WEBVTT - U.S. Shale Oil Walks the Line

0:00:00.520 --> 0:00:03.000
<v Speaker 1>Hi, everyone. What seems like forever ago, when I was

0:00:03.040 --> 0:00:05.320
<v Speaker 1>an energy analyst just starting out, I used to hear

0:00:05.320 --> 0:00:08.399
<v Speaker 1>the term energy security all the time. Maybe it was

0:00:08.400 --> 0:00:10.520
<v Speaker 1>because I was based in Washington, d C. But if

0:00:10.560 --> 0:00:12.719
<v Speaker 1>your policy makers use it constantly to push for an

0:00:12.760 --> 0:00:15.360
<v Speaker 1>all of the above energy approach, so the U S

0:00:15.360 --> 0:00:17.400
<v Speaker 1>would be less relied on other nations for its energy,

0:00:17.520 --> 0:00:20.959
<v Speaker 1>particularly oil. But around two thousand nine that term really

0:00:21.000 --> 0:00:24.079
<v Speaker 1>peaked when shale oil and hydraulic fracturing came into play.

0:00:24.600 --> 0:00:26.680
<v Speaker 1>It changed the game, taking the U S from importer

0:00:26.800 --> 0:00:29.520
<v Speaker 1>to net exporter of oil and gas, and the impacts

0:00:29.520 --> 0:00:32.160
<v Speaker 1>of shale oil reach across all sectors and across the globe.

0:00:32.560 --> 0:00:35.680
<v Speaker 1>Today on the show, we've got Tai Lieu and Anidialinus

0:00:35.960 --> 0:00:37.920
<v Speaker 1>U S oil analysts for ben F. They're going to

0:00:37.960 --> 0:00:40.280
<v Speaker 1>tell us about the state of US shale oil, how

0:00:40.320 --> 0:00:43.479
<v Speaker 1>oil demand rising to pre pandemic levels is impacting prices,

0:00:43.760 --> 0:00:45.680
<v Speaker 1>and how oil producers are dealing with all of it.

0:00:45.760 --> 0:00:48.360
<v Speaker 1>Our discussion is based on report titled U S Sail

0:00:48.440 --> 0:00:51.280
<v Speaker 1>Oil Quarterly Outlook three Q twenty twenty one being if

0:00:51.360 --> 0:00:53.000
<v Speaker 1>users can get this report on beef, go on the

0:00:53.040 --> 0:00:56.360
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg terminal beanef dot com and Bloomberg Mobile. As a reminder,

0:00:56.440 --> 0:00:58.760
<v Speaker 1>beaneif does not provide investment or strategy advice, and you

0:00:58.760 --> 0:01:00.560
<v Speaker 1>can hear the full disclaimer at the end of the show.

0:01:00.880 --> 0:01:03.240
<v Speaker 1>I'm Mark Taylor and you're listening to switch on to

0:01:03.320 --> 0:01:13.760
<v Speaker 1>be an f podcast. Ti Anna, Thanks for joining. So

0:01:13.800 --> 0:01:17.200
<v Speaker 1>we've brought you in to talk about US shale oil today. Ana,

0:01:17.280 --> 0:01:18.760
<v Speaker 1>can you start us off and tell us a bit

0:01:18.880 --> 0:01:22.080
<v Speaker 1>why we're talking about US shale. So, US shale oil

0:01:22.959 --> 0:01:26.759
<v Speaker 1>is a really interesting part of the global supply picture

0:01:26.880 --> 0:01:29.000
<v Speaker 1>for oil, and if you think about it, it's quite

0:01:29.040 --> 0:01:30.840
<v Speaker 1>different from a lot of the rest of the oil

0:01:30.880 --> 0:01:33.600
<v Speaker 1>production that we have in the market. Especially for people

0:01:33.600 --> 0:01:37.280
<v Speaker 1>who don't usually think about oil too much. You usually

0:01:37.280 --> 0:01:40.840
<v Speaker 1>probably picture things like the Beverly Hillbillies when you're envisioning

0:01:40.840 --> 0:01:43.320
<v Speaker 1>oil production. I think my generation we tend to think

0:01:43.319 --> 0:01:45.839
<v Speaker 1>about armageddon, you know, when they're on the offshore rig

0:01:45.880 --> 0:01:49.480
<v Speaker 1>and Harry Stamper hits the uh, the gusher and all

0:01:49.480 --> 0:01:52.680
<v Speaker 1>the oil comes out the top. Yeah. Yeah, well, the

0:01:52.760 --> 0:01:55.600
<v Speaker 1>same same idea, right. You kind of have this hole

0:01:55.640 --> 0:01:58.880
<v Speaker 1>that you've drilled, all the oil flows out just very easily.

0:01:59.360 --> 0:02:03.560
<v Speaker 1>That's oil production. Shale is quite different. Shale oil is

0:02:03.800 --> 0:02:07.400
<v Speaker 1>a fairly newer technology that has come onto the market.

0:02:07.600 --> 0:02:09.840
<v Speaker 1>It was developed actually, you know, sort of by the

0:02:09.960 --> 0:02:12.760
<v Speaker 1>US government and stuff funded by them for decades, but

0:02:12.800 --> 0:02:16.520
<v Speaker 1>it really came onto the scene around early two thousand's

0:02:16.560 --> 0:02:19.720
<v Speaker 1>and in this you extract oil from solid rock, from

0:02:19.760 --> 0:02:22.720
<v Speaker 1>shale rock, it's a tight oil supply. In order to

0:02:22.760 --> 0:02:25.520
<v Speaker 1>do this, you have to use technologies like hydraulic fracturing

0:02:25.560 --> 0:02:28.239
<v Speaker 1>and injection of fluids to help open some of these

0:02:28.280 --> 0:02:30.760
<v Speaker 1>pores that hold oil molecules and allow it to flow

0:02:30.840 --> 0:02:33.760
<v Speaker 1>to the surface. So it has a very different production

0:02:33.840 --> 0:02:37.800
<v Speaker 1>profile than a conventional well. But the benefit is it

0:02:37.880 --> 0:02:41.440
<v Speaker 1>actually takes much less time to get the well to production,

0:02:41.639 --> 0:02:44.400
<v Speaker 1>and the wells don't last nearly as long as conventional wells,

0:02:44.800 --> 0:02:49.080
<v Speaker 1>which actually makes them quite responsive. Anyways, shale is something

0:02:49.080 --> 0:02:50.880
<v Speaker 1>that was developed, as I mentioned, in the early two

0:02:50.919 --> 0:02:54.000
<v Speaker 1>thousands in the US and really started booming because there's

0:02:54.040 --> 0:02:58.240
<v Speaker 1>actually a lot of opportunity for shale in across the US,

0:02:58.320 --> 0:03:01.360
<v Speaker 1>and so starting around two thousand eight or so, we

0:03:01.440 --> 0:03:04.400
<v Speaker 1>saw production coming online and then we just over the

0:03:04.440 --> 0:03:08.160
<v Speaker 1>past few decades have seen phenomenal growth in this sector.

0:03:08.200 --> 0:03:10.760
<v Speaker 1>I mean, especially you look back just a few years ago,

0:03:13.080 --> 0:03:16.200
<v Speaker 1>US production was growing about twenty six percent from US

0:03:16.240 --> 0:03:20.800
<v Speaker 1>shale basins on an annual basis. Production grew to the

0:03:20.800 --> 0:03:24.040
<v Speaker 1>point where US was the largest producer of oil due

0:03:24.080 --> 0:03:27.480
<v Speaker 1>to this shale production that was coming out. So it's

0:03:27.520 --> 0:03:32.040
<v Speaker 1>been a really important feature of the U. S supply story. However,

0:03:32.160 --> 0:03:34.800
<v Speaker 1>the problem is that as the US was just flooding

0:03:34.800 --> 0:03:37.320
<v Speaker 1>the market with all of the shale oil, there was

0:03:37.680 --> 0:03:40.520
<v Speaker 1>also competition with OPEC for who can sort of supply

0:03:40.600 --> 0:03:43.720
<v Speaker 1>into this market where demand is pretty stagnant, and as

0:03:43.760 --> 0:03:46.200
<v Speaker 1>a result, prices were tanking. We've had very low oil

0:03:46.240 --> 0:03:48.920
<v Speaker 1>prices of the past few years, and this meant that

0:03:48.960 --> 0:03:51.920
<v Speaker 1>actually the profitability for a lot of these companies was

0:03:51.960 --> 0:03:55.080
<v Speaker 1>looking worse and worse. They were putting borrowing a lot

0:03:55.080 --> 0:03:59.240
<v Speaker 1>of money to invest in new production, and yet they

0:03:59.240 --> 0:04:02.360
<v Speaker 1>were receiving low prices for that production, and therefore they

0:04:02.360 --> 0:04:06.160
<v Speaker 1>were hiteing negative cash flow, not good returns for shareholders.

0:04:06.640 --> 0:04:08.320
<v Speaker 1>So all of this was kind of happening in the

0:04:08.320 --> 0:04:11.000
<v Speaker 1>background of the U S shale industry, and this was

0:04:11.040 --> 0:04:13.680
<v Speaker 1>all going on, this discussion of do they need to

0:04:13.720 --> 0:04:16.440
<v Speaker 1>be profitable, do you grow production, how do you balance

0:04:16.520 --> 0:04:20.440
<v Speaker 1>those two, and then COVID hit, which completely destroyed all demand.

0:04:20.800 --> 0:04:24.200
<v Speaker 1>Oh man, what a roller coaster. I mean kind of

0:04:24.200 --> 0:04:26.840
<v Speaker 1>halfway through what we're saying there is thinking like when

0:04:26.839 --> 0:04:30.960
<v Speaker 1>I started in the energy industry, I guess, like in renewables,

0:04:30.960 --> 0:04:34.039
<v Speaker 1>really we kept hearing, you know, we have to do

0:04:34.080 --> 0:04:37.000
<v Speaker 1>all this for energy security, you know, US energy security

0:04:37.040 --> 0:04:40.359
<v Speaker 1>and all that. But with shale it kind of seemed

0:04:40.360 --> 0:04:42.360
<v Speaker 1>to kind of end. I didn't I don't heard much

0:04:42.440 --> 0:04:44.760
<v Speaker 1>about that in years, but I guess then it became

0:04:44.760 --> 0:04:48.599
<v Speaker 1>a different problem, right of profitability and keeping the flow

0:04:48.680 --> 0:04:51.720
<v Speaker 1>going or keeping the oil coming. Yeah, so shill was

0:04:51.760 --> 0:04:54.119
<v Speaker 1>great for security in the sense of the US became

0:04:54.320 --> 0:04:57.320
<v Speaker 1>sort of a goal an exporter of oil where the

0:04:57.440 --> 0:05:00.200
<v Speaker 1>we were the largest producer. But you know, the quite

0:05:00.240 --> 0:05:01.880
<v Speaker 1>was what's the cost of all of that and is

0:05:01.880 --> 0:05:05.440
<v Speaker 1>it sustainable? Right? So, ty, can you tell us about

0:05:05.960 --> 0:05:08.400
<v Speaker 1>what did happen during COVID. I think the first thing

0:05:08.480 --> 0:05:12.320
<v Speaker 1>was that it's interesting that right before COVID, Russia and

0:05:12.360 --> 0:05:15.920
<v Speaker 1>OPEC was actually having a price war the head for

0:05:16.080 --> 0:05:18.479
<v Speaker 1>about a week or two, and then COVID hit, So

0:05:18.520 --> 0:05:20.480
<v Speaker 1>it was like a double ramby for the for the

0:05:20.600 --> 0:05:22.640
<v Speaker 1>all markets. You know, first you have the price war

0:05:22.839 --> 0:05:25.200
<v Speaker 1>right with Russia and OPAC, and they drove prices down,

0:05:25.720 --> 0:05:28.000
<v Speaker 1>and then like two weeks after one or two weeks

0:05:28.040 --> 0:05:31.440
<v Speaker 1>after that, COVID hit and prices just crumbled. I mean

0:05:31.839 --> 0:05:35.280
<v Speaker 1>right after COVID struck world. I guess OPAC and Russia

0:05:35.480 --> 0:05:38.680
<v Speaker 1>went into a truce immediately. But the mass took a

0:05:38.720 --> 0:05:41.200
<v Speaker 1>big hit, and so did all crisis. I think all

0:05:41.279 --> 0:05:43.320
<v Speaker 1>prices that w t I at one point, at some

0:05:43.400 --> 0:05:46.440
<v Speaker 1>point it was like straaighting at negative prices, but that

0:05:46.640 --> 0:05:49.200
<v Speaker 1>was because they were running our storage. They have basically

0:05:49.240 --> 0:05:53.520
<v Speaker 1>no nowhere to put the oil in Oklahoma, so the

0:05:53.520 --> 0:05:56.960
<v Speaker 1>demands took a huge hit. And all these producers because

0:05:57.000 --> 0:06:00.440
<v Speaker 1>it's kind of like for surprised to catch up demand,

0:06:00.520 --> 0:06:02.800
<v Speaker 1>there's usually a lag on the way up or on

0:06:02.880 --> 0:06:06.440
<v Speaker 1>the way down, and you really need like all parsons

0:06:06.520 --> 0:06:08.440
<v Speaker 1>to go down to web to wally low level before

0:06:08.440 --> 0:06:11.839
<v Speaker 1>these producers are willing to start shutting off the weals.

0:06:11.880 --> 0:06:13.839
<v Speaker 1>But that was what we saw, you know, and and

0:06:13.920 --> 0:06:17.480
<v Speaker 1>producers had to like we're forced shooting out after production

0:06:18.120 --> 0:06:20.400
<v Speaker 1>during the trap, during the bottom of the pandemic, when

0:06:20.400 --> 0:06:22.719
<v Speaker 1>when the when demand failed out the bottom, and now

0:06:22.760 --> 0:06:25.680
<v Speaker 1>they're starting to turn it back on. Well, I should

0:06:25.720 --> 0:06:28.640
<v Speaker 1>say about the third quarter a fourth quarter of last year,

0:06:28.839 --> 0:06:31.000
<v Speaker 1>they started turning on the worst down to all worlds

0:06:31.040 --> 0:06:34.640
<v Speaker 1>back on when demand slowly recovered. And so that was

0:06:34.680 --> 0:06:37.919
<v Speaker 1>what happened in the physical markets. On the financial side,

0:06:37.920 --> 0:06:40.159
<v Speaker 1>for like on the police companies from the westing side,

0:06:40.360 --> 0:06:43.240
<v Speaker 1>what really changed in the past years that the industry

0:06:43.240 --> 0:06:46.600
<v Speaker 1>has really changed from like a growth industry as and

0:06:46.760 --> 0:06:49.960
<v Speaker 1>I just mentioned, so really are for industry that's focused

0:06:49.960 --> 0:06:52.240
<v Speaker 1>on returns and cash bro physically meant I know w

0:06:52.320 --> 0:06:54.640
<v Speaker 1>T I is West Texas Intermediate and an oil price

0:06:54.680 --> 0:06:58.880
<v Speaker 1>bantomork Okay, so tie. So it's changed for the financial markets.

0:06:58.920 --> 0:07:01.160
<v Speaker 1>So what do you mean by well, I guess I'm

0:07:01.400 --> 0:07:04.040
<v Speaker 1>end set. Before the US shell production was growing at

0:07:04.040 --> 0:07:07.080
<v Speaker 1>a very fast group in the past, but that's a

0:07:07.400 --> 0:07:10.280
<v Speaker 1>pretty much funded by that our companies to going out

0:07:10.280 --> 0:07:13.880
<v Speaker 1>off that to fund this production growth. Nowadays, a lot

0:07:13.880 --> 0:07:17.640
<v Speaker 1>of investors um they want these companies to de leverage

0:07:18.040 --> 0:07:21.160
<v Speaker 1>because that's seen too much financial risk and they want

0:07:21.200 --> 0:07:24.400
<v Speaker 1>these companies to start paying back the show that's fastest

0:07:24.680 --> 0:07:29.040
<v Speaker 1>other in the ways of like higher dividend payout or

0:07:29.120 --> 0:07:33.000
<v Speaker 1>insuring purchases. So the industry has really transformed in the

0:07:33.040 --> 0:07:35.120
<v Speaker 1>past year. So it sounds like they went from kind

0:07:35.120 --> 0:07:39.920
<v Speaker 1>of a bonanza of production, you know, where everything was

0:07:39.960 --> 0:07:43.920
<v Speaker 1>just going great too a much much tighter market with

0:07:44.000 --> 0:07:48.120
<v Speaker 1>much more scrutiny over returns. And how has this change

0:07:48.160 --> 0:07:50.800
<v Speaker 1>in the all US oil industry, I guess the shale

0:07:50.840 --> 0:07:53.840
<v Speaker 1>industry at large, but also the recent changes, how has

0:07:53.880 --> 0:07:56.760
<v Speaker 1>that impacted the global oil market? Yes, so on the US,

0:07:56.800 --> 0:07:58.800
<v Speaker 1>the first thing is such the U S laws about

0:07:58.800 --> 0:08:02.000
<v Speaker 1>two mullion bills the day of production. During the pandemic,

0:08:02.400 --> 0:08:05.720
<v Speaker 1>we were producing about thoting million barrels per day of oil.

0:08:05.840 --> 0:08:08.920
<v Speaker 1>Now we're only doing eleven million barrels. So that's the

0:08:08.920 --> 0:08:12.440
<v Speaker 1>first thing. The second thing is the world all demand

0:08:12.520 --> 0:08:15.680
<v Speaker 1>growth was you pretty much met by us all surprised

0:08:15.920 --> 0:08:19.800
<v Speaker 1>or production growth. Now we a, we pretty much lost

0:08:19.840 --> 0:08:23.480
<v Speaker 1>that engine. And so when and when all demand returns US,

0:08:23.520 --> 0:08:26.960
<v Speaker 1>our production is not going to be there to meet demand. Wow. Okay,

0:08:26.960 --> 0:08:30.040
<v Speaker 1>so demand tanked during COVID, right, and that's what caused

0:08:30.040 --> 0:08:32.880
<v Speaker 1>all that that those challenges last year with over supply,

0:08:33.400 --> 0:08:36.040
<v Speaker 1>they turned off the wells. But now demand is starting

0:08:36.040 --> 0:08:38.280
<v Speaker 1>to pick back up. Is that right? And then you're

0:08:38.280 --> 0:08:40.720
<v Speaker 1>saying that the supply won't be there when the demand

0:08:40.960 --> 0:08:44.600
<v Speaker 1>comes back, There's going to be some difficulties of securing supprise.

0:08:44.679 --> 0:08:47.120
<v Speaker 1>If we assume the growth rate that we had before,

0:08:47.160 --> 0:08:50.480
<v Speaker 1>I think it's still we still have like speckup spac

0:08:50.520 --> 0:08:54.400
<v Speaker 1>capacity from OPAC to meet demand growth. But when we

0:08:54.440 --> 0:08:57.760
<v Speaker 1>turn demand we covers. But when it starts growing again,

0:08:57.800 --> 0:09:00.360
<v Speaker 1>we're gonna have to figure out where those are. How

0:09:00.400 --> 0:09:03.760
<v Speaker 1>how are you going to and mark? Maybe One interesting

0:09:03.840 --> 0:09:07.160
<v Speaker 1>thing to note about shale is that, as I mentioned,

0:09:07.160 --> 0:09:11.040
<v Speaker 1>shale wells are different than most other conventional wells in

0:09:11.080 --> 0:09:13.880
<v Speaker 1>that the production because it's you're pulling it out of

0:09:13.920 --> 0:09:16.600
<v Speaker 1>this tight rock. You get a lot of production in

0:09:16.600 --> 0:09:19.240
<v Speaker 1>the first few months, but then it actually declines quite

0:09:19.280 --> 0:09:22.800
<v Speaker 1>significantly over the next year or two. So you lose

0:09:22.840 --> 0:09:27.160
<v Speaker 1>about sev your well's output in the first few years.

0:09:27.200 --> 0:09:30.040
<v Speaker 1>So that's why in the US shale patch, producers need

0:09:30.080 --> 0:09:33.600
<v Speaker 1>to constantly be injecting capital into their operations in order

0:09:33.600 --> 0:09:36.839
<v Speaker 1>to do drill new wells to offset the declines of

0:09:36.880 --> 0:09:39.880
<v Speaker 1>old wells. So in order to keep production flat, you

0:09:39.920 --> 0:09:42.400
<v Speaker 1>need to constantly be drilling new wells. Anyway, in order

0:09:42.400 --> 0:09:44.440
<v Speaker 1>to grow production, you need to drill even more wells,

0:09:44.960 --> 0:09:46.959
<v Speaker 1>So you just got to keep going. Yeah, exactly. So

0:09:47.000 --> 0:09:50.280
<v Speaker 1>that's where because there was so little investment in new

0:09:50.320 --> 0:09:54.280
<v Speaker 1>production during COVID, a lot of those wells saw massive declines.

0:09:54.440 --> 0:09:56.920
<v Speaker 1>That's why a lot of the output from the region

0:09:57.280 --> 0:10:00.560
<v Speaker 1>has fallen off. And now as time ENTI and US

0:10:00.600 --> 0:10:05.320
<v Speaker 1>producers are just very reluctant to invest significant amounts of

0:10:05.360 --> 0:10:07.679
<v Speaker 1>capital such that that output will grow and sort of

0:10:07.679 --> 0:10:10.520
<v Speaker 1>replace the lost barrels. On the U S side, do

0:10:10.559 --> 0:10:12.600
<v Speaker 1>you think they'll come back? Do you think they will

0:10:12.920 --> 0:10:14.640
<v Speaker 1>meet the demand in time? And do you think that

0:10:14.800 --> 0:10:17.280
<v Speaker 1>oil will have to come from somewhere else? I mean,

0:10:17.320 --> 0:10:19.959
<v Speaker 1>you say the i A is already expecting oil demand

0:10:19.960 --> 0:10:24.200
<v Speaker 1>will return to levels but sometimes in two right, so

0:10:24.280 --> 0:10:27.000
<v Speaker 1>next year, yeah, I think it's going to have to

0:10:27.000 --> 0:10:29.400
<v Speaker 1>come from like several places, not just from U S.

0:10:29.400 --> 0:10:32.720
<v Speaker 1>Show who probably actually draw down their spank capacity compared

0:10:32.760 --> 0:10:35.240
<v Speaker 1>to what they did for some of the national oil

0:10:35.320 --> 0:10:38.080
<v Speaker 1>companies were probably have to pick up the slack um

0:10:38.200 --> 0:10:41.600
<v Speaker 1>some of those private companies which are not so much

0:10:41.679 --> 0:10:44.680
<v Speaker 1>under the financial microscope, they're not so much under the

0:10:44.720 --> 0:10:47.959
<v Speaker 1>scrutiny of the investing community, they probably have a lot

0:10:47.960 --> 0:10:51.160
<v Speaker 1>more leeway to grow production compared to properity companies, and

0:10:51.520 --> 0:10:55.080
<v Speaker 1>we might even need some of those Urani umbrelros mak wow. Okay,

0:10:55.640 --> 0:10:58.920
<v Speaker 1>so they might turn coming back from from everywhere. Will

0:10:59.000 --> 0:11:02.960
<v Speaker 1>be the impact of this possible demand on price, so

0:11:03.120 --> 0:11:05.320
<v Speaker 1>the price definitely go up. There is this there a

0:11:05.320 --> 0:11:07.760
<v Speaker 1>scenario where we might see a price tip. I think

0:11:07.800 --> 0:11:10.680
<v Speaker 1>chances are we will probably see like the market continue

0:11:10.720 --> 0:11:13.959
<v Speaker 1>to tighten, especially if you continue to draw down OPEC

0:11:13.960 --> 0:11:18.400
<v Speaker 1>spec capacity. Historically there's some correlation between christ and opex

0:11:18.559 --> 0:11:23.320
<v Speaker 1>aspect capacity, well negative correlation, and so I think there's

0:11:23.320 --> 0:11:26.000
<v Speaker 1>definitely more upside risk to prices than dan Cy risk.

0:11:26.240 --> 0:11:28.240
<v Speaker 1>In terms of dancy risk. I mean, you really have

0:11:28.280 --> 0:11:32.040
<v Speaker 1>to have the vaccine proout programs to hit a big

0:11:32.080 --> 0:11:34.720
<v Speaker 1>bump and and you know, maybe some of these countries

0:11:34.840 --> 0:11:37.880
<v Speaker 1>starts going back in terms of infection rates and then

0:11:37.920 --> 0:11:40.640
<v Speaker 1>you have to shut down passes the economy again. I

0:11:40.679 --> 0:11:43.080
<v Speaker 1>think that's probably the biggest risk as far as I

0:11:43.120 --> 0:11:46.720
<v Speaker 1>can see. Okay, so if vaccine progress kind of stalls

0:11:46.960 --> 0:11:49.800
<v Speaker 1>and then demand goes back down, then you'll see the

0:11:49.840 --> 0:11:53.280
<v Speaker 1>price follow right. Yeah. The only other one would probably

0:11:53.360 --> 0:11:57.760
<v Speaker 1>be if OPEC just didn't time their production correctly, right,

0:11:57.840 --> 0:11:59.920
<v Speaker 1>like as time mentioned, they have a lot of spirit

0:12:00.000 --> 0:12:02.920
<v Speaker 1>capacity that they're slowly bringing online as they see demand

0:12:03.000 --> 0:12:06.800
<v Speaker 1>ramping up. But if they missed time that they could

0:12:06.880 --> 0:12:10.040
<v Speaker 1>end up over supplying the market when demand is still

0:12:10.360 --> 0:12:13.080
<v Speaker 1>instilled flux. Is there a history of that is that

0:12:13.160 --> 0:12:15.680
<v Speaker 1>does that happen? I'm as an outsider, I have just

0:12:15.720 --> 0:12:18.280
<v Speaker 1>no idea. Yeah for sure. I mean I think before

0:12:18.280 --> 0:12:21.360
<v Speaker 1>this pandemic, OPAC member has like a history of like

0:12:21.440 --> 0:12:25.320
<v Speaker 1>cheating their quotas um so they always had produced like

0:12:25.360 --> 0:12:27.560
<v Speaker 1>a little bit more than what they said they would.

0:12:28.080 --> 0:12:32.040
<v Speaker 1>But this time around, surprisingly that Pakistano has been surprisingly

0:12:32.080 --> 0:12:35.920
<v Speaker 1>disciplined about the production. And I think special Saudi Arabia,

0:12:35.960 --> 0:12:38.560
<v Speaker 1>I mean they you know that really took like bills

0:12:38.600 --> 0:12:41.120
<v Speaker 1>of their own production offline. Who did this year just

0:12:41.160 --> 0:12:43.880
<v Speaker 1>to keep the marketing balance. So this time around they

0:12:43.920 --> 0:12:47.360
<v Speaker 1>are where we disciplined. But as we as surprises guests

0:12:47.400 --> 0:12:52.280
<v Speaker 1>higher and higher, you know, the temptations to cheat higher.

0:12:53.080 --> 0:12:56.880
<v Speaker 1>So yeah, cheeze okay, so needs to stay. We're in

0:12:56.920 --> 0:12:59.680
<v Speaker 1>for for an exciting year in oil global oil regardless.

0:13:00.240 --> 0:13:03.240
<v Speaker 1>One more question about about price, So I want to

0:13:03.320 --> 0:13:07.120
<v Speaker 1>quote you, so in your report you say the following

0:13:07.160 --> 0:13:09.760
<v Speaker 1>You say, although this price range is well above what

0:13:09.840 --> 0:13:12.319
<v Speaker 1>the vast majority of US oil players need to achieve

0:13:12.720 --> 0:13:16.000
<v Speaker 1>for profitability. We're doubtful US oil companies will turn on

0:13:16.080 --> 0:13:20.800
<v Speaker 1>the production spigits yet. So my question is, even if

0:13:20.880 --> 0:13:24.120
<v Speaker 1>the well has become profitable at a certain price, you're

0:13:24.160 --> 0:13:28.160
<v Speaker 1>saying that oil companies will not yet turn on production.

0:13:28.320 --> 0:13:30.440
<v Speaker 1>So why is that? I don't quite get it. So

0:13:30.600 --> 0:13:32.840
<v Speaker 1>I think, Um, if you look at bricky even point

0:13:32.840 --> 0:13:35.400
<v Speaker 1>of you, the vast majority of US show praise in

0:13:35.440 --> 0:13:38.360
<v Speaker 1>the money at these while prices, but they are really

0:13:38.400 --> 0:13:41.080
<v Speaker 1>resisting putting more capital into the ground to put more

0:13:41.120 --> 0:13:45.360
<v Speaker 1>surprise onlines because that will be busipin done debt. All

0:13:45.440 --> 0:13:48.439
<v Speaker 1>these uh mentioned they are are. They took on a

0:13:48.440 --> 0:13:51.200
<v Speaker 1>lot of that during the news to feel the growth.

0:13:51.600 --> 0:13:54.400
<v Speaker 1>So now, um, like all bubbles, when it bursts, you

0:13:54.440 --> 0:13:56.319
<v Speaker 1>know that you just have to work off the excess

0:13:56.400 --> 0:13:59.400
<v Speaker 1>on leverage. That's the first thing. The second thing is

0:13:59.640 --> 0:14:02.440
<v Speaker 1>a lot of investing community, allow of investors are demanding

0:14:03.040 --> 0:14:06.280
<v Speaker 1>faster payback for the investments in our companies. So even

0:14:06.320 --> 0:14:08.280
<v Speaker 1>after these companies woke of the dead, there would be

0:14:08.360 --> 0:14:11.560
<v Speaker 1>under pressure to increase like different and share buybacks. Okay,

0:14:11.679 --> 0:14:14.720
<v Speaker 1>So effectively they're kind of on a diet in a way.

0:14:15.559 --> 0:14:18.520
<v Speaker 1>So broadly speaking, what can we expect from the industry

0:14:18.559 --> 0:14:20.360
<v Speaker 1>going forward for the rest of the year and actually

0:14:20.360 --> 0:14:24.040
<v Speaker 1>poste anything different than we already mentioned already. So I

0:14:24.080 --> 0:14:26.920
<v Speaker 1>think going forward, because the US is no longer a

0:14:26.920 --> 0:14:30.240
<v Speaker 1>big growth engine of production, all prices realities will be

0:14:30.280 --> 0:14:33.160
<v Speaker 1>a lot more sustainable going forward because if you look

0:14:33.240 --> 0:14:35.400
<v Speaker 1>in the past, in the past like ten years or so,

0:14:35.520 --> 0:14:38.680
<v Speaker 1>there were more than several occasions when the growth of

0:14:38.840 --> 0:14:42.440
<v Speaker 1>US our production has like derailed price raieties and the

0:14:42.520 --> 0:14:44.800
<v Speaker 1>end up that OPEC had to like cut back the

0:14:44.840 --> 0:14:48.800
<v Speaker 1>production to make room for for US oil growth. But

0:14:48.960 --> 0:14:52.080
<v Speaker 1>without that, all prices are probably all price rarities are

0:14:52.080 --> 0:14:55.640
<v Speaker 1>probably much more sustainable than in the past. Yeah, and

0:14:55.680 --> 0:14:58.160
<v Speaker 1>the other thing on the US supply side, just as

0:14:58.200 --> 0:15:02.400
<v Speaker 1>time mentioned, producers really are even with the prices where

0:15:02.440 --> 0:15:04.440
<v Speaker 1>they are at the moment, producers are sticking to the

0:15:04.560 --> 0:15:10.240
<v Speaker 1>story of capital discipline, maintaining flat production, putting any increased

0:15:10.240 --> 0:15:14.560
<v Speaker 1>revenue towards debt reduction and shareholder payout. When they think

0:15:14.600 --> 0:15:19.240
<v Speaker 1>past into two, some of them are starting to talk

0:15:19.320 --> 0:15:24.200
<v Speaker 1>about slow production growth, so growth of maybe three percent

0:15:24.360 --> 0:15:27.080
<v Speaker 1>or five percent nowhere near the double digit growth rates

0:15:27.120 --> 0:15:29.520
<v Speaker 1>that we saw before. At the moment, it seems like

0:15:29.560 --> 0:15:32.040
<v Speaker 1>the investor community seems okay with that. We didn't see

0:15:32.040 --> 0:15:35.400
<v Speaker 1>any major stock price movements when they made those announcements

0:15:35.400 --> 0:15:38.960
<v Speaker 1>on their earnings calls. So it looks like if demand

0:15:39.000 --> 0:15:41.840
<v Speaker 1>does recover and things are going well into next year,

0:15:41.880 --> 0:15:44.080
<v Speaker 1>we might see a bit of growth out of the

0:15:44.120 --> 0:15:47.240
<v Speaker 1>U S. Shail patch, but nothing like it was before.

0:15:47.240 --> 0:15:49.680
<v Speaker 1>And they do seem to be watching what the opex

0:15:49.760 --> 0:15:53.160
<v Speaker 1>doing and sort of deferring to being more reactive to

0:15:53.200 --> 0:15:56.120
<v Speaker 1>OPEC rather than as time mentioned before, when they were

0:15:56.120 --> 0:15:59.920
<v Speaker 1>sort of ready to compete for a market share. Okay, okay,

0:16:00.200 --> 0:16:02.880
<v Speaker 1>so a little bit less ambition, more what do you

0:16:02.880 --> 0:16:05.240
<v Speaker 1>call it, fiscal discipline, much better term than I used

0:16:05.280 --> 0:16:09.360
<v Speaker 1>a diet. Yeah, but moderate growth coming yeah. Okay. So

0:16:09.360 --> 0:16:11.320
<v Speaker 1>we're gonna take a quick break and when we come back,

0:16:11.360 --> 0:16:13.160
<v Speaker 1>we're going to talk a bit more about what the

0:16:13.160 --> 0:16:15.840
<v Speaker 1>players are doing, who they are, and the next areas

0:16:15.880 --> 0:16:23.080
<v Speaker 1>of research for the U. S. Oil team. Stay with us.

0:16:23.120 --> 0:16:26.360
<v Speaker 1>So in the report, I noticed something that that we

0:16:26.360 --> 0:16:29.960
<v Speaker 1>were talking about before we hit record, was that a

0:16:29.960 --> 0:16:31.720
<v Speaker 1>lot of the players that you mentioned in this report,

0:16:31.720 --> 0:16:35.280
<v Speaker 1>I've never heard of so shale production comes mostly from

0:16:35.320 --> 0:16:37.840
<v Speaker 1>a handful of areas in the US are basins, and

0:16:37.880 --> 0:16:40.480
<v Speaker 1>the players are mostly independents, is that right? Or they

0:16:40.520 --> 0:16:42.840
<v Speaker 1>listed or they just you know, companies we were just

0:16:43.120 --> 0:16:45.440
<v Speaker 1>not familiar with. Can you describe it a bit in

0:16:45.480 --> 0:16:47.080
<v Speaker 1>the U S all page. A lot of these show

0:16:47.120 --> 0:16:51.200
<v Speaker 1>players on what we called US independent companies, So they're

0:16:51.280 --> 0:16:54.920
<v Speaker 1>not like the examble or show VP majors, the all

0:16:55.000 --> 0:16:57.440
<v Speaker 1>majors that most people are familiar with. They have like

0:16:57.520 --> 0:17:01.600
<v Speaker 1>one names like yog Resources, Devon Energy, Diamondback Energy, just

0:17:01.920 --> 0:17:04.600
<v Speaker 1>companies that people will only be familiar with. Your few

0:17:04.680 --> 0:17:07.080
<v Speaker 1>in the industry. I think it's like some history to

0:17:07.160 --> 0:17:10.600
<v Speaker 1>that because shore He's okay, that's not been big enough

0:17:10.640 --> 0:17:13.840
<v Speaker 1>of an impact for the all majors. So a lot

0:17:13.880 --> 0:17:16.520
<v Speaker 1>of these all majors dident invest in show until like

0:17:16.600 --> 0:17:19.320
<v Speaker 1>the later years. So that's why we have a lot

0:17:19.359 --> 0:17:22.480
<v Speaker 1>of like the smaller independent companies took over in the

0:17:22.560 --> 0:17:26.280
<v Speaker 1>early days, and some of them actually produce sizeable quantities

0:17:26.280 --> 0:17:28.600
<v Speaker 1>of oil. Actually at these points in times like EO

0:17:28.600 --> 0:17:33.600
<v Speaker 1>G and Occidental, they're they're pretty big, publicly traded companies

0:17:33.640 --> 0:17:36.520
<v Speaker 1>for what they produce. But yeah, there's a ton of

0:17:36.560 --> 0:17:39.600
<v Speaker 1>those medium sized guys and a ton of consolidation in

0:17:39.640 --> 0:17:42.760
<v Speaker 1>the industry actually, so you'll constantly hear of mergers and

0:17:42.760 --> 0:17:46.600
<v Speaker 1>acquisitions in this space. Are they particularly active like I

0:17:46.640 --> 0:17:49.040
<v Speaker 1>think they're in your report? You mentioned their five main

0:17:49.320 --> 0:17:53.119
<v Speaker 1>shale basins. Do they like have home home turf for you?

0:17:53.160 --> 0:17:54.879
<v Speaker 1>Know that this is that they are more active in

0:17:54.960 --> 0:17:58.240
<v Speaker 1>one versus another. How does that work? There's like two models.

0:17:58.320 --> 0:18:01.480
<v Speaker 1>One is that's definitely more focused in one region so

0:18:01.560 --> 0:18:04.440
<v Speaker 1>they can larage all the expertise and know how and

0:18:04.560 --> 0:18:07.119
<v Speaker 1>supply change in the one basin. And then they're like

0:18:07.160 --> 0:18:09.800
<v Speaker 1>a couple of companies that spread out so they can

0:18:09.840 --> 0:18:12.960
<v Speaker 1>diversify the risks, or they're spread out in the various regions.

0:18:13.400 --> 0:18:15.119
<v Speaker 1>Can we talk about the basins for a second. Is

0:18:15.119 --> 0:18:17.480
<v Speaker 1>there a basin that really stands out as being a

0:18:17.520 --> 0:18:21.240
<v Speaker 1>top performer? Definitely the Permian if you're talking about size

0:18:21.320 --> 0:18:25.560
<v Speaker 1>and performance, the Permans probably is producing about four point

0:18:25.640 --> 0:18:28.560
<v Speaker 1>six million bells with it right now. And the significance

0:18:28.600 --> 0:18:31.280
<v Speaker 1>if you consider the US is only its producing about

0:18:31.320 --> 0:18:34.040
<v Speaker 1>eleven million belts today, so almost half of the US

0:18:34.119 --> 0:18:37.280
<v Speaker 1>output it's coming from a one basin in the Permian

0:18:37.720 --> 0:18:40.199
<v Speaker 1>and for those of you who aren't familiar with oil

0:18:40.240 --> 0:18:42.639
<v Speaker 1>basins in the US geography sector, it's sort of in

0:18:42.720 --> 0:18:46.240
<v Speaker 1>western Texas and the sort of southeast corner of New Mexico.

0:18:46.400 --> 0:18:48.960
<v Speaker 1>That's where the Permian sits. And how are these plays

0:18:48.960 --> 0:18:51.239
<v Speaker 1>different from each other? They're all shale that are they

0:18:51.240 --> 0:18:53.919
<v Speaker 1>different geologically or anything like that. I think, on a

0:18:54.000 --> 0:18:57.640
<v Speaker 1>very hard level, shell geologically are pretty much the same.

0:18:57.680 --> 0:19:01.359
<v Speaker 1>They have the same characteristics, but the quality of the

0:19:01.480 --> 0:19:05.080
<v Speaker 1>rock definitely could be very different from not only from

0:19:05.119 --> 0:19:07.880
<v Speaker 1>basin to basin, but even from county to Candy. And

0:19:08.000 --> 0:19:10.879
<v Speaker 1>the other questions the maturity of these play Some of

0:19:10.920 --> 0:19:13.800
<v Speaker 1>these played, um, like the Legal Food which is in

0:19:13.880 --> 0:19:17.040
<v Speaker 1>South Texas, They've been very drewed out. They've been around

0:19:17.080 --> 0:19:19.960
<v Speaker 1>for a long time, and the productivity for these worlds

0:19:20.000 --> 0:19:22.480
<v Speaker 1>are just not as good as they were before. So

0:19:22.640 --> 0:19:25.640
<v Speaker 1>that's definitely like an age and quality aspect, as well

0:19:25.680 --> 0:19:29.320
<v Speaker 1>as other characteristics to like infrastructure of variability and so

0:19:29.400 --> 0:19:31.760
<v Speaker 1>on and so forth. Is there anything that you want

0:19:31.800 --> 0:19:35.520
<v Speaker 1>readers or listeners to know about any of the you know,

0:19:35.560 --> 0:19:37.520
<v Speaker 1>the outlook for any of these basins besides you know,

0:19:37.520 --> 0:19:40.280
<v Speaker 1>Eagle Ford is is drawing down. Is there anything else

0:19:40.280 --> 0:19:42.439
<v Speaker 1>that stands out, you know, we put you know research,

0:19:42.720 --> 0:19:45.680
<v Speaker 1>We think that US a production show production will pretty

0:19:45.760 --> 0:19:48.560
<v Speaker 1>much be fratished for the next eighteen months, will probably

0:19:48.560 --> 0:19:50.800
<v Speaker 1>grow by only a hundred sixty tho pars per day

0:19:51.320 --> 0:19:54.560
<v Speaker 1>wh should now and in December, and all of the

0:19:54.680 --> 0:19:57.560
<v Speaker 1>growth will be coming from the premier. The other basins

0:19:57.600 --> 0:20:00.840
<v Speaker 1>will probably be like out of threat or slightly over. Yeah.

0:20:00.960 --> 0:20:03.639
<v Speaker 1>So if the perman ever stops growing for whatever reason,

0:20:04.040 --> 0:20:06.399
<v Speaker 1>the growth trajectory is, it's not going to be exist

0:20:06.520 --> 0:20:09.480
<v Speaker 1>in existence. So, either from the report or not. What

0:20:09.560 --> 0:20:12.320
<v Speaker 1>are some of the major takeaways from your recent research, so, like,

0:20:12.640 --> 0:20:15.000
<v Speaker 1>what are you seeing in the market and what are

0:20:15.200 --> 0:20:17.960
<v Speaker 1>US oil producers saying. I think on that definitely a

0:20:18.000 --> 0:20:20.320
<v Speaker 1>couple of big takeaways. The first one is that hire

0:20:20.359 --> 0:20:23.119
<v Speaker 1>all prices, unlike in the past, it's not going to

0:20:23.320 --> 0:20:26.240
<v Speaker 1>translate into a more oil production, at least in the

0:20:26.400 --> 0:20:30.040
<v Speaker 1>US companies. The producers are really busy putting down to

0:20:30.160 --> 0:20:33.200
<v Speaker 1>debt and returning capital to shareholders, and they are where

0:20:33.240 --> 0:20:35.920
<v Speaker 1>we reluctant to invest capital more capital into the ground

0:20:35.960 --> 0:20:40.000
<v Speaker 1>to increase production. So even if higher commodities prices states

0:20:40.080 --> 0:20:42.240
<v Speaker 1>run for a while, production is not going to concrease.

0:20:42.320 --> 0:20:44.680
<v Speaker 1>That's the first one. I think the second one would be,

0:20:44.760 --> 0:20:47.600
<v Speaker 1>like that's colder of that is that all Pakis back

0:20:47.640 --> 0:20:50.520
<v Speaker 1>in control of all surprise. Historically, like and I mentioned

0:20:50.680 --> 0:20:54.760
<v Speaker 1>that all Pakis made adomy macroom for US production growth.

0:20:55.359 --> 0:20:58.280
<v Speaker 1>Now there's no longer the case. All Pakistani back in control,

0:20:58.640 --> 0:21:01.479
<v Speaker 1>but definitely all prices ready is going to be more

0:21:01.560 --> 0:21:04.520
<v Speaker 1>much more sustainable than in the past without the undergrowth

0:21:04.600 --> 0:21:08.359
<v Speaker 1>engine in the US and taking it to our clients,

0:21:08.400 --> 0:21:11.000
<v Speaker 1>your listeners might know or not know that. One of

0:21:11.040 --> 0:21:12.600
<v Speaker 1>the things that we do is we talk to two

0:21:12.680 --> 0:21:14.960
<v Speaker 1>clients quite a bit, people that are reading the research,

0:21:15.080 --> 0:21:18.920
<v Speaker 1>using the tools, using the data. Are they asking anything

0:21:19.000 --> 0:21:22.040
<v Speaker 1>particularly lately, any common themes of what you're hearing from them,

0:21:22.280 --> 0:21:24.320
<v Speaker 1>or what are some of the debates out in the

0:21:24.400 --> 0:21:26.680
<v Speaker 1>market right now? I think that like two big questions

0:21:26.840 --> 0:21:29.720
<v Speaker 1>from from our clients. The first one is that you

0:21:29.800 --> 0:21:33.920
<v Speaker 1>are um at these high all price levels, US producers

0:21:33.960 --> 0:21:37.040
<v Speaker 1>gonna increase the production or not? And I think at

0:21:37.119 --> 0:21:41.520
<v Speaker 1>least one they will not increase production in any meaningful

0:21:41.600 --> 0:21:46.320
<v Speaker 1>way now beyond um and I mentioned that your producers

0:21:46.600 --> 0:21:50.080
<v Speaker 1>probably comfortable increasing the production, but like where we slow

0:21:50.160 --> 0:21:53.640
<v Speaker 1>single digit through to five. So if you're looking at

0:21:53.800 --> 0:21:57.000
<v Speaker 1>like US all production at eleven million bills they right

0:21:57.040 --> 0:21:59.840
<v Speaker 1>now through five percent is probably about three hundred five

0:22:00.119 --> 0:22:02.560
<v Speaker 1>fifty bellars per day of increase on an annual basis,

0:22:03.280 --> 0:22:05.760
<v Speaker 1>so very far away from what we've seen before about

0:22:05.880 --> 0:22:07.600
<v Speaker 1>one mon and a half million bellars per day of

0:22:07.720 --> 0:22:12.320
<v Speaker 1>increase every year right before the pandemic hit. UM. The

0:22:12.480 --> 0:22:15.399
<v Speaker 1>second question is, Marcus, it is more philosophical. UM is

0:22:15.480 --> 0:22:19.280
<v Speaker 1>that will will these us all producers changed the tune

0:22:19.280 --> 0:22:21.280
<v Speaker 1>and you know, are they're gonna ever going to increase production?

0:22:22.080 --> 0:22:24.679
<v Speaker 1>And I think the answer to that is, and this is, um,

0:22:25.200 --> 0:22:29.720
<v Speaker 1>it does not lies with producers. It probably lies more

0:22:29.800 --> 0:22:33.960
<v Speaker 1>with the investors. So if investors added to change and

0:22:34.040 --> 0:22:35.840
<v Speaker 1>they're like, hey, you know what if you guys, I

0:22:35.880 --> 0:22:39.880
<v Speaker 1>think it's okay if our companies start producing the production

0:22:39.880 --> 0:22:42.879
<v Speaker 1>a bit faster than five percent, if they allow that

0:22:43.000 --> 0:22:45.719
<v Speaker 1>without you know, setting off the stock. Whenever these new

0:22:46.200 --> 0:22:49.159
<v Speaker 1>these ARE producers said they're going to increase production, I

0:22:49.280 --> 0:22:52.680
<v Speaker 1>think you know, we could see more product, faster production

0:22:52.760 --> 0:22:56.280
<v Speaker 1>growth from us ARE producers. Further down the line. The

0:22:56.440 --> 0:22:58.199
<v Speaker 1>two things that come to mind on my side, I mean,

0:22:58.240 --> 0:23:00.080
<v Speaker 1>it's time mentioned One of the big ones is what

0:23:00.119 --> 0:23:02.600
<v Speaker 1>would it take for US production to come up back online?

0:23:03.240 --> 0:23:06.440
<v Speaker 1>And that would really just be a change in strategy

0:23:06.520 --> 0:23:10.600
<v Speaker 1>amongst the producers themselves and the investors who back them.

0:23:10.960 --> 0:23:14.200
<v Speaker 1>H If there is appetite for shale growth, it's there

0:23:14.280 --> 0:23:17.520
<v Speaker 1>if you come back fairly quickly, but it would require

0:23:18.000 --> 0:23:22.320
<v Speaker 1>the capital to shift towards that end. The other question

0:23:22.440 --> 0:23:25.160
<v Speaker 1>I think that is hounding the industry at the moment

0:23:25.320 --> 0:23:28.040
<v Speaker 1>is what should the focus be? Right we talked about

0:23:28.119 --> 0:23:32.560
<v Speaker 1>this trade off between focusing on production growth and focusing

0:23:32.760 --> 0:23:36.359
<v Speaker 1>on capital returns, But then there's this other question of

0:23:36.480 --> 0:23:40.240
<v Speaker 1>like where does sustainability fit into this puzzle too. You

0:23:40.359 --> 0:23:43.760
<v Speaker 1>have some of the majors, especially across Europe, looking to

0:23:43.880 --> 0:23:47.760
<v Speaker 1>transition towards zero carbon diversify away from oil and gas.

0:23:48.720 --> 0:23:51.360
<v Speaker 1>At the moment, most of the US producers, especially these

0:23:51.400 --> 0:23:54.800
<v Speaker 1>smaller independent ones, are really focused on production. And then

0:23:54.840 --> 0:23:56.919
<v Speaker 1>the question is do you produce a lot and put

0:23:56.960 --> 0:24:00.200
<v Speaker 1>all your capital into increasing supply or do you keep

0:24:00.200 --> 0:24:03.280
<v Speaker 1>production flats and just generate returns. You know, the third

0:24:03.320 --> 0:24:05.760
<v Speaker 1>option would be do you take that capital and transition

0:24:05.840 --> 0:24:09.160
<v Speaker 1>it to some other energy source or some other type

0:24:09.200 --> 0:24:12.080
<v Speaker 1>of growth for the company, and I think that's a

0:24:12.200 --> 0:24:15.600
<v Speaker 1>question that especially some of the bigger, you know, more

0:24:15.680 --> 0:24:19.040
<v Speaker 1>financially sound of these companies are starting to think a

0:24:19.080 --> 0:24:21.720
<v Speaker 1>bit about or starting to see pressure on And you

0:24:21.760 --> 0:24:24.280
<v Speaker 1>can see this obviously at the highest levels with Excell

0:24:24.320 --> 0:24:28.439
<v Speaker 1>and having the activist investor pressure now to change up

0:24:28.440 --> 0:24:30.560
<v Speaker 1>their board and change up how they're thinking about things.

0:24:31.280 --> 0:24:35.239
<v Speaker 1>But some of the bigger independence like Occidental Pioneer, are

0:24:35.320 --> 0:24:38.840
<v Speaker 1>also starting to talk a lot about what their emissions are,

0:24:39.560 --> 0:24:41.840
<v Speaker 1>what their plans are for sort of the longer term

0:24:42.080 --> 0:24:46.400
<v Speaker 1>lower carbon future, and they've made investment in a yeah

0:24:46.440 --> 0:24:50.080
<v Speaker 1>exactly that they've made investments and things like carbon capture.

0:24:50.960 --> 0:24:53.520
<v Speaker 1>They're doing things like emissions tracking, which makes sense. You

0:24:53.640 --> 0:24:57.280
<v Speaker 1>have Biden newly elected and a new focused on emissions

0:24:57.960 --> 0:24:59.919
<v Speaker 1>um and then you have sort of the demand picture

0:25:00.040 --> 0:25:02.480
<v Speaker 1>you can't escape to. Right. We just published our the

0:25:02.560 --> 0:25:05.399
<v Speaker 1>electric Vehicle Outlook for be Enough and it's showing an

0:25:05.440 --> 0:25:09.720
<v Speaker 1>even faster adoption of electric vehicles globally than we'd anticipated before.

0:25:10.440 --> 0:25:13.080
<v Speaker 1>So it looks like sort of peak peak oil demand

0:25:13.200 --> 0:25:17.200
<v Speaker 1>is going to start edging even closer, and so especially

0:25:17.280 --> 0:25:20.920
<v Speaker 1>when the outlook for oil is looking more and more tenuous,

0:25:21.600 --> 0:25:23.959
<v Speaker 1>the question comes if you are doing this long term

0:25:24.000 --> 0:25:27.440
<v Speaker 1>strategy of financial returns, do you just ride out the

0:25:27.520 --> 0:25:29.880
<v Speaker 1>oil wave is it declined slowly, or do you try

0:25:29.920 --> 0:25:33.440
<v Speaker 1>and actually actively pursue other industries. Okay, these aren't just

0:25:33.840 --> 0:25:37.000
<v Speaker 1>little debates, these are existential questions. Is pretty heavy stuff.

0:25:38.000 --> 0:25:40.440
<v Speaker 1>And I think in the electric vehicle outlook that just

0:25:40.520 --> 0:25:44.359
<v Speaker 1>came out, they said they can pretty confidently call peak

0:25:44.920 --> 0:25:49.440
<v Speaker 1>new automobile or new internal combustion engine vehicle sales what

0:25:49.600 --> 0:25:52.760
<v Speaker 1>four years ago, I believe. So if that's a you know,

0:25:52.840 --> 0:25:57.439
<v Speaker 1>indicator of what's to come for oil, I mean yeah, wow, Okay,

0:25:58.080 --> 0:26:01.240
<v Speaker 1>existential indeed, yeah, there are some demand sector is certainly

0:26:01.280 --> 0:26:04.560
<v Speaker 1>still growing. I mean aviation. We anticipate aviation demand will grow.

0:26:04.640 --> 0:26:08.160
<v Speaker 1>We anticipate petrochemical demand will grow. But it does point

0:26:08.240 --> 0:26:10.080
<v Speaker 1>to the fact that you know, you have to pick

0:26:10.119 --> 0:26:13.359
<v Speaker 1>and choose your battles at this point too. So what's

0:26:13.440 --> 0:26:16.240
<v Speaker 1>next in your line of research? So what are you

0:26:16.280 --> 0:26:18.560
<v Speaker 1>looking at? Are you trying to answer these debates or

0:26:19.200 --> 0:26:21.439
<v Speaker 1>go somewhere else in new direction? What are you looking at?

0:26:21.760 --> 0:26:24.920
<v Speaker 1>One of our next research on operature right now is

0:26:25.000 --> 0:26:28.080
<v Speaker 1>I'm looking at gas production in the US UM since

0:26:28.160 --> 0:26:30.720
<v Speaker 1>we brew out like most of the models for for

0:26:31.080 --> 0:26:34.040
<v Speaker 1>use all production already, and gas production is pretty much

0:26:34.040 --> 0:26:37.040
<v Speaker 1>follows like a similar track in terms of like a

0:26:37.160 --> 0:26:40.200
<v Speaker 1>mothering and forecasting. So we're working on that right now. Yeah,

0:26:40.200 --> 0:26:42.840
<v Speaker 1>and then on the bigger picture discussions. The note that

0:26:43.040 --> 0:26:45.080
<v Speaker 1>I think is going to be really interesting is some

0:26:45.200 --> 0:26:48.480
<v Speaker 1>of our colleagues covering oil demand out of Asia are

0:26:48.520 --> 0:26:52.840
<v Speaker 1>looking into divestment. So sort of on that same note

0:26:53.119 --> 0:26:57.440
<v Speaker 1>of oil companies deciding how much exposure to have to

0:26:57.480 --> 0:27:00.680
<v Speaker 1>the upstream oil and gas space, a lot of the majors,

0:27:00.800 --> 0:27:04.800
<v Speaker 1>especially the international oil companies, are starting to diversify away

0:27:04.880 --> 0:27:07.920
<v Speaker 1>and divest out of maybe their most heavily polluting assets

0:27:08.000 --> 0:27:10.400
<v Speaker 1>or their most expensive assets. So if they sell off

0:27:10.520 --> 0:27:14.560
<v Speaker 1>major assets via acreage in Alaska or offshore or whatever,

0:27:15.359 --> 0:27:17.960
<v Speaker 1>that can not only reduce their exposure to oil and gas,

0:27:18.040 --> 0:27:20.000
<v Speaker 1>but also take a huge chunk of emissions off their

0:27:20.000 --> 0:27:23.760
<v Speaker 1>books and put it on someone else's, right. Yeah. So

0:27:23.880 --> 0:27:25.920
<v Speaker 1>that's the question though, is who's buying it um A

0:27:26.000 --> 0:27:29.400
<v Speaker 1>lot of these seem to be private producers purchasing them,

0:27:29.680 --> 0:27:34.320
<v Speaker 1>or some national oil companies purchasing them, where the transparency

0:27:34.359 --> 0:27:38.680
<v Speaker 1>around emissions is a lot murkier and so that's something

0:27:38.760 --> 0:27:40.439
<v Speaker 1>I think we'll be diving into it in a bit

0:27:40.480 --> 0:27:43.640
<v Speaker 1>more depth. Is what's happening around this divestment, what assets

0:27:43.680 --> 0:27:48.120
<v Speaker 1>are being divested, who's divesting them, and who's buying them? Well,

0:27:48.160 --> 0:27:52.119
<v Speaker 1>these all sound like upcoming shows for they will have

0:27:52.200 --> 0:27:54.840
<v Speaker 1>to have you back for ti Anna, Thanks for joining,

0:27:54.960 --> 0:27:57.000
<v Speaker 1>Thank you for having us. Thank you so much. Mark.

0:28:05.200 --> 0:28:07.760
<v Speaker 1>Today's episode of Switched On was edited by Rex Warner

0:28:07.880 --> 0:28:10.359
<v Speaker 1>of gray Stoke Media. Bloomberg any App is a service

0:28:10.400 --> 0:28:13.399
<v Speaker 1>provided by Bloomberg Finance LP and its affiliates. This recording

0:28:13.440 --> 0:28:16.639
<v Speaker 1>does not constitute, nor should it be construed as investment advice,

0:28:16.800 --> 0:28:20.320
<v Speaker 1>investment recommendations, or a recommendation as to an investment or

0:28:20.359 --> 0:28:22.879
<v Speaker 1>other strategy. Bloomberg An EPP should not be considered as

0:28:22.960 --> 0:28:26.160
<v Speaker 1>information sufficient upon which to base an investment decision. Neither

0:28:26.240 --> 0:28:29.600
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Finance LP nor any of its affiliates makes any

0:28:29.680 --> 0:28:32.720
<v Speaker 1>representation or warranty as to the accuracy or completeness of

0:28:32.760 --> 0:28:35.800
<v Speaker 1>the information contained in this recording, and any liability as

0:28:35.800 --> 0:28:37.880
<v Speaker 1>a result of this recording is expressly discribed