1 00:00:00,200 --> 00:00:02,360 Speaker 1: You gotta let the players know that the world is 2 00:00:02,480 --> 00:00:05,440 Speaker 1: changing for them. They're the ones on the field, they're 3 00:00:05,440 --> 00:00:09,240 Speaker 1: the ones playing your game. They are your product. 4 00:00:15,000 --> 00:00:18,200 Speaker 2: Let's hit the inside scoop with FT senior insider Ken Rosenthal. Ken, 5 00:00:18,320 --> 00:00:21,079 Speaker 2: great story, really really well put together by you and 6 00:00:21,079 --> 00:00:23,319 Speaker 2: the team over at the Athletics. So what can you 7 00:00:23,400 --> 00:00:26,040 Speaker 2: tell us about it? And also, were you as shocked 8 00:00:26,079 --> 00:00:28,240 Speaker 2: as I was when you first started hearing about this 9 00:00:28,440 --> 00:00:31,560 Speaker 2: and the lack of communication with the league and everyone 10 00:00:31,560 --> 00:00:33,360 Speaker 2: else involved in actually playing the sport. 11 00:00:34,280 --> 00:00:37,880 Speaker 1: Yes, And I'll give you the genesis of this. During 12 00:00:38,000 --> 00:00:40,560 Speaker 1: spring training, where maybe it was recently, it was actually 13 00:00:40,560 --> 00:00:45,400 Speaker 1: more recently than that. Players came to Jason Stark and said, Hey, 14 00:00:46,520 --> 00:00:50,879 Speaker 1: something's up with the zone and it's smaller, it's different. 15 00:00:51,040 --> 00:00:51,880 Speaker 3: We don't get it. 16 00:00:52,920 --> 00:00:55,680 Speaker 1: Can you look into this? So Jason started looking into 17 00:00:55,680 --> 00:00:59,880 Speaker 1: it and found that, yes, there is a difference in 18 00:01:00,120 --> 00:01:02,880 Speaker 1: the buffer zone part of the well, it's not even 19 00:01:02,920 --> 00:01:05,160 Speaker 1: part of the strike zone. It's around the strike zone. 20 00:01:05,240 --> 00:01:08,680 Speaker 1: It's been reduced from two inches all the way around 21 00:01:08,760 --> 00:01:10,679 Speaker 1: to three quarters of an inch all the way around. 22 00:01:11,000 --> 00:01:13,600 Speaker 1: This was something that was agreed to by MLB and 23 00:01:13,640 --> 00:01:18,600 Speaker 1: the umpires in the umpire's newest CBA. So okay, we'll 24 00:01:18,640 --> 00:01:20,399 Speaker 1: get to that in a second and why they did 25 00:01:20,440 --> 00:01:23,160 Speaker 1: it and the effects of it, but part of the 26 00:01:23,240 --> 00:01:26,520 Speaker 1: story is about how, yes, as you mentioned, Scott, it 27 00:01:26,560 --> 00:01:30,240 Speaker 1: took so many people by surprise. Now, MLB claims that 28 00:01:30,319 --> 00:01:34,360 Speaker 1: it communicated it properly to pretty much all the parties involved, 29 00:01:34,760 --> 00:01:38,800 Speaker 1: and that may be true in MLB's eyes, but clearly 30 00:01:38,840 --> 00:01:41,680 Speaker 1: there was a breakdown in communication at some point here 31 00:01:42,240 --> 00:01:45,479 Speaker 1: because we talked to club officials that were not aware 32 00:01:45,520 --> 00:01:47,480 Speaker 1: of this, We talked to managers as you quoted that 33 00:01:47,520 --> 00:01:49,720 Speaker 1: we're not aware of this. We have players on the 34 00:01:49,800 --> 00:01:53,120 Speaker 1: record and managers on the record saying this kind of 35 00:01:53,160 --> 00:01:56,040 Speaker 1: took them by surprise, not kind of took them by surprise. 36 00:01:56,600 --> 00:02:00,400 Speaker 1: So that to me is one thing here, But the 37 00:02:00,560 --> 00:02:04,200 Speaker 1: overriding thing, really, the most important thing for the sake 38 00:02:04,200 --> 00:02:06,800 Speaker 1: of the game, is that this is a good thing. 39 00:02:07,440 --> 00:02:10,360 Speaker 1: It's a good thing because the rule book strike zone 40 00:02:10,440 --> 00:02:13,000 Speaker 1: is going to be called more accurately when you shrink 41 00:02:13,080 --> 00:02:15,079 Speaker 1: the size of the buffer zone. And let me explain 42 00:02:15,120 --> 00:02:17,760 Speaker 1: with that is the buffer zone is the area that, 43 00:02:18,040 --> 00:02:20,240 Speaker 1: as I said, is a couple of inches or was 44 00:02:21,000 --> 00:02:23,680 Speaker 1: around the strike zone. But that was an area in 45 00:02:23,760 --> 00:02:27,280 Speaker 1: which an umpire, if he had a missed call in 46 00:02:27,320 --> 00:02:30,000 Speaker 1: that area, it would not count against him in the evaluation. 47 00:02:30,160 --> 00:02:33,679 Speaker 1: And that was the change in the umpire CBA that, yes, 48 00:02:33,760 --> 00:02:37,280 Speaker 1: the buffer zone would shrink, and that was an area 49 00:02:37,440 --> 00:02:41,919 Speaker 1: in which they could be judged less harshly if they 50 00:02:41,919 --> 00:02:45,320 Speaker 1: missed a call there. But they felt this would get 51 00:02:45,720 --> 00:02:47,919 Speaker 1: closer to the rule book definition of the strike zone, 52 00:02:47,960 --> 00:02:51,000 Speaker 1: and everyone agreed with it. So umpires agreed to be 53 00:02:51,040 --> 00:02:55,120 Speaker 1: evaluated differently. But that has caused a change in the 54 00:02:55,120 --> 00:02:58,000 Speaker 1: way the game is being played now. MLB says it's 55 00:02:58,040 --> 00:03:00,920 Speaker 1: not a significant change. The player that we talked to 56 00:03:02,280 --> 00:03:05,720 Speaker 1: said maybe not, but it's certainly something. And I talked 57 00:03:05,720 --> 00:03:07,800 Speaker 1: to some front office people as well, who said, hey, hey, 58 00:03:07,919 --> 00:03:11,880 Speaker 1: wait a second, because the zone is being called tighter, 59 00:03:12,880 --> 00:03:15,440 Speaker 1: we have to change our framing models. We have to 60 00:03:15,480 --> 00:03:18,240 Speaker 1: look at things completely differently. Maybe we have to get 61 00:03:18,280 --> 00:03:22,600 Speaker 1: more patient hitters because there are fewer strikes being thrown now. Again, 62 00:03:22,720 --> 00:03:26,160 Speaker 1: MLB insists that there are not fewer strikes being thrown 63 00:03:26,160 --> 00:03:29,639 Speaker 1: and that it's essentially a wash, but it's just an 64 00:03:29,680 --> 00:03:32,480 Speaker 1: interesting story from the perspective of one. This change has 65 00:03:32,520 --> 00:03:35,680 Speaker 1: taken place and the change was made in order to 66 00:03:35,920 --> 00:03:39,920 Speaker 1: get the strike zone called more accurately and consistently. Good thing. 67 00:03:40,680 --> 00:03:44,040 Speaker 1: The issue is that obviously a lot of people who 68 00:03:44,040 --> 00:03:47,080 Speaker 1: should have known about it didn't know about it. Despite 69 00:03:47,200 --> 00:03:50,080 Speaker 1: MLB's claims that yes, we told them about it. 70 00:03:51,360 --> 00:03:53,600 Speaker 4: You make a lot of really good points. Now my 71 00:03:53,720 --> 00:03:56,680 Speaker 4: question to you be I know you've talked to some players. 72 00:03:56,680 --> 00:04:00,680 Speaker 4: Have you talked to catchers specifically about this, because it's 73 00:04:00,720 --> 00:04:03,280 Speaker 4: not only pitchers, but also catchers are the ones that 74 00:04:03,320 --> 00:04:05,160 Speaker 4: are getting away with some kind of frames and all 75 00:04:05,160 --> 00:04:07,080 Speaker 4: that kind of stuff, like is it changing the way 76 00:04:07,120 --> 00:04:07,920 Speaker 4: they're catching now? 77 00:04:09,800 --> 00:04:11,960 Speaker 1: I don't know that we asked that question specifically, but 78 00:04:12,000 --> 00:04:15,400 Speaker 1: Travis Darnaut is quoted in the article as saying everyone's 79 00:04:15,480 --> 00:04:19,360 Speaker 1: zone has shrunk, and that is clearly what has happened here. Now, 80 00:04:19,400 --> 00:04:22,560 Speaker 1: it's not again a change in the definition of the 81 00:04:22,600 --> 00:04:24,919 Speaker 1: strike zone. It's really important to know that the actual 82 00:04:24,960 --> 00:04:27,480 Speaker 1: strike zone, by the rule book is exactly the same. 83 00:04:27,920 --> 00:04:31,080 Speaker 1: The difference is in that buffer zone in which umpires 84 00:04:31,120 --> 00:04:35,360 Speaker 1: are allowed to essentially miss. That zone has shrunk from 85 00:04:35,400 --> 00:04:37,400 Speaker 1: two inches around, as I said, to three quarters of 86 00:04:37,400 --> 00:04:40,520 Speaker 1: an inch round, and that's where the difference is from 87 00:04:40,560 --> 00:04:44,760 Speaker 1: before so we did not ask catchers specifically about the 88 00:04:44,760 --> 00:04:48,839 Speaker 1: framing aspect, but club officials told us, yes, we've changed 89 00:04:48,839 --> 00:04:52,840 Speaker 1: our framing models in the ways we've evaluated catchers or 90 00:04:52,880 --> 00:04:56,200 Speaker 1: started to evaluate a catchers because we have noticed a difference. 91 00:04:56,440 --> 00:04:59,400 Speaker 1: One team told me in the last two weeks, they've 92 00:04:59,440 --> 00:05:02,440 Speaker 1: been starting at ask these questions, what's going on? How 93 00:05:02,440 --> 00:05:06,120 Speaker 1: do we adapt? Clearly teams were caught by surprise. 94 00:05:07,360 --> 00:05:12,559 Speaker 3: Why does Major League Baseball feel like rules implementations or 95 00:05:12,839 --> 00:05:16,039 Speaker 3: stuff like this, like implementing things that actually affect the 96 00:05:16,120 --> 00:05:20,919 Speaker 3: game don't need to be not more negotiated, But just 97 00:05:21,320 --> 00:05:23,719 Speaker 3: is it a big brother complex by Major League Baseball 98 00:05:23,880 --> 00:05:28,240 Speaker 3: or is it a avoiding or is it avoiding confrontation and 99 00:05:28,279 --> 00:05:30,640 Speaker 3: we're just trying to do what's best for the game, 100 00:05:30,839 --> 00:05:32,120 Speaker 3: and yet they're hurting it. 101 00:05:33,680 --> 00:05:37,159 Speaker 1: Eric, I don't know the answer to that. My thinking 102 00:05:37,279 --> 00:05:41,640 Speaker 1: here is what should have happened is that MLB, much 103 00:05:41,760 --> 00:05:44,479 Speaker 1: like it did when it rolled out ABS and spring training, 104 00:05:44,960 --> 00:05:47,960 Speaker 1: should have put this out there in the public saying, hey, 105 00:05:48,000 --> 00:05:50,200 Speaker 1: here's what's going on. This is what they did with ABS. 106 00:05:50,279 --> 00:05:53,080 Speaker 1: It was very clear, it was very well publicized. Here's 107 00:05:53,120 --> 00:05:55,360 Speaker 1: what it's going to be this spring we're testing it, 108 00:05:55,400 --> 00:05:58,840 Speaker 1: et cetera. They should have done the same with this said. Listen, 109 00:05:59,080 --> 00:06:01,960 Speaker 1: here's what's going on. We're shrinking the buffer zone. The 110 00:06:02,040 --> 00:06:06,200 Speaker 1: goal of shrinking the buffer zone is to make the 111 00:06:06,279 --> 00:06:09,160 Speaker 1: calls by umpires at home plate on balls and strikes 112 00:06:09,240 --> 00:06:12,200 Speaker 1: more consistent, more accurate. That's the goal. It's a goal 113 00:06:12,200 --> 00:06:15,320 Speaker 1: that's being accomplished. You see the accuracies numbers right there. 114 00:06:15,760 --> 00:06:18,480 Speaker 1: MLB says, this is the most accurate balls and strikes 115 00:06:18,520 --> 00:06:20,240 Speaker 1: have been called in the stackcast era. 116 00:06:20,800 --> 00:06:22,320 Speaker 3: This is a good thing. 117 00:06:22,839 --> 00:06:25,719 Speaker 1: This is something that yes, pictures would have objected to 118 00:06:25,920 --> 00:06:28,920 Speaker 1: and will object to, because obviously it's harder to throw 119 00:06:28,960 --> 00:06:32,320 Speaker 1: a strike or a call strike. But at the same time, 120 00:06:32,920 --> 00:06:36,800 Speaker 1: hitters love it. Obviously they want the zone called more accurately, 121 00:06:37,279 --> 00:06:41,479 Speaker 1: and it's something that all fans could understand and embrace 122 00:06:41,800 --> 00:06:45,440 Speaker 1: if it was just presented that way. And the mere 123 00:06:45,560 --> 00:06:49,560 Speaker 1: fact that so many people who should have known say 124 00:06:49,600 --> 00:06:53,800 Speaker 1: they didn't know. That's a problem, and it's a problem 125 00:06:53,920 --> 00:06:56,960 Speaker 1: MLB might not want to acknowledge, but it's a problem, 126 00:06:57,040 --> 00:07:00,440 Speaker 1: and you're right, Eric, it undermines which should be a 127 00:07:00,480 --> 00:07:04,480 Speaker 1: good thing. More consistent and accurate bull shtrike calls. 128 00:07:05,720 --> 00:07:09,680 Speaker 2: Kratz. Let's talk about the number one recommended dermatologist hair 129 00:07:09,720 --> 00:07:12,880 Speaker 2: growth supplement brand. And it's a brand that you are 130 00:07:12,920 --> 00:07:13,920 Speaker 2: just starting your journey with. 131 00:07:14,680 --> 00:07:17,160 Speaker 3: I'm using what about one and a half two months 132 00:07:17,160 --> 00:07:20,200 Speaker 3: into my journey. It's a six month journey. See where, 133 00:07:20,320 --> 00:07:23,800 Speaker 3: See what I can get? See a little thicker, fuller everywhere, 134 00:07:23,960 --> 00:07:26,520 Speaker 3: filling it out. I don't know, We'll see what happens. 135 00:07:26,840 --> 00:07:30,920 Speaker 2: I'm very excited to see the Neutrofoil results with KRATS 136 00:07:31,120 --> 00:07:33,240 Speaker 2: And don't show us you're hat yet. Okay, you got 137 00:07:33,360 --> 00:07:36,240 Speaker 2: to stay tuned through this journey. And if you want 138 00:07:36,240 --> 00:07:39,520 Speaker 2: to join KRATS for this journey, you can start your 139 00:07:39,560 --> 00:07:42,800 Speaker 2: hair growth journey with neutrofol For a limited time, Neutrofoil 140 00:07:42,880 --> 00:07:46,200 Speaker 2: is offering FT listeners ten dollars off your first month 141 00:07:46,280 --> 00:07:49,360 Speaker 2: subscription and free shipping when you go to nutrofol dot 142 00:07:49,360 --> 00:07:52,520 Speaker 2: com and enter the promo code foul. Find out why 143 00:07:52,600 --> 00:07:56,920 Speaker 2: over forty five hundred healthcare professionals and stylists recommend nutrifol 144 00:07:57,000 --> 00:08:01,120 Speaker 2: for healthier hair. Nutrifold dot com spelled and utr aol 145 00:08:01,280 --> 00:08:04,960 Speaker 2: dot com promo code foul. That's neutrafold dot com promo 146 00:08:05,000 --> 00:08:05,960 Speaker 2: code foul. 147 00:08:07,640 --> 00:08:12,320 Speaker 3: Is this a forward thinking by MLB by saying, hey, 148 00:08:12,320 --> 00:08:15,080 Speaker 3: we're transitting, most likely transitioning to the challenge system. And 149 00:08:15,120 --> 00:08:16,600 Speaker 3: I know this was put out in the winter meeting, 150 00:08:16,640 --> 00:08:19,000 Speaker 3: so this was even before the Challenge system was implemented 151 00:08:19,000 --> 00:08:21,160 Speaker 3: in the spring training. Is this going to make it 152 00:08:21,200 --> 00:08:25,080 Speaker 3: an easier transition to the challenge system or is it? Hey, 153 00:08:25,200 --> 00:08:28,440 Speaker 3: if we shrink this, umpires are getting it right. Maybe 154 00:08:28,480 --> 00:08:30,360 Speaker 3: we don't need the challenge system. 155 00:08:30,880 --> 00:08:33,040 Speaker 1: No, I expect we're going to have the Challenge system. 156 00:08:33,280 --> 00:08:36,600 Speaker 1: And I'm not sure this was done at all with 157 00:08:36,760 --> 00:08:39,200 Speaker 1: ABS in mind. It seems to me that it was 158 00:08:39,240 --> 00:08:42,079 Speaker 1: done simply to get balls and strikes called more accurately. 159 00:08:42,440 --> 00:08:48,360 Speaker 1: Now the zone with ABS is going to be more stringent. 160 00:08:48,400 --> 00:08:50,800 Speaker 1: I guess you would say, right, at least we'll have 161 00:08:50,840 --> 00:08:53,839 Speaker 1: a very defined zone as we do now, but it 162 00:08:53,960 --> 00:08:58,520 Speaker 1: is defined by written words as opposed to a machine, 163 00:08:58,920 --> 00:09:03,120 Speaker 1: so I don't think the two are linked. But at 164 00:09:03,120 --> 00:09:06,080 Speaker 1: the same time, it raises questions for ABS as well. 165 00:09:06,640 --> 00:09:08,840 Speaker 1: Is there going to be in a buffer zone with ABS? 166 00:09:08,880 --> 00:09:10,959 Speaker 1: How is this going to work? And we'll ask those 167 00:09:11,040 --> 00:09:12,480 Speaker 1: questions at the appropriate time. 168 00:09:14,040 --> 00:09:16,160 Speaker 2: And I mean, the league's been around for a while 169 00:09:16,280 --> 00:09:19,360 Speaker 2: they've got plenty of pr This shouldn't have just been 170 00:09:19,520 --> 00:09:22,959 Speaker 2: a memo to players, teams, coaches, et cetera. It should 171 00:09:22,960 --> 00:09:25,640 Speaker 2: have been announced to everyone. We're fans of the game, 172 00:09:25,760 --> 00:09:28,640 Speaker 2: just let us know. This would have been great offseason talk. 173 00:09:28,880 --> 00:09:32,240 Speaker 2: And it's a positive story. So that part is crazy 174 00:09:32,280 --> 00:09:35,480 Speaker 2: to me. Ken, I'm wondering if there's any aftermath to this. 175 00:09:35,720 --> 00:09:37,760 Speaker 2: I know you got to comment here too, but if 176 00:09:38,320 --> 00:09:40,560 Speaker 2: if anybody you know you think he's going to complain, 177 00:09:40,800 --> 00:09:43,040 Speaker 2: because there's probably some people that figured this out the 178 00:09:43,080 --> 00:09:44,800 Speaker 2: first week of the season. Now there's some people that 179 00:09:44,840 --> 00:09:46,800 Speaker 2: are learning about this on May second. 180 00:09:48,600 --> 00:09:50,200 Speaker 1: I don't know what the aftermath is going to be, 181 00:09:50,679 --> 00:09:52,600 Speaker 1: if any I can't predict that. 182 00:09:52,640 --> 00:09:53,600 Speaker 3: Scott, Now, ask. 183 00:09:53,520 --> 00:09:57,000 Speaker 1: For what you're saying about putting this out there, because 184 00:09:57,080 --> 00:10:00,680 Speaker 1: obviously it's had an effect the league. This position is 185 00:10:00,720 --> 00:10:03,880 Speaker 1: it's not that meaningful an impact, and they were basically 186 00:10:03,920 --> 00:10:07,080 Speaker 1: saying it's not that big a deal. It's a change, yes, 187 00:10:07,200 --> 00:10:10,560 Speaker 1: but it's improved the ball strike accuracy, and it's not 188 00:10:10,640 --> 00:10:14,800 Speaker 1: that it's not something that should be sensatialized in their mind, 189 00:10:14,920 --> 00:10:18,000 Speaker 1: not something that is that big a thing. Okay, but 190 00:10:18,360 --> 00:10:21,080 Speaker 1: I'm with you, Scott, why not be more transparent, Why 191 00:10:21,120 --> 00:10:22,760 Speaker 1: not put it out there? What do you have to 192 00:10:22,800 --> 00:10:25,520 Speaker 1: be ashamed about here? You're doing something good. You're trying 193 00:10:25,520 --> 00:10:29,400 Speaker 1: to make the game better. Tell people, I don't really 194 00:10:29,480 --> 00:10:30,640 Speaker 1: understand the problem. 195 00:10:31,600 --> 00:10:35,760 Speaker 2: It is not the CIA, this is not some covert operation. 196 00:10:36,120 --> 00:10:38,040 Speaker 2: This is just like you talked about unfair tiretury the 197 00:10:38,080 --> 00:10:40,080 Speaker 2: other day. This is baseball. This is entertainment, and this 198 00:10:40,200 --> 00:10:43,360 Speaker 2: is a good story. And for fans or anybody the 199 00:10:43,440 --> 00:10:46,040 Speaker 2: league that doesn't think that this is something that affects everyone, 200 00:10:46,440 --> 00:10:49,079 Speaker 2: you should read the story. There's game planning, pitch sequencing, 201 00:10:49,120 --> 00:10:51,320 Speaker 2: everything right. People just want to know what the rules 202 00:10:51,360 --> 00:10:53,920 Speaker 2: are and how umps are being evaluated. Plays into that 203 00:10:53,960 --> 00:10:57,120 Speaker 2: so much so that there's an ump that told a player, oh, 204 00:10:57,240 --> 00:11:00,400 Speaker 2: did you hear about the strike zone change? What do 205 00:11:00,440 --> 00:11:02,760 Speaker 2: you think about that? Even just the way he phrased it, 206 00:11:02,800 --> 00:11:05,160 Speaker 2: I think tells the story of how the umps have 207 00:11:05,240 --> 00:11:08,000 Speaker 2: to think about how they're evaluating the zone. That's why 208 00:11:08,040 --> 00:11:10,880 Speaker 2: to me, it's such a big deal. Krat's what you got. 209 00:11:11,720 --> 00:11:14,240 Speaker 3: Well, I mean you talk about game plans. I just 210 00:11:14,440 --> 00:11:16,600 Speaker 3: was thinking about what you said. There is a paper 211 00:11:16,679 --> 00:11:19,800 Speaker 3: hung up for a left handed batter and a right 212 00:11:19,800 --> 00:11:23,400 Speaker 3: handed batter, how umpire zones change, not that they would 213 00:11:23,400 --> 00:11:26,800 Speaker 3: have been able to build that model before the season, 214 00:11:27,120 --> 00:11:31,440 Speaker 3: and that model is always changing, but it's based on thousands, 215 00:11:31,600 --> 00:11:34,920 Speaker 3: tens of thousands of pitches and that's hung up before 216 00:11:34,920 --> 00:11:37,760 Speaker 3: every game, along with the pitcher scouting report too. So 217 00:11:38,360 --> 00:11:40,559 Speaker 3: if people think I don't really pay attention to it, 218 00:11:40,960 --> 00:11:44,520 Speaker 3: there's somebody that has that job for sure. Ken, do 219 00:11:44,559 --> 00:11:48,120 Speaker 3: you think do you think this improves the chances of 220 00:11:48,360 --> 00:11:51,040 Speaker 3: or I shouldn't say improved because that sounds like I 221 00:11:51,040 --> 00:11:53,960 Speaker 3: want to work stoppage. Does this increase the chances of 222 00:11:54,000 --> 00:11:54,840 Speaker 3: a work stoppage? 223 00:11:56,840 --> 00:11:59,679 Speaker 1: I won't go that far. To me, Eric, the chances 224 00:11:59,679 --> 00:12:03,120 Speaker 1: of a stoppage are high regardless of this. What I 225 00:12:03,160 --> 00:12:08,280 Speaker 1: will say is this that throughout the game's history, since 226 00:12:08,400 --> 00:12:13,280 Speaker 1: the inception of the Union, there has been obviously labor tension, 227 00:12:13,920 --> 00:12:16,880 Speaker 1: and one of the manifestations of that tension has been 228 00:12:17,760 --> 00:12:22,120 Speaker 1: a disconnect at times between the league office and players 229 00:12:22,200 --> 00:12:27,120 Speaker 1: as represented by the Union. This to me kind of 230 00:12:27,160 --> 00:12:29,720 Speaker 1: shows that there's still a disconnect, or at least in 231 00:12:29,760 --> 00:12:33,480 Speaker 1: this example, there was a disconnect, and it doesn't seem 232 00:12:33,520 --> 00:12:36,720 Speaker 1: to me, and this is my opinion now it doesn't 233 00:12:36,720 --> 00:12:41,120 Speaker 1: seem to me that players were taken into account enough here. 234 00:12:41,640 --> 00:12:44,960 Speaker 1: And the league can say, yes, we communicated to the clubs, 235 00:12:45,040 --> 00:12:47,240 Speaker 1: we tried to communicate to the players. We did this, 236 00:12:47,320 --> 00:12:50,360 Speaker 1: We did it properly. They can say that, but it 237 00:12:50,400 --> 00:12:54,760 Speaker 1: didn't happen, or at least didn't happen successfully enough. And 238 00:12:56,200 --> 00:12:58,680 Speaker 1: one of the criticisms the league has faced from players 239 00:12:58,760 --> 00:13:02,040 Speaker 1: is they don't have a feel for us, They don't 240 00:13:02,080 --> 00:13:05,559 Speaker 1: get it, and at times that has been a fair criticism. 241 00:13:05,640 --> 00:13:08,240 Speaker 1: In this particular case, it seems to me that it 242 00:13:08,320 --> 00:13:11,600 Speaker 1: is a fair criticism as well. They just did not 243 00:13:11,760 --> 00:13:14,600 Speaker 1: see that. If you're going to do something, even if 244 00:13:14,600 --> 00:13:16,840 Speaker 1: you think it's small, even if you think it's good, 245 00:13:17,200 --> 00:13:20,240 Speaker 1: and it is, you gotta let the players know that 246 00:13:20,320 --> 00:13:22,960 Speaker 1: the world is changing for them. They're the ones on 247 00:13:23,000 --> 00:13:25,760 Speaker 1: the field, they're the ones playing your game. They are 248 00:13:25,840 --> 00:13:28,680 Speaker 1: your product, and they have to be taken into full 249 00:13:28,840 --> 00:13:30,240 Speaker 1: account and full consideration. 250 00:13:32,000 --> 00:13:34,600 Speaker 4: Now, let's talk a little bit about some baseball teams here. 251 00:13:34,679 --> 00:13:37,600 Speaker 4: The Texas Rangers ranked twenty eighth right now and run 252 00:13:37,640 --> 00:13:40,200 Speaker 4: scored per game. We didn't really see that one coming, 253 00:13:40,240 --> 00:13:43,040 Speaker 4: if you want the truth, and they just demoted Jake 254 00:13:43,080 --> 00:13:46,440 Speaker 4: Berger and brought up Blaine Krim right now, so talk 255 00:13:46,480 --> 00:13:48,640 Speaker 4: a little bit about, you know, what they're gonna do 256 00:13:48,679 --> 00:13:50,960 Speaker 4: with Jake and how Blaine is gonna, you know, help 257 00:13:51,000 --> 00:13:52,199 Speaker 4: this team out at first base. 258 00:13:53,120 --> 00:13:55,719 Speaker 1: Their general manager Chris Young earlier this week told the 259 00:13:55,800 --> 00:13:59,480 Speaker 1: Dallas Morning News that he was edgy about their offense 260 00:13:59,520 --> 00:14:02,960 Speaker 1: and rifle. So now we talked about this unfair territory yesterday. 261 00:14:03,040 --> 00:14:06,400 Speaker 1: You don't often hear GM talk like that, and yet 262 00:14:06,600 --> 00:14:11,040 Speaker 1: his frustration was clear. He made other comments as well 263 00:14:11,080 --> 00:14:14,200 Speaker 1: about the offense and indicated that, yes, we have some 264 00:14:14,320 --> 00:14:17,199 Speaker 1: players at Triple A we might look at Blaine Krim 265 00:14:17,360 --> 00:14:19,640 Speaker 1: is one of those players. He's hit every level of 266 00:14:19,680 --> 00:14:22,000 Speaker 1: the minor leagues. He's twenty seven. I believe he's not 267 00:14:22,040 --> 00:14:24,840 Speaker 1: really a prospect in that sense, but he's a guy 268 00:14:24,880 --> 00:14:27,240 Speaker 1: they want to give a chance to. And the way 269 00:14:27,280 --> 00:14:29,960 Speaker 1: this was portrayed to me is that with Jake Berger, 270 00:14:30,200 --> 00:14:32,320 Speaker 1: this is simply a reset. He'll be down for a 271 00:14:32,320 --> 00:14:35,720 Speaker 1: little bit then come back. Clearly, Jake Berger was one 272 00:14:35,760 --> 00:14:39,960 Speaker 1: of the Rangers' biggest off season acquisitions, along with Jock Peterson, 273 00:14:40,000 --> 00:14:44,200 Speaker 1: who also has struggled, and they're trying to find ways 274 00:14:44,280 --> 00:14:48,480 Speaker 1: to kickstart this offense. And it's really interesting because, yes, 275 00:14:48,600 --> 00:14:51,440 Speaker 1: last year they took a step back offensively, and the 276 00:14:51,560 --> 00:14:55,480 Speaker 1: reasons that they acquired guys like Berger and Peterson was 277 00:14:55,520 --> 00:15:00,600 Speaker 1: to hopefully get the offense going again. Hasn't happened. Things. 278 00:15:00,600 --> 00:15:03,480 Speaker 1: They've dropped Marcus Simeon in the order, he's starting to hit. Finally, 279 00:15:03,920 --> 00:15:08,040 Speaker 1: they basically bench Leoti Tavaris the center fielder. So far 280 00:15:08,080 --> 00:15:10,920 Speaker 1: it's not working. They just had a tough series against 281 00:15:10,920 --> 00:15:14,240 Speaker 1: the A's at home, lost two of three. So this 282 00:15:14,280 --> 00:15:17,160 Speaker 1: is a team to watch, and their general manager Chris 283 00:15:17,200 --> 00:15:21,040 Speaker 1: Young has clearly demonstrated he's not going to wait around 284 00:15:21,120 --> 00:15:23,960 Speaker 1: and simply say hey, back of the baseball cards. Guys 285 00:15:23,960 --> 00:15:26,360 Speaker 1: will come around. No, he's doing things. 286 00:15:27,400 --> 00:15:30,400 Speaker 3: Ken, I'm over three on my questions with getting you 287 00:15:30,480 --> 00:15:33,160 Speaker 3: to know what the answers are, So maybe you know 288 00:15:33,240 --> 00:15:35,080 Speaker 3: what this answer is when you talk to Chris Young, 289 00:15:35,560 --> 00:15:39,760 Speaker 3: did he allude to anything with fastballs because they brought 290 00:15:39,760 --> 00:15:42,880 Speaker 3: over John Peterson and Jake Berger because they were elite 291 00:15:42,920 --> 00:15:48,160 Speaker 3: at hitting fastballs. Their numbers on fastballs this year are atrocious. 292 00:15:48,240 --> 00:15:52,120 Speaker 3: Job Peterson's hitting forty one on fastballs. Jake Berger had 293 00:15:52,160 --> 00:15:55,240 Speaker 3: a nine to twenty one ops last year. On fastballs 294 00:15:55,280 --> 00:15:59,760 Speaker 3: this year, he has a four to sixty ops. Does 295 00:15:59,760 --> 00:16:03,280 Speaker 3: he feel like these players are getting moved or maybe 296 00:16:03,520 --> 00:16:07,280 Speaker 3: did he mention anything about about, hey, what are we 297 00:16:07,360 --> 00:16:10,000 Speaker 3: doing as far as like a team a coaching staff 298 00:16:10,000 --> 00:16:11,720 Speaker 3: of learning to hit the fastball. 299 00:16:12,360 --> 00:16:15,080 Speaker 1: His interview was with Evan Grant of the Dallas Morning News, 300 00:16:15,280 --> 00:16:19,600 Speaker 1: so that was where his comments were. And yes, definitely 301 00:16:19,760 --> 00:16:21,840 Speaker 1: fastballs have been an issue for them and it's been 302 00:16:21,840 --> 00:16:24,720 Speaker 1: something that they've tried to correct with those acquisitions that 303 00:16:24,760 --> 00:16:28,240 Speaker 1: you just mentioned now. In the article that Evan wrote, 304 00:16:29,080 --> 00:16:33,680 Speaker 1: basically he said, once you get through making player moves, 305 00:16:33,840 --> 00:16:37,160 Speaker 1: once you drop guys in the lineup, demote players to 306 00:16:37,200 --> 00:16:39,960 Speaker 1: triple A, bring up other players, and that doesn't work, 307 00:16:40,120 --> 00:16:44,160 Speaker 1: then the only thing left are staffing changes. And Evan 308 00:16:44,200 --> 00:16:47,680 Speaker 1: pointed out in the article that Bruce bochi in twenty 309 00:16:47,680 --> 00:16:50,880 Speaker 1: eight years as a manager has never fired a coach 310 00:16:50,960 --> 00:16:53,000 Speaker 1: at midseason. Now, the front office would be the one 311 00:16:53,240 --> 00:16:56,160 Speaker 1: doing it most likely, but the point was this doesn't 312 00:16:56,160 --> 00:16:58,840 Speaker 1: happen under Boacie, So if it did happen this year, 313 00:16:59,440 --> 00:17:03,720 Speaker 1: that would be an even more dramatic example of how 314 00:17:03,720 --> 00:17:07,320 Speaker 1: this team is trying to get itself going. And we'll 315 00:17:07,359 --> 00:17:10,160 Speaker 1: just have to see what happens. They need to start hitting, period. 316 00:17:10,720 --> 00:17:12,919 Speaker 1: That's what Saw solves all the problems. Is always the 317 00:17:12,920 --> 00:17:16,159 Speaker 1: case in baseball, right guys. If you're not winning, if 318 00:17:16,160 --> 00:17:18,359 Speaker 1: you're not hitting, if you're not pitching, well, do better 319 00:17:18,560 --> 00:17:21,439 Speaker 1: and things will change. The noise will stop. That's the 320 00:17:21,480 --> 00:17:23,439 Speaker 1: case here as well. 321 00:17:23,640 --> 00:17:26,240 Speaker 2: Hey, Ken, let's finish with the series you've got coming 322 00:17:26,320 --> 00:17:30,400 Speaker 2: up this weekend on Fox. You'll be part of Dodgers Braves, 323 00:17:30,480 --> 00:17:34,000 Speaker 2: which is a great heavy weaight tilt. Okay, so I'll 324 00:17:34,000 --> 00:17:36,400 Speaker 2: do one on each. So let's start with the Dodgers 325 00:17:36,960 --> 00:17:40,200 Speaker 2: twenty one to ten, best record in a very competitive 326 00:17:40,280 --> 00:17:42,639 Speaker 2: National League West, but not by much. And I know 327 00:17:42,640 --> 00:17:44,960 Speaker 2: we're only a month into the season, but we've talked 328 00:17:44,960 --> 00:17:47,480 Speaker 2: about how there are multiple other teams in this division 329 00:17:47,560 --> 00:17:50,720 Speaker 2: playing well. What do you think about the way that 330 00:17:50,760 --> 00:17:53,480 Speaker 2: the Dodgers are trying to get through the marathon to 331 00:17:53,560 --> 00:17:56,320 Speaker 2: load up as best as possible for October and the 332 00:17:56,320 --> 00:17:59,679 Speaker 2: potential chance that it could cause some problems at some 333 00:17:59,720 --> 00:18:01,560 Speaker 2: point if one of these teams gets hot. 334 00:18:02,600 --> 00:18:07,800 Speaker 1: It's a really interesting question, Scott, and they obviously are 335 00:18:07,880 --> 00:18:11,920 Speaker 1: running their team and pointing toward October. Everything they do 336 00:18:12,200 --> 00:18:15,919 Speaker 1: points toward October, and yet there's a regular season to play, 337 00:18:16,359 --> 00:18:19,240 Speaker 1: and while it's more likely than not they're going to 338 00:18:19,240 --> 00:18:23,240 Speaker 1: make the playoffs, even in this kind of half state 339 00:18:23,240 --> 00:18:25,040 Speaker 1: that they're in, this weird state that they're in. They're 340 00:18:25,040 --> 00:18:27,280 Speaker 1: twenty one and ten, as you mentioned, they're leading the division. 341 00:18:27,400 --> 00:18:31,440 Speaker 1: They're the best team. But at some point they're going 342 00:18:31,480 --> 00:18:33,080 Speaker 1: to want to turn it up a little bit too. 343 00:18:33,520 --> 00:18:36,720 Speaker 1: And it's understandable for a team coming off a World 344 00:18:36,800 --> 00:18:40,359 Speaker 1: Series to have injuries. It's understandable when that team doesn't 345 00:18:40,400 --> 00:18:43,960 Speaker 1: really necessarily fire on all cylinders right away. There's something 346 00:18:44,000 --> 00:18:47,160 Speaker 1: of a hangover and effect that takes place with teams. 347 00:18:47,760 --> 00:18:51,240 Speaker 1: But it's going to be really interesting to see when 348 00:18:51,480 --> 00:18:54,399 Speaker 1: Dave Roberts in the front office kind of puts the 349 00:18:54,440 --> 00:18:56,760 Speaker 1: pedal to the medal a little bit and says, hey, 350 00:18:56,800 --> 00:19:00,360 Speaker 1: we got to go here. They have succeeded and done 351 00:19:00,480 --> 00:19:04,440 Speaker 1: very well, not really doing that, but at some point 352 00:19:05,800 --> 00:19:08,879 Speaker 1: that focus, that intensity is going to need to come back. 353 00:19:09,040 --> 00:19:12,359 Speaker 1: And I'm not saying they're not trying. Of course they're trying, 354 00:19:12,480 --> 00:19:15,560 Speaker 1: but there's a different level and you can't expect it 355 00:19:15,600 --> 00:19:18,439 Speaker 1: to be the same. Sitting here on May sewid you 356 00:19:18,440 --> 00:19:20,320 Speaker 1: couldn't have expected it in April. I don't know that 357 00:19:20,359 --> 00:19:22,879 Speaker 1: you can expect it in June. But as we go 358 00:19:23,000 --> 00:19:25,640 Speaker 1: forward and as we get to the postseason or closer 359 00:19:25,640 --> 00:19:28,920 Speaker 1: to it, certainly at that point the Dodgers are going 360 00:19:28,960 --> 00:19:30,639 Speaker 1: to have to turn it up, and we'll want to 361 00:19:30,680 --> 00:19:33,520 Speaker 1: turn it up, and are quite capable of turning it up. 362 00:19:34,080 --> 00:19:37,080 Speaker 2: Oh, no doubt about it. My only thought process is 363 00:19:37,240 --> 00:19:40,160 Speaker 2: that there could be a disaster scenario where a few 364 00:19:40,200 --> 00:19:42,679 Speaker 2: things go wrong for your team, another team starts to 365 00:19:42,680 --> 00:19:44,399 Speaker 2: make a run, and then you're like, wait, all of 366 00:19:44,440 --> 00:19:46,760 Speaker 2: a sudden, we might not take this division, and we 367 00:19:46,800 --> 00:19:50,119 Speaker 2: always take this division. So I think that part strategically 368 00:19:50,160 --> 00:19:52,960 Speaker 2: could be interesting. And then the other side here real quick, 369 00:19:53,440 --> 00:19:56,640 Speaker 2: the Braves, they're fourteen and sixteen. I keep looking at 370 00:19:56,680 --> 00:20:00,199 Speaker 2: them with zero panic. I know Strider only gave then 371 00:20:00,240 --> 00:20:02,800 Speaker 2: one start. He's going to come back, Akuna is going 372 00:20:02,840 --> 00:20:05,840 Speaker 2: to come back. I gotta give this team some credit. 373 00:20:05,840 --> 00:20:08,199 Speaker 2: They're hovering around the five hundred range. So what do 374 00:20:08,240 --> 00:20:10,040 Speaker 2: you think about the Braves heading into this series. 375 00:20:11,920 --> 00:20:16,240 Speaker 1: They're interesting, and they're interesting because some things have happened, 376 00:20:16,320 --> 00:20:19,840 Speaker 1: even beyond the injury Scott, that they didn't expect Nick Allen. 377 00:20:19,840 --> 00:20:23,680 Speaker 1: It's shortstop Alex Verdugo playing in the outfield, Eli White 378 00:20:24,000 --> 00:20:27,440 Speaker 1: assuming a prominent role here. So they've kind of adjusted 379 00:20:27,480 --> 00:20:30,760 Speaker 1: on the fly already, and clearly in the end they're 380 00:20:30,760 --> 00:20:33,000 Speaker 1: going to need their stars to be stars, and Riley 381 00:20:33,040 --> 00:20:35,840 Speaker 1: and Olsen and Murphy, those guys have done better of 382 00:20:35,920 --> 00:20:38,800 Speaker 1: Lake Chrysales come on a little bit lately as well, 383 00:20:39,280 --> 00:20:42,919 Speaker 1: so I'm not worried about them. But it's a different 384 00:20:42,960 --> 00:20:47,240 Speaker 1: team and I would expect that even after Kunya and 385 00:20:47,280 --> 00:20:49,080 Speaker 1: Stryder come back, they're going to need to make some 386 00:20:49,160 --> 00:20:53,000 Speaker 1: adjustments along the way, probably the deadline. Their bullpen is 387 00:20:53,040 --> 00:20:57,240 Speaker 1: a huge question right now, especially with Iglesias struggling, and 388 00:20:57,280 --> 00:21:02,359 Speaker 1: that was something they didn't anticipate. So, as always, every 389 00:21:02,400 --> 00:21:04,600 Speaker 1: year is different, every season is different. That's true for 390 00:21:04,640 --> 00:21:06,800 Speaker 1: the Dodgers, and it's true for the Braves. It's true 391 00:21:06,800 --> 00:21:09,080 Speaker 1: for every team, and we'll just have to see how 392 00:21:09,119 --> 00:21:12,359 Speaker 1: they evolve. They kind of came back nicely from that 393 00:21:12,440 --> 00:21:15,159 Speaker 1: five and thirteen start they did. They were covered well. 394 00:21:15,320 --> 00:21:17,720 Speaker 1: Now they go forward and see what they can be. 395 00:21:18,520 --> 00:21:20,640 Speaker 2: Yeah, this could be a statement series. I know it's early, 396 00:21:20,680 --> 00:21:23,359 Speaker 2: and we've seen some good Dodgers Braves matchups in the 397 00:21:23,359 --> 00:21:26,919 Speaker 2: past few years too. So we'll see Ken enjoy the 398 00:21:26,920 --> 00:21:30,360 Speaker 2: weekend and we'll be watching Yon Fox on Saturday. And 399 00:21:30,400 --> 00:21:32,520 Speaker 2: thanks for the time, and I encourage everyone to check 400 00:21:32,520 --> 00:21:36,320 Speaker 2: out the article in The Athletic on the shrinking zone evaluation. 401 00:21:37,359 --> 00:21:41,800 Speaker 2: We just barely scratched the surface. Thanks Ken, Thanks guys. 402 00:21:42,440 --> 00:21:45,760 Speaker 2: Also Fair Territory from yesterday hitting a bunch of other 403 00:21:45,800 --> 00:21:49,280 Speaker 2: topics with Ken and special guest host Tricia Whitaker, who 404 00:21:49,280 --> 00:21:51,159 Speaker 2: did a great job. So check that out wherever you 405 00:21:51,200 --> 00:21:54,480 Speaker 2: get your pods, plus on the ft YouTube channel which 406 00:21:54,480 --> 00:21:56,520 Speaker 2: is close to one hundred and ten thousand subs, so 407 00:21:56,720 --> 00:21:57,560 Speaker 2: doing well there. 408 00:22:00,080 --> 00:22:00,320 Speaker 1: Yeah,