WEBVTT - Ask HTM - Is Direct Indexing Worth It, Sticky Cosigning Situations, & Kiddos With Credit Or Debit #949

0:00:00.040 --> 0:00:03.279
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to Hada Money. I'm Joel, I'm Matt, and today

0:00:03.400 --> 0:00:05.199
<v Speaker 1>we're answering your listener questions.

0:00:24.079 --> 0:00:27.840
<v Speaker 2>We hope everyone had a fantastic weekend. Specifically, you buddy,

0:00:27.880 --> 0:00:31.560
<v Speaker 2>a big old happy birthday. Today is Joel's.

0:00:31.560 --> 0:00:34.040
<v Speaker 1>Forty ninth birthday, though at this point, at this age,

0:00:34.040 --> 0:00:35.640
<v Speaker 1>we don't acknowledge birthdays.

0:00:35.640 --> 0:00:38.760
<v Speaker 2>Matt right, Well, it's one thing to say that, Oh

0:00:38.840 --> 0:00:41.400
<v Speaker 2>I'm forty one and a half as opposed he still

0:00:41.400 --> 0:00:44.440
<v Speaker 2>celebrate your actual birthday though, But this is Monday, and

0:00:45.040 --> 0:00:46.640
<v Speaker 2>I mentioned that because I want everyone to wish Joel

0:00:46.640 --> 0:00:49.720
<v Speaker 2>a happy birthday. Thanks Pat. Okay, we do have those

0:00:49.720 --> 0:00:50.479
<v Speaker 2>of their questions to get to.

0:00:50.479 --> 0:00:52.640
<v Speaker 1>Honestly, I'm not ashamed of my age, so you know,

0:00:52.680 --> 0:00:53.479
<v Speaker 1>I think some people are.

0:00:53.560 --> 0:00:53.880
<v Speaker 3>I don't.

0:00:54.120 --> 0:00:56.360
<v Speaker 1>It's just a number who cares. And I'm gonna be

0:00:56.360 --> 0:00:57.960
<v Speaker 1>like Brian Johnson to live forever, so.

0:00:58.240 --> 0:01:00.320
<v Speaker 2>You know exactly. It really is a number. Reference to

0:01:00.360 --> 0:01:03.640
<v Speaker 2>that recently, but a listener is asking about direct index

0:01:03.680 --> 0:01:06.959
<v Speaker 2>investing if it is worth the squeeze considering the benefits

0:01:07.280 --> 0:01:10.320
<v Speaker 2>he's receiving from it versus the cost. We'll talk about that.

0:01:10.440 --> 0:01:14.080
<v Speaker 2>Another listener is asking what he should do about this

0:01:14.240 --> 0:01:17.800
<v Speaker 2>awkward family money situation. Things I think are going to

0:01:17.959 --> 0:01:21.560
<v Speaker 2>get weird, but I love weighing in on awkwardness. Yeah,

0:01:21.640 --> 0:01:24.600
<v Speaker 2>and another listener is asking for the easiest way for

0:01:24.720 --> 0:01:27.440
<v Speaker 2>his kids to spend their money. We'll talk through some

0:01:27.760 --> 0:01:28.679
<v Speaker 2>methods of payment.

0:01:28.920 --> 0:01:32.880
<v Speaker 1>Sure, get to that more during today's episode, Buddy Quick PSA, Matt,

0:01:33.000 --> 0:01:37.119
<v Speaker 1>My parents just came back from Houston. I have mentioned

0:01:37.160 --> 0:01:39.240
<v Speaker 1>this on the show before. My mom is dealing with

0:01:39.280 --> 0:01:43.280
<v Speaker 1>a kind of skin cancer and she's she's doing well,

0:01:43.920 --> 0:01:46.840
<v Speaker 1>We're hopeful, but gosh, you just never know what this

0:01:46.920 --> 0:01:49.520
<v Speaker 1>kind of thing, right, And it's true. So but one

0:01:49.520 --> 0:01:51.280
<v Speaker 1>of the things that I was looking up because they

0:01:51.280 --> 0:01:52.880
<v Speaker 1>were they were going to get a second opinion in

0:01:52.920 --> 0:01:57.240
<v Speaker 1>Houston at MD Anderson, of course, and the hotel rooms

0:01:57.240 --> 0:01:59.320
<v Speaker 1>were quite expensive, and so I just had this hunch.

0:01:59.360 --> 0:02:01.400
<v Speaker 1>I was like, there has to be some sort of

0:02:01.400 --> 0:02:04.600
<v Speaker 1>free place for people who have cancer who are going

0:02:04.680 --> 0:02:07.559
<v Speaker 1>to some of these bigger cancer centers to stay, because

0:02:07.560 --> 0:02:09.359
<v Speaker 1>there are a lot of people who I would imagine

0:02:09.760 --> 0:02:14.040
<v Speaker 1>can't afford expensive hotel rooms near where they're getting treatment, right,

0:02:14.400 --> 0:02:18.000
<v Speaker 1>So I just like did a quick search and found that, yeah,

0:02:18.120 --> 0:02:20.440
<v Speaker 1>there is, in fact such a thing, and I'm sure

0:02:20.440 --> 0:02:22.519
<v Speaker 1>there are even more resources that I'm completely unaware of it.

0:02:22.600 --> 0:02:24.720
<v Speaker 1>If anybody is aware of them, please let us know.

0:02:24.760 --> 0:02:26.639
<v Speaker 1>We'll like maybe compile them, put them on our website

0:02:26.680 --> 0:02:29.760
<v Speaker 1>or something like that. But the American Cancer Society runs

0:02:29.760 --> 0:02:32.280
<v Speaker 1>something called the Hope Lodge, and it turns out it

0:02:32.320 --> 0:02:33.840
<v Speaker 1>was all booked up. My parents only had like a

0:02:33.840 --> 0:02:36.320
<v Speaker 1>week that they knew in advanced. They didn't have enough planning,

0:02:36.520 --> 0:02:38.919
<v Speaker 1>so they did Unfortunately, they had the funds to work

0:02:38.960 --> 0:02:42.359
<v Speaker 1>over for a hotel. But for the future when if

0:02:42.360 --> 0:02:44.600
<v Speaker 1>they have to make a return visit or at other

0:02:44.680 --> 0:02:48.040
<v Speaker 1>cancer centers around the country. This Hope Lodge exists, and

0:02:48.480 --> 0:02:51.040
<v Speaker 1>I mean it's kind of cool that there are resources

0:02:51.040 --> 0:02:54.040
<v Speaker 1>out there for people. And I guess just don't assume

0:02:54.280 --> 0:02:55.799
<v Speaker 1>that you got to go on a loan, you got.

0:02:55.639 --> 0:02:57.360
<v Speaker 2>To fork it out. Yeah. Well, I mean this is

0:02:57.480 --> 0:03:00.440
<v Speaker 2>like the Ronald McDonald house right in the essentially does

0:03:00.440 --> 0:03:02.880
<v Speaker 2>that still exist? I think he does, Okay, Yeah, I mean,

0:03:02.919 --> 0:03:06.000
<v Speaker 2>which is I'm pretty sure for setting up families to

0:03:06.000 --> 0:03:07.760
<v Speaker 2>have a place to stay if there are somewhere where

0:03:07.760 --> 0:03:10.600
<v Speaker 2>there's a where there's a child I guess getting receiving treatment.

0:03:10.960 --> 0:03:13.120
<v Speaker 2>So this would be the adult equivalent of that, right,

0:03:13.680 --> 0:03:15.840
<v Speaker 2>less orange and red. Perhaps, No, I'm pretty sure they

0:03:16.400 --> 0:03:18.440
<v Speaker 2>make those house you were chicken nuggets, sir, look look

0:03:18.480 --> 0:03:21.040
<v Speaker 2>pretty classy. But I appreciate your your outside of the

0:03:21.040 --> 0:03:23.040
<v Speaker 2>box thinking when it came to trying to find a

0:03:23.080 --> 0:03:23.520
<v Speaker 2>spot for them.

0:03:23.520 --> 0:03:25.560
<v Speaker 1>But yeah, I mean I was like, literally my first

0:03:25.600 --> 0:03:27.679
<v Speaker 1>initial knee jerk was go to hot wire, go to

0:03:27.720 --> 0:03:29.040
<v Speaker 1>price line, see if I can find him a good

0:03:29.040 --> 0:03:31.400
<v Speaker 1>deal in a hotel. And then second line of breastoning

0:03:31.480 --> 0:03:33.360
<v Speaker 1>was wait a second, what if there's something even cheaper

0:03:33.360 --> 0:03:33.560
<v Speaker 1>than that?

0:03:33.639 --> 0:03:36.720
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, this isn't a typical vacation or you know, something

0:03:36.760 --> 0:03:36.920
<v Speaker 2>like that.

0:03:37.040 --> 0:03:38.760
<v Speaker 1>And that is how my brain works, by the way, Yeah,

0:03:39.520 --> 0:03:42.360
<v Speaker 1>it's like orders of magnitude of money saving.

0:03:42.480 --> 0:03:44.320
<v Speaker 2>So run on. A nice little quick tip for folks

0:03:44.320 --> 0:03:46.840
<v Speaker 2>out there, Let's quickly introduce the beer that you and

0:03:46.880 --> 0:03:49.240
<v Speaker 2>I are going to enjoy during this episode, Buddy, A

0:03:49.320 --> 0:03:53.120
<v Speaker 2>Tiny S's, which is a sour ale with fruit candy flavor.

0:03:53.480 --> 0:03:56.600
<v Speaker 2>And this is a beer by Prairie artisan Ales. Brew

0:03:56.600 --> 0:03:58.560
<v Speaker 2>We've had on the show plenty of times, but not

0:03:58.680 --> 0:04:00.360
<v Speaker 2>this one. Even though I know if I actually had

0:04:00.400 --> 0:04:02.320
<v Speaker 2>this beer, oh really, we haven't had it on this

0:04:02.640 --> 0:04:03.160
<v Speaker 2>I'm pretty sure.

0:04:03.200 --> 0:04:03.400
<v Speaker 3>I don't.

0:04:03.480 --> 0:04:05.240
<v Speaker 2>You're like the number one person I drink craft beer with,

0:04:05.240 --> 0:04:07.680
<v Speaker 2>so I'm pretty sure it was with you, but maybe it. Yeah,

0:04:07.720 --> 0:04:10.320
<v Speaker 2>But looking forward to enjoying and sharing our thoughts at

0:04:10.360 --> 0:04:11.080
<v Speaker 2>the end of the episode.

0:04:11.120 --> 0:04:14.800
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, Prairie makes great beers. This one is very unique,

0:04:14.840 --> 0:04:15.760
<v Speaker 1>so we'll give our thoughts in.

0:04:15.680 --> 0:04:16.120
<v Speaker 4>A little bit.

0:04:16.320 --> 0:04:20.520
<v Speaker 2>But Mattle, Prairie gold Oki. Uh, those are just a

0:04:20.520 --> 0:04:21.599
<v Speaker 2>couple of the Prairie beers.

0:04:21.600 --> 0:04:23.960
<v Speaker 1>We've had a lot of, like big boozy stouts, but

0:04:24.040 --> 0:04:26.640
<v Speaker 1>like some really great sours to funky mosaic I ever

0:04:26.760 --> 0:04:27.600
<v Speaker 1>want to say? It was a good one?

0:04:27.880 --> 0:04:28.719
<v Speaker 2>Is it Christmas Bomb?

0:04:28.960 --> 0:04:29.200
<v Speaker 1>Oh?

0:04:29.320 --> 0:04:29.520
<v Speaker 3>Yeah?

0:04:29.720 --> 0:04:31.719
<v Speaker 2>That is that a Prairie total classic? Okay, yes, I

0:04:31.720 --> 0:04:32.400
<v Speaker 2>remember that one too.

0:04:32.480 --> 0:04:34.839
<v Speaker 1>All right, man, let's mention how people can ask a

0:04:34.920 --> 0:04:37.240
<v Speaker 1>question if they're so inclined. If you've got a money question,

0:04:37.560 --> 0:04:39.599
<v Speaker 1>we would love to tackle it on the show. Just

0:04:39.640 --> 0:04:41.479
<v Speaker 1>go to how to money dot com slash ask for

0:04:41.520 --> 0:04:44.480
<v Speaker 1>simple directions. Really just recording your question on the voice

0:04:44.480 --> 0:04:46.840
<v Speaker 1>memo app of your phone, emailing it over to us

0:04:46.920 --> 0:04:49.160
<v Speaker 1>at how to moneypod at gmail dot com. Hopefully we

0:04:49.200 --> 0:04:51.640
<v Speaker 1>can take it next week on the show. Matt, Let's

0:04:51.680 --> 0:04:55.360
<v Speaker 1>get to a question specifically about awkward family finances.

0:04:55.839 --> 0:04:59.760
<v Speaker 4>Hi, Joe, this is move best. A couple of years ago,

0:04:59.839 --> 0:05:03.120
<v Speaker 4>I signed a student loan for my great niece, which

0:05:03.200 --> 0:05:09.960
<v Speaker 4>is my sister's granddaughter, and she graduated from Spilman College,

0:05:10.600 --> 0:05:14.839
<v Speaker 4>and I think she's started to work and she's not

0:05:15.320 --> 0:05:20.080
<v Speaker 4>paying on her student loan which I co signed for. Now,

0:05:20.240 --> 0:05:24.760
<v Speaker 4>my backing institution was the Navy Federal Credit Union. They

0:05:24.760 --> 0:05:28.960
<v Speaker 4>are going into my account and taking out payments without

0:05:29.200 --> 0:05:33.719
<v Speaker 4>my permission. Is this legal? And what can I do

0:05:34.400 --> 0:05:40.080
<v Speaker 4>to get my niece to pay off this student loan?

0:05:40.600 --> 0:05:43.560
<v Speaker 2>Thank you, Joel. He addressed you specifically, so want you

0:05:43.640 --> 0:05:44.360
<v Speaker 2>kick things off?

0:05:44.720 --> 0:05:48.320
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, well, I don't know why. Maybe I maybe I'm

0:05:48.320 --> 0:05:49.160
<v Speaker 1>more memorable Matt.

0:05:49.320 --> 0:05:51.600
<v Speaker 2>Well, that's because he probably heard you talking with your

0:05:51.600 --> 0:05:55.200
<v Speaker 2>buddy Bill Handle out there weekly appearances indeed with Bill

0:05:55.240 --> 0:05:58.520
<v Speaker 2>Handle every Thursday on KFI. Well, Murph, let's get to

0:05:58.520 --> 0:06:01.160
<v Speaker 2>your question. So sorry to hear about this. The truth

0:06:01.200 --> 0:06:01.480
<v Speaker 2>has met.

0:06:01.520 --> 0:06:05.000
<v Speaker 1>These kinds of things are financially and relationally frustrating. It's

0:06:05.000 --> 0:06:06.120
<v Speaker 1>like a double way. I mean, it's like a gut

0:06:06.160 --> 0:06:08.320
<v Speaker 1>punch and a face punch at the same time, which

0:06:08.520 --> 0:06:10.440
<v Speaker 1>if you're like I'm thinking about Mike Tyson punch out

0:06:10.440 --> 0:06:13.040
<v Speaker 1>when I say that, And the double combo can be

0:06:13.400 --> 0:06:14.880
<v Speaker 1>really tough, tough to deal.

0:06:14.720 --> 0:06:16.520
<v Speaker 2>With the old one too, Yeah, and that's what they

0:06:16.560 --> 0:06:17.640
<v Speaker 2>call it. That's right.

0:06:18.120 --> 0:06:20.560
<v Speaker 1>And the truth is like when you mix money with family,

0:06:20.880 --> 0:06:24.440
<v Speaker 1>there are substantial pitfalls that can come about and often

0:06:24.480 --> 0:06:28.120
<v Speaker 1>do come about. I feel like that's why our advice

0:06:28.160 --> 0:06:33.039
<v Speaker 1>typically is like, don't mix family and close relationships. Most

0:06:33.040 --> 0:06:34.040
<v Speaker 1>of the time it doesn't work out.

0:06:34.040 --> 0:06:34.200
<v Speaker 3>Well.

0:06:34.200 --> 0:06:35.720
<v Speaker 1>I guess you and I run a business together. We're

0:06:35.720 --> 0:06:38.120
<v Speaker 1>best buds, so their pitfalls there too, right, and we

0:06:38.160 --> 0:06:40.520
<v Speaker 1>have had to come up with certain guidelines to make

0:06:40.560 --> 0:06:43.280
<v Speaker 1>sure that we are caring for each other well and

0:06:43.480 --> 0:06:46.119
<v Speaker 1>that we're splitting duties properly. And I think the typical

0:06:46.160 --> 0:06:48.520
<v Speaker 1>story we hear is that a family member lends another

0:06:48.600 --> 0:06:50.960
<v Speaker 1>family member money. They're hoping that they're going to get

0:06:50.960 --> 0:06:54.080
<v Speaker 1>paid back in a reasonable timeframe and that's probably what

0:06:54.120 --> 0:06:56.599
<v Speaker 1>the promise is, and when that doesn't happen, it sours

0:06:56.640 --> 0:06:57.440
<v Speaker 1>the relationship.

0:06:57.839 --> 0:06:59.440
<v Speaker 2>And this merv situation is.

0:06:59.400 --> 0:07:02.360
<v Speaker 1>A similar one, but co signing on a loan instead

0:07:02.360 --> 0:07:05.440
<v Speaker 1>of directly putting money into a relative's hands, and so

0:07:06.000 --> 0:07:08.039
<v Speaker 1>at the end of the day they can be similar

0:07:08.080 --> 0:07:10.480
<v Speaker 1>in the way that they work. And this is why

0:07:10.520 --> 0:07:14.240
<v Speaker 1>we typically advise, you know, financial transactions to be considered gifts.

0:07:14.240 --> 0:07:16.000
<v Speaker 1>If you do lend somebody money and then if you

0:07:16.000 --> 0:07:18.320
<v Speaker 1>can't afford to give them that money, don't give them

0:07:18.880 --> 0:07:20.880
<v Speaker 1>any sort of money at all, right, Like, if you

0:07:20.920 --> 0:07:23.160
<v Speaker 1>can't just kind of completely write it off, it could

0:07:23.160 --> 0:07:24.960
<v Speaker 1>come back to bite you. In a Mervh's case, this

0:07:25.080 --> 0:07:27.560
<v Speaker 1>co signing is going to come back to Biden sadly.

0:07:27.640 --> 0:07:31.840
<v Speaker 2>It's indeed, yeah, and it's worth saying as well. We're

0:07:31.880 --> 0:07:35.400
<v Speaker 2>not lawyers, but yes, MERVH. The stay on a holiday

0:07:35.440 --> 0:07:38.560
<v Speaker 2>and last night. The financial institution, it can legally take

0:07:38.640 --> 0:07:40.800
<v Speaker 2>money out of your account, out of your account there

0:07:40.880 --> 0:07:43.760
<v Speaker 2>with the credit union as a co signer of this loan,

0:07:44.280 --> 0:07:47.280
<v Speaker 2>if your great niece isn't making payments. This is known

0:07:47.320 --> 0:07:50.680
<v Speaker 2>as the right to offset. We are getting a little loyally,

0:07:51.040 --> 0:07:53.720
<v Speaker 2>you know, a little more technical in the weeds here. Basically,

0:07:53.760 --> 0:07:57.040
<v Speaker 2>the lender wouldn't have given that loan to your niece alone. Like,

0:07:57.080 --> 0:07:59.160
<v Speaker 2>the only way that they were willing to say yes

0:07:59.280 --> 0:08:01.520
<v Speaker 2>is because of the fact that you signed. There's a

0:08:01.560 --> 0:08:05.080
<v Speaker 2>reason for that, and it's becoming crystal clear to you. Now,

0:08:05.120 --> 0:08:08.000
<v Speaker 2>I'm assuming like they were worried about her ability to

0:08:08.040 --> 0:08:11.400
<v Speaker 2>pay and they wanted some additional recourse and you, in

0:08:11.440 --> 0:08:14.280
<v Speaker 2>this case, specifically your money if she were to fall

0:08:14.280 --> 0:08:17.240
<v Speaker 2>behind or if she were to stop making payments altogether,

0:08:17.560 --> 0:08:21.160
<v Speaker 2>which is you know what's led now to the sticky situation? Yeah,

0:08:21.160 --> 0:08:23.320
<v Speaker 2>that you find yourself and makes you think of my nephew, Matt.

0:08:23.360 --> 0:08:24.120
<v Speaker 2>He's fifteen.

0:08:24.280 --> 0:08:26.240
<v Speaker 1>If you wanted to go out there and buy a

0:08:26.280 --> 0:08:29.080
<v Speaker 1>brand new Mustang or something like that, because you know

0:08:29.160 --> 0:08:31.600
<v Speaker 1>he's about about to hit full driving age and he's like,

0:08:31.640 --> 0:08:33.480
<v Speaker 1>let's go, let me get this forty thousand dollars car.

0:08:33.840 --> 0:08:36.120
<v Speaker 1>If he shows up alone to the dealership, they're going

0:08:36.160 --> 0:08:39.480
<v Speaker 1>to be like, sorry, buddy, you can afford maybe a

0:08:39.559 --> 0:08:42.080
<v Speaker 1>nineteen ninety eight Mustang, right like you have like fifteen

0:08:42.120 --> 0:08:44.640
<v Speaker 1>hundred bucks from working on odds and ends jobs. But

0:08:44.679 --> 0:08:47.000
<v Speaker 1>if I show up with him, not because I've got

0:08:47.040 --> 0:08:49.319
<v Speaker 1>the deepest pockets in the world, they'll be like, oh,

0:08:49.360 --> 0:08:51.439
<v Speaker 1>you just like put your name on this paper too,

0:08:51.920 --> 0:08:54.679
<v Speaker 1>and we can can get whatever Mustang he wants, and

0:08:54.960 --> 0:08:58.000
<v Speaker 1>you have an income right exactly, and we know that

0:08:58.040 --> 0:08:59.880
<v Speaker 1>you're going to be good for it, even if he's not.

0:09:00.640 --> 0:09:02.959
<v Speaker 1>But if I did that, then I'm putting myself at risk,

0:09:03.000 --> 0:09:05.640
<v Speaker 1>which is what happened here sadly with MERV. When you

0:09:05.720 --> 0:09:09.440
<v Speaker 1>co sign alone, you've created a legal obligation for that debt,

0:09:09.679 --> 0:09:11.840
<v Speaker 1>even if you never saw a dime of that money,

0:09:11.960 --> 0:09:14.320
<v Speaker 1>which is exactly what happened in this case and exactly

0:09:14.400 --> 0:09:18.040
<v Speaker 1>what happens in so many co signer cases, like you

0:09:18.080 --> 0:09:19.880
<v Speaker 1>are on the hook for the thing and you see

0:09:20.000 --> 0:09:22.439
<v Speaker 1>none of the benefits. And MERV, you said this was

0:09:22.480 --> 0:09:25.400
<v Speaker 1>a student loan, but you co signers don't have a

0:09:25.440 --> 0:09:28.400
<v Speaker 1>legal obligation if they signed for a physical item either.

0:09:28.480 --> 0:09:31.280
<v Speaker 1>So just because my nephew stop making payments, let's say

0:09:31.520 --> 0:09:35.200
<v Speaker 1>on that proverbial mustang, well I have to pay for them,

0:09:35.240 --> 0:09:36.920
<v Speaker 1>and I don't have the right to be able to

0:09:36.960 --> 0:09:39.320
<v Speaker 1>go get the mustang from him either. And this is

0:09:39.320 --> 0:09:41.920
<v Speaker 1>why co signing is something that we're just not fans of.

0:09:42.640 --> 0:09:44.760
<v Speaker 1>I get why people do it, right, being asked by

0:09:44.760 --> 0:09:46.640
<v Speaker 1>a loved one for help, it tugs at your harsh

0:09:46.640 --> 0:09:48.640
<v Speaker 1>strings and you're like, well, I want them to go

0:09:48.679 --> 0:09:50.160
<v Speaker 1>to college, I know this is going to be good

0:09:50.280 --> 0:09:51.679
<v Speaker 1>for the future, or I want to help them out

0:09:51.720 --> 0:09:52.920
<v Speaker 1>and be able to buy this car that they might

0:09:52.920 --> 0:09:56.120
<v Speaker 1>not otherwise be able to afford. And we should be

0:09:56.360 --> 0:09:58.840
<v Speaker 1>willing to help our family members out, but just not

0:09:58.840 --> 0:10:01.080
<v Speaker 1>by co signing for a loan. It's just too risky.

0:10:01.559 --> 0:10:03.760
<v Speaker 2>It's pretty much one of those don't ever do it things.

0:10:03.760 --> 0:10:05.320
<v Speaker 2>In our opinion, I don't want to have my name

0:10:05.400 --> 0:10:07.760
<v Speaker 2>on those loan documents. And so MERV, what should you

0:10:07.800 --> 0:10:09.959
<v Speaker 2>do legally financially as well?

0:10:10.000 --> 0:10:10.120
<v Speaker 3>Here?

0:10:10.280 --> 0:10:12.880
<v Speaker 2>Like you're on shaky ground. The only thing you can do,

0:10:12.960 --> 0:10:14.720
<v Speaker 2>honestly is just to have a heart to heart with

0:10:14.760 --> 0:10:17.720
<v Speaker 2>your with your great niece. It's worth coming in with

0:10:17.840 --> 0:10:20.480
<v Speaker 2>like without your guns blazing, and having a more kind

0:10:20.480 --> 0:10:22.720
<v Speaker 2>of honest conversation because she might not even be aware

0:10:23.360 --> 0:10:25.360
<v Speaker 2>of what's going on here. I mean, I think given

0:10:25.760 --> 0:10:27.719
<v Speaker 2>all the talk about student loan forgiveness over the past

0:10:27.800 --> 0:10:29.920
<v Speaker 2>couple of years, there's a chance she's like, oh, I

0:10:29.960 --> 0:10:31.679
<v Speaker 2>thought that got written off. I thought the gut that

0:10:31.720 --> 0:10:34.280
<v Speaker 2>the federal government was gonna forgive that. At a point,

0:10:34.320 --> 0:10:37.319
<v Speaker 2>there's a lot of people confused about the stack. It

0:10:37.360 --> 0:10:39.480
<v Speaker 2>was just a constantly it seemed like every week there

0:10:39.520 --> 0:10:40.080
<v Speaker 2>was something new.

0:10:40.360 --> 0:10:42.080
<v Speaker 1>So she might not even know that MERV is being

0:10:42.160 --> 0:10:45.000
<v Speaker 1>like getting their bills now and getting money taken essentially

0:10:45.040 --> 0:10:48.560
<v Speaker 1>actively exactly, So I would just reach out to her,

0:10:49.240 --> 0:10:52.120
<v Speaker 1>just first put that under radar. I can't imagine though,

0:10:52.120 --> 0:10:57.040
<v Speaker 1>that she's also not receiving requests for this money delinquency notices. Yeah,

0:10:57.080 --> 0:10:59.680
<v Speaker 1>but uh, you know, try to have this chat in person.

0:10:59.720 --> 0:11:01.280
<v Speaker 1>I think that can go a long way as well

0:11:01.320 --> 0:11:05.160
<v Speaker 1>as opposed to like shooting her text message or an email,

0:11:05.840 --> 0:11:07.520
<v Speaker 1>but try and find out if she'll be able to

0:11:07.800 --> 0:11:11.679
<v Speaker 1>resume making some payments, because the ability to show her

0:11:11.760 --> 0:11:14.040
<v Speaker 1>how this is impacting you, right, Like, have a running total,

0:11:14.160 --> 0:11:17.320
<v Speaker 1>show her how much you've paid, and let her know that, hey,

0:11:17.440 --> 0:11:20.320
<v Speaker 1>it'd be great to receive that money back over time,

0:11:20.600 --> 0:11:24.160
<v Speaker 1>maybe not expected all at once, but it's worth taking

0:11:24.160 --> 0:11:28.079
<v Speaker 1>a more relational tact here because like I don't think you'd, like,

0:11:28.120 --> 0:11:30.319
<v Speaker 1>you don't really have much legal recourse because your name

0:11:30.360 --> 0:11:32.320
<v Speaker 1>is on the loan and so she doesn't have to

0:11:32.360 --> 0:11:34.360
<v Speaker 1>pay you back, like you would have to go into

0:11:34.520 --> 0:11:37.360
<v Speaker 1>more legal territory, which I'm guessing you want to try

0:11:37.360 --> 0:11:40.040
<v Speaker 1>to avoid doing. Like you could sue her if you can,

0:11:40.240 --> 0:11:42.640
<v Speaker 1>if she has the ability to pay and she's not paying,

0:11:42.880 --> 0:11:44.880
<v Speaker 1>you could see her in small claims but I'm guessing

0:11:44.960 --> 0:11:46.600
<v Speaker 1>that's not something that you want to do, and that

0:11:46.679 --> 0:11:49.360
<v Speaker 1>this is going to be able to be more eloquently

0:11:49.440 --> 0:11:51.959
<v Speaker 1>solved by y'all talking this over. Yeah, it's one of

0:11:52.000 --> 0:11:53.920
<v Speaker 1>the and you can tell her personally, Hey, I co

0:11:54.000 --> 0:11:55.880
<v Speaker 1>signed for you in an effort to try to help

0:11:55.920 --> 0:11:58.440
<v Speaker 1>you out when you needed it, and now I feel

0:11:58.520 --> 0:12:01.160
<v Speaker 1>like the tables have turned and I need you to

0:12:01.160 --> 0:12:04.600
<v Speaker 1>help me out and pay what you owe, and we

0:12:04.640 --> 0:12:05.880
<v Speaker 1>need to come to a solution here. I think the

0:12:05.920 --> 0:12:08.079
<v Speaker 1>emotional peel that you're right, Matt, is really all that

0:12:08.160 --> 0:12:10.360
<v Speaker 1>MERVH has here. I think it's important to note that

0:12:10.440 --> 0:12:12.760
<v Speaker 1>late payments or a lack of payments being made will

0:12:12.800 --> 0:12:16.000
<v Speaker 1>impact your credit score as well as hers. So she's

0:12:16.040 --> 0:12:19.480
<v Speaker 1>not paying that this could negatively impact her credit score.

0:12:19.640 --> 0:12:20.280
<v Speaker 2>She needs to know that.

0:12:20.320 --> 0:12:22.600
<v Speaker 1>I would highlight that for her. And then if you

0:12:22.640 --> 0:12:25.280
<v Speaker 1>stop paying for some reason, you're harming both your credit

0:12:25.400 --> 0:12:27.320
<v Speaker 1>and her. So this is one of those things where

0:12:27.760 --> 0:12:29.640
<v Speaker 1>it's like lighting both of yourselves on fire at the

0:12:29.679 --> 0:12:34.000
<v Speaker 1>same time, which I wouldn't advise. And because the truth is,

0:12:34.120 --> 0:12:37.880
<v Speaker 1>if you do that and you say, let's say, try

0:12:37.920 --> 0:12:40.120
<v Speaker 1>to prevent the credit union from taking money out of

0:12:40.160 --> 0:12:42.400
<v Speaker 1>your account. That could prevent you from being able to

0:12:42.440 --> 0:12:44.400
<v Speaker 1>buy a home or a car, or even rent a

0:12:44.440 --> 0:12:47.200
<v Speaker 1>place in the near future. It will impact her for

0:12:47.240 --> 0:12:49.160
<v Speaker 1>a long time to come from a credit perspective too,

0:12:49.720 --> 0:12:52.160
<v Speaker 1>you would also likely be sued by the lender for

0:12:52.480 --> 0:12:54.520
<v Speaker 1>the outstanding debt. So it's not like you're going to

0:12:54.559 --> 0:12:56.720
<v Speaker 1>be able to get away with it either. Right at

0:12:56.720 --> 0:12:59.160
<v Speaker 1>some point they're going to come for you, come for

0:12:59.280 --> 0:13:01.520
<v Speaker 1>the money, and so we can't sugarcoat it.

0:13:01.559 --> 0:13:01.800
<v Speaker 2>MERVH.

0:13:01.880 --> 0:13:04.040
<v Speaker 1>You're between a rock and a hard place here. We

0:13:04.080 --> 0:13:06.520
<v Speaker 1>wish you good luck with that conversation with your great niece.

0:13:06.720 --> 0:13:09.160
<v Speaker 1>We hope you're able to convince her to start paying

0:13:09.640 --> 0:13:11.520
<v Speaker 1>in order to keep your finances, your credit, and your

0:13:11.559 --> 0:13:14.040
<v Speaker 1>relationship intact. There's just a lot at stake here with

0:13:14.120 --> 0:13:17.360
<v Speaker 1>this conversation. It's not easy, No, it definitely is not.

0:13:17.480 --> 0:13:19.560
<v Speaker 2>And hopefully this is a lesson learned without having to

0:13:19.640 --> 0:13:22.160
<v Speaker 2>experience this firsthand. And I will say, Joel, this is

0:13:22.240 --> 0:13:26.440
<v Speaker 2>one principle that we are in total agreement on with

0:13:26.520 --> 0:13:29.319
<v Speaker 2>Dave Ramsey because I remember listening to him, like I

0:13:29.360 --> 0:13:31.760
<v Speaker 2>don't know, fifteen twenty years ago, and he would always

0:13:31.760 --> 0:13:34.600
<v Speaker 2>harp on folks not co signing for somebody else. It's

0:13:34.640 --> 0:13:37.600
<v Speaker 2>a terrible decision, and this is exactly the exact kind

0:13:37.640 --> 0:13:39.760
<v Speaker 2>of situation that you want to find yourself avoiding.

0:13:39.800 --> 0:13:42.319
<v Speaker 1>The truth is, yeah, if you help co sign for somebody,

0:13:42.800 --> 0:13:44.560
<v Speaker 1>you're on the hook and there's a decent chance you

0:13:44.640 --> 0:13:47.320
<v Speaker 1>end up paying for it, and the relational damage that

0:13:47.400 --> 0:13:50.800
<v Speaker 1>often gets done in these situations can be severe. All right, Matt,

0:13:50.800 --> 0:13:53.880
<v Speaker 1>We've got more questions to get to, including well, is

0:13:53.920 --> 0:13:55.319
<v Speaker 1>there a way that you can actually help out a

0:13:55.400 --> 0:13:58.120
<v Speaker 1>much younger member of your family when it comes to

0:13:58.160 --> 0:14:00.560
<v Speaker 1>building credit. We'll talk about that. Get to a bunch

0:14:00.600 --> 0:14:02.280
<v Speaker 1>more of your money questions right after this.

0:14:10.160 --> 0:14:12.480
<v Speaker 2>A right, Joel, we are now back in the break.

0:14:12.640 --> 0:14:14.960
<v Speaker 2>Let's hear from another listener. This is a listener who

0:14:15.600 --> 0:14:18.240
<v Speaker 2>has some crummy benefits from her employer.

0:14:18.960 --> 0:14:21.360
<v Speaker 5>Hi, Matt, Joel. My name is Vicky and I'm from Ohio.

0:14:21.760 --> 0:14:24.160
<v Speaker 5>I work for an employer that offers a four oh

0:14:24.240 --> 0:14:28.760
<v Speaker 5>one K and an HSA. There is no matching for either.

0:14:30.040 --> 0:14:34.760
<v Speaker 5>I max out my AHSA every year. My FIOH one

0:14:34.840 --> 0:14:39.360
<v Speaker 5>K I do not use because it's through an insurance company.

0:14:39.400 --> 0:14:42.560
<v Speaker 5>They have high fees and the paperwork says that they

0:14:42.600 --> 0:14:46.200
<v Speaker 5>can change the pricing for services at any time without

0:14:46.240 --> 0:14:50.000
<v Speaker 5>a learning the investor. I have some money in a

0:14:50.080 --> 0:14:52.240
<v Speaker 5>brokerage account that I would like to put into a

0:14:52.280 --> 0:14:55.080
<v Speaker 5>four oh one K, but I'm uncomfortable using this four

0:14:55.120 --> 0:14:59.040
<v Speaker 5>oh one K, and I'm not sure what I should do.

0:14:59.440 --> 0:15:02.920
<v Speaker 5>Thank you for your help by Matt.

0:15:02.920 --> 0:15:04.920
<v Speaker 1>All Right, there's good news and bad news here for Vicky,

0:15:04.960 --> 0:15:07.440
<v Speaker 1>isn't there? And I'm glad that she has access to

0:15:07.480 --> 0:15:09.320
<v Speaker 1>multiple tax advantage retirement accounts.

0:15:09.360 --> 0:15:10.040
<v Speaker 2>That's the good news.

0:15:10.080 --> 0:15:13.120
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, sounds like she's using her HSA properly. She's maxing

0:15:13.120 --> 0:15:14.920
<v Speaker 1>that out letting it grow. Also good news, which is

0:15:14.960 --> 0:15:17.000
<v Speaker 1>something we talk about regularly on the show. And we'll

0:15:17.040 --> 0:15:19.440
<v Speaker 1>put a link to an article about HSA's and how

0:15:19.440 --> 0:15:21.640
<v Speaker 1>good they can be in the show notes. By the way,

0:15:21.880 --> 0:15:24.200
<v Speaker 1>just random note here, Vicky, you could always move funds

0:15:24.200 --> 0:15:27.680
<v Speaker 1>from that HSA to Fidelity over time if the fees

0:15:27.760 --> 0:15:30.240
<v Speaker 1>are high on that account too. You didn't mention kind

0:15:30.240 --> 0:15:32.240
<v Speaker 1>of what the HSA fees you're encountering are, but that

0:15:32.360 --> 0:15:34.480
<v Speaker 1>might be the best move to avoid some of the

0:15:34.480 --> 0:15:37.920
<v Speaker 1>fees that you might be encountering. But huge bummer about

0:15:37.920 --> 0:15:40.040
<v Speaker 1>your four to one K being with an insurance company.

0:15:40.080 --> 0:15:43.200
<v Speaker 1>That's the bad news. That is always a giant red flag.

0:15:44.080 --> 0:15:48.400
<v Speaker 1>Makes me frustrated for anybody out there dealing with that reality,

0:15:48.920 --> 0:15:51.240
<v Speaker 1>because that means that the fees are significantly higher than

0:15:51.440 --> 0:15:53.360
<v Speaker 1>what they would be if you are with one of

0:15:53.400 --> 0:15:55.320
<v Speaker 1>the low cost broken terms that we talk about here

0:15:55.440 --> 0:15:59.120
<v Speaker 1>all the time, specifically Vanguard, Fidelity, Schwab. Those ones are

0:15:59.760 --> 0:16:04.880
<v Speaker 1>the those broken terms make costs essentially non existent for

0:16:05.240 --> 0:16:06.720
<v Speaker 1>anybody who does business with them.

0:16:06.880 --> 0:16:07.160
<v Speaker 2>Yeah.

0:16:07.320 --> 0:16:10.160
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, there are small expensary shows, but they're infinteslaly small

0:16:10.200 --> 0:16:13.040
<v Speaker 1>and they barely impact the return that you see. But

0:16:13.080 --> 0:16:15.920
<v Speaker 1>if you're with an insurance company, they could be ten, fifteen,

0:16:16.280 --> 0:16:19.400
<v Speaker 1>twenty times as high and they can massively eat into

0:16:19.400 --> 0:16:22.040
<v Speaker 1>your returns over time. So this is yes, a big problem.

0:16:22.120 --> 0:16:23.800
<v Speaker 1>And if you had a match offer to you, well,

0:16:23.800 --> 0:16:25.400
<v Speaker 1>the advice would be to suck it up and get

0:16:25.440 --> 0:16:28.800
<v Speaker 1>the match, even though the investment options are massively inferior.

0:16:29.000 --> 0:16:31.360
<v Speaker 1>But with no match, I think that four one k man,

0:16:31.400 --> 0:16:34.400
<v Speaker 1>I think if that is like a it's dead to me, right, Like, yeah, totally,

0:16:34.480 --> 0:16:36.680
<v Speaker 1>I don't need that four one k honestly if it's

0:16:36.680 --> 0:16:38.800
<v Speaker 1>that bad and it doesn't come with any match either, well,

0:16:38.840 --> 0:16:41.160
<v Speaker 1>and good on her for having looked at the fine print,

0:16:41.200 --> 0:16:43.160
<v Speaker 1>the fact that it's with an insurance company, the fact

0:16:43.200 --> 0:16:45.560
<v Speaker 1>that they can change the terms, you know, the price,

0:16:45.680 --> 0:16:48.480
<v Speaker 1>the rate at any point. Too many folks make a

0:16:48.520 --> 0:16:52.320
<v Speaker 1>really important decision like this without having dug into the details,

0:16:52.360 --> 0:16:55.720
<v Speaker 1>without any due diligence. And I'll say so, regarding the

0:16:55.720 --> 0:16:58.760
<v Speaker 1>money that you have over there in your separate investing account,

0:16:58.800 --> 0:17:01.200
<v Speaker 1>your brokerage account, what I would do here is to

0:17:01.400 --> 0:17:04.240
<v Speaker 1>leave that money that you have in that account, like,

0:17:04.320 --> 0:17:05.000
<v Speaker 1>leave it in place.

0:17:05.200 --> 0:17:07.360
<v Speaker 2>I would not. It sounds like you might be considering

0:17:07.359 --> 0:17:10.960
<v Speaker 2>selling some positions, selling some funds, some stocks there where

0:17:10.960 --> 0:17:14.159
<v Speaker 2>you would trigger capital gains tax in order to fund

0:17:15.240 --> 0:17:18.240
<v Speaker 2>a very subpar for one k, again with no match,

0:17:18.359 --> 0:17:21.520
<v Speaker 2>And that would be just a terrible situation to find

0:17:21.520 --> 0:17:24.280
<v Speaker 2>yourself in. Like, if you have additional funds and you

0:17:24.320 --> 0:17:27.120
<v Speaker 2>want to invest outside of that brokerage account, then we've

0:17:27.160 --> 0:17:28.600
<v Speaker 2>got some ideas for you. But I would not be

0:17:28.640 --> 0:17:30.480
<v Speaker 2>looking to pull that money from that in order to

0:17:30.800 --> 0:17:33.680
<v Speaker 2>get it within a four to one k somewhere else. Yeah.

0:17:33.800 --> 0:17:35.960
<v Speaker 1>No, the four to one k, I think is just

0:17:36.800 --> 0:17:39.520
<v Speaker 1>I would ignore it, pretend like he doesn't exist. Essentially,

0:17:39.800 --> 0:17:42.520
<v Speaker 1>you're already funding your HSA quite nicely. You've also got

0:17:42.520 --> 0:17:44.760
<v Speaker 1>money in the brokerage account, and VICKI, I'm not sure

0:17:44.800 --> 0:17:47.480
<v Speaker 1>if you have any additional dollars in particular outside of

0:17:47.480 --> 0:17:50.720
<v Speaker 1>the brokerage account that you would like to use to invest,

0:17:50.800 --> 0:17:52.880
<v Speaker 1>but if you do, we'd love to see you contribute

0:17:52.920 --> 0:17:54.800
<v Speaker 1>to a roth IRA with one of those low cost

0:17:54.800 --> 0:17:57.480
<v Speaker 1>providers I mentioned just a second ago, because that's another

0:17:57.560 --> 0:18:00.520
<v Speaker 1>tax advantaged account that we love, and you could stick

0:18:00.600 --> 0:18:03.280
<v Speaker 1>up to seven thousand dollars a year, thousand dollars more

0:18:03.320 --> 0:18:04.720
<v Speaker 1>than that if you're over the age of fifty five,

0:18:04.760 --> 0:18:07.560
<v Speaker 1>eight thousand dollars a year in total, every single year.

0:18:07.600 --> 0:18:10.200
<v Speaker 1>If you wanted to write you're getting some tax diversification.

0:18:10.280 --> 0:18:12.919
<v Speaker 1>You'd be stocking more money away for your future. Plus

0:18:13.000 --> 0:18:16.800
<v Speaker 1>you're completely in control of the costs, potentially to the

0:18:16.800 --> 0:18:18.679
<v Speaker 1>point of zero percent. Matt, Like we talk about with

0:18:19.080 --> 0:18:22.800
<v Speaker 1>fidelities zero index funds like fz ro X, which is

0:18:22.840 --> 0:18:25.399
<v Speaker 1>their total stock market index fund. You could like, how

0:18:25.440 --> 0:18:27.720
<v Speaker 1>much more fun is it to say FC rocks. Yeah,

0:18:28.400 --> 0:18:31.000
<v Speaker 1>I mean, it's amazing the fact that the race to

0:18:31.040 --> 0:18:34.960
<v Speaker 1>the bottom went to the legit bottom. Actually it is

0:18:35.040 --> 0:18:38.480
<v Speaker 1>sometimes even better for some investors where we talk about

0:18:38.600 --> 0:18:41.880
<v Speaker 1>the match that some firms like robin Hood offer. It's

0:18:42.200 --> 0:18:47.359
<v Speaker 1>gotten incredibly competitive the individual retirement account landscape for individual investors,

0:18:47.640 --> 0:18:50.040
<v Speaker 1>and you stand to benefit. But it's all about opening

0:18:50.119 --> 0:18:51.920
<v Speaker 1>up the roth IRA and looking at those options.

0:18:52.040 --> 0:18:55.320
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, and ross are great from the standpoint of pull,

0:18:55.400 --> 0:18:57.919
<v Speaker 2>like ripping the tax band aid off right now and

0:18:57.960 --> 0:18:59.720
<v Speaker 2>never having to think about it ever again. But I

0:19:00.119 --> 0:19:02.960
<v Speaker 2>think it's worth mentioning if you know that you are

0:19:03.119 --> 0:19:05.520
<v Speaker 2>wanting to invest maybe a little more aggressively of let's

0:19:05.520 --> 0:19:07.720
<v Speaker 2>say the next five years, and if you know that

0:19:07.760 --> 0:19:10.840
<v Speaker 2>you're going to be in the highest income producing years

0:19:10.840 --> 0:19:13.480
<v Speaker 2>of your life, if you're basically at peak income, it

0:19:13.560 --> 0:19:14.879
<v Speaker 2>might be worth considering.

0:19:14.480 --> 0:19:16.880
<v Speaker 1>A traditional IRA to be able to reduce the taxes

0:19:16.920 --> 0:19:20.080
<v Speaker 1>owed because of your potentially higher income. But that's of course,

0:19:20.560 --> 0:19:23.639
<v Speaker 1>knowing that these are your peak earning years. Sometimes we

0:19:23.720 --> 0:19:25.480
<v Speaker 1>know we have more of an idea of what that's

0:19:25.520 --> 0:19:27.399
<v Speaker 1>going to because if you're thinking, well, yeah, I'm going

0:19:27.440 --> 0:19:29.040
<v Speaker 1>to go after pretty hard for five years, but then

0:19:29.080 --> 0:19:31.600
<v Speaker 1>after that I'm planning to switch to part time. I've

0:19:31.680 --> 0:19:34.480
<v Speaker 1>got other things i want to pursue. Well, now's the

0:19:34.520 --> 0:19:37.800
<v Speaker 1>time potentially to consider that traditional IRA obviously doesn't give

0:19:37.840 --> 0:19:40.280
<v Speaker 1>you as nearly as much flexibility. It's hard to project

0:19:40.280 --> 0:19:42.919
<v Speaker 1>those things perfectly, but yeah, most people have kind of

0:19:43.080 --> 0:19:46.000
<v Speaker 1>something to think through of them. Yeah, career trajectory they're

0:19:46.000 --> 0:19:46.399
<v Speaker 1>hoping for.

0:19:46.520 --> 0:19:50.000
<v Speaker 2>Totally, here's an outside of the box, maybe a less

0:19:50.080 --> 0:19:53.280
<v Speaker 2>orthodox way of thinking. Let's talk about your actual job.

0:19:53.320 --> 0:19:55.560
<v Speaker 2>Because so I just laid out a scenario where you're, like,

0:19:55.640 --> 0:19:58.560
<v Speaker 2>at the peak of your career, you're making a sweet income.

0:19:59.240 --> 0:20:02.600
<v Speaker 2>Maybe it's worth considering a different job at a different company.

0:20:03.040 --> 0:20:06.280
<v Speaker 2>I wouldn't necessarily go hunting for a new job just

0:20:06.320 --> 0:20:09.480
<v Speaker 2>because you're four to one k offerings are trash because

0:20:09.480 --> 0:20:11.600
<v Speaker 2>they don't offer a match. But if there are other

0:20:11.720 --> 0:20:14.440
<v Speaker 2>reasons that you're unhappy with your job, like maybe it's

0:20:14.480 --> 0:20:17.320
<v Speaker 2>just like the hours or the career potential. Maybe you've

0:20:17.320 --> 0:20:19.320
<v Speaker 2>got more in the tank and you're thinking, I don't

0:20:19.440 --> 0:20:21.359
<v Speaker 2>I don't see much of a future for me there,

0:20:21.560 --> 0:20:24.399
<v Speaker 2>then I would consider this as a good reason to

0:20:24.440 --> 0:20:27.800
<v Speaker 2>feel a job search. Great companies they should offer competitive

0:20:27.840 --> 0:20:31.480
<v Speaker 2>four to one k's. It's almost like a non starter. Honestly, now,

0:20:31.520 --> 0:20:33.760
<v Speaker 2>at this point for a company to not offer it's

0:20:33.760 --> 0:20:34.840
<v Speaker 2>some kind of match.

0:20:34.600 --> 0:20:38.080
<v Speaker 1>It's table stakes. Yes, for literally to hire great employees.

0:20:38.320 --> 0:20:40.840
<v Speaker 1>A match in a four oh one K is like, yeah,

0:20:41.000 --> 0:20:42.000
<v Speaker 1>you have to have it in order.

0:20:41.880 --> 0:20:43.399
<v Speaker 2>To get the right people, it seems like, and it

0:20:43.440 --> 0:20:45.399
<v Speaker 2>just doesn't speak well of the company if that's not

0:20:45.840 --> 0:20:48.359
<v Speaker 2>the base, the bare minimum that they're looking to offer.

0:20:48.480 --> 0:20:50.959
<v Speaker 2>And you know, you probably weren't expecting us to tell

0:20:51.000 --> 0:20:53.280
<v Speaker 2>you to get your resume ready, but I think it's

0:20:53.280 --> 0:20:56.159
<v Speaker 2>worth considering if there are other things that you're unsatisfied

0:20:56.160 --> 0:20:57.160
<v Speaker 2>with at your current employer.

0:20:57.240 --> 0:20:58.720
<v Speaker 1>Agreed, Yeah, you don't want it to be the whole

0:20:58.800 --> 0:21:02.440
<v Speaker 1>kitten Cammodle reason to leave. You might be unhappy if

0:21:02.440 --> 0:21:05.080
<v Speaker 1>you did, but it is certainly one of those factors

0:21:05.080 --> 0:21:07.480
<v Speaker 1>that you want to consider. And the other thing Matt

0:21:07.640 --> 0:21:10.679
<v Speaker 1>I would at least think through is maybe your employer

0:21:10.720 --> 0:21:12.600
<v Speaker 1>doesn't know any better, at least when it comes to

0:21:12.760 --> 0:21:16.760
<v Speaker 1>the fees that this foreign K plan is charging to employees.

0:21:16.960 --> 0:21:19.080
<v Speaker 1>You would think that they would know, but they might not.

0:21:19.160 --> 0:21:21.480
<v Speaker 1>I mean, think about the fact that employers often have

0:21:21.560 --> 0:21:24.840
<v Speaker 1>to find health care plans for their employees and guess

0:21:24.840 --> 0:21:27.440
<v Speaker 1>what the people in charge of that. They're not always

0:21:27.920 --> 0:21:31.119
<v Speaker 1>health care specialists. They might not have the expertise to

0:21:31.200 --> 0:21:34.040
<v Speaker 1>know exactly what's getting passed on to employees and what's not.

0:21:34.640 --> 0:21:36.719
<v Speaker 1>So maybe give them the benefit of the doubt, and

0:21:36.760 --> 0:21:40.840
<v Speaker 1>in that case, will petition them to help them understand

0:21:41.200 --> 0:21:44.600
<v Speaker 1>what sort of product they're giving to their employees. Right,

0:21:44.880 --> 0:21:47.600
<v Speaker 1>let them know about the four one KA options that

0:21:47.640 --> 0:21:50.520
<v Speaker 1>would save them and you money. Yeah, and that's right.

0:21:50.720 --> 0:21:52.800
<v Speaker 1>It's not just about you and your fellow employees. It's

0:21:52.800 --> 0:21:55.000
<v Speaker 1>about them too. There are lower cost plans for them

0:21:55.000 --> 0:21:58.360
<v Speaker 1>to implement. In all likelihood, tell them about companies like Guideline,

0:21:58.359 --> 0:22:00.760
<v Speaker 1>like Betterment that offer low cost four to one case

0:22:00.880 --> 0:22:05.360
<v Speaker 1>for small and medium sized employers, and they massively minimize

0:22:05.400 --> 0:22:08.760
<v Speaker 1>fees for employees too. Maybe they'll be so grateful and

0:22:08.800 --> 0:22:10.359
<v Speaker 1>they'll save enough that they can be more generous and

0:22:10.400 --> 0:22:12.280
<v Speaker 1>start offering a four to one K match too. You

0:22:12.359 --> 0:22:14.400
<v Speaker 1>never know, but it's one of those things where that's

0:22:14.440 --> 0:22:17.000
<v Speaker 1>two birds one stone. Yeah, there's a kind of gentle

0:22:17.040 --> 0:22:19.239
<v Speaker 1>way to let them know. Wait a second, Hey, look

0:22:19.280 --> 0:22:21.000
<v Speaker 1>what I found over here. This might be great for

0:22:21.040 --> 0:22:24.080
<v Speaker 1>the company and great for everyone in it too, in

0:22:24.160 --> 0:22:27.960
<v Speaker 1>order to minimize the crappy fees they're forking over so

0:22:28.080 --> 0:22:30.240
<v Speaker 1>people can't actually utilize the account I mean the employer.

0:22:30.240 --> 0:22:32.240
<v Speaker 1>I'm sure they offer a four one K they want

0:22:32.320 --> 0:22:35.080
<v Speaker 1>their employees to take advantage of it hopefully. Yeah, you know,

0:22:35.359 --> 0:22:37.639
<v Speaker 1>like I mean that's assuming the best. Like that's a

0:22:37.640 --> 0:22:38.880
<v Speaker 1>good faith sort of.

0:22:38.920 --> 0:22:41.560
<v Speaker 2>Argument, the fact that they don't know better, and once

0:22:41.600 --> 0:22:44.000
<v Speaker 2>you just provide them with the information, they're gonna change

0:22:44.000 --> 0:22:45.800
<v Speaker 2>their minds and they're gonna want to treat their employees better.

0:22:45.800 --> 0:22:48.280
<v Speaker 2>But like I guess a bad faith sort of scenario

0:22:48.480 --> 0:22:50.120
<v Speaker 2>would be like if they're getting a sweet trip out

0:22:50.119 --> 0:22:51.920
<v Speaker 2>of it every year from the insurance company or somebody

0:22:51.920 --> 0:22:53.919
<v Speaker 2>who always takes them to a certain golf course, and

0:22:54.000 --> 0:22:57.159
<v Speaker 2>those are deals that still happen today, unfortunately, And if

0:22:57.240 --> 0:22:58.879
<v Speaker 2>that were to be the case, then this could be

0:22:58.960 --> 0:23:03.640
<v Speaker 2>again going back to the suggestion of considering a different company.

0:23:03.880 --> 0:23:07.000
<v Speaker 2>If this is just one of many reasons that you

0:23:07.040 --> 0:23:08.480
<v Speaker 2>are finding yourself unsatisfied, and.

0:23:08.440 --> 0:23:11.560
<v Speaker 1>You think those insurance companies are taking the HR people

0:23:11.640 --> 0:23:12.200
<v Speaker 1>out to the.

0:23:12.160 --> 0:23:14.440
<v Speaker 2>Disc golf course or the real golf course, I'm guessing

0:23:14.480 --> 0:23:18.240
<v Speaker 2>this thea's the latter. Yeah, But let's hear from another listener, Joel.

0:23:18.280 --> 0:23:21.960
<v Speaker 2>This is a listener who has a question about direct indexing,

0:23:22.280 --> 0:23:24.199
<v Speaker 2>which is not something I think we've talked about here

0:23:24.200 --> 0:23:24.600
<v Speaker 2>on the show.

0:23:24.720 --> 0:23:27.960
<v Speaker 3>Hey, Matt, Joel Greg here calling from Lynnwood, Washington, and

0:23:28.040 --> 0:23:30.840
<v Speaker 3>I have a question about direct indexing through an SMA.

0:23:31.560 --> 0:23:34.040
<v Speaker 3>I'm thirty two married. We have about three hundred and

0:23:34.080 --> 0:23:38.040
<v Speaker 3>fifty thousand income and our portfolios five hundred thousand, with

0:23:38.560 --> 0:23:41.159
<v Speaker 3>half in retirement and half in a brokerage account. So

0:23:41.240 --> 0:23:43.919
<v Speaker 3>with the brokerage account, I have an advisor. I'm not

0:23:43.960 --> 0:23:46.359
<v Speaker 3>paying a fee. It's through Fidelity, and they make that

0:23:46.880 --> 0:23:49.280
<v Speaker 3>available if you have more than two hundred and fifty

0:23:49.320 --> 0:23:53.720
<v Speaker 3>thousand invested with Fidelity. But he's suggesting a direct indexing

0:23:53.760 --> 0:23:57.560
<v Speaker 3>approach opening an SMA. It has to be one hundred

0:23:57.600 --> 0:24:01.360
<v Speaker 3>thousand plus and there's a point four percent fee, And

0:24:01.920 --> 0:24:05.439
<v Speaker 3>just using easy math here, his suggestion is, you know

0:24:05.480 --> 0:24:08.720
<v Speaker 3>we can we can donate the winners the top gains

0:24:09.000 --> 0:24:12.000
<v Speaker 3>and tax loss harvest the losers. So out of one

0:24:12.040 --> 0:24:15.119
<v Speaker 3>hundred thousand portfolio, say we grew to one hundred and

0:24:15.119 --> 0:24:19.120
<v Speaker 3>ten in an ETF fund, you just have your holdings

0:24:19.119 --> 0:24:23.600
<v Speaker 3>grew to one hundred and ten. In a direct indexing approach,

0:24:23.640 --> 0:24:27.399
<v Speaker 3>you might have stocks that grew by fifty percent and

0:24:27.480 --> 0:24:30.520
<v Speaker 3>you have other stocks that lost fifty percent so instead

0:24:30.520 --> 0:24:33.760
<v Speaker 3>of having, you know, just a plus ten thousand, you

0:24:33.840 --> 0:24:37.520
<v Speaker 3>might have plus fifty and minus forty. And in that

0:24:37.600 --> 0:24:41.800
<v Speaker 3>instance you could donate the ones that gained a lot

0:24:42.160 --> 0:24:46.199
<v Speaker 3>and rebuy at a higher cost basis plus. Then you

0:24:46.240 --> 0:24:50.880
<v Speaker 3>can tax loss, harvest the losers, and reduce your taxable

0:24:50.880 --> 0:24:54.240
<v Speaker 3>income this year. So I think the math works here.

0:24:54.320 --> 0:24:58.680
<v Speaker 3>The point four percent fee is going to be more

0:24:58.840 --> 0:25:03.000
<v Speaker 3>than turned with that tax efficiency. But I wanted to

0:25:03.080 --> 0:25:04.840
<v Speaker 3>run it by you in case I'm missing anything.

0:25:05.119 --> 0:25:08.639
<v Speaker 2>Thanks so much, ooh man, I like this question and

0:25:08.840 --> 0:25:09.840
<v Speaker 2>a lot of mass.

0:25:09.920 --> 0:25:12.160
<v Speaker 1>It does show that that actually some of the changes

0:25:12.520 --> 0:25:15.800
<v Speaker 1>that have happened on the investing front are not insignificant

0:25:15.800 --> 0:25:18.880
<v Speaker 1>when it comes to individual investors being able to save

0:25:19.040 --> 0:25:21.639
<v Speaker 1>on taxes. And I'm glad that Greg is with Fidelity,

0:25:21.720 --> 0:25:23.840
<v Speaker 1>by the way. I mean, although I have read that

0:25:24.000 --> 0:25:26.199
<v Speaker 1>they regularly try to pitch folks on signing up for

0:25:26.280 --> 0:25:29.240
<v Speaker 1>the more expensive account management services.

0:25:30.040 --> 0:25:32.280
<v Speaker 2>But yeah, I am not happy with the scenario that

0:25:32.280 --> 0:25:34.480
<v Speaker 2>it sounds like Greg is finding himself in because when

0:25:34.480 --> 0:25:37.480
<v Speaker 2>it comes to f Z Rocks and the other zero funds, yeah,

0:25:37.480 --> 0:25:39.600
<v Speaker 2>that's great, But when it comes to some of these

0:25:39.600 --> 0:25:42.439
<v Speaker 2>other services that they're offering, I think there might be

0:25:42.440 --> 0:25:44.359
<v Speaker 2>some better options out there that we'll get to.

0:25:44.480 --> 0:25:46.679
<v Speaker 1>Although just the fact that he had this conversation and

0:25:46.720 --> 0:25:50.560
<v Speaker 1>he's asking this question, I think it sounds like Greg

0:25:50.640 --> 0:25:53.320
<v Speaker 1>has the ability to save money on taxes in ways

0:25:53.560 --> 0:25:54.960
<v Speaker 1>that he hadn't really thought of before.

0:25:55.040 --> 0:25:57.240
<v Speaker 2>That's true. Yeah, So we're talking about tax lost harvesting

0:25:57.320 --> 0:26:00.200
<v Speaker 2>right now, which is one of the things that direct

0:25:59.800 --> 0:26:02.600
<v Speaker 2>and takes advantage of. And you know, this is kind

0:26:02.640 --> 0:26:04.119
<v Speaker 2>of like how we talk about the need for folks

0:26:04.160 --> 0:26:08.080
<v Speaker 2>who have more complex tax situations the pay a pro

0:26:08.520 --> 0:26:11.520
<v Speaker 2>If the tax savings outweigh the fee that you're going

0:26:11.600 --> 0:26:14.639
<v Speaker 2>to pay, well, you'd be shortsighted to not pay. And

0:26:14.680 --> 0:26:17.320
<v Speaker 2>when it comes to tax lost harvesting, it's similar. So

0:26:17.400 --> 0:26:20.760
<v Speaker 2>it's define it real quick. Tax loss harvesting is when

0:26:20.800 --> 0:26:23.119
<v Speaker 2>you sell an investment at a loss in order to

0:26:23.160 --> 0:26:26.560
<v Speaker 2>offset other gains that you might have received, and if

0:26:26.560 --> 0:26:29.680
<v Speaker 2>your losses exceed your gains, well, you can then deduct

0:26:29.760 --> 0:26:32.840
<v Speaker 2>those losses. In a given year, it's up to three

0:26:32.840 --> 0:26:35.600
<v Speaker 2>thousand dollars if you are married filing jointly for that

0:26:35.680 --> 0:26:39.439
<v Speaker 2>given year, in order to reduce your ordinary income. If

0:26:39.480 --> 0:26:42.040
<v Speaker 2>your losses are larger than that well, you can then

0:26:42.119 --> 0:26:45.520
<v Speaker 2>carry those losses forward, claim those losses to offset ordinary

0:26:45.560 --> 0:26:49.159
<v Speaker 2>income in future years. And it's not an insignificant amount

0:26:49.160 --> 0:26:51.240
<v Speaker 2>of money here, and a good advisor who is paying

0:26:51.280 --> 0:26:54.000
<v Speaker 2>attention can help you to save on taxes buy selling

0:26:54.040 --> 0:26:57.640
<v Speaker 2>and buying in a timely manner without changing your portfolio

0:26:58.119 --> 0:26:59.280
<v Speaker 2>allocation all that much.

0:26:59.359 --> 0:27:02.560
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I mean, think about this if you can even

0:27:03.080 --> 0:27:05.520
<v Speaker 1>let's say, if your total stock market index fund has

0:27:05.560 --> 0:27:08.280
<v Speaker 1>experienced some losses, you could sell in order to show

0:27:08.320 --> 0:27:11.000
<v Speaker 1>a paper loss, rebuy an S and P five hundred

0:27:11.000 --> 0:27:14.760
<v Speaker 1>index fund, and those are would not be subject to

0:27:14.800 --> 0:27:18.160
<v Speaker 1>the wash sale rule because because they're dissimilar enough, and

0:27:18.359 --> 0:27:21.439
<v Speaker 1>you can just reap tax savings because of it. And

0:27:21.520 --> 0:27:23.760
<v Speaker 1>it's important to mention that the tax loss harvesting only

0:27:23.760 --> 0:27:26.520
<v Speaker 1>works inside of a brokerage account. You're not creating, that's true,

0:27:26.560 --> 0:27:28.840
<v Speaker 1>a taxable event when you sell a fund inside of

0:27:28.880 --> 0:27:31.720
<v Speaker 1>your four oh and k or your IRA. Also, tax

0:27:31.760 --> 0:27:35.000
<v Speaker 1>loss harvesting is more effective for higher income earners. So

0:27:35.320 --> 0:27:37.800
<v Speaker 1>you know, Greg, he was pretty honest about what he makes.

0:27:37.800 --> 0:27:40.080
<v Speaker 1>He makes a lot of money, close to three hundred

0:27:40.080 --> 0:27:43.600
<v Speaker 1>and fifty kyah, which means that his highest marginal tax

0:27:43.600 --> 0:27:46.320
<v Speaker 1>bracket is getting up there. He's not far from at

0:27:46.400 --> 0:27:48.320
<v Speaker 1>least some of those dollars being taxed in the thirty

0:27:48.320 --> 0:27:51.439
<v Speaker 1>two percent range if he continues to crush, which means

0:27:51.560 --> 0:27:54.840
<v Speaker 1>the stakes are higher and that a tax loss harvesting

0:27:54.920 --> 0:27:58.760
<v Speaker 1>strategy could have I would say, a not insignificant impact

0:27:58.960 --> 0:28:02.800
<v Speaker 1>on his tax situation. Still the point four percent fee,

0:28:03.160 --> 0:28:06.280
<v Speaker 1>it's not cheap, and tax lost harvesting is something you

0:28:06.359 --> 0:28:09.520
<v Speaker 1>can do yourself without an insane amount of effort. But

0:28:09.640 --> 0:28:13.520
<v Speaker 1>this direct indexing approach, I would say that the fidelity

0:28:13.520 --> 0:28:15.800
<v Speaker 1>rep is talking about does make it easier, kind of

0:28:15.840 --> 0:28:18.520
<v Speaker 1>in the way that Greg outlined, making it easier essentially

0:28:18.560 --> 0:28:22.160
<v Speaker 1>to call the losers and to grab those tax savings

0:28:22.280 --> 0:28:24.560
<v Speaker 1>than if you're talking about owning just a couple of

0:28:24.560 --> 0:28:27.560
<v Speaker 1>funds inside of your brokerage account.

0:28:27.680 --> 0:28:31.600
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, direct indexing it's a relatively new product. It's gaining steam,

0:28:31.720 --> 0:28:34.359
<v Speaker 2>but it's an attempt to mirror the index strategy that

0:28:34.400 --> 0:28:38.680
<v Speaker 2>you find with something like let's say an SMPF ETF

0:28:38.720 --> 0:28:41.719
<v Speaker 2>for something similar, but you've got fractional shares, you've got

0:28:41.800 --> 0:28:45.480
<v Speaker 2>zero commission trades, and both of these advancements in investing

0:28:45.640 --> 0:28:48.920
<v Speaker 2>has made this method more widely available to investors in

0:28:48.960 --> 0:28:52.520
<v Speaker 2>recent years. So instead of just buying a simple index fund, instead,

0:28:52.520 --> 0:28:55.720
<v Speaker 2>what's happening is you buy small amounts of individual stocks

0:28:55.720 --> 0:28:58.800
<v Speaker 2>that make up that index, and then this offers the

0:28:58.800 --> 0:29:02.440
<v Speaker 2>potential for smater tax moves are when there is volatility

0:29:02.480 --> 0:29:03.160
<v Speaker 2>there in the market.

0:29:03.960 --> 0:29:05.640
<v Speaker 1>I am thinking of Matt. You know, you have a

0:29:05.680 --> 0:29:08.440
<v Speaker 1>folder on your desktop and you have five hundred files

0:29:08.440 --> 0:29:10.560
<v Speaker 1>in there, or you scatter shot them instead across the

0:29:10.680 --> 0:29:13.840
<v Speaker 1>entirety of your desktop. That's what direct into indexing, at

0:29:13.920 --> 0:29:16.320
<v Speaker 1>least in my mind, looks like instead of putting it

0:29:16.320 --> 0:29:18.880
<v Speaker 1>in a folder inside an index fund, they're literally just

0:29:18.920 --> 0:29:21.840
<v Speaker 1>all scattered all over. But Okay, what should Greg do here?

0:29:22.040 --> 0:29:25.880
<v Speaker 1>And should he succumb to the Fidelity pitch go with

0:29:25.920 --> 0:29:29.400
<v Speaker 1>their their separately managed account in order to have access

0:29:29.440 --> 0:29:32.680
<v Speaker 1>to these tax lost harvesting benefits. I don't think so,

0:29:32.880 --> 0:29:35.600
<v Speaker 1>And I also don't necessarily think it means that Greg

0:29:35.800 --> 0:29:40.120
<v Speaker 1>needs to Diyatt himself, although he could, but there are

0:29:40.360 --> 0:29:44.080
<v Speaker 1>ways to actually, I think maybe split the baby and

0:29:44.120 --> 0:29:46.920
<v Speaker 1>get the best of both worlds. Betterment is a robo

0:29:46.960 --> 0:29:49.560
<v Speaker 1>advisor that we're fans of, and tax loss harvesting is

0:29:49.640 --> 0:29:52.480
<v Speaker 1>included in the feed that Betterment charges, which is only

0:29:52.720 --> 0:29:55.080
<v Speaker 1>a quarter of a percent instead of four tenths of

0:29:55.080 --> 0:29:57.920
<v Speaker 1>a percent. And the bigger that portfolio gets, the more

0:29:57.960 --> 0:30:00.680
<v Speaker 1>that fee matters. So that's actually a s acial difference

0:30:00.960 --> 0:30:03.760
<v Speaker 1>in price. And I think that's a big deal. Reducing

0:30:03.880 --> 0:30:06.440
<v Speaker 1>taxes matters, yes, and I think it's important to highlight that.

0:30:06.640 --> 0:30:11.040
<v Speaker 1>But Betterment has an automated algorithm that harvests losses without

0:30:11.080 --> 0:30:15.160
<v Speaker 1>creating additional trading costs, while also helping you avoid running

0:30:15.160 --> 0:30:16.920
<v Speaker 1>a foul of the irs, which is I guess from

0:30:16.920 --> 0:30:20.080
<v Speaker 1>they perspective, that's the biggest potential pitfall is that you

0:30:20.520 --> 0:30:23.080
<v Speaker 1>don't do it properly, either from a planning perspective or

0:30:23.120 --> 0:30:26.479
<v Speaker 1>from a tax perspective. And hey, it turns out you

0:30:26.520 --> 0:30:30.560
<v Speaker 1>didn't tax lost harvest to its maximum ability. And while

0:30:30.560 --> 0:30:33.360
<v Speaker 1>we love Fidelity, moving over to Betterment might be best

0:30:33.480 --> 0:30:37.600
<v Speaker 1>for Greg in this situation. Betterment also highlights on their

0:30:37.640 --> 0:30:40.440
<v Speaker 1>website that seven out of ten Betterment customers have their

0:30:40.520 --> 0:30:45.040
<v Speaker 1>taxable advisory fee their Betterment fee covered by the likely

0:30:45.080 --> 0:30:47.960
<v Speaker 1>tax savings of tax lost harvesting, and Greg would almost

0:30:47.960 --> 0:30:49.960
<v Speaker 1>certainly be one of them, especially when he ran the

0:30:50.040 --> 0:30:51.880
<v Speaker 1>numbers and he's like, hey, I'm going to come out

0:30:51.880 --> 0:30:54.200
<v Speaker 1>ahead with the higher fee from Fidelity, Well, then you're

0:30:54.200 --> 0:30:55.600
<v Speaker 1>definitely going to come out more than a head with

0:30:55.640 --> 0:30:58.240
<v Speaker 1>the lower fee from Betterment. So I think you can

0:30:58.280 --> 0:31:00.800
<v Speaker 1>maybe have your cake and eat it too, just by

0:31:00.880 --> 0:31:02.680
<v Speaker 1>doing business at the right place.

0:31:02.800 --> 0:31:06.080
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, And I think more than anything, the red flag

0:31:06.160 --> 0:31:08.400
<v Speaker 2>that gets raised in this scenario is the fact that

0:31:08.400 --> 0:31:10.000
<v Speaker 2>it feels like a pitch. It feels like a pitch

0:31:10.000 --> 0:31:12.840
<v Speaker 2>from Fidelity. And while there are many things that we

0:31:12.920 --> 0:31:17.440
<v Speaker 2>love about Fidelity, specifically there's zero cost funds, it feels

0:31:17.480 --> 0:31:19.320
<v Speaker 2>like they're trying to sell you on this and perhaps

0:31:19.320 --> 0:31:21.040
<v Speaker 2>in order to gain more of your business and have

0:31:21.080 --> 0:31:24.720
<v Speaker 2>you pay for slightly more expensive services that they're making

0:31:24.760 --> 0:31:26.760
<v Speaker 2>slightly more profit on. And it's not that's the thing.

0:31:26.800 --> 0:31:29.560
<v Speaker 2>It's not a ridiculous amount. Point four really isn't that bad.

0:31:29.760 --> 0:31:31.360
<v Speaker 2>It's not gonna a lot better than a lot of

0:31:31.480 --> 0:31:34.000
<v Speaker 2>about other advisors other than one percent, for sure, one

0:31:34.000 --> 0:31:36.920
<v Speaker 2>percent of assets under management. It's not predatory. And that's the.

0:31:36.920 --> 0:31:40.160
<v Speaker 1>Part that feels a little weird about this is that,

0:31:40.200 --> 0:31:42.440
<v Speaker 1>like it's good enough for that to be folks who

0:31:42.440 --> 0:31:44.560
<v Speaker 1>are satisfied with the services that they're receiving for that

0:31:44.680 --> 0:31:46.600
<v Speaker 1>dollar amount. But what we're just saying is that hey,

0:31:47.160 --> 0:31:49.000
<v Speaker 1>go with Betterment and you'll be able to get the

0:31:49.000 --> 0:31:51.120
<v Speaker 1>same thing. Basically, you don't have somebody that you're talking to,

0:31:51.400 --> 0:31:53.560
<v Speaker 1>but you're gonna get the same kind of service, the

0:31:53.600 --> 0:31:57.240
<v Speaker 1>same tax loss harvesting there within your brokerage. And he

0:31:57.320 --> 0:32:00.120
<v Speaker 1>said that that Fidelity advisor was saying that, hey, by

0:32:00.200 --> 0:32:02.960
<v Speaker 1>the way, for the ones that gain that have seen

0:32:02.960 --> 0:32:05.000
<v Speaker 1>a lot of gains, you can donate those and so

0:32:05.120 --> 0:32:07.640
<v Speaker 1>you're not realizing your capital gains there. Well, that's not

0:32:08.120 --> 0:32:10.480
<v Speaker 1>a unique selling proposition of Fidelity. You can do that

0:32:10.520 --> 0:32:13.600
<v Speaker 1>with any brokerage, any brokerage account that's like yeah worth

0:32:13.600 --> 0:32:17.440
<v Speaker 1>their salt. You can donate stocks or funds out of

0:32:17.480 --> 0:32:20.000
<v Speaker 1>those brokerages and so that's not You can do that

0:32:20.000 --> 0:32:22.640
<v Speaker 1>with Betterment as well. So in a similar way, it's like, well,

0:32:22.720 --> 0:32:25.600
<v Speaker 1>you're getting all the benefit literally that you've mentioned with

0:32:25.720 --> 0:32:28.640
<v Speaker 1>Betterment at a lower cost as opposed to going with

0:32:29.040 --> 0:32:32.800
<v Speaker 1>you the same services that are being offered there at Fidelity. Okay,

0:32:32.920 --> 0:32:35.800
<v Speaker 1>one minor downside actually to the zero funds from Fidelity. Matt,

0:32:35.800 --> 0:32:39.560
<v Speaker 1>speaking of donation, I tried to donate some FC rocks

0:32:39.760 --> 0:32:43.640
<v Speaker 1>last year and you can't actually donate that fund because

0:32:43.680 --> 0:32:44.720
<v Speaker 1>it's a proprietary fund.

0:32:44.840 --> 0:32:44.959
<v Speaker 4>There.

0:32:45.000 --> 0:32:47.440
<v Speaker 1>You didn't realize that until I try to donate it.

0:32:47.760 --> 0:32:52.200
<v Speaker 1>But so again, there are all sorts of tiny details

0:32:52.240 --> 0:32:53.760
<v Speaker 1>you got to keep in mind. But in this case,

0:32:53.800 --> 0:32:56.400
<v Speaker 1>I think the big thing is much lower price. You

0:32:56.440 --> 0:32:59.080
<v Speaker 1>still get the tax loss harvesting. That's one of the

0:32:59.120 --> 0:33:02.240
<v Speaker 1>things at Betterment. It does really well with their algorithm.

0:33:02.560 --> 0:33:05.560
<v Speaker 1>So I feel very confident. If that's something you really

0:33:05.560 --> 0:33:07.360
<v Speaker 1>want and you feel like it's going to help you

0:33:07.360 --> 0:33:09.880
<v Speaker 1>come out ahead from a tax perspective, I'd go there instead.

0:33:10.240 --> 0:33:11.760
<v Speaker 2>Totally. We got more to get to you, buddy. We're

0:33:11.760 --> 0:33:15.360
<v Speaker 2>gonna talk about Apple Watches, HSA's and more right after this.

0:33:23.040 --> 0:33:23.880
<v Speaker 2>All right, Matt, we're back.

0:33:24.040 --> 0:33:26.080
<v Speaker 1>Let's get to the Facebook question of the week. This

0:33:26.120 --> 0:33:28.280
<v Speaker 1>one comes from Chad. He posted this in the how

0:33:28.280 --> 0:33:31.840
<v Speaker 1>to Money Facebook group. He said, authorized user or checking account.

0:33:32.080 --> 0:33:34.320
<v Speaker 1>We got my eleven year old fifth grader and Apple

0:33:34.360 --> 0:33:37.360
<v Speaker 1>Watch with cellular capabilities. Man, I'm pretty sure you didn't

0:33:37.400 --> 0:33:39.480
<v Speaker 1>have any fancy technology like that in fifth grade.

0:33:39.640 --> 0:33:42.320
<v Speaker 2>Of course I didn't, Chad said, my current fifth grade. Well,

0:33:42.320 --> 0:33:44.360
<v Speaker 2>I don't have a current fifth grader, but my kids,

0:33:44.440 --> 0:33:47.240
<v Speaker 2>right now don't even have a fancy tech like that.

0:33:47.320 --> 0:33:49.840
<v Speaker 1>I get that. Sorry to interrupt, Chad says, I want

0:33:49.840 --> 0:33:51.840
<v Speaker 1>to be able to give him the ability to use

0:33:51.880 --> 0:33:54.240
<v Speaker 1>his watch to make purchases at the various events he

0:33:54.280 --> 0:33:58.040
<v Speaker 1>attends bowling club sporting events, etc. Instead of having him

0:33:58.120 --> 0:34:01.600
<v Speaker 1>use actually more like lose cash. Which do you think

0:34:01.680 --> 0:34:04.080
<v Speaker 1>is better? I know that Chase has a checking account

0:34:04.080 --> 0:34:06.560
<v Speaker 1>for kids, maybe it's for teens. I could fund that

0:34:06.680 --> 0:34:09.080
<v Speaker 1>and put his debit card onto his watch. I could

0:34:09.080 --> 0:34:10.959
<v Speaker 1>make him an authorized user on one of my Chase

0:34:11.000 --> 0:34:13.200
<v Speaker 1>cards and set a really low limit on there so

0:34:13.239 --> 0:34:14.040
<v Speaker 1>he can just use the.

0:34:14.040 --> 0:34:16.480
<v Speaker 2>Watch to pay for stuff. Thoughts, Well, maybe I give

0:34:16.480 --> 0:34:18.240
<v Speaker 2>it away a little bit. I'm not opposed to cash,

0:34:18.280 --> 0:34:20.920
<v Speaker 2>and I will say I also, Chad, I've got an

0:34:20.960 --> 0:34:23.440
<v Speaker 2>eleven year old who's a sixth grader, not a fifth grader,

0:34:24.040 --> 0:34:26.120
<v Speaker 2>And over the past couple of years there have been

0:34:26.280 --> 0:34:29.600
<v Speaker 2>numerous like basketball games, hangs with friends where they're out

0:34:29.600 --> 0:34:31.560
<v Speaker 2>in public where they can like make their own purchases,

0:34:31.640 --> 0:34:34.200
<v Speaker 2>And in all of those scenarios, she's taken her own

0:34:34.239 --> 0:34:36.440
<v Speaker 2>cash with her. Yeah, And I guess the way I

0:34:36.440 --> 0:34:39.040
<v Speaker 2>think about it, I'm like, would I rather her lose

0:34:39.040 --> 0:34:43.759
<v Speaker 2>an Apple watch or have like direct access to all

0:34:43.800 --> 0:34:46.920
<v Speaker 2>of her funds there, or just the ability to at

0:34:46.960 --> 0:34:49.040
<v Speaker 2>most lose the amount of money that she's taken with her.

0:34:49.080 --> 0:34:52.279
<v Speaker 2>So personally, man for us, at least, the going with

0:34:52.320 --> 0:34:56.600
<v Speaker 2>the old school physical cash method for us has worked

0:34:56.600 --> 0:34:56.960
<v Speaker 2>out fine.

0:34:57.040 --> 0:34:59.520
<v Speaker 1>I can't imagine he's gonna lose the watch, right, but

0:34:59.560 --> 0:35:01.359
<v Speaker 1>I don't. I think you can lose some loose money.

0:35:01.440 --> 0:35:04.040
<v Speaker 1>So I get where Chad's coming from. And maybe his

0:35:04.120 --> 0:35:05.840
<v Speaker 1>son has lost twenty bucks here or there before and

0:35:05.840 --> 0:35:08.200
<v Speaker 1>he's like cash to day. Yeah, man, if you could

0:35:08.200 --> 0:35:09.960
<v Speaker 1>just tap with his wrist, it's gonna make this a

0:35:09.960 --> 0:35:12.359
<v Speaker 1>whole lot easier. And I totally understand what you're saying.

0:35:12.360 --> 0:35:14.320
<v Speaker 1>And I think, especially for younger kids, cash makes the

0:35:14.360 --> 0:35:14.920
<v Speaker 1>most sense.

0:35:14.920 --> 0:35:16.960
<v Speaker 2>Sometimes MO money more problems, you know, like you want

0:35:16.960 --> 0:35:19.160
<v Speaker 2>to go digital, and okay, so now you've got something

0:35:19.200 --> 0:35:22.000
<v Speaker 2>that you've got to provide service for. That's true because

0:35:22.120 --> 0:35:23.799
<v Speaker 2>like not only is the cost of the device or

0:35:23.800 --> 0:35:26.239
<v Speaker 2>the phone or the watch or whatever, but then I mean,

0:35:26.280 --> 0:35:28.759
<v Speaker 2>it's not cheap to pay for the cell plans now

0:35:28.880 --> 0:35:30.479
<v Speaker 2>for these individual device, although it's.

0:35:30.360 --> 0:35:32.759
<v Speaker 1>Gotten a lot cheaper. Actually we've talked about that is

0:35:32.760 --> 0:35:35.080
<v Speaker 1>true US Mobile on the show and how you and

0:35:35.160 --> 0:35:38.680
<v Speaker 1>I are US Mobile customers now for our cell plans,

0:35:38.800 --> 0:35:41.960
<v Speaker 1>they're incredibly cheap. But they also have now service for

0:35:42.000 --> 0:35:44.239
<v Speaker 1>smart watches. I think six dollars and fifty cents a month,

0:35:44.280 --> 0:35:46.840
<v Speaker 1>which if that's what you want as it goes, it

0:35:46.880 --> 0:35:48.560
<v Speaker 1>is a fortable Yeah. If he's already got the Apple

0:35:48.600 --> 0:35:50.120
<v Speaker 1>Watch and you're like, man, we just need to save

0:35:50.160 --> 0:35:51.680
<v Speaker 1>money on that because it's costing us a lot more

0:35:51.719 --> 0:35:53.520
<v Speaker 1>with one of the big guys, We'll look at US Mobile.

0:35:53.640 --> 0:35:56.200
<v Speaker 1>That's the best price I've seen, and I think getting

0:35:56.280 --> 0:35:59.040
<v Speaker 1>used to digital money, this is probably right about the

0:35:59.120 --> 0:36:00.919
<v Speaker 1>right time. I'm getting my sixth grade or fourth grader

0:36:01.040 --> 0:36:04.280
<v Speaker 1>kind of used to it right now. I did cash

0:36:04.400 --> 0:36:06.239
<v Speaker 1>kind of thrown in the towel on that. Honestly, it

0:36:06.280 --> 0:36:08.439
<v Speaker 1>was mostly my fault. It's a pain in the butt. Yeah,

0:36:08.480 --> 0:36:10.160
<v Speaker 1>I will say that that was not as good and

0:36:10.200 --> 0:36:12.200
<v Speaker 1>dedicated to it as I should have been. So that's

0:36:12.280 --> 0:36:14.800
<v Speaker 1>not my kids on my kids, that's on me. Although

0:36:14.800 --> 0:36:16.560
<v Speaker 1>when we try to go digital too early that didn't

0:36:16.600 --> 0:36:18.719
<v Speaker 1>work either, so it's a little bit of trial and

0:36:18.840 --> 0:36:21.960
<v Speaker 1>error in our household. But yeah, we opted actually for

0:36:22.000 --> 0:36:24.279
<v Speaker 1>free teen accounts from Capital One. They come with a

0:36:24.280 --> 0:36:26.880
<v Speaker 1>debit card, and so now it's really easy for me

0:36:27.200 --> 0:36:30.000
<v Speaker 1>to transfer money to them for my Capital One account

0:36:30.000 --> 0:36:31.680
<v Speaker 1>to theirs. They've got a debit card, they could take

0:36:31.680 --> 0:36:33.759
<v Speaker 1>it with them, and that's actually been kind of the

0:36:33.760 --> 0:36:36.440
<v Speaker 1>best solution for our family. They don't have fancy watches

0:36:36.480 --> 0:36:38.640
<v Speaker 1>to attach that card to, but you could.

0:36:38.920 --> 0:36:40.600
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I mean, if you do have that account, of

0:36:40.600 --> 0:36:43.080
<v Speaker 2>course you can take that debit card, stick it in

0:36:43.120 --> 0:36:45.240
<v Speaker 2>the wallet app and he could pay from his watch.

0:36:45.320 --> 0:36:47.160
<v Speaker 2>You could actually you could even attach it to Apple's

0:36:47.160 --> 0:36:52.040
<v Speaker 2>new Apple Cash feature, which exists within like the iOS framework,

0:36:52.560 --> 0:36:54.640
<v Speaker 2>where you can even you know, you send your son

0:36:54.800 --> 0:36:57.520
<v Speaker 2>money to his Apple Cash account via like text message.

0:36:58.000 --> 0:37:00.239
<v Speaker 2>Not that this is something you should be doing on

0:37:00.280 --> 0:37:02.520
<v Speaker 2>the RAG, but it's worth highlighting that it's even simpler

0:37:02.840 --> 0:37:06.680
<v Speaker 2>than like Venmo or cash app. If you're so inclined

0:37:06.680 --> 0:37:08.080
<v Speaker 2>and if this is something that you do want.

0:37:07.920 --> 0:37:10.600
<v Speaker 1>To do, yeah, And I think the other thing Chad

0:37:10.600 --> 0:37:12.759
<v Speaker 1>mentioned was, oh, sure I make him an authorized user

0:37:12.840 --> 0:37:16.080
<v Speaker 1>on one of my credit cards so that he can

0:37:16.880 --> 0:37:20.520
<v Speaker 1>use the watch to pay for stuff with that card. Well,

0:37:20.520 --> 0:37:22.360
<v Speaker 1>I think you can and probably should make him an

0:37:22.360 --> 0:37:25.279
<v Speaker 1>authorized user on your credit card that'll help with him

0:37:25.320 --> 0:37:28.799
<v Speaker 1>building credit. Assuming you handle your credit well, he'll become

0:37:28.800 --> 0:37:31.120
<v Speaker 1>a teenager and he'll have a score that many adults

0:37:31.160 --> 0:37:32.920
<v Speaker 1>can only hope for. And if that's the case, if

0:37:32.920 --> 0:37:35.560
<v Speaker 1>you have a long, great credit history, But he wouldn't

0:37:35.560 --> 0:37:37.719
<v Speaker 1>want you to give him access to pay with that

0:37:37.760 --> 0:37:40.080
<v Speaker 1>credit card that's in your name if you make him

0:37:40.080 --> 0:37:42.919
<v Speaker 1>authorized user, don't actually get him the physical credit card,

0:37:43.120 --> 0:37:45.640
<v Speaker 1>but being an authorized user on yours and then having

0:37:45.640 --> 0:37:48.000
<v Speaker 1>his own account like the Capitol One account that I

0:37:48.080 --> 0:37:50.719
<v Speaker 1>mentioned that allows him to use his money that you

0:37:50.760 --> 0:37:53.400
<v Speaker 1>have at least some oversight of seems like the right

0:37:53.440 --> 0:37:56.319
<v Speaker 1>balance to me. I just don't want Matt to have

0:37:56.440 --> 0:37:59.560
<v Speaker 1>a credit card that's mine and my kids using that card.

0:38:00.120 --> 0:38:03.520
<v Speaker 1>Way too young in my opinion for that, and I

0:38:03.560 --> 0:38:07.319
<v Speaker 1>stand to lose more in that case too. So I

0:38:07.360 --> 0:38:09.560
<v Speaker 1>just kind of like that, that separation of powers, Like

0:38:09.600 --> 0:38:12.440
<v Speaker 1>I like them having their own card, their own accounts.

0:38:12.440 --> 0:38:13.480
<v Speaker 1>You don't have them messing up your.

0:38:13.440 --> 0:38:17.600
<v Speaker 2>Stuff, not that they would, but I just, uh, there's.

0:38:17.400 --> 0:38:20.160
<v Speaker 1>Always the risk, right, yeah, there's the risk of them

0:38:20.440 --> 0:38:24.080
<v Speaker 1>going and buying something that they couldn't actually afford and

0:38:24.120 --> 0:38:27.800
<v Speaker 1>then on my credit card, whereas hey they've got a

0:38:27.840 --> 0:38:30.480
<v Speaker 1>finite amount that's in there. It's in their you know

0:38:30.520 --> 0:38:32.759
<v Speaker 1>account on the team account through Capital One, and.

0:38:32.719 --> 0:38:35.239
<v Speaker 2>So downside being if there is any fraud or something

0:38:35.280 --> 0:38:37.399
<v Speaker 2>that happens, they're out their own money. I guess while

0:38:37.400 --> 0:38:39.200
<v Speaker 2>you're trying to claw that back, because that's obviously one

0:38:39.200 --> 0:38:42.040
<v Speaker 2>of the benefits of using credit cards that we like,

0:38:42.640 --> 0:38:45.799
<v Speaker 2>there are those extra protections built in. If I ever

0:38:45.840 --> 0:38:48.359
<v Speaker 2>considered using a credit card, it would be for those protections,

0:38:48.440 --> 0:38:51.560
<v Speaker 2>not because I was looking to try to like completely

0:38:51.600 --> 0:38:54.359
<v Speaker 2>optimize and to teach my kids about how to use

0:38:54.360 --> 0:38:57.080
<v Speaker 2>credit card cash back and rewards and points. Like if

0:38:57.080 --> 0:38:59.120
<v Speaker 2>you're if that's what you're thinking, I think it's a

0:38:59.160 --> 0:39:01.919
<v Speaker 2>little too premature, at least at this point in the game.

0:39:02.000 --> 0:39:03.960
<v Speaker 2>I think, if you've got teenagers that are older like

0:39:03.960 --> 0:39:06.920
<v Speaker 2>seventeen eighteen, hey, trying to start talking about points and

0:39:06.920 --> 0:39:09.960
<v Speaker 2>cash back and how paying on time in fact ahead

0:39:10.000 --> 0:39:11.680
<v Speaker 2>of time before the statement even hits at the end

0:39:11.719 --> 0:39:14.640
<v Speaker 2>of the month, why not run that through the credit

0:39:14.719 --> 0:39:16.760
<v Speaker 2>card company. But at this point, at least at eleven

0:39:16.840 --> 0:39:19.239
<v Speaker 2>years old, that would not at all be on my

0:39:19.280 --> 0:39:20.920
<v Speaker 2>mind at all trying to teach my kid how to

0:39:21.160 --> 0:39:22.359
<v Speaker 2>use your credit card like a pro.

0:39:22.560 --> 0:39:22.759
<v Speaker 3>Right.

0:39:22.840 --> 0:39:25.840
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, you're not ready to gain that system at eleven, Yeah, exactly.

0:39:26.840 --> 0:39:30.360
<v Speaker 1>But I think this is like a perfect fora getting

0:39:30.400 --> 0:39:32.719
<v Speaker 1>him the right account, attaching it to the watch, and

0:39:32.760 --> 0:39:35.680
<v Speaker 1>making sure he has money at his disposal. He knows

0:39:35.680 --> 0:39:37.720
<v Speaker 1>how to spend, he knows where the money comes from.

0:39:37.960 --> 0:39:41.640
<v Speaker 1>It sounds like Chad is, you know, handling his money

0:39:41.680 --> 0:39:44.239
<v Speaker 1>lessons with his son like a pro Matt. Let's get

0:39:44.239 --> 0:39:46.799
<v Speaker 1>to another Facebook question from how to Money Facebook group.

0:39:46.800 --> 0:39:49.400
<v Speaker 1>This one comes from Megan. She says, given the benefits

0:39:49.440 --> 0:39:53.279
<v Speaker 1>of HSA's health savings accounts, would you prioritize investing in

0:39:53.320 --> 0:39:56.719
<v Speaker 1>an HSA over an IRA? Assuming funds are limited and

0:39:56.760 --> 0:39:59.520
<v Speaker 1>it's not possible to fully fund both if you were

0:39:59.560 --> 0:40:01.719
<v Speaker 1>forced to choose, that's what you're asking. If you have

0:40:01.760 --> 0:40:03.560
<v Speaker 1>to choose a favorite child, Joel, which one.

0:40:03.440 --> 0:40:03.880
<v Speaker 2>Would it be?

0:40:05.600 --> 0:40:08.440
<v Speaker 1>Well, we all know that one. That's like playing Russian roulette. Man,

0:40:08.480 --> 0:40:12.600
<v Speaker 1>that's a tough one. Yeah, it's difficult. Which one is superior?

0:40:12.719 --> 0:40:15.360
<v Speaker 2>And I'll say hopefully Megan's talking and talking about the

0:40:15.440 --> 0:40:19.120
<v Speaker 2>roth IRA as opposed to an HSA. Imagining you've got

0:40:19.160 --> 0:40:21.200
<v Speaker 2>a high deductible health care plan here, which gives you

0:40:21.239 --> 0:40:24.200
<v Speaker 2>access to an HSA. I'm assuming here that your income

0:40:24.320 --> 0:40:27.000
<v Speaker 2>is such that you are able to contribute to a

0:40:27.080 --> 0:40:29.439
<v Speaker 2>roth ray. So which one first? And I would say,

0:40:29.440 --> 0:40:32.920
<v Speaker 2>despite the roth ira being far more popular, if you

0:40:32.960 --> 0:40:37.040
<v Speaker 2>were looking at the technical details, well, then you can't

0:40:37.160 --> 0:40:40.560
<v Speaker 2>beat an HSA. And that's because, yes, you can avoid

0:40:40.560 --> 0:40:42.719
<v Speaker 2>a lot of tax when it comes to going with

0:40:42.719 --> 0:40:44.840
<v Speaker 2>a roth ira, but you can avoid all the tax

0:40:45.320 --> 0:40:48.400
<v Speaker 2>with an HSA. So I I guess I want to

0:40:48.400 --> 0:40:51.840
<v Speaker 2>couch that answer in if you are optimizing for the

0:40:51.880 --> 0:40:54.120
<v Speaker 2>absolute best rate, or not the best rate, but for

0:40:54.160 --> 0:40:58.160
<v Speaker 2>the best accounts, Yeah, for the least amount of taxes

0:40:58.200 --> 0:41:01.440
<v Speaker 2>paid as possible on your investments, then the HSA you

0:41:01.520 --> 0:41:02.440
<v Speaker 2>literally can't beat that.

0:41:02.600 --> 0:41:06.000
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, And that's why we sing its praises often on

0:41:06.000 --> 0:41:08.279
<v Speaker 1>the show. The triple tax advantage is huge, and if

0:41:08.320 --> 0:41:11.200
<v Speaker 1>your contributions are coming out of your paycheck, you get

0:41:11.200 --> 0:41:13.120
<v Speaker 1>to skip additional payroll tax on top of That's it's

0:41:13.120 --> 0:41:15.360
<v Speaker 1>almost like a quadruple tax advantage, and technically it is.

0:41:15.400 --> 0:41:17.960
<v Speaker 1>And that puts the HSA on top of our opinion.

0:41:18.360 --> 0:41:19.600
<v Speaker 1>And it's not like you give up on a lot

0:41:19.600 --> 0:41:21.000
<v Speaker 1>of flexibility by doing that either.

0:41:21.040 --> 0:41:21.439
<v Speaker 2>I think Matt.

0:41:21.520 --> 0:41:23.600
<v Speaker 1>Sometimes that's the trade off you have to weigh with

0:41:23.760 --> 0:41:27.560
<v Speaker 1>certain retirement accounts is, well, how long is this money

0:41:27.600 --> 0:41:29.680
<v Speaker 1>going to be locked away? And especially if I feel

0:41:29.680 --> 0:41:32.319
<v Speaker 1>like I need access to those funds before I reach

0:41:32.400 --> 0:41:35.400
<v Speaker 1>like full retirement age, gosh, I'm not going to be

0:41:35.400 --> 0:41:39.000
<v Speaker 1>able to touch it. Well, the WROTH offers some flexibility

0:41:39.000 --> 0:41:40.480
<v Speaker 1>in that regard to being able to claw back some

0:41:40.480 --> 0:41:44.279
<v Speaker 1>of those contributions, but the HSA allows similar flexibility for

0:41:44.360 --> 0:41:47.080
<v Speaker 1>taking those funds out before retirement. So both of those

0:41:47.080 --> 0:41:50.880
<v Speaker 1>funds have certain flexible withdrawal rules that are worth digging into,

0:41:51.239 --> 0:41:54.120
<v Speaker 1>but flexibility on both first they can be helpful, right,

0:41:54.360 --> 0:41:56.759
<v Speaker 1>I think the biggest trade off is, like, I think

0:41:56.760 --> 0:41:59.319
<v Speaker 1>the question that someone needs to ask themselves is how

0:41:59.320 --> 0:42:02.320
<v Speaker 1>committed are they to sticking with a spreadsheet? How organized

0:42:02.320 --> 0:42:04.759
<v Speaker 1>can you be not over the course of months or years,

0:42:04.760 --> 0:42:09.239
<v Speaker 1>but like even decades. Yeah, because yes, one is much

0:42:09.320 --> 0:42:10.879
<v Speaker 1>much better than the other, but it takes a bit

0:42:10.880 --> 0:42:11.880
<v Speaker 1>more work, you know.

0:42:11.960 --> 0:42:14.960
<v Speaker 2>So in this case, the HSA requires more work. And

0:42:15.000 --> 0:42:17.560
<v Speaker 2>it makes me think of something droll that we like

0:42:17.600 --> 0:42:19.920
<v Speaker 2>to do, which is smoking meat. And you talk to

0:42:19.960 --> 0:42:22.960
<v Speaker 2>anybody who's into barbecue, and you're gonna get a superior barbecue,

0:42:23.239 --> 0:42:27.359
<v Speaker 2>a superior brisket or pork butt. If you go with

0:42:27.520 --> 0:42:30.640
<v Speaker 2>an offset smoker where you've got lump charcoal, where you've

0:42:30.640 --> 0:42:33.680
<v Speaker 2>got like white oak. Right, but guess what it takes

0:42:33.920 --> 0:42:37.520
<v Speaker 2>my mouthwater. It takes more handholding, It takes a little

0:42:37.520 --> 0:42:39.680
<v Speaker 2>bit more paying attention to that smoker to make sure

0:42:39.719 --> 0:42:42.160
<v Speaker 2>that you're doing it right. The vast majority of folks

0:42:42.200 --> 0:42:44.320
<v Speaker 2>out there, I think, are probably like, man, I just

0:42:44.360 --> 0:42:46.319
<v Speaker 2>want some nice barbecue at home to where I'm not

0:42:46.360 --> 0:42:49.360
<v Speaker 2>paying out the nose by ordering takeout every time I

0:42:49.440 --> 0:42:52.279
<v Speaker 2>go out. And for those folks in those instances, guess

0:42:52.280 --> 0:42:55.200
<v Speaker 2>what a pellet smoker a trigger because it's not quite

0:42:55.320 --> 0:42:57.600
<v Speaker 2>as good of a product in the end, but dang it,

0:42:57.640 --> 0:42:59.880
<v Speaker 2>you know what, it does a whole lot with a

0:43:00.000 --> 0:43:03.000
<v Speaker 2>minimal amount of efforts, And for the vast majority of folks,

0:43:03.080 --> 0:43:04.600
<v Speaker 2>I think that's going to be enough for them.

0:43:04.600 --> 0:43:06.040
<v Speaker 1>And so I think you just set it and forget it,

0:43:06.080 --> 0:43:07.640
<v Speaker 1>and it's idiot proof. And that's kind of what the

0:43:07.719 --> 0:43:10.239
<v Speaker 1>roth IRA is like. You got to be committed to

0:43:10.280 --> 0:43:13.840
<v Speaker 1>the system if you're gonna take full advantage of the HSA.

0:43:14.120 --> 0:43:16.840
<v Speaker 1>I think the other thing worth highlighting about the HSA

0:43:16.960 --> 0:43:19.080
<v Speaker 1>is that it can become like in traditional IRA after

0:43:19.120 --> 0:43:21.520
<v Speaker 1>the age of sixty five. So if you're incredibly healthy,

0:43:21.560 --> 0:43:23.520
<v Speaker 1>you don't rack up a ton of medical bills, which

0:43:23.560 --> 0:43:25.960
<v Speaker 1>what we hope for you. Hey, it's not like that

0:43:26.000 --> 0:43:30.360
<v Speaker 1>money is locked away because you didn't incur enough medical expenses.

0:43:30.800 --> 0:43:32.520
<v Speaker 2>You could also split the difference, right.

0:43:32.360 --> 0:43:34.760
<v Speaker 1>If if funds are limited, go fifty to fifty funding

0:43:34.800 --> 0:43:37.960
<v Speaker 1>each account halfway. You know, hopefully further down the line

0:43:37.960 --> 0:43:39.960
<v Speaker 1>you can contribute to both of those accounts in more

0:43:40.000 --> 0:43:42.759
<v Speaker 1>meaningful ways. But why not go have these too? If

0:43:42.800 --> 0:43:45.960
<v Speaker 1>you're kind of seriously split on which one is best.

0:43:46.080 --> 0:43:48.520
<v Speaker 1>It's true, I think the HSA is a little bit better.

0:43:49.320 --> 0:43:53.040
<v Speaker 2>I like it's ten but from a financial standpoint, from

0:43:53.040 --> 0:43:55.880
<v Speaker 2>an optimization standpoint, but it's a lot worse from how

0:43:55.920 --> 0:43:58.160
<v Speaker 2>much attention do I need to give to this thing yep,

0:43:58.200 --> 0:44:01.759
<v Speaker 2>over the coming years. So great question, Megan. We hope

0:44:01.800 --> 0:44:04.759
<v Speaker 2>that helps Matt. Let's get back to the beer that

0:44:04.800 --> 0:44:07.120
<v Speaker 2>we had on this episode. This one was called tiny S's.

0:44:07.360 --> 0:44:09.640
<v Speaker 1>It's like a fruited sour, I want to say, or

0:44:09.920 --> 0:44:13.960
<v Speaker 1>I don't know, candied sour from the good folks of Prairie.

0:44:13.680 --> 0:44:16.120
<v Speaker 2>And I think they've like just annoyingly embraced that, because

0:44:16.320 --> 0:44:19.920
<v Speaker 2>like it's got an illustrated chemistry and motif going on,

0:44:20.000 --> 0:44:22.440
<v Speaker 2>and even like some of the things that are so

0:44:22.560 --> 0:44:25.520
<v Speaker 2>called atoms, they just look like nerds. And I literally,

0:44:25.560 --> 0:44:27.120
<v Speaker 2>like when I smelled it before we started drinking it

0:44:27.320 --> 0:44:28.560
<v Speaker 2>at the beginning of the episode, I was like, man,

0:44:28.560 --> 0:44:31.120
<v Speaker 2>this smells like nerd ropes and that is told. It

0:44:31.120 --> 0:44:33.400
<v Speaker 2>spells like your kid's candy basket post Halloween. This is

0:44:33.560 --> 0:44:34.960
<v Speaker 2>exactly what it tastes like. I don't know if I've

0:44:35.000 --> 0:44:38.080
<v Speaker 2>ever had a beer that was so sweet, Like I

0:44:38.080 --> 0:44:40.840
<v Speaker 2>guess we've had some like big, boozy sweet beers, but

0:44:40.880 --> 0:44:42.120
<v Speaker 2>I don't know. I don't know if I've ever had

0:44:42.160 --> 0:44:43.680
<v Speaker 2>a sour that was this sweet before.

0:44:43.800 --> 0:44:45.959
<v Speaker 1>Right, Oh, you're right, like, because usually they're they're they're

0:44:46.080 --> 0:44:48.480
<v Speaker 1>sweet with fruit, but this is sweet with candy, and

0:44:48.520 --> 0:44:49.200
<v Speaker 1>so it feels.

0:44:49.040 --> 0:44:51.879
<v Speaker 2>Like sugary sweet. It's like Skittles sweet one hundred percent.

0:44:51.960 --> 0:44:53.360
<v Speaker 2>It's like, as I drink it, I can kind of

0:44:53.560 --> 0:44:55.680
<v Speaker 2>crunch my teeth together and I can almost feel the sugar.

0:44:56.360 --> 0:44:58.759
<v Speaker 2>I can taste the rainbow, Matt, I can taste the rainbow. Yeah,

0:44:58.760 --> 0:45:00.560
<v Speaker 2>like Sweethearts a little bit. It' art a little bit

0:45:00.560 --> 0:45:03.799
<v Speaker 2>of sweet. This is just more sweet, less tart, for sure,

0:45:04.120 --> 0:45:06.160
<v Speaker 2>And it reminds me of like country time lemonade as

0:45:06.160 --> 0:45:08.239
<v Speaker 2>a kid, where you can like mix your own, because

0:45:08.280 --> 0:45:10.879
<v Speaker 2>it does taste like that. It's less lemony, it's more

0:45:10.920 --> 0:45:13.920
<v Speaker 2>pink tasting, and you know in the big canister where

0:45:13.920 --> 0:45:16.640
<v Speaker 2>you can like add your own, oh yeah, extra, and

0:45:16.640 --> 0:45:18.160
<v Speaker 2>you can make it as sweet or as not sweet

0:45:18.160 --> 0:45:20.319
<v Speaker 2>as you want. This tastes like the pink lemonade I

0:45:20.360 --> 0:45:24.000
<v Speaker 2>was making in seventh grade, Like yeah, high coned to me.

0:45:24.080 --> 0:45:27.360
<v Speaker 1>This is a novelty beer and it's not really my style,

0:45:27.840 --> 0:45:29.440
<v Speaker 1>but every once in a while it's fun to have

0:45:29.440 --> 0:45:31.800
<v Speaker 1>a novelty beer and just see what people can create

0:45:31.880 --> 0:45:34.960
<v Speaker 1>in the beer category. This one is very far afield,

0:45:35.280 --> 0:45:38.880
<v Speaker 1>kind of goofy and very sweet, which is not my jam.

0:45:39.000 --> 0:45:41.160
<v Speaker 2>Very sweet, and it's almos. It's almost like it's marketed.

0:45:41.239 --> 0:45:42.839
<v Speaker 2>Like what do you think of that pencil there with

0:45:42.880 --> 0:45:45.279
<v Speaker 2>like the pencil grip yeah on there, Like there's certain

0:45:45.360 --> 0:45:48.600
<v Speaker 2>it's like a throwback to like middle school kind of days.

0:45:48.960 --> 0:45:52.560
<v Speaker 2>It makes me think about Founders Breakfast Out, remember when

0:45:52.600 --> 0:45:54.600
<v Speaker 2>it had the baby on there and who was it

0:45:54.880 --> 0:45:58.759
<v Speaker 2>the Federal drug No, somebody like shut them down and said, hey,

0:45:58.800 --> 0:46:00.440
<v Speaker 2>you have you can't have the baby be on your

0:46:00.440 --> 0:46:03.400
<v Speaker 2>beer anymore because of it's like you're marketing to kids.

0:46:03.560 --> 0:46:06.319
<v Speaker 2>What it's like an old school Norman Rockwell looking kind

0:46:06.320 --> 0:46:10.080
<v Speaker 2>of picture as opposed to this talk about the different

0:46:10.160 --> 0:46:13.360
<v Speaker 2>vapes getting marketing to kids. This is like totally something

0:46:13.440 --> 0:46:15.000
<v Speaker 2>of nighth grade would see and be like, oh, but

0:46:15.080 --> 0:46:18.360
<v Speaker 2>it tastes a good anyway, they might actually like this.

0:46:18.400 --> 0:46:21.719
<v Speaker 2>I'm not trying to accuse Prairie of anything underhanded here.

0:46:22.480 --> 0:46:25.040
<v Speaker 1>This tasty beer, just a bit sweet, good stuff, unique,

0:46:25.719 --> 0:46:28.359
<v Speaker 1>not one I'll probably ever pick up again. All Right,

0:46:28.360 --> 0:46:30.200
<v Speaker 1>that's gonna do it, though, Matt for this episode. And

0:46:30.280 --> 0:46:32.160
<v Speaker 1>by the way, if you have a money question, please

0:46:32.280 --> 0:46:34.160
<v Speaker 1>do send it our way. We'd love to hear from you.

0:46:34.680 --> 0:46:36.799
<v Speaker 1>Just record it on the voicemail map of your phone,

0:46:37.000 --> 0:46:38.560
<v Speaker 1>send it over to us. Hopefully we can take it

0:46:38.560 --> 0:46:41.040
<v Speaker 1>next week and we'll put links to some of the

0:46:41.040 --> 0:46:43.120
<v Speaker 1>resources we mentioned up in the show notes on our

0:46:43.120 --> 0:46:44.760
<v Speaker 1>website at howtomoney dot com.

0:46:44.840 --> 0:46:47.200
<v Speaker 2>You know it. So, until next time, best Friends Out,

0:46:47.239 --> 0:47:02.240
<v Speaker 2>Best Friends Out,