Speaker 1: Let not your heart be troubled. You are listening to
Speaker 1: the Sean Hannity radio show podcast. The governor parts pledged
Speaker 1: on Sunday that he and you, his words, will absolutely
Speaker 1: accept the result of this election. Today, your daughter Ivanka
Speaker 1: said the same thing. I want to ask you here
Speaker 1: on this stage tonight. Do you make the same and
Speaker 1: then you will absolutely, sir, that you will absolutely accept
Speaker 1: the result of this election. I will look at it
Speaker 1: at the time. I'm not looking at anything now. I'll
Speaker 1: look at it at the time. What I've seen. What
Speaker 1: I've seen is so bad. First of all, the media
Speaker 1: is so dishonest and so corrupt, and the pylon is
Speaker 1: so amazing. The New York Times actually wrote an article
Speaker 1: about it that they don't even care. It's so dishonest,
Speaker 1: and they've poisoned the minds of the voters. But unfortunately
Speaker 1: for them, I think the voters are seeing through it.
Speaker 1: But sir, there is a tradition in this country. In fact,
Speaker 1: one of the prize of this country is the peaceful
Speaker 1: transition of power, and that no matter how hard fought
Speaker 1: a campaign, is that at the end the campaign, that
Speaker 1: the loser concedes to the winner. Not saying that you're
Speaker 1: necessarily going to be the loser or the winner, but
Speaker 1: that the loser concedes to the winner, and that the
Speaker 1: country comes together in part for the good of the country.
Speaker 1: Are you saying you're not paired now to that? I
Speaker 1: will tell you. At the time, I'll keep you in suspense.
Speaker 1: But the thing that has most animated mis election on
Speaker 1: the Democratic side has been the sense of a rigged system.
Speaker 1: The game is rigged against them. So there's a sense
Speaker 1: the game is rigged. This is what about a rigged system?
Speaker 1: Don't do anything to rigg the system to most of
Speaker 1: the games ring against a lot of people who have
Speaker 1: done dead level best that the system is ringing. People
Speaker 1: say the game is rigged, keeps the system rigged. For
Speaker 1: those at the time the system is rigged, Their obstruction
Speaker 1: is keeping a system that has rigged. The game is ringed.
Speaker 1: Must sticks in economy in America that is rigged. The
Speaker 1: game is raped, and it's not right. Ecomy game is
Speaker 1: rigged and the economy is rigged. The American people know
Speaker 1: that the system is rigged against the system rigged against
Speaker 1: the middle class. All I know it is it is
Speaker 1: Greek and it's still too Many people feel like the
Speaker 1: system is rigged. People say the game is rigged. All
Speaker 1: the game is rigged for economy is rigged. People feel
Speaker 1: like the system is rigged against them. And here's the
Speaker 1: painful market. You know, the system is rigged. System our
Speaker 1: our presidential election came down to one state where the
Speaker 1: brother of the man running for president was the governor
Speaker 1: of the state. So we have our problems too. Is
Speaker 1: this the last battleground store if you lose the Creme
Speaker 1: Court of Florida where you can see, well, uh, the
Speaker 1: the the effort I have underway is simply to make
Speaker 1: sure that that all the votes are counted and when
Speaker 1: the when when the issues that are now being considered
Speaker 1: in the Florida Supreme Court are are are decided, that'll
Speaker 1: that'll be an important point. But I don't want to
Speaker 1: speculate on what the Florida Supreme Court do. County County, Well,
Speaker 1: there were more than enough votes to make the difference
Speaker 1: that were apparently thrown into the the applications for ballots
Speaker 1: were thrown into the trash can by the Supervisor of
Speaker 1: Elections there. Apparently, Uh, even though they we're missing the
Speaker 1: same number that the Republican Party workers were allowed to
Speaker 1: come in and uh and and fix the other applications with.
Speaker 1: So I don't want to speculate on what remedy might be.
Speaker 1: I'm not a party of that to that case or
Speaker 1: the Martin County case, but but more than enough votes
Speaker 1: were potentially taken away from Democrats because they were not
Speaker 1: given the same access that Republicans were, remember the according
Speaker 1: to what's come out in that case. Again, I'm not
Speaker 1: a party to it, but I've read about it, and
Speaker 1: apparently the Democratic Party chair was denied the opportunity to
Speaker 1: even look at the list of applications, whereas the Republican
Speaker 1: party workers were allowed to roam around unsupervised inside the
Speaker 1: office and bring their computers in and uh and fix
Speaker 1: all of the vallid applications for one side, even as
Speaker 1: the Democrats were denied an opportunity to come in, denied
Speaker 1: a chance to even look at the applications, and those
Speaker 1: applications were thrown out. That that that doesn't seem fair to me.
Speaker 1: And apparently in Martin County they were able to go
Speaker 1: in and take all the application home with So, you know,
Speaker 1: that's a excuse me, what the black votes that would discount?
Speaker 1: Jesse Jackson and I am very troubled by a lot
Speaker 1: of the stories that have been reported about a roadblock
Speaker 1: on the way to one pre sinct questions raised about
Speaker 1: various activities there. I do not have any personal or
Speaker 1: firsthand knowledge of those events. But whenever there are problems
Speaker 1: of that kind alleged, they are deserving of attention. Jesse Jackson, Oh,
Speaker 1: I talk with him. I talk with him regularly, of course,
Speaker 1: and I work. I have worked with him closely. I
Speaker 1: have spoken with the Kaisi and Fume and Julian Bond.
Speaker 1: Penda Hare, who is uh ahead of the efforts by
Speaker 1: the n double a CP against voter suppression, has been
Speaker 1: in touch with our people. But but I have no
Speaker 1: knowledge of those activities. I just I want to say
Speaker 1: to you clearly that in my opinion, UH, whenever you
Speaker 1: have allegations of those kinds, that is a matter that
Speaker 1: the entire country ought ought to take seriously. Uh. They
Speaker 1: are not part of the ongoing court action, and I
Speaker 1: don't I don't want to mislead you on that, but
Speaker 1: I certainly want you to know that I think that
Speaker 1: they're serious allegations. I remember very well back at two
Speaker 1: thousand there were those who argued that people's votes should
Speaker 1: be discounted over technicalities. For the people of Florida who
Speaker 1: voted in this primary, the notion of discounting their votes
Speaker 1: sounds way too much the same the votes of one
Speaker 1: point seven a million people should not be cast aside
Speaker 1: because of a technicality. The people who voted did nothing wrong,
Speaker 1: and it would be wrong to punish you. All right,
Speaker 1: glad you're with us our post debate Final Debate edition
Speaker 1: of The Sean Hannity Show back in New York. Red
Speaker 1: eyed Home, Yes, arrived at eight o'clock in the morning.
Speaker 1: One sewn you want to be a part of the program.
Speaker 1: The reason I started with these montages here is because
Speaker 1: if you listen and watch and follow the mainstream media,
Speaker 1: which we now have learned Univision, NBCCNBC, MSNBC, CNN, ABC, CBS,
Speaker 1: NBC already mentioned the New York Times, the Boston Globe,
Speaker 1: and Politico and so many others we now know are
Speaker 1: an extension of the Clinton campaign. So their fixation after
Speaker 1: last night, even even you know never Trumper guys, even
Speaker 1: you know I was watching Charles Crownhammer well, Donald Trump
Speaker 1: was winning the debate until he said that that I'll
Speaker 1: keep you in suspense about the election results outcome byron
Speaker 1: Yorke had a similar piece out today, How could you
Speaker 1: possibly how does the media not possibly remember, you know,
Speaker 1: pimpled and dimpled and hanging and swinging and and perforated
Speaker 1: Chad's and the entire Gore lawsuit, his unwillingness to accept
Speaker 1: the results of the election, or that Hillary Clinton, you know,
Speaker 1: was saying Bush was selected and not elected, and last
Speaker 1: week reiterating that point about the two thousand election, when
Speaker 1: Wiki leaks this election cycle has pointed out to us
Speaker 1: that Bernie Sanders was systematically cheated by Hillary Clinton in
Speaker 1: their collaboration with the d n C, even given Hillary
Speaker 1: a heads up on what the Bernie Sanders campaign was
Speaker 1: doing and what they did with the super delegates. And
Speaker 1: then here you have on tape Al Gore and Bernie
Speaker 1: Sanders and Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton, and again and
Speaker 1: again and again they are talking down the electoral system,
Speaker 1: saying that it is rigged, it is rigged, it is rigged,
Speaker 1: it is rigged, and that you know, you go back
Speaker 1: to two thousand and four, John Kerry thought Bush rigged
Speaker 1: that election, and Barbara Boxer was running a protest in Washington,
Speaker 1: d C. At the time. I mean, you've got you know,
Speaker 1: all of everybody here, just like they have selective moral
Speaker 1: outrage on anything Trump. You know, if Trump sits on
Speaker 1: a plane next to a woman and you have an
Speaker 1: eyewitness that says nothing happened in the plane, and the
Speaker 1: woman claims she didn't mind the groping for fifteen minutes
Speaker 1: and it was only when he moved from one part
Speaker 1: of the body to another part of the body then
Speaker 1: it mannered. But she never said help in a crowded airplane,
Speaker 1: not one time. And a witness said no groping had
Speaker 1: gone on, But that didn't stop CNN for going nearly
Speaker 1: an hour with the woman. They didn't spend an hour.
Speaker 1: When it came out the eyewitness said, it's not true.
Speaker 1: You know, how in a year where we know that
Speaker 1: Bernie Sanders was cheated in many many ways in a primary,
Speaker 1: How in a season where Wiki leaks has has now
Speaker 1: described in detail so many different things about how that
Speaker 1: primary was handled, or that the Project Veritas tapes show
Speaker 1: that money goes from the Clinton campaign to the d
Speaker 1: n C, to a Democratic group right into the hands
Speaker 1: of dark art political operatives that bragg on tape, that
Speaker 1: they have been fomenting violence, that Trump rally's the entire
Speaker 1: election season, and that they are involved in a widespread
Speaker 1: voter fraud effort. And we've now since this discovered that
Speaker 1: the key operative in this scheme not only to send
Speaker 1: the agitators, but to advance this older fraud effort had
Speaker 1: actually visited the Obama White House three d and forty
Speaker 1: two times. How could you not You know, you're asking
Speaker 1: Donald Trump to say, you're gonna accept the results, even
Speaker 1: if they're cheating, right, You're gonna accept them. And to
Speaker 1: his very good credit, he didn't fall for the bait.
Speaker 1: He said, well, let me see how if it's fair
Speaker 1: or not. That's what he was saying. And he's actually
Speaker 1: funny today. He said in Ohio earlier today, I'll accept
Speaker 1: the results of the election next month if I win.
Speaker 1: Here's what he said. I would like to promise and
Speaker 1: pledge to all of my voters and supporters and to
Speaker 1: all of the people of the United States, that I
Speaker 1: will totally accept the results of this great and historic
Speaker 1: presidential election if I win. Pull out showing seventy tent
Speaker 1: of Americans have concerns over voting security, you have the
Speaker 1: Texas Attorney General now is investigating voter fraud in in
Speaker 1: that state. You got the Florida Democratic Party wanting ballots
Speaker 1: allowed before the registration of the individuals verified. We have
Speaker 1: John Podesta and Wiki Leak saying immigrants, illegal immigrants with
Speaker 1: drivers licenses can vote. We have, you know, one instance
Speaker 1: after another chronicle a lot of these instances today. Legals
Speaker 1: it's okay for illegals to vote with driver's licenses. Well,
Speaker 1: that's just a lie. And and all the coverage last
Speaker 1: night took away from all of the amazing debate performance
Speaker 1: that I thought Donald Trump had last night. And when
Speaker 1: you you know Bill Clinton, for example, Bill Clinton urged
Speaker 1: al Gore not to accept the volts of the two
Speaker 1: thousand election and praised him for not conceding the election
Speaker 1: on election night, and during the lawsuit of al Gore,
Speaker 1: Clinton refused to help the Bush team with any type
Speaker 1: of transition preparation, and the White House of Bill Clinton
Speaker 1: said they were not willing to open government offices to
Speaker 1: Mr Bush to begin a presidential transition until legal challenges
Speaker 1: were resolved. You know, I'm gonna say, maybe I'm the
Speaker 1: only one that feels this way, but I actually think
Speaker 1: that Donald Trump was especially in light of Project Veritas
Speaker 1: and the Clinton campaign and d NC funding voter fraud efforts,
Speaker 1: and that the guy that responsible, that's one of the
Speaker 1: heads of it, was at the White House three forty
Speaker 1: two times. I think it was right not to agree
Speaker 1: before the first vote is has ever even been counted,
Speaker 1: or to concede an election if he loses before he
Speaker 1: examines the results. And by the way, let me say
Speaker 1: I thought Chris Wallace did a great job last night.
Speaker 1: I thought this was by far the best moderated debate
Speaker 1: out there this year. Um, and I think you know
Speaker 1: it should go. I think he should be the go
Speaker 1: to guy at this point to moderate some of these
Speaker 1: debates the way maybe Jim Lair was for decades and
Speaker 1: get rid of the current completely corrupt phony Boulogney Presidential
Speaker 1: Debate Commission, where members donate to Hillary's campaign. On this question, though,
Speaker 1: I thought, the only thing I would have done differently
Speaker 1: is asked Hillary the same question and asked why you
Speaker 1: have said in the past George Bush was selected and
Speaker 1: not elected, you know, And he said he wasn't assuming
Speaker 1: Trump would lose. But if you notice, Hillary wasn't asked
Speaker 1: that question, and she belongs to the party with a
Speaker 1: long history of using the courts to try and overturn
Speaker 1: election results when they lose. Just to ask Al Gore
Speaker 1: and Al Franken. And by the way, according to The
Speaker 1: Washington Post, Hillary's husband actually urged Gore not to concede
Speaker 1: in two thousand and The New York Times subsequently reported
Speaker 1: Bill Clinton had urged the White House staff not to
Speaker 1: cooperate with the Bush transition team. I've got a lot
Speaker 1: more to say about this and last night's debate. We
Speaker 1: got full coverage of all of this today. We got
Speaker 1: nineteen days to go to election day. We have I'm
Speaker 1: not sure if the public is even beginning to completely
Speaker 1: absorb the Project Veritas videos that have come out, nor
Speaker 1: are they completely absorbing the magnitude of what we are
Speaker 1: learning about how corrupt, even racist, and sexist and misogyny
Speaker 1: and anti Semitic the Democratic Party is. But we'll we'll
Speaker 1: try and do their job for them, because they're never
Speaker 1: going to do it, because we now know they're colluding
Speaker 1: with the Clinton campaign and it's it's a criminal enterprise.
Speaker 1: Saudi Arabia giving twenty five billion dollars guitar all of
Speaker 1: these countries. You talk about women and women's rights. So
Speaker 1: these are people that push gays off business, off buildings.
Speaker 1: These are people that kill women and treat women horribly,
Speaker 1: and yet you take their money. So I'd like to
Speaker 1: ask you right now, why don't you give back the
Speaker 1: money that you've taken from certain countries that treat certain
Speaker 1: groups of people so horribly. Why don't you give back
Speaker 1: the money. I think it would be a great gesture
Speaker 1: because she takes a tremendous amount of money, and you
Speaker 1: take a look at the people of Haiti. I was
Speaker 1: in a little Haiti the other day in Florida, and
Speaker 1: I want to tell you they hate the Clintons because
Speaker 1: what's happened in Haiti with the Clinton Foundation is a disgrace.
Speaker 1: As far as Japan and other countries, we are being
Speaker 1: ripped off by everybody, and there are we're defending other countries.
Speaker 1: We are spending a fortune doing it. They have the
Speaker 1: bargain of the century or all I said is we
Speaker 1: have to renegotiate these agreements because our country cannot afford
Speaker 1: to defend Saudi Arabia, Japan, Germany, South Korea and many
Speaker 1: other places. We cannot continue to afford. She took that
Speaker 1: as saying nuclear weapons. Look, she's been proven to be
Speaker 1: a liar on so many different ways. This is just
Speaker 1: another lie. And we're going to infull are those agreements,
Speaker 1: and we're going to look for businesses to help us
Speaker 1: by buying American products. I asked a simple question. She's
Speaker 1: been doing this for thirty years. Why the hell didn't
Speaker 1: you do it over the last twenty years you were
Speaker 1: very much involved. Excuse me my turn. You were very
Speaker 1: much involved in every aspect of this country very much.
Speaker 1: And you do have experience. I say, the one thing
Speaker 1: you have over me is experience. But it's bad experience
Speaker 1: because what you've done has turned out badly. For thirty years,
Speaker 1: you've been a position to help. And if you say
Speaker 1: that I used steal or I use something else, I
Speaker 1: make it impossible for me to do that. I wouldn't mind.
Speaker 1: The problem is you talk, but you don't get anything done. Hillary,
Speaker 1: You don't. Just like when you ran the State department,
Speaker 1: six billion dollars was missing. How do you miss six
Speaker 1: billion dollars? You ran the state department, six billion dollars
Speaker 1: was either stolen, they don't know it's gone six billion dollars.
Speaker 1: If you become president, this country is going to be
Speaker 1: in some mess. For First of all, those stories have
Speaker 1: been largely debunked. Those people. I don't know those people.
Speaker 1: I have a feeling how they came. I believe it
Speaker 1: was her campaign that did it. Just like if you
Speaker 1: look at what came out today on the clips where
Speaker 1: I was wondering what happened with my rally in Chicago
Speaker 1: and other rallies where we had such violence, She's the
Speaker 1: one in Obama that caused the violence. They hired people,
Speaker 1: they paid them fifteen hundred dollars, and they're on tape
Speaker 1: saying be violent, cause fights do bad things. I would
Speaker 1: say the only way because those stories are all totally false.
Speaker 1: I have to say that. And I didn't even apologize
Speaker 1: to my wife, who sitting right here, because I didn't
Speaker 1: do anything. I didn't know any of these women. I
Speaker 1: didn't see these women. These women, the woman on the plane,
Speaker 1: the woman I think they want either fame or her
Speaker 1: campaign did it. And I think it's her campaign because
Speaker 1: what I saw what they did, which is a criminal
Speaker 1: act by the way, where they're telling people to go
Speaker 1: out and start fistfights and start violence and I'll tell
Speaker 1: you what. In particular in Chicago, people were hurt and
Speaker 1: people could have been killed in that riot, and that
Speaker 1: was now all on tape started by her. I believe
Speaker 1: Chris that she got these people to step forward. If
Speaker 1: it wasn't they get there ten minutes of fame. But
Speaker 1: they were all totally It was all fiction. It was lies,
Speaker 1: and it was fiction helping discussion unfit and he proves
Speaker 1: it every time. You are the one that's unfit. You know,
Speaker 1: Wiki leaks just actually came out. John Podesta said some
Speaker 1: horrible things about you, and boy was he right. He
Speaker 1: said some beauties. And you know, Bernie Sanders, Uh, he said,
Speaker 1: you have bad judgment. You do. And if you think
Speaker 1: that going into muss after we let the world know
Speaker 1: we're going in and all of the people that we
Speaker 1: really wanted, the leaders, they're all gone, if you think
Speaker 1: that was good, then you do. Now. John Podesta said,
Speaker 1: you have terrible instincts. Bernie Sanders said, you have bad judgment.
Speaker 1: I agree with buzz Wow. Powerful Night twenty three now
Speaker 1: till the top of the hour. Right down our toll
Speaker 1: free telephone number. It's eight dred nine four Sean nine one.
Speaker 1: Shawn if you want to be a part of the program.
Speaker 1: That was the third and final debate. You know what
Speaker 1: James Carvil said, you know, he actually said, of course
Speaker 1: there's going to be some fraud. Why do we have
Speaker 1: to accept in this country the idea that there's gonna
Speaker 1: be voter fraud? Now? I want to talk about this
Speaker 1: and from a different perspective here. So much of the
Speaker 1: so called tradition which we have now debunked for you,
Speaker 1: especially modern day Democrats including Hillary and Bernie and and
Speaker 1: Al Gore and John Terry and Barbara Boxer and all
Speaker 1: these Democrats and Bush was selected, he was never elected
Speaker 1: in that whole nonsense and that whole mantra. All right,
Speaker 1: let's talk about Let's talk about other traditions we have,
Speaker 1: maybe telling the truth honest abe. Let's talk about the
Speaker 1: tradition that no person in this country ought to be
Speaker 1: above the law. You know, I think that's a whole
Speaker 1: lot more of a tradition. Equal treatment under the law
Speaker 1: is actually a constitutional principle, which brings me to the
Speaker 1: primary season. And you know what, how did we go
Speaker 1: through that whole campaign discover there's such collusion? Do you
Speaker 1: know the level of collusion in this campaign between the
Speaker 1: d n C, the Hillary campaign to deny Bernie Sanders
Speaker 1: affair shake, and the primary for the Democratic Party. You
Speaker 1: know the amount of collusion. Imagine if Donald Trump offered
Speaker 1: a quick quid pro quote to the FBI to get
Speaker 1: them to alter the true classification of of emails on
Speaker 1: Hillary Clintons server. That's called bribery, That's called obstruction of justice,
Speaker 1: but whatever you want to call it. People go to
Speaker 1: jail for that. I'd go to jail for that. You'd
Speaker 1: go to jail for that. But Hillary Clinton, her team,
Speaker 1: those involved, they don't go to jail. You know. It's
Speaker 1: um you know Trump saying repeatedly, and he's right that
Speaker 1: if Hillary Clinton were treated like an average person, the
Speaker 1: one that she doesn't like talking about average people anymore,
Speaker 1: regular people, you know, the ones that make this country great,
Speaker 1: she would have been indicted. She would have been prosecuted.
Speaker 1: She would have been convicted. But because the Obama administration
Speaker 1: literally shredded this principle of equal treatment under the law,
Speaker 1: because Bill Clinton got to lobby personally the Attorney General
Speaker 1: just days before she made her decision, uh, and because
Speaker 1: the Obama White House themselves were caught in a lie
Speaker 1: by the President directly to you, the American people, about
Speaker 1: what he knew about Hillary Clinton's email server. Remember, Hillary
Speaker 1: emailed him personally, and he emailed her personally as it
Speaker 1: relates to that server. And then he said that he
Speaker 1: only heard about it from the press and when in fact,
Speaker 1: that was an entire lie. And then you've got John
Speaker 1: Podesta and Cheryl Mills and wiki leaks discussing whether they
Speaker 1: should turn over the emails between the President and the
Speaker 1: Secretary of State, which of course would be obstruction of
Speaker 1: justice considering all of those documents were under subpoena. And
Speaker 1: imagine if it was Donald Trump who did this, who
Speaker 1: has been audited now eighteen years in a row. But
Speaker 1: you got in truth here, Hillary Clinton running for presidents.
Speaker 1: It's sort of like the O. J. Simpson here of
Speaker 1: American politics. Everybody knows she's guilty. Everybody knows she lies,
Speaker 1: and Poles showed that even Democrats say she deserves to
Speaker 1: be prosecuted. But instead of heading off to a trial
Speaker 1: and then later the Big House, which is where the
Speaker 1: average Joe would be headed, right now, she is now
Speaker 1: contending to be the next president of the and it states. Now,
Speaker 1: look that that's not merely an injustice. It is a
Speaker 1: monumental perversion of not not only are legal system that
Speaker 1: has destroyed any integrity they may have had as it
Speaker 1: relates to this presidential election. If the law has been
Speaker 1: followed the way it should have been by law, she
Speaker 1: would have been disqualified from running. Another point that Trump
Speaker 1: made last night. But because the strings were pulled, because
Speaker 1: access was given, because of the connections that are made,
Speaker 1: because the Attorney General was pressured, because the FBI took
Speaker 1: a dive, because the Justice Department, State Department, in Obama
Speaker 1: White House, we're tipping off the Clinton campaign every step
Speaker 1: of the way, colluding with them. It's like a criminal enterprise.
Speaker 1: And the President publicly announced that Hillary is innocent in
Speaker 1: the midst of the investigation. Unethical in its own right, Justice,
Speaker 1: along with the integrity of our electoral process, now has
Speaker 1: gone out the window. And let me say this, if
Speaker 1: Hillary Clinton wins this election nineteen days from now, if
Speaker 1: she does, you could make a case that because of
Speaker 1: her ineligibility, because people have been tried, convicted, and denied
Speaker 1: any opportunity ever to wake work for the government again,
Speaker 1: because that is what the law says. We're gonna talk
Speaker 1: about the legitimacy of the presidency. A case could strongly
Speaker 1: be made that she would be an illegitimate president. In
Speaker 1: other words, she would be treated, you know, she could
Speaker 1: be treated the way she treated George Bush as selected
Speaker 1: not elected. Well, she was the one that was not
Speaker 1: prosecuted for the very same crimes others have been charged
Speaker 1: with and have spent time in jail four and as
Speaker 1: part of the punishment, could never work in any government
Speaker 1: capacity ever again, or have any security clearance ever again.
Speaker 1: So she then have the highest office in the land
Speaker 1: by rigging a criminal investigation with the cooperation of a
Speaker 1: Justice department, with the cooperation of an FBI director and
Speaker 1: an attorney general in a state department who wanted her
Speaker 1: to win, to protect, in the case of Obama, his
Speaker 1: disgraceful legacy, and in the case of everybody else, whatever
Speaker 1: their own motive happens to be, or politics happens to be.
Speaker 1: You know, you just would you rather have Republicans roll
Speaker 1: over and look the other way? I mean, you know, look,
Speaker 1: I know Paul Ryan will looked the other way. I
Speaker 1: know John McCaine looked the other way. I know Romney
Speaker 1: will look the other way. And I know the Bushes
Speaker 1: will look the other way. Sadly, you know, and unfortunately,
Speaker 1: as I look at this race and I think it's
Speaker 1: infinitely winnable, I don't think anybody knows which way this
Speaker 1: is is going to in the end turn out. I
Speaker 1: think there. I know there are more tapes from James
Speaker 1: O'Keeffe coming out, because he's told us we know democratic
Speaker 1: operative that's highlighted in both the films that foment violence
Speaker 1: and plotting and planning and scheming of voter fraud. We
Speaker 1: know he was at the Obama White House some three
Speaker 1: hundred and forty two times. I mean, how is that
Speaker 1: not the biggest issue in the campaign. And then you
Speaker 1: can add the Benghazi lies. Then you can add you
Speaker 1: know that it was related to a YouTube video. We
Speaker 1: can look at the before Benghazi six hundred requests for
Speaker 1: security denied. On that case, she failed on a spectacular level.
Speaker 1: Lives were lost, you know. Talking about Donald Trump and
Speaker 1: attacking him last night as a puppet, I'm thinking, Wow,
Speaker 1: you're the same person that wouldn't even send troops in
Speaker 1: when Americans were under fire. You were more concerned about
Speaker 1: getting permission from Libya and what clothes they were gonna
Speaker 1: wear if in fact you sent them in too rescue Americans,
Speaker 1: which you never did. And then the lie afterwards, You
Speaker 1: tell the Libyan president, Egyptian Prime Minister, and your own
Speaker 1: daughter one thing while lying to the American p pull
Speaker 1: all throughout, and you got the whole issue of pay
Speaker 1: to play and the Clinton charities. You know, look, look,
Speaker 1: look at Hillary extolling the virtues of the Clinton Foundation
Speaker 1: last night, falsely claiming that the money they collect goes
Speaker 1: directly to charitable causes. It turns out that's not true.
Speaker 1: You know that one of those charity charitable causes happened
Speaker 1: to be her husband's lifestyle. Bill Clinton receives expensive gifts
Speaker 1: is personally paid by sponsors of the Clinton Global Initiative.
Speaker 1: Uh we know that the surprise claim was made by
Speaker 1: Doug Band, Bill Clinton's longtime aid. Another Wiki leaks development
Speaker 1: November seven, Band appeared frustrated that he was forced to
Speaker 1: sign a conflict of interest policy for his role at
Speaker 1: the at the Foundation as a member and as a
Speaker 1: c g I board member and adviser to the Clinton Foundation,
Speaker 1: while Clinton did not. I signed a conflict of interest
Speaker 1: policy as a member of the Clinton Globe. The initiative,
Speaker 1: he wrote to John Podesta, and, um, you know, he said, oddly,
Speaker 1: William Jefferson. Clinton doesn't have to sign such a document
Speaker 1: even though he's personally paid by three donors and sponsors
Speaker 1: and gets many expensive gifts from them, and some of
Speaker 1: that are at home, et cetera. And I could add
Speaker 1: five examples like this, he said. So there's a lot
Speaker 1: in player. I just don't know how much the American
Speaker 1: people are gonna ultimately be able to absorb here. I
Speaker 1: don't know, you know, but they didn't accept the election
Speaker 1: results in two thousands. They didn't accept the election results
Speaker 1: in two thousand and four. Frankly, I think the case
Speaker 1: has pretty well been made that the Democrats stole the
Speaker 1: nine sixty presidential election in Illinois. You got the Texas
Speaker 1: Attorney General launching an investigation into widespread voter fraud. You've
Speaker 1: got Indiana uncovering thousands of forged voter registrations. This is
Speaker 1: happening in real time. This is not circuit. This is
Speaker 1: modern day America. You know, a lot came up last night.
Speaker 1: The thing that stood out to me the profound and
Speaker 1: distinct differences in terms of the vision for this country
Speaker 1: and it's everything I've been telling you. It's the Supreme Court,
Speaker 1: it's vetting refugees, it's saying radical Islam. It's building a
Speaker 1: border wall. It's Obamacare or free market solutions. It's education
Speaker 1: top down or run from the states. It's energy independence.
Speaker 1: Are not on judicial activism. I mean Hillary basically saying, oh,
Speaker 1: you could have an abortion up to the ninth month.
Speaker 1: You know, Trump said that's not okay with me because
Speaker 1: those children are viable on their own outside the mother's womb.
Speaker 1: And even the most strident pro choice people that I
Speaker 1: know are against partial birth abortion. Learn from the quickly
Speaker 1: weeks that you said this, And I want to quote.
Speaker 1: My dream is a hemispheric common market with open trade
Speaker 1: and open borders. So thank you. Question, is that your
Speaker 1: dream open borders? Well, if you went on to read
Speaker 1: the rest of the sentence, I was talking about energy.
Speaker 1: You know, we trade more energy with our neighbors than
Speaker 1: we trade with the rest of the world combined. And
Speaker 1: I do want us to have a an electric grid
Speaker 1: and energy system that crosses borders. I think that would
Speaker 1: be a great benefit to us. But you are very
Speaker 1: clearly quoting from Wiki leaks, and what's really important about
Speaker 1: Wiki leaks is that the Russian government has engaged in
Speaker 1: espionage against Americans. They have hacked American websites, American accounts
Speaker 1: of private people of institutions. Then they have given that
Speaker 1: information to wiki Leaks for the purpose of putting it
Speaker 1: on the internet. This has come from the highest levels
Speaker 1: of the Russian government, clearly from Putin himself, in an
Speaker 1: effort as seventeen of our intelligence agencies have confirmed to
Speaker 1: influence our election. So I actually think the most important
Speaker 1: question of this evening, Chris, is finally, will Donald Trump
Speaker 1: admit and condemned that the Russians are doing this and
Speaker 1: make it clear that he will not have the help
Speaker 1: of Putin in this election, that he rejects Russian espionage
Speaker 1: against Americans, which he actually encouraged in the past. Those
Speaker 1: are the questions we need answered. We've never had anything
Speaker 1: like this happened in any of our elections before. That
Speaker 1: was a great pivot off the fact that you wants
Speaker 1: open borders. Okay, how did we get up The first
Speaker 1: of I had a very good meeting with the President
Speaker 1: of Mexico, very nice man. We will be doing very
Speaker 1: much better with Mexico and trade deals. Believe me. The
Speaker 1: NAFTA deal signed by her husband's one of the worst
Speaker 1: deals ever made of any kind, signed by any buddy.
Speaker 1: It's a disaster. Hillary Clinton wanted the wall. Hillary Clinton
Speaker 1: fought for the wall in two thousand and six or thereabouts.
Speaker 1: Now she never gets anything done, so naturally, the wall
Speaker 1: wasn't built. But Hillary Clinton wanted the wall. I would
Speaker 1: like to promise and pledge to all of my voters
Speaker 1: and supporters and to all of the people of the
Speaker 1: United States that I will totally accept the results of
Speaker 1: this great at historic presidential election if I win. I
Speaker 1: just wanted to come back and say hello, some of
Speaker 1: you've been on the trail for the whole time. No
Speaker 1: more debates, no more naps, No more naps for Hillary,
Speaker 1: she may have to actually go out and work anyway.
Speaker 1: Glad you are with us nine one, Sean, you want
Speaker 1: to be a part of the program. Hour two and
Speaker 1: in us now is probably one of the strongest conservative
Speaker 1: voices that it has been with Donald Trump from day one.
Speaker 1: And that's a culter and uh and culture is a
Speaker 1: new book out, by the way, that's doing very well
Speaker 1: about Donald Trump. How are you fantastic? How are you Sean?
Speaker 1: I am good, miss cult. So who's gonna win this election?
Speaker 1: I don't know. That's why we hold elections. Um, But
Speaker 1: as I say in my column today, Hillary's advantages the media.
Speaker 1: Trump's advantage are the issues. And I'm really glad that
Speaker 1: that came out last night. I must say I've I've
Speaker 1: been critical in the past, Chris Wallace was. I had
Speaker 1: a few nitpicking complaints. But Chris Wallace was really terrific
Speaker 1: last night by keeping this debate by and large on
Speaker 1: the issues. I mean, it's amazing that an election that
Speaker 1: has been rocketed by a single issue, immigration, we have
Speaker 1: had two ninety minute debates until last night and not
Speaker 1: one question on immigration. We finally got that one question
Speaker 1: last night. I could have done without the question on
Speaker 1: on this nonsense about you know, women coming forward three
Speaker 1: weeks before an election. Oh I remember, now he grow
Speaker 1: uped me. Um. You know, the New York Times did
Speaker 1: a massive investigation back in May of Donald Donald Trump's
Speaker 1: treatment of women. Remember that one. Um, they come up
Speaker 1: empty handed. But now suddenly, anyway, I'm spending too much
Speaker 1: time talking about it now. Um, Wallace was fantastic by
Speaker 1: talking about issues. I loved the first question on the
Speaker 1: Supreme Court. Um. And I would like to note that
Speaker 1: Hillary Clinton's answer about the Supreme Court did not use
Speaker 1: the words constitution or interpretation. No, she sees the Supreme
Speaker 1: Court as as liberals do, as this governing body that
Speaker 1: will enforce the Diane Ie and lifestyle of Hillary and
Speaker 1: Bill and Hillary Clinton. Um, it's all about things that
Speaker 1: aren't in the Constitution. They will force this on the
Speaker 1: American people. She actually referred to the Supreme Court as
Speaker 1: being a representative body. No, it very much is not,
Speaker 1: as as Justice Scalia Hilaria buriously pointed out in a
Speaker 1: in a recent descent. I believe it was um um.
Speaker 1: I forget the details, but it was, Okay, we have
Speaker 1: what is it, um, three Jews, four Catholics. Maybe it's
Speaker 1: five Catholics. Um um. We are all from the Northeast.
Speaker 1: We all went to you know, a total of like
Speaker 1: three schools. This is anything but a representative body. And
Speaker 1: that doesn't matter because it's not supposed to be a
Speaker 1: representative body. They are lawyers who are supposed to be
Speaker 1: interpreting the Constitution. It doesn't matter if all nine of
Speaker 1: them are Hindus. If we're going to have, um, this
Speaker 1: grand group of philosopher Kings deciding issues for us, then
Speaker 1: maybe it should be representatives just just shut it down.
Speaker 1: Trump was fantastic, and I'm so glad he reminded UM
Speaker 1: viewers that that they will be open season not only
Speaker 1: on the Second Amendment but on the unborn if Hillary
Speaker 1: is elected, the next president appoints a fifth Supreme Court justice,
Speaker 1: and you know they are just the left is just
Speaker 1: itching to overturn Heller. That's gonna be it. Well, And
Speaker 1: I was actually to impress that Trump had so many
Speaker 1: details about Hella in his head. Look, he's he's been
Speaker 1: in politics eighteen months. These are issues you and I
Speaker 1: cover at nauseum every day. It's what we do. And
Speaker 1: I don't think the the average person understands how profound
Speaker 1: this issue of the court alone is going to be
Speaker 1: in terms of impacting the country. Yes, that was a
Speaker 1: very important question. I also want to praise Chris Falls
Speaker 1: when he got to immigration. Um. It has been driving
Speaker 1: me crazy that I have a whole chapter in my
Speaker 1: book and Trump we trust because um, you know, people
Speaker 1: go on TV and they have to say something, but
Speaker 1: apparently they don't know anything. Um. So one of the
Speaker 1: catch phrases everyone has been using about Trump basically since
Speaker 1: the moment he announced, is he won't give us policy specifics.
Speaker 1: There's no policy specifics. I'm a whole chapter just quoting
Speaker 1: him saying that, interspersed with the precise date on which
Speaker 1: he gave a major policy speech or at least a
Speaker 1: major policy paper. Um, When in fact he's given us
Speaker 1: specifics on everything. The only thing we don't know is
Speaker 1: the name of the company that's going to supply the
Speaker 1: re bar for for the wall. Um. But Hillary has
Speaker 1: not been asked one what are the specifics on what
Speaker 1: she's going to do on immigration? She says she's going
Speaker 1: to grant amnesty to all the illegal aliens here, Well,
Speaker 1: they've they've been claiming for a decade now, they're eleven
Speaker 1: million illegal aliens. We know it's at least thirty million,
Speaker 1: probably more like forty fifty million. Could we get her
Speaker 1: to answer, um, you know, as you're granting all these amnesties,
Speaker 1: if you get up to forty million, if you get
Speaker 1: to forty one million, forty two, is there any point
Speaker 1: at which you will say, okay, that's enough. Also, how
Speaker 1: many crimes can they have committed under Rubio's amnesty bill?
Speaker 1: I believe you've got three misdemeanors, um can, she says,
Speaker 1: the only one she'll she won't amnesty are the violent criminals? Well,
Speaker 1: the illegal alien who had been deported several times before
Speaker 1: Um and murdered Kate Steinlely. He wasn't convicted of any
Speaker 1: violent felonies until he killed Kate Steinley. Could we get
Speaker 1: some details on what her plans are for the border?
Speaker 1: And that is what what Chris Wallace asked. You said,
Speaker 1: what what is your plan for securing the order? And
Speaker 1: it was the same nonsense I described in my book
Speaker 1: in Trump. We trust anyone who says I will secure
Speaker 1: the border personnel, boots on the ground. That is all
Speaker 1: code for open borders, because what are the troops gonna do? What?
Speaker 1: You're gonna have technology and drones, so what so we
Speaker 1: can watch them run across the border. Are the troops
Speaker 1: going to shoot the illegals? How about a wall that
Speaker 1: just sits there day and night, doesn't need to break
Speaker 1: for sleep or eat. Um doesn't need unemployment insurance at
Speaker 1: continuing salary. But how about a nice wall? Let me
Speaker 1: ask you the big liberal media spin, which is kind
Speaker 1: of ironic in light of all the wiki League stumps
Speaker 1: that prove what I have said for many, many years
Speaker 1: that journalism is dead and and the press is an
Speaker 1: extension of of Hillary Clinton and her campaign. But I mean,
Speaker 1: you know, literally, they cannot say it enough. This was
Speaker 1: outrageous that Donald Trump said I'll keep you in surprise
Speaker 1: about accepting the election outcome. Now this comes on the
Speaker 1: heels of this very weak project Veritas releasing videos talking
Speaker 1: about direct funding coming from Hillary Clinton in the d
Speaker 1: n C and being funneled into dark arts operatives that
Speaker 1: have been fomenting violence all throughout this political cycle. But
Speaker 1: more importantly, as it relates to this question, they're also
Speaker 1: describing in all its detail, a Clinton d n C
Speaker 1: financed effort at massive voter fraud. So, and I think
Speaker 1: a lot of people forget that, you and I this
Speaker 1: is not our first rodeo. You do remember two thousand
Speaker 1: You do remember Hillary in two thousand and two saying
Speaker 1: Bush was selected, not elected. You do remember um John
Speaker 1: Kerry suggesting the same thing after losing an O four,
Speaker 1: Only that, Um, there was a protest led by Barbara
Speaker 1: Boxer in the Senate in two thousand four. This isn't
Speaker 1: two thousand No, this I gotta say this is um
Speaker 1: I do and he was generally good, but um certainly
Speaker 1: better than the other moderators. But um I I my,
Speaker 1: I do have a complaint with Chris Wallace and asking
Speaker 1: Donald Trump if he'll accept the results of the election
Speaker 1: but not Hillary Clinton. No, my entire life has consisted
Speaker 1: of Democrats refusing to accept the results of an election,
Speaker 1: not only two thousand, not only two thousand four with
Speaker 1: their crazy conspiracy theory about the die Bold machines in
Speaker 1: in Ohio, Barbara, but they there was a protest in
Speaker 1: Congress to prevent on the certifying of George Bush beating
Speaker 1: John Kerry. There was also in five Republican won a
Speaker 1: congressional race in Indiana that was back before the English Revolution.
Speaker 1: Um House was very, very democratic. They refused to seat
Speaker 1: the Republican, a guy named McIntyre, who had beat the
Speaker 1: incumbent McCloskey. They refused to see him, demanded that the
Speaker 1: ballots be sent to the House. They recounted them. And
Speaker 1: guess what the Democrats found when they recounted. Oh, the
Speaker 1: Democrat won. They not only refused to accept the result
Speaker 1: of an election, they then stole it. Oh and how
Speaker 1: about two more elections they didn't accept. How about the
Speaker 1: result of a um popular initiative in California of Californian
Speaker 1: saying no, actually, if you ran across the border and
Speaker 1: are living here illegally, I don't want to go to
Speaker 1: work every day to provide you with welfare. That not
Speaker 1: surprisingly passed overwhelmingly. The Democrats refused to accept the results
Speaker 1: of that election, and they ran to a court. Just recently,
Speaker 1: California rejected the idea of homosexual marriage. Um, what did
Speaker 1: Democrats do? Refuse to accept the results of an election?
Speaker 1: Ran to the court. This is an example of something
Speaker 1: I described many years ago in my book Slander. Democrats
Speaker 1: always advanced as if under threat of attack, whatever they
Speaker 1: accuse you of is what they're planning on doing or
Speaker 1: what they are doing. And here, through our entire lives,
Speaker 1: only one party has repeatedly refused to accept the results
Speaker 1: of an election, that is the Democrats. But the Democrat
Speaker 1: last night wasn't asked, will you accept the results of
Speaker 1: the elections? I would also add, um, I had a
Speaker 1: horrible dejah boom omen um because I remember, in fact,
Speaker 1: I remember discussing it with you on your TV show.
Speaker 1: It was Donald Trump in the primaries, who was browbeaten
Speaker 1: into saying he will he will support whomever the eventual
Speaker 1: Republican nominee is. And I ask you at the time
Speaker 1: on television, well it could you ask the other candidates that, well, okay,
Speaker 1: they all raised their hands, um, and he took the pledge.
Speaker 1: And look at what they're doing now. They are betraying
Speaker 1: that pledge. So yeah, I think they betraying the pledge
Speaker 1: and they lied. Let me ask you. Let me ask
Speaker 1: you this question, because you know, here we are nineteen
Speaker 1: days out of the election. I don't think the public
Speaker 1: is fully and completely absorbed the magnitude of the Clinton campaign,
Speaker 1: the d n C financing and fomenting violence at rallies
Speaker 1: and pushing a massive voter fraud effort. Um. They certainly
Speaker 1: haven't digested last night's debate, although the media is spinning
Speaker 1: phrenetically and in terms of helping Hillary. But here's my question.
Speaker 1: I'm if you look at the polls, how what is
Speaker 1: your take on the polls? Now? I generally take it
Speaker 1: this way. I think you've got to believe knock out
Speaker 1: the high, knockout the low, look at the average, and
Speaker 1: you're probably somewhere in there but with so many balls
Speaker 1: up in the air in terms of I don't think
Speaker 1: the public has absorbed Veritas, the Veritas videos, Project Veritas.
Speaker 1: I don't think they've absorbed Wiki leaks. They certainly haven't
Speaker 1: absorbed the debate last night. So there are way too
Speaker 1: many balls in the air. We know the media is
Speaker 1: an extension of the Hillary Clinton campaign, and I don't
Speaker 1: think we're going to get anything that resembles an accurate
Speaker 1: poll number until probably, you know, three days before the election.
Speaker 1: Do we agree with you, I'd forget the polls, um,
Speaker 1: And I don't want to sound like a nut. I
Speaker 1: would not say this In a normal election year. Usually
Speaker 1: an average of the polls genuinely accurately tells you about
Speaker 1: where we are. Though I must say they were wrong
Speaker 1: in two thousand and twelve they had a dead even tie,
Speaker 1: which is why I only I don't like making election predictions.
Speaker 1: The night before I said, if to tie, I think
Speaker 1: that goes to to the challenger. Um. I was wrong
Speaker 1: about that. But but generally the polls are pretty accurate.
Speaker 1: But as you say, I've never seen anything like this.
Speaker 1: As you know, Sean, I've written extensively about the McCarthy era,
Speaker 1: um Goldwater era. There has never been an all out
Speaker 1: attack on on a candidate like this. This puts what
Speaker 1: they did to Sarah Palin in the dust. And I'm
Speaker 1: sorry with with the media behaving that way. I'm just
Speaker 1: say ignore the pulse, just go out and vote the
Speaker 1: Clountain vote. I do not believe this, um. I mean,
Speaker 1: there are a lot of ways that you know. I'm
Speaker 1: not this is going to win. I'm just saying I
Speaker 1: don't know, will not. I don't know. Listen, I'm saying
Speaker 1: I don't know. I don't have a read or a
Speaker 1: pulse on this at all, and I don't think anybody
Speaker 1: else does either. It is my take. But I do
Speaker 1: take the poll serials seriously in terms of average as
Speaker 1: an aggregate. But all right, and culter in Trump, we
Speaker 1: trust a brand new book. Thank you for being one
Speaker 1: of us. You know, it was interesting in the course
Speaker 1: of the debate last night that Chris Wallace, so I thought,
Speaker 1: did a good job, brought up the issue of all
Speaker 1: these women made allegations at once against Donald Trump, most
Speaker 1: of them, as Trump said, we're debunked. But the issue
Speaker 1: there is a woman that has now come out and
Speaker 1: she is saying, hey, wait, a minute. Let me tell
Speaker 1: you my story. Leslie Millway is her name, and she
Speaker 1: talks about her experience with Bill Clinton. She was a
Speaker 1: local reporter in Arkansas at the time, and she joins
Speaker 1: us now on our Newsmaker line, how are you. I'm wonderful,
Speaker 1: Thank you for having me, Sean, I heard you had
Speaker 1: a hard time getting in. Did you feel it was
Speaker 1: politically motivated? Absolutely? Our car we left the hotel at
Speaker 1: four twenty, we were singled out. I was actually in
Speaker 1: the car with Obama's half brother, Malik, and the other
Speaker 1: car held Shawn Smith from the being Kazi uh situation,
Speaker 1: his mom and dad, and also Chris Stevens is Beyonce.
Speaker 1: We were singled out. The rottom car was next to us,
Speaker 1: who also had the brother I guess Hilary's brother there.
Speaker 1: And the ironic thing was they didn't come to the debate.
Speaker 1: I'm meaning the Clintons in one car. There were three
Speaker 1: different um motor cades with them. Hillary came in one,
Speaker 1: Bill came in one, and Uh Chelsea came in one.
Speaker 1: So it held everything up. We were literally kept for
Speaker 1: one hour. Then they let the rotten brother go ahead.
Speaker 1: We relate to the debate as you saw how security
Speaker 1: was crazy. We were held at security and we were
Speaker 1: not even able to go in and sit in the
Speaker 1: chairs that we were assigned. I was on the second
Speaker 1: row in the first chair. Um Malik Obama I believe
Speaker 1: was right next to me and the Stevens fiance and
Speaker 1: also the smith. We were placed in the back behind
Speaker 1: the screen, and Secret Service would not allow us. They
Speaker 1: said they had direct instructions not to allow us to
Speaker 1: go to our seat. So if you don't think that
Speaker 1: isn't politically motivated, I don't know what is. I mean,
Speaker 1: it was orchestrated by the Clintons, I have no doubt.
Speaker 1: Let's talk a little bit about your story. But before
Speaker 1: we get to it, let's go back in time and
Speaker 1: let's listen to Hillary Clinton. I thought Donald Trump was
Speaker 1: specially on the issue of taking money from countries that
Speaker 1: abuse women and challenging her to give that money back.
Speaker 1: I thought that was a really powerful moment during the debate.
Speaker 1: You know, and and Donald Trump parried away very strongly
Speaker 1: the idea that any of these women were being honest
Speaker 1: and truthful. The one woman in particular, was on an airplane,
Speaker 1: claimed that he was groping her. She claimed she didn't
Speaker 1: mind the fifteen minutes of groping. It was only the
Speaker 1: sixteenth minute where she got upset. We have an eyewitness
Speaker 1: that said that he was sitting right next to them
Speaker 1: and that didn't happen. And of course this is all
Speaker 1: taking place in an airplane that is fully booked with
Speaker 1: flight attendants. And if he was groping her, I assume
Speaker 1: all it would have taken was help. One long long
Speaker 1: yelled out help, and she would have gotten it. So,
Speaker 1: you know, like in the case of others, I feel
Speaker 1: the veracity is just not there. And and you know,
Speaker 1: if any woman's getting groped and you have a group
Speaker 1: of people around you, just saying help would solve the problem.
Speaker 1: So and she didn't do that. So I don't really
Speaker 1: trust that story in any way, shape, matter of form.
Speaker 1: But Hillary says she's the champion of women's rights now.
Speaker 1: She's also referred to Monica Lewinsky as a narcissistic Luna
Speaker 1: tune Luny tune wanting to crucify Jennifer Flowers part of
Speaker 1: an effort to smear, slander, and smirche people like Paula Jones,
Speaker 1: and wanted to Broderick and Kathleen Willie. But she's claimed
Speaker 1: still she's the champion of women's right. If somebody's willing
Speaker 1: to pay you a hundred and thirty or a hundred
Speaker 1: seventy thousand hours to say something, and you get your
Speaker 1: fifteen minutes the same and get your picture on the
Speaker 1: front page of every newspaper, and you're some failed cabaret
Speaker 1: singer who doesn't even have much of a resume to
Speaker 1: fall back on. And what's there she's lied about. You know,
Speaker 1: that's the daughter of Willie Horton. As far as on
Speaker 1: he get off the phone and tell me that she
Speaker 1: said sort of wacky things which we thought were attributable
Speaker 1: to the fact that she was terrified. People have been
Speaker 1: harassing my husband for gosh, I don't know, ever since
Speaker 1: I've known him. I have to believe that it is
Speaker 1: in large measure motivated by people who just slat out
Speaker 1: disagree with the kind of politics and policies at my
Speaker 1: husband believes her best for America. The great story here
Speaker 1: for anybody willing to find it and write about it
Speaker 1: and explain it is this vast right wing conspiracy that
Speaker 1: has been conspiring against my husband since the day he
Speaker 1: announced for president. I want to send a message to
Speaker 1: every survivor of sexual assault. Don't let anyone silence your voice.
Speaker 1: You have a right to be heard, and you have
Speaker 1: a right to be believed. We're with you, all right, unless,
Speaker 1: of course, your name is wanting to Broderic, Paula Jones,
Speaker 1: Kathleen Willie, or Monica Lewinsky or a whole host of
Speaker 1: other women. Um, what is your reaction to that tape
Speaker 1: of Hillary claiming to be the great champion of women's rights? Leslie, Well,
Speaker 1: it's absolutely not true. My experience has been and that
Speaker 1: was one of the reasons why I never came forward,
Speaker 1: is because I was afraid of the Clintons. Everyone knew
Speaker 1: her protection of what Bill did, how how she reacted.
Speaker 1: I was going to come out and come forward in
Speaker 1: the nineties when uh, you know, support of Kathleen Willie
Speaker 1: and the other women. But I was terrified. I had
Speaker 1: small children, you know, a family, a very conservative career
Speaker 1: in pharmaceutical I was not about to jeopardize that, you know,
Speaker 1: and go against the Clinton machine. So I made the decision.
Speaker 1: Then my husband's been supportive. I've been married almost thirty
Speaker 1: five years. I said, you know, he said, you'll know
Speaker 1: the right time. You know, someday you need to tell
Speaker 1: this story because it's so important that people understand the
Speaker 1: way he stalked women. He was so inappropriate, made no
Speaker 1: apologies and got by with it, and not only got
Speaker 1: by with it, was protected by his wife, and she
Speaker 1: also would go after these women. So it's a powerful story.
Speaker 1: You need to tell it. So I'm happy to do
Speaker 1: it now. And that's the reason that I've said on
Speaker 1: it so very long. Now. There there are two issues
Speaker 1: as it relates to Bill Clinton. There is the consensual affairs,
Speaker 1: which are numerous, that he had. Monica Lewinsky, Jennifer Flowers
Speaker 1: would fall into that category. And then there's the Bill
Speaker 1: Clinton that literally exposed himself to Paula Jones. There's the
Speaker 1: Bill Clinton that grow grabbed, fondled, kissed, touched against her
Speaker 1: will with Kathleen Willie in the Oval office. Then there's
Speaker 1: the one to Broaderick story, which is out and outright rape. UM,
Speaker 1: tell us about your experience. Tell us your story. Well,
Speaker 1: I was a young reporter, just turned twenty. UM. I
Speaker 1: had to spend a lot of time at Fort Chaffee
Speaker 1: because the Cuban refugee crisis occurred, there were about twenty
Speaker 1: thousand Cuban refugees that had come over in the marriotell
Speaker 1: at end. As a result, Clinton had to spend a
Speaker 1: lot of time at Fort Chaffie. It was a lot
Speaker 1: of discourse in the state. People were not happy to have,
Speaker 1: you know, all of the Cuban refugees that stayed there
Speaker 1: for very long periods of time. So he would come
Speaker 1: into Fort Smith in the area, um it's not on
Speaker 1: a weekly basis, even more often than that, and he
Speaker 1: would use our station sometimes as a base of operation.
Speaker 1: And when I say that, I mean he would come
Speaker 1: in and make phone calls and you know, take care
Speaker 1: of things when he was there, and he would single
Speaker 1: me out, allow me around, you know, compliment me, say
Speaker 1: things like how are you doing, pretty lady, and things
Speaker 1: like that, and you know, touch my shoulder or come
Speaker 1: up and pat me on the back, things like that,
Speaker 1: which were not terribly offensive, but I always felt like
Speaker 1: there was an ulterior motive. So finally, over the course
Speaker 1: of a few months, he would start to really become
Speaker 1: aggressive say things to me. One instance is I had
Speaker 1: a reporter's notebook with my name that said Leslie on it.
Speaker 1: He came up and wrote Clinton on top of my name,
Speaker 1: and I said, are you giving me an autograph now?
Speaker 1: And he said no, I just wanted to show you
Speaker 1: how good Clinton looks on top of Leslie. So that progressed.
Speaker 1: I was in the editing room one day and he
Speaker 1: followed me in and you know, came up from behind.
Speaker 1: It was a very tiny, small room, about six by
Speaker 1: six and I had a low back chair. He came
Speaker 1: up and you're still nineteen at the time, just to
Speaker 1: he's the governor. You're nineteen at the time. I had
Speaker 1: just turned when he actually my birthday was in February.
Speaker 1: That's probably occurred in April the first time. And he
Speaker 1: literally started hunting me from behind and running his hands down,
Speaker 1: you know, my front and trying to and I would
Speaker 1: rather what do you mean hunching? What is that? Well,
Speaker 1: he was pressing his genitals against me and you know,
Speaker 1: groping me, and I mean exactly he just would so
Speaker 1: wait a minute, I mean, this is so creepy. I mean,
Speaker 1: one of the reasons I think Paula Jones got her settlements.
Speaker 1: She was able to identify specific characteristics about his private parts.
Speaker 1: And there's an issue there of some kind. But I
Speaker 1: mean you're saying, like he would just you're a pretty
Speaker 1: much a stranger to him, and he kind of let
Speaker 1: it be known that he was attracted to you, and
Speaker 1: he's the governor, and he would go in this edit room.
Speaker 1: Was it visible to the newsroom, was a visible to
Speaker 1: any other points? No? No, no, this this was very private.
Speaker 1: It was even more private than like a bathroom or something.
Speaker 1: It had equipment on on table. It literally was so
Speaker 1: small that there was room for the table and then
Speaker 1: a chair that you could, you know, scoot up to
Speaker 1: the actual editing area, and then the door right behind that.
Speaker 1: So there was literally, you know, a space of maybe
Speaker 1: two feet between the door and the tables that you
Speaker 1: you were on top of each other anyway, almost so
Speaker 1: you know, one person would go in there. We would.
Speaker 1: We were responsible for editing our own story. So the
Speaker 1: first time he did that, you know, I was mortified.
Speaker 1: I'm saying, you know, it wasn't a very long time.
Speaker 1: The first time, probably two minutes, and I said, please stop,
Speaker 1: do not do this to me. I'm just absolutely terrified,
Speaker 1: and it's kind of surreal. You don't really believe this
Speaker 1: could be happening to you. And he laughed. He left
Speaker 1: in the second time. It happened to total of three times.
Speaker 1: The second time, he was more aggressive. He started hunching
Speaker 1: me from behind his private area. Because I'm sitting in
Speaker 1: a chair of short swivel chair, his privates are like
Speaker 1: right on my neck and lower back area, and he
Speaker 1: begins to hunch me and he's literally rubbing his private
Speaker 1: parts up against your body. I guess up and down
Speaker 1: in some fashion to my neck. Yes, And that is
Speaker 1: so creepy, really a very creepy, creepy story. What happened
Speaker 1: that to the point of, you know, he out an
Speaker 1: orgasm and I just sat there for a while and
Speaker 1: after he left, he left it as soon as that happened,
Speaker 1: and I was just I was just absolutely amazed. I
Speaker 1: was so distraught. My grandmother, who lived several hours away
Speaker 1: in a different state, I had shared with her, you
Speaker 1: know what had happened. She came over and literally was
Speaker 1: living with me because he kept saying things like we're
Speaker 1: going to get together soon, or this needs to you know,
Speaker 1: we need to be together soon, as things like that,
Speaker 1: and it was just so unnerving. I was terrified. I
Speaker 1: was this young young girl alone in a strange state.
Speaker 1: I'd never lived in. I was afraid to go to
Speaker 1: my news director or anyone, because who's going to believe me.
Speaker 1: I'm this young girl and I just have this new,
Speaker 1: great dream job and this person is doing this to me.
Speaker 1: Who happens to be the governor. I'm going to lose
Speaker 1: my job and I'm going to be slandered, you know,
Speaker 1: I you know, like my grandmother said, no goods going
Speaker 1: to come out of that for you. You cannot win
Speaker 1: in that situation. And you have to understand the time
Speaker 1: we were in, you know it was women. What happened
Speaker 1: after that? I'm running out of time, But how many
Speaker 1: more times did he assault you this way? This happened
Speaker 1: one more time after that. I did not even know
Speaker 1: he was in the station, or I would have never
Speaker 1: been in that room alone. I understand he came in,
Speaker 1: he went to seek me out, came in, the same
Speaker 1: thing happened as in the second time. I begged him.
Speaker 1: I said, please do not do this to me. I
Speaker 1: think I started crying. He again had an orgasm, laughed,
Speaker 1: He literally laughed when I said please stop, walked out.
Speaker 1: I went directly into the bathroom and started crying. A
Speaker 1: woman came in and said, are you okay. I said, yeah,
Speaker 1: I've just had a bad experience and never told anybody.
Speaker 1: I went home that night. He knocked on my apartment
Speaker 1: door at ten thirty at night. How he got found
Speaker 1: out where I lived, I have no idea, but he
Speaker 1: stood there and knocked and pounded on my door for
Speaker 1: five to ten minutes. My grandmother happened to be with me,
Speaker 1: thank god, and we decided then and there we she
Speaker 1: and I talked. I did not let him in. She said,
Speaker 1: you have to get out of here. You know this
Speaker 1: is not a good situation. I went in and within
Speaker 1: a day or two I quit my job and moved
Speaker 1: and changed trajectory of your life. And you kept it quiet.
Speaker 1: Last question, do you think that I know it's this
Speaker 1: is hammony as a history of this, But many of
Speaker 1: the other women that have been victimized by him talk
Speaker 1: about Hillary's in BOLB. But you have no knowledge if
Speaker 1: she knew or not. I don't know. That behavior, as
Speaker 1: we know, was so prevalent and so specific over the years.
Speaker 1: I have to believe, and we also know that the
Speaker 1: Jennifer Flower's affair was going on at this very time.
Speaker 1: Chelsea was literally a newborn baby when this was happening,
Speaker 1: and I would say things like that, do you not
Speaker 1: have a moral compass? You have a newborn baby, you
Speaker 1: have a wife, Leave me alone. I'm not interested. And
Speaker 1: he just found that to be so amusingly funny. He
Speaker 1: would laugh when I said that. And it's so creepy too.
Speaker 1: I'm so sorry, Leslie, that you had to go through that.
Speaker 1: I've met a lot of the other women and interviewed them.
Speaker 1: I have no reason to doubt your story at all.
Speaker 1: I think, uh, I think the champion of women's right,
Speaker 1: Hillary Clinton, has probably known about his behaviors for many,
Speaker 1: many years. I think there's a lot of evidence to
Speaker 1: prove that and is covered up and really helped enable
Speaker 1: him in so many ways. But thank you for sharing
Speaker 1: your story, and I apologized. No woman should ever have
Speaker 1: to go through the horror of what you're describing it.
Speaker 1: That is so beyond perverted and creepy and predator like.
Speaker 1: It's it's shocking, it shocks the conscience. Well, thanks for
Speaker 1: letting me tell my story. It's been very cathartic and
Speaker 1: very helpful for me to express it and to tell
Speaker 1: it and to finally, you know, get it out there,
Speaker 1: because I want to reach the millennials. I want to
Speaker 1: reach these young women that are on the scent and
Speaker 1: I want them to understand what kind of a person. Yes,
Speaker 1: Bill Clinton did this, but Hillary was an enabler. She
Speaker 1: allowed this type of behavior by all the things she
Speaker 1: did to support him through all these many years. So,
Speaker 1: you know what, young women need to understand that she
Speaker 1: is not a champion of women. She you know, what
Speaker 1: she did to these women is unthinkable. She literally ruined
Speaker 1: live and I wasn't going to allow her to ruin
Speaker 1: my life. Just the opposite of what she says, she
Speaker 1: is a champion of women's rights. Leslie, thank you for
Speaker 1: telling your story and I hope people paying attention because
Speaker 1: they need to. Um. Thank you all. I appreciate it.
Speaker 1: God bless you, and I'm so sorry. Wow, that's so sad.
Speaker 1: That is that is a predator at a very very deep,
Speaker 1: you know, psychopathic level. I remember very well back at
Speaker 1: two thousand, there were those who argued that people's votes
Speaker 1: should be discounted over technicalities. For the people of Florida
Speaker 1: who voted in this primary, the notion of discounting their
Speaker 1: votes sounds way too much the same the votes of
Speaker 1: one point seven million people should not be cast aside
Speaker 1: because of a technicality. The people who voted did nothing
Speaker 1: wrong and it would be wrong to punish you. Is
Speaker 1: this the last battleground? Strive for reforder that you can
Speaker 1: do well. Uh. The the the effort I have underway
Speaker 1: is simply to make sure, uh, that that all the
Speaker 1: votes are counting and when the when, when the issues
Speaker 1: that are now being considered in the Florida Supreme Court
Speaker 1: are are are decided, that'll that'll be an important point.
Speaker 1: But I don't want to speculate on what the Florida
Speaker 1: Supreme Court doing. County County, Well, there were more than
Speaker 1: enough votes to make the difference that were apparently thrown
Speaker 1: into the the applications for ballots were thrown into the
Speaker 1: trash can by the Supervisor of Elections there apparently, uh,
Speaker 1: even though they we're missing the same number that the
Speaker 1: Republican Party workers were allowed to come in and uh
Speaker 1: and and fix the other applications with. So I don't
Speaker 1: want to speculate on what remedy might be. I'm not
Speaker 1: a party of that to that case or the Martin
Speaker 1: County case. But but more than enough votes were potentially
Speaker 1: taken away from Democrats because they were not given the
Speaker 1: same access that Republicans were, remember the according to what's
Speaker 1: come out in that case. Again, I'm not a party
Speaker 1: to it, but I've read about it, and apparently the
Speaker 1: Democratic Party chair was denied the opportunity to even look
Speaker 1: at the list of applications, whereas the Republican party workers
Speaker 1: were allowed to roam around unsupervised inside the office and
Speaker 1: bring their computers in and uh and fix all of
Speaker 1: the vallot applications for one side, even as the Democrats
Speaker 1: were denied an tunity to come in, denied a chance
Speaker 1: to even look at the applications, and those applications were
Speaker 1: thrown out. That doesn't seem fair to me. And apparently
Speaker 1: in Martin County they were able to go in and
Speaker 1: take all the applications home with so, you know, that's
Speaker 1: a excuse me? What the black votes that were discounted?
Speaker 1: Jesse Jackson, I am very troubled by a lot of
Speaker 1: the stories that have been reported about a roadblock on
Speaker 1: the way to one precinct, questions raised about various activities there.
Speaker 1: I do not have any personal or firsthand knowledge of
Speaker 1: those events, but whenever there are problems of that kind,
Speaker 1: alleged they are deserving of attention. Jesse Jackson, Oh, I
Speaker 1: talk with him. I talked with him regularly, of course,
Speaker 1: and uh I work. I have worked with him closely.
Speaker 1: I I've spoken with the Kaisium Fume and Julian Bond.
Speaker 1: Penda Hare, who is ahead of the efforts by the
Speaker 1: n double a CP against voter suppression, has been in
Speaker 1: touch with our people. But but I have no knowledge
Speaker 1: of those activities. I just I want to say to
Speaker 1: you clearly that in my opinion, UH, whenever you have
Speaker 1: allegations of those kinds, that is a matter that the
Speaker 1: entire country ought ought to take seriously. Uh. They are
Speaker 1: not part of the ongoing court action, and I don't
Speaker 1: I don't want to mislead you on that, but I
Speaker 1: certainly want you to know that I think that they're
Speaker 1: serious allegations. The thing that his most animated dis election
Speaker 1: on the Democratic side has been the sense of a
Speaker 1: rigged system. The game is rigged against them, is rigged.
Speaker 1: This is what a rigged about and rigged system. Don't
Speaker 1: do anything to rig the system to most of the
Speaker 1: topic is rigged. A lot of people who have done
Speaker 1: the dead leveled best that the system is ringed people
Speaker 1: say the game is rigged, keeps the system rigged. For
Speaker 1: those at the top, the system is rigged. Their obstruction
Speaker 1: is keeping a system that has rigged. The game is rigged.
Speaker 1: We must fix an economy in America that is rigged.
Speaker 1: The game is rigged, and it's not right economy, and
Speaker 1: the economy is rigged. The American people know that the
Speaker 1: system is rigged against the system rigged against the middle class.
Speaker 1: All I know it is it is rigged, and it's
Speaker 1: still too many people feel like the system is rigged.
Speaker 1: People say the game is rigged. How the game is rigged,
Speaker 1: The economy is rigged. People feel like the system is
Speaker 1: rigged against them. And here's the painful mark of Ryan.
Speaker 1: You know, the system, folks, is rigged. Our Our presidential
Speaker 1: election came down to one state where the brother of
Speaker 1: the man running for president was the governor of the state.
Speaker 1: So we have our problems too. There you have a
Speaker 1: montage of Democrats well basically saying what Donald Trump said
Speaker 1: last night. But of course it's a far different reaction.
Speaker 1: You know, Al Gore explaining why he would not concede
Speaker 1: the election and then took the whole case to court,
Speaker 1: and Hillary Clinton even two years into George Bush's presidency,
Speaker 1: UH questioning the legitimacy of his presidency, saying, George W.
Speaker 1: Bush was selected, he was not elected. You know, last
Speaker 1: week Hillary and Gray agreed the Gore one and two thousand.
Speaker 1: I mean, that's how deep this goes. John Kerry thought
Speaker 1: Bush rigged the two thousand and four election. I give
Speaker 1: you specific incidents where, in fact, the Democrats themselves have
Speaker 1: done this repeatedly. There are eight specific times where liberals
Speaker 1: the left have claimed that the election was stolen. A
Speaker 1: labor union leader Roseanne Tomorrow said it. NYPD N y
Speaker 1: U professor Mark Miller said it. You know, Urza Klein
Speaker 1: has said it. Um Ben Wafford, a politico they got,
Speaker 1: Darryl lind has said it. Salon's far read for hard
Speaker 1: Monjou has said it. John Marshall of Talking Points has
Speaker 1: said it, and Elizabeth Warren has said it. And if
Speaker 1: we go back to the year two thousand, the media
Speaker 1: claiming it's absolutely unprecedented, today this is there. They can't
Speaker 1: say that Hillary won the debate because she didn't win
Speaker 1: the debate. She lost on substance. She's she's exposed as
Speaker 1: a fraud. Her policy is exposed as being hard hard left,
Speaker 1: so they always look for one narrative. And now we
Speaker 1: know there's collusion with the media and the Clinton campaign,
Speaker 1: which has been exposed now through wiki leaks, And we
Speaker 1: know Univision in ABC and NBC and CBS and CNBC
Speaker 1: and MSNBC, in the New York Times, in the Boston
Speaker 1: Globe are all on the tank and political are all
Speaker 1: in the tank for Hillary Clinton, and the media is
Speaker 1: claiming this is absolutely unprecedented. Al Gore refused to accept
Speaker 1: the results in two thousand, Hillary Clinton, even after Bush
Speaker 1: is president, did not accept the results of the election,
Speaker 1: and she if you go back, Clinton refused to help
Speaker 1: Bush with the transition while Gore was contesting the results.
Speaker 1: You know, this goes back to as the New York
Speaker 1: Times reported November two thousand, nearly three weeks after election day,
Speaker 1: the developments, you know, brought formality without finality to the
Speaker 1: race when the White House said it was not willing
Speaker 1: to open government officers to George W. Bush to begin
Speaker 1: a presidential transition until the legal challenges were resolved. Now,
Speaker 1: as it relates to voter fraud, we have in Texas,
Speaker 1: the Attorney general lost launching an investigation in a widespread
Speaker 1: voter fraud. You have an Ohio woman who was convicted
Speaker 1: of voting eight times for Obama eight in two thousand
Speaker 1: and eight, eleven, twelve. Anyway, she voted eight specific times
Speaker 1: for this man. Indiana has uncovered thousands of forged voter registrations.
Speaker 1: We have nearly two million dead people around the country
Speaker 1: that are still that are still registered to vote. So
Speaker 1: there clearly is a problem. Now. Donald Trump, earlier today
Speaker 1: at a rally, actually said that I will accept the
Speaker 1: results of the election next month if I win. Just
Speaker 1: totally playing with him. Look, my take is what I
Speaker 1: said earlier. Trump is right to say he wouldn't concede,
Speaker 1: especially in light of what we learned from Project Veritas
Speaker 1: this week that we have a guy that had been
Speaker 1: to the White House nearly four hundred times since Obama
Speaker 1: has been president, met with the President nearly fifty times
Speaker 1: on tape, orchestrating a massive, well funded through the Clinton campaign,
Speaker 1: voter fraud effort. Why should anybody accept it at this
Speaker 1: particular point. Let's see how this plays out. Anyway, News
Speaker 1: round up information, overload your calls at the bottom of
Speaker 1: the hour. One, Shawn is our number. Jessica Tarlove as
Speaker 1: a senior strategist at shown consulting in Ron Christie, former
Speaker 1: special assistant the President Bush. Welcome both of you to
Speaker 1: the program. So the media narrative is false. The very
Speaker 1: people we now know in the tank for Hillary Ron Christie,
Speaker 1: we can't trust them, and they're telling everybody this is
Speaker 1: all unprecedented. But there is you know, the players involved
Speaker 1: in this election that are making the claim themselves have
Speaker 1: done the very thing that Trump was talking about last night.
Speaker 1: That's absolutely right, Sean. And for one who is actually
Speaker 1: on the ground as the Northern Florida recount lawyer for
Speaker 1: Bush Cheney, I can tell you it's miraculous to me
Speaker 1: that the media is concocting a story out of nothing.
Speaker 1: They the very Al Gore clip that you just played, Um,
Speaker 1: really hampered our ability to have the incoming Bush administration
Speaker 1: to take office because of course Gore was contesting Uh
Speaker 1: this issue in court set us back several weeks. We
Speaker 1: weren't allowed access to actually have the transition office for
Speaker 1: our use to bring the government up divorce. But more importantly, Sean,
Speaker 1: why in the world should Donald Trump concede anything given
Speaker 1: we've heard from these Project Veritas. It's clear that the
Speaker 1: media is in the tank. It's clear that the d
Speaker 1: n C in officials within the abomb administration are colluding
Speaker 1: to try to thwart justice and in fact to install
Speaker 1: Hillary Clinton in any way, shape or form the camp.
Speaker 1: So again, the media has made this up. If I
Speaker 1: were Donald Trump, I would ignore it and I would
Speaker 1: keep doing what he's doing. Yeah, I look, and on substance,
Speaker 1: he won the debate. It's even interesting to watch the analysis.
Speaker 1: I know. I saw Byron York today and Charles Crownhammer
Speaker 1: last night. They both said, yeah, Trump had this debate.
Speaker 1: Tro won this debate until he said this, And I'm like, guys,
Speaker 1: do you have not any recent knowledge of history. We
Speaker 1: don't have to go back to the eighteen hundreds, we
Speaker 1: don't have to go back to nineteen sixty, where it's
Speaker 1: fairly well believed and well thought that Chicago, I'm sorry,
Speaker 1: Illinois was stolen for John Kennedy and put him over
Speaker 1: the top in the election against Richard Nixon in sixty Jessica,
Speaker 1: you you've got to admit there's media a media double
Speaker 1: standard here. There's media hypocrisy here in democratic hypocrisy here,
Speaker 1: going to some degree. Listen. I mean we've talked about
Speaker 1: this before, and we know that the vast majority of
Speaker 1: journalists do support Hellyclood and are liberals well, and we
Speaker 1: can also talk about, you know, people with college educations
Speaker 1: and what happens to your political leanings when you let
Speaker 1: get indoctrinated at those fantastic institutions that I love them.
Speaker 1: So you're you're saying that the people that are supporting
Speaker 1: Trump are dumb? Is that your insinuation? It is absolutely
Speaker 1: not what I'm saying. I'm saying that there's a correlation
Speaker 1: between people who have college degrees going into journalism, right,
Speaker 1: I mean, this is not I don't know how many
Speaker 1: journalists you know who don't have a college aree. I
Speaker 1: do not think that Donald Trump voters are dumb, but
Speaker 1: we do know that he has a larger share of
Speaker 1: the white working class vote who have not gone to
Speaker 1: I mean the people that have been screwed, the people
Speaker 1: that have been screwed out a job, and people well
Speaker 1: to me, I mean, look, I mean I got into radio,
Speaker 1: but my background is as a strong blue collar worker
Speaker 1: and somebody that washed dishes and cooked and and bust
Speaker 1: was weighted tables intended bar and laid tile and framed
Speaker 1: houses and did roofing and painted houses and hung wallpaper.
Speaker 1: You know, my background is kind of there. Unfortunately, for
Speaker 1: a lot of those blue collar workers that used to
Speaker 1: be able to make a real good living for their
Speaker 1: family and have retirement and have a nice house in
Speaker 1: a safe neighborhood, that dream has been demolished under the
Speaker 1: Obama years. So they're struggling right now. Yeah, listen. And
Speaker 1: I think that that has always been a strong suit
Speaker 1: or a strong aspect of Donald Trump's argument for why
Speaker 1: he's the best person to handle the economy right, to
Speaker 1: bring these jobs back and to support, you know, the
Speaker 1: workers that were not paying attention to. But you know,
Speaker 1: to the point, I agree with what Charles Krossheimer said.
Speaker 1: I thought the first boarding minus Donald Trump did really
Speaker 1: well for himself, and he wasn't taking de bait largely,
Speaker 1: and he was sticking to the issues. He had some
Speaker 1: good uh, some good lines. I was impressed with how
Speaker 1: much he actually knew about the Heller decision. I was shocked, actually, Um,
Speaker 1: and he obviously prepared for this debate. Um. I think
Speaker 1: that where the difference here is versus what went on
Speaker 1: in two thousands is that al Gore didn't say he
Speaker 1: wasn't going to accept the results before the results had
Speaker 1: already happened, and you talked about it, didn't He didn't
Speaker 1: didn't have to say it when he was questioning it,
Speaker 1: bringing it into court and doing everything he could do
Speaker 1: not hang on a second, and it was they took
Speaker 1: a Supreme Court decision. Now with Donald Trump. Did you
Speaker 1: see the Project Veritas tapes? I did see. Well, I
Speaker 1: don't know if I saw all of them. I thought,
Speaker 1: all right, we're gonna we're gonna pick it up there
Speaker 1: when we get back because on those tapes, and again
Speaker 1: we have a money funding. Look, the people involved tell
Speaker 1: us where the money comes from. It comes from the
Speaker 1: Clinton campaign to foment hang On, to foment violence and
Speaker 1: build a widespread voter fraud operation. So it's all on tape.
Speaker 1: It ought to concern every American, not just Republicans or conservatives.
Speaker 1: And I'll ask you about that when we get back,
Speaker 1: because it's a really important issue. Democrat Meloise Richardson has
Speaker 1: worked in Hamlety County polling places since she's also registered
Speaker 1: thousands of people to vote, most of them for President Obamas.
Speaker 1: But this report suggests he may have gone too far,
Speaker 1: and she's going to have to appear before the Hamlet
Speaker 1: County Board of Elections to explain her actions. There's absolutely
Speaker 1: no intent on my part to commit any voter fraud. Yes,
Speaker 1: I voted twice. I after registering thousands of people, certainly
Speaker 1: wanted my vote account, so I voted. I voted at
Speaker 1: the polo lot. Then there's the finding that Richardson's granddaughter, India,
Speaker 1: a first time voter, cast two ballots and that Richardson
Speaker 1: sent in one of them. I absolutely voted an absentee
Speaker 1: ballot for her. I did let her know that I
Speaker 1: was getting an absentee ballot for her and sending it in.
Speaker 1: I had to get her so security number for that,
Speaker 1: but I assumed she forgot are Are was just excited
Speaker 1: and she went to the polls herself. Another claim is
Speaker 1: absentee ballots for Montz Richardson, Joseph Jones, and Marcus Barron
Speaker 1: all came from Richardson's Wetzel Avenue address, were received by
Speaker 1: the board the same time as Richardson's, and the handwriting
Speaker 1: on all four of them was similar. Marcus Baron lives here.
Speaker 1: Joseph Jones is my brother. He's here from time to time.
Speaker 1: I am Montez is power of attorney. I vote voted
Speaker 1: for her in her absence. So were these all legal votes?
Speaker 1: In your mind? Absolutely? Legal votes? Absolutely so? This woman
Speaker 1: Richardson literally was a Hamilton's County in Cincinnati, just outside
Speaker 1: Cincinnati County poll worker from until she got arrested in
Speaker 1: when she was charged with eight counts of the illegal voting.
Speaker 1: She pled guilty, was convicted of four counts in exchange
Speaker 1: for other the other four being dismissed. Convicted of voting
Speaker 1: twice in the twelve election, three times in oh eight,
Speaker 1: and so on and so forth. Now this is only
Speaker 1: one instance of many. How many dead people are gonna
Speaker 1: end up voting this year? Um, we have a history
Speaker 1: of this country of presidential candidates questioning the legitimacy of
Speaker 1: the vote. And add to that, we've got Project Veritas.
Speaker 1: On Project Veritas, we've got tapes and of course they
Speaker 1: talk about the where the financing for efforts involving fomenting
Speaker 1: of violence and voter fraud, And it comes from the
Speaker 1: Clinton campaign, through the d n C, through Democracy Partners,
Speaker 1: through the black arts operatives in the political world that
Speaker 1: go out trained and foment violence of Trump events that
Speaker 1: they've been doing all year, bragging about what happened in
Speaker 1: Chicago and elsewhere, and also expanding in great detail what
Speaker 1: they believe is a widespread what they want is a
Speaker 1: widespread voter fraud operation. And the head of this is
Speaker 1: a guy that recently resigned, but he had been to
Speaker 1: the White House nearly four times since Obama has been president. Now,
Speaker 1: when you watch those efforts and know that that money
Speaker 1: came from the Hillary campaign and the d n C,
Speaker 1: Jessica tar Love, you cannot tell me that Donald Trump
Speaker 1: does not have a legitimate right to be concerned about
Speaker 1: widespread voter fraud funded by the d n C and
Speaker 1: Hillary's campaign. It's just the fact, Well a O was
Speaker 1: not linked to the Clinton campaign. I know its links.
Speaker 1: Excuse me, no, no, Note they say right there on tape,
Speaker 1: they say where the money comes from from the Clinton campaign.
Speaker 1: It goes to the d n C, the d n
Speaker 1: C to Democracy Partners, Democracy Partners to the Foeval Group.
Speaker 1: The Foeval Group, including FOEVO themselves, describe in detail their
Speaker 1: efforts to foment violence and to expand voter fraud. Okay,
Speaker 1: it's fine for people to be concerned that every vote
Speaker 1: cow that I get that we have not when you
Speaker 1: see when you see that video, you see they're telling
Speaker 1: you where the money's coming from people who were fired
Speaker 1: before that video. I just when you look historically and
Speaker 1: you've been playing a lot of tape about what has
Speaker 1: gone on here, but we have what between two thousand
Speaker 1: and one instances out of a billion votes cast of
Speaker 1: there being any voter fraud concern is and Donald Trump
Speaker 1: is signaling to his supporters that it is okay for
Speaker 1: there to be unwrapped after this election. That's what he No, no, no, no, no,
Speaker 1: that's your spin. When is the when is Donald Trump said?
Speaker 1: When is Donald Trump said that he wants unrest? What
Speaker 1: did he say that he's fomenting unrest? Because you know,
Speaker 1: you say that in light of the fact that we
Speaker 1: have audio tape of these democratic operatives that are that
Speaker 1: are perfect wait a minute, that are admitting and bragging
Speaker 1: about causing violence at Trump events where people can get
Speaker 1: injured and hurt. And now you flip it and turn
Speaker 1: it around and say Donald Trump saying it's okay. When
Speaker 1: did Donald Trump say that, Sean, I'm saying that what
Speaker 1: goes on in those videotapes is horrendous. The d n
Speaker 1: C has contemned. Okay, so, but that's not what that's
Speaker 1: not my question. You said. Donald Trump is telling his supporters,
Speaker 1: it's okay. He's telling them that the election, that the
Speaker 1: democratic process does not work in this country. That's what
Speaker 1: he's telling them. We saw all of her twitter last night, right,
Speaker 1: people saying like, oh, I'll rise up about the woman
Speaker 1: who tweeted that she's got her gun ready. He's signaled,
Speaker 1: remember his two second amendments. Some some some way, well
Speaker 1: some keyboard warrior and I'll go to Ron Christy on
Speaker 1: this on Twitter. Um, you know, in the in the
Speaker 1: confidence and privacy of their own bathroom or basement or
Speaker 1: wherever they're involved in tweeting out, is not the Donald
Speaker 1: Trump campaign in this case, they are implicating the Clintons
Speaker 1: and the d n C of organizing and financing voter
Speaker 1: fraud and fomenting violence. There's a huge difference here. There's
Speaker 1: a huge difference, and there's a huge distinction as to
Speaker 1: why the mainstream media doesn't have this on the front page,
Speaker 1: top of the fold of every newspaper and it's not
Speaker 1: leading every newscast in this country shows you that in
Speaker 1: an essence, that Trump is right, that this is rigged.
Speaker 1: The media is so in the tank for Hillary Clinton
Speaker 1: that they're not willing to discuss a people who are
Speaker 1: casting multiple ballots, which is a crime and people should
Speaker 1: be prosecuting and put in jail for that. B That
Speaker 1: there was solicit coordination between a shell organization and the
Speaker 1: Clinton campaign to get people to dress up to insight
Speaker 1: violence at Trump rallies that he had nothing to do with.
Speaker 1: And see, perhaps most importantly, aren't we a democracy. Aren't
Speaker 1: we supposed to have a free fare and open election cycle.
Speaker 1: What this looks like to me, Sean is a banana
Speaker 1: republic that is now established itself in the United States
Speaker 1: that they're willing to do everything they can to throw
Speaker 1: this to Hillary Clinton. Consequences be damned. It's a sad
Speaker 1: day for our democracy here in America. And the fact
Speaker 1: that the media won't even discuss it is disgusting. Well,
Speaker 1: we know why the media is not going to discuss
Speaker 1: it now. I would think that Jessica, if Wiki leaks
Speaker 1: showed that Univision and NBC and MSNBC and CNBC and
Speaker 1: ABC and CBS and the New York Times and the
Speaker 1: Boston Globe and Univision and whatever other news outlet is
Speaker 1: involved in helping Hillary. Uh. I would think that you
Speaker 1: would be upset about that. So we really can't trust
Speaker 1: the media, can we? In light of what we've learned
Speaker 1: through wiki leaks? They are in the tank for Hillary.
Speaker 1: You don't think what they're doing what we've discovered, well,
Speaker 1: you don't think what these companies specifically, which is a
Speaker 1: big part of the mainstream media, you don't think this
Speaker 1: is ethical or political. You don't think what they're doing
Speaker 1: is right, do you? I? I think that you've gone
Speaker 1: way further than I'm willing to go here. Yes, there
Speaker 1: are obvious Okay, let's let's go over it. I'll go
Speaker 1: instance my inswage with you. Univision the chairman, the head
Speaker 1: of Univision advising the Clinton campaign. Is that unethical? I don't.
Speaker 1: I don't see you why it's unethical? What was that
Speaker 1: they're advising their Wait, they're supposed to be covering the news,
Speaker 1: and they're advising Donald Hillary Clinton on how to on
Speaker 1: how to challenge Donald Trump, basically an extension of the
Speaker 1: Hillary campaign. Do you think it's ethical for The New
Speaker 1: York Times in political do you think it's ethical for
Speaker 1: the New York Times and Political to allow the Clinton
Speaker 1: campaign to edit their stories? No? That well, that procedure.
Speaker 1: And also, you know the Glenn's rush thing that I've
Speaker 1: seen and double down on the defense of this, it
Speaker 1: is common practice that reporters and journalists do send back. Well, okay,
Speaker 1: I've been interviewed in the last month three times by
Speaker 1: The New York Times. I have not been given that opportunity.
Speaker 1: You should ask then, because if I ask, okay, okay,
Speaker 1: and let me ask this, do you think it's appropriate
Speaker 1: for a moderator like John Harwood to be advising the campaign?
Speaker 1: Do you think it's appropriate that he brags that he
Speaker 1: got under Donald Trump's skin? I don't. I thought that
Speaker 1: John Harwood email was inappropriate. Do you think it's appropriate
Speaker 1: that CNN Feeds feeds the questions to Hillary? True? I
Speaker 1: mean CNN and Donna Brazil have both denied that, and
Speaker 1: Donna Brazil looked pretty dumb on television last night defending it.
Speaker 1: And do you think it's appropriate for the Clinton campaign
Speaker 1: to hand over questions to Chris Hayes or whoever the
Speaker 1: anchor is. I don't think that there has been evidence
Speaker 1: the proven I think, I think there has been actually
Speaker 1: Rolan Martin to Donna Brazil to the exact verbatim question
Speaker 1: that was given in the debate dispute Jesse, Well, it
Speaker 1: is happort to see because there are people disputing it
Speaker 1: so and people who I don't think Donna Brazil has
Speaker 1: a long career of being a liar unless I missed something. So,
Speaker 1: I mean, she seems pretty vehement about it last night.
Speaker 1: So you think it's just a mere coincidence that you
Speaker 1: think it's just a mere coincidence that she says sometimes
Speaker 1: I get questions ahead of time, she forwards a question
Speaker 1: that has used verbatim in the town hall the next day,
Speaker 1: and you think that's a coincidence. What I'm saying is
Speaker 1: is that no, no, no, no, I'm not I'm asking
Speaker 1: that's what happened. The subject line was sometimes I get
Speaker 1: questions beforehand. She sends a question during the town hall,
Speaker 1: the questions asked verbatim, and you're saying it's a coincidence.
Speaker 1: I certainly if that is what happened, and that she
Speaker 1: was actually feeding it, that the email isn't fabricated, or
Speaker 1: that the email is not fabricated listen, nobody's saying that
Speaker 1: the fabricated wiki leaks emails, are you kidding? Easing? John
Speaker 1: Podesta will write never do well instead of ne'er do well.
Speaker 1: No one excuse me to the authenticity of the emails.
Speaker 1: I mean they never but but well, let me take
Speaker 1: it a step further. Wiki Leaks and Julian Assange have
Speaker 1: never been wrong in ten years, not one time, not
Speaker 1: one time. And you can say whatever you want about
Speaker 1: the media. You can list every organization that you're going
Speaker 1: to say is in the tank for her, and that's fine,
Speaker 1: totally your we're reading it. But give me one instance
Speaker 1: where wiki leaks has been proven wrong. I have to
Speaker 1: well get up, but I know that there are no. No, no,
Speaker 1: you don't. The reason you can't, Jessica, is because they've
Speaker 1: never been proven wrong. Okay, you're I don't know what
Speaker 1: you want me to say. Besides, I just conceded that
Speaker 1: everybody is in the tank for her, right, So if
Speaker 1: we're going on that basis, people still have to turn
Speaker 1: out and they have to vote, So you still agree
Speaker 1: with me. Not because of fraud. Donald Trump is now down,
Speaker 1: even though even though we have a tape of of
Speaker 1: Clinton supporters and operatives saying they're getting money from the
Speaker 1: DNC and the campaign to foment violence and to foment
Speaker 1: voter fraud. I said it was appalling. It's on record
Speaker 1: on your radio show that I've said that. And when
Speaker 1: there were Bernie people going to Donald Trump Rowley's when
Speaker 1: Bernie Sanders was still in the primary race and they
Speaker 1: were linked to him, I said that was appalling, as
Speaker 1: did Bernie Sanders. And do you think that they Do
Speaker 1: you think that the d n C. Do you think
Speaker 1: the d n C colluded to prevent the Clinton to
Speaker 1: colluded to prevent Bernie from getting the nomination? No? No,
Speaker 1: Bernie Sanders had getting the nomination eight million votes. How
Speaker 1: about the recent FBI release where we have a Justice
Speaker 1: Department uh and I'm sorry, State Department official offering a
Speaker 1: quid pro quote to the FBI. Is that called Briber Well,
Speaker 1: both of them, both sides have disputed that that was
Speaker 1: one FBI official who says that that's what they perceived
Speaker 1: had happened. That was in the official le FBI report
Speaker 1: that was released to the public. And do you think
Speaker 1: do you think it's appropriate for the Yeah, I said
Speaker 1: that if that's what happened, obviously not the both sides
Speaker 1: they're denying that, and there are conversations that go on,
Speaker 1: and do you think it's appropriate for the State Department
Speaker 1: and the Justice Department to be tipping off the Clinton
Speaker 1: campaign about what they will be releasing as it relates
Speaker 1: to the email scandal server investigation. I did see that email.
Speaker 1: I wasn't I wasn't completely sure about that where it
Speaker 1: says that there was more that was going to be
Speaker 1: coming out in specific timing. I think he went to
Speaker 1: Robbie mooke Um, but it might have been to another official.
Speaker 1: To no listen, Ron, we could have we could have
Speaker 1: Hillary on tape shooting somebody in the head, and it'll
Speaker 1: be defended by Clinton supporters, of course, and you know
Speaker 1: Patrick Kennedy, the under Secretary of State, who's the official
Speaker 1: that we're talking about here. They should convene a grand
Speaker 1: jury and determine whether or not crimes were committed. What
Speaker 1: he was trying to do, Sean, was to have the
Speaker 1: FBI declassify some of Hillary's emails so then she could
Speaker 1: go out and peddle the lie of well, I never
Speaker 1: sent or received anything that was classified on my email account,
Speaker 1: and the FBI said no, then what did he do?
Speaker 1: He wanted to speak to another official d FBI and
Speaker 1: assistant director and said, well, maybe if we declassify this,
Speaker 1: we can allow FBI agents to go to countries that
Speaker 1: they're currently not able to to go to. If that
Speaker 1: isn't a quid pro quo, if that isn't bribery or
Speaker 1: corruption against the law or the spirit of the law,
Speaker 1: I don't know what is. But the media will never
Speaker 1: report it. Hillary will never go down because they are
Speaker 1: in the tank for her. This is a This is
Speaker 1: a criminal enterprise that the Clinton's run. This is nothing
Speaker 1: short of a criminal enterprise. Everything from the emails, everything
Speaker 1: to the money from the Clinton Foundation, everything to their
Speaker 1: voter fraud find dancing, everything to their voter intimidation and
Speaker 1: flementing violence. The whole thing just reeks of corruption beyond
Speaker 1: and insanely an insane scale. And you know, I guess
Speaker 1: convincing you is not gonna happen on this program, But
Speaker 1: hopefully other people benefit by putting us putting this all
Speaker 1: together all right, we went longer than I thought. Guys.
Speaker 1: Thank you both for being with us. Ron Christie and
Speaker 1: Jessica tar Love