WEBVTT - Chuck's Commentary - Putin’s BIG Mistake When Dealing With Trump + Why Divisiveness Became Political Strategy

0:00:04.960 --> 0:00:07.680
<v Speaker 1>Hello there, I'm Chuck Todd. Welcome to another episode of

0:00:07.680 --> 0:00:11.799
<v Speaker 1>the Chuck Podcast. Hey, just a quick little housekeeping note

0:00:11.840 --> 0:00:15.760
<v Speaker 1>if you will, particularly if you listen to the Check

0:00:15.840 --> 0:00:18.919
<v Speaker 1>podcast versus watching it on YouTube, although we'd love for

0:00:18.960 --> 0:00:22.480
<v Speaker 1>you to go to the YouTube channel, subscribe, like and subscribe.

0:00:22.680 --> 0:00:25.119
<v Speaker 1>You know all of these you know, you know my

0:00:25.239 --> 0:00:28.600
<v Speaker 1>whining about algorithms. You know, I can whine all I want,

0:00:28.640 --> 0:00:30.880
<v Speaker 1>but this is the system that we have. You know,

0:00:31.000 --> 0:00:34.200
<v Speaker 1>as I joke, I cover politics as it is well

0:00:34.240 --> 0:00:37.240
<v Speaker 1>in the information ecosystem. Just because I think it sucks

0:00:37.280 --> 0:00:39.279
<v Speaker 1>doesn't mean I'm not going to participate in it as

0:00:39.320 --> 0:00:42.800
<v Speaker 1>best I can. So would love that. But we're making

0:00:42.840 --> 0:00:46.159
<v Speaker 1>a slight tweak on the audio front, really based on

0:00:46.280 --> 0:00:51.040
<v Speaker 1>sort of our own sort of consumer demands, if you will,

0:00:52.600 --> 0:00:55.440
<v Speaker 1>We're going to break the We're going to offer the

0:00:55.480 --> 0:00:57.720
<v Speaker 1>podcast now in sort of two different ways. You can

0:00:57.760 --> 0:01:00.680
<v Speaker 1>get the entire thing as one every episode and that

0:01:00.920 --> 0:01:04.680
<v Speaker 1>regularly is somewhere two hours or less. Or we will

0:01:04.720 --> 0:01:08.720
<v Speaker 1>also offer it so if you just do the audio feed,

0:01:08.760 --> 0:01:11.080
<v Speaker 1>you may see one episode, you may get three beads.

0:01:11.160 --> 0:01:13.480
<v Speaker 1>One is the entire thing, soup to nuts. One is

0:01:13.600 --> 0:01:17.360
<v Speaker 1>just are just the feature interview for that episode. So today,

0:01:17.360 --> 0:01:20.480
<v Speaker 1>for instance, it's Mark Zandi, the chief economist at Moody's,

0:01:20.800 --> 0:01:23.440
<v Speaker 1>and then one is just my thoughts for the day,

0:01:24.000 --> 0:01:27.720
<v Speaker 1>coupled with the Q and A. So it's a way

0:01:27.800 --> 0:01:30.600
<v Speaker 1>if you want to absorb in chunks or if you

0:01:30.600 --> 0:01:33.479
<v Speaker 1>want to do it all at once. My feeling is,

0:01:33.880 --> 0:01:36.520
<v Speaker 1>in this day and age, you know you're in charge

0:01:36.560 --> 0:01:40.479
<v Speaker 1>is the consumer. We're putting all the content out there

0:01:40.520 --> 0:01:42.280
<v Speaker 1>and we want it. We want you to be able

0:01:42.280 --> 0:01:45.399
<v Speaker 1>to consume it anyway you want, not forcing you to

0:01:45.440 --> 0:01:47.880
<v Speaker 1>consume it the way we want you to consume it

0:01:48.840 --> 0:01:50.680
<v Speaker 1>for what it's worth. I do think of it as

0:01:50.880 --> 0:01:56.000
<v Speaker 1>one one whole meal, sort of thoughts of the day,

0:01:56.160 --> 0:01:59.440
<v Speaker 1>something you know that I've been thinking about, an interview

0:02:00.400 --> 0:02:02.520
<v Speaker 1>on a topic that I think you should know more about,

0:02:03.360 --> 0:02:05.800
<v Speaker 1>and then responding to your question. So I do think

0:02:05.840 --> 0:02:07.920
<v Speaker 1>of it as sort of a complete meal. But I

0:02:07.960 --> 0:02:10.320
<v Speaker 1>also know in this day and age, people you want

0:02:10.360 --> 0:02:12.320
<v Speaker 1>to grab Hey, I'm curious of this, So that's an

0:02:12.360 --> 0:02:14.280
<v Speaker 1>interesting interview, but I want to listen to that later

0:02:14.840 --> 0:02:18.160
<v Speaker 1>totally get that. So we want to provide the opportunity

0:02:19.000 --> 0:02:22.840
<v Speaker 1>to give you, to give you basically both options and

0:02:22.880 --> 0:02:24.800
<v Speaker 1>of course if you want to watch, that's what YouTube

0:02:24.840 --> 0:02:28.320
<v Speaker 1>is for as well. So we appreciate all the different ways.

0:02:28.360 --> 0:02:31.640
<v Speaker 1>And that's the thing I've learned since going independent, which

0:02:31.680 --> 0:02:34.679
<v Speaker 1>is I preached it all the time when I was

0:02:34.720 --> 0:02:40.359
<v Speaker 1>at NBC. Platform neutral. Don't force consumers to take your

0:02:40.400 --> 0:02:42.799
<v Speaker 1>content the way you want it. You got to sort

0:02:42.840 --> 0:02:46.639
<v Speaker 1>of meet them where they are. And this is another

0:02:46.639 --> 0:02:48.280
<v Speaker 1>attempt of me trying to meet you where you are.

0:02:48.320 --> 0:02:53.040
<v Speaker 1>Speaking of that and the information ecosystem, there actually was

0:02:53.080 --> 0:02:57.080
<v Speaker 1>a huge development and how you consume information that is

0:02:57.120 --> 0:03:01.120
<v Speaker 1>going to have a gigantic impact on local news and

0:03:01.160 --> 0:03:03.560
<v Speaker 1>it's probably a headline you had no idea. I was

0:03:03.600 --> 0:03:05.680
<v Speaker 1>going to single out this morning about it, but I

0:03:05.720 --> 0:03:07.480
<v Speaker 1>want to make a brief mention of it since I

0:03:07.560 --> 0:03:12.239
<v Speaker 1>talk about local news all the time and how I think, really,

0:03:12.400 --> 0:03:14.919
<v Speaker 1>we're not going to repair the reputation of national news

0:03:15.040 --> 0:03:17.880
<v Speaker 1>until we clean up the local news ecosystem. But we're

0:03:17.880 --> 0:03:24.160
<v Speaker 1>about to see another devastating blow to local news this morning.

0:03:24.200 --> 0:03:26.640
<v Speaker 1>There's a merger that was announced next Star Media Group

0:03:26.680 --> 0:03:31.359
<v Speaker 1>and Tegna essentially buying out Tegna merging. Of these these

0:03:31.360 --> 0:03:34.000
<v Speaker 1>are the two largest at this point. Now this is

0:03:34.040 --> 0:03:38.880
<v Speaker 1>going to be the largest single company that owns local affiliates.

0:03:38.960 --> 0:03:42.640
<v Speaker 1>So your local channel four, channel ten, channel nine, channel seven,

0:03:42.640 --> 0:03:46.320
<v Speaker 1>whatever market you live in some way, your single digit markets,

0:03:46.320 --> 0:03:49.240
<v Speaker 1>your local ABC affiliate, your local NBC affiliate, your local

0:03:49.320 --> 0:03:52.720
<v Speaker 1>Fox affiliate, your local CBS affiliate. These are not the

0:03:52.760 --> 0:03:55.240
<v Speaker 1>O and os. Sometimes the networks we call them O

0:03:55.280 --> 0:03:58.520
<v Speaker 1>and os owned and operated where the national network also

0:03:58.680 --> 0:04:01.920
<v Speaker 1>owns the local news. If you live in New York

0:04:01.960 --> 0:04:08.400
<v Speaker 1>and LA, for instance, those local channels KNBC, WNBC, WABC, KABC,

0:04:08.680 --> 0:04:12.960
<v Speaker 1>those are owned by ABC and NBC. But if you live,

0:04:13.440 --> 0:04:16.120
<v Speaker 1>say where I grew up in Miami, one of the

0:04:16.160 --> 0:04:20.080
<v Speaker 1>affiliates is owned by by one of the big networks.

0:04:20.120 --> 0:04:25.800
<v Speaker 1>The local NBC affiliate is owned and operated by NBC National,

0:04:25.880 --> 0:04:28.760
<v Speaker 1>NBC Universal, but the other ones are not. Channel ten

0:04:28.960 --> 0:04:32.559
<v Speaker 1>was the ABC affiliate, they've now they're now an independent channel.

0:04:32.600 --> 0:04:36.680
<v Speaker 1>They have no network affiliation. Channel seven is the Fox affiliate.

0:04:37.000 --> 0:04:39.520
<v Speaker 1>They now also are the ABC affiliate. And this is

0:04:39.560 --> 0:04:42.320
<v Speaker 1>what I want to get to, this merging. We are

0:04:42.360 --> 0:04:47.839
<v Speaker 1>going to see consolidation in the local TV sector, just

0:04:47.880 --> 0:04:50.280
<v Speaker 1>in the same way we saw consolidation twenty years ago

0:04:50.760 --> 0:04:54.640
<v Speaker 1>when it came to local newspapers, right, the morning papers

0:04:54.640 --> 0:04:57.480
<v Speaker 1>and the afternoon papers that we used to have. Essentially

0:04:57.600 --> 0:05:00.680
<v Speaker 1>that all collapsed the day of the internet. You didn't

0:05:00.680 --> 0:05:03.880
<v Speaker 1>need the whole afternoon paper. And essentially we saw that

0:05:04.440 --> 0:05:07.320
<v Speaker 1>sort of consolidation take place in the eighties and nineties

0:05:07.800 --> 0:05:10.480
<v Speaker 1>and it has left us with the with the mess

0:05:10.520 --> 0:05:17.000
<v Speaker 1>that we have today in the local newspaper news arena. Well,

0:05:17.000 --> 0:05:18.760
<v Speaker 1>now we're going to see it on the TV side

0:05:18.760 --> 0:05:22.359
<v Speaker 1>of things, this consolidation. You're going to have something that

0:05:22.400 --> 0:05:24.200
<v Speaker 1>you're going to see show up in some of your

0:05:24.520 --> 0:05:28.039
<v Speaker 1>markets now called doopolies. And what that means is one

0:05:28.440 --> 0:05:30.920
<v Speaker 1>local affiliate will be the same place you go to

0:05:31.440 --> 0:05:35.720
<v Speaker 1>for ABC programming and CBS programming, or for NBC in Miami,

0:05:35.720 --> 0:05:39.560
<v Speaker 1>now it is ABC programming and Fox programming. The same

0:05:39.760 --> 0:05:44.320
<v Speaker 1>local entity will be who serves you up that programming.

0:05:44.720 --> 0:05:48.120
<v Speaker 1>And instead of now having two distinct local news organizations,

0:05:48.120 --> 0:05:51.680
<v Speaker 1>you'll now have one. Right, That's what this consolidation is

0:05:51.680 --> 0:05:52.880
<v Speaker 1>going to lead to. So we're going to a few

0:05:52.920 --> 0:05:56.599
<v Speaker 1>local journalists. You know, in theory, you should mean you

0:05:56.680 --> 0:05:58.960
<v Speaker 1>take one outlet and make it bigger, but that is

0:05:59.080 --> 0:06:02.279
<v Speaker 1>never how this stuff works out right. It is simply

0:06:02.600 --> 0:06:06.000
<v Speaker 1>the consolidation does not. You do not have take two

0:06:06.160 --> 0:06:09.880
<v Speaker 1>entities and hope that then you take two hundred percent

0:06:09.920 --> 0:06:12.080
<v Speaker 1>and say cut that in half, but you still have,

0:06:12.920 --> 0:06:15.719
<v Speaker 1>say a greater amount of resources than one alone. That

0:06:15.800 --> 0:06:18.840
<v Speaker 1>is not how this is going to work, sadly, and

0:06:18.880 --> 0:06:22.760
<v Speaker 1>this is why I'm so obsessed with trying to reanimate

0:06:22.800 --> 0:06:28.480
<v Speaker 1>and recreate the local news information ecosystem, community based news

0:06:28.520 --> 0:06:31.440
<v Speaker 1>that is more platform neutral. I think you have everybody's

0:06:31.480 --> 0:06:35.039
<v Speaker 1>in retreat right now. Resources are collapsing, just at a

0:06:35.080 --> 0:06:37.880
<v Speaker 1>time when there's actually demand for more local information. So

0:06:39.320 --> 0:06:41.720
<v Speaker 1>this this was something that was going to happen. The

0:06:41.760 --> 0:06:44.680
<v Speaker 1>FCC is going to allow likely allow more and more

0:06:45.120 --> 0:06:49.520
<v Speaker 1>looser regulatory decisions. The point is this is a big

0:06:49.560 --> 0:06:52.839
<v Speaker 1>deal that's going to get very little coverage, but the

0:06:53.000 --> 0:06:58.560
<v Speaker 1>impact on local communities fewer resources covering what's going on locally.

0:06:59.000 --> 0:07:02.080
<v Speaker 1>It is only for me motivating me to try to

0:07:02.120 --> 0:07:05.520
<v Speaker 1>figure out this larger idea that I really believe we've

0:07:05.520 --> 0:07:09.120
<v Speaker 1>got to scale the expansion of local news, reanimate it.

0:07:09.320 --> 0:07:12.920
<v Speaker 1>I believe youth sports and high school sports is maybe

0:07:12.960 --> 0:07:15.920
<v Speaker 1>the connective tissue that can sort of bring trust back,

0:07:17.000 --> 0:07:20.400
<v Speaker 1>unite different communities to do this. But This is a

0:07:22.040 --> 0:07:28.120
<v Speaker 1>This is a transformative moment today and the impact on

0:07:28.320 --> 0:07:33.160
<v Speaker 1>how you get local information is going to be dramatic.

0:07:33.200 --> 0:07:35.120
<v Speaker 1>You may not notice it in the next six months,

0:07:35.640 --> 0:07:38.120
<v Speaker 1>you certainly are going to notice it over the next

0:07:38.200 --> 0:07:41.200
<v Speaker 1>eighteen months to two years. This has huge you know,

0:07:41.600 --> 0:07:46.160
<v Speaker 1>this means fewer local entities to put on debates, fewer

0:07:46.200 --> 0:07:50.200
<v Speaker 1>local entities to give candidates access to the public. So

0:07:50.280 --> 0:07:57.120
<v Speaker 1>this has a lot of impact on our political communications,

0:07:57.240 --> 0:08:01.280
<v Speaker 1>on how we campaign politics, all of those things, how

0:08:01.320 --> 0:08:04.160
<v Speaker 1>you get basic information about your community. So this is

0:08:04.200 --> 0:08:09.920
<v Speaker 1>a huge you know, as more developments happen, I obviously

0:08:09.960 --> 0:08:13.000
<v Speaker 1>want to we'll be doing my best to surface this,

0:08:13.120 --> 0:08:16.120
<v Speaker 1>but this gets it. This is this is the moment.

0:08:16.280 --> 0:08:19.520
<v Speaker 1>This is why, oddly I actually think there's opportunity, right

0:08:19.720 --> 0:08:23.240
<v Speaker 1>whenever there's consolidation, that's actually the opportunity, Right, You have

0:08:23.360 --> 0:08:26.360
<v Speaker 1>a whole bunch of big entities that are in retreat,

0:08:27.000 --> 0:08:30.840
<v Speaker 1>nothing like a little startup to show up and actually

0:08:30.960 --> 0:08:34.960
<v Speaker 1>try to expand. And so it's something something I want

0:08:35.000 --> 0:08:38.240
<v Speaker 1>to focus there. Obviously, one other big obviously, the other

0:08:38.280 --> 0:08:42.120
<v Speaker 1>big actual political headline has to do with Zelenski's trip

0:08:42.840 --> 0:08:48.200
<v Speaker 1>to Washington, d C. With with his super friends in

0:08:48.200 --> 0:08:50.880
<v Speaker 1>this case, the super super European friends, right, the G

0:08:51.040 --> 0:08:54.000
<v Speaker 1>seven Allies, the heads of Italy and France and the

0:08:54.080 --> 0:08:58.080
<v Speaker 1>UK and Germany. And clearly, you know, everybody has figured

0:08:58.080 --> 0:09:00.200
<v Speaker 1>out how to play kate Donald Trump, right, every thing

0:09:00.280 --> 0:09:05.000
<v Speaker 1>is about placating him. And you know, whether I think

0:09:05.040 --> 0:09:08.920
<v Speaker 1>somebody referred to the phrase tongue bathing Trump is what

0:09:09.040 --> 0:09:11.679
<v Speaker 1>Zelensky's finally learned to do. Even showed up in a

0:09:11.800 --> 0:09:15.079
<v Speaker 1>nice looking, very modern looking suit. Let me just tell

0:09:15.080 --> 0:09:18.160
<v Speaker 1>you if I would hope that this becomes the model

0:09:18.600 --> 0:09:22.679
<v Speaker 1>of what is considered dressing up in Washington because there

0:09:22.720 --> 0:09:25.240
<v Speaker 1>was no tie, right, how great was that there was

0:09:25.320 --> 0:09:27.920
<v Speaker 1>no tie? It looks looks sleek. You know, the all

0:09:27.960 --> 0:09:30.120
<v Speaker 1>black look helps you look thinner. I need to look

0:09:30.160 --> 0:09:33.160
<v Speaker 1>thinner these days. So hey, I endorse it. Let's see

0:09:33.200 --> 0:09:36.000
<v Speaker 1>it come. But in all seriousness, you could see that

0:09:37.760 --> 0:09:40.120
<v Speaker 1>this was a case where they were there, that the

0:09:40.440 --> 0:09:43.480
<v Speaker 1>European Allies and Zelensky were hoping if they're the last

0:09:43.480 --> 0:09:45.640
<v Speaker 1>person in the room and I you know, and as

0:09:45.679 --> 0:09:48.319
<v Speaker 1>you could see, Trump seems to be vacillating. And it's

0:09:48.360 --> 0:09:50.920
<v Speaker 1>interesting here that he sees himself more as a mediator

0:09:51.000 --> 0:09:53.400
<v Speaker 1>between the two sides, rather than as an ally of

0:09:53.440 --> 0:09:57.760
<v Speaker 1>the West. It is weirdly head scratching, right, He's the

0:09:57.800 --> 0:10:00.200
<v Speaker 1>one that would leave the room and go talk, go

0:10:00.360 --> 0:10:03.480
<v Speaker 1>talk to Putin for forty minutes to see what was possible,

0:10:03.600 --> 0:10:08.720
<v Speaker 1>right he was, he was the go between. Now he

0:10:08.760 --> 0:10:11.200
<v Speaker 1>does have the best relationship among the G seven leaders

0:10:11.200 --> 0:10:14.360
<v Speaker 1>with Putin. Right before Trump, when Biden was in office,

0:10:14.600 --> 0:10:19.040
<v Speaker 1>and even actually during the Biden assume me, the Obama years,

0:10:19.080 --> 0:10:20.600
<v Speaker 1>and even the first Trump termam it was thought of

0:10:20.600 --> 0:10:23.440
<v Speaker 1>his Merkle who had the best relationship with Putin, in

0:10:23.480 --> 0:10:28.800
<v Speaker 1>part because he spoke German and so they seem to

0:10:28.800 --> 0:10:31.920
<v Speaker 1>be able to communicate better than the other world leaders.

0:10:31.960 --> 0:10:34.800
<v Speaker 1>These days, it really is Trump who apparently has the

0:10:34.800 --> 0:10:40.640
<v Speaker 1>best relationship with Putin. So look, I think it all

0:10:40.679 --> 0:10:43.200
<v Speaker 1>went it could have. I guess the best headline on

0:10:43.280 --> 0:10:46.400
<v Speaker 1>all of this over the last ninety six hours is

0:10:46.480 --> 0:10:49.800
<v Speaker 1>it could have been worse. Right. It wasn't Helsinki when

0:10:49.840 --> 0:10:52.200
<v Speaker 1>it came to Putin, and it wasn't February when it

0:10:52.240 --> 0:10:55.559
<v Speaker 1>came to Zelenski. And for that, I think everybody's grateful,

0:10:55.600 --> 0:10:57.680
<v Speaker 1>and I think part of that is the effort the

0:10:57.720 --> 0:11:02.160
<v Speaker 1>Europeans have made. I mean, in some ways, perhaps Trump

0:11:02.200 --> 0:11:07.199
<v Speaker 1>deserves some credit for this, both in action and in action, right.

0:11:07.559 --> 0:11:11.080
<v Speaker 1>The inaction has sort of forced the Europeans to start

0:11:11.120 --> 0:11:14.880
<v Speaker 1>working more together, to start thinking about security, which actually

0:11:15.120 --> 0:11:17.480
<v Speaker 1>is some of the rhetoric we've heard from some on

0:11:17.520 --> 0:11:20.320
<v Speaker 1>the right who've said, hey, you know, you heard jd.

0:11:20.400 --> 0:11:24.720
<v Speaker 1>Vance say that Europe has been a bit free. I

0:11:24.720 --> 0:11:26.720
<v Speaker 1>think he'd referred to him as freeloaders at one point

0:11:26.760 --> 0:11:29.120
<v Speaker 1>when it came to American security. And the fact is,

0:11:29.120 --> 0:11:31.120
<v Speaker 1>if you know, this is not you know, I think

0:11:31.240 --> 0:11:33.440
<v Speaker 1>what Trump's been a wake up call to Europe, right,

0:11:33.679 --> 0:11:36.400
<v Speaker 1>which is the assumption that America was always going to

0:11:36.400 --> 0:11:38.760
<v Speaker 1>be there. You never know which way America could turn,

0:11:38.800 --> 0:11:42.160
<v Speaker 1>and suddenly now the instability of the partnership with America

0:11:43.320 --> 0:11:49.719
<v Speaker 1>has forced Europe to to rethink how it conducts its alliances,

0:11:49.800 --> 0:11:55.880
<v Speaker 1>rethink its continent security. And in that sense, if you're

0:11:56.920 --> 0:11:59.719
<v Speaker 1>you know, if you're on the right of center and

0:11:59.800 --> 0:12:03.400
<v Speaker 1>and wanted the US to have a smaller footprint when

0:12:03.400 --> 0:12:09.840
<v Speaker 1>it came to our national security, our commitments, then this

0:12:09.960 --> 0:12:12.439
<v Speaker 1>is a victory because it's Europe that's taking the lead

0:12:12.480 --> 0:12:15.440
<v Speaker 1>on defending Zelenski. It'll be a European I'm trying to

0:12:15.440 --> 0:12:17.680
<v Speaker 1>figure out, you know, how the Russians view you know,

0:12:17.720 --> 0:12:20.360
<v Speaker 1>he you know, Putin's red line is no NATO troops

0:12:20.480 --> 0:12:25.559
<v Speaker 1>in Ukraine to providing security. But if it's a collection

0:12:25.679 --> 0:12:29.920
<v Speaker 1>of European troops, what's the difference if and if all

0:12:29.960 --> 0:12:33.000
<v Speaker 1>those European countries are members of NATO? Is that is

0:12:33.040 --> 0:12:36.960
<v Speaker 1>that a distinct different distinction without a difference or is

0:12:36.960 --> 0:12:39.480
<v Speaker 1>that just enough to play Kate Putin? Right? I think

0:12:39.520 --> 0:12:43.560
<v Speaker 1>that's going to be an important, an important moment, There's

0:12:43.559 --> 0:12:46.520
<v Speaker 1>no doubt there's Look, politically, you're not gonna be able

0:12:46.559 --> 0:12:49.520
<v Speaker 1>to sell in this country putting American troops in Ukraine. Okay,

0:12:49.600 --> 0:12:52.480
<v Speaker 1>so this is not that that is off the table.

0:12:53.520 --> 0:12:56.880
<v Speaker 1>I'm not sure there would be bipartisan support for that,

0:12:56.960 --> 0:13:00.920
<v Speaker 1>to be honest. There is definitely an exult austion from

0:13:01.040 --> 0:13:04.680
<v Speaker 1>American national security commitment still when it comes to Iraq

0:13:04.720 --> 0:13:06.439
<v Speaker 1>and Afghanistan. So I don't think that there would be

0:13:06.520 --> 0:13:09.480
<v Speaker 1>the political will in this country for that. The question

0:13:09.640 --> 0:13:14.920
<v Speaker 1>is if it's an alliance of European countries that are

0:13:14.920 --> 0:13:18.640
<v Speaker 1>providing it, you know those you know, how to me

0:13:18.880 --> 0:13:20.920
<v Speaker 1>NATO and European countries are kind of one and the

0:13:20.960 --> 0:13:24.320
<v Speaker 1>same thing is that the way Putin is going to

0:13:24.360 --> 0:13:26.600
<v Speaker 1>see it, which sometimes he chooses to see it that

0:13:26.640 --> 0:13:29.320
<v Speaker 1>way and sometimes he doesn't. So I think that's an

0:13:29.400 --> 0:13:31.600
<v Speaker 1>important sticking point. But I want to get at one

0:13:31.880 --> 0:13:35.040
<v Speaker 1>aspect to this that is still which to me and

0:13:35.520 --> 0:13:40.360
<v Speaker 1>perhaps it's why Trump is still gettable by the West

0:13:40.400 --> 0:13:42.920
<v Speaker 1>here for them to take their side. First of all,

0:13:42.920 --> 0:13:45.680
<v Speaker 1>I think it is pretty clear that unlike most issues,

0:13:45.720 --> 0:13:49.160
<v Speaker 1>there really is multiple points of view inside the West

0:13:49.200 --> 0:13:53.240
<v Speaker 1>wing in Trump's here that unlike many other issues, there's

0:13:53.280 --> 0:14:01.400
<v Speaker 1>a healthy debate internally about Ukraine that see Putin and

0:14:01.480 --> 0:14:05.360
<v Speaker 1>Russia much more as a threat to the West than

0:14:05.440 --> 0:14:08.240
<v Speaker 1>others see Putin and Russia. So I think the fact

0:14:08.280 --> 0:14:11.320
<v Speaker 1>that there's that spirited debate inside the West wing and

0:14:11.360 --> 0:14:15.680
<v Speaker 1>that Trump seems to vacillate a little bit is why

0:14:15.760 --> 0:14:20.560
<v Speaker 1>we have this sort of weird sort of takeaways from

0:14:20.600 --> 0:14:24.520
<v Speaker 1>this last ninety six hours, right, which I do think,

0:14:25.080 --> 0:14:28.680
<v Speaker 1>and I think there's part of the more Europe flatters Trump.

0:14:29.280 --> 0:14:32.440
<v Speaker 1>It clearly works right, just like it's worked for Putin.

0:14:33.000 --> 0:14:37.960
<v Speaker 1>The Europeans have figured this out. Trump just wants respect, right.

0:14:38.880 --> 0:14:41.120
<v Speaker 1>He may not have earned the respect, but he wants people.

0:14:41.360 --> 0:14:45.200
<v Speaker 1>I was saying this before. He's in some ways desperate

0:14:45.280 --> 0:14:49.240
<v Speaker 1>for it, right. It goes back to his complex about

0:14:49.440 --> 0:14:52.640
<v Speaker 1>you know, being an outer Borough kid trying to make

0:14:52.680 --> 0:14:54.800
<v Speaker 1>it in Manhattan. He's you know, at the end of

0:14:54.880 --> 0:14:57.960
<v Speaker 1>the day, he's been wanting to be respected by the

0:14:57.960 --> 0:15:00.600
<v Speaker 1>New York Times, respected by the elites. The less they

0:15:00.600 --> 0:15:02.760
<v Speaker 1>give him respect, the angry or he gets, and the

0:15:02.800 --> 0:15:04.960
<v Speaker 1>more it goes against the elites. But even as he

0:15:05.000 --> 0:15:06.880
<v Speaker 1>goes against the elites and he tries to build his no,

0:15:07.520 --> 0:15:11.600
<v Speaker 1>you know, if he's paid, you know, he still wants

0:15:11.640 --> 0:15:14.800
<v Speaker 1>the elite awards. Right. If he doesn't actually care about

0:15:14.800 --> 0:15:17.680
<v Speaker 1>the elites, why does he want to Nobel Peace Prize? Right?

0:15:17.720 --> 0:15:21.160
<v Speaker 1>But in some ways it's he still craves it, right,

0:15:21.640 --> 0:15:25.800
<v Speaker 1>And I think that that the Europeans have finally figured

0:15:25.800 --> 0:15:30.920
<v Speaker 1>this out and are placating him in ways that you

0:15:30.920 --> 0:15:32.560
<v Speaker 1>look at it and you may just shake your head

0:15:32.880 --> 0:15:36.040
<v Speaker 1>kind of laugh that this kind of stuff works. But

0:15:36.120 --> 0:15:38.200
<v Speaker 1>it does get me at one point, and a huge

0:15:38.200 --> 0:15:42.200
<v Speaker 1>miscalculation by Putin. You know, I do think that Putin

0:15:42.720 --> 0:15:46.200
<v Speaker 1>really has very low regard for Trump and thinks Trump

0:15:46.280 --> 0:15:48.760
<v Speaker 1>is really easy to manipulate. Why do I say this

0:15:49.360 --> 0:15:52.720
<v Speaker 1>because he's given Trump nothing and and you know, he

0:15:52.720 --> 0:15:55.160
<v Speaker 1>pays him lip service. Right, he tells Trump what he

0:15:55.200 --> 0:15:57.640
<v Speaker 1>wants to hear about mail in voting. You know what

0:15:57.680 --> 0:15:59.320
<v Speaker 1>Trump wants to hear about whether the war would have

0:15:59.320 --> 0:16:03.640
<v Speaker 1>started if Trump been president or not. But he never

0:16:03.760 --> 0:16:07.480
<v Speaker 1>actually gives Trump a win that Trump is asking for. Right,

0:16:08.880 --> 0:16:11.080
<v Speaker 1>the fact that Putin couldn't even give him a one

0:16:11.120 --> 0:16:14.920
<v Speaker 1>week cease fire, couldn't even give him a ceasefire during

0:16:15.000 --> 0:16:18.040
<v Speaker 1>the time that they were meeting in Alaska, couldn't give

0:16:18.080 --> 0:16:20.680
<v Speaker 1>him a ceasefire just for the seventy two hours that

0:16:20.760 --> 0:16:24.880
<v Speaker 1>he was playing Shuttle diplomacy between Putin and Zelenski, that is,

0:16:25.520 --> 0:16:29.760
<v Speaker 1>that is total disrespect by Putin, right, It totally should

0:16:29.840 --> 0:16:34.560
<v Speaker 1>undermine the idea that Putin wouldn't have launched this invasion

0:16:34.560 --> 0:16:36.920
<v Speaker 1>of Ukraine and Trump had been president if he respected

0:16:36.960 --> 0:16:39.600
<v Speaker 1>Trump so much? Why is any Why can't even give

0:16:39.680 --> 0:16:44.520
<v Speaker 1>him a temporary ceasefire? And I think Putin thinks he

0:16:44.520 --> 0:16:46.960
<v Speaker 1>can just pay lip service and not actually have to

0:16:47.000 --> 0:16:50.560
<v Speaker 1>match the lip service with an action. I think he's messcalculating.

0:16:50.880 --> 0:16:54.600
<v Speaker 1>I think this is success. I think over time Trump,

0:16:54.800 --> 0:16:56.160
<v Speaker 1>you know, he has said it a few times. I

0:16:56.200 --> 0:16:58.440
<v Speaker 1>think Putin's tappened me along. I remember he said that

0:16:58.480 --> 0:17:02.440
<v Speaker 1>at one point, and the fact that you know, this

0:17:02.480 --> 0:17:05.680
<v Speaker 1>is where Putin's never going to have. You know, maybe

0:17:05.680 --> 0:17:07.480
<v Speaker 1>he has ambition that he's going to have an even

0:17:07.480 --> 0:17:11.359
<v Speaker 1>more pro Russian, more pro Putin president after Trump. I

0:17:11.359 --> 0:17:13.360
<v Speaker 1>don't know who that would be, but maybe he somehow

0:17:13.600 --> 0:17:17.120
<v Speaker 1>fantasizes about that. But I think it's safe to say

0:17:17.160 --> 0:17:21.760
<v Speaker 1>this is going to be the most friendly leader that

0:17:21.840 --> 0:17:25.560
<v Speaker 1>he's ever going to have in the United States. So

0:17:25.640 --> 0:17:30.840
<v Speaker 1>to not to not enhance his reputation at a time

0:17:30.880 --> 0:17:34.080
<v Speaker 1>when he's desperate to enhance it, not to help him

0:17:34.320 --> 0:17:36.480
<v Speaker 1>get his seaes Fire, get his Peace Prize, give him

0:17:36.480 --> 0:17:39.000
<v Speaker 1>more credibility with the West, with the guy that you

0:17:39.040 --> 0:17:42.480
<v Speaker 1>have influenced, really seems to be a mistake on Putin's part,

0:17:42.520 --> 0:17:45.040
<v Speaker 1>and I think it's shorted. I think it tells me

0:17:45.200 --> 0:17:49.640
<v Speaker 1>how myopic Putin is, how sheltered Putin is, how much

0:17:49.680 --> 0:17:53.080
<v Speaker 1>he doesn't quite see the world very well, and the

0:17:53.119 --> 0:17:55.720
<v Speaker 1>miscalculations he's making on this right, he thought he was

0:17:55.760 --> 0:17:57.600
<v Speaker 1>going to roll over Ukraine. I mean, he is not

0:17:57.720 --> 0:18:00.800
<v Speaker 1>getting very good intelligence. It's pretty if he was. He

0:18:00.840 --> 0:18:03.880
<v Speaker 1>never would have probably done the invasion in the first place.

0:18:04.280 --> 0:18:06.280
<v Speaker 1>They really thought this was going to be quick and easy,

0:18:06.280 --> 0:18:09.520
<v Speaker 1>and they were wrong. And they continue to be wrong

0:18:10.080 --> 0:18:13.480
<v Speaker 1>on some of the military capabilities of Ukraine. They continue

0:18:13.520 --> 0:18:16.280
<v Speaker 1>to be wrong about the ability to divide Europe from

0:18:16.359 --> 0:18:19.800
<v Speaker 1>the United States or to divide Europe amongst itself. And

0:18:19.920 --> 0:18:24.560
<v Speaker 1>so I think he's done it again, and he had

0:18:24.600 --> 0:18:29.439
<v Speaker 1>an opportunity to give Trump more leverage. Trump has more

0:18:29.520 --> 0:18:32.080
<v Speaker 1>leverage over him than he refuses to choose. Right. I

0:18:32.119 --> 0:18:34.159
<v Speaker 1>mean to me, it's a simple way to get him

0:18:34.480 --> 0:18:37.120
<v Speaker 1>to get Putin here, just say, look, come out and say,

0:18:37.280 --> 0:18:38.960
<v Speaker 1>you know, the more I think about it, I'm going

0:18:39.000 --> 0:18:40.719
<v Speaker 1>to put Ukraine in NATO because I don't ever want

0:18:40.720 --> 0:18:43.960
<v Speaker 1>to see another war again. It's pretty clear Putin won't

0:18:44.119 --> 0:18:48.080
<v Speaker 1>touch a country that's a member of NATO. And see

0:18:48.080 --> 0:18:51.320
<v Speaker 1>how fast Putin might suddenly retreat and talk about a ceasefire.

0:18:51.720 --> 0:18:54.000
<v Speaker 1>But he's never used that leverage, right, Trump has not

0:18:54.119 --> 0:18:59.159
<v Speaker 1>used the leverage that I think he has. But the

0:18:59.200 --> 0:19:02.840
<v Speaker 1>same goes for Putin has an opportunity here to essentially

0:19:02.920 --> 0:19:05.440
<v Speaker 1>give a few wins to Trump that would enhance his reputation,

0:19:06.359 --> 0:19:10.359
<v Speaker 1>and only while still preserving that personal relationship he has

0:19:10.400 --> 0:19:13.320
<v Speaker 1>with him. So again, you know a lot of times

0:19:13.320 --> 0:19:15.360
<v Speaker 1>I really want to be dispassionate and looking at these

0:19:15.400 --> 0:19:17.800
<v Speaker 1>things and just sort of like saying, hey, wait a minute,

0:19:17.600 --> 0:19:19.960
<v Speaker 1>forget what you think is the right thing to do.

0:19:20.400 --> 0:19:22.520
<v Speaker 1>Try to figure out why is any doing this? And

0:19:22.560 --> 0:19:24.840
<v Speaker 1>this is a bit of a mystery to me, but

0:19:24.960 --> 0:19:27.200
<v Speaker 1>I think it has to do with he's getting bad information,

0:19:27.280 --> 0:19:31.520
<v Speaker 1>he's getting bad intelligence, or he thinks that little of Trump,

0:19:31.840 --> 0:19:34.560
<v Speaker 1>that Trump has been so easy to manipulate with words,

0:19:35.119 --> 0:19:37.639
<v Speaker 1>that he doesn't have to bother with an action or

0:19:37.680 --> 0:19:40.840
<v Speaker 1>two to give to give Trump a win or two

0:19:40.920 --> 0:19:47.000
<v Speaker 1>that would ironically strengthen him. It's in, which of course

0:19:47.040 --> 0:19:48.720
<v Speaker 1>would be, but that would be long term thing, and

0:19:48.760 --> 0:19:54.399
<v Speaker 1>normally Putin's usually thinking long term. He really is miscalculating

0:19:54.440 --> 0:19:56.320
<v Speaker 1>this one, and I think he does leave it up

0:19:56.320 --> 0:19:59.760
<v Speaker 1>for grabs, and you know it. I think the more

0:19:59.800 --> 0:20:03.679
<v Speaker 1>you look at Putin's actions, you realize he is nothing

0:20:03.720 --> 0:20:07.200
<v Speaker 1>but a thug who wants to take over a sovereign nation,

0:20:08.119 --> 0:20:10.320
<v Speaker 1>and there's only one person that can stop the killing.

0:20:10.400 --> 0:20:14.280
<v Speaker 1>It's him, right, Ukraine could put down arms tomorrow, and

0:20:14.320 --> 0:20:17.320
<v Speaker 1>he's not going to stop the killing until he gets

0:20:17.359 --> 0:20:21.440
<v Speaker 1>that country, so it is on him, and so it's

0:20:21.480 --> 0:20:26.479
<v Speaker 1>a I think we need to ask ourselves that question.

0:20:26.560 --> 0:20:29.200
<v Speaker 1>And there's certainly a question that I'd love to get

0:20:29.359 --> 0:20:31.720
<v Speaker 1>more clarity from our Intel community, but I'm not sure

0:20:31.760 --> 0:20:34.000
<v Speaker 1>how public any of that can be because it's so

0:20:34.160 --> 0:20:37.120
<v Speaker 1>sensitive when it comes to dealing with Donald Trump. Right,

0:20:37.160 --> 0:20:42.879
<v Speaker 1>But why is Putin sort of not giving Trump a

0:20:42.920 --> 0:20:46.840
<v Speaker 1>little something here because it would actually help him both

0:20:46.880 --> 0:20:49.520
<v Speaker 1>of them in the long term, which you would think, Again,

0:20:49.560 --> 0:20:53.320
<v Speaker 1>I go back, Putin's never going to have a president

0:20:53.359 --> 0:21:02.560
<v Speaker 1>who's this let's just say, supportive, probably in one hundred years,

0:21:03.480 --> 0:21:07.680
<v Speaker 1>and if not even more maybe ever. So it is

0:21:08.520 --> 0:21:11.280
<v Speaker 1>this is where I think Putin is making some strategic

0:21:11.320 --> 0:21:14.200
<v Speaker 1>mistakes here, because he's now unified Europe in a way

0:21:14.240 --> 0:21:18.320
<v Speaker 1>that Europe wasn't unified before the invasion. Right, it continues.

0:21:18.520 --> 0:21:23.800
<v Speaker 1>He may have successfully, you know, cracked the American partnership

0:21:23.840 --> 0:21:26.960
<v Speaker 1>with Europe thanks to Donald Trump, but in doing so,

0:21:28.480 --> 0:21:32.720
<v Speaker 1>he's united Europe in a way that the US could

0:21:32.720 --> 0:21:36.159
<v Speaker 1>have only dreamed about ten years ago. All Right. That

0:21:36.240 --> 0:21:41.320
<v Speaker 1>takes me to my substat column this week, and it

0:21:41.400 --> 0:21:44.960
<v Speaker 1>is in some ways it's more of the longer term

0:21:45.040 --> 0:21:51.560
<v Speaker 1>exercise that that I've been using this podcast for and

0:21:51.880 --> 0:21:57.200
<v Speaker 1>using my substack for, which is simply trying to explain

0:21:57.280 --> 0:21:59.960
<v Speaker 1>how he got here and trying to offer up idea

0:22:00.119 --> 0:22:03.280
<v Speaker 1>is to get us out of this mess? Right? What

0:22:03.280 --> 0:22:06.120
<v Speaker 1>do I mean? Right? Well, let me put it this way.

0:22:06.160 --> 0:22:08.439
<v Speaker 1>If there's a through line in the way I've been

0:22:08.480 --> 0:22:14.719
<v Speaker 1>analyzing politics lately, it's this how we got here and

0:22:14.760 --> 0:22:17.240
<v Speaker 1>how we get out? And what do I mean by here?

0:22:17.600 --> 0:22:20.240
<v Speaker 1>I mean the politics of division, the politics where we

0:22:20.240 --> 0:22:24.000
<v Speaker 1>emphasize what separates us, not what we share, Where every

0:22:24.080 --> 0:22:28.679
<v Speaker 1>identity slice gets thinner, every disagreement gets sharper, and the

0:22:28.720 --> 0:22:32.440
<v Speaker 1>incentive structure rewards conflict over consensus. It's not a new

0:22:32.440 --> 0:22:34.560
<v Speaker 1>thought for me. You've heard me talk about this before,

0:22:34.720 --> 0:22:37.320
<v Speaker 1>so I'm not naive. Politics has always had conflict, that's

0:22:37.320 --> 0:22:40.160
<v Speaker 1>not the point, But it hasn't always been this polarized,

0:22:40.600 --> 0:22:45.040
<v Speaker 1>this performative, this locked into division as the strategy itself.

0:22:45.560 --> 0:22:47.400
<v Speaker 1>So today I want to walk you through two moments,

0:22:47.520 --> 0:22:49.359
<v Speaker 1>two sort of forks in the road, if you will,

0:22:49.800 --> 0:22:52.440
<v Speaker 1>that I think actually go a long way in explaining

0:22:52.480 --> 0:22:56.800
<v Speaker 1>how we ended up here, and perhaps it actually by

0:22:56.800 --> 0:23:00.400
<v Speaker 1>figuring out how we got here it's perhaps a half

0:23:01.240 --> 0:23:05.160
<v Speaker 1>for a better politics than frankly for a potential future

0:23:05.200 --> 0:23:10.040
<v Speaker 1>president to take advantage of. So here's FOURK one. It

0:23:10.160 --> 0:23:12.640
<v Speaker 1>was two thousand and four in the age of micro targeting.

0:23:13.760 --> 0:23:17.680
<v Speaker 1>Before two thousand and four, campaigns treated undecided voters as

0:23:17.680 --> 0:23:21.680
<v Speaker 1>moderates centrist types, facillating between the two parties. That's why

0:23:21.680 --> 0:23:25.040
<v Speaker 1>the closing TV ads of your youth used to sound

0:23:25.080 --> 0:23:28.879
<v Speaker 1>so bipartisan. Democrats would brag about working with Republicans, Republicans

0:23:28.880 --> 0:23:31.760
<v Speaker 1>like John McCain or Republicans like you know, Jim Bush

0:23:31.840 --> 0:23:35.159
<v Speaker 1>or something like that. Republicans would point out deals that

0:23:35.160 --> 0:23:38.000
<v Speaker 1>they cut with Democrats, Democrats like Ted Kennedy. You know,

0:23:38.280 --> 0:23:40.640
<v Speaker 1>you'd pick the most you know, even the most ideological

0:23:40.680 --> 0:23:43.239
<v Speaker 1>candidates in their final ads wanted to look like they

0:23:43.320 --> 0:23:46.000
<v Speaker 1>knew how to be consensus builders. Right. You know, why

0:23:46.040 --> 0:23:47.879
<v Speaker 1>did we find out about orn Hatch and Ted Kennedy

0:23:47.880 --> 0:23:49.800
<v Speaker 1>Because the oarrn Hatch wanted it, brag about it. He

0:23:49.800 --> 0:23:51.920
<v Speaker 1>thought it was good politics for him. By the way,

0:23:52.000 --> 0:23:54.080
<v Speaker 1>Kennedy thought it was good politics for him to brag

0:23:54.119 --> 0:23:58.200
<v Speaker 1>about his relationship with orn Hatch. Because the belief was simple,

0:23:58.280 --> 0:24:01.760
<v Speaker 1>undecideds were wouable if you could sound more consensus oriented

0:24:02.400 --> 0:24:05.119
<v Speaker 1>than the other guy. But two thousand and four changed that.

0:24:06.000 --> 0:24:10.360
<v Speaker 1>Karl Rove and the Bush reelection campaign team pioneered what

0:24:10.400 --> 0:24:12.600
<v Speaker 1>we called what we called then and what we still

0:24:12.680 --> 0:24:16.320
<v Speaker 1>kind of call micro targeting. They built detailed voter files

0:24:16.320 --> 0:24:18.359
<v Speaker 1>that told them exactly what church you went to, what

0:24:18.400 --> 0:24:21.760
<v Speaker 1>magazines you subscribed to, Yes, magazines, now, of course it

0:24:21.800 --> 0:24:26.879
<v Speaker 1>would be what subscriptions you have on the internet. But

0:24:27.560 --> 0:24:30.560
<v Speaker 1>stay with me here, what causes you supported? And suddenly

0:24:30.600 --> 0:24:34.120
<v Speaker 1>campaigns didn't have to guess about undecided They actually knew

0:24:34.119 --> 0:24:38.640
<v Speaker 1>who they were. And the big discovery the undecideds weren't centrist,

0:24:39.320 --> 0:24:42.639
<v Speaker 1>not at all. They were independent, but they were independents

0:24:42.640 --> 0:24:46.000
<v Speaker 1>who didn't fit neatly into either party. But they had

0:24:46.000 --> 0:24:49.640
<v Speaker 1>strong views on certain issues right, which kept them from

0:24:49.680 --> 0:24:53.000
<v Speaker 1>being in one party or the other. But if you

0:24:53.080 --> 0:24:55.919
<v Speaker 1>hit those pressure points, if you told them you agreed

0:24:55.960 --> 0:24:58.359
<v Speaker 1>with them on that one issue, you could win them over.

0:25:00.680 --> 0:25:04.359
<v Speaker 1>You might find an independent who was an economic populist

0:25:04.440 --> 0:25:07.520
<v Speaker 1>but cared about gun ownership, or you might find a

0:25:07.560 --> 0:25:10.680
<v Speaker 1>fiscal conservative that cared about planned parenthood. You see where

0:25:10.680 --> 0:25:13.520
<v Speaker 1>I'm going here, right, So the strategy flipped instead of

0:25:13.560 --> 0:25:17.280
<v Speaker 1>we're all in this together. A kind of campaigning started,

0:25:17.320 --> 0:25:20.280
<v Speaker 1>sending surgical messages to activate one slice at a time.

0:25:21.240 --> 0:25:23.160
<v Speaker 1>The Obama two thousand and eight campaign, in some ways

0:25:23.200 --> 0:25:27.000
<v Speaker 1>took this to another level with digital tools, and yeah,

0:25:27.080 --> 0:25:30.359
<v Speaker 1>Obama wrapped it up in some unity rhetoric. No red states,

0:25:30.359 --> 0:25:33.160
<v Speaker 1>no blue state, and in fact that might explain why

0:25:33.160 --> 0:25:36.280
<v Speaker 1>he's the only twenty first century presidential candidate to win

0:25:36.320 --> 0:25:38.879
<v Speaker 1>by more than five percentage points, right, essentially to have

0:25:39.200 --> 0:25:43.880
<v Speaker 1>a decisive victory an actual popular vote mandate. But by

0:25:43.880 --> 0:25:47.520
<v Speaker 1>twenty twelve, and certainly by twenty sixteen, there was no

0:25:47.960 --> 0:25:50.840
<v Speaker 1>attempt at a unity messaging. Right. It was all about

0:25:50.840 --> 0:25:54.440
<v Speaker 1>slicing and dicing. That was the whole ballgame. And then,

0:25:54.480 --> 0:25:57.640
<v Speaker 1>of course came the big accelerant social media. Right, this

0:25:57.840 --> 0:26:01.439
<v Speaker 1>all seemed to fit together. Facebook were built on the

0:26:01.440 --> 0:26:04.919
<v Speaker 1>same logic as micro targeting. Right. They came up, by

0:26:04.920 --> 0:26:07.360
<v Speaker 1>the way, they start up just after the micro targeting

0:26:07.400 --> 0:26:10.800
<v Speaker 1>boom of campaigns and four both of those entities. Right,

0:26:11.119 --> 0:26:14.440
<v Speaker 1>So it was narrow casting engagement, slicing people into categories.

0:26:14.680 --> 0:26:18.680
<v Speaker 1>Campaign ads fit perfectly into that system. Division onesn't just

0:26:18.720 --> 0:26:22.919
<v Speaker 1>a campaign tactic anymore. It became a business model. And

0:26:22.960 --> 0:26:26.520
<v Speaker 1>the uncomfortable truth is this, our politics were less divisive

0:26:26.520 --> 0:26:30.960
<v Speaker 1>when campaigns actually knew less about us, about voters, once

0:26:31.040 --> 0:26:35.119
<v Speaker 1>campaigns and these tech platforms started seeing us as fragments,

0:26:35.200 --> 0:26:38.760
<v Speaker 1>learning about us and fragmented pieces, if you will, well,

0:26:38.800 --> 0:26:42.200
<v Speaker 1>they treated us like fragments. And when all you see

0:26:42.240 --> 0:26:45.760
<v Speaker 1>are things that divide you, then it's division that becomes

0:26:45.800 --> 0:26:48.120
<v Speaker 1>your identity. And that takes me to the second fork

0:26:48.119 --> 0:26:51.480
<v Speaker 1>in the road. And that was the total, complete misinterpretation

0:26:51.560 --> 0:26:54.880
<v Speaker 1>of the twenty twelve election that I think is one

0:26:54.880 --> 0:26:57.959
<v Speaker 1>of the original sins. If you will, to borrow a phrase,

0:26:59.280 --> 0:27:02.679
<v Speaker 1>Barack Obama, this reelection should have been much harder. The

0:27:02.800 --> 0:27:06.760
<v Speaker 1>economy was sluggish, unemployment was high. History said he was

0:27:06.840 --> 0:27:09.520
<v Speaker 1>more likely to lose than win because of that high unemployment.

0:27:09.600 --> 0:27:13.320
<v Speaker 1>But he didn't why well, he reframed the question. It

0:27:13.359 --> 0:27:15.040
<v Speaker 1>wasn't are you better off now than you were four

0:27:15.080 --> 0:27:17.880
<v Speaker 1>years ago? Considering he took over during the Great Recession?

0:27:17.960 --> 0:27:20.560
<v Speaker 1>That was never going to be a good way to

0:27:20.880 --> 0:27:24.920
<v Speaker 1>talk to voters. Instead, he asked, will you be better

0:27:24.960 --> 0:27:27.120
<v Speaker 1>off four years from now? And then he cast met

0:27:27.160 --> 0:27:30.280
<v Speaker 1>Romney as the wrong answer, the out of touch boss

0:27:30.280 --> 0:27:32.960
<v Speaker 1>who wasn't on your side. One of the best examples

0:27:32.960 --> 0:27:35.200
<v Speaker 1>of this strategy came on Saturdays in the fall of

0:27:35.600 --> 0:27:38.679
<v Speaker 1>twenty twelve. The Obama campaign bought up airtime on the

0:27:38.680 --> 0:27:41.560
<v Speaker 1>Big ten network, something campaigns hadn't done before at the time,

0:27:42.000 --> 0:27:45.359
<v Speaker 1>college football Saturdays, and they hammered Romney as a job

0:27:45.480 --> 0:27:49.640
<v Speaker 1>outsourcered at China. These ad barely even mentioned Obama by name,

0:27:49.680 --> 0:27:52.159
<v Speaker 1>basically just the Barack Obama and I paid for this.

0:27:52.560 --> 0:27:56.000
<v Speaker 1>That was it. The entire thing was aimed squarely at

0:27:56.000 --> 0:28:01.680
<v Speaker 1>working class voters in Ohio, Iowa, Wisconsin, Pennsylvania, Michigan, all

0:28:01.720 --> 0:28:04.400
<v Speaker 1>five states Obama would carry in twenty twelve, by the way,

0:28:05.080 --> 0:28:06.960
<v Speaker 1>and of course these are the very states that that

0:28:07.000 --> 0:28:10.040
<v Speaker 1>working class coalition became the heart of Trump's mega coalition.

0:28:10.720 --> 0:28:13.639
<v Speaker 1>But at its core, what Obama was appealing to was class,

0:28:13.720 --> 0:28:17.040
<v Speaker 1>not identity. Obama won those voters by convincing them Romney

0:28:17.040 --> 0:28:19.679
<v Speaker 1>didn't understand their lives, he was out of touch, He

0:28:19.720 --> 0:28:25.200
<v Speaker 1>didn't get them. I'm with you, he's not right. Ultimately,

0:28:25.200 --> 0:28:28.280
<v Speaker 1>I've always believed that's the most important question. You know,

0:28:28.359 --> 0:28:31.480
<v Speaker 1>who's with you? Who do you think's with you? But

0:28:31.560 --> 0:28:34.159
<v Speaker 1>it's not the lesson Democrats absorbed from that victory in

0:28:34.160 --> 0:28:36.920
<v Speaker 1>twenty twelve. Instead, they convinced themselves Obama had won because

0:28:36.960 --> 0:28:40.000
<v Speaker 1>of demographics, because of the so called coalition of the

0:28:40.000 --> 0:28:43.440
<v Speaker 1>ascendant black voters, Latino voters, young people's, single women. They

0:28:43.480 --> 0:28:49.719
<v Speaker 1>believe demographics were destiny. Ironically, Republicans at the time, pre

0:28:49.800 --> 0:28:53.360
<v Speaker 1>Trump Republicans drew the same conclusion, just in reverse. They're

0:28:53.360 --> 0:28:56.520
<v Speaker 1>twenty thirteen Autopsy said they needed to reach out to

0:28:56.560 --> 0:29:01.720
<v Speaker 1>minority voters because identity was going to dominate future politics. Right,

0:29:02.360 --> 0:29:06.760
<v Speaker 1>both parties embraced this what now looks like faulty conventional

0:29:06.760 --> 0:29:10.840
<v Speaker 1>wisdom about what happened in twenty twelve. But what if

0:29:10.840 --> 0:29:13.160
<v Speaker 1>that was the wrong lesson? I think it was. What

0:29:13.200 --> 0:29:16.320
<v Speaker 1>if the real reason Obama won was class? What if

0:29:16.360 --> 0:29:22.040
<v Speaker 1>the decisive blow was Romney's forty seven percent remark. If

0:29:22.040 --> 0:29:24.320
<v Speaker 1>that's true, then Democrats spent the last decade chasing the

0:29:24.400 --> 0:29:28.520
<v Speaker 1>wrong's strategy, doubling down in identity politics just as class

0:29:28.600 --> 0:29:32.760
<v Speaker 1>was reasserting itself. Clinton leaned into the first woman president

0:29:32.800 --> 0:29:36.280
<v Speaker 1>in twenty sixteen, break shattering the glass ceiling. While Trump

0:29:36.280 --> 0:29:39.680
<v Speaker 1>talked about forgotten men and women, Biden tried to reclean

0:29:39.720 --> 0:29:41.920
<v Speaker 1>some of the class frame in twenty twenty, but the

0:29:41.960 --> 0:29:45.880
<v Speaker 1>party still treated identity as its foundation. Hence the promises

0:29:45.920 --> 0:29:48.440
<v Speaker 1>he made about VP and about the Spring Court. Those

0:29:48.480 --> 0:29:52.800
<v Speaker 1>were identity promises, not class promises. By twenty twenty four,

0:29:52.880 --> 0:29:55.880
<v Speaker 1>that coalition of the ascendant theory was exhausted and clearly

0:29:56.240 --> 0:30:00.720
<v Speaker 1>not big enough to win in the irony here. Trump's populism,

0:30:00.880 --> 0:30:03.520
<v Speaker 1>as cynical as it is at times, actually as more

0:30:03.560 --> 0:30:07.320
<v Speaker 1>in common with Obama's twenty twelve message, even mon Dail's

0:30:07.360 --> 0:30:10.880
<v Speaker 1>appeals back in nineteen eighty four to working class solidarity

0:30:11.880 --> 0:30:18.000
<v Speaker 1>than with Reagan's or Bush's republicanism. And that's the thing

0:30:18.040 --> 0:30:21.600
<v Speaker 1>you cannot ever forget right. The real divide of our

0:30:21.640 --> 0:30:25.560
<v Speaker 1>era hasn't been race or cultural identity. It's been class. Right,

0:30:25.640 --> 0:30:28.320
<v Speaker 1>It's what drove us in the twentieth century. So what

0:30:28.400 --> 0:30:31.160
<v Speaker 1>are the consequences of basically these two forks in the row.

0:30:31.240 --> 0:30:34.440
<v Speaker 1>Put them together micro targeting and the misreading of twenty twelve,

0:30:35.360 --> 0:30:38.840
<v Speaker 1>and you get today's politics. Campaigns that no longer practice

0:30:38.840 --> 0:30:42.800
<v Speaker 1>the muscle of unity, parties that organize themselves in identity silos.

0:30:43.360 --> 0:30:47.200
<v Speaker 1>Social media amplifies it all, and it creates a self

0:30:47.240 --> 0:30:52.400
<v Speaker 1>reinforcing cycle. Campaigns fragment us to win. Platforms reward division

0:30:52.440 --> 0:30:57.000
<v Speaker 1>because division drives engagement. Voters consume difference and sort themselves

0:30:57.160 --> 0:31:01.000
<v Speaker 1>more deeply into tribes, focusing on difference rather than on

0:31:01.440 --> 0:31:05.000
<v Speaker 1>what unites us, and parties double down on identity appeals,

0:31:05.000 --> 0:31:10.040
<v Speaker 1>treating consensus as weakness. Right, the result of politics that

0:31:10.160 --> 0:31:14.040
<v Speaker 1>overvalues division at the expense of coalition. You know, be

0:31:14.120 --> 0:31:17.080
<v Speaker 1>careful when somebody says, well, you got to stand for something. Well,

0:31:17.080 --> 0:31:19.560
<v Speaker 1>the something can be to bring the country together. That's

0:31:19.600 --> 0:31:22.200
<v Speaker 1>not a bullshit something. I think it's a good something.

0:31:22.920 --> 0:31:25.000
<v Speaker 1>But it shows up not just in campaigns, now shows

0:31:25.040 --> 0:31:28.080
<v Speaker 1>up in governing. Politicians who win by scraping fifty percent

0:31:28.080 --> 0:31:30.800
<v Speaker 1>plus one feel no obligation to reach beyond that slice.

0:31:31.160 --> 0:31:34.840
<v Speaker 1>Just look at how partisan lely both Greg Abbott and

0:31:34.880 --> 0:31:36.960
<v Speaker 1>Rond De Santis govern the state of Texas. They do

0:31:37.040 --> 0:31:39.160
<v Speaker 1>not govern the state of Texas as a whole or

0:31:39.200 --> 0:31:41.400
<v Speaker 1>the state of Florida as a whole. They only govern

0:31:41.680 --> 0:31:45.600
<v Speaker 1>the red parts. Right. They almost go to war with

0:31:45.680 --> 0:31:48.680
<v Speaker 1>the blue cities if they can. They think that's good politics.

0:31:49.680 --> 0:31:53.160
<v Speaker 1>But here's the irony. America's strength has always been the

0:31:53.160 --> 0:31:56.480
<v Speaker 1>opposite We're not an ethnic nation, we're not a religious nation.

0:31:57.560 --> 0:32:01.640
<v Speaker 1>We're a collection of people from everywhere are bound by

0:32:01.680 --> 0:32:06.560
<v Speaker 1>an idea, and at our best moments, our politics reflects that.

0:32:07.760 --> 0:32:10.200
<v Speaker 1>And here's where I want to leave you. It's worth

0:32:10.280 --> 0:32:13.160
<v Speaker 1>remembering the public does respond to unity messages if they're

0:32:13.200 --> 0:32:17.240
<v Speaker 1>delivered authentically. Right. Think back to Reagan's nineteen eighty four

0:32:17.360 --> 0:32:20.800
<v Speaker 1>Morning in America ad. That wasn't a micro targeted message.

0:32:21.040 --> 0:32:23.920
<v Speaker 1>It was a broad appeal to shared optimism, and it

0:32:24.040 --> 0:32:28.000
<v Speaker 1>worked across party lines. Obama's twenty oh four keynote address

0:32:28.040 --> 0:32:31.880
<v Speaker 1>really resonated. There is not a liberal America and a

0:32:31.920 --> 0:32:36.600
<v Speaker 1>conservative America. There is the United States of America. Speech

0:32:36.680 --> 0:32:39.800
<v Speaker 1>launched them nationally because people wanted to believe that messaging.

0:32:41.240 --> 0:32:43.840
<v Speaker 1>The lesson isn't that unity is easy or that division

0:32:43.880 --> 0:32:46.840
<v Speaker 1>will disappear. The lesson is that politicians still have a choice.

0:32:47.040 --> 0:32:50.120
<v Speaker 1>You can be a fifty percent plus one leader and

0:32:50.320 --> 0:32:54.600
<v Speaker 1>lead by division and survive politically by division. It's a

0:32:54.640 --> 0:32:57.080
<v Speaker 1>way to win, it's a way to stay in office.

0:32:57.280 --> 0:32:58.960
<v Speaker 1>It's not a way to be in the history books.

0:32:59.480 --> 0:33:02.080
<v Speaker 1>Or you can claim to be a sixty percent consensus leader.

0:33:03.160 --> 0:33:07.760
<v Speaker 1>One is arithmetic, the other is nation building. We haven't

0:33:07.760 --> 0:33:12.760
<v Speaker 1>had a nation builder as president arguably since Obama this century,

0:33:12.920 --> 0:33:16.440
<v Speaker 1>and you know we haven't. You know. The irony is

0:33:16.440 --> 0:33:18.480
<v Speaker 1>that that that you know, and maybe that was the

0:33:18.520 --> 0:33:21.000
<v Speaker 1>Cold War mentality that made us think we needed to

0:33:21.000 --> 0:33:24.240
<v Speaker 1>think this one because Reagan and Clinton in many ways

0:33:24.320 --> 0:33:27.640
<v Speaker 1>shared very similar rhetoric, even as they were of two

0:33:27.680 --> 0:33:31.560
<v Speaker 1>different political parties. Because that was the twentieth century rewarded

0:33:31.640 --> 0:33:34.920
<v Speaker 1>leaders who spoke to the whole. The twenty first century

0:33:35.000 --> 0:33:37.080
<v Speaker 1>so far as rewarded those who narrow cast to the part,

0:33:38.040 --> 0:33:41.080
<v Speaker 1>but pendulum swing and when the next leader comes along,

0:33:41.120 --> 0:33:44.920
<v Speaker 1>who can authentically summon the politics of unity, not just

0:33:44.960 --> 0:33:48.400
<v Speaker 1>say the words, but actually do it. Indeed, we're going

0:33:48.400 --> 0:33:51.280
<v Speaker 1>to rediscover something important. Americans still want to hear this,

0:33:51.960 --> 0:33:55.360
<v Speaker 1>they still want to believe this, and most importantly, I

0:33:55.400 --> 0:33:57.680
<v Speaker 1>think they want to see US government that way. So

0:33:57.720 --> 0:34:07.840
<v Speaker 1>with that, we'll sneak in a break. How are that?

0:34:07.920 --> 0:34:13.080
<v Speaker 1>Let me take a few questions ask Chuck. First, one

0:34:13.120 --> 0:34:17.399
<v Speaker 1>comes from John in Memphis and he says, I've really

0:34:17.480 --> 0:34:20.040
<v Speaker 1>enjoyed how your new media venture lets you take off

0:34:20.040 --> 0:34:23.040
<v Speaker 1>the gloves when analyzing the news. It's interesting that you

0:34:23.120 --> 0:34:25.080
<v Speaker 1>put it that way. I feel like I've always been this,

0:34:25.280 --> 0:34:29.120
<v Speaker 1>but I might I will confess to you maybe rounding

0:34:29.120 --> 0:34:32.200
<v Speaker 1>the edges in order to please bosses at times. Right,

0:34:33.040 --> 0:34:35.080
<v Speaker 1>as he said, it's been refreshing and insightful. For years,

0:34:35.080 --> 0:34:36.759
<v Speaker 1>I've been trying to understand the mindset of those who

0:34:36.800 --> 0:34:38.560
<v Speaker 1>took over the GOP and the Trump earrow, and your

0:34:38.600 --> 0:34:41.640
<v Speaker 1>ability to cut through the contradictions is invaluable. My question

0:34:41.719 --> 0:34:44.799
<v Speaker 1>is about the Republican diaspora. Do you think there's a

0:34:44.800 --> 0:34:47.880
<v Speaker 1>sizeable group of classic Reagan Conservatives outside of the Cheneys

0:34:47.920 --> 0:34:50.920
<v Speaker 1>and Kinsingers who are horrified by today's GOP but too

0:34:51.000 --> 0:34:54.520
<v Speaker 1>quiet to see if so, have they given up or

0:34:54.560 --> 0:34:58.160
<v Speaker 1>where are they? Well? I think that's the million dollar question, right.

0:34:59.000 --> 0:35:01.319
<v Speaker 1>I think we found out how many of them show

0:35:01.400 --> 0:35:06.399
<v Speaker 1>up to Republican primaries. Was what was Nikki Haley's vote total?

0:35:06.440 --> 0:35:10.520
<v Speaker 1>Somewhere somewhere between twenty percent and maybe thirty five percent

0:35:10.560 --> 0:35:14.920
<v Speaker 1>depending on the state. So it's about a third of

0:35:14.960 --> 0:35:20.440
<v Speaker 1>the party, okay, And I think this is what's made

0:35:20.760 --> 0:35:24.080
<v Speaker 1>the Democrats have a hard time figuring out how to

0:35:24.120 --> 0:35:27.600
<v Speaker 1>talk to these folks and why in some ways they

0:35:27.600 --> 0:35:30.359
<v Speaker 1>haven't won them over very well. Because the Democrats are

0:35:30.360 --> 0:35:35.160
<v Speaker 1>in their own sort of what identity crisis, right, sort

0:35:35.160 --> 0:35:38.560
<v Speaker 1>of pre you have the consensus Democrats versus probably the

0:35:38.560 --> 0:35:41.680
<v Speaker 1>progressive Democrats, right, those that look at what the look

0:35:41.719 --> 0:35:44.000
<v Speaker 1>at Trump's success and say, hey, he stood for something,

0:35:44.040 --> 0:35:46.120
<v Speaker 1>and this gets it to my whole point. Yeah, but

0:35:46.160 --> 0:35:48.319
<v Speaker 1>he did it through the politics of division and in

0:35:48.320 --> 0:35:51.040
<v Speaker 1>some ways progressive. You know, to stand for something in

0:35:51.040 --> 0:35:53.920
<v Speaker 1>progressive politics, you're also sort of embracing a form of

0:35:53.960 --> 0:35:56.520
<v Speaker 1>that politics of division, because you know, it's an US

0:35:56.560 --> 0:35:58.759
<v Speaker 1>and against you know, in some form or another. And

0:35:58.760 --> 0:36:02.640
<v Speaker 1>I don't know if that can successfully woo that center

0:36:02.719 --> 0:36:05.759
<v Speaker 1>right voter. Right that it's really the we used to

0:36:05.760 --> 0:36:09.880
<v Speaker 1>call it the managerial class, right, This where the white

0:36:09.920 --> 0:36:16.759
<v Speaker 1>collar workers, the ones that are homeowners, that were classically

0:36:16.960 --> 0:36:20.160
<v Speaker 1>sort of Eisenhower Republicans, you know, I think of the

0:36:20.200 --> 0:36:22.759
<v Speaker 1>happy days that used to be the first place where

0:36:22.760 --> 0:36:25.040
<v Speaker 1>you saw that the kids were for Stevenson and the

0:36:25.120 --> 0:36:29.719
<v Speaker 1>parents were for Eisenhower, that sort of mindset. So it is.

0:36:30.160 --> 0:36:37.520
<v Speaker 1>I So I do think there is that the it's

0:36:37.560 --> 0:36:41.000
<v Speaker 1>sort of the business class, right, the ones that want stability,

0:36:42.239 --> 0:36:45.200
<v Speaker 1>that's really what they're craving. Stability. It's why I think

0:36:45.239 --> 0:36:49.080
<v Speaker 1>some of these why Biden seems so appealing to this crowd, right?

0:36:49.200 --> 0:36:51.479
<v Speaker 1>Do why John Kasick, John kay Sick, in some ways

0:36:51.560 --> 0:36:54.760
<v Speaker 1>is probably the best avatar for the Republican you're asking

0:36:54.800 --> 0:36:58.719
<v Speaker 1>me about. He left the party, he supported Biden, and

0:36:58.760 --> 0:37:01.520
<v Speaker 1>he couldn't support him again. Right, He thought Biden was

0:37:01.560 --> 0:37:06.400
<v Speaker 1>going to be a consensus Democrat and instead Biden govern

0:37:06.440 --> 0:37:09.360
<v Speaker 1>more to the left, right, more progressive, sort of leaned

0:37:09.400 --> 0:37:12.200
<v Speaker 1>in on that end of the spectrum. And I do

0:37:12.239 --> 0:37:15.279
<v Speaker 1>think it turned off that group of Republicans. I don't

0:37:15.320 --> 0:37:17.040
<v Speaker 1>know where they went. Right. Some of them, I think

0:37:17.120 --> 0:37:20.440
<v Speaker 1>clearly voted for Trump more as an against vote. Some

0:37:20.520 --> 0:37:22.920
<v Speaker 1>of them may have voted third party, or some of

0:37:23.000 --> 0:37:26.000
<v Speaker 1>them may have skipped the ballot in the presidential a

0:37:26.040 --> 0:37:29.439
<v Speaker 1>little bit. So I think we're going to the twenty

0:37:29.480 --> 0:37:32.879
<v Speaker 1>twenty eight primary could tell us something, right, I guess

0:37:32.880 --> 0:37:37.239
<v Speaker 1>the real question is if Trump is considered to be

0:37:37.320 --> 0:37:41.319
<v Speaker 1>a failed president, and to me, it'll be how what

0:37:41.360 --> 0:37:44.000
<v Speaker 1>does the economy look like in the fall of twenty

0:37:44.040 --> 0:37:46.440
<v Speaker 1>seven when the presidential campaign is starting to kick in.

0:37:47.200 --> 0:37:49.839
<v Speaker 1>Is his theory of the case right or wrong? Right?

0:37:49.880 --> 0:37:53.840
<v Speaker 1>Did the tariffs work or are they considered a spectacular failure?

0:37:54.280 --> 0:37:56.359
<v Speaker 1>And I think by the fall of twenty seven will

0:37:56.400 --> 0:37:59.680
<v Speaker 1>have a clear answer on this. And if it's a failure,

0:37:59.760 --> 0:38:03.920
<v Speaker 1>I think I think you will see this silent minority

0:38:03.920 --> 0:38:07.640
<v Speaker 1>of Republicans begin to speak up. But if it's seen

0:38:07.680 --> 0:38:12.799
<v Speaker 1>as semi successful, some of them may become like Marco

0:38:12.920 --> 0:38:18.080
<v Speaker 1>Rubio and just acquiesce and move closer into that direction. So,

0:38:20.520 --> 0:38:23.520
<v Speaker 1>like I said, the polling indicates if you look at

0:38:23.520 --> 0:38:27.319
<v Speaker 1>the primary season in twenty four, it's somewhere in the

0:38:28.160 --> 0:38:30.840
<v Speaker 1>twenty to thirty five. You know, I think it's about

0:38:30.840 --> 0:38:33.759
<v Speaker 1>a third of the party that fits your definition there.

0:38:35.800 --> 0:38:40.360
<v Speaker 1>The question is whether they're in many cases they're the

0:38:40.400 --> 0:38:43.040
<v Speaker 1>donor class. That's the irony here, the big donor class.

0:38:45.120 --> 0:38:47.359
<v Speaker 1>I don't think they liked this economic model that Trump

0:38:47.480 --> 0:38:51.239
<v Speaker 1>is put together. Do they reassert them? So I think

0:38:51.440 --> 0:38:53.480
<v Speaker 1>if it's seen as a collective failure in a couple

0:38:53.520 --> 0:38:57.240
<v Speaker 1>of years, I think this this winging tries to reassert itself.

0:38:58.440 --> 0:39:03.520
<v Speaker 1>Next question comes from a Receives Pallo from three es Day, Italy.

0:39:03.760 --> 0:39:05.960
<v Speaker 1>Dear mister toddam an Italian engineer who has followed your

0:39:06.000 --> 0:39:08.560
<v Speaker 1>work since twenty eighteen, and I appreciate how you called

0:39:08.640 --> 0:39:10.920
<v Speaker 1>out health Secretary Kennedy and the Gang of ding Dong's

0:39:10.960 --> 0:39:14.000
<v Speaker 1>for undermining the US health system. We faced a similar

0:39:14.040 --> 0:39:16.920
<v Speaker 1>situation in Italy when two anti VAXX figures were appointed

0:39:16.960 --> 0:39:20.720
<v Speaker 1>to our National Vaccine Council, until public pressure forced their removal.

0:39:21.000 --> 0:39:23.239
<v Speaker 1>I've just finished Why the South Won the Civil War

0:39:23.280 --> 0:39:25.279
<v Speaker 1>by Heather Cox Richardson, and I was struck by the

0:39:25.520 --> 0:39:28.280
<v Speaker 1>parallels between the oligarchs of eighteen sixty fighting to preserve

0:39:28.360 --> 0:39:31.359
<v Speaker 1>privilege in today's elites working to restore it, except now

0:39:31.360 --> 0:39:33.719
<v Speaker 1>the president seems aligned with them. My question is, have

0:39:33.800 --> 0:39:35.279
<v Speaker 1>you read the book and do you think history is

0:39:35.320 --> 0:39:38.480
<v Speaker 1>repeating itself in this way. I've not read that book,

0:39:38.960 --> 0:39:43.600
<v Speaker 1>and I actually I have a similar thesis, but it

0:39:43.920 --> 0:39:45.920
<v Speaker 1>isn't it's less. I mean, there was some of that.

0:39:46.040 --> 0:39:50.000
<v Speaker 1>I think it's I think the better comparison is really

0:39:50.480 --> 0:39:55.360
<v Speaker 1>twenty years later and sort of what we saw the

0:39:55.440 --> 0:39:59.480
<v Speaker 1>Republican Party of the late nineteenth century morph into, which

0:39:59.600 --> 0:40:01.759
<v Speaker 1>did into sort of the you know, where they sort

0:40:01.760 --> 0:40:05.680
<v Speaker 1>of align themselves with the industrialists if you will, And

0:40:06.600 --> 0:40:09.680
<v Speaker 1>you know, there was you could argue that in eighteen

0:40:09.760 --> 0:40:12.360
<v Speaker 1>sixty there were different you know, you had some that

0:40:13.280 --> 0:40:16.080
<v Speaker 1>were making a business case against slavery and some that

0:40:16.120 --> 0:40:20.280
<v Speaker 1>were making a business case against disrupting the Southern economy,

0:40:20.680 --> 0:40:23.440
<v Speaker 1>which is one of the arguments that gets made about

0:40:23.560 --> 0:40:26.799
<v Speaker 1>that period of time. I think it's just a clearer contrast.

0:40:26.840 --> 0:40:31.239
<v Speaker 1>But you know, it's just all about what are you

0:40:32.120 --> 0:40:34.840
<v Speaker 1>Are you comparing it to the essentially the eighteen fifties,

0:40:34.920 --> 0:40:37.520
<v Speaker 1>or are you comparing it what I think we're sort

0:40:37.520 --> 0:40:41.720
<v Speaker 1>of repeating, which is circa eighteen eighty to nineteen nineteen

0:40:41.760 --> 0:40:44.840
<v Speaker 1>twenty eight, right, which you know culminated with the Great Depression,

0:40:46.160 --> 0:40:49.080
<v Speaker 1>and that was a huge right and in that sense

0:40:49.760 --> 0:40:52.440
<v Speaker 1>you had the Republican Party of that era align itself

0:40:52.440 --> 0:40:56.880
<v Speaker 1>with the industrialists, and the protectionism was about protecting American

0:40:57.480 --> 0:41:01.320
<v Speaker 1>business because back then trade seemed common implicated and if anything,

0:41:01.320 --> 0:41:04.600
<v Speaker 1>we were always trying to protect our borders. It is

0:41:05.239 --> 0:41:09.040
<v Speaker 1>you know, today's big business would prefer to be global.

0:41:09.719 --> 0:41:13.880
<v Speaker 1>The industrialists of the eighteen nineties through the nineteen twenties

0:41:14.120 --> 0:41:16.480
<v Speaker 1>they wanted they didn't they didn't see any money to

0:41:16.520 --> 0:41:20.000
<v Speaker 1>be made overseas. They wanted to protect their investments here.

0:41:20.880 --> 0:41:24.880
<v Speaker 1>And so that's where I think the brologarchs and the

0:41:24.920 --> 0:41:27.799
<v Speaker 1>industrialists at that era sort of that that is where

0:41:27.840 --> 0:41:30.000
<v Speaker 1>the commonality is. So I don't, like I said, I

0:41:30.080 --> 0:41:37.200
<v Speaker 1>think there is. They definitely think that. I guess I'm

0:41:37.239 --> 0:41:41.400
<v Speaker 1>more of post Civil war. Our post civil war politics

0:41:42.239 --> 0:41:45.319
<v Speaker 1>is where what today feels like more so than the

0:41:45.360 --> 0:41:50.680
<v Speaker 1>pre Civil war politics. But you know, from sixty thousand feet,

0:41:51.120 --> 0:41:54.480
<v Speaker 1>her thesis and my thesis look more similar than different

0:41:54.800 --> 0:41:59.000
<v Speaker 1>on that, so I do need it to I've read

0:41:59.000 --> 0:42:03.000
<v Speaker 1>her columns on this, but I will She's not. She's

0:42:03.000 --> 0:42:06.080
<v Speaker 1>not the first one to sort of frame that, right.

0:42:06.280 --> 0:42:08.400
<v Speaker 1>You know, there's always been this idea that the South

0:42:08.480 --> 0:42:11.200
<v Speaker 1>lost on the battlefield but won the culture right, and

0:42:11.239 --> 0:42:13.480
<v Speaker 1>the longer we go right, they won the post war

0:42:13.560 --> 0:42:17.000
<v Speaker 1>with the with with all the rise of the anti

0:42:17.040 --> 0:42:20.480
<v Speaker 1>Bellum movement and all that business that they've they've done

0:42:20.480 --> 0:42:22.480
<v Speaker 1>a better. You know. It's sort of like the Russians,

0:42:23.480 --> 0:42:26.759
<v Speaker 1>right lost, the lost the Cold War, yet Putin has

0:42:26.800 --> 0:42:31.880
<v Speaker 1>done a better job spinning things on Russia's behalf sometimes

0:42:31.880 --> 0:42:34.400
<v Speaker 1>than the West has. And in this case, the South

0:42:35.080 --> 0:42:37.920
<v Speaker 1>has done a better job spinning things and winning the

0:42:37.960 --> 0:42:40.720
<v Speaker 1>culture even as they lost on the battlefield and lost

0:42:40.760 --> 0:42:44.839
<v Speaker 1>in the at the battot box for a time. Next

0:42:44.880 --> 0:42:50.040
<v Speaker 1>question comes from anonymous all Right, isn't anyone worried about

0:42:50.040 --> 0:42:51.640
<v Speaker 1>the fact that Trump might be trying to take over

0:42:51.640 --> 0:42:53.440
<v Speaker 1>the capital so that he can dictate the results of

0:42:53.480 --> 0:42:55.560
<v Speaker 1>the next presidential election. He tried to do the same

0:42:55.600 --> 0:42:57.680
<v Speaker 1>thing last time around, but the DC police stopped him.

0:42:57.719 --> 0:43:00.360
<v Speaker 1>With Republican States sending the National Guard into DC, it

0:43:00.400 --> 0:43:02.880
<v Speaker 1>would seem that the stage is being set for conflict

0:43:02.880 --> 0:43:07.600
<v Speaker 1>between the red and blue states. Well, I am as

0:43:07.680 --> 0:43:11.160
<v Speaker 1>you know, I think it's a you can look at

0:43:11.200 --> 0:43:14.680
<v Speaker 1>things through one eye and say, Jesus, this is This

0:43:14.719 --> 0:43:16.560
<v Speaker 1>goes back to a bit of this the last question.

0:43:17.160 --> 0:43:19.399
<v Speaker 1>This is the eighteen fifties, and we're on our way

0:43:20.160 --> 0:43:23.960
<v Speaker 1>to some sort of war between the states. Right. This

0:43:24.120 --> 0:43:27.920
<v Speaker 1>redistricting battle between Texas and California is a proxy. Right,

0:43:27.960 --> 0:43:31.400
<v Speaker 1>It's a war between the states. Right, The fight for

0:43:31.480 --> 0:43:34.760
<v Speaker 1>political power of the country is being waged state by state.

0:43:36.719 --> 0:43:41.120
<v Speaker 1>That's a similarity. That's a little bit uncomfortable think about.

0:43:42.360 --> 0:43:45.680
<v Speaker 1>Look at this point, I still believe in the will

0:43:45.719 --> 0:43:48.560
<v Speaker 1>of the voter to win out. But I do think

0:43:48.640 --> 0:43:52.520
<v Speaker 1>it's obvious that Donald Trump is not a constitutionalist, right.

0:43:52.600 --> 0:43:56.040
<v Speaker 1>I mean, you know, I'm of the if we're going

0:43:56.120 --> 0:43:59.480
<v Speaker 1>to sort ourselves right now, let's sort ourselves properly. Are

0:43:59.480 --> 0:44:05.520
<v Speaker 1>you a constantitutionalists or aren't you? You don't have to

0:44:05.560 --> 0:44:09.279
<v Speaker 1>be an ideological agreement on ideas on what to do

0:44:09.320 --> 0:44:11.480
<v Speaker 1>with the economy, what to do with healthcare, things like that,

0:44:12.360 --> 0:44:14.200
<v Speaker 1>to be on the same side when it comes to

0:44:14.200 --> 0:44:17.880
<v Speaker 1>the Constitution, and it's clear he doesn't believe in it,

0:44:17.920 --> 0:44:21.200
<v Speaker 1>he doesn't care about the separation of powers, that stuff.

0:44:21.520 --> 0:44:24.880
<v Speaker 1>I mean, you know, it's frustrating to me when somebody

0:44:24.920 --> 0:44:28.279
<v Speaker 1>is in that high of elective office and probably has

0:44:28.360 --> 0:44:32.200
<v Speaker 1>never read a federalist paper. You know, I sort of

0:44:32.239 --> 0:44:35.680
<v Speaker 1>look at this, you know, I want somebody who wants

0:44:35.680 --> 0:44:37.920
<v Speaker 1>to be a senator or a member of Congress to

0:44:38.040 --> 0:44:41.360
<v Speaker 1>know more about this stuff than I do. And it

0:44:41.480 --> 0:44:44.320
<v Speaker 1>bugs the shit out of me when it's crystal clear

0:44:44.640 --> 0:44:51.160
<v Speaker 1>these people hold offices are that only exists because of

0:44:51.200 --> 0:44:54.280
<v Speaker 1>the Constitution, and yet they've never bothered to read the history.

0:44:54.719 --> 0:44:56.440
<v Speaker 1>You know, when I join a company, I like to

0:44:56.520 --> 0:44:58.520
<v Speaker 1>know the history of the company. How did it become

0:44:58.520 --> 0:45:01.480
<v Speaker 1>what it is? Right? I like, you know it is.

0:45:01.600 --> 0:45:05.600
<v Speaker 1>It is startling to me how few, how few folks

0:45:07.520 --> 0:45:10.480
<v Speaker 1>really and truly understand right that the Constitution was a

0:45:10.520 --> 0:45:16.759
<v Speaker 1>compromise right, the entire country was formed. The Republic was

0:45:16.800 --> 0:45:20.840
<v Speaker 1>formed as a compromise because we didn't have consensus on

0:45:20.880 --> 0:45:23.799
<v Speaker 1>what kind of breakoff country we should be, so we

0:45:23.920 --> 0:45:27.080
<v Speaker 1>came up with the best way to create compromise anywhere

0:45:27.080 --> 0:45:31.840
<v Speaker 1>we could find it. And when you see, you know,

0:45:31.920 --> 0:45:37.279
<v Speaker 1>he just doesn't believe in these things, and so you know,

0:45:37.360 --> 0:45:41.040
<v Speaker 1>I'm concerned he could use he could sort of use

0:45:41.120 --> 0:45:44.120
<v Speaker 1>the will of the people in his head. You know, Hey,

0:45:44.239 --> 0:45:46.080
<v Speaker 1>this is what they wanted. So I'm gonna abide by

0:45:46.120 --> 0:45:51.680
<v Speaker 1>that as a way to break constitutional restrictions, like when

0:45:51.680 --> 0:45:53.839
<v Speaker 1>it comes to the vote count, running for a third term,

0:45:53.880 --> 0:46:02.840
<v Speaker 1>et cetera. I will say this, one of the reasons

0:46:02.880 --> 0:46:06.719
<v Speaker 1>I'm less worked up about Trump running a fourth time,

0:46:06.920 --> 0:46:10.120
<v Speaker 1>trying to get a third term, or whether he abides

0:46:10.120 --> 0:46:15.320
<v Speaker 1>by the elections or not, frankly, is is he doesn't

0:46:15.360 --> 0:46:19.120
<v Speaker 1>live a very healthy life. And he you know, I

0:46:19.120 --> 0:46:22.000
<v Speaker 1>don't think you know, I just don't think he's I

0:46:22.000 --> 0:46:24.279
<v Speaker 1>don't think he's going to be healthy enough to run

0:46:24.280 --> 0:46:26.480
<v Speaker 1>for president again. And I think that's going to get

0:46:26.520 --> 0:46:29.040
<v Speaker 1>clear and clear. All the time. We've seen some of

0:46:29.080 --> 0:46:31.799
<v Speaker 1>the some of the symptoms that he seems to have,

0:46:31.920 --> 0:46:36.520
<v Speaker 1>so he's he's going to have to. You know, Mother

0:46:36.640 --> 0:46:40.680
<v Speaker 1>Nature and Father Time are both undefeated on that front.

0:46:41.200 --> 0:46:44.359
<v Speaker 1>But you know, he certainly is feeling his oats and

0:46:44.400 --> 0:46:48.280
<v Speaker 1>he is. There's no doubt that he has an information

0:46:48.440 --> 0:46:53.239
<v Speaker 1>feedback loop that is really warped that he doesn't sort

0:46:53.280 --> 0:46:56.440
<v Speaker 1>of understand how unpopular he actually is outside of his

0:46:56.520 --> 0:47:03.279
<v Speaker 1>group of folks. But you know, I understand. Here's the thing.

0:47:03.400 --> 0:47:06.759
<v Speaker 1>I always two years ago, I would have dismissed your

0:47:06.760 --> 0:47:09.080
<v Speaker 1>comment as alarmist, and I'm not going to do that now.

0:47:10.160 --> 0:47:13.880
<v Speaker 1>I just think we should be prepared for anything, and

0:47:13.920 --> 0:47:17.320
<v Speaker 1>we should be prepared for anything. I still have faith

0:47:17.320 --> 0:47:20.279
<v Speaker 1>in the American voter. I still have faith in over

0:47:20.360 --> 0:47:22.600
<v Speaker 1>time we're going to get it right, and that the

0:47:22.680 --> 0:47:25.279
<v Speaker 1>voter sentiment is going to win out, and that there

0:47:25.360 --> 0:47:31.000
<v Speaker 1>are there's still there's still a there's still some good

0:47:31.160 --> 0:47:33.799
<v Speaker 1>in Darth Vader, whoever you view as Darth Vader in

0:47:33.840 --> 0:47:40.080
<v Speaker 1>this moment. I'm going to leave it at that. On

0:47:40.160 --> 0:47:43.799
<v Speaker 1>that uplifting Darth Vader moment, Right, We've got to hope

0:47:43.800 --> 0:47:47.000
<v Speaker 1>that maybe Star Wars shows the way just a little bit,

0:47:47.840 --> 0:47:52.000
<v Speaker 1>just a little bit. There's always there's always someone who

0:47:52.080 --> 0:47:56.680
<v Speaker 1>can't who can't truly you know, somebody is going to

0:47:56.719 --> 0:47:58.880
<v Speaker 1>step up. I'll put it this way. It's something I

0:47:58.880 --> 0:48:00.960
<v Speaker 1>said to them. I've said to my own family members

0:48:01.000 --> 0:48:05.120
<v Speaker 1>over time. Be careful judging some people in the moment,

0:48:05.280 --> 0:48:07.120
<v Speaker 1>because you never know when one of these people you

0:48:07.160 --> 0:48:10.920
<v Speaker 1>don't like in the moment becomes the hero that stands

0:48:10.920 --> 0:48:16.080
<v Speaker 1>in the breach. Think Mike Pence January sixth, Think Liz Cheney,

0:48:16.680 --> 0:48:19.799
<v Speaker 1>I think John Bolton. These are people that I bet

0:48:19.840 --> 0:48:25.160
<v Speaker 1>you some of you listening to circa twenty sixteen didn't

0:48:25.200 --> 0:48:27.640
<v Speaker 1>have you didn't think much of them. What do you

0:48:27.640 --> 0:48:32.280
<v Speaker 1>think about those people today? There's you know, I still

0:48:32.440 --> 0:48:38.160
<v Speaker 1>think that that you sort of have to at the

0:48:38.280 --> 0:48:43.360
<v Speaker 1>end of the day. Right, Democracy only thrives if the

0:48:43.440 --> 0:48:46.000
<v Speaker 1>will of the people is respected and if the will

0:48:46.040 --> 0:48:47.960
<v Speaker 1>of the people is noticed. And I guess I'd like

0:48:48.000 --> 0:48:49.680
<v Speaker 1>to think that both of those things are still going

0:48:49.719 --> 0:48:53.400
<v Speaker 1>to be true with just enough people to keep us

0:48:53.440 --> 0:48:56.759
<v Speaker 1>from totally collapsing. But I can't dismiss your question and

0:48:56.800 --> 0:49:00.640
<v Speaker 1>your concern that I can. All right, for that, We'll

0:49:00.680 --> 0:49:03.399
<v Speaker 1>take a twenty for hour break until we upload again.