --> 0:11:20.320
<v Speaker 1>percent on the Chiefs. So in the DraftKings contest, the

0:11:20.360 --> 0:11:22.679
<v Speaker 1>Bucks are getting three and a half. That was one

0:11:22.760 --> 0:11:24.360
<v Speaker 1>of my favorite plays. Now. I don't know if Matt

0:11:24.360 --> 0:11:26.959
<v Speaker 1>would have gone for it. This is just if you've

0:11:26.960 --> 0:11:29.000
<v Speaker 1>listened to this podcast long enough, you know that I

0:11:29.120 --> 0:11:31.640
<v Speaker 1>like kind of I'm very much in the by low,

0:11:32.280 --> 0:11:34.960
<v Speaker 1>sell high sort of range. Now, you don't sell high

0:11:35.000 --> 0:11:36.880
<v Speaker 1>on the Chiefs or anything like that. And again, they

0:11:36.960 --> 0:11:39.440
<v Speaker 1>nearly lost that game to the Raiders, but this is

0:11:39.520 --> 0:11:42.040
<v Speaker 1>much more of a Bilo spot for the Bucks. I

0:11:42.040 --> 0:11:43.760
<v Speaker 1>think their defense is going to play better. I think

0:11:43.880 --> 0:11:46.360
<v Speaker 1>marpet is going to play, is my understanding. You know,

0:11:46.640 --> 0:11:48.760
<v Speaker 1>I don't know how many games he's missed at this

0:11:48.840 --> 0:11:51.160
<v Speaker 1>point with a concussion, but I know he practiced full

0:11:52.400 --> 0:11:54.679
<v Speaker 1>for at least the early part. Again, it's been a

0:11:54.679 --> 0:11:56.120
<v Speaker 1>little I've been out for most of the day. I

0:11:56.160 --> 0:11:58.440
<v Speaker 1>think he's questionable for the game, but I do expect

0:11:58.480 --> 0:12:00.760
<v Speaker 1>him to play. And that's huge er because you gotta

0:12:00.800 --> 0:12:04.040
<v Speaker 1>protect Brady from getting pressure, which you know he's gonna get.

0:12:04.120 --> 0:12:07.760
<v Speaker 1>I think this one is going to be a very

0:12:07.840 --> 0:12:10.280
<v Speaker 1>high scoring game. I think the over under his fifty six.

0:12:10.320 --> 0:12:12.679
<v Speaker 1>I like the over in this game. I've already bet it.

0:12:12.720 --> 0:12:14.800
<v Speaker 1>I know it's a high number. I don't care. I

0:12:14.800 --> 0:12:17.240
<v Speaker 1>think Brady coming off, by the way, after a loss,

0:12:17.559 --> 0:12:19.640
<v Speaker 1>you know historically, I know it's not the same team.

0:12:19.679 --> 0:12:21.840
<v Speaker 1>I know it's with the Patriots, but coming off after

0:12:21.880 --> 0:12:24.960
<v Speaker 1>a loss, he is some you know, somebody who covers

0:12:25.360 --> 0:12:28.000
<v Speaker 1>almost you know, it's like a seventy percent clip or

0:12:28.040 --> 0:12:30.000
<v Speaker 1>something like that. I think they are going to cover here.

0:12:30.040 --> 0:12:31.360
<v Speaker 1>If you can get it at three and a half,

0:12:31.440 --> 0:12:33.880
<v Speaker 1>definitely take it. At three s closer. I mean, I

0:12:33.880 --> 0:12:36.480
<v Speaker 1>think the Chiefs are probably gonna win, but I do

0:12:36.720 --> 0:12:38.400
<v Speaker 1>if I'm forced to pick a side, I will take

0:12:38.400 --> 0:12:39.920
<v Speaker 1>the Bucks even at three. If you can get at

0:12:39.920 --> 0:12:41.920
<v Speaker 1>three and a half, I really like that. Again, the

0:12:42.000 --> 0:12:45.480
<v Speaker 1>Chiefs are coming across the country in this game. It's

0:12:45.600 --> 0:12:48.319
<v Speaker 1>just something where I don't know. I like the Bucks

0:12:48.320 --> 0:12:49.959
<v Speaker 1>in this game as a bounce back. It's a bilo

0:12:50.040 --> 0:12:53.480
<v Speaker 1>spot for me. Dolphins are laying seven to the Jets,

0:12:53.520 --> 0:12:59.160
<v Speaker 1>and seventy two percent are with the Dolphins. I don't

0:12:59.200 --> 0:13:00.719
<v Speaker 1>have a great lean on. You guys know, I'm a

0:13:00.760 --> 0:13:04.160
<v Speaker 1>Jets fan. Sam Darnold is back, That's probably not a

0:13:04.160 --> 0:13:07.000
<v Speaker 1>good thing for the Jets. We know Michael Puran is out.

0:13:07.080 --> 0:13:10.360
<v Speaker 1>That's not a huge deal. But again, Frank Gore versus

0:13:10.559 --> 0:13:12.760
<v Speaker 1>you know, having a little bit of you know, a

0:13:12.800 --> 0:13:16.400
<v Speaker 1>more explosive back and a younger back. I'd prefer that.

0:13:16.800 --> 0:13:18.520
<v Speaker 1>But really, with the Dolphins are a ton of question

0:13:18.559 --> 0:13:20.319
<v Speaker 1>marks right now. We don't know whether or not it's

0:13:20.360 --> 0:13:22.280
<v Speaker 1>going to be Tua, who I guess banged his thumb

0:13:22.559 --> 0:13:26.200
<v Speaker 1>during practice and he's questionable, And I mean Brian Flores

0:13:26.200 --> 0:13:28.559
<v Speaker 1>says he has to review the practice tape. I don't

0:13:29.000 --> 0:13:31.880
<v Speaker 1>know what that means and how that evaluates. Getting to it.

0:13:31.880 --> 0:13:34.360
<v Speaker 1>It Fits is in, it makes me like the Dolphins

0:13:34.360 --> 0:13:36.440
<v Speaker 1>a little more. I realized that he could turn the

0:13:36.440 --> 0:13:39.520
<v Speaker 1>ball over and probably will more than Tua would. But again,

0:13:39.559 --> 0:13:41.880
<v Speaker 1>he does move that offense very well. And if you

0:13:41.960 --> 0:13:45.480
<v Speaker 1>are a prop better I have not looked, and I will.

0:13:45.520 --> 0:13:47.920
<v Speaker 1>I will let Matt know. But if we find out

0:13:47.960 --> 0:13:50.680
<v Speaker 1>that Fits is in for the game, whatever the prop

0:13:50.760 --> 0:13:54.160
<v Speaker 1>bet is for Devonte Parker's passing yards, I'm probably going

0:13:54.240 --> 0:13:56.440
<v Speaker 1>to have him projected higher than that. It's just my

0:13:56.559 --> 0:13:59.440
<v Speaker 1>experience with the way the books seem to do these

0:13:59.440 --> 0:14:02.120
<v Speaker 1>prop bets. You know, I have a feeling that I'm

0:14:02.160 --> 0:14:04.319
<v Speaker 1>going to have a pretty clear edge on that going

0:14:04.360 --> 0:14:07.240
<v Speaker 1>over based on the fact that the Jets are throwing

0:14:07.280 --> 0:14:10.280
<v Speaker 1>out there. You know, tweedled the and tweedledumb in their secondary.

0:14:10.280 --> 0:14:13.280
<v Speaker 1>At this point, their entire secondary is either injured or

0:14:13.320 --> 0:14:16.679
<v Speaker 1>has been cut. So legitimately, if Fits is there and

0:14:16.720 --> 0:14:19.800
<v Speaker 1>he's willing to push it to throw to Devonte Parker,

0:14:20.000 --> 0:14:22.000
<v Speaker 1>he is somebody who I think is going to have

0:14:22.240 --> 0:14:25.480
<v Speaker 1>a big day. Savon Ahmed also out in this game,

0:14:25.480 --> 0:14:27.760
<v Speaker 1>though Miles Gaskin maybe so we don't know what the

0:14:27.880 --> 0:14:29.280
<v Speaker 1>running game is going to look like. We don't know

0:14:29.280 --> 0:14:32.280
<v Speaker 1>who's that quarterback. So right now, I don't love it

0:14:32.600 --> 0:14:35.720
<v Speaker 1>at seven either way or either side. If you force

0:14:35.800 --> 0:14:38.520
<v Speaker 1>me to take a side, I guess would be the Dolphins,

0:14:38.560 --> 0:14:42.080
<v Speaker 1>just because Sam Darnold has played so poorly this entire year,

0:14:42.080 --> 0:14:45.520
<v Speaker 1>and the Dolphins defense is legitimate. But you know our

0:14:45.600 --> 0:14:49.160
<v Speaker 1>experts seventy two percent on Miami. I'd rather take a

0:14:49.160 --> 0:14:53.760
<v Speaker 1>pass Raiders laying three to the Falcons. Seventy percent are

0:14:53.760 --> 0:14:56.720
<v Speaker 1>on the Raiders. Here's the thing with this game, Okay,

0:14:57.560 --> 0:14:59.240
<v Speaker 1>I want you guys to take a step back, and

0:14:59.240 --> 0:15:01.920
<v Speaker 1>I want you to think about both of these teams.

0:15:02.520 --> 0:15:06.200
<v Speaker 1>What we think about with the Raiders is wow, Okay,

0:15:06.800 --> 0:15:08.960
<v Speaker 1>Rangers are a pretty decent football team. I mean they

0:15:09.640 --> 0:15:12.040
<v Speaker 1>you know, they beat the Chiefs once, they nearly beat

0:15:12.080 --> 0:15:16.000
<v Speaker 1>them again. Derek Carr playing extremely well. Josh Jacobs one

0:15:16.080 --> 0:15:18.720
<v Speaker 1>of the better running backs in the league. Darren Waller

0:15:19.120 --> 0:15:21.520
<v Speaker 1>one of the best tight ends in the league. Nelson Ageloor,

0:15:22.200 --> 0:15:24.920
<v Speaker 1>you know, Risen from the Dead playing well. It's still

0:15:25.000 --> 0:15:27.480
<v Speaker 1>drops some passes, but the offense is definitely able to

0:15:27.480 --> 0:15:30.320
<v Speaker 1>move the ball. Defense has some holes for sure. But

0:15:30.360 --> 0:15:33.720
<v Speaker 1>they're a pretty solid football team who you know are

0:15:33.840 --> 0:15:36.920
<v Speaker 1>in contention for a playoff spot. The Falcons, it just

0:15:36.960 --> 0:15:41.480
<v Speaker 1>got destroyed by Taysom Hill and the Saints. You've got

0:15:41.680 --> 0:15:44.600
<v Speaker 1>Todd Gurley out in this game, You've got Julio Jones

0:15:45.080 --> 0:15:48.480
<v Speaker 1>very questionable, and yet the spread is not moving. It's

0:15:48.480 --> 0:15:51.360
<v Speaker 1>at three. It's been at three pretty much all week.

0:15:51.880 --> 0:15:53.880
<v Speaker 1>I mean the DraftKings contest had it at two and

0:15:53.920 --> 0:15:56.400
<v Speaker 1>a half. When you think about a spread like that,

0:15:56.520 --> 0:15:58.600
<v Speaker 1>for me, one of the things you guys should do

0:15:58.640 --> 0:16:02.400
<v Speaker 1>is try to protict the lines. I would have predicted

0:16:02.400 --> 0:16:05.000
<v Speaker 1>this line at three and a half for the Raiders,

0:16:05.120 --> 0:16:08.440
<v Speaker 1>maybe four something over a field goal, because I think

0:16:09.280 --> 0:16:12.200
<v Speaker 1>this is a line begging you to take the Raiders.

0:16:12.200 --> 0:16:14.480
<v Speaker 1>I don't care that it's in Atlanta. It's a line

0:16:14.480 --> 0:16:17.000
<v Speaker 1>that's begging you to take the Raiders. And the fact

0:16:17.000 --> 0:16:20.800
<v Speaker 1>that it's not moving that just you know, the books

0:16:21.040 --> 0:16:24.200
<v Speaker 1>know more than we do. That's the bottom line. It

0:16:24.240 --> 0:16:26.560
<v Speaker 1>feels too much like a trap game, feels like the

0:16:26.600 --> 0:16:28.960
<v Speaker 1>sharp side is going to be on the Falcons. Not

0:16:29.080 --> 0:16:31.800
<v Speaker 1>enough for me to trust them. I mean, their defense

0:16:31.880 --> 0:16:35.040
<v Speaker 1>is playing a little better, but without Julio Jones, without

0:16:35.080 --> 0:16:37.280
<v Speaker 1>Todd Gurley. That may be a plus frankly with the

0:16:37.280 --> 0:16:39.760
<v Speaker 1>way Curley has been running and getting in Brian Hill,

0:16:39.800 --> 0:16:42.320
<v Speaker 1>but still not anywhere where I want to really go near.

0:16:43.080 --> 0:16:47.000
<v Speaker 1>Cardinals against the Patriots. The Cardinals are laying one and

0:16:47.040 --> 0:16:50.920
<v Speaker 1>a half points. Sixty eight percent are on Arizona. This

0:16:51.040 --> 0:16:53.200
<v Speaker 1>is another game that I don't want a part of.

0:16:54.640 --> 0:16:57.000
<v Speaker 1>The Patriots are team that I do not have a

0:16:57.040 --> 0:16:59.920
<v Speaker 1>read on. I just don't. I'm fully willing to admit

0:17:00.120 --> 0:17:02.160
<v Speaker 1>when I think they're gonna play well, they don't. When

0:17:02.160 --> 0:17:05.360
<v Speaker 1>I think they're gonna play poorly, they don't. I think

0:17:05.400 --> 0:17:08.280
<v Speaker 1>Arizona's gonna win this game. They're a better team from

0:17:08.320 --> 0:17:12.880
<v Speaker 1>top to bottom. But you do have Kyler Murray dealing

0:17:12.960 --> 0:17:14.840
<v Speaker 1>with the shoulder entry. Now I understand, I don't even

0:17:14.840 --> 0:17:17.800
<v Speaker 1>think he's on the jury report. No, I refuse to

0:17:17.840 --> 0:17:22.640
<v Speaker 1>believe that. Look, you watch that game against Seattle. This

0:17:22.680 --> 0:17:25.280
<v Speaker 1>is something where whatever it was, an ac joint sprain.

0:17:26.119 --> 0:17:28.919
<v Speaker 1>If he takes a hit, one hit and he runs,

0:17:29.160 --> 0:17:32.440
<v Speaker 1>then it's gonna it's gonna hurt him. You know, it's

0:17:32.480 --> 0:17:35.119
<v Speaker 1>gonna be something where you saw the difference in the

0:17:35.119 --> 0:17:37.960
<v Speaker 1>way he was passing in that Seattle game, there's enough

0:17:38.080 --> 0:17:41.440
<v Speaker 1>uncertainty there that makes me concerned about what he's gonna

0:17:41.440 --> 0:17:44.640
<v Speaker 1>look like. They're coming across the country. I know they've

0:17:44.640 --> 0:17:46.959
<v Speaker 1>had a break here, given the fact that they played,

0:17:48.200 --> 0:17:49.359
<v Speaker 1>you know that they've had a little bit of an

0:17:49.400 --> 0:17:52.560
<v Speaker 1>extra break here. But still it's just not something where

0:17:52.560 --> 0:17:55.120
<v Speaker 1>I'm willing to trust either team in this scenario. There's

0:17:55.119 --> 0:17:57.639
<v Speaker 1>no Larry Fitzgerald here with COVID. I know, we're like, well,

0:17:57.720 --> 0:18:00.600
<v Speaker 1>Larry Fitzgerald whatever, He's a safety blanket there. By the way,

0:18:00.640 --> 0:18:03.040
<v Speaker 1>Andy Isabella prop bets, you're also probably gonna want to

0:18:03.080 --> 0:18:05.240
<v Speaker 1>bet over whenever they come out, because my guess is

0:18:05.240 --> 0:18:07.199
<v Speaker 1>it's not going to be juiced up enough to what

0:18:07.240 --> 0:18:09.560
<v Speaker 1>it's gonna be. You're gonna have Steffan Gilmore trying to

0:18:09.560 --> 0:18:11.760
<v Speaker 1>take away DeAndre Hopkins. You're gonna have them focusing on

0:18:11.840 --> 0:18:14.320
<v Speaker 1>Christian Kirk. They're gonna say, Andy Isabella, you can have

0:18:14.359 --> 0:18:17.320
<v Speaker 1>your passes, So look for Andy Isabella passing rs. Watch

0:18:17.359 --> 0:18:20.879
<v Speaker 1>our live stream on YouTube YouTube dot com Slash Betting

0:18:20.880 --> 0:18:24.200
<v Speaker 1>Pros on Sunday morning, eleven am to twelve pm Eastern.

0:18:24.520 --> 0:18:27.080
<v Speaker 1>Now I will give out my props Andy Isabella over

0:18:27.400 --> 0:18:29.679
<v Speaker 1>whatever receiving yards they're going to throw out there. My

0:18:29.760 --> 0:18:31.720
<v Speaker 1>guess is just again based on when I do my

0:18:31.800 --> 0:18:34.160
<v Speaker 1>projections on Saturday night and I look at the props.

0:18:34.800 --> 0:18:36.399
<v Speaker 1>This just strikes me as one when there's gonna be

0:18:36.400 --> 0:18:38.320
<v Speaker 1>a delta between how I feel about them and what

0:18:38.320 --> 0:18:41.720
<v Speaker 1>the books are gonna set. Bears versus the Packers, sixty

0:18:41.760 --> 0:18:45.639
<v Speaker 1>five percent are on the Packers laying eight and a

0:18:45.640 --> 0:18:51.000
<v Speaker 1>half points in this game. Again, this is a little weird.

0:18:51.320 --> 0:18:55.280
<v Speaker 1>We've got variables. I don't like variables. The variable is

0:18:55.800 --> 0:18:59.840
<v Speaker 1>Mitchell Trubisky is starting. I don't know at this point

0:19:00.000 --> 0:19:01.840
<v Speaker 1>whether or not that is a good thing or a

0:19:01.840 --> 0:19:06.600
<v Speaker 1>bad thing for the Bears. I just don't. I can't

0:19:07.000 --> 0:19:08.720
<v Speaker 1>get a sense of it because it's been a long

0:19:08.760 --> 0:19:12.080
<v Speaker 1>time since we've seen Trubisky play. He was playing okay,

0:19:12.320 --> 0:19:16.119
<v Speaker 1>he's playing better than Nick Foles played. But it's hard

0:19:16.160 --> 0:19:20.040
<v Speaker 1>to envision the Bears really, you know, putting up all

0:19:20.080 --> 0:19:22.679
<v Speaker 1>that many points here unless they just run it NonStop

0:19:23.040 --> 0:19:25.240
<v Speaker 1>with Dave Montgomery. It's a stay away game for me.

0:19:25.440 --> 0:19:28.679
<v Speaker 1>I didn't want it at eight, which was at one

0:19:28.720 --> 0:19:30.760
<v Speaker 1>point in the DraftKings. I don't want it at eight

0:19:30.800 --> 0:19:32.200
<v Speaker 1>and a half. It's just a game that I don't

0:19:32.320 --> 0:19:34.640
<v Speaker 1>really want to touch. Maybe Matt has a better feel

0:19:34.680 --> 0:19:36.480
<v Speaker 1>on it, but this is a stay away game for me.

0:19:37.080 --> 0:19:41.520
<v Speaker 1>Forty nine ers against the Rams, the Rams getting six

0:19:41.600 --> 0:19:44.840
<v Speaker 1>and a half points. Sixty four percent of our experts

0:19:44.880 --> 0:19:48.840
<v Speaker 1>are on the Rams. Not a game that I absolutely love.

0:19:49.640 --> 0:19:52.280
<v Speaker 1>If I had to pick a side, this would be

0:19:52.760 --> 0:19:55.480
<v Speaker 1>the forty nine ers. Again, this is something where I

0:19:55.480 --> 0:19:58.520
<v Speaker 1>would throw it out to Matt. Matt, let's say, you're

0:19:58.600 --> 0:20:02.560
<v Speaker 1>really taking the forty nine against a team that just

0:20:02.760 --> 0:20:06.680
<v Speaker 1>you know, did whatever they wanted against that Bucks defense. Yeah,

0:20:06.880 --> 0:20:10.360
<v Speaker 1>this is how I bet Okay, So this is kind

0:20:10.359 --> 0:20:12.560
<v Speaker 1>of a lot of my philosophy. I look for by

0:20:12.640 --> 0:20:18.440
<v Speaker 1>low sell high situations. The Rams number one, it's a

0:20:18.480 --> 0:20:21.040
<v Speaker 1>short week for them, right, They played on Monday night,

0:20:21.359 --> 0:20:25.439
<v Speaker 1>played a great game. They're a strong team, brilliant offensive coach,

0:20:25.760 --> 0:20:28.520
<v Speaker 1>strong defense. Forty nine ers here are off of buy.

0:20:28.840 --> 0:20:32.240
<v Speaker 1>They are getting much healthier. They're probably gonna have Raheem

0:20:32.280 --> 0:20:35.439
<v Speaker 1>Mostert for this game. They're probably gonna have Deebo Samuel

0:20:35.480 --> 0:20:37.400
<v Speaker 1>for this game. I get they. I don't think they're

0:20:37.400 --> 0:20:39.720
<v Speaker 1>gonna have Brandon Aiyuk. I don't know if he's actually

0:20:39.800 --> 0:20:43.240
<v Speaker 1>been officially ruled out, but they are getting a little healthier.

0:20:43.280 --> 0:20:46.840
<v Speaker 1>If you're gonna give Kyle Shanahan an extra week to

0:20:46.920 --> 0:20:49.479
<v Speaker 1>prepare for a team, I'm gonna take them. If you're

0:20:49.480 --> 0:20:51.000
<v Speaker 1>gonna give me six and a half points, That's just

0:20:51.000 --> 0:20:53.200
<v Speaker 1>what it is. I don't think the Rams are quite

0:20:53.240 --> 0:20:55.719
<v Speaker 1>as good as they showed against the Bucks. I think

0:20:55.720 --> 0:20:58.840
<v Speaker 1>their defense is legitimate. But again it's not again that

0:20:58.880 --> 0:21:01.600
<v Speaker 1>I love have bet at six and a half the

0:21:01.680 --> 0:21:05.080
<v Speaker 1>forty nine ers, you know, but it's not one of

0:21:05.080 --> 0:21:08.280
<v Speaker 1>my favorite bets of the week. Definitely not, but I

0:21:08.359 --> 0:21:11.000
<v Speaker 1>will sixty four percent of our experts are on the Rams.

0:21:11.240 --> 0:21:13.359
<v Speaker 1>I'm on the other side. I'm on the forty nine ers.

0:21:13.600 --> 0:21:15.439
<v Speaker 1>Listen to the Daily Juice. My guess is Matt's going

0:21:15.480 --> 0:21:16.800
<v Speaker 1>to be on the other side of this one. But again,

0:21:17.000 --> 0:21:19.480
<v Speaker 1>a divisional game as well. You know, it's just something

0:21:19.480 --> 0:21:22.760
<v Speaker 1>where most times I'm going to take the points Saints

0:21:22.840 --> 0:21:26.639
<v Speaker 1>against the Broncos sixty one on the Saints laying six.

0:21:27.960 --> 0:21:29.639
<v Speaker 1>I'm also on the other side on this one. And

0:21:29.680 --> 0:21:32.119
<v Speaker 1>again this is this is not a not a huge

0:21:32.960 --> 0:21:34.919
<v Speaker 1>This is a lean, as Matt would say, This is

0:21:34.960 --> 0:21:37.399
<v Speaker 1>not an actual pick that I'm making. But I do

0:21:37.480 --> 0:21:39.639
<v Speaker 1>like the Broncos. Here, the Broncos defense is playing a

0:21:39.640 --> 0:21:41.960
<v Speaker 1>lot better. Okay, you saw it against Miami. They're starting

0:21:42.000 --> 0:21:45.600
<v Speaker 1>to really, you know, play just you know, they're starting

0:21:45.640 --> 0:21:48.119
<v Speaker 1>to gell a little bit late in the season. And

0:21:48.160 --> 0:21:50.560
<v Speaker 1>they're in Denver. That's a tough place to play. And

0:21:50.600 --> 0:21:52.680
<v Speaker 1>as well as the Saints, you know, did beat up

0:21:52.960 --> 0:21:55.960
<v Speaker 1>on Atlanta, it's not as if they dominated the game.

0:21:56.000 --> 0:21:59.360
<v Speaker 1>It sounds of Taysom Hill look like this incredible quarterback.

0:21:59.520 --> 0:22:02.480
<v Speaker 1>Yes he got Michael Thomas more involved. Yes he was

0:22:02.520 --> 0:22:05.800
<v Speaker 1>able to run, and that's just gonna be an X factor,

0:22:06.359 --> 0:22:10.159
<v Speaker 1>you know, whenever he's in the game. But still Denver

0:22:10.440 --> 0:22:13.760
<v Speaker 1>as bad as sort of they are generally speaking. And

0:22:13.800 --> 0:22:16.919
<v Speaker 1>I know that Melvin Gordon and or Philip Lindsay is

0:22:16.920 --> 0:22:18.600
<v Speaker 1>not going to have a great time running the ball

0:22:18.880 --> 0:22:21.400
<v Speaker 1>in this game. And I know that Jerry Judy is

0:22:21.680 --> 0:22:24.920
<v Speaker 1>questionable for this game, so that would make a difference.

0:22:25.000 --> 0:22:28.600
<v Speaker 1>But in the end in Denver, Taysom Hill, now that

0:22:28.640 --> 0:22:31.679
<v Speaker 1>you've actually seen what he looks like. Remember, preparing for

0:22:31.720 --> 0:22:35.240
<v Speaker 1>that game, nobody really knew if Tasom Hill was going

0:22:35.280 --> 0:22:38.280
<v Speaker 1>to be the actual starting quarterback. Yeah, that was sort

0:22:38.280 --> 0:22:42.040
<v Speaker 1>of the report that went out Peyton wouldn't confirm it,

0:22:42.400 --> 0:22:46.880
<v Speaker 1>but we even you, even you out there casual gambler,

0:22:46.920 --> 0:22:48.480
<v Speaker 1>could not have been like, oh yeah, this is gonna

0:22:48.480 --> 0:22:50.320
<v Speaker 1>be taste mil He's just gonna get it. We're never

0:22:50.320 --> 0:22:54.760
<v Speaker 1>gonna see Jameis Winston whatsoever. I thought, but we didn't know.

0:22:55.000 --> 0:22:57.399
<v Speaker 1>So how's Atlanta really going to prepare for that? Especially

0:22:57.440 --> 0:22:59.800
<v Speaker 1>since that only came out middle of the week. We've

0:22:59.800 --> 0:23:02.080
<v Speaker 1>now I've seen it. I'm not saying that that means

0:23:02.080 --> 0:23:04.120
<v Speaker 1>that anybody's going to be able to solve Taysom Hill,

0:23:04.400 --> 0:23:07.440
<v Speaker 1>but at six points, I'd rather go with the Broncos

0:23:07.480 --> 0:23:09.440
<v Speaker 1>at home always a tough place to play, you guys

0:23:09.440 --> 0:23:13.080
<v Speaker 1>know that with the altitude. So for me, I'm on

0:23:13.119 --> 0:23:15.520
<v Speaker 1>the Broncos. Here, sixty one percent are on the Saints,

0:23:15.760 --> 0:23:18.679
<v Speaker 1>now the Ravens and the Steelers. Right now, sixty percent

0:23:18.680 --> 0:23:22.760
<v Speaker 1>of the experts are on the Steelers, who are laying

0:23:22.960 --> 0:23:27.879
<v Speaker 1>seven points to Baltimore. I mean, the game right now

0:23:27.960 --> 0:23:31.320
<v Speaker 1>is scheduled for Tuesday. Okay, you've got no Lamar Jackson,

0:23:31.600 --> 0:23:34.119
<v Speaker 1>you've got no JK. Dobmins, you've got no mark Ingram.

0:23:34.200 --> 0:23:37.120
<v Speaker 1>This is also a game. I'm not one hundred percent

0:23:37.160 --> 0:23:39.520
<v Speaker 1>that Dobbins and Ingram are out. Maybe I haven't seen

0:23:39.520 --> 0:23:42.760
<v Speaker 1>today again the whole COVID protocol, which, to be fair,

0:23:42.840 --> 0:23:45.879
<v Speaker 1>are are great guys at Fantasy Pros had to remind

0:23:45.880 --> 0:23:48.760
<v Speaker 1>me of what it was. If you have tested positive

0:23:48.800 --> 0:23:52.919
<v Speaker 1>and you're asymptomatic, then you can actually be cleared to

0:23:52.960 --> 0:23:56.240
<v Speaker 1>play within five days if you get two negative tests. Now,

0:23:56.760 --> 0:23:59.439
<v Speaker 1>I don't know whether or not Dobbins and Ingram were symptomatic.

0:23:59.800 --> 0:24:02.040
<v Speaker 1>If they were symptomatic, it's ten days and they would

0:24:02.080 --> 0:24:05.160
<v Speaker 1>be out for this game guaranteed. I don't know whether

0:24:05.160 --> 0:24:08.520
<v Speaker 1>they're symptomatic or asymptomatic, but I think that regardless, given

0:24:08.560 --> 0:24:10.720
<v Speaker 1>the fact that it's been an outbreak, that's really just

0:24:10.720 --> 0:24:13.440
<v Speaker 1>a guard against false tests. So my guess is neither

0:24:13.480 --> 0:24:16.760
<v Speaker 1>guy would test negative in the upcoming games, and so

0:24:17.000 --> 0:24:19.760
<v Speaker 1>they're probably out for this game. So you've got RG three,

0:24:20.320 --> 0:24:24.199
<v Speaker 1>You've got Gus Edwards, who's fine, you know, perfectly capable

0:24:24.240 --> 0:24:26.879
<v Speaker 1>back going against the Steelers. I guess you got to

0:24:26.920 --> 0:24:30.320
<v Speaker 1>take the Steelers, but it's just it's not a game

0:24:30.359 --> 0:24:32.800
<v Speaker 1>that I really want to go near. It's just not

0:24:33.119 --> 0:24:35.600
<v Speaker 1>I realize that you can be like, wow, Steelers, you

0:24:35.640 --> 0:24:38.000
<v Speaker 1>know you got to take this. It's RG three. I

0:24:38.000 --> 0:24:41.920
<v Speaker 1>don't know, man. I mean, you know, the Ravens had

0:24:41.920 --> 0:24:45.000
<v Speaker 1>a workable offense and Lamar Jackson has not been passing

0:24:45.040 --> 0:24:47.679
<v Speaker 1>well at all throughout this RG three can run the

0:24:47.840 --> 0:24:50.480
<v Speaker 1>exact same type of offense that they want to run.

0:24:50.680 --> 0:24:53.320
<v Speaker 1>So if I have to take a side, I would

0:24:53.359 --> 0:24:55.840
<v Speaker 1>take the Steelers. But again, as much as it seems

0:24:55.880 --> 0:24:58.640
<v Speaker 1>like wow, lank seven, given all the injuries that might

0:24:58.640 --> 0:25:01.359
<v Speaker 1>be tempting, I get it to supercent of our experts agree.

0:25:01.400 --> 0:25:03.719
<v Speaker 1>It's not a game that I'm going there. Titans are

0:25:03.720 --> 0:25:08.199
<v Speaker 1>the Colts. The Titans are getting fifty nine percent of

0:25:08.280 --> 0:25:11.560
<v Speaker 1>the bets getting three points. Now on the DraftKings contest,

0:25:11.800 --> 0:25:13.919
<v Speaker 1>they're getting three and a half points. This was my

0:25:13.960 --> 0:25:16.280
<v Speaker 1>favorite play of the week, the Titans getting three and

0:25:16.320 --> 0:25:18.600
<v Speaker 1>a half points. I also like the money line, which

0:25:18.640 --> 0:25:21.080
<v Speaker 1>I believe is at plus one point fifty five for

0:25:21.160 --> 0:25:24.199
<v Speaker 1>the Titans. I bet both of these. This is my

0:25:24.280 --> 0:25:27.399
<v Speaker 1>bet for this week. I realized that the teams played

0:25:27.400 --> 0:25:30.280
<v Speaker 1>two weeks ago and the Colts won pretty substantially, but

0:25:30.800 --> 0:25:33.920
<v Speaker 1>they weren't in the first half at all. You looked

0:25:33.920 --> 0:25:37.520
<v Speaker 1>at that game early on, you thought that the Titans

0:25:37.520 --> 0:25:40.000
<v Speaker 1>were maybe gonna be able to run with it early on.

0:25:40.080 --> 0:25:43.600
<v Speaker 1>Then the Nihim Hines nonsense happened. All Jonathan Taylor fantasy

0:25:43.640 --> 0:25:46.080
<v Speaker 1>managers were very upset, but the Colts kind of ran

0:25:46.119 --> 0:25:50.320
<v Speaker 1>with it late. I just don't expect that to happen

0:25:50.560 --> 0:25:54.679
<v Speaker 1>again here. I mean, Titans have bad special teams. They

0:25:54.720 --> 0:25:58.399
<v Speaker 1>made special teams errors. That's part of what happened. I think,

0:25:58.640 --> 0:26:00.879
<v Speaker 1>you know, there's no DeForest Buckner. I believe he's on

0:26:00.920 --> 0:26:03.960
<v Speaker 1>the COVID list. Derrick Henry is gonna continue to run.

0:26:04.000 --> 0:26:06.200
<v Speaker 1>This is Derrick Henry time. Guys. We're into the last

0:26:06.440 --> 0:26:09.119
<v Speaker 1>five games of the season. Whatever. This is where he runs.

0:26:09.200 --> 0:26:11.640
<v Speaker 1>This is where he gets going last. You know, from

0:26:11.720 --> 0:26:15.080
<v Speaker 1>week twelve through week seventeen. Just get out of the way.

0:26:15.320 --> 0:26:17.639
<v Speaker 1>And with no Buckner, I think he's really gonna be

0:26:17.680 --> 0:26:21.639
<v Speaker 1>able to establish himself. I'm not really buying, you know.

0:26:22.080 --> 0:26:24.760
<v Speaker 1>I realized that the Colts hung with the Packers. They

0:26:24.800 --> 0:26:27.200
<v Speaker 1>won that game. They probably shouldn't have won the game.

0:26:27.440 --> 0:26:30.679
<v Speaker 1>But regardless, Colts are very very solid football team. But

0:26:30.760 --> 0:26:33.080
<v Speaker 1>so are the Titans. It's a divisional game, it's the

0:26:33.119 --> 0:26:35.960
<v Speaker 1>second one. It's gonna be tight. Give me the team

0:26:36.000 --> 0:26:37.879
<v Speaker 1>that's getting points I will go with the Titans on

0:26:37.920 --> 0:26:40.720
<v Speaker 1>the money line here plus one fifty five and especially

0:26:40.760 --> 0:26:42.119
<v Speaker 1>getting three if you can get at three and a

0:26:42.160 --> 0:26:43.760
<v Speaker 1>half points, which is where I was able to lock

0:26:43.840 --> 0:26:46.800
<v Speaker 1>it in. Certainly, if that's out there, take it because

0:26:46.800 --> 0:26:48.560
<v Speaker 1>I do think that the Titans are gonna be able

0:26:48.840 --> 0:26:51.159
<v Speaker 1>to win this game going in. And don't forget it

0:26:51.160 --> 0:26:52.919
<v Speaker 1>may not be a big deal. Philip Rivers has a

0:26:52.960 --> 0:26:55.639
<v Speaker 1>minor injury coming into this game. I think it's maybe

0:26:55.680 --> 0:26:58.320
<v Speaker 1>a toe injury or whatever it is. But again, I

0:26:58.400 --> 0:27:00.920
<v Speaker 1>think the Titans are gonna be I think they're gonna

0:27:00.920 --> 0:27:02.840
<v Speaker 1>be ready to go in this game. And again, no

0:27:02.920 --> 0:27:05.560
<v Speaker 1>DeForest Buckner. You're gonna have Derrick Henry having an easy

0:27:05.600 --> 0:27:07.960
<v Speaker 1>time running it. So even though you know we're our

0:27:08.040 --> 0:27:10.600
<v Speaker 1>experts on our bet analyzer are pretty split on this game,

0:27:11.000 --> 0:27:14.159
<v Speaker 1>I definitely like the Titans in this one. Panthers against

0:27:14.200 --> 0:27:17.520
<v Speaker 1>the Vikings. Fifty seven percent are on the Vikings laying

0:27:17.560 --> 0:27:21.240
<v Speaker 1>three and a half to the Panthers. Adam Thieland is

0:27:21.240 --> 0:27:23.159
<v Speaker 1>not going to play in this game. That is going

0:27:23.240 --> 0:27:25.800
<v Speaker 1>to be a big deal. Okay, Teddy Bridgewater is going

0:27:25.880 --> 0:27:28.199
<v Speaker 1>to play in this game. That's good. The Vikings have

0:27:28.359 --> 0:27:33.719
<v Speaker 1>no secondary. All that said, I'm still on the Vikings here. Now.

0:27:33.800 --> 0:27:37.720
<v Speaker 1>I don't love it, but I that's definitely my side

0:27:37.880 --> 0:27:40.359
<v Speaker 1>more than a lean. I have bet it. It's not

0:27:40.480 --> 0:27:43.280
<v Speaker 1>my favorite bet of the week, but I have bet it. Look,

0:27:44.200 --> 0:27:48.640
<v Speaker 1>this is again another kind of by low cell high situation.

0:27:49.000 --> 0:27:52.200
<v Speaker 1>Panthers just shut out the Lions, okay with PJ Walker,

0:27:52.640 --> 0:27:56.880
<v Speaker 1>it's you know, the Vikings just lost to the Cowboys,

0:27:56.880 --> 0:27:58.480
<v Speaker 1>the game that they were favored by seven and a

0:27:58.520 --> 0:28:00.919
<v Speaker 1>half ps, a ridiculous spread. I can't believe I had

0:28:00.960 --> 0:28:03.640
<v Speaker 1>to convince Matt to take that game. It's a classic

0:28:03.720 --> 0:28:06.320
<v Speaker 1>bi Loo sell high. The Vikings aren't nearly as bad

0:28:06.359 --> 0:28:09.120
<v Speaker 1>as they looked last week. The Panthers aren't as good

0:28:09.480 --> 0:28:12.240
<v Speaker 1>as they looked last week against the hapless lines. I

0:28:12.280 --> 0:28:13.959
<v Speaker 1>think the Vikings are going to bounce back here. It's

0:28:14.000 --> 0:28:16.640
<v Speaker 1>a little worrisome without Dylan, who hasn't been ruled out yet.

0:28:16.640 --> 0:28:19.040
<v Speaker 1>He's just not expected to play. But again, these are

0:28:19.080 --> 0:28:22.840
<v Speaker 1>COVID tests at this point. I you know, if the

0:28:22.920 --> 0:28:26.560
<v Speaker 1>protocol is if you're asymptomatic and you test negative twice

0:28:26.600 --> 0:28:28.720
<v Speaker 1>in a five day period, then you're gonna be able

0:28:28.720 --> 0:28:31.560
<v Speaker 1>to play. They're not really allowed to talk about it,

0:28:31.600 --> 0:28:33.520
<v Speaker 1>so maybe he won't play. But even if they don't,

0:28:34.160 --> 0:28:36.600
<v Speaker 1>I think they've got enough with Justin Jefferson and Kyle

0:28:36.680 --> 0:28:39.200
<v Speaker 1>Rudolph earth Smith, you know, isn't even expected to play.

0:28:39.200 --> 0:28:41.280
<v Speaker 1>I don't really care. I think they've got enough because

0:28:41.280 --> 0:28:43.720
<v Speaker 1>they've got somebody. His name is Dalvin Cook. There's no

0:28:43.800 --> 0:28:46.280
<v Speaker 1>Christian McCaffrey in this game. The Vikings secondary isn't great.

0:28:46.320 --> 0:28:48.720
<v Speaker 1>I get it, so that Panthers will be able to pass.

0:28:49.280 --> 0:28:52.240
<v Speaker 1>I think the Panthers aren't a particularly good football team.

0:28:52.280 --> 0:28:54.760
<v Speaker 1>I think they're just extremely well coached, and I think

0:28:54.760 --> 0:28:56.880
<v Speaker 1>that the Vikings are going to bounce back here, find

0:28:56.880 --> 0:28:58.640
<v Speaker 1>a way to win this game, buy more than a

0:28:58.680 --> 0:29:00.840
<v Speaker 1>field goal. So I will take the Vikings at three

0:29:00.840 --> 0:29:02.560
<v Speaker 1>and a half. It was four and a half in

0:29:02.600 --> 0:29:05.440
<v Speaker 1>the DraftKings contest. This was a game that I lean,

0:29:05.600 --> 0:29:07.080
<v Speaker 1>you know, four and a half. I was fine to

0:29:07.080 --> 0:29:09.360
<v Speaker 1>take them. I kind of liked them. They were my

0:29:09.400 --> 0:29:10.880
<v Speaker 1>favorite pick, but I kind of liked them at four

0:29:10.880 --> 0:29:12.400
<v Speaker 1>and a half. If Matt would have gone good, if

0:29:12.400 --> 0:29:14.160
<v Speaker 1>he wanted the Panthers, I would have mixed it. That's

0:29:14.160 --> 0:29:15.800
<v Speaker 1>where I'm out with that game. So I do like

0:29:15.840 --> 0:29:18.760
<v Speaker 1>the Vikings here at three and a half. The one

0:29:18.920 --> 0:29:23.240
<v Speaker 1>our experts are most split on is the Bills against

0:29:23.320 --> 0:29:25.960
<v Speaker 1>the Charters. The Bills are laying four and a half points,

0:29:26.520 --> 0:29:30.920
<v Speaker 1>and fifty one percent of our experts are on the Bills,

0:29:31.280 --> 0:29:36.120
<v Speaker 1>so essentially that's split. This is a really tough one. Chargers,

0:29:36.160 --> 0:29:39.080
<v Speaker 1>of course, as you know, have a way of losing

0:29:39.120 --> 0:29:42.520
<v Speaker 1>games no matter how well they're playing. We don't know

0:29:42.560 --> 0:29:45.959
<v Speaker 1>the exact situation of their backfield. Austin Eckler may play,

0:29:46.200 --> 0:29:49.280
<v Speaker 1>Kaylin Blage may play. If not, I don't know, it's

0:29:49.320 --> 0:29:51.440
<v Speaker 1>gonna be Troy Mayne Pope leaning the way in that

0:29:51.480 --> 0:29:54.720
<v Speaker 1>backfield for the Bills. John Brown is out, that's a

0:29:54.720 --> 0:29:57.520
<v Speaker 1>big deal, okay, Josh Allen. Look at the way he

0:29:57.560 --> 0:29:59.800
<v Speaker 1>plays when John Brown is in the game versus when

0:29:59.840 --> 0:30:01.600
<v Speaker 1>Jo Brown is out of the game. It makes a

0:30:01.680 --> 0:30:04.960
<v Speaker 1>huge difference. Casey Hayward is out in this game, I

0:30:05.000 --> 0:30:08.240
<v Speaker 1>don't know how you're gonna stop Stefan Diggs. Here. Sounds

0:30:08.240 --> 0:30:11.040
<v Speaker 1>like Chris Harris Junior may be back. I haven't seen

0:30:11.080 --> 0:30:13.520
<v Speaker 1>the final report on that, but if Chris Harris Junior

0:30:13.560 --> 0:30:15.600
<v Speaker 1>is back, that's gonna be really tough for Cole Beasley.

0:30:16.280 --> 0:30:18.360
<v Speaker 1>It's gonna be. It's just there are too many things

0:30:18.520 --> 0:30:20.239
<v Speaker 1>in this game for me to have a good lean out,

0:30:20.280 --> 0:30:23.320
<v Speaker 1>which is probably why our experts are split fifty one

0:30:23.560 --> 0:30:26.360
<v Speaker 1>percent both ways. It's not a game that I really

0:30:26.440 --> 0:30:28.560
<v Speaker 1>want to go near. If you are forcing me to

0:30:28.680 --> 0:30:32.120
<v Speaker 1>take a side on it, I'm going to probably just

0:30:32.240 --> 0:30:34.600
<v Speaker 1>take the bills, because I do think that this is

0:30:34.640 --> 0:30:40.120
<v Speaker 1>one where, you know, it's just I bet on the

0:30:40.320 --> 0:30:43.080
<v Speaker 1>Chargers finding a way to lose the game, and to

0:30:43.160 --> 0:30:45.200
<v Speaker 1>lose it big enough. But it's really a game that

0:30:45.240 --> 0:30:47.520
<v Speaker 1>I don't want to go near. All right. So those

0:30:47.560 --> 0:30:50.680
<v Speaker 1>are all the games that we've talked about. The couple

0:30:50.720 --> 0:30:53.080
<v Speaker 1>that I definitely have on. I've gotten in on the

0:30:53.120 --> 0:30:57.560
<v Speaker 1>Titans getting three for sure from Indianapolis. I'm also in

0:30:57.640 --> 0:31:01.600
<v Speaker 1>on the Titans money line, which when I got it

0:31:01.640 --> 0:31:03.680
<v Speaker 1>is at plus one point fifty five. I don't know

0:31:03.720 --> 0:31:05.440
<v Speaker 1>where it is at you. I think they do find

0:31:05.480 --> 0:31:08.560
<v Speaker 1>a way to win this game. I like Cleveland laying

0:31:08.640 --> 0:31:11.200
<v Speaker 1>seven to the Jaguars. Again, if you can get that

0:31:11.240 --> 0:31:13.840
<v Speaker 1>at six and a half somewhere, that's great. I would

0:31:13.920 --> 0:31:15.840
<v Speaker 1>do that, but I do think that they're gonna win.

0:31:16.080 --> 0:31:21.280
<v Speaker 1>I lean Giants laying six to the Bengals. I think

0:31:21.280 --> 0:31:25.120
<v Speaker 1>the Bengals are just They're not in a good spot

0:31:25.200 --> 0:31:28.160
<v Speaker 1>right now, my friends. I don't like the way they're aheaded.

0:31:28.600 --> 0:31:32.440
<v Speaker 1>You know, maybe Allen will be fine at quarterback, but again,

0:31:32.640 --> 0:31:35.800
<v Speaker 1>it's just not something where I really want to go

0:31:35.960 --> 0:31:39.640
<v Speaker 1>near that team in any way, shape or form. So

0:31:40.400 --> 0:31:44.440
<v Speaker 1>Forest pick I lean Giants minus six. I like San

0:31:44.480 --> 0:31:48.480
<v Speaker 1>Francisco getting six and a half from the Rams. Again,

0:31:49.000 --> 0:31:52.720
<v Speaker 1>this is not an overwhelming pick at all. Most of

0:31:52.720 --> 0:31:55.800
<v Speaker 1>our experts in our bed analyzer are on the Rams.

0:31:56.160 --> 0:31:58.240
<v Speaker 1>I like the forty nine ers here give me Kyle

0:31:58.240 --> 0:32:00.760
<v Speaker 1>shanan off bye. With an extra week to prepare for

0:32:00.800 --> 0:32:03.360
<v Speaker 1>this game, got the Rams on a short week. I

0:32:03.480 --> 0:32:05.760
<v Speaker 1>just think that this is a by low Sell high

0:32:06.000 --> 0:32:09.200
<v Speaker 1>type of game. I lean the Broncos getting six from

0:32:09.240 --> 0:32:13.600
<v Speaker 1>New Orleans at home. Not a crazy lean, not not nuts,

0:32:13.800 --> 0:32:16.520
<v Speaker 1>but I do like that game. I do think that

0:32:16.800 --> 0:32:19.440
<v Speaker 1>with an extra week to think about it, monitor the

0:32:19.480 --> 0:32:21.800
<v Speaker 1>COVID situation with the Broncos, because there have been some

0:32:21.840 --> 0:32:24.360
<v Speaker 1>COVID up Monitor Jerry Judy. It's a big loss if

0:32:24.360 --> 0:32:27.000
<v Speaker 1>he's not able to play with his foot achilles injury.

0:32:27.360 --> 0:32:30.600
<v Speaker 1>But I do in a vacuum right now, like Denver

0:32:30.680 --> 0:32:34.600
<v Speaker 1>getting six at home from the Saints. I like the

0:32:34.600 --> 0:32:36.480
<v Speaker 1>Bucks now again, I've locked in the Bucks at three

0:32:36.520 --> 0:32:39.320
<v Speaker 1>and a half. Okay, that's where the lines were early

0:32:39.400 --> 0:32:43.480
<v Speaker 1>on in the weekend. At three, I'd still probably take them,

0:32:43.520 --> 0:32:46.440
<v Speaker 1>and I'm okay with doing that, but I do like

0:32:46.480 --> 0:32:47.959
<v Speaker 1>them certainly at three and a half if you can

0:32:47.960 --> 0:32:49.320
<v Speaker 1>get it. But at three, I still will go with

0:32:49.320 --> 0:32:51.880
<v Speaker 1>the Bucks against the Chiefs, and I'm taking the over

0:32:52.000 --> 0:32:54.200
<v Speaker 1>fifty six. I know that that is a high number,

0:32:54.280 --> 0:32:56.840
<v Speaker 1>I really do. I don't care. I think there's gonna

0:32:56.840 --> 0:32:59.720
<v Speaker 1>be a ton of scoring in this game, so I'm

0:32:59.760 --> 0:33:02.960
<v Speaker 1>willing to go with that without real hesitation for it.

0:33:03.240 --> 0:33:05.040
<v Speaker 1>So those are my picks here. Those are the way

0:33:05.080 --> 0:33:07.360
<v Speaker 1>I lean. Listen to The Daily Juice. Listen to where

0:33:07.360 --> 0:33:10.080
<v Speaker 1>Matt goes. I realize it's not an ideal podcast where

0:33:10.080 --> 0:33:12.920
<v Speaker 1>it's just you know, one person doing it for kind

0:33:12.920 --> 0:33:14.800
<v Speaker 1>of a long time going through the games. But wanted

0:33:14.800 --> 0:33:17.120
<v Speaker 1>to make sure that we gave you guys a podcast.

0:33:17.120 --> 0:33:19.280
<v Speaker 1>This week was a weird week with us with Thanksgiving,

0:33:19.320 --> 0:33:22.720
<v Speaker 1>So again, make sure you are listening to The Daily Juice.

0:33:22.800 --> 0:33:26.040
<v Speaker 1>You can find that on any place that you listen

0:33:26.080 --> 0:33:29.360
<v Speaker 1>to podcasts or on Betting Pros dot com Slash podcast.

0:33:29.400 --> 0:33:31.960
<v Speaker 1>I believe it's also a Betting Pros dot com slash

0:33:32.080 --> 0:33:34.360
<v Speaker 1>Daily Juice, but regardless, go to Betting Pros dot com

0:33:34.440 --> 0:33:36.600
<v Speaker 1>Slash podcast. You can find it there. Tuned into the

0:33:36.600 --> 0:33:39.480
<v Speaker 1>live stroom, subscribe to our YouTube channel YouTube dot com

0:33:39.520 --> 0:33:41.840
<v Speaker 1>Slash Betting Pros. Matt will do a live stroom from

0:33:41.840 --> 0:33:45.200
<v Speaker 1>eleven am to twelve pm Eastern on Sunday. He will

0:33:45.200 --> 0:33:47.960
<v Speaker 1>give out props. I will give out my best props

0:33:48.200 --> 0:33:50.880
<v Speaker 1>and you can have them all there until then. Enjoy

0:33:51.000 --> 0:33:53.719
<v Speaker 1>your week twelve. Everybody, good luck with all your bets,

0:33:53.760 --> 0:33:55.560
<v Speaker 1>and Matt and I will talk to you next week.

0:34:02.720 --> 0:34:04.800
<v Speaker 1>Pisca