WEBVTT - Road Ahead for EVs in 2024: BYD and Tesla Break Away

0:00:00.360 --> 0:00:03.560
<v Speaker 1>This is Dana Perkins and you're listening to Switched on

0:00:04.000 --> 0:00:07.440
<v Speaker 1>the bn EF podcast. At the beginning of every year,

0:00:07.680 --> 0:00:10.680
<v Speaker 1>several of b and EF's teams publish their things to

0:00:10.760 --> 0:00:13.720
<v Speaker 1>Watch research notes for the year ahead. In addition to

0:00:13.800 --> 0:00:17.360
<v Speaker 1>our weekly episodes on this show. In January, we're going

0:00:17.360 --> 0:00:20.720
<v Speaker 1>to be sprinkling in a few shorter bonus shows and

0:00:20.760 --> 0:00:23.239
<v Speaker 1>they will focus on some of these things to watch.

0:00:23.560 --> 0:00:25.400
<v Speaker 1>Hopefully they'll be as fun for you to listen to

0:00:25.640 --> 0:00:28.560
<v Speaker 1>as they were for our team to write and then record,

0:00:28.800 --> 0:00:31.360
<v Speaker 1>because these shows are really a chance for our team

0:00:31.480 --> 0:00:34.440
<v Speaker 1>to digest everything that happened in twenty twenty three and

0:00:34.479 --> 0:00:37.120
<v Speaker 1>think about what all of this means for the year ahead.

0:00:37.159 --> 0:00:40.320
<v Speaker 1>To kick off our series of things to Watch shows today,

0:00:40.440 --> 0:00:43.560
<v Speaker 1>I am joined by bn EF's head of Advanced Transport,

0:00:43.800 --> 0:00:47.159
<v Speaker 1>Colin Mcerriker, and he talks to us about electric vehicles

0:00:47.240 --> 0:00:50.680
<v Speaker 1>and clean transport. In twenty twenty four, we discussed the

0:00:50.720 --> 0:00:54.560
<v Speaker 1>biggest electric vehicle manufacturers in the world, Tesla and BYD,

0:00:54.880 --> 0:00:57.520
<v Speaker 1>and which one could come out on top for car

0:00:57.560 --> 0:00:59.720
<v Speaker 1>sales during the year ahead. We also talk a bit

0:00:59.800 --> 0:01:03.200
<v Speaker 1>of the United States and whether crossing the one million

0:01:03.280 --> 0:01:06.720
<v Speaker 1>EV's soul mark in twenty twenty three, will or won't

0:01:06.800 --> 0:01:10.040
<v Speaker 1>mean new milestones met in twenty twenty four, and we'll

0:01:10.040 --> 0:01:13.600
<v Speaker 1>discuss whether developing markets will be taking advantage of cheaper

0:01:13.680 --> 0:01:17.039
<v Speaker 1>electric vehicles. And finally we turn to oil demand and

0:01:17.080 --> 0:01:21.160
<v Speaker 1>whether we expect to see significant demand destruction from transport

0:01:21.280 --> 0:01:25.000
<v Speaker 1>owing to electric vehicles. To access the research note that

0:01:25.040 --> 0:01:29.160
<v Speaker 1>our team wrote titled EV's and Clean Transport Ten things

0:01:29.200 --> 0:01:31.320
<v Speaker 1>to Watch in twenty twenty four, B and e F

0:01:31.400 --> 0:01:34.600
<v Speaker 1>subscribers can find them at BNF dot com or at

0:01:34.600 --> 0:01:37.800
<v Speaker 1>BNF go on the Bloomberg terminal. If you like this podcast,

0:01:37.880 --> 0:01:40.360
<v Speaker 1>if you subscribe or give us a review, it'll help

0:01:40.400 --> 0:01:43.199
<v Speaker 1>make us more discoverable by others. But right now, let's

0:01:43.280 --> 0:01:46.920
<v Speaker 1>jump into our conversation about twenty twenty four for Electric

0:01:47.040 --> 0:02:00.840
<v Speaker 1>Vehicles and Transport with Colin. Colin, thank you for joining

0:02:00.920 --> 0:02:02.000
<v Speaker 1>us again today.

0:02:02.440 --> 0:02:03.680
<v Speaker 2>Thanks Dana Greig to be here.

0:02:03.840 --> 0:02:05.680
<v Speaker 1>We are here at the beginning of the year. It

0:02:05.760 --> 0:02:09.320
<v Speaker 1>is still January, and we're talking about EV's and Clean

0:02:09.360 --> 0:02:12.760
<v Speaker 1>Transport Ten things to watch in twenty twenty four. Now,

0:02:12.800 --> 0:02:16.160
<v Speaker 1>how many years running have we been doing things to watch?

0:02:16.480 --> 0:02:18.799
<v Speaker 1>Note for the clean transport space, so.

0:02:18.760 --> 0:02:21.800
<v Speaker 3>We've had a broader Bloomberg one. Since BNF was founded,

0:02:21.840 --> 0:02:24.160
<v Speaker 3>there's been one, but for transport, we've just been doing

0:02:24.200 --> 0:02:27.040
<v Speaker 3>it since twenty sixteen, and that was because I liked

0:02:27.120 --> 0:02:29.440
<v Speaker 3>what we were doing company wide and I decided, actually,

0:02:29.480 --> 0:02:31.240
<v Speaker 3>we should start doing one on First it was just

0:02:31.240 --> 0:02:33.560
<v Speaker 3>on electric vehicles, and then as our scope has expanded

0:02:33.560 --> 0:02:36.280
<v Speaker 3>to include other parts of transport, we've started adding predictions

0:02:36.280 --> 0:02:37.040
<v Speaker 3>in on that as well.

0:02:37.080 --> 0:02:40.079
<v Speaker 1>Everybody likes a good predictions note, but I would actually

0:02:40.120 --> 0:02:43.959
<v Speaker 1>say this is just as much looking back and digesting

0:02:44.200 --> 0:02:47.160
<v Speaker 1>really what happened in the previous year. I want to know,

0:02:47.400 --> 0:02:50.320
<v Speaker 1>how do you rate your scorecard for your twenty twenty

0:02:50.320 --> 0:02:51.160
<v Speaker 1>three predictions?

0:02:51.560 --> 0:02:52.679
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I mean this is one of the things that

0:02:52.720 --> 0:02:54.480
<v Speaker 3>we think is we've always said is really important, is

0:02:54.520 --> 0:02:55.720
<v Speaker 3>you have to go back and see what did you

0:02:55.720 --> 0:02:59.320
<v Speaker 3>actually get right. Otherwise you sort of don't really absorb

0:02:59.400 --> 0:03:01.359
<v Speaker 3>the learnings it and you see lots of groups make

0:03:01.400 --> 0:03:04.280
<v Speaker 3>prognostications but not actually come back and revisit them. So

0:03:04.760 --> 0:03:06.320
<v Speaker 3>what we do is we go and say, okay, we

0:03:06.400 --> 0:03:07.840
<v Speaker 3>pull in all the data at the end of the year,

0:03:07.840 --> 0:03:09.120
<v Speaker 3>and we say, look what did we get right and

0:03:09.200 --> 0:03:11.079
<v Speaker 3>what did we get wrong? And then across the group,

0:03:11.120 --> 0:03:13.400
<v Speaker 3>we try and give ourselves a score on each one

0:03:13.440 --> 0:03:16.040
<v Speaker 3>of the ten predictions we made. So, just as an example,

0:03:16.160 --> 0:03:18.919
<v Speaker 3>last year, we predicted fourteen million EV sold. We're still

0:03:18.960 --> 0:03:21.520
<v Speaker 3>tabulating a bit of December data, but it looks like

0:03:21.520 --> 0:03:23.880
<v Speaker 3>that's going to be within about one percent of the

0:03:23.919 --> 0:03:26.680
<v Speaker 3>actual total. So there, we'd give ourselves ten out of ten. Right,

0:03:26.720 --> 0:03:28.320
<v Speaker 3>we'd give ourselves a pat on the back and say.

0:03:28.200 --> 0:03:28.840
<v Speaker 2>We did that. Well.

0:03:29.000 --> 0:03:30.920
<v Speaker 3>There's a couple other good predictions. There's some that didn't

0:03:30.919 --> 0:03:33.640
<v Speaker 3>go as well. So we also had one around battery prices.

0:03:33.680 --> 0:03:35.920
<v Speaker 3>We thought this time last year we thought raw material

0:03:35.920 --> 0:03:38.680
<v Speaker 3>prices might stay higher for longer, battery prices would stay

0:03:38.720 --> 0:03:40.960
<v Speaker 3>kind of elevated the way they were in twenty twenty two,

0:03:41.000 --> 0:03:43.320
<v Speaker 3>but in fact they dropped really sharply in twenty twenty three,

0:03:43.360 --> 0:03:45.440
<v Speaker 3>so down fourteen percent. So in that case, we gave

0:03:45.440 --> 0:03:47.720
<v Speaker 3>ourselves zero out of ten. So overall we I think

0:03:47.760 --> 0:03:49.520
<v Speaker 3>our predictions end up coming out pretty good, but there's

0:03:49.520 --> 0:03:51.560
<v Speaker 3>always one or two misses, And I think that's kind

0:03:51.560 --> 0:03:53.240
<v Speaker 3>of the point, right. You don't want to only predict

0:03:53.240 --> 0:03:55.520
<v Speaker 3>safe things, or predict things that are so generic that

0:03:55.560 --> 0:03:58.120
<v Speaker 3>you can't really test them. So we try and have quantifiable,

0:03:58.280 --> 0:04:00.880
<v Speaker 3>testable things that we're making predictions because that's part of

0:04:00.880 --> 0:04:02.200
<v Speaker 3>the value and it's also part of the fun of

0:04:02.200 --> 0:04:02.440
<v Speaker 3>it too.

0:04:02.720 --> 0:04:04.920
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I mean it's interesting to actually see what does

0:04:05.000 --> 0:04:07.280
<v Speaker 1>end up happening. And also if you're surprised by it,

0:04:07.360 --> 0:04:09.800
<v Speaker 1>surely there are other people out there who are supplied

0:04:09.840 --> 0:04:12.800
<v Speaker 1>by it in the industry. So so let's jump right

0:04:12.840 --> 0:04:15.480
<v Speaker 1>into some of these predictions. So in twenty twenty three,

0:04:15.600 --> 0:04:20.919
<v Speaker 1>passenger EV sales actually broke the one million vehicles sold mark.

0:04:21.160 --> 0:04:24.719
<v Speaker 1>Do we see this momentum continuing in the US in

0:04:24.839 --> 0:04:26.960
<v Speaker 1>twenty twenty four because one of the things we also

0:04:27.000 --> 0:04:29.599
<v Speaker 1>talked about on the show is that US auto manufacturers

0:04:29.640 --> 0:04:32.880
<v Speaker 1>have started to temper their production.

0:04:33.320 --> 0:04:35.200
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, this was the US is probably the most the

0:04:35.240 --> 0:04:37.520
<v Speaker 3>trickiest region to forecast this year. And yeah, they broke

0:04:37.520 --> 0:04:39.080
<v Speaker 3>a million with a few months to spare, so they're

0:04:39.120 --> 0:04:40.680
<v Speaker 3>well over a million for the year. Around one point

0:04:40.720 --> 0:04:43.039
<v Speaker 3>four million plug in vehicles sold in the US last year.

0:04:43.160 --> 0:04:45.880
<v Speaker 3>We think they're going to keep growing up to around

0:04:45.920 --> 0:04:48.000
<v Speaker 3>somewhere between one point eight and one point nine million.

0:04:48.080 --> 0:04:49.719
<v Speaker 3>But I would say the US is the region where

0:04:49.920 --> 0:04:53.000
<v Speaker 3>we're the most uncertain, and that's because of multiple factors.

0:04:53.000 --> 0:04:55.520
<v Speaker 3>One of them is that this incentive that's available in

0:04:55.560 --> 0:04:59.200
<v Speaker 3>the US, the tax credits, it's significantly harder to access

0:04:59.240 --> 0:05:02.400
<v Speaker 3>them this year because that's because there's this Foreign Entities

0:05:02.400 --> 0:05:06.080
<v Speaker 3>of Concern guidance that restricts the number of models that

0:05:06.120 --> 0:05:07.880
<v Speaker 3>are going to be eligible, as well as the existing

0:05:08.040 --> 0:05:10.760
<v Speaker 3>caps on incommon caps on retail price. So there's a

0:05:10.800 --> 0:05:13.360
<v Speaker 3>lot fewer models that are available for incentives, at least

0:05:13.360 --> 0:05:16.159
<v Speaker 3>at the federal level. And then on the pushing on

0:05:16.160 --> 0:05:17.600
<v Speaker 3>the other end of that is those incentives in the

0:05:17.680 --> 0:05:20.080
<v Speaker 3>US are now available at the point of purchase instead

0:05:20.080 --> 0:05:21.640
<v Speaker 3>of at the end of the tax here like they've

0:05:21.680 --> 0:05:23.600
<v Speaker 3>previously been, or at the end of the calendar year

0:05:23.640 --> 0:05:25.920
<v Speaker 3>like they've previously been. So I think that's where we

0:05:26.240 --> 0:05:27.719
<v Speaker 3>had a bit of trouble calling it. And then you

0:05:27.760 --> 0:05:30.719
<v Speaker 3>do see something from the established automakers like Ford and

0:05:30.839 --> 0:05:33.599
<v Speaker 3>GM where they're saying, look, actually inventory levels are pretty high.

0:05:33.839 --> 0:05:37.000
<v Speaker 3>They've downgraded there where they think their targets are going

0:05:37.080 --> 0:05:40.360
<v Speaker 3>to land and push back their manufacturing ramput plans a bit.

0:05:40.440 --> 0:05:41.680
<v Speaker 3>But on the other side of that, then you see

0:05:41.720 --> 0:05:44.880
<v Speaker 3>groups like Hindai Kia selling really well, Tesla selling really well,

0:05:45.000 --> 0:05:47.320
<v Speaker 3>Tesla's about four percent of the overall US auto market

0:05:47.360 --> 0:05:49.520
<v Speaker 3>right now, and the US auto market's quite fragmented, so

0:05:49.520 --> 0:05:52.279
<v Speaker 3>that's actually quite a decent share, ahead of groups like

0:05:52.320 --> 0:05:53.400
<v Speaker 3>BMW and others.

0:05:53.560 --> 0:05:55.280
<v Speaker 2>So it's a tricky one right now.

0:05:55.600 --> 0:05:58.039
<v Speaker 3>I do think the biggest thing I would say about

0:05:58.080 --> 0:06:00.560
<v Speaker 3>the US market is it will have an outsized impact

0:06:00.720 --> 0:06:03.480
<v Speaker 3>on the headlines that you see written about the global

0:06:03.520 --> 0:06:06.000
<v Speaker 3>EV market, but it's not the most important region for

0:06:06.040 --> 0:06:08.239
<v Speaker 3>the global EV market. It's going to be about eleven

0:06:08.279 --> 0:06:11.720
<v Speaker 3>percent of global EV sales this year the US and

0:06:11.960 --> 0:06:15.080
<v Speaker 3>the US share of the global EV market has declined

0:06:15.120 --> 0:06:18.400
<v Speaker 3>almost every year for the last decade, so really that's

0:06:18.520 --> 0:06:21.279
<v Speaker 3>reflecting much more rapid ad option in places like China

0:06:21.279 --> 0:06:21.720
<v Speaker 3>and Europe.

0:06:21.920 --> 0:06:24.520
<v Speaker 1>Well, so let's talk about that Tesla and BYD so

0:06:24.640 --> 0:06:27.120
<v Speaker 1>the US and China specifically. You know, at the end

0:06:27.120 --> 0:06:30.839
<v Speaker 1>of twenty twenty three, Tesla delivered this cybertruck that people

0:06:30.839 --> 0:06:33.280
<v Speaker 1>have been waiting for for some time now, and at

0:06:33.320 --> 0:06:37.080
<v Speaker 1>the same time, BOID has been making headlines because they

0:06:37.240 --> 0:06:40.839
<v Speaker 1>have also been growing. We're already a very significant player

0:06:40.839 --> 0:06:44.960
<v Speaker 1>in Asia, but have expanded further. So how are these

0:06:45.000 --> 0:06:48.360
<v Speaker 1>two companies positioned? I guess versus one another in terms

0:06:48.400 --> 0:06:52.440
<v Speaker 1>of growth and who will be the dominant EV auto

0:06:52.520 --> 0:06:54.200
<v Speaker 1>manufacturer next year.

0:06:54.880 --> 0:06:56.599
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I think it's probably going to go to BYD

0:06:56.720 --> 0:06:59.720
<v Speaker 3>this year. So we actually predicted that in twenty twenty

0:06:59.720 --> 0:07:02.119
<v Speaker 3>three that BID would edge out. Tesla is the largest

0:07:02.160 --> 0:07:04.320
<v Speaker 3>seller of battery electric vehicles at the end of twenty

0:07:04.320 --> 0:07:06.080
<v Speaker 3>twenty three, and that is pretty much what happened in

0:07:06.120 --> 0:07:08.360
<v Speaker 3>the final quarter. Bid edge them out, and I think

0:07:08.400 --> 0:07:10.760
<v Speaker 3>they will continue to have an advantage there, and that's

0:07:10.800 --> 0:07:12.760
<v Speaker 3>really because they've spent a lot more time in the

0:07:12.800 --> 0:07:16.160
<v Speaker 3>last few years launching new models in many different price segments,

0:07:16.240 --> 0:07:18.520
<v Speaker 3>whereas Tesla still has quite a limited model range, and

0:07:18.560 --> 0:07:20.720
<v Speaker 3>those models that it sells, particularly the Model Y and

0:07:20.760 --> 0:07:23.000
<v Speaker 3>the Model three, do extremely well. So it's not to

0:07:23.040 --> 0:07:25.280
<v Speaker 3>take anything away from those, but they are all at

0:07:25.280 --> 0:07:27.360
<v Speaker 3>a minimum price point that is higher than the average

0:07:27.360 --> 0:07:30.280
<v Speaker 3>price point BID. And so while BID has been pushing

0:07:30.320 --> 0:07:32.080
<v Speaker 3>into all these different segments and pushing down all the

0:07:32.080 --> 0:07:34.040
<v Speaker 3>way down to sort of an eleven thousand dollars car

0:07:34.080 --> 0:07:37.040
<v Speaker 3>that it can sell in emerging economies, Tesla the cyber

0:07:37.080 --> 0:07:39.680
<v Speaker 3>truck is going to be a relatively low volume vehicle

0:07:39.760 --> 0:07:42.080
<v Speaker 3>for in our view, this year, and Tesla just doesn't

0:07:42.080 --> 0:07:43.840
<v Speaker 3>really have anything at that entry level in the market

0:07:43.880 --> 0:07:46.200
<v Speaker 3>where a lot of the volume sits, especially in countries

0:07:46.240 --> 0:07:49.720
<v Speaker 3>outside of North America and Europe. So I think BID's

0:07:49.760 --> 0:07:51.320
<v Speaker 3>probably gonna edge it. Bid is probably going to be

0:07:51.360 --> 0:07:53.520
<v Speaker 3>ahead of Tesla this year for the whole year. But

0:07:53.640 --> 0:07:56.000
<v Speaker 3>I think what's most important to recognize that these two

0:07:56.000 --> 0:07:58.760
<v Speaker 3>companies are way ahead of everyone else. So they're miles

0:07:58.760 --> 0:08:00.760
<v Speaker 3>ahead of all of the legacy autit makers. So we

0:08:00.800 --> 0:08:02.720
<v Speaker 3>can get a bit fixated on this race between at

0:08:02.760 --> 0:08:04.560
<v Speaker 3>the very top. In some ways, it doesn't matter. You

0:08:04.560 --> 0:08:07.800
<v Speaker 3>would just say there's two breakout winners, they're beating everyone,

0:08:07.880 --> 0:08:09.480
<v Speaker 3>and then everyone else is a long way back.

0:08:09.680 --> 0:08:11.160
<v Speaker 2>And you can also look at it in different ways.

0:08:11.160 --> 0:08:13.280
<v Speaker 3>You can look at volume, you clink a profit generated,

0:08:13.600 --> 0:08:16.680
<v Speaker 3>there's different ways to cut this, but certainly we see

0:08:16.680 --> 0:08:19.240
<v Speaker 3>a gap opening up at the top between those two

0:08:19.280 --> 0:08:20.000
<v Speaker 3>and everyone else.

0:08:20.200 --> 0:08:22.040
<v Speaker 1>Okay, so let's stick on one of these. So b

0:08:22.120 --> 0:08:24.440
<v Speaker 1>WHYD one of the things they've done is actually taken

0:08:24.440 --> 0:08:28.920
<v Speaker 1>over a Ford plant in Brazil. What does this really signify?

0:08:28.960 --> 0:08:32.200
<v Speaker 1>What does it tell us about growth markets and developing

0:08:32.240 --> 0:08:34.200
<v Speaker 1>economies in terms of electric vehicles?

0:08:34.480 --> 0:08:36.240
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I think it's a fascinating case study. So you

0:08:36.280 --> 0:08:38.120
<v Speaker 3>look at a lot of the places BYD's planning on

0:08:38.200 --> 0:08:40.200
<v Speaker 3>expanding to. They do have a plant that they're going

0:08:40.240 --> 0:08:41.599
<v Speaker 3>to build in Eastern Europe, but a lot of the

0:08:41.600 --> 0:08:44.240
<v Speaker 3>places that are going to expand to are in emerging economies.

0:08:44.280 --> 0:08:46.200
<v Speaker 3>And if you look at the portfolio of vehicles they have,

0:08:46.320 --> 0:08:48.160
<v Speaker 3>they have all these ev models that are in this

0:08:48.280 --> 0:08:51.319
<v Speaker 3>kind of ten to fifteen to twenty thousand dollars range,

0:08:51.320 --> 0:08:53.079
<v Speaker 3>which are much cheaper than the vehicles you see on

0:08:53.120 --> 0:08:55.560
<v Speaker 3>average in North American Europe, but really appealing to an

0:08:55.559 --> 0:08:59.080
<v Speaker 3>emerging market buyer. And that place, that plant in Brazil

0:08:59.160 --> 0:09:01.720
<v Speaker 3>is really fascinating because it used to be a Ford plant,

0:09:01.880 --> 0:09:04.120
<v Speaker 3>and Ford pulled out a few years ago from Brazil,

0:09:04.400 --> 0:09:06.000
<v Speaker 3>and there's sort of this I mean, you don't want

0:09:06.000 --> 0:09:07.880
<v Speaker 3>to overdo the symbolism too much, but the idea of

0:09:07.880 --> 0:09:10.400
<v Speaker 3>like a Western automaker not fully pulling out of Latin America,

0:09:10.440 --> 0:09:12.480
<v Speaker 3>but pulling out of that plan, pulling out of there,

0:09:12.520 --> 0:09:15.160
<v Speaker 3>and bid coming in, taking it over, relaunching with a

0:09:15.200 --> 0:09:17.960
<v Speaker 3>whole bunch more investment. It's kind of emblematic of a

0:09:18.000 --> 0:09:20.480
<v Speaker 3>broader shift in the overall auto industry, and that's that

0:09:20.640 --> 0:09:23.360
<v Speaker 3>Chinese automakers are about to have their moment. They have

0:09:23.440 --> 0:09:25.520
<v Speaker 3>been building towards this for a long time. They've been

0:09:25.559 --> 0:09:28.920
<v Speaker 3>building up to know how, and they are exporting more

0:09:29.000 --> 0:09:31.719
<v Speaker 3>vehicles now than the Japanese. They overtook Germany two years ago,

0:09:31.760 --> 0:09:34.800
<v Speaker 3>overtook Japan last year. We think they'll be ahead of

0:09:34.880 --> 0:09:37.480
<v Speaker 3>Japan again this year. And so I think there's a

0:09:37.520 --> 0:09:40.840
<v Speaker 3>really fascinating thing to watch there on these emerging economies,

0:09:40.880 --> 0:09:43.319
<v Speaker 3>because there is still this narrative that EV adoption is

0:09:43.360 --> 0:09:46.200
<v Speaker 3>primarily a wealthy economy thing, and there's some truth to

0:09:46.240 --> 0:09:48.120
<v Speaker 3>that now. But if you look at the vehicles that

0:09:48.120 --> 0:09:51.120
<v Speaker 3>the Chinese automakers are launching, many of them are not premium,

0:09:51.200 --> 0:09:54.320
<v Speaker 3>high end vehicles. They're ones that are very much aimed

0:09:54.360 --> 0:09:57.520
<v Speaker 3>at average buyers, and so I think we're going to

0:09:57.559 --> 0:09:59.800
<v Speaker 3>be watching that quite closely. We're expecting almost a million

0:10:00.040 --> 0:10:03.160
<v Speaker 3>evs sold in places like India, Southeast Asia, Latam other

0:10:03.520 --> 0:10:06.040
<v Speaker 3>emerging economies this year, which is just quite a jump

0:10:06.120 --> 0:10:08.240
<v Speaker 3>versus where we've been in other other years before.

0:10:08.600 --> 0:10:11.600
<v Speaker 1>I mean, this is a story about expansion, but really

0:10:11.679 --> 0:10:13.839
<v Speaker 1>one of the themes that ran across all of twenty

0:10:13.840 --> 0:10:16.920
<v Speaker 1>twenty three was supply chain disruption, not just by the

0:10:16.960 --> 0:10:19.320
<v Speaker 1>way for transportation, but for a number of the different

0:10:19.320 --> 0:10:22.880
<v Speaker 1>industries that we cover. It benfter talking about higher material

0:10:22.960 --> 0:10:25.679
<v Speaker 1>costs and higher interest rates. Where do you see that

0:10:25.800 --> 0:10:28.560
<v Speaker 1>going in twenty twenty four as it relates to the

0:10:28.600 --> 0:10:32.520
<v Speaker 1>transport space. Do we foresee a more stable environment for

0:10:32.760 --> 0:10:33.840
<v Speaker 1>auto manufacturing?

0:10:34.360 --> 0:10:36.400
<v Speaker 3>So what kind of happened through last year is that

0:10:36.559 --> 0:10:39.600
<v Speaker 3>raw material prices started out high and then they really plummeted.

0:10:39.760 --> 0:10:42.280
<v Speaker 3>So they were already sort of turning this time last year,

0:10:42.360 --> 0:10:45.000
<v Speaker 3>and then they really went further. So lithium, cobalt, nico,

0:10:45.000 --> 0:10:47.040
<v Speaker 3>all these things way way down. And so when we

0:10:47.080 --> 0:10:49.199
<v Speaker 3>looked at the battery prices this year, they were down

0:10:49.240 --> 0:10:52.400
<v Speaker 3>fourteen percent on average, and in some cases down significantly

0:10:52.440 --> 0:10:54.880
<v Speaker 3>more than that. And that's for lithium I own battery packs.

0:10:55.000 --> 0:10:57.880
<v Speaker 3>So that's really reflecting a couple things. One of them

0:10:57.960 --> 0:11:00.240
<v Speaker 3>is this drop in raw material costs. Another No One

0:11:00.280 --> 0:11:03.559
<v Speaker 3>is just intense price competition between manufacturers because they have

0:11:03.600 --> 0:11:06.439
<v Speaker 3>built a lot of manufacturing capacity and again really driven

0:11:06.440 --> 0:11:09.559
<v Speaker 3>out of China. So some quick number crunching we did

0:11:09.800 --> 0:11:11.520
<v Speaker 3>this at the end of this year, was that China

0:11:11.600 --> 0:11:14.280
<v Speaker 3>produced enough batteries to more than supply all of the

0:11:14.320 --> 0:11:17.480
<v Speaker 3>world's evs and all of the world's stationary storage deployed

0:11:17.480 --> 0:11:20.400
<v Speaker 3>in twenty twenty three, So just produced in China significantly

0:11:20.440 --> 0:11:23.160
<v Speaker 3>more than was needed globally. So that just kind of

0:11:23.160 --> 0:11:25.760
<v Speaker 3>gives you a sense of how competitive this market is,

0:11:25.920 --> 0:11:27.560
<v Speaker 3>and that's sort of part of one of the reasons

0:11:27.600 --> 0:11:29.880
<v Speaker 3>we saw those declines. I think on the supply chain,

0:11:29.920 --> 0:11:31.959
<v Speaker 3>the really interesting story that I would take cut of

0:11:32.040 --> 0:11:33.960
<v Speaker 3>last year and that I think will continue into this

0:11:34.040 --> 0:11:38.160
<v Speaker 3>year is this tension between localization and on one side,

0:11:38.200 --> 0:11:40.760
<v Speaker 3>and then cost reduction and deployment on the other. So

0:11:40.960 --> 0:11:42.600
<v Speaker 3>for most of the last decade, we've been talking about

0:11:42.600 --> 0:11:44.720
<v Speaker 3>how do we get this stuff deployed really quickly, and

0:11:44.760 --> 0:11:47.040
<v Speaker 3>now increasingly we're saying talking about okay, but we also

0:11:47.040 --> 0:11:49.319
<v Speaker 3>want it made locally. We also want it made in Europe.

0:11:49.360 --> 0:11:51.000
<v Speaker 3>We also want it made in North America, not just

0:11:51.080 --> 0:11:54.240
<v Speaker 3>the cheapest and that's those two things are sometimes at

0:11:54.280 --> 0:11:56.800
<v Speaker 3>odds with each other, right, Sometimes the cheapest way to

0:11:56.840 --> 0:11:59.000
<v Speaker 3>do it would be too important from the cheapest producer,

0:11:59.000 --> 0:12:01.920
<v Speaker 3>which is still know right now. So I think those

0:12:02.040 --> 0:12:04.280
<v Speaker 3>all that effort to try and localize supply chains in

0:12:04.320 --> 0:12:06.280
<v Speaker 3>the long term will be a very positive thing, but

0:12:06.320 --> 0:12:08.600
<v Speaker 3>in the short term actually think it's driving up costs

0:12:08.640 --> 0:12:11.480
<v Speaker 3>and in some ways going to slow down deployment. So

0:12:11.840 --> 0:12:13.600
<v Speaker 3>this is kind of where we got a bit uncomfortable

0:12:13.640 --> 0:12:15.600
<v Speaker 3>with this year, is there may be some real hiccups

0:12:15.600 --> 0:12:18.320
<v Speaker 3>this year around deployment, and we could even see sales

0:12:18.360 --> 0:12:21.120
<v Speaker 3>be significantly lower than we thought. But that's the number

0:12:21.120 --> 0:12:23.280
<v Speaker 3>we went out with. That's sort of sixteen about seventeen

0:12:23.360 --> 0:12:25.920
<v Speaker 3>million headline number. We'll see where it lands.

0:12:25.960 --> 0:12:28.160
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, we'll see your scorecard this time next year. Let's

0:12:28.200 --> 0:12:30.640
<v Speaker 1>talk about some of the implications for other industries, so

0:12:30.840 --> 0:12:34.280
<v Speaker 1>specifically oil. How much oil demand is being destroyed by

0:12:34.400 --> 0:12:37.200
<v Speaker 1>electric vehicles becoming more popular.

0:12:37.559 --> 0:12:39.920
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, this is one of those things that's probably it's

0:12:39.960 --> 0:12:41.840
<v Speaker 3>been hyped a bit too early in some ways. So

0:12:41.880 --> 0:12:43.840
<v Speaker 3>you go back a few years and everyone's talking about

0:12:43.880 --> 0:12:47.559
<v Speaker 3>how there's stories about EV's and peak demand, and if

0:12:47.559 --> 0:12:50.040
<v Speaker 3>you look at the impact, it was pretty modest so far.

0:12:50.160 --> 0:12:53.400
<v Speaker 3>Really it's a relatively modest amount of displacement. But that's

0:12:53.440 --> 0:12:55.199
<v Speaker 3>really going to start to change this year. And so

0:12:55.240 --> 0:12:58.000
<v Speaker 3>there's about fifty seven million evs on the road by

0:12:58.000 --> 0:12:59.360
<v Speaker 3>the end of this year, that's going to be about

0:12:59.360 --> 0:13:01.360
<v Speaker 3>four percent of the passenger vehicle fleet. And if you

0:13:01.440 --> 0:13:04.040
<v Speaker 3>just break down where oil consumption goes, road transport is

0:13:04.080 --> 0:13:06.880
<v Speaker 3>still the largest source of oil demand, and passenger cars

0:13:06.880 --> 0:13:09.559
<v Speaker 3>are still the largest source of oil demand within road transport.

0:13:09.600 --> 0:13:11.360
<v Speaker 3>So there's sometimes said, oh, no, the really important thing

0:13:11.400 --> 0:13:13.600
<v Speaker 3>is plastics or aviation, and those are important for growth,

0:13:13.600 --> 0:13:17.280
<v Speaker 3>but in absolute numbers, displacement from passenger cars is where

0:13:17.440 --> 0:13:19.720
<v Speaker 3>the biggest chunk of oil demand is, or that's where

0:13:19.720 --> 0:13:22.160
<v Speaker 3>the largest absolute share of oil demand comes from. So

0:13:22.280 --> 0:13:25.760
<v Speaker 3>what we're kind of watching right now is internal combustion

0:13:25.800 --> 0:13:28.520
<v Speaker 3>engine vehicle sales are still down about twenty percent from

0:13:28.559 --> 0:13:31.160
<v Speaker 3>their twenty seventeen peak. They're significantly off that peak we

0:13:31.160 --> 0:13:33.720
<v Speaker 3>think they peaked in twenty seventeen, or internal decline. We've

0:13:33.760 --> 0:13:35.880
<v Speaker 3>been saying that for a long time or long term decline.

0:13:35.880 --> 0:13:37.840
<v Speaker 3>There might be bumps upward or downward here and there,

0:13:37.920 --> 0:13:40.120
<v Speaker 3>and that twenty seventeen peak is starting to flow into

0:13:40.160 --> 0:13:42.480
<v Speaker 3>the fleet. So there's a big lag between what happens

0:13:42.520 --> 0:13:44.920
<v Speaker 3>on sale new sales and the fleet. So it's not

0:13:45.000 --> 0:13:47.520
<v Speaker 3>going to turn the corner anytime immediately. But we think

0:13:47.559 --> 0:13:50.599
<v Speaker 3>broadly the fleet of internal combustion engine vehicle starts to

0:13:50.640 --> 0:13:52.760
<v Speaker 3>sort of plateau in the next few years. And those

0:13:52.840 --> 0:13:54.880
<v Speaker 3>vehicles are also more efficient than the ones that were

0:13:54.880 --> 0:13:56.920
<v Speaker 3>sold twenty years ago or fifteen years ago the ones

0:13:56.920 --> 0:13:59.720
<v Speaker 3>that are being retired. So all that together means we

0:13:59.800 --> 0:14:01.760
<v Speaker 3>think think that there is a start to become a

0:14:01.800 --> 0:14:04.880
<v Speaker 3>material impact from electric vehicles this year.

0:14:04.880 --> 0:14:05.760
<v Speaker 2>On oil demand.

0:14:06.040 --> 0:14:08.800
<v Speaker 3>Now, most of the displacement that we've had historically from

0:14:08.840 --> 0:14:11.319
<v Speaker 3>electrified electric vehicles has been on the two and three

0:14:11.320 --> 0:14:14.440
<v Speaker 3>wheeler segment that's been relatively stable. That's because China deployed

0:14:14.480 --> 0:14:17.000
<v Speaker 3>a huge number of these over the last decade. But

0:14:17.320 --> 0:14:20.040
<v Speaker 3>now passenger vehicles will start to play a material role.

0:14:20.080 --> 0:14:22.040
<v Speaker 3>So by the end of this year, we think passenger

0:14:22.120 --> 0:14:24.160
<v Speaker 3>vehicles will be displacing our a little over six hundred

0:14:24.200 --> 0:14:26.880
<v Speaker 3>thousand barrels per day of oil demand. That's relatively small

0:14:26.960 --> 0:14:29.920
<v Speaker 3>still against over one hundred million barrels per day of

0:14:29.960 --> 0:14:32.320
<v Speaker 3>oil demand, But if you think about what is the

0:14:32.360 --> 0:14:35.560
<v Speaker 3>additional demand going forward in the twenty twenty in the

0:14:35.560 --> 0:14:37.760
<v Speaker 3>second half of the twenty twenties year, that starts to

0:14:37.800 --> 0:14:40.600
<v Speaker 3>be quite material because the annual additions to oil demand

0:14:40.720 --> 0:14:43.640
<v Speaker 3>are starting to decrease. There's this been this COVID rebound.

0:14:43.720 --> 0:14:45.360
<v Speaker 3>We think they're going to start to decrease next year,

0:14:45.520 --> 0:14:48.040
<v Speaker 3>So then that effect from EV's becomes more visible because

0:14:48.080 --> 0:14:50.320
<v Speaker 3>it's not being overwhelmed by a pigger increase. So I

0:14:50.320 --> 0:14:52.040
<v Speaker 3>think you're going to start to see more groups kind

0:14:52.080 --> 0:14:53.920
<v Speaker 3>of acknowledging that. Like I said, I think the hype

0:14:53.960 --> 0:14:55.240
<v Speaker 3>on this was a bit early, but I think that

0:14:55.280 --> 0:14:58.000
<v Speaker 3>starts to play in a real way now. And the

0:14:58.000 --> 0:15:00.360
<v Speaker 3>place to watch there is China. So China has seven

0:15:00.400 --> 0:15:02.960
<v Speaker 3>percent of the vehicle fleet is now electric. Sinopek has

0:15:03.000 --> 0:15:05.120
<v Speaker 3>said that it thinks gasoline demand has already peaked in

0:15:05.120 --> 0:15:07.280
<v Speaker 3>the country and that it's long term declined from here.

0:15:07.520 --> 0:15:10.200
<v Speaker 3>We overall think the road fuel demand globally has still

0:15:10.240 --> 0:15:11.560
<v Speaker 3>going to a rise for a couple more years till

0:15:11.600 --> 0:15:13.560
<v Speaker 3>around twenty twenty seven, and then it's a bit of

0:15:13.560 --> 0:15:15.520
<v Speaker 3>a plateau before it starts to come down more sharply

0:15:15.560 --> 0:15:17.560
<v Speaker 3>in the twenty thirties. But I think what we're flagging

0:15:17.600 --> 0:15:19.400
<v Speaker 3>with this prediction is that this is the year that

0:15:19.520 --> 0:15:23.280
<v Speaker 3>actually marks real materiality for the energy that's consumed and

0:15:23.320 --> 0:15:24.920
<v Speaker 3>displaced from evs, and.

0:15:24.880 --> 0:15:26.880
<v Speaker 1>If we're not putting oil in the vehicles we're putting

0:15:26.880 --> 0:15:30.200
<v Speaker 1>electricity in, which then brings us to charging networks, which

0:15:30.200 --> 0:15:32.280
<v Speaker 1>we have talked about on this show. And you know,

0:15:32.360 --> 0:15:35.280
<v Speaker 1>one of the themes across twenty twenty three was grids

0:15:35.560 --> 0:15:37.960
<v Speaker 1>and whether or not grids can handle all of the

0:15:37.960 --> 0:15:40.800
<v Speaker 1>additional demand on them as well as all of the

0:15:40.840 --> 0:15:44.560
<v Speaker 1>new renewable energy in producing infrastructure. On the other end,

0:15:44.640 --> 0:15:48.360
<v Speaker 1>when it comes to charging infrastructure, which really helps with

0:15:48.720 --> 0:15:51.360
<v Speaker 1>actually getting these vehicles on the road, what is the

0:15:51.360 --> 0:15:53.040
<v Speaker 1>outlook for public chargers?

0:15:53.240 --> 0:15:54.880
<v Speaker 3>So you're going to see a lot more charging infrastructure

0:15:54.880 --> 0:15:56.840
<v Speaker 3>built next year. We think there's about one point two

0:15:56.880 --> 0:16:00.880
<v Speaker 3>million public charging connectors, so not stations, but in outlets

0:16:00.960 --> 0:16:04.040
<v Speaker 3>public chargers that is installed in twenty twenty three. So

0:16:04.080 --> 0:16:06.320
<v Speaker 3>that brought the total to just under four million, which

0:16:06.400 --> 0:16:08.360
<v Speaker 3>instenttally is where we predicted it would be. I think

0:16:08.360 --> 0:16:10.200
<v Speaker 3>we said four point one million and it came out

0:16:10.200 --> 0:16:12.440
<v Speaker 3>at three point nine or something, so pretty good there.

0:16:13.040 --> 0:16:14.800
<v Speaker 3>We think it's gonna be about one point six million

0:16:14.840 --> 0:16:17.080
<v Speaker 3>this year. Now it's important to recognize there that this

0:16:17.200 --> 0:16:20.320
<v Speaker 3>doesn't mean charging is solved everywhere. It's going in much

0:16:20.360 --> 0:16:23.160
<v Speaker 3>faster in some places than others. So China is installing

0:16:23.440 --> 0:16:25.960
<v Speaker 3>more public charging than the rest of the world combined,

0:16:26.160 --> 0:16:28.800
<v Speaker 3>and when it comes to ultra other types of fast charging,

0:16:28.800 --> 0:16:31.160
<v Speaker 3>it's that ratio is even more than that. So there

0:16:31.200 --> 0:16:32.680
<v Speaker 3>is going to be a lot more chargers go in.

0:16:32.840 --> 0:16:34.600
<v Speaker 3>But I think you're still going to see charging as

0:16:34.640 --> 0:16:37.200
<v Speaker 3>a as a challenge and as a barrier, particularly in

0:16:37.240 --> 0:16:39.120
<v Speaker 3>the US where some of the chargers that are in

0:16:39.160 --> 0:16:42.560
<v Speaker 3>there are not especially reliable. And I think what we're

0:16:42.560 --> 0:16:44.920
<v Speaker 3>seeing kind of globally is a very uneven picture on

0:16:45.160 --> 0:16:47.840
<v Speaker 3>the degree to which people trust the charging infrastructure and

0:16:47.920 --> 0:16:50.840
<v Speaker 3>should trust the charging infrastructure to be honest. So the

0:16:50.920 --> 0:16:54.320
<v Speaker 3>other thing is that the public charging networks are starting

0:16:54.360 --> 0:16:57.720
<v Speaker 3>to be pretty big dispensers of electricity when you look

0:16:57.720 --> 0:17:00.480
<v Speaker 3>at the total demand for electricity that is going to

0:17:00.480 --> 0:17:04.399
<v Speaker 3>come from public charging. So we have ev charging in

0:17:04.480 --> 0:17:07.840
<v Speaker 3>China representing the same amount of total electricity consumption as

0:17:08.000 --> 0:17:10.760
<v Speaker 3>a sort of small to mid sized country, and last

0:17:10.800 --> 0:17:12.520
<v Speaker 3>year we think it was about the same as all

0:17:12.520 --> 0:17:15.080
<v Speaker 3>of Ireland. So we'll we'll keep going with these country

0:17:15.080 --> 0:17:17.399
<v Speaker 3>comparisons to hopefully make it a bit more tangible to

0:17:17.440 --> 0:17:19.639
<v Speaker 3>people who don't think in tear what hours.

0:17:21.200 --> 0:17:23.439
<v Speaker 1>So Colin, you and I are about to head to

0:17:23.480 --> 0:17:26.920
<v Speaker 1>California for our summit that is in San Francisco, which

0:17:27.000 --> 0:17:30.240
<v Speaker 1>is specifically focused on the transport space. One of the

0:17:30.280 --> 0:17:33.800
<v Speaker 1>areas that has been tricky for zero missions vehicles across

0:17:33.800 --> 0:17:36.080
<v Speaker 1>the board has been in the medium and heavy duty

0:17:36.160 --> 0:17:39.600
<v Speaker 1>vehicle space. And in California they are soon to implement

0:17:39.680 --> 0:17:44.679
<v Speaker 1>the Advance Clean Truck Legislation, which is abbreviated as ACT

0:17:44.880 --> 0:17:49.480
<v Speaker 1>and the Advanced Clean Fleets Rules ACF. What do you

0:17:49.560 --> 0:17:52.879
<v Speaker 1>think is going to happen then in terms of commercial

0:17:52.960 --> 0:17:56.679
<v Speaker 1>vehicle sales and is this going to essentially spur that

0:17:56.840 --> 0:17:59.199
<v Speaker 1>part of electric vehicle transition on?

0:18:00.119 --> 0:18:01.280
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, we think it is.

0:18:01.440 --> 0:18:04.840
<v Speaker 3>So there has been more activity around heavy trucks in

0:18:04.880 --> 0:18:07.280
<v Speaker 3>some other markets, but the US it's been relatively slow

0:18:07.320 --> 0:18:07.640
<v Speaker 3>so far.

0:18:07.840 --> 0:18:09.119
<v Speaker 2>The ACT marks.

0:18:08.840 --> 0:18:10.840
<v Speaker 3>That change for that. There are some other states that

0:18:10.880 --> 0:18:13.520
<v Speaker 3>follow it. The ACT is essentially a quota system for

0:18:13.600 --> 0:18:16.320
<v Speaker 3>zero missions trucks that the manufacturers who sell trucks there

0:18:16.359 --> 0:18:18.240
<v Speaker 3>have to meet and the fleets on the fleet side.

0:18:18.280 --> 0:18:20.240
<v Speaker 3>And we think for twenty twenty four somewhe around five

0:18:20.280 --> 0:18:22.560
<v Speaker 3>to nine percent of sales in California will have to

0:18:22.600 --> 0:18:25.919
<v Speaker 3>be zero missions in the heavy medium truck segment to

0:18:26.000 --> 0:18:27.800
<v Speaker 3>meet that, and it depends a bit on the segment,

0:18:27.800 --> 0:18:29.640
<v Speaker 3>but that's sort of an overall it's not a bad

0:18:29.680 --> 0:18:32.120
<v Speaker 3>guideline number, and that's a big jump up from where

0:18:32.119 --> 0:18:33.960
<v Speaker 3>we've been in the last few years. So there is

0:18:34.000 --> 0:18:35.639
<v Speaker 3>going to be a big surge we think. We know

0:18:35.680 --> 0:18:37.520
<v Speaker 3>a lot of groups have been preparing for that. There's

0:18:37.560 --> 0:18:40.000
<v Speaker 3>also been a lot of lobbying and maneuvering behind the

0:18:40.040 --> 0:18:42.800
<v Speaker 3>scenes on this, So some of the groups that might

0:18:42.800 --> 0:18:45.959
<v Speaker 3>make more publicly supportive statements behind the scenes have been

0:18:46.000 --> 0:18:48.480
<v Speaker 3>lobbying against some of the provisions of the Act. So

0:18:48.720 --> 0:18:51.359
<v Speaker 3>it's like any other policy around vehicles, there's sort of

0:18:51.400 --> 0:18:54.359
<v Speaker 3>this fight between the regulators and the manufacturers, most of

0:18:54.359 --> 0:18:58.200
<v Speaker 3>whom are not that keen on being pushed into new

0:18:58.400 --> 0:19:00.920
<v Speaker 3>drive train types. But also, as with passenger cars, you've

0:19:00.920 --> 0:19:03.200
<v Speaker 3>got some that are going down that path as pure

0:19:03.240 --> 0:19:05.720
<v Speaker 3>plays and are happy to keep pushing things forward, and

0:19:05.760 --> 0:19:08.800
<v Speaker 3>this does create a significant opportunity for them. So I

0:19:08.800 --> 0:19:11.040
<v Speaker 3>think we're going to see a big jump there, and

0:19:11.040 --> 0:19:13.919
<v Speaker 3>you're going to hear a lot more about charging big trucks,

0:19:14.040 --> 0:19:18.439
<v Speaker 3>about fleets going electric, and just about the major cost

0:19:18.520 --> 0:19:21.120
<v Speaker 3>savings that can be available in terms of fuel costs,

0:19:21.119 --> 0:19:23.040
<v Speaker 3>because you've got to remember, for some of these fleets,

0:19:23.080 --> 0:19:26.159
<v Speaker 3>fuels is a big part of the cost. And if

0:19:26.200 --> 0:19:28.040
<v Speaker 3>they can get more evs into their fleet, because most

0:19:28.040 --> 0:19:29.840
<v Speaker 3>of them are going to v's, there'll be some hydrogen

0:19:29.880 --> 0:19:31.399
<v Speaker 3>fuel cell vehicles in there too, but most of them

0:19:31.440 --> 0:19:34.959
<v Speaker 3>are going to be EV's, they can significantly cut their

0:19:35.000 --> 0:19:36.679
<v Speaker 3>operating costs. So I think you're going to hear more

0:19:36.720 --> 0:19:39.800
<v Speaker 3>about both the challenges and the success stories that come

0:19:39.840 --> 0:19:40.080
<v Speaker 3>from that.

0:19:40.480 --> 0:19:43.800
<v Speaker 1>Now pivoting away from the electrification of fleets, but still

0:19:43.840 --> 0:19:47.560
<v Speaker 1>in decarbonizing, let's talk a little bit about airlines and shipping,

0:19:47.800 --> 0:19:52.120
<v Speaker 1>where electrification isn't necessarily going to be the most obvious

0:19:52.280 --> 0:19:55.760
<v Speaker 1>path forward. It's in these kind of sustainable aviation fuels

0:19:55.840 --> 0:20:00.760
<v Speaker 1>and cleaner burning fuels. With a number of shipping and

0:20:01.119 --> 0:20:04.760
<v Speaker 1>airlines looking at emissions reduction, is there going to be

0:20:05.160 --> 0:20:08.200
<v Speaker 1>enough clean fuel to meet demand? And what does twenty

0:20:08.240 --> 0:20:09.040
<v Speaker 1>twenty four hold.

0:20:09.359 --> 0:20:12.000
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, this is an important point and it may seem

0:20:12.040 --> 0:20:14.000
<v Speaker 3>like a bit of an abrupt pivot when we talk

0:20:14.000 --> 0:20:16.320
<v Speaker 3>about from cars to ships and planes, but one of

0:20:16.320 --> 0:20:18.280
<v Speaker 3>the things you have to realize is the ways to

0:20:18.359 --> 0:20:21.199
<v Speaker 3>decarbonize these things are linked and one of the reasons

0:20:21.200 --> 0:20:23.600
<v Speaker 3>they're linked is that there is a scarcity of supply

0:20:23.800 --> 0:20:26.240
<v Speaker 3>to decarbonizing some of the hardest things, and those things

0:20:26.240 --> 0:20:28.240
<v Speaker 3>are things like shipping and aviation. So a big part

0:20:28.240 --> 0:20:30.159
<v Speaker 3>of the reason you need to push hard on electrifying

0:20:30.160 --> 0:20:32.119
<v Speaker 3>the things you can electrify is because there's going to

0:20:32.119 --> 0:20:34.680
<v Speaker 3>be really intense competition for the supply.

0:20:34.440 --> 0:20:36.160
<v Speaker 2>Of those liquid renewable.

0:20:35.720 --> 0:20:37.959
<v Speaker 3>Fuels for things like shipping and aviation. So that's kind

0:20:38.000 --> 0:20:40.320
<v Speaker 3>of why they're linked, and in our view, it doesn't

0:20:40.359 --> 0:20:42.840
<v Speaker 3>make sense to do anything other than electrify, at least

0:20:42.840 --> 0:20:45.560
<v Speaker 3>in terms of the most efficient route to getting there.

0:20:45.600 --> 0:20:48.600
<v Speaker 3>In terms of decarbonizing passenger cars, that's by far the

0:20:48.640 --> 0:20:52.840
<v Speaker 3>most cost effective and efficient way of getting there. So

0:20:53.080 --> 0:20:54.960
<v Speaker 3>on the fuel side, yes, what we're starting to see

0:20:54.960 --> 0:20:57.760
<v Speaker 3>is this competition shaping up between the shipping sector and

0:20:57.800 --> 0:21:01.520
<v Speaker 3>the aviation sector for supply some of those clean fuels

0:21:01.520 --> 0:21:03.879
<v Speaker 3>that can be used either directly or to make sustainable

0:21:03.880 --> 0:21:06.919
<v Speaker 3>aviation fuel through a different conversion pathway. And we've actually

0:21:06.920 --> 0:21:10.280
<v Speaker 3>we track every off take agreement between an airline and

0:21:10.560 --> 0:21:13.919
<v Speaker 3>a fuel producer of sustainable aviation fuel. We've tracked one

0:21:13.960 --> 0:21:15.879
<v Speaker 3>hundred of those deals since twenty nineteen. We have a

0:21:15.960 --> 0:21:17.760
<v Speaker 3>database on this if anybody wants to see it. We've

0:21:17.760 --> 0:21:19.600
<v Speaker 3>got quite a bit of coverage of this now and

0:21:19.640 --> 0:21:22.240
<v Speaker 3>that amounts to the total amount of purchase about thirty

0:21:22.240 --> 0:21:25.040
<v Speaker 3>seven billion leaders and that looks like an amount that

0:21:25.119 --> 0:21:27.159
<v Speaker 3>can be supplied. But the point is is that not

0:21:27.200 --> 0:21:30.600
<v Speaker 3>everyone's entered the market yet, so more what we're expecting

0:21:30.600 --> 0:21:32.280
<v Speaker 3>to see is more and more groups saying, look, we're

0:21:32.280 --> 0:21:35.320
<v Speaker 3>trying to purchase sustainable aviation fuel, but we can't necessarily

0:21:35.359 --> 0:21:37.960
<v Speaker 3>find the supply, the reliable supply to do that. And

0:21:38.000 --> 0:21:39.480
<v Speaker 3>I think that's where you're going to see this sort

0:21:39.520 --> 0:21:42.479
<v Speaker 3>of intense this competition ramp up between the shippers and

0:21:42.560 --> 0:21:44.760
<v Speaker 3>the aviation sector. And so far, what we're seeing is

0:21:44.760 --> 0:21:46.720
<v Speaker 3>the aviation sector is jumping out ahead, so they're the

0:21:46.720 --> 0:21:48.880
<v Speaker 3>ones signing many more of these deals. There is some

0:21:48.920 --> 0:21:51.440
<v Speaker 3>activity on the shipping side, but it's generally much smaller,

0:21:51.440 --> 0:21:54.360
<v Speaker 3>and that might just be because those are less consumer

0:21:54.440 --> 0:21:57.919
<v Speaker 3>facing brands than airlines are. But the pressure is going

0:21:57.960 --> 0:21:59.680
<v Speaker 3>to start to come on them too, So I think

0:21:59.720 --> 0:22:02.400
<v Speaker 3>you are going to see this continued competition and that's

0:22:02.440 --> 0:22:04.640
<v Speaker 3>going to probably be a good thing for catalyzing more

0:22:04.680 --> 0:22:08.280
<v Speaker 3>supply to help these others harder to abate sectors decarbonise

0:22:08.320 --> 0:22:08.640
<v Speaker 3>as well.

0:22:09.040 --> 0:22:09.240
<v Speaker 2>Well.

0:22:09.280 --> 0:22:12.119
<v Speaker 1>Colin, thank you for joining today and talking through some

0:22:12.200 --> 0:22:14.520
<v Speaker 1>of the points that came out of ten Things to Watch,

0:22:14.600 --> 0:22:16.359
<v Speaker 1>and we'll have you back to give as a scorecard,

0:22:16.400 --> 0:22:18.600
<v Speaker 1>and certainly we'll be digging in on a number of

0:22:18.680 --> 0:22:21.480
<v Speaker 1>these topics with members of your team throughout the course

0:22:21.480 --> 0:22:22.400
<v Speaker 1>of this upcoming year.

0:22:22.560 --> 0:22:24.919
<v Speaker 3>Thanks Dana, and we will definitely revisit them. There's no

0:22:24.960 --> 0:22:26.879
<v Speaker 3>point in doing these things if you're not accountable on them,

0:22:26.880 --> 0:22:28.560
<v Speaker 3>So looking forward to joining in a year's time and

0:22:28.640 --> 0:22:36.639
<v Speaker 3>we can score them and see how we did.

0:22:38.640 --> 0:22:41.960
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg NEF is a service provided by Bloomberg Finance LP

0:22:42.160 --> 0:22:45.520
<v Speaker 1>and its affiliates. This recording does not constitute, nor should

0:22:45.560 --> 0:22:49.600
<v Speaker 1>it be construed as investment advice, investment recommendations, or a

0:22:49.640 --> 0:22:53.200
<v Speaker 1>recommendation as to an investment or other strategy. Bloomberg n

0:22:53.200 --> 0:22:56.720
<v Speaker 1>EF should not be considered as information sufficient upon which

0:22:56.760 --> 0:23:00.640
<v Speaker 1>to base an investment decision. Neither Bloomberg Finance nor any

0:23:00.680 --> 0:23:04.040
<v Speaker 1>of its affiliates makes any representation or warranty as to

0:23:04.080 --> 0:23:07.480
<v Speaker 1>the accuracy or completeness of the information contained in this recording,

0:23:07.880 --> 0:23:10.679
<v Speaker 1>and any liability as a result of this recording is

0:23:10.720 --> 0:23:11.800
<v Speaker 1>expressly disclaimed