WEBVTT - 2022 Was a Good Year for Crypto Hackers

0:00:02.759 --> 0:00:05.800
<v Speaker 1>This is Bloomberg Crypto, a daily Bloomberg I HUD podcast,

0:00:05.880 --> 0:00:08.760
<v Speaker 1>and I'm Stacy Marie Ishmael, Managing editor of Crypto for

0:00:08.760 --> 0:00:26.800
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg News. It's Thursday, February twenty third. Want to hear

0:00:26.840 --> 0:00:31.840
<v Speaker 1>a big number? How about three point eight billion with

0:00:32.120 --> 0:00:35.200
<v Speaker 1>a b yep, that's the amount of crypto that hacker

0:00:35.240 --> 0:00:37.400
<v Speaker 1>has managed to steal last year and it's a new

0:00:37.479 --> 0:00:41.880
<v Speaker 1>record the company behind that number. Cha analysis also found

0:00:41.920 --> 0:00:45.640
<v Speaker 1>that one specific hacking group was responsible for a huge

0:00:45.720 --> 0:00:48.839
<v Speaker 1>chunk of that stolen crypto. If you guessed that the

0:00:48.840 --> 0:00:51.199
<v Speaker 1>hacking group was Lazarus and you know that they're connected

0:00:51.200 --> 0:00:54.240
<v Speaker 1>to North Korea, congratulations, you're probably a regular listener of

0:00:54.280 --> 0:00:59.000
<v Speaker 1>this podcast. Lazarus allegedly stole one point seven billion dollars

0:00:59.000 --> 0:01:02.400
<v Speaker 1>in twenty twenty two, with compares with less than half

0:01:02.440 --> 0:01:06.160
<v Speaker 1>a billion dollars the year before. This further solidifies the

0:01:06.200 --> 0:01:10.400
<v Speaker 1>notion that North Korean hackers are seeing the cryptocurrency sector

0:01:10.480 --> 0:01:13.440
<v Speaker 1>as a way to raise funds and revenue in the

0:01:13.440 --> 0:01:17.240
<v Speaker 1>face of international sanctions. Now, what does all of this

0:01:17.360 --> 0:01:19.360
<v Speaker 1>mean for the crypto markets and what does it mean

0:01:19.400 --> 0:01:22.360
<v Speaker 1>for you? If you hold crypto? Can anything to be

0:01:22.360 --> 0:01:25.199
<v Speaker 1>done to prevent these kinds of hacks from happening. Joining

0:01:25.240 --> 0:01:38.240
<v Speaker 1>me now is Bloomberg REPORTO Jeff Stone with more. Jeff,

0:01:38.280 --> 0:01:40.200
<v Speaker 1>welcome back to the podcast. Thank you for having me.

0:01:40.560 --> 0:01:42.360
<v Speaker 1>We are once again I'm going to talk about hackers.

0:01:42.800 --> 0:01:44.280
<v Speaker 1>I love it. That's what I'm here for. Happy to

0:01:44.319 --> 0:01:47.760
<v Speaker 1>do it. I continue to be fascinated by the fact

0:01:48.200 --> 0:01:53.680
<v Speaker 1>that the North Koreans in particular seem to have emerged

0:01:54.320 --> 0:02:00.400
<v Speaker 1>as the most profitable hackers in the entire old. Is

0:02:00.440 --> 0:02:04.640
<v Speaker 1>that a fair assessment, I think so. It's a difficult

0:02:04.640 --> 0:02:09.440
<v Speaker 1>thing to quantify candidly, but in very broad terms. If

0:02:09.480 --> 0:02:15.000
<v Speaker 1>you think about the big nation state hacking groups, North

0:02:15.080 --> 0:02:19.720
<v Speaker 1>Korea is singularly focused on generating revenue for Pyongyang. We

0:02:19.800 --> 0:02:24.799
<v Speaker 1>know that they're under intense international sanctions, so raising money

0:02:24.880 --> 0:02:28.919
<v Speaker 1>via hacking is a key part of their existence. Really,

0:02:29.120 --> 0:02:32.240
<v Speaker 1>whereas like a Chinese hacking group might be more focused

0:02:32.280 --> 0:02:35.280
<v Speaker 1>on stealing intellectual property, for instance. We know that Russia

0:02:35.320 --> 0:02:37.359
<v Speaker 1>has been involved in all kinds of political stuff as

0:02:37.400 --> 0:02:40.280
<v Speaker 1>well as just different kinds of mayhem, but that's really

0:02:40.600 --> 0:02:44.280
<v Speaker 1>North Korea and hacker's singular focus. You know, you recently

0:02:44.320 --> 0:02:49.119
<v Speaker 1>published a story about the fact that crypto hacks in general, right,

0:02:49.240 --> 0:02:52.080
<v Speaker 1>so anything that you could mention, and this is based

0:02:52.120 --> 0:02:55.800
<v Speaker 1>on a report by ch Analysis, had reached nearly four

0:02:55.840 --> 0:02:59.640
<v Speaker 1>billion dollars in twenty twenty two, which was an increase

0:02:59.639 --> 0:03:01.440
<v Speaker 1>from the year before when it was about three point

0:03:01.440 --> 0:03:04.040
<v Speaker 1>three billion dollars. But the thing again that blew me

0:03:04.080 --> 0:03:07.440
<v Speaker 1>away was how much of that was directly attributable to

0:03:07.480 --> 0:03:11.079
<v Speaker 1>this one particular North Korean group. Me too, I mean,

0:03:11.080 --> 0:03:13.720
<v Speaker 1>that was the biggest surprise, you know. I think everyone,

0:03:13.760 --> 0:03:15.760
<v Speaker 1>probably all your listeners spent a lot of last year

0:03:15.800 --> 0:03:19.920
<v Speaker 1>reading about different hacks and major hundreds of millions of

0:03:19.919 --> 0:03:24.160
<v Speaker 1>dollars worth of theft in cryptocurrency. It's pretty staggering to

0:03:24.600 --> 0:03:27.839
<v Speaker 1>think about almost half of that, half of that three

0:03:27.840 --> 0:03:30.920
<v Speaker 1>point eight billion being the work of North Koreans and

0:03:30.919 --> 0:03:33.480
<v Speaker 1>then the rest being various other parties. I think a

0:03:33.520 --> 0:03:36.200
<v Speaker 1>lot of those are still under investigation, but this relatively

0:03:36.280 --> 0:03:41.960
<v Speaker 1>small apparently military intelligence hacking units has taken the vast

0:03:42.040 --> 0:03:44.640
<v Speaker 1>majority of the sum of virtual currency last year. It

0:03:44.720 --> 0:03:47.520
<v Speaker 1>seems like they really sharpened their focus on crypto because

0:03:47.520 --> 0:03:51.160
<v Speaker 1>the year before, hacks attributed to Lazarus, which is what

0:03:51.160 --> 0:03:54.000
<v Speaker 1>they're called, were like less than five hundred million dollars, right,

0:03:54.560 --> 0:03:57.800
<v Speaker 1>that's a pretty dramatic increase. Like what's driving that, It's

0:03:57.840 --> 0:04:02.000
<v Speaker 1>difficult to know from sitting outside Telligence Agency. It seems

0:04:02.000 --> 0:04:03.880
<v Speaker 1>like they were successful and they found a way to

0:04:03.920 --> 0:04:05.360
<v Speaker 1>do it, and they're going to continue to do it.

0:04:05.760 --> 0:04:09.640
<v Speaker 1>If you think back to previous generations, we know that

0:04:09.840 --> 0:04:13.880
<v Speaker 1>North Koreans were accused of counterfeiting cash, you know, American

0:04:14.160 --> 0:04:16.920
<v Speaker 1>US dollars and using that in the black market to

0:04:17.000 --> 0:04:19.040
<v Speaker 1>raise money. We know that they have a history of

0:04:19.120 --> 0:04:22.120
<v Speaker 1>using counterfeit cigarettes and kind of propping up a lot

0:04:22.120 --> 0:04:25.560
<v Speaker 1>of that trade over the past couple decades. Cryptocurrency seems

0:04:25.600 --> 0:04:30.679
<v Speaker 1>to be their next mL And is that because people

0:04:30.720 --> 0:04:33.839
<v Speaker 1>in crypto are like uniquely prone to being bamboozled? Is

0:04:33.880 --> 0:04:36.760
<v Speaker 1>it because the crypto company security isn't great? Is it

0:04:36.839 --> 0:04:39.159
<v Speaker 1>kind of a culmination of things. I think there's a

0:04:39.240 --> 0:04:42.520
<v Speaker 1>scramble to get rich in crypto. Certainly over the past

0:04:42.560 --> 0:04:45.719
<v Speaker 1>couple of years. I think that has led to a

0:04:45.839 --> 0:04:49.920
<v Speaker 1>reduction in the amount of perhaps scrutiny that people are

0:04:49.920 --> 0:04:53.880
<v Speaker 1>putting on different projects and really rushing to kind of

0:04:53.920 --> 0:04:56.800
<v Speaker 1>monetize in this space. There's a new currency we have

0:04:56.839 --> 0:04:59.120
<v Speaker 1>to jump on this, there's a new market. We have

0:04:59.160 --> 0:05:01.000
<v Speaker 1>to jump on this. There's lot of speculation, as you

0:05:01.040 --> 0:05:04.480
<v Speaker 1>know better than anyone, and North Korea is honing their

0:05:04.480 --> 0:05:08.280
<v Speaker 1>craft at really inserting themselves into that process. Well, so

0:05:08.440 --> 0:05:10.520
<v Speaker 1>that point, you know, I think a lot of folks

0:05:10.880 --> 0:05:14.320
<v Speaker 1>have this very stereotypical idea that all hacking is just

0:05:14.400 --> 0:05:17.839
<v Speaker 1>like someone probably a dude, hovering in front of a

0:05:17.880 --> 0:05:21.560
<v Speaker 1>computer in which like green text on a black background

0:05:21.720 --> 0:05:24.679
<v Speaker 1>is flashing before their very eyes. But you've also reported

0:05:24.720 --> 0:05:28.239
<v Speaker 1>on the ones that like there are folks doing fake

0:05:28.320 --> 0:05:32.480
<v Speaker 1>interviews to try to get intelligence at crypto companies, say

0:05:32.520 --> 0:05:35.680
<v Speaker 1>more about some of these strategies. Yeah, that kind of

0:05:35.680 --> 0:05:39.640
<v Speaker 1>hacker in abasement stereotype is no longer the case. There

0:05:39.640 --> 0:05:43.440
<v Speaker 1>have been US indictments against alleged North Kreen hackers, while

0:05:43.480 --> 0:05:46.160
<v Speaker 1>one came out in twenty twenty one that was really

0:05:46.600 --> 0:05:51.119
<v Speaker 1>revelatory in some of the scope of these efforts. These

0:05:51.240 --> 0:05:56.880
<v Speaker 1>are professional soldiers who spend their lives going to international

0:05:56.880 --> 0:06:01.560
<v Speaker 1>competitions abroad. They are working very carefully night and day

0:06:01.600 --> 0:06:04.520
<v Speaker 1>to get as good as they can at using Western

0:06:04.640 --> 0:06:07.480
<v Speaker 1>languages online. They're very good at programming. It's the same

0:06:07.560 --> 0:06:10.719
<v Speaker 1>kind of programming that you would learn at Stanford or

0:06:10.760 --> 0:06:14.400
<v Speaker 1>Harvard in a kind of coding program. And the reason

0:06:14.440 --> 0:06:16.560
<v Speaker 1>that they're so motivated and the reason that they're so

0:06:16.839 --> 0:06:20.120
<v Speaker 1>crafty is because a lot of their life depends on it.

0:06:20.839 --> 0:06:24.400
<v Speaker 1>They are supporting families, you know, according to an analysis

0:06:24.400 --> 0:06:26.760
<v Speaker 1>of these some of these charges that have come out

0:06:26.800 --> 0:06:30.599
<v Speaker 1>against these alleged hackers, but they're really prolific and they're

0:06:30.640 --> 0:06:33.320
<v Speaker 1>incredibly focused. I had a researcher tell me one of

0:06:33.360 --> 0:06:37.120
<v Speaker 1>the reasons they're so good at using fake resumes, for instance,

0:06:37.240 --> 0:06:41.640
<v Speaker 1>or searching on LinkedIn or indeed for job data they

0:06:41.640 --> 0:06:45.920
<v Speaker 1>can kind of use for themselves is because they need

0:06:45.960 --> 0:06:49.720
<v Speaker 1>to do it. There's not a lot of other options

0:06:49.760 --> 0:06:53.039
<v Speaker 1>that they have to raise revenue online. You know. One

0:06:53.080 --> 0:06:56.440
<v Speaker 1>person mentioned to me that they are doing a lot

0:06:56.480 --> 0:06:58.960
<v Speaker 1>more with a lot less than other hacking groups have

0:06:59.080 --> 0:07:02.679
<v Speaker 1>in terms of technology. Coming up more from Bloomberger posts

0:07:02.800 --> 0:07:14.520
<v Speaker 1>Jeffstone on record breaking cryptoffs. We'll be right back. One

0:07:14.520 --> 0:07:17.000
<v Speaker 1>of the other things that I find interesting about what

0:07:17.040 --> 0:07:19.960
<v Speaker 1>you're describing in terms of like these motivations, you know,

0:07:20.000 --> 0:07:22.200
<v Speaker 1>these are folks with families, These are folks who are

0:07:22.480 --> 0:07:26.880
<v Speaker 1>who are trying to survive. It also seems to me

0:07:27.120 --> 0:07:30.680
<v Speaker 1>that it doesn't seem to be slowing down at all,

0:07:30.720 --> 0:07:33.560
<v Speaker 1>you know, like the numbers are getting bigger every single time,

0:07:33.640 --> 0:07:36.640
<v Speaker 1>like year over year these reports are coming out. Is

0:07:36.640 --> 0:07:39.600
<v Speaker 1>there any way to stop any of this? There's not

0:07:39.600 --> 0:07:41.920
<v Speaker 1>an obvious way to stop it. We know the Department

0:07:41.920 --> 0:07:47.360
<v Speaker 1>of Treasury is engaged in kind of an information tour

0:07:47.520 --> 0:07:50.800
<v Speaker 1>to ensure that organizations, particularly in the cryptocurrency world and

0:07:50.800 --> 0:07:54.160
<v Speaker 1>the financial world and the technology sector, have a stronger

0:07:54.240 --> 0:07:57.880
<v Speaker 1>understanding of what's happening. A lot of your listeners will

0:07:57.880 --> 0:08:01.480
<v Speaker 1>be familiar with the sanctions against Tornado Cash and Blender,

0:08:01.520 --> 0:08:05.320
<v Speaker 1>which are some of these mixing services that these actors

0:08:05.320 --> 0:08:09.960
<v Speaker 1>have used to launder cryptocurrency. We know, according to recent

0:08:10.000 --> 0:08:15.239
<v Speaker 1>reports from just recently, there is a new service called

0:08:15.280 --> 0:08:20.000
<v Speaker 1>Sinbad that has allegedly used to you know, convert a

0:08:20.040 --> 0:08:22.120
<v Speaker 1>lot of these transactions in a way that is more

0:08:22.160 --> 0:08:26.680
<v Speaker 1>difficult for law enforcement and for independent security researchers to track.

0:08:27.240 --> 0:08:31.800
<v Speaker 1>So those are all really subtle but important indications that

0:08:32.280 --> 0:08:36.800
<v Speaker 1>this phenomenon is going to continue, if not accelerating. You know.

0:08:36.840 --> 0:08:40.240
<v Speaker 1>One of the things that people I remember, I grew

0:08:40.320 --> 0:08:41.720
<v Speaker 1>up in the ins and as am of the generation

0:08:41.760 --> 0:08:43.960
<v Speaker 1>that was like, you know, forget hotmail I had I

0:08:43.960 --> 0:08:47.800
<v Speaker 1>had accounts before hotmail existed. It would be like, don't

0:08:47.840 --> 0:08:51.000
<v Speaker 1>click any links, don't give anybody your credit card details.

0:08:51.920 --> 0:08:55.840
<v Speaker 1>How do you defend against someone who is pretending to

0:08:56.040 --> 0:08:59.640
<v Speaker 1>be not a North Korean hacker in a job interview,

0:08:59.840 --> 0:09:03.200
<v Speaker 1>or who is engaging in some of the more sophisticated

0:09:03.240 --> 0:09:06.240
<v Speaker 1>techniques like cloning your simcard? Like is there anything a

0:09:06.280 --> 0:09:09.840
<v Speaker 1>person can do if even governments configure this out. The

0:09:09.920 --> 0:09:13.520
<v Speaker 1>short answer is no, Unfortunately for a lot of investors

0:09:13.679 --> 0:09:16.560
<v Speaker 1>and a lot of people who might find themselves even

0:09:16.600 --> 0:09:19.239
<v Speaker 1>as the targets of surveillance. A little bit outside this conversation,

0:09:19.320 --> 0:09:21.680
<v Speaker 1>but if there's a nation state hacking group that is

0:09:22.360 --> 0:09:26.880
<v Speaker 1>specifically targeting a certain individual or perhaps in exchange, they

0:09:26.920 --> 0:09:30.080
<v Speaker 1>have the means and motive and opportunity and probably the

0:09:30.240 --> 0:09:33.480
<v Speaker 1>orders to make that happen. You might log into your

0:09:33.720 --> 0:09:37.599
<v Speaker 1>personal cryptocurrency website and it looks completely legitimate, just like

0:09:38.160 --> 0:09:40.800
<v Speaker 1>it did yesterday, asks you to insert your user name

0:09:40.800 --> 0:09:44.319
<v Speaker 1>and password, and you do that, and then you find out,

0:09:44.520 --> 0:09:47.320
<v Speaker 1>once your cryptocurrency is gone, that that was a fake

0:09:47.400 --> 0:09:52.120
<v Speaker 1>page that was the product of eighteen months of reconnaissance

0:09:52.280 --> 0:09:57.120
<v Speaker 1>and intelligence gathering and a really careful attack designed to

0:09:57.720 --> 0:10:01.400
<v Speaker 1>take over as much as they possibly can. I mean,

0:10:01.480 --> 0:10:03.480
<v Speaker 1>hearing things like that is one of the reasons folks

0:10:03.520 --> 0:10:06.920
<v Speaker 1>are like everybody should have a cold wallet and you know,

0:10:07.000 --> 0:10:09.400
<v Speaker 1>only access your crypto and computers that are not connected

0:10:09.440 --> 0:10:13.439
<v Speaker 1>to the Internet. That has never felt like a scalable

0:10:13.520 --> 0:10:17.440
<v Speaker 1>solution for the cryptocurrency world. I mean that advice that

0:10:17.440 --> 0:10:20.440
<v Speaker 1>you're describing sounds to me like the cryptocurrency world is

0:10:20.640 --> 0:10:24.560
<v Speaker 1>experiencing some of the pain that the rest of the

0:10:24.600 --> 0:10:27.520
<v Speaker 1>Internet has gone through. When it comes to changing your

0:10:27.520 --> 0:10:31.280
<v Speaker 1>passwords frequently and making sure that you're not reusing the

0:10:31.360 --> 0:10:34.720
<v Speaker 1>same user name credentials across the Internet. It's a very

0:10:34.720 --> 0:10:37.160
<v Speaker 1>difficult problem to solve, so a lot of organizations are

0:10:37.559 --> 0:10:41.280
<v Speaker 1>not offloading that risk onto users but kind of saying,

0:10:41.520 --> 0:10:43.440
<v Speaker 1>you know, those are subtle ways of saying, we can't

0:10:43.440 --> 0:10:45.559
<v Speaker 1>completely protect you. Here's a couple things that you might

0:10:45.559 --> 0:10:48.920
<v Speaker 1>be able to do, but again, it's just very difficult.

0:10:48.920 --> 0:10:51.000
<v Speaker 1>Everyone has busy lives. You can't change your password and

0:10:51.040 --> 0:10:53.360
<v Speaker 1>write it down every day. You have to be able

0:10:53.400 --> 0:10:56.840
<v Speaker 1>to trust systems at a certain point in kind of

0:10:56.880 --> 0:11:00.320
<v Speaker 1>hope that you're not taken for all your worth. You know,

0:11:00.360 --> 0:11:02.640
<v Speaker 1>it's so interesting that so many of these conversations come

0:11:02.640 --> 0:11:04.319
<v Speaker 1>back to trust, because one of the problems of crypto

0:11:04.400 --> 0:11:06.920
<v Speaker 1>was supposed to solve is not having to trust anything

0:11:07.160 --> 0:11:09.559
<v Speaker 1>or anybody, And here we are again talking about having

0:11:09.559 --> 0:11:13.440
<v Speaker 1>to trust systems, just as a kind of a closing question,

0:11:13.679 --> 0:11:16.520
<v Speaker 1>as somebody who has covered cybersecurity for a long time

0:11:16.920 --> 0:11:19.760
<v Speaker 1>and is now kind of a crypto reports as a

0:11:19.800 --> 0:11:22.360
<v Speaker 1>result of that. I really like the analogy that you

0:11:22.480 --> 0:11:24.679
<v Speaker 1>made of you know, this is a problem that's been

0:11:24.679 --> 0:11:27.040
<v Speaker 1>experienced in any other domain that is connected to a

0:11:27.080 --> 0:11:30.360
<v Speaker 1>computer or a silver anywhere in the world. Are there

0:11:30.360 --> 0:11:35.240
<v Speaker 1>things that other domains have done that have helped at all?

0:11:35.360 --> 0:11:39.400
<v Speaker 1>Or is it really just like an intellectual arms race

0:11:40.120 --> 0:11:42.960
<v Speaker 1>over who's going to be more sophisticated, you know, like

0:11:43.040 --> 0:11:45.840
<v Speaker 1>Red team Blue team kind of stuff. The smartest thing

0:11:45.840 --> 0:11:49.520
<v Speaker 1>that you can do is use multi factor authentication. You know,

0:11:49.559 --> 0:11:53.200
<v Speaker 1>from an individual standpoint, it's not going to solve every problem,

0:11:53.200 --> 0:11:55.480
<v Speaker 1>but from an individual standpoint, you want to make sure

0:11:55.480 --> 0:11:58.040
<v Speaker 1>that when you're logging into a website with your password,

0:11:58.800 --> 0:12:02.960
<v Speaker 1>that website verifies you that you are who you say

0:12:02.960 --> 0:12:05.360
<v Speaker 1>you are in a different way, whether that be through

0:12:05.360 --> 0:12:09.560
<v Speaker 1>a text message, which is not the most reliable example anymore,

0:12:10.080 --> 0:12:14.120
<v Speaker 1>or a phone call or a QR code. Make sure

0:12:14.160 --> 0:12:18.560
<v Speaker 1>that that is on all of your accounts, and try

0:12:18.600 --> 0:12:22.920
<v Speaker 1>to be mindful about how far and wide the services

0:12:22.960 --> 0:12:25.760
<v Speaker 1>that you're signing up to are. That's to say, don't

0:12:25.800 --> 0:12:27.880
<v Speaker 1>sign up to every other thing. Try to keep things

0:12:27.880 --> 0:12:30.959
<v Speaker 1>relatively concentrated under your control so that it's not a

0:12:31.040 --> 0:12:34.040
<v Speaker 1>huge shock when in two years a website that you

0:12:34.080 --> 0:12:38.120
<v Speaker 1>completely forgot about is breached in your information spills out. Yeah,

0:12:38.160 --> 0:12:40.040
<v Speaker 1>I mean a couple of weeks ago, I got an

0:12:40.040 --> 0:12:44.080
<v Speaker 1>email from a stationary websites like they literally print cards

0:12:44.080 --> 0:12:46.920
<v Speaker 1>and envelopes, and they're like, so sorry, your information has

0:12:46.920 --> 0:12:48.920
<v Speaker 1>been revealed for the entire incident. I was like, are

0:12:48.920 --> 0:12:50.960
<v Speaker 1>you kidding me? Let me ask you this. When you

0:12:51.040 --> 0:12:53.959
<v Speaker 1>read that, were you like, were you just like of course,

0:12:54.200 --> 0:12:56.199
<v Speaker 1>or were you like, you're not even shocked anymore? Right,

0:12:56.240 --> 0:12:58.160
<v Speaker 1>I'm not even shocked anymore. I mean I think after

0:12:58.280 --> 0:13:01.200
<v Speaker 1>like the big Experience debacle in the United States, which

0:13:01.360 --> 0:13:04.720
<v Speaker 1>you know is that that is a company with literally

0:13:04.760 --> 0:13:09.479
<v Speaker 1>one job right, just identity prosection and they were like oopsie.

0:13:10.480 --> 0:13:14.000
<v Speaker 1>So it can feel really demoralizing that It's like, you

0:13:14.040 --> 0:13:16.640
<v Speaker 1>know you, you're screaming into the void of I'm trying

0:13:16.679 --> 0:13:20.200
<v Speaker 1>so hard and yet I wish I had better news. Sorry.

0:13:20.920 --> 0:13:22.480
<v Speaker 1>You know, so much of being a reporter is like,

0:13:22.520 --> 0:13:26.320
<v Speaker 1>let me tell you how bad it is. So sorry, Yeah,

0:13:26.600 --> 0:13:29.800
<v Speaker 1>especially lately. Well, Jeff on that cherry note, thank you

0:13:29.840 --> 0:13:32.520
<v Speaker 1>as always for coming on the show. Thank you such

0:13:32.600 --> 0:13:36.120
<v Speaker 1>a fan. That was Bloomberg Report to Jeff Stone. You

0:13:36.160 --> 0:13:38.320
<v Speaker 1>can find more of his reporting on the Bloomberg Terminal

0:13:38.360 --> 0:13:40.760
<v Speaker 1>and on Bloomberg dot com. And don't forget to sign

0:13:40.880 --> 0:13:49.640
<v Speaker 1>up for twice weekly newsletter, Bloomberg Crypto. This is Bloomberg Crypto,

0:13:49.840 --> 0:13:53.720
<v Speaker 1>a daily podcast from Bloomberg and iHeartRadio. For more shows

0:13:53.760 --> 0:13:57.920
<v Speaker 1>from iHeartRadio, visit the iHeartRadio app, Apple Podcasts, or wherever

0:13:57.960 --> 0:14:01.480
<v Speaker 1>you get your podcasts. Send us your comments, questions, or

0:14:01.520 --> 0:14:04.560
<v Speaker 1>suggestions for the show to Crypto at Bloomberg dot net.

0:14:07.720 --> 0:14:11.480
<v Speaker 1>The supervising producer of Bloomberg Crypto is Vicky Vergelina. Our

0:14:11.480 --> 0:14:15.320
<v Speaker 1>senior producer is Janet Babin. Our producers are Mohammed Farouk

0:14:15.400 --> 0:14:18.760
<v Speaker 1>and Sharon Barrero. Our associate producers are Ty Butler and

0:14:18.840 --> 0:14:23.120
<v Speaker 1>Moses on m Desta wonder At is our engineer. Original

0:14:23.200 --> 0:14:27.800
<v Speaker 1>music by Leo Sidron. I'm Stacy Marie Schml. We'll be

0:14:27.840 --> 0:14:28.440
<v Speaker 1>back tomorrow.