WEBVTT - Chuck’s Commentary - Trump’s Most Consequential Scandal Wasn’t Clickable Enough + Democrats Need A “Project 2032” To Stay Electorally Viable

0:00:00.080 --> 0:00:02.360
<v Speaker 1>This episode of the Chuck Todcast is brought to you

0:00:02.400 --> 0:00:06.240
<v Speaker 1>by Wild Grain. Wild Grain is the first bake from

0:00:06.400 --> 0:00:11.280
<v Speaker 1>frozen subscription box for sour dough breads, arteasonal pastries, and

0:00:11.320 --> 0:00:14.800
<v Speaker 1>fresh pastas, plus all the items conveniently baked in twenty

0:00:14.800 --> 0:00:18.759
<v Speaker 1>five minutes or less. Unlike many store brought options, Wild

0:00:18.840 --> 0:00:21.880
<v Speaker 1>Grain uses some simple ingredients you can pronounce and a

0:00:22.040 --> 0:00:25.480
<v Speaker 1>slow fermentation process that can be a lot easier on

0:00:25.520 --> 0:00:28.080
<v Speaker 1>your belly, little gut health there right, and richer in

0:00:28.200 --> 0:00:32.600
<v Speaker 1>nutrients antioxidants. There's also no preservatives and no shortcuts. The

0:00:32.640 --> 0:00:35.800
<v Speaker 1>Wild Grain boxes are fully customizable. In addition to their

0:00:35.880 --> 0:00:38.920
<v Speaker 1>variety box, they have a gluten free box, a vegan box,

0:00:39.200 --> 0:00:42.559
<v Speaker 1>and a new protein box. I will tell you I

0:00:42.600 --> 0:00:44.960
<v Speaker 1>have done the gluten free box. I have done it

0:00:44.960 --> 0:00:48.600
<v Speaker 1>a second time. I have also used the code, the

0:00:48.680 --> 0:00:52.040
<v Speaker 1>todcast code. If you use the promo code toodcast at checkout,

0:00:52.080 --> 0:00:55.640
<v Speaker 1>you get thirty dollars off. I've already used it as

0:00:55.680 --> 0:00:58.880
<v Speaker 1>a gift to somebody else who loves this bread. It

0:00:59.000 --> 0:01:02.560
<v Speaker 1>is hard to find good gluten free bread. It is fantastic.

0:01:02.720 --> 0:01:04.640
<v Speaker 1>They give you step by step instructions.

0:01:04.920 --> 0:01:05.720
<v Speaker 2>I really dig this.

0:01:06.520 --> 0:01:09.760
<v Speaker 1>There is nothing like having an artesion bakery in your

0:01:09.800 --> 0:01:12.560
<v Speaker 1>freezer to chase away the winter chill. Now is the

0:01:12.560 --> 0:01:15.920
<v Speaker 1>best time to stay in and enjoy some comforting homemade

0:01:15.920 --> 0:01:19.600
<v Speaker 1>meals with Wildgrain. I obviously highly recommend it. It is

0:01:19.760 --> 0:01:22.759
<v Speaker 1>worth giving Wildgrain a try. Right now, Wildgrain is offering

0:01:22.840 --> 0:01:25.920
<v Speaker 1>my listeners thirty dollars off your first box plus free

0:01:25.959 --> 0:01:29.400
<v Speaker 1>croyissants for life. Come on when you go to wildgrain

0:01:29.440 --> 0:01:33.280
<v Speaker 1>dot com slash podcast to start your subscription today. That's

0:01:33.360 --> 0:01:36.440
<v Speaker 1>thirty dollars off your first box and free croissants for

0:01:36.520 --> 0:01:39.840
<v Speaker 1>life when you visit wildgrain dot com slash podcast, or

0:01:39.880 --> 0:01:43.640
<v Speaker 1>simply use the promo code podcast at check out. This

0:01:43.680 --> 0:01:51.480
<v Speaker 1>is a sponsor I absolutely embrace, so use that code. Hello,

0:01:51.520 --> 0:01:54.760
<v Speaker 1>They're happy Wednesday and welcome to another episode of the

0:01:54.880 --> 0:01:57.080
<v Speaker 1>Chuck Podcast. Let me give you a quick little rundown

0:01:57.120 --> 0:02:02.680
<v Speaker 1>of what to expect in today's full episode. I will

0:02:02.720 --> 0:02:07.640
<v Speaker 1>have an answer to the question that I get more

0:02:07.680 --> 0:02:12.360
<v Speaker 1>often than any other will the mid terms happen? But

0:02:12.440 --> 0:02:14.040
<v Speaker 1>I want to explain it in such a way that

0:02:14.120 --> 0:02:16.480
<v Speaker 1>kind of builds off of what we talked about on Monday.

0:02:16.560 --> 0:02:18.640
<v Speaker 1>I will get to that in a minute. So going

0:02:18.680 --> 0:02:21.120
<v Speaker 1>to have my top five list, and this one has

0:02:21.200 --> 0:02:24.440
<v Speaker 1>to do with thought. I'm calling Project twenty thirty two

0:02:25.400 --> 0:02:27.959
<v Speaker 1>for the Democratic Party. I'll just leave that little tease

0:02:28.080 --> 0:02:30.639
<v Speaker 1>at that, and you'll get an idea of where I'm

0:02:30.639 --> 0:02:32.840
<v Speaker 1>going to go with my top five list on that,

0:02:32.880 --> 0:02:35.919
<v Speaker 1>and of course we'll take some questions and go from there.

0:02:36.240 --> 0:02:40.639
<v Speaker 1>All right, So let's go back to the to this exercise.

0:02:40.639 --> 0:02:42.320
<v Speaker 1>I want to do it, and it wants to I

0:02:42.320 --> 0:02:45.520
<v Speaker 1>want to build on the story we talked about on Monday,

0:02:45.520 --> 0:02:50.200
<v Speaker 1>but try to explain why why it's disappearing, and I'm

0:02:50.240 --> 0:02:52.839
<v Speaker 1>going to lament why it's disappearing because I don't think

0:02:52.919 --> 0:02:55.800
<v Speaker 1>it should be disappearing, and try to sort of help

0:02:55.880 --> 0:02:59.520
<v Speaker 1>you discern, you know, which one of these alarming stories.

0:02:59.520 --> 0:03:03.680
<v Speaker 1>How much worry about Trump's alarming rhetoric versus his alarming deeds.

0:03:04.360 --> 0:03:06.200
<v Speaker 1>So look, if you listen to Money's episode, you know

0:03:06.240 --> 0:03:09.200
<v Speaker 1>I spent a good chunk of time slowing things down,

0:03:09.240 --> 0:03:11.120
<v Speaker 1>walking through a story that I think is easy to

0:03:11.120 --> 0:03:14.440
<v Speaker 1>miss in this current information ecosystem. I knew that this

0:03:14.480 --> 0:03:18.359
<v Speaker 1>didn't have easy visuals to show bells and whistles, But

0:03:18.400 --> 0:03:20.680
<v Speaker 1>what I really believe is that this is the worst

0:03:21.680 --> 0:03:25.120
<v Speaker 1>sort of this is the worst corruption scandal we've ever

0:03:25.160 --> 0:03:28.120
<v Speaker 1>had involving an American president. It's bigger than teapot doma

0:03:28.160 --> 0:03:31.280
<v Speaker 1>bigger than Watergate. And I know, because we're so numb

0:03:31.360 --> 0:03:35.600
<v Speaker 1>to Trump's transactionalism, we just don't see it, right. But

0:03:35.680 --> 0:03:40.400
<v Speaker 1>that's why I wanted to walk through the details very deliberately,

0:03:41.000 --> 0:03:42.960
<v Speaker 1>because it's incredibly important.

0:03:44.040 --> 0:03:44.400
<v Speaker 2>And it was.

0:03:44.600 --> 0:03:46.560
<v Speaker 1>Of course, I'm referring to the Wall Street Journal story,

0:03:46.720 --> 0:03:51.040
<v Speaker 1>the report about how Sovereign Wealth Fund of UAE investments

0:03:51.040 --> 0:03:53.880
<v Speaker 1>into a crypto company that really wasn't going anywhere for

0:03:53.960 --> 0:03:58.160
<v Speaker 1>Trump that suddenly became relevant. It led to a change

0:03:58.240 --> 0:04:02.400
<v Speaker 1>in America in the States of America's policy on AI

0:04:02.480 --> 0:04:06.120
<v Speaker 1>and chips, and of course led to a pardon of

0:04:06.160 --> 0:04:09.640
<v Speaker 1>a very controversial figure in the crypto world. And all

0:04:09.760 --> 0:04:15.080
<v Speaker 1>of it happening while Trump was receiving hundreds of millions

0:04:15.120 --> 0:04:16.760
<v Speaker 1>of dollars in cash Trump.

0:04:16.480 --> 0:04:17.040
<v Speaker 2>And his family.

0:04:19.920 --> 0:04:24.000
<v Speaker 1>Now, the story didn't have dramatic visuals, and it wasn't

0:04:24.040 --> 0:04:27.159
<v Speaker 1>easy to villainize somebody in a moment. It was a

0:04:27.240 --> 0:04:30.520
<v Speaker 1>dense it was. It's a story that requires some patience.

0:04:32.040 --> 0:04:32.679
<v Speaker 2>In some ways.

0:04:32.720 --> 0:04:34.520
<v Speaker 1>As I said, right, you need a you need to

0:04:34.880 --> 0:04:38.159
<v Speaker 1>either the Whiteboard on a Beautiful Mind or clar Danes

0:04:38.200 --> 0:04:41.520
<v Speaker 1>and Homeland to sort of see how everything is connected.

0:04:43.320 --> 0:04:46.080
<v Speaker 1>And I really believe that it was the most important

0:04:46.080 --> 0:04:48.520
<v Speaker 1>story of the weekend and really something that that should

0:04:48.600 --> 0:04:52.240
<v Speaker 1>be seen. You know that every congressional reporter should be

0:04:52.279 --> 0:04:55.120
<v Speaker 1>asking every member of Congress about it, right, that type

0:04:55.160 --> 0:05:01.040
<v Speaker 1>of story to sort of get Congress off its ass

0:05:01.680 --> 0:05:05.400
<v Speaker 1>and start worrying about whether presidents are following the Constitution.

0:05:06.440 --> 0:05:08.720
<v Speaker 1>But then the rest of the Then the rest of

0:05:08.800 --> 0:05:09.679
<v Speaker 1>Monday happened.

0:05:09.839 --> 0:05:10.039
<v Speaker 2>Right.

0:05:10.960 --> 0:05:14.160
<v Speaker 1>You had the Dan Bongino podcast that the President did

0:05:14.200 --> 0:05:17.920
<v Speaker 1>where he mused about federalizing elections, which, of course that

0:05:18.040 --> 0:05:21.520
<v Speaker 1>quick comment coupled with the video footage of the bizarre

0:05:21.560 --> 0:05:26.480
<v Speaker 1>Telsea Gabbard leven FBI rate of Fulton County in Atlanta

0:05:26.600 --> 0:05:30.640
<v Speaker 1>with the twenty twenty ballots, and boom, right, you instantly

0:05:30.680 --> 0:05:33.680
<v Speaker 1>had a bit viral of a feeding frenzy on a

0:05:33.720 --> 0:05:34.640
<v Speaker 1>specific story.

0:05:36.320 --> 0:05:36.880
<v Speaker 2>You know, by.

0:05:36.760 --> 0:05:39.560
<v Speaker 1>Tuesday morning, you wake up and it's Kennedy Senator has

0:05:39.600 --> 0:05:42.320
<v Speaker 1>been Kennedy Center. He's just canceled it, shutting it down

0:05:42.360 --> 0:05:46.159
<v Speaker 1>for two years. Again, a shiny metal object story became

0:05:46.200 --> 0:05:47.600
<v Speaker 1>the lead of the day, and oh, by the way,

0:05:47.640 --> 0:05:49.359
<v Speaker 1>the government was shut down, so we had to reopen

0:05:49.400 --> 0:05:52.640
<v Speaker 1>that and all of it, shoving what is the perhaps

0:05:52.720 --> 0:05:56.400
<v Speaker 1>the biggest scandal in American history further and further and

0:05:56.480 --> 0:06:00.919
<v Speaker 1>further down the information ecosystem ladder. And of course, the

0:06:01.000 --> 0:06:08.600
<v Speaker 1>sudden burst of rhetorical crazy from Trump involving the midterms

0:06:09.400 --> 0:06:12.000
<v Speaker 1>led to a whole bunch of questions that I regularly

0:06:12.080 --> 0:06:17.640
<v Speaker 1>get from both listeners, viewers, and friends and family starting

0:06:17.640 --> 0:06:20.159
<v Speaker 1>to panic, you know, is is he going to cancel

0:06:20.200 --> 0:06:24.120
<v Speaker 1>the midterms? And it always leads to this, because how

0:06:24.120 --> 0:06:27.320
<v Speaker 1>anxious should we all be right now? And you know

0:06:27.360 --> 0:06:31.000
<v Speaker 1>you can and I get it right? Are things collapsing?

0:06:31.080 --> 0:06:35.279
<v Speaker 1>Is this different? Is Trump actually serious this time? What

0:06:35.400 --> 0:06:38.920
<v Speaker 1>guardrails are left that could stop him on this? So

0:06:38.960 --> 0:06:42.680
<v Speaker 1>here's what I want to do. I don't want to

0:06:42.720 --> 0:06:45.200
<v Speaker 1>hype your anxiety, and I don't want to dismiss it either.

0:06:46.640 --> 0:06:48.360
<v Speaker 1>What I want to try to do is organize it,

0:06:49.200 --> 0:06:51.240
<v Speaker 1>because one of the biggest mistakes we make in moments

0:06:51.279 --> 0:06:55.919
<v Speaker 1>like this is confusing volume with importance and mistaking what

0:06:56.040 --> 0:07:00.280
<v Speaker 1>feels scariest for what's actually doing the most damage. It

0:07:00.720 --> 0:07:04.320
<v Speaker 1>goes to the original trope with Trump, you know, right,

0:07:04.560 --> 0:07:07.960
<v Speaker 1>you know, which is you know, do you take them

0:07:08.120 --> 0:07:10.000
<v Speaker 1>literally or seriously or both?

0:07:10.160 --> 0:07:10.360
<v Speaker 2>Right?

0:07:10.440 --> 0:07:13.080
<v Speaker 1>And in this case, what I would say is should

0:07:13.080 --> 0:07:16.320
<v Speaker 1>you worry about what he's saying or should you worry about.

0:07:16.080 --> 0:07:16.800
<v Speaker 2>What he's doing?

0:07:17.280 --> 0:07:19.040
<v Speaker 1>Now, of course I would argue the answer is yes

0:07:19.080 --> 0:07:21.400
<v Speaker 1>to everything. And that's what we're going to get to.

0:07:21.680 --> 0:07:24.040
<v Speaker 1>So let's start with the story that everyone understands. Immediately,

0:07:24.080 --> 0:07:27.760
<v Speaker 1>Donald Trump goes on a podcast muses again about federalizing elections,

0:07:28.120 --> 0:07:30.840
<v Speaker 1>which of course you know, reminds people of him musing

0:07:30.880 --> 0:07:32.840
<v Speaker 1>about just I wish I could cancel the midterms, and

0:07:32.880 --> 0:07:36.560
<v Speaker 1>almost simultaneously, right when you play that, you have your

0:07:36.600 --> 0:07:39.200
<v Speaker 1>file footage, right, so if you see this on video,

0:07:39.240 --> 0:07:42.720
<v Speaker 1>you could just show the weird Tulsa Gabert thing and

0:07:42.720 --> 0:07:46.440
<v Speaker 1>the striking images out of Georgia of federal agents executing

0:07:46.560 --> 0:07:51.320
<v Speaker 1>a raid connected to election materials from twenty twenty. You know,

0:07:51.360 --> 0:07:54.840
<v Speaker 1>we're at nearly six years later. We've had multiple elections

0:07:54.840 --> 0:07:58.040
<v Speaker 1>in Fulton County ever since. I mean, I sort of

0:07:58.040 --> 0:08:01.000
<v Speaker 1>look at what he's doing is laughable. I think it's silly,

0:08:01.080 --> 0:08:05.000
<v Speaker 1>but it's also very serious. Right, we know he's desperate

0:08:06.400 --> 0:08:11.960
<v Speaker 1>to continue to sell this lie that he somehow was

0:08:15.600 --> 0:08:20.320
<v Speaker 1>illegitimately thrown out of office in twenty twenty.

0:08:21.440 --> 0:08:22.760
<v Speaker 2>So Trump talks.

0:08:22.520 --> 0:08:24.360
<v Speaker 1>About overwriting elections, and then all of a sudden, you

0:08:24.360 --> 0:08:27.880
<v Speaker 1>see federal agents seizing ballots. Right, the great fear that

0:08:27.960 --> 0:08:31.720
<v Speaker 1>so many people have. So you don't need a constitutional

0:08:31.840 --> 0:08:34.760
<v Speaker 1>law degree to fill your stomach drop. That is scary.

0:08:35.600 --> 0:08:39.199
<v Speaker 1>Rhetoric plus visuals, threat plus spectacle. It's an easy story

0:08:39.240 --> 0:08:42.040
<v Speaker 1>to tell. It fits in a tweet, it fits in

0:08:42.080 --> 0:08:45.120
<v Speaker 1>a cairn, and it fits in your nervous system, and

0:08:45.160 --> 0:08:48.560
<v Speaker 1>it rides the algorithm. Now, let me be very clear.

0:08:48.600 --> 0:08:51.839
<v Speaker 1>The rhetoric is not harmless. This isn't normal, and it

0:08:51.840 --> 0:08:56.440
<v Speaker 1>shouldn't be normalized. Election interference talk is as damaging as

0:08:56.480 --> 0:09:00.840
<v Speaker 1>election interference itself, and using federal power to intimidate state

0:09:00.880 --> 0:09:03.480
<v Speaker 1>workers matters a great deal.

0:09:04.760 --> 0:09:05.920
<v Speaker 2>So I don't want to I'm.

0:09:05.800 --> 0:09:08.200
<v Speaker 1>Not trying to minimize what he has said or what

0:09:08.240 --> 0:09:13.360
<v Speaker 1>he has done. But here's what I want. I want

0:09:13.440 --> 0:09:15.480
<v Speaker 1>you to understand, and I want to make this clear

0:09:15.960 --> 0:09:19.720
<v Speaker 1>because it's essential. What feels existential is not always what's

0:09:19.760 --> 0:09:23.560
<v Speaker 1>most consequential. So these two events, the rhetoric and the raid,

0:09:23.640 --> 0:09:26.600
<v Speaker 1>landed together. They functioned together. They were consumed as one

0:09:26.679 --> 0:09:30.520
<v Speaker 1>narrative event. It almost doesn't matter which technically came first, right,

0:09:30.600 --> 0:09:33.880
<v Speaker 1>the raid itself or his rhetoric to Bongino, the meaning

0:09:34.360 --> 0:09:39.160
<v Speaker 1>formed through proximity and imaging. Right, that's how political narratives

0:09:39.200 --> 0:09:42.200
<v Speaker 1>work now, thanks to these algorithms, thanks to these big

0:09:42.240 --> 0:09:44.920
<v Speaker 1>tech companies that control the flow of information that you

0:09:44.960 --> 0:09:47.679
<v Speaker 1>and I get to see. It isn't done through chronology

0:09:48.400 --> 0:09:51.679
<v Speaker 1>or nuanced but through what shows up next on your screen.

0:09:52.480 --> 0:09:55.120
<v Speaker 1>And that's why this story dominates. It feels like democracy

0:09:55.120 --> 0:09:57.120
<v Speaker 1>itself is on the line, and it animates a lot

0:09:57.160 --> 0:10:00.920
<v Speaker 1>of people. But feeling existential isn't the same thing as

0:10:00.960 --> 0:10:06.839
<v Speaker 1>actually being the thing that does the most lasting damage. Now,

0:10:06.920 --> 0:10:09.160
<v Speaker 1>let me talk about the Kennedy Center here. First glance,

0:10:10.440 --> 0:10:12.880
<v Speaker 1>Trump's moved to effectively just shut down the Kennedy Center

0:10:12.960 --> 0:10:17.240
<v Speaker 1>unilaterally under the guise of renovations. I see why some

0:10:17.480 --> 0:10:21.520
<v Speaker 1>see it as cultural authoritarianism, and symbolically, sure, it's pretty ugly,

0:10:22.480 --> 0:10:25.480
<v Speaker 1>and if it's a broader pattern of treating institutions as

0:10:25.600 --> 0:10:28.640
<v Speaker 1>enemies and loyalty tests. But then the context of all

0:10:28.640 --> 0:10:30.880
<v Speaker 1>this matters, right, and I think it tells us something

0:10:30.880 --> 0:10:33.480
<v Speaker 1>pretty important about how Trump actually operates. So why did

0:10:33.520 --> 0:10:36.040
<v Speaker 1>he shut this down? This wasn't a first strike, This

0:10:36.160 --> 0:10:39.920
<v Speaker 1>was a reaction. He was being humiliated right. Artists were

0:10:39.960 --> 0:10:44.800
<v Speaker 1>pulling out, performers were canceling, events were unraveling quietly but visibly.

0:10:45.240 --> 0:10:50.559
<v Speaker 1>The reputational damage was happening big time for Trump. Right

0:10:50.600 --> 0:10:53.760
<v Speaker 1>the minute Trump touched the Kennedy Center got involved. Everybody

0:10:53.800 --> 0:10:58.880
<v Speaker 1>wanted out. The opera wanted out. People, every classical, anybody

0:10:59.520 --> 0:11:02.680
<v Speaker 1>with any level of integrity wanted in. The art community

0:11:02.720 --> 0:11:06.280
<v Speaker 1>wanted out. And it was humiliating the Kennedy Center. It

0:11:06.320 --> 0:11:15.000
<v Speaker 1>was humiliating Trump. Right. So Trump wasn't dominating the story.

0:11:15.040 --> 0:11:17.760
<v Speaker 1>He was losing control of it. So what does he do?

0:11:18.040 --> 0:11:20.840
<v Speaker 1>This is a classic Trump He flips the script. Instead

0:11:20.880 --> 0:11:23.320
<v Speaker 1>of having to deal with they're rejecting me, which is

0:11:23.320 --> 0:11:26.040
<v Speaker 1>what they are doing, it becomes I shut it down,

0:11:26.640 --> 0:11:29.920
<v Speaker 1>and instead of absorbing a thousand small acts of descent,

0:11:31.000 --> 0:11:35.680
<v Speaker 1>he creates one big spectacle. Instead of reputational damage accumulating quietly,

0:11:36.559 --> 0:11:39.360
<v Speaker 1>he centralizes the conflict and reframes it as Trump versus

0:11:39.400 --> 0:11:44.920
<v Speaker 1>the culture. Right, it's just simple spin, right, And notice

0:11:44.920 --> 0:11:46.800
<v Speaker 1>what happens when he does that, right, The story becomes

0:11:46.800 --> 0:11:49.120
<v Speaker 1>about Trump's power, Trump's move Trump's dominance.

0:11:49.160 --> 0:11:50.400
<v Speaker 2>Can he do it? Is it legal?

0:11:52.200 --> 0:11:56.640
<v Speaker 1>The stories of the cancelations fade, the accountability dissipates, and

0:11:56.720 --> 0:12:02.320
<v Speaker 1>the noise replaces the consequence. This matters because it's the

0:12:02.360 --> 0:12:05.520
<v Speaker 1>same dynamic we're seeing everywhere else, which brings me back

0:12:06.440 --> 0:12:07.040
<v Speaker 1>to Monday.

0:12:07.880 --> 0:12:08.120
<v Speaker 2>Right.

0:12:08.240 --> 0:12:11.079
<v Speaker 1>While George and the Kennedy Center sucked all the oxygen

0:12:11.080 --> 0:12:13.760
<v Speaker 1>out of the room early part of this week, the

0:12:13.800 --> 0:12:16.120
<v Speaker 1>story I walked through earlier in the week is already fading.

0:12:16.400 --> 0:12:19.760
<v Speaker 1>And that should worry us more because that story, the

0:12:19.800 --> 0:12:23.000
<v Speaker 1>fact that Donald Trump has turned America into a kleptocracy

0:12:23.320 --> 0:12:30.720
<v Speaker 1>for his personal enrichment, that's the story that ought to

0:12:30.720 --> 0:12:33.880
<v Speaker 1>be alarming everybody because he's already doing it, and he's

0:12:33.920 --> 0:12:37.079
<v Speaker 1>already done it. He has taken these payments, he has

0:12:37.200 --> 0:12:41.680
<v Speaker 1>enriched himself. This isn't he might he's thinking about. He's doing.

0:12:41.920 --> 0:12:45.080
<v Speaker 1>This is stuff he's done.

0:12:45.280 --> 0:12:45.679
<v Speaker 2>Okay.

0:12:46.080 --> 0:12:51.280
<v Speaker 1>Foreign sovereign wealth flowing into Trump linked enterprises, policy decisions,

0:12:51.400 --> 0:12:55.040
<v Speaker 1>especially around AI chips and crypto, suddenly aligning with the

0:12:55.080 --> 0:13:01.640
<v Speaker 1>private financial financial upside, pardons, permission, an access, all moving

0:13:01.640 --> 0:13:05.600
<v Speaker 1>in parallel, And as I said, the journal never says

0:13:05.600 --> 0:13:08.520
<v Speaker 1>it was a quid pro quo. But all you have

0:13:08.520 --> 0:13:11.480
<v Speaker 1>to do is look right. The modern corruption doesn't look

0:13:11.559 --> 0:13:14.520
<v Speaker 1>like a brown paper bag anymore. It looks like timing,

0:13:14.559 --> 0:13:18.600
<v Speaker 1>proximity and mutual benefit. Each step defensible on its own

0:13:18.760 --> 0:13:23.000
<v Speaker 1>and technically legal in some sort of byzantine way of

0:13:23.040 --> 0:13:26.520
<v Speaker 1>looking at it, but it is damning when taken together,

0:13:28.040 --> 0:13:31.559
<v Speaker 1>and it is illegal when you realize it's being done

0:13:31.600 --> 0:13:33.719
<v Speaker 1>by the president of the United States, and violation of

0:13:33.760 --> 0:13:37.080
<v Speaker 1>the Constitution. And here's the moment that really sort of

0:13:37.120 --> 0:13:40.200
<v Speaker 1>crystallized all this for me. So on Tuesday morning, I

0:13:40.240 --> 0:13:46.200
<v Speaker 1>was scanning my usual mountain of newsletters right bias. You know,

0:13:46.400 --> 0:13:48.439
<v Speaker 1>lots of good ones out there, lots of mediocre ones,

0:13:48.440 --> 0:13:50.800
<v Speaker 1>but I read a lot of them good faith actors,

0:13:50.800 --> 0:13:54.800
<v Speaker 1>smart people, outlets that are deeply focused on democratic norms.

0:13:55.520 --> 0:13:58.080
<v Speaker 1>And the foreign policy story was gone from a couple

0:13:58.080 --> 0:14:00.000
<v Speaker 1>of them that I was shocked to see it gone

0:14:00.040 --> 0:14:03.920
<v Speaker 1>on from. But the election rhetoric that was everywhere, the

0:14:03.960 --> 0:14:08.720
<v Speaker 1>midterm anxiety that was dominant. I mean, my friend Bill Crystal,

0:14:08.760 --> 0:14:12.040
<v Speaker 1>who does the Morning Shots newsletter for the Bullwork on Tuesday,

0:14:12.120 --> 0:14:14.880
<v Speaker 1>not a single mention of this Wall Street Journal story anymore. Look,

0:14:14.920 --> 0:14:17.479
<v Speaker 1>they did a lot on Monday, but they were obsessed

0:14:17.520 --> 0:14:22.120
<v Speaker 1>with the midterm issue. Ditto with playbook had nothing on

0:14:22.200 --> 0:14:26.840
<v Speaker 1>that had a slew on the midterm issue. We all

0:14:26.880 --> 0:14:30.640
<v Speaker 1>know how this stuff, right. Some stuff travels more, some

0:14:30.680 --> 0:14:34.920
<v Speaker 1>stuff rides the algorithm right, and the way the independent

0:14:34.960 --> 0:14:42.600
<v Speaker 1>media landscape works, a lot of editorial folks examine what's

0:14:42.720 --> 0:14:45.640
<v Speaker 1>getting attention what isn't, and they may lean more heavily

0:14:45.680 --> 0:14:48.160
<v Speaker 1>on the stories that are getting more traction, even if

0:14:48.160 --> 0:14:51.680
<v Speaker 1>there are other stories that are arguably more important. And

0:14:51.720 --> 0:14:53.480
<v Speaker 1>I'm not calling it. I don't think that's bad faith.

0:14:53.560 --> 0:14:56.520
<v Speaker 1>I don't think it's corruption. But it is sort of

0:14:56.520 --> 0:15:00.240
<v Speaker 1>how our information ecosystem is kind of doing exactly what

0:15:00.240 --> 0:15:02.880
<v Speaker 1>it's designed to do. It rewards stories that are visually

0:15:02.920 --> 0:15:07.240
<v Speaker 1>immediate and emotionally legible and quietly pushes aside stories that

0:15:07.280 --> 0:15:11.520
<v Speaker 1>are technical, slow and complicated it and might not be

0:15:11.560 --> 0:15:16.120
<v Speaker 1>as gripping to as large enough of an audience. And

0:15:16.160 --> 0:15:21.960
<v Speaker 1>that's exactly why the story of the creation of the

0:15:21.960 --> 0:15:26.640
<v Speaker 1>American kleptocracy is much more dangerous. So it brings me

0:15:26.680 --> 0:15:28.600
<v Speaker 1>back to the anxiety question and something I want to

0:15:28.600 --> 0:15:30.920
<v Speaker 1>be very clear about. As alarmed as we all are

0:15:31.040 --> 0:15:33.040
<v Speaker 1>by some of Trump's rhetoric and by the sense that

0:15:33.040 --> 0:15:35.800
<v Speaker 1>there are no guardrails left. The truth is a bit

0:15:35.840 --> 0:15:39.640
<v Speaker 1>more complicated, because what's interesting is every time we lament

0:15:39.720 --> 0:15:43.920
<v Speaker 1>this idea that there are no guardrails, you start to

0:15:43.960 --> 0:15:46.600
<v Speaker 1>see that some of them do work, not all of them,

0:15:47.160 --> 0:15:50.600
<v Speaker 1>not consistently, but some of them some of the time.

0:15:52.160 --> 0:15:54.800
<v Speaker 1>And it's interesting for us to realize when they do

0:15:54.880 --> 0:15:57.600
<v Speaker 1>work and when they don't work, and understanding which ones

0:15:57.640 --> 0:16:00.560
<v Speaker 1>work and why is the difference, I think, between whether

0:16:00.600 --> 0:16:03.120
<v Speaker 1>you should panic and whether you should view it as

0:16:03.120 --> 0:16:06.560
<v Speaker 1>some sort of strategy. So let me give you two examples. First,

0:16:06.560 --> 0:16:12.480
<v Speaker 1>there's Minneapolis after the killing of two Americans, and let's

0:16:12.520 --> 0:16:15.640
<v Speaker 1>just say it took two American deaths for Trump to

0:16:15.680 --> 0:16:18.160
<v Speaker 1>do this. Trump did something almost never does rhetorically.

0:16:18.160 --> 0:16:18.640
<v Speaker 2>He back down.

0:16:20.280 --> 0:16:23.760
<v Speaker 1>He sat down with Senate Democrats, he negotiated, He accepted

0:16:24.040 --> 0:16:27.080
<v Speaker 1>the premise that they were going to shut down the

0:16:27.080 --> 0:16:29.320
<v Speaker 1>government if he didn't negotiate constraints on ice.

0:16:29.640 --> 0:16:33.400
<v Speaker 2>And he said, okay, right.

0:16:33.320 --> 0:16:36.840
<v Speaker 1>Here's a guy that his critics consistently say, you know,

0:16:36.960 --> 0:16:39.560
<v Speaker 1>doesn't listen to anything. There's no and he did on

0:16:39.640 --> 0:16:42.880
<v Speaker 1>this one. So why was it because of norms? No,

0:16:43.240 --> 0:16:45.360
<v Speaker 1>we know he doesn't care about norms. Was it because

0:16:45.360 --> 0:16:50.760
<v Speaker 1>someone made a better constitutional argument to him, sorry? Or

0:16:50.840 --> 0:16:53.760
<v Speaker 1>was it because the political costs suddenly became undeniable even

0:16:53.800 --> 0:17:00.640
<v Speaker 1>for Trump? Right, public opinion has shifted dramatically on this issue.

0:17:00.960 --> 0:17:04.199
<v Speaker 1>Republicans got nervous. The backlash wasn't abstract anymore, and it

0:17:04.240 --> 0:17:06.560
<v Speaker 1>wasn't just coming from Democrats that owned the Libs. It

0:17:06.600 --> 0:17:11.280
<v Speaker 1>was measurable, and Trump does respond to measurable pain, at

0:17:11.400 --> 0:17:12.879
<v Speaker 1>least political pain in poling.

0:17:13.960 --> 0:17:14.639
<v Speaker 2>Look at the FED.

0:17:15.680 --> 0:17:18.879
<v Speaker 1>We heard all the noise, the threats, the posturing, and

0:17:18.920 --> 0:17:23.920
<v Speaker 1>then the choice came down to it. He picked Kevin Walsh, conventional,

0:17:24.600 --> 0:17:30.040
<v Speaker 1>even market reassuring pick. He didn't pick a sickophan, a

0:17:30.040 --> 0:17:33.959
<v Speaker 1>guy like Kevin Hassett, who might have been somebody who

0:17:34.000 --> 0:17:38.320
<v Speaker 1>would have just yes, you know, been a yes man

0:17:38.359 --> 0:17:40.959
<v Speaker 1>for whatever Trump wanted on interest rates. So why did

0:17:40.960 --> 0:17:44.480
<v Speaker 1>he do that? Well, one guardrail. He does seem to

0:17:44.480 --> 0:17:48.680
<v Speaker 1>care about our markets, right, and he cares about what

0:17:48.800 --> 0:17:51.520
<v Speaker 1>some donors think, his donors, and he certainly cares about

0:17:51.520 --> 0:17:54.399
<v Speaker 1>what the elites that he interacts with think. So the

0:17:54.480 --> 0:17:57.200
<v Speaker 1>guardrail wasn't the idea of FED independence. It was the

0:17:57.320 --> 0:18:01.000
<v Speaker 1>risk of immediate, tangible financial consequences for him and his friends.

0:18:03.160 --> 0:18:06.320
<v Speaker 1>So it's an interesting pattern that you've watched over. It's like,

0:18:06.440 --> 0:18:09.280
<v Speaker 1>every once in a while he responds to a guardrail,

0:18:09.320 --> 0:18:12.680
<v Speaker 1>but it's never that for the reason you want him

0:18:12.680 --> 0:18:15.560
<v Speaker 1>to respond to a guardrail. It's for usually some sort

0:18:15.600 --> 0:18:19.480
<v Speaker 1>of personal cost and personal nervousness. So it does seem

0:18:19.480 --> 0:18:23.240
<v Speaker 1>as if Trump accepts pushback when when three conditions are met. First,

0:18:23.280 --> 0:18:27.080
<v Speaker 1>the cost is immediate, it's not theoretical, it's not long term,

0:18:27.119 --> 0:18:33.479
<v Speaker 1>it's immediate. Second, the backlash is something he sees poll numbers,

0:18:34.040 --> 0:18:38.320
<v Speaker 1>market drops, donor anger, maybe even a ratings issue. Right,

0:18:38.400 --> 0:18:43.200
<v Speaker 1>it's not an editorial, it's not a whole bunch of statements, right.

0:18:44.680 --> 0:18:49.560
<v Speaker 1>And if the pressure is across the board, right, lots

0:18:49.600 --> 0:18:53.000
<v Speaker 1>of people and lots of different parts of his life going, hey,

0:18:53.280 --> 0:18:54.040
<v Speaker 1>are you sure about this?

0:18:54.040 --> 0:18:56.880
<v Speaker 2>Are you sure about this? Are you sure about this? Right?

0:18:57.200 --> 0:19:01.000
<v Speaker 1>It's why he seemed to back down a bit on Minneapolis.

0:19:01.000 --> 0:19:02.040
<v Speaker 1>And I know some of you're going to say he

0:19:02.040 --> 0:19:04.480
<v Speaker 1>hasn't back down that much, But for Trump, he's back down.

0:19:05.160 --> 0:19:06.200
<v Speaker 2>Right. What happened?

0:19:06.240 --> 0:19:08.879
<v Speaker 1>You had Republicans saying, oh, whoall this went too far.

0:19:10.440 --> 0:19:11.200
<v Speaker 2>The same with the FED.

0:19:14.280 --> 0:19:17.679
<v Speaker 1>But all those reasons are also explained why it's so

0:19:17.840 --> 0:19:24.400
<v Speaker 1>hard for the formn policy monetization story to get legs.

0:19:25.119 --> 0:19:28.320
<v Speaker 1>Because it fails those three tests, the costs are delayed.

0:19:28.520 --> 0:19:32.840
<v Speaker 1>We won't see the impact of selling out American form policy,

0:19:32.960 --> 0:19:35.639
<v Speaker 1>creating loopholes for China to catch up. We won't know

0:19:35.680 --> 0:19:39.840
<v Speaker 1>this until after it's too late. The consequences are on

0:19:39.880 --> 0:19:43.080
<v Speaker 1>a spreadsheet, and none of us like to read spreadsheets.

0:19:44.200 --> 0:19:47.200
<v Speaker 1>And of course the backlash is a bit fragmented. There's

0:19:47.200 --> 0:19:50.359
<v Speaker 1>no market crash, there's no single dramatic moment, there's no

0:19:50.440 --> 0:19:54.600
<v Speaker 1>image on cable news. Just a slow monetization of power,

0:19:55.000 --> 0:19:57.000
<v Speaker 1>and we see it. We see it almost every week

0:19:57.040 --> 0:19:59.720
<v Speaker 1>when he signs, when he releases the list of people

0:19:59.720 --> 0:20:01.760
<v Speaker 1>he's and you start to go through it and you

0:20:01.800 --> 0:20:04.840
<v Speaker 1>realize most of them were represented by friends of Trump,

0:20:04.880 --> 0:20:09.880
<v Speaker 1>and he just was monetizing, helping them win fees from

0:20:09.920 --> 0:20:17.160
<v Speaker 1>these rich crooks. And it also explains why I'm less

0:20:17.200 --> 0:20:19.960
<v Speaker 1>worried about Trump's election rhetoric than i am about what

0:20:20.000 --> 0:20:23.480
<v Speaker 1>he's doing in form policing. Elections in the United States

0:20:23.520 --> 0:20:27.080
<v Speaker 1>are decentralized by design, States run them counties, administer. The

0:20:28.359 --> 0:20:32.560
<v Speaker 1>diffusion isn't a weakness, it's actually a firewall.

0:20:32.760 --> 0:20:32.960
<v Speaker 2>Right.

0:20:33.000 --> 0:20:37.400
<v Speaker 1>Trump doesn't control it. Republicans quietly know he can't override

0:20:37.440 --> 0:20:42.200
<v Speaker 1>it without detonating their own power. They can't do it.

0:20:42.600 --> 0:20:45.480
<v Speaker 1>They'd have to pass Acts of Congress. There's so many

0:20:45.560 --> 0:20:48.600
<v Speaker 1>different ways in order to make this happen. It's for

0:20:48.680 --> 0:20:52.000
<v Speaker 1>it to happen, the Republican Republic would essentially have to collapse.

0:20:52.240 --> 0:20:56.439
<v Speaker 1>We'd have to suspend the Constitution, and we're not and

0:20:56.520 --> 0:21:01.400
<v Speaker 1>he doesn't have that kind of power. Ironically, I think politically,

0:21:01.840 --> 0:21:06.399
<v Speaker 1>every time Trump muses about interfering with elections, he doesn't

0:21:06.440 --> 0:21:09.320
<v Speaker 1>suppress turnout, which I know is a fear some people have.

0:21:09.920 --> 0:21:10.679
<v Speaker 2>He fuels it.

0:21:11.880 --> 0:21:16.159
<v Speaker 1>He energizes opposition voters, he repels swing voters who just

0:21:16.240 --> 0:21:19.600
<v Speaker 1>want to get rid of the chaos, and he deepened

0:21:19.600 --> 0:21:22.359
<v Speaker 1>cynicism among his own base. So if you were trying

0:21:22.359 --> 0:21:27.480
<v Speaker 1>to design the dumbest possible strategy heading into the midterm election,

0:21:28.119 --> 0:21:30.080
<v Speaker 1>you'd be hard pressed to beat the one Trump is

0:21:30.119 --> 0:21:33.760
<v Speaker 1>doing right now. Talk about if you're on the Democratic

0:21:33.800 --> 0:21:35.840
<v Speaker 1>side of the aisle, you should want him talking about this.

0:21:36.040 --> 0:21:38.600
<v Speaker 1>All it does is make it saved you money on

0:21:38.680 --> 0:21:40.960
<v Speaker 1>get out the vote. Donald Trump is going to get

0:21:40.960 --> 0:21:43.040
<v Speaker 1>your base out to vote. And then he's sending a

0:21:43.080 --> 0:21:45.760
<v Speaker 1>message that he thinks the whole thing is rigged anyway,

0:21:46.040 --> 0:21:47.840
<v Speaker 1>and he's sending a message to his own base that,

0:21:48.000 --> 0:21:50.400
<v Speaker 1>you know, maybe he's sort of winking and nodding, don't worry,

0:21:50.400 --> 0:21:51.760
<v Speaker 1>I'll rig it. So it doesn't matter.

0:21:52.200 --> 0:21:53.160
<v Speaker 2>They're not going to show up.

0:21:56.800 --> 0:21:59.639
<v Speaker 1>So, yes, the rhetoric's extraordinarily dangerous and I don't want

0:21:59.680 --> 0:22:05.360
<v Speaker 1>to miss it, but it is institutionally constrained and politically

0:22:05.520 --> 0:22:10.639
<v Speaker 1>incredibly self defeating. That's not the case with this foreign

0:22:10.640 --> 0:22:14.560
<v Speaker 1>policy story. Congress is supposed to be the check here.

0:22:14.680 --> 0:22:16.320
<v Speaker 1>The voters are never going to be the check.

0:22:16.200 --> 0:22:16.800
<v Speaker 2>On this story.

0:22:17.440 --> 0:22:18.919
<v Speaker 1>It's going to take them a while to get it.

0:22:20.200 --> 0:22:22.879
<v Speaker 1>This Congress has shown no interest in investigating the leader of

0:22:22.880 --> 0:22:26.399
<v Speaker 1>their own party, so that story is just going to

0:22:26.480 --> 0:22:30.159
<v Speaker 1>keep going. He's going to keep selling foreign policy decisions

0:22:30.240 --> 0:22:36.000
<v Speaker 1>to the highest bidder. Sometimes he'll do it right out

0:22:36.000 --> 0:22:38.000
<v Speaker 1>in the open. Sometimes they'll do it quietly. I mean

0:22:38.440 --> 0:22:40.800
<v Speaker 1>times it feels like Venezuela, and the oil is he's

0:22:40.840 --> 0:22:44.000
<v Speaker 1>just doing it right out in the open. Most of

0:22:44.000 --> 0:22:48.520
<v Speaker 1>this he'll do out of view. So The point is this, No,

0:22:48.760 --> 0:22:54.760
<v Speaker 1>I don't think the country's collapsing tomorrow, and no, I

0:22:54.760 --> 0:23:01.080
<v Speaker 1>don't think elections are going to get canceled twenty six,

0:23:02.400 --> 0:23:04.320
<v Speaker 1>But I do think we're watching something more subtle and

0:23:04.359 --> 0:23:10.399
<v Speaker 1>more corrosive. Democracies don't usually fall from who's they actually erode.

0:23:10.600 --> 0:23:13.680
<v Speaker 1>They look more like what happened, what's happening in Turkey,

0:23:14.160 --> 0:23:21.960
<v Speaker 1>what's happening in Hungary. They erode when corruption becomes complicated, normalized,

0:23:22.440 --> 0:23:28.520
<v Speaker 1>and easier to ignore than the latest outrage, cultural outrage.

0:23:29.119 --> 0:23:30.120
<v Speaker 2>You know, bad bunny.

0:23:30.480 --> 0:23:32.920
<v Speaker 1>You know, pay attention to bad Bunny, but don't pay

0:23:32.960 --> 0:23:37.240
<v Speaker 1>attention to the selling out of American foreign policy. So

0:23:37.280 --> 0:23:41.520
<v Speaker 1>what Trump does say threatens democracy symbolically, but what Trump

0:23:41.560 --> 0:23:47.119
<v Speaker 1>does corrodes it materially. And our information ecosystem, whether it

0:23:48.080 --> 0:23:52.000
<v Speaker 1>intends to or not, keep steering us towards the loudest,

0:23:52.320 --> 0:23:56.840
<v Speaker 1>scariest stories while the most consequential ones fade in the background.

0:23:58.040 --> 0:24:00.679
<v Speaker 1>That's the real danger. It's not the panic, it's not

0:24:00.760 --> 0:24:06.880
<v Speaker 1>the calm. It's miss placed attention and mist placed concern.

0:24:08.600 --> 0:24:10.360
<v Speaker 1>There used to be a publication out there that once

0:24:10.400 --> 0:24:17.159
<v Speaker 1>reminded us democracy dies in darkness, But sometimes that darkness

0:24:17.920 --> 0:24:22.600
<v Speaker 1>is also noisy, and the democracy can die in a

0:24:22.600 --> 0:24:29.280
<v Speaker 1>lot of distraction and noise. Do you hate hangovers, We'll

0:24:29.320 --> 0:24:31.639
<v Speaker 1>say goodbye to hangovers. Out of Office gives you the

0:24:31.680 --> 0:24:34.600
<v Speaker 1>social buzz without the next day regret. Their best selling

0:24:34.600 --> 0:24:36.840
<v Speaker 1>out of Office gummies were designed to provide a mild,

0:24:36.880 --> 0:24:40.680
<v Speaker 1>relaxing buzz, boost your mood, and enhance creativity and relaxation.

0:24:40.920 --> 0:24:43.280
<v Speaker 1>With five different strengths, you can tailor the dose to

0:24:43.320 --> 0:24:46.600
<v Speaker 1>fit your vibe. From a gentle one point five milligram

0:24:46.640 --> 0:24:50.560
<v Speaker 1>micro doose to their newest fifteen milligram gummy for a

0:24:50.600 --> 0:24:54.600
<v Speaker 1>more elevated experience. Their THHC beverages and gummies are a modern,

0:24:54.720 --> 0:24:57.960
<v Speaker 1>mindful alternative to a glass of wine or a cocktail.

0:24:58.040 --> 0:25:00.399
<v Speaker 1>And I'll tell you this, I've given up booze. I

0:25:00.480 --> 0:25:04.560
<v Speaker 1>don't like the hangovers. I prefer the gummy experience. Soul

0:25:04.680 --> 0:25:07.000
<v Speaker 1>is a wellness brand that believes feeling good should be

0:25:07.160 --> 0:25:10.920
<v Speaker 1>fun and easy. Soul specializes in delicious HEMP derived THHC

0:25:10.960 --> 0:25:13.919
<v Speaker 1>and CBD products, all designed to boost your mood and

0:25:14.280 --> 0:25:16.960
<v Speaker 1>simply help you unwind so if you struggle to switch

0:25:17.000 --> 0:25:19.359
<v Speaker 1>off at night. Sol also has a variety of products

0:25:19.400 --> 0:25:22.120
<v Speaker 1>specifically designed to just simply help you get a better

0:25:22.200 --> 0:25:25.480
<v Speaker 1>night's sleep, including their top selling sleepy gummies. It's a

0:25:25.480 --> 0:25:28.840
<v Speaker 1>fan favorite for deep restorative sleep. So bring on the

0:25:28.840 --> 0:25:31.880
<v Speaker 1>good vibes and treat yourself to Soul today. Right now,

0:25:32.040 --> 0:25:35.920
<v Speaker 1>Soul is offering my audience thirty percent off your entire order.

0:25:36.160 --> 0:25:38.840
<v Speaker 1>So go to get sold dot Com use the promo

0:25:38.880 --> 0:25:42.640
<v Speaker 1>code toodcast. Don't forget that code. That's get sold dot

0:25:42.640 --> 0:25:50.680
<v Speaker 1>Com promo code toodcast for thirty percent off. I'm going

0:25:50.760 --> 0:25:57.280
<v Speaker 1>to the Census and a little bit of a riff

0:25:57.320 --> 0:25:59.879
<v Speaker 1>as there's some new Sensus updates went around in there

0:26:00.080 --> 0:26:03.960
<v Speaker 1>a new round of panic among Democrats and liberals about

0:26:03.960 --> 0:26:10.520
<v Speaker 1>how the electoral college map in twenty thirty two after

0:26:10.560 --> 0:26:13.760
<v Speaker 1>the twenty thirty census is going to become a disaster

0:26:13.840 --> 0:26:18.480
<v Speaker 1>for the Democrats because the power shift essentially, you know,

0:26:18.560 --> 0:26:23.680
<v Speaker 1>the Democrats. You know, had Kamala Harris simply carried Pennsylvania, Wisconsin,

0:26:25.960 --> 0:26:29.200
<v Speaker 1>and Michigan in addition all the other states she carried,

0:26:29.200 --> 0:26:31.320
<v Speaker 1>she'd have been right at two hundred and seventy by

0:26:31.359 --> 0:26:35.679
<v Speaker 1>twenty thirty two. The same configuration of states would have

0:26:35.680 --> 0:26:38.080
<v Speaker 1>only gotten her to two hundred and fifty nine electoral votes.

0:26:38.440 --> 0:26:41.359
<v Speaker 1>So basically, Democrats in the next census are going to

0:26:41.400 --> 0:26:45.639
<v Speaker 1>lose a dozen base electoral votes, which means the Republican

0:26:45.680 --> 0:26:48.280
<v Speaker 1>floor is going to go up about a dozen votes.

0:26:49.240 --> 0:26:53.680
<v Speaker 1>Just to give you some technical numbers, Essentially, you've got

0:26:53.960 --> 0:26:59.879
<v Speaker 1>Republican states Florida, Texas, Idaho, Utah that collectively are going

0:26:59.920 --> 0:27:06.200
<v Speaker 1>to net anywhere from say ten to twelve congressional districts,

0:27:06.200 --> 0:27:09.879
<v Speaker 1>which means electoral votes. And then you will have a

0:27:09.880 --> 0:27:13.200
<v Speaker 1>bunch of losses in the blue based states. Right, California

0:27:13.600 --> 0:27:16.200
<v Speaker 1>in New York collectively are going to lose eight to nine.

0:27:16.760 --> 0:27:18.879
<v Speaker 1>Throw in Illinois's going to lose another two, and then

0:27:18.920 --> 0:27:21.720
<v Speaker 1>you're going to lose one each from Oregon and Minnesota.

0:27:21.880 --> 0:27:23.640
<v Speaker 1>Never mind some of the swing states that you're gonna

0:27:23.640 --> 0:27:26.520
<v Speaker 1>see somerom shifts in. Right, Pennsylvania, Michigan, and Wisconsin each

0:27:26.560 --> 0:27:29.400
<v Speaker 1>lose one, but North Carolina, Arizona, and Georgia will each

0:27:29.480 --> 0:27:32.879
<v Speaker 1>gain one. So in that sense, the swing states the

0:27:32.960 --> 0:27:36.239
<v Speaker 1>numbers are going to be the same, but it is

0:27:36.280 --> 0:27:38.560
<v Speaker 1>going to mean that the Blue wall is not going

0:27:38.600 --> 0:27:41.360
<v Speaker 1>to be the important thing. It's the Sunbelt purple wall

0:27:41.359 --> 0:27:44.880
<v Speaker 1>that's going to matter. More of Georgia, North Carolina, Arizona

0:27:45.000 --> 0:27:48.600
<v Speaker 1>are going to be at least as important, if not

0:27:48.640 --> 0:27:53.520
<v Speaker 1>more important, than the trio of Pennsylvania, Wisconsin, in Michigan.

0:27:56.000 --> 0:27:59.080
<v Speaker 1>But that's just if you're sitting there, assuming the map

0:27:59.240 --> 0:28:03.399
<v Speaker 1>is what it is. Political parties are supposed to be

0:28:03.520 --> 0:28:08.359
<v Speaker 1>dynamic organizations, and they, based on investments, can can try

0:28:08.440 --> 0:28:12.760
<v Speaker 1>to take a base state from the other party and

0:28:12.800 --> 0:28:14.840
<v Speaker 1>turn it into a swing state. Take a swing state

0:28:14.880 --> 0:28:16.359
<v Speaker 1>and try to turn it into a base state.

0:28:16.480 --> 0:28:16.680
<v Speaker 2>Right.

0:28:16.960 --> 0:28:20.520
<v Speaker 1>Virginia and Colorado Democrats successfully took what were swing states

0:28:20.520 --> 0:28:23.800
<v Speaker 1>and turn them into base states. Arguably, Republicans Florida and

0:28:23.840 --> 0:28:27.400
<v Speaker 1>Ohio took what was swing states and turned them into

0:28:27.400 --> 0:28:28.080
<v Speaker 1>base states.

0:28:28.640 --> 0:28:29.160
<v Speaker 2>Right, So.

0:28:31.400 --> 0:28:34.479
<v Speaker 1>Political parties, right, you've got right Now, Republicans would love

0:28:34.520 --> 0:28:36.879
<v Speaker 1>to take a swing state like Minnesota and see or

0:28:37.000 --> 0:28:38.920
<v Speaker 1>a lean blue state like Minnesota and see if they

0:28:38.960 --> 0:28:41.520
<v Speaker 1>can turn it into a swing state. Democrats have been

0:28:41.520 --> 0:28:45.240
<v Speaker 1>amusing about the idea of taking Texas and making it

0:28:45.280 --> 0:28:51.560
<v Speaker 1>a swing state, but now the project is more acute

0:28:51.560 --> 0:28:54.800
<v Speaker 1>than ever for the Democrats. Now, look, I'm going to

0:28:54.840 --> 0:28:57.640
<v Speaker 1>make one tangent real quick because those of you that

0:28:58.560 --> 0:29:00.720
<v Speaker 1>read me closely and listen to me closely. Know, I'm

0:29:00.720 --> 0:29:03.920
<v Speaker 1>obsessed that the easiest way to fix this electoral You

0:29:03.920 --> 0:29:05.440
<v Speaker 1>know that one of the ways we need to fix

0:29:05.480 --> 0:29:10.360
<v Speaker 1>the electoral college unfairness is to not have a constitutional

0:29:10.400 --> 0:29:13.120
<v Speaker 1>amendment but simply expand the House to the size that

0:29:13.160 --> 0:29:15.560
<v Speaker 1>the founders intended it to be. Right, it is no

0:29:15.640 --> 0:29:18.560
<v Speaker 1>longer a representative democracy we have now. We now have

0:29:18.880 --> 0:29:21.280
<v Speaker 1>every congressional districts the size of a major city, with

0:29:21.280 --> 0:29:25.160
<v Speaker 1>about eight hundred thousand. They're too big, They don't they

0:29:25.160 --> 0:29:29.160
<v Speaker 1>are not representative of communities of interest anymore. They're simply

0:29:29.200 --> 0:29:34.240
<v Speaker 1>dominated by the most powerful faction within each of these

0:29:34.280 --> 0:29:37.720
<v Speaker 1>congressional districts, and so they're not doing what the founders intended.

0:29:39.640 --> 0:29:42.560
<v Speaker 1>The House of Representatives was supposed to expand with the

0:29:42.600 --> 0:29:46.120
<v Speaker 1>population of the country, and they did this every decade

0:29:46.200 --> 0:29:49.040
<v Speaker 1>until nineteen twenty when there was a dispute between the

0:29:49.040 --> 0:29:51.080
<v Speaker 1>two parties and then they locked it in at four

0:29:51.160 --> 0:29:54.880
<v Speaker 1>hundred and thirty five. That is now why you feel

0:29:54.920 --> 0:29:57.600
<v Speaker 1>like you live in a congressional district, likely where you

0:29:57.600 --> 0:29:59.720
<v Speaker 1>feel like your member of Congress doesn't really represent the

0:29:59.800 --> 0:30:03.160
<v Speaker 1>day strict. They either represent to liberal part of the

0:30:03.440 --> 0:30:06.800
<v Speaker 1>of the district over they sort of overrepresent the liberal

0:30:06.800 --> 0:30:11.040
<v Speaker 1>part or overrepresent the conservative part. But there's but it

0:30:11.080 --> 0:30:16.920
<v Speaker 1>doesn't feel like anybody represents right the district as a whole.

0:30:17.000 --> 0:30:20.200
<v Speaker 1>So I want to set that tangent aside. So if

0:30:20.200 --> 0:30:23.080
<v Speaker 1>you're the DNC and you're and you have leadership that

0:30:23.160 --> 0:30:26.120
<v Speaker 1>is thinking beyond tomorrow, and I don't know if that's

0:30:26.160 --> 0:30:28.320
<v Speaker 1>the case, I say it. I'm not trying to be snarky,

0:30:28.840 --> 0:30:34.120
<v Speaker 1>but you know, leaders of political parties are like general

0:30:34.160 --> 0:30:38.800
<v Speaker 1>managers for sports teams. The fan base expects immediate results.

0:30:39.280 --> 0:30:42.080
<v Speaker 1>They are not interested in you building a foundation that

0:30:42.120 --> 0:30:45.440
<v Speaker 1>pays dividends in eight years, because that general manager won't

0:30:45.440 --> 0:30:48.280
<v Speaker 1>even be there in eight years, just like that political

0:30:48.320 --> 0:30:50.520
<v Speaker 1>party leader won't be there in eight years. So it

0:30:50.600 --> 0:30:54.800
<v Speaker 1>is the incentive structures are messed up. But that doesn't

0:30:54.840 --> 0:30:58.680
<v Speaker 1>mean there aren't other outside entities that should be thinking

0:30:58.720 --> 0:31:01.840
<v Speaker 1>about the following, which is, if the Democrats are suddenly

0:31:02.600 --> 0:31:07.000
<v Speaker 1>have an electoral college majority problem, then they need to

0:31:07.040 --> 0:31:09.360
<v Speaker 1>design what I call a project twenty to thirty two

0:31:10.120 --> 0:31:14.080
<v Speaker 1>and decide they've got to put eight to ten They've

0:31:14.080 --> 0:31:17.960
<v Speaker 1>got to invest in eight to ten states, and about

0:31:18.000 --> 0:31:20.000
<v Speaker 1>half of them are swing states that they've got to

0:31:20.040 --> 0:31:24.959
<v Speaker 1>attempt to make more reliably blue and or red states

0:31:25.000 --> 0:31:28.040
<v Speaker 1>that they can put into the competitive category. They have

0:31:28.160 --> 0:31:31.200
<v Speaker 1>got to expand the map, even though it doesn't look

0:31:31.240 --> 0:31:35.720
<v Speaker 1>obvious that they can expand the map, so that long

0:31:35.880 --> 0:31:40.360
<v Speaker 1>wind up is designed. So if project with twenty thirty

0:31:40.360 --> 0:31:43.720
<v Speaker 1>two's presidential election in mind, with the new map that

0:31:43.760 --> 0:31:47.720
<v Speaker 1>we'll have, then I give you the top five list

0:31:48.000 --> 0:31:51.880
<v Speaker 1>of states that the Democrats should be targeting now in

0:31:51.960 --> 0:31:57.720
<v Speaker 1>an effort to keep them competitive on in the electoral

0:31:58.360 --> 0:32:09.840
<v Speaker 1>college going forward. Top top because the political power that

0:32:09.880 --> 0:32:13.240
<v Speaker 1>California and New York, that sort of floor of support

0:32:13.320 --> 0:32:16.280
<v Speaker 1>that at times made it seem like the electoral college,

0:32:16.360 --> 0:32:18.440
<v Speaker 1>and this is something that always is cyclical. At times

0:32:18.440 --> 0:32:20.640
<v Speaker 1>it looks like there's an advantage to the Democrats, at

0:32:20.640 --> 0:32:24.520
<v Speaker 1>times looks like there's advantage to Republicans. Really it usually

0:32:24.600 --> 0:32:29.480
<v Speaker 1>is who's winning the middle more often, right is, and

0:32:29.520 --> 0:32:32.000
<v Speaker 1>who's got the larger base, And right now Republicans have

0:32:32.040 --> 0:32:35.840
<v Speaker 1>a slightly larger base than the Democrats. So with that

0:32:35.920 --> 0:32:39.320
<v Speaker 1>in mind, I'm going to give you my top five

0:32:39.400 --> 0:32:43.920
<v Speaker 1>lists of states that the Democrats have to invest in

0:32:44.000 --> 0:32:46.680
<v Speaker 1>either because they need to try to make that state

0:32:46.800 --> 0:32:51.760
<v Speaker 1>more reliably competitive, or they need to try to take

0:32:51.760 --> 0:32:53.880
<v Speaker 1>a state and make it competitive.

0:32:53.360 --> 0:32:54.120
<v Speaker 2>In the first place.

0:32:54.600 --> 0:32:56.800
<v Speaker 1>So number one on the list is North Carolina. North

0:32:56.840 --> 0:32:58.800
<v Speaker 1>Carolina by twenty thirty two is likely to be up

0:32:58.800 --> 0:33:04.280
<v Speaker 1>to seventeen electoral votes. It's arguably should you know, it

0:33:04.400 --> 0:33:08.400
<v Speaker 1>is trending the way we've seen with Georgia trending. It

0:33:08.480 --> 0:33:10.320
<v Speaker 1>is younger, it's a bit more diverse, but it hadn't

0:33:10.360 --> 0:33:14.080
<v Speaker 1>quite tipped yet, right, But it is one of the

0:33:14.160 --> 0:33:18.240
<v Speaker 1>highest education to growth ratios in the state. Right, it's

0:33:18.280 --> 0:33:22.280
<v Speaker 1>seven percent higher education than some of its neighbors. So

0:33:22.480 --> 0:33:25.840
<v Speaker 1>you know, here they've they've got Virginia as a light

0:33:25.920 --> 0:33:29.840
<v Speaker 1>blue state. Georgia is a model here. But North Carolina

0:33:29.880 --> 0:33:33.880
<v Speaker 1>they have multiple markets. Charlotte, Raleigh, Ashville can serve as

0:33:33.920 --> 0:33:38.200
<v Speaker 1>anchors there. But the bottom line is they've they've acted

0:33:38.200 --> 0:33:41.560
<v Speaker 1>while they are while they're competitive in North Carolina, they

0:33:41.640 --> 0:33:44.480
<v Speaker 1>usually come up short. Right, It's sort of what Minnesota

0:33:44.520 --> 0:33:48.520
<v Speaker 1>has been to the Republicans. And yes, Barack Obama carried

0:33:48.560 --> 0:33:51.600
<v Speaker 1>North Carolina once and in that one year they won

0:33:51.640 --> 0:33:53.720
<v Speaker 1>a Senate seat. And occasionally they win Senate seats just

0:33:53.800 --> 0:33:57.240
<v Speaker 1>like Republicans occasionally win statewide. In Minnesota, there seems to

0:33:57.280 --> 0:33:59.640
<v Speaker 1>be a hard cap of about forty eight percent in

0:33:59.680 --> 0:34:04.040
<v Speaker 1>most federal elections. Dido in Minnesota for the Republicans. Ditto

0:34:04.280 --> 0:34:06.680
<v Speaker 1>for that in North Carolina. They've got to change that.

0:34:07.000 --> 0:34:09.759
<v Speaker 1>And North Carolina has been a state that they you know,

0:34:09.840 --> 0:34:12.360
<v Speaker 1>it's always like, was on the periphery of targeting in

0:34:12.400 --> 0:34:14.840
<v Speaker 1>the swing state. Yeah, we're going to target North Carolina

0:34:14.920 --> 0:34:16.640
<v Speaker 1>the same way they would say, yeah, we might target

0:34:16.680 --> 0:34:19.720
<v Speaker 1>Florida back in twenty twelve and twenty sixteen, and sometimes

0:34:19.760 --> 0:34:20.120
<v Speaker 1>they didn't.

0:34:20.160 --> 0:34:20.920
<v Speaker 2>Sometimes they didn't.

0:34:21.280 --> 0:34:23.440
<v Speaker 1>Now they've got to treat North Carolina the same way

0:34:23.440 --> 0:34:26.480
<v Speaker 1>they treat Wisconsin and Michigan. It's got to be that

0:34:26.480 --> 0:34:30.480
<v Speaker 1>that sort of you know, it's got to be treated

0:34:30.520 --> 0:34:32.960
<v Speaker 1>on another level. So that's number one North Carolina. In

0:34:33.000 --> 0:34:36.319
<v Speaker 1>some ways, I don't know if a Democrat's going to

0:34:36.320 --> 0:34:40.279
<v Speaker 1>get elected president without carrying North Carolina and Georgia. At

0:34:40.280 --> 0:34:42.680
<v Speaker 1>the end of the day, you know, when you start

0:34:42.719 --> 0:34:45.239
<v Speaker 1>to look at this in the way trend's going in

0:34:45.280 --> 0:34:48.799
<v Speaker 1>the demographic makeup of the Democratic Party versus what we're

0:34:48.800 --> 0:34:52.040
<v Speaker 1>seeing in the Republican Party aging in smaller populations, I

0:34:52.120 --> 0:34:56.439
<v Speaker 1>suspect over time Pennsylvania, Wisconsin's going to start drifting right,

0:34:57.360 --> 0:35:02.359
<v Speaker 1>which means Democrats have to figure out how to turn Georgia, Arizona,

0:35:02.520 --> 0:35:06.719
<v Speaker 1>and North Carolina collectively into the new trio into their

0:35:07.239 --> 0:35:09.120
<v Speaker 1>You know, that's going to be the new wall, right.

0:35:09.160 --> 0:35:11.520
<v Speaker 1>It's either a red wall for the Republicans that Democrats

0:35:11.560 --> 0:35:16.759
<v Speaker 1>can't penetrate, or it becomes the building blocks of a

0:35:16.800 --> 0:35:20.400
<v Speaker 1>Sunbelt blue wall. But either way, the anchor of it

0:35:20.440 --> 0:35:24.920
<v Speaker 1>is likely North Carolina number two on that list. I

0:35:24.960 --> 0:35:27.279
<v Speaker 1>think of targeting is a bit of a reach state,

0:35:27.320 --> 0:35:33.160
<v Speaker 1>but it's Texas Texas more than Florida right now. It's

0:35:33.360 --> 0:35:36.120
<v Speaker 1>I think the trend lines in Florida for some demographic

0:35:36.200 --> 0:35:39.120
<v Speaker 1>reasons with the Latino population. In some ways, I think

0:35:39.200 --> 0:35:42.640
<v Speaker 1>Hispanics are more gettable for Democrats in Texas than Hispanics

0:35:42.640 --> 0:35:49.680
<v Speaker 1>are in Florida. They're more swing voter, swingy swing votery

0:35:49.920 --> 0:35:52.400
<v Speaker 1>in Texas than they are in South Florida. So I

0:35:52.440 --> 0:35:54.960
<v Speaker 1>think that when you start to just look at the numbers,

0:35:54.960 --> 0:35:57.440
<v Speaker 1>they're there. Texas is just getting a lot of new

0:35:57.440 --> 0:36:01.160
<v Speaker 1>residents and any just like how Florida transitioned in the

0:36:01.239 --> 0:36:05.600
<v Speaker 1>nineties from being a fairly reliable Republican state to becoming

0:36:05.600 --> 0:36:09.239
<v Speaker 1>a swing state. First Clinton carried it in ninety six,

0:36:09.280 --> 0:36:11.640
<v Speaker 1>and then of course it became the single most important

0:36:11.680 --> 0:36:15.480
<v Speaker 1>state in two thousand, in two thousand and four. That's

0:36:15.680 --> 0:36:18.880
<v Speaker 1>the sort of reasoning in rationale why Texas has to

0:36:18.880 --> 0:36:21.440
<v Speaker 1>be a focal point. And the fact is, rhetorically the

0:36:21.480 --> 0:36:24.000
<v Speaker 1>Democrats have talked about Texas for a long time. They've

0:36:24.000 --> 0:36:27.200
<v Speaker 1>never actually put their money where their mouth is. Maybe

0:36:27.200 --> 0:36:29.960
<v Speaker 1>this year's Senate race, if it's indeed competitive, if Ken

0:36:30.000 --> 0:36:34.319
<v Speaker 1>Paxton is the Republican nominee, that jump starts interest in it.

0:36:34.360 --> 0:36:38.920
<v Speaker 1>But I would argue regardless, they have to treat Texas

0:36:38.960 --> 0:36:41.319
<v Speaker 1>like a swing state even when it's not, in order

0:36:41.360 --> 0:36:46.239
<v Speaker 1>to get that state comfortable supporting a Democrat by twenty

0:36:46.280 --> 0:36:48.839
<v Speaker 1>thirty two. It's not going to happen overnight. And that's

0:36:48.880 --> 0:36:51.440
<v Speaker 1>why it's sort of like again, I go back, I have.

0:36:52.040 --> 0:36:54.040
<v Speaker 1>You know, it is hard to get political parties to

0:36:54.120 --> 0:36:57.839
<v Speaker 1>think more than a luncheon cycle ahead. That's not how

0:36:57.840 --> 0:37:01.320
<v Speaker 1>the incentives work. But when thinking this far in advance,

0:37:03.480 --> 0:37:05.680
<v Speaker 1>that's why Texas arguably is number two. Because it's going

0:37:05.760 --> 0:37:07.640
<v Speaker 1>to be very expensive, and it's going to be and

0:37:07.920 --> 0:37:08.479
<v Speaker 1>you just got.

0:37:08.400 --> 0:37:09.040
<v Speaker 2>To plot along.

0:37:09.680 --> 0:37:11.239
<v Speaker 1>Number three on my list is the state that I

0:37:11.280 --> 0:37:15.000
<v Speaker 1>talk about all the time that it's a head scratcher

0:37:15.080 --> 0:37:18.560
<v Speaker 1>to me that Democrats really don't focus on it, and

0:37:18.600 --> 0:37:19.480
<v Speaker 1>it's Kansas.

0:37:20.280 --> 0:37:20.680
<v Speaker 2>It is.

0:37:20.800 --> 0:37:27.200
<v Speaker 1>We've seen this now two different Democrat, two term Democratic

0:37:27.239 --> 0:37:30.560
<v Speaker 1>governors over the last you know, sixteen of the last

0:37:30.680 --> 0:37:34.040
<v Speaker 1>twenty four years have had Democratic governors, and they've won

0:37:34.200 --> 0:37:37.239
<v Speaker 1>due to Republican overreach, but they've also won because you've

0:37:37.280 --> 0:37:40.759
<v Speaker 1>seen you know, you have a growing you know, look,

0:37:40.800 --> 0:37:44.800
<v Speaker 1>the biggest sort of deno way to find out if

0:37:44.840 --> 0:37:49.040
<v Speaker 1>a state leans will inherently lean red or blue is

0:37:49.239 --> 0:37:51.920
<v Speaker 1>you know, the number of college grads. Well, Kansas is

0:37:51.960 --> 0:37:54.640
<v Speaker 1>one that in Kansas and Missouri are kind of going

0:37:54.640 --> 0:37:58.480
<v Speaker 1>in the opposite directions. You've got the growing suburbs of

0:37:58.560 --> 0:38:03.320
<v Speaker 1>Kansas City in Kansas that have taken have basically taken

0:38:03.360 --> 0:38:05.719
<v Speaker 1>what used to be a lean red district and turned

0:38:05.719 --> 0:38:09.720
<v Speaker 1>it into a lean blue district. Both what Chaton Topeka

0:38:09.800 --> 0:38:13.880
<v Speaker 1>are growing. You've got two big state schools in Lawrence

0:38:14.000 --> 0:38:18.120
<v Speaker 1>and in Manhattan, Kansas and Kansas State. And so when

0:38:18.160 --> 0:38:20.960
<v Speaker 1>you look at the sort of formula that Democrats have

0:38:21.920 --> 0:38:26.080
<v Speaker 1>used to succeed in places like Wisconsin or Michigan, or

0:38:26.200 --> 0:38:27.880
<v Speaker 1>let's see, smaller states are like Nevada.

0:38:28.200 --> 0:38:34.560
<v Speaker 2>I could I could argue that Kansas looks more like that.

0:38:36.640 --> 0:38:40.880
<v Speaker 1>Look there, I get the sort of the historical trends

0:38:40.880 --> 0:38:46.000
<v Speaker 1>of Kansas, but Kansas is not as you know, Yes,

0:38:46.000 --> 0:38:49.400
<v Speaker 1>there's MAGA in Kansas, but there's sort of this Kansas

0:38:49.400 --> 0:38:55.800
<v Speaker 1>Republican that is different than the MAGA makeup as well.

0:38:55.840 --> 0:39:00.279
<v Speaker 1>Where Missouri, you know, it's funny, Missouri feels more like

0:39:00.280 --> 0:39:03.560
<v Speaker 1>a southern state and Kansas feels more like a Midwestern state.

0:39:03.640 --> 0:39:06.280
<v Speaker 1>And Democrats, I think right now have a better shot,

0:39:06.520 --> 0:39:10.400
<v Speaker 1>particularly among white voters in the Kansas winning those folks

0:39:10.440 --> 0:39:14.320
<v Speaker 1>over than they do winning the white voters of Missouri

0:39:15.000 --> 0:39:17.480
<v Speaker 1>number four on the list. Very similar argument to North Carolina.

0:39:17.520 --> 0:39:18.080
<v Speaker 2>It's Georgia.

0:39:19.280 --> 0:39:20.719
<v Speaker 1>Georgia is a state that you know, we're going to

0:39:20.800 --> 0:39:23.960
<v Speaker 1>find out in twenty twenty six just how strong the

0:39:24.000 --> 0:39:25.040
<v Speaker 1>Democratic Party is.

0:39:25.040 --> 0:39:27.040
<v Speaker 2>Is this a state that just.

0:39:28.480 --> 0:39:31.719
<v Speaker 1>Is competitive only when they have Rafael Warnock on the ballot,

0:39:31.960 --> 0:39:33.640
<v Speaker 1>or is this a state that is going to be

0:39:33.640 --> 0:39:38.879
<v Speaker 1>competitive now no matter what. And asof winning reelection would

0:39:38.920 --> 0:39:41.960
<v Speaker 1>send one signal Democrats winning the governor's mansion would send

0:39:42.000 --> 0:39:44.120
<v Speaker 1>another signal. So I think we're going to learn a

0:39:44.120 --> 0:39:46.959
<v Speaker 1>lot about just sort of the health of the Democratic brand.

0:39:47.160 --> 0:39:52.200
<v Speaker 1>How much is the marginal success Democrats have had in

0:39:52.239 --> 0:39:56.080
<v Speaker 1>Georgia been just because of backlash to Trump or is

0:39:55.280 --> 0:39:57.960
<v Speaker 1>there is this starting to become durable. I think we're

0:39:57.960 --> 0:40:00.200
<v Speaker 1>going to learn. But no matter what, again, because the

0:40:00.239 --> 0:40:05.120
<v Speaker 1>math issue, right Georgia. When you think about how much

0:40:05.160 --> 0:40:09.200
<v Speaker 1>money and resources over the decades have gone into Michigan, Wisconsin,

0:40:09.200 --> 0:40:13.200
<v Speaker 1>and Pennsylvania, Georgia, North Carolina and number five on my list, Arizona.

0:40:13.440 --> 0:40:14.000
<v Speaker 2>Three of those.

0:40:13.840 --> 0:40:19.120
<v Speaker 1>Fights, they have to become just core states. Arguably now

0:40:19.200 --> 0:40:23.520
<v Speaker 1>they're as important, if not more important, than the blue

0:40:23.560 --> 0:40:26.200
<v Speaker 1>Wall of the Midwest. This is going to be a

0:40:26.239 --> 0:40:29.520
<v Speaker 1>red wall, a purple wall, or a blue sunbolt wall

0:40:29.520 --> 0:40:30.040
<v Speaker 1>either way.

0:40:30.680 --> 0:40:31.239
<v Speaker 2>So there's that.

0:40:31.600 --> 0:40:33.920
<v Speaker 1>So three states that didn't make my list that I

0:40:33.920 --> 0:40:38.320
<v Speaker 1>think deserve some investment in when you're looking at Project

0:40:38.400 --> 0:40:43.799
<v Speaker 1>thirty two, Iowa, Indiana, in Florida, I think all of them.

0:40:44.280 --> 0:40:48.399
<v Speaker 1>It's one of those where you want to get into

0:40:48.440 --> 0:40:52.680
<v Speaker 1>a position where you're competitive in those states where you

0:40:52.719 --> 0:40:56.280
<v Speaker 1>have enough because you need some buffers. You can't always

0:40:56.320 --> 0:40:59.720
<v Speaker 1>have to draw this, you know, the perfect inside straight.

0:41:00.120 --> 0:41:02.200
<v Speaker 1>And you know, if you want to expand the map

0:41:02.200 --> 0:41:04.000
<v Speaker 1>for Senate seats, and you want to expand the map

0:41:04.040 --> 0:41:07.120
<v Speaker 1>for more governor's mansions, you've got to give yourself buffers.

0:41:07.239 --> 0:41:13.040
<v Speaker 1>And Indiana, Iowa, and Florida, in theory, all have enough

0:41:13.320 --> 0:41:20.840
<v Speaker 1>combinations of metro areas and suburban populations and some allergies

0:41:20.880 --> 0:41:25.000
<v Speaker 1>to MAGA policies that collectively, in theory, should give the

0:41:25.000 --> 0:41:30.440
<v Speaker 1>Democrats opportunity. Now, you know, it's interesting the Democrats in

0:41:30.480 --> 0:41:33.680
<v Speaker 1>this in what should be a focal point here Project

0:41:33.680 --> 0:41:35.840
<v Speaker 1>twenty thirty two. And I'm at some point waiting for

0:41:35.840 --> 0:41:38.240
<v Speaker 1>there to be an organization that's spun off just called

0:41:38.280 --> 0:41:41.719
<v Speaker 1>this right, you know that some big donor decides to

0:41:41.800 --> 0:41:45.759
<v Speaker 1>fund and just focused on voter registration programs things like

0:41:45.800 --> 0:41:49.560
<v Speaker 1>that is when the Democrats decide what their early calendar

0:41:49.600 --> 0:41:54.520
<v Speaker 1>looks like. And they just over the last week greenlit

0:41:54.760 --> 0:41:58.359
<v Speaker 1>twelve states that plan to petition to be in the

0:41:58.400 --> 0:42:02.880
<v Speaker 1>early primary window for president antil politics. If if the

0:42:02.920 --> 0:42:06.640
<v Speaker 1>Democrats are thinking long term, they should be thinking about

0:42:06.640 --> 0:42:12.680
<v Speaker 1>these four states as this decision as an opportunity to

0:42:13.000 --> 0:42:16.239
<v Speaker 1>invest in Project twenty thirty two for them, how to

0:42:16.400 --> 0:42:20.680
<v Speaker 1>strengthen their ability to get more a few more states

0:42:20.680 --> 0:42:24.319
<v Speaker 1>in play expand the map, right, So I wanted to

0:42:24.320 --> 0:42:26.919
<v Speaker 1>look at their twelve states and see where they overlapped

0:42:27.840 --> 0:42:31.880
<v Speaker 1>with states that perhaps they need to strengthen in in

0:42:32.040 --> 0:42:34.839
<v Speaker 1>order to give keep themselves competitive in a presidential by

0:42:34.880 --> 0:42:37.360
<v Speaker 1>twenty thirty two. So the twelve states they put in

0:42:37.360 --> 0:42:39.520
<v Speaker 1>out of the east, it was Delaware, New Hampshire, Out

0:42:39.520 --> 0:42:42.920
<v Speaker 1>of the midwest, Illinois, Iowa, Michigan. Out of the south, Georgia,

0:42:42.920 --> 0:42:45.680
<v Speaker 1>North Carolina, South Carolina, Tennessee, Virginia, and out of the

0:42:45.680 --> 0:42:51.000
<v Speaker 1>west Nevada, and New Mexico. So North Caro and the

0:42:51.040 --> 0:42:55.520
<v Speaker 1>top five lists Georgia and North Carolina overlaps. You know,

0:42:55.640 --> 0:42:58.279
<v Speaker 1>I think on the you know, I've said this before

0:42:58.280 --> 0:43:01.360
<v Speaker 1>in the early state stuff, the bigger this day, the

0:43:01.440 --> 0:43:05.040
<v Speaker 1>more ineffective that state can be at being sort of

0:43:05.080 --> 0:43:08.480
<v Speaker 1>a fair fairness because with the bigger states then rewards

0:43:08.480 --> 0:43:11.200
<v Speaker 1>those with big money. And both Georgia and North Carolina

0:43:11.239 --> 0:43:13.960
<v Speaker 1>are expensive states. So while I think you could argue

0:43:13.960 --> 0:43:17.880
<v Speaker 1>this would this in theory, having them as early states,

0:43:17.920 --> 0:43:20.160
<v Speaker 1>having more Democrats campaign in them all the time could

0:43:20.520 --> 0:43:23.319
<v Speaker 1>serve to overtime invest them. I don't know if they're

0:43:23.360 --> 0:43:27.040
<v Speaker 1>the best states to create a level playing field for

0:43:27.120 --> 0:43:29.600
<v Speaker 1>those candidates with big money and those candidates that don't

0:43:29.640 --> 0:43:31.600
<v Speaker 1>have big money at the beginning. That would be the

0:43:32.040 --> 0:43:35.319
<v Speaker 1>two negatives, right, just very expensive states to advertise in,

0:43:35.920 --> 0:43:39.920
<v Speaker 1>but having them as early states where Democrats are just

0:43:40.000 --> 0:43:43.640
<v Speaker 1>always traveling to those to what Georgia or North Carolina. Certainly,

0:43:44.239 --> 0:43:46.879
<v Speaker 1>I think that is why Iowa state in the battle round,

0:43:47.480 --> 0:43:50.040
<v Speaker 1>even though demographically Iowa looks like a state that should

0:43:50.040 --> 0:43:51.960
<v Speaker 1>be darker red than it is.

0:43:54.480 --> 0:43:54.800
<v Speaker 2>Iowa.

0:43:54.880 --> 0:43:57.400
<v Speaker 1>Obviously, I think this is a way on the smaller

0:43:57.400 --> 0:43:59.920
<v Speaker 1>state scale. I was disappointed to see that either ca

0:44:00.000 --> 0:44:03.120
<v Speaker 1>anas didn't apply or there was no interest. I saw

0:44:03.160 --> 0:44:05.680
<v Speaker 1>that Nebraska didn't do this either. So when you look

0:44:05.719 --> 0:44:10.840
<v Speaker 1>at it, the only viable small states that applied for

0:44:10.920 --> 0:44:14.400
<v Speaker 1>the early state window for the Democratic presidential primaries, with

0:44:14.440 --> 0:44:16.880
<v Speaker 1>Iowa right. The other two in the midwester or Illinois

0:44:16.960 --> 0:44:20.839
<v Speaker 1>Michigan again too big, too expensive, will only be there

0:44:20.880 --> 0:44:25.280
<v Speaker 1>to help the big name candidates. It doesn't really doesn't

0:44:25.320 --> 0:44:29.239
<v Speaker 1>really work as a good early test where Iowa you

0:44:29.360 --> 0:44:31.880
<v Speaker 1>have to campaign in rural parts of the state in

0:44:31.920 --> 0:44:34.560
<v Speaker 1>order to win, versus Ellinois, Michigan you don't have to

0:44:34.600 --> 0:44:37.040
<v Speaker 1>campaign in the rural parts of the state in order

0:44:37.200 --> 0:44:40.560
<v Speaker 1>to win. The most interesting state that's on there that's

0:44:40.600 --> 0:44:43.319
<v Speaker 1>got advanced for consideration to be in the early state

0:44:43.360 --> 0:44:45.800
<v Speaker 1>window is Tennessee.

0:44:45.920 --> 0:44:46.400
<v Speaker 2>And I want to.

0:44:46.360 --> 0:44:48.719
<v Speaker 1>Close with Tennessee because Tennessee is a state that has

0:44:48.760 --> 0:44:53.160
<v Speaker 1>been a head scratcher to me. Twenty years ago. I

0:44:53.200 --> 0:44:56.080
<v Speaker 1>thought Tennessee was going to go, was going to be

0:44:56.200 --> 0:44:59.480
<v Speaker 1>a part of Georgia North Carolina. Right, you always said

0:44:59.480 --> 0:45:01.200
<v Speaker 1>Florida was the first state in the sun Belt that

0:45:01.280 --> 0:45:04.839
<v Speaker 1>became competitive, and then the question was, Okay, which ones

0:45:04.880 --> 0:45:06.640
<v Speaker 1>are going to go next? And if you went by

0:45:06.880 --> 0:45:14.000
<v Speaker 1>sort of socioeconomics, where we were seeing more people moving

0:45:14.080 --> 0:45:16.960
<v Speaker 1>to right, Georgia North Carolina on the list, but so

0:45:17.080 --> 0:45:22.480
<v Speaker 1>is Tennessee. And Tennessee is actually moved become more Republican,

0:45:22.520 --> 0:45:27.319
<v Speaker 1>not less Republican over the last twenty years. Is that

0:45:27.360 --> 0:45:34.000
<v Speaker 1>going to continue? Does the growth of Nashville does that

0:45:34.239 --> 0:45:37.480
<v Speaker 1>sort of the bigger it grows, the more it becomes

0:45:37.520 --> 0:45:41.960
<v Speaker 1>sort of Austin meets Las Vegas, which then creates your

0:45:42.000 --> 0:45:45.200
<v Speaker 1>sort of suburban and you just get more non sort

0:45:45.239 --> 0:45:51.600
<v Speaker 1>of cultural Southerners in your electorate. It's certainly something that

0:45:51.920 --> 0:45:54.680
<v Speaker 1>I think a lot of US election observers have been

0:45:54.680 --> 0:45:56.759
<v Speaker 1>waiting to see, and there's been very little evidence of it.

0:45:56.800 --> 0:46:00.920
<v Speaker 1>I mean, you know, if this were happening Tennessee special

0:46:00.960 --> 0:46:03.120
<v Speaker 1>in December, would have would have seen a flip, while

0:46:03.160 --> 0:46:04.839
<v Speaker 1>we didn't see a flip. Right, it was a little

0:46:04.840 --> 0:46:07.640
<v Speaker 1>bit more competitive, but it wasn't necessarily a flip. So

0:46:08.239 --> 0:46:09.640
<v Speaker 1>you know, part of it is, you could say the

0:46:09.680 --> 0:46:12.680
<v Speaker 1>election lines. I do think Democrats have a Memphis problem

0:46:13.160 --> 0:46:16.960
<v Speaker 1>in the state. Meaning Memphis is just it's just it's

0:46:17.000 --> 0:46:19.200
<v Speaker 1>a city that is not as it's not what it

0:46:19.320 --> 0:46:24.120
<v Speaker 1>was thirty years ago. It feels as if and there's

0:46:24.160 --> 0:46:27.279
<v Speaker 1>this whether it's fair or not, this perception while it's

0:46:27.280 --> 0:46:30.200
<v Speaker 1>a Democrat run city and it's poorly run and et cetera,

0:46:30.239 --> 0:46:34.600
<v Speaker 1>et cetera. And Republicans have weaponized sort of Memphis a

0:46:34.600 --> 0:46:37.920
<v Speaker 1>long time to win elections. It's been sort of something

0:46:37.920 --> 0:46:41.040
<v Speaker 1>they've done, been sort of a you know, Memphis has

0:46:41.080 --> 0:46:43.120
<v Speaker 1>been used as sort of a code word for race.

0:46:46.360 --> 0:46:50.680
<v Speaker 1>But when you look at the elector in Tennessee, you know,

0:46:51.560 --> 0:46:54.200
<v Speaker 1>I know that if I if I were a strategist

0:46:54.320 --> 0:46:57.359
<v Speaker 1>over at the DNC, I'd be thinking you know, yeah,

0:46:57.440 --> 0:47:00.239
<v Speaker 1>Tennessee is a reached state. But here's a state that

0:47:00.840 --> 0:47:03.799
<v Speaker 1>is that's got something in common with Virginia, something in

0:47:03.800 --> 0:47:08.799
<v Speaker 1>common with North Carolina. You know, maybe more resources into

0:47:08.840 --> 0:47:15.480
<v Speaker 1>the state opened some doors here. I found, of all

0:47:15.520 --> 0:47:17.360
<v Speaker 1>the of all the states that made it through in

0:47:17.400 --> 0:47:20.040
<v Speaker 1>the top twelve, the one that you know, which one

0:47:20.040 --> 0:47:22.360
<v Speaker 1>of these is not like the other, It was Tennessee.

0:47:23.480 --> 0:47:25.319
<v Speaker 1>But I'll tell you if you if you went back

0:47:25.360 --> 0:47:28.719
<v Speaker 1>thirty years, a lot of US election forecasters would have

0:47:28.760 --> 0:47:31.080
<v Speaker 1>said Tennessee was one of the states that we expected

0:47:31.080 --> 0:47:33.840
<v Speaker 1>to start to sort of I think a lot of

0:47:33.880 --> 0:47:36.040
<v Speaker 1>people saw the South sort of splitting into sort of

0:47:36.120 --> 0:47:39.000
<v Speaker 1>you know, the South more Cosmopolitans south of quote New

0:47:39.040 --> 0:47:42.240
<v Speaker 1>South right, and the sort of old South, deep South,

0:47:42.239 --> 0:47:44.120
<v Speaker 1>however you want to describe it. And there was a

0:47:44.640 --> 0:47:47.000
<v Speaker 1>you know, you had sort of your your Tennessee, your

0:47:47.000 --> 0:47:50.400
<v Speaker 1>North Carolina, your Georgia. You're Virginia in one area, Florida

0:47:50.400 --> 0:47:55.000
<v Speaker 1>in one area, and then you're Alabama, your Mississippi, You're Louisiana,

0:47:56.239 --> 0:48:02.120
<v Speaker 1>South Carolina in another area. So it is mostly broken

0:48:02.200 --> 0:48:06.960
<v Speaker 1>along those lines, but not totally. In Tennessee has been interesting.

0:48:07.360 --> 0:48:08.880
<v Speaker 1>I know, my friend Brad Todd has a lot of

0:48:08.920 --> 0:48:13.680
<v Speaker 1>theories there. He thinks that Tennessee Republicans have benefited from

0:48:13.760 --> 0:48:16.839
<v Speaker 1>a lot of Midwestern refugees, if you will, sort of

0:48:17.280 --> 0:48:24.000
<v Speaker 1>Midwestern conservatives who have left the higher tax states of Ohio, Illinois,

0:48:24.160 --> 0:48:27.040
<v Speaker 1>Michigan and have not moved all the way south, but

0:48:27.120 --> 0:48:31.439
<v Speaker 1>moved to Tennessee, a low income tax state. So he says,

0:48:31.440 --> 0:48:32.680
<v Speaker 1>one of the ways you notice it is if you

0:48:32.719 --> 0:48:34.719
<v Speaker 1>go in the suburbs, some of these suburban communities in

0:48:34.800 --> 0:48:38.720
<v Speaker 1>Nashville on a fall Saturday, you don't see Tennessee flex.

0:48:39.320 --> 0:48:43.120
<v Speaker 1>He goes, you see a lot of Ohio, State, Michigan, Purdue,

0:48:43.600 --> 0:48:50.239
<v Speaker 1>Indiana flex. So that's been It's an interesting anecdote. I

0:48:50.239 --> 0:48:54.239
<v Speaker 1>think it's one worth processing. But the reality is this

0:48:54.440 --> 0:48:58.240
<v Speaker 1>Democrats have a major problem on their hands come twenty

0:48:58.280 --> 0:49:00.880
<v Speaker 1>thirty two, and if they start worrying about it in

0:49:00.880 --> 0:49:02.920
<v Speaker 1>twenty thirty one, it's going to be too late. So

0:49:02.960 --> 0:49:05.239
<v Speaker 1>if they're going to launch Project twenty thirty two, now,

0:49:06.200 --> 0:49:07.920
<v Speaker 1>let me go through it again. The five states they

0:49:07.960 --> 0:49:12.480
<v Speaker 1>should be focusing on North Carolina basically the sun Belt,

0:49:13.040 --> 0:49:17.200
<v Speaker 1>Purple Wall of North Carolina, Arizona, and Georgia, and then

0:49:17.239 --> 0:49:19.560
<v Speaker 1>I'd throw in Texas and Kansas. They've got to expand

0:49:19.600 --> 0:49:24.160
<v Speaker 1>their map, and then maybe you dabble in Indiana, Iowa,

0:49:24.400 --> 0:49:27.600
<v Speaker 1>and Florida, and then of course we'll see what they

0:49:27.640 --> 0:49:32.360
<v Speaker 1>do about Tennessee. But if the party doesn't start thinking

0:49:32.440 --> 0:49:36.040
<v Speaker 1>that way, they could get locked out of the presidency

0:49:36.040 --> 0:49:40.200
<v Speaker 1>for a generation. That's how dire this population shift is

0:49:40.960 --> 0:49:49.680
<v Speaker 1>from California, New York to Florida and Texas. Having good

0:49:49.719 --> 0:49:53.800
<v Speaker 1>life insurance is incredibly important. I know from personal experience.

0:49:54.000 --> 0:49:55.959
<v Speaker 1>I was sixteen when my father passed away.

0:49:55.960 --> 0:49:57.440
<v Speaker 2>We didn't have any money.

0:49:57.560 --> 0:49:59.919
<v Speaker 1>He didn't leave us in the best shape. My mother,

0:50:00.160 --> 0:50:04.160
<v Speaker 1>single mother, now widow, myself sixteen trying to figure out

0:50:04.160 --> 0:50:06.080
<v Speaker 1>how am I going to pay for college and lo

0:50:06.239 --> 0:50:09.480
<v Speaker 1>and behold, my dad had one life insurance policy that

0:50:09.560 --> 0:50:12.560
<v Speaker 1>we found wasn't a lot, but it was important at

0:50:12.560 --> 0:50:15.560
<v Speaker 1>the time, and it's why I was able to go

0:50:15.719 --> 0:50:18.799
<v Speaker 1>to college. Little did he know how important that would

0:50:18.840 --> 0:50:22.799
<v Speaker 1>be in that moment. Well, guess what. That's why I

0:50:22.840 --> 0:50:25.359
<v Speaker 1>am here to tell you about Etho's life. They can

0:50:25.400 --> 0:50:28.160
<v Speaker 1>provide you with peace of mind knowing your family is

0:50:28.280 --> 0:50:31.640
<v Speaker 1>protected even if the worst comes to pass. Ethos is

0:50:31.640 --> 0:50:35.200
<v Speaker 1>an online platform that makes getting life insurance fast and easy,

0:50:35.600 --> 0:50:38.920
<v Speaker 1>all designed to protect your family's future in minutes, not months.

0:50:39.200 --> 0:50:43.240
<v Speaker 1>There's no complicated process, and it's one hundred percent online.

0:50:43.360 --> 0:50:46.160
<v Speaker 1>There's no medical exam require you just answer a few

0:50:46.200 --> 0:50:48.560
<v Speaker 1>health questions online. You can get a quote in as

0:50:48.560 --> 0:50:50.600
<v Speaker 1>little as ten minutes, and you can get same day

0:50:50.640 --> 0:50:54.640
<v Speaker 1>coverage without ever leaving your home. You can get up

0:50:54.640 --> 0:50:57.120
<v Speaker 1>to three million dollars in coverage, and some policies start

0:50:57.160 --> 0:50:59.080
<v Speaker 1>as low as two dollars a day that would be

0:50:59.120 --> 0:51:02.840
<v Speaker 1>billed monthly. As of March twenty twenty five, Business Insider

0:51:02.960 --> 0:51:06.399
<v Speaker 1>named Ethos the number one no medical exam instant life

0:51:06.440 --> 0:51:11.080
<v Speaker 1>insurance provider. So protect your family with life insurance from Ethos.

0:51:11.280 --> 0:51:15.280
<v Speaker 1>Get your free quoted Ethos dot com slash chuck. So again,

0:51:15.400 --> 0:51:20.560
<v Speaker 1>that's Ethos dot com slash chuck. Application times may vary

0:51:20.640 --> 0:51:23.480
<v Speaker 1>and the rates themselves may vary as well, but trust me,

0:51:23.880 --> 0:51:26.840
<v Speaker 1>life insurance is something you should really think about, especially

0:51:27.239 --> 0:51:33.120
<v Speaker 1>if you've got a growing family. Ash chuck. All right,

0:51:33.160 --> 0:51:34.880
<v Speaker 1>let's do a little last chuck before we get out

0:51:34.920 --> 0:51:36.360
<v Speaker 1>of here. I think I'm going to try to do

0:51:37.160 --> 0:51:40.720
<v Speaker 1>six of them today, so let's keep me honest. Number

0:51:40.719 --> 0:51:43.759
<v Speaker 1>one came from Brian from New England. He says, Hey,

0:51:43.800 --> 0:51:45.680
<v Speaker 1>it's been about a year since you announced your departure

0:51:45.680 --> 0:51:51.000
<v Speaker 1>from NBC. Yes, it is feels feels like it feels

0:51:51.040 --> 0:51:53.800
<v Speaker 1>like a decade. But anyway, I imagine you're happy with

0:51:53.840 --> 0:51:55.520
<v Speaker 1>the move. Was there a moment that made you realize

0:51:55.520 --> 0:51:57.440
<v Speaker 1>going independent was the right call? Or had you just

0:51:57.480 --> 0:51:59.400
<v Speaker 1>done everything you set up to? Two in a broadcast,

0:52:00.040 --> 0:52:02.160
<v Speaker 1>it's the roles you wish you tried, like foreign correspondent

0:52:02.200 --> 0:52:04.760
<v Speaker 1>or local politics and any future plans you can tease

0:52:04.760 --> 0:52:07.839
<v Speaker 1>maybe a check sports cast. Thanks Brian from New England. Well,

0:52:08.840 --> 0:52:10.960
<v Speaker 1>there's a fun little sports project I'm working on. I'll

0:52:11.000 --> 0:52:15.480
<v Speaker 1>have more details soon ish, partnering with somebody that is

0:52:16.040 --> 0:52:18.480
<v Speaker 1>probably very familiar to many of you in the sports space.

0:52:18.880 --> 0:52:20.800
<v Speaker 1>I'm looking forward to it. But it sort of combines

0:52:20.840 --> 0:52:24.719
<v Speaker 1>my love for sports in history. So I will throw

0:52:24.760 --> 0:52:26.200
<v Speaker 1>that out there and leave that out there as a

0:52:26.239 --> 0:52:28.680
<v Speaker 1>tease for you. But it's something that should be come

0:52:28.719 --> 0:52:31.680
<v Speaker 1>into fruition in the next four to six weeks on

0:52:31.719 --> 0:52:38.440
<v Speaker 1>that front. Look, I have I I have no regrets.

0:52:38.480 --> 0:52:41.160
<v Speaker 1>I miss I miss the collaboration, I miss some of

0:52:41.200 --> 0:52:46.480
<v Speaker 1>my friends in colleagues. I ache currently for my longtime

0:52:46.520 --> 0:52:51.719
<v Speaker 1>friend Savannah got three, who's going through just the worst,

0:52:52.360 --> 0:52:53.680
<v Speaker 1>the worst experience imaginable.

0:52:55.000 --> 0:52:55.200
<v Speaker 2>Right.

0:52:55.560 --> 0:52:57.440
<v Speaker 1>You know, something happens to your parents, your kids, and

0:52:57.600 --> 0:53:06.319
<v Speaker 1>they're just there's there's no there's no consoling that, and

0:53:06.360 --> 0:53:09.879
<v Speaker 1>it's just heartbreaking. I know Savannah's mother a little bit.

0:53:10.360 --> 0:53:15.400
<v Speaker 1>I love Nancy. She's just terrific. I hope by the

0:53:15.400 --> 0:53:20.160
<v Speaker 1>time you hear this, she's home safe. So moments like this,

0:53:20.760 --> 0:53:25.799
<v Speaker 1>you know, I miss, I miss just miss being able

0:53:25.840 --> 0:53:27.759
<v Speaker 1>to be a be a friend on that.

0:53:27.800 --> 0:53:29.080
<v Speaker 2>But I can always be a friend. I don't have

0:53:29.120 --> 0:53:30.160
<v Speaker 2>to be an NBC to do that.

0:53:31.239 --> 0:53:35.000
<v Speaker 1>But I'm just in pain for that, you know I

0:53:35.320 --> 0:53:40.239
<v Speaker 1>have When you go on the regret front, you know

0:53:40.320 --> 0:53:47.600
<v Speaker 1>some of my regrets, I I it's not really regrets.

0:53:47.600 --> 0:53:48.359
<v Speaker 1>It's sort of like.

0:53:50.360 --> 0:53:53.440
<v Speaker 2>I, uh, I leaned in.

0:53:53.520 --> 0:53:56.560
<v Speaker 1>I should have jumped into certain to certain things, right.

0:53:57.760 --> 0:54:00.520
<v Speaker 1>But I honestly, I'm pretty proud out of my work.

0:54:00.560 --> 0:54:04.000
<v Speaker 1>I think it's aging. I think it's aging very well so.

0:54:04.160 --> 0:54:04.920
<v Speaker 2>In that sense.

0:54:05.120 --> 0:54:07.000
<v Speaker 1>And frankly, I feel like I got out at the

0:54:07.000 --> 0:54:11.400
<v Speaker 1>time just before everybody else was being shoved out because

0:54:11.400 --> 0:54:14.359
<v Speaker 1>of what's happening with corporate ownership of media. So in

0:54:14.360 --> 0:54:18.200
<v Speaker 1>some ways I feel lucky to be in the independent

0:54:18.239 --> 0:54:23.120
<v Speaker 1>space before it was cool. I feel lucky to get

0:54:23.120 --> 0:54:27.960
<v Speaker 1>this opportunity to help really talented friends and former colleagues

0:54:28.760 --> 0:54:30.960
<v Speaker 1>jump into these waters. As I say, it's a big

0:54:31.000 --> 0:54:32.959
<v Speaker 1>cliff dive, but I promise you there's water there.

0:54:35.440 --> 0:54:40.040
<v Speaker 2>And you know, I.

0:54:43.120 --> 0:54:45.360
<v Speaker 1>You know, when you look back and realize this moment

0:54:45.400 --> 0:54:49.279
<v Speaker 1>that we're in with corporate owned media, I don't know.

0:54:49.440 --> 0:54:52.120
<v Speaker 1>I think I was able to maximize everything that was

0:54:52.160 --> 0:54:56.200
<v Speaker 1>possible under that situation. And you know that was as

0:54:56.239 --> 0:54:59.040
<v Speaker 1>I was talking with an old friend yesterday, actually we

0:54:59.040 --> 0:55:02.680
<v Speaker 1>were doing a little catching up and reminiscing and lamenting

0:55:03.080 --> 0:55:07.600
<v Speaker 1>about what's happening to our friend's mom. And you know,

0:55:07.920 --> 0:55:10.720
<v Speaker 1>he put it as like, you know, it's so different

0:55:10.840 --> 0:55:16.440
<v Speaker 1>now that it's it's not even the same thing I worked.

0:55:16.520 --> 0:55:19.600
<v Speaker 1>I don't recognize this network.

0:55:20.400 --> 0:55:21.080
<v Speaker 2>I say, it is, no.

0:55:21.680 --> 0:55:24.560
<v Speaker 1>This not me dissing them, it's just totally different, right,

0:55:24.640 --> 0:55:28.560
<v Speaker 1>the separation from that, there's no cable channel anymore. They basically,

0:55:28.800 --> 0:55:34.040
<v Speaker 1>you know, just reimagined, right, there's a real shrinkage of

0:55:34.040 --> 0:55:37.200
<v Speaker 1>what NBC News is. And you know, I don't I

0:55:37.280 --> 0:55:42.319
<v Speaker 1>know this. I wouldn't be happy under this circumstance, but

0:55:43.400 --> 0:55:46.319
<v Speaker 1>you know, I wore the jersey, so I still root

0:55:46.360 --> 0:55:50.239
<v Speaker 1>for him. I root for the individuals there because there's

0:55:50.280 --> 0:55:54.480
<v Speaker 1>some good people still there doing some good reporting. I

0:55:54.520 --> 0:55:58.080
<v Speaker 1>just hope they're given the opportunity to do it all. Right,

0:55:58.160 --> 0:56:00.439
<v Speaker 1>next one, let's see, he says, Hey, I rarely miss

0:56:00.440 --> 0:56:02.360
<v Speaker 1>an episode and really appreciate how you approach issues with

0:56:02.400 --> 0:56:05.360
<v Speaker 1>balance and thoughtfulness. You give me hope multiple times a week.

0:56:06.480 --> 0:56:07.920
<v Speaker 1>My wife tells me this all the time. You have

0:56:07.960 --> 0:56:10.319
<v Speaker 1>to get people hope, don't depress them too much. So

0:56:10.320 --> 0:56:12.239
<v Speaker 1>I appreciate you saying that I sensed a bit of

0:56:12.239 --> 0:56:14.600
<v Speaker 1>fatigue in your one twenty six episode, which is understandable

0:56:14.600 --> 0:56:17.319
<v Speaker 1>given the repetitive nature of our political chaos. Just wanted

0:56:17.320 --> 0:56:19.640
<v Speaker 1>to say your perspective is helping thousands of us see

0:56:19.640 --> 0:56:21.160
<v Speaker 1>the bigger picture and hold on to hope.

0:56:21.239 --> 0:56:21.719
<v Speaker 2>Keep it up.

0:56:22.160 --> 0:56:25.239
<v Speaker 1>Well, can I confess your You know I worried that

0:56:25.320 --> 0:56:25.719
<v Speaker 1>I let.

0:56:25.680 --> 0:56:28.360
<v Speaker 2>My fatigue show that night. I just was tired.

0:56:28.400 --> 0:56:32.000
<v Speaker 1>I'd been traveling and doing all this, so I you know,

0:56:32.080 --> 0:56:35.000
<v Speaker 1>my goal is to never let you see me tired.

0:56:35.040 --> 0:56:35.440
<v Speaker 2>Trust me.

0:56:35.520 --> 0:56:38.960
<v Speaker 1>I always have a cup of coffee going because I

0:56:39.040 --> 0:56:42.600
<v Speaker 1>don't you know, I appreciate the sentiment, but you shouldn't

0:56:42.600 --> 0:56:45.239
<v Speaker 1>catch that which you were correct, You caught me a

0:56:45.239 --> 0:56:49.759
<v Speaker 1>little tired. Next question comes from Eric R. North Oaks,

0:56:49.800 --> 0:56:53.600
<v Speaker 1>Minnesota with parentheses. Want to be Canadian Chuck?

0:56:53.600 --> 0:56:54.359
<v Speaker 2>First time? Long time?

0:56:54.360 --> 0:56:57.040
<v Speaker 1>Why isn't there more discussion about the contrast between Trump

0:56:57.120 --> 0:56:59.040
<v Speaker 1>wanting to send you AUS troops into Iran to protect

0:56:59.080 --> 0:57:03.080
<v Speaker 1>protesters while labying protesters in Minneapolis as domestic terrorists. Imagine

0:57:03.080 --> 0:57:05.880
<v Speaker 1>if Canada crossed our border to defend US protesters, how

0:57:05.920 --> 0:57:09.719
<v Speaker 1>would MAGA respond? The inconsistency is baffling, Eric, That's a

0:57:09.840 --> 0:57:13.040
<v Speaker 1>terrific observation. I you know, I want to sit here

0:57:13.080 --> 0:57:15.400
<v Speaker 1>and say, oh, well, you know this is apples and pairs,

0:57:15.400 --> 0:57:20.520
<v Speaker 1>and you know, no, it's a terrific observation. I think

0:57:20.560 --> 0:57:22.920
<v Speaker 1>the second part, what if Canada sent in troops to

0:57:22.960 --> 0:57:27.120
<v Speaker 1>protect protesters? It's you know, if you recall Tim Wallas

0:57:27.240 --> 0:57:29.360
<v Speaker 1>was asked about bringing in the National Guard, and he

0:57:29.400 --> 0:57:33.680
<v Speaker 1>seemed to think he was concerned that, you know that

0:57:33.840 --> 0:57:36.440
<v Speaker 1>maybe the military confrontation.

0:57:36.080 --> 0:57:37.480
<v Speaker 2>Is is is.

0:57:37.360 --> 0:57:40.120
<v Speaker 1>The pretext that that Trump might be looking for and

0:57:40.160 --> 0:57:47.520
<v Speaker 1>all that. So it's I, you know, I don't have.

0:57:48.600 --> 0:57:50.680
<v Speaker 1>I don't have a lot to add to your comparison.

0:57:51.000 --> 0:57:51.400
<v Speaker 2>It is.

0:57:51.960 --> 0:57:57.440
<v Speaker 1>Now, can I just say something on Iran? Donald Trump

0:57:57.480 --> 0:58:02.800
<v Speaker 1>is playing with America's credibility again, these Iranian protesters. It's

0:58:02.840 --> 0:58:06.160
<v Speaker 1>just like he is messing with these Venezuelan. Venezuelan dissidents.

0:58:06.640 --> 0:58:09.440
<v Speaker 1>You know what, the Venezuelan dissidents want, the democracy. You

0:58:09.520 --> 0:58:12.360
<v Speaker 1>know what Donald Trump is not delivering a democracy. He

0:58:12.520 --> 0:58:17.040
<v Speaker 1>is keeping right Maduro's number two in power because she

0:58:17.240 --> 0:58:19.840
<v Speaker 1>is simply trying to buy time and is playing the

0:58:19.840 --> 0:58:23.520
<v Speaker 1>transactional game. And Trump, as long as he gets what

0:58:23.600 --> 0:58:26.720
<v Speaker 1>he wants in regards to control and oil, he doesn't

0:58:26.720 --> 0:58:30.560
<v Speaker 1>care about democracy. So I do think Donald Trump is

0:58:30.600 --> 0:58:33.919
<v Speaker 1>telling us something about what he thinks of democracy by

0:58:36.880 --> 0:58:39.720
<v Speaker 1>what he's not doing in Venezuela. The fact that this

0:58:39.880 --> 0:58:44.080
<v Speaker 1>is not a priority. Well, if democracy is not a

0:58:44.080 --> 0:58:46.200
<v Speaker 1>priority when you have an opportunity to make it a

0:58:46.240 --> 0:58:50.680
<v Speaker 1>priority in another country, it's clearly not a priority for

0:58:50.760 --> 0:58:55.040
<v Speaker 1>him here. So that's the unfortunate takeaway. Now speaking of

0:58:55.080 --> 0:58:58.440
<v Speaker 1>American credibility with the Iranian hostage of the Iranian protesters,

0:58:59.320 --> 0:59:06.280
<v Speaker 1>you know, every time we make a promise and don't

0:59:06.320 --> 0:59:11.680
<v Speaker 1>follow through, overseas a potential terrorist, future terrorist attacking the

0:59:11.760 --> 0:59:19.400
<v Speaker 1>United States or a US entity only increases. Right, somebody

0:59:20.200 --> 0:59:24.800
<v Speaker 1>who's fifteen protesting in Iran will see their parent killed

0:59:25.400 --> 0:59:28.360
<v Speaker 1>and wondering how come the Americans didn't come. They said

0:59:28.360 --> 0:59:31.360
<v Speaker 1>they would come, but they didn't follow through. Their word

0:59:31.440 --> 0:59:36.600
<v Speaker 1>means nothing. The impression that leads each time, right is

0:59:37.360 --> 0:59:41.080
<v Speaker 1>it is to make a promise and then abandon is

0:59:41.120 --> 0:59:45.680
<v Speaker 1>in some ways worse than not doing anything. But at

0:59:45.760 --> 0:59:51.040
<v Speaker 1>least he didn't promise that you would. So look, it's

0:59:51.080 --> 0:59:53.840
<v Speaker 1>a fair picture you're painting about, you know, the sort

0:59:53.880 --> 0:59:57.560
<v Speaker 1>of protesters. But I think if we're really trying to understand,

0:59:58.040 --> 1:00:02.560
<v Speaker 1>does he care about democracy or I think the actions

1:00:02.600 --> 1:00:06.480
<v Speaker 1>in Venezuela say it all. And the lack of prioritization

1:00:06.560 --> 1:00:09.880
<v Speaker 1>of making this a democracy. There is a democratic elected

1:00:09.920 --> 1:00:15.520
<v Speaker 1>government already ready to go, and the inability to acknowledge

1:00:15.560 --> 1:00:19.720
<v Speaker 1>that is because for whatever reason, they haven't financially paid

1:00:19.760 --> 1:00:24.520
<v Speaker 1>whatever price. I guess it needs to be paid to

1:00:24.600 --> 1:00:28.760
<v Speaker 1>become to get this, to get the support of the

1:00:28.840 --> 1:00:32.880
<v Speaker 1>United States for what the will of the people wanted.

1:00:36.360 --> 1:00:40.000
<v Speaker 1>But I also worry about you know, he's used a

1:00:40.040 --> 1:00:42.400
<v Speaker 1>lot of hot rhetoric with these Iranian protesters, and we

1:00:42.440 --> 1:00:45.440
<v Speaker 1>can debate whether American firepower should be used to protect

1:00:45.440 --> 1:00:48.120
<v Speaker 1>these protesters or not. You know why in Iran but

1:00:48.280 --> 1:00:51.800
<v Speaker 1>not in me and mar right why? You know, picking

1:00:51.840 --> 1:00:54.560
<v Speaker 1>and choosing when we step in is always comes with

1:00:55.640 --> 1:00:58.640
<v Speaker 1>that comes with a lot of problems long term. But

1:00:59.080 --> 1:01:02.320
<v Speaker 1>making a promise not keeping it is in some ways

1:01:02.360 --> 1:01:09.760
<v Speaker 1>the worst possible outcome. Next question comes from Darryl. He says,

1:01:09.800 --> 1:01:11.960
<v Speaker 1>longtime listener and fellow alum of Miami Killian and the

1:01:12.040 --> 1:01:14.320
<v Speaker 1>University of Miami class in ninety seven. Hey, what you

1:01:14.360 --> 1:01:16.120
<v Speaker 1>take on the current state of nil in college football

1:01:16.120 --> 1:01:19.400
<v Speaker 1>and specifically Yum's approach to bringing established quarterbacks rather than

1:01:19.440 --> 1:01:22.080
<v Speaker 1>developing talent from within. I worry this could push promising

1:01:22.120 --> 1:01:25.200
<v Speaker 1>recruits like Darien Coleman to transfer and thrive elsewhere.

1:01:25.200 --> 1:01:26.960
<v Speaker 2>Thanks and keep up the great podcasting. Darryl.

1:01:27.800 --> 1:01:30.200
<v Speaker 1>You're not the only person worried about this. And I

1:01:30.240 --> 1:01:31.480
<v Speaker 1>saw that the Hurricane.

1:01:31.520 --> 1:01:32.120
<v Speaker 2>You know, I'd say, the.

1:01:34.120 --> 1:01:38.840
<v Speaker 1>Hurricane fanatics like yourself and myself were pretty divided, right

1:01:38.920 --> 1:01:43.800
<v Speaker 1>Like I was, I was weirdly not confident that we'd

1:01:43.800 --> 1:01:46.280
<v Speaker 1>be okay if we didn't get a.

1:01:46.200 --> 1:01:47.640
<v Speaker 2>Top notch portal quarterback.

1:01:49.040 --> 1:01:52.919
<v Speaker 1>But that I'm like, all right, you know, we'll find

1:01:52.960 --> 1:01:55.200
<v Speaker 1>a Ken Dorsey, We'll find a Steve Walsh. And what

1:01:55.240 --> 1:01:57.600
<v Speaker 1>do I mean by that? Both Steve Walsh and Ken

1:01:57.640 --> 1:01:59.480
<v Speaker 1>Dorsey did get a couple of cups of coffee in

1:01:59.520 --> 1:02:02.200
<v Speaker 1>the NFL, and Dorsey became a coach, really and he's

1:02:02.240 --> 1:02:06.280
<v Speaker 1>a really good coach. Steve Walsh, I think does some

1:02:06.360 --> 1:02:11.160
<v Speaker 1>coaching in Minnesota, but neither one. We're sort of highly

1:02:11.200 --> 1:02:15.960
<v Speaker 1>touted NFL quarterbacks. But they had great offensive lines, they

1:02:15.960 --> 1:02:20.720
<v Speaker 1>had great running backs and receivers, and they were I

1:02:20.720 --> 1:02:23.840
<v Speaker 1>don't want to call them game managers, sounds like a negative.

1:02:23.840 --> 1:02:24.640
<v Speaker 2>They were better than that.

1:02:25.640 --> 1:02:28.760
<v Speaker 1>They were cerebral, they understood the offense and all that.

1:02:29.160 --> 1:02:33.280
<v Speaker 1>So I certainly think that the way Miami has built

1:02:33.720 --> 1:02:36.760
<v Speaker 1>this brother the way Mario wants to build, which is, you.

1:02:38.440 --> 1:02:39.320
<v Speaker 2>Get as deep of.

1:02:39.360 --> 1:02:42.000
<v Speaker 1>An offensive line and defensive line as you can, you

1:02:42.160 --> 1:02:46.520
<v Speaker 1>get as many playmakers as you can, and then you

1:02:46.560 --> 1:02:49.680
<v Speaker 1>know on receivers, and then you make it where it

1:02:49.800 --> 1:02:53.080
<v Speaker 1>is hard for an average to above average to a

1:02:53.120 --> 1:02:55.280
<v Speaker 1>great quarterback to fail no matter what level they're in.

1:02:57.520 --> 1:03:01.200
<v Speaker 1>And so as long as we're building these powerful offensive lines,

1:03:02.040 --> 1:03:05.280
<v Speaker 1>I'm not concerned about this, and I think that this quarterback.

1:03:05.320 --> 1:03:09.840
<v Speaker 1>I mean, here's the thing. I mean, look at the top,

1:03:10.960 --> 1:03:15.040
<v Speaker 1>look at all of the top top ten. Let's just

1:03:15.040 --> 1:03:17.040
<v Speaker 1>go through the top ten programs real quick. Ohio State

1:03:17.320 --> 1:03:19.800
<v Speaker 1>last year won a national title with a portal quarterback.

1:03:20.200 --> 1:03:22.360
<v Speaker 1>In the end of this year went to a national

1:03:22.400 --> 1:03:25.600
<v Speaker 1>lad with a portal quarterback. Notre Dame was in the finals,

1:03:25.600 --> 1:03:28.560
<v Speaker 1>lost the finals with a portal quarterback. Miami lost the

1:03:28.560 --> 1:03:30.680
<v Speaker 1>finals with a portal quarterback.

1:03:32.120 --> 1:03:32.440
<v Speaker 2>It is.

1:03:35.040 --> 1:03:38.600
<v Speaker 1>Not you can do both. One could argue Georgia hasn't

1:03:38.600 --> 1:03:42.760
<v Speaker 1>won a title because they stuck with Gunner Stockton when

1:03:42.800 --> 1:03:47.680
<v Speaker 1>maybe they should have shopped for a portal quarterback. Is

1:03:47.680 --> 1:03:49.360
<v Speaker 1>that what happened to Alabama?

1:03:49.440 --> 1:03:49.680
<v Speaker 2>Right?

1:03:49.880 --> 1:03:53.560
<v Speaker 1>Is you see LSU has had some success with portal quarterbacks.

1:03:54.680 --> 1:03:56.800
<v Speaker 1>Texas has arch Manning. I don't even think that counts

1:03:56.880 --> 1:04:04.480
<v Speaker 1>right on that front. But I think that, you know,

1:04:04.680 --> 1:04:09.440
<v Speaker 1>you're assuming this is in Miami's control. I think until

1:04:09.480 --> 1:04:12.720
<v Speaker 1>we get some sort of parameters around transfers and how

1:04:12.760 --> 1:04:16.520
<v Speaker 1>this all works, the quarterbacks themselves are going to keep

1:04:16.520 --> 1:04:20.959
<v Speaker 1>shopping because the paydays are there. Because you know, there's

1:04:20.960 --> 1:04:24.840
<v Speaker 1>always one program that thinks they're a quarterback away from

1:04:24.880 --> 1:04:28.400
<v Speaker 1>relevancy if some form or another and will overpay. So

1:04:28.440 --> 1:04:30.440
<v Speaker 1>you're going to get more of these quarterbacks to get

1:04:30.440 --> 1:04:33.200
<v Speaker 1>out of the portal and go in. And so do

1:04:33.240 --> 1:04:36.720
<v Speaker 1>I do? I, you know, think, Well, my guess is

1:04:36.760 --> 1:04:39.520
<v Speaker 1>sixty percent of Miami starting quarterback until the system is

1:04:39.600 --> 1:04:42.080
<v Speaker 1>sort of changed. If this is the system, that a

1:04:42.160 --> 1:04:46.120
<v Speaker 1>majority of our starters will be quort of quarterbacks. But

1:04:46.200 --> 1:04:49.560
<v Speaker 1>if there's you know, we'll find out, you know, what

1:04:49.720 --> 1:04:53.400
<v Speaker 1>happens to how we recruit if we get a major injury, right,

1:04:53.480 --> 1:04:58.200
<v Speaker 1>you know, there's also unforeseen issues that could pop up.

1:04:59.760 --> 1:05:00.840
<v Speaker 2>That could end up.

1:05:02.480 --> 1:05:04.800
<v Speaker 1>Forcing our hand, and we'll find out just how good

1:05:05.080 --> 1:05:08.000
<v Speaker 1>our high school recruiting has been and our quarterback development

1:05:08.480 --> 1:05:15.080
<v Speaker 1>has been. But I think as long as we're building

1:05:15.520 --> 1:05:18.800
<v Speaker 1>an offensive line and whether it's making sure we have

1:05:18.840 --> 1:05:21.640
<v Speaker 1>the best freshman and the best portal right like that is,

1:05:22.520 --> 1:05:25.920
<v Speaker 1>then I do think you can plug and play quarterback.

1:05:26.520 --> 1:05:29.520
<v Speaker 1>It's probably the only position I'm comfortable plugging in playing

1:05:29.560 --> 1:05:34.800
<v Speaker 1>like that, But I think you can. Next question comes

1:05:34.840 --> 1:05:41.120
<v Speaker 1>from Heather from Decatur, longtime listener. I'm curious Illinois or Alabama. Heather,

1:05:41.440 --> 1:05:45.400
<v Speaker 1>long time listener, appreciate the clear, nonpartisan analysis that helps

1:05:45.440 --> 1:05:47.440
<v Speaker 1>me stay grounded in two days political climate.

1:05:47.560 --> 1:05:49.360
<v Speaker 2>Well, thank you for saying that, Heather as.

1:05:49.240 --> 1:05:51.880
<v Speaker 1>A Georgia native. I'm curious about your recent confidence in

1:05:52.040 --> 1:05:54.600
<v Speaker 1>John Ossoff holding the Senate seat beyond the two flipped

1:05:54.600 --> 1:05:56.760
<v Speaker 1>PSC races. Do you have other insights? I wear those

1:05:56.800 --> 1:05:59.520
<v Speaker 1>results might be skewed since many Republican areas had fewer

1:05:59.560 --> 1:06:01.800
<v Speaker 1>races on the like compared to Democratic strongholds. Thanks and

1:06:01.960 --> 1:06:05.360
<v Speaker 1>war Eagle. Obviously it's decater Alabama. What you take on

1:06:05.440 --> 1:06:08.160
<v Speaker 1>Auburn's new head coach. I love Auburn's new head coach,

1:06:08.200 --> 1:06:11.120
<v Speaker 1>Alex GROLs. I think he's got a great story. I

1:06:11.160 --> 1:06:12.520
<v Speaker 1>don't know if you know it. I think he was

1:06:12.880 --> 1:06:15.240
<v Speaker 1>if I'm not mistaken. He was born in Moscow in

1:06:15.280 --> 1:06:18.480
<v Speaker 1>nineteen eighty four. Parents brought him over to the United

1:06:18.480 --> 1:06:22.360
<v Speaker 1>States at the age of seven, became a football crazed,

1:06:22.480 --> 1:06:24.800
<v Speaker 1>got into it, all that stuff, and he's bringing over

1:06:24.840 --> 1:06:27.240
<v Speaker 1>a great quarterback and Byron Brown. So I you know, look,

1:06:27.280 --> 1:06:31.000
<v Speaker 1>I've got Auburn fans of my and my family and

1:06:31.280 --> 1:06:36.120
<v Speaker 1>two our closest friends and some of my closest relatives.

1:06:36.280 --> 1:06:39.200
<v Speaker 1>Big Auburn fans. So I'm a I'm an Auburn apologist

1:06:39.760 --> 1:06:45.000
<v Speaker 1>in general. I've become I'm learning to become one. They

1:06:45.040 --> 1:06:47.640
<v Speaker 1>still didn't deserve a shot at the national title over

1:06:47.720 --> 1:06:50.040
<v Speaker 1>Miami in nineteen eighty three, Stephen, And I'll just leave

1:06:50.080 --> 1:06:57.120
<v Speaker 1>it at that. But I'm bullish on him. I you know,

1:06:57.200 --> 1:07:02.200
<v Speaker 1>I just hope the Auburn powers that we have patience, right,

1:07:02.320 --> 1:07:06.360
<v Speaker 1>They're so inpatience nobody ever seems to get a chance

1:07:06.400 --> 1:07:11.240
<v Speaker 1>to build a program. But I think I like that

1:07:11.320 --> 1:07:16.160
<v Speaker 1>they they're trying this, you know, instead of like trying

1:07:16.200 --> 1:07:18.920
<v Speaker 1>the searching for Bobby, you know, in the obsessions with

1:07:18.920 --> 1:07:22.520
<v Speaker 1>Bobby Petrino, or throwing cash at Lane Kiffin or doing

1:07:22.520 --> 1:07:25.000
<v Speaker 1>something like that, right, seeing if they can get a

1:07:25.040 --> 1:07:29.040
<v Speaker 1>guy from the level below, find their own Urban Meyer, right,

1:07:29.120 --> 1:07:31.840
<v Speaker 1>who came at the time from the mid majors and

1:07:32.640 --> 1:07:35.280
<v Speaker 1>then turned, you know, came in and helped make Florida power.

1:07:36.440 --> 1:07:37.480
<v Speaker 2>So I would.

1:07:39.360 --> 1:07:42.080
<v Speaker 1>I'm I am more bullish on him, and I'd like

1:07:42.960 --> 1:07:45.040
<v Speaker 1>I'd like to see the South Florida guy do good

1:07:45.680 --> 1:07:49.680
<v Speaker 1>on that front. Now, as for the other part of

1:07:49.720 --> 1:07:54.760
<v Speaker 1>your question, John, assof what gives me this confidence, it's

1:07:54.800 --> 1:07:57.960
<v Speaker 1>the weak Republican primary field as well. Right, so you

1:07:58.400 --> 1:08:01.480
<v Speaker 1>throw a bunch of things. Number One, you know, Asofsun

1:08:01.520 --> 1:08:06.479
<v Speaker 1>Andcoman has an enormous financial advantage. Number Two, the only

1:08:06.600 --> 1:08:09.200
<v Speaker 1>can the I would argue, there were two candidates he

1:08:09.240 --> 1:08:12.480
<v Speaker 1>had to fear, Brian Camp and Brad Rathensberger.

1:08:12.640 --> 1:08:13.840
<v Speaker 2>Neither one of them are running.

1:08:15.840 --> 1:08:19.760
<v Speaker 1>Three, you have the national climate and Georgia, clearly being

1:08:19.760 --> 1:08:22.120
<v Speaker 1>a swing state, now seems to move in that direction.

1:08:22.600 --> 1:08:26.120
<v Speaker 1>I agree with you, I I. It is not the margins.

1:08:26.200 --> 1:08:28.519
<v Speaker 1>It is the result of the PSC races. Not necessarily

1:08:28.560 --> 1:08:33.120
<v Speaker 1>even the margins that impressed me, because you're right, you

1:08:33.160 --> 1:08:35.080
<v Speaker 1>know you had you had to turn out differential that

1:08:35.200 --> 1:08:37.439
<v Speaker 1>was huge. But the fact that you still got those

1:08:37.520 --> 1:08:40.800
<v Speaker 1>huge margins says something. But it mostly goes this is

1:08:40.800 --> 1:08:44.479
<v Speaker 1>a weak field. I think the strongest candidate will be

1:08:44.479 --> 1:08:47.479
<v Speaker 1>Derek Dooley, but it looks like the likely opponent's going

1:08:47.520 --> 1:08:49.400
<v Speaker 1>to be somebody with the first name of Congressman, which

1:08:49.400 --> 1:08:53.879
<v Speaker 1>I think is an absolute gift because his biggest impetive,

1:08:53.960 --> 1:08:57.040
<v Speaker 1>you know, in theory, being a part of the Washington

1:08:57.080 --> 1:08:59.120
<v Speaker 1>Swamp is not good. But if you're a House Republican

1:08:59.439 --> 1:09:01.880
<v Speaker 1>people people don't like Congress. I think they hate the

1:09:01.880 --> 1:09:04.880
<v Speaker 1>House more than the Senate, just generically, right. So I

1:09:05.560 --> 1:09:08.639
<v Speaker 1>just think you throw all that together open governor's seat.

1:09:08.840 --> 1:09:13.080
<v Speaker 1>No Brian Kemp leading the ticket either, right, his political

1:09:13.120 --> 1:09:16.280
<v Speaker 1>machine just yes, it's helping Derek Dooley in that Senate primary.

1:09:16.280 --> 1:09:19.640
<v Speaker 1>But I think when you throw all that together, and

1:09:19.720 --> 1:09:22.640
<v Speaker 1>I was, you know, look, I thought as Off was

1:09:22.680 --> 1:09:25.120
<v Speaker 1>the accidental senator when you know, sort of writing the

1:09:25.160 --> 1:09:30.559
<v Speaker 1>coattails of Raphael Warnock back and during those runoffs. You know,

1:09:30.800 --> 1:09:34.439
<v Speaker 1>he's got a formidable He's always been formidable on raising money,

1:09:36.240 --> 1:09:39.599
<v Speaker 1>and he works his you know what off, he works

1:09:39.640 --> 1:09:43.320
<v Speaker 1>his us off off. I guess it's a to to

1:09:43.439 --> 1:09:46.639
<v Speaker 1>try to create a Dad humor pun there. So yeah,

1:09:46.720 --> 1:09:50.920
<v Speaker 1>that's I think this is I'm I'm inclined to right now.

1:09:51.320 --> 1:09:54.559
<v Speaker 1>It's in lean dee to me until you show me

1:09:54.760 --> 1:09:56.800
<v Speaker 1>proof that one of these Republicans can get the fifty

1:09:56.800 --> 1:10:00.280
<v Speaker 1>percent plus one right now, I don't see it all right.

1:10:00.280 --> 1:10:04.559
<v Speaker 1>Final question of the day comes from Colonel Stephen Mitchell,

1:10:04.960 --> 1:10:07.240
<v Speaker 1>the United States Air Force retired, and he writes says,

1:10:07.280 --> 1:10:09.960
<v Speaker 1>good day, Check. I really enjoyed your January twenty ninth podcast,

1:10:10.040 --> 1:10:12.240
<v Speaker 1>especially in the segment on Trump's poll numbers, it seems

1:10:12.240 --> 1:10:15.080
<v Speaker 1>he's losing support from voters who backed him for economic reasons.

1:10:15.080 --> 1:10:16.599
<v Speaker 1>But I'm unsure if the same is true for those

1:10:16.640 --> 1:10:19.720
<v Speaker 1>focused on the border. Given your polling expertise, what you

1:10:19.800 --> 1:10:22.439
<v Speaker 1>take and aside from the economy, what do you think

1:10:22.520 --> 1:10:25.400
<v Speaker 1>will be the top issue on voter's minds?

1:10:25.439 --> 1:10:26.040
<v Speaker 2>Thank you very much.

1:10:26.080 --> 1:10:30.040
<v Speaker 1>Look, I think obviously you're gonna have economy one. I

1:10:30.080 --> 1:10:34.400
<v Speaker 1>think there's the question I have is is there a

1:10:34.520 --> 1:10:38.320
<v Speaker 1>do we create a bucket called sort of chaos or

1:10:38.360 --> 1:10:43.040
<v Speaker 1>tumult right? Because ultimately, I think the reason why Trump

1:10:43.080 --> 1:10:45.599
<v Speaker 1>won in twenty twenty four is because the perceived chaos

1:10:45.600 --> 1:10:49.800
<v Speaker 1>Biden created at the border, in addition to sourness about

1:10:49.800 --> 1:10:53.880
<v Speaker 1>the economy, like you needed sort of both things. I

1:10:53.920 --> 1:10:57.360
<v Speaker 1>think sourness in the economy plus you know, is he

1:10:57.520 --> 1:10:59.519
<v Speaker 1>intentionally dividing the country with ice?

1:10:59.640 --> 1:10:59.800
<v Speaker 2>Right?

1:11:00.000 --> 1:11:02.280
<v Speaker 1>It's not that the it's not that what he did

1:11:02.280 --> 1:11:05.760
<v Speaker 1>on the borders unpopular. In fact, that's an important distinction.

1:11:05.360 --> 1:11:10.400
<v Speaker 2>Which I which you're I think indicating that you understand

1:11:10.400 --> 1:11:12.360
<v Speaker 2>about how you know.

1:11:12.400 --> 1:11:16.519
<v Speaker 1>The danger for Republicans now is that the voters are

1:11:16.520 --> 1:11:20.360
<v Speaker 1>pretty sophisticated in how they are processing the immigration issue.

1:11:21.320 --> 1:11:24.720
<v Speaker 1>When you ask them about border security, they're impressed with

1:11:24.800 --> 1:11:27.920
<v Speaker 1>the Trump administration. They're mostly approving. When you ask them

1:11:27.960 --> 1:11:30.840
<v Speaker 1>about immigration, they see that through the prism of ice,

1:11:31.840 --> 1:11:34.320
<v Speaker 1>not security anymore, and they don't like what they're seeing.

1:11:35.080 --> 1:11:39.280
<v Speaker 1>So I think the fact that that's been split right

1:11:39.720 --> 1:11:44.360
<v Speaker 1>where it's an opening if a nimble Democrat knows how

1:11:44.360 --> 1:11:47.640
<v Speaker 1>to take it, which is, Look, Biden was terrible on

1:11:47.720 --> 1:11:50.400
<v Speaker 1>border security. I'm not going to let that happen again.

1:11:50.439 --> 1:11:52.720
<v Speaker 1>And I'm glad to see what the Trump administration has

1:11:52.720 --> 1:11:55.040
<v Speaker 1>done at the border, but what they're doing in our

1:11:55.040 --> 1:11:58.040
<v Speaker 1>communities across the country is outrageous, et cetera, et cetera. Right,

1:11:58.320 --> 1:12:00.320
<v Speaker 1>So the point is that I think what it does

1:12:00.360 --> 1:12:03.840
<v Speaker 1>provide is the Democrats an opening to look like, hey,

1:12:03.920 --> 1:12:08.160
<v Speaker 1>I'm no Biden on the border, but I'm no Trump

1:12:08.240 --> 1:12:12.760
<v Speaker 1>in harassing Americans either. Right, It's a way to differentiate

1:12:12.800 --> 1:12:16.000
<v Speaker 1>yourself from the Democratic brand on a negative aspect of

1:12:16.040 --> 1:12:18.839
<v Speaker 1>the border and at the same time being able to

1:12:18.880 --> 1:12:22.280
<v Speaker 1>differentiate yourself and show empathy and compassionate about what's happening

1:12:22.280 --> 1:12:25.080
<v Speaker 1>in places like Minneapolis. So that's where I think that

1:12:25.720 --> 1:12:28.920
<v Speaker 1>there's a real problem now for Republicans on this issue,

1:12:28.960 --> 1:12:33.200
<v Speaker 1>and why so many of them are starting to whisper

1:12:33.280 --> 1:12:36.960
<v Speaker 1>loudly that Stephen Miller's a problem, that he is creating

1:12:37.640 --> 1:12:42.000
<v Speaker 1>a narrative, creating a perception about Republicans. It's going to

1:12:42.000 --> 1:12:44.840
<v Speaker 1>be hard to overcome in many of these places. You know,

1:12:45.000 --> 1:12:48.920
<v Speaker 1>maybe the base is happy, but that is it on

1:12:48.960 --> 1:12:52.840
<v Speaker 1>this stuff. But when you're asking about other issues, look,

1:12:52.880 --> 1:12:57.160
<v Speaker 1>I think obviously economy anything that's you know, so do

1:12:57.640 --> 1:13:00.559
<v Speaker 1>you consider healthcare and economy issue? I kind of do, right,

1:13:00.680 --> 1:13:07.240
<v Speaker 1>So I think that's there. If Democrats let me do this,

1:13:07.560 --> 1:13:11.559
<v Speaker 1>let me flip the question here. If Democrats have a

1:13:11.680 --> 1:13:15.960
<v Speaker 1>huge night, it isn't going to be because they only

1:13:15.960 --> 1:13:19.840
<v Speaker 1>won on the economy. If Democrats have a huge night,

1:13:19.920 --> 1:13:24.599
<v Speaker 1>it means they got the corruption issue into the mind

1:13:24.640 --> 1:13:27.479
<v Speaker 1>of the swing voter, that they found a way into it.

1:13:27.520 --> 1:13:31.320
<v Speaker 1>Maybe they did it via exhaustion, you know, the Trump

1:13:31.439 --> 1:13:33.880
<v Speaker 1>chaos idea. Look what he does at the White House,

1:13:34.080 --> 1:13:37.799
<v Speaker 1>Kennedy centers selling foreign policy like lumping it all in together.

1:13:38.360 --> 1:13:44.679
<v Speaker 1>But you know, I think the difference between Democrats having

1:13:44.760 --> 1:13:48.519
<v Speaker 1>a good night in November and having an incredible night

1:13:48.560 --> 1:13:58.080
<v Speaker 1>in November is their ability to take these various gross, corruptive,

1:13:59.520 --> 1:14:03.120
<v Speaker 1>uncomfortable stories and figuring out how to package it as

1:14:03.160 --> 1:14:08.200
<v Speaker 1>one right. COVID helped paint a picture of you know,

1:14:08.240 --> 1:14:10.720
<v Speaker 1>all the Trump chaos and it led to this right,

1:14:10.800 --> 1:14:13.799
<v Speaker 1>And so that's why that messaging was was pretty easy

1:14:14.360 --> 1:14:15.439
<v Speaker 1>to get him out of there.

1:14:15.760 --> 1:14:20.200
<v Speaker 2>If you know it.

1:14:20.640 --> 1:14:23.760
<v Speaker 1>It's sort of I'll be curious to see how they

1:14:23.760 --> 1:14:25.400
<v Speaker 1>do it and if they can do it. But my

1:14:25.479 --> 1:14:28.880
<v Speaker 1>point is is that it's one of those if I'm

1:14:28.880 --> 1:14:30.400
<v Speaker 1>in a coma, If I go in to coma to

1:14:30.479 --> 1:14:33.160
<v Speaker 1>my and I don't wake up till day after election

1:14:33.240 --> 1:14:35.000
<v Speaker 1>and you tell me they won six Senate seats and

1:14:35.000 --> 1:14:38.240
<v Speaker 1>thirty House seats, I'm like, oh wow, the corruption issue

1:14:38.320 --> 1:14:42.280
<v Speaker 1>must have played. That would be my initial instinct. So

1:14:43.800 --> 1:14:49.200
<v Speaker 1>I don't know if it's going to play, but I

1:14:49.240 --> 1:14:51.599
<v Speaker 1>think this is one of those for them to go

1:14:51.680 --> 1:14:54.439
<v Speaker 1>from good to great, they need to figure out how

1:14:54.479 --> 1:14:57.000
<v Speaker 1>to get the corruption issue to be easy to digest

1:14:58.439 --> 1:15:03.400
<v Speaker 1>and something the quote check on Trump rite the check

1:15:03.439 --> 1:15:05.960
<v Speaker 1>on his power, you know it is. It is the

1:15:06.000 --> 1:15:09.280
<v Speaker 1>path for them to get to that messaging. But you

1:15:09.439 --> 1:15:12.320
<v Speaker 1>need to make the case that he's corrupt and that

1:15:12.360 --> 1:15:15.960
<v Speaker 1>this corruption is happening in order to do it, and

1:15:16.080 --> 1:15:17.719
<v Speaker 1>we'll see if they're able to pull that off.

1:15:18.960 --> 1:15:19.760
<v Speaker 2>All Right, there you go.

1:15:20.560 --> 1:15:26.200
<v Speaker 1>That does it for me on a Wednesday, Man, I

1:15:26.240 --> 1:15:29.200
<v Speaker 1>got to this is a political junkies, junkies episode trying

1:15:29.240 --> 1:15:31.640
<v Speaker 1>to explain this is like the old hotline for me.

1:15:31.960 --> 1:15:36.720
<v Speaker 1>Little media narrative explanation, a little historical comparison with Teddy Roosevelt,

1:15:36.960 --> 1:15:41.240
<v Speaker 1>a little electoral scoreboard in college strategizing for twenty thirty two,

1:15:41.800 --> 1:15:45.600
<v Speaker 1>plus this, and somebody's asking me whether you know what

1:15:45.680 --> 1:15:47.759
<v Speaker 1>do I miss about NBC at this point?

1:15:47.840 --> 1:15:48.120
<v Speaker 2>Nothing?

1:15:48.880 --> 1:15:53.519
<v Speaker 1>This, This is this is the broadcast, the type of

1:15:53.560 --> 1:15:56.080
<v Speaker 1>broadcast I've always wanted to do. So I appreciate you listening,

1:15:56.320 --> 1:15:59.800
<v Speaker 1>appreciate your support. I can subscribe, don't forget to use

1:15:59.800 --> 1:16:04.040
<v Speaker 1>all the codes from our advertisers, and with that, I'll

1:16:04.040 --> 1:16:05.000
<v Speaker 1>see you in twenty four hours