WEBVTT - #754 Packers Unscripted: Damaging loss

0:00:07.440 --> 0:00:10.719
<v Speaker 1>Hi, everybody. Welcome to another edition of Packers Unscripted from

0:00:10.720 --> 0:00:13.760
<v Speaker 1>Packers dot Com. I am Mike Spofford, joined as always

0:00:13.760 --> 0:00:16.760
<v Speaker 1>by my trusted colleague Weston Hodkowitz. We're coming to you

0:00:16.800 --> 0:00:19.800
<v Speaker 1>here from our studios at Lambeufield and Wes unfortunately to

0:00:19.840 --> 0:00:23.279
<v Speaker 1>talk about another tough loss for the Green Bay Packers,

0:00:23.320 --> 0:00:27.120
<v Speaker 1>this one thirty four to twenty against the Tampa Bay Buccaneers.

0:00:27.640 --> 0:00:29.760
<v Speaker 1>And we'll get into some of the specifics in a minute,

0:00:29.760 --> 0:00:32.760
<v Speaker 1>but big picture, two weeks ago, the Packers were six

0:00:32.840 --> 0:00:35.600
<v Speaker 1>and six and things were looking pretty good in terms

0:00:35.640 --> 0:00:39.400
<v Speaker 1>of the teams that you had beaten, what was on

0:00:39.400 --> 0:00:42.360
<v Speaker 1>your schedule, and the opportunity you were going to have

0:00:42.560 --> 0:00:45.600
<v Speaker 1>to keep yourself in the middle of this playoff race.

0:00:46.240 --> 0:00:47.960
<v Speaker 1>And not that the Packers are out of it, but

0:00:48.040 --> 0:00:52.639
<v Speaker 1>these last two games, two huge missed opportunities that now

0:00:52.720 --> 0:00:55.400
<v Speaker 1>have the Packers very much on the outside looking in well.

0:00:55.400 --> 0:00:57.639
<v Speaker 2>And it's just such a difficult thing, Mike, because when

0:00:57.680 --> 0:01:00.560
<v Speaker 2>you go into Detroit with in I understand the Lions,

0:01:00.560 --> 0:01:02.480
<v Speaker 2>they weren't playing their best ball at that point, but

0:01:03.240 --> 0:01:06.959
<v Speaker 2>you go into Detroit and you impose your will on

0:01:07.000 --> 0:01:09.320
<v Speaker 2>the Lions the way you did and then you come

0:01:09.360 --> 0:01:11.919
<v Speaker 2>home in a big Sunday night football matchup against Kansas

0:01:11.920 --> 0:01:15.040
<v Speaker 2>City and you're six and six. I think the enthusiasm

0:01:15.120 --> 0:01:17.360
<v Speaker 2>and the optimism is there because of what a lot

0:01:17.360 --> 0:01:20.040
<v Speaker 2>of pundits called the easiest slate of games to finish

0:01:20.120 --> 0:01:22.520
<v Speaker 2>out a season. Packers at that point their oposing team

0:01:22.560 --> 0:01:25.759
<v Speaker 2>records were twenty and forty. A lot of that having

0:01:25.760 --> 0:01:29.360
<v Speaker 2>to do with this upcoming opponent, the Carolina Panthers. But

0:01:30.040 --> 0:01:33.200
<v Speaker 2>things didn't go well this season for the Giants. Tampa Bay,

0:01:33.280 --> 0:01:35.800
<v Speaker 2>much like Green Bay, has been up and down, and

0:01:35.840 --> 0:01:38.800
<v Speaker 2>for the Packers to kind of give back both of

0:01:38.840 --> 0:01:43.080
<v Speaker 2>those victories that they had against Detroit and Kansas City disheartening.

0:01:43.200 --> 0:01:46.640
<v Speaker 2>And then obviously to have the defensive performance that they

0:01:46.680 --> 0:01:49.120
<v Speaker 2>had against the Bucks, not being able to get off

0:01:49.120 --> 0:01:52.160
<v Speaker 2>the field too much production on third downs, Baker Mayfield

0:01:52.200 --> 0:01:55.200
<v Speaker 2>having a maximum passer rating, and the Green Bay Packers

0:01:55.240 --> 0:01:58.880
<v Speaker 2>ultimately losing what became a shootout. It's tough and it's

0:01:58.920 --> 0:02:02.640
<v Speaker 2>tough to come shooting back down to earth after you

0:02:02.720 --> 0:02:04.920
<v Speaker 2>felt like you're really starting to build towards something.

0:02:05.120 --> 0:02:07.640
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, and that's what this most recent game will be

0:02:07.680 --> 0:02:13.320
<v Speaker 1>remembered for the defensive performance that just allowed Baker Mayfield

0:02:13.560 --> 0:02:15.480
<v Speaker 1>to do whatever he wanted to do. You mentioned a one

0:02:15.520 --> 0:02:18.320
<v Speaker 1>hundred and fifty eight point three passer rating, three hundred

0:02:18.320 --> 0:02:21.240
<v Speaker 1>and eighty one yards, four touchdowns. He came sixteen yard

0:02:21.280 --> 0:02:23.840
<v Speaker 1>shy of his career high for yardage in a game,

0:02:24.440 --> 0:02:30.920
<v Speaker 1>which is three ninety seven. And you know, Matt Lafleur,

0:02:31.120 --> 0:02:33.799
<v Speaker 1>he deferred the question on Sunday night. He then answered

0:02:33.840 --> 0:02:36.400
<v Speaker 1>the question on Monday. He's not making any coaching changes

0:02:36.400 --> 0:02:39.200
<v Speaker 1>at this point. Obviously, all those kinds of things are

0:02:39.200 --> 0:02:43.000
<v Speaker 1>going to be evaluated to a greater extent in due time.

0:02:44.080 --> 0:02:48.320
<v Speaker 1>But this Packers' defense has got to figure something out West,

0:02:48.400 --> 0:02:51.119
<v Speaker 1>because no, the Packers are not out of it yet.

0:02:51.160 --> 0:02:53.799
<v Speaker 1>You still have three games left to go. You want

0:02:53.800 --> 0:02:57.080
<v Speaker 1>to start playing better football. But the bottom line is

0:02:57.120 --> 0:03:00.679
<v Speaker 1>for the last two seasons and there have been in reason, yes,

0:03:00.680 --> 0:03:03.480
<v Speaker 1>and every team deals with injuries, but throughout twenty twenty

0:03:03.480 --> 0:03:06.639
<v Speaker 1>two and twenty twenty three, I think the most maddening

0:03:06.720 --> 0:03:09.760
<v Speaker 1>thing about this Packers defense is that it cannot get

0:03:09.760 --> 0:03:13.799
<v Speaker 1>off the roller coaster. It plays good football and then

0:03:13.840 --> 0:03:16.800
<v Speaker 1>it swings the other way. And the distance of the

0:03:16.800 --> 0:03:21.600
<v Speaker 1>swings between what this team's top performances are, and then

0:03:21.639 --> 0:03:26.160
<v Speaker 1>what this team's rock bottom performances are. We've seen it all,

0:03:26.560 --> 0:03:29.120
<v Speaker 1>We've seen it all, and then they can't seem to

0:03:29.160 --> 0:03:32.800
<v Speaker 1>smooth it out, and that just makes it really hard

0:03:32.800 --> 0:03:34.880
<v Speaker 1>to know what you're going to get from that side

0:03:34.920 --> 0:03:36.680
<v Speaker 1>of the ball every week when you take the field.

0:03:36.680 --> 0:03:38.120
<v Speaker 1>That's the bottom line right now.

0:03:37.960 --> 0:03:40.080
<v Speaker 2>And when you say we've seen it all, we saw

0:03:40.120 --> 0:03:42.040
<v Speaker 2>it all. In the sixty minutes of that football game

0:03:42.080 --> 0:03:45.600
<v Speaker 2>on Sunday, the green Bay Packers defense goes on the

0:03:45.600 --> 0:03:48.400
<v Speaker 2>field after Green Bay turns over the ball at its

0:03:48.400 --> 0:03:51.839
<v Speaker 2>own five yard line, and Kingsleyannigbari gets a strip sack

0:03:52.040 --> 0:03:54.720
<v Speaker 2>ess the type of adversity response you want to see,

0:03:55.040 --> 0:03:57.800
<v Speaker 2>taking advantage of that field position and allowing the Packers

0:03:57.840 --> 0:04:00.400
<v Speaker 2>to score a touchdown right after that intake and early lead.

0:04:01.040 --> 0:04:05.640
<v Speaker 2>Kenny Clark gets the six yard sack, pushing and stopping

0:04:06.520 --> 0:04:09.680
<v Speaker 2>the Tampa Bay drive and making them settle for a

0:04:09.680 --> 0:04:12.640
<v Speaker 2>field goal. That's the way Green Bay has been playing

0:04:12.680 --> 0:04:16.520
<v Speaker 2>when they've played well this season, but when they've played poorly.

0:04:16.920 --> 0:04:21.200
<v Speaker 2>It was another manifestation of really those last three quarters

0:04:21.279 --> 0:04:24.320
<v Speaker 2>of that game against Tampa Bay. Too much production in

0:04:24.360 --> 0:04:26.720
<v Speaker 2>the middle of the field a week after giving up

0:04:26.720 --> 0:04:29.840
<v Speaker 2>the rushing yards to Tommy Devido. Some of the trickeration

0:04:30.000 --> 0:04:32.880
<v Speaker 2>that the Giants played in this one, it was Chris Godwin,

0:04:33.160 --> 0:04:35.680
<v Speaker 2>it was Baker from Mayfield, kind of dicing things up

0:04:35.720 --> 0:04:40.359
<v Speaker 2>a little bit. Green Bay got home five times to

0:04:40.400 --> 0:04:43.520
<v Speaker 2>have a season high five sacks and have such a

0:04:43.600 --> 0:04:46.560
<v Speaker 2>drastic swing where if it's gonna be kind of all

0:04:46.640 --> 0:04:50.440
<v Speaker 2>or nothing, well, Mike, you only have five defensive plays

0:04:50.440 --> 0:04:53.000
<v Speaker 2>that result in sacks. There's a lot more defensive plays

0:04:53.080 --> 0:04:55.880
<v Speaker 2>that resulted in production. And for the green Bay Packers,

0:04:55.880 --> 0:04:57.960
<v Speaker 2>by the time it got into that third quarter, in

0:04:58.000 --> 0:05:00.840
<v Speaker 2>that fourth quarter, it just did not feel like they

0:05:00.839 --> 0:05:01.960
<v Speaker 2>were going to be able to find a way to

0:05:02.000 --> 0:05:02.960
<v Speaker 2>get the brakes on the thing.

0:05:03.120 --> 0:05:05.240
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, when you look at the five sacks you mentioned,

0:05:05.240 --> 0:05:07.320
<v Speaker 1>the first two had a huge impact on the game.

0:05:07.440 --> 0:05:10.120
<v Speaker 1>The first sack forces the Buccaneers to kick a field goal,

0:05:10.640 --> 0:05:12.880
<v Speaker 1>and the second one becomes a turnover near the goal

0:05:12.960 --> 0:05:15.400
<v Speaker 1>line that the Packers turn into a touchdown. The other

0:05:15.520 --> 0:05:20.080
<v Speaker 1>three sacks had absolutely no effect on the Buccaneers offense

0:05:20.160 --> 0:05:23.159
<v Speaker 1>quite frankly. I mean, the Packers had him in second

0:05:23.200 --> 0:05:25.279
<v Speaker 1>and twenty nine and they still managed to get a

0:05:25.279 --> 0:05:27.800
<v Speaker 1>field goal before half. They had him in a second

0:05:28.440 --> 0:05:31.800
<v Speaker 1>second and eighteen. At one point the Buccaneers didn't even

0:05:31.839 --> 0:05:34.120
<v Speaker 1>need third down to move the chains. There was a

0:05:34.160 --> 0:05:37.520
<v Speaker 1>third and twelve. They throw a basic wide receiver screen,

0:05:38.839 --> 0:05:41.520
<v Speaker 1>which quite frankly in some ways look like they're going

0:05:41.600 --> 0:05:43.679
<v Speaker 1>to get whatever yards they can and kick the field

0:05:43.680 --> 0:05:45.680
<v Speaker 1>goal rather than take a big risk on third and

0:05:45.720 --> 0:05:48.120
<v Speaker 1>twelve shooting it down the field. Well, the third and

0:05:48.160 --> 0:05:50.720
<v Speaker 1>twelve wide receiver screen turns into sixteen yards in a

0:05:50.760 --> 0:05:53.960
<v Speaker 1>first down and they get a touchdown. You mentioned the

0:05:53.960 --> 0:05:56.760
<v Speaker 1>game kind of became a shootout, because yes, the Buccaneers

0:05:56.800 --> 0:06:00.240
<v Speaker 1>they scored touchdowns on with long drives. I believe it

0:06:00.279 --> 0:06:03.080
<v Speaker 1>was sixty six, seventy five and seventy five yards on

0:06:03.120 --> 0:06:05.640
<v Speaker 1>the on their first three drives of the second half.

0:06:06.320 --> 0:06:09.200
<v Speaker 1>And while the Packers they missed an opportunity going three

0:06:09.240 --> 0:06:12.159
<v Speaker 1>and out to start the second half, and then early

0:06:12.200 --> 0:06:13.960
<v Speaker 1>in the fourth quarter they had to settle for a

0:06:14.000 --> 0:06:18.240
<v Speaker 1>field goal. But you know, you get a touchdown in

0:06:18.240 --> 0:06:21.960
<v Speaker 1>the third quarter on a great throw and catch Jordan

0:06:22.040 --> 0:06:24.719
<v Speaker 1>Love to Jaden Reid on a third and long to

0:06:24.800 --> 0:06:27.280
<v Speaker 1>get within twenty seventeen. But then the next time your

0:06:27.320 --> 0:06:30.200
<v Speaker 1>offense gets the ball, you're down twenty seven to seventeen.

0:06:30.440 --> 0:06:33.000
<v Speaker 1>Then you drive, put together another nice drive, but you

0:06:33.040 --> 0:06:35.520
<v Speaker 1>stall out, you kick a field goal, so you're within

0:06:35.560 --> 0:06:38.039
<v Speaker 1>twenty seven to twenty. There's still ten minutes on the clock,

0:06:38.120 --> 0:06:40.800
<v Speaker 1>plenty of ballgame left. But then the next time your

0:06:40.800 --> 0:06:43.160
<v Speaker 1>offense gets the ball back, it's thirty four to twenty

0:06:43.200 --> 0:06:45.520
<v Speaker 1>and the game is for all intents and purposes over.

0:06:45.600 --> 0:06:51.279
<v Speaker 1>You're in desperation mode at that point. It just became

0:06:51.600 --> 0:06:53.880
<v Speaker 1>to the It got to the point where the Packers

0:06:53.960 --> 0:06:57.440
<v Speaker 1>offense was under too much pressure to be perfect because

0:06:57.480 --> 0:07:00.800
<v Speaker 1>the Buccaneers offense was just unrelenting in the Packer's defense

0:07:00.839 --> 0:07:02.440
<v Speaker 1>was unable to do anything about it.

0:07:02.560 --> 0:07:06.320
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, and for the Tampa Bay Buccaneers, I think they

0:07:06.440 --> 0:07:09.360
<v Speaker 2>kind of came as advertised, to be honest with you, Mike.

0:07:09.440 --> 0:07:12.000
<v Speaker 2>Specifically on the defensive side of the ball, Jordan Love

0:07:12.040 --> 0:07:14.840
<v Speaker 2>had a fine day. His statistics bared out well. One

0:07:14.920 --> 0:07:18.120
<v Speaker 2>hundred and eleven passer writing whatever. It was a lot

0:07:18.160 --> 0:07:20.119
<v Speaker 2>of times that's going to be good enough to win games.

0:07:20.200 --> 0:07:25.320
<v Speaker 2>This game it was not. But defensively, Tampa Bay played

0:07:25.400 --> 0:07:27.960
<v Speaker 2>up to their billing. They gave up some yards, they

0:07:28.040 --> 0:07:31.000
<v Speaker 2>battened down the hatches in the red zone. They forced

0:07:31.000 --> 0:07:35.600
<v Speaker 2>green Bay into a turnover late that kind of stimied everything,

0:07:35.640 --> 0:07:37.560
<v Speaker 2>That kind of closed the door on any hopes of

0:07:37.600 --> 0:07:41.680
<v Speaker 2>a comeback, and ultimately they just did not blink when

0:07:41.720 --> 0:07:45.360
<v Speaker 2>green Bay did first offensively. And we'll talk about this

0:07:45.400 --> 0:07:47.560
<v Speaker 2>in a second, but I mean there were positives. You're

0:07:47.560 --> 0:07:50.480
<v Speaker 2>seeing guys like Tucker Craft and Dontavian Wicks, you got

0:07:51.480 --> 0:07:54.160
<v Speaker 2>Aaron Jones back in this thing. There's a lot of

0:07:54.200 --> 0:07:57.680
<v Speaker 2>positives to draw from offensively, but in a season in

0:07:57.720 --> 0:07:59.640
<v Speaker 2>which it's been difficult for green Bay to find the

0:07:59.680 --> 0:08:04.040
<v Speaker 2>perfect complimentary pieces to win these type of games, you know,

0:08:04.080 --> 0:08:06.360
<v Speaker 2>the defense came up short and this was the end result.

0:08:06.600 --> 0:08:10.240
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, and I think I think that's you know, these

0:08:10.320 --> 0:08:13.920
<v Speaker 1>back to back losses are obviously very damaging to green

0:08:13.960 --> 0:08:17.440
<v Speaker 1>Bay season, but very very different losses. We were sitting

0:08:17.480 --> 0:08:19.120
<v Speaker 1>here a week ago, I guess it would have been

0:08:19.200 --> 0:08:21.360
<v Speaker 1>six days ago, coming off of the Monday night game

0:08:21.400 --> 0:08:25.080
<v Speaker 1>against the Giants, talking about a three phase failure. The

0:08:25.120 --> 0:08:29.240
<v Speaker 1>Packers failed pretty miserably, quite frankly, in all three phases

0:08:29.280 --> 0:08:33.520
<v Speaker 1>against the Giants. This one was primarily about one phase,

0:08:33.760 --> 0:08:36.120
<v Speaker 1>not saying the special teams were perfect, but there was

0:08:36.200 --> 0:08:38.920
<v Speaker 1>kind of no harm done there. The offense certainly missed

0:08:38.960 --> 0:08:41.319
<v Speaker 1>a couple of opportunities, but Tampa Bay's got a pretty

0:08:41.320 --> 0:08:43.200
<v Speaker 1>good defense. You're not gonna be able to cash in

0:08:43.679 --> 0:08:45.720
<v Speaker 1>every single time and to have twenty points on the

0:08:45.720 --> 0:08:48.080
<v Speaker 1>board with ten minutes left in the game against a

0:08:48.080 --> 0:08:51.880
<v Speaker 1>good defense. You'll take your chances there. This one was

0:08:51.920 --> 0:08:54.880
<v Speaker 1>about the defense not really giving the Packers a chance

0:08:54.920 --> 0:08:57.080
<v Speaker 1>to be able to win a really, really important home

0:08:57.120 --> 0:09:00.679
<v Speaker 1>game in December. I do want to talk about if

0:09:00.720 --> 0:09:02.880
<v Speaker 1>I could just quickly, Yeah, absolutely.

0:09:02.360 --> 0:09:05.080
<v Speaker 2>The fact that Baker Mayfield threw four different touchdowns of

0:09:05.120 --> 0:09:07.200
<v Speaker 2>four different players right, The fact that it was one

0:09:07.280 --> 0:09:09.439
<v Speaker 2>hundred and forty yards I think of two touchdowns on

0:09:09.559 --> 0:09:13.040
<v Speaker 2>third downs. The fact that they did this against Green

0:09:13.040 --> 0:09:16.600
<v Speaker 2>Bay at Lambeufield in December. It points to the fact

0:09:16.640 --> 0:09:19.880
<v Speaker 2>it wasn't one specific player. It wasn't falling on one

0:09:19.920 --> 0:09:22.880
<v Speaker 2>guy's plate. It was the collective hole from the coaching

0:09:22.880 --> 0:09:25.840
<v Speaker 2>staff to the players. It wasn't where it needed to be.

0:09:26.280 --> 0:09:30.000
<v Speaker 1>Twelve plays solutions for twelve plays by the Buccaneers, an

0:09:30.040 --> 0:09:33.640
<v Speaker 1>even dozen of eighteen plus yards a dozen, that's three

0:09:33.720 --> 0:09:36.800
<v Speaker 1>per quarter. You like to maybe get through you know

0:09:36.960 --> 0:09:40.600
<v Speaker 1>a game like three per half or you know even

0:09:41.040 --> 0:09:44.960
<v Speaker 1>you know, three every few quarters. Three per quarter is

0:09:45.040 --> 0:09:47.800
<v Speaker 1>essentially what the average was of plays of eighteen plus

0:09:47.880 --> 0:09:50.160
<v Speaker 1>yards in this game. And that's just not going to

0:09:50.200 --> 0:09:53.800
<v Speaker 1>cut it. I do want to talk about, though, what

0:09:53.840 --> 0:09:57.400
<v Speaker 1>you hinted at before, which is what we are seeing

0:09:57.800 --> 0:10:02.240
<v Speaker 1>happening with the Packers offense, particularly two players, Tucker Craft

0:10:02.280 --> 0:10:07.600
<v Speaker 1>and Doantavian Wicks, rookie rookie draft picks who have seen

0:10:08.000 --> 0:10:11.719
<v Speaker 1>their opportunities and their reps increase because of injuries. Luke

0:10:11.800 --> 0:10:14.000
<v Speaker 1>Musgrave has been out for a little while now and

0:10:14.080 --> 0:10:16.440
<v Speaker 1>Christian Watson has missed the last couple of games. So

0:10:16.520 --> 0:10:19.640
<v Speaker 1>both Craft and Wicks are playing more snaps, getting the

0:10:19.679 --> 0:10:23.360
<v Speaker 1>ball thrown their way a lot more often. And I

0:10:23.480 --> 0:10:27.160
<v Speaker 1>tell you what these these young players have produced, Wes.

0:10:27.160 --> 0:10:30.240
<v Speaker 1>And when you talk about craft man, it's it's not

0:10:30.440 --> 0:10:33.240
<v Speaker 1>just that he can, you know, get an explosive play

0:10:33.280 --> 0:10:35.240
<v Speaker 1>down the field, or that he can be a threat

0:10:35.240 --> 0:10:38.880
<v Speaker 1>in the red zone. His blocking, you know, from a

0:10:38.920 --> 0:10:41.640
<v Speaker 1>guy coming from South Dakota State where you're making a

0:10:41.679 --> 0:10:44.400
<v Speaker 1>bigger leap than a lot of other players to the NFL.

0:10:44.440 --> 0:10:46.760
<v Speaker 1>In terms of the guy who's lined up across from you.

0:10:48.240 --> 0:10:51.880
<v Speaker 1>Tucker Craft is becoming an all around tight end in

0:10:51.920 --> 0:10:54.240
<v Speaker 1>front of our eyes in a fairly short amount of time.

0:10:54.360 --> 0:10:57.880
<v Speaker 2>And it's interesting too, because he talked about coming to

0:10:57.920 --> 0:10:59.520
<v Speaker 2>the Green Bay Packers. One of the things that got

0:10:59.600 --> 0:11:02.480
<v Speaker 2>him draft after the third round was his yards after catch.

0:11:02.520 --> 0:11:03.800
<v Speaker 2>It was some of the things he did in the

0:11:03.800 --> 0:11:07.080
<v Speaker 2>big plays two years ago that kind of give you

0:11:07.080 --> 0:11:08.800
<v Speaker 2>that idea that a guy with this size and this

0:11:08.880 --> 0:11:10.960
<v Speaker 2>type of skill set could really do some damage in

0:11:10.960 --> 0:11:13.600
<v Speaker 2>the NFL. The area, as you mentioned, that was kind

0:11:13.640 --> 0:11:16.160
<v Speaker 2>of unproven was the blocking aspect of it. How he

0:11:16.280 --> 0:11:17.720
<v Speaker 2>was going to be able to hold up on that

0:11:17.920 --> 0:11:22.120
<v Speaker 2>end against now football's absolute elite. Coincidentally enough, I actually

0:11:22.160 --> 0:11:23.880
<v Speaker 2>feel like that was one area that sort of was

0:11:24.320 --> 0:11:27.319
<v Speaker 2>come together earlier in the season for him, and he's

0:11:27.360 --> 0:11:30.480
<v Speaker 2>been able to improve upon it throughout the year. Now

0:11:30.520 --> 0:11:32.440
<v Speaker 2>we're starting to see some of the yards after catch

0:11:32.440 --> 0:11:36.040
<v Speaker 2>stuff happen too. And he's a gritty, hard nosed football player, man.

0:11:36.160 --> 0:11:38.560
<v Speaker 2>I mean you saw in that thirty six yard catch

0:11:38.600 --> 0:11:41.000
<v Speaker 2>and run. He explained it afterwards. He wasn't just trying

0:11:41.040 --> 0:11:43.199
<v Speaker 2>to showboat when he elevated when he jumped to try

0:11:43.200 --> 0:11:46.120
<v Speaker 2>to get to the defender. His mind was defensive backs,

0:11:46.200 --> 0:11:48.240
<v Speaker 2>especially when they're going up against a guy that could

0:11:48.240 --> 0:11:51.120
<v Speaker 2>be conceivably sixty pounds heavier than them, they have a

0:11:51.160 --> 0:11:54.160
<v Speaker 2>tendency to go for the legs. In that particular case,

0:11:54.200 --> 0:11:56.600
<v Speaker 2>they did not. They went right into his torso and

0:11:56.679 --> 0:12:00.280
<v Speaker 2>unfortunate for him, right into the nether regions exactly to

0:12:00.320 --> 0:12:02.720
<v Speaker 2>go out a couple of plays. But thirty six yard

0:12:02.720 --> 0:12:05.200
<v Speaker 2>pick up there. You also had that little tiny it

0:12:05.240 --> 0:12:07.960
<v Speaker 2>was basically like a tight end screen on the touchdown pass.

0:12:08.600 --> 0:12:11.520
<v Speaker 2>Four catches, fifty seven yards a touchdown. I tweeted it

0:12:11.600 --> 0:12:14.760
<v Speaker 2>during the game, Mike, I cannot wait. You will see

0:12:14.760 --> 0:12:17.800
<v Speaker 2>if it happens this year. But getting this version of

0:12:17.840 --> 0:12:21.280
<v Speaker 2>Tucker Kraft now on the field with Luke Musgrave, I mean,

0:12:21.320 --> 0:12:23.280
<v Speaker 2>the possibilities. This is what the Packers wanted when they

0:12:23.280 --> 0:12:25.800
<v Speaker 2>invested as much draft capital of the as they've put

0:12:25.800 --> 0:12:29.320
<v Speaker 2>into the tight end position since the seventy merger. Yeah,

0:12:29.600 --> 0:12:31.680
<v Speaker 2>you're starting to see exactly why they took these two

0:12:31.679 --> 0:12:33.600
<v Speaker 2>particular players and how they can kind of work off

0:12:33.640 --> 0:12:34.200
<v Speaker 2>of one another.

0:12:34.280 --> 0:12:36.920
<v Speaker 1>Yeah. Absolutely. And when you talk about don Tavian Wicks,

0:12:36.960 --> 0:12:41.120
<v Speaker 1>I tell you I've mentioned before how We've seen him

0:12:41.160 --> 0:12:43.440
<v Speaker 1>bounce back from his rough moments. He had the drop

0:12:43.440 --> 0:12:46.400
<v Speaker 1>of the slant pass by the goal line against the Vikings.

0:12:45.840 --> 0:12:49.720
<v Speaker 1>He lost the football on his own trying to fight

0:12:49.760 --> 0:12:52.080
<v Speaker 1>for the first down or you know, try to get

0:12:52.160 --> 0:12:54.240
<v Speaker 1>to the first down marker against the Rams, where the

0:12:54.240 --> 0:12:56.720
<v Speaker 1>ball popped out when it hit the ground ends up

0:12:56.760 --> 0:12:59.800
<v Speaker 1>being a turnover. He's rebounded from that, but not only

0:12:59.840 --> 0:13:04.040
<v Speaker 1>just making catches and moving the chains and getting yards.

0:13:04.840 --> 0:13:08.240
<v Speaker 1>This guy is fighting for every yard there is to get.

0:13:08.320 --> 0:13:10.400
<v Speaker 1>The one thing I didn't do when I went through

0:13:10.400 --> 0:13:14.080
<v Speaker 1>the offensive film yesterday that I wish I would have done.

0:13:14.320 --> 0:13:16.960
<v Speaker 1>I wish I would have just charted it and counted

0:13:17.040 --> 0:13:20.600
<v Speaker 1>up what wicks yards after the catch were in this game.

0:13:20.640 --> 0:13:22.920
<v Speaker 1>He ended with a career high to this point of

0:13:23.000 --> 0:13:26.120
<v Speaker 1>ninety seven yards on his six receptions. But man, a

0:13:26.160 --> 0:13:29.960
<v Speaker 1>bunch of those yards were after the catch, and he's

0:13:30.000 --> 0:13:32.440
<v Speaker 1>fighting for every yard he can get. He's protecting the

0:13:32.480 --> 0:13:35.360
<v Speaker 1>ball while he's doing that, And I tell you what

0:13:35.400 --> 0:13:39.160
<v Speaker 1>that's You see that kind of play from a young man,

0:13:39.240 --> 0:13:42.080
<v Speaker 1>from a rookie out there with a team that's fighting

0:13:42.080 --> 0:13:44.360
<v Speaker 1>for a playoff spot and everything. I'll take that guy

0:13:44.360 --> 0:13:45.280
<v Speaker 1>on my team any day.

0:13:45.360 --> 0:13:47.440
<v Speaker 2>And here's the other aspect of this. You mentioned some

0:13:47.480 --> 0:13:50.680
<v Speaker 2>of the things you know this season, times in which

0:13:50.720 --> 0:13:53.079
<v Speaker 2>you know plays you can improve upon, you can learn from.

0:13:54.200 --> 0:13:57.679
<v Speaker 2>I'm a big pound for pound guy. This is a

0:13:57.800 --> 0:14:02.360
<v Speaker 2>rookie fifth round receiver. You do not get this type

0:14:02.400 --> 0:14:05.440
<v Speaker 2>of production that often from these type of players because

0:14:05.480 --> 0:14:09.200
<v Speaker 2>he's not just catching passes. Mike. That last touchdown scoring

0:14:09.280 --> 0:14:12.640
<v Speaker 2>drive that Green Bay put together, that was Dontavian Wicks. Yea.

0:14:12.880 --> 0:14:15.320
<v Speaker 2>I even tweeted it during the game. He willed them

0:14:15.360 --> 0:14:17.680
<v Speaker 2>down the field on that drive. It wasn't the most

0:14:18.160 --> 0:14:20.480
<v Speaker 2>in rhythm, in sync drive you've ever seen. No, it

0:14:20.520 --> 0:14:26.480
<v Speaker 2>was Dontavian Wicks making incredible football plays. Ninety seven receiving yards. Yeah, however,

0:14:26.560 --> 0:14:29.320
<v Speaker 2>much of that was built under the Yact. But the

0:14:29.360 --> 0:14:31.720
<v Speaker 2>green Bay Packers found something here, man. They found something

0:14:31.720 --> 0:14:35.600
<v Speaker 2>in twenty eighteen with Marquezveldez. Scantling fifth round has been

0:14:35.720 --> 0:14:38.880
<v Speaker 2>very productive for them as a whole. When you think about,

0:14:39.040 --> 0:14:41.920
<v Speaker 2>you know, an all Pro like Corey Linsley in twenty fourteen,

0:14:43.040 --> 0:14:45.680
<v Speaker 2>Dantavian Wicks man in a year in which the Packers

0:14:45.680 --> 0:14:48.640
<v Speaker 2>expected to build so much around Christian Watson and Romeo

0:14:48.720 --> 0:14:51.640
<v Speaker 2>Dobbs and Jayden Reid and also Samori too y being

0:14:51.680 --> 0:14:55.480
<v Speaker 2>in that conversation, here's Wis jumping right into the fold,

0:14:55.600 --> 0:14:57.640
<v Speaker 2>becoming that next man up, and when he's been given

0:14:57.680 --> 0:14:59.960
<v Speaker 2>the opportunities, here's what he's doing with them.

0:15:00.080 --> 0:15:02.280
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, and a couple other things I want to say

0:15:02.280 --> 0:15:06.120
<v Speaker 1>about the offense, because because something something getting a little

0:15:06.160 --> 0:15:08.880
<v Speaker 1>bit lost because of all the attention on the defense

0:15:08.960 --> 0:15:12.200
<v Speaker 1>and everything that went wrong there. And I understand all that,

0:15:13.600 --> 0:15:17.080
<v Speaker 1>but a couple of things. Jordan Love, for one, bounced

0:15:17.120 --> 0:15:20.160
<v Speaker 1>back from one of his one of his rougher games,

0:15:20.200 --> 0:15:22.640
<v Speaker 1>probably his roughest game of the second half of the season.

0:15:22.720 --> 0:15:24.680
<v Speaker 1>After you know, he kind of hit his stride and

0:15:24.680 --> 0:15:27.480
<v Speaker 1>everything and then a lot went wrong against the Giants.

0:15:27.640 --> 0:15:31.040
<v Speaker 1>Wasn't a good performance. He bounced back and quite frankly, Wes,

0:15:31.200 --> 0:15:34.760
<v Speaker 1>I think maybe maybe you have another one in mind.

0:15:35.120 --> 0:15:38.040
<v Speaker 1>I think that third and fourteen from the seventeen yard line,

0:15:38.320 --> 0:15:43.160
<v Speaker 1>the improvise the breakdown play, sorry broken down play, and

0:15:43.200 --> 0:15:45.880
<v Speaker 1>then he hits Jayden Reid for the touchdown with the

0:15:46.160 --> 0:15:48.600
<v Speaker 1>with the toe tap, the tow drag. I thought that

0:15:48.760 --> 0:15:51.960
<v Speaker 1>was the most impressive throw Jordan Love's made all season long,

0:15:52.040 --> 0:15:54.640
<v Speaker 1>and kind of it's kind of gotten lost because the

0:15:54.680 --> 0:15:57.560
<v Speaker 1>Packers didn't win the game, and with everything that was

0:15:57.960 --> 0:16:00.160
<v Speaker 1>going wrong on the defensive side of the ball, was

0:16:00.200 --> 0:16:04.120
<v Speaker 1>an absolutely tremendous third and fourteen from the seventeen yard

0:16:04.160 --> 0:16:07.440
<v Speaker 1>line and the play breaks down and he beats you.

0:16:07.760 --> 0:16:11.160
<v Speaker 1>We've seen it happen at lambeau Field with the previous

0:16:11.240 --> 0:16:14.680
<v Speaker 1>quarterbacks that have that have played in the Green and Gold.

0:16:14.800 --> 0:16:16.880
<v Speaker 1>That was a heck of a moment, and I just

0:16:16.880 --> 0:16:18.840
<v Speaker 1>don't want it to get too lost in what was

0:16:18.880 --> 0:16:20.200
<v Speaker 1>a very disappointing defeat.

0:16:20.360 --> 0:16:22.560
<v Speaker 2>I have a take on this. I have some opinions

0:16:22.600 --> 0:16:28.680
<v Speaker 2>on this to expository, explain, expound, expound, Thank you sure,

0:16:28.720 --> 0:16:30.960
<v Speaker 2>But before I do that, I have a question for you. Yeah,

0:16:31.000 --> 0:16:33.440
<v Speaker 2>how many twenty five year old quarterbacks, and they're first

0:16:33.520 --> 0:16:35.400
<v Speaker 2>either twenty five years old or is a first year

0:16:35.440 --> 0:16:38.440
<v Speaker 2>as a starter, how many of the quarterbacks throw that

0:16:38.480 --> 0:16:40.400
<v Speaker 2>pass to Jaden Reied and how many pull it down

0:16:40.400 --> 0:16:41.960
<v Speaker 2>and try to scramble for a first down.

0:16:42.840 --> 0:16:44.600
<v Speaker 1>The majority are going to pull it down to try

0:16:44.640 --> 0:16:46.840
<v Speaker 1>to scramble and see here and here's the thing. And

0:16:46.880 --> 0:16:51.479
<v Speaker 1>I we saw earlier in the season in that same situation.

0:16:51.600 --> 0:16:54.240
<v Speaker 1>It was it was a third and long yardage and

0:16:54.600 --> 0:16:57.200
<v Speaker 1>Love did take off to scramble, but there were way

0:16:57.200 --> 0:16:59.320
<v Speaker 1>too many yards to have to gain for the first down.

0:16:59.360 --> 0:17:03.000
<v Speaker 1>He's gotten chance in his field, and as soon as

0:17:03.000 --> 0:17:05.080
<v Speaker 1>he crosses the line of scrimmage, he's a dead duck.

0:17:05.119 --> 0:17:06.880
<v Speaker 1>He's not going to be able to get the first down.

0:17:07.400 --> 0:17:11.959
<v Speaker 1>We saw against the Giants a very similar play that

0:17:12.000 --> 0:17:15.080
<v Speaker 1>had broken down. He steps up in the pocket, he escapes,

0:17:15.680 --> 0:17:19.160
<v Speaker 1>and he missed the throw to Samari Toure along the

0:17:19.200 --> 0:17:21.280
<v Speaker 1>boundary in the end zone. That could have been a

0:17:21.359 --> 0:17:24.040
<v Speaker 1>very much a game changing play against the Giants. He

0:17:24.119 --> 0:17:27.879
<v Speaker 1>comes back the very next week and makes that play.

0:17:27.920 --> 0:17:29.720
<v Speaker 1>I thought it was really really.

0:17:29.800 --> 0:17:32.280
<v Speaker 2>So here's my take on the throw. The other thing

0:17:32.320 --> 0:17:34.040
<v Speaker 2>you'll see from a lot of young quarterbacks in this

0:17:34.119 --> 0:17:36.600
<v Speaker 2>league is what I always refer to as as Madden

0:17:36.720 --> 0:17:39.080
<v Speaker 2>scramble drills. Yeah, because it's what I always used to

0:17:39.080 --> 0:17:41.760
<v Speaker 2>do during Madden, which is you just try to evade

0:17:41.760 --> 0:17:43.879
<v Speaker 2>the pocket as quickly as possible. And it's usually not

0:17:43.920 --> 0:17:46.280
<v Speaker 2>taking a direct line. You're not pursuing the right eggs

0:17:46.280 --> 0:17:48.920
<v Speaker 2>at angle. It's just kind of running around the defensive

0:17:49.000 --> 0:17:50.879
<v Speaker 2>end and getting over into the open field on the

0:17:50.920 --> 0:17:53.520
<v Speaker 2>right side and trying to find somebody. What impressed me

0:17:53.560 --> 0:17:56.560
<v Speaker 2>about Jordan Love on that play was he saw through

0:17:56.560 --> 0:17:59.359
<v Speaker 2>the smoke there's a lot going on around him. His

0:17:59.440 --> 0:18:03.359
<v Speaker 2>eggs at hole was probably what the size of a guard,

0:18:04.000 --> 0:18:06.520
<v Speaker 2>and he kind of got his way through there. The

0:18:06.600 --> 0:18:09.560
<v Speaker 2>reason why I mentioned the piece about how many quarterbacks

0:18:09.600 --> 0:18:12.280
<v Speaker 2>tucket and go there is because they wouldn't be able

0:18:12.280 --> 0:18:14.639
<v Speaker 2>to keep their eyes down field when they're trying to

0:18:14.680 --> 0:18:18.560
<v Speaker 2>get through that clutter. Jordan did that, stayed true to

0:18:18.600 --> 0:18:21.560
<v Speaker 2>his fundamentals and his footwork, and then put an absolute

0:18:21.680 --> 0:18:24.159
<v Speaker 2>dime on Jayden Reid and Jaden Reid Mike. For a

0:18:24.160 --> 0:18:28.000
<v Speaker 2>guy that is now one catch away from tying Sterling

0:18:28.040 --> 0:18:34.240
<v Speaker 2>Sharp single season receptions record by a rookie, it's as

0:18:34.280 --> 0:18:36.080
<v Speaker 2>extraordinary as of a catch as you're going to see

0:18:36.080 --> 0:18:38.440
<v Speaker 2>from a rookie football player. His ability to get both

0:18:38.480 --> 0:18:41.560
<v Speaker 2>feet down there and drag them there was not an

0:18:41.600 --> 0:18:44.080
<v Speaker 2>inch to waste on that play, and he made the

0:18:44.119 --> 0:18:44.840
<v Speaker 2>play regardless.

0:18:44.920 --> 0:18:46.760
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, and I'll be honest. I mean I said it

0:18:46.800 --> 0:18:49.920
<v Speaker 1>in the live blog at the time. When I saw

0:18:49.960 --> 0:18:52.600
<v Speaker 1>it live, I thought, there's no way Reid got his

0:18:52.680 --> 0:18:54.959
<v Speaker 1>feet in. There's no way that that's a reception like

0:18:55.320 --> 0:18:59.120
<v Speaker 1>replay is gonna reverse it. And sure enough he kept

0:18:59.160 --> 0:19:01.320
<v Speaker 1>his toes on the ground, you know, dragged it just

0:19:01.440 --> 0:19:05.800
<v Speaker 1>right with a defender right on him there. And yeah,

0:19:05.840 --> 0:19:08.000
<v Speaker 1>I wanted to mention that as well. Jayden Reid now

0:19:08.000 --> 0:19:11.960
<v Speaker 1>with fifty four receptions, he leads the Packers. The Packers

0:19:12.080 --> 0:19:17.760
<v Speaker 1>rookie record in this franchise's illustrious history for receptions by

0:19:17.760 --> 0:19:21.040
<v Speaker 1>a rookie is fifty five by Sterling Sharp. That was

0:19:21.280 --> 0:19:24.919
<v Speaker 1>thirty five years ago Wes nineteen eighty eight. That rookie

0:19:24.920 --> 0:19:27.760
<v Speaker 1>record has stood for a long time, and Jaden Reid

0:19:27.920 --> 0:19:31.520
<v Speaker 1>is just one catch from tying it and two from

0:19:32.040 --> 0:19:32.600
<v Speaker 1>breaking it.

0:19:32.760 --> 0:19:35.920
<v Speaker 2>I don't have the officials yards after catch for don

0:19:35.960 --> 0:19:38.760
<v Speaker 2>Tavian Wicks. It's twenty twenty three. I'm not paying for

0:19:38.800 --> 0:19:42.480
<v Speaker 2>that anymore. But for the season, now this one goes.

0:19:42.520 --> 0:19:47.719
<v Speaker 2>I'll give credit here to this is player profile dot Com.

0:19:47.920 --> 0:19:50.760
<v Speaker 2>They have him down for one hundred and thirty nine

0:19:50.840 --> 0:19:53.600
<v Speaker 2>yards after catch on the season out of his four

0:19:53.680 --> 0:19:57.040
<v Speaker 2>hundred and ninety one, so just about a quarter of

0:19:57.080 --> 0:19:58.200
<v Speaker 2>his receiving yards.

0:19:58.359 --> 0:20:01.840
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, a little more, a little more than a quest Yeah,

0:20:01.960 --> 0:20:02.760
<v Speaker 1>so pretty impressive.

0:20:02.760 --> 0:20:03.880
<v Speaker 2>What the guy's done, right, out of the gate.

0:20:04.200 --> 0:20:07.840
<v Speaker 1>Yeah. Absolutely, a little bit of sponsor business here west.

0:20:07.880 --> 0:20:10.919
<v Speaker 1>Then we'll move on to other topics. Serious XM NFL

0:20:11.040 --> 0:20:13.480
<v Speaker 1>Radio delivers hard hitting analysis and up to the minute

0:20:13.560 --> 0:20:17.040
<v Speaker 1>NFL news that true football fanatics need. Twenty four to seven,

0:20:17.160 --> 0:20:19.440
<v Speaker 1>three sixty five and at Cousin Subs, we have something

0:20:19.480 --> 0:20:22.400
<v Speaker 1>for everyone like our Wisconsin cheese curds, mac and cheese,

0:20:22.440 --> 0:20:24.879
<v Speaker 1>golden fries, and creamy shakes, all paired with your favorite

0:20:24.880 --> 0:20:28.399
<v Speaker 1>sub or sub and a bowl Cousin Subs fifty years

0:20:28.720 --> 0:20:32.280
<v Speaker 1>of better. All right, Taking a look at where things

0:20:32.320 --> 0:20:37.840
<v Speaker 1>are in the playoff picture, lots of lots of moving

0:20:37.880 --> 0:20:41.800
<v Speaker 1>and shifting going on. You know. The Minnesota Vikings blow

0:20:41.920 --> 0:20:45.160
<v Speaker 1>a fourth quarter lead in Cincinnati on Saturday, they drop

0:20:45.200 --> 0:20:49.080
<v Speaker 1>to seven and seven. The Seattle Seahawks pull one out

0:20:49.240 --> 0:20:54.360
<v Speaker 1>on Monday night, driving ninety two yards against the Philadelphia

0:20:54.359 --> 0:20:57.879
<v Speaker 1>Eagles for the go ahead touchdown in the final two minutes,

0:20:58.240 --> 0:21:01.119
<v Speaker 1>and the Seahawks break their lose streak and get to

0:21:01.720 --> 0:21:04.119
<v Speaker 1>seven and seven. In the NFC South, you have the

0:21:04.119 --> 0:21:07.320
<v Speaker 1>Buccaneers and the Saints both at seven and seven. They

0:21:07.320 --> 0:21:10.199
<v Speaker 1>are going to face each other in week seventeen, not

0:21:10.280 --> 0:21:13.439
<v Speaker 1>this week, but the week after, so that division title

0:21:13.520 --> 0:21:16.440
<v Speaker 1>in some respects could be on the line and at

0:21:16.440 --> 0:21:19.880
<v Speaker 1>the top of the NFC. We talked last week about

0:21:19.880 --> 0:21:21.800
<v Speaker 1>how suddenly there was a three way tie for the

0:21:21.880 --> 0:21:25.760
<v Speaker 1>number one seed. Well, the Dallas Cowboys lose, the Philadelphia

0:21:25.760 --> 0:21:28.600
<v Speaker 1>Eagles lose, the San Francisco forty nine Ers keep on winning,

0:21:28.960 --> 0:21:31.120
<v Speaker 1>and the Niners, who already have a head to head

0:21:31.200 --> 0:21:34.520
<v Speaker 1>tiebreaker over both of those clubs, now have a one

0:21:34.560 --> 0:21:37.840
<v Speaker 1>game lead with just three to play in the race

0:21:37.880 --> 0:21:40.240
<v Speaker 1>for the number one seed and the only playoff buy

0:21:40.280 --> 0:21:41.560
<v Speaker 1>that comes with it in the NFC.

0:21:41.680 --> 0:21:43.480
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, forty nine Ers did what they needed to do

0:21:43.760 --> 0:21:45.800
<v Speaker 2>against the Cardinals. Cardinals put up some points in the

0:21:45.840 --> 0:21:47.560
<v Speaker 2>fourth quarter, but for the most part that game was

0:21:47.600 --> 0:21:51.160
<v Speaker 2>out of hand pretty early. On the one that impresses

0:21:51.200 --> 0:21:53.600
<v Speaker 2>me the most of the Rams, because here's the thing,

0:21:53.640 --> 0:21:54.680
<v Speaker 2>you and I talked about it.

0:21:54.720 --> 0:21:56.160
<v Speaker 1>They got to seven and seven as well.

0:21:56.680 --> 0:21:56.960
<v Speaker 2>Seven.

0:21:57.080 --> 0:21:58.160
<v Speaker 1>I meant to mention them.

0:21:58.720 --> 0:22:01.359
<v Speaker 2>And the only reason I bring them up. We've talked

0:22:01.400 --> 0:22:03.520
<v Speaker 2>so much about the Packers just beating the teams you

0:22:03.560 --> 0:22:06.400
<v Speaker 2>need to beat. The Rams have worked themselves back into

0:22:06.440 --> 0:22:08.919
<v Speaker 2>this conversation for the playoffs by beating the teams they

0:22:08.920 --> 0:22:11.600
<v Speaker 2>need to beat exactly under no pretenses, should you lose

0:22:11.640 --> 0:22:13.359
<v Speaker 2>that game to Washington with the all the issues of

0:22:13.480 --> 0:22:17.160
<v Speaker 2>Washington's had, you know, kind of breaking up their defensive line,

0:22:17.359 --> 0:22:20.560
<v Speaker 2>Jack del Rio being fired. The Rams are a different

0:22:20.560 --> 0:22:23.440
<v Speaker 2>team with Kiriyan Williams back in this lineup. I think

0:22:23.640 --> 0:22:27.280
<v Speaker 2>I saw one thing about the yards over expectation. I mean,

0:22:27.280 --> 0:22:30.600
<v Speaker 2>Williams is just he's in front of Christian McCaffrey. With

0:22:30.640 --> 0:22:32.479
<v Speaker 2>what he's done so far this he's a different football

0:22:32.480 --> 0:22:34.600
<v Speaker 2>team when he's out there. I tip my cap to

0:22:34.720 --> 0:22:37.439
<v Speaker 2>Drew Lock obviously finished that game strong. It seemed like

0:22:37.480 --> 0:22:38.920
<v Speaker 2>he didn't even know for sure he was going to

0:22:38.960 --> 0:22:40.640
<v Speaker 2>be playing until hours before the game.

0:22:40.680 --> 0:22:42.879
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, that was that was almost that was. That was

0:22:43.520 --> 0:22:46.520
<v Speaker 1>not just a last minute decision, but even after the

0:22:46.800 --> 0:22:50.359
<v Speaker 1>inactives were turned in, both Geno Smith and Drew Locke

0:22:50.400 --> 0:22:52.280
<v Speaker 1>were active, and then it was sort of like they

0:22:52.320 --> 0:22:54.840
<v Speaker 1>were all going through pregame warmups and then they decided

0:22:54.880 --> 0:22:56.160
<v Speaker 1>to give the ball to Lock.

0:22:56.320 --> 0:22:58.800
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, and Locke had come in before the season, but

0:22:58.800 --> 0:23:02.639
<v Speaker 2>otherwise really hasn't played much before last week. I would

0:23:02.680 --> 0:23:05.240
<v Speaker 2>be happy and content now if the Denver Broncos would

0:23:05.240 --> 0:23:08.879
<v Speaker 2>dismiss themselves from this playoff contention just didn't even bother

0:23:08.960 --> 0:23:12.640
<v Speaker 2>showing up against the Lions, which is fine, but one

0:23:12.680 --> 0:23:14.679
<v Speaker 2>of the you know, it looked a lot more like

0:23:14.760 --> 0:23:17.360
<v Speaker 2>the first month of the season Denver Broncos than what

0:23:17.480 --> 0:23:18.800
<v Speaker 2>the Packers had seen and what a lot of these

0:23:18.840 --> 0:23:20.679
<v Speaker 2>other teams had seen in the second half of the season.

0:23:21.480 --> 0:23:23.240
<v Speaker 2>It's gonna be down to the wire, man, but you're

0:23:23.240 --> 0:23:25.840
<v Speaker 2>seeing what the value of that victory is. And you know,

0:23:25.920 --> 0:23:28.680
<v Speaker 2>Tampa now actually has, you know, in a position where

0:23:28.680 --> 0:23:30.359
<v Speaker 2>they're kind of in control of their own destiny now

0:23:30.359 --> 0:23:32.320
<v Speaker 2>by picking up that seventh win and seeing what they

0:23:32.320 --> 0:23:34.159
<v Speaker 2>can do against the New Orleans Saints here in a

0:23:34.200 --> 0:23:38.080
<v Speaker 2>couple of weeks and teams like Minnesota and the Rams

0:23:38.200 --> 0:23:41.080
<v Speaker 2>in the Seahawks trying to hold those positions now that

0:23:41.119 --> 0:23:43.200
<v Speaker 2>they got back to five hundred, green Bay has work

0:23:43.240 --> 0:23:45.280
<v Speaker 2>to do. But as I said in our insider inbox

0:23:45.320 --> 0:23:47.560
<v Speaker 2>call today, it almost kind of feels like they play

0:23:47.600 --> 0:23:50.040
<v Speaker 2>better in these instances when they are playing from behind,

0:23:50.040 --> 0:23:51.840
<v Speaker 2>when they are the B side kind of have that

0:23:51.880 --> 0:23:55.080
<v Speaker 2>Connor McGregor quality to them and seeing if maybe now

0:23:55.080 --> 0:23:57.159
<v Speaker 2>they can reel three off here to keep this thing interesting.

0:23:57.280 --> 0:23:59.879
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, Well, in the Atlanta Falcons took a damaging loss

0:24:00.080 --> 0:24:03.520
<v Speaker 1>to the Carolina Panthers. The Falcons have now fallen off

0:24:03.560 --> 0:24:06.199
<v Speaker 1>the pace in the NFC South and UH, and that

0:24:06.280 --> 0:24:09.000
<v Speaker 1>Panthers team is the one the Packers will be facing

0:24:09.680 --> 0:24:12.480
<v Speaker 1>this week, and we'll talk about them on our next show.

0:24:12.520 --> 0:24:14.080
<v Speaker 1>But I want to make a couple of quick comments

0:24:14.080 --> 0:24:17.879
<v Speaker 1>about the a f C because it kind of looks

0:24:17.920 --> 0:24:21.440
<v Speaker 1>like right now if the NFC, or sorry, the a

0:24:21.640 --> 0:24:24.800
<v Speaker 1>f C is is UH as you know, crowded and

0:24:24.840 --> 0:24:28.000
<v Speaker 1>convoluted as the NFC, but just with UH, with a

0:24:28.040 --> 0:24:30.840
<v Speaker 1>lot of the middling teams having a little bit better records.

0:24:32.400 --> 0:24:34.480
<v Speaker 1>But when I look at the a f C right now, West,

0:24:34.520 --> 0:24:36.520
<v Speaker 1>the three teams that stand out to me that I

0:24:36.560 --> 0:24:41.080
<v Speaker 1>wouldn't want to have to mess with in January are Baltimore, Miami.

0:24:40.680 --> 0:24:42.080
<v Speaker 2>And Buffalo and Indianapolis.

0:24:42.920 --> 0:24:47.280
<v Speaker 1>You're putting Indianapolis in that category? Okay, okay, you just yeah,

0:24:47.280 --> 0:24:51.560
<v Speaker 1>you love You're you're a big gardner. Hey, but here's

0:24:52.080 --> 0:24:54.720
<v Speaker 1>but here's here's the here's the really interesting thing, because

0:24:54.720 --> 0:24:58.040
<v Speaker 1>the the Buffalo Bills have gotten themselves back in this

0:24:58.080 --> 0:25:01.399
<v Speaker 1>thing now with big wins over the Chiefs and a

0:25:01.440 --> 0:25:04.000
<v Speaker 1>big road win over the Chiefs and then a convincing

0:25:04.480 --> 0:25:08.080
<v Speaker 1>home win over the Dallas Cowboys. Buffalo's now eight and six.

0:25:08.119 --> 0:25:12.560
<v Speaker 1>Miami has been riding the riding atop that AFC East

0:25:12.600 --> 0:25:14.240
<v Speaker 1>all season long, and they are still there at ten

0:25:14.320 --> 0:25:16.639
<v Speaker 1>and four, two games ahead of the Bills. This is

0:25:16.680 --> 0:25:20.240
<v Speaker 1>what's interesting, though, Wes. Miami's next two games are against

0:25:20.320 --> 0:25:25.119
<v Speaker 1>Dallas and Baltimore. Buffalo's next two games are against the

0:25:25.200 --> 0:25:28.119
<v Speaker 1>Chargers and somebody else who's also sub five hundred, and

0:25:28.160 --> 0:25:29.520
<v Speaker 1>the name escapes me right now.

0:25:29.520 --> 0:25:32.280
<v Speaker 2>Hold on, I got you, brev Okay, it is the

0:25:32.480 --> 0:25:34.040
<v Speaker 2>uh Patriots.

0:25:34.119 --> 0:25:36.719
<v Speaker 1>The Patriots, so they have the Chargers and the Patriots.

0:25:37.600 --> 0:25:40.520
<v Speaker 1>Nothing is a given in this league. What I'm saying

0:25:40.560 --> 0:25:44.920
<v Speaker 1>is it's an entirely plausible scenario that Miami could lose

0:25:44.960 --> 0:25:47.560
<v Speaker 1>its next to Buffalo could win its next to. Both

0:25:47.600 --> 0:25:50.200
<v Speaker 1>of those teams would be ten and six and facing

0:25:50.240 --> 0:25:53.640
<v Speaker 1>each other for the AFC East title head to head

0:25:53.760 --> 0:25:56.840
<v Speaker 1>in Miami in Week eighteen. I just think that's one

0:25:56.880 --> 0:25:59.920
<v Speaker 1>to watch because so many people had written off the

0:26:00.080 --> 0:26:04.680
<v Speaker 1>Buffalo Bills with their struggles and everything, and they lost

0:26:04.720 --> 0:26:09.000
<v Speaker 1>that absolute heartbreaker to the Philadelphia Eagles when Jake Elliott

0:26:09.000 --> 0:26:11.080
<v Speaker 1>made a fifty nine yard field goal in the rain

0:26:11.200 --> 0:26:13.280
<v Speaker 1>to get that game to overtime where they would have

0:26:13.320 --> 0:26:16.360
<v Speaker 1>won that one. They bounce back from that to beat

0:26:16.400 --> 0:26:18.960
<v Speaker 1>the Chiefs and the Cowboys. Nobody wants to mess with

0:26:18.960 --> 0:26:19.960
<v Speaker 1>the Buffalo Bills.

0:26:19.800 --> 0:26:21.840
<v Speaker 2>Right they don't, And I agree with you, But I

0:26:21.880 --> 0:26:24.479
<v Speaker 2>will use my final two minutes here to just quickly

0:26:24.480 --> 0:26:27.879
<v Speaker 2>talk on the Baltimore Ravens because Lamar Jackson is not

0:26:28.000 --> 0:26:30.359
<v Speaker 2>the most boisterous quarterback in the league. I feel like

0:26:30.400 --> 0:26:33.920
<v Speaker 2>that sometimes as to his detriment. The Ravens are playing

0:26:33.960 --> 0:26:36.240
<v Speaker 2>as good a football as anybody right now.

0:26:36.119 --> 0:26:37.679
<v Speaker 1>And I agree with you.

0:26:38.320 --> 0:26:41.760
<v Speaker 2>Their defense, they're just so consistent, Mike, and you know it.

0:26:41.640 --> 0:26:45.320
<v Speaker 1>Looks so complete, right is the way they unfortunately, the

0:26:45.400 --> 0:26:46.680
<v Speaker 1>way they look as a football team.

0:26:46.720 --> 0:26:49.560
<v Speaker 2>Their lost Mitchell, so I mean their running back situation.

0:26:49.960 --> 0:26:53.280
<v Speaker 2>They've just been completely snake bitting at running back over

0:26:53.320 --> 0:26:56.320
<v Speaker 2>the last few years. But Lamar Jackson, the way he's

0:26:56.359 --> 0:26:58.480
<v Speaker 2>performing right now, he's steady as they goes. He's not

0:26:58.520 --> 0:27:01.560
<v Speaker 2>a big quote, and I think that again, people don't

0:27:01.600 --> 0:27:04.400
<v Speaker 2>really give him the national attension he deserves because of it.

0:27:05.880 --> 0:27:08.080
<v Speaker 2>But when you talk about teams you don't want to

0:27:08.119 --> 0:27:10.560
<v Speaker 2>face in the playoffs. I think it starts with a

0:27:10.560 --> 0:27:12.639
<v Speaker 2>team like the Ravens because for the most part, you

0:27:12.800 --> 0:27:15.399
<v Speaker 2>know what you're getting and they're going to give you

0:27:15.480 --> 0:27:18.480
<v Speaker 2>that when you play them. There's going to be dangerous

0:27:18.480 --> 0:27:21.879
<v Speaker 2>teams here, Mike, the Bills definitely one of them. You

0:27:21.920 --> 0:27:24.320
<v Speaker 2>look at these squads that could find their way into

0:27:24.359 --> 0:27:26.760
<v Speaker 2>the postseason and possibly make a run at this thing.

0:27:27.000 --> 0:27:29.240
<v Speaker 2>There's a lot of names to keep track of right now,

0:27:29.920 --> 0:27:33.600
<v Speaker 2>but what wins in the playoffs is consistency, and I

0:27:33.640 --> 0:27:35.920
<v Speaker 2>feel like that's the one aspect of the Ravens as

0:27:36.040 --> 0:27:38.880
<v Speaker 2>long as Lamar Jackson stays healthy, that is the one

0:27:38.920 --> 0:27:41.200
<v Speaker 2>thing that they have over everybody else in that conference

0:27:41.280 --> 0:27:42.720
<v Speaker 2>right now. Consistency.

0:27:42.840 --> 0:27:45.760
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, and they and they seem to have made a

0:27:45.800 --> 0:27:48.600
<v Speaker 1>decent adjustment losing a big play tight end in Mark

0:27:48.680 --> 0:27:50.920
<v Speaker 1>Andrews who has been such a big part of their offense.

0:27:51.160 --> 0:27:54.639
<v Speaker 1>Well likely mart and Yeah, Lamar Jackson is making it

0:27:54.680 --> 0:27:59.239
<v Speaker 1>work and Isaiah likely has definitely filled the shoes of

0:27:59.320 --> 0:28:01.480
<v Speaker 1>Mark Andrews about as well as they could have hoped for.

0:28:01.920 --> 0:28:04.399
<v Speaker 2>When you lose a superstar, you just don't see that

0:28:04.440 --> 0:28:06.480
<v Speaker 2>type of stuff. It's one thing for Luke Musgrave to

0:28:06.480 --> 0:28:08.200
<v Speaker 2>go down, and you got a transition to Tucker Craft.

0:28:08.200 --> 0:28:10.240
<v Speaker 2>They're both rookies, they're both going through this thing together.

0:28:10.880 --> 0:28:13.119
<v Speaker 2>There are a lot of teams. Where would the Kansas

0:28:13.119 --> 0:28:15.360
<v Speaker 2>City Chiefs be if Travis Kelsey goes down?

0:28:15.440 --> 0:28:18.000
<v Speaker 1>Right? Well, we saw it in Week one, yeah, exactly.

0:28:18.119 --> 0:28:20.920
<v Speaker 1>They were playing at home as the defending Super Bowl

0:28:21.040 --> 0:28:25.560
<v Speaker 1>champson and played an absolutely terrible football gametely, So with that,

0:28:25.760 --> 0:28:28.720
<v Speaker 1>we'll call it a rap on this edition of Packers Unscripted.

0:28:28.840 --> 0:28:30.720
<v Speaker 1>Be sure to follow all of our coverage of the

0:28:30.760 --> 0:28:32.720
<v Speaker 1>team on Packers dot com. We'll be back in a

0:28:32.760 --> 0:28:35.119
<v Speaker 1>couple of days to talk about the next opponent, the

0:28:35.200 --> 0:28:39.080
<v Speaker 1>Carolina Panthers on the road for Christmas Eve. For Wes,

0:28:39.160 --> 0:28:41.360
<v Speaker 1>I am Mike. Thank you for tuning in everybody. We

0:28:41.400 --> 0:28:42.560
<v Speaker 1>will see you next time.