WEBVTT - EU Growth is OK for Credit, Not So Much For Stocks

0:00:02.640 --> 0:00:05.320
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to the Bloomberg Penel podcast on Paul Swing You.

0:00:05.360 --> 0:00:07.680
<v Speaker 1>Along with my co host Lisa Brahma wits each day

0:00:07.720 --> 0:00:10.240
<v Speaker 1>we bring you the most noteworthy and useful interviews for

0:00:10.280 --> 0:00:12.520
<v Speaker 1>you and your money, whether at the grocery store or

0:00:12.560 --> 0:00:15.480
<v Speaker 1>the trading floor. Find a Bloomberg Penl podcast on Apple

0:00:15.520 --> 0:00:17.959
<v Speaker 1>podcast or wherever you listen to podcasts, as well as

0:00:17.960 --> 0:00:27.080
<v Speaker 1>at Bloomberg dot com. Earlier today, the European Commission cut

0:00:27.080 --> 0:00:30.240
<v Speaker 1>its growth forecasts for the euro Area and slashed its projection,

0:00:30.280 --> 0:00:34.479
<v Speaker 1>in particular for Germany, warning that escalating trade tensions threatened

0:00:34.520 --> 0:00:37.480
<v Speaker 1>to make the outlook even worse. Not a huge surprise,

0:00:37.680 --> 0:00:40.640
<v Speaker 1>and yet there definitely was a market response, with guilds

0:00:40.680 --> 0:00:44.200
<v Speaker 1>going even lower in Germany. Joining us now Alberto Galla,

0:00:44.320 --> 0:00:47.800
<v Speaker 1>partner in folio manager for the Algebras Macro Credit Fund

0:00:47.880 --> 0:00:51.159
<v Speaker 1>as well as a Bloomberg Opinion calumnist. Alberto, what was

0:00:51.200 --> 0:00:56.040
<v Speaker 1>your take on the European Commission's forecast that was cut

0:00:56.120 --> 0:00:59.480
<v Speaker 1>yet again and the fact that the market moved on it.

0:01:02.280 --> 0:01:08.080
<v Speaker 1>The European region is clearly um into a Japan like

0:01:08.319 --> 0:01:13.600
<v Speaker 1>environment for growth, so we have had repetitive downgrades on

0:01:13.760 --> 0:01:18.800
<v Speaker 1>growth over the last month with limited fiscal stimulus. Um.

0:01:18.840 --> 0:01:21.080
<v Speaker 1>Only some countries have been able to do it, but

0:01:21.240 --> 0:01:25.160
<v Speaker 1>the core countries remained very conservative. And we are in

0:01:25.200 --> 0:01:27.080
<v Speaker 1>the run up to European elections at the end of

0:01:27.120 --> 0:01:31.000
<v Speaker 1>this month, so that could be perhaps a game changer.

0:01:31.280 --> 0:01:35.759
<v Speaker 1>UM we could see maybe after European elections some reaction

0:01:35.880 --> 0:01:39.200
<v Speaker 1>to these luggish growth environment which we have had. But

0:01:39.280 --> 0:01:42.720
<v Speaker 1>you know, so far it's just the ECB has been

0:01:43.120 --> 0:01:45.840
<v Speaker 1>doing most of the stimulus and marty policy on its

0:01:45.880 --> 0:01:50.680
<v Speaker 1>own cannot really lift growth. We have seen that across

0:01:50.880 --> 0:01:54.120
<v Speaker 1>several countries. You actually end up having the opposite results.

0:01:54.120 --> 0:01:57.120
<v Speaker 1>You go into liquidity trap if you only have monetary

0:01:57.160 --> 0:02:00.440
<v Speaker 1>policy keeping interest rates negative for too long. So we

0:02:00.480 --> 0:02:03.680
<v Speaker 1>need a fiscal boost, but we don't have the willingness.

0:02:03.720 --> 0:02:07.120
<v Speaker 1>Germany is still on the sided, and the other countries

0:02:07.120 --> 0:02:10.000
<v Speaker 1>don't have a lot of ammunition we better. You mentioned

0:02:10.040 --> 0:02:11.920
<v Speaker 1>in Germany, and that's kind of what surprised me the

0:02:11.919 --> 0:02:14.679
<v Speaker 1>most out of this morning's data, the e c B

0:02:14.880 --> 0:02:19.040
<v Speaker 1>slashing the growth projection to just zero point five from

0:02:19.080 --> 0:02:23.480
<v Speaker 1>one point one. What's really driving that deceleration in Germany.

0:02:25.080 --> 0:02:27.119
<v Speaker 1>There is a number of theories, So I would say

0:02:27.120 --> 0:02:33.040
<v Speaker 1>first there's been a global desileration with Chinese orders for

0:02:32.120 --> 0:02:36.399
<v Speaker 1>UM for important goods including cars, you know, falling very

0:02:36.440 --> 0:02:39.960
<v Speaker 1>sharply at the end of last year. This hasn't recovered.

0:02:40.080 --> 0:02:43.560
<v Speaker 1>Then there's a second factor specific to Germany, which is Turkey.

0:02:43.560 --> 0:02:47.120
<v Speaker 1>You know, the Turkish economies under pressure. UM. Turkey and

0:02:47.120 --> 0:02:50.480
<v Speaker 1>Germany are very close import expert partners. You know, the

0:02:50.560 --> 0:02:53.360
<v Speaker 1>President Erdogan is just called for the rerun of the

0:02:53.400 --> 0:02:56.360
<v Speaker 1>Istanbul elections and this is creating a lot of volatility

0:02:56.440 --> 0:02:59.960
<v Speaker 1>in the Turkish lira and in in generally in busines

0:03:00.000 --> 0:03:05.639
<v Speaker 1>as flows to Turkey UM, which affects affects Germany being

0:03:05.680 --> 0:03:09.360
<v Speaker 1>part of the supply chain UM. But there's also a

0:03:09.480 --> 0:03:12.960
<v Speaker 1>lack of domestic demand UH in Europe. UM. There is

0:03:13.400 --> 0:03:15.680
<v Speaker 1>a rebound from last year for short p M I

0:03:15.840 --> 0:03:18.600
<v Speaker 1>have gone back to positive. We're not in a recession,

0:03:18.880 --> 0:03:22.200
<v Speaker 1>but we also don't have a V shaped rebound. It's

0:03:22.360 --> 0:03:26.040
<v Speaker 1>it's something between a U shaped and an L shaped rebound. Now,

0:03:26.080 --> 0:03:30.200
<v Speaker 1>to re accelerate an economy in in an late stage

0:03:30.400 --> 0:03:33.720
<v Speaker 1>in you know, in the late stage of an expansion, UM,

0:03:33.760 --> 0:03:37.280
<v Speaker 1>you need some physical stimulus. You don't, it just doesn't

0:03:37.280 --> 0:03:39.560
<v Speaker 1>happen on its own. Well, you know, if you just

0:03:39.680 --> 0:03:42.560
<v Speaker 1>had a recession and you tend to grow much faster

0:03:42.640 --> 0:03:45.120
<v Speaker 1>because you have pent up demand. You have you know,

0:03:45.160 --> 0:03:48.560
<v Speaker 1>consumers that haven't spent for many years and companies that

0:03:48.600 --> 0:03:50.960
<v Speaker 1>haven't invested. Here where the late at late stage of

0:03:51.000 --> 0:03:55.800
<v Speaker 1>the cycle, and we need some some government top down

0:03:55.800 --> 0:04:01.000
<v Speaker 1>decision um either from Germany or or broadly from China.

0:04:01.040 --> 0:04:03.119
<v Speaker 1>But we have seen that the Chinese stimulus is relatively

0:04:03.160 --> 0:04:08.160
<v Speaker 1>smaller compared to what they did in on nine. So Alberto,

0:04:08.280 --> 0:04:11.600
<v Speaker 1>as an investor, is this a time to stay away

0:04:11.640 --> 0:04:15.480
<v Speaker 1>from European assets in particularly in Germany? Or from a

0:04:15.480 --> 0:04:18.279
<v Speaker 1>credit standpoint, is this a positive because it means the

0:04:18.320 --> 0:04:20.919
<v Speaker 1>ECB isn't going to be backing away from its stimulus

0:04:20.960 --> 0:04:25.919
<v Speaker 1>anytime soon. So exactly, if you take Japan as an example,

0:04:26.000 --> 0:04:30.360
<v Speaker 1>So what happened over fifteen years, twenty years? Rates remained

0:04:30.360 --> 0:04:34.640
<v Speaker 1>relatively low. UM equities didn't do much. They you know,

0:04:34.680 --> 0:04:37.520
<v Speaker 1>they kept going down. You could trade some rallies, but

0:04:37.600 --> 0:04:41.359
<v Speaker 1>they kept going down. Credit was fine except the worst

0:04:41.480 --> 0:04:48.039
<v Speaker 1>banks and corporates UH. Credit UH survived because once you

0:04:48.080 --> 0:04:50.479
<v Speaker 1>are you know, the definition is you are in a UM.

0:04:50.720 --> 0:04:53.480
<v Speaker 1>You're in a slow growth environment with persistent lower rates,

0:04:53.600 --> 0:04:56.520
<v Speaker 1>companies kick the can. You may have don't be firms,

0:04:56.600 --> 0:04:59.359
<v Speaker 1>don't be banks that survived because of lower rates. So

0:04:59.520 --> 0:05:03.880
<v Speaker 1>essentially credit is okay in a Japan like environment, it's

0:05:03.880 --> 0:05:07.200
<v Speaker 1>not extremely exciting. But actually in Europe you have yields

0:05:07.200 --> 0:05:10.320
<v Speaker 1>which are you know, in dollar terms, close to high

0:05:10.360 --> 0:05:13.440
<v Speaker 1>single digit sometimes double digit UM. You don't want to

0:05:13.440 --> 0:05:15.720
<v Speaker 1>go in the lowest rated names in the you know,

0:05:15.760 --> 0:05:18.799
<v Speaker 1>in the triple c's or lower rated smaller single bees.

0:05:18.880 --> 0:05:22.600
<v Speaker 1>But overall the stimulus from this b will stay there,

0:05:22.960 --> 0:05:25.600
<v Speaker 1>and that's part that's been part of our view. Where

0:05:25.640 --> 0:05:28.400
<v Speaker 1>we go for growth. Where there's upside risk is some

0:05:28.520 --> 0:05:31.640
<v Speaker 1>other countries outside of Europe, in emerging markets or in

0:05:31.640 --> 0:05:35.040
<v Speaker 1>the US UM. But I think Europe for now seems

0:05:35.880 --> 0:05:38.880
<v Speaker 1>very much in a very stable, lower rate environment, good

0:05:38.920 --> 0:05:42.080
<v Speaker 1>for fixing, good for corporate bonds, not so good for

0:05:42.120 --> 0:05:45.560
<v Speaker 1>equities in the medium term. So abrot to what extent

0:05:45.720 --> 0:05:50.880
<v Speaker 1>is the ongoing Brexit uncertainty impacting the economies across your

0:05:51.080 --> 0:05:54.080
<v Speaker 1>you know, we saw again that big down grade for German,

0:05:54.240 --> 0:05:59.760
<v Speaker 1>Just wondering is that uncertainty still an issue a meaningful issue.

0:06:00.240 --> 0:06:03.080
<v Speaker 1>I would say that in the investment world, in markets

0:06:03.120 --> 0:06:06.680
<v Speaker 1>there has been a lot of fears. UM, there have

0:06:06.760 --> 0:06:09.680
<v Speaker 1>been a lot of fears about Brexit and also European elections,

0:06:09.640 --> 0:06:13.120
<v Speaker 1>so there's a lot of investors that are disengaged from Europe.

0:06:13.760 --> 0:06:16.279
<v Speaker 1>So on the one hand, yes, fundamentals are not great.

0:06:16.400 --> 0:06:20.680
<v Speaker 1>Growth is very slow compared to em or or the US,

0:06:20.680 --> 0:06:23.400
<v Speaker 1>But on the other hand, positioning is very very light.

0:06:23.760 --> 0:06:27.680
<v Speaker 1>According to the Bank America's Fund Managers Survey, short in

0:06:27.720 --> 0:06:31.880
<v Speaker 1>European equities the most crowded trade across global portfolio managers.

0:06:31.920 --> 0:06:35.480
<v Speaker 1>So if you have a bit of positive news, you

0:06:35.640 --> 0:06:40.080
<v Speaker 1>can you know, prices can rise relatively quickly, both in

0:06:40.080 --> 0:06:43.240
<v Speaker 1>in in in bonds and in UM in corporate bonds

0:06:43.279 --> 0:06:45.840
<v Speaker 1>and in an inequities. So you know, we do have

0:06:46.000 --> 0:06:49.440
<v Speaker 1>an unexciting fundamental view. We are stuck in a low

0:06:49.520 --> 0:06:53.400
<v Speaker 1>growth f loor rate environment. But um there's also very

0:06:53.440 --> 0:06:57.960
<v Speaker 1>little um lungs at the moment, so we sometimes like

0:06:58.040 --> 0:07:00.760
<v Speaker 1>to be contrarian, we don't go into the warst areas.

0:07:01.800 --> 0:07:05.000
<v Speaker 1>But there is still some value. And I think European

0:07:05.000 --> 0:07:07.479
<v Speaker 1>elections are going to be a non event because the

0:07:07.520 --> 0:07:10.320
<v Speaker 1>populace just may win a quarter of the European Parliament,

0:07:10.320 --> 0:07:12.960
<v Speaker 1>but then all the other parties will we'll create a

0:07:13.000 --> 0:07:15.360
<v Speaker 1>pro European coalition. In the end, you're in the European

0:07:15.400 --> 0:07:19.280
<v Speaker 1>Parliament and the pro Europeans are the majority. Brexit will

0:07:19.360 --> 0:07:24.320
<v Speaker 1>have to see what happens, you know, towards the end

0:07:24.320 --> 0:07:26.760
<v Speaker 1>of the extension period in the in the second half

0:07:26.760 --> 0:07:30.600
<v Speaker 1>of the year, after the summer um. We do think that,

0:07:30.680 --> 0:07:34.640
<v Speaker 1>you know, the base case remains either a longer extension

0:07:35.680 --> 0:07:40.160
<v Speaker 1>or a Norway style deal. So a deal soft deal,

0:07:40.480 --> 0:07:43.600
<v Speaker 1>yea very good Alberto Gallo, thank you so much. Alberta,

0:07:43.600 --> 0:07:46.640
<v Speaker 1>as a partner and portfolio manager for the Algebras Macro

0:07:46.800 --> 0:07:51.000
<v Speaker 1>Credit Fund with about twelve point three billion pounds under management,

0:07:51.040 --> 0:08:03.520
<v Speaker 1>is also a Bloomberg Opinion calumnist. Well, US and China

0:08:03.600 --> 0:08:07.000
<v Speaker 1>trade negotiations are back on investors radar, that's for sure.

0:08:07.240 --> 0:08:11.000
<v Speaker 1>Definitely a risk off day today after a very volatile

0:08:11.080 --> 0:08:14.520
<v Speaker 1>day yesterday, driven in part by some of the tariff concerns.

0:08:14.720 --> 0:08:16.440
<v Speaker 1>To get the latest on what these may mean for

0:08:16.480 --> 0:08:19.760
<v Speaker 1>the market, we welcome Matt Mally Matts, managing director and

0:08:19.800 --> 0:08:23.280
<v Speaker 1>equity strategist at Miller tebec Um. Matt, thanks so much

0:08:23.320 --> 0:08:25.640
<v Speaker 1>for joining us again taking a look at what's happened

0:08:25.680 --> 0:08:28.520
<v Speaker 1>over the past couple of days following President Trump's tweets

0:08:28.520 --> 0:08:33.840
<v Speaker 1>about the tariffs. Clearly the market is rightfully concerned about

0:08:33.880 --> 0:08:37.080
<v Speaker 1>some of these issues. What is your call, Well, you know,

0:08:37.160 --> 0:08:39.160
<v Speaker 1>it's funny. I I think that you know, yes, I

0:08:39.200 --> 0:08:41.920
<v Speaker 1>totally agree they should be at least a little bit concerned.

0:08:42.200 --> 0:08:43.560
<v Speaker 1>And we also have to look at what was the

0:08:43.600 --> 0:08:46.439
<v Speaker 1>market doing before this came Before this news came out.

0:08:46.480 --> 0:08:49.160
<v Speaker 1>I mean, this is negative news. And even if you

0:08:49.280 --> 0:08:51.280
<v Speaker 1>believe that you know, we're we're going to get a

0:08:51.360 --> 0:08:55.200
<v Speaker 1>deal eventually, Uh, the odds of that, odds of having

0:08:55.200 --> 0:08:57.920
<v Speaker 1>a being it pushed out further or you know, more

0:08:57.960 --> 0:09:01.360
<v Speaker 1>strains within that situation have bob the risen. And when

0:09:01.400 --> 0:09:04.480
<v Speaker 1>you have a situation where the stock markets rally twenty

0:09:04.559 --> 0:09:07.599
<v Speaker 1>five percent in just four months, had become quite overbought

0:09:08.360 --> 0:09:10.880
<v Speaker 1>on a near term basis. Anyway, when you get negative news,

0:09:10.960 --> 0:09:12.760
<v Speaker 1>it should pull back. And to be honest with you,

0:09:12.880 --> 0:09:15.959
<v Speaker 1>yesterday's reaction where it rallied back so strongly, that made

0:09:16.000 --> 0:09:17.880
<v Speaker 1>me a little worried about. But there's a little bit

0:09:18.200 --> 0:09:20.520
<v Speaker 1>too much complacency in the market. I think this is

0:09:20.520 --> 0:09:23.400
<v Speaker 1>a natural and healthy things that that that the market

0:09:23.520 --> 0:09:25.880
<v Speaker 1>is coming back down and we could fall a little

0:09:25.880 --> 0:09:29.200
<v Speaker 1>bit further again after rally. Not the worst thing in

0:09:29.240 --> 0:09:31.520
<v Speaker 1>the world. Yeah, and we should note that actually the

0:09:31.559 --> 0:09:36.000
<v Speaker 1>losses are deepening near session lows negative one point four

0:09:36.080 --> 0:09:39.480
<v Speaker 1>percent on the NASDAC. I'm just wondering, uh, you know,

0:09:39.520 --> 0:09:42.680
<v Speaker 1>you look at the technical underpinnings here and I'm wondering,

0:09:42.880 --> 0:09:46.760
<v Speaker 1>if the trade talks were really fundamentally break down and

0:09:46.800 --> 0:09:49.720
<v Speaker 1>put on ice for a while, how big of a

0:09:49.760 --> 0:09:53.480
<v Speaker 1>down draft could we see. Well, I think it could be,

0:09:53.640 --> 0:09:55.760
<v Speaker 1>you know, a fairly decent one. I mean, certainly in

0:09:55.760 --> 0:09:59.560
<v Speaker 1>the uh uh, you know, kind of the five to

0:09:59.640 --> 0:10:02.040
<v Speaker 1>seven p sent pullback. Uh. And even you know, in

0:10:02.320 --> 0:10:05.760
<v Speaker 1>today's markets where where the you know, mechanized tracing, the

0:10:05.800 --> 0:10:08.800
<v Speaker 1>algal mechanized trading and the algales and things like that

0:10:09.400 --> 0:10:11.280
<v Speaker 1>have a big impact on the market, it could take

0:10:11.559 --> 0:10:14.360
<v Speaker 1>even down towards correction territory. And the reason why I

0:10:14.400 --> 0:10:16.559
<v Speaker 1>say that is it is it because a lot of

0:10:16.600 --> 0:10:19.760
<v Speaker 1>the turnaround in or at least people literally looking for

0:10:19.800 --> 0:10:22.640
<v Speaker 1>earnings to pick up on the second half, uh, And

0:10:22.679 --> 0:10:24.160
<v Speaker 1>a lot of that has to do with with a

0:10:25.200 --> 0:10:27.920
<v Speaker 1>you know, an agreement had being made sometime in the

0:10:27.960 --> 0:10:30.040
<v Speaker 1>near future. So if that doesn't happen, some of those

0:10:30.040 --> 0:10:32.560
<v Speaker 1>earnings forecasts are going to come down, and uh, I

0:10:32.559 --> 0:10:33.800
<v Speaker 1>think that would put a little bit of a dent

0:10:33.880 --> 0:10:36.240
<v Speaker 1>in the market. So, Matt, you're just talking about earnings.

0:10:36.240 --> 0:10:38.959
<v Speaker 1>What is your takeaway from the first quarter here? Seems

0:10:38.960 --> 0:10:42.160
<v Speaker 1>to have come in better than expected? Um? What is

0:10:42.200 --> 0:10:46.400
<v Speaker 1>your take? Well, that is true and and and the

0:10:46.400 --> 0:10:49.680
<v Speaker 1>one problem, of course, though is that they always beat expectations. Uh,

0:10:49.760 --> 0:10:52.040
<v Speaker 1>this time a little bit more than expected and and

0:10:52.040 --> 0:10:54.440
<v Speaker 1>and it's very good that it went from expectations of

0:10:54.480 --> 0:10:57.520
<v Speaker 1>a negative earning season to one that is a positive one,

0:10:57.559 --> 0:11:00.400
<v Speaker 1>which you know, takes an earnings recession off the table.

0:11:00.720 --> 0:11:03.640
<v Speaker 1>And that's good. But the my my concern a little

0:11:03.640 --> 0:11:06.920
<v Speaker 1>bit here is that the guidance wasn't really raised. In fact,

0:11:06.920 --> 0:11:09.079
<v Speaker 1>that it's come down a little bit for future quarters

0:11:09.360 --> 0:11:12.160
<v Speaker 1>and we're really relying heavily on this, uh on a

0:11:12.240 --> 0:11:14.880
<v Speaker 1>big fourth quarter where estimates are now at a plus

0:11:15.679 --> 0:11:18.080
<v Speaker 1>eight and nine percent, where most of the other quarters

0:11:18.080 --> 0:11:19.840
<v Speaker 1>are start of the second and third quarters are down

0:11:19.840 --> 0:11:23.520
<v Speaker 1>in the one to three percent range. Uh So, Uh, yes,

0:11:23.559 --> 0:11:27.600
<v Speaker 1>it's been a good earning season. Um, but I wouldn't

0:11:27.640 --> 0:11:29.280
<v Speaker 1>like to see if much better, if we've been raising

0:11:29.280 --> 0:11:32.560
<v Speaker 1>expectations a little bit more. And Lori Kelvicina over at

0:11:32.640 --> 0:11:35.640
<v Speaker 1>RBC Capital had a really interesting point today saying that

0:11:36.040 --> 0:11:38.959
<v Speaker 1>UH earnings really weren't even as good as many people

0:11:38.960 --> 0:11:41.720
<v Speaker 1>are putting them out as because you did see the

0:11:41.760 --> 0:11:45.160
<v Speaker 1>earnings per share beats UH. Seventy six percent of companies

0:11:45.200 --> 0:11:47.880
<v Speaker 1>that have reported so far as something about that have

0:11:48.120 --> 0:11:50.840
<v Speaker 1>beaten on the EPs side. On sales side, it's about

0:11:50.840 --> 0:11:54.439
<v Speaker 1>half UH, and that's harder to engineer, whereas EPs were

0:11:54.440 --> 0:11:57.240
<v Speaker 1>engineered by things like share buybacks, which were actually at

0:11:57.240 --> 0:12:00.600
<v Speaker 1>the highest level post crisis in the first quarter. And

0:12:00.640 --> 0:12:02.920
<v Speaker 1>I'm just wondering, from your perspective, how much of a

0:12:03.000 --> 0:12:06.320
<v Speaker 1>sort of warning flag is that UH that companies pulled

0:12:06.360 --> 0:12:08.440
<v Speaker 1>out all the stops in the first quarter and really

0:12:08.480 --> 0:12:10.840
<v Speaker 1>cannot do a repeat of that when it comes to

0:12:10.880 --> 0:12:15.480
<v Speaker 1>engineering the EPs beats later in the year. Yeah, I mean, obviously,

0:12:15.600 --> 0:12:18.520
<v Speaker 1>you know, the quote unquote quality of earnings UH has

0:12:18.559 --> 0:12:21.080
<v Speaker 1>been something that people were worried about for a while now.

0:12:21.280 --> 0:12:23.400
<v Speaker 1>And the thing is, the quality of earnings were quite

0:12:23.400 --> 0:12:25.360
<v Speaker 1>good last year, UM, and I say that they were

0:12:25.360 --> 0:12:27.200
<v Speaker 1>worried about it, you know before you know, in two

0:12:27.200 --> 0:12:30.280
<v Speaker 1>thousand and fourteen fifteen sixteen, we were worried about that. Uh.

0:12:30.360 --> 0:12:32.280
<v Speaker 1>Last year they were you know, they were quite good.

0:12:32.520 --> 0:12:34.280
<v Speaker 1>But now the quality again it seems to be more

0:12:34.280 --> 0:12:36.720
<v Speaker 1>financial engineering. Now that the tax that has been pushed

0:12:36.960 --> 0:12:38.959
<v Speaker 1>to the to the side, and now that will we

0:12:39.000 --> 0:12:43.040
<v Speaker 1>get a problem again with this agreement on the tax side.

0:12:43.200 --> 0:12:46.440
<v Speaker 1>It definitely lowers that, uh, not just the stated earnings,

0:12:46.480 --> 0:12:48.840
<v Speaker 1>but the quality of earnings. And and again when the

0:12:48.880 --> 0:12:51.600
<v Speaker 1>market has moved as much as it has, it doesn't

0:12:51.640 --> 0:12:54.160
<v Speaker 1>just you know, uh, it doesn't necessarily mean that we're

0:12:54.160 --> 0:12:55.959
<v Speaker 1>gonna have a disaster here, you know, any kind of

0:12:56.000 --> 0:12:58.120
<v Speaker 1>a repeat of two thousand eight or two thousand, but

0:12:58.200 --> 0:13:00.960
<v Speaker 1>it does begin to get people to worry about, you know,

0:13:01.000 --> 0:13:03.800
<v Speaker 1>that we could have another a down draft something like

0:13:03.840 --> 0:13:05.320
<v Speaker 1>we had in the fourth quarter. I'm not not calling

0:13:05.320 --> 0:13:08.439
<v Speaker 1>for correction, but I wouldn't be surprised at all if

0:13:08.480 --> 0:13:10.360
<v Speaker 1>we saw something in the five to seven percent range.

0:13:10.720 --> 0:13:12.560
<v Speaker 1>Matt Malie, thank you so much for being with us.

0:13:12.600 --> 0:13:15.800
<v Speaker 1>Matt Malie as chief equity strategist for Miller, Tabac and Co.

0:13:16.160 --> 0:13:35.520
<v Speaker 1>Talking about market, it is time for a public service announcement.

0:13:35.720 --> 0:13:39.080
<v Speaker 1>If you have a mother or a wife who has

0:13:39.200 --> 0:13:43.160
<v Speaker 1>a children or a grandmother. This Sunday is Mother's Day.

0:13:43.280 --> 0:13:46.000
<v Speaker 1>You might want to remember that. Paul Sweeney, what are

0:13:46.000 --> 0:13:48.320
<v Speaker 1>you doing for Mother's Day? Um, we are having brunch

0:13:48.440 --> 0:13:51.040
<v Speaker 1>and there'll probably be some type of flower thing involved,

0:13:51.160 --> 0:13:54.120
<v Speaker 1>some type of flower gifting going on, a lot of

0:13:54.160 --> 0:13:56.560
<v Speaker 1>people giving flowers. We are so lucky to have Chris McGann,

0:13:56.720 --> 0:14:00.360
<v Speaker 1>chief executive officer of one flowers dot Com. I'm here

0:14:00.400 --> 0:14:03.360
<v Speaker 1>with us in our bloombergett to Active Broker's studios. So, Chris,

0:14:03.400 --> 0:14:07.000
<v Speaker 1>how important is Mother's Day to your business? Well? How

0:14:07.040 --> 0:14:10.600
<v Speaker 1>important is Mother's Day to you? In other words, how

0:14:10.600 --> 0:14:13.760
<v Speaker 1>many flowers am I hoping to get? I mean, you know,

0:14:14.040 --> 0:14:16.080
<v Speaker 1>I'm one of those people. If my kids make a

0:14:16.120 --> 0:14:19.760
<v Speaker 1>handmade card and they, you know, put some effort into it,

0:14:20.360 --> 0:14:22.320
<v Speaker 1>I'll be happy. Well, we'll take it up a step.

0:14:24.040 --> 0:14:26.840
<v Speaker 1>So some Mother's Days are very important holiday for our business.

0:14:26.880 --> 0:14:29.080
<v Speaker 1>You know, if you really look at our business overall

0:14:29.160 --> 0:14:32.240
<v Speaker 1>on an annual basis, because we're driven by such everyday

0:14:32.240 --> 0:14:35.960
<v Speaker 1>occasions like birthdays, anniversaries, Mother's Day is only about six

0:14:36.000 --> 0:14:37.840
<v Speaker 1>percent of our business. But if you look at the

0:14:37.840 --> 0:14:40.640
<v Speaker 1>floral side of our business for this quarter, Mother's Day

0:14:40.600 --> 0:14:44.200
<v Speaker 1>can counsel for about about consumer floral business in this

0:14:44.280 --> 0:14:47.960
<v Speaker 1>quarter about fiscal fourth quarter. So it's an important day

0:14:47.960 --> 0:14:50.200
<v Speaker 1>and it's an important day to celebrate. Yeah, well I'm

0:14:50.240 --> 0:14:52.320
<v Speaker 1>looking I like to celebrate the stock. The stock is

0:14:52.360 --> 0:14:59.400
<v Speaker 1>of about sixty eight percent this year. Of let's get

0:14:59.400 --> 0:15:01.560
<v Speaker 1>down to the you know, the dollarsand cents in the stock.

0:15:01.960 --> 0:15:03.680
<v Speaker 1>So I mean, even on a day when the markets

0:15:03.720 --> 0:15:05.440
<v Speaker 1>down one and a half percent, your stock is up

0:15:05.440 --> 0:15:07.880
<v Speaker 1>one and a half percent. So what's the story behind

0:15:08.080 --> 0:15:11.200
<v Speaker 1>your company's great stock race performance this year? I think

0:15:11.200 --> 0:15:13.880
<v Speaker 1>it's driven mostly by mothers investing in our stock right now,

0:15:15.880 --> 0:15:18.200
<v Speaker 1>and take it back to the sentimental I don't think so.

0:15:19.680 --> 0:15:22.480
<v Speaker 1>But really what's been happening and what we the investment

0:15:22.520 --> 0:15:25.080
<v Speaker 1>community is recognizing that we're doing what we said we

0:15:25.080 --> 0:15:26.560
<v Speaker 1>were going to do and we laid out for the

0:15:26.600 --> 0:15:29.800
<v Speaker 1>last couple of years. Actually, when we've been accelerating our growth.

0:15:29.800 --> 0:15:32.200
<v Speaker 1>We took the growth rate from three percent two years

0:15:32.200 --> 0:15:34.760
<v Speaker 1>ago to four percent. This year, we came out, we

0:15:34.800 --> 0:15:38.120
<v Speaker 1>guided the five to seven percent growth. We raised our

0:15:38.120 --> 0:15:41.280
<v Speaker 1>guidance after the holiday season to seven to eight percent.

0:15:41.560 --> 0:15:43.800
<v Speaker 1>We just raised our guidance again two weeks ago to

0:15:43.800 --> 0:15:46.160
<v Speaker 1>the high end of that range. So our growth rate

0:15:46.200 --> 0:15:49.240
<v Speaker 1>is accelerating as customers are becoming more and more aware

0:15:49.240 --> 0:15:52.040
<v Speaker 1>of our family of brands and ordering from more than

0:15:52.120 --> 0:15:56.160
<v Speaker 1>one brand. What's the highest margin aspect of your business?

0:15:56.160 --> 0:15:59.040
<v Speaker 1>The food? The Flowers going may food side of our business,

0:15:59.040 --> 0:16:01.080
<v Speaker 1>we're probably get in the mid to hire uh to

0:16:01.360 --> 0:16:04.160
<v Speaker 1>up at range margin. The one in a hundred of

0:16:04.160 --> 0:16:07.720
<v Speaker 1>Flowers business is usually around that thirty. That's where it's

0:16:07.720 --> 0:16:10.200
<v Speaker 1>going to stay. But really the higher margin products are

0:16:10.200 --> 0:16:12.240
<v Speaker 1>goingmet food side for us. I'm looking at the p

0:16:12.360 --> 0:16:15.080
<v Speaker 1>g O function on the Bloomberg terminal, which gives a

0:16:15.120 --> 0:16:17.640
<v Speaker 1>breakdown of kind of where your revenue comes from, and

0:16:17.680 --> 0:16:19.960
<v Speaker 1>I was shocked to see that the gourmet food and

0:16:20.000 --> 0:16:22.760
<v Speaker 1>get baskets is over fifty percent of your business and

0:16:22.760 --> 0:16:25.680
<v Speaker 1>Flowers are about forty of your business. Is a time

0:16:25.720 --> 0:16:28.160
<v Speaker 1>to rename the company? Because you're more than Flowers, You're

0:16:28.200 --> 0:16:33.560
<v Speaker 1>kind of all year round, lots of gifts and sat foods. Yeah,

0:16:33.600 --> 0:16:36.560
<v Speaker 1>that's right, But we get that question all the time, Paul,

0:16:36.600 --> 0:16:39.760
<v Speaker 1>should we rename the company? As we've become really this

0:16:39.840 --> 0:16:42.480
<v Speaker 1>company of celebrations. But when we look at it from

0:16:42.520 --> 0:16:45.560
<v Speaker 1>a marketing perspective, we have such iconic brands, especially the

0:16:45.640 --> 0:16:48.280
<v Speaker 1>two lead ones one in a hundred flowers dot com,

0:16:48.280 --> 0:16:50.960
<v Speaker 1>Harry and David, and they bring in such great traffic.

0:16:51.160 --> 0:16:53.960
<v Speaker 1>We'd only be renaming it really for the investment community.

0:16:54.280 --> 0:16:56.520
<v Speaker 1>And I think one hundred Flowers and Harry and David

0:16:56.560 --> 0:16:59.080
<v Speaker 1>both has such brand equity, will stay with this multi

0:16:59.080 --> 0:17:02.400
<v Speaker 1>brand strategy. I love the idea also though of calling

0:17:02.640 --> 0:17:05.359
<v Speaker 1>it to order something is also an athema to people

0:17:05.440 --> 0:17:07.719
<v Speaker 1>under a certain age. But just do it online. So

0:17:07.760 --> 0:17:10.920
<v Speaker 1>it's not only is it also more food than than

0:17:10.960 --> 0:17:13.919
<v Speaker 1>it is flowers, but also the concept of one hundred

0:17:14.000 --> 0:17:16.480
<v Speaker 1>is probably going to be obsolete in about ten years.

0:17:16.880 --> 0:17:19.240
<v Speaker 1>So I mean, from that perspective, how much of the

0:17:19.680 --> 0:17:22.919
<v Speaker 1>how much of the sales come online? Well, we're predominantly

0:17:22.920 --> 0:17:25.160
<v Speaker 1>an e commerce driven company, and even if you look

0:17:25.160 --> 0:17:28.560
<v Speaker 1>at one eight hundred of Flowers brand itself, of the

0:17:28.560 --> 0:17:31.760
<v Speaker 1>businesses e commerce mobile commerce driven. So I think the

0:17:31.840 --> 0:17:35.000
<v Speaker 1>brand has become so well known most younger people don't

0:17:35.000 --> 0:17:39.399
<v Speaker 1>even realize it was named after a telephone number. So

0:17:39.440 --> 0:17:41.360
<v Speaker 1>all right, I'll go back sentimental a little bit more.

0:17:41.440 --> 0:17:45.199
<v Speaker 1>What are the most popular flowers for Mother's Day? That's

0:17:45.200 --> 0:17:49.840
<v Speaker 1>how sentimental? Yet that's impressive. So for Mother's Day, I

0:17:49.880 --> 0:17:54.040
<v Speaker 1>think we see mix of vibrant colors. So it's roses, lilies, daisies, carnations,

0:17:54.040 --> 0:17:55.879
<v Speaker 1>which have made a nice comeback, which are one of

0:17:55.920 --> 0:17:59.880
<v Speaker 1>my favorites. They last forever, I love them. But really

0:17:59.880 --> 0:18:02.440
<v Speaker 1>a mix of vibrant colors. And one of the great

0:18:02.480 --> 0:18:05.360
<v Speaker 1>products that we sell is called Mother's Embrace and it's

0:18:05.440 --> 0:18:08.119
<v Speaker 1>named after what's the most comforting thing you can get

0:18:08.200 --> 0:18:10.359
<v Speaker 1>from your mom but a hug. So we turn that

0:18:10.400 --> 0:18:15.360
<v Speaker 1>around and one of our creative one of our creative

0:18:15.359 --> 0:18:18.719
<v Speaker 1>florists and Stafford, Virginia, Devil and Reid, created this Mother's

0:18:18.720 --> 0:18:21.639
<v Speaker 1>Embrace product and it's just a fantastic product, one of

0:18:21.640 --> 0:18:26.880
<v Speaker 1>our top selling. What are you getting your wife? Flowers? Actually?

0:18:26.880 --> 0:18:29.080
<v Speaker 1>This this this Mother's Day, I won't be because we'll

0:18:29.119 --> 0:18:34.560
<v Speaker 1>be celebrating my daughter's graduation from William and Mary. So no,

0:18:34.720 --> 0:18:36.320
<v Speaker 1>so I won't be able to have flowers there. Well,

0:18:36.320 --> 0:18:38.919
<v Speaker 1>well down Williamsburg, Virginia. What's the growth area for you?

0:18:39.520 --> 0:18:42.480
<v Speaker 1>The growth area is both really right now, all three

0:18:42.520 --> 0:18:45.160
<v Speaker 1>areas of our business are growing. The gourmet food side

0:18:45.200 --> 0:18:47.800
<v Speaker 1>is growing nicely to consume, a floral business is growing.

0:18:48.040 --> 0:18:50.600
<v Speaker 1>What's driving the gomet food side is the acquisition of

0:18:50.640 --> 0:18:52.640
<v Speaker 1>Harry and David that we did a number of years ago.

0:18:53.040 --> 0:18:55.520
<v Speaker 1>You take a business like Harry and David that went

0:18:55.560 --> 0:18:58.560
<v Speaker 1>through a bankruptcy, was stagnant for three years. Coming out

0:18:58.600 --> 0:19:01.760
<v Speaker 1>of the bankruptcy, we we put it on our platform.

0:19:02.040 --> 0:19:04.760
<v Speaker 1>We take out over twenty million dollars of operating costs

0:19:04.760 --> 0:19:07.359
<v Speaker 1>doing so, and now we have the e commerce business

0:19:08.119 --> 0:19:12.159
<v Speaker 1>Joe growing about eight right now. That's that shows the

0:19:12.200 --> 0:19:15.479
<v Speaker 1>benefits of the platform for growth that we've created. Well,

0:19:15.520 --> 0:19:18.080
<v Speaker 1>my favorite study here is about twenty million stems for

0:19:18.200 --> 0:19:21.399
<v Speaker 1>Mother's Day alone will be delivered. That's a lot, some

0:19:21.520 --> 0:19:25.479
<v Speaker 1>of them to the Sweeney House hopefully yea Christmas can

0:19:25.560 --> 0:19:28.720
<v Speaker 1>President CEO Flowers dot com does trade on the NaSTA

0:19:28.720 --> 0:19:31.840
<v Speaker 1>act onto the symbol f LWS. Based in Long Island.

0:19:31.920 --> 0:19:34.640
<v Speaker 1>Joining us here in our Bloomberg Interactive Broker studio, Chris,

0:19:34.640 --> 0:19:51.800
<v Speaker 1>thanks so much for joining us. Well. US markets are

0:19:51.800 --> 0:19:55.320
<v Speaker 1>going lower led by the NAZAC down one point six percent,

0:19:55.480 --> 0:20:00.520
<v Speaker 1>driven really by the increasing question around whether the US

0:20:00.600 --> 0:20:03.520
<v Speaker 1>and China will come to a trade agreement after all.

0:20:03.640 --> 0:20:06.640
<v Speaker 1>Joining US, I'm very pleased to say, is Dr Henry Wong.

0:20:06.800 --> 0:20:09.240
<v Speaker 1>He is founder and president of the Center for China

0:20:09.320 --> 0:20:13.080
<v Speaker 1>and Globalization based in Beijing, but joining us here in

0:20:13.119 --> 0:20:16.280
<v Speaker 1>our boombergadda active broker studios in New York. Dr Wong,

0:20:16.400 --> 0:20:19.200
<v Speaker 1>thank you so much for being here. Just how much

0:20:19.359 --> 0:20:22.600
<v Speaker 1>of a disagreement seems to be going on right now

0:20:22.640 --> 0:20:25.399
<v Speaker 1>between the US and China that's impeding some sort of

0:20:26.280 --> 0:20:29.520
<v Speaker 1>trade trade pact here. Thank you, thank you for having me.

0:20:29.600 --> 0:20:32.840
<v Speaker 1>I actually I think that all along we have been

0:20:32.880 --> 0:20:36.879
<v Speaker 1>seeing President Trump giving tweets and Secretary Lightheiser and the

0:20:36.920 --> 0:20:41.199
<v Speaker 1>minutul talking about all positive news about negotiations. If according

0:20:41.280 --> 0:20:43.880
<v Speaker 1>to the Secretary, that has been done well, I think

0:20:43.880 --> 0:20:47.640
<v Speaker 1>that's already very great achievement. So so so I think

0:20:47.680 --> 0:20:50.040
<v Speaker 1>that there may be some finalizing when they put into

0:20:50.119 --> 0:20:53.159
<v Speaker 1>the printing and put into the details, that could be

0:20:53.200 --> 0:20:56.480
<v Speaker 1>a little I think still negotiation going on on the

0:20:56.480 --> 0:20:59.359
<v Speaker 1>final awarding of that. So I think that probably needs

0:20:59.359 --> 0:21:03.760
<v Speaker 1>both and oak sides to really take the wisdom and leadership,

0:21:04.320 --> 0:21:07.640
<v Speaker 1>you know, a role in finalize they Still I think

0:21:07.680 --> 0:21:10.960
<v Speaker 1>it's it will be highly irresponsible to to to really

0:21:11.600 --> 0:21:14.080
<v Speaker 1>uh to not having this do because not only the

0:21:14.119 --> 0:21:16.560
<v Speaker 1>business community in China and the US wants days, but

0:21:16.600 --> 0:21:18.200
<v Speaker 1>also the rest of the world and whole world is

0:21:18.320 --> 0:21:20.600
<v Speaker 1>highly watching on this. I don't think both countire can

0:21:20.680 --> 0:21:24.040
<v Speaker 1>forward now that trade tiiff war going on, and I

0:21:24.080 --> 0:21:28.119
<v Speaker 1>think this this, this final differences could be solved, you know,

0:21:28.240 --> 0:21:30.560
<v Speaker 1>Cervier consultation and a friend that they discussion rather than

0:21:30.840 --> 0:21:33.320
<v Speaker 1>really hostile and the maker, you know, force people to

0:21:33.359 --> 0:21:35.600
<v Speaker 1>the corner, which I think with backfire maybe in the end.

0:21:35.880 --> 0:21:38.600
<v Speaker 1>So dr One, you mentioned that both sides, certainly from

0:21:38.640 --> 0:21:41.440
<v Speaker 1>the business community, would like to have a trade deal

0:21:41.520 --> 0:21:45.119
<v Speaker 1>done in China. From the Chinese perspective, Um, is that

0:21:45.200 --> 0:21:47.760
<v Speaker 1>consistent with what the government wants? Is the government and

0:21:47.880 --> 0:21:52.240
<v Speaker 1>business are they on the same page or is there

0:21:52.280 --> 0:21:54.800
<v Speaker 1>just a fundamental problem from the government's perspective about some

0:21:54.840 --> 0:21:57.560
<v Speaker 1>of the bigger issues about trade. I think it's it's

0:21:57.600 --> 0:22:00.680
<v Speaker 1>finally clear enough in China, you know, after this Tradelo

0:22:00.760 --> 0:22:02.359
<v Speaker 1>has already started for a year or not in its

0:22:02.400 --> 0:22:06.119
<v Speaker 1>friction going on, and we all go through ups and

0:22:06.240 --> 0:22:09.639
<v Speaker 1>downs and uh and the rollercoaster of both economies. And

0:22:09.720 --> 0:22:13.320
<v Speaker 1>I think particularly in China, I think we um, you know,

0:22:13.400 --> 0:22:15.440
<v Speaker 1>I have our councilors for a lunchier time. I think

0:22:15.480 --> 0:22:18.359
<v Speaker 1>the government actually foreign spokesperson said that, you know, we

0:22:18.400 --> 0:22:21.920
<v Speaker 1>want the stability, We want to be responsible, We want

0:22:21.960 --> 0:22:25.320
<v Speaker 1>to really finish this deal. We want to be reasonable

0:22:25.400 --> 0:22:27.359
<v Speaker 1>to not until Chinese beings, but also US and the

0:22:27.400 --> 0:22:29.320
<v Speaker 1>rest of the war. So so I think the governors

0:22:29.520 --> 0:22:32.240
<v Speaker 1>in the same wavelens with the business community, and I

0:22:32.280 --> 0:22:35.040
<v Speaker 1>think that's not only for Chinese perspective, but also for

0:22:35.080 --> 0:22:37.720
<v Speaker 1>the US perspective as well. So Robert light Hazard, the

0:22:37.840 --> 0:22:41.560
<v Speaker 1>chief negotiator for the US with China over some of

0:22:41.600 --> 0:22:45.920
<v Speaker 1>these trade parameters, he came out and he confirmed that

0:22:45.960 --> 0:22:48.800
<v Speaker 1>there is some sort of back peddling by the Chinese

0:22:48.800 --> 0:22:52.720
<v Speaker 1>government on some agreements that they had made previously, including

0:22:53.119 --> 0:22:56.680
<v Speaker 1>changing Chinese law having to do with intellectual property, among

0:22:56.760 --> 0:23:00.760
<v Speaker 1>other things. I'm just wondering if that's true. That seems

0:23:00.760 --> 0:23:03.960
<v Speaker 1>like a more fundamental breach that perhaps everybody wants to

0:23:04.000 --> 0:23:05.800
<v Speaker 1>deal in sis saying Kumbai yah, but it's going to

0:23:05.840 --> 0:23:09.640
<v Speaker 1>be very hard to get beyond. Yes, you know, I'm

0:23:09.680 --> 0:23:12.040
<v Speaker 1>not involving in the detail of this, but for what

0:23:12.080 --> 0:23:14.320
<v Speaker 1>I heard, you know, what the secretary is said, Uh

0:23:14.320 --> 0:23:17.639
<v Speaker 1>that you know, uh possible. But but there's also a

0:23:17.680 --> 0:23:21.080
<v Speaker 1>culture issue there, you know, like if as Chinese law

0:23:21.200 --> 0:23:22.919
<v Speaker 1>is already there then if you want to change that,

0:23:22.960 --> 0:23:25.600
<v Speaker 1>it takes you know, takes the process. I mean, the

0:23:25.720 --> 0:23:27.960
<v Speaker 1>national paper's con has to go through that, and then

0:23:28.000 --> 0:23:30.919
<v Speaker 1>that a lot of consens consensus building. So it's not

0:23:30.960 --> 0:23:34.800
<v Speaker 1>acting absolute to say immediately it can be done. Not

0:23:35.400 --> 0:23:37.960
<v Speaker 1>So I think if there's a macadium there to to

0:23:38.560 --> 0:23:41.159
<v Speaker 1>walk towards that direction, let's give a little a patient

0:23:41.200 --> 0:23:43.600
<v Speaker 1>on that, not really push you know, right away and

0:23:44.080 --> 0:23:46.240
<v Speaker 1>you know, or interpret that is a refused. So I

0:23:46.240 --> 0:23:48.880
<v Speaker 1>think that's probably important. This is really an interesting point

0:23:49.000 --> 0:23:50.800
<v Speaker 1>dr wrong and I think it's it's one that that

0:23:50.800 --> 0:23:54.240
<v Speaker 1>that we really need to emphasize, which is uh, Robert Leitheiser,

0:23:54.320 --> 0:23:59.000
<v Speaker 1>President Trump. They have not been talking with leh Is recently, right,

0:23:59.000 --> 0:24:01.959
<v Speaker 1>so this has been over you know, through other people

0:24:02.280 --> 0:24:05.600
<v Speaker 1>or or not necessarily discussed. Could this just simply be

0:24:05.760 --> 0:24:08.879
<v Speaker 1>a communication error where the Chinese government said, well, we

0:24:08.960 --> 0:24:11.879
<v Speaker 1>can't change the law overnight, uh, you know, and then

0:24:11.920 --> 0:24:14.479
<v Speaker 1>then they're saying, well, you guys are back peddling, and

0:24:14.520 --> 0:24:17.679
<v Speaker 1>that's the breaching communication. Absolutely, that's that's quite possible. I mean,

0:24:17.800 --> 0:24:20.280
<v Speaker 1>from from my experience and talking with the people in

0:24:20.320 --> 0:24:23.159
<v Speaker 1>the in the multinational past, there could be a culture

0:24:23.680 --> 0:24:27.240
<v Speaker 1>misinterpretation sometimes taken only the process to do things in China,

0:24:27.480 --> 0:24:29.159
<v Speaker 1>like I can give examples, you know, I mean the

0:24:29.480 --> 0:24:33.040
<v Speaker 1>Foreign Investment law just passed in March. It takes quite

0:24:33.080 --> 0:24:35.800
<v Speaker 1>a while to discuss that. So so they don't mention

0:24:36.080 --> 0:24:38.720
<v Speaker 1>China twenty five anymore. They are actually saying, you know,

0:24:38.720 --> 0:24:41.280
<v Speaker 1>they got guaranteed the form right of and there's no

0:24:41.359 --> 0:24:44.960
<v Speaker 1>force technology transfer and if IPR violation will be punished,

0:24:45.000 --> 0:24:47.520
<v Speaker 1>would be persecuted. That'd been written into the law. So

0:24:47.680 --> 0:24:49.840
<v Speaker 1>you see, Chinese law is also accommodating a lot of

0:24:50.640 --> 0:24:54.960
<v Speaker 1>complaints that multinational West country complain us, particularly in the past.

0:24:55.240 --> 0:24:57.240
<v Speaker 1>So I think, you know, the attigies of Chinese always,

0:24:57.440 --> 0:24:59.600
<v Speaker 1>you know, they are very a common y thing. As

0:24:59.640 --> 0:25:02.280
<v Speaker 1>a matter of I think that to to black you know,

0:25:02.440 --> 0:25:06.000
<v Speaker 1>to frankly say oh China is delying or restow, I

0:25:06.000 --> 0:25:07.920
<v Speaker 1>don't think that that is two If they are ready

0:25:07.960 --> 0:25:10.680
<v Speaker 1>grade in principle, let's find out detail how to implement that,

0:25:10.760 --> 0:25:13.040
<v Speaker 1>rather than say, oh, China has been uh you know,

0:25:13.400 --> 0:25:15.439
<v Speaker 1>taking all the things back. So that may be for

0:25:15.480 --> 0:25:18.159
<v Speaker 1>the political purpose, I mean, very very useful and generate

0:25:18.200 --> 0:25:20.080
<v Speaker 1>a lot of hype on that, but but it's not

0:25:20.119 --> 0:25:23.240
<v Speaker 1>I don't think it's a real situation, probably so dr wrong.

0:25:23.359 --> 0:25:25.280
<v Speaker 1>Just be clear that the two big issues is I

0:25:25.280 --> 0:25:29.400
<v Speaker 1>think the that we understand it our intellectual property, uh,

0:25:29.480 --> 0:25:32.879
<v Speaker 1>forced transfer, technology trans transfer. That seems to be the

0:25:32.920 --> 0:25:35.919
<v Speaker 1>area where there's either disagreement or there's no agreement. What

0:25:36.200 --> 0:25:38.840
<v Speaker 1>is the stance of China on those two key issues.

0:25:38.840 --> 0:25:42.440
<v Speaker 1>Are you saying that they will be addressed? Well, actually,

0:25:42.520 --> 0:25:44.720
<v Speaker 1>you know, China just passed the law and the last

0:25:45.000 --> 0:25:50.240
<v Speaker 1>National People's Congress which in March, and that in no

0:25:50.400 --> 0:25:53.240
<v Speaker 1>new investment law. China has a stupid In that law

0:25:53.560 --> 0:25:56.080
<v Speaker 1>there will be normal forced time transferred and not allow

0:25:56.440 --> 0:25:59.080
<v Speaker 1>any any government at any level. And also on the

0:25:59.119 --> 0:26:01.639
<v Speaker 1>i PR to like the property protection and then there

0:26:01.640 --> 0:26:05.160
<v Speaker 1>will be no violace. Cannot be a violation of that,

0:26:05.400 --> 0:26:08.560
<v Speaker 1>cannot be forcetanking transfer if if anybody doing that to

0:26:08.640 --> 0:26:12.000
<v Speaker 1>be punished, to prosecute it. So that already written into

0:26:12.080 --> 0:26:16.000
<v Speaker 1>Chinese law past in much this year. So you can

0:26:16.000 --> 0:26:19.359
<v Speaker 1>see Chinese attitudes towards that. It is quite forescoming actually

0:26:19.400 --> 0:26:22.320
<v Speaker 1>not avoiding those kind of you know challenges. One of

0:26:22.320 --> 0:26:25.399
<v Speaker 1>the big other issues is enforcement of the agreement. And

0:26:25.880 --> 0:26:29.840
<v Speaker 1>I'm wondering, you know, you're saying Dr Wong that this

0:26:29.920 --> 0:26:32.880
<v Speaker 1>could be a communication error and law takes a while

0:26:32.920 --> 0:26:36.840
<v Speaker 1>to change, But what's sort of the recourse if the

0:26:36.920 --> 0:26:41.280
<v Speaker 1>law doesn't change in time? Yeah, No, I think that.

0:26:42.119 --> 0:26:45.120
<v Speaker 1>I I think that the government is now it's very serious.

0:26:45.320 --> 0:26:47.320
<v Speaker 1>I read there's going to be a pub because a

0:26:47.359 --> 0:26:50.800
<v Speaker 1>hundred people to come. It's very very very real. All

0:26:50.800 --> 0:26:53.119
<v Speaker 1>the details going to be problely backed up, and you know,

0:26:53.280 --> 0:26:56.520
<v Speaker 1>looking into the final really in the conclusion of this too,

0:26:56.560 --> 0:26:59.479
<v Speaker 1>but very seriously. Is such a large delegation, and I

0:26:59.560 --> 0:27:01.879
<v Speaker 1>think that to you know, let's put it there, we

0:27:01.920 --> 0:27:03.920
<v Speaker 1>have we have not on the US, but those international

0:27:03.920 --> 0:27:06.200
<v Speaker 1>commitities to watch this. This is such a high profile

0:27:06.240 --> 0:27:08.960
<v Speaker 1>trade fiction and we have a you know, World Intellectual

0:27:08.960 --> 0:27:13.560
<v Speaker 1>Property Organization, we have you know WT. All those people

0:27:13.560 --> 0:27:15.840
<v Speaker 1>are watching this. So so I don't think that if

0:27:15.920 --> 0:27:18.119
<v Speaker 1>China deliberately saying something and then it said, oh, we

0:27:18.240 --> 0:27:20.560
<v Speaker 1>need to take it back, I don't think China, you know,

0:27:20.880 --> 0:27:24.639
<v Speaker 1>it's still of course honor its commitments and and so whatever.

0:27:25.040 --> 0:27:27.320
<v Speaker 1>I think one, if finalizing is still there could be

0:27:27.359 --> 0:27:29.920
<v Speaker 1>a lot of discussion going on. And also there's a

0:27:29.960 --> 0:27:32.960
<v Speaker 1>culture differences, uh, in terms of understanding of each other.

0:27:33.000 --> 0:27:36.000
<v Speaker 1>But I think in the end um the world needs this,

0:27:36.200 --> 0:27:39.800
<v Speaker 1>the Chinese needs, the US needs, and multinational needs. After all,

0:27:39.840 --> 0:27:41.720
<v Speaker 1>you know, the U. S Company have a six or

0:27:41.720 --> 0:27:44.800
<v Speaker 1>eight thousand of them in China making five billion revenue

0:27:44.800 --> 0:27:48.439
<v Speaker 1>a year. I mean, both sides much larger than the

0:27:48.480 --> 0:27:52.280
<v Speaker 1>than than the deficit. And China and US actually expert

0:27:52.280 --> 0:27:55.200
<v Speaker 1>to US US Martina accounts half of that. So so

0:27:55.280 --> 0:27:57.800
<v Speaker 1>that's right, Dr Henry Wan. Thank you so much. Dr

0:27:57.840 --> 0:27:59.960
<v Speaker 1>Wang as founder and president of the Center for China

0:28:00.160 --> 0:28:04.360
<v Speaker 1>and Globalization giving us his thoughts on the ongoing trade

0:28:04.440 --> 0:28:08.160
<v Speaker 1>negotiations between the United States and China. Trade delegation arrives

0:28:08.320 --> 0:28:11.720
<v Speaker 1>later this week from China to Washington. Thanks for listening

0:28:11.760 --> 0:28:14.160
<v Speaker 1>to the Bloomberg P and L podcast. You can subscribe

0:28:14.160 --> 0:28:17.000
<v Speaker 1>and listen to interviews at Apple Podcasts or whatever podcast

0:28:17.000 --> 0:28:20.479
<v Speaker 1>platform you prefer. Paul Sweeney, I'm on Twitter at pt Sweeney.

0:28:20.600 --> 0:28:23.119
<v Speaker 1>I'm Lisa abram Woyit's I'm on Twitter at Lisa abram

0:28:23.119 --> 0:28:25.679
<v Speaker 1>woits one before the podcast. You can always catch us

0:28:25.800 --> 0:28:27.359
<v Speaker 1>worldwide on Bloomberg Radio.