WEBVTT - Interview: Josh & Benny Safdie (Archive)

0:00:00.520 --> 0:00:00.760
<v Speaker 1>Adam.

0:00:00.760 --> 0:00:02.840
<v Speaker 2>Wednesday is when we like to drop something from the

0:00:03.000 --> 0:00:07.600
<v Speaker 2>vast Film Spotting Archive, and we'll get to this week's

0:00:08.200 --> 0:00:11.160
<v Speaker 2>treat But first off, you know, if you want access,

0:00:11.160 --> 0:00:13.680
<v Speaker 2>if a listener wants access to that vast archive, listen

0:00:13.680 --> 0:00:18.920
<v Speaker 2>to everything in there, twenty plus years now of content.

0:00:19.320 --> 0:00:21.520
<v Speaker 2>You could join the Film Spotting Family. And you should

0:00:21.560 --> 0:00:24.239
<v Speaker 2>join the Film Spotting Family this month because it is

0:00:24.680 --> 0:00:29.000
<v Speaker 2>twenty percent off through January. Give me the details, give me,

0:00:29.480 --> 0:00:31.400
<v Speaker 2>give me the promo code. And how they can do

0:00:31.480 --> 0:00:32.120
<v Speaker 2>that again.

0:00:32.120 --> 0:00:34.680
<v Speaker 3>Well, we're talking about Marty Supreme this week, so we thought,

0:00:34.720 --> 0:00:37.800
<v Speaker 3>why not make that promo code Supreme and you'll get

0:00:37.800 --> 0:00:40.519
<v Speaker 3>a supreme discount twenty percent off all subscriptions. So it

0:00:40.520 --> 0:00:44.840
<v Speaker 3>could be the monthly approach to the Film Spotting Family,

0:00:45.280 --> 0:00:47.479
<v Speaker 3>or if you pay annually where you really get the

0:00:47.640 --> 0:00:50.519
<v Speaker 3>biggest discount. You can get twenty percent off that as well.

0:00:50.680 --> 0:00:54.800
<v Speaker 3>Just use promo code Supreme Film Spottingfamily dot Com.

0:00:55.080 --> 0:00:58.200
<v Speaker 2>There you go, So jump on that this week out

0:00:58.200 --> 0:01:00.680
<v Speaker 2>of our gracious hearts, we're going to give you for free, Adam.

0:01:00.680 --> 0:01:05.800
<v Speaker 2>It's your interview with Josh and Benny Safti about Uncut JEMs.

0:01:06.080 --> 0:01:10.240
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, and it's funny, Josh, I haven't listened to this yet.

0:01:10.480 --> 0:01:13.800
<v Speaker 3>Re listened to it, and I just went back and

0:01:14.200 --> 0:01:16.720
<v Speaker 3>looked at my notes for the interview and the questions

0:01:16.720 --> 0:01:18.880
<v Speaker 3>that I had jotted down. You'll never believe some of

0:01:18.880 --> 0:01:22.160
<v Speaker 3>the words and phrases that are littering the page in

0:01:22.200 --> 0:01:24.640
<v Speaker 3>front of me. As we just recorded our review of

0:01:24.640 --> 0:01:27.360
<v Speaker 3>Marty Supreme that's coming later in the week. I've got

0:01:27.360 --> 0:01:33.280
<v Speaker 3>things like single mindedly focused on their objective and spiraling

0:01:33.319 --> 0:01:37.880
<v Speaker 3>out of control and larger purpose. So there are some

0:01:38.000 --> 0:01:41.280
<v Speaker 3>themes that do reoccur. I'm talking there about Connie in

0:01:41.319 --> 0:01:45.000
<v Speaker 3>Good Time played by Robert Pattinson. I'm talking about Howard

0:01:45.160 --> 0:01:49.320
<v Speaker 3>played by Adam Sandler and Uncut Gems and yes that

0:01:49.800 --> 0:01:53.720
<v Speaker 3>is true as well of Timothy Shallomey as Marty and

0:01:53.840 --> 0:01:57.000
<v Speaker 3>Marty Supreme. So we thought, why not set the table,

0:01:57.760 --> 0:02:01.360
<v Speaker 3>set the table. Tennis's at the pink pong table, Josh,

0:02:02.160 --> 0:02:05.240
<v Speaker 3>is that close to a pun? Sure the tennis table

0:02:05.640 --> 0:02:09.160
<v Speaker 3>for our conversation, and we have a lengthy one about

0:02:09.200 --> 0:02:12.560
<v Speaker 3>Marty Supreme coming with this conversation with Josh and Benny

0:02:12.639 --> 0:02:17.120
<v Speaker 3>Safti about Uncut Gems. And this comes to you from

0:02:17.720 --> 0:02:19.400
<v Speaker 3>the year twenty nineteen.

0:02:23.120 --> 0:02:24.600
<v Speaker 2>I made a crazy risk.

0:02:24.760 --> 0:02:34.919
<v Speaker 1>We've gambled limbs about to pay off. So I want

0:02:34.919 --> 0:02:35.839
<v Speaker 1>to Celtics to cover.

0:02:35.960 --> 0:02:38.000
<v Speaker 2>I want to Celtics hand time. I want gone at

0:02:38.120 --> 0:02:39.200
<v Speaker 2>points and rebound.

0:02:40.200 --> 0:02:40.720
<v Speaker 4>What do you know?

0:02:41.720 --> 0:02:42.120
<v Speaker 2>I don't know.

0:02:42.240 --> 0:02:45.200
<v Speaker 4>I just know. Well, I'll tell you what I know.

0:02:45.280 --> 0:02:47.120
<v Speaker 4>That's the dumbest that I ever heard of.

0:02:48.280 --> 0:02:49.919
<v Speaker 2>I disagree.

0:02:50.720 --> 0:02:51.440
<v Speaker 1>I disagree.

0:02:51.480 --> 0:02:52.440
<v Speaker 2>Gary.

0:02:53.200 --> 0:02:56.720
<v Speaker 3>We last spoke for Good Time back in twenty seventeen,

0:02:56.840 --> 0:02:59.080
<v Speaker 3>and I think it's fair to say there's a lot

0:02:59.080 --> 0:03:02.600
<v Speaker 3>of Connie in Howard here in this film. They're both

0:03:02.680 --> 0:03:06.200
<v Speaker 3>kind of single mindedly focused on whatever their objective is,

0:03:06.240 --> 0:03:09.200
<v Speaker 3>though their objectives are very different, and we'll definitely get

0:03:09.240 --> 0:03:11.840
<v Speaker 3>in to that. But there's that sense of the urgency

0:03:11.880 --> 0:03:14.280
<v Speaker 3>of the moment always bringing out kind of the best

0:03:14.320 --> 0:03:16.440
<v Speaker 3>in them or the worst in them, which is something

0:03:16.480 --> 0:03:19.240
<v Speaker 3>we talked about. And I was wondering if you guys

0:03:19.280 --> 0:03:24.119
<v Speaker 3>are aware or how aware are you of a character's lineage,

0:03:24.160 --> 0:03:26.720
<v Speaker 3>if you will, when you're creating that character, are you

0:03:26.800 --> 0:03:29.720
<v Speaker 3>thinking about how similar Howard may be too?

0:03:29.880 --> 0:03:33.440
<v Speaker 4>Well, it's kind of not. No.

0:03:33.639 --> 0:03:36.320
<v Speaker 5>The answer answer is no, But the longer answer is

0:03:36.840 --> 0:03:39.800
<v Speaker 5>what happens when you spend ten years working on a project.

0:03:39.800 --> 0:03:42.760
<v Speaker 5>That's how long we're working on Uncut Gems. So Connie

0:03:43.120 --> 0:03:46.040
<v Speaker 5>and his creation was basically was the whole film. Good

0:03:46.080 --> 0:03:49.200
<v Speaker 5>Time came about because Pattinson wanted to work with us

0:03:49.240 --> 0:03:51.360
<v Speaker 5>and he wasn't right for any role in Uncut Gems,

0:03:51.360 --> 0:03:53.920
<v Speaker 5>and it led to the creation of Good Time. And

0:03:54.000 --> 0:03:58.120
<v Speaker 5>actually Benny's character in Good Time was originally in Uncut

0:03:58.160 --> 0:04:01.360
<v Speaker 5>Gems and then we used for that one. So but

0:04:01.440 --> 0:04:05.520
<v Speaker 5>I do think that the single mindedness and the determination

0:04:05.680 --> 0:04:09.400
<v Speaker 5>to see a dream realized and prove your worth in

0:04:09.440 --> 0:04:13.360
<v Speaker 5>the world or maybe to the universe comes stems from

0:04:14.600 --> 0:04:18.280
<v Speaker 5>a decade long pursuit of a single entity, which is

0:04:18.720 --> 0:04:19.320
<v Speaker 5>Uncut Gems.

0:04:19.520 --> 0:04:21.479
<v Speaker 6>And I think it's it also makes sense to just

0:04:21.560 --> 0:04:24.640
<v Speaker 6>kind of see a character who you might not at

0:04:24.680 --> 0:04:28.200
<v Speaker 6>first see the beauty in or the understanding in, and

0:04:28.320 --> 0:04:31.520
<v Speaker 6>kind of trying to understand to see the love in

0:04:31.560 --> 0:04:34.560
<v Speaker 6>them or understanding And that's what Uncut Gems is, you know,

0:04:34.560 --> 0:04:36.239
<v Speaker 6>It's the rough on the outside of beautiful.

0:04:36.440 --> 0:04:41.720
<v Speaker 5>And the difference for me between Gems and Good Time,

0:04:42.440 --> 0:04:45.880
<v Speaker 5>you know, is that the Connie character was slightly more

0:04:45.920 --> 0:04:50.719
<v Speaker 5>anthropological in the sense that I can I've seen that

0:04:50.839 --> 0:04:54.520
<v Speaker 5>person before, I know people like that. There are tiny

0:04:54.600 --> 0:04:56.280
<v Speaker 5>little pieces of mean it, but it's for more or

0:04:56.360 --> 0:05:00.760
<v Speaker 5>less study. Whereas Gems there's a lot of me and

0:05:01.000 --> 0:05:03.159
<v Speaker 5>Howard there's a lot of you know, there's a lot

0:05:03.200 --> 0:05:07.440
<v Speaker 5>of personal stuff in that movie that maybe wasn't in

0:05:07.520 --> 0:05:09.520
<v Speaker 5>Good Time, not to denigrate Good Time in any way.

0:05:09.680 --> 0:05:11.760
<v Speaker 3>Well, I want to stay on this path for a second, because,

0:05:12.000 --> 0:05:14.440
<v Speaker 3>as you said, they're both kind of con men at

0:05:14.440 --> 0:05:17.840
<v Speaker 3>their core, right, self destructive, always the sense of things

0:05:17.880 --> 0:05:20.960
<v Speaker 3>kind of spiraling out of control around them. But Connie

0:05:21.640 --> 0:05:25.360
<v Speaker 3>is sympathetic and that we can definitely appreciate his larger purpose,

0:05:25.360 --> 0:05:27.279
<v Speaker 3>which is to keep his brother played by you Benny,

0:05:27.560 --> 0:05:29.920
<v Speaker 3>out of jail. We know he needs to be protected.

0:05:29.960 --> 0:05:31.359
<v Speaker 3>We're on board with that. So I feel like for

0:05:31.440 --> 0:05:34.800
<v Speaker 3>most viewers getting to a place where the end justifies

0:05:34.839 --> 0:05:39.200
<v Speaker 3>whatever insane means we're watching unfold, it's easier to get too. Probably,

0:05:39.240 --> 0:05:42.440
<v Speaker 3>I think it's a tougher proposition with Howard, and so

0:05:42.720 --> 0:05:43.200
<v Speaker 3>I'm curious.

0:05:43.320 --> 0:05:44.200
<v Speaker 4>It's the first time i've heard it.

0:05:44.200 --> 0:05:45.960
<v Speaker 3>I don't Well, so that's that's where I was going,

0:05:46.040 --> 0:05:48.359
<v Speaker 3>is that I feel like he's more irredeemable, And I

0:05:48.400 --> 0:05:50.240
<v Speaker 3>wondered if that was part of the challenge and fun

0:05:50.320 --> 0:05:52.960
<v Speaker 3>for you with this project, or if you discard that

0:05:53.040 --> 0:05:54.960
<v Speaker 3>completely and you see him as redeemable.

0:05:55.040 --> 0:05:58.280
<v Speaker 5>I see Howard as as the ultimate provider. I think

0:05:58.279 --> 0:06:00.880
<v Speaker 5>that he's a you know, Connie's kind of does a

0:06:00.920 --> 0:06:03.960
<v Speaker 5>lot of you know, really, he's.

0:06:03.360 --> 0:06:05.520
<v Speaker 6>Also the reason that the brothers in jail in the

0:06:05.520 --> 0:06:07.240
<v Speaker 6>first place, you know, true.

0:06:07.240 --> 0:06:08.839
<v Speaker 4>Yes, So it's like kind of a look.

0:06:08.960 --> 0:06:11.520
<v Speaker 5>I mean, Howard is such a this character Sandler place,

0:06:11.560 --> 0:06:15.760
<v Speaker 5>and also Sandler in general is a notoriously lovable person.

0:06:15.800 --> 0:06:18.839
<v Speaker 5>And I think that Howard is is. I think that

0:06:18.920 --> 0:06:21.400
<v Speaker 5>he's ultimately a righteous person. And I don't I don't

0:06:21.400 --> 0:06:22.880
<v Speaker 5>see him as a con man. I don't think that

0:06:22.920 --> 0:06:25.080
<v Speaker 5>he has any con that he's pulling he's trying to

0:06:25.080 --> 0:06:27.240
<v Speaker 5>pull off in this film. I think that he's he's

0:06:27.279 --> 0:06:30.560
<v Speaker 5>actually he's just trying the con might be to prove

0:06:30.600 --> 0:06:32.880
<v Speaker 5>that he belongs in a society that actually might say

0:06:32.920 --> 0:06:36.280
<v Speaker 5>you don't belong. Maybe your place is to be somewhat

0:06:36.279 --> 0:06:38.520
<v Speaker 5>towards the bottom and not some guy at the top.

0:06:38.560 --> 0:06:40.960
<v Speaker 5>And he's trying to cheat God. And and I think

0:06:41.000 --> 0:06:45.240
<v Speaker 5>that this the pay the patriarchal part of Howard is.

0:06:45.800 --> 0:06:47.800
<v Speaker 5>You know, uh, you know that he has all these

0:06:47.800 --> 0:06:49.640
<v Speaker 5>people who depend on him, that all these people that

0:06:49.680 --> 0:06:53.600
<v Speaker 5>he has to support, which makes him I think. I mean, look,

0:06:53.600 --> 0:06:56.719
<v Speaker 5>they're both, they're both the same sides of there's different

0:06:56.920 --> 0:06:58.680
<v Speaker 5>parts of our voice, but I do.

0:06:58.960 --> 0:07:00.760
<v Speaker 4>But it's funny though, because I do. You know.

0:07:00.800 --> 0:07:04.279
<v Speaker 5>I remember when Scott Ruden, who's one of the producers

0:07:04.320 --> 0:07:06.240
<v Speaker 5>of this film, when he read it, he said the

0:07:06.240 --> 0:07:08.560
<v Speaker 5>opposite when he read the script. He was like, you know,

0:07:08.560 --> 0:07:10.480
<v Speaker 5>the difference here is that you know, Howard's a guy

0:07:10.520 --> 0:07:11.040
<v Speaker 5>you can love.

0:07:11.320 --> 0:07:12.320
<v Speaker 4>Where's Connie you can't?

0:07:12.600 --> 0:07:15.560
<v Speaker 6>Thing, Yeah, And I think it's Howard does bring the

0:07:15.600 --> 0:07:17.720
<v Speaker 6>best out of the people around him. You know, he

0:07:17.760 --> 0:07:21.520
<v Speaker 6>creates this environment where everybody has to say in some ways.

0:07:21.520 --> 0:07:25.280
<v Speaker 6>And I think with him he also knows when he

0:07:25.760 --> 0:07:28.240
<v Speaker 6>does know when he's going to do something, how it

0:07:28.280 --> 0:07:31.440
<v Speaker 6>will affect other people. And I think he knows that

0:07:31.520 --> 0:07:33.720
<v Speaker 6>and then does it anyway, does it anyway. But the

0:07:33.760 --> 0:07:36.560
<v Speaker 6>thing is is, at least he is aware of that,

0:07:36.640 --> 0:07:38.720
<v Speaker 6>and like when he checks in with his daughter, he

0:07:38.800 --> 0:07:41.720
<v Speaker 6>knows he's affected the family in a deep, deep way, right,

0:07:41.800 --> 0:07:43.240
<v Speaker 6>And I think that's part of what we were talking

0:07:43.240 --> 0:07:45.720
<v Speaker 6>about with Sandler too, was here's a guy who does

0:07:45.760 --> 0:07:47.600
<v Speaker 6>some things that you might not be able to get behind.

0:07:47.920 --> 0:07:51.120
<v Speaker 6>But it's very important that we root him in real

0:07:51.120 --> 0:07:54.760
<v Speaker 6>emotions and feelings because you do need to love this guy.

0:07:54.800 --> 0:07:55.320
<v Speaker 4>You do need to.

0:07:55.360 --> 0:07:58.120
<v Speaker 6>Root for him. And when people are yelling at the screen, oh,

0:07:58.200 --> 0:08:00.760
<v Speaker 6>don't do that, don't do this, don't want him to

0:08:00.800 --> 0:08:03.360
<v Speaker 6>do it. If you didn't like somebody or didn't love somebody,

0:08:03.480 --> 0:08:05.400
<v Speaker 6>you wouldn't really be yelling at the screen to get

0:08:05.440 --> 0:08:06.000
<v Speaker 6>them to stop.

0:08:06.200 --> 0:08:08.920
<v Speaker 5>The film is called uncut Gems, Uh, you know, by

0:08:08.960 --> 0:08:13.840
<v Speaker 5>design obviously, Uh, we don't just pick random words out

0:08:13.880 --> 0:08:16.920
<v Speaker 5>of a hat. But you know, the concept of something

0:08:17.160 --> 0:08:21.560
<v Speaker 5>being considered or deemed unvaluable on the outside because of

0:08:21.760 --> 0:08:22.640
<v Speaker 5>rough impressions.

0:08:23.080 --> 0:08:23.400
<v Speaker 4>Uh.

0:08:23.440 --> 0:08:26.920
<v Speaker 5>And when you scope down underneath it and get to something,

0:08:27.000 --> 0:08:30.400
<v Speaker 5>you get to the insides of of this of this gem,

0:08:30.640 --> 0:08:32.880
<v Speaker 5>there's actually deep value there and that you can take

0:08:32.880 --> 0:08:36.680
<v Speaker 5>in the sense that you know, certain people are you know,

0:08:37.160 --> 0:08:39.679
<v Speaker 5>they might appear rough on the outside, but deep down

0:08:39.679 --> 0:08:41.720
<v Speaker 5>inside there's something kind of great about them. And that's

0:08:42.080 --> 0:08:44.640
<v Speaker 5>you know, the perseverance, the fact that it's a very

0:08:44.679 --> 0:08:48.760
<v Speaker 5>egalitarian person. Everyone is equal in their regards someone like Connie.

0:08:48.800 --> 0:08:51.240
<v Speaker 5>Not everybody was equal at all, he was actually very

0:08:51.360 --> 0:08:55.120
<v Speaker 5>very condescending of a person. So there are these elements

0:08:55.200 --> 0:08:58.320
<v Speaker 5>to to the character that that that I can that

0:08:58.360 --> 0:08:59.000
<v Speaker 5>I disagree with.

0:08:59.080 --> 0:09:01.199
<v Speaker 3>You on, but sure or experience, and I want to

0:09:01.200 --> 0:09:03.760
<v Speaker 3>be clear, it's nuanced, right. We could dissect these two

0:09:03.880 --> 0:09:07.120
<v Speaker 3>characters other similarities and differences, I think for a long time,

0:09:07.120 --> 0:09:07.720
<v Speaker 3>and I think that's.

0:09:07.760 --> 0:09:10.840
<v Speaker 4>I love them both, the rich characters. So yeah, and

0:09:10.880 --> 0:09:11.480
<v Speaker 4>that comes through.

0:09:11.640 --> 0:09:13.560
<v Speaker 3>And I think that was one of the surprises for

0:09:13.600 --> 0:09:15.679
<v Speaker 3>me of the film, not knowing really anything about it.

0:09:15.679 --> 0:09:17.160
<v Speaker 3>I try to go in with as much of a

0:09:17.160 --> 0:09:19.640
<v Speaker 3>blank slate, not even watching trailers if I can avoid it.

0:09:19.880 --> 0:09:22.160
<v Speaker 3>And I sort of expected, even after the first few

0:09:22.200 --> 0:09:24.160
<v Speaker 3>minutes that I was going to watch kind of a

0:09:24.200 --> 0:09:28.080
<v Speaker 3>standard movie tale of a gambler who is a loser, right,

0:09:28.120 --> 0:09:29.920
<v Speaker 3>because that's what we usually see guys who are they're

0:09:30.000 --> 0:09:32.320
<v Speaker 3>so that they owe so much money to someone, they're

0:09:32.320 --> 0:09:33.720
<v Speaker 3>just trying to get out of this hole that they're

0:09:33.760 --> 0:09:35.160
<v Speaker 3>in and they're willing to do anything to get out

0:09:35.160 --> 0:09:37.000
<v Speaker 3>of it. But that's not really the character you guys

0:09:37.080 --> 0:09:39.240
<v Speaker 3>have created. He's he's not just trying to get himself

0:09:39.240 --> 0:09:40.959
<v Speaker 3>out of a hole. He's he's willing to dig whatever

0:09:41.080 --> 0:09:44.000
<v Speaker 3>size hole he has to to achieve some kind of

0:09:44.160 --> 0:09:45.640
<v Speaker 3>higher calling all the exactly right.

0:09:45.720 --> 0:09:46.480
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, for sure.

0:09:47.520 --> 0:09:49.160
<v Speaker 5>What's funny is, and I don't want to spoil the

0:09:49.200 --> 0:09:51.280
<v Speaker 5>movie in any way, but for a guy who's a

0:09:51.280 --> 0:09:54.560
<v Speaker 5>degenerate gambler, there's some pretty big bets in this movie.

0:09:54.679 --> 0:09:57.240
<v Speaker 5>Yet he you know that he takes that he maybe make,

0:09:57.360 --> 0:10:00.600
<v Speaker 5>so you know, it is I think the high calling

0:10:00.600 --> 0:10:03.240
<v Speaker 5>element to it is is he's also don't forget he's

0:10:03.280 --> 0:10:05.880
<v Speaker 5>a guy who was the man in the nineties, late

0:10:05.960 --> 0:10:10.360
<v Speaker 5>nineties and early aughts. He was the guy and uh,

0:10:10.400 --> 0:10:12.280
<v Speaker 5>you know, and he's starting to now see that fall

0:10:12.320 --> 0:10:15.120
<v Speaker 5>away and that that life is full of cycles and

0:10:15.160 --> 0:10:19.920
<v Speaker 5>that he's actually trying to kind of go against the

0:10:19.960 --> 0:10:21.760
<v Speaker 5>grain of natural tides.

0:10:21.920 --> 0:10:25.240
<v Speaker 7>Yeah, and I think just like we well, yeah, but

0:10:25.280 --> 0:10:29.080
<v Speaker 7>because it's like I would rather hear from you, he's not. Yes,

0:10:29.240 --> 0:10:31.760
<v Speaker 7>he he has he has lost, but he goes through

0:10:31.760 --> 0:10:32.720
<v Speaker 7>life as a winner.

0:10:32.760 --> 0:10:32.920
<v Speaker 2>You know.

0:10:33.160 --> 0:10:36.040
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, you touched on the casting of Adam Sandler. So

0:10:36.080 --> 0:10:38.680
<v Speaker 3>how important was it whether you love him or not

0:10:38.840 --> 0:10:41.480
<v Speaker 3>or I'm being too harsh on Howard. He certainly does

0:10:41.480 --> 0:10:43.880
<v Speaker 3>a lot of hurtful things to other people. How important

0:10:43.960 --> 0:10:47.160
<v Speaker 3>was it to have a character like Sandler who brings

0:10:47.240 --> 0:10:50.160
<v Speaker 3>just an affability and an amiability.

0:10:49.480 --> 0:10:53.040
<v Speaker 4>To anything amount there wouldn't work. There's no other person.

0:10:53.040 --> 0:10:55.000
<v Speaker 5>The only other person who I could ever see this

0:10:55.160 --> 0:10:59.440
<v Speaker 5>movie functioning with is Rodney Dangerfield and and but that

0:10:59.520 --> 0:11:01.640
<v Speaker 5>was that would have to be ten years before Easy Money.

0:11:01.640 --> 0:11:03.680
<v Speaker 5>But then again, Easy Money came at a time in

0:11:03.720 --> 0:11:05.840
<v Speaker 5>his life when you know, he had a certain age

0:11:05.840 --> 0:11:11.680
<v Speaker 5>that made him lovable. Sandler's Sandler has an an uncanny

0:11:11.760 --> 0:11:15.560
<v Speaker 5>ability to root the most absurd scenarios in a weird

0:11:15.600 --> 0:11:18.199
<v Speaker 5>form of his own brand of realism. Yeah, you look

0:11:18.200 --> 0:11:21.160
<v Speaker 5>at those earliest lovable people love him and I love him,

0:11:21.280 --> 0:11:23.600
<v Speaker 5>I deeply love We grew up on his records before we.

0:11:23.600 --> 0:11:24.559
<v Speaker 4>Even saw the movies.

0:11:24.720 --> 0:11:26.240
<v Speaker 6>You look at you look at his early his like

0:11:26.720 --> 0:11:29.040
<v Speaker 6>so all of his comedies, really those early comedies, which

0:11:29.040 --> 0:11:31.679
<v Speaker 6>are so crazy and so absurd, and you really are

0:11:31.720 --> 0:11:34.120
<v Speaker 6>looking at the screen and saying, I want that guy

0:11:34.320 --> 0:11:35.960
<v Speaker 6>to win and I want him to succeed.

0:11:36.559 --> 0:11:39.240
<v Speaker 1>And it's just something inside of him.

0:11:39.120 --> 0:11:41.360
<v Speaker 6>You know, it's part of his soul that we knew

0:11:41.360 --> 0:11:44.760
<v Speaker 6>that that needed to be brought to the character in

0:11:44.800 --> 0:11:46.640
<v Speaker 6>a way that the film wouldn't work without.

0:11:46.679 --> 0:11:49.000
<v Speaker 3>That you know, And I wanted to ask about one

0:11:49.000 --> 0:11:50.960
<v Speaker 3>element of the performance. And I'm totally prepared for you

0:11:50.960 --> 0:11:53.120
<v Speaker 3>guys to tell me I'm wrong about this part too.

0:11:53.320 --> 0:11:55.160
<v Speaker 3>But the frenetic pace of the film, right, I don't

0:11:55.160 --> 0:11:58.080
<v Speaker 3>want to tell you you're wrong about anything. That's what's

0:11:58.080 --> 0:12:00.319
<v Speaker 3>great about movies is that they're your own. Yeah, the

0:12:00.400 --> 0:12:01.640
<v Speaker 3>viewers experience.

0:12:01.280 --> 0:12:01.640
<v Speaker 4>For sure.

0:12:01.640 --> 0:12:04.160
<v Speaker 3>But this is I know this word talk about cliches.

0:12:04.160 --> 0:12:08.160
<v Speaker 3>You've heard it four thousand times. It's intense, right, And

0:12:08.760 --> 0:12:11.160
<v Speaker 3>it struck me though fairly early on and throughout the film,

0:12:11.160 --> 0:12:14.280
<v Speaker 3>that Howard is never really overwhelmed by it, right, he

0:12:14.360 --> 0:12:16.680
<v Speaker 3>kind of thrives on it. Obviously, he's usually the one

0:12:16.720 --> 0:12:18.600
<v Speaker 3>causing it. But I think you actually see that in

0:12:18.640 --> 0:12:22.800
<v Speaker 3>Sandler's performance a little bit, and how relatively slowly he speaks. Right,

0:12:22.840 --> 0:12:25.720
<v Speaker 3>He's always in motion and he's always talking, that's for sure,

0:12:25.800 --> 0:12:27.640
<v Speaker 3>but it seemed to me almost like he's always slowing

0:12:27.640 --> 0:12:29.480
<v Speaker 3>down the pace a little bit, like a point guard,

0:12:29.760 --> 0:12:31.520
<v Speaker 3>you know, who's like, I'm I'm gonna bring it up.

0:12:31.800 --> 0:12:33.520
<v Speaker 3>It's a little bit too chaotic. I'm going to bring

0:12:33.520 --> 0:12:35.319
<v Speaker 3>it up deliberately and consider my options.

0:12:35.360 --> 0:12:39.840
<v Speaker 6>He's he's always listening it and feeling the conversations around him,

0:12:39.880 --> 0:12:42.360
<v Speaker 6>and yeah, that's the truth is there is like there's

0:12:42.360 --> 0:12:44.319
<v Speaker 6>a moment where it does kind of catch up with

0:12:44.440 --> 0:12:46.880
<v Speaker 6>him and he does feel the weight of it all.

0:12:47.280 --> 0:12:50.640
<v Speaker 6>But for the most part, he is trying. He's trying

0:12:50.679 --> 0:12:52.400
<v Speaker 6>as hard as you know. He's thinking, I guess what

0:12:52.440 --> 0:12:54.800
<v Speaker 6>makes it so stressful is so many decisions happening right

0:12:54.800 --> 0:12:56.320
<v Speaker 6>away and they're all like, oh my god, I wish

0:12:56.320 --> 0:12:58.400
<v Speaker 6>you did that, But he is trying to make the

0:12:58.400 --> 0:13:00.640
<v Speaker 6>best decision and that exact same thing.

0:13:00.800 --> 0:13:01.600
<v Speaker 1>Keep going from there.

0:13:01.679 --> 0:13:03.120
<v Speaker 4>The thing that I'm most.

0:13:04.280 --> 0:13:08.120
<v Speaker 5>Kind of moved by and encouraged by is in the

0:13:08.160 --> 0:13:10.640
<v Speaker 5>screening process of this movie since Tell Your Ide Toronto,

0:13:10.679 --> 0:13:13.040
<v Speaker 5>New York, et cetera, even last night in Chicago, he

0:13:13.280 --> 0:13:18.480
<v Speaker 5>is seeing how entertained people are by the stressful scenarios.

0:13:18.760 --> 0:13:21.199
<v Speaker 5>And that's taking a concept of, Hey, we're going to

0:13:21.280 --> 0:13:24.920
<v Speaker 5>make this comedic thriller or thriller, comedic drama, however you

0:13:24.960 --> 0:13:27.760
<v Speaker 5>want to peg this movie, but it's thrilling in its

0:13:27.800 --> 0:13:32.320
<v Speaker 5>in its soul, and we're going to include in the

0:13:32.440 --> 0:13:36.480
<v Speaker 5>thrill attention that is so lived in and real and

0:13:36.559 --> 0:13:39.199
<v Speaker 5>personal that and then we're going to have someone like

0:13:39.240 --> 0:13:41.640
<v Speaker 5>Adam Sandler come and add humor to it.

0:13:41.720 --> 0:13:42.920
<v Speaker 4>At moments, it's.

0:13:43.000 --> 0:13:47.560
<v Speaker 5>It's making, it's creating this new form of entertainment, if

0:13:47.600 --> 0:13:49.800
<v Speaker 5>you want to call it that, but it's the experience

0:13:49.880 --> 0:13:52.960
<v Speaker 5>is so immersive, and I think seeing it like we

0:13:53.000 --> 0:13:55.480
<v Speaker 5>saw last night in the theater, you can you know,

0:13:55.640 --> 0:13:58.240
<v Speaker 5>if you see a sad movie with an audience, hearing

0:13:58.240 --> 0:14:01.240
<v Speaker 5>someone cry might actually be distracting. Not taking anything away

0:14:01.240 --> 0:14:03.320
<v Speaker 5>from sad movies, but that is the truth. If you

0:14:03.320 --> 0:14:05.280
<v Speaker 5>see a scary movie with a bunch of people, the

0:14:05.360 --> 0:14:07.320
<v Speaker 5>collective fright is a huge.

0:14:07.120 --> 0:14:07.920
<v Speaker 4>Part of the experience.

0:14:08.120 --> 0:14:10.440
<v Speaker 5>Seeing a thriller like this with a bunch of people,

0:14:10.640 --> 0:14:12.920
<v Speaker 5>I'm telling you, I've seen it in every theater. You

0:14:12.920 --> 0:14:16.959
<v Speaker 5>can feel the entire audience lean towards the screen as

0:14:17.000 --> 0:14:18.920
<v Speaker 5>if they want to reach out to the screen and

0:14:19.000 --> 0:14:22.760
<v Speaker 5>grab Howard Adam Sandler and just shake some sense into him.

0:14:22.840 --> 0:14:23.240
<v Speaker 1>Right there.

0:14:24.760 --> 0:14:26.600
<v Speaker 6>It's popping in my head right now. There's a very

0:14:26.600 --> 0:14:30.320
<v Speaker 6>funny scene in the Buster Key movie Steamboat Bill. Yeah,

0:14:30.360 --> 0:14:34.160
<v Speaker 6>and he like he's his whole boat is sinking and

0:14:34.240 --> 0:14:38.320
<v Speaker 6>he's holding all all of the holes water's pouring in.

0:14:38.360 --> 0:14:39.000
<v Speaker 1>He doesn't know what to do.

0:14:39.080 --> 0:14:40.280
<v Speaker 4>So he realized, Okay, I got it.

0:14:40.520 --> 0:14:42.400
<v Speaker 6>He then picks up a hammer. He's in the bottom

0:14:42.400 --> 0:14:44.080
<v Speaker 6>of the boat, picks a hammer and some nails, and

0:14:44.120 --> 0:14:47.120
<v Speaker 6>he goes to nail in over the hole inside the boat.

0:14:47.120 --> 0:14:49.280
<v Speaker 6>And in the moment you're thinking, that's a great idea,

0:14:49.560 --> 0:14:51.960
<v Speaker 6>cover up the hole. The moment the hammer hits the

0:14:52.040 --> 0:14:56.040
<v Speaker 6>nail more water. But that's the essence that you're trying

0:14:56.040 --> 0:14:56.960
<v Speaker 6>to kind of create here.

0:14:57.400 --> 0:14:59.960
<v Speaker 3>When we were here last time, we talked about pattinson

0:15:00.160 --> 0:15:03.240
<v Speaker 3>performance and I asked you guys to talk about a

0:15:03.280 --> 0:15:05.960
<v Speaker 3>moment or a scene in the film where he really

0:15:06.000 --> 0:15:08.200
<v Speaker 3>surprised you with something where it wasn't how you envisioned

0:15:08.240 --> 0:15:10.440
<v Speaker 3>it at all when it was on the page. And Benny,

0:15:10.480 --> 0:15:13.440
<v Speaker 3>you had a great moment which was a moment between

0:15:13.480 --> 0:15:16.000
<v Speaker 3>the two of you, the hug and I Love you

0:15:16.080 --> 0:15:18.960
<v Speaker 3>scene in the elevator, and Josh you talked about that

0:15:19.000 --> 0:15:21.480
<v Speaker 3>great line he has when he says to the younger girl,

0:15:21.720 --> 0:15:23.760
<v Speaker 3>you know, don't don't be confused, s He'll just make

0:15:23.800 --> 0:15:25.800
<v Speaker 3>it harder for me. And also that that kind of

0:15:26.320 --> 0:15:29.280
<v Speaker 3>that story he tells Jennifer Jason Lee in the taxi cab.

0:15:29.400 --> 0:15:32.840
<v Speaker 3>So I'm wondering if there's a similar story with Sandler,

0:15:32.960 --> 0:15:35.960
<v Speaker 3>is there, they're an example for each of you. He

0:15:36.040 --> 0:15:37.320
<v Speaker 3>really surprised you with something.

0:15:37.680 --> 0:15:39.720
<v Speaker 5>I think that the I think that there's a big

0:15:39.760 --> 0:15:42.320
<v Speaker 5>scene between him and Kevin Garnett towards the end of

0:15:42.320 --> 0:15:45.880
<v Speaker 5>the film. It's about a six page scene and it's

0:15:45.960 --> 0:15:47.920
<v Speaker 5>you know, it's a it's the scene we spent the

0:15:47.920 --> 0:15:49.760
<v Speaker 5>most time writing, in the most time editing, and the

0:15:49.840 --> 0:15:53.720
<v Speaker 5>least time shooting. But that's largely because of the testament

0:15:53.800 --> 0:15:57.200
<v Speaker 5>of the two performers. Garnett blew us away, but Sandler

0:15:57.440 --> 0:16:02.400
<v Speaker 5>the way that he was able to give the moral

0:16:02.480 --> 0:16:05.480
<v Speaker 5>compass and the meaning of the movie essentially in one

0:16:05.560 --> 0:16:08.720
<v Speaker 5>scene without it feeling like naked exposition and just like

0:16:08.760 --> 0:16:10.480
<v Speaker 5>it's from his soul and you kind of feel bad

0:16:10.480 --> 0:16:12.640
<v Speaker 5>for him in that moment, and it's and that was

0:16:12.960 --> 0:16:15.360
<v Speaker 5>that was unbelievable. Another moment that, you know, it's like

0:16:15.400 --> 0:16:18.840
<v Speaker 5>a tiny scene. There's a scene with the sports radio

0:16:19.000 --> 0:16:22.400
<v Speaker 5>show host persona Mike Frantz has a where Sandler delivers

0:16:22.440 --> 0:16:22.920
<v Speaker 5>this line.

0:16:22.960 --> 0:16:25.400
<v Speaker 4>I they use it in the trailers. I disagree the

0:16:25.440 --> 0:16:26.440
<v Speaker 4>way that he said it.

0:16:26.560 --> 0:16:28.160
<v Speaker 5>You know, first of all, he has this motor mouth

0:16:28.240 --> 0:16:30.120
<v Speaker 5>quality throughout the whole scene and then he pauses at

0:16:30.120 --> 0:16:30.320
<v Speaker 5>the end.

0:16:30.360 --> 0:16:33.480
<v Speaker 4>He just looks at me, goes, I disagree. I disagree Gary.

0:16:33.760 --> 0:16:34.880
<v Speaker 4>The way that he said it.

0:16:35.720 --> 0:16:38.360
<v Speaker 5>From a as a Sandler fan too, it was just like, oh,

0:16:38.400 --> 0:16:39.840
<v Speaker 5>there's the iconic Sandler moment.

0:16:40.000 --> 0:16:43.320
<v Speaker 6>Yeah, and it's there's so many moments, like it's hard

0:16:43.360 --> 0:16:44.240
<v Speaker 6>to justify one.

0:16:44.200 --> 0:16:46.240
<v Speaker 4>Because I know what's one you want to do though

0:16:46.280 --> 0:16:46.760
<v Speaker 4>with the guard.

0:16:48.080 --> 0:16:52.560
<v Speaker 6>Yeah, when he's with the Dina in that in that conversation.

0:16:52.880 --> 0:16:54.680
<v Speaker 4>Menzell's that's a big scene.

0:16:54.760 --> 0:16:57.800
<v Speaker 6>Yes, But Sandler starts doing this kind of thing where

0:16:57.800 --> 0:16:59.920
<v Speaker 6>he's like ex haling this a lot of mouth movement

0:17:01.840 --> 0:17:04.240
<v Speaker 6>and he's like you can feel the uncomfort like that

0:17:04.280 --> 0:17:06.400
<v Speaker 6>he's he's really trying to get it out, but he's

0:17:06.440 --> 0:17:08.760
<v Speaker 6>not saying it. But yeah, in general, it was just

0:17:08.840 --> 0:17:12.960
<v Speaker 6>watching him make these micro decisions as Howard. It's like

0:17:13.000 --> 0:17:16.639
<v Speaker 6>I wasn't watching Adam perform it. I was watching Howard

0:17:16.680 --> 0:17:18.600
<v Speaker 6>in these scenes doing it. There's like a very little

0:17:18.640 --> 0:17:22.040
<v Speaker 6>one where it's like when Garnett says to his manager, just.

0:17:22.040 --> 0:17:24.080
<v Speaker 4>Wait right here, we'll be right back.

0:17:24.160 --> 0:17:27.679
<v Speaker 6>Howard just instinctively owns that idea and looks at the

0:17:27.680 --> 0:17:30.280
<v Speaker 6>manager and does the same exact hand motion that Garnett

0:17:30.280 --> 0:17:32.000
<v Speaker 6>does like a half a second later, just.

0:17:31.960 --> 0:17:33.040
<v Speaker 4>To be like, oh, yeah, that was my idea.

0:17:33.040 --> 0:17:33.360
<v Speaker 1>This is good.

0:17:33.960 --> 0:17:36.880
<v Speaker 5>I also I also really love the you know, he

0:17:36.880 --> 0:17:40.080
<v Speaker 5>he would add improvised jokes all the time, like little

0:17:40.119 --> 0:17:42.720
<v Speaker 5>things that he felt like Howard could do, you know,

0:17:43.840 --> 0:17:47.000
<v Speaker 5>in particular, like tiny weird borsch belty things like when

0:17:47.000 --> 0:17:49.760
<v Speaker 5>he when he goes and is gonna pawn a ring

0:17:49.840 --> 0:17:51.400
<v Speaker 5>to these two real jewelers.

0:17:51.560 --> 0:17:52.880
<v Speaker 4>He goes, I'd shake your hand, but I know where

0:17:52.880 --> 0:17:55.280
<v Speaker 4>it's been, right, just like it's such a bad joke,

0:17:55.400 --> 0:17:56.639
<v Speaker 4>but it's such a Howard.

0:17:56.680 --> 0:17:58.760
<v Speaker 5>It's such a jeweler joke that he did, and it

0:17:58.800 --> 0:17:59.960
<v Speaker 5>was really great.

0:18:00.200 --> 0:18:02.399
<v Speaker 4>And the movie is filled with stuff like that.

0:18:02.520 --> 0:18:05.920
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, you talked about the immersive quality the film. Sound

0:18:06.000 --> 0:18:09.520
<v Speaker 3>obviously has a big part in that, and I know

0:18:09.600 --> 0:18:11.840
<v Speaker 3>Altman is a big touchstone for you guys, and there's

0:18:11.840 --> 0:18:13.800
<v Speaker 3>that element to it. I think anyone watching it will

0:18:13.920 --> 0:18:15.640
<v Speaker 3>get a little bit of a sense of whether it's

0:18:15.760 --> 0:18:18.040
<v Speaker 3>belong Goodbye or mcayn Missus Miller. But when I think

0:18:18.040 --> 0:18:20.480
<v Speaker 3>about those films in particular, which I love, there's that

0:18:20.600 --> 0:18:22.960
<v Speaker 3>sense of kind of hanging out in the space with

0:18:23.000 --> 0:18:25.080
<v Speaker 3>all those multiple voices, you're just kind of it's very

0:18:25.119 --> 0:18:27.040
<v Speaker 3>laid back and you can kind of eavesdrop on the

0:18:27.040 --> 0:18:29.320
<v Speaker 3>conversations and decide which one you're going to poke your

0:18:29.359 --> 0:18:31.399
<v Speaker 3>head in on. There's nothing really laid back at all

0:18:31.440 --> 0:18:32.520
<v Speaker 3>about how you guys are doing it.

0:18:32.640 --> 0:18:36.800
<v Speaker 5>California Split another Altman film, you know, in about gambling.

0:18:37.119 --> 0:18:40.400
<v Speaker 5>All the gambling dens are filled with all of these

0:18:40.480 --> 0:18:43.760
<v Speaker 5>kind of you know, again more down and out players,

0:18:44.119 --> 0:18:46.600
<v Speaker 5>but there is You're right, there's a great story about

0:18:46.880 --> 0:18:49.040
<v Speaker 5>more and Batty. At the premiere of McKay and Missus Miller,

0:18:49.040 --> 0:18:51.520
<v Speaker 5>you sit next to Robert Altman and twenty minutes into

0:18:51.560 --> 0:18:54.120
<v Speaker 5>the movie, Warren Batty turns to Altman and he goes,

0:18:54.240 --> 0:18:56.520
<v Speaker 5>is a whole movie sound like this? And Altman turned

0:18:56.600 --> 0:18:59.200
<v Speaker 5>him with smiling he goes, yeah, how cool is that?

0:18:59.440 --> 0:19:02.320
<v Speaker 5>And Altman's and babies just like, oh, I can't handle

0:19:02.359 --> 0:19:04.240
<v Speaker 5>this because it was he was so ahead of his time.

0:19:04.440 --> 0:19:07.080
<v Speaker 6>The thing, and you're pointing out something interesting, which is, yes,

0:19:07.160 --> 0:19:10.520
<v Speaker 6>if you let it exist in kind of more laid

0:19:10.560 --> 0:19:11.200
<v Speaker 6>back feeling.

0:19:11.720 --> 0:19:12.280
<v Speaker 1>It's one thing.

0:19:12.320 --> 0:19:14.080
<v Speaker 6>What we're trying to do here is we're trying to

0:19:14.160 --> 0:19:18.679
<v Speaker 6>kind of really capture the points of view of everybody

0:19:18.760 --> 0:19:21.959
<v Speaker 6>in the scene at almost exactly the same time, and

0:19:22.400 --> 0:19:25.400
<v Speaker 6>we're very, very like, the shot verse shot is so important,

0:19:25.560 --> 0:19:28.320
<v Speaker 6>and to get a shot reverse shot within that environment

0:19:28.680 --> 0:19:33.000
<v Speaker 6>from a production standpoint is almost physically impossible, but we're

0:19:33.280 --> 0:19:37.400
<v Speaker 6>so so tuned into kind of making that impossibility of reality.

0:19:37.600 --> 0:19:39.639
<v Speaker 6>And what it does for the actors I think is

0:19:39.680 --> 0:19:43.200
<v Speaker 6>something kind of incredible, because you if you give people

0:19:43.240 --> 0:19:46.239
<v Speaker 6>the ability to speak over one another and not have

0:19:46.320 --> 0:19:49.320
<v Speaker 6>to wait, you're going to create a performance that's a

0:19:49.359 --> 0:19:51.840
<v Speaker 6>lot freer. And it's like, yes, it's like, we're going

0:19:51.920 --> 0:19:54.640
<v Speaker 6>to make that work afterwards, no matter how hard it's

0:19:54.640 --> 0:19:57.680
<v Speaker 6>going to be. But yeah, what Altman did there, which

0:19:57.840 --> 0:20:01.879
<v Speaker 6>I found a little so so important, was the realism

0:20:01.960 --> 0:20:05.280
<v Speaker 6>of the performances in these situations that aren't real. And

0:20:05.280 --> 0:20:06.960
<v Speaker 6>then I guess what we're trying to do now is

0:20:07.040 --> 0:20:11.000
<v Speaker 6>just take that and then create the appearance of a

0:20:11.040 --> 0:20:13.360
<v Speaker 6>two camera cutting, even though it's not positive that we're

0:20:13.359 --> 0:20:15.840
<v Speaker 6>not doing that, but to create this kind of single

0:20:15.880 --> 0:20:18.640
<v Speaker 6>camera point of view shift at any moment in time.

0:20:19.000 --> 0:20:20.840
<v Speaker 5>I'm surprised that Benning is able to actually get that

0:20:20.880 --> 0:20:24.040
<v Speaker 5>all across, because to prove a point, right now I'm

0:20:24.240 --> 0:20:28.280
<v Speaker 5>messing with the volume modulation on his Vsfron and it's

0:20:28.320 --> 0:20:32.080
<v Speaker 5>going from blasting to complete zero. And that's and that's

0:20:32.119 --> 0:20:34.520
<v Speaker 5>something that life is all about. Sometimes you have these

0:20:34.560 --> 0:20:37.919
<v Speaker 5>cacophony noises that you have to ignore, and as an actor,

0:20:38.280 --> 0:20:39.439
<v Speaker 5>I think it's very freeing.

0:20:39.520 --> 0:20:40.880
<v Speaker 4>I think for a lot of the actors it.

0:20:40.840 --> 0:20:42.520
<v Speaker 3>Was I wanted to yeah, I wanted to touch on that,

0:20:42.600 --> 0:20:45.679
<v Speaker 3>because you talk about maybe how they felt in that space.

0:20:46.520 --> 0:20:48.680
<v Speaker 3>My first reaction was as an actor, I would find

0:20:48.720 --> 0:20:51.320
<v Speaker 3>it so distracting and so chaotic that maybe I couldn't

0:20:51.359 --> 0:20:53.199
<v Speaker 3>fully get into the character. But imagine it is just

0:20:53.240 --> 0:20:55.560
<v Speaker 3>the opposite. It's kind of freeing. It led itself to

0:20:55.600 --> 0:20:58.000
<v Speaker 3>an authority. You're not performing as much.

0:20:58.040 --> 0:21:01.200
<v Speaker 6>Yeah, you're not thinking about the construct of the scene.

0:21:01.280 --> 0:21:04.000
<v Speaker 6>You know, you're thinking about, okay, this is you're this

0:21:04.040 --> 0:21:05.120
<v Speaker 6>is all really happening.

0:21:05.200 --> 0:21:06.520
<v Speaker 4>So just just think that.

0:21:06.560 --> 0:21:09.120
<v Speaker 5>I think that as some as you know, I think,

0:21:09.320 --> 0:21:11.880
<v Speaker 5>as somebody who's acted briefly in a couple of things,

0:21:11.920 --> 0:21:14.800
<v Speaker 5>I think a big thing that you know sometimes you know,

0:21:14.920 --> 0:21:20.040
<v Speaker 5>is that suspension, disbelief and being able to basically disappear

0:21:20.200 --> 0:21:23.160
<v Speaker 5>into into the character, you know, in a specific scene,

0:21:23.160 --> 0:21:25.920
<v Speaker 5>and a scene between Sandler and Lakeith Stanfield. There's a

0:21:25.960 --> 0:21:27.399
<v Speaker 5>scene early on in the movie where they have a

0:21:27.400 --> 0:21:31.399
<v Speaker 5>conversation about fake Rolex's and you know, that conversation is

0:21:31.400 --> 0:21:35.119
<v Speaker 5>supposed to be a private one amongst a group of

0:21:35.760 --> 0:21:38.439
<v Speaker 5>people in a small showroom on seventh floor and on

0:21:38.480 --> 0:21:41.120
<v Speaker 5>forty seventh Street in New York City. Now, I hate

0:21:41.119 --> 0:21:43.760
<v Speaker 5>it in movies and TV when you see people have

0:21:43.800 --> 0:21:46.440
<v Speaker 5>a private conversation that's clearly can be heard.

0:21:46.800 --> 0:21:47.960
<v Speaker 4>So we encourage all the.

0:21:47.920 --> 0:21:51.320
<v Speaker 5>Extras to actually speak and have their own experience, And

0:21:51.400 --> 0:21:55.080
<v Speaker 5>I think for Lakeith and Sandler that was that was

0:21:55.320 --> 0:21:57.920
<v Speaker 5>really informing, and it allowed them to actually feel like

0:21:57.960 --> 0:22:00.760
<v Speaker 5>they were having a private conversation that fell like it

0:22:00.800 --> 0:22:03.960
<v Speaker 5>had high stakes because you have you know, and also

0:22:04.080 --> 0:22:06.840
<v Speaker 5>don't forget that if the general din of the audio

0:22:07.000 --> 0:22:10.480
<v Speaker 5>of people speaking a rose a certain amount, they could

0:22:10.800 --> 0:22:12.680
<v Speaker 5>increase the volume of their voice, so there was no

0:22:13.200 --> 0:22:14.080
<v Speaker 5>pretending in.

0:22:14.000 --> 0:22:14.520
<v Speaker 4>A certain way.

0:22:14.560 --> 0:22:16.280
<v Speaker 6>And then on our end, it's a matter of like,

0:22:16.280 --> 0:22:18.639
<v Speaker 6>like you're working with somebody like Skip Livesay, who was

0:22:18.680 --> 0:22:22.520
<v Speaker 6>mixing it, he has to kind of keep it in

0:22:22.640 --> 0:22:25.840
<v Speaker 6>a relative reality. You know, we were working with the

0:22:26.359 --> 0:22:29.479
<v Speaker 6>confines of that as our basis. So when you have

0:22:29.680 --> 0:22:32.960
<v Speaker 6>that audio, it's a matter of working it in and

0:22:33.000 --> 0:22:35.160
<v Speaker 6>working like we would actually be listening to certain parts

0:22:35.200 --> 0:22:37.760
<v Speaker 6>and when there was a break in the dialogue, like, oh,

0:22:37.800 --> 0:22:40.560
<v Speaker 6>let's bring in that adr that we recorded in the background.

0:22:40.720 --> 0:22:42.640
<v Speaker 6>Let's raise it up so you can hear that person there.

0:22:42.840 --> 0:22:45.320
<v Speaker 6>And it is kind of a woven fabric of sound there.

0:22:45.440 --> 0:22:47.560
<v Speaker 3>I want to close, though, There's so much more to

0:22:47.560 --> 0:22:49.240
<v Speaker 3>get to with this movie, with our kind of rapid

0:22:49.280 --> 0:22:51.159
<v Speaker 3>fire film Spotting five, You guys were nice enough to

0:22:51.160 --> 0:22:53.280
<v Speaker 3>play last time. The first two questions the same as

0:22:53.320 --> 0:22:54.879
<v Speaker 3>last time. What's the last movie you saw in a

0:22:54.920 --> 0:22:56.240
<v Speaker 3>theater other than your own?

0:22:56.640 --> 0:22:58.520
<v Speaker 4>Last week? Saw on a last movie I saw in

0:22:58.520 --> 0:22:58.920
<v Speaker 4>a theater?

0:23:00.200 --> 0:23:03.000
<v Speaker 5>I mean, we've been having to promote so much. Might

0:23:03.040 --> 0:23:04.000
<v Speaker 5>have been parasite.

0:23:04.440 --> 0:23:07.040
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, for me, it might have been what.

0:23:07.000 --> 0:23:08.520
<v Speaker 4>Are we talking about? I just went to go see

0:23:08.520 --> 0:23:10.280
<v Speaker 4>Lost Highway two days ago in l A.

0:23:10.400 --> 0:23:13.680
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, at Tarantino as a theater and yeah, and then

0:23:13.720 --> 0:23:16.080
<v Speaker 5>before that, I did three every break that I had

0:23:16.080 --> 0:23:19.840
<v Speaker 5>in l A to New Beverly, I saw a murder

0:23:19.920 --> 0:23:23.680
<v Speaker 5>by Contract and the one before that was dolomite Ise

0:23:24.080 --> 0:23:27.040
<v Speaker 5>and uh and then yeah, and then I did, uh,

0:23:27.160 --> 0:23:30.159
<v Speaker 5>and then I did. But the most recent new release

0:23:30.240 --> 0:23:33.480
<v Speaker 5>I saw, I guess was Dolomite Yeasite before.

0:23:33.320 --> 0:23:35.480
<v Speaker 1>And I saw I saw the Lighthouse in Parasite.

0:23:35.520 --> 0:23:39.760
<v Speaker 3>Okay, the movie a movie that you revisited recently, something

0:23:39.760 --> 0:23:40.200
<v Speaker 3>you love.

0:23:40.240 --> 0:23:44.920
<v Speaker 5>In a lonely place. Great film, Nicholas, Yeah, and oddly

0:23:45.280 --> 0:23:46.840
<v Speaker 5>relevant for this movie for sure.

0:23:47.480 --> 0:23:50.800
<v Speaker 6>I want to say that I revisited because I actually

0:23:51.680 --> 0:23:55.000
<v Speaker 6>the one. Uh, it's it's it's hard because I I

0:23:55.760 --> 0:24:03.080
<v Speaker 6>revisited a bunch of stuff in pieces. But I guess

0:24:03.400 --> 0:24:04.080
<v Speaker 6>Hole in the Head.

0:24:04.240 --> 0:24:05.520
<v Speaker 1>I've watched that again recently.

0:24:05.600 --> 0:24:09.320
<v Speaker 3>Is there a current movie obsession you have a director,

0:24:09.359 --> 0:24:10.760
<v Speaker 3>an actor, an actress.

0:24:11.960 --> 0:24:17.439
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, I recently wanted to rewatch every talk Fujamoto lensed

0:24:17.520 --> 0:24:21.600
<v Speaker 5>movie and it leads you down a pretty like extensive

0:24:21.720 --> 0:24:26.280
<v Speaker 5>eighties hole of filmmaking. But yeah, I wanted to look

0:24:26.320 --> 0:24:27.879
<v Speaker 5>at every talk foto movie.

0:24:28.400 --> 0:24:30.880
<v Speaker 3>Last question, actually two more real quick movie that made

0:24:30.880 --> 0:24:31.680
<v Speaker 3>you want to become.

0:24:31.440 --> 0:24:38.879
<v Speaker 5>A director, that woul maybe want to become a director, Yeah.

0:24:37.119 --> 0:24:41.520
<v Speaker 4>It might. Weirdly enough, it was probably the movie Kids.

0:24:42.440 --> 0:24:45.119
<v Speaker 5>I mean, Kramer Versus Kramer was the first movie that

0:24:45.160 --> 0:24:47.680
<v Speaker 5>showed the power of cinema When we were little kids,

0:24:47.960 --> 0:24:49.840
<v Speaker 5>but kids. I saw when I was fifteen and I

0:24:49.880 --> 0:24:52.000
<v Speaker 5>was in a scenario where there was whippits happening, and

0:24:52.600 --> 0:24:55.000
<v Speaker 5>I saw the scene on a VHS tape and it

0:24:55.119 --> 0:24:56.359
<v Speaker 5>just felt like life led.

0:24:56.280 --> 0:24:58.680
<v Speaker 4>Onto the screen. And I was so curious about how

0:24:58.680 --> 0:24:59.680
<v Speaker 4>that could be done.

0:25:00.080 --> 0:25:00.600
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, it was.

0:25:00.760 --> 0:25:03.199
<v Speaker 6>I was going to go to school to be a

0:25:03.200 --> 0:25:07.399
<v Speaker 6>physicist and then film in addition. And I went to

0:25:07.600 --> 0:25:10.320
<v Speaker 6>Josh said, oh, come over to Boston University and watch this.

0:25:10.560 --> 0:25:13.119
<v Speaker 6>Watch we're looking at the neo realists, the Italian realist

0:25:13.440 --> 0:25:17.040
<v Speaker 6>and I saw you'll posto and totally changed.

0:25:17.200 --> 0:25:18.880
<v Speaker 1>Really yeah, I couldn't.

0:25:18.520 --> 0:25:19.359
<v Speaker 4>Believe that you could do.

0:25:19.720 --> 0:25:21.159
<v Speaker 6>And then, of course then you dig deeper into that

0:25:21.160 --> 0:25:21.600
<v Speaker 6>whole era.

0:25:21.600 --> 0:25:23.040
<v Speaker 1>Of course. Yeah, mind blowing.

0:25:23.119 --> 0:25:24.960
<v Speaker 3>So this one's a more timely question, with it being

0:25:24.960 --> 0:25:26.119
<v Speaker 3>not only the end of the year, but the end

0:25:26.160 --> 0:25:27.720
<v Speaker 3>of the decade. I'm sure you're seeing a lot of

0:25:28.080 --> 0:25:30.760
<v Speaker 3>shows like mine and critics sharing their best films of

0:25:30.800 --> 0:25:32.840
<v Speaker 3>the decade. Do you have one that immediately comes to

0:25:32.840 --> 0:25:34.440
<v Speaker 3>mind as the best film of the twenty tens?

0:25:34.960 --> 0:25:38.240
<v Speaker 6>That's right, I mean good to that top ten list

0:25:38.320 --> 0:25:38.880
<v Speaker 6>was pretty good.

0:25:38.960 --> 0:25:42.000
<v Speaker 1>Which one the twenty ten for the was for the Kye.

0:25:41.880 --> 0:25:43.199
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, but I didn't end up sending it up.

0:25:43.200 --> 0:25:44.760
<v Speaker 5>You didn't, okay, because I don't like to do the

0:25:44.880 --> 0:25:48.159
<v Speaker 5>top ten because there's you see so much I forgot

0:25:48.240 --> 0:25:48.640
<v Speaker 5>what what?

0:25:48.640 --> 0:25:48.720
<v Speaker 3>What?

0:25:48.880 --> 0:25:52.080
<v Speaker 5>Ended up reaching pretty high? Do you remember what I

0:25:52.119 --> 0:25:53.200
<v Speaker 5>had on there when I sent it to you? And

0:25:53.240 --> 0:25:54.479
<v Speaker 5>I was like, guy, should I send this? And then

0:25:54.480 --> 0:25:55.920
<v Speaker 5>I ended up not sending it.

0:25:57.359 --> 0:25:58.960
<v Speaker 1>There's so many. I don't know.

0:25:59.600 --> 0:26:01.399
<v Speaker 4>It's hard because it's like you of course you know

0:26:01.480 --> 0:26:03.159
<v Speaker 4>the list in front of you. Yeah, yeah, you know

0:26:03.160 --> 0:26:03.800
<v Speaker 4>what you want me to pull.

0:26:05.359 --> 0:26:06.440
<v Speaker 1>Phantom thread was on there.

0:26:06.480 --> 0:26:08.760
<v Speaker 4>Phantom Dread was way up. It was on there. Yeah, yeah,

0:26:08.760 --> 0:26:09.400
<v Speaker 4>that makes sense.

0:26:09.480 --> 0:26:11.159
<v Speaker 5>Phantom thread was way up on there. Let me just

0:26:11.200 --> 0:26:12.640
<v Speaker 5>pull it up because you can just edit this.

0:26:12.680 --> 0:26:13.440
<v Speaker 4>End the favorite.

0:26:13.480 --> 0:26:14.480
<v Speaker 1>The favorite was on there.

0:26:15.160 --> 0:26:17.600
<v Speaker 4>The favorite was way up. Yeah, all right. This was

0:26:17.640 --> 0:26:20.800
<v Speaker 4>my U This was my top ten that I had

0:26:20.840 --> 0:26:22.440
<v Speaker 4>that I that I never sent to the kis.

0:26:22.480 --> 0:26:29.040
<v Speaker 5>This is an exclusive here exclusive Phantom Thread, Uh, the Favorite, Lanthemos,

0:26:29.080 --> 0:26:33.720
<v Speaker 5>Margaret Lonigan, Beyond the Candle, Ober Sodenberg, Under the Skin

0:26:33.800 --> 0:26:36.879
<v Speaker 5>by Glazer, Wolf of Wall Streetscorsesey Inside, Lewin Davis at

0:26:36.920 --> 0:26:40.400
<v Speaker 5>Coen Brothers, The Act of Killing Josh Oppenheimer, Bitter Lake

0:26:40.400 --> 0:26:42.760
<v Speaker 5>by Adam Curtis and Parasite Bay Bonkuan.

0:26:42.440 --> 0:26:45.560
<v Speaker 3>Who those are some great choice. I'm in locked up

0:26:45.600 --> 0:26:47.160
<v Speaker 3>with you on more than a few of those guys.

0:26:47.160 --> 0:26:49.520
<v Speaker 3>This was a lot of fun. I encourage everyone out

0:26:49.520 --> 0:26:51.520
<v Speaker 3>there to see the film if they get a chance.

0:26:51.560 --> 0:26:53.000
<v Speaker 4>Thank you so much, best of luck, Thank thank you,

0:26:53.160 --> 0:26:53.720
<v Speaker 4>appreciate it.

0:26:56.160 --> 0:26:57.160
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, having a good time.

0:26:58.200 --> 0:27:07.159
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, this is me.

0:27:08.680 --> 0:27:09.720
<v Speaker 4>This is how I went.

0:27:11.280 --> 0:27:14.600
<v Speaker 3>Hope you enjoyed that trip into the time capsule there

0:27:14.680 --> 0:27:18.720
<v Speaker 3>with Josh and Benny Safti. You get complete access to

0:27:18.720 --> 0:27:21.800
<v Speaker 3>the film Spotting Archive, monthly bonus shows and more as

0:27:21.840 --> 0:27:24.000
<v Speaker 3>a film Spotting Family member, and yes, if you use

0:27:24.040 --> 0:27:26.720
<v Speaker 3>promo code Supreme you can get twenty percent off through

0:27:27.080 --> 0:27:31.600
<v Speaker 3>January thirty. First, just go to film Spottingfamily dot com.

0:27:31.640 --> 0:27:34.639
<v Speaker 3>Film Spotting is listeners supported. Join the film Spotting Family

0:27:34.680 --> 0:27:37.600
<v Speaker 3>at Filmspotting Family dot com and get access to ad

0:27:37.600 --> 0:27:41.040
<v Speaker 3>free episodes, monthly bonus shows, our weekly newsletter, and, for

0:27:41.080 --> 0:27:43.760
<v Speaker 3>the first time, all in one place, the entire film

0:27:43.760 --> 0:27:46.440
<v Speaker 3>Spotting archive going back to two thousand and five. That's

0:27:46.440 --> 0:27:51.119
<v Speaker 3>a film Spotting Family dot com.

0:27:51.160 --> 0:27:51.640
<v Speaker 1>Panically