WEBVTT - Berkshire's Operating Units Holding Up Well

0:00:00.080 --> 0:00:07.760
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Audio Studios, Podcasts, radio news.

0:00:08.680 --> 0:00:13.040
<v Speaker 2>This is Bloomberg Business Wait inside from the reporters and

0:00:13.200 --> 0:00:16.800
<v Speaker 2>editors who bring you America's most trusted business magazine, plus

0:00:16.840 --> 0:00:21.000
<v Speaker 2>global business, finance and tech news. The Bloomberg Business Week

0:00:21.040 --> 0:00:25.960
<v Speaker 2>podcast with Carol Messer and Tim Stenebeck from Bloomberg Radio.

0:00:27.760 --> 0:00:30.440
<v Speaker 3>So let's go to a company that has often looked

0:00:30.480 --> 0:00:32.400
<v Speaker 3>to Tim Ford's various businesses that can tell us a

0:00:32.440 --> 0:00:34.519
<v Speaker 3>lot too about the macro business environment and just the

0:00:34.560 --> 0:00:35.720
<v Speaker 3>macro environment overall.

0:00:35.840 --> 0:00:38.800
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, we're talking none other than Berkshire Hathaway. Berkshire's earnings

0:00:38.840 --> 0:00:41.640
<v Speaker 4>always closely watched as a proxy for US economic health

0:00:41.920 --> 0:00:47.559
<v Speaker 4>because the expansive nature of Warren Buffett's businesses, ranging from Railroad, BNSF, Geico,

0:00:47.680 --> 0:00:49.280
<v Speaker 4>Carol and Dairy Queen.

0:00:49.400 --> 0:00:52.640
<v Speaker 3>So much going on and stock has been it was

0:00:52.960 --> 0:00:55.280
<v Speaker 3>moving closer to that tillion dollar mark, but not going

0:00:55.360 --> 0:00:57.000
<v Speaker 3>to make it. It looks like today let's get more though

0:00:57.040 --> 0:00:59.600
<v Speaker 3>on the quarterly update. What we heard from Warren Buffett

0:00:59.600 --> 0:01:02.920
<v Speaker 3>with US is Bloomberg Intelligence, Property and Casualty Insurance Senior

0:01:02.920 --> 0:01:07.120
<v Speaker 3>analyst Matthew Palazola. He's here in studio, Matt. Good to

0:01:07.160 --> 0:01:09.399
<v Speaker 3>have you here, stock was up, we were closer to

0:01:09.440 --> 0:01:11.720
<v Speaker 3>the trillion dollar mark, although we still had a ways

0:01:11.720 --> 0:01:14.920
<v Speaker 3>to go. What was important about the quarter for this company.

0:01:14.800 --> 0:01:17.480
<v Speaker 1>So I'm not surprised that it's didn't reach there today.

0:01:17.520 --> 0:01:19.360
<v Speaker 1>I actually thought it would be down on the open.

0:01:19.680 --> 0:01:20.959
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, it was that three percent.

0:01:21.080 --> 0:01:21.560
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, I was.

0:01:21.840 --> 0:01:24.760
<v Speaker 1>Surprised to see that the quarter was fine. It wasn't

0:01:25.040 --> 0:01:28.759
<v Speaker 1>It wasn't really great positive, It wasn't really all that negative.

0:01:29.840 --> 0:01:31.520
<v Speaker 1>I thought the insurance learnings were actually gonna be a

0:01:31.520 --> 0:01:33.280
<v Speaker 1>little better. They did carry the whole company, but I

0:01:33.319 --> 0:01:33.920
<v Speaker 1>thought they were going.

0:01:33.840 --> 0:01:34.600
<v Speaker 5>To be a little bit better.

0:01:34.840 --> 0:01:38.759
<v Speaker 1>If you peel back the onion on Geico, their expenses

0:01:38.800 --> 0:01:41.800
<v Speaker 1>were a lot lower intentionally, which which helped them out

0:01:41.840 --> 0:01:43.959
<v Speaker 1>a lot or officially, what.

0:01:43.880 --> 0:01:44.840
<v Speaker 3>Do you mean intentionally?

0:01:45.000 --> 0:01:49.640
<v Speaker 1>So the auto insurance loss costs, meaning the cost of accidents,

0:01:49.680 --> 0:01:52.920
<v Speaker 1>has risen dramatically since COVID, Right, We've talked about it.

0:01:52.920 --> 0:01:54.520
<v Speaker 4>We talked about this a lot, but the context of

0:01:54.520 --> 0:01:56.760
<v Speaker 4>how much it cost us in premiums, right, And.

0:01:56.680 --> 0:01:59.160
<v Speaker 1>So they're raising those premiums because their costs are going

0:01:59.240 --> 0:02:01.560
<v Speaker 1>up more using money. So even no matter how much

0:02:01.600 --> 0:02:03.520
<v Speaker 1>more you're paying the once treans, companies are still losing

0:02:03.560 --> 0:02:06.320
<v Speaker 1>money the past couple of years. So what Geico did

0:02:06.480 --> 0:02:09.000
<v Speaker 1>was they actually reduced a lot of staff, they reduced

0:02:09.040 --> 0:02:12.560
<v Speaker 1>a lot of advertising. We looked at the run rate

0:02:12.600 --> 0:02:15.320
<v Speaker 1>for the year and they spent about one point five

0:02:15.400 --> 0:02:19.880
<v Speaker 1>billion dollars less than their run rate normal expenses just

0:02:19.919 --> 0:02:22.840
<v Speaker 1>in Geico, So that that propped them up a little

0:02:22.840 --> 0:02:25.040
<v Speaker 1>bit too. I would say this though, I think the

0:02:25.440 --> 0:02:29.240
<v Speaker 1>negatives were in the letter actually, So you've got the

0:02:29.240 --> 0:02:32.040
<v Speaker 1>typical Witten wisdom of Buffett in there, which was great.

0:02:32.280 --> 0:02:35.040
<v Speaker 1>He had a little homage to Charlie Munger, you know,

0:02:35.160 --> 0:02:38.760
<v Speaker 1>got a little dusty in my home office. But he

0:02:38.800 --> 0:02:41.680
<v Speaker 1>talks to kind of negatively about the railroad outlook and

0:02:41.720 --> 0:02:45.280
<v Speaker 1>the energy outlook. So labor costs and energy and the

0:02:45.320 --> 0:02:48.920
<v Speaker 1>regulatory environment. I'm sorry, labor costs were in the railroad

0:02:49.160 --> 0:02:51.919
<v Speaker 1>and then the regulatory environment in energy, and those are

0:02:51.960 --> 0:02:54.600
<v Speaker 1>go forward issues which will impact next year. So I

0:02:54.600 --> 0:02:57.160
<v Speaker 1>think that's probably partially why the stock selling off.

0:02:57.200 --> 0:02:59.239
<v Speaker 4>Okay, so let's talk a little bit about the balance

0:02:59.240 --> 0:03:01.560
<v Speaker 4>sheet because a big part of the story to emerge

0:03:01.600 --> 0:03:04.560
<v Speaker 4>after Saturday's letter is the record pile of cash. I mean,

0:03:04.600 --> 0:03:07.720
<v Speaker 4>we're talking one hundred and sixty seven point six billion dollars.

0:03:08.160 --> 0:03:10.400
<v Speaker 4>The problem and Warren Buffets talked about this in the past.

0:03:10.760 --> 0:03:12.519
<v Speaker 4>There's nowhere to put that money.

0:03:12.639 --> 0:03:14.679
<v Speaker 3>There's no where they can UN's saying that for years.

0:03:14.720 --> 0:03:16.640
<v Speaker 1>I say that for a long time, and it's been true.

0:03:16.720 --> 0:03:21.040
<v Speaker 1>So what has been the newer thing? I would say

0:03:21.120 --> 0:03:23.240
<v Speaker 1>in the past may five years, as we're talking about

0:03:23.280 --> 0:03:25.920
<v Speaker 1>private equity bidding up a lot of the companies that

0:03:25.919 --> 0:03:28.200
<v Speaker 1>they're looking at, and they hadn't seen this level of

0:03:28.240 --> 0:03:31.839
<v Speaker 1>competition in years. Besides the fact that you just need

0:03:31.880 --> 0:03:34.280
<v Speaker 1>something gigantic to move the needle for them anyway. I

0:03:34.280 --> 0:03:37.480
<v Speaker 1>mean they bought Allegheny was twelve billion dollars. Their investments

0:03:37.520 --> 0:03:40.960
<v Speaker 1>in these Japanese trading houses are now around twenty billion

0:03:41.000 --> 0:03:44.880
<v Speaker 1>dollars adjusted for currency, and that still doesn't move the needle.

0:03:45.000 --> 0:03:48.200
<v Speaker 1>So I don't think we're going to see anything huge

0:03:48.200 --> 0:03:48.880
<v Speaker 1>anytime soon.

0:03:48.960 --> 0:03:51.560
<v Speaker 3>But what about Oh sorry, Carol, No, no, no, officially because

0:03:51.600 --> 0:03:53.680
<v Speaker 3>I want to go back to actually the railroads and energy.

0:03:53.760 --> 0:03:55.880
<v Speaker 4>I was going to say, yeah, what about increasing Steaks

0:03:55.880 --> 0:03:58.160
<v Speaker 4>and Occidental for example, because they have the option to

0:03:58.160 --> 0:04:00.800
<v Speaker 4>do that, or increasing stakes other companies they have.

0:04:01.120 --> 0:04:05.440
<v Speaker 1>So he talks about I always thought they would buy Occidental, right,

0:04:05.520 --> 0:04:08.960
<v Speaker 1>and now that was I think very very widely speculated. They

0:04:08.960 --> 0:04:12.120
<v Speaker 1>threw cold water on that last year at the annual meeting.

0:04:12.160 --> 0:04:14.360
<v Speaker 1>He actually reiterated it in the letter that we're not

0:04:14.400 --> 0:04:16.040
<v Speaker 1>going to buy the entire company. We love it, but

0:04:16.080 --> 0:04:18.600
<v Speaker 1>we're not going to buy the entire company. I think

0:04:18.680 --> 0:04:21.200
<v Speaker 1>they can. They probably will increase the stake in it

0:04:21.360 --> 0:04:23.800
<v Speaker 1>as much as they can. He also called it a

0:04:23.880 --> 0:04:27.599
<v Speaker 1>forever investment, so that one and the Japan trading houses.

0:04:27.640 --> 0:04:30.200
<v Speaker 1>So I think you'll see stuff like that on the margin.

0:04:31.080 --> 0:04:33.440
<v Speaker 1>Thirteen F came out a couple of days ago before

0:04:33.800 --> 0:04:36.280
<v Speaker 1>there weren't any you know, dramatic new positions in there.

0:04:36.360 --> 0:04:39.040
<v Speaker 1>So it's a great a little bit. Yeah, I mean

0:04:39.040 --> 0:04:41.640
<v Speaker 1>it's a good problem to have, but you know, a problem.

0:04:41.440 --> 0:04:43.880
<v Speaker 3>Nonethelesson not bind Nvidia, like it's not his new Apple

0:04:43.960 --> 0:04:46.000
<v Speaker 3>or anything. Right, No, it's not happening.

0:04:46.160 --> 0:04:46.760
<v Speaker 5>No, I don't think.

0:04:46.839 --> 0:04:48.680
<v Speaker 3>So go back to I mean, what we love about

0:04:48.720 --> 0:04:51.599
<v Speaker 3>this company is that Warren Buffett Berkshire outh we tend

0:04:51.640 --> 0:04:55.360
<v Speaker 3>to really invest in just kind of these core industries

0:04:55.480 --> 0:04:58.240
<v Speaker 3>that often are tell us a lot about the economy,

0:04:58.320 --> 0:05:02.719
<v Speaker 3>So energy, railroad, you said, higher labor costs and energy specifically.

0:05:02.240 --> 0:05:06.680
<v Speaker 1>Energy specifically, so there's the regulatory environment specifically on the

0:05:06.720 --> 0:05:09.480
<v Speaker 1>West coast, so there's a lot of there's wildfires, right,

0:05:09.560 --> 0:05:12.720
<v Speaker 1>and if the utilities end up causing these, they have

0:05:12.760 --> 0:05:15.200
<v Speaker 1>to shoulder a lot of the cost for them. So

0:05:16.720 --> 0:05:21.000
<v Speaker 1>two things. One, Pacific Corp. Which they own, is involved

0:05:21.040 --> 0:05:25.560
<v Speaker 1>in a bunch of litigation they're settling. It's not hugely

0:05:25.640 --> 0:05:28.200
<v Speaker 1>material for the company as a whole, right, It's a

0:05:28.320 --> 0:05:31.080
<v Speaker 1>couple of billion here there. It's not good for Pacific Court,

0:05:31.160 --> 0:05:34.560
<v Speaker 1>but it's not going to hurt Berkshire's financial strength. But

0:05:35.040 --> 0:05:39.159
<v Speaker 1>what Buffett had said was depending on how those fire

0:05:39.279 --> 0:05:42.440
<v Speaker 1>costs end up may determine if we want to make

0:05:42.480 --> 0:05:45.440
<v Speaker 1>further investments. So it was kind of if we get

0:05:45.600 --> 0:05:47.760
<v Speaker 1>banged on this, we may not invest much more.

0:05:47.800 --> 0:05:49.560
<v Speaker 3>Well, that's what I think is interesting. He's not necessarily

0:05:49.600 --> 0:05:51.520
<v Speaker 3>pulling the plug on it, right or backing out. But

0:05:51.560 --> 0:05:53.880
<v Speaker 3>it doesn't necessarily going to pony up more money to it.

0:05:53.960 --> 0:05:56.000
<v Speaker 1>I don't think so. I mean the other thing in

0:05:56.040 --> 0:06:00.520
<v Speaker 1>the railroad you mentioned railroad is constantly consuming capital. It

0:06:00.560 --> 0:06:05.400
<v Speaker 1>wasn't necessarily negative or that things were going poorly there.

0:06:05.480 --> 0:06:08.640
<v Speaker 1>It was just specific two railroads they were having labor

0:06:08.680 --> 0:06:13.200
<v Speaker 1>shortages one and two. He kind of railed against the

0:06:13.240 --> 0:06:16.280
<v Speaker 1>government getting too involved in the labor negotiations and saying

0:06:16.279 --> 0:06:18.920
<v Speaker 1>those keep coming up and those will hurt the margin

0:06:19.000 --> 0:06:22.680
<v Speaker 1>of Burlington Northern, which has trailed Peers historically.

0:06:24.040 --> 0:06:26.800
<v Speaker 4>Just very briefly twenty seconds May fourth, twenty twenty four,

0:06:26.960 --> 0:06:28.200
<v Speaker 4>that's when the annual meeting.

0:06:28.000 --> 0:06:29.479
<v Speaker 5>Is local point next.

0:06:29.560 --> 0:06:32.520
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, well, I want to hear more from g Jane

0:06:32.560 --> 0:06:33.920
<v Speaker 1>and greg Abel.

0:06:34.000 --> 0:06:34.719
<v Speaker 5>They'll be there.

0:06:34.920 --> 0:06:37.560
<v Speaker 1>They were there briefly for the past two years, but

0:06:37.920 --> 0:06:39.400
<v Speaker 1>it would be nice to hear a lot more from

0:06:39.440 --> 0:06:40.120
<v Speaker 1>greg You.

0:06:40.040 --> 0:06:42.480
<v Speaker 3>Do wonder how he pulls those guys in. They obviously

0:06:42.640 --> 0:06:44.839
<v Speaker 3>right are key now to the future of the company.

0:06:44.839 --> 0:06:47.840
<v Speaker 3>But with Charlie Munger and what's happened and his passing,

0:06:48.000 --> 0:06:50.520
<v Speaker 3>how he kind of relies on these guys whether they

0:06:50.560 --> 0:06:53.120
<v Speaker 3>become part of kind of the show if you will, Yeah.

0:06:52.920 --> 0:06:55.279
<v Speaker 1>I mean I hope they will. Honestly, Munger didn't even

0:06:55.279 --> 0:06:57.040
<v Speaker 1>really talk much last time anyway, all.

0:06:56.960 --> 0:06:59.120
<v Speaker 3>Right, gonna leave with them, Matt, Thanks so much. Matt Palizola.

0:06:59.160 --> 0:07:02.040
<v Speaker 3>He's property in casual to insurance Senior Alyss covers Berkshire

0:07:02.240 --> 0:07:04.520
<v Speaker 3>for our Bloomberg Intelligence team right here in studio. This

0:07:04.560 --> 0:07:05.120
<v Speaker 3>is Bloomberg.

0:07:05.880 --> 0:07:09.440
<v Speaker 2>You're listening to the Bloomberg Business Week podcast. Catch us

0:07:09.440 --> 0:07:12.679
<v Speaker 2>Live weekday afternoons from two to five pm Eastern Listen

0:07:12.720 --> 0:07:14.880
<v Speaker 2>on Apple car Play and then brought auto with a

0:07:14.920 --> 0:07:19.040
<v Speaker 2>Bloomberg Business act or want us live on YouTube.

0:07:19.920 --> 0:07:23.880
<v Speaker 3>Tim Elon Muskin ebies check Elon Muskin satellites and space

0:07:23.920 --> 0:07:27.720
<v Speaker 3>exploration via SpaceX ad check. Then there's the brain Elon's

0:07:27.760 --> 0:07:28.679
<v Speaker 3>neuralleak project.

0:07:28.840 --> 0:07:30.760
<v Speaker 4>Okay, some news there recently too, so we can go

0:07:30.760 --> 0:07:32.360
<v Speaker 4>ahead and say check I think at this point, but

0:07:32.440 --> 0:07:33.440
<v Speaker 4>don't sign me up for it.

0:07:34.040 --> 0:07:35.800
<v Speaker 3>What we haven't earn much about in a while is

0:07:35.840 --> 0:07:38.840
<v Speaker 3>Elon's tunneling venture the Boring Company, That is, until.

0:07:38.880 --> 0:07:41.520
<v Speaker 4>I think it's fair to say uncheck on this one.

0:07:41.440 --> 0:07:44.160
<v Speaker 3>Exactly well, which is why our Bloomberg BusinessWeek team had

0:07:44.160 --> 0:07:47.520
<v Speaker 3>to take do some digging around no pun intended. They

0:07:47.560 --> 0:07:50.520
<v Speaker 3>found out that the Boring Company's tiny Las Vegas loop

0:07:50.640 --> 0:07:54.080
<v Speaker 3>is all that's come of Musk's promise and his promises

0:07:54.120 --> 0:07:57.840
<v Speaker 3>overall to build super fast mass transit hyperloops. Workers say

0:07:57.840 --> 0:08:00.920
<v Speaker 3>it's tunnels, meantime, are packed with chemical slut. Judge this

0:08:00.960 --> 0:08:03.320
<v Speaker 3>is a story by Max Chafkin and Sarah McBride of

0:08:03.320 --> 0:08:04.280
<v Speaker 3>our Bloomberg News team.

0:08:04.400 --> 0:08:06.800
<v Speaker 4>Max is Bloomberg Business We columnists also contributor to the

0:08:06.800 --> 0:08:09.880
<v Speaker 4>Elon Inc. Podcast, a new episode dropping tomorrow onto the

0:08:09.920 --> 0:08:12.880
<v Speaker 4>Bloomberg Terminal and on Bloomberg dot com slash elon Ing.

0:08:13.360 --> 0:08:14.200
<v Speaker 4>Maxis here in our.

0:08:14.440 --> 0:08:15.720
<v Speaker 3>Called the Studge episode.

0:08:15.840 --> 0:08:18.000
<v Speaker 6>It's yeah, it's a sludge special.

0:08:18.560 --> 0:08:20.160
<v Speaker 4>Since we talked about the sledge, we got to start

0:08:20.160 --> 0:08:22.400
<v Speaker 4>with the sludge because it's it's actually kind of serious,

0:08:22.480 --> 0:08:26.679
<v Speaker 4>pretty serious laughing but causes some pretty bad health effects.

0:08:26.760 --> 0:08:26.960
<v Speaker 7>Yeah.

0:08:27.000 --> 0:08:29.760
<v Speaker 6>So, I mean, the genes of this story are these

0:08:29.880 --> 0:08:32.960
<v Speaker 6>documents that we obtained that Sarah McBride and I obtained

0:08:33.679 --> 0:08:37.679
<v Speaker 6>from the state OSHA, that's the Occupational Health and Safety Administration,

0:08:38.480 --> 0:08:41.920
<v Speaker 6>and it basically shows lots of complaints from workers about

0:08:41.960 --> 0:08:46.720
<v Speaker 6>unsafe conditions, including this issue of like these toxic muck,

0:08:47.280 --> 0:08:50.199
<v Speaker 6>which the workers say they've had to wade through. The

0:08:50.280 --> 0:08:53.040
<v Speaker 6>reason it's toxic, it's not it's not necessarily like they're

0:08:53.080 --> 0:08:57.360
<v Speaker 6>doing something that's totally outside the norms of tunneling. These

0:08:57.440 --> 0:08:59.760
<v Speaker 6>chemicals are are sort of standard chemicals that are used,

0:09:00.160 --> 0:09:02.960
<v Speaker 6>but the allegation from the workers is that corners are

0:09:03.000 --> 0:09:05.480
<v Speaker 6>being cut, they're trying to move too fast, they're doing

0:09:05.480 --> 0:09:07.400
<v Speaker 6>it on the cheap, you know. And the funny thing

0:09:07.440 --> 0:09:09.600
<v Speaker 6>about this, or it's not really funny, but these are

0:09:09.679 --> 0:09:11.760
<v Speaker 6>the things that Elon Musk has set out to do

0:09:12.160 --> 0:09:14.559
<v Speaker 6>to some extent, Like the whole point of the Boring Company,

0:09:15.280 --> 0:09:19.560
<v Speaker 6>like many of Musk's companies, has been to cut unnecessary costs.

0:09:19.840 --> 0:09:23.000
<v Speaker 6>The thing that we're hearing with this story, however, and

0:09:23.080 --> 0:09:24.880
<v Speaker 6>I think you see echoes of this elsewhere in Elon

0:09:25.000 --> 0:09:29.120
<v Speaker 6>Musk's empire, actually is that they're not necessarily finding lots

0:09:29.120 --> 0:09:32.120
<v Speaker 6>of innovations there. They're ultimately ending up with a normal

0:09:32.160 --> 0:09:36.640
<v Speaker 6>tunneling company essentially that happens to have a safety record

0:09:36.679 --> 0:09:37.760
<v Speaker 6>that some would say is troubling.

0:09:37.840 --> 0:09:40.280
<v Speaker 4>Okay, So here's what's a little puzzling to me, Max

0:09:40.480 --> 0:09:42.679
<v Speaker 4>Elon Musk is a guy who's literally putting chips in

0:09:42.720 --> 0:09:46.800
<v Speaker 4>people's heads. He's doing something that only until SpaceX did it,

0:09:47.400 --> 0:09:52.400
<v Speaker 4>governments taking a whole of government approach could do. We've

0:09:52.400 --> 0:09:55.199
<v Speaker 4>been able to dig tunnels for transportation purposes for over

0:09:55.240 --> 0:09:57.440
<v Speaker 4>a century. Why is he running into so much trouble here?

0:09:57.640 --> 0:09:57.760
<v Speaker 2>So?

0:09:58.120 --> 0:09:59.920
<v Speaker 6>I think I wrote one of the first stories about

0:09:59.920 --> 0:10:02.640
<v Speaker 6>this back in early twenty seventeen. Talked to Elon Musk

0:10:02.679 --> 0:10:05.160
<v Speaker 6>at the time about this, and just to put a

0:10:05.160 --> 0:10:08.040
<v Speaker 6>slightly different spin on what you just said and which

0:10:08.120 --> 0:10:10.360
<v Speaker 6>relates to this, which is that SpaceX is not the

0:10:10.360 --> 0:10:13.839
<v Speaker 6>first company, not the first private company to build rockets, right,

0:10:13.920 --> 0:10:16.839
<v Speaker 6>the shuttle, all the things that NASA done were built

0:10:16.840 --> 0:10:18.160
<v Speaker 6>by government contractors.

0:10:18.840 --> 0:10:20.320
<v Speaker 4>I guess what I'm saying is that he's doing it

0:10:20.360 --> 0:10:22.560
<v Speaker 4>in a way that is really innovative. Ay, well, yeah,

0:10:23.320 --> 0:10:25.480
<v Speaker 4>very much reusable stuff is that was a really.

0:10:25.360 --> 0:10:26.960
<v Speaker 7>Innovative contracting process.

0:10:27.040 --> 0:10:29.640
<v Speaker 6>They used contracts, they sold them directly the government at

0:10:29.679 --> 0:10:32.680
<v Speaker 6>a fixed price, which was new. But one of the

0:10:32.679 --> 0:10:34.760
<v Speaker 6>core things that SpaceX did was like go out and

0:10:34.800 --> 0:10:37.960
<v Speaker 6>look for existing technology and find a way to improve

0:10:38.000 --> 0:10:39.880
<v Speaker 6>on it and do it cost effectively.

0:10:40.120 --> 0:10:41.240
<v Speaker 7>Now, there are a lot of.

0:10:41.200 --> 0:10:44.640
<v Speaker 6>Potential inefficiencies in the world of aerospace, and.

0:10:44.640 --> 0:10:47.120
<v Speaker 7>Musk has had a much harder time in some.

0:10:47.040 --> 0:10:51.040
<v Speaker 6>Other fields finding similar sort of levels of inefficiency, just

0:10:51.200 --> 0:10:53.560
<v Speaker 6>sort of low hanging fruit. And I think the tunneling

0:10:53.600 --> 0:10:56.320
<v Speaker 6>example is one you know he talked about back in

0:10:56.360 --> 0:10:58.960
<v Speaker 6>twenty seventeen. He talked, you know, it costs a billion

0:10:59.080 --> 0:11:01.920
<v Speaker 6>dollars a year, and it like it takes a mile,

0:11:02.160 --> 0:11:04.160
<v Speaker 6>It takes a year to dig a mile, and it

0:11:04.200 --> 0:11:06.040
<v Speaker 6>costs like a billion dollars a mile or some some

0:11:06.200 --> 0:11:09.280
<v Speaker 6>very large figure like that. And now Boring is doing

0:11:09.280 --> 0:11:11.240
<v Speaker 6>maybe a little better on cost, although it's hard to know,

0:11:11.480 --> 0:11:13.920
<v Speaker 6>but when you look at the actual pace that they're going,

0:11:14.000 --> 0:11:16.760
<v Speaker 6>it's basically a mile a year. It's it's not that

0:11:16.960 --> 0:11:21.640
<v Speaker 6>much faster than existing tunneling projects. And when you look

0:11:21.679 --> 0:11:24.080
<v Speaker 6>at the end result, we're not talking about mass transit.

0:11:24.120 --> 0:11:26.880
<v Speaker 6>We're not talking about you know, big subway cars full

0:11:26.920 --> 0:11:29.240
<v Speaker 6>of people, which is actually what many people in Las Vegas,

0:11:29.240 --> 0:11:31.480
<v Speaker 6>you know, would have hoped for, because traffic there is

0:11:31.480 --> 0:11:35.439
<v Speaker 6>really bad. We're talking about are Tesla's just normal cars

0:11:35.760 --> 0:11:38.160
<v Speaker 6>that can take three people and a driver. They're not

0:11:38.200 --> 0:11:42.080
<v Speaker 6>even driverless, and they're limited to forty miles an hour.

0:11:42.280 --> 0:11:45.680
<v Speaker 6>So we're so far away from the kind of grand visions.

0:11:45.720 --> 0:11:49.160
<v Speaker 6>And just to remind people what Elon Musk originally promised

0:11:49.160 --> 0:11:52.080
<v Speaker 6>here was New York to DC in twenty nine minutes

0:11:52.160 --> 0:11:53.760
<v Speaker 6>San Francisco, Los Angeles.

0:11:53.880 --> 0:11:55.520
<v Speaker 7>Yeah, in thirty five. Sounds awesome.

0:11:55.559 --> 0:11:57.560
<v Speaker 6>You could commute from you know, you could like commute

0:11:57.559 --> 0:12:01.360
<v Speaker 6>halfway across the country, and and you know, it just.

0:12:01.360 --> 0:12:04.360
<v Speaker 7>Hasn't gone that way. And I think, you know, in

0:12:04.400 --> 0:12:05.000
<v Speaker 7>all sorts of.

0:12:05.000 --> 0:12:10.120
<v Speaker 6>Different ways across Elon Musk's empire, you're seeing maybe fissures, cracks,

0:12:10.160 --> 0:12:13.360
<v Speaker 6>ways in which the promises are not necessarily matching up.

0:12:13.400 --> 0:12:16.640
<v Speaker 6>You know, we saw this ruling with pay in Delaware.

0:12:17.000 --> 0:12:20.480
<v Speaker 6>You know, of course, lots of problems documented at x

0:12:20.520 --> 0:12:23.559
<v Speaker 6>slash Twitter. And here you just have like a very

0:12:24.280 --> 0:12:27.760
<v Speaker 6>visceral way where you have these grand promises and the

0:12:27.880 --> 0:12:31.120
<v Speaker 6>end what you have is basically a glorified shuttle bus system.

0:12:31.160 --> 0:12:32.959
<v Speaker 6>It doesn't take you, you know, from one end of

0:12:32.960 --> 0:12:34.880
<v Speaker 6>the country to the other. It takes you from one

0:12:34.960 --> 0:12:37.240
<v Speaker 6>end to the Las Vegas Convention Center to the other.

0:12:37.400 --> 0:12:39.280
<v Speaker 3>Is it just a case of that's all I can

0:12:39.320 --> 0:12:41.120
<v Speaker 3>do so far the plan?

0:12:41.920 --> 0:12:43.920
<v Speaker 6>Yeah, I mean to some extent, yes, I mean the

0:12:44.640 --> 0:12:48.880
<v Speaker 6>thing that if you squint, and I think the reason that.

0:12:48.800 --> 0:12:52.880
<v Speaker 7>This was approved, it's partly that was approved.

0:12:52.559 --> 0:12:56.079
<v Speaker 6>Because Las Vegas is a low regulation city.

0:12:56.200 --> 0:12:57.720
<v Speaker 7>These are mostly on private property.

0:12:57.720 --> 0:13:00.440
<v Speaker 6>There isn't a ton of oversight from the government as

0:13:00.440 --> 0:13:02.840
<v Speaker 6>there might be in other places. But also you know,

0:13:02.840 --> 0:13:06.120
<v Speaker 6>they're talking about opening these stations throughout the city. But

0:13:06.200 --> 0:13:08.000
<v Speaker 6>you know, when we talk to people on the ground there,

0:13:08.320 --> 0:13:11.160
<v Speaker 6>it is a long way from happening. It's also hard

0:13:11.200 --> 0:13:13.360
<v Speaker 6>to see how this is going to make a huge

0:13:13.400 --> 0:13:16.440
<v Speaker 6>impact on traffic. Again, when you're talking about, you know,

0:13:16.480 --> 0:13:18.520
<v Speaker 6>moving people three at a time, very very slowly, A

0:13:18.520 --> 0:13:20.680
<v Speaker 6>lot of things would have to happen, and there are

0:13:20.720 --> 0:13:22.680
<v Speaker 6>lots of reasons for skepticism. I mean, you know, digging

0:13:22.760 --> 0:13:26.640
<v Speaker 6>underground is hard. There's a reason it costs so much money.

0:13:26.720 --> 0:13:28.320
<v Speaker 6>It costs so much money because there's stuff you can

0:13:28.360 --> 0:13:31.479
<v Speaker 6>run into, complicated property rights, and of course.

0:13:31.280 --> 0:13:33.319
<v Speaker 3>So the company's not going to create a trillion jobs.

0:13:34.040 --> 0:13:36.719
<v Speaker 6>Well yeah, which is what Elon Musk told me back

0:13:36.720 --> 0:13:38.559
<v Speaker 6>in twenty seventeen. They were going to create a trillion jobs.

0:13:38.600 --> 0:13:40.680
<v Speaker 6>I'd say, it's a long way from that.

0:13:42.040 --> 0:13:42.440
<v Speaker 7>To put it.

0:13:42.440 --> 0:13:45.840
<v Speaker 6>To put it mildly, I mean, there was sort of

0:13:45.840 --> 0:13:49.040
<v Speaker 6>flirtations or talk of various projects. There was one in Maryland,

0:13:49.240 --> 0:13:51.880
<v Speaker 6>one in Los Angeles, one Chicago, and in all these cases,

0:13:51.880 --> 0:13:54.280
<v Speaker 6>you know, he was bringing along some of the most

0:13:54.320 --> 0:13:57.280
<v Speaker 6>famous politicians in the United States. So it was Larry Hogan,

0:13:57.480 --> 0:13:59.720
<v Speaker 6>you know, governor of Maryland, who former governor of Maryland,

0:13:59.720 --> 0:14:01.240
<v Speaker 6>who was, you know, at the time, a big star

0:14:01.280 --> 0:14:05.000
<v Speaker 6>of the Republican Party, you know, Rama Manuel, you know,

0:14:05.080 --> 0:14:07.720
<v Speaker 6>former chief of staff to President Obama, Mayor of Chicago,

0:14:08.040 --> 0:14:10.319
<v Speaker 6>Eric Garcetti, star mayor of Los Angeles. Like, a lot

0:14:10.320 --> 0:14:13.000
<v Speaker 6>of people went for this and they just you know,

0:14:13.040 --> 0:14:15.320
<v Speaker 6>they haven't been able to deliver. And I think there's

0:14:15.360 --> 0:14:19.000
<v Speaker 6>probably some element of distraction. Obviously Musk has a lot

0:14:19.080 --> 0:14:22.600
<v Speaker 6>going on. And also I think just tunneling this is hard.

0:14:22.640 --> 0:14:25.080
<v Speaker 6>You're dealing with dirt and putting.

0:14:24.760 --> 0:14:28.040
<v Speaker 3>People up in space and stuff in space is really hard.

0:14:28.480 --> 0:14:31.360
<v Speaker 3>Tapping into the auto way industry. I mean, this is

0:14:31.400 --> 0:14:34.240
<v Speaker 3>like going back to Tim's point, right, how many times

0:14:34.240 --> 0:14:36.360
<v Speaker 3>were like, you know, you count out elon Musk or whatever,

0:14:36.360 --> 0:14:38.120
<v Speaker 3>and then he's like, whoa, look what he did. And

0:14:38.160 --> 0:14:40.120
<v Speaker 3>I understand there's a lot on his plate right now

0:14:40.120 --> 0:14:42.840
<v Speaker 3>and that's got to be distracting. But should we not

0:14:43.000 --> 0:14:45.400
<v Speaker 3>rule him out? Has he not found the right boring tool?

0:14:45.600 --> 0:14:45.680
<v Speaker 5>Is?

0:14:45.760 --> 0:14:46.680
<v Speaker 3>What is it? Max?

0:14:47.320 --> 0:14:51.040
<v Speaker 6>Well, I would say, I mean, I think it's there's

0:14:51.080 --> 0:14:52.920
<v Speaker 6>probably a bunch of different factors going on.

0:14:52.960 --> 0:14:54.800
<v Speaker 7>I mean, one thing that was different.

0:14:54.480 --> 0:14:57.640
<v Speaker 6>With SpaceX is you had a very interested buyer, which

0:14:57.680 --> 0:15:01.040
<v Speaker 6>was NASA. You had the US government wanting to finance

0:15:01.080 --> 0:15:04.200
<v Speaker 6>this thing, right, looking for somebody just like Elon Musk,

0:15:04.200 --> 0:15:07.320
<v Speaker 6>and Elon Musk sort of finding a way to fit himself,

0:15:07.920 --> 0:15:10.000
<v Speaker 6>you know, to sort of make himself look like the

0:15:10.040 --> 0:15:11.240
<v Speaker 6>thing that the US government want.

0:15:11.280 --> 0:15:12.680
<v Speaker 7>Elon Musk is really good at this.

0:15:12.720 --> 0:15:15.680
<v Speaker 6>We're seeing this with Starlink as well, where like, you know,

0:15:15.720 --> 0:15:18.600
<v Speaker 6>he's this what would seem like a civilian technology, these

0:15:18.640 --> 0:15:20.960
<v Speaker 6>these internet services for as Musk I told it to

0:15:21.000 --> 0:15:22.800
<v Speaker 6>Walter Isaacson, I think he said, you know, it's to

0:15:22.840 --> 0:15:26.880
<v Speaker 6>Netflix and chill. Increasingly, this looks like a potential military tool.

0:15:26.920 --> 0:15:29.520
<v Speaker 6>This is gonna this is gonna lead to government contracts

0:15:29.560 --> 0:15:31.600
<v Speaker 6>and and and could be a big line of business

0:15:31.640 --> 0:15:35.160
<v Speaker 6>for SpaceX. You know, I think what happened is in

0:15:35.280 --> 0:15:37.520
<v Speaker 6>twenty sixteen and twenty seventeen.

0:15:37.160 --> 0:15:38.440
<v Speaker 7>Donald Trump becomes president.

0:15:38.800 --> 0:15:41.840
<v Speaker 6>There's a lot of talk about infrastructure and in general,

0:15:41.880 --> 0:15:43.840
<v Speaker 6>there's been a lot of talk about wanting to spend

0:15:43.840 --> 0:15:46.680
<v Speaker 6>public money on infrastructure, but there hasn't been a ton

0:15:46.720 --> 0:15:49.360
<v Speaker 6>of delivery, right, And and I think a big part

0:15:49.360 --> 0:15:52.760
<v Speaker 6>of this was predicated on this you know, trillion dollar

0:15:53.000 --> 0:15:54.440
<v Speaker 6>the thing that Trump was saying, which was like a

0:15:54.440 --> 0:15:58.960
<v Speaker 6>trillion dollar infrastructure plan. And you know, ultimately infrastructure, whether

0:15:58.960 --> 0:16:00.400
<v Speaker 6>it's Elon Musk or any one.

0:16:00.240 --> 0:16:01.440
<v Speaker 7>Else, is very expensive.

0:16:01.680 --> 0:16:04.600
<v Speaker 6>It's politically dicey because you have land rights and so on,

0:16:04.680 --> 0:16:07.360
<v Speaker 6>and it it just hasn't come together with the speed

0:16:07.760 --> 0:16:08.880
<v Speaker 6>that SpaceX came together.

0:16:09.080 --> 0:16:09.320
<v Speaker 2>Max.

0:16:09.720 --> 0:16:11.560
<v Speaker 4>I want to dig into something that you said, that

0:16:11.600 --> 0:16:13.800
<v Speaker 4>you mentioned a little earlier, which is the idea that

0:16:14.120 --> 0:16:17.280
<v Speaker 4>back in twenty seventeen twenty eighteen, a lot of politicians

0:16:17.360 --> 0:16:19.240
<v Speaker 4>were kind of jumping up and down with the idea

0:16:19.280 --> 0:16:22.640
<v Speaker 4>of collaborating with Elon Musk. What I noticed in your

0:16:22.680 --> 0:16:25.760
<v Speaker 4>piece is that that tone has totally shifted and they

0:16:25.800 --> 0:16:28.840
<v Speaker 4>are now local politicians who are saying hey, thanks, but

0:16:28.880 --> 0:16:29.320
<v Speaker 4>no thanks.

0:16:29.360 --> 0:16:32.160
<v Speaker 6>Yeah, including the mayor of Las Vegas, who is you know,

0:16:33.080 --> 0:16:35.840
<v Speaker 6>Las Vegas is an interesting place because the city of

0:16:35.880 --> 0:16:38.480
<v Speaker 6>Las Vegas actually doesn't contain most of the Strip, so

0:16:38.560 --> 0:16:41.000
<v Speaker 6>it's not like she has oversight overall this. As I said,

0:16:41.000 --> 0:16:43.120
<v Speaker 6>a lot of it is on public property. But with

0:16:43.240 --> 0:16:46.440
<v Speaker 6>Caroline Goodman, the mayor, longtime mayor, her husband was a

0:16:46.480 --> 0:16:48.080
<v Speaker 6>long time Mariage. She's like one of the probably the

0:16:48.080 --> 0:16:52.280
<v Speaker 6>most famous politician in Las Vegas, is essentially criticizing it

0:16:52.320 --> 0:16:55.360
<v Speaker 6>and criticizing it on the grounds that it's unpractical. She,

0:16:55.840 --> 0:16:58.960
<v Speaker 6>you know, from the start, has raised these safety concerns,

0:16:58.960 --> 0:17:01.240
<v Speaker 6>which I think looks prescient when you look at this,

0:17:01.840 --> 0:17:05.439
<v Speaker 6>oh shut thing and yeah, and she's essentially saying, you know,

0:17:05.600 --> 0:17:07.480
<v Speaker 6>this would be great if it could actually happen, but

0:17:08.000 --> 0:17:10.679
<v Speaker 6>I don't see it. And that again, is that that

0:17:10.720 --> 0:17:13.080
<v Speaker 6>does represent a bit of a departure for Elon Musk.

0:17:13.119 --> 0:17:16.000
<v Speaker 6>You do feel like in Las Vegas at least, you know,

0:17:16.119 --> 0:17:18.320
<v Speaker 6>some of the magic, some of that kind of Elon

0:17:18.400 --> 0:17:19.240
<v Speaker 6>Musk star doest.

0:17:19.440 --> 0:17:21.119
<v Speaker 7>It just doesn't feel quite, you.

0:17:21.160 --> 0:17:22.960
<v Speaker 6>Know, shine quite as brightly. Maybe that's the lights of

0:17:23.000 --> 0:17:24.879
<v Speaker 6>the strip drowning it out. I don't know, but but

0:17:24.960 --> 0:17:27.320
<v Speaker 6>it definitely feels like there's something different.

0:17:26.960 --> 0:17:29.200
<v Speaker 3>Going on there all right. Back to the workers though

0:17:29.320 --> 0:17:32.399
<v Speaker 3>and their conditions. Is this something unusual in terms of

0:17:32.440 --> 0:17:35.240
<v Speaker 3>infrastructure projects? And I'm always a little wary when there's

0:17:35.359 --> 0:17:36.840
<v Speaker 3>a line in your story. Although no one has been

0:17:36.880 --> 0:17:41.120
<v Speaker 3>killed at a boring company work site so far in Vegas,

0:17:41.560 --> 0:17:44.119
<v Speaker 3>it doesn't just speak to how tricky it is.

0:17:44.200 --> 0:17:46.720
<v Speaker 6>Yeah, as I said, these are not like no one's saying,

0:17:46.720 --> 0:17:50.200
<v Speaker 6>they're using chemicals that are worse than anybody else what

0:17:51.000 --> 0:17:52.680
<v Speaker 6>the workers are saying, what you see in these ocean

0:17:52.800 --> 0:17:56.160
<v Speaker 6>complaints are sort of like little things that maybe add

0:17:56.200 --> 0:17:58.720
<v Speaker 6>up to a dangerous situation. And you know, we have

0:17:58.840 --> 0:18:04.040
<v Speaker 6>seen similar stories like this around Tesla's car factories around there.

0:18:04.119 --> 0:18:06.640
<v Speaker 6>You know, Reuter's had a great piece uh some weeks

0:18:06.680 --> 0:18:09.719
<v Speaker 6>ago about you know, death at a SpaceX site. So

0:18:10.000 --> 0:18:12.800
<v Speaker 6>you know, I mean when you're when you're radically trying

0:18:12.800 --> 0:18:15.080
<v Speaker 6>to cut costs, when you're going around telling people that

0:18:15.200 --> 0:18:18.360
<v Speaker 6>the only law that matters are the laws of physics, right,

0:18:18.400 --> 0:18:20.919
<v Speaker 6>I think I think to some extent they're going to

0:18:20.960 --> 0:18:23.840
<v Speaker 6>be costs of that, and we're seeing that, and and

0:18:23.960 --> 0:18:27.040
<v Speaker 6>but we should say, like this isn't This is probably

0:18:27.119 --> 0:18:30.080
<v Speaker 6>more an indictment of Boring Company being less innovative rather

0:18:30.160 --> 0:18:32.320
<v Speaker 6>than it's like the most dangerous place in there.

0:18:32.560 --> 0:18:35.080
<v Speaker 4>You know, there just hasn't been proof rock three yet, Max.

0:18:35.240 --> 0:18:37.760
<v Speaker 4>And that, by the way, is the tunnel boring machine.

0:18:37.840 --> 0:18:39.560
<v Speaker 3>Read the story you'll find out more.

0:18:39.760 --> 0:18:43.040
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, which is you know, promising, over promising and under delivering.

0:18:43.119 --> 0:18:43.840
<v Speaker 7>They have good names.

0:18:43.880 --> 0:18:47.040
<v Speaker 4>Those Ton Sliot would be proud, of course.

0:18:46.840 --> 0:18:49.560
<v Speaker 3>They do, all right, Max, Thank you so much, Max Staffkin.

0:18:49.600 --> 0:18:51.679
<v Speaker 3>He is Bloomberg Business to be Calm, a story featured

0:18:51.720 --> 0:18:54.320
<v Speaker 3>in the new episode of the Elon Inc. Podcast, debuting

0:18:54.320 --> 0:18:56.680
<v Speaker 3>tomorrow on The Bloomberg and at Bloomberg dot Com slash

0:18:56.800 --> 0:18:57.680
<v Speaker 3>Elon Inc.

0:18:59.520 --> 0:19:03.400
<v Speaker 2>Your listening to the Bloomberg Business Week podcast. Listen live

0:19:03.520 --> 0:19:06.720
<v Speaker 2>each weekday starting a two pm Eastern do applecar Play

0:19:06.720 --> 0:19:09.600
<v Speaker 2>and Android Auto with the Bloomberg Business ad. You can

0:19:09.640 --> 0:19:12.879
<v Speaker 2>also listen live on Amazon Alexa from our flagship New

0:19:12.920 --> 0:19:16.840
<v Speaker 2>York station, Just Say Alexa playing Bloomberg eleven thirty.

0:19:18.520 --> 0:19:18.760
<v Speaker 7>Joel.

0:19:18.800 --> 0:19:21.000
<v Speaker 4>I don't know if you saw this over the weekend,

0:19:21.119 --> 0:19:23.919
<v Speaker 4>but actually you definitely didn't because it happened like in

0:19:23.920 --> 0:19:26.879
<v Speaker 4>the middle of the night and you hopefully, yeah, hopefully

0:19:26.880 --> 0:19:31.040
<v Speaker 4>you're asleep. Micro Strategy, it's the largest publicly held corporate holder.

0:19:31.119 --> 0:19:35.240
<v Speaker 4>Bitcoin suffered a hack on its x account that tricked

0:19:35.240 --> 0:19:37.159
<v Speaker 4>some people into handing over a total of more than

0:19:37.320 --> 0:19:39.640
<v Speaker 4>four hundred one thousand dollars to the attacker.

0:19:39.800 --> 0:19:43.000
<v Speaker 3>Not good, right, the account was compromised. That's pretty amazing,

0:19:43.080 --> 0:19:45.360
<v Speaker 3>and they're not alone. Listen. Some of the other instances

0:19:45.359 --> 0:19:47.280
<v Speaker 3>of hacking in the corporate world in the last couple

0:19:47.320 --> 0:19:50.639
<v Speaker 3>of weeks alone include the Danish it and consulting company

0:19:50.680 --> 0:19:53.760
<v Speaker 3>net Company, a cyber attack against the division of United

0:19:53.800 --> 0:19:56.159
<v Speaker 3>Health Group, and hackers believe to be part of a

0:19:56.200 --> 0:19:59.960
<v Speaker 3>cybercrime group gaining access to some of Prudential's IT system.

0:20:00.119 --> 0:20:01.919
<v Speaker 3>I mean, there's constantly a lot going on.

0:20:02.119 --> 0:20:03.760
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, no question, the hackers are getting more and more

0:20:03.800 --> 0:20:06.880
<v Speaker 4>sophisticated and going after more and more valuable data. That's

0:20:06.920 --> 0:20:09.800
<v Speaker 4>certainly what IBM's X Force, the form of the firm's

0:20:09.920 --> 0:20:13.320
<v Speaker 4>threat intelligence service, has found. We've got with us Charles Henderson,

0:20:13.359 --> 0:20:16.200
<v Speaker 4>global managing Partner and a head of X Force at IBM.

0:20:16.240 --> 0:20:19.239
<v Speaker 4>He joins us from Austin, Texas. Good to have you

0:20:19.480 --> 0:20:22.520
<v Speaker 4>with us this afternoon, Charles, how are you hey.

0:20:22.520 --> 0:20:24.120
<v Speaker 5>I'm doing great. Thanks for having me again.

0:20:24.240 --> 0:20:24.440
<v Speaker 2>Yeah.

0:20:24.480 --> 0:20:27.800
<v Speaker 4>So every year you guys come out with this sort

0:20:27.800 --> 0:20:30.480
<v Speaker 4>of state of the landscape, and you know, I was

0:20:30.520 --> 0:20:34.800
<v Speaker 4>actually surprised to see that it's ransom attacks went down

0:20:35.240 --> 0:20:38.800
<v Speaker 4>in twenty twenty three, but not necessarily down for a

0:20:38.840 --> 0:20:41.159
<v Speaker 4>good reason. The idea is that they're sort of like

0:20:41.240 --> 0:20:42.600
<v Speaker 4>becoming more sophisticated.

0:20:42.680 --> 0:20:42.880
<v Speaker 5>Here.

0:20:42.920 --> 0:20:44.680
<v Speaker 4>So let's take a step back and just think about

0:20:44.720 --> 0:20:47.560
<v Speaker 4>the landscape out there, because each and every day it

0:20:47.600 --> 0:20:49.639
<v Speaker 4>does seem like there's another hacking story.

0:20:51.520 --> 0:20:55.359
<v Speaker 8>Yeah, you know, what's old is new again. And I

0:20:55.359 --> 0:21:00.720
<v Speaker 8>think what you're seeing is not necessarily a change in crime,

0:21:00.800 --> 0:21:04.960
<v Speaker 8>but it's a change in monetization strategy. The cyber criminals

0:21:05.000 --> 0:21:10.320
<v Speaker 8>are getting some headwinds and the market forces dictate a

0:21:10.480 --> 0:21:14.479
<v Speaker 8>change from ransomware, where you have governments that are stepping

0:21:14.480 --> 0:21:16.560
<v Speaker 8>in and saying, hey, we're going to forbid you from

0:21:16.560 --> 0:21:20.040
<v Speaker 8>paying the ransom. You have organizations that are better suited

0:21:20.040 --> 0:21:25.000
<v Speaker 8>to just recover from backup or really anything but pay

0:21:25.040 --> 0:21:28.800
<v Speaker 8>the ransom. And you're seeing attackers change their business strategy

0:21:29.200 --> 0:21:30.560
<v Speaker 8>to accommodate.

0:21:30.000 --> 0:21:30.680
<v Speaker 5>A changing work.

0:21:32.080 --> 0:21:34.960
<v Speaker 3>Okay, so it's interesting, right in terms of some of

0:21:34.960 --> 0:21:36.800
<v Speaker 3>the shifts, I guess what really kind of freaked us

0:21:36.800 --> 0:21:40.440
<v Speaker 3>out or me out specifically is the exploiting of identity.

0:21:40.600 --> 0:21:43.639
<v Speaker 3>And I just think about how increasingly so much of

0:21:43.720 --> 0:21:46.439
<v Speaker 3>us have loaded everything and anything in our world, a

0:21:46.480 --> 0:21:50.840
<v Speaker 3>lot of it financially connected or related, onto our phones. Right,

0:21:50.920 --> 0:21:54.840
<v Speaker 3>And we've got Norton, we've got different types of systems

0:21:54.880 --> 0:21:57.639
<v Speaker 3>in terms of storing our passwords and so on and

0:21:57.720 --> 0:22:01.280
<v Speaker 3>so forth, but nonetheless, are identity, it sounds like, is

0:22:01.280 --> 0:22:03.880
<v Speaker 3>increasingly at risk. What have you guys found out give

0:22:03.920 --> 0:22:05.960
<v Speaker 3>us some color around the number alone.

0:22:07.000 --> 0:22:08.879
<v Speaker 8>So normally, when I get up here and I say, hey,

0:22:08.920 --> 0:22:11.199
<v Speaker 8>there's a five or ten, maybe even a twenty percent

0:22:11.280 --> 0:22:14.080
<v Speaker 8>increase in something, that's a signal that you should be

0:22:14.080 --> 0:22:14.760
<v Speaker 8>paying attention.

0:22:14.920 --> 0:22:16.120
<v Speaker 5>Right, Well, we.

0:22:16.119 --> 0:22:19.879
<v Speaker 8>Have a seventy one percent increase in credential based attacks.

0:22:19.880 --> 0:22:22.760
<v Speaker 8>That's where somebody takes a valid credential set and just

0:22:22.840 --> 0:22:23.400
<v Speaker 8>logs in.

0:22:24.359 --> 0:22:26.320
<v Speaker 5>And the truth of the matter is that logging in.

0:22:26.280 --> 0:22:31.119
<v Speaker 8>Is a lot easier than breaking okay, and once you

0:22:31.200 --> 0:22:34.119
<v Speaker 8>have valid credentials, you really render a lot of the

0:22:34.119 --> 0:22:37.280
<v Speaker 8>primeter defenses useless because a lot of these detection and

0:22:37.320 --> 0:22:41.719
<v Speaker 8>response capabilities are centered around finding things that look abnormal,

0:22:41.760 --> 0:22:45.040
<v Speaker 8>and a log in is just the system behaving normally.

0:22:45.800 --> 0:22:47.240
<v Speaker 8>And a lot of this comes back to the fact

0:22:47.280 --> 0:22:50.320
<v Speaker 8>that we're not using multi factor authentication. Users have a

0:22:50.359 --> 0:22:55.480
<v Speaker 8>tendency to reuse passwords, and when passwords are compromised, there

0:22:55.480 --> 0:22:57.600
<v Speaker 8>aren't a lot of organizations that are checking to make

0:22:57.640 --> 0:23:00.560
<v Speaker 8>sure that those compromised passwords are not still use.

0:23:00.480 --> 0:23:01.000
<v Speaker 5>In their vice.

0:23:01.040 --> 0:23:02.919
<v Speaker 3>Well, I'm also amazing how much I get something in

0:23:02.920 --> 0:23:04.840
<v Speaker 3>the mail or some kind of email. Oh, by the way,

0:23:05.600 --> 0:23:08.520
<v Speaker 3>you know, our systems were compromised and it was your

0:23:08.560 --> 0:23:11.040
<v Speaker 3>information and here I'm finding about it, you know, several

0:23:11.040 --> 0:23:12.280
<v Speaker 3>weeks after the fact.

0:23:13.320 --> 0:23:14.720
<v Speaker 7>I mean, so be vigilant.

0:23:15.640 --> 0:23:19.320
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, thanks to be more specific in terms of what

0:23:19.400 --> 0:23:23.240
<v Speaker 3>kinds of things are to your awareness are being targeted.

0:23:24.840 --> 0:23:28.800
<v Speaker 8>So you know, the world at large suffers a lot

0:23:28.840 --> 0:23:33.040
<v Speaker 8>of breaches, and each time a breach occurs, information is

0:23:33.080 --> 0:23:36.879
<v Speaker 8>in it, and the attackers are taking that information and

0:23:37.000 --> 0:23:39.639
<v Speaker 8>selling it on the black market, on the dark web,

0:23:40.480 --> 0:23:43.080
<v Speaker 8>and a lot of it is prudentials, and prudential sets

0:23:43.359 --> 0:23:48.440
<v Speaker 8>have escalated in value because criminal organizations are becoming adept

0:23:48.640 --> 0:23:52.160
<v Speaker 8>at using those credentials to affect a breach. They're using

0:23:52.240 --> 0:23:58.119
<v Speaker 8>it as their initial point of access. And essentially, when

0:23:58.160 --> 0:24:01.040
<v Speaker 8>you have valid credentials and you know that users are

0:24:01.040 --> 0:24:06.359
<v Speaker 8>going to reuse passwords, it becomes really easy. We're taking

0:24:06.359 --> 0:24:10.040
<v Speaker 8>an already stat deck and we're really giving the criminals

0:24:10.080 --> 0:24:11.400
<v Speaker 8>a real advantage.

0:24:12.000 --> 0:24:15.680
<v Speaker 4>My concern, Charles, is less about you know what I'm

0:24:15.720 --> 0:24:18.359
<v Speaker 4>doing right now to keep myself safe. I'm pretty confident.

0:24:18.400 --> 0:24:19.840
<v Speaker 4>Well I shouldn't say that because then everyone's going to

0:24:19.880 --> 0:24:22.800
<v Speaker 4>try to attack me. But anyway, my bigger concern is

0:24:22.840 --> 0:24:25.679
<v Speaker 4>like what's already out there and I always get like,

0:24:25.840 --> 0:24:27.800
<v Speaker 4>you know, these annoyed like I was at the dentist.

0:24:28.040 --> 0:24:29.359
<v Speaker 4>I think I shared this story its a dentist a

0:24:29.400 --> 0:24:30.760
<v Speaker 4>couple of years ago, and they're like, we need your

0:24:30.760 --> 0:24:33.320
<v Speaker 4>social Security number and there's no way I'm giving you

0:24:33.359 --> 0:24:35.359
<v Speaker 4>my social Security number. You're a dentist, Like you're good

0:24:35.400 --> 0:24:37.600
<v Speaker 4>at filling cavities, but I have no idea how good

0:24:37.640 --> 0:24:40.000
<v Speaker 4>you are accum You never except yeah, like I need

0:24:40.040 --> 0:24:42.240
<v Speaker 4>it for the insurance. And I'm like, really, if you do,

0:24:42.320 --> 0:24:43.920
<v Speaker 4>then I'm not going to come here. And he's like, Okay,

0:24:43.960 --> 0:24:46.080
<v Speaker 4>we don't need it for the insurance, Like we'll figure

0:24:46.080 --> 0:24:48.159
<v Speaker 4>that out another way. But it's like, never give out

0:24:48.160 --> 0:24:50.440
<v Speaker 4>your socials. But it's out there, that's the problem, and

0:24:50.480 --> 0:24:53.120
<v Speaker 4>then it gets stolen, and I mean, what's it. What's

0:24:53.119 --> 0:24:53.919
<v Speaker 4>a consumer to do?

0:24:55.320 --> 0:24:55.480
<v Speaker 5>Well?

0:24:55.520 --> 0:24:57.000
<v Speaker 8>You know, first of all, I think I think you

0:24:57.080 --> 0:24:59.400
<v Speaker 8>had a great strategy there, which is just don't give

0:24:59.520 --> 0:25:03.159
<v Speaker 8>the private information that you don't need to give. Secondarily,

0:25:03.480 --> 0:25:05.400
<v Speaker 8>there's some information that you may have given out. Maybe

0:25:05.440 --> 0:25:07.720
<v Speaker 8>you have a password that you use more than once,

0:25:07.800 --> 0:25:09.560
<v Speaker 8>and I know we tell you not to do it,

0:25:09.600 --> 0:25:13.800
<v Speaker 8>but statistics show you're going to do it well every time.

0:25:14.160 --> 0:25:16.800
<v Speaker 8>You get a note that says your information has been breached,

0:25:16.800 --> 0:25:19.400
<v Speaker 8>that's a great time to rotate all your passwords. Okay,

0:25:20.000 --> 0:25:22.280
<v Speaker 8>and at the very least look at the password you

0:25:22.320 --> 0:25:24.040
<v Speaker 8>are using in the Bridge account make sure you're not

0:25:24.160 --> 0:25:28.520
<v Speaker 8>using it elsewhere. Similarly, you can start to think about

0:25:28.560 --> 0:25:31.199
<v Speaker 8>the type of information that may be exposed in a

0:25:31.200 --> 0:25:37.320
<v Speaker 8>given breach and ensure that you understand what your exposure is.

0:25:37.320 --> 0:25:44.080
<v Speaker 3>Is artificial intelligence helping fight against a cyber attax or

0:25:44.119 --> 0:25:50.480
<v Speaker 3>is it helping to stimulate and increase the frequency and

0:25:50.600 --> 0:25:54.400
<v Speaker 3>maybe even the sophistication of cyber attacks? And yes, yes

0:25:54.520 --> 0:25:55.440
<v Speaker 3>is a good answer too.

0:25:56.440 --> 0:26:00.600
<v Speaker 8>Yeah, there's three real I think pillars of AI if

0:26:00.640 --> 0:26:01.280
<v Speaker 8>you want to think about it.

0:26:01.280 --> 0:26:02.280
<v Speaker 5>When it comes to security.

0:26:02.359 --> 0:26:06.040
<v Speaker 8>There's AI as a target, there's AI as a tool

0:26:06.160 --> 0:26:11.680
<v Speaker 8>to prevent attacks, and there's AI abating an attack. And

0:26:11.880 --> 0:26:14.000
<v Speaker 8>right now we're in the very early stages of AI,

0:26:14.080 --> 0:26:19.040
<v Speaker 8>and we really haven't seen AI used in massive attacks

0:26:19.119 --> 0:26:24.440
<v Speaker 8>just yet. That said, you know, we've seen it used

0:26:24.480 --> 0:26:27.800
<v Speaker 8>maybe in helping to craft phishing emails as an example

0:26:27.800 --> 0:26:32.240
<v Speaker 8>of a foreign language. That's not to say it won't

0:26:32.240 --> 0:26:36.600
<v Speaker 8>be used, it's just an early phase of adoption. Secondly,

0:26:36.600 --> 0:26:40.840
<v Speaker 8>we have AI used in defense, So AI used in

0:26:40.880 --> 0:26:44.679
<v Speaker 8>defensive attack. You're really starting to see that blossom. And

0:26:44.720 --> 0:26:48.240
<v Speaker 8>the hope is that the security industry can stay ahead

0:26:48.280 --> 0:26:52.240
<v Speaker 8>of attackers in leveraging AI. And then finally you have

0:26:52.400 --> 0:26:54.800
<v Speaker 8>AI as a target for attack. And it's really important

0:26:54.800 --> 0:26:58.280
<v Speaker 8>that we start looking at the supporting infrastructure that we're

0:26:58.359 --> 0:27:01.359
<v Speaker 8>using in a lot of these AI instaf and say, hey,

0:27:01.600 --> 0:27:02.480
<v Speaker 8>have we thought.

0:27:02.280 --> 0:27:03.520
<v Speaker 5>About security there?

0:27:04.440 --> 0:27:06.640
<v Speaker 8>Not to mention the AI itself, but you know, think

0:27:06.640 --> 0:27:09.320
<v Speaker 8>about all the things you used to train AI or

0:27:09.600 --> 0:27:13.600
<v Speaker 8>to host the functionality of AI. There's a lot of

0:27:13.640 --> 0:27:17.679
<v Speaker 8>attack surface there. And as we rush to this this

0:27:17.800 --> 0:27:19.560
<v Speaker 8>new market, we want to make sure that we're doing

0:27:19.640 --> 0:27:20.359
<v Speaker 8>it responsible.

0:27:21.520 --> 0:27:24.080
<v Speaker 4>Charles, how concerned are you about spoofing? And I'm not

0:27:24.160 --> 0:27:25.879
<v Speaker 4>just I don't just mean spoofing when it comes to

0:27:26.000 --> 0:27:29.239
<v Speaker 4>you know, the caller ID says Amazon's calling and it's not,

0:27:29.440 --> 0:27:32.679
<v Speaker 4>you know, really Amazon. More so when it comes to

0:27:32.720 --> 0:27:34.679
<v Speaker 4>the voice stuff, and you know, we had that robook

0:27:34.680 --> 0:27:38.480
<v Speaker 4>call earlier this year during the New Hampshire primary that

0:27:38.880 --> 0:27:42.040
<v Speaker 4>was not actually Joe Biden but sounded like President Biden.

0:27:42.400 --> 0:27:44.280
<v Speaker 4>And then you have all these you know, people who

0:27:44.280 --> 0:27:46.240
<v Speaker 4>are saying, okay, you know, I didn't know if my

0:27:46.280 --> 0:27:48.440
<v Speaker 4>son was actually in jail, and I got this call

0:27:48.520 --> 0:27:50.240
<v Speaker 4>that said he needed money, and those sorts of things

0:27:50.320 --> 0:27:52.359
<v Speaker 4>that used to be emails that you could ignore, but

0:27:52.400 --> 0:27:54.560
<v Speaker 4>now they're getting pretty sophisticated.

0:27:55.880 --> 0:27:56.080
<v Speaker 5>You know.

0:27:57.040 --> 0:27:58.840
<v Speaker 8>I think there's a learning curve on the part of

0:27:58.880 --> 0:28:02.280
<v Speaker 8>the general population there in terms of, hey, these things

0:28:02.320 --> 0:28:03.480
<v Speaker 8>can be faked.

0:28:04.560 --> 0:28:04.840
<v Speaker 1>You know.

0:28:05.040 --> 0:28:06.680
<v Speaker 8>Ten years from now, I think we'll have a deep

0:28:06.800 --> 0:28:11.040
<v Speaker 8>understanding collectively as a society that just because you hear

0:28:11.200 --> 0:28:15.280
<v Speaker 8>or see something on video or audio doesn't mean that.

0:28:15.240 --> 0:28:17.720
<v Speaker 5>There's a high fidelity to it. It can be faked.

0:28:19.200 --> 0:28:22.720
<v Speaker 8>And I think that until we get to that learning curve,

0:28:22.760 --> 0:28:26.479
<v Speaker 8>there's certainly going to be abuse of the ability to

0:28:26.600 --> 0:28:30.439
<v Speaker 8>use AI and other technologies to fake audio and video.

0:28:30.840 --> 0:28:33.520
<v Speaker 3>Hey, one last thing, Europe feeling the brend to the

0:28:33.560 --> 0:28:36.600
<v Speaker 3>cyber attacks. According to you guys your report and when

0:28:36.640 --> 0:28:39.760
<v Speaker 3>you're finding is making up thirty two percent of global incidents.

0:28:40.720 --> 0:28:42.560
<v Speaker 3>Why and how is the US doing? And we just

0:28:42.560 --> 0:28:45.120
<v Speaker 3>have about a minute or so left here, So.

0:28:45.120 --> 0:28:46.560
<v Speaker 5>The US is right behind them.

0:28:46.640 --> 0:28:51.560
<v Speaker 8>So don't breathe a sigh of relief just yet this year, essentially,

0:28:51.680 --> 0:28:55.320
<v Speaker 8>or in twenty twenty three, essentially, Asia, pac and Europe

0:28:55.360 --> 0:28:59.200
<v Speaker 8>switch places. Some of that can be geopolitical tension, other

0:28:59.320 --> 0:29:02.320
<v Speaker 8>can just be following the money trail and you know,

0:29:02.440 --> 0:29:04.840
<v Speaker 8>easy targets. At the end of the day, attackers are

0:29:04.920 --> 0:29:06.800
<v Speaker 8>going to take the path at least resistance.

0:29:07.680 --> 0:29:09.800
<v Speaker 3>One last piece of advice for those of us who

0:29:09.800 --> 0:29:15.640
<v Speaker 3>are worried about our identity being stolen, Just a quick

0:29:15.640 --> 0:29:18.480
<v Speaker 3>piece of advice thirty seconds. Is it just simple? Passwords?

0:29:18.520 --> 0:29:19.320
<v Speaker 3>Be smart folks.

0:29:20.320 --> 0:29:21.560
<v Speaker 5>Passwords is a great start.

0:29:21.600 --> 0:29:25.080
<v Speaker 8>First of all, use unique passwords, complicated passwords, all of that.

0:29:25.480 --> 0:29:28.000
<v Speaker 5>But most of the organizations you deal with.

0:29:28.080 --> 0:29:31.680
<v Speaker 8>Will offer multi factor authentication as an option, if not

0:29:31.800 --> 0:29:34.320
<v Speaker 8>require it. Just because they don't require it doesn't mean

0:29:34.360 --> 0:29:37.640
<v Speaker 8>you shouldn't be using it. Enable multi factor authentication. It

0:29:37.680 --> 0:29:39.000
<v Speaker 8>only works if you enable it.

0:29:39.440 --> 0:29:40.760
<v Speaker 3>Agreed. I kind of love it.

0:29:40.960 --> 0:29:42.440
<v Speaker 4>I do too, I do it for everything.

0:29:42.480 --> 0:29:44.240
<v Speaker 3>I'm like, okay, okay, hey, we.

0:29:44.200 --> 0:29:46.120
<v Speaker 4>Got to hear on the Bloomberg terminal, every time you

0:29:46.160 --> 0:29:49.440
<v Speaker 4>log in rights your password, you get your fingerprint.

0:29:49.800 --> 0:29:50.400
<v Speaker 3>It's really cool.

0:29:50.440 --> 0:29:52.240
<v Speaker 5>Or you can use the iPhone out.

0:29:52.280 --> 0:29:54.560
<v Speaker 3>No, it's good and it's super super secure.

0:29:56.440 --> 0:29:59.560
<v Speaker 7>Muck a journal.

0:30:00.640 --> 0:30:03.320
<v Speaker 3>How about you let me drive? Oh no, no, no, no, who's.

0:30:03.120 --> 0:30:08.480
<v Speaker 2>Going all right, please, I'll do the gravel wat I

0:30:08.600 --> 0:30:09.120
<v Speaker 2>want to drive.

0:30:09.120 --> 0:30:12.560
<v Speaker 4>It's a good question.

0:30:16.040 --> 0:30:18.400
<v Speaker 2>Which is the drive to the globe down?

0:30:19.200 --> 0:30:19.320
<v Speaker 5>Thing?

0:30:19.440 --> 0:30:22.520
<v Speaker 2>Well by around on Bloomberg Radio.

0:30:23.240 --> 0:30:26.280
<v Speaker 3>All right, everybody just got about eighteen minutes left in

0:30:26.320 --> 0:30:30.080
<v Speaker 3>today's trading session. Carol Master along with Tim Stenovik, Charlie

0:30:30.120 --> 0:30:31.640
<v Speaker 3>of course, just breaking down the numbers. We were just

0:30:31.680 --> 0:30:34.600
<v Speaker 3>talking with our Bill Maloney uh and Jess who covers

0:30:34.600 --> 0:30:37.760
<v Speaker 3>the markets. Uh goes on the Squawk and talks about

0:30:37.800 --> 0:30:38.760
<v Speaker 3>interesting trends and stories.

0:30:39.080 --> 0:30:40.160
<v Speaker 4>We squawks on the weekends.

0:30:40.200 --> 0:30:41.200
<v Speaker 7>He does, there's news.

0:30:41.240 --> 0:30:43.800
<v Speaker 3>He's kind of NonStop. But it's just he said today,

0:30:43.840 --> 0:30:45.440
<v Speaker 3>it was like you kind of were searching for things

0:30:45.440 --> 0:30:48.200
<v Speaker 3>to talk about. Although he did note bitcoin topping fifty

0:30:48.280 --> 0:30:50.480
<v Speaker 3>three thousand, reaching the highest in more than two years.

0:30:50.520 --> 0:30:52.600
<v Speaker 4>It gives me something to think about, that's it. Yeah,

0:30:52.800 --> 0:30:55.680
<v Speaker 4>what maybe like a little comment about bitcoin during the

0:30:55.680 --> 0:30:58.280
<v Speaker 4>close today and we'll see they're like we need those

0:30:58.720 --> 0:31:01.719
<v Speaker 4>dueling comments. Hey, I know somebody who has their eye

0:31:01.760 --> 0:31:03.640
<v Speaker 4>on the markets all the time. That's An Maletti, head

0:31:03.640 --> 0:31:06.400
<v Speaker 4>of active equity at all Spring Global Investment. She joins

0:31:06.480 --> 0:31:09.000
<v Speaker 4>us from Wisconsin and good to have you with us

0:31:09.120 --> 0:31:09.760
<v Speaker 4>this afternoon.

0:31:09.760 --> 0:31:12.480
<v Speaker 3>How are you good? Thanks for having me back.

0:31:12.760 --> 0:31:16.320
<v Speaker 4>Okay, quiet day, But that's okay because not every day

0:31:16.360 --> 0:31:19.360
<v Speaker 4>can be like what we saw last week. You're arguing

0:31:19.400 --> 0:31:22.040
<v Speaker 4>that the sign that we're seeing that breath is expanding

0:31:22.040 --> 0:31:24.040
<v Speaker 4>when it comes to the rally that we've seen so

0:31:24.120 --> 0:31:27.760
<v Speaker 4>far this year, bodes well for stocks moving forward this year.

0:31:29.480 --> 0:31:34.280
<v Speaker 9>I do think it does. Signs of breath are generally positive.

0:31:35.360 --> 0:31:38.080
<v Speaker 9>We saw a lot of concentration, as everyone knows, that

0:31:38.200 --> 0:31:42.000
<v Speaker 9>was the theme of twenty three the Magnificent seven. What

0:31:42.440 --> 0:31:45.920
<v Speaker 9>quietly started to happen in October of last year is

0:31:46.000 --> 0:31:48.600
<v Speaker 9>a broadening out and it's something that we talked about

0:31:49.000 --> 0:31:51.360
<v Speaker 9>in our outlook piece for twenty twenty four that we

0:31:51.440 --> 0:31:54.080
<v Speaker 9>really believe that would be the trend for twenty twenty four,

0:31:54.720 --> 0:31:58.480
<v Speaker 9>that especially in the small and mid cap space, that

0:31:58.600 --> 0:32:01.200
<v Speaker 9>those areas of the market that had been ignored would

0:32:01.240 --> 0:32:04.640
<v Speaker 9>start to outperform in twenty twenty four. And that's what

0:32:04.680 --> 0:32:07.640
<v Speaker 9>we've started to see kind of quietly, and name by name,

0:32:07.920 --> 0:32:12.040
<v Speaker 9>which is another thing that I think is warranted. Fundamentals

0:32:12.120 --> 0:32:15.520
<v Speaker 9>do matter, valuations do matter, and we're starting to see that.

0:32:15.720 --> 0:32:18.160
<v Speaker 9>And so for the last I think eleven of the

0:32:18.240 --> 0:32:22.479
<v Speaker 9>thirteen eleven of the last thirteen weeks, we've seen the

0:32:22.600 --> 0:32:26.320
<v Speaker 9>S and P mid cap index outperform. We're kind of

0:32:26.400 --> 0:32:31.720
<v Speaker 9>nearing where the high was in November of twenty twenty one,

0:32:32.200 --> 0:32:35.400
<v Speaker 9>so not quite at that peak, but close to that peak.

0:32:35.920 --> 0:32:39.400
<v Speaker 9>And the Russell two thousand even, you know, continues to

0:32:39.440 --> 0:32:43.160
<v Speaker 9>look attractive. You know, people forgot that we've been in

0:32:43.200 --> 0:32:46.719
<v Speaker 9>a bear market for the Russell two thousand one that

0:32:46.800 --> 0:32:49.560
<v Speaker 9>lasted twenty three months, and that's a long time. The

0:32:49.720 --> 0:32:53.040
<v Speaker 9>average bear market for the Russell two thousand typically lasts

0:32:53.320 --> 0:32:57.440
<v Speaker 9>eleven months, where the typical bull market for the Russell

0:32:57.680 --> 0:33:01.400
<v Speaker 9>two thousand last thirty five months. And so you know it,

0:33:01.560 --> 0:33:04.960
<v Speaker 9>just the rally started in October, we're early into it.

0:33:05.160 --> 0:33:09.760
<v Speaker 9>And so if fundamentals and the macro economy can stay strong,

0:33:10.280 --> 0:33:13.200
<v Speaker 9>I think the quiet areas of the market are the

0:33:13.240 --> 0:33:15.360
<v Speaker 9>places to be and in the places that have been

0:33:15.400 --> 0:33:16.880
<v Speaker 9>ignored are still the places to be.

0:33:17.200 --> 0:33:19.560
<v Speaker 3>And so I was just want to go what's been

0:33:19.560 --> 0:33:22.000
<v Speaker 3>the good of the market so far in terms of

0:33:22.040 --> 0:33:26.960
<v Speaker 3>trends and maybe just I was gonna say technicals, but

0:33:27.040 --> 0:33:28.560
<v Speaker 3>we don't have to go there. But just in terms

0:33:28.560 --> 0:33:30.760
<v Speaker 3>of fundamentals, what's been the bad of the market so

0:33:30.840 --> 0:33:32.680
<v Speaker 3>far this year, because if I look at the S

0:33:32.720 --> 0:33:35.000
<v Speaker 3>and P five hundred, most of the major industry groups

0:33:35.040 --> 0:33:38.040
<v Speaker 3>are higher by a lot so far this year. And

0:33:38.040 --> 0:33:40.800
<v Speaker 3>then we've got like real estate utilities at the bottom

0:33:40.800 --> 0:33:43.040
<v Speaker 3>of the pack losing some ground, and we kind that

0:33:43.120 --> 0:33:45.200
<v Speaker 3>makes some sense in terms of the interest rate environment.

0:33:45.240 --> 0:33:47.240
<v Speaker 3>But what is the good and bad of the market

0:33:47.360 --> 0:33:47.800
<v Speaker 3>so far?

0:33:48.800 --> 0:33:52.560
<v Speaker 9>Yeah, Carol, it's a great question, and what I really like,

0:33:53.600 --> 0:33:55.600
<v Speaker 9>as you point out, it's hard to see it when

0:33:55.640 --> 0:33:57.880
<v Speaker 9>you look at the suctor level, but the good and

0:33:57.920 --> 0:34:01.480
<v Speaker 9>the bad really is happening kind of at the company level,

0:34:02.000 --> 0:34:04.120
<v Speaker 9>and you're even caring about it. You guys talk about

0:34:04.120 --> 0:34:06.440
<v Speaker 9>it every afternoon when you talk about earnings, and you're

0:34:06.480 --> 0:34:10.520
<v Speaker 9>seeing earnings react to what the company is delivering on

0:34:10.880 --> 0:34:14.920
<v Speaker 9>and so if the company is actually delivering and producing

0:34:15.120 --> 0:34:19.640
<v Speaker 9>growth and earnings, then the company is getting rewarded. And

0:34:19.680 --> 0:34:23.759
<v Speaker 9>that wasn't always the case. In twenty twenty four for

0:34:23.840 --> 0:34:26.640
<v Speaker 9>the small and MidCap space, you are seeing multiple compression

0:34:26.840 --> 0:34:29.839
<v Speaker 9>even if the companies were performing, even if they were

0:34:29.840 --> 0:34:33.799
<v Speaker 9>delivering earnings. Where in the meg seven stocks, yes they

0:34:33.800 --> 0:34:37.400
<v Speaker 9>were delivering earnings, but you were also seeing huge multiple expansion,

0:34:37.800 --> 0:34:41.160
<v Speaker 9>and so fundamentals are really starting to matter, so is valuation.

0:34:41.760 --> 0:34:43.000
<v Speaker 3>I would say there are.

0:34:42.880 --> 0:34:46.359
<v Speaker 9>Still some areas of the market that look attractive to us.

0:34:48.040 --> 0:34:50.759
<v Speaker 9>You can't ignore technology, so I'll just throw that out there.

0:34:50.840 --> 0:34:55.040
<v Speaker 9>Our managers certainly are still interested in technology, but it's

0:34:55.080 --> 0:34:58.640
<v Speaker 9>not necessarily just a few select names. They are looking

0:34:58.719 --> 0:35:02.800
<v Speaker 9>down cap and looking at technology names, and it's because

0:35:03.600 --> 0:35:07.200
<v Speaker 9>margins are really strong in those areas, in that area

0:35:07.239 --> 0:35:12.680
<v Speaker 9>in particular. And we think sustainable healthcare, though, is kind

0:35:12.680 --> 0:35:14.680
<v Speaker 9>of about the other end of the spectrum. It has

0:35:14.719 --> 0:35:17.759
<v Speaker 9>been the area that's been the baby thrown out with

0:35:17.800 --> 0:35:21.960
<v Speaker 9>the pathwater. In some cases, fundamentals weren't the greatest in

0:35:22.000 --> 0:35:25.160
<v Speaker 9>twenty twenty three. They were hurt by a lot of

0:35:25.239 --> 0:35:29.600
<v Speaker 9>factors lower utilization, post COVID, etc. But we're starting to

0:35:29.600 --> 0:35:33.080
<v Speaker 9>see utilization pick up. I think also the fears of

0:35:33.160 --> 0:35:37.359
<v Speaker 9>the GLP one drugs now is starting to get sorted out,

0:35:37.400 --> 0:35:40.480
<v Speaker 9>like what might be reality and what might be just

0:35:40.680 --> 0:35:44.920
<v Speaker 9>kind of like fear. And when you look at Earning's

0:35:44.960 --> 0:35:48.319
<v Speaker 9>growth projections for twenty twenty four, healthcare has one of

0:35:48.360 --> 0:35:51.960
<v Speaker 9>the best expectations for Earning's growth, and so that is

0:35:52.239 --> 0:35:55.480
<v Speaker 9>an area that I would say, generally speaking, our managers

0:35:55.520 --> 0:35:57.399
<v Speaker 9>are also very interested in.

0:35:57.520 --> 0:35:59.880
<v Speaker 3>Well and it's actually the third best performing major industry

0:36:00.280 --> 0:36:02.120
<v Speaker 3>out of eleven in the S and P five hundred

0:36:02.160 --> 0:36:04.520
<v Speaker 3>as a whole, up about seven point seven percent. And

0:36:04.560 --> 0:36:06.719
<v Speaker 3>it's interesting. I love that you went there because it's

0:36:07.400 --> 0:36:09.160
<v Speaker 3>I feel like there's been so much news. There's been

0:36:09.160 --> 0:36:11.479
<v Speaker 3>a fair amount of M and A activity like within

0:36:11.520 --> 0:36:15.680
<v Speaker 3>the space, so you definitely see some things moving around.

0:36:15.960 --> 0:36:18.080
<v Speaker 3>Where do you not want to be right now?

0:36:19.560 --> 0:36:21.680
<v Speaker 9>I think the areas of the market where you really

0:36:21.719 --> 0:36:24.799
<v Speaker 9>just want to stay away from kind of factor into

0:36:24.800 --> 0:36:28.040
<v Speaker 9>that low quality space. And I know that's kind of

0:36:28.040 --> 0:36:32.320
<v Speaker 9>a generalization, so let me just define that a little bit. Certainly,

0:36:32.640 --> 0:36:35.560
<v Speaker 9>I would be fearful our managers are kind of shining

0:36:35.600 --> 0:36:40.839
<v Speaker 9>away from companies that don't have great balance sheets, the

0:36:41.239 --> 0:36:45.160
<v Speaker 9>where cash flow, where free cash flow is kind of

0:36:45.200 --> 0:36:50.960
<v Speaker 9>on the decline, where the competitive situation for companies doesn't

0:36:51.000 --> 0:36:54.080
<v Speaker 9>look great. And so I know it's easy to kind

0:36:54.080 --> 0:36:56.560
<v Speaker 9>of go to low quality when the market is rallying

0:36:56.640 --> 0:36:58.279
<v Speaker 9>like this, because that's where you think you're going to

0:36:58.320 --> 0:37:00.760
<v Speaker 9>get the biggest bang for your buck. But I don't

0:37:00.760 --> 0:37:04.040
<v Speaker 9>think that's a good long term strategy because the macro

0:37:04.239 --> 0:37:08.319
<v Speaker 9>environment is still certain. So generally speaking, I would stay

0:37:08.360 --> 0:37:11.120
<v Speaker 9>away from anything that appears to be low quality, and

0:37:11.120 --> 0:37:15.160
<v Speaker 9>that's what our managers are doing. I do think the

0:37:15.280 --> 0:37:18.920
<v Speaker 9>utility space has been a little bit more difficult, as

0:37:18.960 --> 0:37:22.640
<v Speaker 9>you pointed out, because of rates that you know probably

0:37:22.680 --> 0:37:24.640
<v Speaker 9>will stay that way for a good portion of the year,

0:37:24.680 --> 0:37:27.759
<v Speaker 9>but you know it does have a yield and you

0:37:27.760 --> 0:37:29.800
<v Speaker 9>know at a certain point that's going to be attractive

0:37:29.840 --> 0:37:30.560
<v Speaker 9>to Hey, and.

0:37:30.600 --> 0:37:32.480
<v Speaker 4>Just thirty seconds left, our team breaking the news that

0:37:32.560 --> 0:37:35.600
<v Speaker 4>Charter Communications is said to weigh a takeover of ALTCUSA.

0:37:35.800 --> 0:37:37.239
<v Speaker 4>You argue that M and A is going to start

0:37:37.280 --> 0:37:40.160
<v Speaker 4>accelerating in the later half of the year. Where should

0:37:40.160 --> 0:37:41.320
<v Speaker 4>we be looking for M and A.

0:37:42.480 --> 0:37:44.759
<v Speaker 9>I think, you know, healthcare is definitely one of the

0:37:44.800 --> 0:37:48.000
<v Speaker 9>places technology as well, but I think we're going to

0:37:48.000 --> 0:37:51.759
<v Speaker 9>see it across the board. Companies and CEO CFOs tend

0:37:51.800 --> 0:37:54.959
<v Speaker 9>to get a little bit more optimistic once we see

0:37:55.080 --> 0:37:59.319
<v Speaker 9>rates stabilize and once they think that the economy is

0:37:59.320 --> 0:38:02.320
<v Speaker 9>pretty stable, and so I think the setup is pretty

0:38:02.400 --> 0:38:04.120
<v Speaker 9>ripe right now for M and A.

0:38:04.280 --> 0:38:06.680
<v Speaker 3>Hey, ten seconds M and A activity that we are seeing,

0:38:06.719 --> 0:38:09.879
<v Speaker 3>that's a good market side that's a positive. Correct, Yes,

0:38:09.960 --> 0:38:12.120
<v Speaker 3>it is so a great sign. All right, good stuff.

0:38:12.120 --> 0:38:14.680
<v Speaker 3>Thank you covered so much ground as we always do

0:38:14.719 --> 0:38:17.120
<v Speaker 3>with Anna Maleetti, and take care be well. A Maleetti,

0:38:17.360 --> 0:38:20.800
<v Speaker 3>head of Active Equity over an all Spring Global Investments,

0:38:20.880 --> 0:38:23.520
<v Speaker 3>joining us from a Nominee Falls, Wisconsin.

0:38:24.160 --> 0:38:28.799
<v Speaker 2>This is the Bloomberg Business Week podcast, available on Apple, Spotify,

0:38:28.960 --> 0:38:32.640
<v Speaker 2>and anywhere else you get your podcasts. Listen live weekday

0:38:32.680 --> 0:38:36.320
<v Speaker 2>afternoons from two to five pm Eastern on Bloomberg dot Com,

0:38:36.360 --> 0:38:39.680
<v Speaker 2>the iHeartRadio app, tune In, and the Bloomberg Business App.

0:38:39.719 --> 0:38:42.799
<v Speaker 2>You can also watch us live every weekday on YouTube

0:38:42.880 --> 0:38:46.960
<v Speaker 2>and always on the Bloomberg journyalone