WEBVTT - Dr. Orna Guralnik Reflects on the Ethics of Practicing 'Couples Therapy' on TV

0:00:07.200 --> 0:00:10.680
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to another episode of Strictly Business, the podcast in

0:00:10.720 --> 0:00:13.119
<v Speaker 1>which we speak with some of the brightest minds working

0:00:13.119 --> 0:00:17.840
<v Speaker 1>in the media business today. I'm Andrew Wallenstein, and the

0:00:17.960 --> 0:00:21.919
<v Speaker 1>dog days of summer are traditionally the time psychotherapists of

0:00:21.960 --> 0:00:26.239
<v Speaker 1>all stripes take some well deserved time off. Well, Strictly

0:00:26.280 --> 0:00:28.880
<v Speaker 1>Business has managed to coax one of them back in

0:00:28.920 --> 0:00:31.560
<v Speaker 1>front of the couch to fill the vacuum. But this

0:00:31.640 --> 0:00:35.839
<v Speaker 1>is no average shrink. Doctor Orna Garalmik is the featured

0:00:35.880 --> 0:00:39.880
<v Speaker 1>physician on the Showtime series Couples Therapy, where she helps

0:00:40.000 --> 0:00:44.320
<v Speaker 1>relationships in crisis, letting viewers follow their progress we're lack

0:00:44.360 --> 0:00:48.800
<v Speaker 1>thereof from episode to episode. She's currently shooting a fifth season,

0:00:48.840 --> 0:00:51.200
<v Speaker 1>so we're glad she's making time today to talk about

0:00:51.440 --> 0:00:54.720
<v Speaker 1>what it's like to adapt her practice to the small screen.

0:00:55.480 --> 0:00:56.600
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to Strictly Business.

0:00:56.640 --> 0:00:59.960
<v Speaker 2>Auna, Thank you, thank you for inviting me, Andrew.

0:01:00.080 --> 0:01:03.880
<v Speaker 1>We must explain for the uninitiated and maybe some cynics.

0:01:04.160 --> 0:01:08.440
<v Speaker 1>Your show features real life couples sharing real life problems

0:01:08.480 --> 0:01:11.559
<v Speaker 1>with the world, and of course you are a very

0:01:11.640 --> 0:01:16.800
<v Speaker 1>real practicing clinical psychologist and psychoanalyst. You teach An NYU's

0:01:17.040 --> 0:01:21.600
<v Speaker 1>postdoctoral psychoanalysis program, So you're not just playing one on TV,

0:01:22.040 --> 0:01:22.720
<v Speaker 1>so to speak.

0:01:23.280 --> 0:01:24.560
<v Speaker 2>I'm not playing one at all.

0:01:24.600 --> 0:01:29.280
<v Speaker 1>I'm myself okay, But it begs a question, what is

0:01:29.319 --> 0:01:33.120
<v Speaker 1>a nice, pre eminently qualified therapist like you doing on

0:01:33.200 --> 0:01:36.840
<v Speaker 1>a medium like this, What motivates you to open up

0:01:36.920 --> 0:01:39.480
<v Speaker 1>what is a very private process typically?

0:01:40.520 --> 0:01:46.520
<v Speaker 2>Well, first of all, I join in the question because

0:01:46.560 --> 0:01:52.240
<v Speaker 2>I asked myself that question still, But it was it

0:01:52.280 --> 0:01:56.480
<v Speaker 2>didn't It happened kind of gradually. It was not at

0:01:56.520 --> 0:01:58.440
<v Speaker 2>all my plan. I mean, most people who choose to

0:01:58.480 --> 0:02:03.920
<v Speaker 2>be psychoanalysts, including myself, are generally very private people. We're

0:02:04.000 --> 0:02:08.040
<v Speaker 2>usually in a profession that privacy is like the number

0:02:08.120 --> 0:02:11.840
<v Speaker 2>one frame or rule of the game, right, And we

0:02:12.040 --> 0:02:14.680
<v Speaker 2>like to sit behind our patients and not even look

0:02:14.720 --> 0:02:17.960
<v Speaker 2>at them face to face. So we're typically very private people.

0:02:20.320 --> 0:02:26.320
<v Speaker 2>But I have become gradually somewhat more public being in academics.

0:02:26.440 --> 0:02:30.280
<v Speaker 2>So I teach, and I write, and I write not

0:02:30.480 --> 0:02:34.720
<v Speaker 2>only for academics, I write kind of beyond the scope

0:02:34.760 --> 0:02:39.880
<v Speaker 2>of psychoanalysts. So I've already had somewhat of a public

0:02:39.960 --> 0:02:46.040
<v Speaker 2>reach before, and that's probably what got the makers of

0:02:46.080 --> 0:02:49.560
<v Speaker 2>the show to got to me. Somehow. They reached out

0:02:49.600 --> 0:02:52.040
<v Speaker 2>to me, and first I thought I would consult to

0:02:52.160 --> 0:02:55.320
<v Speaker 2>them just to make sure kind of they're keeping in

0:02:56.639 --> 0:02:59.760
<v Speaker 2>like doing a good job in representing my profession. Sure,

0:03:00.840 --> 0:03:05.000
<v Speaker 2>but we really hit it off and they convinced me

0:03:05.120 --> 0:03:09.680
<v Speaker 2>to actually try and do it myself, which was a

0:03:09.800 --> 0:03:13.320
<v Speaker 2>total strange idea to me, to try to do something

0:03:13.360 --> 0:03:15.960
<v Speaker 2>so private on camera, and none of us knew it

0:03:16.000 --> 0:03:19.359
<v Speaker 2>was going to work. We didn't know that function on camera,

0:03:19.400 --> 0:03:21.880
<v Speaker 2>we didn't know that the work could be done on camera,

0:03:22.240 --> 0:03:24.200
<v Speaker 2>and it was all like one big experiment.

0:03:24.919 --> 0:03:28.160
<v Speaker 1>So what made you, you know, give this a world?

0:03:30.160 --> 0:03:33.560
<v Speaker 2>Many things. First of all, I guess just kind of

0:03:33.560 --> 0:03:37.960
<v Speaker 2>an adventurous spirit, something about the adventure of it. And

0:03:38.240 --> 0:03:42.760
<v Speaker 2>I really liked the filmmakers. They're just incredible people, and

0:03:42.920 --> 0:03:45.880
<v Speaker 2>they felt like I could do something with these people.

0:03:45.880 --> 0:03:47.760
<v Speaker 2>It would be good, it would be of high quality,

0:03:47.800 --> 0:03:50.840
<v Speaker 2>it would be ethical, it would be a real project,

0:03:50.880 --> 0:03:57.720
<v Speaker 2>it wouldn't be some kind of fake representation. But I

0:03:57.760 --> 0:04:04.200
<v Speaker 2>also feel in ways compelled to represent the prefetsion well.

0:04:04.280 --> 0:04:08.280
<v Speaker 2>And I think the world kind of needs a lot

0:04:08.400 --> 0:04:13.480
<v Speaker 2>more psychological and psychoanalytic thinking nowadays. I think it's and

0:04:13.520 --> 0:04:15.400
<v Speaker 2>I think that's one of the reasons the show became

0:04:15.440 --> 0:04:20.840
<v Speaker 2>so successful. It just hit a spot that is desperately needed,

0:04:21.279 --> 0:04:27.280
<v Speaker 2>which is like deeper, slower thought into like the underlying motivations.

0:04:28.520 --> 0:04:33.200
<v Speaker 1>So I mean, I couldn't agree more in terms of

0:04:33.240 --> 0:04:38.480
<v Speaker 1>that public need. But you know, I've also wondered, are

0:04:38.520 --> 0:04:41.080
<v Speaker 1>you want a mission of sorts, maybe even to sort

0:04:41.080 --> 0:04:46.200
<v Speaker 1>of preserve the world of psychoanalysis, which you know is

0:04:46.240 --> 0:04:49.560
<v Speaker 1>often described And please dispute my characterization if you take

0:04:49.600 --> 0:04:54.240
<v Speaker 1>issue with it as something of a dying art approaching obsolescence?

0:04:54.520 --> 0:04:56.840
<v Speaker 1>Did you am? I off both there?

0:04:57.640 --> 0:05:02.080
<v Speaker 2>I have two things to say about that. Honestly, I'm

0:05:02.080 --> 0:05:05.880
<v Speaker 2>not doing the show to promote psychoanalysis or to promote psychotherapy.

0:05:06.520 --> 0:05:09.960
<v Speaker 2>I don't. I mean, there are not enough therapists out

0:05:10.000 --> 0:05:13.159
<v Speaker 2>there in the world. There's obviously a great need, but

0:05:13.200 --> 0:05:16.839
<v Speaker 2>I'm not there to promote therapy. I'm there mostly to

0:05:16.960 --> 0:05:24.880
<v Speaker 2>promote psychological thinking. See, I want people to come out

0:05:24.920 --> 0:05:28.440
<v Speaker 2>of the show thinking about themselves in a deeper way,

0:05:28.480 --> 0:05:32.279
<v Speaker 2>thinking about fellow humans in a deeper way, thinking psychologically,

0:05:32.360 --> 0:05:34.760
<v Speaker 2>not oh, how do I go and find a therapist

0:05:34.880 --> 0:05:40.640
<v Speaker 2>right now? So that's my objective as far as, like

0:05:40.720 --> 0:05:43.159
<v Speaker 2>you know, since I became a psychoanalyst, which was quite

0:05:43.160 --> 0:05:46.880
<v Speaker 2>some time ago. There's always been talk about like the oh,

0:05:46.920 --> 0:05:49.800
<v Speaker 2>it's a dying field, it's a dying profession. That is

0:05:49.880 --> 0:05:52.760
<v Speaker 2>not true. I mean, especially not in New York. Sure,

0:05:53.360 --> 0:05:56.120
<v Speaker 2>you constantly people looking for therapy. They are not enough

0:05:56.160 --> 0:06:00.360
<v Speaker 2>therapists around. People want to do real deep work. They

0:06:00.400 --> 0:06:02.920
<v Speaker 2>start with regular therapy, then they want to go deeper

0:06:02.960 --> 0:06:05.920
<v Speaker 2>into analysis. It is not a dying profession. And there

0:06:05.920 --> 0:06:09.480
<v Speaker 2>are other ways that psychoanalysis is relevant in the world,

0:06:09.520 --> 0:06:12.279
<v Speaker 2>not only by way of therapy. It's it's it's a

0:06:12.400 --> 0:06:14.560
<v Speaker 2>it's a way of thinking. It's a way of analyzing

0:06:14.839 --> 0:06:17.800
<v Speaker 2>the world, and we need it.

0:06:19.200 --> 0:06:22.520
<v Speaker 1>I get it. And so you mentioned that you had

0:06:22.520 --> 0:06:25.200
<v Speaker 1>to be sort of coaxed into trying this out. We

0:06:25.200 --> 0:06:27.520
<v Speaker 1>should mention the names of the producers, by the way,

0:06:27.560 --> 0:06:30.720
<v Speaker 1>Elise Steinberg, Josh Kriegman, and forgive me if I'm miss

0:06:31.320 --> 0:06:31.680
<v Speaker 1>to pray.

0:06:31.760 --> 0:06:32.479
<v Speaker 2>You like to pray?

0:06:33.080 --> 0:06:36.839
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, Okay, there you go. And so they put you

0:06:36.880 --> 0:06:40.840
<v Speaker 1>in the saddle, and I'm curious what that first experience

0:06:41.000 --> 0:06:43.760
<v Speaker 1>was like and were you hooked or maybe still a

0:06:43.760 --> 0:06:44.600
<v Speaker 1>little skeptical.

0:06:45.120 --> 0:06:50.000
<v Speaker 2>I was definitely skeptical. We started with kind of a

0:06:50.000 --> 0:06:54.320
<v Speaker 2>few test sessions with Actually the cameras were still in

0:06:54.360 --> 0:07:00.919
<v Speaker 2>the room when we were doing that, and part of

0:07:00.960 --> 0:07:06.320
<v Speaker 2>what happened was oddly, even though I was nervous and

0:07:06.400 --> 0:07:09.000
<v Speaker 2>confused about how this is all going to play out,

0:07:10.760 --> 0:07:13.280
<v Speaker 2>the work is the work. That was Like I remember

0:07:13.320 --> 0:07:16.920
<v Speaker 2>coming out of the few test sessions and saying, wow,

0:07:16.960 --> 0:07:20.560
<v Speaker 2>I feel like a baker. I know how to make bread.

0:07:21.320 --> 0:07:23.640
<v Speaker 2>Doesn't matter the conditions, you always have to do the

0:07:23.640 --> 0:07:27.720
<v Speaker 2>same thing. So the material just presents itself and you

0:07:27.800 --> 0:07:29.960
<v Speaker 2>know what to do. I've been doing it for so

0:07:30.040 --> 0:07:33.400
<v Speaker 2>many years, so that was like a first surprise. But

0:07:33.440 --> 0:07:37.640
<v Speaker 2>then even the people I was kind of working with,

0:07:38.480 --> 0:07:41.240
<v Speaker 2>even though they were nervous and confused and not exactly

0:07:41.280 --> 0:07:45.840
<v Speaker 2>knowing what's going to happen here, it just you know,

0:07:45.920 --> 0:07:47.840
<v Speaker 2>you listen to people and they want to tell you

0:07:47.880 --> 0:07:50.360
<v Speaker 2>their stories, and then you think together about how to

0:07:50.400 --> 0:07:53.880
<v Speaker 2>problem solve and it just happens.

0:07:54.080 --> 0:07:56.080
<v Speaker 1>It's like, got it.

0:07:57.240 --> 0:08:00.840
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, it's stronger than the artific context.

0:08:02.280 --> 0:08:07.440
<v Speaker 1>And but you mentioned artificial context. And so the question

0:08:07.520 --> 0:08:11.280
<v Speaker 1>that arises for me is it certainly looks like what

0:08:11.320 --> 0:08:15.400
<v Speaker 1>you're doing is actual therapy, but is it? I mean,

0:08:15.960 --> 0:08:18.360
<v Speaker 1>do you have to explain to participants, perhaps that this

0:08:18.440 --> 0:08:22.960
<v Speaker 1>is maybe like a similacrum of therapy, or you're saying, no,

0:08:23.120 --> 0:08:26.920
<v Speaker 1>this is the real deal, and there's something about I mean,

0:08:27.080 --> 0:08:30.080
<v Speaker 1>I guess I wonder if somehow the cameras corrupt the

0:08:30.160 --> 0:08:32.400
<v Speaker 1>process despite the best of intentions.

0:08:33.840 --> 0:08:39.120
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, really really good questions. It is not therapy per

0:08:39.160 --> 0:08:45.080
<v Speaker 2>se in the sense that, first of all, you know,

0:08:45.120 --> 0:08:50.120
<v Speaker 2>as I mentioned earlier, like the iron frame of confidentiality

0:08:50.800 --> 0:08:56.199
<v Speaker 2>is gone. So whoever starts this work knows that this

0:08:56.280 --> 0:09:01.680
<v Speaker 2>is not private information between them and me. It's potentially

0:09:01.679 --> 0:09:04.520
<v Speaker 2>going to be broadcast to the world. So in that

0:09:04.640 --> 0:09:10.520
<v Speaker 2>sense it's definitely not regular therapy. But also part of

0:09:10.559 --> 0:09:16.040
<v Speaker 2>the contract of therapy is the patient pays the analyst,

0:09:16.200 --> 0:09:18.600
<v Speaker 2>and we don't do that. I mean, this is free,

0:09:18.720 --> 0:09:21.840
<v Speaker 2>so it's not it's a different The whole frame of

0:09:21.880 --> 0:09:24.760
<v Speaker 2>it is not the frame of therapy, right, not that

0:09:24.920 --> 0:09:28.679
<v Speaker 2>aren't pro bono therapies, but the entire frame of it

0:09:28.720 --> 0:09:33.480
<v Speaker 2>is different. So we call them participants, not patients, the couples,

0:09:34.440 --> 0:09:40.640
<v Speaker 2>and it is in its in its contract and its

0:09:40.800 --> 0:09:44.080
<v Speaker 2>ens in its essence, it is a similar croom in

0:09:44.120 --> 0:09:48.160
<v Speaker 2>the sense that certain aspects of the therapy of original

0:09:48.200 --> 0:09:52.760
<v Speaker 2>therapy continue. I think as a therapist, the work we're

0:09:52.760 --> 0:09:59.360
<v Speaker 2>doing is therapeutic. It's hopefully helpful, but the basic tenants,

0:09:59.559 --> 0:10:06.360
<v Speaker 2>the base frame is gone, so it's a similar room,

0:10:06.520 --> 0:10:10.200
<v Speaker 2>but many aspects of the therapeutic process continue and are

0:10:10.320 --> 0:10:16.440
<v Speaker 2>very powerful. So we're sitting together, I'm thinking analytically and

0:10:16.679 --> 0:10:20.520
<v Speaker 2>systematically about what they're presenting me with. They're talking about

0:10:20.559 --> 0:10:24.720
<v Speaker 2>their problems. We're trying to problem solve. Together. We build

0:10:24.720 --> 0:10:28.200
<v Speaker 2>a relationship of a certain kind of trust and mutual care,

0:10:29.200 --> 0:10:32.840
<v Speaker 2>and good things happen, like people get better with the

0:10:32.880 --> 0:10:33.880
<v Speaker 2>material they bring.

0:10:34.800 --> 0:10:38.480
<v Speaker 1>So that's certainly clear to anyone who has watched the

0:10:38.559 --> 0:10:42.880
<v Speaker 1>past four seasons. And I'm actually curious, as you're currently

0:10:42.920 --> 0:10:46.920
<v Speaker 1>shooting the fifth season, has the process changed as your

0:10:46.960 --> 0:10:51.199
<v Speaker 1>approach evolved. Does it get easier because you sounded initially

0:10:51.200 --> 0:10:53.560
<v Speaker 1>almost as if like you still need a little coaxing

0:10:53.600 --> 0:10:54.800
<v Speaker 1>to even do this.

0:10:55.600 --> 0:11:01.280
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I don't know if it gets I mean, I'm

0:11:01.320 --> 0:11:07.840
<v Speaker 2>convinced now that what we're doing is an incredibly useful

0:11:07.880 --> 0:11:11.199
<v Speaker 2>thing for the public, which is kind of an amazing

0:11:11.240 --> 0:11:13.520
<v Speaker 2>thing to be involved in nowadays. I mean, there's so

0:11:13.559 --> 0:11:15.679
<v Speaker 2>many things that are going wrong with our world and

0:11:16.280 --> 0:11:19.240
<v Speaker 2>to be part of something that is actually helpful for

0:11:19.320 --> 0:11:23.960
<v Speaker 2>the world and pushes whoever is like watching it is

0:11:24.080 --> 0:11:32.400
<v Speaker 2>pushing them towards more compassion and slowness and empathy and goodwill.

0:11:32.880 --> 0:11:37.600
<v Speaker 2>To be part of that is an incredible experience. And

0:11:37.640 --> 0:11:40.200
<v Speaker 2>the team I'm working with is just, you know, just

0:11:40.240 --> 0:11:45.800
<v Speaker 2>the best people on earth. But it's not easy. It's

0:11:45.840 --> 0:11:51.280
<v Speaker 2>not It didn't get easier. No, it's hard work. We

0:11:51.440 --> 0:11:55.559
<v Speaker 2>take our job and we take the mission very seriously.

0:11:55.640 --> 0:11:58.679
<v Speaker 2>So there's like an enormous amount of like thought and

0:11:58.720 --> 0:12:03.680
<v Speaker 2>intention and presence that goes into this project by everyone.

0:12:04.480 --> 0:12:10.200
<v Speaker 2>It's kind of a very intense commitment. Like every season

0:12:10.200 --> 0:12:13.200
<v Speaker 2>that we shoot, it's like a full on dive into

0:12:13.240 --> 0:12:17.120
<v Speaker 2>a few months of just full on commitment to the

0:12:17.160 --> 0:12:20.880
<v Speaker 2>well being of the people to like a dignified representation

0:12:21.000 --> 0:12:26.800
<v Speaker 2>of who they are. It's it's not easy. It's very satisfying,

0:12:28.480 --> 0:12:32.120
<v Speaker 2>and I think we all feel just incredibly lucky to

0:12:32.120 --> 0:12:34.520
<v Speaker 2>be part of this. But it's hard work.

0:12:36.440 --> 0:12:40.280
<v Speaker 1>I do wonder though, you know, I can't help but

0:12:40.440 --> 0:12:43.319
<v Speaker 1>think about the field in which you operate and the

0:12:43.640 --> 0:12:48.160
<v Speaker 1>fundamentals that many insist on, and so I know you've

0:12:48.160 --> 0:12:52.160
<v Speaker 1>gotten compliments. I'm curious though, if you've gotten criticism people

0:12:52.160 --> 0:12:56.280
<v Speaker 1>who say that, well, once you pull out certain frameworks,

0:12:57.080 --> 0:13:01.520
<v Speaker 1>this is not something that is this cheapen or distort

0:13:01.679 --> 0:13:03.440
<v Speaker 1>what the actual process is.

0:13:04.120 --> 0:13:08.040
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, you know, I oddly I did not get a

0:13:08.040 --> 0:13:12.040
<v Speaker 2>lot of criticism. To my face, I don't want.

0:13:11.880 --> 0:13:12.679
<v Speaker 1>To know how that works.

0:13:13.160 --> 0:13:16.480
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I don't know what's happening behind closed doors. But

0:13:16.679 --> 0:13:21.359
<v Speaker 2>what I have heard and what I've read are legitimate questions,

0:13:21.640 --> 0:13:26.960
<v Speaker 2>really legitimate questions about you know, big ethical questions like

0:13:28.520 --> 0:13:32.680
<v Speaker 2>even people who agree to participate and are supposedly benefiting

0:13:32.720 --> 0:13:35.920
<v Speaker 2>from the show, do they end up regretting it? Do

0:13:36.000 --> 0:13:41.120
<v Speaker 2>they feel exploited? And those are always big questions that

0:13:41.200 --> 0:13:47.600
<v Speaker 2>we take super seriously, and I think it would be

0:13:47.800 --> 0:13:50.880
<v Speaker 2>dishonest to say that there isn't some degree of compromise

0:13:51.280 --> 0:13:59.320
<v Speaker 2>for at least some of the participants experience privacy, and

0:13:59.360 --> 0:14:03.800
<v Speaker 2>they may you know, they consent is like a funny thing.

0:14:03.880 --> 0:14:07.760
<v Speaker 2>They might feel totally gung ho while they're doing it,

0:14:08.280 --> 0:14:10.960
<v Speaker 2>but a year later they might feel very differently about

0:14:10.960 --> 0:14:14.319
<v Speaker 2>it and have regrets or feel like, oh, it would

0:14:14.320 --> 0:14:16.679
<v Speaker 2>have been very different if I did it now, or

0:14:17.720 --> 0:14:24.840
<v Speaker 2>and that's real. So you know, my way of thinking

0:14:24.840 --> 0:14:27.720
<v Speaker 2>about it is that and I think the participants feel

0:14:27.720 --> 0:14:32.160
<v Speaker 2>that way, is that the benefit to the public ultimately

0:14:35.640 --> 0:14:41.320
<v Speaker 2>fit it outweighs this this kind of sacrifice. But yeah,

0:14:41.360 --> 0:14:45.960
<v Speaker 2>they're they're they're ethical questions here. I mean, I were

0:14:46.080 --> 0:14:50.520
<v Speaker 2>super sensitive when when people during the filming, if anyone

0:14:50.600 --> 0:14:53.840
<v Speaker 2>is feeling uncomfortable about what they're going through, they're always

0:14:53.880 --> 0:14:58.400
<v Speaker 2>free to like drop out and stop. It's people are

0:14:58.440 --> 0:15:01.000
<v Speaker 2>always doing it with like a great degree of like

0:15:04.360 --> 0:15:06.920
<v Speaker 2>wanting to do it, being grateful for doing it. There

0:15:07.000 --> 0:15:11.920
<v Speaker 2>there there's never any kind of pressure on them. So

0:15:13.080 --> 0:15:15.120
<v Speaker 2>but it's it's it's a complicated issue.

0:15:15.640 --> 0:15:21.560
<v Speaker 1>How involved are you in choosing which participants participate. I

0:15:21.640 --> 0:15:25.240
<v Speaker 1>assume the producers have their thoughts, but I'm curious if

0:15:25.640 --> 0:15:27.880
<v Speaker 1>you know, producers can say, hey, here's a couple with

0:15:27.920 --> 0:15:30.880
<v Speaker 1>an interesting dilemma, and you may find, you know, what,

0:15:30.960 --> 0:15:35.160
<v Speaker 1>these people need the real deal and maybe aren't suitable

0:15:35.160 --> 0:15:35.560
<v Speaker 1>for TV.

0:15:36.320 --> 0:15:41.960
<v Speaker 2>Yeah. There, there's there's a whole team that is that

0:15:42.080 --> 0:15:44.880
<v Speaker 2>they recruit people and they interview people, and there's there's

0:15:45.120 --> 0:15:49.360
<v Speaker 2>a team of psychologists that interview people before I meet them.

0:15:49.880 --> 0:15:54.280
<v Speaker 2>So I'm not involved in any of that. I basically

0:15:54.320 --> 0:16:00.000
<v Speaker 2>meet the people for the first session on camera. Oh,

0:16:00.480 --> 0:16:03.280
<v Speaker 2>but if I meet people and I feel like, I mean,

0:16:03.280 --> 0:16:05.360
<v Speaker 2>it's been very rare. But if I feel like people

0:16:05.400 --> 0:16:09.480
<v Speaker 2>are too vulnerable or there might be kind of an

0:16:09.560 --> 0:16:11.680
<v Speaker 2>issue that we didn't think about or that didn't come

0:16:11.760 --> 0:16:15.000
<v Speaker 2>up in earlier interviews, I can say I don't think

0:16:15.040 --> 0:16:17.360
<v Speaker 2>this is a good idea, this is too vulnerable a couple,

0:16:17.520 --> 0:16:20.800
<v Speaker 2>or let's say there's a vulnerable kid that's involved in

0:16:20.840 --> 0:16:23.320
<v Speaker 2>the family or something like that, And then I say,

0:16:23.360 --> 0:16:26.440
<v Speaker 2>this is not a good idea. But it's rare because

0:16:26.520 --> 0:16:28.400
<v Speaker 2>usually they do a really good job of screening.

0:16:29.120 --> 0:16:34.000
<v Speaker 1>Sure, I guess I find as I watch that I

0:16:34.040 --> 0:16:36.200
<v Speaker 1>want to pay you the compliment of saying you really,

0:16:36.640 --> 0:16:40.400
<v Speaker 1>you know, you radiate a genuine integrity and it really

0:16:40.440 --> 0:16:43.640
<v Speaker 1>comes across. But it's also a bit of a backhanded

0:16:43.680 --> 0:16:48.000
<v Speaker 1>compliment because I worry about that. I worry about as

0:16:48.040 --> 0:16:51.920
<v Speaker 1>you become a more and more public figure, how you

0:16:52.000 --> 0:16:55.920
<v Speaker 1>protect that integrity and how you preserve it. I mean,

0:16:55.960 --> 0:16:58.680
<v Speaker 1>do you ever fear as you I mean, you're several

0:16:58.760 --> 0:17:02.920
<v Speaker 1>years into this now sort of a corruptive influence, because

0:17:03.360 --> 0:17:06.960
<v Speaker 1>sometimes I see a lot of no one does typically

0:17:07.000 --> 0:17:09.840
<v Speaker 1>what you do, but there are certain people whose names

0:17:09.880 --> 0:17:12.600
<v Speaker 1>I won't name, who are you know, therapists who go

0:17:12.680 --> 0:17:16.960
<v Speaker 1>into various modalities of this in the media, and I'm

0:17:17.000 --> 0:17:20.520
<v Speaker 1>amazed at the transformation over time, let's put it that gently.

0:17:21.240 --> 0:17:27.440
<v Speaker 2>Totally agree. And I'm very aware of the corruptive nature

0:17:27.600 --> 0:17:34.560
<v Speaker 2>that is lurking every corner, whether it's the corruptive nature

0:17:34.600 --> 0:17:37.679
<v Speaker 2>of money, you know, being offered to do something that

0:17:37.760 --> 0:17:39.480
<v Speaker 2>will pay you a lot of money but will be

0:17:39.560 --> 0:17:42.880
<v Speaker 2>kind of a real compromise to the profession, or the

0:17:42.960 --> 0:17:46.919
<v Speaker 2>corruptive nature of like somehow, you know, I don't know,

0:17:46.960 --> 0:17:50.720
<v Speaker 2>somehow fame seems to have some kind of pull for

0:17:50.800 --> 0:17:54.920
<v Speaker 2>people I don't. That doesn't do much for me. But yeah,

0:17:54.960 --> 0:17:59.040
<v Speaker 2>there's always there's always, you know, on the corners of things.

0:17:59.080 --> 0:18:04.160
<v Speaker 2>There's always way that you can forget about your ethical principles.

0:18:04.200 --> 0:18:09.840
<v Speaker 2>And I'm very aware of it, and i try very

0:18:09.880 --> 0:18:12.200
<v Speaker 2>hard to protect myself. And I'm also just like you're

0:18:12.240 --> 0:18:16.199
<v Speaker 2>saying that you're worried, I'm worried too my own. I

0:18:16.240 --> 0:18:20.679
<v Speaker 2>think about it a lot. I'm it's I mean, especially nowadays,

0:18:20.720 --> 0:18:27.840
<v Speaker 2>there's there's just such a sliding slope where like ethics

0:18:27.840 --> 0:18:31.040
<v Speaker 2>and morals are like so cheap. Now, wow.

0:18:32.240 --> 0:18:35.639
<v Speaker 1>Well, but the thing is success always in in the

0:18:35.680 --> 0:18:41.160
<v Speaker 1>biz begets more opportunity. And I'm curious, you know, do

0:18:41.200 --> 0:18:45.120
<v Speaker 1>you have ambitions beyond this show in the media space.

0:18:47.200 --> 0:18:50.240
<v Speaker 2>I don't have ambitions in the media space. I have

0:18:52.480 --> 0:19:01.720
<v Speaker 2>I have, you know, somewhat ambitious mcgallu Mannic hopes to

0:19:01.800 --> 0:19:09.240
<v Speaker 2>contribute something to making the world a better place. That's

0:19:09.440 --> 0:19:13.080
<v Speaker 2>my real ambition is to somehow add to the forces

0:19:13.080 --> 0:19:19.760
<v Speaker 2>that are going against this kind of doggy dog world

0:19:19.840 --> 0:19:23.399
<v Speaker 2>we're facing. You know, I have things that matter to

0:19:23.440 --> 0:19:28.800
<v Speaker 2>me that I want to use this whatever engine I'm

0:19:28.840 --> 0:19:32.200
<v Speaker 2>getting behind me to contribute to things that matter.

0:19:34.040 --> 0:19:37.399
<v Speaker 1>So, you know, I could play Devil's advocate here and say,

0:19:37.600 --> 0:19:40.960
<v Speaker 1>I hear what you're saying. The media is the place

0:19:41.040 --> 0:19:43.119
<v Speaker 1>to advance that cause. If you want to reach the

0:19:43.160 --> 0:19:47.400
<v Speaker 1>most people, So do this other show or produce this

0:19:47.480 --> 0:19:50.440
<v Speaker 1>other thing. How does that strike you?

0:19:51.280 --> 0:19:53.280
<v Speaker 2>If it's something I don't know, if I can produce

0:19:53.320 --> 0:19:56.840
<v Speaker 2>a show that will somehow help people deal with their

0:19:56.880 --> 0:20:00.880
<v Speaker 2>denial about climate or about what's going on, and or

0:20:01.840 --> 0:20:05.159
<v Speaker 2>I would do it. I'm open to doing things about

0:20:06.240 --> 0:20:10.760
<v Speaker 2>to participating in things that matter to me, and I

0:20:10.840 --> 0:20:18.720
<v Speaker 2>will I'm going to join an international peacemaking organization. I will,

0:20:18.800 --> 0:20:21.760
<v Speaker 2>and I want to, and I appreciate kind of having

0:20:21.760 --> 0:20:25.920
<v Speaker 2>the opportunity to do that if I'm asked to join

0:20:26.000 --> 0:20:32.920
<v Speaker 2>in selling a product that doesn't help anyone, No.

0:20:34.200 --> 0:20:37.480
<v Speaker 1>Okay, but how do you think about the prospect of

0:20:37.560 --> 0:20:40.119
<v Speaker 1>what you do and the way you are doing it

0:20:40.200 --> 0:20:45.399
<v Speaker 1>on TV being done elsewhere? I guess I asked the

0:20:45.480 --> 0:20:48.760
<v Speaker 1>question because often when I watch your show, which I love,

0:20:49.400 --> 0:20:51.920
<v Speaker 1>I say, oh my god, I could watch this all day.

0:20:51.960 --> 0:20:54.639
<v Speaker 1>This could be a whole network. Do you feel like

0:20:54.680 --> 0:20:58.760
<v Speaker 1>there's an untapped appeal regardless of whether you're the one capitalizing.

0:21:00.840 --> 0:21:06.240
<v Speaker 2>I think people can benefit and want to see people

0:21:06.320 --> 0:21:11.480
<v Speaker 2>doing therapy. Yes, if it's good therapy. I think the more.

0:21:12.040 --> 0:21:13.600
<v Speaker 2>I don't know if the more the better, but more

0:21:13.640 --> 0:21:15.919
<v Speaker 2>would be better. I think it would be great for

0:21:16.000 --> 0:21:21.679
<v Speaker 2>people to watch a lot of this, to watch people thinking,

0:21:21.960 --> 0:21:27.800
<v Speaker 2>taking their time, thinking, analytically, listening to their unconscious, trying

0:21:27.840 --> 0:21:31.640
<v Speaker 2>to listen to their partner in a way that is compassionate,

0:21:32.080 --> 0:21:35.680
<v Speaker 2>in a way that is not about blaming or winning. Yeah,

0:21:35.760 --> 0:21:37.480
<v Speaker 2>I think it would be great if more of that

0:21:37.600 --> 0:21:38.120
<v Speaker 2>was out there.

0:21:39.880 --> 0:21:42.080
<v Speaker 1>What's also been interesting and I don't know if you've

0:21:42.119 --> 0:21:45.720
<v Speaker 1>seen this is the way your show has taken on

0:21:45.800 --> 0:21:50.240
<v Speaker 1>a second life in social media. I constantly see clips.

0:21:50.280 --> 0:21:54.000
<v Speaker 1>Are you aware of that? Do you have any I'm aware.

0:21:53.720 --> 0:21:56.160
<v Speaker 2>Of that because I go and sit at my regular

0:21:56.280 --> 0:21:58.400
<v Speaker 2>cafe here and people come up to me and they

0:21:58.400 --> 0:22:01.320
<v Speaker 2>say to me, like, I love your social media, and

0:22:01.359 --> 0:22:08.000
<v Speaker 2>I'm like, I don't have social media. I'm aware that

0:22:08.040 --> 0:22:11.040
<v Speaker 2>there's like a lot out there. I'm not part of it,

0:22:11.160 --> 0:22:14.199
<v Speaker 2>but yes, I'm aware that it's out there and that

0:22:14.200 --> 0:22:15.560
<v Speaker 2>that's where a lot of people live.

0:22:16.320 --> 0:22:21.800
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, perhaps even more so than Showtime or Paramount Plus itself.

0:22:22.240 --> 0:22:25.200
<v Speaker 1>But it's also like you kind of have less control

0:22:25.480 --> 0:22:29.520
<v Speaker 1>over that. So I was curious, is it a double

0:22:29.600 --> 0:22:32.720
<v Speaker 1>edged sword where it's like, Okay, there's more exposure, great,

0:22:33.000 --> 0:22:34.400
<v Speaker 1>but less control.

0:22:35.800 --> 0:22:38.439
<v Speaker 2>I don't actually know what to do with that. Do

0:22:38.480 --> 0:22:39.560
<v Speaker 2>you have any suggestions?

0:22:41.640 --> 0:22:44.400
<v Speaker 1>Well, it would start, and I'm not advocating you get

0:22:44.440 --> 0:22:47.400
<v Speaker 1>an official account because that does not sound like your

0:22:47.480 --> 0:22:49.440
<v Speaker 1>cup of tea, And to some degree, I don't think

0:22:49.480 --> 0:22:53.480
<v Speaker 1>you can control it. I mean, I've seen I tet

0:22:53.560 --> 0:22:57.120
<v Speaker 1>to disturb you at this, but like I've seen your

0:22:57.240 --> 0:23:02.600
<v Speaker 1>voice get taken and trained with AI so that it

0:23:02.760 --> 0:23:06.400
<v Speaker 1>looks like there are accounts run by you. I mean,

0:23:06.880 --> 0:23:09.720
<v Speaker 1>that's got to be disturbing, though frankly it's not particularly

0:23:09.720 --> 0:23:11.600
<v Speaker 1>well done, so I don't know who would fall for this.

0:23:12.359 --> 0:23:17.160
<v Speaker 2>Wow. Okay, that's that's.

0:23:16.680 --> 0:23:20.960
<v Speaker 1>A lot, I know. On a less dark note, I

0:23:21.640 --> 0:23:25.600
<v Speaker 1>I don't know if you've seen there. You have imitators

0:23:26.119 --> 0:23:30.359
<v Speaker 1>meaning impressionists who people have sent me funny memes.

0:23:30.640 --> 0:23:34.600
<v Speaker 2>Yes, I love the humor. I mean the more humor

0:23:34.640 --> 0:23:35.879
<v Speaker 2>the better. Yeah, that's right.

0:23:36.040 --> 0:23:38.800
<v Speaker 1>I will shout out a gentleman on tik toktalk named

0:23:38.880 --> 0:23:44.919
<v Speaker 1>Miguel Luciano who does a flawless and flattering imitation of you.

0:23:45.119 --> 0:23:47.320
<v Speaker 1>And I was just curious if you had seen it,

0:23:47.440 --> 0:23:50.359
<v Speaker 1>and do you Are you disturbed by that or flattered?

0:23:50.440 --> 0:23:53.400
<v Speaker 2>Or I love humor, even.

0:23:53.240 --> 0:23:57.320
<v Speaker 1>If it's at your expense totally? What's the ill Luciano,

0:23:58.000 --> 0:24:04.840
<v Speaker 1>Miguel Luciano, Okay, I want to reward good work by

0:24:04.920 --> 0:24:08.800
<v Speaker 1>publicizing it, and I think you will not be disturbed

0:24:08.840 --> 0:24:09.240
<v Speaker 1>by it.

0:24:09.400 --> 0:24:12.639
<v Speaker 2>No, I love humor and humor at my expense. Please

0:24:12.720 --> 0:24:14.520
<v Speaker 2>bring it on. I'm all for that.

0:24:15.920 --> 0:24:17.919
<v Speaker 1>Well, but it's interesting to hear that I think you

0:24:17.960 --> 0:24:21.760
<v Speaker 1>know a sense of humor isn't necessarily something you get

0:24:21.760 --> 0:24:27.040
<v Speaker 1>to show off in a psychotherapy setting. And my guess is,

0:24:27.160 --> 0:24:29.720
<v Speaker 1>and tell me if I'm wrong. Producers are probably pushed like, hey,

0:24:29.800 --> 0:24:33.280
<v Speaker 1>we want to see more of you outside the office

0:24:33.320 --> 0:24:36.520
<v Speaker 1>on the show, open up your private life. You get

0:24:36.520 --> 0:24:38.320
<v Speaker 1>those pressures. How do you feel about that?

0:24:39.040 --> 0:24:43.040
<v Speaker 2>I originally when we started making the show, the director's

0:24:43.480 --> 0:24:46.159
<v Speaker 2>Josh and Elise and Eli, they were like, well why not?

0:24:46.640 --> 0:24:50.399
<v Speaker 2>And I kept explaining I would I remember like I

0:24:50.440 --> 0:24:55.760
<v Speaker 2>would read them passages from LACAN to explain why it's

0:24:55.960 --> 0:24:58.720
<v Speaker 2>very important to maintain a certain wall of privacy. It's

0:24:58.720 --> 0:25:01.760
<v Speaker 2>why it's important for the trans it's important for the process.

0:25:01.800 --> 0:25:05.000
<v Speaker 2>It's not and I'm also private, but I also really

0:25:05.000 --> 0:25:08.960
<v Speaker 2>believe that the show will do better if it's not

0:25:09.200 --> 0:25:14.760
<v Speaker 2>about my private life. That it's not kind of cheap

0:25:15.240 --> 0:25:19.560
<v Speaker 2>idolization of the therapist. But it's the emphasis on the process,

0:25:19.600 --> 0:25:26.320
<v Speaker 2>not on the person. And they realize as we continued

0:25:26.560 --> 0:25:29.119
<v Speaker 2>making the show, they realize that it's true that people

0:25:29.160 --> 0:25:34.440
<v Speaker 2>don't need personal information about me. They need a way

0:25:34.480 --> 0:25:38.679
<v Speaker 2>of thinking. They need the insights I mean, not the nonsense.

0:25:39.960 --> 0:25:43.480
<v Speaker 1>Got it? And do you correct me if I'm wrong?

0:25:43.560 --> 0:25:46.760
<v Speaker 1>You still maintain an actual, real life practice.

0:25:47.320 --> 0:25:49.879
<v Speaker 2>Yes, that is my real life. I still that's what

0:25:50.040 --> 0:25:53.720
<v Speaker 2>matters to me the most, my patience, and that's never

0:25:53.760 --> 0:25:54.480
<v Speaker 2>going to change.

0:25:54.560 --> 0:25:57.920
<v Speaker 1>But I can't imagine, and again, correct me if I'm

0:25:57.920 --> 0:26:03.520
<v Speaker 1>wrong that your media presence doesn't somehow impact the real life.

0:26:03.560 --> 0:26:08.720
<v Speaker 1>It must your real patients must see this, and who

0:26:08.760 --> 0:26:11.840
<v Speaker 1>knows how that impacts the process.

0:26:12.680 --> 0:26:15.679
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, First of all, not all of my real patients

0:26:16.000 --> 0:26:19.960
<v Speaker 2>see Some choose not to watch. They just know about it.

0:26:20.040 --> 0:26:25.520
<v Speaker 2>And Okay, I've said this in other interviews that I

0:26:25.520 --> 0:26:28.880
<v Speaker 2>feel like my real patients are actually the ones that

0:26:29.000 --> 0:26:34.119
<v Speaker 2>carry the most burden of this show because they didn't

0:26:34.160 --> 0:26:37.240
<v Speaker 2>necessarily ask for it. They didn't, I didn't. They didn't

0:26:37.280 --> 0:26:39.720
<v Speaker 2>start working with me knowing that I'm a public figure

0:26:39.800 --> 0:26:43.360
<v Speaker 2>that I'm going to be and suddenly, you know, their

0:26:43.400 --> 0:26:49.639
<v Speaker 2>mother can see their therapist on TV. It's not necessarily great,

0:26:49.720 --> 0:26:54.720
<v Speaker 2>and so I think it's not great for my private

0:26:54.800 --> 0:27:03.680
<v Speaker 2>practice patients. But that's the price, and I think they

0:27:03.760 --> 0:27:06.120
<v Speaker 2>realize that I'm I think a lot of people were

0:27:06.160 --> 0:27:09.760
<v Speaker 2>worried that it's going to become my primary preoccupation, that

0:27:09.840 --> 0:27:12.040
<v Speaker 2>I'm not going to care anymore about my practice. But

0:27:12.080 --> 0:27:16.600
<v Speaker 2>it's not true. I love my practice. It's really where

0:27:16.640 --> 0:27:19.240
<v Speaker 2>my true self lives.

0:27:20.640 --> 0:27:23.480
<v Speaker 1>It's okay, So yeah, I mean there must be quite

0:27:23.480 --> 0:27:28.240
<v Speaker 1>a balancing act between academia, the show, the real practice.

0:27:28.240 --> 0:27:30.119
<v Speaker 1>Who know, And of course you know you have a

0:27:30.160 --> 0:27:36.200
<v Speaker 1>private life. Do you foresee a time where the show,

0:27:36.560 --> 0:27:39.720
<v Speaker 1>because of all these other demands, has to go? I mean,

0:27:40.160 --> 0:27:46.600
<v Speaker 1>or you're not even looking ahead at this point.

0:27:44.600 --> 0:27:46.840
<v Speaker 2>I don't know. Also, you know, with the way the

0:27:46.920 --> 0:27:49.840
<v Speaker 2>networks are now operating, who knows, like how long this

0:27:50.520 --> 0:27:50.800
<v Speaker 2>go on.

0:27:50.960 --> 0:27:55.080
<v Speaker 1>It's not up to you necessarily, definitely.

0:27:54.640 --> 0:27:59.520
<v Speaker 2>Not only up to me. But I'm sure at some point,

0:28:00.680 --> 0:28:03.280
<v Speaker 2>but either we will stop making it or somebody else

0:28:03.320 --> 0:28:05.359
<v Speaker 2>will replace me. I mean, I'm not going to keep

0:28:05.440 --> 0:28:09.760
<v Speaker 2>doing this forever. I'm not. I'm not a young person.

0:28:10.520 --> 0:28:14.120
<v Speaker 1>So there could conceivably be a version of this show

0:28:14.119 --> 0:28:17.560
<v Speaker 1>that continues with a different therapist. Never thought about.

0:28:17.280 --> 0:28:19.720
<v Speaker 2>That, Yeah, I think that would be interesting.

0:28:20.359 --> 0:28:26.280
<v Speaker 1>M m, certainly, although I would. I mean, we should

0:28:26.320 --> 0:28:30.080
<v Speaker 1>mention you're not the only therapist who appears on the show.

0:28:30.119 --> 0:28:35.000
<v Speaker 1>Your advisor, Virginia Goldner, your colleagues are seen talking about that,

0:28:35.440 --> 0:28:38.560
<v Speaker 1>and to me, it's almost as surprising, if not more

0:28:38.600 --> 0:28:40.959
<v Speaker 1>so that you're on the show in the sense that

0:28:41.400 --> 0:28:45.719
<v Speaker 1>so many from your typically private field are maybe not

0:28:45.800 --> 0:28:49.320
<v Speaker 1>opening up their own practices, but opening themselves up. I mean,

0:28:49.320 --> 0:28:51.240
<v Speaker 1>did that take arm twisting or.

0:28:54.160 --> 0:28:56.520
<v Speaker 2>I think for some of my friends, I mean it's

0:28:56.560 --> 0:28:58.680
<v Speaker 2>a lot of these are friends, colleagues that are in

0:28:58.720 --> 0:29:02.520
<v Speaker 2>my peer supervision group. These are all people that I anyway,

0:29:02.520 --> 0:29:05.800
<v Speaker 2>I have like really strong professional and personal bonds with

0:29:06.960 --> 0:29:10.680
<v Speaker 2>and I think early on people felt a little nervous

0:29:10.720 --> 0:29:15.920
<v Speaker 2>to participate, but they heard from me that it's there's

0:29:15.960 --> 0:29:20.880
<v Speaker 2>something that's really that feels very gratifying about doing this.

0:29:22.320 --> 0:29:28.080
<v Speaker 2>You really feel like you're doing a public service and

0:29:28.120 --> 0:29:31.320
<v Speaker 2>the you know, the team we work with make make

0:29:31.400 --> 0:29:34.280
<v Speaker 2>everything feel very natural and no one's pressuring you to

0:29:34.400 --> 0:29:38.280
<v Speaker 2>think in any one or other directions. So just feels

0:29:38.280 --> 0:29:43.320
<v Speaker 2>like an extension of our regular life. People have just

0:29:43.880 --> 0:29:44.920
<v Speaker 2>joined happily.

0:29:46.320 --> 0:29:49.800
<v Speaker 1>That's good to hear. Well, I'll bet I'm the very

0:29:49.880 --> 0:29:52.400
<v Speaker 1>first person to make this joke at the end of

0:29:52.440 --> 0:29:56.280
<v Speaker 1>an interview with you, But our time is up. Sweet,

0:29:56.880 --> 0:30:00.280
<v Speaker 1>thank you or enough for your time, looking forward forward

0:30:00.320 --> 0:30:04.360
<v Speaker 1>to the following season, and thanks for joining me on

0:30:04.400 --> 0:30:05.200
<v Speaker 1>Strictly Business.

0:30:05.760 --> 0:30:08.480
<v Speaker 2>Thank you Andrew, Thank you for these awesome questions.

0:30:12.160 --> 0:30:15.080
<v Speaker 3>Thanks for listening, be sure to leave us a review

0:30:15.240 --> 0:30:18.840
<v Speaker 3>at Apple Podcasts or Amazon Music. We love to hear

0:30:18.880 --> 0:30:22.040
<v Speaker 3>from listeners. Please go to Variety dot com and sign

0:30:22.120 --> 0:30:26.120
<v Speaker 3>up for the free weekly Strictly Business newsletter, and don't

0:30:26.120 --> 0:30:29.640
<v Speaker 3>forget to tune in next week for another episode of

0:30:29.720 --> 0:30:30.640
<v Speaker 3>Strictly Business