1 00:00:04,800 --> 00:00:07,240 Speaker 1: On this episode of New World, we're entering a new 2 00:00:07,280 --> 00:00:10,280 Speaker 1: era of global cataclysm, in which the world faces a 3 00:00:10,280 --> 00:00:14,600 Speaker 1: deadly mix of war, climate change, great power rivalry, rapid 4 00:00:14,640 --> 00:00:18,360 Speaker 1: technological advancement, the end of both monarchy and empire, and 5 00:00:18,400 --> 00:00:23,159 Speaker 1: countless other dangers. In his new book Wasteland, Robert D. 6 00:00:23,320 --> 00:00:27,040 Speaker 1: Kaplan incisively explains how we got here and where we 7 00:00:27,080 --> 00:00:30,760 Speaker 1: are going. Kaplan makes a novel argument that the current 8 00:00:30,840 --> 00:00:35,640 Speaker 1: jeebuo political landscape must be considered alongside contemporary social phenomena 9 00:00:36,000 --> 00:00:40,479 Speaker 1: such as urbanization and digital news media. The singular dilemmas 10 00:00:40,479 --> 00:00:45,519 Speaker 1: of the twenty first century pandemic disease, recession, mass migration, 11 00:00:46,080 --> 00:00:49,680 Speaker 1: the destabilizing effects of large scale democracy and great power conflicts, 12 00:00:50,080 --> 00:00:53,720 Speaker 1: and the intimate bonds created by technology mean that every 13 00:00:53,720 --> 00:00:56,680 Speaker 1: disaster in one country has the potential of him a 14 00:00:56,680 --> 00:01:01,360 Speaker 1: global crisis too. According to Kaplan, the solutions lie in 15 00:01:01,440 --> 00:01:06,720 Speaker 1: prioritizing order and governing systems, arguing that stability and historic liberalism, 16 00:01:07,200 --> 00:01:11,440 Speaker 1: rather than mass democracy, will save global populations from an 17 00:01:11,440 --> 00:01:15,360 Speaker 1: anarchic future. I'm really pleased to welcome my guest, somebody 18 00:01:15,360 --> 00:01:18,560 Speaker 1: who I admired deeply. I have used his book The 19 00:01:18,600 --> 00:01:22,840 Speaker 1: Coming anarchy for a quarter century now as probably the 20 00:01:22,840 --> 00:01:26,520 Speaker 1: best single insight to what was going to happen and 21 00:01:26,520 --> 00:01:29,160 Speaker 1: how it's happened. He is the best selling author of 22 00:01:29,200 --> 00:01:32,320 Speaker 1: twenty books on foreign affairs and travel. He holds the 23 00:01:32,400 --> 00:01:35,480 Speaker 1: Robert Strauss who Pay Chair in Geopolitics at the Foreign 24 00:01:35,480 --> 00:01:39,240 Speaker 1: Policy Research Institute. For three decades he reported in foreign 25 00:01:39,240 --> 00:01:42,080 Speaker 1: affairs with The Atlantic. I am thrilled to have him 26 00:01:42,080 --> 00:01:56,720 Speaker 1: with a Robert Welcome and thank you for joining me 27 00:01:56,760 --> 00:01:57,320 Speaker 1: a newt world. 28 00:01:57,640 --> 00:02:00,360 Speaker 2: It's a great pleasure to be here with you. 29 00:02:00,240 --> 00:02:02,840 Speaker 1: And you begin Wastelam by going into the history of 30 00:02:02,840 --> 00:02:06,000 Speaker 1: the Weimar Republic. Why did you start there? 31 00:02:07,040 --> 00:02:10,600 Speaker 2: I started there because I'm a journalist, and you start 32 00:02:10,680 --> 00:02:14,000 Speaker 2: with a long anecdote. You don't just jump into it 33 00:02:14,040 --> 00:02:17,880 Speaker 2: and tell your thesis, you know. And I thought that 34 00:02:18,040 --> 00:02:26,000 Speaker 2: the Weimar Republic was incredibly, yeerily similar to our world today. 35 00:02:26,639 --> 00:02:31,040 Speaker 2: That the Viimar Republic, to most people, connotades doom because 36 00:02:31,040 --> 00:02:34,800 Speaker 2: it led to Hitler. That's not where we're headed. But 37 00:02:34,919 --> 00:02:38,240 Speaker 2: the Weimar Republic could have turned out well. There was 38 00:02:38,280 --> 00:02:42,800 Speaker 2: a matter of contingency had this happened or that happened, 39 00:02:42,800 --> 00:02:46,160 Speaker 2: had the Great Depression not happened exactly when it did. 40 00:02:46,240 --> 00:02:49,240 Speaker 2: Hitler may not have come to power. But the reason 41 00:02:49,320 --> 00:02:55,079 Speaker 2: I chose Viymar was because it's how geography has been 42 00:02:55,200 --> 00:03:01,760 Speaker 2: shrunk by technology. In that sense, our world today, so interconnected, 43 00:03:01,919 --> 00:03:08,360 Speaker 2: so shrunken, so anxious, so claustrophobic, connotates and is similar 44 00:03:08,800 --> 00:03:13,720 Speaker 2: to the constant, permanent crisis of the Vimar Republic. It's 45 00:03:13,800 --> 00:03:17,800 Speaker 2: like our world is one big Viymar. Now we don't 46 00:03:17,840 --> 00:03:22,200 Speaker 2: have world government, there is very little world governance, but 47 00:03:22,320 --> 00:03:26,880 Speaker 2: there is an emerging global system. That doesn't mean order. 48 00:03:27,200 --> 00:03:30,720 Speaker 2: It just means that every place can interact with every 49 00:03:30,840 --> 00:03:35,800 Speaker 2: other place like never before, Like the far flung Germany 50 00:03:36,040 --> 00:03:40,000 Speaker 2: of the Vymar years, when there was always a cabinet crisis, 51 00:03:40,440 --> 00:03:44,920 Speaker 2: there was never a feeling of relaxation. It was just exhausting. 52 00:03:45,240 --> 00:03:47,000 Speaker 2: And that's our world today. 53 00:03:48,120 --> 00:03:50,880 Speaker 3: You have an amazing term. You say, Vymar is a 54 00:03:50,960 --> 00:03:52,800 Speaker 3: candy coated horror tale. 55 00:03:53,200 --> 00:03:57,400 Speaker 2: Yes, that's just a wonderful term phrase. Well, that's because 56 00:03:57,440 --> 00:04:00,960 Speaker 2: it gave birth to the arts, to the Bauhaus architecture, 57 00:04:01,280 --> 00:04:05,680 Speaker 2: to the atonal music of Arnold Schoenberg, to so much 58 00:04:05,720 --> 00:04:09,760 Speaker 2: else in the arts, in literature, to Thomas Mahn Renier, 59 00:04:09,960 --> 00:04:14,760 Speaker 2: Maria Rilke and others. And yet what it led because 60 00:04:14,800 --> 00:04:18,279 Speaker 2: it ultimately had a lack of order. And the reason 61 00:04:18,320 --> 00:04:21,159 Speaker 2: it had a lack of order was because the very 62 00:04:21,520 --> 00:04:25,800 Speaker 2: formation of the Weimar Republic in the central German town 63 00:04:25,880 --> 00:04:29,800 Speaker 2: of Vymar right after World War One was to prevent, 64 00:04:29,920 --> 00:04:35,120 Speaker 2: at any cost the rise of another Kaiser or another Bismarck. 65 00:04:35,520 --> 00:04:39,000 Speaker 2: And as usual, and as we all know, we all 66 00:04:39,120 --> 00:04:43,000 Speaker 2: tend to overlearn lessons, and that's when we make mistakes 67 00:04:43,040 --> 00:04:48,440 Speaker 2: when we overlearn a lesson, and Vymar overlearned a lesson. 68 00:04:48,720 --> 00:04:53,160 Speaker 2: They created a system which was so unmanageable that nobody 69 00:04:53,279 --> 00:04:57,040 Speaker 2: was ever really in control. And that lack of order, 70 00:04:57,120 --> 00:05:00,800 Speaker 2: that demonstrable lack of order, led to Hitler. 71 00:05:01,360 --> 00:05:04,119 Speaker 1: It's interesting I just recently got involved with this whole 72 00:05:04,839 --> 00:05:08,719 Speaker 1: concept that Weimar did not try to suppress speech, but 73 00:05:08,760 --> 00:05:12,400 Speaker 1: in fact the Nasense I think, lost some two hundred lossits. 74 00:05:12,880 --> 00:05:15,839 Speaker 1: There was a constant effort to push them down and 75 00:05:15,880 --> 00:05:17,080 Speaker 1: they kept bouncing back. 76 00:05:17,920 --> 00:05:20,760 Speaker 2: Yeah. Well, that had a lot to do with vast 77 00:05:20,960 --> 00:05:25,960 Speaker 2: impersonal historical forces, namely the inflation of the early years 78 00:05:26,000 --> 00:05:29,120 Speaker 2: and the great depression of the later years of the 79 00:05:29,200 --> 00:05:33,000 Speaker 2: Weimar Republic. As I said, had the Great Depression not 80 00:05:33,240 --> 00:05:36,800 Speaker 2: come when it did, and as it did, Hitler never 81 00:05:36,800 --> 00:05:39,800 Speaker 2: would have come to power. So those are the vast 82 00:05:39,839 --> 00:05:45,279 Speaker 2: impersonal forces. The contingencies was the utter mediocrity of the 83 00:05:45,360 --> 00:05:49,000 Speaker 2: leaders right before Hitler, and how they thought they were 84 00:05:49,040 --> 00:05:53,080 Speaker 2: in control but they weren't. So what I'm doing is 85 00:05:53,160 --> 00:05:56,520 Speaker 2: I'm painting a picture of our world today where literally 86 00:05:56,640 --> 00:06:00,640 Speaker 2: anything is possible. It could get much better, it could 87 00:06:00,720 --> 00:06:03,919 Speaker 2: get much worse. But don't think we don't have the 88 00:06:04,040 --> 00:06:07,760 Speaker 2: raw material for tragedy in our world today. 89 00:06:08,440 --> 00:06:12,039 Speaker 1: And you suggest, as an example, that the chaotic US 90 00:06:12,080 --> 00:06:16,479 Speaker 1: withdrawal from Afghanistan might have encouraged Putin to invade Ukraine, 91 00:06:17,000 --> 00:06:20,000 Speaker 1: believing the West had lost any capacity to be effective. 92 00:06:20,560 --> 00:06:25,280 Speaker 2: Yes, there were two ironic results to the withdrawal from Afghanistan. 93 00:06:25,839 --> 00:06:29,520 Speaker 2: First is, if you're going to withdraw, don't announce it 94 00:06:29,600 --> 00:06:32,480 Speaker 2: in advance. Don't do it at the beginning of the 95 00:06:32,520 --> 00:06:35,839 Speaker 2: fighting in the middle of the fighting season in Afghanistan. 96 00:06:36,000 --> 00:06:39,360 Speaker 2: Do it slowly gradually during the winter when there's very 97 00:06:39,400 --> 00:06:43,080 Speaker 2: little fighting. Anyway, there are many different ways to withdraw, 98 00:06:43,600 --> 00:06:46,400 Speaker 2: and they withdrew in a way that led to a 99 00:06:46,440 --> 00:06:52,320 Speaker 2: catastrophe which had two ironic results. One was it demonstrated 100 00:06:52,720 --> 00:06:56,520 Speaker 2: American weakness in that it couldn't get anything done right. 101 00:06:57,000 --> 00:07:00,560 Speaker 2: The other thing that led to was the Biden Habinet 102 00:07:00,920 --> 00:07:05,440 Speaker 2: actually started to work better among each other after the 103 00:07:05,520 --> 00:07:08,560 Speaker 2: withdrawal from Afghanistan because it was like a coming to 104 00:07:08,720 --> 00:07:12,760 Speaker 2: Jesus moment kind of and so they were better equipped 105 00:07:12,800 --> 00:07:15,600 Speaker 2: to deal at least in the initially in the first 106 00:07:15,640 --> 00:07:18,920 Speaker 2: few months of the Ukraine War. But I think it 107 00:07:19,040 --> 00:07:23,520 Speaker 2: was overwhelmingly ironic because it gave Putin the idea that 108 00:07:23,560 --> 00:07:27,400 Speaker 2: the West was finished, essentially, that the West was not 109 00:07:27,640 --> 00:07:31,120 Speaker 2: going to challenge him, and that led him into what 110 00:07:31,320 --> 00:07:35,000 Speaker 2: I still consider to be a disastrous war on his part. 111 00:07:35,840 --> 00:07:38,720 Speaker 1: It's obviously a disaster for Ukraine, but it's also a 112 00:07:38,720 --> 00:07:41,800 Speaker 1: disaster for Russia. And I was struck that about two 113 00:07:41,840 --> 00:07:45,360 Speaker 1: weeks before the attack the channel that Joint Chiefs Milly 114 00:07:46,040 --> 00:07:48,960 Speaker 1: said in a Senate hearing thought to take the Russians 115 00:07:49,000 --> 00:07:51,520 Speaker 1: three days to get to Kiv and I have a 116 00:07:51,600 --> 00:07:54,320 Speaker 1: hunch that Putin's general is still them the same thing. 117 00:07:55,080 --> 00:07:59,400 Speaker 2: Yes, what I learned being embedded as a journalist with 118 00:07:59,520 --> 00:08:02,640 Speaker 2: the Marine and the Army in the Iraq War and 119 00:08:02,680 --> 00:08:07,560 Speaker 2: in Afghanistan was that the real jewel in the crown 120 00:08:07,640 --> 00:08:12,160 Speaker 2: of the American military, of the non commissioned officers, the NCOs. 121 00:08:12,800 --> 00:08:16,440 Speaker 2: They're really the heart and soul and culture of the military. 122 00:08:16,600 --> 00:08:21,880 Speaker 2: The officers devised plans, the NCOs carry them out, and 123 00:08:22,200 --> 00:08:27,800 Speaker 2: NCOs are sergeants, petty officers, corporals and the like. And 124 00:08:27,840 --> 00:08:31,040 Speaker 2: the reason our NCO corps is so great is because 125 00:08:31,080 --> 00:08:34,920 Speaker 2: we're a middle class society and we produced people who 126 00:08:34,960 --> 00:08:39,280 Speaker 2: are highly educated, even if they're not officers. Russia did 127 00:08:39,320 --> 00:08:42,800 Speaker 2: not have, in reality a NCO corps. It had a 128 00:08:42,920 --> 00:08:47,479 Speaker 2: very weakend CEO corps that did not matter in Russia's 129 00:08:47,600 --> 00:08:53,800 Speaker 2: small wars or imperial policing operations in Abkhazia and Sub 130 00:08:53,840 --> 00:08:58,160 Speaker 2: Saharan Africa. Syria was an air war. The Russians never 131 00:08:58,240 --> 00:09:02,400 Speaker 2: put troops in there on the so Putin was living 132 00:09:02,440 --> 00:09:05,720 Speaker 2: in this dream world, you know, where he learned from 133 00:09:05,760 --> 00:09:09,680 Speaker 2: all these policing operations and Syria that he could do anything. 134 00:09:10,080 --> 00:09:14,520 Speaker 2: And then he attempted a major land war where the 135 00:09:14,640 --> 00:09:19,319 Speaker 2: component that was needed was an NCO corps or an equivalent, 136 00:09:19,480 --> 00:09:22,760 Speaker 2: and he did not have it. And the first few weeks, 137 00:09:22,880 --> 00:09:26,240 Speaker 2: first few months, one could argue even longer than that 138 00:09:26,400 --> 00:09:28,640 Speaker 2: has been a shambles for Russia. 139 00:09:29,360 --> 00:09:32,760 Speaker 1: And it seems to me that the misallocation that's probably 140 00:09:32,800 --> 00:09:35,920 Speaker 1: the wrong word, but of both resources and human beings, 141 00:09:36,480 --> 00:09:39,640 Speaker 1: there's a diversion from what Russia might have become that 142 00:09:39,679 --> 00:09:41,520 Speaker 1: they'll probably never fully recover from. 143 00:09:42,080 --> 00:09:44,640 Speaker 2: Yeah, one of the things I talk about in the book, 144 00:09:44,679 --> 00:09:48,480 Speaker 2: One of my themes is that all three great powers, 145 00:09:48,559 --> 00:09:53,360 Speaker 2: the US, China, and Russia are all in different ways, 146 00:09:53,440 --> 00:09:57,559 Speaker 2: in at different paces in periods of decline. You can 147 00:09:57,720 --> 00:10:01,080 Speaker 2: argue that, but I think Russia's the most extreme case 148 00:10:01,520 --> 00:10:06,080 Speaker 2: because the Ukraine War has gone on for three years. 149 00:10:06,200 --> 00:10:10,559 Speaker 2: That's a long time. That's a long time for intense 150 00:10:10,880 --> 00:10:16,240 Speaker 2: urban industrial combat, fighting over inches and feet, with large 151 00:10:16,240 --> 00:10:20,880 Speaker 2: scale casualties, thousands of tanks destroyed. The only reason we 152 00:10:20,920 --> 00:10:23,800 Speaker 2: don't read even more about it is because there's not 153 00:10:23,960 --> 00:10:27,319 Speaker 2: that much novelty value in recent months, and the media 154 00:10:27,440 --> 00:10:32,080 Speaker 2: loves novelty value, something new to talk about. I believe 155 00:10:32,360 --> 00:10:35,280 Speaker 2: as every month that the Ukraine War has gone on 156 00:10:35,800 --> 00:10:41,280 Speaker 2: has weakened Russia's ability to determine outcomes in the Caucuses, 157 00:10:41,559 --> 00:10:46,400 Speaker 2: in former Soviet Central Asia, in Siberia, and the Russian 158 00:10:46,559 --> 00:10:50,480 Speaker 2: Far East. So I think this war is really a 159 00:10:50,520 --> 00:10:55,480 Speaker 2: sign of Russian decline, however it may turn out in negotiations. 160 00:11:11,960 --> 00:11:14,760 Speaker 1: The one thing that I can't quite get my head 161 00:11:14,800 --> 00:11:17,920 Speaker 1: around is they do have as a remnant of the 162 00:11:17,920 --> 00:11:23,480 Speaker 1: Soviet Union, so many nuclear weapons. Even if they're decaying, 163 00:11:24,080 --> 00:11:28,560 Speaker 1: they're decaying with a potential due unimaginable damage. You have 164 00:11:28,600 --> 00:11:29,760 Speaker 1: to deal with them carefully. 165 00:11:30,640 --> 00:11:33,120 Speaker 2: Yes, And I bring this up in the book. I 166 00:11:33,160 --> 00:11:36,800 Speaker 2: talk about Henry Kissinger's book written in his mid thirties 167 00:11:36,840 --> 00:11:40,720 Speaker 2: as a young man, Nuclear Weapons and Foreign Policy, which 168 00:11:40,800 --> 00:11:43,720 Speaker 2: was a very revolutionary book for its time because at 169 00:11:43,800 --> 00:11:48,719 Speaker 2: the time we were pursuing mass destruction anyone messes with us, 170 00:11:48,840 --> 00:11:52,760 Speaker 2: we had hydrogen bonds. Kissinger brought up what was then 171 00:11:52,960 --> 00:11:57,040 Speaker 2: an original idea, which is you could have a conventional 172 00:11:57,120 --> 00:12:02,480 Speaker 2: war where a low level tactical nuclear weapons were injected 173 00:12:02,520 --> 00:12:06,000 Speaker 2: into the war in the middle phases by the party 174 00:12:06,040 --> 00:12:09,120 Speaker 2: that was not doing well, and that would be a 175 00:12:09,200 --> 00:12:13,720 Speaker 2: real danger. Don't just think of nuclear war as nuclear holocausts. 176 00:12:13,840 --> 00:12:18,240 Speaker 2: Think about it in terms of conventional war with nuclear 177 00:12:18,360 --> 00:12:21,840 Speaker 2: aspects to it. And if you look at today. I 178 00:12:21,880 --> 00:12:24,920 Speaker 2: don't know about Russia, but generally the trend has been 179 00:12:25,040 --> 00:12:31,640 Speaker 2: to develop low yield high tech tactical nuclear weapons that 180 00:12:31,720 --> 00:12:36,960 Speaker 2: are actually designed to be used, and that really raises 181 00:12:37,080 --> 00:12:39,680 Speaker 2: the danger in our world today. 182 00:12:40,640 --> 00:12:43,960 Speaker 1: Frankly, I think from our side, we have developed conventional 183 00:12:44,000 --> 00:12:47,640 Speaker 1: weapons of such power that in effect are the equivalent 184 00:12:47,720 --> 00:12:50,880 Speaker 1: of what a tactical nuclear would be. They're not psychologically 185 00:12:50,880 --> 00:12:54,240 Speaker 1: the equivalent, but they're devastating. You raise a point here. 186 00:12:54,679 --> 00:12:57,280 Speaker 1: People think of this as the beginning of violence in Europe. 187 00:12:57,320 --> 00:13:00,000 Speaker 1: The truth is the Balkans had been in a decade 188 00:13:00,080 --> 00:13:04,000 Speaker 1: of violence, much of a horrendous with real efforts of 189 00:13:04,080 --> 00:13:05,600 Speaker 1: genocide and bombing. 190 00:13:05,880 --> 00:13:08,360 Speaker 3: We'd intervened, We bomb Serbia. 191 00:13:07,800 --> 00:13:10,439 Speaker 1: So there was actually violence on the margins of Europe, 192 00:13:11,080 --> 00:13:13,000 Speaker 1: much more than people want to talk about. 193 00:13:14,200 --> 00:13:19,400 Speaker 2: Yeah. Remember it was only literally right after the Berlin 194 00:13:19,480 --> 00:13:24,480 Speaker 2: Wall collapse that war erupted in the former Yugoslavia. It 195 00:13:24,640 --> 00:13:28,200 Speaker 2: was months we're talking about. And one of the reasons 196 00:13:28,200 --> 00:13:33,760 Speaker 2: why the elder Bush administration did not intervene more dynamically. 197 00:13:34,280 --> 00:13:38,480 Speaker 2: They did send peacekeepers to Macedonia, which many people forget, 198 00:13:38,679 --> 00:13:42,920 Speaker 2: but they did not intervene dynamically was because, as James 199 00:13:43,000 --> 00:13:47,160 Speaker 2: Baker indicated, the Europeans have been lecturing us for years 200 00:13:47,160 --> 00:13:50,240 Speaker 2: that they can deal with their own problems. Well, now 201 00:13:50,280 --> 00:13:53,560 Speaker 2: here's a chance. Let's use this as a test case. 202 00:13:53,720 --> 00:13:56,480 Speaker 2: Let's see. So that was at the heart of the 203 00:13:56,520 --> 00:14:01,880 Speaker 2: original ghost slow approach of the elder Bush administration not 204 00:14:02,040 --> 00:14:05,720 Speaker 2: to intervene, and then it mushroomed into a much wider war. 205 00:14:05,840 --> 00:14:08,840 Speaker 2: And then we had the Clinton administration which had to 206 00:14:08,880 --> 00:14:09,760 Speaker 2: take action. 207 00:14:10,200 --> 00:14:13,120 Speaker 1: And they were confused, I think because as a member 208 00:14:13,120 --> 00:14:15,400 Speaker 1: of Congress of the time dealing with them, I think 209 00:14:15,400 --> 00:14:18,160 Speaker 1: they were so scarred by the blackhawk Down incident in 210 00:14:18,160 --> 00:14:22,320 Speaker 1: Somalia that they were just terrified of getting into a 211 00:14:22,360 --> 00:14:24,480 Speaker 1: situation where they'd lose a lot of Americans. 212 00:14:25,000 --> 00:14:29,680 Speaker 2: Yeah, that also influenced Rwanda, which occurred only six months 213 00:14:29,760 --> 00:14:34,360 Speaker 2: after the blackhawk Down incident. But yes, the Clinton administration 214 00:14:34,680 --> 00:14:39,480 Speaker 2: was very averse to getting sucked into a conflict where 215 00:14:39,480 --> 00:14:43,280 Speaker 2: there would be large numbers of American casualties. And I 216 00:14:43,360 --> 00:14:49,320 Speaker 2: think though it's interesting that the Balkans dominated the nineteen nineties, 217 00:14:49,480 --> 00:14:53,040 Speaker 2: you know, the horrific war and ethnic cleansing there, and 218 00:14:53,080 --> 00:14:57,040 Speaker 2: the US intervened twice in Bosnia and ninety five and 219 00:14:57,080 --> 00:15:00,360 Speaker 2: in Kosovo in ninety nine, but they were the main 220 00:15:00,680 --> 00:15:04,560 Speaker 2: small wars. They never mushroomed into an Iraq or a 221 00:15:04,680 --> 00:15:10,480 Speaker 2: Vietnam or anything like that. So Clinton really inserted forces 222 00:15:10,520 --> 00:15:14,360 Speaker 2: in a delayed way, of course, with limits. You know, 223 00:15:14,400 --> 00:15:17,680 Speaker 2: it could have been a much different decade had this 224 00:15:17,840 --> 00:15:21,680 Speaker 2: small war emerged into a middle sized war for the 225 00:15:21,800 --> 00:15:23,840 Speaker 2: United States and the Balkans. 226 00:15:24,560 --> 00:15:30,240 Speaker 1: Do you think that when Putin took over Crimea that 227 00:15:30,320 --> 00:15:32,320 Speaker 1: there was anything practical that could have been done at 228 00:15:32,320 --> 00:15:32,720 Speaker 1: that point. 229 00:15:33,760 --> 00:15:39,600 Speaker 2: That's a good question. Remember Crimea was always historically considered Russia. 230 00:15:39,680 --> 00:15:42,680 Speaker 2: It was thought of as different from the rest of Ukraine. 231 00:15:43,040 --> 00:15:47,920 Speaker 2: There was always romantic associations that Russians had for Crimea. 232 00:15:48,440 --> 00:15:52,200 Speaker 2: The Tsar had his summer home there, his warm weather 233 00:15:52,320 --> 00:15:56,360 Speaker 2: home there, not just one Tsar, but several czars. The 234 00:15:56,400 --> 00:16:00,800 Speaker 2: Soviet Politbureau would take vacations there for the warmer weather. 235 00:16:01,280 --> 00:16:04,360 Speaker 2: There was the literature of Tolstoy and all of that. 236 00:16:04,840 --> 00:16:11,920 Speaker 2: Crimea had emotional sentimental appeal to Russia that Donetsks and 237 00:16:12,040 --> 00:16:15,920 Speaker 2: some of these other places in Ukraine utterly lacked. So 238 00:16:15,960 --> 00:16:21,440 Speaker 2: that when they took Crimea, I think our options really narrowed. 239 00:16:21,600 --> 00:16:25,480 Speaker 2: And that isn't to say we succeeded at the terrence 240 00:16:25,600 --> 00:16:28,200 Speaker 2: for a wider war. We did not succeed at the 241 00:16:28,360 --> 00:16:29,880 Speaker 2: terrence in a wider war. 242 00:16:31,000 --> 00:16:35,080 Speaker 1: I think Khrushchev was married to Ukrainian and it's Krushev 243 00:16:35,120 --> 00:16:40,120 Speaker 1: who actually reassigns Crimea to be Ukrainian rather than Russian. 244 00:16:40,720 --> 00:16:42,920 Speaker 1: And I think that that was always sort of a 245 00:16:42,960 --> 00:16:45,520 Speaker 1: breakpoint that made it harder. 246 00:16:46,120 --> 00:16:50,360 Speaker 2: Yeah, it was. And next thing you, Crimea was easy 247 00:16:50,480 --> 00:16:53,800 Speaker 2: for Putin to do. Actually, it was one of those 248 00:16:53,920 --> 00:16:56,960 Speaker 2: plans that were on the table, on the shelf for 249 00:16:57,040 --> 00:17:00,840 Speaker 2: any crisis that might erupt, and he did it and 250 00:17:00,960 --> 00:17:03,400 Speaker 2: there was nothing we can do. 251 00:17:03,440 --> 00:17:06,840 Speaker 1: You discuss the end of the Cold War as a 252 00:17:06,840 --> 00:17:10,520 Speaker 1: decisive victory for the West. From your perspective, you give 253 00:17:11,720 --> 00:17:16,280 Speaker 1: more of the responsibility to Gorbachev than to Reagan. Do 254 00:17:16,320 --> 00:17:19,120 Speaker 1: you think had they not picked Gorbachev, or had Gorbachev 255 00:17:19,800 --> 00:17:22,480 Speaker 1: not decided to try to be a modernizer, that it 256 00:17:22,520 --> 00:17:24,880 Speaker 1: could have gone on for the two or three decades. 257 00:17:25,400 --> 00:17:29,879 Speaker 2: It might have. Remember, Gorbachev had an opponent for leadership. 258 00:17:29,920 --> 00:17:33,440 Speaker 2: I believe his name was Romanov. I might be mistaken here. 259 00:17:33,520 --> 00:17:38,720 Speaker 2: It gets very obscure, but Gorbachev was chosen in the 260 00:17:38,840 --> 00:17:42,960 Speaker 2: wake He was chosen by the Soviet Politburo in the 261 00:17:43,080 --> 00:17:48,080 Speaker 2: wake of the SS twenty Pershing missile crisis in Europe 262 00:17:48,119 --> 00:17:51,119 Speaker 2: that came, I believe, in the fall of nineteen eighty three, 263 00:17:51,160 --> 00:17:54,080 Speaker 2: and then I covered as a young journalist where the 264 00:17:54,080 --> 00:17:59,879 Speaker 2: Soviets deployed SS twenties. There were massive peace demonstrations throughout 265 00:18:00,280 --> 00:18:05,439 Speaker 2: Western Europe. Millions and millions of people showed up, telling 266 00:18:05,480 --> 00:18:10,119 Speaker 2: the Americans, under no account, deploy more missiles, stop it 267 00:18:10,280 --> 00:18:14,240 Speaker 2: right here. And the Reagan administration went ahead and deployed 268 00:18:14,760 --> 00:18:20,240 Speaker 2: Pershing missiles, and this peace demonstration stopped, and the Pershing 269 00:18:20,320 --> 00:18:24,119 Speaker 2: missiles were deployed. And I think that impressed the Soviet 270 00:18:24,200 --> 00:18:27,879 Speaker 2: Pollock bureau, who thought, we have a really tough president 271 00:18:27,960 --> 00:18:33,200 Speaker 2: on our hands in Washington. We need someone who's really vigorous, 272 00:18:33,560 --> 00:18:36,879 Speaker 2: who's going to shake things up, somebody vigorous, not just 273 00:18:36,920 --> 00:18:40,280 Speaker 2: an old dying man. And I think that was the 274 00:18:40,320 --> 00:18:45,520 Speaker 2: background for choosing Gorbachev. And remember it was Gorbachev really 275 00:18:45,880 --> 00:18:49,200 Speaker 2: who ended the Cold War by trying to reform the 276 00:18:49,240 --> 00:18:54,000 Speaker 2: Soviet Union and it collapsed all around him essentially, and 277 00:18:54,080 --> 00:18:57,720 Speaker 2: he made the decision that he would not militarily support 278 00:18:58,119 --> 00:19:02,800 Speaker 2: the Communist parties in the Warsaw Pact if they ran 279 00:19:02,840 --> 00:19:06,240 Speaker 2: into trouble, which was a different policy than the Brezhnev 280 00:19:06,359 --> 00:19:10,920 Speaker 2: doctrine where they intervened in Czechoslovakia in nineteen sixty eight. 281 00:19:11,560 --> 00:19:14,560 Speaker 2: But I think Gorbachev was the key figure for ending 282 00:19:14,600 --> 00:19:19,040 Speaker 2: the Cold War, and he came into power indirectly through 283 00:19:19,080 --> 00:19:23,000 Speaker 2: decisions made by Ronald Reagan to deploy the Pershing missiles. 284 00:19:23,720 --> 00:19:25,200 Speaker 3: To me, it was an amazing moment. 285 00:19:26,040 --> 00:19:28,520 Speaker 1: I'd spent my whole career trying to understand how to 286 00:19:28,560 --> 00:19:29,800 Speaker 1: contain the Soviet Empire. 287 00:19:30,320 --> 00:19:31,399 Speaker 3: Suddenly they weren't there. 288 00:19:31,880 --> 00:19:34,040 Speaker 1: It was sort of a sense of a huge capital 289 00:19:34,080 --> 00:19:52,080 Speaker 1: investment gone. You make a point that I think people 290 00:19:52,119 --> 00:19:56,960 Speaker 1: really don't understand, which is as the world gets closer 291 00:19:57,000 --> 00:20:01,040 Speaker 1: to itself because of technology, etc. That doesn't mean it 292 00:20:01,040 --> 00:20:03,879 Speaker 1: gets nicer or it doesn't mean that it gets less violent. 293 00:20:04,359 --> 00:20:07,360 Speaker 1: You have more things crowded near each other, and if anything, 294 00:20:07,480 --> 00:20:10,520 Speaker 1: it can become much more unstad Can you expand on that. 295 00:20:10,920 --> 00:20:12,199 Speaker 1: It's a very important insight. 296 00:20:12,560 --> 00:20:15,720 Speaker 2: Yeah. Now, as I said at the beginning, the world 297 00:20:15,840 --> 00:20:22,200 Speaker 2: is more claustrophobic and anxious than ever before because of technology. 298 00:20:22,560 --> 00:20:26,560 Speaker 2: It's not just new things, it's also the attrition of 299 00:20:26,600 --> 00:20:30,840 Speaker 2: the same adds up to big change. More jet airplanes, 300 00:20:30,920 --> 00:20:37,760 Speaker 2: more flights, more airports, higher populations, the Internet, email. Remember 301 00:20:37,760 --> 00:20:40,399 Speaker 2: when the Cold War ended, there was no Internet for 302 00:20:40,560 --> 00:20:44,480 Speaker 2: most people. There was no email, nobody had web addresses. 303 00:20:44,680 --> 00:20:48,520 Speaker 2: You didn't have all these fancy elite conferences that united 304 00:20:48,560 --> 00:20:51,320 Speaker 2: the global elite all over the world to come and 305 00:20:51,359 --> 00:20:54,720 Speaker 2: go to. None of that existed. All that came in 306 00:20:54,840 --> 00:20:59,000 Speaker 2: the wake of America's unipolar moment at the end of 307 00:20:59,040 --> 00:21:03,000 Speaker 2: the Cold War. So the world is smaller, it's tighter, 308 00:21:03,480 --> 00:21:09,280 Speaker 2: it's more connected, but because we still have our grave differences, 309 00:21:10,040 --> 00:21:13,639 Speaker 2: that only makes the world more unstable, because your enemy 310 00:21:13,760 --> 00:21:19,679 Speaker 2: or your rival is closer. Take US China relations. China 311 00:21:19,760 --> 00:21:23,919 Speaker 2: may be thousands of miles away, eleven time zones away, 312 00:21:24,800 --> 00:21:30,119 Speaker 2: but it's not it's one click away. So that cyber warfare, 313 00:21:30,720 --> 00:21:35,840 Speaker 2: cyber attacks shorten the distance between the US and China 314 00:21:35,880 --> 00:21:40,520 Speaker 2: and in fact help destabilize the US China relationship. 315 00:21:41,320 --> 00:21:44,639 Speaker 1: If you think about it in that context, it seems 316 00:21:44,640 --> 00:21:48,520 Speaker 1: to me that people, particularly among the elites, had this 317 00:21:48,680 --> 00:21:52,360 Speaker 1: notion that we were all kind of cookie cutters. We're 318 00:21:52,359 --> 00:21:54,159 Speaker 1: all going to be the same kind of human we 319 00:21:54,240 --> 00:21:57,240 Speaker 1: could all understand each other, and we could all somehow 320 00:21:57,440 --> 00:22:01,560 Speaker 1: get along in sort of kumbaya. In fact, both in 321 00:22:01,640 --> 00:22:04,080 Speaker 1: terms of power and in terms of ideology and culture, 322 00:22:04,840 --> 00:22:08,639 Speaker 1: there are really extraordinary differences across the planet. 323 00:22:09,560 --> 00:22:10,159 Speaker 3: Yeah. 324 00:22:10,200 --> 00:22:15,639 Speaker 2: Well, elites around the world are like each other because 325 00:22:15,680 --> 00:22:20,119 Speaker 2: they're all highly educated, multilingual, they live in different countries. 326 00:22:20,160 --> 00:22:23,600 Speaker 2: They are on the same corporate boards together, the same 327 00:22:23,720 --> 00:22:27,800 Speaker 2: foundation boards together, so they're alike. At the very very 328 00:22:27,960 --> 00:22:31,080 Speaker 2: top level, there is a kind of a unity, but 329 00:22:31,200 --> 00:22:34,400 Speaker 2: that's a thin top level. The moments you go down 330 00:22:34,440 --> 00:22:39,760 Speaker 2: there are real cultural and historical differences, and these are 331 00:22:39,880 --> 00:22:44,639 Speaker 2: hard to talk about because they cannot be quantified, and 332 00:22:44,720 --> 00:22:48,840 Speaker 2: elites love what they can quantify. That's what specialists do. 333 00:22:49,520 --> 00:22:53,440 Speaker 2: So when you start talking about culture, the antennas go up. 334 00:22:53,560 --> 00:22:57,800 Speaker 2: They get very, very nervous about this. And yet this 335 00:22:57,880 --> 00:23:01,280 Speaker 2: is what drives history and why China is such a 336 00:23:01,400 --> 00:23:05,640 Speaker 2: challenge because its culture is so different from ours, much 337 00:23:05,720 --> 00:23:10,440 Speaker 2: different than Soviet culture was because the Soviets were Europeans 338 00:23:10,480 --> 00:23:13,440 Speaker 2: at the end of the day. So there are real 339 00:23:13,640 --> 00:23:18,399 Speaker 2: cultural differences. And it's fine to talk about cultural differences 340 00:23:18,440 --> 00:23:21,919 Speaker 2: when you're praising a culture, but if you're making a 341 00:23:22,000 --> 00:23:26,159 Speaker 2: critique of it, that's not allowed. And yet it's those 342 00:23:26,359 --> 00:23:29,240 Speaker 2: kinds of things that can drive conflict. 343 00:23:29,960 --> 00:23:33,840 Speaker 1: How much does this inability to deal with reality by 344 00:23:33,840 --> 00:23:38,919 Speaker 1: the elites reflect back into the I think sort of 345 00:23:38,960 --> 00:23:42,800 Speaker 1: surprising ineffectiveness of the United Nations. 346 00:23:43,000 --> 00:23:46,840 Speaker 2: I remember growing up in the late nineteen fifties, early 347 00:23:46,960 --> 00:23:50,240 Speaker 2: nineteen sixties, and the United Nations was a big deal. 348 00:23:50,359 --> 00:23:54,720 Speaker 2: Back then, everybody knew the name of the Secretary general. 349 00:23:55,040 --> 00:23:59,080 Speaker 2: Secretary generals were like commonly known about, and you had 350 00:23:59,240 --> 00:24:03,119 Speaker 2: great fame his speeches. You had Khrushchev banging his shoe. 351 00:24:03,320 --> 00:24:06,600 Speaker 2: Later on, you had the great speeches of Abba Eben 352 00:24:07,040 --> 00:24:11,119 Speaker 2: Daniel Patrick moynihan when he was UN ambassador. The UN 353 00:24:11,200 --> 00:24:15,080 Speaker 2: really mattered because it gave the promise of a global world. 354 00:24:15,400 --> 00:24:18,720 Speaker 2: But now what global world has actually come into being? 355 00:24:18,840 --> 00:24:21,840 Speaker 2: The UN has been diminished because there are so many 356 00:24:21,960 --> 00:24:27,160 Speaker 2: other global organizations. The UN was ultimately an elite project 357 00:24:27,200 --> 00:24:31,560 Speaker 2: about soft power. Therefore, it worked well when there were 358 00:24:31,640 --> 00:24:36,440 Speaker 2: no major wars going on, especially wars that involved members 359 00:24:36,480 --> 00:24:39,959 Speaker 2: of the Security Council. But now you have a major 360 00:24:40,040 --> 00:24:43,919 Speaker 2: war in Ukraine going three years on, where one of 361 00:24:43,920 --> 00:24:47,679 Speaker 2: the protagonists is a member of the Security Council and 362 00:24:47,800 --> 00:24:52,359 Speaker 2: another protagonists. The United States has been supplying billions of 363 00:24:52,400 --> 00:24:57,440 Speaker 2: dollars of weapons. This kind of thing diminishes the United Nations. 364 00:24:58,240 --> 00:25:01,320 Speaker 1: If young leaders of the future came to you and said, 365 00:25:02,680 --> 00:25:04,760 Speaker 1: what should we be aware of and what should we 366 00:25:04,840 --> 00:25:09,080 Speaker 1: focus on to minimize damage to our world? 367 00:25:09,760 --> 00:25:11,200 Speaker 3: What would you tell them? 368 00:25:11,600 --> 00:25:15,119 Speaker 2: I would tell them that it's a good practice to 369 00:25:15,359 --> 00:25:21,359 Speaker 2: employ constructive pessimism, to always think pessimistically, but in a 370 00:25:21,440 --> 00:25:26,920 Speaker 2: constructive way, because in our lives, normal people who are 371 00:25:27,040 --> 00:25:31,240 Speaker 2: used to tragedy and are used to adversity always think 372 00:25:31,280 --> 00:25:35,240 Speaker 2: about what can go wrong, and foreign policy elite should 373 00:25:35,280 --> 00:25:38,199 Speaker 2: do the same thing, because if you think about what 374 00:25:38,400 --> 00:25:41,800 Speaker 2: can go wrong, if you think four or five steps ahead, 375 00:25:41,840 --> 00:25:46,480 Speaker 2: the chances are you will diminish the percentages that things 376 00:25:46,560 --> 00:25:50,679 Speaker 2: actually will go wrong. In lives and in foreign policy. 377 00:25:51,080 --> 00:25:54,040 Speaker 2: What goes wrong is what you're not thinking about, what 378 00:25:54,200 --> 00:25:56,560 Speaker 2: hits you over the back of your head, which you 379 00:25:56,760 --> 00:26:00,600 Speaker 2: hadn't considered. So I would say, like, as a discipline, 380 00:26:00,760 --> 00:26:06,959 Speaker 2: employ anxious foresight constructive pessimism. This is not new. Machiavelli 381 00:26:07,040 --> 00:26:07,800 Speaker 2: wrote about it. 382 00:26:08,680 --> 00:26:12,400 Speaker 1: So if you think about constructing pessimism, do you see 383 00:26:12,400 --> 00:26:16,600 Speaker 1: any positive constructive pessimism for Israel in the Middle East? 384 00:26:17,640 --> 00:26:22,240 Speaker 2: You no, I think Israel has employed constructive pessimism. They've 385 00:26:22,440 --> 00:26:26,240 Speaker 2: launched one attack on Iran but not others. You know, 386 00:26:26,280 --> 00:26:29,520 Speaker 2: they're always thinking ahead of the curve. If we do this, 387 00:26:29,720 --> 00:26:34,040 Speaker 2: what can they do? If we attack Gaza full out? 388 00:26:34,160 --> 00:26:37,600 Speaker 2: Even now, what will happen to the rest of the hostages? 389 00:26:37,920 --> 00:26:41,600 Speaker 2: I think the Israelis lived with constructive pessimism every day 390 00:26:41,600 --> 00:26:44,920 Speaker 2: of their lives. Nettagne, who is attacked from the right 391 00:26:45,119 --> 00:26:48,359 Speaker 2: as well as from the left. People criticized him for 392 00:26:48,520 --> 00:26:52,080 Speaker 2: making this deal with Hamas, but who knows what was 393 00:26:52,119 --> 00:26:56,240 Speaker 2: behind it? Who knows what promises the Trump administration gave 394 00:26:56,359 --> 00:26:59,639 Speaker 2: him If he made the deal, maybe they made some 395 00:26:59,680 --> 00:27:03,480 Speaker 2: concentessions on helping him with Iran. I have no idea, 396 00:27:03,880 --> 00:27:07,960 Speaker 2: but remember the Israelis. Whatever you think of net Tan Yaho, 397 00:27:08,520 --> 00:27:13,000 Speaker 2: he deals with levels of stress and anxiety that would 398 00:27:13,040 --> 00:27:18,120 Speaker 2: immobilize the average American politician on a number of levels. 399 00:27:18,800 --> 00:27:21,440 Speaker 1: I've known BB since eighty four, and I think that's 400 00:27:21,520 --> 00:27:25,760 Speaker 1: exactly right. He has an astonishing endurance level. It may 401 00:27:25,760 --> 00:27:27,639 Speaker 1: be in part because most of it doesn't feel I mean, 402 00:27:27,640 --> 00:27:30,680 Speaker 1: he's trained himself, he's disciplined, and he doesn't let it 403 00:27:30,760 --> 00:27:31,240 Speaker 1: get to him. 404 00:27:31,560 --> 00:27:32,879 Speaker 3: I want to thank you for joining me. 405 00:27:33,359 --> 00:27:37,159 Speaker 1: Your earlier book on the Coming Anarchy, I thought was 406 00:27:37,200 --> 00:27:40,600 Speaker 1: a historic work and I heard everybody remember that also, 407 00:27:40,920 --> 00:27:44,639 Speaker 1: and your new book, wastelamd A World in Prominent Crisis, 408 00:27:45,000 --> 00:27:47,880 Speaker 1: is a pretty good guide to what we're likely having 409 00:27:47,920 --> 00:27:50,440 Speaker 1: to deal with in our generation and our children and 410 00:27:50,480 --> 00:27:54,960 Speaker 1: grandchildren's generation. It's available now in Amazon and on bookstairs everywhere. 411 00:27:55,280 --> 00:27:58,439 Speaker 1: It's a very important book because it resets how to 412 00:27:58,480 --> 00:28:01,160 Speaker 1: think about the world around us, and I recommend every 413 00:28:01,200 --> 00:28:04,080 Speaker 1: citizen get a copy and read it. And Robert, I 414 00:28:04,160 --> 00:28:06,159 Speaker 1: really appreciate you taking the time to be with me. 415 00:28:06,760 --> 00:28:09,399 Speaker 2: It's been my great pleasure to be with you. Thank you. 416 00:28:12,760 --> 00:28:14,680 Speaker 3: Thank you to my guest, Robert D. Kaplan. 417 00:28:15,160 --> 00:28:16,800 Speaker 1: You can get a link to buy his new book, 418 00:28:17,119 --> 00:28:20,520 Speaker 1: Waste Lamb A World and Prominent Crisis on our show 419 00:28:20,560 --> 00:28:23,919 Speaker 1: page at newtworld dot com. Newt World is produced by 420 00:28:23,960 --> 00:28:28,280 Speaker 1: Gingish three sixty and iHeartMedia. Our executive producer's Guarnsey Sloan. 421 00:28:28,840 --> 00:28:32,720 Speaker 1: Our researcher is Rachel Peterson. The artwork for the show 422 00:28:33,280 --> 00:28:36,400 Speaker 1: was created by Steve Penley. Special thanks to the team 423 00:28:36,400 --> 00:28:37,439 Speaker 1: at Ginglish three sixty. 424 00:28:38,320 --> 00:28:39,520 Speaker 3: If you've been enjoying news. 425 00:28:39,320 --> 00:28:42,360 Speaker 1: World, I hope you'll go to Apple Podcast and both 426 00:28:42,400 --> 00:28:44,920 Speaker 1: rate us with five stars and give us a review 427 00:28:45,360 --> 00:28:46,040 Speaker 1: so others can. 428 00:28:46,000 --> 00:28:46,840 Speaker 3: Learn what it's all about. 429 00:28:47,440 --> 00:28:50,240 Speaker 1: Right now, listeners of neut World can sign up for 430 00:28:50,360 --> 00:28:54,360 Speaker 1: my three free weekly columns at Gingrishtree sixty dot com 431 00:28:54,440 --> 00:28:58,160 Speaker 1: slash newsletter. I'm NEWT Gingrich. This is neutrald