WEBVTT - Is Crypto Going Extinct? with Stacy-Marie Ishmael #583

0:00:00.080 --> 0:00:02.920
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to How the Money. I'm Joel and I am Matt.

0:00:03.120 --> 0:00:06.600
<v Speaker 1>Today we're asking the question is crypto going extinct? With

0:00:06.840 --> 0:00:28.960
<v Speaker 1>Stacy Marie Ishmael. That's right, Joel, we are diving into

0:00:28.960 --> 0:00:32.320
<v Speaker 1>cryptocurrencies today because guess what, Uh, there's a very good

0:00:32.400 --> 0:00:35.640
<v Speaker 1>chance that if you're listening, your crypto holdings are worth

0:00:35.800 --> 0:00:38.760
<v Speaker 1>much less and you might be a little concerned. Um.

0:00:38.800 --> 0:00:41.240
<v Speaker 1>And if so, it turns out you're not alone because

0:00:41.280 --> 0:00:44.000
<v Speaker 1>a recent bank Rate survey show that only about thirty

0:00:44.360 --> 0:00:47.479
<v Speaker 1>of millennials are comfortable investing in crypto today, which is

0:00:47.680 --> 0:00:50.960
<v Speaker 1>down from about a year ago. There's just not as

0:00:51.040 --> 0:00:54.360
<v Speaker 1>much confidence in crypto as there used to be. And

0:00:54.400 --> 0:00:57.240
<v Speaker 1>so we're excited to be joined by Stacy Marie Ishmael

0:00:57.640 --> 0:01:00.520
<v Speaker 1>for yours. Stacy, she used to work at The Finance Times,

0:01:00.520 --> 0:01:03.720
<v Speaker 1>where she started the block Alphaville. She's worked as a

0:01:03.800 --> 0:01:06.560
<v Speaker 1>senior editor at Apple, and now she's a writer and

0:01:06.600 --> 0:01:10.440
<v Speaker 1>podcaster over at Bloomberg, where basically she eats and drinks

0:01:10.440 --> 0:01:14.440
<v Speaker 1>crypto every single day. So, Stacy, thank you for joining

0:01:14.480 --> 0:01:16.920
<v Speaker 1>us today. Thank you so much for having me. I

0:01:16.920 --> 0:01:19.759
<v Speaker 1>wouldn't say that crypto is like super delicious as a mean,

0:01:21.400 --> 0:01:23.240
<v Speaker 1>I was wondering. Yeah, bacon eggs in a side of

0:01:23.240 --> 0:01:25.520
<v Speaker 1>cryptos like that that sounds like a nice breakfast and

0:01:25.520 --> 0:01:29.080
<v Speaker 1>and well balanced, probably too. Uh Well, the first question

0:01:29.160 --> 0:01:32.280
<v Speaker 1>we ask everybody that comes on the show, Stacy, is

0:01:32.680 --> 0:01:34.320
<v Speaker 1>we want to know what they explored John Matt and

0:01:34.400 --> 0:01:36.319
<v Speaker 1>I we sported John beer. We already showed you ours

0:01:36.360 --> 0:01:39.360
<v Speaker 1>before we started recording. It's uh an expensive like twenty

0:01:39.360 --> 0:01:41.880
<v Speaker 1>dollar bottle craft here that we're enjoying on today's episode

0:01:42.080 --> 0:01:44.360
<v Speaker 1>and very much looking forward to talking about this at

0:01:44.360 --> 0:01:47.319
<v Speaker 1>the end. Yeah. Well, and so we we sporge on

0:01:47.360 --> 0:01:50.640
<v Speaker 1>that while we're saving and investing well for the future. So, yeah,

0:01:50.640 --> 0:01:52.040
<v Speaker 1>what's that sport for you? What do you like to

0:01:52.040 --> 0:01:53.920
<v Speaker 1>spend money on where people might think you're you're a

0:01:53.920 --> 0:01:58.520
<v Speaker 1>little crazy for for doing it? Fountain pens. Oh, very nice.

0:01:58.800 --> 0:02:02.880
<v Speaker 1>It's basically like the sit of cryptocurrency, like what is

0:02:02.920 --> 0:02:08.240
<v Speaker 1>the most Yeah? Absolutely? Was this something you've always been

0:02:08.240 --> 0:02:11.280
<v Speaker 1>into or was it because you needed something to juxtapose

0:02:11.840 --> 0:02:15.480
<v Speaker 1>against cryptocurrencies and all the digital stuff that you're into. Oh,

0:02:15.520 --> 0:02:19.120
<v Speaker 1>I've always been into it. So I'm left handed and

0:02:19.800 --> 0:02:22.200
<v Speaker 1>a curse of being left handed, as you find that

0:02:22.280 --> 0:02:25.480
<v Speaker 1>most pens don't work for you, and so I kind

0:02:25.480 --> 0:02:28.440
<v Speaker 1>of fell down this path relatively early on of trying

0:02:28.480 --> 0:02:31.280
<v Speaker 1>to find the perfect pen and trying to find, you know,

0:02:31.760 --> 0:02:34.680
<v Speaker 1>something that would make my handwriting look a little bit

0:02:34.720 --> 0:02:37.320
<v Speaker 1>less like chicken scratches. And somebody was like, have you

0:02:37.320 --> 0:02:39.040
<v Speaker 1>heard of fountain pens? I was like, no, but I'm

0:02:39.040 --> 0:02:41.400
<v Speaker 1>going to find out everything there is to know. And

0:02:41.440 --> 0:02:45.200
<v Speaker 1>then I found out how expensive these can get, and

0:02:45.240 --> 0:02:47.120
<v Speaker 1>it was a whole thing. So Matt and I we

0:02:47.120 --> 0:02:50.040
<v Speaker 1>have a mutual friend who got so into fountain pens.

0:02:50.320 --> 0:02:52.040
<v Speaker 1>He and I didn't. I was like, oh, that's cool.

0:02:52.080 --> 0:02:54.000
<v Speaker 1>I'm glad that you're that you're interested in this, and

0:02:54.000 --> 0:02:55.919
<v Speaker 1>he would talk about it occasionally show off his pens.

0:02:56.200 --> 0:02:59.160
<v Speaker 1>But he went to a physical conference I have really

0:02:59.200 --> 0:03:03.080
<v Speaker 1>wanted to go to. Okay, he had a really good time.

0:03:03.160 --> 0:03:05.200
<v Speaker 1>So I think it would be worth the time and

0:03:05.320 --> 0:03:07.600
<v Speaker 1>energy that it would take for you to get like,

0:03:08.760 --> 0:03:11.440
<v Speaker 1>I didn't know that was a thing, but okay, So

0:03:12.440 --> 0:03:14.240
<v Speaker 1>can I ask what is the most expensive pen that

0:03:14.320 --> 0:03:19.560
<v Speaker 1>you own? It's okay, ask you can ask, um, the

0:03:19.600 --> 0:03:22.440
<v Speaker 1>most expensive pen that I own is not the most

0:03:22.440 --> 0:03:26.200
<v Speaker 1>expensive pen that I want, but I would say that

0:03:26.400 --> 0:03:29.720
<v Speaker 1>I have spent at least there was one pen in

0:03:29.760 --> 0:03:35.360
<v Speaker 1>particular that cost me more than all Right, I like it.

0:03:36.920 --> 0:03:39.160
<v Speaker 1>I would love to just I mean, I've never held

0:03:39.200 --> 0:03:41.360
<v Speaker 1>a pen like that before. It is I'm gorgeous, It

0:03:41.400 --> 0:03:45.800
<v Speaker 1>writes beautifully, it's perfectly balanced. It is a work of arts. Okay, yeah,

0:03:45.840 --> 0:03:47.600
<v Speaker 1>that's exactly. I have to follow up with this then,

0:03:47.800 --> 0:03:51.040
<v Speaker 1>So how often are you writing letters to people? Because

0:03:51.080 --> 0:03:52.720
<v Speaker 1>I would think if this is a sporge, like you

0:03:52.760 --> 0:03:54.920
<v Speaker 1>don't want to get these pens just so you can

0:03:55.000 --> 0:03:57.120
<v Speaker 1>you're not looking just look look at I'm putting them

0:03:57.120 --> 0:03:59.200
<v Speaker 1>on the wall or something like that, Like are you

0:03:59.240 --> 0:04:02.560
<v Speaker 1>are you often writing letters like old school style to

0:04:02.720 --> 0:04:05.200
<v Speaker 1>fans and family? I even make wax seals for them.

0:04:05.960 --> 0:04:08.920
<v Speaker 1>That's that's all. That is awesome. That is Can you

0:04:08.960 --> 0:04:11.680
<v Speaker 1>send us a letter? We will send address. We'll give

0:04:11.720 --> 0:04:13.960
<v Speaker 1>you our our millions, like put us on your your

0:04:14.000 --> 0:04:16.400
<v Speaker 1>Christmas card list or whatever whatever in holiday card you

0:04:16.400 --> 0:04:18.760
<v Speaker 1>send out. We would love to be on the receiving

0:04:18.880 --> 0:04:21.240
<v Speaker 1>end of that beautiful writing. Well. I love that it's

0:04:21.240 --> 0:04:23.279
<v Speaker 1>coming back to and and that you're helping bring it

0:04:23.279 --> 0:04:25.520
<v Speaker 1>back because it's it's one of the like there's not

0:04:25.640 --> 0:04:28.599
<v Speaker 1>much better than something handwritten from somebody to share to

0:04:28.680 --> 0:04:31.360
<v Speaker 1>show that like you, you, you were thoughtful about you,

0:04:31.600 --> 0:04:33.479
<v Speaker 1>you care about them. So I think it's cool. I

0:04:33.480 --> 0:04:36.080
<v Speaker 1>think it's super cool as well. Thanks for sharing that, Stacy.

0:04:36.680 --> 0:04:39.440
<v Speaker 1>Uh So, your background, right, like, you've lived, You've gone

0:04:39.440 --> 0:04:41.960
<v Speaker 1>to school all over the world, just generally speaking, How

0:04:42.000 --> 0:04:45.560
<v Speaker 1>has spending just a significant amount of time, you know,

0:04:45.560 --> 0:04:47.720
<v Speaker 1>on a few different continents, how has that impacted your

0:04:47.760 --> 0:04:51.320
<v Speaker 1>perspective when it comes to just economic matters that we're

0:04:51.320 --> 0:04:54.880
<v Speaker 1>dealing with today. I think I've been very fortunate to

0:04:54.880 --> 0:05:00.080
<v Speaker 1>be able to live what it feels like to not

0:05:00.200 --> 0:05:03.680
<v Speaker 1>just like think about things like foreign exchange in the abstract,

0:05:03.839 --> 0:05:07.400
<v Speaker 1>but actually go from one country to another where you know,

0:05:07.440 --> 0:05:10.560
<v Speaker 1>all of my savings were in the Trinidad and Tobago

0:05:10.640 --> 0:05:14.160
<v Speaker 1>dollar and I was paying bills in the the British

0:05:14.200 --> 0:05:18.240
<v Speaker 1>pounds sterling, or to experience what it's like to have

0:05:18.920 --> 0:05:21.000
<v Speaker 1>in one place, what would be considered kind of like

0:05:21.000 --> 0:05:23.440
<v Speaker 1>a very comfortable standard of living that costs X y

0:05:23.520 --> 0:05:26.160
<v Speaker 1>z amount, and then you moved to say San Francisco,

0:05:27.240 --> 0:05:30.599
<v Speaker 1>where for exactly the same amount and rent you essentially

0:05:30.600 --> 0:05:33.760
<v Speaker 1>live in a closet with no window. Um and it's

0:05:33.760 --> 0:05:37.640
<v Speaker 1>it's really made me appreciate how important having a range

0:05:37.640 --> 0:05:40.560
<v Speaker 1>of understandings of local contexts is as a as a reporter,

0:05:40.600 --> 0:05:43.680
<v Speaker 1>as an and as an editor. Okay, talk to me,

0:05:43.760 --> 0:05:46.599
<v Speaker 1>talk to me about your how you got interested in cryptocurrency,

0:05:46.680 --> 0:05:49.760
<v Speaker 1>because yeah, you're at the point you host a daily

0:05:49.760 --> 0:05:51.919
<v Speaker 1>podcast about it. Like Matt said at the beginning, you

0:05:52.000 --> 0:05:54.960
<v Speaker 1>eat and breathe crypto and so like, what what got

0:05:54.960 --> 0:05:58.719
<v Speaker 1>to this point where Stacy Marie Ishmael is now like

0:05:59.520 --> 0:06:03.839
<v Speaker 1>that enthusiastic, that interested in the space where you hold

0:06:03.839 --> 0:06:06.599
<v Speaker 1>client sinker that's your day job. Now, this is a

0:06:06.640 --> 0:06:09.960
<v Speaker 1>reasonable question, and it comes from, I think the confluence

0:06:10.000 --> 0:06:12.520
<v Speaker 1>of several of my interests. So when I started as

0:06:12.520 --> 0:06:17.040
<v Speaker 1>a finance report to financial journalist, I was responsible for

0:06:17.839 --> 0:06:21.760
<v Speaker 1>covering structured finance, for covering things like derivatives, for covering

0:06:21.839 --> 0:06:26.000
<v Speaker 1>things that were called credit default swaps, um. I was

0:06:26.080 --> 0:06:28.960
<v Speaker 1>looking at mortgage backed securities, you know, all the things

0:06:28.960 --> 0:06:30.400
<v Speaker 1>that in two thousand and eight seemed like a good

0:06:30.400 --> 0:06:33.520
<v Speaker 1>idea until they stopped seeming like a good idea. And

0:06:33.920 --> 0:06:35.800
<v Speaker 1>so I've been I've always been interested in, like what

0:06:35.920 --> 0:06:38.960
<v Speaker 1>is the nerdiest possible corner of a financial market and

0:06:38.960 --> 0:06:41.279
<v Speaker 1>how can I make that interesting and accessible to people

0:06:41.279 --> 0:06:44.680
<v Speaker 1>other than me and my immediate editors. And I've always

0:06:44.680 --> 0:06:46.560
<v Speaker 1>also been the kind of person who is super interested

0:06:46.560 --> 0:06:50.279
<v Speaker 1>in technology, Like I've worked at large and small technology companies.

0:06:50.440 --> 0:06:53.479
<v Speaker 1>I was definitely the friend that would build your website.

0:06:53.920 --> 0:06:55.840
<v Speaker 1>I was definitely the friend that you'd be like, I

0:06:55.839 --> 0:06:57.800
<v Speaker 1>can't get by pre ne to work, like try this.

0:06:58.360 --> 0:07:03.279
<v Speaker 1>And you know, crypto is essentially the confluence of risk pricing,

0:07:03.600 --> 0:07:09.679
<v Speaker 1>financial arbitrage and speculation, and interesting underlying technology smashed together.

0:07:10.360 --> 0:07:13.600
<v Speaker 1>M Yeah, that makes sense. Okay, So I mean, on

0:07:13.600 --> 0:07:16.200
<v Speaker 1>that note, can you maybe just give us a brief

0:07:16.440 --> 0:07:20.440
<v Speaker 1>cryptocurrency history or just like an evolution, And obviously there's

0:07:20.440 --> 0:07:22.800
<v Speaker 1>a lot to cover, but cover and kind of like

0:07:22.840 --> 0:07:25.120
<v Speaker 1>go over the aspects of crypto that you think are

0:07:25.200 --> 0:07:30.280
<v Speaker 1>most important given where we are with crypto today. So

0:07:31.600 --> 0:07:34.160
<v Speaker 1>in a historical context, the main thing to understand is

0:07:34.200 --> 0:07:38.280
<v Speaker 1>that crypto, which started as bitcoin, started as a rejection

0:07:38.600 --> 0:07:42.800
<v Speaker 1>of traditional banking, started as a rejection of the idea

0:07:42.960 --> 0:07:46.240
<v Speaker 1>that governments should have a say in your ability to

0:07:46.320 --> 0:07:49.600
<v Speaker 1>transact with somebody else, and started as a rejection of

0:07:49.640 --> 0:07:53.200
<v Speaker 1>the idea that you should have to trust big centralized

0:07:53.200 --> 0:07:57.560
<v Speaker 1>agencies like central banks or banks in general, to be

0:07:57.640 --> 0:08:00.520
<v Speaker 1>an intermediary in those same types of trans actions. And

0:08:00.560 --> 0:08:03.760
<v Speaker 1>this was all written out in a relatively short white

0:08:03.760 --> 0:08:07.480
<v Speaker 1>paper about thirteen years ago that was the origins of bitcoin,

0:08:07.600 --> 0:08:09.800
<v Speaker 1>and it was based on you know, like some some

0:08:09.880 --> 0:08:14.800
<v Speaker 1>political theories, some philosophies, some mathematical proofs, some conspiracy theory. Toadah,

0:08:14.920 --> 0:08:18.680
<v Speaker 1>you've got a bitcoin white paper. And since then what

0:08:18.920 --> 0:08:22.480
<v Speaker 1>it has evolved into is absolutely for a lot of

0:08:22.480 --> 0:08:26.320
<v Speaker 1>people are kind of an ideological expression of other deeply

0:08:26.440 --> 0:08:29.240
<v Speaker 1>held beliefs that they might have. For some people it's

0:08:29.240 --> 0:08:32.680
<v Speaker 1>a means of transacting. For some people it's a means

0:08:32.880 --> 0:08:35.720
<v Speaker 1>of you know, kind of speculating and generating some kind

0:08:35.720 --> 0:08:38.520
<v Speaker 1>of financial yield. And for other people it's just like

0:08:38.600 --> 0:08:40.920
<v Speaker 1>an interesting problem to be solved. They're like, oh, this

0:08:40.920 --> 0:08:42.840
<v Speaker 1>this is a cool piece of technology. What what can

0:08:42.880 --> 0:08:45.760
<v Speaker 1>I build on top of this? Yeah, So it seems

0:08:45.760 --> 0:08:48.880
<v Speaker 1>like there's definitely some we mentioned political elements are certainly

0:08:48.920 --> 0:08:51.960
<v Speaker 1>some like libertarian libertarian leaning elements right in a lot

0:08:52.000 --> 0:08:55.120
<v Speaker 1>of the crypto space. And and we we take a

0:08:55.120 --> 0:08:58.080
<v Speaker 1>look step back and you look at maybe decentralized finance

0:08:58.080 --> 0:09:00.800
<v Speaker 1>as a whole um I guess what what do you

0:09:00.840 --> 0:09:03.080
<v Speaker 1>think what makes it worth striving for? Or what do

0:09:03.120 --> 0:09:06.840
<v Speaker 1>these people, the people who are who are crypto enthusiasts enthusiasts,

0:09:06.840 --> 0:09:09.600
<v Speaker 1>what what what makes them think that the centralized finance

0:09:09.800 --> 0:09:12.120
<v Speaker 1>is worth striving for. I guess to our listener, the

0:09:12.120 --> 0:09:15.559
<v Speaker 1>average American, right, it feels like the current system works

0:09:15.559 --> 0:09:18.600
<v Speaker 1>decently well. Sure, the banks, their credit card companies, they

0:09:18.640 --> 0:09:21.160
<v Speaker 1>make lots of money on every transaction that we make.

0:09:21.480 --> 0:09:24.080
<v Speaker 1>But you know, the system, it meets our needs pretty

0:09:24.080 --> 0:09:26.120
<v Speaker 1>well and it seems to hold up. So why in

0:09:26.160 --> 0:09:28.520
<v Speaker 1>the world do we need defy in our lives? Well,

0:09:28.559 --> 0:09:31.120
<v Speaker 1>if let's jump back to two thousand and you know,

0:09:31.200 --> 0:09:34.920
<v Speaker 1>the sort of late two thousand's, early two thousand tens,

0:09:34.920 --> 0:09:37.520
<v Speaker 1>when for a lot of people, particularly people in the

0:09:37.559 --> 0:09:40.079
<v Speaker 1>United States, they wouldn't say that the financial system was

0:09:40.120 --> 0:09:43.280
<v Speaker 1>working particularly well. There were tons of people that had

0:09:43.520 --> 0:09:47.560
<v Speaker 1>lost their homes to mortgage foreclosure. There were people who

0:09:47.559 --> 0:09:51.480
<v Speaker 1>had lost their savings to bank failures. There were people

0:09:51.520 --> 0:09:55.720
<v Speaker 1>who were looking at those same banks that they were saying, hey, sorry,

0:09:55.760 --> 0:09:57.480
<v Speaker 1>we we can't pay you back. We're out of money.

0:09:57.720 --> 0:10:00.240
<v Speaker 1>Their ceo s were like flying around in private It's

0:10:00.280 --> 0:10:03.960
<v Speaker 1>like there was this real perception on both ends of

0:10:03.960 --> 0:10:07.720
<v Speaker 1>the political spectrum that you know, banks, the financial system

0:10:07.760 --> 0:10:11.560
<v Speaker 1>was not serving the quote unquote average American and a

0:10:11.600 --> 0:10:14.880
<v Speaker 1>lot of the belief system of crypto is well reject

0:10:15.160 --> 0:10:18.520
<v Speaker 1>that system that wasn't serving you, and let's create a

0:10:18.559 --> 0:10:24.160
<v Speaker 1>different one that is based on much more egalitarian principles.

0:10:24.679 --> 0:10:28.120
<v Speaker 1>And that idea of we don't need to rely on

0:10:28.200 --> 0:10:31.000
<v Speaker 1>somebody else who is just like looking to monetize us

0:10:31.559 --> 0:10:33.560
<v Speaker 1>to you know, to be able to participate in a

0:10:33.600 --> 0:10:36.160
<v Speaker 1>financial system was really powerful for a lot of people

0:10:36.200 --> 0:10:38.760
<v Speaker 1>and remains really powerful for a lot of people, even

0:10:38.760 --> 0:10:41.400
<v Speaker 1>though a lot of people are doing just fine and

0:10:41.440 --> 0:10:44.560
<v Speaker 1>are not facing foreclosure and actually are using banks to

0:10:44.600 --> 0:10:47.640
<v Speaker 1>store their considerable assets that they may have generated from

0:10:47.640 --> 0:10:50.839
<v Speaker 1>bitcoin or otherwise. You know, this narrative, the story the

0:10:50.840 --> 0:10:54.320
<v Speaker 1>white paper behind crypto, like our bitcoin specifically, like it's

0:10:55.120 --> 0:10:57.160
<v Speaker 1>it's been like like you said, it's been around for

0:10:57.200 --> 0:10:58.600
<v Speaker 1>a while, but I think a lot of folks have

0:10:58.640 --> 0:11:00.880
<v Speaker 1>kind of jumped onto it within the recent years. Um,

0:11:01.280 --> 0:11:04.400
<v Speaker 1>do you think that that story, that narrative combined with

0:11:04.559 --> 0:11:06.760
<v Speaker 1>than what we experienced with the pandemic, right, like the

0:11:06.760 --> 0:11:09.520
<v Speaker 1>pandemic coupled with stimmy checks. Do you think all those

0:11:09.520 --> 0:11:12.160
<v Speaker 1>things combined contributed to the to the rise and the

0:11:12.200 --> 0:11:15.920
<v Speaker 1>fall that that we've seen cryptocurrencies and door Absolutely, So

0:11:15.960 --> 0:11:18.040
<v Speaker 1>I have a um, my friends will have heard me

0:11:18.080 --> 0:11:19.400
<v Speaker 1>say this, So if any of them are listening, they're

0:11:19.440 --> 0:11:21.320
<v Speaker 1>about to rule their eyes. But I have I have

0:11:21.400 --> 0:11:28.440
<v Speaker 1>a unified theory of like video games, meme stocks, crypto reddit,

0:11:29.240 --> 0:11:32.320
<v Speaker 1>which is that all of these things kind of tapped

0:11:32.400 --> 0:11:36.280
<v Speaker 1>into a desire to be a part of something. They

0:11:36.440 --> 0:11:39.240
<v Speaker 1>tapped into the fact that a lot of people were

0:11:39.240 --> 0:11:41.360
<v Speaker 1>just spending a lot of time staring at computer screens

0:11:41.520 --> 0:11:45.880
<v Speaker 1>because they couldn't go outside, and that for various reasons,

0:11:45.880 --> 0:11:49.000
<v Speaker 1>some folks had like an above average amount of disposable income.

0:11:49.760 --> 0:11:53.200
<v Speaker 1>And so you know, whether it was people suddenly spending

0:11:53.440 --> 0:11:56.280
<v Speaker 1>a bunch of money playing video games or getting aggressively

0:11:56.400 --> 0:11:59.440
<v Speaker 1>into online poker in the states where that's allowed, or

0:11:59.720 --> 0:12:02.600
<v Speaker 1>you know, trying to persuade everybody that buying game stop

0:12:02.640 --> 0:12:04.680
<v Speaker 1>is a good idea, or shares and game Stop was

0:12:04.679 --> 0:12:07.440
<v Speaker 1>a good idea. It was the sort of the same fuel.

0:12:07.640 --> 0:12:10.480
<v Speaker 1>Everything was fueled by very similar things, and none of

0:12:10.520 --> 0:12:12.640
<v Speaker 1>those things really have to do with that sense of

0:12:12.840 --> 0:12:16.160
<v Speaker 1>you know, pure libertarianism. None of that necessarily requires you

0:12:16.200 --> 0:12:19.319
<v Speaker 1>to have read a white paper. It's just a sense of, Oh,

0:12:19.360 --> 0:12:22.040
<v Speaker 1>this coin that looks like a sheba. You knew that

0:12:22.080 --> 0:12:25.280
<v Speaker 1>Elon Muski is talking about. That seems fun and I

0:12:25.320 --> 0:12:27.439
<v Speaker 1>need fun, and I'm going to do something like that.

0:12:27.520 --> 0:12:30.040
<v Speaker 1>And you know, so there was it is impossible to

0:12:30.080 --> 0:12:33.240
<v Speaker 1>separate some of the price increases of the past two

0:12:33.320 --> 0:12:38.400
<v Speaker 1>years with the overarching macro reality of all of these

0:12:38.400 --> 0:12:40.280
<v Speaker 1>other things that were happening at the same time. It's

0:12:40.280 --> 0:12:41.680
<v Speaker 1>it's almost like it was just in the right place

0:12:41.720 --> 0:12:43.880
<v Speaker 1>at the right time. Like it kind of makes me

0:12:43.920 --> 0:12:47.720
<v Speaker 1>wonder if cryptocurrencies didn't exist, Well, what when we have

0:12:47.760 --> 0:12:51.280
<v Speaker 1>turned to write like just as a world in particular

0:12:51.280 --> 0:12:53.600
<v Speaker 1>here in the US, Like, what would all of those

0:12:53.640 --> 0:12:57.160
<v Speaker 1>individuals have done instead of dumping that money into crypto

0:12:57.400 --> 0:12:59.560
<v Speaker 1>As physical communities are kind of breaking down and you

0:12:59.600 --> 0:13:02.200
<v Speaker 1>can't in time with people that you're close to in

0:13:02.240 --> 0:13:05.599
<v Speaker 1>the ways that you're used to. It's the cryptocurrency is

0:13:05.640 --> 0:13:07.679
<v Speaker 1>kind of filled a void and I don't know what

0:13:07.679 --> 0:13:10.600
<v Speaker 1>they absolutely did, And it's you know, whether you look

0:13:10.640 --> 0:13:13.599
<v Speaker 1>at subreddits like our Cryptocurrency, which is one of the

0:13:13.679 --> 0:13:16.959
<v Speaker 1>largest on Reddit, or you know, Discord, which I tend

0:13:17.000 --> 0:13:19.480
<v Speaker 1>to describe as like slack for video games. There were

0:13:19.520 --> 0:13:22.400
<v Speaker 1>so many people in there that in between sharing trading

0:13:22.440 --> 0:13:24.320
<v Speaker 1>tips or whatever they were talking about, we're just like

0:13:24.320 --> 0:13:27.280
<v Speaker 1>talking about their lives and you know, just kind of

0:13:27.320 --> 0:13:30.760
<v Speaker 1>sharing experiences and finding community in a way that also

0:13:30.840 --> 0:13:32.600
<v Speaker 1>happened to be like, oh, by the way, I'm buying

0:13:32.679 --> 0:13:34.040
<v Speaker 1>this thing is going to the moon. You should get

0:13:34.040 --> 0:13:37.400
<v Speaker 1>in on that as well. Yeah, okay, so I guess there.

0:13:37.400 --> 0:13:40.199
<v Speaker 1>But there are more and more naysayers in the crypto

0:13:40.200 --> 0:13:42.800
<v Speaker 1>space now or or or like you know, they talk

0:13:42.880 --> 0:13:45.200
<v Speaker 1>about crypto even though they're not they're not in on

0:13:45.200 --> 0:13:47.920
<v Speaker 1>on the game. And Jamie Diamonds, the CEO of Chase,

0:13:48.000 --> 0:13:49.960
<v Speaker 1>he recently he called crypto. I mean this, I mean,

0:13:49.960 --> 0:13:52.080
<v Speaker 1>I'm sure this made ripples in that Reddit community, right.

0:13:52.120 --> 0:13:55.440
<v Speaker 1>He called crypto a decentralized Ponzi scheme. And he's He's

0:13:55.440 --> 0:13:57.319
<v Speaker 1>not the only one who's kind of a Debbie Downer

0:13:57.400 --> 0:14:00.160
<v Speaker 1>in this regard, but it certainly feels like, you know,

0:14:00.200 --> 0:14:02.160
<v Speaker 1>anyone like Matt Side at the beginning, who invested some

0:14:02.200 --> 0:14:04.440
<v Speaker 1>of their money around Super Bowl time earlier this year,

0:14:04.840 --> 0:14:07.439
<v Speaker 1>like they might feel the same way as he does, so,

0:14:07.679 --> 0:14:11.200
<v Speaker 1>I don't know how how has the crypto community responded

0:14:11.600 --> 0:14:14.360
<v Speaker 1>to big time players like it are they? Is he

0:14:14.480 --> 0:14:17.319
<v Speaker 1>like the arch nemesis now of the crypto community. There

0:14:17.320 --> 0:14:19.720
<v Speaker 1>are so many animals in crypto, like Jamie Diavon, like

0:14:19.800 --> 0:14:22.760
<v Speaker 1>some you know, the it's like you know those murder

0:14:22.760 --> 0:14:24.400
<v Speaker 1>boards where there's just a bunch of people and they're

0:14:24.400 --> 0:14:27.200
<v Speaker 1>connected by red string like some dudes. Somewhere definitely has

0:14:27.200 --> 0:14:31.720
<v Speaker 1>like Jamie Diamond's face as well as Somewhere board somewhere. Um, well,

0:14:31.760 --> 0:14:34.120
<v Speaker 1>I'll say a couple of things. One is, it is

0:14:34.320 --> 0:14:36.680
<v Speaker 1>very much the case that a lot of people bought

0:14:36.720 --> 0:14:40.400
<v Speaker 1>into crypto because prices were hitting all time highs and

0:14:40.680 --> 0:14:43.520
<v Speaker 1>there was this this you know, legit fomo, this fair

0:14:43.520 --> 0:14:45.520
<v Speaker 1>of missing out, this idea of like wow, all of

0:14:45.520 --> 0:14:48.520
<v Speaker 1>my friends are suddenly rich on paper, Um, I want

0:14:48.560 --> 0:14:51.560
<v Speaker 1>to get in on this action. And so, and that

0:14:51.600 --> 0:14:53.760
<v Speaker 1>was before the super Bowl. For me, the Super Bowl

0:14:53.800 --> 0:14:55.840
<v Speaker 1>was kind of like the toppi Ist top of the

0:14:55.920 --> 0:14:59.760
<v Speaker 1>marketing crency. Um, you know, if like million dollar ads

0:14:59.800 --> 0:15:02.320
<v Speaker 1>with famous celebrities, exactly Matt Damon is telling you to

0:15:02.360 --> 0:15:06.320
<v Speaker 1>buy something, it's like a strong counter indicator. Otherwise you're weak,

0:15:07.200 --> 0:15:12.080
<v Speaker 1>are you not your exactly so, but that enthusiasm has

0:15:12.120 --> 0:15:14.400
<v Speaker 1>been going on for several months, and you know, like

0:15:14.440 --> 0:15:17.520
<v Speaker 1>that September to December period is when you couldn't if

0:15:17.520 --> 0:15:19.400
<v Speaker 1>you were a celebrity and you weren't talking about your

0:15:19.400 --> 0:15:22.160
<v Speaker 1>board ape and ft like, were you even a celebrity?

0:15:22.480 --> 0:15:25.400
<v Speaker 1>And but the reality for a lot of other people

0:15:25.480 --> 0:15:28.400
<v Speaker 1>who bought into crypto in two thousand thirteen, two thousand

0:15:28.440 --> 0:15:31.760
<v Speaker 1>fourteen when it was trading like the low thousands of dollars,

0:15:32.240 --> 0:15:34.120
<v Speaker 1>is that even though it's down, you know, more than

0:15:34.160 --> 0:15:37.760
<v Speaker 1>fifty this year, those people are still fine. And so

0:15:38.120 --> 0:15:41.280
<v Speaker 1>you have this kind of dichotomy emerging in the market

0:15:41.440 --> 0:15:46.120
<v Speaker 1>of folks who piled in at the top and folks

0:15:46.160 --> 0:15:50.520
<v Speaker 1>who have been in from the beginning. And it's sort

0:15:50.560 --> 0:15:53.280
<v Speaker 1>of it's almost like two sides talking past each other

0:15:53.560 --> 0:15:55.240
<v Speaker 1>because a lot of the folks who piled in at

0:15:55.240 --> 0:15:57.040
<v Speaker 1>the top, and to be clear, some of the people

0:15:57.120 --> 0:16:00.200
<v Speaker 1>piled on the top were very sophisticated. They were, in

0:16:00.320 --> 0:16:02.600
<v Speaker 1>kind of parlance, I'm sure folks and you're shore familiar with,

0:16:02.800 --> 0:16:05.720
<v Speaker 1>considered like qualified investors. Right. They had they had the

0:16:05.760 --> 0:16:10.200
<v Speaker 1>liquid assets, they had the background, they had the experience um,

0:16:10.240 --> 0:16:15.880
<v Speaker 1>and they made decisions that institutional investors, including major hedge funds,

0:16:15.880 --> 0:16:18.360
<v Speaker 1>were also making, Like this token looks like a smart bet,

0:16:18.880 --> 0:16:22.120
<v Speaker 1>you know, hindsight and all that stuff. So I would

0:16:22.160 --> 0:16:24.360
<v Speaker 1>be very careful not to say that everybody who came

0:16:24.400 --> 0:16:26.520
<v Speaker 1>in because of the Super Bowl was like didn't know

0:16:26.560 --> 0:16:28.840
<v Speaker 1>what they were doing. People who very much knew what

0:16:28.840 --> 0:16:31.720
<v Speaker 1>they were doing also made bad bets and bad calculations.

0:16:32.000 --> 0:16:34.600
<v Speaker 1>That's very true, good distinction to make, Stacy. You know,

0:16:34.640 --> 0:16:36.600
<v Speaker 1>we're kind of talking about crypto here, just kind of

0:16:36.640 --> 0:16:39.360
<v Speaker 1>widely and broadly. We're gonna take a quick break, but

0:16:39.440 --> 0:16:41.040
<v Speaker 1>after that break, we're going to dive into kind of

0:16:41.120 --> 0:16:44.440
<v Speaker 1>some of the more specific and practical applications that we

0:16:44.480 --> 0:16:48.320
<v Speaker 1>can see cryptocurrencies impacting our lives directly. We'll get to

0:16:48.360 --> 0:17:00.280
<v Speaker 1>all of that right after this our we're background the break,

0:17:00.360 --> 0:17:05.159
<v Speaker 1>still talking with Stacy Marie Ishmael about cryptocurrency. And you know,

0:17:05.600 --> 0:17:09.080
<v Speaker 1>we covered a lot of history, old history, recent history

0:17:09.400 --> 0:17:13.360
<v Speaker 1>just a second ago. But obviously since the Super Bowl time,

0:17:13.440 --> 0:17:16.400
<v Speaker 1>right since the topi ist of the top Stacy, we're

0:17:16.440 --> 0:17:19.399
<v Speaker 1>we're experiencing a lot of volatility um a lull in

0:17:19.400 --> 0:17:22.520
<v Speaker 1>the crypto market, right and so I guess I'm curious

0:17:22.560 --> 0:17:23.919
<v Speaker 1>to hear from you. Like, We've got a lot of

0:17:23.960 --> 0:17:27.560
<v Speaker 1>history to draw from when it comes to stock market recoveries,

0:17:27.760 --> 0:17:29.560
<v Speaker 1>but we just, you know, we just don't have as

0:17:29.640 --> 0:17:32.840
<v Speaker 1>much history on the crypto front. So how have you

0:17:32.880 --> 0:17:37.359
<v Speaker 1>seen investing strategies shifting in the face of less data

0:17:37.480 --> 0:17:41.520
<v Speaker 1>less information? There's a phrase in crypto that is deployed

0:17:42.000 --> 0:17:44.840
<v Speaker 1>in a way that's not always helpful. Um that's called

0:17:44.840 --> 0:17:48.520
<v Speaker 1>do your own research. And it's this it's you know,

0:17:48.560 --> 0:17:49.960
<v Speaker 1>you would have seen this at the heights of meme

0:17:50.040 --> 0:17:52.960
<v Speaker 1>stocks as well, But it's just this idea of you

0:17:52.960 --> 0:17:55.479
<v Speaker 1>should be able to find out and you should be

0:17:55.520 --> 0:17:58.240
<v Speaker 1>able to you know, like use Google, use Reddit, use

0:17:58.320 --> 0:18:01.280
<v Speaker 1>discord talks to your financial advisor, whatever, but you should

0:18:01.280 --> 0:18:04.119
<v Speaker 1>be able to figure this out for yourself. The reality, though,

0:18:04.280 --> 0:18:06.040
<v Speaker 1>and I say this from the vantage points of somebody

0:18:06.040 --> 0:18:08.520
<v Speaker 1>who works at in a newsroom that has access to

0:18:08.640 --> 0:18:11.879
<v Speaker 1>like the best, fastest, most real time financial data in

0:18:11.880 --> 0:18:14.680
<v Speaker 1>the world, you can stare at crypto data all day

0:18:14.720 --> 0:18:18.480
<v Speaker 1>long and not be sure what exactly you're looking at because,

0:18:18.960 --> 0:18:21.920
<v Speaker 1>as you say, you have a relatively short amount of

0:18:22.040 --> 0:18:25.080
<v Speaker 1>like sample, right, it's you know, Thirteen years is not

0:18:25.119 --> 0:18:27.520
<v Speaker 1>a long time for a financial asset to be in existence.

0:18:28.119 --> 0:18:32.520
<v Speaker 1>You have many different types of pricing because one of

0:18:32.560 --> 0:18:35.200
<v Speaker 1>the things about being decentralized is like you don't necessarily

0:18:35.240 --> 0:18:38.920
<v Speaker 1>have one single clearing price that everybody agrees on is

0:18:38.920 --> 0:18:41.280
<v Speaker 1>is the price. It can be quite hard to get

0:18:41.480 --> 0:18:44.880
<v Speaker 1>certain other kinds of data, like volumes, you know, things

0:18:44.880 --> 0:18:47.080
<v Speaker 1>that if you are like a traditional look at a

0:18:47.080 --> 0:18:49.719
<v Speaker 1>person coming at this from a traditional financial perspective, You're like,

0:18:49.760 --> 0:18:53.320
<v Speaker 1>how do you assess the fundamentals of bitcoin? Question mark?

0:18:53.880 --> 0:18:56.520
<v Speaker 1>And the folks on the more skeptical side of the

0:18:56.520 --> 0:18:58.960
<v Speaker 1>spectrum will say, well, bitcoin has no fundamentals, And the

0:18:59.000 --> 0:19:02.439
<v Speaker 1>folks on the more maximalist side of the spectrum, she'll say,

0:19:02.440 --> 0:19:04.800
<v Speaker 1>the fundamentals don't matter. What matters is like the future

0:19:04.840 --> 0:19:08.040
<v Speaker 1>and the optimism and the limited supply, and so trying

0:19:08.080 --> 0:19:10.639
<v Speaker 1>to value this thing like a traditional financial asset is

0:19:10.680 --> 0:19:14.960
<v Speaker 1>extremely difficult. So what folks have done instead is things like, okay,

0:19:15.000 --> 0:19:18.719
<v Speaker 1>what is crypto correlated to? And for a decent stretch

0:19:18.840 --> 0:19:21.680
<v Speaker 1>over the past several months, it was very correlated with

0:19:22.040 --> 0:19:25.080
<v Speaker 1>like big cap tech stocks, So you know, whatever Apple

0:19:25.359 --> 0:19:28.960
<v Speaker 1>or Meta or Amazon were up to or even Netflix,

0:19:29.040 --> 0:19:30.720
<v Speaker 1>like that was what you were going to see in bitcoin.

0:19:30.800 --> 0:19:33.760
<v Speaker 1>You know, if you were to chart Bitcoin versus the

0:19:33.800 --> 0:19:36.360
<v Speaker 1>fangs for a while, it looked like a single chart.

0:19:36.760 --> 0:19:38.560
<v Speaker 1>Some people would look at this from the perspective of

0:19:38.640 --> 0:19:41.200
<v Speaker 1>something that you said earlier. Okay, like nobody has stimmy

0:19:41.240 --> 0:19:44.160
<v Speaker 1>checks anymore. There's less liquidity in the economy. That means

0:19:44.200 --> 0:19:45.960
<v Speaker 1>that fewer people are going to have the appetite for

0:19:46.040 --> 0:19:48.639
<v Speaker 1>riskier assets. We're going to expect that we're gonna adjust

0:19:48.640 --> 0:19:51.479
<v Speaker 1>our price targets downward. But again, those are things that

0:19:51.520 --> 0:19:55.600
<v Speaker 1>are almost orthogonal to crypto itself that folks are trying

0:19:55.640 --> 0:19:58.800
<v Speaker 1>to model on top of, because again they're just there

0:19:58.800 --> 0:20:03.800
<v Speaker 1>are very few crypto native inputs that are scalable and

0:20:03.880 --> 0:20:07.679
<v Speaker 1>available for the average person to analyze. Right, Yeah, as

0:20:07.680 --> 0:20:09.360
<v Speaker 1>we're trying to find these corollaries, I mean, a lot

0:20:09.359 --> 0:20:11.840
<v Speaker 1>of folks said that Bitcoin that it would be this

0:20:11.880 --> 0:20:15.480
<v Speaker 1>inflation hedge, almost like a like a digital form of gold, right,

0:20:15.520 --> 0:20:17.600
<v Speaker 1>and so folks turn to sort of like those safe

0:20:17.640 --> 0:20:20.480
<v Speaker 1>harbor assets like gold when you're seeing, you know, the

0:20:20.480 --> 0:20:24.280
<v Speaker 1>market tank. But obviously as inflation has been soaring, Bitcoin

0:20:24.359 --> 0:20:27.200
<v Speaker 1>has been crashing along with the market, and yeah, So,

0:20:27.359 --> 0:20:28.960
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I guess why is it that you think

0:20:28.960 --> 0:20:31.320
<v Speaker 1>bitcoin hasn't lived up to its billing. Is it just

0:20:31.359 --> 0:20:34.879
<v Speaker 1>an improper comparison to something like gold or to something

0:20:35.200 --> 0:20:37.360
<v Speaker 1>like some of the top stocks. Well, I think it's

0:20:37.359 --> 0:20:41.960
<v Speaker 1>the difference between like theory and the reality of markets, right,

0:20:42.000 --> 0:20:44.159
<v Speaker 1>which is, you can have a really good theory and

0:20:44.160 --> 0:20:47.920
<v Speaker 1>then markets will be like ha ha you thought. And

0:20:48.240 --> 0:20:50.040
<v Speaker 1>one of the but one of the things that is

0:20:50.080 --> 0:20:54.040
<v Speaker 1>true about crypto is this is a This is an asset.

0:20:54.280 --> 0:20:56.600
<v Speaker 1>Whether you're thinking about you know, the big ones like

0:20:56.880 --> 0:20:59.560
<v Speaker 1>ethereum and bitcoin or even the you know things like

0:20:59.560 --> 0:21:02.400
<v Speaker 1>stable points, but this is an asset that started in retail.

0:21:02.800 --> 0:21:05.840
<v Speaker 1>It started with people who were interested enough to solve

0:21:05.880 --> 0:21:09.760
<v Speaker 1>math problems on paper in their bedrooms, and then you

0:21:09.760 --> 0:21:13.280
<v Speaker 1>know kind of like upgrade their their PCs versus starting

0:21:13.320 --> 0:21:15.879
<v Speaker 1>from you know, fully formed from the minds of some

0:21:15.920 --> 0:21:18.679
<v Speaker 1>person at Goldman Sacks or JP Morgan or wherever. And

0:21:18.840 --> 0:21:24.600
<v Speaker 1>retail investors are much less predictable than your average institutional

0:21:24.640 --> 0:21:29.440
<v Speaker 1>investors and much less likely to be engaging in trillion

0:21:29.480 --> 0:21:32.600
<v Speaker 1>dollar group think. Billion dollar group think absolutely, but you know,

0:21:32.680 --> 0:21:35.760
<v Speaker 1>generally speaking, the capitalization of any one retail investor is

0:21:35.800 --> 0:21:38.960
<v Speaker 1>way way smaller. But as institutional investors got into the market,

0:21:39.359 --> 0:21:41.480
<v Speaker 1>they do the kinds of things that institutional investors do,

0:21:41.520 --> 0:21:44.719
<v Speaker 1>which is they pile into a position or or a

0:21:44.720 --> 0:21:48.440
<v Speaker 1>series of positions. They allocate their portfolios where they're looking

0:21:48.440 --> 0:21:50.199
<v Speaker 1>for things that can hedge, so you know, they want

0:21:50.240 --> 0:21:52.119
<v Speaker 1>something that's going up while something else is going down

0:21:52.200 --> 0:21:55.760
<v Speaker 1>and vice versa. And that has this like same making

0:21:55.920 --> 0:21:59.960
<v Speaker 1>tendency where trades become very crowded and they become identical

0:22:00.640 --> 0:22:03.960
<v Speaker 1>because you have a bunch of very large entities all

0:22:04.040 --> 0:22:06.600
<v Speaker 1>moving in the same direction at once. So something that

0:22:06.600 --> 0:22:09.119
<v Speaker 1>somebody else would argue is supposed to be uncoupled from

0:22:09.160 --> 0:22:13.200
<v Speaker 1>sociain kinds of fundamentals like becomes coupled because people who

0:22:13.200 --> 0:22:16.040
<v Speaker 1>are prone to big investment band group think are now

0:22:16.160 --> 0:22:18.119
<v Speaker 1>playing in that space. All right, I want to know

0:22:18.200 --> 0:22:21.359
<v Speaker 1>about like we we've seen problems with wallets and crypto

0:22:21.440 --> 0:22:24.439
<v Speaker 1>storage and people losing their passwords and getting locked out

0:22:24.480 --> 0:22:26.640
<v Speaker 1>and they've got like a deadline in order to figure

0:22:26.640 --> 0:22:28.840
<v Speaker 1>out what their password was or they're gonna lose like

0:22:28.880 --> 0:22:32.520
<v Speaker 1>a ton of money, and um so yeah, I guess

0:22:32.920 --> 0:22:35.280
<v Speaker 1>what's the best way for people maybe to go about

0:22:35.400 --> 0:22:38.600
<v Speaker 1>investing in cryptic currency. Do E t F solve this problem?

0:22:38.640 --> 0:22:40.800
<v Speaker 1>Like that's something that's happening outside of the United States.

0:22:40.880 --> 0:22:45.080
<v Speaker 1>We don't have any crypto approved ets here inside the

0:22:45.119 --> 0:22:46.919
<v Speaker 1>US yet. But is that the future and is that

0:22:46.960 --> 0:22:49.040
<v Speaker 1>the best way for people to have some exposure or

0:22:49.240 --> 0:22:52.120
<v Speaker 1>I guess there's two different problems. There's one like the

0:22:52.119 --> 0:22:54.360
<v Speaker 1>the investor wants some sort of exposure, but then there's

0:22:54.359 --> 0:22:57.520
<v Speaker 1>also that somebody who feels like there's a use case

0:22:57.560 --> 0:23:00.959
<v Speaker 1>they want actual crypto in some sort of you know,

0:23:01.440 --> 0:23:04.199
<v Speaker 1>at crypto wallet. Right, yeah, I mean you hit on

0:23:04.240 --> 0:23:07.119
<v Speaker 1>something really important, which is that the user experience of

0:23:07.160 --> 0:23:14.520
<v Speaker 1>crypto is challenging. Most people in most countries have figured

0:23:14.560 --> 0:23:19.399
<v Speaker 1>out paper money. A large percentage of people in countries

0:23:19.440 --> 0:23:22.240
<v Speaker 1>that you might not have expect have figured out digital money.

0:23:22.359 --> 0:23:25.840
<v Speaker 1>Right there, like Venmo native or Empesso native. They're like cash,

0:23:25.880 --> 0:23:28.919
<v Speaker 1>what is cash? I'll venmo you or i'll you know

0:23:29.000 --> 0:23:32.520
<v Speaker 1>cash app you or whatever those things are. Crypto has

0:23:32.640 --> 0:23:37.600
<v Speaker 1>not quite reached that same level of user friendliness. You

0:23:37.600 --> 0:23:40.400
<v Speaker 1>you start from a place of if you forget your password,

0:23:41.000 --> 0:23:44.080
<v Speaker 1>r I p all your money, right It's it's not

0:23:44.119 --> 0:23:47.520
<v Speaker 1>like you can call your bank and give them, you know,

0:23:47.840 --> 0:23:50.960
<v Speaker 1>nineteen different forms of identification and your firstborn child, and

0:23:51.000 --> 0:23:53.120
<v Speaker 1>they'd be like, okay, we've unlocked your account. Here you go.

0:23:53.560 --> 0:23:55.600
<v Speaker 1>There's none of that because again, this is a rejection

0:23:55.640 --> 0:23:58.600
<v Speaker 1>of centralization. There's no appeal to a higher authority to

0:23:58.640 --> 0:24:02.280
<v Speaker 1>say it comes down to you. And frankly, most people

0:24:02.280 --> 0:24:05.680
<v Speaker 1>are bounded password managements. It's just not a strength for

0:24:06.040 --> 0:24:09.919
<v Speaker 1>acquired right now. So you know, anything that gets like

0:24:10.000 --> 0:24:12.479
<v Speaker 1>really intensely built around make sure you remember this very

0:24:12.480 --> 0:24:15.879
<v Speaker 1>complicated combination of characters and never forget it's a hurdle.

0:24:16.520 --> 0:24:18.480
<v Speaker 1>Uh So, I think the last problem number one. I

0:24:18.480 --> 0:24:22.280
<v Speaker 1>think problem number two is the way that some folks

0:24:22.320 --> 0:24:24.919
<v Speaker 1>think about crypto is that as if it's as safe

0:24:25.200 --> 0:24:28.199
<v Speaker 1>as other kinds of financial assets. You know, like a

0:24:28.200 --> 0:24:33.040
<v Speaker 1>lot of the most um depressing testimony from people who

0:24:33.080 --> 0:24:36.360
<v Speaker 1>lost money to entities like Celsius and Voyage has been

0:24:36.400 --> 0:24:39.560
<v Speaker 1>folks saying I thought you were a bank, and I

0:24:39.560 --> 0:24:42.080
<v Speaker 1>thought you had f D I C type insurance and

0:24:42.080 --> 0:24:44.000
<v Speaker 1>I thought that'd be okay. And you you know, this

0:24:44.040 --> 0:24:46.439
<v Speaker 1>was marketed to me as a savings product. And so

0:24:46.480 --> 0:24:49.280
<v Speaker 1>I think there's a misunderstanding of the levels of risk here.

0:24:49.800 --> 0:24:52.080
<v Speaker 1>Even when you get two products like e t f s,

0:24:52.119 --> 0:24:56.280
<v Speaker 1>which are supposed to provide more of those traditional looking things,

0:24:56.320 --> 0:25:00.400
<v Speaker 1>they're still just rappers on an underlying asset class that's

0:25:00.440 --> 0:25:03.960
<v Speaker 1>right volatile, or on equities exposed to an underlying acid

0:25:04.000 --> 0:25:07.679
<v Speaker 1>class that is very volatile. Basically, that's why stable coins

0:25:07.680 --> 0:25:11.840
<v Speaker 1>weren't so stable, right because at least some of them, Yeah, right, right, yeah,

0:25:11.840 --> 0:25:14.240
<v Speaker 1>because like they get labeled as such, they get wrapped

0:25:14.359 --> 0:25:17.240
<v Speaker 1>in it's in the name exictically, it kind of gets

0:25:17.240 --> 0:25:19.600
<v Speaker 1>wrapped in that way, gets promoted, gets marketed the less

0:25:19.640 --> 0:25:22.399
<v Speaker 1>volatile form of cryptocurrency. But like you said, some of

0:25:22.400 --> 0:25:25.040
<v Speaker 1>them didn't experience that. But okay, so you're kind of

0:25:25.040 --> 0:25:28.480
<v Speaker 1>talking about some of the reasons why cryptocurrencies, how they're

0:25:28.480 --> 0:25:31.960
<v Speaker 1>not actually being used as a currency, right, Like you're

0:25:32.000 --> 0:25:34.479
<v Speaker 1>you're talking about first of all, it's tough to manage

0:25:35.160 --> 0:25:37.480
<v Speaker 1>whether or not they're safe. It's not an actual bank.

0:25:37.920 --> 0:25:41.600
<v Speaker 1>Are there other reasons that we're not seeing countries adopt cryptocurrencies?

0:25:41.640 --> 0:25:44.800
<v Speaker 1>We've seen too, right, right, So yet El Salvador, right,

0:25:44.880 --> 0:25:47.600
<v Speaker 1>like they made it their national exchange, but it just

0:25:47.800 --> 0:25:50.560
<v Speaker 1>in the Central African Republic is the other one. But

0:25:50.640 --> 0:25:53.119
<v Speaker 1>it doesn't seem like it's it's getting widely adopted. Up.

0:25:53.119 --> 0:25:55.280
<v Speaker 1>I'm curious if there are some other reasons that you

0:25:55.280 --> 0:25:57.240
<v Speaker 1>think that that's the case. Yeah, I mean the big

0:25:57.240 --> 0:26:00.520
<v Speaker 1>one is slowness. And and this is thing that is

0:26:00.560 --> 0:26:03.080
<v Speaker 1>not like talked about as often. It's like you want

0:26:03.119 --> 0:26:07.400
<v Speaker 1>to send, like you want to buy something on a blockchain,

0:26:07.480 --> 0:26:09.600
<v Speaker 1>or you want to send money from one way to another,

0:26:10.080 --> 0:26:12.480
<v Speaker 1>most of the solutions that are available to most people

0:26:12.720 --> 0:26:16.440
<v Speaker 1>are nowhere near as fast as your average like Venmo transaction.

0:26:17.359 --> 0:26:20.240
<v Speaker 1>There's just a lot of latency built into these networks,

0:26:20.240 --> 0:26:22.800
<v Speaker 1>and there are fees that folks might not expect. Right.

0:26:22.880 --> 0:26:24.720
<v Speaker 1>It's which is not to say that there are no

0:26:24.800 --> 0:26:27.280
<v Speaker 1>fees in banking, because like every time I get dinged

0:26:27.359 --> 0:26:30.640
<v Speaker 1>for a wire transfer fee, I'm like, ah, But in

0:26:30.760 --> 0:26:33.080
<v Speaker 1>every single time you do a transaction in crypto, you

0:26:33.080 --> 0:26:36.320
<v Speaker 1>you pay some kind of fee to process that transaction.

0:26:36.880 --> 0:26:40.760
<v Speaker 1>And I remember in like last fall, when folks were

0:26:40.760 --> 0:26:42.240
<v Speaker 1>doing they were like, oh, we're going to save the

0:26:42.280 --> 0:26:45.240
<v Speaker 1>world by raising money in crypto. Donate here and we'll

0:26:45.240 --> 0:26:47.840
<v Speaker 1>send it to good cause of your choosing, And people

0:26:47.960 --> 0:26:49.760
<v Speaker 1>be like, great, I want to donate a hundred dollars

0:26:49.800 --> 0:26:51.120
<v Speaker 1>and then on the other end they'd be like, great,

0:26:51.119 --> 0:26:53.159
<v Speaker 1>that will be fifty dollars in fees, And excuse me

0:26:54.720 --> 0:26:56.240
<v Speaker 1>for you know, so that I was a calculation you

0:26:56.280 --> 0:26:58.600
<v Speaker 1>were not expecting because even the world's most aggressive credit

0:26:58.600 --> 0:27:02.120
<v Speaker 1>card is rarely going to charge you a fIF on

0:27:02.119 --> 0:27:04.760
<v Speaker 1>on some kind of donation. And then I think, just

0:27:04.800 --> 0:27:07.760
<v Speaker 1>like a third thing is the inherance volatility of the

0:27:07.760 --> 0:27:11.359
<v Speaker 1>thing itself. Like one of the key expected attributes of

0:27:11.440 --> 0:27:13.480
<v Speaker 1>something that acts like a currency is that it's a

0:27:13.600 --> 0:27:16.760
<v Speaker 1>store of value that at the beginning, middle of the

0:27:16.880 --> 0:27:19.000
<v Speaker 1>end of transaction, this one dollar is still going to

0:27:19.040 --> 0:27:22.320
<v Speaker 1>be worth a dollar. And if you combine like the

0:27:22.440 --> 0:27:25.679
<v Speaker 1>slowness and the fees that I mentioned, that you're by

0:27:25.680 --> 0:27:27.560
<v Speaker 1>the end of a transaction, you're one dollar might be

0:27:27.560 --> 0:27:29.600
<v Speaker 1>worth two dollars or it might be worth twenty cets.

0:27:30.200 --> 0:27:32.879
<v Speaker 1>And that is a degree of instability that not everybody

0:27:32.920 --> 0:27:35.639
<v Speaker 1>is super comfortable with. Yeah, and and something else that

0:27:35.920 --> 0:27:38.040
<v Speaker 1>people aren't comfortable with in the crypto space or more

0:27:38.200 --> 0:27:42.080
<v Speaker 1>there's more more discomfort with these days, is is hacking

0:27:42.080 --> 0:27:45.280
<v Speaker 1>in scam attempts? Right, because we saw it just the

0:27:45.320 --> 0:27:47.959
<v Speaker 1>other day. Stats came out that more than two billion

0:27:48.000 --> 0:27:50.960
<v Speaker 1>dollars has been stolen in crypto accounts this year alone,

0:27:51.320 --> 0:27:55.320
<v Speaker 1>and so I guess, uh, some of these some of

0:27:55.359 --> 0:27:59.000
<v Speaker 1>these places where people buy in store cryptocurrency, they're not

0:27:59.080 --> 0:28:03.760
<v Speaker 1>as secure as may be the end end user thinks,

0:28:04.200 --> 0:28:06.800
<v Speaker 1>and then they find out that their money has been

0:28:06.840 --> 0:28:09.200
<v Speaker 1>stolen by hackers. I mean, how big of a problem

0:28:09.240 --> 0:28:11.680
<v Speaker 1>is this, because it seems like the more the more

0:28:11.720 --> 0:28:14.119
<v Speaker 1>money that's being ripped from people's hands as they're getting

0:28:14.160 --> 0:28:18.240
<v Speaker 1>into the space, that that creates just preponderance of issues

0:28:18.520 --> 0:28:22.159
<v Speaker 1>for adoption of crypto in general. This is a problem,

0:28:22.280 --> 0:28:23.719
<v Speaker 1>and it's a problem for all of the reasons you've

0:28:23.760 --> 0:28:27.280
<v Speaker 1>identified and a few more. And one of the things

0:28:28.320 --> 0:28:32.080
<v Speaker 1>is that a lot of the energy coming into like

0:28:32.160 --> 0:28:36.439
<v Speaker 1>crypto hacking are non state or state actors like the

0:28:36.520 --> 0:28:38.920
<v Speaker 1>Lazarus Group, which is, you know, kind of an infamous

0:28:38.960 --> 0:28:44.480
<v Speaker 1>North Korea based hacking collective who five years ago might

0:28:44.480 --> 0:28:47.080
<v Speaker 1>have been ripping people off or attempting to hack into

0:28:47.160 --> 0:28:49.120
<v Speaker 1>into like non crypto things, but there was less money

0:28:49.160 --> 0:28:51.160
<v Speaker 1>in crypto five years ago. So what you have are

0:28:51.200 --> 0:28:56.280
<v Speaker 1>these incredibly sophisticated, well organized actors that are very opportunistic

0:28:56.760 --> 0:28:58.760
<v Speaker 1>and they're looking for where is there a bunch of

0:28:58.760 --> 0:29:01.880
<v Speaker 1>money slashing around and the opportunity to confuse people and

0:29:01.920 --> 0:29:05.080
<v Speaker 1>make an easy book as a result of that. And

0:29:05.280 --> 0:29:07.640
<v Speaker 1>that is a real challenge. And when I say sophisticated,

0:29:07.720 --> 0:29:09.880
<v Speaker 1>it's you know, some of my colleagues on the cybersecurity

0:29:09.880 --> 0:29:12.360
<v Speaker 1>team here at Bloomberg have reported on things like that

0:29:12.440 --> 0:29:16.560
<v Speaker 1>group will bribe employees at Team Mobile to get them

0:29:16.600 --> 0:29:19.720
<v Speaker 1>to clone your simcard, you know, so that they can

0:29:19.800 --> 0:29:25.240
<v Speaker 1>redirect your two factor authentication code and log into your account.

0:29:25.280 --> 0:29:27.080
<v Speaker 1>I mean, this is not like your average like somebody

0:29:27.080 --> 0:29:29.600
<v Speaker 1>clicked on a spa bammily link in an email thing.

0:29:30.120 --> 0:29:36.640
<v Speaker 1>This is legit incredibly sophisticated attempts that are very hard

0:29:36.640 --> 0:29:39.719
<v Speaker 1>as an ordinary human being to protect yourself against. So

0:29:39.760 --> 0:29:42.640
<v Speaker 1>that's the first thing, and I think the second thing is, yeah,

0:29:42.640 --> 0:29:44.320
<v Speaker 1>there's also just a bunch of like you click on

0:29:44.360 --> 0:29:47.320
<v Speaker 1>a spammi link in an email, or you know, somebody

0:29:47.560 --> 0:29:50.480
<v Speaker 1>loses or had a very weak password on their Instagram

0:29:50.480 --> 0:29:53.120
<v Speaker 1>account and then their Instagram was taken over and it's

0:29:53.120 --> 0:29:55.400
<v Speaker 1>a celebrity account. So people are like, oh, yeah, why

0:29:55.440 --> 0:29:57.480
<v Speaker 1>is so and so celebrity telling me to buy dogecoin.

0:29:57.560 --> 0:29:59.680
<v Speaker 1>I guess I'll buy dogcoin, but it was in fact

0:29:59.680 --> 0:30:02.680
<v Speaker 1>somebody who has compromised that celebrity account. Or you know,

0:30:02.720 --> 0:30:05.440
<v Speaker 1>you get an email that looks like your n f

0:30:05.520 --> 0:30:07.640
<v Speaker 1>T provider and it says click here for a free

0:30:07.720 --> 0:30:10.040
<v Speaker 1>n f T and everybody loves free stuff and they

0:30:10.080 --> 0:30:12.400
<v Speaker 1>click on the thing. But the thing is a link

0:30:12.480 --> 0:30:15.400
<v Speaker 1>to some kind of malware, and that malware, you know,

0:30:15.520 --> 0:30:17.400
<v Speaker 1>connects to a server, and that server is like, cool,

0:30:17.440 --> 0:30:19.080
<v Speaker 1>thank you, We'll take all your actual n f T

0:30:19.200 --> 0:30:20.760
<v Speaker 1>s and we will make our merry away with it.

0:30:21.280 --> 0:30:23.400
<v Speaker 1>You know. So I don't think that the hacking is

0:30:23.480 --> 0:30:28.520
<v Speaker 1>necessarily like new I do think that the the opportunity

0:30:28.680 --> 0:30:30.920
<v Speaker 1>is so large that a lot of folks who are

0:30:30.960 --> 0:30:34.000
<v Speaker 1>being like sketchy and netherious in other areas have turned

0:30:34.000 --> 0:30:36.280
<v Speaker 1>their attention to crypto. That makes a ton of sense.

0:30:36.360 --> 0:30:38.160
<v Speaker 1>You're getting hit on both ends. You're getting hit by

0:30:38.160 --> 0:30:42.360
<v Speaker 1>the folks who are trying the less sophisticated spam attacks.

0:30:42.440 --> 0:30:44.160
<v Speaker 1>But then you've got, like you said, some of these

0:30:44.200 --> 0:30:46.360
<v Speaker 1>big players as well. And I think some folks would

0:30:46.360 --> 0:30:48.280
<v Speaker 1>say that like one of the solutions to this frauds

0:30:48.400 --> 0:30:51.000
<v Speaker 1>these attempts would be tieder regulation. So can you talk

0:30:51.040 --> 0:30:54.640
<v Speaker 1>about how you think that type of regulation by the state,

0:30:55.080 --> 0:30:59.440
<v Speaker 1>how would that affect something like cryptocurrencies. This is one

0:30:59.440 --> 0:31:04.280
<v Speaker 1>of the hardest simple questions because crypto is global, right,

0:31:04.320 --> 0:31:06.440
<v Speaker 1>So when you're when you're talking about regulation, you're also

0:31:06.480 --> 0:31:09.160
<v Speaker 1>talking about you have to have some kind of cross

0:31:09.200 --> 0:31:13.200
<v Speaker 1>border framework, because you can't only regulate bitcoin in the

0:31:13.280 --> 0:31:16.560
<v Speaker 1>United States and then have nothing happening in Europe because

0:31:16.560 --> 0:31:18.280
<v Speaker 1>you're gonna want to You're gonna have people in Paris

0:31:18.320 --> 0:31:19.880
<v Speaker 1>who want to send something to people in New York,

0:31:20.280 --> 0:31:22.640
<v Speaker 1>and then you're gonna have a conflict of regulatory entities.

0:31:23.120 --> 0:31:25.280
<v Speaker 1>So that's kind of a huge problem. And there are

0:31:25.280 --> 0:31:27.760
<v Speaker 1>there are many efforts by the folks who are paid

0:31:27.760 --> 0:31:30.840
<v Speaker 1>to write white papers that are very long about global

0:31:30.840 --> 0:31:33.920
<v Speaker 1>financial stability and regulation, that are attempting to find solutions

0:31:33.920 --> 0:31:37.080
<v Speaker 1>to this problem. But then you have different kinds of

0:31:38.080 --> 0:31:40.560
<v Speaker 1>potential regulation. You have regulation at the state level. As

0:31:40.560 --> 0:31:42.479
<v Speaker 1>you say, so, like I live in New York City,

0:31:42.920 --> 0:31:46.080
<v Speaker 1>the New York Attorney General and others have been very

0:31:46.120 --> 0:31:48.680
<v Speaker 1>aggressive in saying, okay, crypto companies, if you want to

0:31:48.720 --> 0:31:51.240
<v Speaker 1>operate here, if you want to have New Yorkers sign

0:31:51.360 --> 0:31:52.720
<v Speaker 1>up for your stuff, you are going to have to

0:31:52.760 --> 0:31:57.160
<v Speaker 1>abide by a higher class of disclosure requirements. There's way

0:31:57.160 --> 0:31:59.600
<v Speaker 1>more paperwork in your future. Get ready. And by the way,

0:31:59.600 --> 0:32:01.440
<v Speaker 1>if you don't follow up, we will find you out

0:32:01.440 --> 0:32:06.320
<v Speaker 1>of existence. Other states have been like, word, chill, we

0:32:06.320 --> 0:32:08.720
<v Speaker 1>we have no requirements. Do what you will, it's fine.

0:32:09.440 --> 0:32:12.600
<v Speaker 1>Then you have federal level regulations, right, So you've got

0:32:12.720 --> 0:32:15.520
<v Speaker 1>the Securities and Exchange Commission, you have the the cftc

0:32:16.160 --> 0:32:18.360
<v Speaker 1>UM and others saying we are going to make sure

0:32:18.400 --> 0:32:21.920
<v Speaker 1>that at the level of like qualified Investors or Kim Kardashian,

0:32:22.440 --> 0:32:26.600
<v Speaker 1>that no one is engaging in behavior that contravene existing laws.

0:32:27.080 --> 0:32:30.720
<v Speaker 1>Then you've got the legislators, so people who are trying

0:32:30.720 --> 0:32:32.680
<v Speaker 1>to say, well, I as a congress person or I

0:32:32.720 --> 0:32:35.800
<v Speaker 1>as a Senator, I'm proposing that we do more stuff

0:32:35.800 --> 0:32:38.280
<v Speaker 1>with stable coin. And here's my five page long bill.

0:32:38.640 --> 0:32:40.720
<v Speaker 1>Will somebody please remember to vote on this before the

0:32:40.720 --> 0:32:43.959
<v Speaker 1>midterm elections. So you've got this sort of stew of

0:32:44.080 --> 0:32:47.080
<v Speaker 1>different kinds of things, and that's leading to a bunch

0:32:47.080 --> 0:32:49.160
<v Speaker 1>of people in the industry being like, woe is us.

0:32:49.200 --> 0:32:51.760
<v Speaker 1>There's no regulatory clarity. We don't know how to proceed.

0:32:52.120 --> 0:32:54.080
<v Speaker 1>And in the meantime, the people who are really suffering

0:32:54.120 --> 0:32:57.560
<v Speaker 1>are those individual investors who thought this thing was a bank. Yeah,

0:32:57.680 --> 0:32:59.840
<v Speaker 1>I guess when we're talking about decentralized find its right

0:33:00.000 --> 0:33:02.240
<v Speaker 1>to currency is a part of this movement to get

0:33:02.280 --> 0:33:06.240
<v Speaker 1>away from traditionally regulated ways of doing of doing business,

0:33:06.240 --> 0:33:09.440
<v Speaker 1>sending money and does regulation kind of flying the face

0:33:09.440 --> 0:33:11.280
<v Speaker 1>of that is does it kind of up end like

0:33:11.360 --> 0:33:14.240
<v Speaker 1>toss over to the apple cart? Per se? It absolutely

0:33:14.280 --> 0:33:18.600
<v Speaker 1>does by definition. So it's because this to regulate something,

0:33:18.720 --> 0:33:21.479
<v Speaker 1>you have to be able to define it. You have

0:33:21.600 --> 0:33:25.040
<v Speaker 1>to be able to say, these are the this is

0:33:25.080 --> 0:33:27.400
<v Speaker 1>the jurisdiction that you operate in. There is there are

0:33:27.440 --> 0:33:29.720
<v Speaker 1>a couple of crypto companies that famously are like we

0:33:29.760 --> 0:33:34.000
<v Speaker 1>are not headquartered anywhere, no one can regulate us, and

0:33:34.120 --> 0:33:40.520
<v Speaker 1>regulators like, um, yeah we can. We will regulate you

0:33:40.520 --> 0:33:43.360
<v Speaker 1>in every place that you have in office like good try.

0:33:43.480 --> 0:33:46.720
<v Speaker 1>Uh you know. So it's this this idea of statelessness,

0:33:46.720 --> 0:33:51.840
<v Speaker 1>this idea of being entirely decentralized. There are always people

0:33:51.880 --> 0:33:54.680
<v Speaker 1>behind these protocols, and those people will say things like well,

0:33:54.800 --> 0:33:58.000
<v Speaker 1>you can't regulate software and the European Union and be

0:33:58.040 --> 0:34:00.720
<v Speaker 1>like tell that's a Microsoft, my guys, we absolutely can

0:34:00.840 --> 0:34:03.640
<v Speaker 1>regulate software. So you know, I think that this this

0:34:03.800 --> 0:34:09.120
<v Speaker 1>paradigm of you want something that is entirely decentralized, entirely stateless,

0:34:09.160 --> 0:34:12.920
<v Speaker 1>but also safe, it's very hard to reconcile. Yeah, all right,

0:34:13.080 --> 0:34:15.000
<v Speaker 1>We've got a few more questions we want to get

0:34:15.000 --> 0:34:17.320
<v Speaker 1>to with you. Stay. That's that's fascinating. I'm so curious.

0:34:17.400 --> 0:34:18.880
<v Speaker 1>I feel like this is one of those things where

0:34:19.520 --> 0:34:21.319
<v Speaker 1>like what happens here is where I'm on the edge

0:34:21.320 --> 0:34:24.160
<v Speaker 1>of my seat because it's in tossing popcorn of my

0:34:24.160 --> 0:34:26.319
<v Speaker 1>mouth while I watch um. But yeah, we've got a

0:34:26.320 --> 0:34:28.360
<v Speaker 1>few more questions to get to with you, including we

0:34:28.440 --> 0:34:30.240
<v Speaker 1>want to talk about n f T s. We also

0:34:30.520 --> 0:34:34.720
<v Speaker 1>want to discuss maybe like crypto and how it seems

0:34:34.719 --> 0:34:37.040
<v Speaker 1>to have religious elements to it going on. We'll we'll

0:34:37.040 --> 0:34:48.200
<v Speaker 1>get to those questions right after this. All right, we're

0:34:48.239 --> 0:34:52.080
<v Speaker 1>back from the break talking with Stacy Marie Ishmael about cryptocurrencies,

0:34:52.640 --> 0:34:55.080
<v Speaker 1>and just before the break, you heard it here Stacy

0:34:55.320 --> 0:34:58.719
<v Speaker 1>is a proponent for one global organization to regulate all

0:34:58.800 --> 0:35:03.960
<v Speaker 1>the one ring to rule the act exactly. It sounds

0:35:03.960 --> 0:35:08.719
<v Speaker 1>like even watching the series as well. Stacy. On that note,

0:35:08.960 --> 0:35:13.359
<v Speaker 1>let's talk about religion, because yeah, a lot of segues here,

0:35:13.680 --> 0:35:15.480
<v Speaker 1>like earlier on, like you're kind of talking about this

0:35:15.800 --> 0:35:18.239
<v Speaker 1>sort of like your unified theory as to why it

0:35:18.320 --> 0:35:21.640
<v Speaker 1>is that folks were sort of latching onto something like crypto.

0:35:21.760 --> 0:35:23.680
<v Speaker 1>I mean to that end, like do you see parallels

0:35:23.760 --> 0:35:27.279
<v Speaker 1>between cryptocurrencies and sort of like fundamentalist religion, because I

0:35:27.280 --> 0:35:30.800
<v Speaker 1>feel like the like the fear, uncertainty, doubts, the mantra,

0:35:30.880 --> 0:35:35.600
<v Speaker 1>the combined with continued calls for fellow crypto enthusiast to

0:35:35.680 --> 0:35:37.440
<v Speaker 1>hold all to keep the faith like that has a

0:35:37.480 --> 0:35:40.279
<v Speaker 1>lot of these kind of like quasi religious elements, which

0:35:40.360 --> 0:35:43.520
<v Speaker 1>kind of makes this an even weirder asset class. Oh,

0:35:43.520 --> 0:35:45.759
<v Speaker 1>it's super weird. Um. One of my colleagues was on

0:35:45.760 --> 0:35:52.560
<v Speaker 1>the team in London, Emily Nicole. She academically studied cults

0:35:52.600 --> 0:35:56.600
<v Speaker 1>and has a kind of a research background in understanding,

0:35:57.000 --> 0:36:01.359
<v Speaker 1>you know, what makes people coalesced a round, either an

0:36:01.440 --> 0:36:07.040
<v Speaker 1>idea or particularly compelling personality, And it's so interesting to

0:36:07.040 --> 0:36:10.120
<v Speaker 1>get to benefit from the perspective that she brings to

0:36:10.400 --> 0:36:13.040
<v Speaker 1>covering this for all of the reasons that you've just described,

0:36:13.160 --> 0:36:16.200
<v Speaker 1>which is I don't know if I would necessarily go

0:36:16.280 --> 0:36:19.120
<v Speaker 1>so far as to say it is religious, but it

0:36:19.680 --> 0:36:26.000
<v Speaker 1>is certainly a space that is marked by charismatic leaders

0:36:26.920 --> 0:36:34.239
<v Speaker 1>and by people who are held up as quasi deities.

0:36:34.520 --> 0:36:36.920
<v Speaker 1>You know, whether it's like you believe in Doge and

0:36:36.960 --> 0:36:40.560
<v Speaker 1>Elon Musk, or you believe in Jack Dorsey and bitcoin,

0:36:40.840 --> 0:36:43.960
<v Speaker 1>or you perhaps some of your listeners are familiar with

0:36:44.000 --> 0:36:49.640
<v Speaker 1>something that was called Home and was a very interesting

0:36:50.520 --> 0:36:54.040
<v Speaker 1>set of tokens that relied very heavily on the idea

0:36:54.080 --> 0:36:57.640
<v Speaker 1>that if nobody ever sells, this can only go up,

0:36:58.200 --> 0:37:02.680
<v Speaker 1>which is in other parts the financial markets described very differently.

0:37:03.480 --> 0:37:07.680
<v Speaker 1>But this was led by a person who was pseudonymously

0:37:07.760 --> 0:37:11.480
<v Speaker 1>known as Zeus, and Zeus would hold these town halls

0:37:11.560 --> 0:37:15.400
<v Speaker 1>where he would like rally his followers who call themselves

0:37:15.400 --> 0:37:18.600
<v Speaker 1>Om's and talk about the need to keep the faith

0:37:19.320 --> 0:37:21.120
<v Speaker 1>and you know, all of us have to be in

0:37:21.160 --> 0:37:23.479
<v Speaker 1>this together. I mean they're down like ninety seven percent

0:37:23.480 --> 0:37:26.680
<v Speaker 1>since the height of the height of those town halls.

0:37:26.719 --> 0:37:31.120
<v Speaker 1>But there is something about crypto that is very much

0:37:31.200 --> 0:37:34.920
<v Speaker 1>based in this idea of community, which is very confusing

0:37:35.840 --> 0:37:37.719
<v Speaker 1>when you think about the fact that it is also

0:37:37.800 --> 0:37:41.560
<v Speaker 1>explicitly a rejection of trust, right that this whole thing

0:37:41.800 --> 0:37:45.799
<v Speaker 1>is supposed to function even if you don't know or

0:37:45.920 --> 0:37:49.640
<v Speaker 1>trust your counterparty. And yet so many of these kinds

0:37:49.640 --> 0:37:53.960
<v Speaker 1>of appeals are to identity, are to the idea of

0:37:54.080 --> 0:37:58.960
<v Speaker 1>like tribe or nation and other kind of collective organizing principles,

0:37:58.960 --> 0:38:02.400
<v Speaker 1>like crypto people even invented companies. They were like, you know,

0:38:02.440 --> 0:38:05.719
<v Speaker 1>forget ll c s, we can have decentralized autonomous organization

0:38:06.480 --> 0:38:09.239
<v Speaker 1>because we like, we need a way to make decisions collectively.

0:38:09.960 --> 0:38:13.560
<v Speaker 1>So I absolutely think that I don't know if it's

0:38:13.560 --> 0:38:15.440
<v Speaker 1>inherent to the asset class or if it's that the

0:38:15.520 --> 0:38:18.360
<v Speaker 1>kinds of people who are attracted to this tend to

0:38:18.520 --> 0:38:20.960
<v Speaker 1>manifest in very specific ways, but there are there are

0:38:21.040 --> 0:38:23.640
<v Speaker 1>very much elements of this that are defined by that

0:38:23.719 --> 0:38:28.400
<v Speaker 1>appeal to charisma. I'm sure that that unknown identity of Satoshi,

0:38:28.560 --> 0:38:30.839
<v Speaker 1>right has to has to play a little part in that, right,

0:38:30.880 --> 0:38:33.960
<v Speaker 1>the ambiguous nature of who wrote the paper and kind

0:38:33.960 --> 0:38:35.919
<v Speaker 1>of like it came from on high, what's started. Yeah,

0:38:35.960 --> 0:38:37.600
<v Speaker 1>it's like the tablet's coming down from the mountain and

0:38:37.640 --> 0:38:40.080
<v Speaker 1>you're like, all right, cool. And that has to be

0:38:40.080 --> 0:38:41.439
<v Speaker 1>a part of it, because if you could just point

0:38:41.480 --> 0:38:44.759
<v Speaker 1>to a nerdy individual like in their mom's basement, you

0:38:44.840 --> 0:38:47.000
<v Speaker 1>might be like, okay, well, some of the mystery is lost,

0:38:47.080 --> 0:38:49.960
<v Speaker 1>and I'm not going to keep the faith in that. Yeah,

0:38:49.960 --> 0:38:53.399
<v Speaker 1>I mean, mythology is really important, right, It's people love

0:38:54.239 --> 0:38:57.120
<v Speaker 1>hero they love villains even more, but they do they

0:38:57.120 --> 0:38:59.240
<v Speaker 1>do love a hero, and they do love the idea

0:38:59.320 --> 0:39:02.399
<v Speaker 1>that somebody out there was like smarter than everyone else

0:39:02.440 --> 0:39:04.640
<v Speaker 1>and figured something out and then like rude off into

0:39:04.760 --> 0:39:08.439
<v Speaker 1>some kind of financial sunset mysteriously. Yeah, yeah, I want

0:39:08.440 --> 0:39:09.960
<v Speaker 1>to know to Let's talk about n f T s

0:39:09.960 --> 0:39:12.440
<v Speaker 1>for a second, because this is very much a part

0:39:12.520 --> 0:39:15.480
<v Speaker 1>of this DeFi space. And and you know, obviously we

0:39:15.560 --> 0:39:18.680
<v Speaker 1>remember when picks of apes and crypto punks were going

0:39:18.719 --> 0:39:22.280
<v Speaker 1>for millions and digital pet rocks. Basically we're costing hundreds

0:39:22.280 --> 0:39:25.799
<v Speaker 1>of thousands of dollars and when you think about it, though,

0:39:25.840 --> 0:39:28.319
<v Speaker 1>it really wasn't that long ago, although it looks like

0:39:28.440 --> 0:39:30.880
<v Speaker 1>art based n f t s have seen this enormous

0:39:30.960 --> 0:39:34.440
<v Speaker 1>drop in value. But yeah, what's what's going on in

0:39:34.480 --> 0:39:36.359
<v Speaker 1>the n f T space. What do we need to know?

0:39:36.640 --> 0:39:39.640
<v Speaker 1>And is is there a future for enough T s?

0:39:39.680 --> 0:39:41.840
<v Speaker 1>What does that look like? Well, I'll start with the

0:39:42.120 --> 0:39:43.520
<v Speaker 1>question of is there a future for n f T

0:39:43.719 --> 0:39:46.840
<v Speaker 1>s and an n f T fundamentally is just a

0:39:46.840 --> 0:39:53.080
<v Speaker 1>piece of software. It's a way of defining encode, rights, obligations,

0:39:53.120 --> 0:39:57.120
<v Speaker 1>and benefits. And for you know, say about a year

0:39:57.200 --> 0:40:00.319
<v Speaker 1>or so, the primary use case of that software was

0:40:00.360 --> 0:40:04.880
<v Speaker 1>telling somebody you have the right to be recognized as

0:40:04.960 --> 0:40:08.520
<v Speaker 1>the owner of this picture of a monkey, which is

0:40:08.560 --> 0:40:10.719
<v Speaker 1>definitely something you could use software for. Sounds goofy, that

0:40:11.840 --> 0:40:14.799
<v Speaker 1>seems fine, um, but there are other things that you

0:40:14.840 --> 0:40:17.799
<v Speaker 1>can do with that software. And that's where I think, like,

0:40:18.480 --> 0:40:23.120
<v Speaker 1>we haven't seen anything close to actual use cases. And

0:40:23.120 --> 0:40:26.040
<v Speaker 1>by use cases, I don't mean you know, like nobody's

0:40:26.080 --> 0:40:29.879
<v Speaker 1>doing this. I mean like widespread utility and usefulness and

0:40:30.080 --> 0:40:32.120
<v Speaker 1>you know, but I've seen people do experiments. They're like, well,

0:40:32.200 --> 0:40:35.040
<v Speaker 1>we can sell music in the form of an n

0:40:35.080 --> 0:40:38.360
<v Speaker 1>f T, and that software, that code that defines this

0:40:38.400 --> 0:40:42.160
<v Speaker 1>transaction can say you know, if I, Stacy sell this

0:40:42.280 --> 0:40:44.719
<v Speaker 1>to you at and then you sell this to somebody else,

0:40:44.800 --> 0:40:47.360
<v Speaker 1>I will still get royalties without having to do anything.

0:40:47.840 --> 0:40:49.680
<v Speaker 1>And you don't have to do anything either, because that's

0:40:49.719 --> 0:40:54.040
<v Speaker 1>just encoded into the contracts like the world's smartest analytic basically,

0:40:54.160 --> 0:40:57.280
<v Speaker 1>right yea um, And that's you know, that's that's really interesting.

0:40:57.320 --> 0:41:00.440
<v Speaker 1>There are other people who are trying to design n

0:41:00.480 --> 0:41:04.399
<v Speaker 1>f T s that would allow like portability between video games. Right, so,

0:41:04.400 --> 0:41:07.640
<v Speaker 1>say you have like some really cool bow and arrow

0:41:07.760 --> 0:41:11.080
<v Speaker 1>set in Fortnite, but you also play elden Ring. There's

0:41:11.120 --> 0:41:13.720
<v Speaker 1>a bunch of assumptions based into this, including that Fortnite

0:41:13.719 --> 0:41:15.480
<v Speaker 1>and the makers of elden Ring will ever get along

0:41:16.000 --> 0:41:18.120
<v Speaker 1>stay with me? Um, so you know, see whom the

0:41:18.200 --> 0:41:21.120
<v Speaker 1>video games were interoperable, and you could like take that

0:41:21.320 --> 0:41:23.160
<v Speaker 1>bow and you know, that bow and arrow out of

0:41:23.160 --> 0:41:25.279
<v Speaker 1>Fortnite and into elden Ring and vice versa. Like you

0:41:25.320 --> 0:41:26.960
<v Speaker 1>would do that in the form of software, and you

0:41:26.960 --> 0:41:28.080
<v Speaker 1>would do that in the form of an n f

0:41:28.120 --> 0:41:32.279
<v Speaker 1>T and like those sorts of things where you're sort

0:41:32.280 --> 0:41:36.200
<v Speaker 1>of taking a step back and imagining the possibilities of

0:41:36.680 --> 0:41:40.680
<v Speaker 1>software that reacts intelligently to circumstances. Is I think a

0:41:40.800 --> 0:41:43.360
<v Speaker 1>much more expansive way of understanding the reality of n

0:41:43.360 --> 0:41:45.560
<v Speaker 1>f T s than apes. But but it's also like

0:41:45.880 --> 0:41:49.440
<v Speaker 1>less profitable immediately, right, Yeah, I mean it kind of

0:41:49.440 --> 0:41:51.799
<v Speaker 1>makes me think just to early computing and just some

0:41:51.880 --> 0:41:54.440
<v Speaker 1>of the applications early on, it was a lot of

0:41:54.440 --> 0:41:56.600
<v Speaker 1>it was kind of dumb stuff, maybe like we've seen today,

0:41:56.760 --> 0:41:59.920
<v Speaker 1>like with the digital pet rocks and monkeys in stomical

0:42:00.040 --> 0:42:05.480
<v Speaker 1>cheese were brilliant. Yeah, but it does seem like that

0:42:05.520 --> 0:42:07.000
<v Speaker 1>there's a lot of future ahead of us when it

0:42:07.000 --> 0:42:11.440
<v Speaker 1>comes to just the application specifically of blockchain, which which

0:42:11.480 --> 0:42:13.359
<v Speaker 1>kind of makes me then want to ask you how

0:42:13.400 --> 0:42:16.360
<v Speaker 1>excited should we be about the possibility that blockchain is

0:42:16.360 --> 0:42:18.759
<v Speaker 1>going to be able to change the future and a

0:42:19.280 --> 0:42:21.279
<v Speaker 1>how likely is that do you think to happen? And

0:42:21.280 --> 0:42:23.520
<v Speaker 1>then be do you think we can do that without

0:42:23.600 --> 0:42:27.480
<v Speaker 1>going all in and buying actual cryptocurrencies because the underlying

0:42:27.480 --> 0:42:30.680
<v Speaker 1>technology will solve problems and we don't necessarily have to

0:42:31.160 --> 0:42:34.440
<v Speaker 1>egg it on with our investing dollars. I mean that

0:42:34.480 --> 0:42:37.320
<v Speaker 1>phrase that you used people have used in like crypto

0:42:37.360 --> 0:42:39.759
<v Speaker 1>skeptic drinking games, which is like somebody's going to say

0:42:39.800 --> 0:42:45.279
<v Speaker 1>underlying techno and we've alway said once, thank goodness. So

0:42:45.360 --> 0:42:47.600
<v Speaker 1>but this is kind of this is sort of the challenge,

0:42:47.719 --> 0:42:51.560
<v Speaker 1>right where a lot of those early tech things that

0:42:51.600 --> 0:42:53.680
<v Speaker 1>you're describing, like some of that turned into pets dot

0:42:53.680 --> 0:42:56.000
<v Speaker 1>Com and some of it turned into Apple, and it's

0:42:56.280 --> 0:43:00.880
<v Speaker 1>very very hard to predict what direct action any of

0:43:00.920 --> 0:43:03.239
<v Speaker 1>this is going to be used for is you know,

0:43:04.040 --> 0:43:07.839
<v Speaker 1>is crypto gonna go from like interesting but marginal from

0:43:07.840 --> 0:43:11.920
<v Speaker 1>a technology perspective to redefining the way that you understand

0:43:11.960 --> 0:43:15.760
<v Speaker 1>the universe. There are absolutely people, mostly venture capitalists, making

0:43:15.840 --> 0:43:19.080
<v Speaker 1>extremely significant bets in that direction. But then there's also

0:43:19.120 --> 0:43:21.799
<v Speaker 1>a ton of people that are like, I don't know,

0:43:22.040 --> 0:43:25.520
<v Speaker 1>I'm not sure, and you know, I think journalists in

0:43:25.560 --> 0:43:28.520
<v Speaker 1>general are not prone to like wild bouts of enthusiasm

0:43:29.320 --> 0:43:32.560
<v Speaker 1>or for any particular thing. But I think what makes

0:43:33.120 --> 0:43:36.680
<v Speaker 1>class Fountain bens foreshort, that is like where I channel

0:43:36.800 --> 0:43:39.160
<v Speaker 1>my enthusiasm. Um. But I think what makes this as

0:43:39.200 --> 0:43:40.799
<v Speaker 1>the class interesting to me is the fact that I

0:43:40.800 --> 0:43:43.439
<v Speaker 1>don't know, right, It's the fact that sort of every day,

0:43:43.800 --> 0:43:47.720
<v Speaker 1>some utterly chaotic thing happens that makes me think about

0:43:48.440 --> 0:43:51.520
<v Speaker 1>the potential both in terms of upside and downside in

0:43:51.640 --> 0:43:54.560
<v Speaker 1>very different ways. Again, this is another thing where I'm

0:43:54.680 --> 0:43:56.560
<v Speaker 1>be on the edge of my seat, popcorn like watching

0:43:56.560 --> 0:43:59.280
<v Speaker 1>how things play out. Because in the next ten years,

0:43:59.120 --> 0:44:01.600
<v Speaker 1>it's right a fascinating space. We're going to continue to

0:44:01.600 --> 0:44:05.239
<v Speaker 1>see developments for sure, And uh, Stacy, Marie Ishmael, we

0:44:05.320 --> 0:44:07.520
<v Speaker 1>really really appreciate you joining us today on the podcast

0:44:07.880 --> 0:44:10.759
<v Speaker 1>Where can Our listeners go to find out more about

0:44:10.760 --> 0:44:12.719
<v Speaker 1>you and what you're up to. Well, we're all part

0:44:12.760 --> 0:44:15.120
<v Speaker 1>of the I Heart Radio family, sir. The Bloomberg. The

0:44:15.160 --> 0:44:18.400
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Crypto podcast is Monday to Friday. It's available wherever

0:44:18.400 --> 0:44:22.600
<v Speaker 1>you get your podcasts um I am on easily findable

0:44:22.640 --> 0:44:24.319
<v Speaker 1>on the internet. But please do check out the work

0:44:24.360 --> 0:44:27.600
<v Speaker 1>of my fantastic reporters and editors on Bloomberg dot com.

0:44:27.680 --> 0:44:30.000
<v Speaker 1>It's awesome. We'll make sure to link to all of that. Stacy,

0:44:30.239 --> 0:44:33.520
<v Speaker 1>thank you so much for joining us today. My pleasure. Well,

0:44:33.520 --> 0:44:35.600
<v Speaker 1>all right, Joel May, what a fun conversation we just

0:44:35.640 --> 0:44:38.880
<v Speaker 1>had here with Stacy Marie ishmael Um. I feel like

0:44:38.920 --> 0:44:40.880
<v Speaker 1>we were able to this truly did feel like a

0:44:40.880 --> 0:44:42.640
<v Speaker 1>conversation we had with a friend, Like I felt like

0:44:42.680 --> 0:44:44.839
<v Speaker 1>she was here with us. We're all having a beer

0:44:44.920 --> 0:44:47.240
<v Speaker 1>together and we're able just to talk about a topic

0:44:47.320 --> 0:44:50.640
<v Speaker 1>that you and I are very interested in. But simultaneously

0:44:50.640 --> 0:44:52.600
<v Speaker 1>it's difficult for us to die, like really dive into

0:44:52.640 --> 0:44:55.480
<v Speaker 1>it a because we're we don't have the depth of

0:44:55.520 --> 0:44:58.000
<v Speaker 1>knowledge that someone likes Stacy does, but we're idiots on

0:44:58.040 --> 0:45:00.719
<v Speaker 1>this front. But also we I want to talk about

0:45:00.719 --> 0:45:04.120
<v Speaker 1>it too much. Um, and that's something I'm afraid, Like,

0:45:04.160 --> 0:45:05.960
<v Speaker 1>I wonder if we talked about it too much back

0:45:06.000 --> 0:45:08.560
<v Speaker 1>when it was more hots and folks bought more of

0:45:08.560 --> 0:45:10.399
<v Speaker 1>it maybe than they should have. We're still talking about

0:45:10.400 --> 0:45:12.239
<v Speaker 1>and we're still hating on the folks who are just

0:45:12.640 --> 0:45:15.160
<v Speaker 1>too enthusiastics. And I will say that's the right to

0:45:15.160 --> 0:45:17.839
<v Speaker 1>bring some nuance conversation. That's a nice thing about having

0:45:17.880 --> 0:45:19.759
<v Speaker 1>a journalist on the show to talk about it who

0:45:19.760 --> 0:45:23.719
<v Speaker 1>covers it with ridiculous frequency like Stacy, because you're you're

0:45:23.719 --> 0:45:27.600
<v Speaker 1>not getting someone who is sold out to this asset

0:45:27.640 --> 0:45:30.560
<v Speaker 1>class who believes the cryptocurrency is the future. And if

0:45:30.560 --> 0:45:32.840
<v Speaker 1>we interview somebody like that, it would be difficult to

0:45:32.880 --> 0:45:35.440
<v Speaker 1>temper their enthusiast and ask them the hard questions. But

0:45:35.480 --> 0:45:38.000
<v Speaker 1>Stacy is like involved talking to all the players in

0:45:38.000 --> 0:45:39.840
<v Speaker 1>this space, and so I feel like she has a

0:45:39.880 --> 0:45:43.480
<v Speaker 1>really nuanced helfold take and just provides a lot of understanding.

0:45:43.520 --> 0:45:45.920
<v Speaker 1>So now I feel like I understand crypto more now

0:45:45.960 --> 0:45:48.719
<v Speaker 1>after that comment, and even possibly the future depending on

0:45:48.800 --> 0:45:50.480
<v Speaker 1>I mean, who knows what's actually gonna happen, but the

0:45:50.480 --> 0:45:53.720
<v Speaker 1>possibilities are there. She's not holding her own town halls

0:45:54.239 --> 0:45:56.319
<v Speaker 1>where She's just launched her own coin, right, and it's

0:45:56.320 --> 0:45:58.279
<v Speaker 1>just like, let me tell you, you can get it

0:45:58.320 --> 0:46:02.440
<v Speaker 1>on the ground floor, this nig the Stacey Coin, Fountain

0:46:02.440 --> 0:46:04.719
<v Speaker 1>pen Coin. But yeah, do you have a Do you

0:46:04.719 --> 0:46:07.879
<v Speaker 1>have a big takeaway from this conversation? Yeah? I think

0:46:07.920 --> 0:46:11.360
<v Speaker 1>my biggest takeaway was when she said that we we

0:46:11.440 --> 0:46:15.000
<v Speaker 1>have this misunderstanding of risk when it comes to crypto markets,

0:46:15.160 --> 0:46:17.399
<v Speaker 1>and I thought that was I thought that was really

0:46:17.400 --> 0:46:21.560
<v Speaker 1>smart that oftentimes we're thinking about the risk of like,

0:46:21.840 --> 0:46:24.640
<v Speaker 1>are are the price of the asset going down? Deploying

0:46:24.680 --> 0:46:27.279
<v Speaker 1>some capital into the crypto space and then seeing that

0:46:27.320 --> 0:46:29.080
<v Speaker 1>we have less money six months from now than we

0:46:29.120 --> 0:46:31.680
<v Speaker 1>had before, and that is a real risk, right, and

0:46:31.719 --> 0:46:34.360
<v Speaker 1>we a lot of people have experienced that risk. But

0:46:34.400 --> 0:46:36.239
<v Speaker 1>when I'm thinking about like all of the risks in

0:46:36.280 --> 0:46:38.680
<v Speaker 1>the crypto space, like there are actually a lot more

0:46:38.719 --> 0:46:41.400
<v Speaker 1>than there are with other traditional asset classes. So so

0:46:41.520 --> 0:46:43.880
<v Speaker 1>not only are you at risk of deeper price cuts,

0:46:44.000 --> 0:46:47.279
<v Speaker 1>you're also you potentially experienced faster gains right in the

0:46:47.280 --> 0:46:49.879
<v Speaker 1>crypto space. But not only are you at risk of

0:46:49.880 --> 0:46:52.080
<v Speaker 1>of even deeper price cuts, but you're also at risk

0:46:52.360 --> 0:46:56.359
<v Speaker 1>of fraud, hacking, scam attempts, and so I guess, um,

0:46:56.400 --> 0:46:59.000
<v Speaker 1>I think crypto is, like we said, it's a fascinating space.

0:46:59.040 --> 0:47:00.960
<v Speaker 1>There's a lot going on, there's a lot to kind

0:47:00.960 --> 0:47:03.800
<v Speaker 1>of keep your eyes on. Um. But I think with

0:47:03.800 --> 0:47:07.960
<v Speaker 1>with the preponderance of nefarious activity we've seen in the space,

0:47:08.120 --> 0:47:10.640
<v Speaker 1>I think your risk appetite has to be pretty strong

0:47:10.760 --> 0:47:13.359
<v Speaker 1>to be in the crypto game, to have to hold

0:47:13.400 --> 0:47:16.520
<v Speaker 1>many of your assets in cryptocurrency at the current time. Yeah,

0:47:16.560 --> 0:47:17.799
<v Speaker 1>and I think I thought you're going to go in

0:47:17.800 --> 0:47:20.760
<v Speaker 1>this direction, like you're talking, we're talking about different countries

0:47:20.800 --> 0:47:24.840
<v Speaker 1>that have adopted cryptocurrencies as their national medium of exchange.

0:47:25.280 --> 0:47:27.640
<v Speaker 1>And she was talking about how that that volatility that

0:47:27.680 --> 0:47:30.239
<v Speaker 1>you're talking about, Joll, is what is keeping it from

0:47:30.239 --> 0:47:32.719
<v Speaker 1>being becoming more widely adopted because people don't like that.

0:47:32.960 --> 0:47:35.400
<v Speaker 1>I mean, even just with inflation that is providing some

0:47:35.480 --> 0:47:39.880
<v Speaker 1>uncertainty within our lives, you see prices rising and dropping. No,

0:47:40.040 --> 0:47:42.120
<v Speaker 1>we don't as a people, we don't like that kind

0:47:42.160 --> 0:47:44.520
<v Speaker 1>of uncertainty. There's enough uncertainty that we have in life,

0:47:44.719 --> 0:47:47.560
<v Speaker 1>let alone the the mediums of exchange that we're using

0:47:47.920 --> 0:47:50.520
<v Speaker 1>within our lives. But if you're trying to use your

0:47:50.560 --> 0:47:52.279
<v Speaker 1>money as a store of value as a medium of

0:47:52.280 --> 0:47:54.600
<v Speaker 1>exchange if it's up or down by ten percent in

0:47:54.640 --> 0:47:56.520
<v Speaker 1>a given day, doesn't work well as a store of

0:47:56.600 --> 0:47:58.520
<v Speaker 1>value if it felluctuates that much. And that's so that's

0:47:58.560 --> 0:48:01.560
<v Speaker 1>clearly a hurdle that has to be overcome before I think,

0:48:01.719 --> 0:48:04.840
<v Speaker 1>before it becomes widely adopted. So that was a little,

0:48:05.200 --> 0:48:07.320
<v Speaker 1>I guess, small idendum to yours, But my big takeaway

0:48:07.360 --> 0:48:09.800
<v Speaker 1>she said the phrase that you need to like in

0:48:10.080 --> 0:48:13.000
<v Speaker 1>a lot of cryptocurrency circles, how you should be doing

0:48:13.000 --> 0:48:15.120
<v Speaker 1>your own research. And man, that stood out to me

0:48:15.200 --> 0:48:17.160
<v Speaker 1>because not only is that true when it comes to

0:48:17.480 --> 0:48:21.240
<v Speaker 1>a more speculative asset like crypto, but how about everything

0:48:21.280 --> 0:48:23.480
<v Speaker 1>that we put our money towards uh and within the

0:48:23.480 --> 0:48:26.279
<v Speaker 1>world of personal finance, and not just cryptocurrencies, but just

0:48:26.680 --> 0:48:28.160
<v Speaker 1>what it is that you spend your money on from

0:48:28.160 --> 0:48:30.399
<v Speaker 1>a consumption standpoint, the bank that you choose to leave

0:48:30.400 --> 0:48:33.120
<v Speaker 1>your money with where you're expecting it to stay safe,

0:48:33.440 --> 0:48:36.680
<v Speaker 1>the different kind of investments, whatever company you're thinking about

0:48:36.760 --> 0:48:39.120
<v Speaker 1>joining with in order to earn money, all the different

0:48:39.160 --> 0:48:42.400
<v Speaker 1>arenas it's important that we vet do our own research

0:48:42.440 --> 0:48:45.960
<v Speaker 1>and all the different arenas within our personal finance life

0:48:45.960 --> 0:48:48.440
<v Speaker 1>as a whole. Because like, truly there, I don't think

0:48:48.440 --> 0:48:50.640
<v Speaker 1>there should be anything that we just take for granted.

0:48:50.880 --> 0:48:53.360
<v Speaker 1>I really do think that there should be a higher

0:48:53.520 --> 0:48:56.239
<v Speaker 1>level of personal responsibility when it comes to what it

0:48:56.360 --> 0:48:58.640
<v Speaker 1>is that we each do individually with our money. That

0:48:58.680 --> 0:49:00.880
<v Speaker 1>it makes me just think that anybody who's listening to

0:49:00.880 --> 0:49:02.839
<v Speaker 1>this show, even if they've been listening for a long time,

0:49:02.840 --> 0:49:04.600
<v Speaker 1>and they're like, man, I really think Matt and Joeler

0:49:04.640 --> 0:49:06.239
<v Speaker 1>spot on a lot of things, and you you might

0:49:06.239 --> 0:49:08.000
<v Speaker 1>be like, they're idiots on a lot of things, which

0:49:08.160 --> 0:49:11.400
<v Speaker 1>which which is probably true. But even that, even in

0:49:11.440 --> 0:49:13.719
<v Speaker 1>that like take our word with a grain of salt, like,

0:49:13.840 --> 0:49:16.400
<v Speaker 1>listen to us. Hopefully we can provide you valuable information

0:49:16.440 --> 0:49:18.759
<v Speaker 1>and a helpful way to think about important topics in

0:49:18.760 --> 0:49:22.319
<v Speaker 1>your life, like whatever personal finance conundrum you've got going on.

0:49:22.600 --> 0:49:25.840
<v Speaker 1>But we're also fallible human beings, and and it just

0:49:25.880 --> 0:49:28.319
<v Speaker 1>makes me think of like TikTok and how there's some

0:49:28.360 --> 0:49:30.480
<v Speaker 1>great people dishing some good advice on TikTok, but there's

0:49:30.480 --> 0:49:31.960
<v Speaker 1>a lot of bad information out there too, and it's

0:49:31.960 --> 0:49:35.040
<v Speaker 1>coming at you in these bite sized bits that are,

0:49:35.080 --> 0:49:37.160
<v Speaker 1>you know, a minute or less in length, and so

0:49:37.200 --> 0:49:39.879
<v Speaker 1>it's really hard to communicate effectively when we're talking about

0:49:39.960 --> 0:49:42.760
<v Speaker 1>complicated maneuvers that we might be making with our money.

0:49:43.000 --> 0:49:46.040
<v Speaker 1>So yeah, I would listen to a range of people.

0:49:46.160 --> 0:49:48.960
<v Speaker 1>I would read books, blogs, I listen to podcasts. I

0:49:48.960 --> 0:49:50.960
<v Speaker 1>would kind of run the gamut when I'm getting my

0:49:51.000 --> 0:49:53.920
<v Speaker 1>information on things. And if you found one guru in

0:49:53.960 --> 0:49:57.040
<v Speaker 1>the crypto space that you're beholden to, then you're treading

0:49:57.080 --> 0:49:59.480
<v Speaker 1>on really risky ground at that point. Yeah, that's true.

0:49:59.719 --> 0:50:01.719
<v Speaker 1>Although I will say, like, there's nothing that we stay

0:50:01.719 --> 0:50:04.400
<v Speaker 1>here on the show that we don't personally do. Although

0:50:04.440 --> 0:50:06.480
<v Speaker 1>I'm sure those gurus out there say the same thing

0:50:06.480 --> 0:50:08.560
<v Speaker 1>as well. Yeah, they're like, no, this is what I'm doing.

0:50:08.600 --> 0:50:11.000
<v Speaker 1>Obviously I believe it. I mean, we we plent crypto broke.

0:50:11.800 --> 0:50:14.040
<v Speaker 1>We try to say things that that only that are

0:50:14.080 --> 0:50:16.640
<v Speaker 1>in the best interest supper audience, and that's our goal

0:50:16.960 --> 0:50:18.960
<v Speaker 1>three days a week, every week. And I think it

0:50:19.040 --> 0:50:21.279
<v Speaker 1>is important to mention that, to say that that's kind

0:50:21.280 --> 0:50:23.400
<v Speaker 1>of the standard we hold ourselves too. But there are

0:50:23.400 --> 0:50:25.399
<v Speaker 1>a lot of other people who might say the same

0:50:25.400 --> 0:50:28.120
<v Speaker 1>thing and then not actually practice it. That's right, Okay,

0:50:28.160 --> 0:50:30.000
<v Speaker 1>let's get to our amazing beer that you and I

0:50:30.080 --> 0:50:33.240
<v Speaker 1>enjoyed during this episode. Well, this is a barrel aged

0:50:33.360 --> 0:50:37.240
<v Speaker 1>blended strong ale by our friends over at Monday night brewing.

0:50:37.840 --> 0:50:40.279
<v Speaker 1>So this is their anniversary beer, their anniversary ale. They

0:50:40.360 --> 0:50:43.160
<v Speaker 1>used to call it tie whatever on, like whatever year

0:50:43.160 --> 0:50:44.919
<v Speaker 1>it was, So if it was the fifth anniversary, tie

0:50:44.920 --> 0:50:48.319
<v Speaker 1>five on. So this one it doesn't say tie eleven on,

0:50:48.560 --> 0:50:50.600
<v Speaker 1>but it just has an eleven on there made out

0:50:50.600 --> 0:50:52.239
<v Speaker 1>of neck ties because neck ties are kind of their thing.

0:50:52.280 --> 0:50:55.600
<v Speaker 1>It's kind of like their original original thing was like

0:50:55.760 --> 0:50:58.879
<v Speaker 1>a young professional individual who was loosening as tie after

0:50:58.880 --> 0:51:00.880
<v Speaker 1>a hard, hard day's work. Essentially, they were trying to

0:51:00.880 --> 0:51:04.160
<v Speaker 1>like combat the we're drinking beer on the weekends. It's like, no, no,

0:51:04.200 --> 0:51:07.439
<v Speaker 1>we make sophisticated beers that you enjoy during the week.

0:51:07.480 --> 0:51:10.120
<v Speaker 1>It's more about quality than quantity. Munch of the clock,

0:51:10.400 --> 0:51:12.400
<v Speaker 1>leave your work, go get a good beer at the

0:51:12.440 --> 0:51:14.920
<v Speaker 1>end of the day, exactly. And this beer is a

0:51:15.000 --> 0:51:17.600
<v Speaker 1>quality beer, I'll say. So. It's a blended strong ale.

0:51:18.000 --> 0:51:21.800
<v Speaker 1>And the reason it's not a particular style is because

0:51:22.320 --> 0:51:24.080
<v Speaker 1>this is truly a mash up of a bunch of

0:51:24.080 --> 0:51:26.000
<v Speaker 1>different beers. Like like they say here, it's a mash

0:51:26.080 --> 0:51:30.120
<v Speaker 1>up of a stout quad brown Ale, barley wine Ale, Doppelbox.

0:51:30.840 --> 0:51:32.840
<v Speaker 1>There are so many different beers that they've brewed in

0:51:32.960 --> 0:51:37.399
<v Speaker 1>order to blend together. In some of these extra special makes,

0:51:37.440 --> 0:51:40.239
<v Speaker 1>Burana would barrels. I guess this is what they stuck

0:51:40.239 --> 0:51:44.520
<v Speaker 1>these things. It's like Brazilian Brazilian. That makes me think

0:51:44.600 --> 0:51:46.640
<v Speaker 1>of when I was a kid, and you would do

0:51:46.760 --> 0:51:51.200
<v Speaker 1>the suicide of this and but awestent times that tasted

0:51:51.480 --> 0:51:54.279
<v Speaker 1>like trash. But this this one does not. Because when

0:51:54.280 --> 0:51:56.319
<v Speaker 1>I hear because it's funny, I was like, man, this

0:51:56.400 --> 0:51:58.759
<v Speaker 1>has some quad like elements. So this has some barley

0:51:58.760 --> 0:52:01.040
<v Speaker 1>wine like elements. I didn't the label and know that,

0:52:01.200 --> 0:52:03.120
<v Speaker 1>but I can taste it all coming through. It wasn't

0:52:03.200 --> 0:52:06.440
<v Speaker 1>it works. It was like a traditional stouts Russian Imperial,

0:52:06.560 --> 0:52:08.480
<v Speaker 1>or it wasn't just a straight up barley wine. It's

0:52:08.520 --> 0:52:12.920
<v Speaker 1>just a dark, rich, flavorful ale that also happens to

0:52:12.960 --> 0:52:16.360
<v Speaker 1>have some vanilla. But yeah, man, this was a fantastic beer. Often,

0:52:16.480 --> 0:52:18.400
<v Speaker 1>when you're doing that, it takes like a master blender.

0:52:18.600 --> 0:52:21.480
<v Speaker 1>Blending multiple beers to create a great beer is actually

0:52:21.480 --> 0:52:23.480
<v Speaker 1>a really difficult thing to do well. And there's a

0:52:23.480 --> 0:52:25.839
<v Speaker 1>lot of really crappy, blendid beers out there, but this

0:52:26.000 --> 0:52:29.520
<v Speaker 1>is a really really good blendid beer that yeah, I

0:52:29.560 --> 0:52:31.200
<v Speaker 1>would like to have more of for sure. Yeah. The

0:52:31.280 --> 0:52:34.239
<v Speaker 1>technique they borrowed from the world of scotch, because that's

0:52:34.280 --> 0:52:37.400
<v Speaker 1>typically that's how you get some of those consistently amazing

0:52:37.640 --> 0:52:40.239
<v Speaker 1>scotches like you you know, the Johnny Walker whatever, You've

0:52:40.239 --> 0:52:42.320
<v Speaker 1>got the different colors, like each one of those are blends,

0:52:42.400 --> 0:52:44.600
<v Speaker 1>and so you've got single malts, which are a single

0:52:45.239 --> 0:52:48.200
<v Speaker 1>like vintage basically a single year. Most folks like the

0:52:48.200 --> 0:52:50.360
<v Speaker 1>consistency that comes with the blend. But then there's folks

0:52:50.400 --> 0:52:53.520
<v Speaker 1>who use that blending technique to create entirely new products,

0:52:53.680 --> 0:52:55.880
<v Speaker 1>which is the beer that you and I are enjoying today.

0:52:55.960 --> 0:53:00.880
<v Speaker 1>It's like blending on steroids. Yeah, absolutely, so good, agreed, delicious.

0:53:00.960 --> 0:53:02.919
<v Speaker 1>So that's gonna do it for this episode. For folks

0:53:02.960 --> 0:53:05.560
<v Speaker 1>who want show notes links to anything that that Stacy

0:53:05.600 --> 0:53:07.719
<v Speaker 1>mentioned in the interview, Will will put those up on

0:53:07.719 --> 0:53:09.600
<v Speaker 1>our website and how to money dot com. That's right,

0:53:09.600 --> 0:53:12.040
<v Speaker 1>So Joel, that's going to be it, buddy. Until next time,

0:53:12.200 --> 0:53:13.959
<v Speaker 1>Best Friends Out, Best Friends Out,