1
00:00:05,360 --> 00:00:08,720
Speaker 1: Hello, everybody, Welcome into the cycle. Part two of the week.

2
00:00:08,760 --> 00:00:11,240
Speaker 2: We were talking some bylows and sell highs.

3
00:00:11,240 --> 00:00:13,920
Speaker 1: We're also talking some waiver ads that Mayor and I

4
00:00:13,960 --> 00:00:16,000
Speaker 1: think you should be looking at Mayor.

5
00:00:16,079 --> 00:00:17,159
Speaker 2: Let's dive right in.

6
00:00:17,280 --> 00:00:19,320
Speaker 1: We will start where we always do for this section,

7
00:00:19,800 --> 00:00:23,040
Speaker 1: with our favorite buy lows who you got for us.

8
00:00:23,680 --> 00:00:26,200
Speaker 3: So my by low for this week is Christian Walker,

9
00:00:26,600 --> 00:00:29,640
Speaker 3: and it's a little concerning because he's an older player,

10
00:00:29,640 --> 00:00:31,040
Speaker 3: and with an older player who's off to a really

11
00:00:31,080 --> 00:00:34,559
Speaker 3: slow start, you always worry is this more than a

12
00:00:34,560 --> 00:00:36,639
Speaker 3: slow start? Is this kind of the beginning of the end,

13
00:00:37,080 --> 00:00:39,920
Speaker 3: And for Christian Walker, I don't think so. I think

14
00:00:40,479 --> 00:00:43,320
Speaker 3: there's still a lot of production to come. The one

15
00:00:43,320 --> 00:00:46,000
Speaker 3: thing I noticed while kind of researching this is that

16
00:00:46,080 --> 00:00:50,080
Speaker 3: his bat speed looks fine. So not like an obvious

17
00:00:50,080 --> 00:00:52,640
Speaker 3: concern you would, you know, if you were kind of

18
00:00:52,640 --> 00:00:55,040
Speaker 3: looking at a player as like, you know, maybe the

19
00:00:55,120 --> 00:00:56,800
Speaker 3: end is coming, you might see like a decline of

20
00:00:56,800 --> 00:01:00,360
Speaker 3: batspeed there, But his bat speed looks fine. I just

21
00:01:00,400 --> 00:01:04,040
Speaker 3: think it's kind of like a new new situation, new team,

22
00:01:04,120 --> 00:01:06,440
Speaker 3: new ballpark, new everything, and he's just kind of like

23
00:01:06,480 --> 00:01:08,920
Speaker 3: off to a slow start, and I think he's going

24
00:01:08,959 --> 00:01:10,720
Speaker 3: to turn around. I think you're going to probably still

25
00:01:10,760 --> 00:01:12,440
Speaker 3: end up with close to thirty home runs and an

26
00:01:12,440 --> 00:01:16,800
Speaker 3: average around two fifty. And I think you can buy

27
00:01:16,840 --> 00:01:18,800
Speaker 3: really low right now because there are you know, I've

28
00:01:18,800 --> 00:01:21,839
Speaker 3: seen on our discord and in the comments that people

29
00:01:21,880 --> 00:01:24,400
Speaker 3: are talking about dropping Christian Walker, and so if you

30
00:01:24,440 --> 00:01:26,080
Speaker 3: want to drop him, please go ahead and I'll pick

31
00:01:26,120 --> 00:01:26,479
Speaker 3: him up.

32
00:01:28,680 --> 00:01:32,360
Speaker 1: So, setting aside dropping him because obviously you'll be happy

33
00:01:32,400 --> 00:01:35,480
Speaker 1: to pick him up in that scenario, what would you

34
00:01:35,560 --> 00:01:38,400
Speaker 1: be willing to get rid of to acquire him right now?

35
00:01:38,440 --> 00:01:40,039
Speaker 2: What type of player?

36
00:01:40,319 --> 00:01:42,600
Speaker 1: If you want to throw ou specific names, definitely you can,

37
00:01:42,720 --> 00:01:44,760
Speaker 1: But who are the types of players that you'd be

38
00:01:44,800 --> 00:01:45,200
Speaker 1: looking to?

39
00:01:45,200 --> 00:01:45,440
Speaker 2: Say?

40
00:01:45,480 --> 00:01:47,640
Speaker 1: Like, I will move on from this person to go

41
00:01:47,680 --> 00:01:48,640
Speaker 1: get Christian Walker.

42
00:01:48,920 --> 00:01:50,200
Speaker 3: So when I run him up in the article, I

43
00:01:50,240 --> 00:01:53,200
Speaker 3: included a few names, So how about I shoot those

44
00:01:53,240 --> 00:01:55,400
Speaker 3: back at you and you tell me which player you

45
00:01:55,400 --> 00:01:59,720
Speaker 3: would rather have rest of season? Okay, So the first

46
00:01:59,800 --> 00:02:01,760
Speaker 3: name my poot was Marcus Simeon. Would you rather have

47
00:02:01,760 --> 00:02:03,200
Speaker 3: Marcus Simon or Christian Walker?

48
00:02:03,720 --> 00:02:05,120
Speaker 2: I'd rather have Christian Walker.

49
00:02:06,600 --> 00:02:07,720
Speaker 3: How about Bryce Miller?

50
00:02:08,800 --> 00:02:10,840
Speaker 2: We were just talking about Miller before we started recording.

51
00:02:11,760 --> 00:02:14,680
Speaker 1: I really liked Miller coming into the year. I think

52
00:02:14,720 --> 00:02:18,400
Speaker 1: I'd rather have Miller. But if I had a strong

53
00:02:18,600 --> 00:02:22,200
Speaker 1: need at first base, which is very possible, and I

54
00:02:22,280 --> 00:02:25,720
Speaker 1: had depth at pitching, then I might I would consider it,

55
00:02:25,760 --> 00:02:27,320
Speaker 1: but I would rather in a vacuum have Miller.

56
00:02:28,760 --> 00:02:31,799
Speaker 3: How about Freddy Peralta, I think I'd rather have Walker,

57
00:02:33,600 --> 00:02:35,200
Speaker 3: And then last one is Bailey over.

58
00:02:36,919 --> 00:02:39,000
Speaker 2: I would I like Bailey over.

59
00:02:39,080 --> 00:02:41,560
Speaker 1: I think I'd rather have Walker, though, so I think

60
00:02:41,560 --> 00:02:43,960
Speaker 1: I am buying your case of him as a by

61
00:02:44,040 --> 00:02:47,040
Speaker 1: low given that most of those names I would agree

62
00:02:47,040 --> 00:02:47,840
Speaker 1: with making that trade.

63
00:02:48,800 --> 00:02:50,520
Speaker 3: Yeah, And I tried to pair those. I looked at

64
00:02:50,800 --> 00:02:53,920
Speaker 3: our fantasy baseball trade value chart and tried to pick

65
00:02:54,000 --> 00:02:56,280
Speaker 3: people like in similar tiers that I thought would match

66
00:02:56,320 --> 00:02:59,560
Speaker 3: up as I kind of like, you know, fair trade offers.

67
00:02:59,600 --> 00:03:01,200
Speaker 3: I would do you agree that they're all kind of

68
00:03:01,240 --> 00:03:03,119
Speaker 3: like in the same kind of area as like fair

69
00:03:03,240 --> 00:03:03,840
Speaker 3: trade offers.

70
00:03:03,960 --> 00:03:06,000
Speaker 1: None of them stuck out to me as like this

71
00:03:06,080 --> 00:03:08,639
Speaker 1: is like a disrespectful offer or anything like that.

72
00:03:08,760 --> 00:03:10,359
Speaker 2: I think those are all reasonable.

73
00:03:10,840 --> 00:03:13,040
Speaker 1: I feel those are all trades that you would not

74
00:03:13,080 --> 00:03:15,480
Speaker 1: get laughed at for making in most leagues.

75
00:03:16,560 --> 00:03:18,240
Speaker 3: I would think perfect iailed it.

76
00:03:18,240 --> 00:03:21,919
Speaker 2: Then you did fine. A passing grade.

77
00:03:22,800 --> 00:03:26,840
Speaker 1: All right, My favorite BILO is Gunner Henderson, who I

78
00:03:26,880 --> 00:03:30,840
Speaker 1: wanted to highlight because obviously anybody who invested in Gunner

79
00:03:30,880 --> 00:03:34,280
Speaker 1: Henderson invested quite a bit in him in draft season,

80
00:03:34,480 --> 00:03:37,000
Speaker 1: so they're probably not just like looking to get out,

81
00:03:37,360 --> 00:03:38,240
Speaker 1: you know, no matter what.

82
00:03:38,800 --> 00:03:40,480
Speaker 2: But I wanted to highlight.

83
00:03:40,960 --> 00:03:42,520
Speaker 1: What percent I don't know if you've looked at his

84
00:03:42,520 --> 00:03:45,320
Speaker 1: statcast page or not, I hope you haven't yet. What

85
00:03:45,480 --> 00:03:48,520
Speaker 1: percentile do you think his average exit velocity is? And

86
00:03:48,560 --> 00:03:49,960
Speaker 1: also just if you want to throw out a number

87
00:03:49,960 --> 00:03:52,360
Speaker 1: of guess of what you think it actually is. And

88
00:03:52,400 --> 00:03:55,000
Speaker 1: he's had forty three played appearances since coming back from

89
00:03:55,000 --> 00:03:55,800
Speaker 1: the AL.

90
00:03:56,320 --> 00:03:58,560
Speaker 3: I have not looked at it, but since you're asking,

91
00:03:58,680 --> 00:04:00,960
Speaker 3: it feels like a trick, unless you want me to

92
00:04:01,000 --> 00:04:03,000
Speaker 3: think it's a trick, in which case it's not a trick.

93
00:04:04,440 --> 00:04:05,720
Speaker 2: Reverse reverse Reversee.

94
00:04:06,080 --> 00:04:10,440
Speaker 3: Yeah, let's go with eighty eighth percentile exit velocity.

95
00:04:11,520 --> 00:04:15,360
Speaker 1: His average EGX velocity is ninety nine point three miles

96
00:04:15,360 --> 00:04:20,200
Speaker 1: per hour. It is one one hundredth percentile in base baseball.

97
00:04:20,240 --> 00:04:24,040
Speaker 1: His hard hit rate is also one hundredth percentile, sixty

98
00:04:24,120 --> 00:04:27,599
Speaker 1: nine point two percent hard hit rate. Fat speed is

99
00:04:27,640 --> 00:04:28,920
Speaker 1: its typical, very high.

100
00:04:29,279 --> 00:04:30,600
Speaker 2: Interestingly, some of the.

101
00:04:32,080 --> 00:04:35,000
Speaker 1: His stackcast page is either blue or red. There's not

102
00:04:35,160 --> 00:04:38,120
Speaker 1: a lot of kind of gray area middle ground. So

103
00:04:38,200 --> 00:04:39,960
Speaker 1: like his barrel rate and his sweet spot rate are

104
00:04:39,960 --> 00:04:43,880
Speaker 1: actually fairly low. He's striking out a ton. That's not

105
00:04:43,880 --> 00:04:46,039
Speaker 1: going to last though. His striker rates thirty seven point

106
00:04:46,080 --> 00:04:48,640
Speaker 1: two percent his career high before this was his rookie

107
00:04:48,680 --> 00:04:51,359
Speaker 1: season at twenty five point eight percent. That's going to

108
00:04:51,400 --> 00:04:54,360
Speaker 1: come down. The walk rate is a career low, that's

109
00:04:54,400 --> 00:04:57,040
Speaker 1: going to come up. And he is hitting the absolute

110
00:04:57,080 --> 00:05:00,520
Speaker 1: crapitable I'm telling you Mayor again somebody who watches Oriols

111
00:05:00,560 --> 00:05:03,520
Speaker 1: game every single night. It feels like he has one

112
00:05:03,600 --> 00:05:06,920
Speaker 1: or two at bats where he hits an absolute missile

113
00:05:07,680 --> 00:05:10,159
Speaker 1: right at a fielder's glove. And it is crazy how

114
00:05:10,240 --> 00:05:13,040
Speaker 1: much it's happened. Right now, he's lying is his bat

115
00:05:13,040 --> 00:05:15,560
Speaker 1: average is two fourteen, is ops is five to forty three.

116
00:05:15,720 --> 00:05:17,800
Speaker 1: He has not hit a home run yet. He has

117
00:05:17,880 --> 00:05:20,440
Speaker 1: two stolen bases despite not getting on base that often.

118
00:05:20,480 --> 00:05:23,159
Speaker 2: His obie b's two thirty three. Those numbers are all

119
00:05:23,200 --> 00:05:23,720
Speaker 2: going to go up.

120
00:05:23,880 --> 00:05:28,200
Speaker 1: And I put him in this segment to say Gunner

121
00:05:28,240 --> 00:05:33,440
Speaker 1: Henderson before this injury and stretch was borderline unattainable in

122
00:05:33,480 --> 00:05:36,440
Speaker 1: most leagues. I think he is still going to cost

123
00:05:36,480 --> 00:05:39,960
Speaker 1: a pretty penny, but he might actually be attainable with.

124
00:05:39,960 --> 00:05:40,880
Speaker 2: This very slow start.

125
00:05:40,920 --> 00:05:45,000
Speaker 1: If somebody's kind of feeling early desperation mode or they're like, listen,

126
00:05:45,040 --> 00:05:47,520
Speaker 1: I just want to get out from the Gunner Henderson business.

127
00:05:47,839 --> 00:05:48,479
Speaker 2: I'm worried.

128
00:05:49,080 --> 00:05:51,920
Speaker 1: You know, last year was not an outlier for him,

129
00:05:51,960 --> 00:05:54,080
Speaker 1: but it's not like he has the longest track record

130
00:05:54,480 --> 00:05:57,080
Speaker 1: of major league success yet this.

131
00:05:56,960 --> 00:05:59,160
Speaker 2: Early in his career. Is still only twenty three years old.

132
00:05:59,839 --> 00:06:03,400
Speaker 1: I'm putting him here to say zero percent concerned those

133
00:06:03,440 --> 00:06:05,039
Speaker 1: hits are going to start falling. He's hitting the ball

134
00:06:05,080 --> 00:06:07,839
Speaker 1: too hard for them not to. I think his numbers

135
00:06:07,839 --> 00:06:09,320
Speaker 1: are going to look worse than they were last year

136
00:06:09,360 --> 00:06:10,920
Speaker 1: by the end of the season because he's had this

137
00:06:11,000 --> 00:06:15,240
Speaker 1: slow start I expect, but his pace there will be

138
00:06:15,279 --> 00:06:17,480
Speaker 1: there will come a moment soon where that luck is

139
00:06:17,520 --> 00:06:19,960
Speaker 1: going to flip and his pace is going to look

140
00:06:20,240 --> 00:06:23,520
Speaker 1: just like it did last year, a borderline forty twenty pace,

141
00:06:23,560 --> 00:06:25,720
Speaker 1: which is which is what he was close to last year.

142
00:06:27,040 --> 00:06:31,480
Speaker 1: I would trade good players, I would trade borderline studs

143
00:06:32,080 --> 00:06:35,000
Speaker 1: if I thought I could get Gunner Henderson In return.

144
00:06:34,760 --> 00:06:36,560
Speaker 3: All right, I'll trying to see where your breaking point is.

145
00:06:36,560 --> 00:06:38,160
Speaker 3: The one thing about him which I think you're right,

146
00:06:38,200 --> 00:06:40,120
Speaker 3: his swinging. Not only is he striking out a ton,

147
00:06:40,200 --> 00:06:43,279
Speaker 3: his swinging strike rate his way up. It's over fifteen percent.

148
00:06:43,279 --> 00:06:45,080
Speaker 3: It was below ten percent last year, so he just

149
00:06:45,080 --> 00:06:45,880
Speaker 3: has to start well.

150
00:06:46,000 --> 00:06:48,359
Speaker 1: The other thing I'll quickly say on that too, is like,

151
00:06:48,440 --> 00:06:51,920
Speaker 1: remember he didn't play in the last however many weeks

152
00:06:51,960 --> 00:06:54,520
Speaker 1: of spring because of this injury, So like this really

153
00:06:54,600 --> 00:06:57,159
Speaker 1: is his spring, just getting that timing down. Like we

154
00:06:57,279 --> 00:06:59,400
Speaker 1: kind of roll our eyes at spring training SATs and stuff,

155
00:06:59,440 --> 00:07:02,280
Speaker 1: but the actual act of getting those at bats is important.

156
00:07:03,320 --> 00:07:06,280
Speaker 1: So I'm like keeping that in mind, even aside from

157
00:07:06,320 --> 00:07:08,880
Speaker 1: the fact that some of the underlying numbers are still

158
00:07:09,520 --> 00:07:12,440
Speaker 1: not just better than we've shown, but like among the

159
00:07:12,480 --> 00:07:13,400
Speaker 1: best in baseball.

160
00:07:13,680 --> 00:07:16,960
Speaker 3: So how good of a player are we talking? Would

161
00:07:17,000 --> 00:07:20,800
Speaker 3: you trade Bryce Harper? Yes?

162
00:07:20,840 --> 00:07:22,440
Speaker 2: I would trade Bryce Harper for Gunnar.

163
00:07:22,200 --> 00:07:27,239
Speaker 1: Okay, Ignoring positional scarcity type.

164
00:07:27,120 --> 00:07:29,920
Speaker 3: Questions, all right, let's try some I like to do

165
00:07:29,960 --> 00:07:32,520
Speaker 3: a lot of like picture for hitter trades because a

166
00:07:32,560 --> 00:07:35,160
Speaker 3: lot of times I think in reality, like I either

167
00:07:35,200 --> 00:07:37,520
Speaker 3: have pitching or need pitching or have hitting or need hitting,

168
00:07:37,560 --> 00:07:41,280
Speaker 3: So I'm flipping one for the other. How about Gara.

169
00:07:41,200 --> 00:07:45,240
Speaker 2: Corchet Man, that's an interesting one.

170
00:07:45,360 --> 00:07:47,280
Speaker 1: So there are when you said Pitcher, there are a

171
00:07:47,280 --> 00:07:50,160
Speaker 1: couple of names that I was like, definitely I would

172
00:07:50,160 --> 00:07:52,560
Speaker 1: not trade, and that's Schooble and Schemes.

173
00:07:53,320 --> 00:07:54,280
Speaker 2: And then there was.

174
00:07:54,320 --> 00:07:59,200
Speaker 1: Like, I think, I like, like anybody after Crochet, I

175
00:07:59,240 --> 00:08:01,800
Speaker 1: definitely would Wheler and Crochet were the two where I'm like,

176
00:08:02,320 --> 00:08:06,880
Speaker 1: I would think about it. I probably wouldn't trade wheelershe

177
00:08:07,280 --> 00:08:08,800
Speaker 1: Crochet is a really it's a really good one to

178
00:08:08,800 --> 00:08:12,360
Speaker 1: throw out because I think he could be like he

179
00:08:12,400 --> 00:08:14,480
Speaker 1: could finish his sp one this year and it wouldn't

180
00:08:14,600 --> 00:08:16,840
Speaker 1: my job wouldn't be on the floor, and I wouldn't

181
00:08:16,840 --> 00:08:20,080
Speaker 1: want to give up that guy for Gunner. But I

182
00:08:20,120 --> 00:08:22,280
Speaker 1: think in a vacuum, I would like, if we were

183
00:08:22,360 --> 00:08:24,440
Speaker 1: drafting today, I would draft Gunner ahead of Crochet. So

184
00:08:24,440 --> 00:08:25,240
Speaker 1: I think I should I have.

185
00:08:25,200 --> 00:08:27,800
Speaker 3: To say yes, Okay, So that seems like that's where

186
00:08:27,840 --> 00:08:29,320
Speaker 3: the line is. I was going to keep going, but

187
00:08:29,440 --> 00:08:31,720
Speaker 3: like Logan Gilbert Spencer Stride on the.

188
00:08:31,680 --> 00:08:33,680
Speaker 2: On the picture side, that is the line.

189
00:08:33,760 --> 00:08:36,880
Speaker 1: Anybody after Crochet I would trade for Gunner I will

190
00:08:36,880 --> 00:08:39,800
Speaker 1: say right now, there's no name you can throw out that.

191
00:08:39,840 --> 00:08:42,080
Speaker 1: I mean, like, I guess Strider maybe, but that's like

192
00:08:42,120 --> 00:08:44,040
Speaker 1: a question of how much you believe in the health.

193
00:08:44,360 --> 00:08:47,000
Speaker 1: So like setting that aside, there's no picture I wouldn't

194
00:08:47,080 --> 00:08:50,240
Speaker 1: trade for Gunner. Besides those top four maybe five guys.

195
00:08:50,360 --> 00:08:52,280
Speaker 3: Did you have Gunner? You probably did Gunner ahead of

196
00:08:52,320 --> 00:08:53,400
Speaker 3: Lindor coming into the year.

197
00:08:54,960 --> 00:08:56,920
Speaker 1: I did have him ahead coming into the year, and

198
00:08:57,000 --> 00:08:58,560
Speaker 1: I would still have him ahead.

199
00:09:00,040 --> 00:09:03,360
Speaker 3: What about lad again, ignoring positional.

200
00:09:04,040 --> 00:09:06,920
Speaker 1: Yeah, ignoring positional that, that's like a very close one.

201
00:09:06,920 --> 00:09:10,440
Speaker 1: I would rather have Gunner because of the steels going forward,

202
00:09:11,559 --> 00:09:14,800
Speaker 1: and I expect the power numbers to be largely similar

203
00:09:15,160 --> 00:09:16,240
Speaker 1: once Gunnar gets going.

204
00:09:16,800 --> 00:09:20,319
Speaker 3: How about Kyle Tucker.

205
00:09:20,559 --> 00:09:21,880
Speaker 2: I'd probably rather have Tucker.

206
00:09:23,000 --> 00:09:24,920
Speaker 1: Here's an interesting one, and we don't have to like

207
00:09:25,000 --> 00:09:27,360
Speaker 1: just throw out every single name, but here, how about everybody?

208
00:09:28,080 --> 00:09:31,520
Speaker 2: Yeah, you know, I could solve this by saying where

209
00:09:31,520 --> 00:09:32,160
Speaker 2: he's right.

210
00:09:33,559 --> 00:09:35,600
Speaker 1: Now? I was gonna say, an interesting one for me

211
00:09:35,640 --> 00:09:38,240
Speaker 1: would be Churio, because you know, I was extremely high

212
00:09:38,280 --> 00:09:40,600
Speaker 1: on him coming into the year. He was going like

213
00:09:40,679 --> 00:09:44,640
Speaker 1: around round and a half later than Gunner in drafts.

214
00:09:44,240 --> 00:09:46,720
Speaker 1: He's been good He's going to give you both power

215
00:09:46,760 --> 00:09:48,400
Speaker 1: and speed like I expect Gunner to do.

216
00:09:49,800 --> 00:09:54,280
Speaker 2: He is an interesting one. I would probably trade Jackson Curio.

217
00:09:54,000 --> 00:09:56,200
Speaker 1: For Gunner Henderson today though if I could, but that

218
00:09:56,240 --> 00:09:58,000
Speaker 1: one would be like a very close one in terms

219
00:09:58,040 --> 00:09:59,640
Speaker 1: of how I viewed them rest of season.

220
00:09:59,679 --> 00:10:01,960
Speaker 3: I've go Rid eleven and Chario at fifteen.

221
00:10:03,080 --> 00:10:04,800
Speaker 2: So you would also make that deal, neyep.

222
00:10:05,640 --> 00:10:08,120
Speaker 1: Yeah, And anyways, I don't need to tell people Gunners good.

223
00:10:08,160 --> 00:10:10,400
Speaker 1: I'm just telling you that don't be don't be afraid

224
00:10:10,600 --> 00:10:16,080
Speaker 1: of this really really poor start. The good times are

225
00:10:16,120 --> 00:10:21,520
Speaker 1: coming soon. I can promise you that. All right, let's

226
00:10:21,520 --> 00:10:22,200
Speaker 1: go to our cell highs.

227
00:10:22,200 --> 00:10:22,600
Speaker 2: Who do you got?

228
00:10:22,720 --> 00:10:25,840
Speaker 3: So? My cell high is Michael Bush? And it's because

229
00:10:26,640 --> 00:10:30,000
Speaker 3: I kind of like Michael Bush. But I also he's

230
00:10:30,040 --> 00:10:32,400
Speaker 3: offten a really strong start. I'm not sure what his

231
00:10:32,520 --> 00:10:34,600
Speaker 3: value is, but I think it's probably near its peak

232
00:10:34,679 --> 00:10:38,320
Speaker 3: right now. He's batting clean up in that lineup every day,

233
00:10:38,360 --> 00:10:41,760
Speaker 3: which is great to see after a strong start with

234
00:10:41,840 --> 00:10:47,280
Speaker 3: some power, still not really hitting lefties that great, which

235
00:10:47,320 --> 00:10:49,480
Speaker 3: is interesting because I wrote him up in our Bilow

236
00:10:49,520 --> 00:10:53,280
Speaker 3: Cell High article on the site, and the interesting thing

237
00:10:53,520 --> 00:10:56,000
Speaker 3: is that he actually had a decent batting average against

238
00:10:56,080 --> 00:10:59,960
Speaker 3: lefties last year, but only one home run last year

239
00:11:00,000 --> 00:11:02,880
Speaker 3: against lefties. The other twenty we're all against righty's, and

240
00:11:02,920 --> 00:11:07,600
Speaker 3: this year he's got really poor numbers against lefties, and

241
00:11:07,920 --> 00:11:10,000
Speaker 3: I kind of think we're going to continue to see

242
00:11:10,040 --> 00:11:13,400
Speaker 3: him not in the lineup against lefties on a pretty

243
00:11:13,400 --> 00:11:16,439
Speaker 3: regular basis, which kind of takes away some of his value,

244
00:11:16,520 --> 00:11:20,160
Speaker 3: especially you think about, you know, if you're in a

245
00:11:20,200 --> 00:11:21,840
Speaker 3: daily league, fine, you can kind of flip him in

246
00:11:22,200 --> 00:11:23,800
Speaker 3: out of your lineup and get most of his stats.

247
00:11:23,840 --> 00:11:27,240
Speaker 3: But if I'm in a weekly lineup league where I

248
00:11:27,280 --> 00:11:28,840
Speaker 3: have to kind of you know, said it, what if

249
00:11:29,040 --> 00:11:31,400
Speaker 3: I you know, I'm facing two or three lefties that week,

250
00:11:31,480 --> 00:11:33,440
Speaker 3: or Michael Bush is facing two or three lefties that week,

251
00:11:33,760 --> 00:11:35,840
Speaker 3: can you just stick him in your lineup for you know,

252
00:11:35,960 --> 00:11:39,400
Speaker 3: three or four games. He's batting twenty four right now

253
00:11:39,400 --> 00:11:41,439
Speaker 3: with four home runs, Like I said, already, you know,

254
00:11:41,480 --> 00:11:44,959
Speaker 3: hitting in the middle of that order, and I think

255
00:11:44,960 --> 00:11:46,360
Speaker 3: I would try to flip him. And some of the

256
00:11:46,480 --> 00:11:49,760
Speaker 3: names I included, I'll flip it back to you because

257
00:11:49,800 --> 00:11:52,319
Speaker 3: I wrote a bunch of names, and I actually was

258
00:11:52,360 --> 00:11:55,440
Speaker 3: workshopping this with Kelly because not only is she a

259
00:11:55,440 --> 00:11:57,200
Speaker 3: really good analyst, but she's also a Cubs fan. So

260
00:11:57,320 --> 00:11:58,400
Speaker 3: I was like, tell me if I'm in the right

261
00:11:58,440 --> 00:12:01,319
Speaker 3: ballpark here for like a Michael Bush trade, because like,

262
00:12:01,360 --> 00:12:03,959
Speaker 3: am I overvaluing undervaluing him? And these are the names

263
00:12:04,000 --> 00:12:07,440
Speaker 3: I landed on. So would you rather have Michael Bush

264
00:12:07,520 --> 00:12:09,360
Speaker 3: or Brandon Fought rest of season?

265
00:12:10,600 --> 00:12:11,520
Speaker 2: I'd rather have Fought.

266
00:12:13,320 --> 00:12:21,880
Speaker 3: How about Mackenzie Gore, I'd rather Gore. Clay Holmes.

267
00:12:22,679 --> 00:12:25,760
Speaker 1: Honestly depends on the format. I'm pretty skeptical of him.

268
00:12:26,080 --> 00:12:28,640
Speaker 1: I was really high on Holmes in draft season. I'm

269
00:12:28,640 --> 00:12:31,320
Speaker 1: pretty skeptical of him going deep enough into games to

270
00:12:31,360 --> 00:12:35,439
Speaker 1: be super valuable in more points formats, but I think

271
00:12:35,480 --> 00:12:38,720
Speaker 1: he will be good the ning he pitches, So for me,

272
00:12:38,800 --> 00:12:41,600
Speaker 1: that's format dependent. I think I would probably rather have

273
00:12:41,640 --> 00:12:43,120
Speaker 1: Holmes than.

274
00:12:43,240 --> 00:12:46,719
Speaker 3: However, in point formats, he's also a spark, which can

275
00:12:46,760 --> 00:12:48,839
Speaker 3: be helpful, and you know, especially for the two start

276
00:12:48,880 --> 00:12:54,840
Speaker 3: week unless he gets minus seventeen points. Like to interact it. Yeah,

277
00:12:54,880 --> 00:12:58,760
Speaker 3: a pitcher off to a slow start, you say, Kakuchi, I.

278
00:12:58,720 --> 00:13:03,520
Speaker 1: Think I'd rather have Bush, but I don't think that's

279
00:13:03,559 --> 00:13:06,440
Speaker 1: like off on the range.

280
00:13:06,640 --> 00:13:08,880
Speaker 3: And then the one hitter I included was Tailor board,

281
00:13:08,920 --> 00:13:11,080
Speaker 3: I'd rather I want to trade for Tailor Ward if

282
00:13:11,120 --> 00:13:11,520
Speaker 3: I can.

283
00:13:12,720 --> 00:13:16,040
Speaker 1: I think I'd probably rather have Bush, but I wouldn't

284
00:13:16,200 --> 00:13:20,080
Speaker 1: argue strongly that you're wrong if you prefer Ward.

285
00:13:22,120 --> 00:13:24,240
Speaker 3: Well, there you go. That's my that's my cell High.

286
00:13:24,280 --> 00:13:26,960
Speaker 3: I just think he's after a really strong start, and

287
00:13:26,960 --> 00:13:28,400
Speaker 3: like I said, like the value was kind of like

288
00:13:28,400 --> 00:13:31,560
Speaker 3: at its peak because I rostered Michael Bush a bunch

289
00:13:31,520 --> 00:13:33,120
Speaker 3: of last year and there were just stretchers where I

290
00:13:33,160 --> 00:13:34,360
Speaker 3: just I couldn't use him and I had to, like

291
00:13:34,400 --> 00:13:35,800
Speaker 3: you know, he was like on and off my roster.

292
00:13:36,720 --> 00:13:38,760
Speaker 3: And even though I think he's probably a little bit

293
00:13:38,800 --> 00:13:40,360
Speaker 3: better this year, and obviously the clubs are buying in,

294
00:13:40,360 --> 00:13:43,560
Speaker 3: they're patting him clean up every day, I just think

295
00:13:43,600 --> 00:13:45,319
Speaker 3: the leftiest thing is going to be continued to be

296
00:13:45,320 --> 00:13:47,520
Speaker 3: a problem unless he really improves in that in that area,

297
00:13:47,559 --> 00:13:50,240
Speaker 3: and I don't know that he's going to, at least

298
00:13:50,280 --> 00:13:50,760
Speaker 3: not this year.

299
00:13:52,440 --> 00:13:55,240
Speaker 2: Yeah, I think that's that's totally fair. We'll go to

300
00:13:55,280 --> 00:13:55,920
Speaker 2: my cell High.

301
00:13:56,000 --> 00:13:58,720
Speaker 1: The only pitcher on our Bilos Eye segment so far

302
00:13:59,160 --> 00:14:03,520
Speaker 1: today I Kevin Gosman, and it's it.

303
00:14:03,720 --> 00:14:04,959
Speaker 2: He has pitched well.

304
00:14:05,720 --> 00:14:09,400
Speaker 1: But I wonder if like I was somebody who was saying,

305
00:14:09,400 --> 00:14:11,240
Speaker 1: I think he could be a nice bounce back this year.

306
00:14:11,280 --> 00:14:12,960
Speaker 2: It looked like the velocity was back up.

307
00:14:12,880 --> 00:14:15,240
Speaker 1: In spring, and he was somebody I was interested in

308
00:14:15,240 --> 00:14:18,400
Speaker 1: investing him. And so I wonder if other folks who

309
00:14:18,600 --> 00:14:21,920
Speaker 1: had that same approach and did draft him are sitting

310
00:14:21,920 --> 00:14:26,120
Speaker 1: here saying he's the RAS two forty nine. You know,

311
00:14:26,160 --> 00:14:29,960
Speaker 1: his whip is zero point seventy to one. Gosman's back.

312
00:14:30,800 --> 00:14:33,920
Speaker 1: The strikeouts are not there. Twenty strikeouts and twenty five

313
00:14:33,920 --> 00:14:37,000
Speaker 1: in a thirds innings, and a lot of the strikeouts came.

314
00:14:37,920 --> 00:14:41,280
Speaker 2: Literally half of them came. Is that literally?

315
00:14:41,320 --> 00:14:41,480
Speaker 1: Half?

316
00:14:41,480 --> 00:14:42,440
Speaker 2: Am I doing my math right?

317
00:14:42,560 --> 00:14:42,840
Speaker 3: Yes?

318
00:14:42,880 --> 00:14:45,680
Speaker 2: Literally? Half? I was like leaking a different number. Half

319
00:14:45,680 --> 00:14:46,840
Speaker 2: of them gave in that one.

320
00:14:47,120 --> 00:14:49,120
Speaker 1: The excellent start that he had against the Red Sox,

321
00:14:49,160 --> 00:14:50,880
Speaker 1: it was a superb start, you know, not taking that

322
00:14:50,880 --> 00:14:54,560
Speaker 1: away from him. The rest of his season has been good,

323
00:14:54,680 --> 00:14:59,280
Speaker 1: like very startable, but not some elite ace. And if

324
00:14:59,320 --> 00:15:01,880
Speaker 1: you are if you think there's anybody in your league

325
00:15:01,920 --> 00:15:04,760
Speaker 1: who's looking at this as like Kevin Gossman is kind

326
00:15:04,760 --> 00:15:08,280
Speaker 1: of back and expecting the era where he I mean,

327
00:15:08,320 --> 00:15:11,280
Speaker 1: prior to last season, he had three straight years of

328
00:15:11,320 --> 00:15:14,560
Speaker 1: two hundred plus strikeouts if you can trade him as

329
00:15:14,600 --> 00:15:18,000
Speaker 1: a guy that people are expecting that out of, you

330
00:15:18,000 --> 00:15:19,920
Speaker 1: should do that because you're not going to get that

331
00:15:19,960 --> 00:15:20,280
Speaker 1: this year.

332
00:15:20,320 --> 00:15:21,680
Speaker 2: I feel very strongly about that.

333
00:15:22,600 --> 00:15:25,040
Speaker 1: His FIP is a lot higher than what his era

334
00:15:25,400 --> 00:15:28,840
Speaker 1: is now it's three eighty four compared to that era

335
00:15:29,000 --> 00:15:33,120
Speaker 1: of two forty nine. I think Kevin Goslain is a

336
00:15:33,120 --> 00:15:35,040
Speaker 1: good picture. So it's not like I'm saying dumping med

337
00:15:35,080 --> 00:15:37,920
Speaker 1: Ay cost, but if you can get somebody to trade

338
00:15:37,920 --> 00:15:40,320
Speaker 1: for him as like not an ace. Nobody thinks he's

339
00:15:40,360 --> 00:15:43,120
Speaker 1: an ace, but as maybe a better picture than he is,

340
00:15:43,320 --> 00:15:47,360
Speaker 1: especially given that I'm worried about those strikeouts, then would

341
00:15:47,440 --> 00:15:49,520
Speaker 1: I would be willing to make that move. Like not

342
00:15:49,600 --> 00:15:52,520
Speaker 1: to mention the fact that he's in his mid thirties now,

343
00:15:52,600 --> 00:15:55,240
Speaker 1: like you never know with injuries and how he'll last

344
00:15:55,320 --> 00:15:58,480
Speaker 1: throughout the season. You know when you get when you

345
00:15:58,480 --> 00:16:00,520
Speaker 1: get up to that age. But I think that whip's

346
00:16:00,560 --> 00:16:01,960
Speaker 1: going up. I mean it's definitely going to go up.

347
00:16:01,960 --> 00:16:04,920
Speaker 1: It's not going to stay seventy one. I think that

348
00:16:04,960 --> 00:16:07,000
Speaker 1: era is definitely going to finish in the three's, not

349
00:16:07,080 --> 00:16:07,760
Speaker 1: the twos.

350
00:16:08,040 --> 00:16:08,920
Speaker 2: And I think he's going to.

351
00:16:08,960 --> 00:16:13,160
Speaker 1: Be not a lot under but under under a strikeout

352
00:16:13,200 --> 00:16:15,040
Speaker 1: peraining by the time we get to the end of

353
00:16:15,080 --> 00:16:17,480
Speaker 1: the season, and all that added up. If you find

354
00:16:17,480 --> 00:16:19,760
Speaker 1: somebody who's more of a believer than me, I think

355
00:16:19,800 --> 00:16:20,480
Speaker 1: you make that deal.

356
00:16:21,800 --> 00:16:24,160
Speaker 3: Yeah. His like you mentioned, his FIP is three eight

357
00:16:24,240 --> 00:16:26,840
Speaker 3: four x Rap three eight eight, Sierra three seven five

358
00:16:27,440 --> 00:16:30,800
Speaker 3: x Era three three three. It's interesting that his K

359
00:16:30,880 --> 00:16:33,400
Speaker 3: per nine is down from eight eight oh six to

360
00:16:33,600 --> 00:16:37,920
Speaker 3: seven point eleven. His K percentage is actually slightly up.

361
00:16:37,960 --> 00:16:39,520
Speaker 3: It was twenty one point four percent last year and

362
00:16:39,600 --> 00:16:41,600
Speaker 3: sitting at twenty two percent this year, So it's kind

363
00:16:41,640 --> 00:16:42,200
Speaker 3: of hard.

364
00:16:42,200 --> 00:16:44,760
Speaker 1: But still well down from twenty twenty three and before.

365
00:16:45,560 --> 00:16:48,080
Speaker 1: Oh yeah, because because he had that stretch where it

366
00:16:48,120 --> 00:16:51,960
Speaker 1: was like starting in twenty nineteen, it was K rate

367
00:16:52,120 --> 00:16:54,760
Speaker 1: was twenty five percent. I'm not gonna read the decimals,

368
00:16:54,800 --> 00:16:57,360
Speaker 1: but about twenty five percent, thirty two percent, twenty nine percent,

369
00:16:57,400 --> 00:17:00,600
Speaker 1: twenty eight percent, thirty one percent. Then las year dropped

370
00:17:00,600 --> 00:17:02,840
Speaker 1: all way down to twenty one and then twenty two

371
00:17:02,920 --> 00:17:03,680
Speaker 1: so far this year.

372
00:17:04,080 --> 00:17:06,320
Speaker 3: Yeah, well, even even looking at like twenty twenty three

373
00:17:06,320 --> 00:17:08,720
Speaker 3: and twenty twenty four, like side by side, it's kind

374
00:17:08,760 --> 00:17:11,040
Speaker 3: of a drastic drop because he threw like the same

375
00:17:11,040 --> 00:17:13,480
Speaker 3: amount of innings one eighty five versus one eighty one.

376
00:17:13,960 --> 00:17:16,239
Speaker 3: But in one one of those years he struck out

377
00:17:16,280 --> 00:17:18,720
Speaker 3: two hundred and thirty seven and the next one to

378
00:17:18,800 --> 00:17:22,760
Speaker 3: one and sixty two, So a massive, massive difference despite

379
00:17:22,800 --> 00:17:24,080
Speaker 3: the innings being almost identical.

380
00:17:24,520 --> 00:17:27,680
Speaker 1: Yeah, so again, I like Gosman, actually have him in

381
00:17:27,720 --> 00:17:31,760
Speaker 1: a number of leagues. But I'm trying to sell high,

382
00:17:31,800 --> 00:17:34,720
Speaker 1: not sell, but sell high if I can, uh, if

383
00:17:34,720 --> 00:17:35,159
Speaker 1: I can do that.

384
00:17:35,240 --> 00:17:38,320
Speaker 3: I like that. I like that you you wrote up

385
00:17:38,359 --> 00:17:40,679
Speaker 3: two players for our article for this week, and then

386
00:17:40,760 --> 00:17:43,760
Speaker 3: chose two different players for this segment.

387
00:17:43,840 --> 00:17:46,119
Speaker 1: Well, the article, the the players I wrote up in

388
00:17:46,160 --> 00:17:50,280
Speaker 1: the article, which everybody should go check out fantasypros dot com.

389
00:17:50,640 --> 00:17:53,879
Speaker 1: What are players I picked last week on the show.

390
00:17:54,119 --> 00:17:55,920
Speaker 1: That's still When it came down to write the article,

391
00:17:55,920 --> 00:17:58,360
Speaker 1: I hadn't really started prepping for this week yet, and

392
00:17:58,440 --> 00:18:01,480
Speaker 1: so rather than do that, I was like, everything I

393
00:18:01,520 --> 00:18:03,480
Speaker 1: said on the show last week still applies. So I'm

394
00:18:03,480 --> 00:18:04,879
Speaker 1: just gonna put Brent Rooker again.

395
00:18:05,880 --> 00:18:06,679
Speaker 2: Who is a picture? Oh?

396
00:18:06,720 --> 00:18:10,000
Speaker 1: I put Lodola right, yeah yeah yeah, And we talked

397
00:18:10,000 --> 00:18:11,520
Speaker 1: about those guys last week, so I wanted to mix

398
00:18:11,560 --> 00:18:13,640
Speaker 1: it up, But yes I did. I did that thought

399
00:18:13,680 --> 00:18:17,760
Speaker 1: did cross my mind. If you are struggling with lineup decisions,

400
00:18:17,840 --> 00:18:21,800
Speaker 1: our lineup assistant recommends optimal lineup suggestions to maximize your

401
00:18:21,800 --> 00:18:25,080
Speaker 1: team's performance each day or week. Just sink your league

402
00:18:25,080 --> 00:18:27,800
Speaker 1: for tailored guidance based on your roster in league settings,

403
00:18:28,000 --> 00:18:31,800
Speaker 1: download the Fantasy Baseball My Playbook app or visit fantasypros

404
00:18:31,800 --> 00:18:35,200
Speaker 1: dot com slash MLB my Playbook to set your winning

405
00:18:35,200 --> 00:18:39,680
Speaker 1: lineup today, let's get the waivers central. Who is your

406
00:18:39,760 --> 00:18:40,600
Speaker 1: favorite hitter?

407
00:18:42,240 --> 00:18:44,920
Speaker 3: So, my favorite hitter, I went pretty deep this week.

408
00:18:45,080 --> 00:18:47,280
Speaker 3: I haven't. I haven't always gone the deepest in previous weeks.

409
00:18:47,280 --> 00:18:49,359
Speaker 3: This one, I would, I would argue, was pretty deep.

410
00:18:50,480 --> 00:18:54,920
Speaker 3: Chase my draft who. I think it's a pretty good hitter,

411
00:18:55,119 --> 00:19:00,320
Speaker 3: pretty good contact hitter who like maybe not the most power,

412
00:19:00,320 --> 00:19:02,359
Speaker 3: maybe not the most speed. I just think he's a

413
00:19:02,400 --> 00:19:04,680
Speaker 3: really good hitter. And the note I wanted to add

414
00:19:04,720 --> 00:19:06,159
Speaker 3: when I was writing it up this morning is that

415
00:19:06,240 --> 00:19:09,879
Speaker 3: today he's betting leadoff. Obviously not the best lineup. He's

416
00:19:09,920 --> 00:19:12,840
Speaker 3: on the White Sox, but still, you know, he was

417
00:19:12,960 --> 00:19:17,600
Speaker 3: kind of like he came up, he was betting like seventh, sixth, fifth, sixth, fifth, leadoff,

418
00:19:18,280 --> 00:19:21,159
Speaker 3: and so there's value, you know, if especially for a

419
00:19:21,160 --> 00:19:23,080
Speaker 3: player like him who's just going to get on base.

420
00:19:23,320 --> 00:19:27,159
Speaker 3: He's actually the one, ironically who broke up the Garrett

421
00:19:27,160 --> 00:19:31,000
Speaker 3: Crochet no hitter the other day, ironically because he was

422
00:19:31,040 --> 00:19:33,119
Speaker 3: one of the big pieces in that gar Crochet trade.

423
00:19:33,800 --> 00:19:35,520
Speaker 3: And so he's the one who broke up the no hitter.

424
00:19:36,280 --> 00:19:39,680
Speaker 3: And so far he's beat in two eighty six again,

425
00:19:39,680 --> 00:19:42,960
Speaker 3: no horme runs, no steals in one hundred and twenty

426
00:19:43,040 --> 00:19:46,480
Speaker 3: two games, and the miners in twenty twenty four seven

427
00:19:46,520 --> 00:19:48,720
Speaker 3: home runs, thirteen steals, but a two ninety three average.

428
00:19:48,720 --> 00:19:49,800
Speaker 3: So I think he's a guy who's going to get

429
00:19:49,800 --> 00:19:52,639
Speaker 3: on base. He's going to run a little bit when

430
00:19:52,680 --> 00:19:54,240
Speaker 3: the weather gets warm, where he might you know, I

431
00:19:54,280 --> 00:19:57,840
Speaker 3: think his ceiling is probably ten home runs fifteen solen bases,

432
00:19:57,880 --> 00:20:01,000
Speaker 3: and even that might be a little optimistic. But if

433
00:20:01,000 --> 00:20:03,560
Speaker 3: he's betting leadoff, he can give you a nice little

434
00:20:03,840 --> 00:20:06,440
Speaker 3: batting average boost and he might score some runs even

435
00:20:06,440 --> 00:20:09,360
Speaker 3: though it's a bad lineup. And I'm in a bunch

436
00:20:09,359 --> 00:20:11,199
Speaker 3: of leagues where I can use some batting average, and

437
00:20:11,240 --> 00:20:13,479
Speaker 3: I can use a player who just you know, like

438
00:20:13,720 --> 00:20:15,159
Speaker 3: we mentioned a bunch of players who are off to

439
00:20:15,200 --> 00:20:19,719
Speaker 3: slow starts. He's someone who's hitting now and who I

440
00:20:19,760 --> 00:20:22,640
Speaker 3: think you know, I would like to add, because he's

441
00:20:22,680 --> 00:20:26,760
Speaker 3: just got really good like plate disibin back to to

442
00:20:26,880 --> 00:20:30,639
Speaker 3: ball like his his walk rate is usually like much

443
00:20:30,720 --> 00:20:32,359
Speaker 3: higher than a strikeout rate, which you don't see a

444
00:20:32,400 --> 00:20:37,040
Speaker 3: lot of. So just like a really like solid, great

445
00:20:37,080 --> 00:20:38,000
Speaker 3: plan at the plate hitter.

446
00:20:39,920 --> 00:20:41,360
Speaker 2: I think this is a good call.

447
00:20:41,359 --> 00:20:41,600
Speaker 3: I don't.

448
00:20:41,600 --> 00:20:45,400
Speaker 1: I don't really have any pushback on this one. I

449
00:20:45,440 --> 00:20:49,600
Speaker 1: and like you said, kind of super available, kind of

450
00:20:49,600 --> 00:20:52,399
Speaker 1: looking deeper. So yeah, I don't have anything to disagree

451
00:20:52,440 --> 00:20:55,359
Speaker 1: with you on. I went a little deeper as well.

452
00:20:56,800 --> 00:21:00,520
Speaker 1: I went Jake Mangum. I have pronounce them that right, right,

453
00:21:01,440 --> 00:21:03,040
Speaker 1: you guys catch.

454
00:21:02,840 --> 00:21:03,640
Speaker 3: Me on vacach.

455
00:21:03,840 --> 00:21:05,280
Speaker 2: I believe so he's one.

456
00:21:05,320 --> 00:21:07,120
Speaker 3: I always read it as magnum, So.

457
00:21:07,280 --> 00:21:11,040
Speaker 2: Yeah, I caught myself there. Yeah.

458
00:21:11,160 --> 00:21:14,520
Speaker 1: At any rate, this is like strictly a stolen bases

459
00:21:14,600 --> 00:21:17,439
Speaker 1: play and batting average, I think to a degree, but

460
00:21:18,480 --> 00:21:20,359
Speaker 1: clearly not somebody you're ever going to get any power

461
00:21:20,359 --> 00:21:22,879
Speaker 1: out of. He does not have a single barrel on

462
00:21:23,000 --> 00:21:29,159
Speaker 1: the season. It's literally barrel percentage of zero. But despite that,

463
00:21:29,520 --> 00:21:32,520
Speaker 1: he's batting three twenty seven. He has seven stolen bases already.

464
00:21:32,800 --> 00:21:35,399
Speaker 1: His on base percentage is over three point fifty. I

465
00:21:35,440 --> 00:21:37,960
Speaker 1: think this is largely who he is as a player.

466
00:21:38,000 --> 00:21:40,520
Speaker 1: So if you can afford a guy who's not going

467
00:21:40,560 --> 00:21:43,439
Speaker 1: to hit a single home run this season, quite by

468
00:21:43,800 --> 00:21:46,680
Speaker 1: his launch angle is negatives on the season right now,

469
00:21:46,720 --> 00:21:48,800
Speaker 1: Like that's this is the type of player areas he

470
00:21:48,840 --> 00:21:52,040
Speaker 1: doesn't walk a ton, but he also basically never strikes out,

471
00:21:52,680 --> 00:21:55,720
Speaker 1: and he is so fast I really expect, Like his

472
00:21:55,760 --> 00:21:58,200
Speaker 1: batting average on balls and play this year is three

473
00:21:58,280 --> 00:22:01,439
Speaker 1: sixty four. That's very in line with what it was

474
00:22:01,520 --> 00:22:03,919
Speaker 1: in the minors. Like, this is somebody who, with his

475
00:22:04,040 --> 00:22:06,439
Speaker 1: speed and the fact that he doesn't strike out, I

476
00:22:06,480 --> 00:22:10,760
Speaker 1: think can sustain quality batting averages even without you know,

477
00:22:10,880 --> 00:22:14,520
Speaker 1: barreling of the ball every time out there and having

478
00:22:14,600 --> 00:22:16,639
Speaker 1: kind of the stat cast page that would make you

479
00:22:16,640 --> 00:22:18,679
Speaker 1: think the batting average is going to be high. I

480
00:22:18,720 --> 00:22:21,119
Speaker 1: think he's one of those outlier types, just given that

481
00:22:21,119 --> 00:22:24,080
Speaker 1: he doesn't strike out and is a ninetieth percentile sprint

482
00:22:24,160 --> 00:22:26,880
Speaker 1: speed type of a guy, and every time he's on base,

483
00:22:27,000 --> 00:22:28,679
Speaker 1: you're expecting a stolen base. I don't think he's been

484
00:22:28,680 --> 00:22:30,520
Speaker 1: caught yet this year. If he has, then I didn't

485
00:22:30,840 --> 00:22:33,800
Speaker 1: then I missed that. I don't know that he's going

486
00:22:33,880 --> 00:22:35,439
Speaker 1: to get a ton of playing time the whole season.

487
00:22:35,720 --> 00:22:38,480
Speaker 1: He could get market corrected by Chandler Simpson at some point,

488
00:22:39,800 --> 00:22:44,280
Speaker 1: but for now, if you need stolen bases, take advantage

489
00:22:44,440 --> 00:22:46,760
Speaker 1: it would be. This is not a pick him up

490
00:22:46,760 --> 00:22:48,200
Speaker 1: to be a league winner the rest of the way.

491
00:22:48,280 --> 00:22:50,439
Speaker 1: This is pick him up, get some batting average, get

492
00:22:50,480 --> 00:22:52,199
Speaker 1: some steals out of him, and then be willing to

493
00:22:52,240 --> 00:22:53,680
Speaker 1: drop him when the time comes.

494
00:22:54,520 --> 00:22:57,159
Speaker 3: He's also twenty nine years old, making I believe his

495
00:22:57,760 --> 00:23:00,760
Speaker 3: MLB debut this season at twenty nine years old, So

496
00:23:00,760 --> 00:23:03,240
Speaker 3: shout out to him for sticking with it. This feels

497
00:23:03,280 --> 00:23:05,960
Speaker 3: like a raised player, just like a guy with a

498
00:23:05,960 --> 00:23:07,919
Speaker 3: specific skill set that they were just like, you know,

499
00:23:08,000 --> 00:23:10,560
Speaker 3: this fits this, This broken toy fits perfectly with what

500
00:23:10,560 --> 00:23:13,680
Speaker 3: we got going on down here. And maybe who knows

501
00:23:13,720 --> 00:23:15,639
Speaker 3: that that's stein Bernerfield, Maybe he might sneak out of

502
00:23:15,920 --> 00:23:17,560
Speaker 3: a few home runs down there in the summer if

503
00:23:17,560 --> 00:23:20,200
Speaker 3: he's still in the lineup. Like you said, it's a

504
00:23:20,200 --> 00:23:22,600
Speaker 3: short term play. Who knows how long he's going to

505
00:23:22,640 --> 00:23:24,280
Speaker 3: be in the lineup. But seven Stone bases, it's seven

506
00:23:24,320 --> 00:23:26,640
Speaker 3: Stone bases and those you know, those those count Fore.

507
00:23:26,680 --> 00:23:29,640
Speaker 1: You're in any league that soul bases matter which most

508
00:23:29,720 --> 00:23:32,960
Speaker 1: leagues do, he will get you the stolen bases. And

509
00:23:33,240 --> 00:23:36,520
Speaker 1: I think be a good batting average guy too. You

510
00:23:36,560 --> 00:23:38,439
Speaker 1: mentioned that you need batting average in a lot of places,

511
00:23:38,520 --> 00:23:41,000
Speaker 1: like I think he will help you there too, even

512
00:23:41,040 --> 00:23:43,720
Speaker 1: if not to the same degree as the as the steals.

513
00:23:44,000 --> 00:23:45,800
Speaker 1: All right, let's look at our favorite pictures?

514
00:23:45,960 --> 00:23:46,320
Speaker 2: Do you have?

515
00:23:47,960 --> 00:23:49,600
Speaker 3: So it was tough this week. It was tough to

516
00:23:49,600 --> 00:23:54,280
Speaker 3: find a picture. I had to dig pretty deep, and

517
00:23:55,000 --> 00:23:57,160
Speaker 3: I was gonna go with Tyler Molly, but I figured

518
00:23:57,480 --> 00:23:59,600
Speaker 3: someone we alreadys talked about a little bit last week.

519
00:24:00,359 --> 00:24:03,720
Speaker 3: His roster percentage is probably already creeping up in your league,

520
00:24:03,720 --> 00:24:06,960
Speaker 3: depending on when waivers run. So I decided to go

521
00:24:07,000 --> 00:24:10,400
Speaker 3: a little bit deeper with a pitcher who is off

522
00:24:10,400 --> 00:24:13,760
Speaker 3: to a strong start. Jose Kintana. Not the sexiest name

523
00:24:13,760 --> 00:24:16,360
Speaker 3: out there. You know, it's kind of been around forever.

524
00:24:17,680 --> 00:24:21,080
Speaker 3: He's in his mid thirties, never had the best stuff,

525
00:24:21,760 --> 00:24:22,640
Speaker 3: Just kind of a guy.

526
00:24:23,560 --> 00:24:26,320
Speaker 2: But you're really selling them, I know.

527
00:24:26,560 --> 00:24:28,760
Speaker 3: But here's the thing. He's off to a strong start.

528
00:24:29,000 --> 00:24:30,440
Speaker 3: I believe he's lined up to be a two star

529
00:24:30,440 --> 00:24:32,760
Speaker 3: pitcher this week, unless I have that wrong.

530
00:24:33,040 --> 00:24:34,720
Speaker 2: I think you're right about that.

531
00:24:34,320 --> 00:24:35,920
Speaker 3: I think yeah. So he's lined up to be a

532
00:24:35,920 --> 00:24:37,879
Speaker 3: two star pitcher this week, so a great streaming option,

533
00:24:38,800 --> 00:24:40,520
Speaker 3: and he's just off to a really good start for

534
00:24:40,560 --> 00:24:42,159
Speaker 3: a brusting that really needs pitching.

535
00:24:41,960 --> 00:24:44,120
Speaker 2: At the Giants at the Cardinals.

536
00:24:44,600 --> 00:24:49,320
Speaker 3: Yeah, that's terrible. You know, Giants ballpark is fine, Cardinals

537
00:24:49,320 --> 00:24:50,879
Speaker 3: are after a good start, so that could be a

538
00:24:50,880 --> 00:24:54,200
Speaker 3: tougher one. But you know, and if you need pitching

539
00:24:54,240 --> 00:24:56,359
Speaker 3: and you need a streamer, he's a pretty good option

540
00:24:56,440 --> 00:24:57,919
Speaker 3: on the waiver wire. And let me tell you, I

541
00:24:58,000 --> 00:24:59,440
Speaker 3: was I spent a lot of time on this because

542
00:24:59,480 --> 00:25:01,040
Speaker 3: I was trying to to find someone better than jose

543
00:25:01,119 --> 00:25:04,000
Speaker 3: Kntana and I couldn't, at least not someone who's likely

544
00:25:04,000 --> 00:25:08,280
Speaker 3: to be available. He's fifteen percent Yahoo, nine percent ESPN,

545
00:25:08,359 --> 00:25:14,000
Speaker 3: twenty six percent CBS, and yeah, like he's probably not

546
00:25:14,080 --> 00:25:17,159
Speaker 3: someone you're gonna keep for, you know, the whole season.

547
00:25:17,160 --> 00:25:19,280
Speaker 3: But if you need a streamer for this week, jose

548
00:25:19,320 --> 00:25:21,320
Speaker 3: Kntana has got two starts coming his way, and he's

549
00:25:21,320 --> 00:25:23,520
Speaker 3: got so far as zero point seventy to one ERA,

550
00:25:23,880 --> 00:25:27,840
Speaker 3: although his expected numbers are multiple runs higher than that.

551
00:25:28,400 --> 00:25:32,680
Speaker 1: It's funny that you looked at the available pictures and thought, well,

552
00:25:32,760 --> 00:25:34,440
Speaker 1: there's a lot of good options, so maybe this guy

553
00:25:34,440 --> 00:25:36,639
Speaker 1: could be a streamer. I did the exact opposite. I

554
00:25:36,680 --> 00:25:38,639
Speaker 1: looked at the pictures and said, well, there's not a

555
00:25:38,640 --> 00:25:40,800
Speaker 1: lot of good options, so let's pick up somebody that

556
00:25:40,840 --> 00:25:42,439
Speaker 1: I think could be good later in the season.

557
00:25:42,640 --> 00:25:44,040
Speaker 2: So I went with Chase Dolander.

558
00:25:44,760 --> 00:25:47,879
Speaker 1: He is basically the same roster percentages as Jose Quintana,

559
00:25:48,320 --> 00:25:51,160
Speaker 1: except for on CBS he's twice as rostered, but Yahoo

560
00:25:51,160 --> 00:25:54,800
Speaker 1: and ESPN he's He's basically identical to your pick, and

561
00:25:55,520 --> 00:25:59,400
Speaker 1: he is obviously like a high level prospect with the Rockies.

562
00:25:59,480 --> 00:26:03,040
Speaker 1: I know with the Rockies is not the most exciting,

563
00:26:03,160 --> 00:26:06,760
Speaker 1: but his strength as a pitcher is the opposite. Actually yes,

564
00:26:06,920 --> 00:26:09,240
Speaker 1: but his strength as a picture is the fastball velocity,

565
00:26:09,280 --> 00:26:11,760
Speaker 1: which I do think plays a little better in Colorado

566
00:26:11,840 --> 00:26:14,880
Speaker 1: than maybe guys who rely on more like breaking ball

567
00:26:14,880 --> 00:26:18,800
Speaker 1: and like movement pitches. So you know, it will be

568
00:26:18,840 --> 00:26:21,159
Speaker 1: an obstacle for him to overcome throughout his career anytime

569
00:26:21,200 --> 00:26:23,760
Speaker 1: he's pitching a home game. But I think he's a

570
00:26:23,800 --> 00:26:27,080
Speaker 1: really talented prospect. I believe he was inside the top

571
00:26:27,119 --> 00:26:30,960
Speaker 1: twenty five on MLB pipeline. Coming into the season, I

572
00:26:31,000 --> 00:26:32,840
Speaker 1: didn't really expect him actually to make his debut as

573
00:26:32,880 --> 00:26:35,240
Speaker 1: early as he did this year, and he already has

574
00:26:35,560 --> 00:26:38,520
Speaker 1: thirteen strikeouts and ten to two thirds innings. The era

575
00:26:38,720 --> 00:26:42,359
Speaker 1: is over five, the whip is over. It's one twenty two. Like,

576
00:26:42,400 --> 00:26:44,040
Speaker 1: I'm not saying that you pick him up and start

577
00:26:44,080 --> 00:26:46,960
Speaker 1: starting him right away. I think the strikeout upside is

578
00:26:47,119 --> 00:26:50,199
Speaker 1: very legitimate, though, and I think as he adjusts to

579
00:26:50,240 --> 00:26:52,359
Speaker 1: the big leagues, he will do a better job of

580
00:26:52,440 --> 00:26:54,080
Speaker 1: keeping the ball in the ballpark, which has been a

581
00:26:54,080 --> 00:26:57,560
Speaker 1: struggle for him so far to start the year. And

582
00:26:57,840 --> 00:26:59,800
Speaker 1: I think he'll be a playable pitcher by the second

583
00:26:59,840 --> 00:27:02,679
Speaker 1: half of the season, if with more upside beyond that.

584
00:27:03,040 --> 00:27:04,679
Speaker 2: So, like I said, you took kind of the.

585
00:27:04,640 --> 00:27:06,040
Speaker 1: Short term view with there not being a lot of

586
00:27:06,040 --> 00:27:07,720
Speaker 1: good options, I took a long term view with there

587
00:27:07,720 --> 00:27:09,640
Speaker 1: not being a lot of good options, and said, if

588
00:27:09,640 --> 00:27:12,159
Speaker 1: you have the ability to have a picture on your

589
00:27:12,200 --> 00:27:14,200
Speaker 1: offer that you're not really looking to start right away,

590
00:27:15,359 --> 00:27:17,400
Speaker 1: but that you can hold on to, I think there's

591
00:27:17,400 --> 00:27:20,359
Speaker 1: real upside going for especially if you need strikeouts. I

592
00:27:20,359 --> 00:27:22,440
Speaker 1: think that's gonna be the category he helps you most

593
00:27:22,480 --> 00:27:25,920
Speaker 1: in what do you make of I mean it's only

594
00:27:25,960 --> 00:27:27,640
Speaker 1: been two starts, but what we've seen so far out

595
00:27:27,640 --> 00:27:28,480
Speaker 1: of dyl Lander.

596
00:27:29,440 --> 00:27:31,119
Speaker 3: I mean, there's lots to like. It's just you know,

597
00:27:31,200 --> 00:27:33,000
Speaker 3: the elephant in the room that you already mentioned is

598
00:27:33,040 --> 00:27:34,879
Speaker 3: that it's you know, Colorado of coursefield.

599
00:27:35,440 --> 00:27:36,919
Speaker 2: But if you're not starting it start to cut you off.

600
00:27:36,960 --> 00:27:39,959
Speaker 1: But if you're not starting him every week anyway, like

601
00:27:40,040 --> 00:27:43,000
Speaker 1: your expectation is not that you could just save him

602
00:27:43,119 --> 00:27:45,800
Speaker 1: for the way starts. If that is enough of a

603
00:27:45,840 --> 00:27:48,080
Speaker 1: concern for you, Like if you're already kind of you're

604
00:27:48,119 --> 00:27:51,280
Speaker 1: not viewing him as an every week starter, then you know,

605
00:27:51,320 --> 00:27:54,000
Speaker 1: I'm not sure how much that matters, like if you're

606
00:27:54,000 --> 00:27:56,359
Speaker 1: picking and choosing your spots with him.

607
00:27:56,520 --> 00:27:59,760
Speaker 3: Yeah, he's a guy who has like great to a

608
00:27:59,800 --> 00:28:01,840
Speaker 3: lead like stuff like if you if you want to

609
00:28:01,840 --> 00:28:03,800
Speaker 3: talk about like the stuff plus model, he has like

610
00:28:03,840 --> 00:28:07,000
Speaker 3: really good stuff. He greades out really well. There really

611
00:28:07,240 --> 00:28:11,280
Speaker 3: strong track record and the miners coming up. It's just

612
00:28:11,320 --> 00:28:14,520
Speaker 3: like I can't get that Colorado stink off my mind

613
00:28:14,560 --> 00:28:17,080
Speaker 3: when when talking about pictures, which like I honestly, you know,

614
00:28:17,160 --> 00:28:18,879
Speaker 3: this is a bigger conversation, Like I think it's a

615
00:28:18,880 --> 00:28:21,480
Speaker 3: real problem with like obviously, like course field has been

616
00:28:21,480 --> 00:28:24,480
Speaker 3: around like forever. It's not going away. But it's not

617
00:28:24,720 --> 00:28:26,639
Speaker 3: just like the way the ball flies there, like the

618
00:28:26,680 --> 00:28:29,760
Speaker 3: ball with pitchers like just doesn't move the same. And

619
00:28:29,800 --> 00:28:31,160
Speaker 3: so like they have to you have to like learn

620
00:28:31,160 --> 00:28:33,600
Speaker 3: how to pitch and course field because like your slider

621
00:28:33,640 --> 00:28:34,800
Speaker 3: doesn't move when your curveballs.

622
00:28:34,840 --> 00:28:36,920
Speaker 1: That's why I actually the fastball velocity is such a

623
00:28:36,920 --> 00:28:39,880
Speaker 1: strong thing for him, possibly translating a little bit better

624
00:28:39,920 --> 00:28:40,560
Speaker 1: in Colorado.

625
00:28:41,760 --> 00:28:43,640
Speaker 3: Yeah, that's the scary part. Other than that, if you know,

626
00:28:43,680 --> 00:28:46,280
Speaker 3: if we're talking about him like on the Pirates or

627
00:28:46,320 --> 00:28:48,640
Speaker 3: like you know, some other like neutral location, I would

628
00:28:48,680 --> 00:28:52,240
Speaker 3: be excited about him. It's just the Colorado stuff is tough.

629
00:28:52,280 --> 00:28:53,480
Speaker 3: But yeah, if you're kind of like.

630
00:28:54,120 --> 00:28:57,120
Speaker 1: I wonder, I haven't looked actually in recent years, so

631
00:28:57,160 --> 00:28:58,640
Speaker 1: I wonder if this is still true. But I know

632
00:28:58,640 --> 00:29:01,280
Speaker 1: at one point, I some of the thought about Cores

633
00:29:01,440 --> 00:29:04,600
Speaker 1: was like it's such a big outfield that it's actually

634
00:29:04,600 --> 00:29:06,959
Speaker 1: more of a better like doubles and triples park than

635
00:29:07,000 --> 00:29:10,000
Speaker 1: home runs necessarily, like obviously the ball still does travel.

636
00:29:10,720 --> 00:29:12,720
Speaker 1: I wonder because home runs have been a problem for

637
00:29:12,800 --> 00:29:14,800
Speaker 1: him in his first two starts. He's given up four

638
00:29:14,800 --> 00:29:18,080
Speaker 1: of them already. I wonder if the home games almost

639
00:29:18,120 --> 00:29:21,000
Speaker 1: maybe play a little to his favor with the outfield

640
00:29:21,000 --> 00:29:23,320
Speaker 1: being as big as it is and cores. That would

641
00:29:23,320 --> 00:29:24,720
Speaker 1: require me to look into it a little more. I

642
00:29:24,760 --> 00:29:26,600
Speaker 1: don't want to speak to out out of hand.

643
00:29:26,640 --> 00:29:28,680
Speaker 2: There, I pulled it up real quick.

644
00:29:28,920 --> 00:29:32,000
Speaker 3: Okay, so let's take a look the if we're just

645
00:29:32,040 --> 00:29:34,960
Speaker 3: talking about I just pulled up the park factors leaderboard

646
00:29:34,960 --> 00:29:41,160
Speaker 3: on Stockcast number one the Rockies of course field, but

647
00:29:41,240 --> 00:29:44,480
Speaker 3: if we're going by just home runs, they are one

648
00:29:44,480 --> 00:29:47,600
Speaker 3: oh seven, which is above average. One hundred is average,

649
00:29:48,800 --> 00:29:50,880
Speaker 3: which puts them in the top nine, So they're like

650
00:29:51,000 --> 00:29:53,000
Speaker 3: not the most and that's this is over the last

651
00:29:53,000 --> 00:29:54,960
Speaker 3: three years, so they're still like top ten.

652
00:29:55,080 --> 00:29:56,760
Speaker 1: So I'm right that it's not to the same degree

653
00:29:56,800 --> 00:29:59,360
Speaker 1: as some of the other stuff with the park factor,

654
00:29:59,440 --> 00:30:01,440
Speaker 1: but it is still an issue.

655
00:30:01,960 --> 00:30:04,120
Speaker 3: Also, triples off the chart two oh three.

656
00:30:04,400 --> 00:30:07,479
Speaker 2: Yeah, that's always been there. Like the triples. It's crazy.

657
00:30:07,520 --> 00:30:10,600
Speaker 1: I've seen so many triples live like relative to how

658
00:30:10,880 --> 00:30:13,200
Speaker 1: common of an occurrence it is in a baseball game,

659
00:30:13,560 --> 00:30:15,600
Speaker 1: and not just since moving to Denver, like even at

660
00:30:15,640 --> 00:30:17,840
Speaker 1: other scenarios. My buddy and I we were like trying

661
00:30:17,880 --> 00:30:19,600
Speaker 1: to count one time, Like every time we go to

662
00:30:19,640 --> 00:30:21,480
Speaker 1: a game, it seems like we see a triple that

663
00:30:21,600 --> 00:30:24,640
Speaker 1: has gotten up since going to Rockies games living out here,

664
00:30:24,680 --> 00:30:27,200
Speaker 1: But yeah, I see a lot of triples.

665
00:30:26,920 --> 00:30:29,200
Speaker 3: Are also were also number two in doubles. Do you

666
00:30:29,240 --> 00:30:31,280
Speaker 3: can you name the park that's number one in doubles?

667
00:30:34,360 --> 00:30:40,240
Speaker 1: My first guess is Fenway, just with the weird dimensions. Okay, yeah,

668
00:30:40,320 --> 00:30:42,200
Speaker 1: I was gonna say, I don't have a second guess

669
00:30:42,240 --> 00:30:43,680
Speaker 1: if it's not Fenway.

670
00:30:44,000 --> 00:30:46,080
Speaker 3: Yeah, a lot of people think Fenway is like a

671
00:30:46,080 --> 00:30:48,000
Speaker 3: big home run park. It's not. It's a blow average

672
00:30:48,000 --> 00:30:49,440
Speaker 3: home run park. Well, it's a doubles park.

673
00:30:49,520 --> 00:30:53,160
Speaker 1: Well, directly down the line is easy, but the rest

674
00:30:53,160 --> 00:30:56,320
Speaker 1: of it is like a pretty deep outfield or the Monster.

675
00:30:56,560 --> 00:31:00,880
Speaker 3: So yeah, well yeah, or the monster or like straightaway

676
00:31:00,920 --> 00:31:03,320
Speaker 3: center to like right center is four twenty huge, Yeah,

677
00:31:03,400 --> 00:31:06,440
Speaker 3: it's a straight away right field is three eighty, but

678
00:31:06,640 --> 00:31:07,520
Speaker 3: like straight.

679
00:31:07,280 --> 00:31:09,160
Speaker 2: Away redfield that's not right down the line right down

680
00:31:09,200 --> 00:31:09,480
Speaker 2: the line.

681
00:31:09,560 --> 00:31:11,120
Speaker 3: No, no, no, I'm talking about like strict like where the

682
00:31:11,200 --> 00:31:13,200
Speaker 3: right fielder plays is three down the line.

683
00:31:13,080 --> 00:31:15,760
Speaker 1: Is like literally literally outside of down the line. That

684
00:31:15,800 --> 00:31:17,400
Speaker 1: whole park is difficult a home.

685
00:31:17,360 --> 00:31:20,000
Speaker 3: Run, Well, it goes like because it's like round yeah,

686
00:31:20,000 --> 00:31:21,720
Speaker 3: after the poll, it goes like straight.

687
00:31:21,440 --> 00:31:25,200
Speaker 1: Back yeah yeah, so uh yeah interesting.

688
00:31:26,120 --> 00:31:27,680
Speaker 3: Oh you want to hit some deep league targets?

689
00:31:27,880 --> 00:31:29,880
Speaker 2: Say, I lost my thought. Yeah, we'll dive back into

690
00:31:29,960 --> 00:31:31,880
Speaker 2: the quickly, right through the deep league targets.

691
00:31:33,120 --> 00:31:37,480
Speaker 3: So we mentioned already for favorite hitters for waivers, Chase

692
00:31:37,480 --> 00:31:41,760
Speaker 3: my draft, Jake Mangum and then pictures Josek and Towna,

693
00:31:41,880 --> 00:31:45,680
Speaker 3: Chase Dollander. Some deep league targets if you need some

694
00:31:45,720 --> 00:31:49,040
Speaker 3: of these. Peven Smith, he's been off to a hot

695
00:31:49,080 --> 00:31:51,400
Speaker 3: start as a hitter. Again, these probably aren't guys you're

696
00:31:51,400 --> 00:31:54,520
Speaker 3: gonna roster forever, but you need help in in deeper leagues. Uh.

697
00:31:54,600 --> 00:31:56,520
Speaker 3: Nick Barntinez is an interesting one. He's off to a

698
00:31:56,560 --> 00:32:00,400
Speaker 3: rough start. He has a two start week coming up. However,

699
00:32:00,880 --> 00:32:03,520
Speaker 3: one of those two stars is at Colorado. The first

700
00:32:03,520 --> 00:32:07,480
Speaker 3: one is against Miami, very favorable spot for him to bounce.

701
00:32:07,520 --> 00:32:09,000
Speaker 2: And it is Colorado, a tough park to pitch in.

702
00:32:09,040 --> 00:32:09,960
Speaker 2: Pull up the park factor.

703
00:32:11,520 --> 00:32:13,680
Speaker 3: I believe it is. I believe it is. Mike or

704
00:32:13,720 --> 00:32:16,600
Speaker 3: Stremsky is a guy I mentioned last week, still available,

705
00:32:16,760 --> 00:32:21,400
Speaker 3: still hitting really well. Cameron Meisner, another one of the

706
00:32:21,400 --> 00:32:24,440
Speaker 3: eight hundred players that the Rays have that are available

707
00:32:24,640 --> 00:32:27,239
Speaker 3: just producing for them right now. Matt Murvis is off

708
00:32:27,240 --> 00:32:29,080
Speaker 3: to a strong star and then Tyler Anderson, who's had

709
00:32:29,080 --> 00:32:32,720
Speaker 3: some recent good recent years, is off to another pretty

710
00:32:32,720 --> 00:32:34,840
Speaker 3: good start. So if you need another pitching option, Tyler

711
00:32:34,880 --> 00:32:36,280
Speaker 3: Anderson should be available for you.

712
00:32:36,880 --> 00:32:38,200
Speaker 1: All Right, We got to wrap up there because we

713
00:32:38,280 --> 00:32:39,920
Speaker 1: went a little long in this segment. If you missed

714
00:32:39,960 --> 00:32:41,680
Speaker 1: our first segment, Round on the Bases, go ahead and

715
00:32:41,760 --> 00:32:44,200
Speaker 1: check that out on your feeds or on YouTube, and

716
00:32:44,240 --> 00:32:46,200
Speaker 1: make sure to stick around for our pitching streamers and

717
00:32:46,240 --> 00:32:49,160
Speaker 1: to start pitcher competition as we preview the week ahead

718
00:32:49,200 --> 00:32:52,320
Speaker 1: on the Mound for Mayor Ryan Worldman, thanks for tuning

719
00:32:52,360 --> 00:32:55,080
Speaker 1: in and we'll see you next episode. Thanks for listening

720
00:32:55,080 --> 00:32:57,520
Speaker 1: to the Fantasy Pros Fantasy Baseball podcast.

721
00:32:57,760 --> 00:33:00,000
Speaker 2: If you love the show, the best freeway to suppor

722
00:33:00,240 --> 00:33:00,560
Speaker 2: us is by

723
00:33:00,640 --> 00:33:04,360
Speaker 1: Leaving a positive review on Apple Podcasts or Spotify, Follow

724
00:33:04,440 --> 00:33:07,840
Speaker 1: us on x, Instagram, and TikTok at Fantasy Pros, and

725
00:33:07,880 --> 00:33:10,800
Speaker 1: subscribe to our YouTube channel at YouTube dot com slash

726
00:33:10,840 --> 00:33:12,040
Speaker 1: Fantasy Pros MLB