Speaker 1: You are entering the freedom huge Beware, Beware the Biden
Speaker 1: amnesty ABC's ambush town hall judge in Pennsylvania says lockdowns
Speaker 1: unconstitutional and stars freeze their Instagram accounts for a day
Speaker 1: to protest hate speech. This is the Buck Sexon Show,
Speaker 1: where the mission or mission is to decode what really
Speaker 1: matters with actionable intelligence, Make no mistakes, break You're a
Speaker 1: great American. Again, the Buck Sexon Show begins. He's a
Speaker 1: great guy. No, welcome everyone to the Buck Sexton Show. Yes,
Speaker 1: we are locked and loaded. I do enjoy so much.
Speaker 1: I do enjoy so much that we are focused in
Speaker 1: this fight right now. Obviously the stakes are very high.
Speaker 1: There's a lot to discuss here. More information today about
Speaker 1: the mass free vaccination campaign that the Trump administration is
Speaker 1: rolling out, saying could be in mass distribution as soon
Speaker 1: as January. I want to start with something else because
Speaker 1: I often tell you guys, you gotta understand the stakes
Speaker 1: in this election, or you're gonna hear this, or there's
Speaker 1: a certain pundit speak that everyone's going to constantly be using. Right. Oh,
Speaker 1: it all comes down to turn out. Get ready for
Speaker 1: that one, well, Bob, Really important polling today and what
Speaker 1: it really means is that at the end, the election
Speaker 1: will come down to turn out. But why is it
Speaker 1: that I feel like this election is in particular so important?
Speaker 1: What is it about this one that separates it from
Speaker 1: previous elections? And you could argue that this issue isn't
Speaker 1: different from twenty sixteen. We're just closer and it's more
Speaker 1: likely to even happen this time around if Democrats take power,
Speaker 1: and this is the issue that will control all others.
Speaker 1: If you believe in your right to bear arms, if
Speaker 1: you believe in the Second Amendment, if you believe in
Speaker 1: the First Amendment, if you believe in individual constitutional freedoms
Speaker 1: that are not subject to the whims of the mob
Speaker 1: and the Democrat parties moods of the moment, then you
Speaker 1: should be very concerned about this one issue that will
Speaker 1: overshadow all others. And it's amnesty. It's illegal immigration that
Speaker 1: then turns into mass legalization that then transitions into citizenship
Speaker 1: for people who broke the law, came here illegally and
Speaker 1: are going to be by at least a three to one,
Speaker 1: maybe more like an eight or nine to one vote
Speaker 1: reliable Democrats. Now, let's be very clear about all This
Speaker 1: has nothing to do with a person's country of origin, ethnicity, nationality.
Speaker 1: Don't care about any of that. I wouldn't want five
Speaker 1: million Swedes showing up illegally and voting in this country
Speaker 1: once they got an amnesty. I wouldn't want this for
Speaker 1: anyone from Latin America. I wouldn't want this from anyone
Speaker 1: from Asia, Europe, you name it. We have laws. We're
Speaker 1: a nation of laws. We're supposed to care about sovereignty
Speaker 1: and the rule of law, which, as we know, the
Speaker 1: Democrats don't really. We see this with the police situation
Speaker 1: and how they're undermining cops are undermining the front line
Speaker 1: of our law enforcement efforts because it benefits them right now.
Speaker 1: Because a country that is frightened and suffering is more
Speaker 1: likely to vote for change. A country that thinks that
Speaker 1: people aren't able to freely walk down the street without
Speaker 1: being concerned for their physical safety or that they have
Speaker 1: to worry whether their business will be burned down to
Speaker 1: the ground, that's a country that just wants something else.
Speaker 1: And then there's also the rest and the anger that
Speaker 1: has been building up in Democrat controlled enclaves in major cities,
Speaker 1: including a lot of majority majority minority areas of large,
Speaker 1: large urban districts where the Democrats are pandering right, instead
Speaker 1: of saying, you know what, maybe some of the Democrat
Speaker 1: policies have failed these communities as they have, they're saying
Speaker 1: it's not anything that we've done, it's their fault, it's
Speaker 1: the Republicans. Now, this is an argument that you would
Speaker 1: think should fall on deaf ears based on reason, history, facts, data, logic.
Speaker 1: But all that gets pushed aside. All that gets pushed
Speaker 1: aside because of the emotions, because of the narrative, the propaganda,
Speaker 1: and if we get amnesty, because of the votes, it's
Speaker 1: going to be all over. Friends, understand this. As Joe
Speaker 1: Biden continues to say buffoonish things across the country, there's
Speaker 1: one thing that he is very clear on. The Democrat
Speaker 1: Party has slowly but now openly become a day facto
Speaker 1: open borders party. Now I understand the argument this is
Speaker 1: to be bucked. But we have all these border controls,
Speaker 1: and Trump has in building a wall, and there's a
Speaker 1: bipartisan consensus about securing the border. The bipartisan consensus about
Speaker 1: border security is a fraud. It's a fiction, it's not real.
Speaker 1: Democrats don't want border security they just want to make
Speaker 1: sure they're counting all of their soon to be made
Speaker 1: voters as they cross into the country. Who do they
Speaker 1: not want to allow in If you don't think that
Speaker 1: things are going well in Honduras because of MS thirteen,
Speaker 1: you should be able to claim refugee status here. That
Speaker 1: was the Democrat Party's position and still is. Democrats believe
Speaker 1: that anyone who comes here, particularly from a third world country,
Speaker 1: particularly from circumstances where they have very limited education, no
Speaker 1: connection to America other than economic interest, they think that's
Speaker 1: that's a great thing, and they want as much of
Speaker 1: that as is possible, and they see California as the
Speaker 1: model for the rest of the country. Bring in as
Speaker 1: many illegals as possible, so then you tip the political
Speaker 1: balance permanently in favor of the Democrats Socialist left, and
Speaker 1: then those households, those illegals, as they have household formation
Speaker 1: and they have children here. The children, of course, are
Speaker 1: under our law, considered US citizens. We've never really dealt
Speaker 1: with in court the issue of anchor babies and subject
Speaker 1: to the jurisdiction thereof, but Trump said he would. That
Speaker 1: has not yet happened, but currently or a US citizen
Speaker 1: if you're born here and if your parents came here illegally,
Speaker 1: and we know that this leads to birth tourism, where
Speaker 1: Asian Asian visitors, not even immigrants, will show up here,
Speaker 1: have a baby in a usually California hospital, give that
Speaker 1: babies it is, and ship go back to mainland China
Speaker 1: in particular, and then when they feel like it, their
Speaker 1: kid gets to go to come back to America full
Speaker 1: citizenship rights, the whole thing, right, go to in state
Speaker 1: tuition and the ucale system. And no other country in
Speaker 1: the world does this. We're the only country where people
Speaker 1: are doing that, at least the only major country that
Speaker 1: I know of where that occurs. And we're told that
Speaker 1: this is normal. I know immigration is not a major
Speaker 1: media narrative right now. People aren't focused on this. I'm
Speaker 1: trying to tell you we've lost sight of this. Trump
Speaker 1: needs to return to this issue because the Democrats are
Speaker 1: all on board. They already know what the game plan is,
Speaker 1: they know what they're going to do if they get
Speaker 1: a Democrat in the White House under these circumstances, before
Speaker 1: the wall has been built, before there has been a
Speaker 1: true reform in security at the border, and also for
Speaker 1: enforcement of immigration. Those things have not happened yet, and
Speaker 1: we don't have some grand bargain to prevent a future amnesty.
Speaker 1: After a mass amnesty, in fact, it will become even
Speaker 1: more likely, which gets us to that open borders de
Speaker 1: facto open border status I'm talking about. There's no such
Speaker 1: thing as an open border, no, no no one really has it.
Speaker 1: There's no country that has a truly open border, but
Speaker 1: where we would be as close to it as anybody.
Speaker 1: Joe Biden knows what his marching orders are. Here here
Speaker 1: he is saying what he's gonna do if he becomes
Speaker 1: president for the first hundred days play clip nine. There're
Speaker 1: gonna be no deportations in the first hundred days of
Speaker 1: my campaign. Right, you are going to freeze deportations. Freeze
Speaker 1: deportations for the first one hundred days and then and
Speaker 1: the only people will be deported are people who committed
Speaker 1: a felony. While here that's number one, freeze deportations. Huh.
Speaker 1: So the law doesn't counter anymore, right US law. If
Speaker 1: you're in the United States illegally, you are subject to deportation.
Speaker 1: Now they're going to go beyond just the prosecutorial discretion.
Speaker 1: Expansion of the Obama administration, which is really just lawlessness,
Speaker 1: right oh. Obama says We're going to do everything we
Speaker 1: can to make sure that only the proper resources are
Speaker 1: utilized for deportations. Ie. Yeah, if you, you know, kill someone,
Speaker 1: or you're in a drunk driving accident, you maim someone,
Speaker 1: I guess we'll still deport that illegal. But other illegals, no, no,
Speaker 1: they get to they get to stay, especially if there
Speaker 1: are dacca dappa, you know, deferred action for the friends
Speaker 1: of the parents of the childhood arrivals, you know, DAPA.
Speaker 1: I'm sure they we're getting ready for that one. Well
Speaker 1: I'm not. I wasn't brought here as a kid, but
Speaker 1: my friend was, and you know, we're close, so shouldn't
Speaker 1: I stay too. Biden saying no deportation in the first
Speaker 1: hundred days, what do you what do you think that is?
Speaker 1: It's not a dog whistle to the Democrat base. It's
Speaker 1: just letting them know, guys, it's the plan. We're gonna
Speaker 1: freeze all deport to give the Democrats in Congress, assuming
Speaker 1: they have even a simple majority in the House, and
Speaker 1: they might even have one in the Senate, they're going
Speaker 1: to get rid of the filibuster and their first order
Speaker 1: of business will be amnesty. They made a strategic mistake
Speaker 1: the last time. The Democrats have learned from this. They
Speaker 1: went all in on healthcare and couldn't get the American
Speaker 1: people there, so they had to do this Obamacare thing
Speaker 1: that they had to change the implementation, and then it
Speaker 1: was subject to all kinds of legal challenges. What they
Speaker 1: for the true left wing socialist takeover of America, what
Speaker 1: they should have done. And I can only say that
Speaker 1: now because they missed their window with it, So it's
Speaker 1: not like I'm giving them any advice they're going to take.
Speaker 1: What they should have done is go all in on
Speaker 1: ambassy and Republicans were willing. Look at Rubio and others,
Speaker 1: the Gang of Eight were right, they were willing to
Speaker 1: do it. And then the political gravity, the political reality
Speaker 1: shifts dramatically. You get whatever you want after that. It's
Speaker 1: not eleven million illegals, folks. And I'm not just making
Speaker 1: I've talked to border patrol about this at the highest levels.
Speaker 1: I've talked to Immigration and Customs enforcement the highest level.
Speaker 1: The answers we have no way of knowing, and Democrats
Speaker 1: won't let us know. But it's probably twenty to twenty
Speaker 1: five million illegal aliens in the country. And when it's
Speaker 1: a Democrat amnesty and they just say, everybody, just come
Speaker 1: out and you get your get come on out, get
Speaker 1: your citizenship. Everyone. Then we'll finally see the numbers. And
Speaker 1: then it's too late. Buck, this is this is too much.
Speaker 1: They wouldn't do this, This isn't the plan. Really. Here's
Speaker 1: Joe Biden yesterday play eight. President Trump is canceled doc
Speaker 1: I'm gonna do. I'm gonna reinstate it, and then they're
Speaker 1: going to be part of what I'm going to send
Speaker 1: to the United States Congress is a total immigration bill
Speaker 1: to provide a pathway to citizenship for undocumented people in
Speaker 1: the United States of America. This is this is it
Speaker 1: makes no sense for us not to do that pathway
Speaker 1: to citizenship. The only guarantee that you get with a
Speaker 1: pathway to citizenship is amnesty for legal aliens. All the
Speaker 1: other stuff they say, we have done this before. Look
Speaker 1: at history, look at the Reagan amnesty. I know of
Speaker 1: some people don't like to hear this in the right,
Speaker 1: but Reagan got swindled. Look at the end and he
Speaker 1: admitted that. So don't don't send me some angry email. Buck,
Speaker 1: don't say that about Saint Reagan. Reagan's like, look, I got,
Speaker 1: I got, I got bamboozled. They will say there are
Speaker 1: all these checks and balances, and only people who pay
Speaker 1: back taxes and learn English and all that's all crap.
Speaker 1: And they'll be court challenges for all eternity for anybody
Speaker 1: after that who should be deported, even under the amnesty
Speaker 1: that they pass. And you'll be paying for it, right though,
Speaker 1: Bill be lawyers offered up by the government or by
Speaker 1: nonprofits who cares, and they will may make sure that
Speaker 1: no one ever gets deported. What do you think we're
Speaker 1: fighting right now? In an election where it's very likely
Speaker 1: that a half a million total votes will be the
Speaker 1: margin of victory in the various states in play, and
Speaker 1: it could be one hundred two hundred thousand votes. The
Speaker 1: Democrats have a plan here to amnesty by their own
Speaker 1: numbers at least eleven point seven million, and it's probably
Speaker 1: double that at the very bit. They're gonna do it
Speaker 1: at the very beginning. Why wouldn't they right, why wouldn't
Speaker 1: they do this makes perfect sense for them, But it
Speaker 1: means the Republican Party and limited government and the Constitution
Speaker 1: as we know it an individual rights. That stuff all
Speaker 1: goes away in favor of big government, big state, socialism,
Speaker 1: rule by the mob. No more individual rights, no more
Speaker 1: anchoring constitution to protect us from what the big state
Speaker 1: wants to do. Those are the stakes. That's what we're
Speaker 1: up against right now. And I wish the President of
Speaker 1: the United States, who won his first election on this issue,
Speaker 1: would return to it now. I know there's COVID, I
Speaker 1: know there's law and order issues. We're talking about that
Speaker 1: a lot, but what about immigration. Tell people that you're
Speaker 1: going to have built almost three hundred miles of wall
Speaker 1: already and they're going to get to five hundred in
Speaker 1: short order. Tell people, mister president, where is this issue
Speaker 1: where there's silence on it? And it's not just about
Speaker 1: what's happening today. It is about the strategic, long term
Speaker 1: implications for this country. He won in twenty sixteen on this.
Speaker 1: He can help himself win again if he focuses in
Speaker 1: on this, and we all need to be aware of it.
Speaker 1: With amnesty comes the end, my friends, this country will
Speaker 1: never be the same afterwards. You're in the Freedom mund
Speaker 1: This is the Buck Sex and Show podcast. He is
Speaker 1: probably wrong according to my sources, about when the people
Speaker 1: working on the vaccine will feel good about it getting
Speaker 1: out of phase three, especially with this little setback they
Speaker 1: just had. I don't know that it's a little setback,
Speaker 1: but they have people who are getting sick in a
Speaker 1: way that they have to figure out why. So let's
Speaker 1: say he's wrong about when it comes out because he
Speaker 1: wants the time to the election. Of course he does.
Speaker 1: He wants everything about this to be geared to his advantage.
Speaker 1: A vaccine doesn't stop this virus for us, thanks noted
Speaker 1: legal and high level legal expert in high level intellectual
Speaker 1: Chris Kuomozzi. And the vaccine won't stop this. What will
Speaker 1: stop it? If you're listening to democrats, nothing stops the pandemic.
Speaker 1: If you listen to the current drumbeat from the media,
Speaker 1: get ready for a second wave more masking. They're all now,
Speaker 1: they're all not telling you, Oh, it's gonna be maybe
Speaker 1: next summer we can start to just live life normally
Speaker 1: again next Some of these people are out of their minds.
Speaker 1: They do not have the rights to control everyone because
Speaker 1: of their fear or their political needs. I'm sorry, but
Speaker 1: but mandating orders for people who are healthy with the
Speaker 1: idea that it's theoretically possible that some of them may
Speaker 1: be sick and get other people sick is tyrannical lunacy.
Speaker 1: And everyone agreed in the medical community about that until
Speaker 1: like five minutes ago. You can read about pandemic preparators.
Speaker 1: You can read from the from the top levels of
Speaker 1: global health expertise. When they looked at lockdowns, I always said, wait,
Speaker 1: we can't do this. That's too much and we don't
Speaker 1: even know how well it will work. And here's here's
Speaker 1: some news for them. It didn't work. Fires all over
Speaker 1: the country. Something like Canna say, oh, well, we didn't
Speaker 1: do a good enough job. Yeah, kind of like communism. Right,
Speaker 1: the lockdown wasn't implemented correctly, but next time we'll get
Speaker 1: it right. Wasn't implemented correctly. The lockdown makes no sense.
Speaker 1: Lockdown until vaccine, we all agree, too painful, too long,
Speaker 1: too much to damaging to society, with too little benefit.
Speaker 1: Because you could never truly lockdown. People starve in their homes, right,
Speaker 1: you gotta go to the groceries, you gotta go outside
Speaker 1: to do certain things. People are gonna mingle with people.
Speaker 1: Not everyone's gonna listen. We don't have the police resources
Speaker 1: to force everybody to do what the lockdowners want them to.
Speaker 1: And even if we did have those resources, it would
Speaker 1: be wrong. It would be tyranny, real tyranny. Into The
Speaker 1: Libs that were complaining about trump fascism at the beginning
Speaker 1: of his presidency have had not a word of protests,
Speaker 1: in fact, a lot of support for governments just arbitrarily
Speaker 1: saying you can't leave your home, you can't see other people,
Speaker 1: you can't see family and friends. And we've just sort
Speaker 1: of gone along with this. And I'm even seeing conservative saying, oh,
Speaker 1: wear a mask, wear a mask, do as you're told.
Speaker 1: Why show me the proof that any of this has
Speaker 1: done anything for us. All that it's done is we
Speaker 1: wait till the level goes really low, and then we reopen,
Speaker 1: and then all of a sudden the cases go up
Speaker 1: because they're doing more testing. You're delaying cases, you're not
Speaker 1: stopping them. So what is the point. And now they're
Speaker 1: even saying with a vaccine, it doesn't end. So when
Speaker 1: does it end? Oh? I know when it ends when
Speaker 1: they say so, that's not the country, that's not the
Speaker 1: world I want to live in. Thanks for listening to
Speaker 1: the bus Essen Show podcasts. Remember to subscribe on Apple podcasts,
Speaker 1: the iHeartRadio app, or wherever you get your podcasts. I'm
Speaker 1: just going to be frank here. I've heard some people
Speaker 1: say basically, well, it's all old people, you know, they're
Speaker 1: at the end of their life. That is not. First
Speaker 1: of all, that's a terrible thing to say and violates
Speaker 1: every ethical standard. But second of all, it is not
Speaker 1: just going to be ninety five year olds. It is
Speaker 1: going to be lots of people who would die if
Speaker 1: we just let this virus rip and didn't wear masks
Speaker 1: and didn't do social distancing and didn't do anything. It
Speaker 1: would be our mothers and fathers and sisters and brothers
Speaker 1: and friends and children who would be dying. Why would
Speaker 1: you want that? Why does the president of the United
Speaker 1: States want Americans to die in large numbers? Why does
Speaker 1: he want that? Why does he want his own people
Speaker 1: to die? It makes no sense whatsoever. Someone needs to
Speaker 1: give CNN's medical reporter they're a klonopin how to calm down.
Speaker 1: Why does he want people to die? Why does he
Speaker 1: want to kill everyone? Why is Trump such a monster?
Speaker 1: He doesn't want anyone to die? You idiot? I mean
Speaker 1: CNN is trash and we all know it. Jeff Zucker
Speaker 1: has destroyed that place. It is worthy of nothing but
Speaker 1: your contempt. It does not do good work, it does
Speaker 1: not do honest reporting. It's a horrible place. And so
Speaker 1: it's not surprising their medical court, their medical correspondent is
Speaker 1: going to say things like, why does the president want
Speaker 1: people to die? We've been doing the masking, we've been
Speaker 1: doing the social distancing. At what point is the cost
Speaker 1: too high? You know that according to yelp data, now
Speaker 1: sixty percent of closed businesses are closed forever. The millions
Speaker 1: and millions of people who have lost their life's work,
Speaker 1: lost lost their job. And you know, people die every
Speaker 1: day from a whole lot of diseases, a whole lot
Speaker 1: more people even now are dying from heart disease every
Speaker 1: day than die from COVID nineteen. We don't shut down society.
Speaker 1: We don't mandate that everybody has to walk four miles
Speaker 1: a day or else because it's good for hard health.
Speaker 1: You know, the world is imperfect, and there are risks
Speaker 1: the flu is coming back this year. Are we supposed
Speaker 1: to all mask up for that? Oh? But buck, it's Oh,
Speaker 1: I'm sorry those thirty thousand or forty thousand people. A
Speaker 1: lot of them are elderly and have comorbidities. Are they
Speaker 1: their lives don't count? No. At some point though, you
Speaker 1: can't just go through life acting like you're always carrying
Speaker 1: some kind of fires. Common sends for caught. If you
Speaker 1: are sick, stay away from old people. If you are sick,
Speaker 1: try to, you know, separate yourself from others. But you
Speaker 1: do that if you had a cold or if you
Speaker 1: had the flu. This other stuff, there's masking outdoors. This
Speaker 1: is for show. What are they doing? Well, we know
Speaker 1: what they're doing, and we talk about it. But they
Speaker 1: want old people to die? Did they want old people
Speaker 1: to die in Sweden? Is that? Is that the plan?
Speaker 1: The only person that you can point to and say
Speaker 1: maybe he did want old people to die is Democrat
Speaker 1: Andrew Cuomo of New York who sent COVID positive seniors
Speaker 1: back into nursing homes when there was no way that
Speaker 1: that wasn't going to create even more infections among the
Speaker 1: most susceptible population. But this is the logic that libs
Speaker 1: give you on this, that that Trump wants people to die.
Speaker 1: That's what there's that's what they believe. They really think that,
Speaker 1: why would he want that. The guy definitely wants to
Speaker 1: be president, likes being in charge. It's not good for him,
Speaker 1: not good for his supporters, not good for his brand.
Speaker 1: Put aside the moral implications for a second, because they
Speaker 1: think Trump's a moral monster. I think they're morons and
Speaker 1: they're wrong. But doesn't want people to die. But if
Speaker 1: you start from that premise, if you think that you're
Speaker 1: dealing with an evil monster that doesn't care, then nothing
Speaker 1: else really matters that We'll be said to a person,
Speaker 1: and that's what we're dealing with with the lockdown Libs.
Speaker 1: That's where we are. Trump listened to Founcie, I think
Speaker 1: too much. Trump listened to the experts on this. You know,
Speaker 1: he set up the ventilators, he sent the hospital ships,
Speaker 1: he opened the field hospitals, He did all these things,
Speaker 1: did all this federal money into testing and now and
Speaker 1: to a vaccine. I mean, he's done a lot. What
Speaker 1: is it supposed to do. States set their own timelines
Speaker 1: for opening and closing. We forget that now, they were saying,
Speaker 1: and they want you to forget this in May. It's
Speaker 1: not up to the president. He can't tell us to
Speaker 1: reopen and now we're into September, soon to be October.
Speaker 1: They're saying, look what Trump did, He's all his fault.
Speaker 1: Why is it all Trump's fault that people weren't doing
Speaker 1: enough social distancing, enough mask wearing? And then we see
Speaker 1: all these lib frauds who are all wear a mask,
Speaker 1: wear a mask, and then you see photos of them,
Speaker 1: video them. They're not wearing a mask when they're out
Speaker 1: with people. Oh but I care so much. I mean,
Speaker 1: hypocrisy is the single most obvious. It's really the catastrophic
Speaker 1: failing of the Democrats today. They're just such hypocrites all
Speaker 1: the time. They pretend to be something they're not, and
Speaker 1: then they wonder why people don't believe them and don't
Speaker 1: trust them. But the good news is people are starting
Speaker 1: to realize that there are still laws and protections, that
Speaker 1: we are the same legal system that is now being
Speaker 1: abused to send me text messages from my state government.
Speaker 1: I just got more than yesterday saying you better not
Speaker 1: go outside unless you have a medical emergency for two weeks.
Speaker 1: You know what, New York State. Go blank yourself. Okay,
Speaker 1: I'm not staying Yeah, I'm not going to go hang
Speaker 1: out in a nursing home. I'm not going to a
Speaker 1: crowd of facility. I'm not locking myself in my apartment
Speaker 1: for two weeks because I was in Montana for a
Speaker 1: couple of days. And by the way, now you know
Speaker 1: they take states on that list, they put them off
Speaker 1: the list. I go into a restaurant, I don't have
Speaker 1: a mask when I sit down. I get up to
Speaker 1: walk to a bathroom. Ever, he goes, oh my gosh,
Speaker 1: where's your mask? This is hysteria. People have lost it.
Speaker 1: They need to think through what's actually happening. This is
Speaker 1: a virus. The government was unable to stop the spread
Speaker 1: of it. It's like a cold that can kill people.
Speaker 1: We have never been able to stop the cold from
Speaker 1: spreading continuously throughout the year. We were not able to
Speaker 1: stop the spread of this. But this particular strain hopefully
Speaker 1: has gotten to a point now in a lot of
Speaker 1: populations where we're near herd immunity and we have a
Speaker 1: vaccine coming. That's it. All this other stuff, wash your hands,
Speaker 1: wear a mask, social distance, all these fauciisms that were
Speaker 1: said as though it was some genius idea to protect
Speaker 1: this all this is lunacy. It doesn't do anything This
Speaker 1: is mandating a campaign to eliminate, you know, a heart
Speaker 1: disease by telling everybody you are, under law forced to
Speaker 1: go for a three mile walk every morning. Do you
Speaker 1: know how much we would cut down heart disease if
Speaker 1: we did that? We would say tens of thousands, perhaps
Speaker 1: hundreds of thousands of lives. All we have to do
Speaker 1: is you must go for a three mile walk every
Speaker 1: day when you wake up, if you're physically capable of
Speaker 1: doing it. That's not the government's job. It's not the
Speaker 1: government's job. The government doesn't have a right to make
Speaker 1: you do that. And I know it's a it's an analogy,
Speaker 1: or it seems like, oh, well, come on, you're being
Speaker 1: told that you have to put a cloth over your
Speaker 1: mouth when you're outside by yourself. I've had friends who
Speaker 1: have had people shout at them for going on nature
Speaker 1: walks alone, and they walk past somebody ten feet away
Speaker 1: from them, who's obviously a Biden voting shrill lunatic. But
Speaker 1: that's what the Biden voters are. Now, Who's like, where
Speaker 1: a mask? Why we're gonna wear a mask? This whole
Speaker 1: thing is we have failed this stress test on our
Speaker 1: emotions as a country and you know the virtue signaling
Speaker 1: is it just makes me want to vomit what I
Speaker 1: see from all these people, Oh, the big public platforms.
Speaker 1: They care so much. There's a photo of Cuomo walking
Speaker 1: his dog on the street, no mask, not even down
Speaker 1: around his neck, no mask on doesn't care. I mean
Speaker 1: the governor Cuomo, not the bro brother Bro Cuomo, a man.
Speaker 1: But there's at least a judge, Tom Wolf not to
Speaker 1: be confused with the famous author Tom Wolfe judge in
Speaker 1: Pennsylvania appointed. I'm sorry, Tom Wolf is the governor. Pardon me,
Speaker 1: Tom Wolf's orders have been stopped. He is not to
Speaker 1: be confused with the author. Tom Wolf is a governor,
Speaker 1: and he has said, well, he has put in place
Speaker 1: for months COVID restrictions. US District Judge William Stickman, the fourth,
Speaker 1: the Trump appointee, has said that this is this is
Speaker 1: just wrong. He has sided with people, you know, barbershops,
Speaker 1: other small businesses who have come forward to say, hey,
Speaker 1: what is this? Why is my business shut down? But
Speaker 1: other businesses aren't. What are these arbitrary rules? At least
Speaker 1: there should be legislation. At least the people that are
Speaker 1: elected to create laws should have to make these laws
Speaker 1: and then deal with the public backlash. But when you
Speaker 1: have in blue states, we're the only choices Democrat because Democrats,
Speaker 1: god forbid, vote for anything other than the same failed
Speaker 1: policies they always want. You if you see what's actually
Speaker 1: happening in these places, they're making it up as they
Speaker 1: go along. So you know, the governor there is an
Speaker 1: apologis is promising to appeal for all of this, and
Speaker 1: it's just appalling that this is this is what has
Speaker 1: been going on with this with the wave of a pen,
Speaker 1: with a public pronouncement. Are elected officials think that they
Speaker 1: can say you have you've done nothing wrong, You've committed
Speaker 1: your no crime, and there's a ninety nine point nine
Speaker 1: chance that you're not actually a COVID risk, and you
Speaker 1: can be told to stay in your home. You can
Speaker 1: be told you have to put yourself into physical discomfort
Speaker 1: even when you're working out. I mean, I was in
Speaker 1: the gym yesterday. There were four other people the gym.
Speaker 1: We're all wearing masks. I'm looking around like, do you
Speaker 1: guys all realize this is the dumbest, most pointless thing
Speaker 1: I've done in a long time. And I've voted for
Speaker 1: Mitt Romney in twenty twelve. For heaven sakes, does anyone
Speaker 1: else feel like this is completely insane? We're living in crazytown.
Speaker 1: Let's get rid of the crazy. This isn't this is nuts.
Speaker 1: We all go along with it. Oh, okay, makes people
Speaker 1: feel better. No, No, this is the beginning, I hope
Speaker 1: of the legal challenges to this. You know. Yeah, The
Speaker 1: right to bear arms means that there are going to
Speaker 1: be some people. There are guns in circulation, some people
Speaker 1: will get them, usually illegally, and then use them for
Speaker 1: illegal means. Doesn't mean you get to take away my gun.
Speaker 1: The right to basic individual freedom and autonomy means that
Speaker 1: unless the state has a reason to punish you for something,
Speaker 1: they're not allowed to shut down your business, lock you
Speaker 1: in your home, tell you what you can and can't
Speaker 1: say about this, and send men with sticks and guns
Speaker 1: after you in the employee of the state if you
Speaker 1: disagree what is going on here. I swear this country
Speaker 1: has been dragged through a mass delusion, and we're going
Speaker 1: to way up and look back at this, and people
Speaker 1: will not even believe it. When they look back at this,
Speaker 1: I'll say this couldn't have really been what had happened here,
Speaker 1: This couldn't really be America where people just assume, oh, sure,
Speaker 1: whatever the government tells me, I'll do. They've been wrong
Speaker 1: about this at every stage. They don't have a plan
Speaker 1: to protect this, and now they're pretending that a vaccine's
Speaker 1: not even enough. I want my life back, and people
Speaker 1: need to start taking action themselves to say no, no,
Speaker 1: we're not We're not actually going to listen to your stupid,
Speaker 1: your dumb ass rules anymore until somebody wants to explain
Speaker 1: why wearing a mask when you get up and walk
Speaker 1: to the bathroom in a restaurant, but take it off
Speaker 1: for the two hours you're sitting there eating is good
Speaker 1: health policy. They can all shut their mouths with the
Speaker 1: masks over them. You're in the Freedom Hunt. This is
Speaker 1: the Buck Sex and Show podcast. I'm not looking at
Speaker 1: me this honest. I don't want people to panic. And
Speaker 1: we are going to be okay. We're going to be okay,
Speaker 1: and it is going away, and it's probably going to
Speaker 1: go away now a lot faster because of the vaccine.
Speaker 1: It would go away without the vaccine, George, But it's
Speaker 1: going to go away a lot faster would go away
Speaker 1: without the vaccine. Sure, over a period of time. Sure,
Speaker 1: with time it goes any deaths and you'll develop, You'll
Speaker 1: develop her like a herd mentality. It's going to be,
Speaker 1: it's going to be heard developed and that's going to happen.
Speaker 1: That will all happen. But with the vaccine, I think
Speaker 1: it will go away very quickly. Got to take a
Speaker 1: quick but I really believe we're rounding the corner and
Speaker 1: I believe that strungs. You know, doctor Faucci disagrees with that. Well,
Speaker 1: I mean, but a lot of people do do agree
Speaker 1: with me. You look at Scott Atlas, you look at
Speaker 1: some of the other doctors that are highly from Stanford,
Speaker 1: look at some of the other doctors. They think, maybe
Speaker 1: we could have done that from the beginning. I think
Speaker 1: we did it exactly right. We closed it up. Now
Speaker 1: we're opening and we're opening up to a super v
Speaker 1: because the numbers are fantastic. Oh but but Fouci disagree.
Speaker 1: Fauci's been wrong always. Everything Fouchy he has said, from
Speaker 1: the beginning of this to the end, has been whenever
Speaker 1: there's a judgment, call the make wrong. This guy's got
Speaker 1: nothing to offer. The Libs love him because he's a
Speaker 1: bureaucrat democrat product of the system. Who's this this this
Speaker 1: constant nag on the country, just sitting on her shoulders, like, well,
Speaker 1: you gotta you know this is gonna What has he
Speaker 1: done that's helpful? What has he done? He goes out
Speaker 1: there and says, you know, could be it is and
Speaker 1: could be that I can do that too. What does
Speaker 1: he explain that we don't know what's the what's the
Speaker 1: what's the actual mortality rate of this doctor Fauci? How
Speaker 1: well do masks work? Does he have answers to one
Speaker 1: of these questions? No, Instead it's wash your hands. Thanks, thanks,
Speaker 1: that'll really that'll really be helpful. Even Trump is just
Speaker 1: asking some basic questions about this stuff. Play thirteen. Well,
Speaker 1: there is, by the way, a lot of people don't
Speaker 1: want to wear masks. There are a lot of people
Speaker 1: think of masks are not good, and there are a
Speaker 1: lot of people that as an example, you have those people. Well,
Speaker 1: i'll tell you who those people are, waiters. They come
Speaker 1: over and they serve you and they have a mask.
Speaker 1: And I saw it the other day where they were
Speaker 1: serving me and they're playing with a mask. I'm not
Speaker 1: blaming that. I'm just saying what happens they're playing with
Speaker 1: a mask, so the mask is over and they're touching it,
Speaker 1: and then they're touching the plate. That can't be good.
Speaker 1: There are a lot of people. If you look at
Speaker 1: doctor Fauci's original statement, you look at a lot of
Speaker 1: people CDC, you look at a lot of people's original statement.
Speaker 1: They said very strongly, George, don't wear masks. Then all
Speaker 1: of a sudden they went to wear masks. The concept
Speaker 1: of a mask is good, but it also does you're
Speaker 1: constantly touching it. You're touching your face, you're touching plates.
Speaker 1: There are people that don't think masks are good. Yes,
Speaker 1: that is true. Mask is so good. Why is it
Speaker 1: The people that are really working in full on COVID
Speaker 1: units have respirators. I mean, I have much more advance
Speaker 1: and those do work. Yeah, of course that is science, right.
Speaker 1: I mean, okay, maybe wearing a mask reduces transmission five
Speaker 1: percent in certain circumstances, and maybe if that was all
Speaker 1: it took. Why is it? Why is it that Hawaii
Speaker 1: a state that instituted the outdoor mask mandate a month
Speaker 1: after it did that, It might have even been two
Speaker 1: months after it did that. Based on the chart that
Speaker 1: I saw in a huge explosion of cases in Hawaii,
Speaker 1: and they've had mask mandates all along. Oh we're listening.
Speaker 1: We listen to the science. We listen to the science.
Speaker 1: Doeople don't know anything about science. Science is constantly testing
Speaker 1: and re testing assumptions. It changes, they're wrong about stuff,
Speaker 1: they learn new stuff. I mean, all you have to
Speaker 1: do is watch a local news broadcast. I'm like, Oh,
Speaker 1: it turns out science to say milk is actually bad
Speaker 1: for you. Oh no, it's good for you. No, Marjarine's good, No,
Speaker 1: butter's good. I mean, we're always learning new things. And
Speaker 1: that's why it has to be based in what the
Speaker 1: data is that you have right now. And you have
Speaker 1: to be honest about the assumptions. They've made so many
Speaker 1: assumptions about about COVID, and they the fact that they
Speaker 1: point to New York as a model of success. The
Speaker 1: fact that public perception, based on the most recent polling
Speaker 1: from this week, is that the best COVID responses have
Speaker 1: been in blue New England states like New York, New Jersey, Massachusetts,
Speaker 1: and they have the worst mortality, the most people dying.
Speaker 1: Just goes to show you this is all a propaganda fight.
Speaker 1: It's all political and the health authorities. People like Fouch,
Speaker 1: you say New York flattened the curve. I want to
Speaker 1: be like, are you a moron? I want to ask
Speaker 1: Fouch is are you a moron? New York flattened its
Speaker 1: population because so many people died here. Thanks for listening
Speaker 1: to the Bus Sesson Show podcast. Remember to subscribe on
Speaker 1: Apple podcast, the iHeartRadio app, or wherever you get your podcasts.
Speaker 1: Let's check in with noted scientific expert and chardonay connoisseur,
Speaker 1: chardonnay socialist. That's it Day Day Dave Contempt for Science
Speaker 1: play seventeen. I'm the crisis which is causing these has
Speaker 1: has an impact, has a has influenced what is happening
Speaker 1: in California and the whole West, as well as the
Speaker 1: storms that are battering the Gulf Coast. This is a reality.
Speaker 1: So and when it comes to the coronavirus, they have
Speaker 1: contempt for science. That's why we are almost two hundred
Speaker 1: thousand people who will lose their lives by the end
Speaker 1: of this week. Two hundred thousand people. And that's why
Speaker 1: that they're contempt for science. As to what the climate
Speaker 1: crisis is, she goes from climate crisis to basically fake
Speaker 1: crying about the two hundred thousand people who have died
Speaker 1: who will have died from COVID this week, as though
Speaker 1: she's an actress reading for a part. We're not supposed
Speaker 1: to pay attention that. Of course, we're to believe that
Speaker 1: Nancy Pelosi can't so much about the poet the point people, Yeah,
Speaker 1: they who else is going to scrib my toilets and
Speaker 1: do all my choice and laundry and cooking? You know
Speaker 1: that that's what Nancy thinks about poor people. She likes
Speaker 1: poor people to be around so that she can order
Speaker 1: them to do things for her that she doesn't want
Speaker 1: to have to do herself, because she's a millionaire who
Speaker 1: lives in a mansion in San Francisco. So there's that.
Speaker 1: But oh yeah, I know she cares a lot, big
Speaker 1: big tears. Nancy's got big tears, sure she does. What
Speaker 1: a fraud? What an absolute fraud? And this this phrase
Speaker 1: contempt for science? What does that mean? I mean when
Speaker 1: they say that, it makes me think, oh wow, is
Speaker 1: this a person who are they? Like a true luddite?
Speaker 1: You know, they don't want to use they don't want
Speaker 1: to use cell phones because they think that it's going
Speaker 1: to give you brain cancer or something, you know, Luddite.
Speaker 1: Going back to the beginnings of what was it the
Speaker 1: Industrial Revolution in England, ned lud apocryphal character who they
Speaker 1: would say would kremit stage and the factories when they're
Speaker 1: using machinery to or place. I believe it was weavers,
Speaker 1: loom workers and yeah, yeah, Luddites, right, that's where we
Speaker 1: get the term people that won't use technology, although it
Speaker 1: was really more political than it was about actually being
Speaker 1: scared or unwilling to use technology. They didn't want their
Speaker 1: jobs to be replaced. What is it exactly that Republicans
Speaker 1: have contempt for when it comes to science. We are
Speaker 1: lectured about this from people who as and this is
Speaker 1: mainstream Democrat thinking. Now. They will tell you openly that
Speaker 1: men can get pregnant, that a fetus is not a baby,
Speaker 1: that a man can become a woman, that there are
Speaker 1: multiple genders, not just two. And I'm trying to think
Speaker 1: what else on I mean, there's a whole sleuth, you know,
Speaker 1: you could there's a lot of stuff here leave out.
Speaker 1: But yeah, that's the political party that wants to lecture
Speaker 1: people on science and the scientific illiteracy of so many
Speaker 1: of their beliefs and ideas is apparent to the point
Speaker 1: where it's almost beyond parody. I mean, you can't even
Speaker 1: really mock these things. You know, they will say stuff,
Speaker 1: Oh they think that men don't have a biological advantage
Speaker 1: in sports or in fighting over women. This is mainstream
Speaker 1: democrats off. This is what if you are a Democrat,
Speaker 1: you are to believe these things. It's not a per debate,
Speaker 1: not a per discussion. And they want to lecture us
Speaker 1: about science. You know, anytime you start to get a
Speaker 1: lib who wants to tell you about how sciency they are,
Speaker 1: just ask them to define what a woman is and
Speaker 1: see how they start to stammer, well, ex chromosome with
Speaker 1: the but nah, but you know, ideas and feelings, and
Speaker 1: it's pretty straightforward, isn't It isn't just female agenda a
Speaker 1: biological reality. But no, they can't even say that because
Speaker 1: their belief system has has gone well beyond it. It's
Speaker 1: funny the same way that libs have can lives say
Speaker 1: that we have contempt for science. I just want to
Speaker 1: say they have. They have contempt for for history and
Speaker 1: for logic. They put emotion over reason all the time.
Speaker 1: And Nancy Pelosi is a perfect example of that. It's
Speaker 1: just pathetic to watch it try to get some tears
Speaker 1: going for political advantage. Nancy Pelosi doesn't give a crap
Speaker 1: about people that aren't useful to Nancy Pelosi. Just as
Speaker 1: a rule, she's the classic limousine liberal, the chardonnay socialist,
Speaker 1: the person who elevates herself doesn't have to actually deal
Speaker 1: with the bad policies that she enforces on everyone else,
Speaker 1: and then goes around thinking she's doing some great surface
Speaker 1: for America, or at least pretends to the fact that
Speaker 1: she is at the top of the Democrat Party. Really
Speaker 1: tells you everything you need to know. But my favorite
Speaker 1: thing had happened yesterday may have been this CNBC's Jim Kramer.
Speaker 1: It was out there like yeah, like investing this, you know,
Speaker 1: Hong Kong, like like you know, all the noises and
Speaker 1: buy this stock and buy that stock, and all this
Speaker 1: stuff that he does. I'll never forget when Kramer went
Speaker 1: on The Daily Show with John Stewart and John Stewart
Speaker 1: just got to sit there and sanctimoniously lamb based him.
Speaker 1: I'll never forget that. Man. It was like, Jim, why
Speaker 1: are you doing this for? For the financial crisis. Is
Speaker 1: this some guy who's on a show like, yeah, buy
Speaker 1: this stock, sell this one. Is this there's a huge
Speaker 1: there's you know, trillion dollars, trillions of dollars moving around
Speaker 1: in these financial markets, mega institutions, and Jim Kramer's the
Speaker 1: fall guy. I thought that was I was just unfair, man,
Speaker 1: that was unfair. That's why you can never trust. You
Speaker 1: can never have a political conversation with lib comedians because
Speaker 1: they all their whole their whole bit is to humiliate
Speaker 1: you and avoid accountability for their idea is clown nose on,
Speaker 1: clown nose off. You know, Hong Kong, I'm a comedian.
Speaker 1: Oh look at you. Your name is silly. Did you
Speaker 1: just say that there are no victims of communism from
Speaker 1: the twentieth century, Like, oh, I'm just a comedian, manoper.
Speaker 1: You know, That's what they love to do. John Stewart
Speaker 1: did it, many, many, many left wing comedians. They want
Speaker 1: to play in the big boy intellectual game when they
Speaker 1: want to, and the moment they get cornered, they go, oh,
Speaker 1: I'm just here and making making cranky anchor jokes and
Speaker 1: you know whatever he did it to h John Stewart
Speaker 1: did the same thing to Tucker crosson a long time
Speaker 1: ago on CNN. The clip is still there. I just
Speaker 1: completely play the clown nose on clown nose off game
Speaker 1: and ambushed him. Anyway, this was fun. Speaking of clown
Speaker 1: nose on clowdhse off. Jim Kramer, he let this one
Speaker 1: slip yesterday, play clip too between you and I think
Speaker 1: Secretary manution, I mean, what deal? Can we have a
Speaker 1: crazy Nancy? I'm sorry that was the President. I have
Speaker 1: such reverence for the office. I would never use that term,
Speaker 1: but it is you just did you know what I mean?
Speaker 1: He called it crazy Nancy to her face. Yes, Cramer, Yes,
Speaker 1: And the President retreated this. He's like, don't back don't
Speaker 1: back down from this, don't step away from this. You
Speaker 1: gotta go for her, man, she is crazy Nancy, crazy Nancy,
Speaker 1: crazy Nancy. So yeah, there you have it. Ah, it
Speaker 1: was great. I would really really made my day. I
Speaker 1: really did just just have a Nancy Polos get called
Speaker 1: crazy to her face. Uh, you know, she's even some
Speaker 1: Democrats have come out to say that her tactics during
Speaker 1: this COVID lockdown, this this tact this tactic that she's
Speaker 1: taken of hold the country hostage and then try to
Speaker 1: use that uh in order to get more concessions from
Speaker 1: Republicans to get wish list wish list items from the
Speaker 1: Congress done right, They get from the Libs in the
Speaker 1: Congress that that Pelosi doesn't care about people that are
Speaker 1: suffering right now, that much is very obvious, doesn't feel
Speaker 1: any urgency, all the businesses that are going under, all
Speaker 1: the people who are losing their livelihoods. And then remember,
Speaker 1: you lose your business, you can't pay your bills, then
Speaker 1: you lose your home. Right, there's there's a cascading effect
Speaker 1: here when all that income and all that work, all
Speaker 1: that work product is taken from you by the government.
Speaker 1: These are not businesses that have failed because of the market.
Speaker 1: These are businesses that have failed because of lockdown Libs.
Speaker 1: They have taken people's livelihoods from them by force of
Speaker 1: law of police. We're gonna come shut you down. Don't
Speaker 1: don't let people work out in your gym. Don't let
Speaker 1: healthy people go do something that's good for them during
Speaker 1: a pandemic. No, no, don't let that happens. Unbelievable, but
Speaker 1: you get, you know, crazy Nancy lecture people about how
Speaker 1: she cares about the poor. Oh and about science too,
Speaker 1: and about how they have they have contempt for sense?
Speaker 1: How do they have contempt for science? What is it
Speaker 1: exactly that Republicans say that it's contemptuous of science? You know?
Speaker 1: Now we now play their game too. Even on climate change,
Speaker 1: they'll say, do you believe in climate change? No, climate
Speaker 1: change is real. It's just not something we can control
Speaker 1: and doesn't really make much of a difference. Oh my gosh,
Speaker 1: you know, but I'm sure climate change is real. It's
Speaker 1: always been real. It's been real for as long as
Speaker 1: the Earth has been around, So why would it not
Speaker 1: be real now? Of course it's real. Oh but you
Speaker 1: mean it's kind of like BLM. They create a phrase
Speaker 1: that you must agree with, and then you sign on
Speaker 1: for the entire political agenda, almost like this is a
Speaker 1: propaganda tactic that they've honed over time, as dishonest and
Speaker 1: disgusting as it is. This is what they like to do.
Speaker 1: And here's the mayor Garcetti, the mayor of La as
Speaker 1: if you know, la plastic bag ordinances are going to
Speaker 1: somehow stop the earth from warning morons. Play five. The
Speaker 1: idea of saying I don't think science knows is like
Speaker 1: turning back two thousand years of human progress. It's like
Speaker 1: saying the truth doesn't actually know. We know what is
Speaker 1: causing this. There is consensus there, and he's kind of
Speaker 1: one of the last members of the Flat Earth Society.
Speaker 1: But you know, denial doesn't work when it comes to COVID,
Speaker 1: Denial doesn't come, doesn't work when it comes to climate
Speaker 1: and the cost of denial is that people lose their
Speaker 1: lives and their livelihood. What is Trump denying about COVID exactly?
Speaker 1: I'm always amazed by that. It's kind of like when
Speaker 1: they say Trump's a racist and I say why, and
Speaker 1: then the only thing they can bring up is a
Speaker 1: talking point that's a lie about Charlottesville that they just
Speaker 1: keep saying, even though it's demonstrably false. What is it exactly?
Speaker 1: What is it exactly that they point to here? It's
Speaker 1: not clear. It's not clear at all. It's just that's
Speaker 1: that's what you're supposed to here. I go, I hadn't know.
Speaker 1: I had an old friend reach out last night. He
Speaker 1: lives in California. He's a LIB, and he said, look, man,
Speaker 1: I don't like I know, I don't I don't like
Speaker 1: to bring up politics with you. And you know that's
Speaker 1: I can be friends with liberals, just don't you know,
Speaker 1: don't step don't step into the thunderdome with the Buckster,
Speaker 1: because you're not gonna like what ends up happening. Right,
Speaker 1: you can be my friend and be a lib but
Speaker 1: don't start thinking. Have you ever thought of? Yes, I
Speaker 1: have thought of Have you ever heard the argument from
Speaker 1: the left? Buck? Yes, I've heard. I've heard that argument.
Speaker 1: This is what I do all day, all the time.
Speaker 1: But he go as you know, I don't think that
Speaker 1: climate change denial is going to look so smart when
Speaker 1: Manhattan's underwater. I can't even respond because I'm just you're
Speaker 1: so brainwashed. Do you think Manhattan's gonna be underwater in
Speaker 1: our in our lifetime in five hundred years? Who knows
Speaker 1: what the world's gonna look like. But I'm not gonna
Speaker 1: change how much water I use in the shower because
Speaker 1: of what might happen in a century or two. You're
Speaker 1: in the freedom. This is the buck and Show podcast.
Speaker 1: Why did Trump agree to do a town hall with Stephanopolis?
Speaker 1: First of all, is Stephanopolis thing. I'm fascinated by this
Speaker 1: guy because I don't understand it at all. It's just
Speaker 1: another tiny, smug lib journal guy who's a Democrat operative,
Speaker 1: just like Jake Tapper. Oh, Jake Tapper who intervenes in
Speaker 1: congressional racist now to try to convince people not to run.
Speaker 1: Did that to our friend Sean Parnell. If you read
Speaker 1: the reports on it. It's a weird move, isn't it.
Speaker 1: But these Democrat operatives pose as journalists, which so they're frauds.
Speaker 1: And then they said, well, when I say they can
Speaker 1: be journalists, but their opinion journalists, right, they are people
Speaker 1: that are pushing an agenda and that they pretend not to.
Speaker 1: It is absurd, it's laughable. But Stephanopolis sits there, and
Speaker 1: last night it reminded me of a CNN segment where
Speaker 1: the neutral anchor is there just to make sure that
Speaker 1: the hand picked Democrat, you know, attack guests can go
Speaker 1: after the Republican and have somebody there'say, yeah, yeah, make
Speaker 1: sure that all the all the blows land as hard
Speaker 1: as they possibly can. And that's what I saw happening.
Speaker 1: Then that's the circumstance, as it was unveiled in front
Speaker 1: of me. I don't know why Trump did it. I
Speaker 1: don't understand, you know, we don't really have that many
Speaker 1: of them here. But it just was a lot of
Speaker 1: questions that were basically like, sir, why do you do
Speaker 1: this terrible thing? And you know you're kind of a racist?
Speaker 1: And then he sits there and he tries to be
Speaker 1: nice and respectful to the person. There's one woman who
Speaker 1: was asking about pre existing conditions and like said, basically
Speaker 1: told the president. She didn't say, shut up. It was
Speaker 1: kind of like, you know, excuse me, sir, you'd be quiet.
Speaker 1: I'm like, lady, you're talking to the President of the
Speaker 1: United States, Okay, like show just a tiny bit of respect.
Speaker 1: Can you imagine if at a town hall somebody had
Speaker 1: had silenced, just some random person picked by the producers
Speaker 1: to attack Obama with some loaded question, but some random
Speaker 1: person was talking over the president saying, excuse me, sir,
Speaker 1: be quiet, let me finish my question. Oh. I don't
Speaker 1: think that ever would have happened, would it? But Trump
Speaker 1: got he was being asked, you know what. A pastor
Speaker 1: from Philadelphia said, what are we supposed to think in
Speaker 1: the ghetto? His phrase quote in the in the ghettos
Speaker 1: of America when you say make America great, and that
Speaker 1: that's essentially that's like offensive to make America great again,
Speaker 1: or what are we supposed to say? What the Countrey's
Speaker 1: going to say, make make America bend the knee and
Speaker 1: beg forgiveness forever again? I mean, what are we really
Speaker 1: supposed to do? People that are alive now that had
Speaker 1: no part of the wrongs of the past shouldn't be
Speaker 1: made to feel guilty about what they themselves did not do,
Speaker 1: and certainly shouldn't be made to pay for actions that
Speaker 1: they did not engage in, for deeds that they are
Speaker 1: not responsible for. Democrats seem to not think this. Oh no,
Speaker 1: let's let's keep let's keep turning the clock back and
Speaker 1: find a way to create a narrative that will empower
Speaker 1: us in the present at the expense of our political opponents. Look,
Speaker 1: the President was asked about the healthcare thing. I'm just
Speaker 1: gonna this is. This is all they're during this town
Speaker 1: hall of Stephanopolis. I don't know. I don't know why
Speaker 1: he does. This doesn't help, It's not worth it, I
Speaker 1: don't think. I mean, I know people are saying I
Speaker 1: watched it. I did not think it came off. It's
Speaker 1: not that it came off badly for the president that
Speaker 1: I didn't like his answers or anything else. But he's
Speaker 1: just subjecting himself to handpicked ABC News hostility. It's an ambush.
Speaker 1: That's the whole point. It's the whole point. You know,
Speaker 1: Stephanopolis is there to tell them to, you know, yah,
Speaker 1: punch this guy in the face and then you know,
Speaker 1: hand him a bag of ice and say you might
Speaker 1: want to put this on that there, mister President. Sorry,
Speaker 1: orchestrating the whole thing. Here's what Trump said about the
Speaker 1: healthcare issue, because this is for Republicans right now. This
Speaker 1: is a weakness. What's the messaging on healthcare? Where? You know,
Speaker 1: why are we talking more about immigration as I mentioned
Speaker 1: the last hour, and where are we all the healthcare issue?
Speaker 1: Play fourteen. We are not going to hurt anything having
Speaker 1: to do with pre existing conditions. We're not going to
Speaker 1: hurt pre existing conditions and infect just the opposite. If
Speaker 1: you look at what they want to do where they
Speaker 1: have socialized medicine, they will get rid of pre existing
Speaker 1: conditions if they go into Medicare for All, which is
Speaker 1: socialized medicine, and you can forget about your doctors and
Speaker 1: your plans, just like you could forget under President Obama.
Speaker 1: He said, you can have your doctor, you can have
Speaker 1: your plan. And that turned out to be a lie,
Speaker 1: and he said at twenty eight different times. At least
Speaker 1: we have twenty eight different times you can have your doctor,
Speaker 1: you can have your plan. Well, it's not true. But
Speaker 1: what we're doing is we're going to be doing a
Speaker 1: healthcare plan pre existing, protecting people with pre existing conditions.
Speaker 1: As an example yourself. It sounds like that's exactly perfect.
Speaker 1: That's exactly what we're talking about. We're going to be
Speaker 1: doing a healthcare plan very strongly and protect people with
Speaker 1: pre existing conditions. What is that healthcare plan? How? How
Speaker 1: is it possible that we had? You know, let's ask
Speaker 1: some tough talk Republicans. You know, you know, I you know,
Speaker 1: I love all the best things about this Trump administration
Speaker 1: and the GOP and Mitch McConnell, the mean lean judge
Speaker 1: confirmation machine. There have been some great things that have happened,
Speaker 1: the Mid East peace deal. I you know, I talk
Speaker 1: about the good stuff. You know, I share the things
Speaker 1: I need to about this. But we need to have
Speaker 1: a better healthcare plan, that's for sure. Thanks for listening
Speaker 1: to The Bus Sesson Show podcasts. Remember to subscribe on
Speaker 1: Apple podcasts, the iHeartRadio app or wherever you get your podcasts.
Speaker 1: Let's take a little stroll down memory lane. Now that
Speaker 1: we know what the actual results of the Trump administration's
Speaker 1: foreign policy thus far have been. As the President has
Speaker 1: the Prime Minister of Israel talking about what a great
Speaker 1: peace deal has been, peace deals are being negotiated or
Speaker 1: being signed, I should say, right now with Bahrain and
Speaker 1: the UAE, what was the LIB claim going to be
Speaker 1: or what was the LIB claim that Trump was going
Speaker 1: to do to the Middle East back at the start
Speaker 1: of the presidency. We've got a nice little montage for you.
Speaker 1: Play one President's Trump's big decision to recognize Jerusalem as
Speaker 1: the capital of Israel, and one that Palestinians and others
Speaker 1: say could destroy hopes of Middle East peace once and
Speaker 1: for all. The president's unilateral action will get people killed.
Speaker 1: How hot will he get and how destabilizing will it be?
Speaker 1: What he has done has thrown a diplomatic bomb into
Speaker 1: the Middle East peace process. They're not interested in history,
Speaker 1: they don't know history. How would it embarrass all the
Speaker 1: sunny Arab regimes? They would have to do something enormously complicating.
Speaker 1: By the way, Israel's relations with them. It's going to
Speaker 1: stop any hope of Middle East progress. And if he's
Speaker 1: talked this kind of policy, unilateral decision will basically wreck
Speaker 1: in the Middle East. Despite warnings from Turkey's president or Nowan,
Speaker 1: the kings of Jordan and Saudi Arabia and all of
Speaker 1: America's NATO allies that this could kill hopes from Middle
Speaker 1: East peace, you'd have an explosion, an absolute explosion in
Speaker 1: the region. You might be saying, Buck, what was that
Speaker 1: all about? Well, what country did Trump invade and massacre
Speaker 1: all the inhabitants in in the Middle East? That was
Speaker 1: about moving the embassy to Jerusalem. Okay, you know, it's like,
Speaker 1: oh my gosh, the world's gonna have all part of
Speaker 1: the MIAs is gonna be soaked in blood forever. I
Speaker 1: always think it's so funny people who don't really know
Speaker 1: anything about history or politics in the Middle East will say, oh,
Speaker 1: it's going to be destabilizing against Like, first of all,
Speaker 1: it's pretty destabilized. We're talking about mini stability. It's always
Speaker 1: something that you're measuring in pretty short increments. And second
Speaker 1: of all, you think moving an embassy is really gonna
Speaker 1: be a big deal there, meaning that it's gonna lead
Speaker 1: to violence, and please Steve Schmidt, the dumbest analyst on
Speaker 1: TV over MSNBC, He tweeted out, where was this back
Speaker 1: in twenty eighteen? This is making the rounds today. Trump
Speaker 1: destabilized the Middle East with his decision to move the embassy.
Speaker 1: His abject ignorance of the history and religions that have
Speaker 1: shaped this moment have given succor to the agents of
Speaker 1: terror and chaos. Trump destabilizes hamas terrorists provoked. Israel responds, repeat,
Speaker 1: really the dumbest analyst on television, dumber than Anna Navarro,
Speaker 1: which is amazing. I mean that's I almost am impressed
Speaker 1: by how stupid Steve Schmidt is when he talks about
Speaker 1: these things. Now, I don't know the guy, never met him.
Speaker 1: It's not personal. I just think he's the worst. I
Speaker 1: think he's the dumbest analyst on television. Political analysts might
Speaker 1: be dumber sports analysts or something. I don't know, but yeah,
Speaker 1: that was what they were saying about the move of
Speaker 1: the embassy. It was gonna wreck everything. Why now, Now,
Speaker 1: if you were buying a car from somebody, I want
Speaker 1: to I want to put this in a context. If
Speaker 1: you were buying a car from somebody, and they were
Speaker 1: as wrong about that car as you were, as they
Speaker 1: were rather about this moving of the embassy right, meaning
Speaker 1: that they were saying, oh my gosh, that car. The
Speaker 1: wheels are going to fall off if you buy that car,
Speaker 1: and it's going to explode if you have the smallest
Speaker 1: fender bender. The next time, after you drive that car,
Speaker 1: let's say one hundred thousand miles, it's perfect, purs like
Speaker 1: a kitten, no problems. The next time you go to
Speaker 1: buy a car. Would you listen to those morons? Why
Speaker 1: is it that our news media analysts, particularly about foreign
Speaker 1: policy and the so called foreign policy intelligentsia that exists
Speaker 1: in DC, in New York primarily, they can just be
Speaker 1: so stunningly, shockingly wrong, And it's like, you know, oh, yeah,
Speaker 1: that's just Tuesday, no biggie, no big problem. These people
Speaker 1: are morons. I sit here, and you know, you can
Speaker 1: go back in time. You're never going to create a
Speaker 1: montage of what I say on this show about foreign
Speaker 1: policy that sounds anything like that in terms of Wow,
Speaker 1: this person doesn't know what the heck they're talking about.
Speaker 1: But you see, why do they do it? Why would
Speaker 1: they say all those things just idiotic things because they
Speaker 1: weren't analyzing foreign policy. Really, foreign policy was merely the
Speaker 1: blunt instrument used for the to attack Trump for the
Speaker 1: amusement of the MSNBC and CNN audience. That's why that's
Speaker 1: all that I was. And so in that sense they
Speaker 1: completely succeeded, which is why they get bigger followings and
Speaker 1: they'll get paid more money by these propaganda networks. Because
Speaker 1: the point isn't to be right, The point isn't to
Speaker 1: be insightful or to educate people. The point is to
Speaker 1: attack the political opponents of the left. And whether it's
Speaker 1: foreign policy or healthcare, or immigration or police issues, that's
Speaker 1: the ultimate goal, or everything else is not even really
Speaker 1: a consideration, doesn't matter. And the way that the Libs
Speaker 1: were reacting to this piece deal yesterday, I think tells
Speaker 1: you everything you need to know about are they really
Speaker 1: rooting for peace the Middle East? And with that, are
Speaker 1: they really rooting for American success in foreign policy? You know,
Speaker 1: there's this old phrase, it's so trite now, it's it's
Speaker 1: so quaint that partisanship stops at our nation's orders, or
Speaker 1: you know, at the oceans that that border US and
Speaker 1: that's clearly not true. Right. Foreign policy has been highly
Speaker 1: superpartisan for a long time. But you know, you do
Speaker 1: want good things to happen for America and for the world,
Speaker 1: regardless of political party, if you're a sane and moral person.
Speaker 1: The Democrats can't help but root against this, which is
Speaker 1: the beginning of what could be. I mean, if you
Speaker 1: get Saudi Arabia normalize relations with Israel, which the President
Speaker 1: said yesterday he believes is a real possibility, you will
Speaker 1: have an entirely new conception of the future of a
Speaker 1: whole region of the world, and it will go a
Speaker 1: long way to healing bitterness and hatreds that stretch back
Speaker 1: over a millennium now going on to millenniums. So that's
Speaker 1: really meaningful if you can just take the range man
Speaker 1: bad aspect out of it for a second. Libs you
Speaker 1: could see that, but they can. I mean, even Chuck
Speaker 1: Todd again, Chuck Todd is just he's an intense mediocrity.
Speaker 1: I don't know. I mean, Stephanopolis, I don't I don't
Speaker 1: get it. I don't get it with these guys. But
Speaker 1: you know, they they have people in the corporate suites
Speaker 1: of these corporations, of these corporate media entities that are
Speaker 1: owned by mega corporations, and you know, they just sort
Speaker 1: of get the job. They're the guy that gets the job.
Speaker 1: And here's what Chuck Todd said about this piece deal.
Speaker 1: I just thought this is so funny. He's he's clever
Speaker 1: enough not to say, what do you mean? We want
Speaker 1: things in the midies to be terrible, But he can't
Speaker 1: bring himself to actually think this is a good idea,
Speaker 1: this is a good thing place six. You know, Peter,
Speaker 1: this deal is a bit uncomfortable for a lot of
Speaker 1: observers to watch because it seems so transactional. It's as
Speaker 1: if pulling out of the Iran deal is what got
Speaker 1: these golf states on board to do this. To then
Speaker 1: recognize it, it feels like there is a lot of
Speaker 1: quid pro quotes involved in this that it isn't something
Speaker 1: larger than that. Then again, sometimes Middle East diplomacy the
Speaker 1: only way to make things move is through the transactional
Speaker 1: nature of the regions. Notice how he ends up having
Speaker 1: to kind of he says this out loud because he's
Speaker 1: looking for a way to get an answer or response.
Speaker 1: It's like this deals not so great, right, because it's transactional,
Speaker 1: and then he even goes into I mean, I guess yeah,
Speaker 1: kind of transactional is how diplomacy really works. Quid pro
Speaker 1: quote is how diplomacy works, right, This is the basis
Speaker 1: of all of it. You know, it's amazing. This guy
Speaker 1: has a job doing political analysis on TV that pays
Speaker 1: him a lot of money. He says things like that,
Speaker 1: that's the best I want to say. Fortunately for him,
Speaker 1: he managed to kind of turn the ship around at
Speaker 1: the end a little bit. But you want to ask,
Speaker 1: have you have you ever been in the Middle East?
Speaker 1: Do you know how stuff gets done there? If you
Speaker 1: walk around and you tell error regime, hey, you know,
Speaker 1: it would be really nice. You'll be a really nice thing.
Speaker 1: It would make people feel good. It'd be like a
Speaker 1: big hug. If you just stop hating Israel and actually
Speaker 1: have diplomatic relations with this country that is a close
Speaker 1: ally of the United States. Uh no, you're You're not
Speaker 1: gonna get very far if you do that. The transactional
Speaker 1: nature of diplomacy is something that one who's trying to
Speaker 1: do real analysis of this would expect as a part
Speaker 1: of the equation. But they just couldn't like it. I'm
Speaker 1: still waiting, and it hasn't happened yet, But I am
Speaker 1: still waiting for Vox to write a piece, a preemptive piece,
Speaker 1: if you will, you know, quote why a US Trump
Speaker 1: brokered Saudi Israel peace deal could be not such a
Speaker 1: good thing. They might go there if they think that
Speaker 1: Trump might actually get some kind of official I don't
Speaker 1: look the Saudi recognition. That's kind of the holy grail
Speaker 1: of this. That would be the biggest That would be
Speaker 1: the biggest piece deal in the Middle East ever ever,
Speaker 1: and bigger even than Sadat and Egypt. In Israel if
Speaker 1: the Saudist came on board, I don't know if it'll happen.
Speaker 1: That's that's a still to me. It feels like a
Speaker 1: long shot. But then again, look what Trump's been able
Speaker 1: to pull off so far. But they would, they would
Speaker 1: find a way, I'm telling you right now. They'd find
Speaker 1: a way to be like, well, really he inherited Obama's
Speaker 1: Ford policy. Really, it was the the a Rod nuclear
Speaker 1: deal that created the groundwork that then they built the part.
Speaker 1: They'd come up with something. Otherwise they can just admit
Speaker 1: that they were wrong. I don't know why it's so
Speaker 1: hard for Libs. They won't do it. They won't admit
Speaker 1: that they're wrong. I just want to sit here and say,
Speaker 1: you know, I mean, was Mitt Romney was a better
Speaker 1: choice than Obama at the time? Yes? But was I
Speaker 1: wrong to think that Mitt Romney would have been an
Speaker 1: excellent president? Yeah? I was wrong? Okay, I was wrong.
Speaker 1: You know, you think about our Mid East military interventions,
Speaker 1: the war in Afghanistan, absolutely necessary, but we should have
Speaker 1: left soon after toppling and announcing the Taliban and just
Speaker 1: kept in place a minimal footprint to help our allies
Speaker 1: stave off a total collapse afterwards, you know, Iraq it
Speaker 1: You know, we were told they were that they were,
Speaker 1: there was WMD and there was an imminent threat. You know,
Speaker 1: was that the right move? No? I think Republicans made
Speaker 1: a mistake there, right, And you can disagree with me
Speaker 1: and that that's fine, But I'm just saying admitting when
Speaker 1: you're wrong is necessary if you're going to think of
Speaker 1: yourself as a person who has judgment integrity and should
Speaker 1: be listened to. Right, It's a critical step. But we
Speaker 1: now live in a media environment, in particular with the
Speaker 1: Lib echo chambers. It's true on the right as well.
Speaker 1: You have people like this, who will just never they
Speaker 1: will never admit a mistake. They think the pretense of
Speaker 1: being you know, it's smartest, the best. They think the
Speaker 1: pretense of that is the most important aspect of their brand,
Speaker 1: that they're better and smarter than everybody else all the time,
Speaker 1: and never wrong and never wrong. You know, they're wrong
Speaker 1: about Trump on foreign I mean, the Libs were wrong
Speaker 1: about Trump on foreign policy, and they just they just
Speaker 1: can't handle it. It's like they can't process it. It's
Speaker 1: like they can't figure out what to do with it.
Speaker 1: So it just does not come. So whether they're gonna
Speaker 1: ignore it or they're gonna downplay it, move on to
Speaker 1: something else, you know, talk about how Trump is, you know,
Speaker 1: worse than Hitler. They'll come up with some some craziness
Speaker 1: to replace this in our minds so that we just
Speaker 1: don't spend time thinking about. You're in the freedom This
Speaker 1: is the Buck Sex and Show podcast. Oh here we go.
Speaker 1: We're gonna get told any minute now, any minute now,
Speaker 1: there's going to finally be justice for the deep state
Speaker 1: calue against Trump. Landsay Graham was going to get to
Speaker 1: the bottom of it. Senate Homeland Security Committee authorized the
Speaker 1: subpoenas and testimony from our subpoenas. Four testimony from Obama
Speaker 1: officials as part of Russia probe. Brennan, Clapper, comey and
Speaker 1: look out. We'll talk about this, we'll we'll discuss this.
Speaker 1: But they already have. We already know what they're gonna
Speaker 1: say once they testify. I mean, you got the Center
Speaker 1: Holmand Security Committee here saying that they've authorized subpoenas for
Speaker 1: former CI director Brennan, former Director of National Intelligence James Clapper,
Speaker 1: former FBI Director James Coming other Obama administration officials. The
Speaker 1: committee held a business meaning to authorize committee Chairman Ron
Speaker 1: Johnson to issue notices for taking depositions, etc. Etc. The
Speaker 1: committee voted eight to six to authorize the subpoenas. All right,
Speaker 1: so they're doing some subpoenas. Oh, also Dennis mcdonnaugh, former
Speaker 1: FBI Council Lee A. Page, FBI agent Joe Pianca, former
Speaker 1: Ambassadory United Nations Samantha Power, Director of Intelligence Bill Priests.
Speaker 1: Nowt wow, they got a lot of people on this list.
Speaker 1: So I'm happy they're doing this because at least it'll
Speaker 1: it'll allow people to see these various Senior Democrat Deep
Speaker 1: State officials go before Congress and act like we're all
Speaker 1: a bunch of idiots and lie to our faces, and
Speaker 1: you can draw your conclusions from there about how much
Speaker 1: we can trust these institutions going forward, which have been
Speaker 1: riddled with far left and deep state deep state idealogus.
Speaker 1: And I know this because I was in the CIA,
Speaker 1: and I remember there are lefties all over that place.
Speaker 1: The analytic core at the CIA is full of people
Speaker 1: who might as well be working for you know, Asauros
Speaker 1: funded left wing think tank. Honestly, yeah, I know. I
Speaker 1: was known as like a right wing bomb thrower. Even
Speaker 1: within the ranks of the CIA, people were like, where
Speaker 1: does this This guy likes Reagan too much? What's going
Speaker 1: on here? The analysts are very left wing and their
Speaker 1: political inclinations there. But here's where I've also a team.
Speaker 1: I always speak the truth you. I've been telling you
Speaker 1: from the beginning. I don't think the Durham probe is
Speaker 1: going to amount too much because they can always fall back.
Speaker 1: The bureaucrats know that their ultimate fallback position is we
Speaker 1: do the best we could. We're just not very smart.
Speaker 1: We made we believe things that no intelligent person could believe.
Speaker 1: That just happened to be really negative for Donald Trump.
Speaker 1: But you can't prove it was criminal, can't prove it
Speaker 1: was criminal, and that'll be that. That'll be that. I mean,
Speaker 1: except for the one guy who is so the only
Speaker 1: hope for the Durham probe to really get somebody was
Speaker 1: if they were so reckless and sloppy like that one
Speaker 1: lawyer at the FBI who changed evidence. But he's not
Speaker 1: gonna he's he even going to jail for any period
Speaker 1: that he's not going to prison or anything. He's gonna plead,
Speaker 1: gonna plead to something. And you know, that's it, and
Speaker 1: he'll get a book deal and probably get a go
Speaker 1: on the speaking circuit talk about how he was protecting
Speaker 1: America from the Russian collusion. So I know, look, it
Speaker 1: would be probably better or we get more downloads and
Speaker 1: listens and clicks if I do what some of my
Speaker 1: fellow rightly media folks do and just say any any moment, now,
Speaker 1: you know, just look at the clock, we're gonna get him.
Speaker 1: We're gonna get him. We're not, We're not. You want
Speaker 1: justice for what happened with the deep state coup against Trump?
Speaker 1: Give this president four more years. That's the only justice
Speaker 1: that will achieve. There's not gonna There's not gonna be
Speaker 1: Coomy or Brennan marched out, you know, frog marched out
Speaker 1: of an office or their homes and handcuffs. It's not
Speaker 1: gonna happen. And if I'm wrong, just like I was
Speaker 1: saying before, I'll come on they say, Wow, Team, I'm
Speaker 1: this one, but it's not going to happen. So I
Speaker 1: don't want people getting their hopes up about that. Let's
Speaker 1: focus on winning this election. Thanks for listening to The
Speaker 1: bus Sexton Show podcast. Remember to subscribe on Apple Podcasts,
Speaker 1: the iHeart Radio app, or wherever you get your podcasts.
Speaker 1: All right, team with us for the first time here
Speaker 1: on the Buck Sexton Show, we are joined by the
Speaker 1: one and only Bill O'Reilly. He's got a new book out,
Speaker 1: Killing Crazy Horse. Like all the others, I'm sure gonna
Speaker 1: be a huge bestseller. And of course he hosts the
Speaker 1: Bill O'Reilly Show. Bill, great to have you. Thanks for
Speaker 1: having me in, Buck, I really appreciate it. So I
Speaker 1: want to I got a lot of questions I gotta
Speaker 1: ask you about politics, but first let's just Killing Crazy
Speaker 1: Horse some of your other topics. I think people they
Speaker 1: think Jesus Lincoln. Okay, biggest figures you know in our history?
Speaker 1: Why crazy Horse? Well, this is the ninth Killing Book,
Speaker 1: the most successful nonfiction book series of all time, seventeen
Speaker 1: million copies of my books in print, and I'm writing
Speaker 1: primarily for the American citizen who loves his or her
Speaker 1: country and wants an honest appraisal of it. So if
Speaker 1: you look at all of my books outside of Jesus,
Speaker 1: that's the theme. And the big gap that people don't
Speaker 1: know about is what happened between eighteen thirteen and eighteen
Speaker 1: ninety seventy seven years of conflict between Native Americans and Washington,
Speaker 1: d C. So how did an unfold? Who were the heroes,
Speaker 1: who were the villains, who did what? To whom? We
Speaker 1: don't know? I was a history teacher, high school history teacher.
Speaker 1: I didn't know until I started to research the book
Speaker 1: with Martin Dugard, my co author, and I want to
Speaker 1: you kidding me, this really happened. So we give you
Speaker 1: all the big names, Coach Chief's Crazy Horse, sitting Bowl,
Speaker 1: Geronimo Chief, Joseph Tacumsa. We tell you what happened to them,
Speaker 1: a kind of people they were? And then we go
Speaker 1: over the white section from Andrew Jackson, who put down
Speaker 1: the Creek Rebellion all the way up to Grover Cleveland.
Speaker 1: I ain't the immortal Grover Cleveland. So you read this book,
Speaker 1: Killing Crazy Horse, you're gonna know what happened in your country,
Speaker 1: and therefore you're going to be able to counter the
Speaker 1: far left propaganda that is trying to dismantle our nation
Speaker 1: right now. Yeah, there's not a lot. I mean, there's
Speaker 1: Baring my Heart at Wounded either. There are a few
Speaker 1: books that deal with this period American history, but there
Speaker 1: should be a lot more. So I'm glad to hear
Speaker 1: that you tackle this one, especially as we get into
Speaker 1: this rewriting of history that's going on with the left.
Speaker 1: And with that Bill, I wanted to transition if I could,
Speaker 1: into are the what is the primary dynamic you see
Speaker 1: right now for the folks who are still who are
Speaker 1: still open to changing their mind in this election? I mean,
Speaker 1: you're speaking to an audience of mostly but not entirely conservatives.
Speaker 1: But how do you think the Trump administration is positioning
Speaker 1: itself right now for those persuadables? I mean, is the
Speaker 1: messaging right? Are we handling these issues? The right way.
Speaker 1: I think President Trump's making a lot of mistakes. I
Speaker 1: think you could lose. To me, as an independent and
Speaker 1: somebody who's known Donald Trump for thirty years, I wrote
Speaker 1: the history book on him, The United States of Trump,
Speaker 1: which is the best book on Trump if you really
Speaker 1: want to understand him. I think he's making too many mistakes.
Speaker 1: I mean, you have a country that is divided, but
Speaker 1: it's not portrayed accurately by the corrupt media. So if
Speaker 1: you listen to the media, if you watch the networks
Speaker 1: and cable news, you think, oh, everybody, everybody despises Donald Trump.
Speaker 1: He's a liar. He says he's that it's not true.
Speaker 1: So when mister Trump goes on TV or buys as
Speaker 1: and he touts his record, his records pretty strong. I
Speaker 1: mean it is. You want to blame him for COVID,
Speaker 1: all right, Fine, go blame him for COVID, But you
Speaker 1: have to blame mccron and France, in India, everybody else
Speaker 1: because they're all experiencing tremendous backlash on COVID. So to me,
Speaker 1: as an American, I don't feel deceived on COVID as
Speaker 1: far as the economy is concerned. I mean, We just
Speaker 1: got numbers today from the Census Bureau that says the
Speaker 1: median income in America had the largest rise in its
Speaker 1: history under President Trump before COVID. I mean, it's pretty
Speaker 1: good to me. I mean, you know, everybody benefits, and
Speaker 1: poverty dropped a single percentage point, which is a huge drop.
Speaker 1: These are all facts. So the president unfortunately wanders. He wanders,
Speaker 1: and by wandering, he gives the corrupt media much opportunity
Speaker 1: to demonize him and the voters who are not well
Speaker 1: informed here that and that could influence the election. However,
Speaker 1: the big day is September twenty ninth, because the pressure
Speaker 1: is on Joe Biden to see if he can perform
Speaker 1: in a cogent manner and he's not befuddled, which he
Speaker 1: has been much of the time so far. Do you
Speaker 1: think it's a it's a fair hit. I mean, you're
Speaker 1: you're somebody who doesn't pull punches, but also you don't
Speaker 1: like cheap shots. Do you think that the cognitive decline
Speaker 1: issue with Biden is already well enough established in the
Speaker 1: public eye that that that should be an area that's
Speaker 1: a it's a fair area attack, area of attack, and
Speaker 1: should be one for the Republicans don't. I don't see
Speaker 1: it as an attack. I see it as a problem.
Speaker 1: If you listen Bucket, I know you have because I
Speaker 1: listened to your program. If you listen to what Joe
Speaker 1: Biden said about COVID and the military in Michigan last week,
Speaker 1: it's frightening. He did not know what he was saying.
Speaker 1: If you and I make a mistake, we use that
Speaker 1: we made a mistake and we correct it, or it's
Speaker 1: a little mistake, not him. The entire description that he
Speaker 1: gave about COVID in the military was so far off
Speaker 1: he couldn't even say numbers and he was reading it.
Speaker 1: He couldn't even read it. So this isn't an attack
Speaker 1: on Joe Biden. It's an observation. Is a problem, Yeah,
Speaker 1: that the Democratic nominee for president has. Yeah, it's amazing.
Speaker 1: And we're speaking of Bill O'Reilly, author of Killing Crazy Horse,
Speaker 1: one of the latest in his long series of best
Speaker 1: sellers looking back into important parts, important characters in history.
Speaker 1: And of course you all know the Bill O'Reilly show,
Speaker 1: Bill the Law and Order issue. From the very beginning
Speaker 1: of this, after George Floyd's protests, I was saying, don't
Speaker 1: bend the knee of this BLM stuff. We've seen this before.
Speaker 1: We've actually been through this before under the Obama ministration,
Speaker 1: as you know, and it somehow seems like Democrats are
Speaker 1: almost surprised that this has come back to bite them
Speaker 1: in the polls, which has become obvious in the last
Speaker 1: few weeks. Do you think that this is the liability
Speaker 1: that could tip the election or do Democrats feel like
Speaker 1: they make up that they make more from their base
Speaker 1: on this than they lose with the independence by by
Speaker 1: pushing this movement that I think is just bad for everybody. Honestly,
Speaker 1: the violence issue in America is of help to Donald Trump.
Speaker 1: So you've had two prongs. You have the looney, destructive
Speaker 1: maniacs who are attacking Portland, Oregon, Seattle, Minneapolis, Kenosha, Wisconsin,
Speaker 1: on and on. That's one. Then you have the roving
Speaker 1: drug gangs in New York, in Los Angeles, in Chicago
Speaker 1: who are literally gunning down children in the streets, and
Speaker 1: the mayors and governors of those places will not control
Speaker 1: of violence. That's a huge issue for Donald Trump because
Speaker 1: he will and has when was sent into Kenosha because
Speaker 1: the governor of Wisconsin asked for it. The guards stopped
Speaker 1: the violence there in hours, not days. Hours. I had
Speaker 1: called for the National Guard to be sent into Chicago
Speaker 1: six years ago, and if it had been, thousands of
Speaker 1: African American lives would have been saved. But the idiot
Speaker 1: governor of Illinois Pritzker, who is one of the most
Speaker 1: incompetent people I've ever seen, refused to do it. And
Speaker 1: Ron Emmanuel, then mayor of Chicago at the time, is
Speaker 1: a blithering idiot. So all of that has to be
Speaker 1: put into some kind of perspective by President Trump and
Speaker 1: he can then persuade people on that issue. COVID I
Speaker 1: think is a loser for him at this point. He
Speaker 1: should just keep quiet about it. And you just said, look,
Speaker 1: I did the best I could. Everybody makes mistakes in
Speaker 1: a situation like that. But we've got a vaccine coming
Speaker 1: and that's it. He's not gonna win on COVID, but
Speaker 1: on law and order he will, Bill, before we let
Speaker 1: you go, And everyone should check out Killing Crazy Horse.
Speaker 1: I'm gonna make sure I get a copy of it.
Speaker 1: We'll get one for producer Mark as well. But Bill,
Speaker 1: I want to know what is the biggest if Biden
Speaker 1: wins whis big if, but it's possible, as we both know,
Speaker 1: what's your biggest concern about what you think realistically can
Speaker 1: happen to this country as a result. I think if
Speaker 1: Joe Biden wins the presidency, there'll be a severe re
Speaker 1: session and perhaps a depression. Now Trump said that last
Speaker 1: night in his town hall. I have said it four months.
Speaker 1: We know the president gets a transcript of what I
Speaker 1: say on Billoreilly dot com every day. I believe that
Speaker 1: because you raise taxes on corporations, they're going to do
Speaker 1: exactly what they did under President Obama. They're going to
Speaker 1: go overseas because there are companies that will give them
Speaker 1: a much more favorable play. And as everybody knows, you
Speaker 1: can do business anywhere worldwide. Now that's number one. I
Speaker 1: fear a severe recession. The second thing is Joe Biden
Speaker 1: is not going to be in control, and we need
Speaker 1: the American people are not going to know who's calling
Speaker 1: those shots. Now. I suspect it will be members of
Speaker 1: the Obama administration like David axel Rod those kinds of people,
Speaker 1: but I don't know. And the socialism and the far
Speaker 1: left Bernie Sanders bros. They're going to take on a
Speaker 1: lot of power and if the Republicans lose the Senate,
Speaker 1: my god, this country and its traditions are going to
Speaker 1: be destroyed. That's what you're voting for. Bill O'Riley. Everybody
Speaker 1: killing crazy Horse out now. Make sure you get your
Speaker 1: copy of it and go to Bill riley dot com.
Speaker 1: Download a show, listen to it there. Bill. Great to
Speaker 1: have you on, sir. We'll talk to you soon, I hope. So, Buck,
Speaker 1: thanks for having me in. You're in the Freedom d
Speaker 1: This is the Buck Sex and Show podcast. Let's check
Speaker 1: in on good old Joe Biden for a second here,
Speaker 1: blue collar Joe. We haven't talked about him that much halfway,
Speaker 1: not enough today, that's for sure. This is the guy
Speaker 1: I remember. If you are a caring, sensitive, smart pro
Speaker 1: science pro women, except for the whole Joe Biden groping
Speaker 1: the woman to work for him thing, it's actually assaulting
Speaker 1: or but we don't talk about that anymore. Then you
Speaker 1: got to vote for this guy because he's such a
Speaker 1: great leader that even Democrats didn't believe that until five
Speaker 1: minutes ago. But here he is explaining about being a
Speaker 1: quartermaster in the lingerie floor of the department place. Thing
Speaker 1: in the what the heck play three? As if you
Speaker 1: could take care of you were a quartermaster, you can
Speaker 1: sure and health take care of running a you know,
Speaker 1: a department store. Think you word in the second floor
Speaker 1: of the ladies department, right, you know what I mean?
Speaker 1: You know what I mean? I mean, I don't know.
Speaker 1: Gurgling with Gurgen seems to uh, gurgling with Gurgan seems
Speaker 1: to be about to be replaced by gurgling with Biden
Speaker 1: thing the pleasure rubber, just mumbling, babbling, nonsense, and they
Speaker 1: just don't care. They just don't care. It doesn't matter.
Speaker 1: I do think the word at the point, you know,
Speaker 1: when Trump said that thing, and he was obviously exaggerating,
Speaker 1: he say he could shoots on the Fifth Avenue and
Speaker 1: not lose any supporters. I mean, Joe Biden could walk
Speaker 1: out on stage at this debate. This is what they've
Speaker 1: been concerned about. This with the independence certainly people that
Speaker 1: are still open to saying maybe Joe Biden's not my guy.
Speaker 1: But Joe Biden could walk out on stage and just
Speaker 1: start muttering about his favorite chipmunk and how he needs
Speaker 1: his blankie and and I'm telling you the Democrats would
Speaker 1: happily vote for him anyway. So that's the only problem
Speaker 1: with this. You know, I agree with with with Bill
Speaker 1: Reiley when he says it's fair, a fair area of attack.
Speaker 1: Of course it's just an observation. I mean, that's the
Speaker 1: real truth of it. But it also the sense doesn't
Speaker 1: matter to the Democrats, which is deeply troubling. They've been
Speaker 1: so pompous and lecturing us for years now, for years
Speaker 1: about how Trump is so coarse and he's not an intellectual,
Speaker 1: and you know, he does eat his steaks well done,
Speaker 1: which I'm sorry, it's just there are you know, this
Speaker 1: is not non there are rules, but there's all oh,
Speaker 1: he does all these terrible things. And then they put
Speaker 1: this guy forward, who also is, as we know, losing
Speaker 1: numbers when it comes to Hispanic voters. He's losing the
Speaker 1: support of the Hispanic community in some key places, including
Speaker 1: in Florida. So what does Joe Biden do yesterday? And
Speaker 1: he walks out to a press conference play eighteen. I
Speaker 1: just have one thing to say, all right, he can.
Speaker 1: I'll tell you what. If I had to tell him
Speaker 1: of any one of these people, I'd be I'd be
Speaker 1: elected present acclamation tell you what I'm on play Desposito
Speaker 1: on my cell phone to show everybody. You know, I'm
Speaker 1: just like a cool catman, and I'm Joe Biden. Yeah, yeah,
Speaker 1: Joe Biden. That's Posito on his phone. I really wish
Speaker 1: he had come out and and it would have been
Speaker 1: better if he had just gone with like the Macarena.
Speaker 1: You know, then it really would feel like he's he
Speaker 1: doesn't know if he's on a cruise ship somewhere running
Speaker 1: for president. It's all the same thing. You remember the Macarena,
Speaker 1: producer Mark, that was a that was a dark period
Speaker 1: in America's history where everybody was dancing to the Macarena.
Speaker 1: You don't like the Macarena? Oh what's wrong with the Macarena?
Speaker 1: I don't understand you. Hear that song one time and
Speaker 1: it burrows into the center of your brain like a hot,
Speaker 1: rusty nail that you can never get out. I do
Speaker 1: agree with that, yes, yeah, And I will say it
Speaker 1: is better than Who Let the Dogs Out? Oh that
Speaker 1: was great? That was my childhood. That's I mean, it's
Speaker 1: like they created a song just to play in arenas
Speaker 1: for people to be like, whoo whoo, whoo whoo who
Speaker 1: that that dog's out. There was a period of arena rock.
Speaker 1: Wait were they the the was that the Bahaman? I
Speaker 1: believe that? Yeah, the Bahman I think is what they
Speaker 1: were called. Yeah, Oh my god. Though arena rock is
Speaker 1: like stone tumble Pilots, which is great. I don't know
Speaker 1: if we can call that arena rock. What is what
Speaker 1: is the most for you? Uh? The most annoying song
Speaker 1: of all time? Baby Shark? But okay, okay, fair, But
Speaker 1: that's I mean is that really? I mean like an
Speaker 1: actual song that Oh it's an actual irritating song. Yeah, no,
Speaker 1: that's a that's a fair one for me. It's a
Speaker 1: it's a toss. It's probably the the Venga Boys song
Speaker 1: that that song is You're No Fun? That song, that
Speaker 1: song just it makes me think that I'm like stuck
Speaker 1: in a chucky cheese that's run out of food and
Speaker 1: there's just kids running around and screaming where and they're like, buck,
Speaker 1: You're in charge of everyone one. Have the song on
Speaker 1: like the six Flags commercials back? Yes, yes, that's probably
Speaker 1: why it's so annoying to you. Oh my gosh. Yeah, oh,
Speaker 1: I I gotta say that's uh that that was one
Speaker 1: of the I remember I saw oh gosh, I can't remember.
Speaker 1: They were like a Latin boy band in the late
Speaker 1: nineties and I saw them at some event that I
Speaker 1: went to, and I can't even remember. It wasn't the
Speaker 1: Venga Boys, it was Ah, I can't I can't even
Speaker 1: wort they're called anymore. But yeah, look, Desposito is a
Speaker 1: catchy tune. I'm not gonna lie it's a catchy tune.
Speaker 1: I just think that Joe Biden, I mean, if he's
Speaker 1: gonna go out and play a song for you on
Speaker 1: his cell phone like that, it's really only a matter
Speaker 1: of time before the Biden campaign starts sending you inspiring
Speaker 1: chain emails that then you have to send to seven
Speaker 1: people or else you'll have bad luck from their AOL account. Yes,
Speaker 1: I said it, So that's what's coming up next. It
Speaker 1: feels it's like, you know, Biden's actually not a boomer,
Speaker 1: producer Mark, he is pre boomer. He's silent generation. Really,
Speaker 1: he's that old. He is not a boomer. He is
Speaker 1: silent generation. That means he's younger than a boomer, older
Speaker 1: than a boomer. Oh yeah, that's what I said. Yeah, yeah,
Speaker 1: older than a boomer. Yep, yep, thanks for listening. To
Speaker 1: the Bus Sesson Show podcast. Remember to subscribe on Apple podcasts,
Speaker 1: the iHeartRadio app, or wherever you get your podcasts. Before
Speaker 1: we get to roll call, some really important news from
Speaker 1: celebrity land. You have a number of celebrities now coming
Speaker 1: out to say that for a full twenty four hours,
Speaker 1: a full twenty four hours, they will not use their
Speaker 1: social media account on Instagram. Yay, you see this, producer, Mark,
Speaker 1: I think, And they're doing this because of hate speech
Speaker 1: on Facebook. So in ordered to protest hate speak on
Speaker 1: hate speech on Facebook, they will take a full twenty
Speaker 1: four hours out of posting on Instagram. Oh my gosh,
Speaker 1: it takes real courage. Mark, it's not I'm not one
Speaker 1: of those guys who follow celebrities on Instagram, so my
Speaker 1: life won't change much. I don't understand why people do.
Speaker 1: I really mean this. I see these these like actors
Speaker 1: with large Twitter followings. They have other people to write
Speaker 1: their words for them in movies. They're not They're overwhelmingly
Speaker 1: not very I mean, like James Woods is awesome on Twitter.
Speaker 1: There's some people who are actors who are good at Twitter.
Speaker 1: But the lib actors out there that you see, they're
Speaker 1: not good. They're not good at that. They have nothing
Speaker 1: to say. It's it's amazing that the celebrity fascination that
Speaker 1: people have on it's one of the Instagram I understand
Speaker 1: a little more. Look, you know, if you want to
Speaker 1: follow Jennifer Lawrence on Instagram, I mean, you know, I'm
Speaker 1: not gonna throw stones. I'm not gonna throw stone owns
Speaker 1: or uh. I don't even. I can't even. I don't even.
Speaker 1: Who's like? Who's the eight girl right now in Hollywood?
Speaker 1: You're as Scarlett Johansen. I think she's been married four times,
Speaker 1: but her fourth husband is, in fact, my high school classmate.
Speaker 1: Fun fact, look at you. Yeah, we're on the debate
Speaker 1: team together. I was better, by the way, but yeah,
Speaker 1: um yeah. So I'm just saying, who else? But who
Speaker 1: is like that? Who's the big celebrity lady these days?
Speaker 1: Who's the number? I don't even know who? I mean?
Speaker 1: J Low is like eighties. She looks great. I'm just kidding,
Speaker 1: I kid, I kid, she's like something. I'm just happy
Speaker 1: the Mets dodge the bullet with her as their owner.
Speaker 1: Oh she didn't get the team, No, Steve Cohen did.
Speaker 1: Fun guys, the Mets are now the richest team in baseball.
Speaker 1: Are they gonna get good? Now? You think, oh, yeah,
Speaker 1: he's a lifelong Mets fan and he hates losing, so
Speaker 1: he's just gonna spend all the money you can. It's
Speaker 1: gonna be great. So the Mets will get good now, yes, exactly.
Speaker 1: Oh I'm excited. Okay, this is what happens by the end.
Speaker 1: The best I know, soccer is not a sport that
Speaker 1: Americans like, but the best European team, and some of
Speaker 1: those European teams are worth like a billion dollars because
Speaker 1: they are a global you know, Manchester United in these
Speaker 1: Premier League teams in England for soccer are uh did
Speaker 1: you not hear what sold for what? They almost two
Speaker 1: point five billion? Yeah, that's that's I mean, I would
Speaker 1: have guessed. I would have guessed that that's about you
Speaker 1: know what what the Mets are. Look, it's the biggest
Speaker 1: market in the United States, right, I mean, you know
Speaker 1: imagine if yee yeah, well, I mean I just wish
Speaker 1: could could a billionaire buy the Knicks and make them good,
Speaker 1: you know, and tell them, tell them no kneeling during
Speaker 1: the anthem and make them good. That would be nice.
Speaker 1: I mean, yes, the Dolans are not good owners. They
Speaker 1: are not good owners, you know. The but they're like
Speaker 1: Russian billionaires or Mid East billionaires who will come in
Speaker 1: and buy a soccer team and then they'll just they'll
Speaker 1: just they're like, I will pay, They'll pay a player
Speaker 1: on a hundred million dollars. Then they'll just pay whatever
Speaker 1: they have to pay to have a great team. That's
Speaker 1: what they do. That I was gonna say, be fun
Speaker 1: to be a billionaire Russian oligarch soccer team. Maybe they
Speaker 1: can come over and, you know, buy a team in
Speaker 1: a real sport. There you go. There's a lot, there's
Speaker 1: a lot, a lot of upside to that. Anyway. So
Speaker 1: I don't know who the Hollywood it girl is. I
Speaker 1: don't know even Oh, but who's who's not Kara de Lavine?
Speaker 1: Who's this? Do we know who's Kara? He's one of them?
Speaker 1: And I guess it. Look, it doesn't matter. I don't
Speaker 1: want the audience. Everyone's like, buck, we don't come here.
Speaker 1: I mean, but I'm just saying they're protesting hate speech
Speaker 1: on Facebook and it's making everyone so proud because for
Speaker 1: one day, uh oh, Kim Kardashian is one of them,
Speaker 1: that's why this is getting so much attention. Sasha Baron
Speaker 1: Cohen hasn't done anything funny or worthwhile in ten years.
Speaker 1: Um what else? Who else is on here? There are
Speaker 1: some others, There are some others, But yeah, Kim Kardashian,
Speaker 1: I look, and I know I'm not alone here on conservatives.
Speaker 1: I don't understand. I've never understood the Kardashian fascination. I
Speaker 1: don't get it at all. I don't I do not
Speaker 1: get it, and I've asked women that I've known in
Speaker 1: life socially to explain it to me. And I don't understand.
Speaker 1: Let's get onto more useful things and more important things,
Speaker 1: like your thoughts in roll Call Hit It, Team buck
Speaker 1: It's time for roll Call. Roll Call everybody if Facebook
Speaker 1: dot com, slashbuck Sexton and team buck at iHeartMedia dot com.
Speaker 1: If you want to email us, that's Team buck at
Speaker 1: iHeartMedia dot com. Very easy comes in that way. And
Speaker 1: also buck Sexton dot com new an improved site coming
Speaker 1: up this week, more posting, more fun, more good things.
Speaker 1: So go add it to your your list of favorites
Speaker 1: Bucksexton dot com. You can also listen to the podcast
Speaker 1: right there. Just go to Bucksexton dot com and just
Speaker 1: click on the play button. It'll be so easy. You'll
Speaker 1: love it, and make sure you pass the buck too.
Speaker 1: We are we're moving up the Apple podcast chart every
Speaker 1: month because of you. We don't we don't have some
Speaker 1: we don't have some budget for promotion. I haven't raised
Speaker 1: a bunch of money from investors to buy huge Facebook
Speaker 1: pages and you know, shovel my content down people's throats digitally.
Speaker 1: I'm just relying on doing a really good show that
Speaker 1: you appreciate and so you pass it to your friends.
Speaker 1: So it is the most useful, helpful thing you could
Speaker 1: possibly do for this show, and we are grateful if
Speaker 1: you just pass the buck. Get one person in your
Speaker 1: life who, even if they don't listen to podcasts, be like,
Speaker 1: you gotta try this, but don't listen to NPR on
Speaker 1: the way home from working. Oh and today we're going
Speaker 1: to talk about how to make the most delicious chestnut
Speaker 1: fricacy salad thing. Ever, No, I don't even want to.
Speaker 1: You can't do that to a salary. If you get
Speaker 1: what I'm saying, you get what I'm saying, So there
Speaker 1: you go. Anyway, Facebook dot com slash buck Sexton and
Speaker 1: by the fricacy, I don't even know what that was.
Speaker 1: It's why I stopped for a second. Is a method
Speaker 1: of cooking meat in which it has cut up and
Speaker 1: braised and served with its saw. That sounds delicious. Actually,
Speaker 1: fricacy of chicken is common all kinds of meat and politry. Oh,
Speaker 1: I got him, man, I'm getting hungry. I gotta make
Speaker 1: some frecacy for myself. All right, producer, Mark, this is
Speaker 1: from David. Let me help you understand why the fans
Speaker 1: booted the game Thursday night. There are two very good reasons.
Speaker 1: The long established tradition of properly show respect for the flag.
Speaker 1: Number two, I and most fans watch sports for entertainment. Also,
Speaker 1: it's a break from the day to day reality. I
Speaker 1: wonder why, or two why fans would go to the
Speaker 1: game knowing the players had most likely behaved that way.
Speaker 1: I wouldn't have gone, but perhaps they could voice their
Speaker 1: objection or form that wouldn't be heard. My little email
Speaker 1: to you won't have nearly the reach shield time. My friend, Mark,
Speaker 1: you want to say something. David disagrees you, but he
Speaker 1: was respectful. Yes, and listen, we've gotten a lot of
Speaker 1: messages on this so I just want to point something out.
Speaker 1: This is a Buck Sexton show, not the Producer Mark show.
Speaker 1: I'm not here to give political opinions. I do think
Speaker 1: people forget that suffing exactly. Budges, you're my buddy in
Speaker 1: my right hand, like guys, he's not. He's not here
Speaker 1: to give post politics. I'm here to give witty banter,
Speaker 1: make fun of Buck, and occasionally give the occasional sports opinion.
Speaker 1: And I come at everything from a sports single. I
Speaker 1: love sports, I always will. It's my passion in life,
Speaker 1: and I'm gonna watch no matter what. I understand both
Speaker 1: sides of the arguments. But I respect you're a right
Speaker 1: not to watch, respect my right to watch. That's all
Speaker 1: I ask. There we go, There we go, rispect producer Mark.
Speaker 1: It's all he asked for. Craig Hey, Buck, listen to
Speaker 1: Monday's podcast. I heard Chris from Idaho's email, and I
Speaker 1: think the elite group of listeners should be shields of
Speaker 1: the round table. Also, maybe Bark can have a Friday
Speaker 1: segment that it is like Andy Rooney called Grumpy Mark's
Speaker 1: penalty box. He could come on comment on societal stupidity
Speaker 1: or whatever else tickles his fancy shields high. Grumpy Mark
Speaker 1: shares his grumpiness without we don't have to worry. He'll
Speaker 1: let us know when things are yeah, making him feel
Speaker 1: a little grumpy, lets me comment on my grumpiness whenever
Speaker 1: he feels fit. Yeah, he just lets he just let
Speaker 1: her rip. You know, like the kids on Sesame Street.
Speaker 1: They don't ask Oscar the Grouch, Like, oh, maybe they do,
Speaker 1: but you know, Oscar's there letting it rip no matter what.
Speaker 1: Did you just compare me to Oscar the Grouch? I mean,
Speaker 1: if the shoe fits van hey Buck, would you think
Speaker 1: that the doomsday doctors and journals would want the so
Speaker 1: called deplorables to attend as many Trump rallies as possible?
Speaker 1: That way, he quotes Smelly Walmart, people can catch all
Speaker 1: the COVID and decrease the surplus Trump population. But that's
Speaker 1: probably one of those things that keeps that things that
Speaker 1: the Dems don't want to say out loud, however secretly
Speaker 1: wish would happen keeping shields high while you keep us
Speaker 1: safe and warm at night. Then, I mean, it's tough
Speaker 1: to wade deep into the minds of the sick, twisted
Speaker 1: and evil lib apparatus I mean, I think what you're
Speaker 1: saying is not beyond the possibility of some Libs believing it.
Speaker 1: But I don't think that. My belief is they don't
Speaker 1: want the rallies to happen because they know that it
Speaker 1: shows that there's a lot of enthusiasm and support for
Speaker 1: Trump out there, and there'll be nothing similar for Biden.
Speaker 1: I don't think they want rallies to happen so people
Speaker 1: will get more COVID, although they will whenever there are rallies,
Speaker 1: look for and even if necessary, manufacture evidence to suggest
Speaker 1: that there are more COVID cases because of the Trump rallies.
Speaker 1: So there you have it. Let's see here, Christine hey Buck,
Speaker 1: California fan, we're working hard here to recall Newsoman Garcetti.
Speaker 1: Seems like you guys in New York should try to
Speaker 1: recall Cuomo and de Blasio. Does New York law not
Speaker 1: allow recalls? Just curious because we're in the same boat
Speaker 1: on opposite coast. She'll tie Christine, Christine, that's you know,
Speaker 1: it's a good question, I'll admit to you because I
Speaker 1: don't know everything, um, I which is obvious. I don't know.
Speaker 1: I don't know if New York law allows for a recall.
Speaker 1: I just know that it won't spend time thinking about it,
Speaker 1: because understand this, Cuomo's numbers in New York State as
Speaker 1: a result of COVID are like sky high. His approval
Speaker 1: ratings increased. It's it's like living an opposite reality or
Speaker 1: opposite day or something where people should be saying, get
Speaker 1: this bum out, they're actually saying, Oh, Cuomo did a
Speaker 1: good job. Oh my gosh, it's it's it's amazing, it's amazing.
Speaker 1: I don't know what you know. They all he said,
Speaker 1: all he has to do is do the press conference.
Speaker 1: He gives the press God friends, and he kind of
Speaker 1: does this little thing where he says, Okay, it is Monday,
Speaker 1: which is the day before Tuesday and after Sunday, and
Speaker 1: we are on planet Earth. It is seventy two degrees
Speaker 1: we are at north northwest latitude of the thing. And
Speaker 1: here I am telling you about COVID. What what do
Speaker 1: you mean about COVID? COVID You get the idea, you're
Speaker 1: in the freedom heart. This is the Buck Sexton Show podcast.
Speaker 1: Alrighty the role calleth Continue with your thoughts f Facebook
Speaker 1: dot Com, Slashbuck Saxon, Team Bucket iHeartMedia dot Com. Mike writes, FYI,
Speaker 1: Tim Tebow was sort of good in college, at least
Speaker 1: good enough to win the Heisman Trophy in two thousand
Speaker 1: and seven. Your sidekick knows little about what constitute's a
Speaker 1: successful athlete. Alright, Hey, everybody, all right, everybody, all right,
Speaker 1: prouser Marcus is a good is the good guy. It's
Speaker 1: a good guy. Alright. It's not a side sidekick. He
Speaker 1: is the producer. He is the producer, not a sidekick.
Speaker 1: So as we've already discussed, Mark, anything else you want
Speaker 1: to say, Yeah, One, I specifically said Tim Tebow was
Speaker 1: a great college quarterback. And two in sixteen career starts
Speaker 1: in the NFL, he threw seventeen touchdowns. That's all I
Speaker 1: need to say. In six I'm sorry. That was sixteen
Speaker 1: career starts. He threw seventeen touchdowns, and he completed less
Speaker 1: than fifty percent of his passes less I checked. That's
Speaker 1: not good. There you go, Adam Buck and producer Mark,
Speaker 1: I'm a tennis coach. We got a tennis I love tennis, Adam.
Speaker 1: Due to COVID, we no longer transport players together to matches.
Speaker 1: My thirteen year old son plays for me, and so
Speaker 1: we ride to matches together. We listened to podcast driving
Speaker 1: two and from matches, trying to make him what I'm
Speaker 1: calling a young buck. Well, we love that. We call
Speaker 1: them young bucks, as the old saying goes, together, we're
Speaker 1: training up the next generation of conservatives. Although he says,
Speaker 1: what he really enjoys listening to me yell at. What
Speaker 1: he really enjoys is listening to me yell at the libs.
Speaker 1: Keep up the good work, shields high. Yeah, man, you
Speaker 1: gotta yell at those libs. Gotta show the kids how
Speaker 1: it's done. It's important. That's great tennis play. I wish
Speaker 1: I had learned a one handed backhand. Instead I got
Speaker 1: a two hander, and I've always wished I had a
Speaker 1: one hander, and I feel like now it's too late
Speaker 1: to switch. I don't know how many tennis players are
Speaker 1: listening to this show, but it's a great game and
Speaker 1: play a year old. You know, I played basketball and
Speaker 1: soccer Rose or my team. I know soccer like I'm
Speaker 1: barely American, but those are my team sports, Mike. I
Speaker 1: was good at I was good at baseball and softball,
Speaker 1: really good at hitting, okay, at fielding, throwing. I always would.
Speaker 1: I could throw it far, just not accurately. So I
Speaker 1: was always like, position did you play? I mean this
Speaker 1: was you know, high school, junior, junior high Really I
Speaker 1: usually I usually tried to play third base, I think
Speaker 1: was what I usually played. Well, the hot corner, that's
Speaker 1: like the hardest position. Well, you know, I could catch.
Speaker 1: I just wasn't that great at throwing. Um else we
Speaker 1: got here. Yeah, I mean they didn't put me in
Speaker 1: right field. I can tell you that because with most
Speaker 1: people being right eas you get put in right field,
Speaker 1: and it's like, you know, you're the kid that's playing
Speaker 1: with the butterflies and the daisies, and you know, like
Speaker 1: if you're playing a fun, slow pitch softball game, yes
Speaker 1: that's true, but in an actual baseball game, that's not true. No. Yeah,
Speaker 1: I'm talking about slow pitch softball. Right the right field
Speaker 1: is always the worst player in the slow pitch softball game.
Speaker 1: But so in real baseball, the right field is legit. Yeah,
Speaker 1: you usually want the strongest arm out in right field.
Speaker 1: Yeah I didn't. I was unaware of that. Interesting, Um, Mike,
Speaker 1: hey buck. I figured either Bar or Durham investigations being
Speaker 1: stone walled until after November or more likely they and
Speaker 1: their staff just don't have the life insurance to go
Speaker 1: up against the levels of globalists and swamp mafia they face.
Speaker 1: I will be presently surprised, but perhaps all we ever
Speaker 1: will see Verify will have been carefully leaked at a
Speaker 1: future time when it doesn't matter and no one cares. Seriously,
Speaker 1: Jesus will end up sorting this out shields high against
Speaker 1: the godless. Nonetheless, Mike, I's pretty intense, but I think
Speaker 1: you're correct in terms of we're not going to get
Speaker 1: anything out of this Durham probe. Dan, right, it's getting
Speaker 1: harry out there, and I live in a high risk
Speaker 1: zone downtown DC near the Georgetown Waterfront. Well, Dan, I
Speaker 1: live in that area too. It's a great area. As
Speaker 1: a fellow urban dweller. What are you doing to prepare
Speaker 1: for the next round of riding excuse me protesting after
Speaker 1: the election? A few people last in the city near
Speaker 1: your area are remarkably unconcerned, or a few people I
Speaker 1: asked are unconcerned. But right now seems like the calm
Speaker 1: before the storm. To me, it feels like we're sitting
Speaker 1: in a tinderbox and the match's about the light. What
Speaker 1: say you Dan. First of all, go have a burger
Speaker 1: for me at Billy Martin's tavern. And second of all,
Speaker 1: if Trump wins, they're going to freak out, loot, riot,
Speaker 1: and destroy even fancy neighborhoods and cities across the country.
Speaker 1: I don't know how many or how bad it will be,
Speaker 1: but it's going to happen. So you know, my friend,
Speaker 1: keep your shield high. That's it, Team Past the Buck.
Speaker 1: As I said, we'll be back tomorrow. Shield tie,