WEBVTT - David Fahrenthold: Investigating Trump

0:00:04.920 --> 0:00:09.520
<v Speaker 1>Hi, Brian, Hi Katie. Guess what, it's our last podcast

0:00:09.680 --> 0:00:12.200
<v Speaker 1>of the year, and I'm kind of sad about that, Brian,

0:00:12.680 --> 0:00:14.920
<v Speaker 1>I know, I know. But we're recording this a little

0:00:14.920 --> 0:00:17.880
<v Speaker 1>bit ahead of the new year because you're going on

0:00:17.920 --> 0:00:20.800
<v Speaker 1>a special trip. Actually, yes, I'm going to see my

0:00:20.880 --> 0:00:28.240
<v Speaker 1>daughter who's studying abroad, So I'm going to Barry's studying Jackie. Jackie.

0:00:28.520 --> 0:00:32.000
<v Speaker 1>She is in Paris, so I'm heading there actually momentarily.

0:00:32.159 --> 0:00:34.120
<v Speaker 1>But I just want to say to you, Brian, I've

0:00:34.159 --> 0:00:36.960
<v Speaker 1>really really enjoyed doing our podcast this year. Thank you

0:00:37.000 --> 0:00:39.479
<v Speaker 1>so much for being a part of this and for

0:00:39.680 --> 0:00:44.120
<v Speaker 1>sharing your wit and most importantly your wisdom about politics.

0:00:44.240 --> 0:00:47.760
<v Speaker 1>Oh my god, well, thank you. Wait what just happened?

0:00:47.800 --> 0:00:51.199
<v Speaker 1>I was just weirdly sincere for a moment. Thank you

0:00:51.280 --> 0:00:56.440
<v Speaker 1>for allowing me to to blah brush aside greatness every

0:00:56.440 --> 0:00:59.760
<v Speaker 1>other week for about an hour or so. Thank you

0:00:59.800 --> 0:01:02.360
<v Speaker 1>and away. Well, of course, Donald Trump was the big story.

0:01:02.400 --> 0:01:04.880
<v Speaker 1>We spent a lot of time talking about Donald Trump

0:01:04.920 --> 0:01:07.920
<v Speaker 1>this year, so we wanted to spend the last podcast

0:01:07.959 --> 0:01:11.080
<v Speaker 1>of the year talking about something new and different, right, Brian, Yeah,

0:01:11.120 --> 0:01:13.800
<v Speaker 1>what is that, Katie? Donald Trump? And we're going to

0:01:13.920 --> 0:01:16.800
<v Speaker 1>do that with a journalist who really held his feet

0:01:16.800 --> 0:01:20.760
<v Speaker 1>to the fire during the campaign season. David Farrenhald is

0:01:20.800 --> 0:01:23.360
<v Speaker 1>a reporter with the Washington Post. Many people are saying

0:01:23.360 --> 0:01:25.480
<v Speaker 1>he might actually want a pulic surprise. I don't want

0:01:25.520 --> 0:01:30.000
<v Speaker 1>to jinxis. But remember that Access Hollywood tape, Remember all

0:01:30.080 --> 0:01:34.440
<v Speaker 1>the reporting on the Trump Foundation. Yes, I'm not mentioning

0:01:34.600 --> 0:01:37.000
<v Speaker 1>you know the word because I don't. I don't know.

0:01:37.160 --> 0:01:39.560
<v Speaker 1>I don't like that word, Brian, the p word that

0:01:39.680 --> 0:01:46.200
<v Speaker 1>Donald Trump used. The Yeah, I tried to avoid that.

0:01:46.319 --> 0:01:48.640
<v Speaker 1>Let's just say, yeah, he likes to grab him by

0:01:48.640 --> 0:01:52.440
<v Speaker 1>the kiddies. How about that? That sounds gross too, But anyway,

0:01:52.560 --> 0:01:57.840
<v Speaker 1>David Barrel broke these stories and reported fearlessly throughout the

0:01:57.840 --> 0:02:01.320
<v Speaker 1>course of the campaign. But David became kind of Woodward

0:02:01.320 --> 0:02:04.200
<v Speaker 1>and Bernstein all rolled into one at a time when

0:02:04.240 --> 0:02:07.440
<v Speaker 1>a lot of people were just commenting on the poles

0:02:07.440 --> 0:02:10.840
<v Speaker 1>and the horse race. He was really focused on trying

0:02:10.880 --> 0:02:14.840
<v Speaker 1>to figure out who Donald Trump is, as revealed by

0:02:14.919 --> 0:02:20.239
<v Speaker 1>his charitable contributions, his past comments, and really broke news

0:02:20.320 --> 0:02:23.240
<v Speaker 1>about stuff that matter. That's right. He wasn't talking about

0:02:23.240 --> 0:02:24.839
<v Speaker 1>the comment of the day, the news of the day.

0:02:24.880 --> 0:02:28.200
<v Speaker 1>He actually did some serious digging and digging using a

0:02:28.240 --> 0:02:31.920
<v Speaker 1>cool mix of twenty one century social media technology and

0:02:32.360 --> 0:02:36.200
<v Speaker 1>little fashion gum shoe reporting and yellow legal pad reporting.

0:02:40.840 --> 0:02:43.720
<v Speaker 1>David Farenthal from The Washington Post, thank you for joining

0:02:43.720 --> 0:02:46.280
<v Speaker 1>our podcast. We're very excited to talk to you. We're

0:02:46.280 --> 0:02:49.640
<v Speaker 1>going to be completely geeking out today. David. It's going

0:02:49.680 --> 0:02:51.800
<v Speaker 1>to be all Trump, all the time. I'm glad to

0:02:51.800 --> 0:02:54.480
<v Speaker 1>be here. First of all, I want to say congratulations

0:02:54.720 --> 0:02:59.000
<v Speaker 1>on your extraordinary reporting this campaign season. I know you've

0:02:59.040 --> 0:03:02.760
<v Speaker 1>been heralded for all your scoops, for many of your

0:03:02.760 --> 0:03:06.080
<v Speaker 1>pieces that really got to the heart of issues in

0:03:06.160 --> 0:03:09.760
<v Speaker 1>a in a era when people were covering really the

0:03:09.840 --> 0:03:15.000
<v Speaker 1>superficialities of the horse race. So congratulations. There there Pulitzer

0:03:15.120 --> 0:03:18.560
<v Speaker 1>rumors flying around. David. Um, you must be feeling pretty

0:03:18.600 --> 0:03:22.320
<v Speaker 1>good about yourself right now. You know, I was looking

0:03:22.360 --> 0:03:24.079
<v Speaker 1>at your bio by the way, and it occurred to

0:03:24.120 --> 0:03:26.040
<v Speaker 1>me it took you about sixteen years to become an

0:03:26.080 --> 0:03:30.000
<v Speaker 1>overnight sensation, So I think that's probably good to remember. Exactly. Yes,

0:03:30.800 --> 0:03:32.760
<v Speaker 1>this time last year was writing about Jim Gilmore. So

0:03:33.080 --> 0:03:36.120
<v Speaker 1>it's really been a pretty fast rise. Well, how are

0:03:36.160 --> 0:03:39.440
<v Speaker 1>you feeling? Well? Good? I mean, the job that I

0:03:39.520 --> 0:03:41.440
<v Speaker 1>thought was going to sort of be over on November eight,

0:03:41.520 --> 0:03:44.680
<v Speaker 1>now continues on in a much more comprehensive way. So

0:03:44.760 --> 0:03:46.600
<v Speaker 1>I'm trying to kind of get figure out what my

0:03:46.760 --> 0:03:49.560
<v Speaker 1>niche is gonna be covering Trump the president, So it'll

0:03:49.600 --> 0:03:51.640
<v Speaker 1>be some Trump charity stuff as well, but it's obviously

0:03:51.680 --> 0:03:53.840
<v Speaker 1>got to expand because it's you know, He's there's a

0:03:53.840 --> 0:03:55.640
<v Speaker 1>lot more to say, you know, before we talk about

0:03:55.680 --> 0:03:58.200
<v Speaker 1>moving forward, because that's a big area I think we

0:03:58.360 --> 0:04:02.880
<v Speaker 1>want to broach. How would you characterize covering this campaign?

0:04:03.120 --> 0:04:05.880
<v Speaker 1>What was sort of your your true north as you

0:04:06.040 --> 0:04:10.240
<v Speaker 1>set out to cover the Trump candidacy. Well, I felt

0:04:10.280 --> 0:04:12.119
<v Speaker 1>like the way to cover Trump is not to write

0:04:12.120 --> 0:04:14.480
<v Speaker 1>about his words, or not about his words only not

0:04:14.520 --> 0:04:16.800
<v Speaker 1>about what he says, but about what he does. Uh.

0:04:16.920 --> 0:04:19.240
<v Speaker 1>And the Trump is a unique candidate. And then he

0:04:19.279 --> 0:04:21.400
<v Speaker 1>spends all his time sort of throwing out these things

0:04:21.480 --> 0:04:23.520
<v Speaker 1>that I don't know if they're on, if it's purposeful

0:04:23.640 --> 0:04:25.360
<v Speaker 1>or not, but they serve as a good distraction. Every

0:04:25.400 --> 0:04:27.640
<v Speaker 1>day there's some new thing to chase, and the campaign,

0:04:27.680 --> 0:04:29.400
<v Speaker 1>it was sort of a new outrage every day. He

0:04:29.720 --> 0:04:31.960
<v Speaker 1>said and said things that would have killed off anybody

0:04:32.000 --> 0:04:34.080
<v Speaker 1>else's campaign. But the way he did it. He would

0:04:34.080 --> 0:04:35.440
<v Speaker 1>say them, and the next day, when we were sort

0:04:35.440 --> 0:04:37.520
<v Speaker 1>of getting spun up to cover the first outrageus thing,

0:04:37.560 --> 0:04:39.400
<v Speaker 1>he'd do another outrageous thing. We have just jumped onto that.

0:04:39.800 --> 0:04:43.200
<v Speaker 1>So I wanted to cover his actions, the results of

0:04:43.279 --> 0:04:45.680
<v Speaker 1>his actions, and in particular in this case, this really

0:04:45.720 --> 0:04:48.160
<v Speaker 1>sort of important moral dimension. This is a guy bragged

0:04:48.200 --> 0:04:50.440
<v Speaker 1>his whole life about how much he gave the charity,

0:04:50.480 --> 0:04:52.400
<v Speaker 1>how generous he was. Let's go and see if it

0:04:52.440 --> 0:04:54.360
<v Speaker 1>did he really keep those promises, and how much sort

0:04:54.400 --> 0:04:57.520
<v Speaker 1>of moral compunction did he feel to help. He really

0:04:57.600 --> 0:05:00.760
<v Speaker 1>put sort of a bull's eye on Trump's carrot. I mean,

0:05:00.839 --> 0:05:03.480
<v Speaker 1>I think in a way that any great journalists would

0:05:04.160 --> 0:05:08.160
<v Speaker 1>can use just reveal or review what you discovered in

0:05:08.240 --> 0:05:11.360
<v Speaker 1>the course of your reporting. The main takeaway from me

0:05:11.560 --> 0:05:14.320
<v Speaker 1>was that Trump understood that because he was rich, people

0:05:14.440 --> 0:05:17.440
<v Speaker 1>expected him to be generous. That that's what rich people

0:05:17.520 --> 0:05:19.320
<v Speaker 1>do have always been. That's a sort of part of

0:05:19.320 --> 0:05:21.280
<v Speaker 1>the lifestyle of a rich person is giving to charity,

0:05:21.600 --> 0:05:23.719
<v Speaker 1>and he wanted to have that appearance as much as

0:05:23.760 --> 0:05:25.400
<v Speaker 1>he could. He wanted to have the the sort of

0:05:25.480 --> 0:05:27.880
<v Speaker 1>the facade that he was a very generous person, but

0:05:28.000 --> 0:05:30.239
<v Speaker 1>he did as much as he could to avoid actually

0:05:30.800 --> 0:05:34.160
<v Speaker 1>doing the charitable work that that that illusion or that

0:05:34.240 --> 0:05:38.000
<v Speaker 1>facade required. So often he would use other people's money

0:05:38.560 --> 0:05:40.280
<v Speaker 1>as his own charities. He's find a way to convert

0:05:40.320 --> 0:05:42.960
<v Speaker 1>other people's money into what seemed like his own charitable gifts.

0:05:43.200 --> 0:05:45.920
<v Speaker 1>He would often promise gifts that he never gave. Even

0:05:46.080 --> 0:05:48.680
<v Speaker 1>his own charity, that Donald J. Trump Foundation, he would

0:05:48.800 --> 0:05:51.280
<v Speaker 1>use that in ways that basically where he was the

0:05:51.320 --> 0:05:53.640
<v Speaker 1>biggest beneficiary, it looked like he was helping charity, but

0:05:53.720 --> 0:05:56.800
<v Speaker 1>actually often he was helping himself. So that's that's what

0:05:56.920 --> 0:05:59.440
<v Speaker 1>I learned. He knew that people expected him to be generous,

0:05:59.600 --> 0:06:02.440
<v Speaker 1>and he need to meet those expectations on the surface,

0:06:02.520 --> 0:06:04.960
<v Speaker 1>but didn't. I often want to comply with the sort

0:06:05.000 --> 0:06:08.320
<v Speaker 1>of true moral dimension of charity, which is giving actually

0:06:08.400 --> 0:06:10.960
<v Speaker 1>something of yourself to help others. So what actually spurred

0:06:11.040 --> 0:06:16.719
<v Speaker 1>you to start looking into Trump's philanthropy or lack thereof,

0:06:17.160 --> 0:06:21.120
<v Speaker 1>and and how hard was it to track down the

0:06:21.640 --> 0:06:26.040
<v Speaker 1>contributions he did or didn't make. Well, it started actually

0:06:26.480 --> 0:06:29.640
<v Speaker 1>kind of by Shant, So I spent all covering basically

0:06:29.760 --> 0:06:34.159
<v Speaker 1>loser candidates George Pataki, Jim Gilmour, Rick Santorum, Rick Perry,

0:06:34.440 --> 0:06:36.000
<v Speaker 1>they were all gone by the time we got to

0:06:36.040 --> 0:06:38.760
<v Speaker 1>the Iowa caucuses where they were, they were all clearly

0:06:39.400 --> 0:06:41.440
<v Speaker 1>hitted out the door. So I had nothing to do

0:06:41.600 --> 0:06:43.800
<v Speaker 1>on Iowa caucus Day. And the report the editors said, Okay,

0:06:43.839 --> 0:06:47.040
<v Speaker 1>go to Iowa, follow Trump around. We're gonna see this possibility,

0:06:47.080 --> 0:06:50.080
<v Speaker 1>which didn't actually come to pass. This three time married guy,

0:06:50.200 --> 0:06:53.200
<v Speaker 1>sort of play famous playboy is gonna win, we thought,

0:06:53.320 --> 0:06:56.200
<v Speaker 1>the famously conservative and religious state of Iowa. So go

0:06:56.360 --> 0:06:58.640
<v Speaker 1>see what he does on caucus day. So I went

0:06:58.680 --> 0:07:01.080
<v Speaker 1>to this rally Trump did on caucus in Waterloo, Iowa.

0:07:01.440 --> 0:07:03.560
<v Speaker 1>And during the rally, he got up. It was up

0:07:03.600 --> 0:07:05.599
<v Speaker 1>on stage, and he stopped the rally and he said, okay,

0:07:05.640 --> 0:07:08.360
<v Speaker 1>now come to the stage. Uh, this local veterans group,

0:07:08.400 --> 0:07:11.320
<v Speaker 1>the this Waterloo Veterans Aid group. And in the middle

0:07:11.320 --> 0:07:13.400
<v Speaker 1>of the rally, he gives them a giant check like

0:07:13.720 --> 0:07:15.440
<v Speaker 1>one that they give to people who win win golf

0:07:15.480 --> 0:07:18.160
<v Speaker 1>Tournament's a really big oversized check that says Donald J.

0:07:18.280 --> 0:07:21.000
<v Speaker 1>Trump Foundation on the top, make America great Again on

0:07:21.080 --> 0:07:23.720
<v Speaker 1>the bottom for a hundred thousand dollars. It turned out

0:07:23.760 --> 0:07:25.720
<v Speaker 1>this was money that he had raised a few days ago.

0:07:25.960 --> 0:07:28.360
<v Speaker 1>Do you remember he skipped a Republican debate because he

0:07:28.400 --> 0:07:30.080
<v Speaker 1>was having a fight with Fox News and he had

0:07:30.120 --> 0:07:32.560
<v Speaker 1>this big televised fundraiser race. He raised six million dollars

0:07:32.600 --> 0:07:34.560
<v Speaker 1>for veterans, which included a million bucks out of his

0:07:34.640 --> 0:07:38.160
<v Speaker 1>own pocket. So this is he's stopping his political rally

0:07:38.200 --> 0:07:40.760
<v Speaker 1>to give away a check from his charity. Um, And

0:07:41.040 --> 0:07:43.000
<v Speaker 1>I thought, Okay, I know you can't do that. I

0:07:43.000 --> 0:07:44.720
<v Speaker 1>don't know much about charity law, but I know that's

0:07:44.800 --> 0:07:47.200
<v Speaker 1>against the law. You can't use you the money and

0:07:47.240 --> 0:07:49.960
<v Speaker 1>your charity to boost a political campaign, even if it's

0:07:50.000 --> 0:07:52.520
<v Speaker 1>your own. Uh. So I came back from having covered

0:07:52.560 --> 0:07:54.320
<v Speaker 1>Iowa and New Hampshire and I wanted to look into

0:07:54.360 --> 0:07:56.320
<v Speaker 1>that to see where they'd broken the law. And there

0:07:56.400 --> 0:07:59.400
<v Speaker 1>was another thing. He had said he'd raised six million dollars,

0:07:59.680 --> 0:08:02.080
<v Speaker 1>but he only actually given out about a million dollars

0:08:02.120 --> 0:08:04.240
<v Speaker 1>of these oversized checks and then he stopped. So I

0:08:04.240 --> 0:08:05.920
<v Speaker 1>wanted to know, Okay, where's the rest of the money.

0:08:06.320 --> 0:08:08.280
<v Speaker 1>And I thought at the time that question where's the

0:08:08.360 --> 0:08:09.880
<v Speaker 1>rest of the money would take a couple of days

0:08:09.960 --> 0:08:13.679
<v Speaker 1>to answer, because what political campaign would basically stiff veterans

0:08:13.760 --> 0:08:15.760
<v Speaker 1>in the you know, in the middle of a Republican primary.

0:08:15.800 --> 0:08:18.920
<v Speaker 1>Who would ever do that? The veterans contributions he made

0:08:19.280 --> 0:08:23.000
<v Speaker 1>to catch people up were as part of an event

0:08:23.160 --> 0:08:25.280
<v Speaker 1>to get out of a presidential debate that he didn't

0:08:25.320 --> 0:08:26.640
<v Speaker 1>want to be part of. He said, you know what,

0:08:26.760 --> 0:08:29.840
<v Speaker 1>instead of debating these you know losers, I'm gonna throw

0:08:29.920 --> 0:08:32.720
<v Speaker 1>a fundraiser for veterans to which I'm going to contribute

0:08:32.720 --> 0:08:35.720
<v Speaker 1>a million bucks of my own money. Basically, you're right.

0:08:35.760 --> 0:08:38.360
<v Speaker 1>So he got a huge political goodwill out of that

0:08:38.440 --> 0:08:41.240
<v Speaker 1>televised fundraiser and out of the idea that, look, isn't

0:08:41.240 --> 0:08:43.400
<v Speaker 1>he amazing? He can raise six million bucks for veterans

0:08:43.920 --> 0:08:45.599
<v Speaker 1>at the drop of a hat. He's so rich he

0:08:45.640 --> 0:08:47.400
<v Speaker 1>can give a million bucks of his own at the

0:08:47.440 --> 0:08:49.640
<v Speaker 1>drop of the hat. It's important to test and see

0:08:49.679 --> 0:08:51.559
<v Speaker 1>whether he really followed through in those promises, because he

0:08:51.600 --> 0:08:53.319
<v Speaker 1>got a lot of good will out of making so funny.

0:08:53.400 --> 0:08:56.160
<v Speaker 1>This seems like such a no you know, a no brainer,

0:08:56.320 --> 0:08:58.800
<v Speaker 1>doesn't it, David? I mean, you did something that most

0:08:58.920 --> 0:09:01.800
<v Speaker 1>journalists should be doing. You've actually followed up right. You

0:09:01.880 --> 0:09:04.760
<v Speaker 1>continued to cover the story and connect the dots. But

0:09:04.880 --> 0:09:06.920
<v Speaker 1>the dots were harder to connect than I thought. Because

0:09:07.360 --> 0:09:09.880
<v Speaker 1>I got back and said, okay, Trump, you know Trump campaign,

0:09:09.920 --> 0:09:11.160
<v Speaker 1>Where did the rest of the money go? And I

0:09:11.200 --> 0:09:13.560
<v Speaker 1>looked and looked at called the veterans organizations he named

0:09:13.600 --> 0:09:16.400
<v Speaker 1>his beneficiaries. I talked to them. After a month, I

0:09:16.440 --> 0:09:18.880
<v Speaker 1>could find about three million worth of the six million.

0:09:18.880 --> 0:09:20.360
<v Speaker 1>I didn't know where the other three million had gone.

0:09:20.640 --> 0:09:22.199
<v Speaker 1>And I kept looking, kept looking. This was kind of

0:09:22.240 --> 0:09:24.080
<v Speaker 1>in the background while I was writing some other stories.

0:09:24.559 --> 0:09:26.880
<v Speaker 1>Finally we get to May, so it's not been almost

0:09:26.960 --> 0:09:30.199
<v Speaker 1>four months since the original fundraiser. Something really odd happened.

0:09:30.320 --> 0:09:33.040
<v Speaker 1>Coral Lewandowski, who was Trump's campaign manager at the time,

0:09:33.120 --> 0:09:35.319
<v Speaker 1>called me and he said, Okay, I can tell you

0:09:35.440 --> 0:09:37.720
<v Speaker 1>what happened to that one million dollars the Trump said

0:09:37.720 --> 0:09:39.880
<v Speaker 1>he'd get give out of his own pocket to veterans groups.

0:09:40.240 --> 0:09:42.079
<v Speaker 1>He gave it away. But I can't tell you who

0:09:42.120 --> 0:09:44.160
<v Speaker 1>got it, or in what amounts, or when or anything.

0:09:44.200 --> 0:09:46.640
<v Speaker 1>It's a secret. But just know that million dollars has

0:09:46.640 --> 0:09:49.720
<v Speaker 1>been given. At that point where you at that point

0:09:49.760 --> 0:09:54.000
<v Speaker 1>where you also looking into Trump's other charitable giving. Had

0:09:54.040 --> 0:09:56.040
<v Speaker 1>you broadened out yet or were you just focused on

0:09:56.080 --> 0:09:58.959
<v Speaker 1>this one event. I was mostly focused. We've done some

0:09:59.000 --> 0:10:01.000
<v Speaker 1>other stuff, but I was mostly focused on the veterans thing.

0:10:01.160 --> 0:10:03.160
<v Speaker 1>Was there was such a concrete promise he had made

0:10:03.200 --> 0:10:05.600
<v Speaker 1>in the in the context of the presidential campaign on TV.

0:10:06.000 --> 0:10:08.559
<v Speaker 1>So I really wanted to focus on that um. And

0:10:08.679 --> 0:10:10.959
<v Speaker 1>so after Lendowski says that to me, I thought, well, okay,

0:10:11.000 --> 0:10:12.520
<v Speaker 1>I want to I want to see if he's right,

0:10:12.679 --> 0:10:14.199
<v Speaker 1>you know, if you will tell me any details. I

0:10:14.200 --> 0:10:15.679
<v Speaker 1>want to try to find some of this money on

0:10:15.800 --> 0:10:18.280
<v Speaker 1>my own. So I used Twitter, knowing that Trump was

0:10:18.360 --> 0:10:19.959
<v Speaker 1>on it, knowing that a lot of media were on it.

0:10:20.040 --> 0:10:24.320
<v Speaker 1>I started sending out queries on Twitter to different veterans. Well,

0:10:24.640 --> 0:10:26.640
<v Speaker 1>I thought, if in the old days before Twitter, you

0:10:26.640 --> 0:10:28.480
<v Speaker 1>would just have to send out, you know, call or

0:10:28.559 --> 0:10:31.080
<v Speaker 1>email a million you know, different veterans groups, and there's

0:10:31.120 --> 0:10:32.599
<v Speaker 1>thousands of them, and you never would be able to

0:10:32.600 --> 0:10:34.439
<v Speaker 1>reach them all. So, you know, the idea you could

0:10:34.480 --> 0:10:36.160
<v Speaker 1>prove a negative. It's no way you could prove the

0:10:36.200 --> 0:10:38.400
<v Speaker 1>negative dot Trump gave no money. But I thought, maybe

0:10:38.440 --> 0:10:40.520
<v Speaker 1>I'll prove the opposite. I'll find a little bit of

0:10:40.559 --> 0:10:41.760
<v Speaker 1>the money and we'll say, okay, well I found the

0:10:41.760 --> 0:10:44.440
<v Speaker 1>tip of the iceberg. This must have been a real thing. Uh.

0:10:44.640 --> 0:10:46.640
<v Speaker 1>And I sent us spend a day tweeting and nothing,

0:10:46.760 --> 0:10:48.800
<v Speaker 1>no response from anybody. I couldn't find any of the money,

0:10:48.800 --> 0:10:50.920
<v Speaker 1>and I thought at the end, yeah, I thought, okay,

0:10:50.960 --> 0:10:53.080
<v Speaker 1>I've just wasted a day. I felt like the oldest

0:10:53.160 --> 0:10:55.000
<v Speaker 1>man in the world. I was like, right, the Twitter

0:10:55.200 --> 0:10:59.079
<v Speaker 1>didn't work. Uh, what a waste of time? Uh So

0:10:59.640 --> 0:11:04.040
<v Speaker 1>what howen was Trump? Uh? He saw he was paying attention.

0:11:04.160 --> 0:11:06.160
<v Speaker 1>And that night, the night that I had been making

0:11:06.240 --> 0:11:08.560
<v Speaker 1>this search and not finding any of his million dollars,

0:11:08.880 --> 0:11:11.120
<v Speaker 1>that's when he gave the million dollars away. So when

0:11:11.280 --> 0:11:13.800
<v Speaker 1>Lewandowski told me he'd given it away, that was totally false.

0:11:13.840 --> 0:11:16.000
<v Speaker 1>It was still in Trump's pocket. So how did you

0:11:16.080 --> 0:11:19.319
<v Speaker 1>do the crowdsourcing? So you tried to Twitter and that

0:11:19.480 --> 0:11:22.480
<v Speaker 1>didn't work so much, although it actually did because Donald

0:11:22.480 --> 0:11:26.000
<v Speaker 1>Trump saw it. But tell us about crowdsourcing the report? Well,

0:11:26.120 --> 0:11:27.760
<v Speaker 1>that was my first experience with it, and I was

0:11:27.840 --> 0:11:29.720
<v Speaker 1>surprised at how well it worked. And then a bunch

0:11:29.800 --> 0:11:32.800
<v Speaker 1>of media, a bunch of you know, campaign reporters, other

0:11:32.840 --> 0:11:35.640
<v Speaker 1>reporters picked it up and started tweeting about it, spreading

0:11:35.679 --> 0:11:38.319
<v Speaker 1>the reach and Veterans Group started started tweeting about it,

0:11:38.360 --> 0:11:40.520
<v Speaker 1>and the idea had been okay, maybe I don't. I

0:11:40.520 --> 0:11:42.840
<v Speaker 1>won't be able to query every veterans group in the world.

0:11:43.120 --> 0:11:46.000
<v Speaker 1>But you know, somebody else watching this will say, well, hey,

0:11:46.040 --> 0:11:47.920
<v Speaker 1>you didn't ask me directly, but you know he did

0:11:48.000 --> 0:11:49.640
<v Speaker 1>give us this money, so and I could find it

0:11:49.760 --> 0:11:51.679
<v Speaker 1>kind of by word of mouth that way. That was

0:11:51.720 --> 0:11:53.280
<v Speaker 1>the idea, and it turned out and I thought, okay,

0:11:53.400 --> 0:11:55.200
<v Speaker 1>my backup plan is maybe Trump will just tell us

0:11:55.240 --> 0:11:57.160
<v Speaker 1>what he did. And it turned out to be that's

0:11:57.160 --> 0:11:58.719
<v Speaker 1>what happened. Because he hadn't given it. There was nothing

0:11:58.760 --> 0:12:00.400
<v Speaker 1>else to find. There was nothing to find at that point.

0:12:00.400 --> 0:12:02.000
<v Speaker 1>It was all in Trump's pocket. So you kind of

0:12:02.080 --> 0:12:05.480
<v Speaker 1>shamed you kind of shamed him into it in a way. Yeah,

0:12:05.559 --> 0:12:07.599
<v Speaker 1>I guess. So I asked him that night. He so

0:12:07.720 --> 0:12:09.480
<v Speaker 1>Trump called me. This is the last time he and

0:12:09.559 --> 0:12:12.360
<v Speaker 1>I spoke. He called me in late May to say, okay, yes,

0:12:12.440 --> 0:12:14.360
<v Speaker 1>I just gave the million dollars out. He gave it

0:12:14.400 --> 0:12:16.480
<v Speaker 1>all in one fell swoop to this particular charity run

0:12:16.559 --> 0:12:18.880
<v Speaker 1>by a friend of his, and I said, well, you know,

0:12:19.360 --> 0:12:21.960
<v Speaker 1>could you would you have given this money out if

0:12:22.000 --> 0:12:23.800
<v Speaker 1>I hadn't been asking about it? And he said, oh,

0:12:23.800 --> 0:12:25.800
<v Speaker 1>you're really a nasty guy. You're a very nasty guy.

0:12:25.920 --> 0:12:28.120
<v Speaker 1>That was his answer. Did he say sad with an

0:12:28.200 --> 0:12:31.000
<v Speaker 1>exclamation mark? I don't. I don't find that he says

0:12:31.040 --> 0:12:32.960
<v Speaker 1>that in conversation, but he does say nasty a lot.

0:12:33.000 --> 0:12:34.480
<v Speaker 1>It was a weird interview because he would say, you're

0:12:34.480 --> 0:12:37.440
<v Speaker 1>so nasty guy, and Hillary Clinton was a nasty woman. Yeah,

0:12:38.240 --> 0:12:40.560
<v Speaker 1>I'm not definitely not the only nasty person. We should

0:12:40.600 --> 0:12:48.520
<v Speaker 1>que Janet Jackson right now for some reason. But anyway,

0:12:48.559 --> 0:12:51.880
<v Speaker 1>and then you started looking more broadly at what the

0:12:51.960 --> 0:12:55.400
<v Speaker 1>Donald J. Trump Foundation has been doing or not doing,

0:12:55.720 --> 0:12:58.640
<v Speaker 1>and in a nutshell, the answer would be, well, the

0:12:58.720 --> 0:13:02.240
<v Speaker 1>Trump Foundation, he was giving money out of it, not

0:13:02.400 --> 0:13:05.360
<v Speaker 1>in very large amounts, to charities, often charities that did

0:13:05.480 --> 0:13:07.160
<v Speaker 1>business with him. You have to remember a lot of

0:13:07.200 --> 0:13:10.199
<v Speaker 1>Trump's business at marl Lago and Trump Tower is running

0:13:10.200 --> 0:13:12.319
<v Speaker 1>out ballrooms to charities who can pay like two it

0:13:12.440 --> 0:13:14.920
<v Speaker 1>and seventy five thousand dollars a night to rent out

0:13:14.960 --> 0:13:17.839
<v Speaker 1>Mara Lago. So they're his clients. So he was giving

0:13:18.240 --> 0:13:21.480
<v Speaker 1>donations to these clients. But the money we figured out

0:13:21.600 --> 0:13:23.720
<v Speaker 1>was not his, the money the Trump Foundation. He hadn't

0:13:23.720 --> 0:13:26.480
<v Speaker 1>given the Trump Foundation a dollar since two thousand and eight,

0:13:26.559 --> 0:13:29.240
<v Speaker 1>and had all been other people's money that he took

0:13:29.320 --> 0:13:31.640
<v Speaker 1>in and then gave out. I mean, the one extreme

0:13:31.679 --> 0:13:34.199
<v Speaker 1>example we found just amazed me. So okay. So there's

0:13:34.240 --> 0:13:38.080
<v Speaker 1>this charity in in Florida, the Palm Beach Police Foundation,

0:13:38.360 --> 0:13:41.760
<v Speaker 1>which is uh, they ran out Mara Lago for seventy

0:13:41.760 --> 0:13:44.240
<v Speaker 1>five thousand dollars a night. Trump wants to give them

0:13:44.240 --> 0:13:46.960
<v Speaker 1>a donation, but he doesn't use his money. He doesn't

0:13:46.960 --> 0:13:48.920
<v Speaker 1>even use the money. And the Trump Foundation. He calls

0:13:49.000 --> 0:13:51.120
<v Speaker 1>the foundation of a friend of his who has died

0:13:51.480 --> 0:13:54.360
<v Speaker 1>and asked the friends surviving relatives, hey, listen, I'm raising

0:13:54.400 --> 0:13:56.320
<v Speaker 1>money for the Palm Beach Police Foundation. Can you kick

0:13:56.360 --> 0:13:58.600
<v Speaker 1>in someone? I say sure, but he says, don't give

0:13:58.640 --> 0:14:00.400
<v Speaker 1>it straight to the Palmic Police Foundation. Give it to

0:14:00.480 --> 0:14:02.120
<v Speaker 1>me and I'll pass it on to them. So they

0:14:02.160 --> 0:14:04.760
<v Speaker 1>give him two hundred thousand dollars the Donald J. Trump Foundation.

0:14:05.040 --> 0:14:07.520
<v Speaker 1>He just takes their money and gives it on, adding

0:14:07.600 --> 0:14:09.240
<v Speaker 1>nothing of his own, gives it to the Palm Beach

0:14:09.280 --> 0:14:12.200
<v Speaker 1>Police Foundation, and then Trump is recognized as a philanthropist.

0:14:12.280 --> 0:14:15.280
<v Speaker 1>He gets a giant crystal palm tree as a reward

0:14:15.360 --> 0:14:18.000
<v Speaker 1>for his grate philanthropy. When was all somebody else's money

0:14:18.120 --> 0:14:20.680
<v Speaker 1>that's the sort of most director like Florence Johnson gave

0:14:20.720 --> 0:14:23.960
<v Speaker 1>the money, but he gets the credit credit. Yeah. One

0:14:24.000 --> 0:14:26.760
<v Speaker 1>of the strangest stories was the story of his portrait

0:14:27.240 --> 0:14:30.400
<v Speaker 1>four ft tall or six foot tall portrait that was

0:14:30.440 --> 0:14:32.880
<v Speaker 1>paid for by the foundation. Can you tell us the

0:14:33.480 --> 0:14:36.000
<v Speaker 1>story of that portrait? Sure? So I've been calling all

0:14:36.040 --> 0:14:38.840
<v Speaker 1>these charities the Trump Foundation had given money to just

0:14:38.960 --> 0:14:41.160
<v Speaker 1>to find out a had Trump given them any money

0:14:41.600 --> 0:14:43.920
<v Speaker 1>extra out of his own pocket? And also to find out, Okay,

0:14:44.000 --> 0:14:46.640
<v Speaker 1>what was the money when the Trump Foundation gave this donation.

0:14:47.120 --> 0:14:48.920
<v Speaker 1>Was it an exchange for anything or was it just

0:14:49.000 --> 0:14:51.880
<v Speaker 1>a straight up gift? Uh? And so this particular group,

0:14:51.960 --> 0:14:54.680
<v Speaker 1>this was I'd called three and five charities is choarity

0:14:54.800 --> 0:14:57.880
<v Speaker 1>number three five? And they said, yes, that the Trump

0:14:57.920 --> 0:14:59.920
<v Speaker 1>Foundation gave us twenty thou dollars. But it wasn't just

0:15:00.000 --> 0:15:02.560
<v Speaker 1>a straight gift. It was a purchase. A Trump had

0:15:02.600 --> 0:15:05.400
<v Speaker 1>gone to this event at Mara Lago, where the entertainment

0:15:05.440 --> 0:15:07.400
<v Speaker 1>was a guy who was a speed painter. He paints

0:15:07.560 --> 0:15:11.000
<v Speaker 1>portraits in like five minutes and then then auctions them off.

0:15:11.000 --> 0:15:12.600
<v Speaker 1>So he painted a picture of Trump he auctioned off.

0:15:12.720 --> 0:15:15.920
<v Speaker 1>Trump's wife Melania, was the only person willing to bid

0:15:16.040 --> 0:15:18.960
<v Speaker 1>very much for it. She won it for twenty dollars,

0:15:19.200 --> 0:15:21.600
<v Speaker 1>and then he paid with the Trump Foundation's money, and

0:15:21.720 --> 0:15:24.560
<v Speaker 1>that is really puts him on thin ice with the

0:15:24.640 --> 0:15:29.240
<v Speaker 1>I R S because that is not kosher. Well, basically,

0:15:29.320 --> 0:15:30.760
<v Speaker 1>the I R S says that if you're a charity

0:15:30.840 --> 0:15:32.880
<v Speaker 1>and you buy something, that has to be something that

0:15:32.920 --> 0:15:35.680
<v Speaker 1>you're using for a charitable purpose. Right, Trump can't use

0:15:35.760 --> 0:15:38.360
<v Speaker 1>his charity to buy something for himself or his business.

0:15:38.400 --> 0:15:41.480
<v Speaker 1>So the question what the heck charitable purpose would there

0:15:41.480 --> 0:15:44.360
<v Speaker 1>be in his six ft tall portrait of Donald Trump?

0:15:44.760 --> 0:15:46.440
<v Speaker 1>And we never got the answer. Wh wouldn't she just

0:15:46.520 --> 0:15:49.320
<v Speaker 1>pay for it from from their private We never got

0:15:49.360 --> 0:15:51.640
<v Speaker 1>the answer. I thought in a number of cases that

0:15:51.680 --> 0:15:55.360
<v Speaker 1>Trump's understanding of his charity was whenever he needed to

0:15:55.440 --> 0:15:58.600
<v Speaker 1>give money to another charity, he would use the Trump Foundation,

0:15:58.960 --> 0:16:01.200
<v Speaker 1>basically not understand ending that that's not how it works.

0:16:01.760 --> 0:16:03.440
<v Speaker 1>That even though in this case the money went to

0:16:03.520 --> 0:16:05.560
<v Speaker 1>a charity auction, and then we said we then we

0:16:05.680 --> 0:16:08.960
<v Speaker 1>found this later another portrait, a ten dollar portrait also

0:16:09.000 --> 0:16:12.840
<v Speaker 1>of Trump himself, that was also bought pay using charity money,

0:16:12.880 --> 0:16:15.120
<v Speaker 1>and that we actually were able to trace to his

0:16:15.240 --> 0:16:17.440
<v Speaker 1>golf resort outside Miami where it's hanging on the wall

0:16:17.480 --> 0:16:20.280
<v Speaker 1>of the sports bar. So that's clearly a legal so wait, wait,

0:16:20.360 --> 0:16:23.000
<v Speaker 1>so what so so there were two portraits, there were

0:16:23.040 --> 0:16:26.960
<v Speaker 1>two portraits one and so whatever happened to the twenty

0:16:27.400 --> 0:16:30.600
<v Speaker 1>dollar one? Is that in Trump Tower. All we know

0:16:30.960 --> 0:16:35.440
<v Speaker 1>is that afterward the artist at Milania Trump's direction, boxed

0:16:35.440 --> 0:16:37.160
<v Speaker 1>it up and shipped it to Trump's golf course in

0:16:37.240 --> 0:16:39.840
<v Speaker 1>Westchester County, New York, with the understanding they would hang

0:16:39.880 --> 0:16:42.400
<v Speaker 1>in the employee boardroom. I haven't been in the employee

0:16:42.400 --> 0:16:44.400
<v Speaker 1>boardroom there. They won't let us in, they won't talk

0:16:44.400 --> 0:16:45.840
<v Speaker 1>to us about it. So maybe it's there, and maybe

0:16:45.840 --> 0:16:48.960
<v Speaker 1>it's somewhere else, but it was clearly Children's hospital. But

0:16:49.320 --> 0:16:51.440
<v Speaker 1>the other one you tracked down though, and that was

0:16:51.560 --> 0:16:54.840
<v Speaker 1>we're again. Trump has a golf resort called Durrell outside Miami,

0:16:55.720 --> 0:16:59.040
<v Speaker 1>and so thanks to my Twitter followers, we found it

0:16:59.120 --> 0:17:01.280
<v Speaker 1>hanging on the wall of the sports bar there. So

0:17:01.400 --> 0:17:03.200
<v Speaker 1>that's you know, the charity paid for it, and it

0:17:03.320 --> 0:17:05.679
<v Speaker 1>was used to decorate the wall of Trump's for profit business,

0:17:05.720 --> 0:17:08.399
<v Speaker 1>which is like textbook self dealing text books. And you

0:17:08.480 --> 0:17:10.880
<v Speaker 1>became kind of famous over the course of this reporting

0:17:11.400 --> 0:17:15.000
<v Speaker 1>of sort of mixing Twitter with this old fashioned yellow

0:17:15.160 --> 0:17:18.400
<v Speaker 1>legal pad that you used to keep track of how

0:17:18.520 --> 0:17:22.320
<v Speaker 1>much money Trump was giving or not giving to charity. Um,

0:17:22.440 --> 0:17:25.080
<v Speaker 1>how did the yellow legal pad become such a thing?

0:17:25.240 --> 0:17:27.160
<v Speaker 1>You know, we had all these promises Trump had made

0:17:27.200 --> 0:17:29.200
<v Speaker 1>to give money to charity out of his own pocket

0:17:29.280 --> 0:17:30.680
<v Speaker 1>over the years, and I was trying to figure out

0:17:30.720 --> 0:17:32.840
<v Speaker 1>if he'd done any of that, And so the Trump

0:17:32.880 --> 0:17:34.560
<v Speaker 1>people wouldn't help me, and I try to think, Okay,

0:17:34.600 --> 0:17:37.320
<v Speaker 1>well I'll try to again, trying to prove, not prove

0:17:37.359 --> 0:17:39.359
<v Speaker 1>a negative, but proved Trump. Right, let me try. Let

0:17:39.400 --> 0:17:41.800
<v Speaker 1>me go calling the charities that I think seemed closest

0:17:41.840 --> 0:17:44.240
<v Speaker 1>to Trump, the ones most likely to have gotten his money.

0:17:44.440 --> 0:17:45.879
<v Speaker 1>I'll call him and see whether they ever gotten a

0:17:45.920 --> 0:17:47.480
<v Speaker 1>donation from him. And I knew it was going to

0:17:47.560 --> 0:17:48.879
<v Speaker 1>be futile a lot of the time, that I was

0:17:48.920 --> 0:17:50.680
<v Speaker 1>going to be calling and getting nothing, no answer. So

0:17:50.720 --> 0:17:52.920
<v Speaker 1>I needed a way to make futility look interesting. And

0:17:52.960 --> 0:17:54.639
<v Speaker 1>that's when I came up with that legal pad. Right,

0:17:54.640 --> 0:17:56.840
<v Speaker 1>could take a picture and at one glance sort of

0:17:56.920 --> 0:17:58.639
<v Speaker 1>show you how hard I was trying to find this

0:17:58.720 --> 0:18:00.920
<v Speaker 1>money and how I was failing. We're gonna move on

0:18:01.680 --> 0:18:03.520
<v Speaker 1>in a moment. But before we do, I have to

0:18:03.600 --> 0:18:07.720
<v Speaker 1>ask you why you're reporting, as excellent as it was,

0:18:07.920 --> 0:18:10.920
<v Speaker 1>didn't seem to resonate with with a many voters on

0:18:11.000 --> 0:18:13.399
<v Speaker 1>election day when it came to Donald Trump and his

0:18:13.560 --> 0:18:16.680
<v Speaker 1>use of charity dollars. I think people did care. I

0:18:16.760 --> 0:18:18.520
<v Speaker 1>have sort of a couple of theories about this. One

0:18:18.600 --> 0:18:20.440
<v Speaker 1>is that I don't think it was used very effectively

0:18:20.520 --> 0:18:23.960
<v Speaker 1>by the Democrats. I think you're you're sort of dependent

0:18:24.080 --> 0:18:26.800
<v Speaker 1>on you know, in some cases, you know, I can

0:18:26.840 --> 0:18:28.639
<v Speaker 1>only bring these things to light, somebody else has to

0:18:28.760 --> 0:18:30.800
<v Speaker 1>use them for political purposes and for them to quote

0:18:30.840 --> 0:18:33.560
<v Speaker 1>unquote matter and the election. So they used it a

0:18:33.640 --> 0:18:36.040
<v Speaker 1>couple of times, but not very much. That maybe one reason.

0:18:36.400 --> 0:18:37.760
<v Speaker 1>The other one is that there was just a lot

0:18:37.840 --> 0:18:39.560
<v Speaker 1>else going on in this election, and there are so

0:18:39.640 --> 0:18:43.119
<v Speaker 1>many other factors, you know, an FBI director chastising the

0:18:43.200 --> 0:18:45.719
<v Speaker 1>Democratic candidate writing a letter a week before the election,

0:18:46.119 --> 0:18:48.120
<v Speaker 1>you know, just to say that Trump one. I don't

0:18:48.119 --> 0:18:50.160
<v Speaker 1>think that means that it didn't matter. It just means

0:18:50.160 --> 0:18:52.360
<v Speaker 1>that a lot of other things matter too. Well. When

0:18:52.400 --> 0:18:54.520
<v Speaker 1>we come back, we're going to talk about your other

0:18:54.760 --> 0:18:57.960
<v Speaker 1>big scoop of this campaign cycle and has to do

0:18:58.200 --> 0:19:03.800
<v Speaker 1>with Kitty. We'll be back with David farenthought right after this.

0:19:13.240 --> 0:19:15.280
<v Speaker 1>During our last episode, we asked you what is the

0:19:15.359 --> 0:19:17.760
<v Speaker 1>best thing that happened to you in two thousand and

0:19:17.800 --> 0:19:20.720
<v Speaker 1>sixteen other than our podcast, of course, And here's what

0:19:20.840 --> 0:19:24.800
<v Speaker 1>you had to say. Hi, this is Lisa Craig from Cleveland, Ohio,

0:19:25.320 --> 0:19:30.480
<v Speaker 1>and the best thing about was the Cleveland Cavaliers winning

0:19:30.560 --> 0:19:34.720
<v Speaker 1>the World Championship and breaking our ruts here in Cleveland.

0:19:35.160 --> 0:19:37.480
<v Speaker 1>And we're also really proud of how we hosted the

0:19:37.880 --> 0:19:40.840
<v Speaker 1>r NC this year. Oh and the Indians made it

0:19:40.920 --> 0:19:43.960
<v Speaker 1>to the World Series. So I think Cleveland was the

0:19:44.040 --> 0:19:48.920
<v Speaker 1>best thing for me about So you asked for the

0:19:49.000 --> 0:19:52.159
<v Speaker 1>best thing that happened into thousands of sixteen. For me,

0:19:52.359 --> 0:19:54.640
<v Speaker 1>the best thing that happened was coming to this beautiful

0:19:54.680 --> 0:20:01.680
<v Speaker 1>country and being able to expand my life and my

0:20:01.920 --> 0:20:06.359
<v Speaker 1>career and my education to how to high a level

0:20:06.760 --> 0:20:09.600
<v Speaker 1>after being twenty five years in the dictator Ship, which

0:20:09.680 --> 0:20:13.919
<v Speaker 1>is a minial east In country. Thanks Katie, Bye. So, Brian,

0:20:14.320 --> 0:20:16.440
<v Speaker 1>you love to learn, right, or at least I like

0:20:16.520 --> 0:20:19.120
<v Speaker 1>to give people that impression. Well, I have a new

0:20:19.280 --> 0:20:22.840
<v Speaker 1>way for you to learn, the Great Courses Plus Video

0:20:22.960 --> 0:20:25.600
<v Speaker 1>Learning service. It's a great way to learn about any

0:20:25.720 --> 0:20:28.640
<v Speaker 1>topic that interests you. You can learn new skills, expand

0:20:28.720 --> 0:20:31.760
<v Speaker 1>on your hobbies. I know about the Great Courses Plus

0:20:31.960 --> 0:20:34.880
<v Speaker 1>because I'm a big fan of one of their classes,

0:20:34.920 --> 0:20:38.399
<v Speaker 1>which is called the Fundamentals of Photography. The teacher is

0:20:38.720 --> 0:20:44.040
<v Speaker 1>Joel Sartor, who's a long time expert National Geographic Photographer.

0:20:44.080 --> 0:20:46.440
<v Speaker 1>And this has been very useful for me because with

0:20:46.520 --> 0:20:48.359
<v Speaker 1>a new baby at home, I have to take a

0:20:48.480 --> 0:20:51.240
<v Speaker 1>lot of photos. As you can imagine, you should be

0:20:51.320 --> 0:20:53.800
<v Speaker 1>sending more of those photos to the team here at

0:20:53.800 --> 0:20:57.119
<v Speaker 1>the podcast. You sound like my mother. But anyway, The

0:20:57.240 --> 0:21:00.359
<v Speaker 1>Great Courses Plus gives you unlimited access to over seven

0:21:00.520 --> 0:21:05.840
<v Speaker 1>thousand amazing video lectures presented by top professors, any time, anywhere,

0:21:05.920 --> 0:21:09.040
<v Speaker 1>from any device. And now I think we have a

0:21:09.080 --> 0:21:12.639
<v Speaker 1>special offer Gianna for Katie kurrg listeners. Right, we do.

0:21:13.119 --> 0:21:16.600
<v Speaker 1>You can stream hundreds of their courses free for one

0:21:16.680 --> 0:21:19.480
<v Speaker 1>month when you sign up, get your free trial of

0:21:19.600 --> 0:21:23.120
<v Speaker 1>the Great Courses Plus by going to the Great Courses

0:21:23.240 --> 0:21:28.760
<v Speaker 1>Plus dot com slash Katie. That's the Great Courses Plus

0:21:29.240 --> 0:21:34.160
<v Speaker 1>dot com slash Katie. On our next episode, we will

0:21:34.200 --> 0:21:37.120
<v Speaker 1>be talking with Donald Trump. Well, actually we'll be talking

0:21:37.160 --> 0:21:40.440
<v Speaker 1>with Alec Baldwin, who plays Donald Trump. Does a fantastic

0:21:40.520 --> 0:21:42.440
<v Speaker 1>Tony Bennett. By the way, he does a lot of

0:21:42.480 --> 0:21:44.800
<v Speaker 1>fantastic impressions. Maybe he'll do something for us. He is

0:21:45.119 --> 0:21:48.280
<v Speaker 1>he is on Fuego, Yes, he is, as Donald Trump

0:21:48.359 --> 0:21:52.000
<v Speaker 1>would say, Uh, what questions do you have for Alec Baldwin?

0:21:52.080 --> 0:21:56.520
<v Speaker 1>Please leave us a message At nine to nine to four, four, six,

0:21:56.880 --> 0:22:05.720
<v Speaker 1>three seven, and we're back with David Farenthal from the

0:22:05.800 --> 0:22:09.080
<v Speaker 1>Washington Post. Let's talk about your other big scoop and

0:22:09.320 --> 0:22:14.160
<v Speaker 1>this was the notorious Access Hollywood Billy Bush tape. Um.

0:22:14.720 --> 0:22:16.240
<v Speaker 1>I'm not sure how much you're going to be able

0:22:16.280 --> 0:22:18.240
<v Speaker 1>to talk to me about this or how much you're

0:22:18.240 --> 0:22:21.480
<v Speaker 1>going to be able to reveal your sources, But come on, David,

0:22:21.800 --> 0:22:26.560
<v Speaker 1>give it up. How did you get that tape? I

0:22:26.680 --> 0:22:28.600
<v Speaker 1>can always say we had a source. It was not

0:22:28.640 --> 0:22:30.560
<v Speaker 1>something we were looking for. We had you know that

0:22:30.640 --> 0:22:33.639
<v Speaker 1>we knew existed beforehand, but you know, on our laps,

0:22:34.320 --> 0:22:36.280
<v Speaker 1>And maybe it was because I'm better known than I

0:22:36.440 --> 0:22:38.560
<v Speaker 1>was before because of the Trump Foundation stories. You know,

0:22:38.680 --> 0:22:40.000
<v Speaker 1>not look at a gift horse in the mouth and

0:22:40.080 --> 0:22:42.840
<v Speaker 1>we had Can you just describe sort of how it

0:22:43.000 --> 0:22:44.520
<v Speaker 1>came to you? In terms of did you get a

0:22:44.560 --> 0:22:47.399
<v Speaker 1>phone call? Uh, when you listen to it, I mean,

0:22:47.520 --> 0:22:51.800
<v Speaker 1>just give me some color commentary here, please, Well, uh,

0:22:52.680 --> 0:22:54.359
<v Speaker 1>we got it. I can't say much more about how

0:22:54.400 --> 0:22:56.440
<v Speaker 1>it came to us, but when we got it. You know,

0:22:56.600 --> 0:22:58.800
<v Speaker 1>I'm watching this videotape. In the beginning, it's just a

0:22:58.960 --> 0:23:01.360
<v Speaker 1>it's a it's a video of a bus, right, It's

0:23:01.359 --> 0:23:04.280
<v Speaker 1>a bus driving around this extremely boring back lot. At

0:23:04.320 --> 0:23:07.159
<v Speaker 1>the beginning, like this is so lame. Yeah, And you

0:23:07.200 --> 0:23:08.760
<v Speaker 1>can hear some mumbling, but you can't really hear what

0:23:08.800 --> 0:23:11.120
<v Speaker 1>the mumbling is about in the beginning. But then maybe

0:23:11.200 --> 0:23:13.879
<v Speaker 1>fifteen or sixteen seconds in, you hear Trump's voice and

0:23:13.920 --> 0:23:16.560
<v Speaker 1>you hear him telling this story about Billy Bush, about

0:23:16.560 --> 0:23:18.840
<v Speaker 1>trying to seduce this woman in Palm Beach, And you know,

0:23:19.320 --> 0:23:21.560
<v Speaker 1>immediately you knew the language. You know, you could tell

0:23:21.680 --> 0:23:23.919
<v Speaker 1>was Trump's voice, obviously, but you knew the language was different.

0:23:24.000 --> 0:23:25.879
<v Speaker 1>This was him talking about himself in a way that

0:23:26.200 --> 0:23:28.399
<v Speaker 1>even Donald Trump had not talked about himself in public.

0:23:28.880 --> 0:23:30.960
<v Speaker 1>It packs a lot in the two minutes, uh, And

0:23:31.320 --> 0:23:33.680
<v Speaker 1>I mean to the point that you know he's there's

0:23:33.720 --> 0:23:35.240
<v Speaker 1>that line in there that I always stuck with you

0:23:35.400 --> 0:23:37.239
<v Speaker 1>with me where he talks about groping women, and then

0:23:37.240 --> 0:23:39.159
<v Speaker 1>he says, when you're a star, they let you do it.

0:23:39.320 --> 0:23:42.040
<v Speaker 1>And then and there's like a wonderment in that in

0:23:42.160 --> 0:23:44.920
<v Speaker 1>his voice, there like a genuine wonder where he's like wow,

0:23:45.280 --> 0:23:47.600
<v Speaker 1>like I'm not I'm not bussing here, like I'm just

0:23:47.680 --> 0:23:49.600
<v Speaker 1>telling you, this is amazing that this happens to me.

0:23:49.840 --> 0:23:51.760
<v Speaker 1>I can't believe the world works this way. So we

0:23:51.840 --> 0:23:53.399
<v Speaker 1>knew it was a big deal. And we knew it

0:23:53.440 --> 0:23:55.200
<v Speaker 1>was you know, this was not him talking about women,

0:23:55.320 --> 0:23:57.280
<v Speaker 1>rating women's bodies or whatever. This was him saying like,

0:23:57.440 --> 0:23:59.600
<v Speaker 1>here's how I behave, Here's what I do to women.

0:23:59.600 --> 0:24:00.840
<v Speaker 1>Here's what I will do. Here's something I might do

0:24:00.920 --> 0:24:02.399
<v Speaker 1>to this woman we're about to meet right now, this

0:24:02.760 --> 0:24:05.840
<v Speaker 1>soap opera actress. And so the the sort of guy

0:24:05.920 --> 0:24:07.960
<v Speaker 1>got a lot of gears started in motion. Here, the

0:24:08.080 --> 0:24:11.040
<v Speaker 1>video team, the lawyers, you know, trying to figure out

0:24:11.160 --> 0:24:13.200
<v Speaker 1>getting everybody ready, like okay, listen, something really big is

0:24:13.240 --> 0:24:14.520
<v Speaker 1>going to happen, and we have don't have that much

0:24:14.560 --> 0:24:17.240
<v Speaker 1>time to do it. In did NBC sit on that tape?

0:24:17.680 --> 0:24:20.040
<v Speaker 1>I read later that they did that they had got

0:24:20.119 --> 0:24:22.880
<v Speaker 1>they had found it. Uh, the Monday of that week,

0:24:22.960 --> 0:24:25.040
<v Speaker 1>I guess in response to an AP story that was

0:24:25.080 --> 0:24:27.879
<v Speaker 1>about The Apprentice. Uh, I don't know. That was my

0:24:28.080 --> 0:24:29.840
<v Speaker 1>main worry all day long was that we were gonna

0:24:29.880 --> 0:24:32.680
<v Speaker 1>get beat by by NBC. UM. So we had a

0:24:32.760 --> 0:24:36.040
<v Speaker 1>call NBC obviously to say, hey, you know, you know,

0:24:36.400 --> 0:24:38.119
<v Speaker 1>are you gonna sue us? Because this is you think

0:24:38.160 --> 0:24:39.840
<v Speaker 1>this is your property? And we we've you know, we've

0:24:39.880 --> 0:24:42.560
<v Speaker 1>gotten it somehow. And b do you think it's a hoax?

0:24:42.640 --> 0:24:45.000
<v Speaker 1>Do you think this is? Um? You know that this

0:24:45.080 --> 0:24:47.520
<v Speaker 1>was because when all the offending words are said, you

0:24:47.560 --> 0:24:49.440
<v Speaker 1>can see the bus, but you can't see Trump or Bush,

0:24:49.480 --> 0:24:51.760
<v Speaker 1>can't see their mouth moving. So are you gonna NBC

0:24:52.080 --> 0:24:53.439
<v Speaker 1>gonna say it's a hoax? And we had a called

0:24:53.480 --> 0:24:55.080
<v Speaker 1>Trump for the same reason to say, to see if

0:24:55.080 --> 0:24:56.800
<v Speaker 1>he would say it was a hoax. So that was

0:24:57.080 --> 0:24:59.359
<v Speaker 1>so wait, yeah, yeah, So what did NBC say? What

0:24:59.440 --> 0:25:01.840
<v Speaker 1>did Trump's and miss basically did not get back to

0:25:01.920 --> 0:25:03.879
<v Speaker 1>us on the record. They didn't send the signal that hey,

0:25:03.880 --> 0:25:07.040
<v Speaker 1>We're gonna sue you, but they didn't comment either. Trump's

0:25:07.080 --> 0:25:09.200
<v Speaker 1>people At first we sent them a transcript of the

0:25:09.320 --> 0:25:11.600
<v Speaker 1>video of you know the parts that are the first

0:25:11.640 --> 0:25:13.840
<v Speaker 1>two minutes and they said, well, it doesn't sound like

0:25:13.920 --> 0:25:17.440
<v Speaker 1>Mr Trump. Can we see the whole video? And uh,

0:25:17.840 --> 0:25:20.000
<v Speaker 1>we were like, you know, there was some arguing back

0:25:20.000 --> 0:25:21.679
<v Speaker 1>and forth among the editors, and they decided yes, they

0:25:21.680 --> 0:25:23.000
<v Speaker 1>can see the video. So we sent them the full

0:25:23.080 --> 0:25:26.920
<v Speaker 1>video and it was, you know, probably it was about

0:25:26.960 --> 0:25:29.480
<v Speaker 1>three thirty. We told him, look, we're gonna publish it four. Uh,

0:25:29.640 --> 0:25:31.520
<v Speaker 1>and you haven't till four o'clock to comment or not.

0:25:31.560 --> 0:25:33.679
<v Speaker 1>We're gonna publish with you know, either way, and they

0:25:33.720 --> 0:25:35.960
<v Speaker 1>got back to us at four. It was almost like

0:25:36.040 --> 0:25:37.960
<v Speaker 1>a sort of digital stop the press this moment. I

0:25:38.000 --> 0:25:39.520
<v Speaker 1>had to yell at somebody to get her to stop,

0:25:39.800 --> 0:25:41.320
<v Speaker 1>you know, before she get the button to publish it.

0:25:41.600 --> 0:25:43.879
<v Speaker 1>And their statement that came in then was yes, Trump

0:25:44.000 --> 0:25:46.240
<v Speaker 1>did it. You know, this is him. He apologizes, locker

0:25:46.320 --> 0:25:48.560
<v Speaker 1>room talk that sort of thing. Wow. Wait, I just

0:25:48.640 --> 0:25:50.680
<v Speaker 1>have a question because I'm this is so fascinating to me.

0:25:50.800 --> 0:25:53.520
<v Speaker 1>Do you think NBC so they didn't get back to

0:25:53.600 --> 0:25:56.040
<v Speaker 1>you because you know, they took a lot of criticism

0:25:56.160 --> 0:25:59.240
<v Speaker 1>for sitting on the tape, holding onto it, maybe with

0:25:59.359 --> 0:26:01.840
<v Speaker 1>the suggestion and that they were protecting Billy Bush. You know,

0:26:02.000 --> 0:26:05.400
<v Speaker 1>this was their show Access. Hollywood is an NBC show,

0:26:05.720 --> 0:26:08.399
<v Speaker 1>so just like The Apprentice was an NBC show. But

0:26:08.520 --> 0:26:10.359
<v Speaker 1>he didn't say that they didn't get back to him.

0:26:10.400 --> 0:26:12.280
<v Speaker 1>He said that they didn't respond on the record. I know.

0:26:12.359 --> 0:26:15.119
<v Speaker 1>That's why I'm following up, baby, go ahead, go ahead,

0:26:15.160 --> 0:26:19.520
<v Speaker 1>and let the master work go ahead, David So Uh,

0:26:20.080 --> 0:26:22.160
<v Speaker 1>I don't know, really, I did not get that much

0:26:22.200 --> 0:26:24.280
<v Speaker 1>out of them that day. I should note that our

0:26:24.280 --> 0:26:26.920
<v Speaker 1>story published it like four oh two that afternoon, and

0:26:27.080 --> 0:26:29.280
<v Speaker 1>MSNBC and Katie Tour had a story about this up

0:26:29.320 --> 0:26:31.399
<v Speaker 1>at like four oh six, So we beat them, but

0:26:31.440 --> 0:26:33.240
<v Speaker 1>not by very much at all. I wonder, but I wonder.

0:26:33.440 --> 0:26:36.440
<v Speaker 1>I mean, it's very interesting whether I guess the the

0:26:36.760 --> 0:26:38.880
<v Speaker 1>official story is they were kind of running it through

0:26:38.920 --> 0:26:41.720
<v Speaker 1>their lawyers too, But it seems like they had a

0:26:41.800 --> 0:26:44.080
<v Speaker 1>lot of time and those were you know, a number

0:26:44.119 --> 0:26:46.640
<v Speaker 1>of days spent running it by the lawyers. It didn't

0:26:46.680 --> 0:26:48.440
<v Speaker 1>take you that long to do that, did it. I

0:26:48.520 --> 0:26:51.000
<v Speaker 1>wonder if they wanted the cover of not being the

0:26:51.080 --> 0:26:53.159
<v Speaker 1>ones to break the story and to let you all

0:26:53.240 --> 0:26:56.080
<v Speaker 1>have that honor. Who knows if if they did, you know,

0:26:56.200 --> 0:26:58.320
<v Speaker 1>and that's the origin of all this. I don't know,

0:26:58.440 --> 0:27:00.560
<v Speaker 1>but I'd be grateful for it, you know, however it happened,

0:27:01.440 --> 0:27:05.040
<v Speaker 1>I'm grateful for the h that it was me. Uh, no,

0:27:05.160 --> 0:27:08.280
<v Speaker 1>matter what, this changed the tenor of the campaign dramatically

0:27:08.480 --> 0:27:12.439
<v Speaker 1>for I would say maybe two weeks. Yeah, two weeks,

0:27:13.080 --> 0:27:16.639
<v Speaker 1>and uh, you know, Billie Bush lost his job at

0:27:16.760 --> 0:27:20.320
<v Speaker 1>NBC as a result of it. A number of senior Republicans,

0:27:20.400 --> 0:27:23.680
<v Speaker 1>including members the United States Senate, abandoned Trump. This is

0:27:23.760 --> 0:27:29.040
<v Speaker 1>when McCain finally abandoned Trump, and we now know that

0:27:29.240 --> 0:27:34.120
<v Speaker 1>behind the scenes, a lot of top Republicans were panicked,

0:27:34.240 --> 0:27:36.200
<v Speaker 1>convinced they were going to lose in the landslide. Some

0:27:36.440 --> 0:27:39.000
<v Speaker 1>even said that Trump he should drop out at this moment.

0:27:39.760 --> 0:27:43.119
<v Speaker 1>Do you know much from your reporting about what was

0:27:43.200 --> 0:27:47.639
<v Speaker 1>going on in Trump Tower as this was unfolding, Uh no,

0:27:48.000 --> 0:27:50.760
<v Speaker 1>not really. I mean I've read, you know, our version

0:27:50.840 --> 0:27:53.520
<v Speaker 1>of it, and it seemed like I read this interesting.

0:27:53.520 --> 0:27:56.320
<v Speaker 1>Glenn Thrush from Politico wrote something a few weeks ago

0:27:56.359 --> 0:27:59.040
<v Speaker 1>about sort of how Trump responded to it, and they

0:27:59.119 --> 0:28:01.119
<v Speaker 1>called that sort of one of the most consequential decisions

0:28:01.119 --> 0:28:04.000
<v Speaker 1>of the election. That Trump basically was unrepentant. You know,

0:28:04.040 --> 0:28:06.440
<v Speaker 1>he said, I'm sorry, but then you know, quick move

0:28:06.560 --> 0:28:08.440
<v Speaker 1>quickly to say, you know, this is the liberal media

0:28:08.680 --> 0:28:10.600
<v Speaker 1>to get me. This is a you know, conspiracy to

0:28:10.680 --> 0:28:14.000
<v Speaker 1>stop you the people from getting what you want, apparently

0:28:14.040 --> 0:28:15.880
<v Speaker 1>borrowing a playbook from a lot of things that Bill

0:28:15.920 --> 0:28:18.600
<v Speaker 1>clin did when he was under investigation for his affair.

0:28:19.960 --> 0:28:23.280
<v Speaker 1>So you know, Trump responded aggressively. I thought that the

0:28:23.800 --> 0:28:25.680
<v Speaker 1>that the true consequence of it for those couple of

0:28:25.720 --> 0:28:27.520
<v Speaker 1>weeks was going to be that it had set Trump

0:28:27.600 --> 0:28:30.200
<v Speaker 1>against the Republican establishment in a very open way. Remember,

0:28:30.200 --> 0:28:32.639
<v Speaker 1>he was attacking Paul Ryan and encouraging his people to

0:28:32.720 --> 0:28:34.760
<v Speaker 1>vote against Paul Ryan. It was this kind of like

0:28:34.800 --> 0:28:38.040
<v Speaker 1>Republican circular firing squad that had set off that lasted

0:28:38.080 --> 0:28:40.280
<v Speaker 1>a long time, lasted basically till the COMI letter. Yeah.

0:28:40.400 --> 0:28:43.560
<v Speaker 1>And and it was interesting in in those days following it,

0:28:43.920 --> 0:28:47.000
<v Speaker 1>Kelly and Conway wouldn't really come out to defend him

0:28:47.080 --> 0:28:49.480
<v Speaker 1>on this topic. The only person who really did was

0:28:49.800 --> 0:28:54.120
<v Speaker 1>Rudy Giuliani, right right, b Rudy Giuliani, who has been

0:28:54.160 --> 0:28:56.600
<v Speaker 1>rewarded for that so far, rewarded for that loyalty with

0:28:56.680 --> 0:29:01.200
<v Speaker 1>precisely nothing. Glenn brush Piece you referred to in Politico.

0:29:01.560 --> 0:29:04.360
<v Speaker 1>I highly recommend people who are political junkies to read it.

0:29:04.440 --> 0:29:08.080
<v Speaker 1>It goes into some depth on this topic, and and

0:29:08.160 --> 0:29:11.640
<v Speaker 1>it reports that Trump was actually pissed at Giuliani for

0:29:11.800 --> 0:29:14.400
<v Speaker 1>going out and defending it, for saying that he made

0:29:14.440 --> 0:29:17.000
<v Speaker 1>a mistake and he's apologized because they just wanted to

0:29:17.040 --> 0:29:19.720
<v Speaker 1>go on the attack. They wanted to throw out the

0:29:19.800 --> 0:29:23.560
<v Speaker 1>normal playbook and just divert the topic to the liberal

0:29:23.640 --> 0:29:26.400
<v Speaker 1>media trying to screw Donald Trump. What impact do you

0:29:26.480 --> 0:29:29.680
<v Speaker 1>think that huge, huge story had on the electorate when

0:29:29.720 --> 0:29:32.040
<v Speaker 1>all was said and done. Well, I think it did

0:29:32.160 --> 0:29:34.800
<v Speaker 1>have an impact on the electorate when it happened. I

0:29:34.880 --> 0:29:37.240
<v Speaker 1>think people it did changed people's minds about Trump. You

0:29:37.280 --> 0:29:39.920
<v Speaker 1>saw that in the polling averages. Uh. And I think

0:29:40.000 --> 0:29:42.600
<v Speaker 1>also it caused you know, there are a lot of

0:29:42.800 --> 0:29:45.120
<v Speaker 1>other Republicans who I think, we're willing to support Donald

0:29:45.160 --> 0:29:47.640
<v Speaker 1>Trump when they thought he could win, but you know,

0:29:47.760 --> 0:29:49.680
<v Speaker 1>disagree with him in a variety of things, and at

0:29:49.720 --> 0:29:51.320
<v Speaker 1>that point when they thought he was going to lose,

0:29:51.760 --> 0:29:54.080
<v Speaker 1>we're willing to back off. And think of Jason Chaffits,

0:29:54.160 --> 0:29:57.560
<v Speaker 1>the powerful House Oversight Committee chairman, saying I'm out. You know,

0:29:57.640 --> 0:29:59.400
<v Speaker 1>I can't look at my teenage daughter in the eye

0:29:59.480 --> 0:30:01.400
<v Speaker 1>when I hear this sort of stuff, you know, and

0:30:01.480 --> 0:30:04.920
<v Speaker 1>it's it's made people, I think, even more cynical about politicians,

0:30:05.040 --> 0:30:08.240
<v Speaker 1>if that's even possible, because there were so many people

0:30:08.320 --> 0:30:10.640
<v Speaker 1>at that moment who said, on principle, absolutely no, they

0:30:10.680 --> 0:30:13.000
<v Speaker 1>couldn't support Trump, they couldn't vote for him, who then

0:30:13.080 --> 0:30:16.360
<v Speaker 1>reversed themselves again before election day and said they were

0:30:16.400 --> 0:30:20.040
<v Speaker 1>for Trump, including chaff its Um And and now we're

0:30:20.080 --> 0:30:23.640
<v Speaker 1>having to back him because he's president elect. So what

0:30:23.800 --> 0:30:25.840
<v Speaker 1>have we learned from this? I mean, do you think

0:30:26.160 --> 0:30:29.480
<v Speaker 1>politicians are going to behave differently in response to scandals

0:30:29.520 --> 0:30:32.240
<v Speaker 1>as a result of this? I mean, I think that

0:30:32.560 --> 0:30:34.920
<v Speaker 1>this sort of picked up a lesson that George W.

0:30:35.160 --> 0:30:37.600
<v Speaker 1>Bush and before him, Bill Clinton had employed, which is

0:30:37.680 --> 0:30:40.480
<v Speaker 1>that if you don't seem ashamed by whatever you did,

0:30:40.560 --> 0:30:42.760
<v Speaker 1>people will start to think that it wasn't shameful after

0:30:42.840 --> 0:30:44.600
<v Speaker 1>all that. I think a lot of people look to

0:30:44.720 --> 0:30:48.880
<v Speaker 1>politicians to communicate the depth of their own mistakes. And

0:30:49.000 --> 0:30:50.880
<v Speaker 1>if you were able to convince people that you don't

0:30:50.880 --> 0:30:52.600
<v Speaker 1>think it's a big deal that you're moving on or

0:30:52.600 --> 0:30:55.160
<v Speaker 1>it's really somebody else's fault, you can move past it.

0:30:55.240 --> 0:30:57.400
<v Speaker 1>Not everybody can do that. I was going to say, though,

0:30:57.440 --> 0:30:59.480
<v Speaker 1>I'm going to have to take issue with that, David,

0:30:59.480 --> 0:31:03.320
<v Speaker 1>because I think this was a singularly Trumpian response, and

0:31:03.440 --> 0:31:07.080
<v Speaker 1>I'm just not sure anybody would have the bluster and

0:31:07.240 --> 0:31:10.720
<v Speaker 1>the hubris to kind of deflect a story like this

0:31:11.000 --> 0:31:13.320
<v Speaker 1>the way he did, don't. I mean, can you see

0:31:13.400 --> 0:31:15.840
<v Speaker 1>that as well? I think you're right. I think he

0:31:16.000 --> 0:31:18.320
<v Speaker 1>was an extreme case. I mean, he already at by

0:31:18.360 --> 0:31:19.600
<v Speaker 1>that point, had been the guy who said I could

0:31:19.600 --> 0:31:21.600
<v Speaker 1>shoot someone in Fifth Avenue and people wouldn't care. You know.

0:31:21.800 --> 0:31:24.400
<v Speaker 1>My colleague get Yahoo mapped By often said during the

0:31:24.480 --> 0:31:28.920
<v Speaker 1>course of this campaign, Trump cannot be shamed. He does.

0:31:29.120 --> 0:31:33.959
<v Speaker 1>He's genetically he's genetically incapable of feeling ashamed about anything.

0:31:34.520 --> 0:31:36.480
<v Speaker 1>But I think that's right. I think that's what we learned.

0:31:36.520 --> 0:31:39.280
<v Speaker 1>But it's interesting thing to me you mentioned other politicians.

0:31:39.320 --> 0:31:42.880
<v Speaker 1>I was really struck by those people. Sort of they

0:31:42.920 --> 0:31:45.400
<v Speaker 1>were reacting to what they thought voters would think, to

0:31:45.520 --> 0:31:47.160
<v Speaker 1>what they thought voters would care about. And I think

0:31:47.200 --> 0:31:49.640
<v Speaker 1>when voters, you know, I think after a while, when

0:31:49.640 --> 0:31:51.520
<v Speaker 1>they realized that voters were not turning on Trump in

0:31:51.600 --> 0:31:53.200
<v Speaker 1>the way they thought, they sort of slowly came back

0:31:53.200 --> 0:31:55.200
<v Speaker 1>because they wanted to be on the winning side. So, David,

0:31:55.200 --> 0:31:57.600
<v Speaker 1>I met you a few weeks ago at this conference

0:31:57.920 --> 0:32:01.120
<v Speaker 1>at Harvard that brought together all the time campaign operatives

0:32:01.160 --> 0:32:05.240
<v Speaker 1>on both sides, and Katie's to Harvard people, Harvard, Harvard, Harvard. Yeah,

0:32:05.280 --> 0:32:07.800
<v Speaker 1>we're gonna do the secret handshake after this, but you

0:32:07.920 --> 0:32:10.720
<v Speaker 1>can't watch it my safety school. By the way, David,

0:32:11.240 --> 0:32:13.920
<v Speaker 1>she says, not at all defensively. I was really struck

0:32:15.280 --> 0:32:18.720
<v Speaker 1>by saying. Robbie Mook, Hillary Clinton's campaign manager, said to me,

0:32:18.840 --> 0:32:22.800
<v Speaker 1>which is the negative frame on Trump was always take

0:32:22.880 --> 0:32:25.560
<v Speaker 1>something he said and kind of make fun of it,

0:32:25.680 --> 0:32:28.360
<v Speaker 1>attack it. But the media always showed the thing that

0:32:28.440 --> 0:32:32.120
<v Speaker 1>Trump said, and the negative frame on Hillary was something

0:32:32.240 --> 0:32:36.360
<v Speaker 1>totally outside of her campaign messaging the Clinton Foundation or

0:32:36.800 --> 0:32:40.560
<v Speaker 1>the emails or ben Ghazi, and so she didn't get

0:32:40.680 --> 0:32:43.080
<v Speaker 1>the opportunity to like say what she wanted to say.

0:32:43.520 --> 0:32:45.240
<v Speaker 1>And so for a lot of voters it kind of

0:32:45.320 --> 0:32:49.440
<v Speaker 1>boiled down to Trump the badass versus Hillary the crook.

0:32:49.840 --> 0:32:53.080
<v Speaker 1>And given that choice, particularly in the wake of the

0:32:53.600 --> 0:32:58.080
<v Speaker 1>FBI director's letter, Uh, they went with the badass um

0:32:58.520 --> 0:33:01.720
<v Speaker 1>and thinking at least they get some cha Angeine Washington, Well,

0:33:01.800 --> 0:33:04.240
<v Speaker 1>we talked about the you know, the shame thing. And

0:33:04.280 --> 0:33:06.840
<v Speaker 1>I think that's a really interesting They were two very

0:33:06.920 --> 0:33:09.160
<v Speaker 1>opposite cases of of how do you deal with a

0:33:09.240 --> 0:33:11.680
<v Speaker 1>shameful act? Right think of way Clinton reacted to the

0:33:11.800 --> 0:33:14.400
<v Speaker 1>email thing, which was for a long time giving shifting

0:33:14.440 --> 0:33:16.680
<v Speaker 1>explanations about how much she was allowed to do it

0:33:16.800 --> 0:33:19.320
<v Speaker 1>was totally fine, or maybe it was mostly fine, then

0:33:19.640 --> 0:33:23.200
<v Speaker 1>apologizing for it than apologizing more for it and dragging

0:33:23.240 --> 0:33:25.040
<v Speaker 1>it out and letting it be the main thing that

0:33:25.120 --> 0:33:26.920
<v Speaker 1>she talked about because she couldn't find the right thing

0:33:26.960 --> 0:33:29.280
<v Speaker 1>to say about it. Uh. And I think that's sort

0:33:29.320 --> 0:33:31.080
<v Speaker 1>of that she was an extreme case in the other way,

0:33:31.120 --> 0:33:33.440
<v Speaker 1>and that she showed so much sort of shame and

0:33:33.840 --> 0:33:36.600
<v Speaker 1>unhappiness about that that it allowed it to dominate the campaign.

0:33:36.720 --> 0:33:38.960
<v Speaker 1>So I think I think Robbie Mook was right. I

0:33:39.000 --> 0:33:41.000
<v Speaker 1>think that's I think he's right about uh, sort of

0:33:41.080 --> 0:33:43.400
<v Speaker 1>the two different frames. But Clinton someone did some of

0:33:43.440 --> 0:33:45.560
<v Speaker 1>that to herself, and I should say that she didn't

0:33:45.600 --> 0:33:49.240
<v Speaker 1>have some sort of other positive message about herself or

0:33:49.320 --> 0:33:51.840
<v Speaker 1>not anything that broke through. So she was relying on

0:33:52.040 --> 0:33:53.960
<v Speaker 1>Trump to sort of make her case for her to

0:33:54.040 --> 0:33:56.200
<v Speaker 1>be a sort of campaign against him rather than four

0:33:56.400 --> 0:33:59.840
<v Speaker 1>Can you imagine Hillary Clinton responding the email scandal by saying, hey,

0:34:00.160 --> 0:34:02.479
<v Speaker 1>I did it, deal with it. Well, it's interesting. One

0:34:02.520 --> 0:34:05.800
<v Speaker 1>of her biggest supporters made exactly that point that she

0:34:05.800 --> 0:34:08.239
<v Speaker 1>shouldn't have apologized, that she should have said, you know

0:34:08.320 --> 0:34:11.480
<v Speaker 1>what Cohen Palell suggested it. It was allowed under the rules.

0:34:11.640 --> 0:34:14.960
<v Speaker 1>I did it, and you know, there was nothing wrong

0:34:15.000 --> 0:34:16.640
<v Speaker 1>with it, and there was nothing you know, and it

0:34:16.719 --> 0:34:22.040
<v Speaker 1>didn't it didn't jeopardize national that that email was ever hacked, right.

0:34:22.560 --> 0:34:25.160
<v Speaker 1>I do think that. I mean, I'm playing armchair armchair

0:34:25.200 --> 0:34:27.279
<v Speaker 1>politician here, but I feel like if whatever she was

0:34:27.320 --> 0:34:29.480
<v Speaker 1>going to do, she should have started doing it in

0:34:29.800 --> 0:34:32.440
<v Speaker 1>May of two fifteen and stuck with it. And the

0:34:32.520 --> 0:34:35.280
<v Speaker 1>same with the Golden Sack speeches that you know released

0:34:35.320 --> 0:34:37.800
<v Speaker 1>that or don't. But you know, at this at the

0:34:37.880 --> 0:34:41.600
<v Speaker 1>Harvard thing, uh they have somebody asked one of Clinton's aids,

0:34:41.600 --> 0:34:43.160
<v Speaker 1>why didn't you just put out the transcripts of the

0:34:43.200 --> 0:34:46.560
<v Speaker 1>Goldmen Sack speeches before? And her response was, well, what

0:34:46.719 --> 0:34:48.520
<v Speaker 1>people would have picked through it. They would have asked

0:34:48.520 --> 0:34:50.120
<v Speaker 1>all these questions. It would have been a lot of hassle.

0:34:50.360 --> 0:34:52.720
<v Speaker 1>It was not a political calculation. It was them bearing

0:34:52.800 --> 0:34:55.640
<v Speaker 1>the weight of these years of Clinton scandals and not

0:34:55.760 --> 0:34:57.560
<v Speaker 1>wanting to get into it, and they created this something

0:34:57.600 --> 0:35:00.480
<v Speaker 1>that lasted, this mystery that lasted the It was just

0:35:00.760 --> 0:35:03.320
<v Speaker 1>drip drip, drip drip. And because she never gave a

0:35:03.560 --> 0:35:06.879
<v Speaker 1>satisfactory answer, every journalist had to ask her every time

0:35:06.960 --> 0:35:09.400
<v Speaker 1>she did an interview. And she could have said, hey,

0:35:09.520 --> 0:35:12.760
<v Speaker 1>refer to my comments from May. I've answered that question.

0:35:12.920 --> 0:35:15.240
<v Speaker 1>Let's talk about things in American people really care about.

0:35:15.440 --> 0:35:16.960
<v Speaker 1>You know, I think I'm going to run for office.

0:35:17.320 --> 0:35:21.799
<v Speaker 1>I'm kidding. Anyways, were talking about fake news significant ye

0:35:22.920 --> 0:35:26.279
<v Speaker 1>to to final sort of categories that I want to

0:35:26.360 --> 0:35:28.720
<v Speaker 1>talk to you about. And I know Brian's super interested

0:35:28.719 --> 0:35:31.400
<v Speaker 1>in this as well. You know, why wasn't fake news

0:35:31.960 --> 0:35:35.879
<v Speaker 1>discovered before election day? I mean, we saw all these

0:35:36.120 --> 0:35:39.600
<v Speaker 1>bogus stories circulating around Facebook. I had friends send me

0:35:39.680 --> 0:35:42.239
<v Speaker 1>things and say did you see this? And I'd be like,

0:35:42.480 --> 0:35:46.200
<v Speaker 1>it's insane. You know, Whoma and Hillary Clinton are lesbians,

0:35:46.320 --> 0:35:49.480
<v Speaker 1>or Whoma's associated with the Muslim Brotherhood or I mean,

0:35:49.520 --> 0:35:54.080
<v Speaker 1>there's so many crazy, crazy things out there. What happened?

0:35:54.200 --> 0:35:57.920
<v Speaker 1>What I mean? I think journalism I include myself in

0:35:58.000 --> 0:36:01.479
<v Speaker 1>this category. I think journalists really let the American people

0:36:01.520 --> 0:36:03.400
<v Speaker 1>down by not pointing this out earlier, and we know

0:36:03.520 --> 0:36:05.560
<v Speaker 1>the impact it had because there was one study that

0:36:05.640 --> 0:36:08.480
<v Speaker 1>showed that in the three months before the election, these

0:36:08.560 --> 0:36:11.680
<v Speaker 1>fake news stories were actually more widely shared than real

0:36:11.760 --> 0:36:15.520
<v Speaker 1>news stories. So what happened? Well, I do think that it's,

0:36:16.120 --> 0:36:18.359
<v Speaker 1>you know, part of our bubble is that we live

0:36:18.400 --> 0:36:21.080
<v Speaker 1>in a world where we read other legitimate news outlets,

0:36:21.200 --> 0:36:23.399
<v Speaker 1>you know, that's who we follow on Twitter's, we follow

0:36:23.440 --> 0:36:25.400
<v Speaker 1>on Facebook as journalists, and so I think in some

0:36:25.520 --> 0:36:27.960
<v Speaker 1>ways it was hard to see how much you know,

0:36:28.160 --> 0:36:31.759
<v Speaker 1>other people had self selected their their media feeds to

0:36:31.880 --> 0:36:33.719
<v Speaker 1>just tell them all fake news. I think we didn't

0:36:33.760 --> 0:36:36.319
<v Speaker 1>get it because we didn't see it. That's one thing. Uh.

0:36:37.200 --> 0:36:38.960
<v Speaker 1>Another thing is I think that it's you know, for

0:36:39.160 --> 0:36:41.600
<v Speaker 1>us to agree that we knew about it. You could

0:36:41.680 --> 0:36:43.520
<v Speaker 1>write about it, and there was some writing about it,

0:36:43.600 --> 0:36:46.399
<v Speaker 1>but you know, we are struggling to figure out, Okay, well,

0:36:46.480 --> 0:36:49.279
<v Speaker 1>how do we show people our credibility, you know, how

0:36:49.320 --> 0:36:50.959
<v Speaker 1>do we stand out how do we beat those people

0:36:50.960 --> 0:36:53.040
<v Speaker 1>in the marketplace if Facebook or Twitter is going to

0:36:53.080 --> 0:36:55.439
<v Speaker 1>treat them equally to us. And I think we're still

0:36:55.480 --> 0:36:57.000
<v Speaker 1>sort of trying to figure that out. And for me,

0:36:57.520 --> 0:36:59.279
<v Speaker 1>my own little piece of it adant, trying to be

0:36:59.440 --> 0:37:01.239
<v Speaker 1>very transp Aaron about what I was doing. You know,

0:37:01.320 --> 0:37:04.080
<v Speaker 1>here's how I'm gathering this information, Here's who I've asked,

0:37:04.120 --> 0:37:06.560
<v Speaker 1>Here's what I've asked, you know, and be open to

0:37:06.600 --> 0:37:09.040
<v Speaker 1>people's suggestions. So to degree that people saw me doing

0:37:09.120 --> 0:37:10.600
<v Speaker 1>that on Twitter, I was trying to show them, Look,

0:37:10.640 --> 0:37:12.880
<v Speaker 1>this is how you report a real news story. Uh,

0:37:13.040 --> 0:37:14.680
<v Speaker 1>you know, so you can have more trust than what

0:37:14.760 --> 0:37:16.320
<v Speaker 1>I'm produced. So what's going to be What can be

0:37:16.440 --> 0:37:19.520
<v Speaker 1>done about fake news without sort of censoring you know,

0:37:20.160 --> 0:37:23.880
<v Speaker 1>news that may not be desirable or whatever. I mean,

0:37:24.000 --> 0:37:25.360
<v Speaker 1>how do you how do you get your how do

0:37:25.400 --> 0:37:27.880
<v Speaker 1>you wrap your arms around this? Well, part of it

0:37:28.000 --> 0:37:30.200
<v Speaker 1>is a question for people like Twitter and Facebook. You know,

0:37:30.280 --> 0:37:31.960
<v Speaker 1>they have to decide do they want to you know,

0:37:32.080 --> 0:37:35.120
<v Speaker 1>is there a market reason forget about censorship or you know,

0:37:35.200 --> 0:37:37.640
<v Speaker 1>public good reason. Is there a market reason why they

0:37:38.000 --> 0:37:40.200
<v Speaker 1>might want to be able to give their customers a

0:37:40.280 --> 0:37:43.000
<v Speaker 1>way to distinguish between you real and fake things? You know,

0:37:43.040 --> 0:37:45.200
<v Speaker 1>what do they think there's a there's a you know,

0:37:45.280 --> 0:37:47.520
<v Speaker 1>a problem with their business model. You know, half of

0:37:47.520 --> 0:37:49.839
<v Speaker 1>the news they're showing is fake. Uh. The other thing

0:37:49.920 --> 0:37:52.279
<v Speaker 1>for us, because how do we think about ways for

0:37:52.400 --> 0:37:55.200
<v Speaker 1>the you know, the mainstream media, the true media. How

0:37:55.239 --> 0:37:58.680
<v Speaker 1>do we show people how hard we worked to produce

0:37:58.719 --> 0:38:00.760
<v Speaker 1>what we do. How do we show people the standards

0:38:00.840 --> 0:38:02.560
<v Speaker 1>we adhere to. I think we need to be a

0:38:02.600 --> 0:38:04.680
<v Speaker 1>lot more explicit about this. We think we live in

0:38:04.719 --> 0:38:07.080
<v Speaker 1>our world and think that, oh, everybody knows, you know,

0:38:07.360 --> 0:38:09.719
<v Speaker 1>you have to have two sources everything. Everybody knows things

0:38:09.760 --> 0:38:12.000
<v Speaker 1>are better on the record. Everybody knows the rules that

0:38:12.080 --> 0:38:15.520
<v Speaker 1>we follow, but not everybody. You're saying that journalists have

0:38:15.640 --> 0:38:18.440
<v Speaker 1>to have to sell the public on what good journalism

0:38:18.680 --> 0:38:20.840
<v Speaker 1>is and explain it to the public. I guess maybe

0:38:21.160 --> 0:38:23.080
<v Speaker 1>maybe so, huh yeah. I mean, if we're gonna grow

0:38:23.120 --> 0:38:24.680
<v Speaker 1>our audience. There's a lot of people who read us now,

0:38:24.719 --> 0:38:26.120
<v Speaker 1>but if we're going to reach those people who are

0:38:26.160 --> 0:38:27.920
<v Speaker 1>out there passing around fake news, like we need to

0:38:27.960 --> 0:38:29.880
<v Speaker 1>show them Okay, this is this is how we do it.

0:38:30.040 --> 0:38:32.439
<v Speaker 1>You know, we need to be sure we're not wrong.

0:38:32.440 --> 0:38:34.200
<v Speaker 1>Bec we can lose a lot of what having sort

0:38:34.200 --> 0:38:37.080
<v Speaker 1>of like a good housekeeping seal of approval for legitimate

0:38:37.160 --> 0:38:41.640
<v Speaker 1>news organizations. Craig Newmark, from the who started Craigslist, said,

0:38:41.920 --> 0:38:44.200
<v Speaker 1>is giving a million dollars to the pointer Institute, and

0:38:44.239 --> 0:38:46.880
<v Speaker 1>one of the things they're talking about is having some

0:38:47.120 --> 0:38:51.160
<v Speaker 1>kind of indication to viewers or readers that this is

0:38:51.200 --> 0:38:54.879
<v Speaker 1>from a legitimate news, particularly on social media. Yeah, yeah, yeah,

0:38:55.000 --> 0:38:57.520
<v Speaker 1>I mean I support that. I think there's you know,

0:38:57.960 --> 0:39:00.480
<v Speaker 1>there's a lot of difficulties inherent in that, and you know,

0:39:00.560 --> 0:39:03.200
<v Speaker 1>you worry about seeding the power to somebody to distinguish

0:39:03.360 --> 0:39:06.080
<v Speaker 1>my real or faith. Uh, you know, more want to

0:39:06.120 --> 0:39:07.719
<v Speaker 1>do that on your own with the way you you know,

0:39:07.800 --> 0:39:10.080
<v Speaker 1>with your own work. But I think it's important people

0:39:10.080 --> 0:39:12.600
<v Speaker 1>are paying attention to that. I mean, I was just

0:39:12.719 --> 0:39:15.120
<v Speaker 1>thinking about ways to make our you know, our stories

0:39:15.200 --> 0:39:18.080
<v Speaker 1>more trustworthy or more you know, more clear how we

0:39:18.200 --> 0:39:20.560
<v Speaker 1>know things. There's ways you could do stuff online to

0:39:20.640 --> 0:39:22.320
<v Speaker 1>show people, make it easier for people to see the

0:39:22.360 --> 0:39:25.320
<v Speaker 1>primary sources you relied on, to show people how you

0:39:25.480 --> 0:39:28.200
<v Speaker 1>know the things you know when when that's possible, I

0:39:28.200 --> 0:39:29.879
<v Speaker 1>think it would be really educational for a lot of people.

0:39:29.920 --> 0:39:32.160
<v Speaker 1>And covering President Donald Trump is going to be an

0:39:32.239 --> 0:39:36.000
<v Speaker 1>enormous challenge already. His team is floating stuff like eliminating

0:39:36.040 --> 0:39:38.200
<v Speaker 1>the daily briefings for the press. What do you think

0:39:38.239 --> 0:39:40.560
<v Speaker 1>are going to be the two or three biggest challenges

0:39:40.920 --> 0:39:45.200
<v Speaker 1>for reporters trying to hold this White House accountable. Well,

0:39:45.280 --> 0:39:48.480
<v Speaker 1>I think the biggest challenge we've identified so far is

0:39:48.480 --> 0:39:51.400
<v Speaker 1>Trump himself. That he often uses Twitter as a way

0:39:51.440 --> 0:39:55.040
<v Speaker 1>to reach a mass audience and with information that's wrong.

0:39:55.160 --> 0:39:57.000
<v Speaker 1>I mean, he'll he'll, he'll tell you'll tweet out something

0:39:57.000 --> 0:39:59.319
<v Speaker 1>that where the facts are wrong or the context is wrong.

0:39:59.680 --> 0:40:01.840
<v Speaker 1>And you know, the way that we had dealt with

0:40:01.960 --> 0:40:04.680
<v Speaker 1>things like that in the past was if the you know,

0:40:04.840 --> 0:40:07.200
<v Speaker 1>on the Sunday talk shows or a presidential speech or

0:40:07.239 --> 0:40:09.640
<v Speaker 1>something like that, if the president says something, the first

0:40:09.760 --> 0:40:11.839
<v Speaker 1>version of the story is written usually by somebody who's

0:40:11.840 --> 0:40:14.080
<v Speaker 1>not a subject matter expert in that thing, and the

0:40:14.200 --> 0:40:17.120
<v Speaker 1>story is the President said X, right, and then a

0:40:17.200 --> 0:40:18.920
<v Speaker 1>few hours later, somebody who's a sub a matter of

0:40:18.920 --> 0:40:21.160
<v Speaker 1>expert rights the second version that says the President says X,

0:40:21.440 --> 0:40:23.439
<v Speaker 1>Here's what it means, here's how you know, here's what's

0:40:23.480 --> 0:40:26.920
<v Speaker 1>going to happen next. All that context. But the way

0:40:26.960 --> 0:40:28.520
<v Speaker 1>that you have to do with Trump. Trump comes out

0:40:28.560 --> 0:40:31.399
<v Speaker 1>and says, you know, the Air Force one contract carts

0:40:31.440 --> 0:40:33.719
<v Speaker 1>four billion dollars. That's wrong. You know, millions of people

0:40:33.760 --> 0:40:36.479
<v Speaker 1>voted illegally, that's wrong. But you know, nobody knows about

0:40:36.480 --> 0:40:39.160
<v Speaker 1>climate change. That's wrong. So you can't have the first

0:40:39.280 --> 0:40:41.520
<v Speaker 1>version of the story responsible. You can to the first

0:40:41.640 --> 0:40:44.560
<v Speaker 1>version of the stories that be Trump says X and

0:40:44.600 --> 0:40:46.360
<v Speaker 1>then five hours later come back and say, hey, what

0:40:46.440 --> 0:40:48.080
<v Speaker 1>he said was totally wrong. I mean, the truth is

0:40:48.080 --> 0:40:49.600
<v Speaker 1>a you know, lie gets around the world before the

0:40:49.600 --> 0:40:52.600
<v Speaker 1>truth gets its pants on. So we wanna have something

0:40:52.640 --> 0:40:54.920
<v Speaker 1>where we can the first time we write about Trump's statement,

0:40:54.960 --> 0:40:56.879
<v Speaker 1>the first story we write about his tweet or whatever

0:40:57.440 --> 0:40:59.239
<v Speaker 1>is from the expert, and the expert says, hey, Trump

0:40:59.280 --> 0:41:00.719
<v Speaker 1>said this, but it's wrong, and I want you to

0:41:00.840 --> 0:41:02.719
<v Speaker 1>know that right away. Well, so it sounds like a

0:41:02.920 --> 0:41:05.160
<v Speaker 1>lot of the coverage is going to be intensely critical.

0:41:05.320 --> 0:41:08.600
<v Speaker 1>And do you worry about alienating the wide swath of

0:41:08.640 --> 0:41:13.279
<v Speaker 1>American readers, viewers, etcetera, who say, hey, give this guy

0:41:13.360 --> 0:41:16.480
<v Speaker 1>a chance. I mean, it's it's kind of a delicate balance,

0:41:16.560 --> 0:41:19.680
<v Speaker 1>isn't it. It is. I think the main question for

0:41:19.920 --> 0:41:25.120
<v Speaker 1>us is to avoid uh seeming sort of emotional or

0:41:25.239 --> 0:41:29.200
<v Speaker 1>invested in in a particular outcome, and meaning in Trump

0:41:29.560 --> 0:41:32.719
<v Speaker 1>not doing well. There's a big political ecosystem out there,

0:41:32.800 --> 0:41:34.680
<v Speaker 1>and our job is to tell you what happened, and

0:41:34.760 --> 0:41:36.960
<v Speaker 1>to tell you, you know, what's what's new about what

0:41:37.000 --> 0:41:38.759
<v Speaker 1>Trump is doing, but not to tell you, you know,

0:41:39.040 --> 0:41:41.040
<v Speaker 1>is it going to lead to the autocracy or is

0:41:41.080 --> 0:41:43.120
<v Speaker 1>it going to lead to America being great again? You know,

0:41:43.200 --> 0:41:44.839
<v Speaker 1>we have to just tell you what happened. Let other

0:41:44.880 --> 0:41:47.560
<v Speaker 1>people run with the with the meaning of it. I

0:41:47.640 --> 0:41:49.560
<v Speaker 1>think that's gonna be Uh. We have to sort of

0:41:49.600 --> 0:41:53.239
<v Speaker 1>restrain ourselves from commenting too much rather than just sort

0:41:53.239 --> 0:41:55.600
<v Speaker 1>of telling you what happened. David Farenthald, it's so fun

0:41:55.719 --> 0:41:57.560
<v Speaker 1>to talk to you. I could stay here all day,

0:41:57.960 --> 0:42:00.120
<v Speaker 1>and I have so much respect for your reporting. You

0:42:00.200 --> 0:42:02.440
<v Speaker 1>do our podcast. After you want to pull us or

0:42:02.520 --> 0:42:05.000
<v Speaker 1>did I just jinx it? Don't jinx it, but I

0:42:05.040 --> 0:42:06.879
<v Speaker 1>would love to come on again. Thank you. I really

0:42:06.880 --> 0:42:08.960
<v Speaker 1>appreciate it. You'll have a good home, Okay, Thank you, David.

0:42:11.480 --> 0:42:15.280
<v Speaker 1>A big fat thank you to Gianna Palmer for producing

0:42:15.400 --> 0:42:18.920
<v Speaker 1>the show and Jared O'Connell for engineering and mixing it.

0:42:19.239 --> 0:42:22.800
<v Speaker 1>Thanks to Mark Phillips for our fantastic theme music. And

0:42:23.160 --> 0:42:25.879
<v Speaker 1>thanks to you for listening throughout this year. We really

0:42:25.920 --> 0:42:29.160
<v Speaker 1>appreciate it. And remember you can email us at comments

0:42:29.320 --> 0:42:31.759
<v Speaker 1>at curric podcast dot com or you can find me

0:42:31.840 --> 0:42:34.440
<v Speaker 1>on social media. Brian is on social media too, he

0:42:34.480 --> 0:42:38.600
<v Speaker 1>has oh tens of follower Yeah, I'm at Katie Curic

0:42:38.680 --> 0:42:41.920
<v Speaker 1>on Twitter and Instagram and Katie dot curric on Snapchat.

0:42:42.040 --> 0:42:45.080
<v Speaker 1>What's your handle? Good buddy? You don't even know, do you? Yes?

0:42:45.160 --> 0:42:47.680
<v Speaker 1>I do? Isn't it? Is it at BM Goldsmith? No,

0:42:49.680 --> 0:42:53.440
<v Speaker 1>that's sad at goldsmith b on Twitter? Good because I

0:42:53.480 --> 0:42:56.200
<v Speaker 1>don't like BM Goldsmith. Okay. Best of all, you can

0:42:56.320 --> 0:42:59.239
<v Speaker 1>rate and review us on iTunes. Don't forget to subscribe

0:42:59.320 --> 0:43:02.440
<v Speaker 1>as well. Thank you again for listening. We've had so

0:43:02.640 --> 0:43:05.360
<v Speaker 1>much fun doing this. I hope you've had fun listening

0:43:05.480 --> 0:43:08.680
<v Speaker 1>to our antics and we'll see you in two thousand

0:43:08.719 --> 0:43:09.240
<v Speaker 1>and seventeen.