WEBVTT - The Long Game feat. Elie Mystal 

0:00:00.200 --> 0:00:02.960
<v Speaker 1>Native Lampid is a production of iHeart Radio and partnership

0:00:03.000 --> 0:00:10.080
<v Speaker 1>with Reason Choice Media. Welcome home, y'all. This is episode

0:00:10.119 --> 0:00:12.640
<v Speaker 1>one hundred and nine of Native Lampid, where we give

0:00:12.640 --> 0:00:14.240
<v Speaker 1>you our breakdown of all things.

0:00:14.000 --> 0:00:15.080
<v Speaker 2>Politics and culture.

0:00:15.480 --> 0:00:18.759
<v Speaker 1>We are your hosts, Angela Rye, Tiffany Cross, Andrew Gillim

0:00:18.760 --> 0:00:22.599
<v Speaker 1>and Bacari Sellers. What's going on y'all will get into today?

0:00:23.720 --> 0:00:25.239
<v Speaker 3>Well, I want to get into the same thing I

0:00:25.280 --> 0:00:27.280
<v Speaker 3>get into every weekends, so you know, I want to

0:00:27.280 --> 0:00:30.560
<v Speaker 3>hear from the viewers, and we have a lot of questions.

0:00:30.720 --> 0:00:33.360
<v Speaker 3>So that's my thing for this week. What y'all got.

0:00:34.240 --> 0:00:35.160
<v Speaker 4>It's been a big week.

0:00:37.159 --> 0:00:39.120
<v Speaker 5>Sorry, no, no, no no.

0:00:39.159 --> 0:00:41.600
<v Speaker 4>I didn't want to interrupt, but I was a feeling

0:00:41.680 --> 0:00:43.199
<v Speaker 4>well in the middle of the night and took some

0:00:43.280 --> 0:00:45.839
<v Speaker 4>medicine and I took the drowsy version. So if I

0:00:45.880 --> 0:00:48.040
<v Speaker 4>seem a little slower today, I just want you to

0:00:48.080 --> 0:00:52.040
<v Speaker 4>bear with me. I felt like that disclosed you was necessary.

0:00:52.360 --> 0:00:55.000
<v Speaker 1>Well I'm glad because I was hoping you weren't drinking

0:00:55.040 --> 0:00:57.440
<v Speaker 1>on the clock, So I'm glad to know it's Benadrill

0:00:57.520 --> 0:01:01.200
<v Speaker 1>instead or mused X or whatever else they got. Andrew,

0:01:01.200 --> 0:01:04.800
<v Speaker 1>we hope you feel better. I know you don't, but

0:01:04.800 --> 0:01:07.280
<v Speaker 1>that's why I was so concerned, because I thought somebody

0:01:07.360 --> 0:01:10.160
<v Speaker 1>had put something, you know, in your in your in

0:01:10.240 --> 0:01:12.960
<v Speaker 1>your hot tea, gave you a hot toddy instead. You

0:01:12.959 --> 0:01:16.160
<v Speaker 1>didn't even ask for. Well, here's the thing. It has

0:01:16.200 --> 0:01:18.399
<v Speaker 1>not been a big day for Andrew. It's actually a

0:01:18.440 --> 0:01:21.440
<v Speaker 1>slow day, not by design, but it is a It's

0:01:21.480 --> 0:01:23.000
<v Speaker 1>been a big week for women. So I want to

0:01:23.040 --> 0:01:26.800
<v Speaker 1>talk about too, in particular, shout out to Asia Wilson,

0:01:26.959 --> 0:01:29.000
<v Speaker 1>who is the Time Athlete of the Year.

0:01:29.040 --> 0:01:30.600
<v Speaker 2>Hopefully we talk about that just a little bit.

0:01:30.600 --> 0:01:34.000
<v Speaker 1>And also Jasmine Crockett is finally announced that she's going

0:01:34.040 --> 0:01:37.120
<v Speaker 1>to run for uh senden seed in Texas, going against

0:01:37.360 --> 0:01:39.680
<v Speaker 1>incumbent John Corner, So I definitely want to talk about

0:01:39.720 --> 0:01:40.080
<v Speaker 1>that with us.

0:01:40.120 --> 0:01:45.080
<v Speaker 2>Y'all think you God damn did y'all not?

0:01:46.800 --> 0:01:49.639
<v Speaker 3>Like I'm waiting to hear from Bacari and the camera

0:01:49.760 --> 0:01:51.440
<v Speaker 3>like this frozen again.

0:01:52.560 --> 0:01:53.000
<v Speaker 5>I don't know.

0:01:54.600 --> 0:01:59.800
<v Speaker 2>Talking what do you want to talk about?

0:02:01.080 --> 0:02:03.920
<v Speaker 5>We're gonna talk about the WI FI in Columbia, South Carolina.

0:02:03.960 --> 0:02:06.880
<v Speaker 5>How about we talked about that? Apparently it is the

0:02:07.000 --> 0:02:10.000
<v Speaker 5>issue is the issue de jure of the day. I

0:02:10.000 --> 0:02:11.800
<v Speaker 5>don't know I mean, there's there's so much, there's so

0:02:11.840 --> 0:02:16.240
<v Speaker 5>much to talk about. I actually appreciated uh Angel's topic

0:02:16.480 --> 0:02:18.440
<v Speaker 5>about Asia Wilson coming from South Carolina. So I'm a

0:02:18.520 --> 0:02:19.960
<v Speaker 5>chiment on that with y'all because I think that she

0:02:20.040 --> 0:02:21.600
<v Speaker 5>deserves a lot of props for the weight that she

0:02:21.720 --> 0:02:24.280
<v Speaker 5>carries for black women, the w NBA, and a lot

0:02:24.280 --> 0:02:26.000
<v Speaker 5>of many a lot of others.

0:02:27.200 --> 0:02:29.960
<v Speaker 4>Beca, didn't you also suggest we talk a little bit

0:02:30.000 --> 0:02:35.520
<v Speaker 4>about the consequences of of elections and elections out this

0:02:35.600 --> 0:02:36.600
<v Speaker 4>is the Detroit story.

0:02:36.880 --> 0:02:38.440
<v Speaker 2>I thought he was saving that for next week.

0:02:38.440 --> 0:02:38.680
<v Speaker 6>A g.

0:02:41.240 --> 0:02:44.480
<v Speaker 5>Well head you got.

0:02:44.639 --> 0:02:47.280
<v Speaker 1>I cannot handle this delayed ass pace today. Okay, so

0:02:47.360 --> 0:02:49.960
<v Speaker 1>here's the next thing. Y'all blame my add but I'm

0:02:49.960 --> 0:02:52.640
<v Speaker 1>just gonna say this. The other thing that is very exciting.

0:02:52.840 --> 0:02:55.200
<v Speaker 1>This is something where even Andrew in his slow state

0:02:55.280 --> 0:02:55.760
<v Speaker 1>is going.

0:02:55.560 --> 0:02:58.200
<v Speaker 2>To get excited about. I just know it. Ellie missed out.

0:02:58.200 --> 0:03:01.720
<v Speaker 1>Our resident Supreme Court Exford is also joining us today.

0:03:01.840 --> 0:03:04.120
<v Speaker 1>We have so much to talk about with the Supreme Court.

0:03:04.360 --> 0:03:06.760
<v Speaker 1>They cutting up y'all. You ared of citizens United, They

0:03:06.840 --> 0:03:09.440
<v Speaker 1>trying to make it even worse. They're also going to

0:03:09.480 --> 0:03:11.920
<v Speaker 1>consider birthright citizenship. We're gonna get into all of that

0:03:12.040 --> 0:03:14.000
<v Speaker 1>and more with Ellie today. We're gonna get right into

0:03:14.000 --> 0:03:14.280
<v Speaker 1>the show.

0:03:14.360 --> 0:03:19.600
<v Speaker 5>Let's go, y'all, how about this new one. They have

0:03:19.639 --> 0:03:20.919
<v Speaker 5>their new star, Crockett.

0:03:21.080 --> 0:03:24.840
<v Speaker 4>How about her? She's a new star of the Democrat Party,

0:03:24.960 --> 0:03:29.240
<v Speaker 4>Jasmine Crockett. They're in big trouble, but you have this

0:03:29.320 --> 0:03:32.000
<v Speaker 4>woman Crockett. She's a very low IQ person.

0:03:32.280 --> 0:03:34.800
<v Speaker 5>I watched her speak to the other day. She's definitely

0:03:34.880 --> 0:03:36.000
<v Speaker 5>a low IQ person.

0:03:37.120 --> 0:03:39.840
<v Speaker 4>Crockett. Oh man, oh man.

0:03:40.840 --> 0:03:42.960
<v Speaker 5>She's a very low IQ person.

0:03:44.680 --> 0:03:46.760
<v Speaker 4>Somebody said the other day she's one of the leaders

0:03:46.800 --> 0:03:48.600
<v Speaker 4>of the party. I think you gotta be kidding.

0:03:50.040 --> 0:03:53.120
<v Speaker 5>Now, they're going to rely on Crockett's gonna bring the bed.

0:03:54.000 --> 0:03:58.040
<v Speaker 1>So everyone, as we know, Jasmine Crockett announced her run

0:03:58.080 --> 0:04:01.120
<v Speaker 1>for the United States Senate. This week, Colin Aureed, who

0:04:01.160 --> 0:04:04.400
<v Speaker 1>is a former member of the House of Representatives, announced

0:04:04.400 --> 0:04:08.080
<v Speaker 1>that he will run for what is now her seat,

0:04:08.600 --> 0:04:10.720
<v Speaker 1>and he's dropping out of the Senate race. I want

0:04:10.720 --> 0:04:12.800
<v Speaker 1>to know what you all think about the announcement video

0:04:14.240 --> 0:04:16.800
<v Speaker 1>in what you think about Jazzin's run for the United

0:04:16.800 --> 0:04:17.440
<v Speaker 1>States Senate.

0:04:21.200 --> 0:04:24.039
<v Speaker 4>I think first I would just acknowledge up front that

0:04:24.440 --> 0:04:29.040
<v Speaker 4>the hit pieces that will undermine her math, that will

0:04:29.120 --> 0:04:31.839
<v Speaker 4>undermine her politics. To try to drive this to a

0:04:32.279 --> 0:04:39.240
<v Speaker 4>radical left versus moderate versus you know, centric centrist, you

0:04:39.240 --> 0:04:42.880
<v Speaker 4>know democrat. That stuff is going to happen. We should

0:04:43.000 --> 0:04:45.800
<v Speaker 4>just gear it up for it. And it's not unusual

0:04:46.160 --> 0:04:48.719
<v Speaker 4>that that's where people start, because what they have to

0:04:48.760 --> 0:04:54.080
<v Speaker 4>do is penetrate, pierce, and then destroy your viability. Her

0:04:54.160 --> 0:04:59.360
<v Speaker 4>opponents will want to make her look unviable, and unfortunately

0:04:59.480 --> 0:05:01.800
<v Speaker 4>a lot of that you know, sort of bag mention

0:05:02.000 --> 0:05:04.880
<v Speaker 4>is gonna come the Democratic side. They'll be on shows

0:05:04.920 --> 0:05:08.839
<v Speaker 4>today and throughout. Given all the reasons why this is

0:05:08.880 --> 0:05:10.919
<v Speaker 4>a full hearted run, but I want to applaud her.

0:05:10.960 --> 0:05:14.039
<v Speaker 4>I think it is a brave and courageous run, and

0:05:14.400 --> 0:05:16.720
<v Speaker 4>I think she can do as well, if not better,

0:05:16.800 --> 0:05:20.279
<v Speaker 4>hopefully much better than some of the more recent candidates

0:05:20.320 --> 0:05:22.960
<v Speaker 4>who got close, either going after a cruise or corning.

0:05:24.040 --> 0:05:27.080
<v Speaker 5>You know. I got to echo Andrew sentiment here here,

0:05:27.440 --> 0:05:29.960
<v Speaker 5>just because I don't think people get enough credit or

0:05:29.960 --> 0:05:33.560
<v Speaker 5>give enough credit for individuals who give themselves to run

0:05:33.600 --> 0:05:38.159
<v Speaker 5>for office, particularly statewide in the South. I like to

0:05:38.160 --> 0:05:41.520
<v Speaker 5>say that you know, in twenty fourteen, you know, you

0:05:41.600 --> 0:05:45.000
<v Speaker 5>help chip away at that glass. You have people like

0:05:45.160 --> 0:05:48.000
<v Speaker 5>Andrew Gillim and Stacy Abrams who helped chip away at

0:05:48.000 --> 0:05:52.760
<v Speaker 5>that glass after some of us are in. And you know,

0:05:52.960 --> 0:05:54.919
<v Speaker 5>I just think that it takes so much courage because

0:05:54.920 --> 0:05:57.240
<v Speaker 5>you you know, what I tell folks is that you

0:05:58.600 --> 0:06:02.560
<v Speaker 5>have you met anybody halfway pregnant it and that's what

0:06:02.600 --> 0:06:11.960
<v Speaker 5>it is with you, and that that that not that

0:06:12.040 --> 0:06:13.839
<v Speaker 5>you have in your stomach because you don't know where

0:06:13.839 --> 0:06:20.400
<v Speaker 5>the barbs the next day are going, that anxiety, that angst.

0:06:20.600 --> 0:06:24.440
<v Speaker 5>So I'm very, very proud of Jasmine Crockett for running.

0:06:24.640 --> 0:06:26.800
<v Speaker 5>If we want to have a conversation about her viability

0:06:26.960 --> 0:06:31.240
<v Speaker 5>to win, that's another conversation, because I think that she's

0:06:31.320 --> 0:06:35.040
<v Speaker 5>running uphill with a couple of mules on her back,

0:06:35.360 --> 0:06:37.679
<v Speaker 5>a couple of bouters pulling her back in the other direction.

0:06:38.320 --> 0:06:39.880
<v Speaker 5>And I think it's going to be very difficult for

0:06:39.960 --> 0:06:43.440
<v Speaker 5>Jasmine Crockett to be the next United States Senator from

0:06:43.440 --> 0:06:46.080
<v Speaker 5>the great state of Texas if anybody can do what

0:06:46.200 --> 0:06:48.960
<v Speaker 5>she can. But I just don't know if anybody wearing

0:06:49.000 --> 0:06:52.440
<v Speaker 5>a D on their lapel can win Texas right now

0:06:52.480 --> 0:06:54.040
<v Speaker 5>through no fault of her own. But we can get

0:06:54.040 --> 0:06:56.000
<v Speaker 5>to that. I wanted to start it off though by

0:06:56.040 --> 0:06:59.480
<v Speaker 5>lauding the fact that she's actually jumping out there and running,

0:06:59.520 --> 0:07:01.760
<v Speaker 5>because that in itself as a testament to her strength.

0:07:03.839 --> 0:07:05.960
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, you know, we should let the viewers know that.

0:07:06.040 --> 0:07:07.719
<v Speaker 3>Of course, she'll have to go through the primary. The

0:07:07.760 --> 0:07:11.480
<v Speaker 3>Democratic primary was hill Face Congressman tallerco. I believe it's

0:07:11.520 --> 0:07:13.960
<v Speaker 3>how you say his name, a congressman from Austin, And

0:07:14.000 --> 0:07:16.800
<v Speaker 3>I think what you're getting at, Bacari is we have

0:07:16.880 --> 0:07:19.760
<v Speaker 3>been promised for so long that Texas is going to

0:07:19.840 --> 0:07:22.960
<v Speaker 3>turn purple and it has not yet happened. I mean,

0:07:22.960 --> 0:07:26.840
<v Speaker 3>we saw this effort with Betel O'Rourke, who came really close,

0:07:26.880 --> 0:07:28.960
<v Speaker 3>and it was a lot of excitement around his campaign,

0:07:29.280 --> 0:07:31.480
<v Speaker 3>and I think there are a lot of competing interest

0:07:31.560 --> 0:07:35.040
<v Speaker 3>in Texas, right you know. There, our brother Rollad Martin

0:07:35.040 --> 0:07:38.360
<v Speaker 3>would want us to point out that Texas has numerically

0:07:38.560 --> 0:07:42.560
<v Speaker 3>the highest number of eligible black voters in the state,

0:07:43.280 --> 0:07:45.640
<v Speaker 3>and I don't know if that's going to be enough

0:07:46.160 --> 0:07:48.320
<v Speaker 3>to carry her across the line. I think one of

0:07:48.320 --> 0:07:51.000
<v Speaker 3>the challenges those mules that you were talking about that

0:07:51.440 --> 0:07:57.360
<v Speaker 3>she's carrying is the population that leans towards whiteness. So

0:07:57.520 --> 0:08:01.800
<v Speaker 3>even though there's this huge Latino population. Within the Latino community,

0:08:01.920 --> 0:08:05.920
<v Speaker 3>there are a lot of white presenting, white thinking Latinos

0:08:05.960 --> 0:08:10.280
<v Speaker 3>who ascribe to a very conservative ideology and landscape, so

0:08:10.800 --> 0:08:14.200
<v Speaker 3>it will be interesting. I definitely applaud her for jumping

0:08:14.200 --> 0:08:16.640
<v Speaker 3>in the race, will certainly be watching it and covering

0:08:16.640 --> 0:08:20.360
<v Speaker 3>it extensively. I'm looking forward to fair, clear, clean, concise

0:08:20.440 --> 0:08:24.480
<v Speaker 3>coverage of the race with proper context. I would love

0:08:24.680 --> 0:08:28.000
<v Speaker 3>to see another black woman in the Senate representing the

0:08:28.000 --> 0:08:31.160
<v Speaker 3>interests of the folks in the longhorned state, but I

0:08:31.200 --> 0:08:32.960
<v Speaker 3>do think it is fair to acknowledge that it's an

0:08:33.040 --> 0:08:35.160
<v Speaker 3>uphill battle. I also think this is going to be

0:08:35.200 --> 0:08:37.000
<v Speaker 3>one of the Senate races that will morph into a

0:08:37.080 --> 0:08:41.080
<v Speaker 3>national race. We've seen Donald Trump laser focus on black women,

0:08:41.160 --> 0:08:44.520
<v Speaker 3>particularly effective black women, and so I hope that people

0:08:44.600 --> 0:08:46.920
<v Speaker 3>can get behind her because I also think Angela that

0:08:46.960 --> 0:08:48.960
<v Speaker 3>there are a lot of times when we're saying, well,

0:08:49.000 --> 0:08:51.440
<v Speaker 3>she can't win, and you know, well, you know it's

0:08:51.440 --> 0:08:53.720
<v Speaker 3>a good effort, but we're gonna see like sometimes let's

0:08:53.760 --> 0:08:56.600
<v Speaker 3>just get in there and say, hey, we plan to win.

0:08:56.920 --> 0:08:58.720
<v Speaker 3>You know, when you're on that spade table and your

0:08:58.720 --> 0:09:01.160
<v Speaker 3>partner looking at you like, well, no, I always say,

0:09:01.160 --> 0:09:03.600
<v Speaker 3>play to win. Play to win. Assume that you want

0:09:03.640 --> 0:09:05.680
<v Speaker 3>to win as soon the universe is tilted in your favor.

0:09:06.000 --> 0:09:08.720
<v Speaker 3>So I think we have to give that energy to her.

0:09:08.800 --> 0:09:10.520
<v Speaker 3>But but what are your thoughts? Because I know she's

0:09:10.520 --> 0:09:13.199
<v Speaker 3>a friend of the show, and you've worked on campaigns

0:09:13.240 --> 0:09:15.600
<v Speaker 3>before and certainly navigated Capitol Hill.

0:09:15.840 --> 0:09:19.440
<v Speaker 1>What do you think about her chances? Well, I'm going

0:09:19.480 --> 0:09:21.080
<v Speaker 1>to tell you what I think. Right after this fire

0:09:21.120 --> 0:09:23.400
<v Speaker 1>alarm goes off at the hotel that I'm in. But

0:09:23.520 --> 0:09:26.440
<v Speaker 1>I also got to stop smoking.

0:09:31.000 --> 0:09:33.520
<v Speaker 2>So again, it's a fire alarm test.

0:09:33.640 --> 0:09:36.160
<v Speaker 1>You goofball. That's what you do at hotels, not what

0:09:36.240 --> 0:09:39.360
<v Speaker 1>I do in hotels. Now, what I would just say quickly,

0:09:39.360 --> 0:09:42.160
<v Speaker 1>hopefully y'all can't hear this. I really want to hear

0:09:42.360 --> 0:09:46.920
<v Speaker 1>from the guys, in particular because there are her there.

0:09:47.040 --> 0:09:48.840
<v Speaker 1>There are a lot of folks who are saying, like,

0:09:48.880 --> 0:09:50.920
<v Speaker 1>why would you even try to run statewide in the

0:09:51.000 --> 0:09:54.240
<v Speaker 1>South and so, Bakari, you ran for a lieutenant governor,

0:09:54.679 --> 0:09:57.440
<v Speaker 1>was the Democratic nominee in South Carolina in twenty fourteen.

0:09:57.840 --> 0:10:00.840
<v Speaker 1>What would you implore jazzmin to do different? And Andrew

0:10:00.880 --> 0:10:04.480
<v Speaker 1>from your gubernatorial run in twenty eighteen, what would you

0:10:04.520 --> 0:10:06.920
<v Speaker 1>implore Jazmin to do differently, and what would you implore

0:10:06.960 --> 0:10:10.079
<v Speaker 1>the voters to do differently? Because I think that's the major.

0:10:09.880 --> 0:10:16.280
<v Speaker 5>Keeler for me, one of the things that has made

0:10:16.320 --> 0:10:20.280
<v Speaker 5>me raise an eyebrow. As one of Congressman Crockett's first

0:10:20.280 --> 0:10:23.400
<v Speaker 5>interviews on National TV and her rollout when she was

0:10:23.440 --> 0:10:25.480
<v Speaker 5>talking about whether or not she had to go after

0:10:25.520 --> 0:10:29.040
<v Speaker 5>Trump voters or other voters, and her response was, I

0:10:29.040 --> 0:10:35.240
<v Speaker 5>don't necessarily need them, right, And I ascribed to the

0:10:35.280 --> 0:10:41.080
<v Speaker 5>notion that elections are more about addition and multiplication than

0:10:41.120 --> 0:10:44.320
<v Speaker 5>they are subtraction and division. And I think that she's

0:10:44.360 --> 0:10:50.760
<v Speaker 5>talented enough that by not limiting her electorate, she can grow.

0:10:50.920 --> 0:10:54.680
<v Speaker 5>So that's one thing. The other thing is she has

0:10:54.760 --> 0:10:57.760
<v Speaker 5>to create an entirely new electric That's something Barack Obama

0:10:57.800 --> 0:10:59.719
<v Speaker 5>did when he ran in two thousand and eight to

0:10:59.760 --> 0:11:03.199
<v Speaker 5>kind of shock the world. And creating that new elector

0:11:03.240 --> 0:11:05.439
<v Speaker 5>it means that you have an entire new base of voters,

0:11:05.440 --> 0:11:08.440
<v Speaker 5>which I believe she's going to do extremely well. She's

0:11:08.440 --> 0:11:13.040
<v Speaker 5>going to raise the money. I think that Texas has

0:11:13.240 --> 0:11:15.719
<v Speaker 5>long been Food's goal for Democrats, and we waste a

0:11:15.720 --> 0:11:18.360
<v Speaker 5>lot of money in Texas on different races that can

0:11:18.440 --> 0:11:20.760
<v Speaker 5>go to other seats where you can possibly fare better.

0:11:21.760 --> 0:11:24.559
<v Speaker 5>But I do think that that she's going to add

0:11:24.600 --> 0:11:27.120
<v Speaker 5>a new energy, and I regardless of whether or not

0:11:27.120 --> 0:11:29.000
<v Speaker 5>I think she can win, I think she will be

0:11:29.040 --> 0:11:31.280
<v Speaker 5>a winner win this race is over. And I also

0:11:31.360 --> 0:11:33.880
<v Speaker 5>think something about Jasmine Crockett running in this race that

0:11:33.920 --> 0:11:37.000
<v Speaker 5>people aren't necessarily giving her credit for. Right now, She's

0:11:37.080 --> 0:11:39.680
<v Speaker 5>going to drag along a lot of other Democrats in Texas.

0:11:40.200 --> 0:11:42.920
<v Speaker 5>She there is going to be a wave in Texas

0:11:42.960 --> 0:11:47.640
<v Speaker 5>because Jasmine Crockett is running. I don't think she'll get

0:11:47.679 --> 0:11:51.280
<v Speaker 5>beat like a drum per se, but I just find

0:11:51.280 --> 0:11:53.800
<v Speaker 5>it to be extremely difficult. But I do think that

0:11:53.880 --> 0:11:55.920
<v Speaker 5>her race still can be a success with other things

0:11:55.960 --> 0:11:58.080
<v Speaker 5>I think. I mean, I got over forty percent of

0:11:58.080 --> 0:11:59.679
<v Speaker 5>the vote in South Carolina, which is a whole hell

0:11:59.720 --> 0:12:02.000
<v Speaker 5>of a lot for Democrats now who don't break you know,

0:12:02.080 --> 0:12:04.640
<v Speaker 5>over thirty five And I know Andrew was one megachurch

0:12:04.679 --> 0:12:07.240
<v Speaker 5>away from being governor of Florida. What it was it

0:12:07.280 --> 0:12:10.600
<v Speaker 5>thirty five thousand voters, So I mean, I do know,

0:12:10.679 --> 0:12:13.120
<v Speaker 5>and Stacey Abrams came close the first time, so it's

0:12:13.200 --> 0:12:16.160
<v Speaker 5>not this isn't out of the realm if possible. But

0:12:17.040 --> 0:12:19.440
<v Speaker 5>when we talk about these type of races, we have

0:12:19.520 --> 0:12:22.240
<v Speaker 5>to understand the magnitude the difficulty and get her the

0:12:22.320 --> 0:12:25.439
<v Speaker 5>benefit of knowing that she still can be a success

0:12:25.440 --> 0:12:27.520
<v Speaker 5>because so many people are going to She's going to

0:12:27.640 --> 0:12:29.080
<v Speaker 5>drag along with them with her.

0:12:32.280 --> 0:12:34.600
<v Speaker 4>If she's able to raise the amount of money that

0:12:34.920 --> 0:12:42.079
<v Speaker 4>would be typical for a contested a general election. Right

0:12:42.320 --> 0:12:45.040
<v Speaker 4>if they believe if Cornyon wins on the Republican side,

0:12:45.280 --> 0:12:48.079
<v Speaker 4>and Democrats are really serious about competing and therefore they

0:12:48.120 --> 0:12:52.040
<v Speaker 4>resource her race, I don't see her doing any worse

0:12:52.960 --> 0:12:56.360
<v Speaker 4>than the latest Democrat who has gotten the closest I think,

0:12:56.400 --> 0:13:01.000
<v Speaker 4>so I'll perform the Democratic typical performance. She gets the

0:13:01.040 --> 0:13:04.800
<v Speaker 4>resources that are equal because I think her natural instincts

0:13:04.840 --> 0:13:07.480
<v Speaker 4>are going to the places that she knows she needs

0:13:07.480 --> 0:13:10.920
<v Speaker 4>to be. She will need to camp out between the

0:13:11.040 --> 0:13:17.240
<v Speaker 4>largest Black centers in the state and the largest Latino areas,

0:13:17.679 --> 0:13:21.760
<v Speaker 4>and progressive whites tend to find you they're determined a

0:13:21.760 --> 0:13:25.520
<v Speaker 4>lot of times in that way. But those two groups

0:13:25.520 --> 0:13:29.360
<v Speaker 4>trying to demystify where she needs to with the Latino

0:13:29.400 --> 0:13:32.640
<v Speaker 4>community around what she does and doesn't know, believes or

0:13:32.679 --> 0:13:36.000
<v Speaker 4>doesn't believe what the values they share in common, and

0:13:36.040 --> 0:13:39.360
<v Speaker 4>then motivating black folks because what I know about us

0:13:39.440 --> 0:13:43.120
<v Speaker 4>is we're extremely sophisticated voters and we do not throw

0:13:43.160 --> 0:13:46.280
<v Speaker 4>our votes away. In that sophistication has largely come from

0:13:46.280 --> 0:13:48.839
<v Speaker 4>the fact that we've always had to do the math

0:13:48.960 --> 0:13:52.080
<v Speaker 4>and the figuring out the psychology of how everybody else

0:13:52.160 --> 0:13:54.680
<v Speaker 4>is going to vote, how everybody else is going to perform,

0:13:54.880 --> 0:13:57.040
<v Speaker 4>before we then can decide whether or not we're putting

0:13:57.040 --> 0:13:59.959
<v Speaker 4>our vote behind a losing cause to make a statement

0:14:00.600 --> 0:14:03.720
<v Speaker 4>or negotiating space to share power.

0:14:04.920 --> 0:14:07.960
<v Speaker 3>Just I kinda follow up because I was really interested

0:14:07.960 --> 0:14:11.080
<v Speaker 3>in hearing your thoughts on Angela's question about what do

0:14:11.240 --> 0:14:16.800
<v Speaker 3>voters need to do differently, particularly given that they're going

0:14:16.880 --> 0:14:19.560
<v Speaker 3>to be flooded with it's an uphill battle and you know,

0:14:19.680 --> 0:14:21.240
<v Speaker 3>things that are going on. And also just want to

0:14:21.280 --> 0:14:24.160
<v Speaker 3>let the listeners know that there's quite the primary on

0:14:24.200 --> 0:14:27.320
<v Speaker 3>the other side as well. The incumbent is Senator John Cornyn,

0:14:27.400 --> 0:14:30.640
<v Speaker 3>a Trump acolyte. He's being primary by the Attorney General

0:14:30.680 --> 0:14:35.160
<v Speaker 3>there Ken Paxton, another Trump acolyte, and joining the race

0:14:35.240 --> 0:14:38.320
<v Speaker 3>is also Congressman Wesley Hunt. And these are all Trump

0:14:38.320 --> 0:14:40.800
<v Speaker 3>sick of fans, so I'm not sure that she'll be

0:14:40.800 --> 0:14:42.680
<v Speaker 3>competing for the same voters that they are. But I'm

0:14:42.720 --> 0:14:45.120
<v Speaker 3>curious from you and Bacari, what do voters need to

0:14:45.160 --> 0:14:45.760
<v Speaker 3>do differently?

0:14:46.880 --> 0:14:48.360
<v Speaker 5>So, I mean, I think a lot of this is

0:14:48.360 --> 0:14:50.240
<v Speaker 5>a little bit premature because I think the way you,

0:14:50.560 --> 0:14:52.840
<v Speaker 5>the way you run this race, the way voters think

0:14:52.880 --> 0:14:54.720
<v Speaker 5>about it is going to be vastly different. If it's

0:14:54.800 --> 0:14:57.840
<v Speaker 5>Kim Paxton, who has the ethical baggage of it's probably

0:14:57.880 --> 0:15:00.520
<v Speaker 5>worse than Donald Trump. Right, that's a that is an

0:15:00.600 --> 0:15:02.560
<v Speaker 5>easier race. None of them are easy, but that's an

0:15:02.560 --> 0:15:05.720
<v Speaker 5>easier race for Jasmin Crockett. I think Cornyn is a

0:15:05.760 --> 0:15:08.480
<v Speaker 5>typical type of r beside his name, and he's been

0:15:08.560 --> 0:15:11.280
<v Speaker 5>in politics there for a very long period of time

0:15:11.280 --> 0:15:15.440
<v Speaker 5>and people are used to pressing the button statewide. And

0:15:15.480 --> 0:15:17.680
<v Speaker 5>then the other one is Wesley Hunt, who doesn't stand

0:15:17.680 --> 0:15:21.040
<v Speaker 5>a chance in hell. So I think that we're going

0:15:21.120 --> 0:15:23.000
<v Speaker 5>to learn a lot about Jasmine Crockett, We're going to

0:15:23.080 --> 0:15:25.800
<v Speaker 5>learn a lot about this about the electorate through this

0:15:25.840 --> 0:15:29.920
<v Speaker 5>Democratic primary because Tara Leko is very formidable. You know,

0:15:29.960 --> 0:15:33.240
<v Speaker 5>he is a messenger that a lot of people have

0:15:33.360 --> 0:15:36.000
<v Speaker 5>gravitated towards. He's the type of person who goes out

0:15:36.040 --> 0:15:39.360
<v Speaker 5>and speaks to different groups. And one of the things

0:15:39.360 --> 0:15:41.720
<v Speaker 5>that Jasmine Crockett has and I think we take for

0:15:41.760 --> 0:15:44.040
<v Speaker 5>granted because we live in this media bubble, but this

0:15:44.120 --> 0:15:48.440
<v Speaker 5>is an opportunity for her. Like on the Internet, Jasmine

0:15:48.440 --> 0:15:53.000
<v Speaker 5>Crockett probably has one hundred percent name ID, but throughout Texas,

0:15:53.400 --> 0:15:56.440
<v Speaker 5>her name I D probably doesn't crack one third right.

0:15:56.920 --> 0:15:59.600
<v Speaker 5>And that is the type of growth and a runway

0:16:00.160 --> 0:16:03.000
<v Speaker 5>that I think that she can. I mean, because me

0:16:03.040 --> 0:16:04.680
<v Speaker 5>and Angela were talking about this the other day. People

0:16:04.680 --> 0:16:07.040
<v Speaker 5>don't even know and Tiffany, we talked about it several times.

0:16:07.080 --> 0:16:10.200
<v Speaker 5>People don't even know her resume. I mean, they don't

0:16:10.200 --> 0:16:12.280
<v Speaker 5>know how brilliant she is. They don't know that she

0:16:12.360 --> 0:16:14.240
<v Speaker 5>went to law school. They don't know where she went

0:16:14.320 --> 0:16:16.800
<v Speaker 5>to law school. You know, they don't know how she

0:16:16.960 --> 0:16:20.200
<v Speaker 5>had to be this much better than everybody else to

0:16:20.240 --> 0:16:22.240
<v Speaker 5>get to where she is. So she literally has an

0:16:22.280 --> 0:16:26.960
<v Speaker 5>opportunity to introduce herself to voters, Tiffany, to kind of

0:16:26.960 --> 0:16:29.760
<v Speaker 5>get to your question, and she has to take advantage

0:16:29.800 --> 0:16:33.280
<v Speaker 5>of that moment, an opportunity to introduce herself to those voters.

0:16:33.280 --> 0:16:39.280
<v Speaker 5>And also it's not voters have to train themselves. And

0:16:39.320 --> 0:16:42.080
<v Speaker 5>we're still learning how to do that because very few

0:16:42.160 --> 0:16:45.120
<v Speaker 5>voters have ever had the opportunity to press a button

0:16:45.280 --> 0:16:47.480
<v Speaker 5>for a black person in that seat, let alone a

0:16:47.480 --> 0:16:50.160
<v Speaker 5>black woman. And so you have to go through this

0:16:50.280 --> 0:16:55.360
<v Speaker 5>process of actually training the electorate too, giving them kind

0:16:55.360 --> 0:16:57.720
<v Speaker 5>of a permission skip to go and do that.

0:17:00.160 --> 0:17:03.680
<v Speaker 1>You know, part of what I think is so important.

0:17:04.760 --> 0:17:07.320
<v Speaker 1>And well, actually, Andrew, maybe you were going to answer

0:17:07.359 --> 0:17:09.840
<v Speaker 1>the voter question too, but I think that this is

0:17:09.880 --> 0:17:12.960
<v Speaker 1>an important piece to add here. And I think both

0:17:13.040 --> 0:17:16.000
<v Speaker 1>of you all have done this. When candidates are running,

0:17:16.040 --> 0:17:19.920
<v Speaker 1>you also hear them talking about the campaign and they say,

0:17:20.000 --> 0:17:24.040
<v Speaker 1>we're going to win in our campaign, right, it's a

0:17:24.080 --> 0:17:27.600
<v Speaker 1>collective wi and it's a collective hour because it isn't

0:17:27.720 --> 0:17:31.280
<v Speaker 1>just the candidate who is needed to pull off a victory.

0:17:31.359 --> 0:17:35.760
<v Speaker 1>It is the responsibility of the voters. The amount of

0:17:36.840 --> 0:17:39.680
<v Speaker 1>reliance that you take that you have to have and

0:17:39.800 --> 0:17:42.480
<v Speaker 1>people some that you only shook hands with, if at all,

0:17:43.200 --> 0:17:47.240
<v Speaker 1>is humbling. And so I would love Andrew for you

0:17:47.359 --> 0:17:49.840
<v Speaker 1>to talk about that we that hour and you know

0:17:49.960 --> 0:17:52.600
<v Speaker 1>how that we in our has to change in this

0:17:52.680 --> 0:17:54.760
<v Speaker 1>moment in time. There are some things that are shifting

0:17:54.760 --> 0:17:57.560
<v Speaker 1>for example, for the first time in three decades, I

0:17:57.560 --> 0:18:01.399
<v Speaker 1>believe a Democrat one my mayoral race in Miami. So

0:18:01.440 --> 0:18:04.400
<v Speaker 1>the tide is changing. Has it changed enough? And what

0:18:04.480 --> 0:18:07.480
<v Speaker 1>is needed for the voters Andrew to continue that tithe change?

0:18:08.480 --> 0:18:10.679
<v Speaker 4>Well, no, there's not been a permantive change. I think

0:18:10.720 --> 0:18:14.639
<v Speaker 4>there's a realignment every cycle, at least of late so

0:18:14.680 --> 0:18:18.680
<v Speaker 4>far as Obama race, where he was getting upwards of

0:18:19.080 --> 0:18:22.560
<v Speaker 4>sixty seven percent of Miami Dade County. When you know,

0:18:22.640 --> 0:18:27.479
<v Speaker 4>I come around and we're hovering at forty and fifty percent.

0:18:28.280 --> 0:18:33.080
<v Speaker 4>So you had these precipitous fall and then now it's

0:18:33.119 --> 0:18:40.280
<v Speaker 4>every four cycles, maybe every two cycles, every two years.

0:18:40.400 --> 0:18:43.639
<v Speaker 4>Rather for every cycle there's a there is a swing

0:18:44.240 --> 0:18:46.600
<v Speaker 4>back from one to the other and another swing, and

0:18:46.640 --> 0:18:50.240
<v Speaker 4>in some cases the you know, the the swing is

0:18:50.359 --> 0:18:52.800
<v Speaker 4>more extreme than we would have ever thought. I think

0:18:52.800 --> 0:18:55.439
<v Speaker 4>what voters have to do, and I you know, I

0:18:55.520 --> 0:18:57.800
<v Speaker 4>actually I was real honest with people when I was

0:18:57.880 --> 0:19:01.400
<v Speaker 4>running in Florida that this system can't change just because

0:19:01.440 --> 0:19:04.119
<v Speaker 4>you send one person there, one man, they're one governor there,

0:19:04.680 --> 0:19:07.439
<v Speaker 4>and that if you send me there and you're not

0:19:07.640 --> 0:19:11.520
<v Speaker 4>back up, then you're sending me alone and you're stranding me,

0:19:12.160 --> 0:19:13.679
<v Speaker 4>and so we can't get the kind of change that

0:19:13.720 --> 0:19:15.600
<v Speaker 4>we want to see in this state if we all

0:19:15.880 --> 0:19:18.280
<v Speaker 4>aren't in this game. That means coming up and visiting

0:19:18.440 --> 0:19:22.840
<v Speaker 4>legislators and talking to your city councils and wrestling resolutions

0:19:22.840 --> 0:19:26.359
<v Speaker 4>out of them in support of our legislative reforms. But

0:19:26.440 --> 0:19:29.680
<v Speaker 4>it required us all to do something, and I wanted

0:19:29.680 --> 0:19:32.360
<v Speaker 4>to be honest about it, because we delude our voters

0:19:32.400 --> 0:19:36.280
<v Speaker 4>into thinking that one man changes one thing through one

0:19:36.480 --> 0:19:39.960
<v Speaker 4>cycle and voila. And then that thing doesn't happen, and

0:19:39.960 --> 0:19:42.479
<v Speaker 4>everybody's like, but you told us that you was going

0:19:42.520 --> 0:19:45.080
<v Speaker 4>to do and it doesn't happen, and then that cycle

0:19:45.119 --> 0:19:47.880
<v Speaker 4>continues to repeat itself, and it turns people off of politics,

0:19:47.880 --> 0:19:50.520
<v Speaker 4>and we spend a whole generation's time trying to recruit

0:19:50.520 --> 0:19:50.880
<v Speaker 4>them back.

0:19:51.840 --> 0:19:55.399
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, and to this point, if you asked earlier about

0:19:57.440 --> 0:20:00.439
<v Speaker 1>like just my work, I would just say simple. The

0:20:00.480 --> 0:20:03.840
<v Speaker 1>most important thing for voters right now is to do

0:20:03.880 --> 0:20:07.280
<v Speaker 1>as Reverend Jackson said often, which is to keep hope alive.

0:20:07.800 --> 0:20:11.200
<v Speaker 1>I think that we often lose sight of the way

0:20:11.240 --> 0:20:13.520
<v Speaker 1>that things change. It is one vote at a time,

0:20:13.840 --> 0:20:16.359
<v Speaker 1>and I think, in particular in this environment, it's hard

0:20:16.359 --> 0:20:18.560
<v Speaker 1>to stay encouraged. It's hard to know that the power

0:20:18.640 --> 0:20:21.360
<v Speaker 1>is in your hands. It's hard to remember that democracy

0:20:22.119 --> 0:20:25.680
<v Speaker 1>in and of itself people power, right, It is us

0:20:25.760 --> 0:20:28.560
<v Speaker 1>realizing that power. And so that's the first thing that

0:20:28.560 --> 0:20:32.199
<v Speaker 1>I would say to encourage, you know, Jasmine in this

0:20:32.280 --> 0:20:35.040
<v Speaker 1>particular journey, which is to know like you signed up

0:20:35.080 --> 0:20:37.119
<v Speaker 1>to do this because you know you're a formidable fighter.

0:20:37.200 --> 0:20:37.879
<v Speaker 2>You work hard.

0:20:38.200 --> 0:20:40.919
<v Speaker 1>There are people that she knows very well who have

0:20:40.960 --> 0:20:43.720
<v Speaker 1>run statewide, some of them who have won black women.

0:20:44.119 --> 0:20:46.160
<v Speaker 1>She should talk to them, Tis James, she should talk

0:20:46.160 --> 0:20:49.719
<v Speaker 1>to Kamala Harris is not a blue state by any stretch,

0:20:49.840 --> 0:20:51.959
<v Speaker 1>but there are some really key lessons that she can

0:20:52.040 --> 0:20:55.320
<v Speaker 1>learn because no matter what, we know that racism is

0:20:55.359 --> 0:20:58.240
<v Speaker 1>a nonpartisan problem. So she also is up against whatever

0:20:58.280 --> 0:21:01.400
<v Speaker 1>happens in that primary. Folks who are already seen, they don't

0:21:01.400 --> 0:21:03.200
<v Speaker 1>know that they're gonna get in, they're gonna endorse or

0:21:03.200 --> 0:21:05.360
<v Speaker 1>get involved in all of that. So I think it's

0:21:05.400 --> 0:21:07.800
<v Speaker 1>important for her to hold on to that hope in

0:21:07.880 --> 0:21:09.800
<v Speaker 1>this moment as well. And that's something that's got to

0:21:09.840 --> 0:21:11.280
<v Speaker 1>be shared by the voters.

0:21:12.960 --> 0:21:15.280
<v Speaker 3>The balloon Angela, I hope you reiterate all of that.

0:21:15.960 --> 0:21:17.119
<v Speaker 2>Men who don't vote.

0:21:17.400 --> 0:21:19.919
<v Speaker 1>So I won't be popping the balloon. But the people

0:21:19.960 --> 0:21:29.119
<v Speaker 1>have spoken. They cannot wait for you to go to.

0:21:27.880 --> 0:21:30.000
<v Speaker 2>Oh no, it's going too far.

0:21:32.040 --> 0:21:35.720
<v Speaker 1>Where's r hr R falling complete?

0:21:36.480 --> 0:21:43.159
<v Speaker 5>You are the executive producer who okay, okay, they fired already.

0:21:45.440 --> 0:21:47.320
<v Speaker 5>I do want to clarify one thing real quick, though,

0:21:47.960 --> 0:21:50.400
<v Speaker 5>because I think I said that the voters you got

0:21:50.400 --> 0:21:52.560
<v Speaker 5>to train the voters, and I'm not sure people know

0:21:52.600 --> 0:21:55.800
<v Speaker 5>what that means. And I think people take for granted

0:21:55.880 --> 0:22:00.440
<v Speaker 5>the work that uh Stacey Abrams did in George before

0:22:00.480 --> 0:22:05.320
<v Speaker 5>she ran. She went to a sub precinct level, meaning

0:22:05.400 --> 0:22:09.159
<v Speaker 5>that it's not just the precinct where you vote, but

0:22:09.200 --> 0:22:12.320
<v Speaker 5>she actually went into those communities and met with those

0:22:12.320 --> 0:22:15.359
<v Speaker 5>community leaders and had individuals go through and meet with

0:22:15.400 --> 0:22:18.479
<v Speaker 5>those community leaders to make sure that the next election,

0:22:18.640 --> 0:22:21.199
<v Speaker 5>the school board election, those individuals were trained to go

0:22:21.280 --> 0:22:25.480
<v Speaker 5>to the polls to make sure that those city council races,

0:22:25.520 --> 0:22:28.920
<v Speaker 5>those individuals were trained to go to the polls. Andrew

0:22:29.119 --> 0:22:31.119
<v Speaker 5>knows his state of Florida better than I, but I

0:22:31.119 --> 0:22:33.080
<v Speaker 5>would guess that there was a lot of remnants of

0:22:33.600 --> 0:22:37.600
<v Speaker 5>you know, Obama for America and the infrastructure that shit

0:22:37.640 --> 0:22:43.240
<v Speaker 5>ain't cheap either, you're talking about tens of millions of

0:22:43.440 --> 0:22:48.240
<v Speaker 5>dollars that are spent on infrastructure over a period of time.

0:22:48.920 --> 0:22:51.639
<v Speaker 5>And so that's when we talk about it being uphill.

0:22:51.720 --> 0:22:55.560
<v Speaker 5>This isn't an indictment of Jasmine Crockett. This is more

0:22:55.600 --> 0:23:00.919
<v Speaker 5>so an indictment of democratic infrastructure being prepared to catapulta

0:23:00.960 --> 0:23:04.720
<v Speaker 5>candidacy like Jasmine Crockets and putting her into place where

0:23:04.720 --> 0:23:07.520
<v Speaker 5>you have a puncher's chance to have success. And so

0:23:07.560 --> 0:23:09.840
<v Speaker 5>I just wanted to be extremely clear that that those

0:23:09.880 --> 0:23:12.280
<v Speaker 5>things have to be in place if you're not in

0:23:12.320 --> 0:23:14.919
<v Speaker 5>a blue state like Massachusetts or New York. And then

0:23:14.920 --> 0:23:16.960
<v Speaker 5>I wanted to pose a question to y'all because Angela

0:23:17.000 --> 0:23:20.040
<v Speaker 5>got me kind of fired up about it. But what

0:23:20.160 --> 0:23:22.040
<v Speaker 5>y'all think about a King Jeffrey saying he won't going

0:23:22.040 --> 0:23:23.240
<v Speaker 5>to endorse or stay out the race?

0:23:25.359 --> 0:23:28.200
<v Speaker 1>Wait a minute, where play that clip? Where is that at?

0:23:29.240 --> 0:23:32.880
<v Speaker 5>Oh? Okay, I'll drop it in the I will drop

0:23:32.920 --> 0:23:35.800
<v Speaker 5>it in the chat. Let me, let me, let me

0:23:35.840 --> 0:23:38.159
<v Speaker 5>do my best. Let me do my best, Nicholas, and

0:23:38.320 --> 0:23:40.960
<v Speaker 5>y'all gonna hear me tat of tatter on the back of.

0:23:41.040 --> 0:23:42.840
<v Speaker 1>That's and get it because I want to make sure

0:23:42.880 --> 0:23:45.560
<v Speaker 1>we got to we got to fact actuals and factuals,

0:23:45.560 --> 0:23:48.800
<v Speaker 1>because if he said that there's something that, yeah, we should.

0:23:48.520 --> 0:23:49.479
<v Speaker 2>Definitely discuss that.

0:23:50.119 --> 0:23:52.800
<v Speaker 1>So while Bakari is pulling that, we can just run

0:23:52.840 --> 0:23:54.480
<v Speaker 1>that thing back. But in the meantime, we were talking

0:23:54.520 --> 0:23:56.800
<v Speaker 1>about people power. So I want us to know that

0:23:56.880 --> 0:23:59.359
<v Speaker 1>this show is a we also it's not just the

0:23:59.400 --> 0:24:02.280
<v Speaker 1>four of us city here, it also includes our NLP

0:24:02.440 --> 0:24:03.840
<v Speaker 1>fam that you are, the viewers.

0:24:04.080 --> 0:24:05.720
<v Speaker 2>So at this point we're gonna run a viewer question.

0:24:05.800 --> 0:24:11.240
<v Speaker 7>Let's go I Native Land Pod, Hi, Angela, Andrew and Tiffany,

0:24:11.760 --> 0:24:18.159
<v Speaker 7>and welcome Baccari. My question is, can we have a

0:24:18.240 --> 0:24:25.240
<v Speaker 7>mini pod in regards to legacy News media News, who

0:24:25.280 --> 0:24:31.560
<v Speaker 7>controls them and how they've become complicit in what Trump

0:24:31.680 --> 0:24:34.480
<v Speaker 7>is doing. As of now, you are not going to

0:24:34.560 --> 0:24:42.040
<v Speaker 7>hear anybody saying anything that's going to come against what's

0:24:42.080 --> 0:24:44.120
<v Speaker 7>going on. They're very.

0:24:45.760 --> 0:24:46.040
<v Speaker 8>Tame.

0:24:47.400 --> 0:24:49.680
<v Speaker 7>I did a little bit of research and I saw

0:24:49.800 --> 0:24:56.240
<v Speaker 7>that you know who owns MSNBC, CNN, NBC. But could

0:24:56.240 --> 0:25:01.480
<v Speaker 7>you guys go deeper dive into it, especially you put it,

0:25:01.640 --> 0:25:04.959
<v Speaker 7>you know, on a bigger platform, because I think people

0:25:05.119 --> 0:25:05.920
<v Speaker 7>really need.

0:25:05.720 --> 0:25:06.360
<v Speaker 6>To know.

0:25:07.880 --> 0:25:13.480
<v Speaker 7>Who owns and why the news isn't speaking up like

0:25:13.600 --> 0:25:14.360
<v Speaker 7>they should be.

0:25:15.320 --> 0:25:21.800
<v Speaker 4>That's really good. Yeah, that's that's a uh. This Netflix

0:25:21.960 --> 0:25:25.399
<v Speaker 4>Paramount Warner Brothers situation is brought into focus for a

0:25:25.400 --> 0:25:29.920
<v Speaker 4>lot of people, especially with the threats from the President

0:25:30.080 --> 0:25:33.520
<v Speaker 4>about making changes at CNN and the guarantees that they

0:25:33.520 --> 0:25:36.320
<v Speaker 4>say are being made being shuttled between Jerry Kushner, who

0:25:36.359 --> 0:25:40.119
<v Speaker 4>is on one side of the two deals with regard

0:25:40.240 --> 0:25:44.600
<v Speaker 4>to the to the to the takeover at Warner Brothers,

0:25:45.720 --> 0:25:53.800
<v Speaker 4>and the number of interconnected, interwoven billionaire millionaire class in

0:25:53.840 --> 0:25:57.960
<v Speaker 4>this country who are running our government in a shadowy way,

0:25:58.840 --> 0:26:01.960
<v Speaker 4>you know, guiding you know the direction in which the

0:26:02.000 --> 0:26:05.280
<v Speaker 4>administration takes on certain issues, you know, impacting all of this,

0:26:06.040 --> 0:26:08.760
<v Speaker 4>and much of it is happening behind the veil, not

0:26:08.920 --> 0:26:12.119
<v Speaker 4>in public. These are private calls and shuttles that are

0:26:12.119 --> 0:26:16.480
<v Speaker 4>being made between Donald Trump and it closest folks to

0:26:16.520 --> 0:26:20.439
<v Speaker 4>build this cabal and the Congress that would be ashamed

0:26:20.480 --> 0:26:24.200
<v Speaker 4>of not, as the Court says, jealously protecting it's its

0:26:24.240 --> 0:26:27.119
<v Speaker 4>responsibilities to hold this president accountable.

0:26:26.680 --> 0:26:29.359
<v Speaker 3>As not everybody knows the Netflix, Warner Brothers things that

0:26:29.400 --> 0:26:31.480
<v Speaker 3>do you want to break it down?

0:26:32.000 --> 0:26:34.760
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, it's so so for folks who haven't heard this

0:26:34.880 --> 0:26:39.760
<v Speaker 4>last week, Uh, it was heavy in the news the

0:26:39.760 --> 0:26:46.000
<v Speaker 4>fact that Netflix the nation's largest I think they've got

0:26:46.000 --> 0:26:48.719
<v Speaker 4>the largest customer base as it relates to these uh

0:26:49.160 --> 0:26:55.320
<v Speaker 4>streaming apps. Yeah, streaming platforms had made a I think

0:26:55.320 --> 0:26:57.920
<v Speaker 4>it was a seventy six billion dollar bid to take

0:26:57.960 --> 0:27:02.080
<v Speaker 4>over Warner Brothers. And it's seventy two billion and it's

0:27:02.119 --> 0:27:07.240
<v Speaker 4>over one hundred year catalog of entertainment, big shows to

0:27:09.119 --> 0:27:13.440
<v Speaker 4>you know, series because what they found in this streaming

0:27:13.440 --> 0:27:18.120
<v Speaker 4>space is at over half the folks who are streaming

0:27:18.160 --> 0:27:22.240
<v Speaker 4>are streaming old shows, not new things on television. They're

0:27:22.280 --> 0:27:25.760
<v Speaker 4>going back to things that they grew up on potentially

0:27:25.840 --> 0:27:28.680
<v Speaker 4>in streaming those, which I thought was very fascinating, and

0:27:28.760 --> 0:27:30.680
<v Speaker 4>then I thought about my own habits and I sometimes

0:27:30.720 --> 0:27:37.679
<v Speaker 4>found myself doing that either way sort of. The Actors Guild,

0:27:37.840 --> 0:27:41.000
<v Speaker 4>the arts community writ large are against this because they

0:27:41.040 --> 0:27:44.920
<v Speaker 4>believe it's going to one concentrate really power on all

0:27:45.000 --> 0:27:48.640
<v Speaker 4>sides of a negotiation to do just one of these

0:27:48.680 --> 0:27:53.560
<v Speaker 4>companies fewer games in town, which tends to one layoff

0:27:53.600 --> 0:27:56.600
<v Speaker 4>employees and drive up the costs. So for those of

0:27:56.680 --> 0:27:59.520
<v Speaker 4>us who get subscriptions, you may be consolidating them, but

0:27:59.560 --> 0:28:01.480
<v Speaker 4>in the total you end up paying, you end up

0:28:01.480 --> 0:28:03.360
<v Speaker 4>paying more. So it sounds like a deal, but isn't

0:28:03.359 --> 0:28:06.800
<v Speaker 4>a deal at all. But the consolidation of media part

0:28:07.320 --> 0:28:09.679
<v Speaker 4>we really all have to be paying attention to, because

0:28:09.880 --> 0:28:13.960
<v Speaker 4>there's already too many closure relationships to take actions to

0:28:14.040 --> 0:28:18.960
<v Speaker 4>then make that Cabald even smaller and thereby stronger I

0:28:19.000 --> 0:28:20.880
<v Speaker 4>think Bear's consequences as well.

0:28:21.080 --> 0:28:23.480
<v Speaker 3>So just so folks know, there was quite a bidding war.

0:28:23.560 --> 0:28:26.280
<v Speaker 3>So it was one of brothers technically Warner Brothers Discovery,

0:28:26.359 --> 0:28:28.840
<v Speaker 3>but then when they merge with this is happening, the

0:28:28.840 --> 0:28:31.360
<v Speaker 3>consolidation of a lot of these companies, what is happening.

0:28:31.680 --> 0:28:36.480
<v Speaker 3>David Zaslov was over Discovery. David Zaslov is, according to

0:28:36.520 --> 0:28:40.440
<v Speaker 3>the reporting, is rumored to lean right and be more

0:28:40.480 --> 0:28:43.440
<v Speaker 3>of a conservative. And so as this bidding war was happening,

0:28:43.480 --> 0:28:46.000
<v Speaker 3>there were a lot of eyes paying attention to see

0:28:46.040 --> 0:28:48.880
<v Speaker 3>who was going to buy this company, because as you

0:28:48.920 --> 0:28:52.880
<v Speaker 3>all know, Warner Brothers include CNN, HBO, and when you

0:28:52.880 --> 0:28:55.440
<v Speaker 3>think about the really big franchises that people watch Game

0:28:55.440 --> 0:28:57.680
<v Speaker 3>of Thrones, think about all your favorite shows on HBO.

0:28:58.160 --> 0:29:00.240
<v Speaker 3>The streaming giant will then have access to that. And

0:29:00.280 --> 0:29:04.440
<v Speaker 3>so after this, after Netflix has acquired Warner Brothers, a

0:29:04.480 --> 0:29:06.400
<v Speaker 3>lot of people held their breast. What does this mean

0:29:06.400 --> 0:29:10.080
<v Speaker 3>for CNN? So in this deal they did not they

0:29:10.120 --> 0:29:14.080
<v Speaker 3>will not acquire CNN. CNN will now be a part

0:29:14.120 --> 0:29:16.800
<v Speaker 3>of its own group that I believe. You guys correct

0:29:16.800 --> 0:29:18.360
<v Speaker 3>me if I'm wrong, but I believe that will still

0:29:18.920 --> 0:29:23.760
<v Speaker 3>remain under the control of Zaslov. But yet, to your point, Andrew,

0:29:23.800 --> 0:29:28.880
<v Speaker 3>what this means for entertainers, what this means for writers, directors?

0:29:28.960 --> 0:29:30.920
<v Speaker 3>All these things remains to be seen. As we've seen,

0:29:30.960 --> 0:29:34.920
<v Speaker 3>streaming has completely changed the field. But certainly when it

0:29:34.920 --> 0:29:37.400
<v Speaker 3>comes to our news outlets and who they feed into.

0:29:37.800 --> 0:29:43.680
<v Speaker 3>Comcast owns, MSNBC, CNN, like I said, will remain under

0:29:43.880 --> 0:29:46.320
<v Speaker 3>Warner Brothers. Fox, when you think about how incestuous that

0:29:46.480 --> 0:29:50.080
<v Speaker 3>is so Fox, Wall Street Journal, HarperCollins, all of these

0:29:50.080 --> 0:29:53.520
<v Speaker 3>things feed up, funnel up into the same conservative outlets.

0:29:53.520 --> 0:29:55.160
<v Speaker 3>So this is I think the caller for the question.

0:29:55.240 --> 0:29:57.160
<v Speaker 3>This is something that I would love to do a

0:29:57.200 --> 0:29:57.840
<v Speaker 3>mini pod on.

0:29:58.240 --> 0:30:01.560
<v Speaker 5>We're gonna dig deep into some stuff that is pretty

0:30:01.600 --> 0:30:03.800
<v Speaker 5>interesting in the courts with the Courts with our guest

0:30:03.880 --> 0:30:06.080
<v Speaker 5>Elie Mistel on the other side of the break, let

0:30:06.160 --> 0:30:06.880
<v Speaker 5>us pay some bills.

0:30:17.320 --> 0:30:20.080
<v Speaker 1>Well, I wanted to if we can pivot back to

0:30:21.240 --> 0:30:25.840
<v Speaker 1>Jasmine Crockett. We were talking just a moment ago about Hakim.

0:30:25.960 --> 0:30:28.960
<v Speaker 1>Jeffries said in a recent press conference, Nick, can we

0:30:29.000 --> 0:30:29.640
<v Speaker 1>roll that clip?

0:30:30.240 --> 0:30:34.320
<v Speaker 8>Well, I think I'm obviously focused on the House, not

0:30:34.440 --> 0:30:38.360
<v Speaker 8>the Senate, and we're only three seats short of taking

0:30:38.400 --> 0:30:40.600
<v Speaker 8>back the majority, and we are going to take the

0:30:40.640 --> 0:30:44.040
<v Speaker 8>majority back in the next Congress. The Republicans have been

0:30:44.040 --> 0:30:47.320
<v Speaker 8>a disaster. They're totally on the run. They failed the

0:30:47.320 --> 0:30:49.680
<v Speaker 8>American people. The cost of living is out of control.

0:30:50.080 --> 0:30:53.240
<v Speaker 8>Democrats are the only group of people in this town

0:30:53.280 --> 0:30:56.360
<v Speaker 8>and across the country actually interested in dealing with the

0:30:56.400 --> 0:31:00.760
<v Speaker 8>affordability crisis. That's where our focus continue to be.

0:31:01.440 --> 0:31:04.320
<v Speaker 5>I think that the clip didn't necessarily encapsulate the question,

0:31:04.360 --> 0:31:06.640
<v Speaker 5>But the question was asked, are you going to support?

0:31:06.880 --> 0:31:09.080
<v Speaker 5>I mean, are you going to endorse Jasmine Crockett? And

0:31:09.080 --> 0:31:12.520
<v Speaker 5>that was his response. His response was, I'm focused on

0:31:12.560 --> 0:31:15.200
<v Speaker 5>the I'm focused on the House, which of course is

0:31:15.280 --> 0:31:17.440
<v Speaker 5>his job. With three seats away. He pivoted and moved on.

0:31:18.160 --> 0:31:21.040
<v Speaker 5>I just think that in this in this world where

0:31:21.040 --> 0:31:25.240
<v Speaker 5>information moves fast, disinformation misinformation moves fast. He did say

0:31:25.280 --> 0:31:27.560
<v Speaker 5>that she was strong and formidable in those type of things.

0:31:27.600 --> 0:31:29.280
<v Speaker 5>I just wanted to know your thoughts on it, because

0:31:29.280 --> 0:31:33.160
<v Speaker 5>I know that he has been drawing a lot of

0:31:33.160 --> 0:31:36.840
<v Speaker 5>heat from all sides, particularly those of us who support him,

0:31:37.240 --> 0:31:41.240
<v Speaker 5>are questioning some decisions, and I don't I don't, you know,

0:31:41.320 --> 0:31:44.560
<v Speaker 5>I think Nancy Pelosi handles things differently. I don't. I

0:31:44.600 --> 0:31:47.520
<v Speaker 5>don't know. I just think that she handled things with

0:31:47.640 --> 0:31:52.280
<v Speaker 5>a kind of, you know, a testicular fortitude that isn't

0:31:52.320 --> 0:31:57.320
<v Speaker 5>necessarily displayed often or all the time by by Kim Jeffrey.

0:31:57.360 --> 0:32:00.360
<v Speaker 5>So that was my that I'm not saying I'm critical it.

0:32:00.400 --> 0:32:03.120
<v Speaker 5>I just wanted to hear your thoughts on the non endorsement.

0:32:04.240 --> 0:32:07.160
<v Speaker 5>She's cool, though, you know.

0:32:07.440 --> 0:32:10.040
<v Speaker 1>I'm just I'm not going in too deep here, but

0:32:10.080 --> 0:32:12.760
<v Speaker 1>I will just say this. I think that context also matters.

0:32:12.800 --> 0:32:15.520
<v Speaker 1>I hate when people clip our stuff without context, so

0:32:15.600 --> 0:32:17.000
<v Speaker 1>let me just give context.

0:32:17.000 --> 0:32:18.719
<v Speaker 2>People might get mad, but it is what it is.

0:32:19.880 --> 0:32:22.760
<v Speaker 1>This was a press conference in the House, the typical

0:32:22.840 --> 0:32:26.760
<v Speaker 1>weekly press conference they have, and the press conference was

0:32:26.840 --> 0:32:33.160
<v Speaker 1>about the Republicans refusing to support I really think Andrew's

0:32:33.160 --> 0:32:33.760
<v Speaker 1>fall asleep.

0:32:35.440 --> 0:32:37.560
<v Speaker 2>This was about Uh, the.

0:32:40.000 --> 0:32:42.760
<v Speaker 5>I just watching it.

0:32:43.480 --> 0:32:46.320
<v Speaker 4>It's really hard because you're you're want to be like

0:32:46.840 --> 0:32:49.280
<v Speaker 4>really intensive in your hearing, but then your body is.

0:32:49.240 --> 0:32:51.760
<v Speaker 2>Like, oh my god, Andrew, go get some water. Put

0:32:51.800 --> 0:32:52.680
<v Speaker 2>some water in your face.

0:32:52.760 --> 0:32:55.440
<v Speaker 5>Chet about to about to do Andrew some coffee and

0:32:55.480 --> 0:32:56.200
<v Speaker 5>some coked.

0:32:57.240 --> 0:33:01.080
<v Speaker 2>Get like Coca co Jesus, y'all pray for our brother.

0:33:01.200 --> 0:33:05.960
<v Speaker 1>Anyway, The frustration here is that this was about their

0:33:06.480 --> 0:33:11.680
<v Speaker 1>many failed attempts to get Republicans to side with voters

0:33:11.680 --> 0:33:15.720
<v Speaker 1>and everyday Americans on healthcare subsidies and extending the healthcare subsidies.

0:33:15.720 --> 0:33:17.960
<v Speaker 1>They have until the end of the year before people's

0:33:18.200 --> 0:33:21.959
<v Speaker 1>subsidies skyrocket. And so he's asked about the announcement, and

0:33:22.000 --> 0:33:24.560
<v Speaker 1>that's not the purpose of this particular press conference. It's

0:33:24.920 --> 0:33:28.360
<v Speaker 1>policy based, not necessarily political unless he's talking about and

0:33:28.400 --> 0:33:29.680
<v Speaker 1>he's been disciplined about it.

0:33:29.720 --> 0:33:30.960
<v Speaker 2>Do I like the response?

0:33:31.120 --> 0:33:33.840
<v Speaker 1>No, No, I don't like the response, but I do

0:33:33.960 --> 0:33:37.560
<v Speaker 1>appreciate the fact that the that the context matters. I

0:33:37.600 --> 0:33:40.280
<v Speaker 1>think that it sucks because Jasmine has gone so hard

0:33:40.320 --> 0:33:43.640
<v Speaker 1>for Hakim hard, and I think that he owes her

0:33:44.400 --> 0:33:47.560
<v Speaker 1>not just a bit of gratitude, but also loyalty.

0:33:47.600 --> 0:33:48.400
<v Speaker 2>In that same way.

0:33:48.440 --> 0:33:50.400
<v Speaker 1>So I hope that he comes back around and makes

0:33:50.400 --> 0:33:53.320
<v Speaker 1>that clear when the timing is right, maybe get.

0:33:53.360 --> 0:33:54.480
<v Speaker 2>Enough conference.

0:33:55.720 --> 0:33:58.120
<v Speaker 4>That we get enough rope that every other candidate who's

0:33:58.160 --> 0:34:02.200
<v Speaker 4>white and male gets Whenever they enter a race, everyone

0:34:02.280 --> 0:34:04.960
<v Speaker 4>doesn't rush to They can't raise the money, and oh

0:34:05.000 --> 0:34:07.680
<v Speaker 4>are they going to be viable amongst the black constituency,

0:34:07.760 --> 0:34:09.480
<v Speaker 4>which is going to be the base vote that will

0:34:09.520 --> 0:34:12.360
<v Speaker 4>depend on an election day? You know, none of that

0:34:12.440 --> 0:34:16.440
<v Speaker 4>level of scrutiny. But the moment you put a transcending candidate,

0:34:16.600 --> 0:34:19.719
<v Speaker 4>you know in there something that's not the norm, then

0:34:19.760 --> 0:34:23.359
<v Speaker 4>it's everything's all speculative. Now this is a gamble, and

0:34:23.440 --> 0:34:25.680
<v Speaker 4>so much is at stake, And do we really want

0:34:25.680 --> 0:34:28.439
<v Speaker 4>to split our resources between this race and a Senate race?

0:34:28.440 --> 0:34:30.600
<v Speaker 4>Why don't we just throw all of our money into

0:34:30.600 --> 0:34:33.360
<v Speaker 4>one of those? I mean, just the games that are played.

0:34:34.719 --> 0:34:39.560
<v Speaker 4>There's no real fealty to sessing out what's the best. Necessarily,

0:34:39.640 --> 0:34:45.200
<v Speaker 4>there's this there's this negotiation we do amongst ourselves, negotiating

0:34:45.200 --> 0:34:50.640
<v Speaker 4>away from ourselves. It's it's crazy Republicans don't negotiate against themselves.

0:34:51.280 --> 0:34:52.239
<v Speaker 4>They go all in.

0:34:52.280 --> 0:34:54.840
<v Speaker 5>To andrew point. They push to Andrew's point that the

0:34:54.920 --> 0:34:57.360
<v Speaker 5>context that I also think matters, is I compared to

0:34:57.400 --> 0:35:01.080
<v Speaker 5>the Nancy Pelosi but like she is one of his

0:35:01.200 --> 0:35:06.600
<v Speaker 5>caucus members, and yeah, and he ain't. Terre Leko ain't.

0:35:06.760 --> 0:35:09.279
<v Speaker 5>I mean, it's not like there is a decision to

0:35:09.600 --> 0:35:11.680
<v Speaker 5>be made or to be had. And I know Nancy

0:35:11.719 --> 0:35:14.640
<v Speaker 5>and I may be wrong, Angela, you actually are way

0:35:14.680 --> 0:35:17.360
<v Speaker 5>more keen than in depth. But I do believe that

0:35:17.400 --> 0:35:20.480
<v Speaker 5>there was times when Nancy Pelosi had caucus members run

0:35:20.520 --> 0:35:24.160
<v Speaker 5>for something else and when they announced, she was I'm

0:35:24.239 --> 0:35:26.439
<v Speaker 5>right there with them, you know, I'm missing I love him.

0:35:26.640 --> 0:35:28.680
<v Speaker 5>She might not even like them that much, but she

0:35:28.800 --> 0:35:30.880
<v Speaker 5>was always ten toes down for her caucus members. And

0:35:30.880 --> 0:35:32.799
<v Speaker 5>I just think that people remember that because it's not

0:35:32.880 --> 0:35:36.280
<v Speaker 5>that distant and are questioning it now. That's my only point.

0:35:36.480 --> 0:35:36.880
<v Speaker 2>I guess.

0:35:36.960 --> 0:35:39.120
<v Speaker 1>I mean, you could say that, but Hakeim is not

0:35:39.160 --> 0:35:41.319
<v Speaker 1>the chair of the Congressional Black Caucus. He's the chair

0:35:41.400 --> 0:35:45.080
<v Speaker 1>of or he is the or the Democratic leader of

0:35:45.120 --> 0:35:48.880
<v Speaker 1>the House. So technically Talla, Rico, Tyreko, Tyrek and nem

0:35:48.960 --> 0:35:52.000
<v Speaker 1>is in his caucus. It's the Democratic Caucus.

0:35:52.080 --> 0:35:52.960
<v Speaker 2>Democratic.

0:35:53.560 --> 0:35:57.759
<v Speaker 5>He's not a member of the House, oh lord, He's

0:35:57.800 --> 0:35:59.600
<v Speaker 5>a member of the tech No he's a member of

0:35:59.640 --> 0:36:01.719
<v Speaker 5>the Teche.

0:36:04.000 --> 0:36:10.479
<v Speaker 1>Prom but generally speaking, but generally speaking, to be fair,

0:36:10.640 --> 0:36:13.919
<v Speaker 1>democratic leadership normally does stay out of things in their

0:36:13.920 --> 0:36:17.560
<v Speaker 1>primary stage. I am with you to be fair that

0:36:17.680 --> 0:36:19.920
<v Speaker 1>I think he should have said something about Jasmine. I

0:36:19.920 --> 0:36:21.960
<v Speaker 1>said that Jasmine was a writer for him. I said

0:36:22.000 --> 0:36:24.560
<v Speaker 1>that Jasmine has had his back. Now here's the place

0:36:24.560 --> 0:36:26.919
<v Speaker 1>where I'm a different with you on Nancy Pelosi. I've

0:36:27.000 --> 0:36:31.359
<v Speaker 1>watched Nancy Pelosi pit members against each other, and we're

0:36:31.360 --> 0:36:33.879
<v Speaker 1>talking about her, how she's such a writer. She wasn't

0:36:33.880 --> 0:36:35.759
<v Speaker 1>a writer for Kamala Harris. She was calling for an

0:36:35.760 --> 0:36:39.760
<v Speaker 1>open premier, open convention, sorry, not an open primary, open convention.

0:36:39.880 --> 0:36:40.960
<v Speaker 2>Since we messing up today.

0:36:41.280 --> 0:36:43.799
<v Speaker 1>Charge that to andrews Cole means getting its way all

0:36:43.800 --> 0:36:47.160
<v Speaker 1>the way to Jacksonville where I'm at. Now, Okay, that said,

0:36:47.880 --> 0:36:50.440
<v Speaker 1>I did want to tell you all really quickly. We

0:36:50.480 --> 0:36:54.480
<v Speaker 1>know our good friend Terrence Woodbury is working with Jasmine

0:36:54.520 --> 0:36:56.480
<v Speaker 1>on this campaign, and I asked him to send us

0:36:56.560 --> 0:37:01.000
<v Speaker 1>a response into this article from notice UH which talks

0:37:01.040 --> 0:37:06.520
<v Speaker 1>about the NRSC, which is the Republican Senatorial Committee having

0:37:06.520 --> 0:37:11.320
<v Speaker 1>an astro turf recruitment process, which would have encouraged Jasmin

0:37:11.320 --> 0:37:13.960
<v Speaker 1>Crockett to run. They said that they started to include

0:37:14.200 --> 0:37:18.240
<v Speaker 1>her name in polling to see if she would bite.

0:37:18.280 --> 0:37:20.640
<v Speaker 1>And they try trying to exclaim credit for this, that

0:37:20.719 --> 0:37:25.480
<v Speaker 1>they wanted the least viable candidate in this race against

0:37:25.560 --> 0:37:28.839
<v Speaker 1>John cornn Er, whoever wins the Republican primary, and they're

0:37:28.960 --> 0:37:31.759
<v Speaker 1>trying to say that they they're the reasons why, the

0:37:31.800 --> 0:37:35.440
<v Speaker 1>reason why she decided to run. So Terrence Woodbury's response,

0:37:35.480 --> 0:37:39.640
<v Speaker 1>I think is worth noting. He says, Republicans recruiting Crockett

0:37:39.680 --> 0:37:42.880
<v Speaker 1>because she is less electable is as silly as Dems

0:37:42.920 --> 0:37:47.440
<v Speaker 1>recruiting Trump or Republicans recruiting Obama because they are less electable,

0:37:47.760 --> 0:37:50.560
<v Speaker 1>because they both have something in common with Jasmin Crockett.

0:37:50.600 --> 0:37:54.160
<v Speaker 1>One the ability to expand the elector with frustrated voters

0:37:54.160 --> 0:37:57.840
<v Speaker 1>that otherwise think all politicians are the same. Two the

0:37:57.920 --> 0:38:00.759
<v Speaker 1>ability to gain and keep media attention long enough to

0:38:00.800 --> 0:38:03.320
<v Speaker 1>make the case to those frustrated voters that are ignoring

0:38:03.320 --> 0:38:07.880
<v Speaker 1>other politicians. Any generic Democrat Democrat can get to forty

0:38:07.920 --> 0:38:10.920
<v Speaker 1>five percent in Texas, Jasmine is the only one that

0:38:10.960 --> 0:38:13.560
<v Speaker 1>can break through to the eight million Texas voters that

0:38:13.680 --> 0:38:17.479
<v Speaker 1>have tuned other politicians out and if she can get

0:38:17.520 --> 0:38:20.520
<v Speaker 1>just ten percent of them to believe in her enough

0:38:20.520 --> 0:38:23.440
<v Speaker 1>to vote, she is the next Senator from Texas. I

0:38:23.480 --> 0:38:26.359
<v Speaker 1>thought that was a great point from Terrence. I love

0:38:26.440 --> 0:38:28.640
<v Speaker 1>the way that he broke it down in numbers only

0:38:28.680 --> 0:38:31.440
<v Speaker 1>like Upholster would. Terrence would very of course from hit strategies.

0:38:31.960 --> 0:38:34.200
<v Speaker 1>And of course at this point we're gonna pivot to

0:38:34.280 --> 0:38:36.839
<v Speaker 1>somebody else that is an expert among us, and that

0:38:37.040 --> 0:38:40.799
<v Speaker 1>is to our good friend Ellie Missole, a Supreme Court expert,

0:38:41.040 --> 0:38:43.120
<v Speaker 1>the person we always turn to when it's way too

0:38:43.200 --> 0:38:45.400
<v Speaker 1>much going down with the Supreme Court. There is a

0:38:45.400 --> 0:38:47.960
<v Speaker 1>lot happening, three cases in particular we want to talk

0:38:47.960 --> 0:38:50.400
<v Speaker 1>to Ellie about. So let's bring Ellie Mistyle to the show.

0:38:51.680 --> 0:38:52.880
<v Speaker 6>Hi, guys, thanks for having me.

0:38:58.320 --> 0:38:59.120
<v Speaker 2>It's crazy.

0:39:00.320 --> 0:39:02.480
<v Speaker 4>I thought the big deserved acknowledgement.

0:39:02.600 --> 0:39:03.880
<v Speaker 5>That's Delhi, Thank you.

0:39:04.560 --> 0:39:07.080
<v Speaker 6>I don't want to let the Democratic Minority leader slide

0:39:09.160 --> 0:39:14.879
<v Speaker 6>on his non endorsement of Crockett and basically to right

0:39:16.160 --> 0:39:19.080
<v Speaker 6>or or basically the last three weeks of Hakem Jeffries experience,

0:39:19.120 --> 0:39:21.880
<v Speaker 6>because what that has told me, beyond a shadow of

0:39:21.880 --> 0:39:25.279
<v Speaker 6>a doubt, is that Hakeem Jefferies does not want to

0:39:25.320 --> 0:39:28.920
<v Speaker 6>be the leader of the opposition party to fascism and

0:39:28.960 --> 0:39:32.239
<v Speaker 6>authoritarianism in this country. What he wants to be is

0:39:32.280 --> 0:39:34.840
<v Speaker 6>the leader of the Democratic Party. And the analogy that

0:39:34.840 --> 0:39:37.520
<v Speaker 6>I would use here is like, right now we're on

0:39:37.600 --> 0:39:40.800
<v Speaker 6>a bus. Right Trump is driving the bus, Mike Johnson

0:39:40.840 --> 0:39:43.080
<v Speaker 6>is driving the bus. Hakeem Jeffries is like, hey, I'm

0:39:43.160 --> 0:39:45.279
<v Speaker 6>three votes away from driving the bus. I really want

0:39:45.320 --> 0:39:48.800
<v Speaker 6>to drive this bus. That is my that is my focus. Angela.

0:39:48.840 --> 0:39:51.160
<v Speaker 6>You said he is very disciplined. Absolutely, I'll give them

0:39:51.239 --> 0:39:53.960
<v Speaker 6>credit for that. The man knows. The man is disciplined,

0:39:54.200 --> 0:39:56.160
<v Speaker 6>and what he thinks he's doing, and what he wants

0:39:56.200 --> 0:39:59.000
<v Speaker 6>to do is drive the bus. He doesn't want to

0:39:59.000 --> 0:40:01.600
<v Speaker 6>blow up the bus. He doesn't want to get off

0:40:01.640 --> 0:40:03.640
<v Speaker 6>the bus. He doesn't want to get us off the bus.

0:40:03.680 --> 0:40:06.719
<v Speaker 6>He wants to drive the bus. And he's promising us, Oh,

0:40:06.719 --> 0:40:09.400
<v Speaker 6>when I'm driving the bus will go to better places.

0:40:09.600 --> 0:40:12.640
<v Speaker 6>We need to blow up the bus and takeem. Jeffries

0:40:12.840 --> 0:40:17.200
<v Speaker 6>is not that guy. That's that's not shade, that is fact.

0:40:17.239 --> 0:40:19.880
<v Speaker 6>He is not the guy who wants to be the

0:40:19.960 --> 0:40:23.840
<v Speaker 6>leader of the opposition to fascism in this country. Cheron

0:40:23.920 --> 0:40:27.120
<v Speaker 6>doesn't want it Durwan doesn't want it, the Newsom doesn't

0:40:27.120 --> 0:40:30.640
<v Speaker 6>want it, Shapiro doesn't want it. We don't have democrats

0:40:30.719 --> 0:40:35.080
<v Speaker 6>right now who want to oppose fascism we want we

0:40:35.160 --> 0:40:39.000
<v Speaker 6>have democrats who want to wait for their turn to

0:40:39.120 --> 0:40:41.600
<v Speaker 6>be in charge of the wheels of power. They don't

0:40:41.640 --> 0:40:44.480
<v Speaker 6>want to use a Game of Thrones analogy. They're just

0:40:44.560 --> 0:40:47.000
<v Speaker 6>waiting for their turn on the wheel. They don't want

0:40:47.040 --> 0:40:50.720
<v Speaker 6>to break it. And at some point a leader needs

0:40:50.760 --> 0:40:53.799
<v Speaker 6>to emerge who is going to tell us how to

0:40:54.040 --> 0:40:57.800
<v Speaker 6>break the wheel of fascism, how to break the wheel

0:40:57.960 --> 0:41:01.560
<v Speaker 6>of the oligarts, because that is what the country is

0:41:01.760 --> 0:41:04.600
<v Speaker 6>crying out for right there. There are not people out there,

0:41:04.600 --> 0:41:07.520
<v Speaker 6>are not people out here who just want to replace

0:41:07.680 --> 0:41:11.120
<v Speaker 6>the figureheads at the top and find one that's a

0:41:11.120 --> 0:41:13.880
<v Speaker 6>little bit more. And that's why Crockett has, you know,

0:41:13.960 --> 0:41:17.000
<v Speaker 6>a lot of support right now. That's why Mundami won

0:41:17.080 --> 0:41:19.600
<v Speaker 6>in New York. The people who are willing to tell

0:41:19.680 --> 0:41:22.799
<v Speaker 6>us how to break the wheel are gonna be our

0:41:22.920 --> 0:41:26.279
<v Speaker 6>leaders of the future. And and and Jeffries is not

0:41:26.360 --> 0:41:29.760
<v Speaker 6>that guy, which is not saying that I'm not gonna look,

0:41:30.400 --> 0:41:33.479
<v Speaker 6>I'm gonna spend the next year of my life until

0:41:33.520 --> 0:41:36.680
<v Speaker 6>we get to the twenty twenty six mid terms, telling

0:41:36.719 --> 0:41:40.680
<v Speaker 6>everybody within earshot about how Hockeing Jeffries must be the

0:41:40.719 --> 0:41:43.000
<v Speaker 6>next Speaker of the House, how the Democrats need to

0:41:43.000 --> 0:41:45.400
<v Speaker 6>take control of the House, how that has to happen,

0:41:45.560 --> 0:41:47.560
<v Speaker 6>and that we have to support Democrats and we I'm

0:41:47.560 --> 0:41:50.960
<v Speaker 6>gonna do all the things, right. I'm not not gonna vote.

0:41:50.960 --> 0:41:55.640
<v Speaker 6>I'm not I'm not stephen A. Smith, right, like I'm rational, right,

0:41:55.680 --> 0:41:59.520
<v Speaker 6>and and so I understand what needs to happen politically,

0:42:00.120 --> 0:42:04.400
<v Speaker 6>but in terms of what this country needs to defeat

0:42:04.920 --> 0:42:07.120
<v Speaker 6>the authoritarians and the fascists and the biggots and the

0:42:07.200 --> 0:42:10.799
<v Speaker 6>racists and the misogynists that are running roughshod over our

0:42:10.840 --> 0:42:14.120
<v Speaker 6>country on over our rights. Hakim Jeffries is not the

0:42:14.200 --> 0:42:17.720
<v Speaker 6>leader of the opposition movement, and we need one.

0:42:20.680 --> 0:42:23.160
<v Speaker 2>Well at our reach.

0:42:24.440 --> 0:42:27.160
<v Speaker 5>Resident Collie, Let's take take up an offering.

0:42:28.840 --> 0:42:32.120
<v Speaker 1>Yes, the doors of the church might might now be open,

0:42:32.239 --> 0:42:34.600
<v Speaker 1>but now they're going to be open to the Supreme Court. So, ellie,

0:42:34.640 --> 0:42:38.120
<v Speaker 1>all hill is breaking loose in every branch of the government,

0:42:38.800 --> 0:42:41.280
<v Speaker 1>So please take us over to the Supreme Court.

0:42:41.719 --> 0:42:43.120
<v Speaker 2>I don't know where you even want to begin.

0:42:43.160 --> 0:42:44.760
<v Speaker 1>I don't know if you want to start in campaign

0:42:44.880 --> 0:42:46.759
<v Speaker 1>finance or if you want to go somewhere else, but

0:42:46.840 --> 0:42:47.440
<v Speaker 1>let's get it.

0:42:48.400 --> 0:42:51.680
<v Speaker 6>Yeah, so look at thirty thousand feet. Every time I

0:42:51.719 --> 0:42:53.680
<v Speaker 6>come on your show, every time I call on every show,

0:42:53.719 --> 0:42:58.440
<v Speaker 6>I try to tell Democrats, liberals, progressives, black people, Latino people,

0:42:58.680 --> 0:43:01.640
<v Speaker 6>anybody who will listen to me, that if you do

0:43:01.719 --> 0:43:05.080
<v Speaker 6>not control the Supreme Court, you do not control anything.

0:43:05.640 --> 0:43:08.600
<v Speaker 6>There is no liberal agenda, there is no democratic agenda,

0:43:08.719 --> 0:43:11.759
<v Speaker 6>there is no progressive agenda. There is no black agenda

0:43:11.920 --> 0:43:16.719
<v Speaker 6>that can survive. Generational control of the Supreme Court by

0:43:17.120 --> 0:43:21.799
<v Speaker 6>six conservatives, Republican fascists in ropes, nothing happens, you don't

0:43:21.800 --> 0:43:24.560
<v Speaker 6>get anything. And the Supreme Court this year, since they

0:43:24.600 --> 0:43:27.279
<v Speaker 6>got back to work, actually even before they officially got

0:43:27.280 --> 0:43:30.720
<v Speaker 6>back to work, this year has has proven my point.

0:43:30.840 --> 0:43:33.760
<v Speaker 6>All they have done is rubber snamp the MAGA, administer

0:43:34.040 --> 0:43:38.080
<v Speaker 6>the MAGA policies. And it starts. It started in September

0:43:38.120 --> 0:43:40.279
<v Speaker 6>on the shadow docket when the Supreme Court in Brett

0:43:40.360 --> 0:43:44.960
<v Speaker 6>Kavanaugh reconstitutionalize racial profiling. Like I'm not sure that everybody

0:43:45.000 --> 0:43:49.839
<v Speaker 6>fully grasps this, but like racial profiling is back and constitutional,

0:43:50.000 --> 0:43:52.520
<v Speaker 6>and Brett Kavanagh says it is just common sense, and

0:43:52.560 --> 0:43:55.920
<v Speaker 6>that is what And so Ice is now explicitly by

0:43:55.920 --> 0:43:59.160
<v Speaker 6>the Supreme Court allowed to racially profile people as they

0:43:59.239 --> 0:44:04.759
<v Speaker 6>arrest and detained in their ridiculous search for illegal immigrants. Right, Like,

0:44:04.800 --> 0:44:09.440
<v Speaker 6>that's just back on the table that was September. The

0:44:09.480 --> 0:44:13.840
<v Speaker 6>Supreme Court has agreed finally, and I'm not surprised to

0:44:13.920 --> 0:44:16.560
<v Speaker 6>hear the birthright citizenship case on the merits and so

0:44:16.600 --> 0:44:20.600
<v Speaker 6>I think that's the logical place to start, because birthright

0:44:20.680 --> 0:44:27.120
<v Speaker 6>citizenship is a fundamental right in this country, right, a

0:44:27.239 --> 0:44:29.960
<v Speaker 6>right given to us after the Civil War by the

0:44:30.000 --> 0:44:32.760
<v Speaker 6>Fourteenth Amendment. Right that says that you are a citizen

0:44:33.040 --> 0:44:36.600
<v Speaker 6>of where you are born, not where your parents are born.

0:44:36.960 --> 0:44:39.319
<v Speaker 6>And the Supreme Court and the Conservatives want to take

0:44:39.360 --> 0:44:44.040
<v Speaker 6>that away and return us to truly an antebellum, a

0:44:44.200 --> 0:44:47.520
<v Speaker 6>pre Civil War state of affairs. And I say that

0:44:47.560 --> 0:44:50.520
<v Speaker 6>because you have to understand why birthright citizenship is here

0:44:50.520 --> 0:44:52.680
<v Speaker 6>in the first place, right, Like, yes, it was here

0:44:52.719 --> 0:44:58.279
<v Speaker 6>to provide citizenship to newly freed Africans after the Civil War. Yes, great,

0:44:58.280 --> 0:45:01.960
<v Speaker 6>but what was it really changed? What the Fourteenth Amendment

0:45:02.000 --> 0:45:06.720
<v Speaker 6>did was create an entirely new concept in this country

0:45:06.760 --> 0:45:11.480
<v Speaker 6>called the American citizen. See before the Fourteenth Amendment, in

0:45:11.560 --> 0:45:14.880
<v Speaker 6>the pre Civil War War days, citizenship did not flowed

0:45:14.920 --> 0:45:18.160
<v Speaker 6>down from the federal government. It flowed up from the states.

0:45:18.719 --> 0:45:21.880
<v Speaker 6>So whether you were a citizen of the United States America,

0:45:22.000 --> 0:45:24.400
<v Speaker 6>there was no such thing. You were a citizen of Georgia,

0:45:24.480 --> 0:45:26.440
<v Speaker 6>you were a citizen of Missouri, you were a citizen

0:45:26.680 --> 0:45:29.680
<v Speaker 6>of New York. That's how they did it, and that's

0:45:29.760 --> 0:45:33.200
<v Speaker 6>why we had a war, because obviously Missouri was like,

0:45:33.200 --> 0:45:35.640
<v Speaker 6>black people can't be citizens, and Illinois was like, actually,

0:45:35.640 --> 0:45:38.360
<v Speaker 6>black people can't be citizens, and you can't have a

0:45:38.440 --> 0:45:41.520
<v Speaker 6>country with those. You can't have a country where your

0:45:41.520 --> 0:45:45.279
<v Speaker 6>citizenship changes depending on which side of the railroad track

0:45:45.320 --> 0:45:49.560
<v Speaker 6>you live on. That's unworkable and led to the bloodiest

0:45:49.600 --> 0:45:52.840
<v Speaker 6>war in American history. The Fourteenth Amendment solved all that

0:45:52.880 --> 0:45:55.239
<v Speaker 6>by saying, all right, we're not going to have every

0:45:55.239 --> 0:45:58.640
<v Speaker 6>state doing what they want. One standard of citizenship, a

0:45:58.680 --> 0:46:02.200
<v Speaker 6>federal standard citizenship, an American standard of citizenship. Right, So

0:46:02.239 --> 0:46:04.440
<v Speaker 6>that's number one why it's here. The second reason why

0:46:04.440 --> 0:46:07.080
<v Speaker 6>it's here, and you'll see Republicans always talk, well, you know,

0:46:07.680 --> 0:46:13.040
<v Speaker 6>Western Europe doesn't do birthright citizenship no, they don't because

0:46:13.200 --> 0:46:19.160
<v Speaker 6>they're colonialists. Having citizenship be based on where your parents

0:46:19.160 --> 0:46:22.279
<v Speaker 6>are from, specifically where your father is from, is a

0:46:22.360 --> 0:46:26.800
<v Speaker 6>colonial idea because it allowed the French and the British

0:46:26.840 --> 0:46:29.000
<v Speaker 6>and the Dutch and whatever to go all over the

0:46:29.000 --> 0:46:31.879
<v Speaker 6>world rape and pillage other people's countries and when they

0:46:31.920 --> 0:46:34.680
<v Speaker 6>produced offspring and other places of the world. Oh no, no, no,

0:46:34.880 --> 0:46:37.440
<v Speaker 6>you weren't a citizen of Vietnam. No no, no, you

0:46:37.480 --> 0:46:40.640
<v Speaker 6>were still French. No no, no, you're not a citizen of Ghana.

0:46:40.960 --> 0:46:44.759
<v Speaker 6>You're still English. Like that is why they did it

0:46:44.800 --> 0:46:46.959
<v Speaker 6>that way. When you get to the New World, which

0:46:47.000 --> 0:46:50.239
<v Speaker 6>is a country of immigrants, having citizenship tied to where

0:46:50.280 --> 0:46:55.000
<v Speaker 6>your parents are from was unworkable because then you're all

0:46:55.040 --> 0:46:58.080
<v Speaker 6>English citizens, then you're all Dutch citizens, then you're all right.

0:46:58.200 --> 0:47:02.719
<v Speaker 6>So the New World adopted an idea that your citizenship

0:47:02.800 --> 0:47:05.520
<v Speaker 6>was tied to your both birth and that existed for

0:47:05.600 --> 0:47:07.919
<v Speaker 6>white people before the Civil War, right like when people

0:47:07.960 --> 0:47:10.520
<v Speaker 6>are saying saying, oh, it's how Western Europe does it,

0:47:10.560 --> 0:47:13.520
<v Speaker 6>why don't we do that? White folks before the Civil War,

0:47:14.080 --> 0:47:16.919
<v Speaker 6>their citizenship was based on the state that they were

0:47:16.960 --> 0:47:19.600
<v Speaker 6>born in, not the state where their parents were born

0:47:19.640 --> 0:47:22.279
<v Speaker 6>in right, you didn't have William Pennah, I'm not a

0:47:22.320 --> 0:47:26.000
<v Speaker 6>citizen of Pennsylvania. I'm actually a citizen of jolly old England. No,

0:47:26.520 --> 0:47:29.080
<v Speaker 6>that's not how white people rolled, right. So the idea

0:47:29.080 --> 0:47:31.200
<v Speaker 6>that your citizenship is tied to your parents is a

0:47:31.239 --> 0:47:37.360
<v Speaker 6>colonial idea. The New World rejected that. And not just America, Canada, Mexico, Venezuela,

0:47:37.360 --> 0:47:40.360
<v Speaker 6>and Brazil, El Saltley the name a country in the

0:47:40.400 --> 0:47:44.719
<v Speaker 6>New World, almost all of them have birthright citizenship as

0:47:44.719 --> 0:47:47.960
<v Speaker 6>opposed to Old World citizenship. And that leasing to my

0:47:48.040 --> 0:47:51.160
<v Speaker 6>third and final point. I'm talking to you about the law,

0:47:51.160 --> 0:47:53.680
<v Speaker 6>about why the fourteenth Amendment is written the way it is.

0:47:54.280 --> 0:48:01.879
<v Speaker 6>But there's also a level of disgusting moral apocrisy when

0:48:02.040 --> 0:48:09.000
<v Speaker 6>a nation of colonizers, usurpers, and thieves purports to say

0:48:09.520 --> 0:48:12.759
<v Speaker 6>that a person born in these lands is not a

0:48:12.800 --> 0:48:15.799
<v Speaker 6>citizen of these lands, and actually it's based on where

0:48:15.840 --> 0:48:20.480
<v Speaker 6>their parents are born. Right. We stole this country from

0:48:20.600 --> 0:48:24.719
<v Speaker 6>people who wait for it. We're born here, we're born here.

0:48:24.760 --> 0:48:27.919
<v Speaker 6>We stole this country from people who were born here.

0:48:27.960 --> 0:48:30.960
<v Speaker 6>And now we're gonna where the Republicans want to say,

0:48:31.160 --> 0:48:33.239
<v Speaker 6>even if you're born here, you don't get to be

0:48:33.320 --> 0:48:36.880
<v Speaker 6>a citizen in this nation that we've created on stolen land.

0:48:36.920 --> 0:48:43.799
<v Speaker 6>There is a disgusting layer of moral hypocrisy underlying the

0:48:44.080 --> 0:48:47.479
<v Speaker 6>entire project to end birthright citizenship. Of course, you didn't

0:48:47.480 --> 0:48:50.400
<v Speaker 6>bring me on to tell you why birthright citizenship of supportant.

0:48:50.440 --> 0:48:52.640
<v Speaker 6>You brought me on to explain why the Supreme Court

0:48:52.680 --> 0:48:55.440
<v Speaker 6>is about to take it away, and on that particular question.

0:48:55.440 --> 0:48:59.799
<v Speaker 1>But Ellie, Ellie, this is important context, and I want you,

0:48:59.840 --> 0:49:02.320
<v Speaker 1>if you can, in this next portion of your response,

0:49:02.840 --> 0:49:06.560
<v Speaker 1>to talk about why folks who may be at home,

0:49:06.680 --> 0:49:08.919
<v Speaker 1>folks who look like us, you know, parents are born

0:49:08.960 --> 0:49:12.319
<v Speaker 1>here here for multiple generations, we're stolen from, you know,

0:49:12.400 --> 0:49:13.400
<v Speaker 1>our original land.

0:49:13.520 --> 0:49:13.719
<v Speaker 2>Right.

0:49:14.320 --> 0:49:16.319
<v Speaker 1>But there are some of us, some folks who look

0:49:16.400 --> 0:49:17.840
<v Speaker 1>like us, who are like, well, this isn't going to

0:49:17.920 --> 0:49:21.120
<v Speaker 1>apply to us, because this is really about the immigrants

0:49:21.160 --> 0:49:23.719
<v Speaker 1>that we're mad at for taking our opportunities and they

0:49:23.800 --> 0:49:25.960
<v Speaker 1>got our jobs and this and that. So they're thinking

0:49:26.080 --> 0:49:30.480
<v Speaker 1>that this birthright citizenship case, if they've heard about it,

0:49:30.520 --> 0:49:36.040
<v Speaker 1>is going to target children of immigrants, not necessarily us.

0:49:36.080 --> 0:49:37.200
<v Speaker 2>Can you talk about why.

0:49:37.080 --> 0:49:40.680
<v Speaker 5>That is also inherently really really good question, Angela, particularly

0:49:40.680 --> 0:49:42.479
<v Speaker 5>about the politics around a really good question.

0:49:42.640 --> 0:49:44.359
<v Speaker 6>Yeah. So for people who think that this is only

0:49:44.440 --> 0:49:47.720
<v Speaker 6>going to affect Latino or legal immigrants, I would ask you, guys,

0:49:47.880 --> 0:49:51.880
<v Speaker 6>this proven prove that you prove that your parents were

0:49:51.920 --> 0:49:55.279
<v Speaker 6>citizens in the United States. When they ask you, how

0:49:55.840 --> 0:49:59.240
<v Speaker 6>are you going to do that? Right? They don't always

0:49:59.320 --> 0:50:02.000
<v Speaker 6>keep great req on where we were stolen from and

0:50:03.040 --> 0:50:06.760
<v Speaker 6>where we came from, not all of us. I happened

0:50:06.800 --> 0:50:08.400
<v Speaker 6>to be able to trace at least a part of

0:50:08.440 --> 0:50:11.920
<v Speaker 6>my lineage all the way back to a plantation that

0:50:12.080 --> 0:50:14.759
<v Speaker 6>was freed when Sherman came marching through the South. Most

0:50:14.800 --> 0:50:17.520
<v Speaker 6>black people aren't that lucky. Most black people don't have

0:50:17.920 --> 0:50:21.960
<v Speaker 6>that kind of record keeping in their family tree. So

0:50:22.000 --> 0:50:24.680
<v Speaker 6>when the ice agent, when the government agent comes into

0:50:24.719 --> 0:50:27.560
<v Speaker 6>the maternity ward and says, well, I don't think that

0:50:27.760 --> 0:50:30.719
<v Speaker 6>you are that your baby is a citizenship is a

0:50:30.719 --> 0:50:34.720
<v Speaker 6>citizen because I can't prove that you're a citizen, because

0:50:34.760 --> 0:50:38.080
<v Speaker 6>I can't prove that your citizenship is not also derived

0:50:38.080 --> 0:50:40.840
<v Speaker 6>from birthright citizenship. How are you going to prove that

0:50:40.880 --> 0:50:43.040
<v Speaker 6>it's not? How are you going to prove that you

0:50:43.280 --> 0:50:47.840
<v Speaker 6>actually were brought over here on the second ship of

0:50:47.960 --> 0:50:51.880
<v Speaker 6>Dutch settlers that had fourteen slaves to build the wall

0:50:52.560 --> 0:50:54.200
<v Speaker 6>on Wall Street, Manhattan. How are you going to prove

0:50:54.200 --> 0:50:55.960
<v Speaker 6>that you go back that far? I know that there

0:50:55.960 --> 0:50:58.040
<v Speaker 6>are atos people out here just like this is great

0:50:58.040 --> 0:51:02.759
<v Speaker 6>for us. Prove it, prove it. And because you, the

0:51:02.800 --> 0:51:06.680
<v Speaker 6>black person will be asked to prove it, while John

0:51:07.000 --> 0:51:12.440
<v Speaker 6>Hinton Meister, the third with that German ass name, is

0:51:12.600 --> 0:51:17.600
<v Speaker 6>never gonna be asked to prove that they are citizenship

0:51:17.760 --> 0:51:21.600
<v Speaker 6>by dentt of their fathers. There's also an issue about

0:51:21.719 --> 0:51:25.399
<v Speaker 6>when they if they try to change this, citizenship will

0:51:25.400 --> 0:51:28.440
<v Speaker 6>be directed through who the father or the mother? Right,

0:51:28.480 --> 0:51:31.800
<v Speaker 6>because they're all anchor babies or shit all that. So

0:51:32.440 --> 0:51:34.319
<v Speaker 6>how how do you do what if you have one

0:51:34.400 --> 0:51:36.680
<v Speaker 6>parent who is a citizen and one who wasn't. Is

0:51:36.719 --> 0:51:39.600
<v Speaker 6>that gonnaccount? And which parent? And do you have records

0:51:39.600 --> 0:51:40.120
<v Speaker 6>of that parent?

0:51:40.239 --> 0:51:40.359
<v Speaker 5>Right?

0:51:40.400 --> 0:51:44.200
<v Speaker 6>Maybe your mother was an illegal immigrant who came here,

0:51:44.239 --> 0:51:47.960
<v Speaker 6>but your father was you know, not only your father.

0:51:48.400 --> 0:51:50.879
<v Speaker 6>You can't even find him to pay child support, much

0:51:50.960 --> 0:51:54.080
<v Speaker 6>less find him to produce his birth certificate.

0:51:54.160 --> 0:51:54.279
<v Speaker 2>Right.

0:51:54.320 --> 0:51:56.840
<v Speaker 6>So again, if you think that this is only gonna

0:51:56.840 --> 0:52:02.040
<v Speaker 6>affect the obvious Latino illegal immigrants, prove it. How are

0:52:02.080 --> 0:52:05.480
<v Speaker 6>you going to prove that you were allowed to be here,

0:52:05.840 --> 0:52:09.040
<v Speaker 6>because that is a That is the second question that

0:52:09.080 --> 0:52:11.799
<v Speaker 6>these people will ask you when they try to send

0:52:11.840 --> 0:52:13.319
<v Speaker 6>you back to wherever the hell they think that you're

0:52:13.320 --> 0:52:14.360
<v Speaker 6>supposed to be from.

0:52:17.480 --> 0:52:22.600
<v Speaker 4>Nobody knows.

0:52:24.920 --> 0:52:26.200
<v Speaker 2>I want to just really quickly.

0:52:27.719 --> 0:52:30.359
<v Speaker 1>Andrew is not feeling well, So Andrew's gonna gonna go

0:52:30.440 --> 0:52:32.319
<v Speaker 1>for the rest of the day. I know he's gonna

0:52:32.360 --> 0:52:34.799
<v Speaker 1>go get some rest, so we're gonna let him go

0:52:34.880 --> 0:52:37.480
<v Speaker 1>so you can sleep, sleep off this mucinex or whatever

0:52:37.520 --> 0:52:40.200
<v Speaker 1>he took to get better. But Ellie, because Andrew's leaving,

0:52:40.239 --> 0:52:44.200
<v Speaker 1>I got a quick follow up. That question is you

0:52:44.239 --> 0:52:46.600
<v Speaker 1>guys that don't know that I've been dealing with medical

0:52:46.600 --> 0:52:48.480
<v Speaker 1>stuff with my mom, so I had to find her

0:52:48.560 --> 0:52:49.840
<v Speaker 1>birth certificate recently.

0:52:50.120 --> 0:52:50.960
<v Speaker 2>And this is crazy.

0:52:51.000 --> 0:52:53.440
<v Speaker 1>Like to Ellie's point, think about these technicalities, which we've

0:52:53.480 --> 0:52:56.800
<v Speaker 1>also seen like with voting records too. On my mom's

0:52:56.840 --> 0:53:00.960
<v Speaker 1>original birth certificate, they re ordered her name and her

0:53:01.000 --> 0:53:04.319
<v Speaker 1>first name, so she had to get an updated birth

0:53:04.320 --> 0:53:08.000
<v Speaker 1>certificate with her name as it is originally ordered. But

0:53:08.120 --> 0:53:11.120
<v Speaker 1>who's to say that these folks won't say no, you

0:53:11.120 --> 0:53:13.799
<v Speaker 1>know that doesn't count. This is not so now even

0:53:13.840 --> 0:53:17.080
<v Speaker 1>maybe her citizenship is challenged our elders.

0:53:17.120 --> 0:53:19.160
<v Speaker 2>My grandmother when she passed was one hundred and five.

0:53:19.160 --> 0:53:21.640
<v Speaker 1>When you talk about one hundred years ago, our records

0:53:21.680 --> 0:53:22.960
<v Speaker 1>in the South weren't tight.

0:53:23.280 --> 0:53:26.120
<v Speaker 2>So our names are wrong, birth years are wrong.

0:53:26.239 --> 0:53:31.200
<v Speaker 1>My dad's mom, y'all, she has three different Social Security

0:53:31.239 --> 0:53:34.480
<v Speaker 1>guards with three different from three different birth years. She's

0:53:34.520 --> 0:53:37.360
<v Speaker 1>now passed. But if we start really peeling the layer

0:53:37.440 --> 0:53:40.280
<v Speaker 1>of this onion back, this is treacherous for black folks

0:53:40.320 --> 0:53:42.839
<v Speaker 1>in this country who have been here for most situations.

0:53:43.000 --> 0:53:43.839
<v Speaker 2>I will yield hied.

0:53:45.080 --> 0:53:49.200
<v Speaker 6>Citizenship should not be tied to clerical stuff, right, Like

0:53:49.360 --> 0:53:55.200
<v Speaker 6>we shouldn't be relying on the white racist matron at

0:53:55.239 --> 0:54:00.239
<v Speaker 6>the maternity Ward and Selma, Alabama in nineteen oh for

0:54:00.680 --> 0:54:03.680
<v Speaker 6>to figure out whether or not your grandkid is a

0:54:03.719 --> 0:54:07.600
<v Speaker 6>citizen of the country that they were born in. That's

0:54:07.719 --> 0:54:09.840
<v Speaker 6>just not a And again I go back to the

0:54:09.840 --> 0:54:14.000
<v Speaker 6>pre Civil War or situation. It's not a workable solution,

0:54:14.239 --> 0:54:17.160
<v Speaker 6>right because what happens if the Supreme Court takes away

0:54:17.200 --> 0:54:22.040
<v Speaker 6>birthright citizenship is that will probably devolve back into separate states. Right,

0:54:22.120 --> 0:54:24.719
<v Speaker 6>so they'll say, Okay, you're not a citizen in the

0:54:24.800 --> 0:54:27.320
<v Speaker 6>United States. So if you're a legal immigrant and immediately,

0:54:27.440 --> 0:54:30.080
<v Speaker 6>Kathy Hokel Gafa Newsom, they'll pass a law saying, well,

0:54:30.120 --> 0:54:33.839
<v Speaker 6>you're a citizen of California regard if you're born in California.

0:54:33.880 --> 0:54:36.880
<v Speaker 6>Like that. That is the next thing that that's the

0:54:37.000 --> 0:54:39.840
<v Speaker 6>liberal response to all of this, and that brings us

0:54:39.960 --> 0:54:43.279
<v Speaker 6>right back to where we were in eighteen fifty seven

0:54:43.320 --> 0:54:45.040
<v Speaker 6>in the dread Scott decision, where you're going to have

0:54:45.200 --> 0:54:49.360
<v Speaker 6>a class of people who are citizens in one state

0:54:49.400 --> 0:54:51.720
<v Speaker 6>but aren't citizens in another state. You'll have a class

0:54:51.760 --> 0:54:54.840
<v Speaker 6>of people who are who are citizens in California but

0:54:54.920 --> 0:54:58.520
<v Speaker 6>then lose their citizenship when they travel to Texas, who

0:54:58.600 --> 0:55:02.960
<v Speaker 6>lose their ability, their record, their record, the providence of

0:55:03.000 --> 0:55:06.200
<v Speaker 6>their records when they travel across state lines. And again,

0:55:06.680 --> 0:55:11.200
<v Speaker 6>we have literally tried it this way before and it

0:55:11.320 --> 0:55:19.120
<v Speaker 6>led to war. So I don't understand always people's apathy

0:55:19.280 --> 0:55:21.839
<v Speaker 6>towards this particular issue, and I do think that part

0:55:21.880 --> 0:55:24.239
<v Speaker 6>of it is racialized. They think it's only going to

0:55:24.320 --> 0:55:27.200
<v Speaker 6>hurt a certain class of people and not all classes

0:55:27.280 --> 0:55:30.360
<v Speaker 6>of people that white folks want to hurt, and that

0:55:30.520 --> 0:55:33.200
<v Speaker 6>is just not true. But because of its unworkability, that's

0:55:33.200 --> 0:55:36.319
<v Speaker 6>why I say I'm not sure that Trump wins this one.

0:55:36.360 --> 0:55:39.200
<v Speaker 6>This is one of the only cases up where I

0:55:39.360 --> 0:55:43.879
<v Speaker 6>can't immediately say, oh, Trump has six votes, right, he might,

0:55:44.000 --> 0:55:46.200
<v Speaker 6>and oral arguments haven't happened, and I will listen to

0:55:46.200 --> 0:55:49.560
<v Speaker 6>those closely and have much better sense after these people

0:55:49.560 --> 0:55:56.960
<v Speaker 6>start talking. But on spec I can't fully I can't

0:55:57.000 --> 0:56:00.719
<v Speaker 6>necessarily count to six votes count to five votes for

0:56:00.840 --> 0:56:04.040
<v Speaker 6>Trump on this issue. I'm not saying that he won't win.

0:56:04.320 --> 0:56:06.680
<v Speaker 6>I'm just saying that of the cases, you know, there's

0:56:06.680 --> 0:56:08.600
<v Speaker 6>a class of cases that I know he's gonna win,

0:56:08.840 --> 0:56:10.799
<v Speaker 6>and this is not one of them. I don't know

0:56:11.239 --> 0:56:13.840
<v Speaker 6>that he's gonna win this one because blowing up the

0:56:13.880 --> 0:56:18.160
<v Speaker 6>fourteenth Amendment, remember by executive fiat, Like he's trying to

0:56:18.280 --> 0:56:22.520
<v Speaker 6>change the text and the meaning of the fourteenth Amendment,

0:56:22.880 --> 0:56:26.759
<v Speaker 6>not through legislation, not through a constitutional amendment, just through

0:56:26.840 --> 0:56:31.200
<v Speaker 6>some like podunked executive order. It's a lot for the

0:56:31.239 --> 0:56:34.400
<v Speaker 6>Supreme Court to say Trump can change the Constitution by

0:56:34.440 --> 0:56:37.759
<v Speaker 6>executive order. They might, they might say it, but they also,

0:56:37.960 --> 0:56:41.120
<v Speaker 6>like literally they just might not that might. This might

0:56:41.239 --> 0:56:44.440
<v Speaker 6>be actually the bridge too far. And there's also the

0:56:44.440 --> 0:56:48.160
<v Speaker 6>political balance here that I'm sure McCary thinks about a lot.

0:56:49.000 --> 0:56:54.200
<v Speaker 6>You if you're if you make Trump lose here, you're

0:56:54.200 --> 0:56:58.560
<v Speaker 6>gonna have a whole series of center right stories from

0:56:58.680 --> 0:57:01.080
<v Speaker 6>mainstream media, from the New York Times in the Washington Post,

0:57:01.120 --> 0:57:03.680
<v Speaker 6>from all those guys saying, ah, as we can clearly

0:57:03.680 --> 0:57:06.120
<v Speaker 6>see the Supreme Court is legitimate and reasonable. Right, the

0:57:06.160 --> 0:57:08.320
<v Speaker 6>Supreme Court is taking a lot of heat right now

0:57:08.480 --> 0:57:11.319
<v Speaker 6>and having this one decision, which is completely coogle for

0:57:11.360 --> 0:57:16.760
<v Speaker 6>cocabus bonkers away from Trump will will trigger a bunch

0:57:16.880 --> 0:57:20.080
<v Speaker 6>of mainstream and right wing media being like, ah this, ah, yes,

0:57:20.160 --> 0:57:23.720
<v Speaker 6>the Supreme Court totally reasonable, toyal, legitimate, so we should

0:57:23.960 --> 0:57:25.800
<v Speaker 6>so now we can clearly see that all the other

0:57:25.840 --> 0:57:29.680
<v Speaker 6>things that they've done, like taking away voting rights, jerrymandering,

0:57:29.840 --> 0:57:32.840
<v Speaker 6>anti trans stuff, all of that is fine because clearly

0:57:32.920 --> 0:57:35.800
<v Speaker 6>they're just following the law. They're not beholden to Trump. So, like,

0:57:35.840 --> 0:57:39.480
<v Speaker 6>you also have political value for the Supreme Court and

0:57:40.040 --> 0:57:42.480
<v Speaker 6>standing up to Trump on this issue, which is so

0:57:43.600 --> 0:57:46.960
<v Speaker 6>is so beyond the pale of normal constitutional law. That's

0:57:47.000 --> 0:57:51.240
<v Speaker 6>another reason why I think he could lose this, and

0:57:51.280 --> 0:57:53.040
<v Speaker 6>then I'll have to come on all the shows explaining

0:57:53.080 --> 0:57:56.040
<v Speaker 6>why the Supreme Court still sucks even though you had

0:57:56.120 --> 0:57:56.760
<v Speaker 6>this one good.

0:57:56.640 --> 0:58:01.120
<v Speaker 5>Decision isn't this the politics of John rob though more

0:58:01.120 --> 0:58:03.040
<v Speaker 5>so than anything else. I mean, what we've seen is

0:58:03.040 --> 0:58:05.560
<v Speaker 5>there that John Roberts will. You know, we've had some

0:58:05.600 --> 0:58:08.480
<v Speaker 5>surprises from Amy Cony Barrett as well. But John Roberts

0:58:08.520 --> 0:58:11.600
<v Speaker 5>oftentimes will take the side with the liberal justices or

0:58:11.600 --> 0:58:15.280
<v Speaker 5>pull somebody with him to preserve the quote unquote integrity,

0:58:15.360 --> 0:58:18.320
<v Speaker 5>or if he sees the court slipping away in the

0:58:18.360 --> 0:58:21.120
<v Speaker 5>pages of history, he attempts to salvage his court.

0:58:21.440 --> 0:58:23.000
<v Speaker 6>I mean you said often. I don't know that it's

0:58:23.040 --> 0:58:24.040
<v Speaker 6>often anymore.

0:58:24.320 --> 0:58:26.960
<v Speaker 5>Not often, but at every every blue moon or so.

0:58:27.200 --> 0:58:30.040
<v Speaker 6>Every now and again, Roberts will will join levels. And

0:58:30.120 --> 0:58:31.760
<v Speaker 6>really I have a little bit more faith on a

0:58:31.800 --> 0:58:35.040
<v Speaker 6>llegit tempt at rapist Kavanaugh than Barrett because Caveall is

0:58:35.080 --> 0:58:41.240
<v Speaker 6>also more susceptible to the political wins one, you know,

0:58:41.360 --> 0:58:45.440
<v Speaker 6>to armchair psycle analyze Kavanaugh. He desperately wants to be liked.

0:58:45.600 --> 0:58:48.960
<v Speaker 6>He desperately wants to be treated in the press like

0:58:49.400 --> 0:58:52.040
<v Speaker 6>Roberts is treated in the press. Now he will never

0:58:52.120 --> 0:58:54.600
<v Speaker 6>be because he's an alleged tempt at rapist and also

0:58:54.640 --> 0:58:57.720
<v Speaker 6>a freaking idiot. But he wants what Roberts has and

0:58:57.800 --> 0:59:01.320
<v Speaker 6>so sometimes Kavanaugh can be pulled on these political strings,

0:59:02.040 --> 0:59:04.680
<v Speaker 6>I think even more so than than Barrett can can,

0:59:05.040 --> 0:59:08.320
<v Speaker 6>who to the extent that she's ever moderated, it comes

0:59:08.320 --> 0:59:11.720
<v Speaker 6>from a very doctrinal position, as supposed to Kavanaugh, who's

0:59:11.760 --> 0:59:14.640
<v Speaker 6>just trying to get a good press hit. And then Roberts,

0:59:14.640 --> 0:59:16.880
<v Speaker 6>I think for Cari, you're right that he will occasionally

0:59:17.480 --> 0:59:20.680
<v Speaker 6>at least pretend to care about the legitimacy and stature

0:59:20.720 --> 0:59:23.760
<v Speaker 6>of the Supreme Court. So all of that can again,

0:59:23.880 --> 0:59:25.880
<v Speaker 6>I can listen to oral arguments and in an hour,

0:59:25.920 --> 0:59:27.840
<v Speaker 6>I can tell you, wait, no, I was wrong. But

0:59:28.800 --> 0:59:31.680
<v Speaker 6>as I stand now, before they've heard arguments on the case,

0:59:32.120 --> 0:59:34.600
<v Speaker 6>I don't know that he has five votes for this.

0:59:34.880 --> 0:59:37.080
<v Speaker 6>I know he's got to I know he's got Thomas,

0:59:37.080 --> 0:59:39.440
<v Speaker 6>and I know he's got Alida, but I don't know

0:59:39.520 --> 0:59:44.880
<v Speaker 6>that he's got Roberts, Barrett and Kavanaugh. And then Gorsich

0:59:44.960 --> 0:59:50.040
<v Speaker 6>can get really Gorsich can get really textual on these issues.

0:59:51.000 --> 0:59:54.000
<v Speaker 6>And there's also with Gorsish you also have to remember,

0:59:54.280 --> 0:59:56.640
<v Speaker 6>you know, I sometimes jokingly call him the last Justice

0:59:56.680 --> 1:00:01.440
<v Speaker 6>of the Mohicans, Neil Gorsich, those Native Americans. He is,

1:00:01.560 --> 1:00:05.160
<v Speaker 6>he is Dale Day Lewis, he is out there. Any

1:00:05.200 --> 1:00:09.520
<v Speaker 6>decision involving Native Americans is something where where Gorcious can

1:00:09.560 --> 1:00:12.760
<v Speaker 6>be relied upon to vote with the liberals. It's it's

1:00:12.800 --> 1:00:16.800
<v Speaker 6>the one good thing in his portfolio. And you can

1:00:16.880 --> 1:00:20.440
<v Speaker 6>make an argument that taking away birthright citizenship also significantly

1:00:20.560 --> 1:00:24.200
<v Speaker 6>negatively impacts Native Americans, and if you hit that argument right,

1:00:24.280 --> 1:00:27.320
<v Speaker 6>you'll get Gorsic too. So again, I could be I

1:00:27.360 --> 1:00:29.720
<v Speaker 6>don't want to I hate. I never want to sound naive.

1:00:30.680 --> 1:00:33.880
<v Speaker 6>I know exactly what this court is capable of. They're

1:00:33.960 --> 1:00:37.080
<v Speaker 6>capable of giving Trump the win on birthright citizenship. I

1:00:37.120 --> 1:00:38.440
<v Speaker 6>just don't know that they will.

1:00:41.200 --> 1:00:41.640
<v Speaker 3>Elliott.

1:00:41.720 --> 1:00:43.960
<v Speaker 5>I gotta go ahead, Go ahead, Tiffany, because I was

1:00:44.000 --> 1:00:46.040
<v Speaker 5>gonna ry something up to you, Tiffany and Angela. But

1:00:46.080 --> 1:00:51.720
<v Speaker 5>go ahead, Tiffany. I want to hear you perspective jump in.

1:00:52.680 --> 1:00:52.960
<v Speaker 2>I don't.

1:00:52.960 --> 1:00:54.760
<v Speaker 3>I don't want to take us away from where you

1:00:54.800 --> 1:00:58.120
<v Speaker 3>were going. So remember where we were, because I'd love

1:00:58.160 --> 1:01:00.000
<v Speaker 3>to hear your question. But I just wanted to ask you.

1:01:00.200 --> 1:01:00.560
<v Speaker 2>Ellie.

1:01:01.360 --> 1:01:06.400
<v Speaker 3>You know, the Scotus is off limits to cameras, so

1:01:06.440 --> 1:01:11.000
<v Speaker 3>we never hear what's being said. And I've asked this

1:01:11.080 --> 1:01:13.560
<v Speaker 3>question before, but I've never posed this question to you.

1:01:14.480 --> 1:01:16.840
<v Speaker 3>Is it helpful to us that we don't get to

1:01:16.880 --> 1:01:21.160
<v Speaker 3>see what's being said during SCOTUS hearings or is it

1:01:21.200 --> 1:01:24.840
<v Speaker 3>more harmful, Like would it become kabuki theater if there

1:01:24.840 --> 1:01:28.040
<v Speaker 3>were cameras there? Would people you know, be like you said,

1:01:28.200 --> 1:01:31.360
<v Speaker 3>Kavanaugh wants the next press hit. Or would it provide

1:01:31.400 --> 1:01:34.600
<v Speaker 3>more transparency for the American people even though we can

1:01:34.800 --> 1:01:37.840
<v Speaker 3>see the opinions and read the transcripts, there might be

1:01:37.880 --> 1:01:39.880
<v Speaker 3>a little bit of a difference. So just curious your thoughts.

1:01:40.000 --> 1:01:42.240
<v Speaker 6>Yeah, So before I answer that question, I'll kind of

1:01:42.280 --> 1:01:45.080
<v Speaker 6>attack the premise a little bit. My views shouldn't matter

1:01:45.240 --> 1:01:47.120
<v Speaker 6>on whether or not there should be cameras in the courtroom,

1:01:47.320 --> 1:01:49.480
<v Speaker 6>because courts are public hearings in the public has a

1:01:49.560 --> 1:01:52.560
<v Speaker 6>right to see their leadership in action. And it actually

1:01:52.600 --> 1:01:55.240
<v Speaker 6>doesn't matter whether or not it's good or bad for lag,

1:01:55.720 --> 1:01:57.840
<v Speaker 6>Like you have a right, you should have a right

1:01:57.920 --> 1:02:03.920
<v Speaker 6>to see it and not sing it is unnecessarily secretive

1:02:04.240 --> 1:02:08.640
<v Speaker 6>of the courts. Secret courts are bad, are big b

1:02:08.640 --> 1:02:11.840
<v Speaker 6>bad for democracy, and so the courts should be the

1:02:11.920 --> 1:02:15.600
<v Speaker 6>court proceeding should be televised, just because whether or not

1:02:15.640 --> 1:02:17.400
<v Speaker 6>that would be a good thing for the court itself.

1:02:17.480 --> 1:02:21.560
<v Speaker 6>Right now, I do think that if you had cameras

1:02:21.560 --> 1:02:23.760
<v Speaker 6>in the courtroom, there would be more grand standing from

1:02:23.800 --> 1:02:26.520
<v Speaker 6>the lawyers. I think there would be more grand standing

1:02:26.600 --> 1:02:29.960
<v Speaker 6>from the justices. I don't particularly think that's I don't

1:02:29.960 --> 1:02:31.040
<v Speaker 6>think that's particularly good.

1:02:32.280 --> 1:02:34.960
<v Speaker 5>Lawyers don't lawyers don't grandstand. I ain't never seen nothing

1:02:35.000 --> 1:02:39.000
<v Speaker 5>like that before.

1:02:35.440 --> 1:02:42.520
<v Speaker 6>I right, you know, that's a thing that would happen.

1:02:42.560 --> 1:02:44.200
<v Speaker 6>But the other thing that would happen if there are

1:02:44.240 --> 1:02:46.560
<v Speaker 6>cameras in the courtroom is that you would have more

1:02:46.600 --> 1:02:48.640
<v Speaker 6>of this on TV. I was talking with a TV

1:02:48.800 --> 1:02:51.760
<v Speaker 6>producer that I will not name, but a very important

1:02:51.840 --> 1:02:56.960
<v Speaker 6>TV person, and they were saying how hard it is

1:02:57.000 --> 1:02:59.560
<v Speaker 6>to cover the courts on the TV news, on cable

1:02:59.600 --> 1:03:03.760
<v Speaker 6>news because you don't have video, because you can't just

1:03:03.880 --> 1:03:06.400
<v Speaker 6>play a clip of the Yes, you can play the audio,

1:03:06.600 --> 1:03:09.760
<v Speaker 6>but you can't play the video. And TV's a video medium,

1:03:09.960 --> 1:03:14.200
<v Speaker 6>and so by not having cameras, it prevents a lot

1:03:14.240 --> 1:03:19.840
<v Speaker 6>of otherwise what would happen television coverage of these unelected

1:03:20.000 --> 1:03:23.840
<v Speaker 6>rulers of our country. So I think whatever the bad

1:03:24.360 --> 1:03:29.680
<v Speaker 6>grandstanding issues are overcome by the need for more transparency

1:03:29.720 --> 1:03:31.600
<v Speaker 6>and for people to be able to see and learn

1:03:31.720 --> 1:03:34.960
<v Speaker 6>what their actual rulers are doing. So I'm one hundred

1:03:34.960 --> 1:03:37.760
<v Speaker 6>percent in favor of cameras in the courtroom, even though

1:03:37.800 --> 1:03:39.720
<v Speaker 6>I think it would probably be bad in terms of

1:03:39.800 --> 1:03:43.240
<v Speaker 6>like the quality of arguments. I don't think those concerns

1:03:43.280 --> 1:03:48.360
<v Speaker 6>are are misplaced. I just think they're completely overtopped by

1:03:48.440 --> 1:03:53.520
<v Speaker 6>both the democratic necessity of being able to see your

1:03:53.560 --> 1:03:57.840
<v Speaker 6>leaders in action and the ability to cover those cases

1:03:57.840 --> 1:03:58.480
<v Speaker 6>on television.

1:03:59.440 --> 1:04:01.840
<v Speaker 5>But you just all yesterday. I think the cannon or

1:04:01.880 --> 1:04:04.920
<v Speaker 5>the US Code of Judges Code of Conduct for Judges

1:04:04.960 --> 1:04:07.920
<v Speaker 5>says that I say yesterday, Tiffany, dammit, I'm sorry you

1:04:08.000 --> 1:04:08.800
<v Speaker 5>just saw this week.

1:04:10.400 --> 1:04:10.560
<v Speaker 2>Uh.

1:04:10.600 --> 1:04:13.840
<v Speaker 5>And it's from the US conduct US Code of Conduct

1:04:13.840 --> 1:04:16.960
<v Speaker 5>for Judges or their cannons that they should refrain from

1:04:17.000 --> 1:04:21.720
<v Speaker 5>political activity. But I believe he's in the third Circuit

1:04:21.760 --> 1:04:25.320
<v Speaker 5>quarter third Circuit Court of Appeals. Yeah, I don't. I'm

1:04:25.320 --> 1:04:27.280
<v Speaker 5>a I'm a I'm gonna fuck his name all up.

1:04:27.320 --> 1:04:33.000
<v Speaker 5>But Judge Emil bouve bove both, it's really it's really

1:04:33.040 --> 1:04:36.320
<v Speaker 5>pronounced like it's spelled both. Okay, he showed up at

1:04:36.320 --> 1:04:38.280
<v Speaker 5>Trump's rally last night like it wasn't nothing.

1:04:38.440 --> 1:04:38.640
<v Speaker 6>Yep.

1:04:38.880 --> 1:04:42.520
<v Speaker 5>I've never seen a judge on a federal Court of

1:04:42.560 --> 1:04:45.560
<v Speaker 5>Appeals show up at a political rally where it evolved

1:04:45.600 --> 1:04:50.240
<v Speaker 5>in this partisan rhetoric like it was nothing. But I think,

1:04:51.520 --> 1:04:54.080
<v Speaker 5>Elly correct me if I'm wrong. But we don't have

1:04:54.120 --> 1:04:56.919
<v Speaker 5>any recourse as part of this democracy for a judge

1:04:56.920 --> 1:05:00.680
<v Speaker 5>who just simply flaunts the United States Code of for judge.

1:05:01.160 --> 1:05:06.240
<v Speaker 6>Republicans do not DGAF. They do not care about any

1:05:06.320 --> 1:05:10.439
<v Speaker 6>ethical strictures. And it's why I keep saying, my first bill,

1:05:10.600 --> 1:05:14.760
<v Speaker 6>if you know you elect me a dictator for a day,

1:05:14.920 --> 1:05:17.880
<v Speaker 6>my first bill is expanding the Supreme Court. My second

1:05:17.920 --> 1:05:21.520
<v Speaker 6>bill is ethics reform for the Supreme Court. We need

1:05:21.760 --> 1:05:26.360
<v Speaker 6>ethics reforms for the entire federal judiciary so that Bakari,

1:05:26.480 --> 1:05:30.440
<v Speaker 6>we have a recourse when these judges are openly corrupt. Right.

1:05:30.480 --> 1:05:33.720
<v Speaker 6>I call it the Clarence Thomas Anti Corruption Bill, right,

1:05:34.120 --> 1:05:36.880
<v Speaker 6>or the Harland Crow Anti Corruption Bill. But you need

1:05:36.960 --> 1:05:42.440
<v Speaker 6>something where an independent body can hold these judges accountable

1:05:42.480 --> 1:05:47.040
<v Speaker 6>when they clearly flout what should be ethics ruled. We

1:05:47.080 --> 1:05:49.000
<v Speaker 6>don't have any ethics rules, so I almost can't even

1:05:49.000 --> 1:05:52.880
<v Speaker 6>say they're can't clearly flout what doesn't exist. But you know,

1:05:53.000 --> 1:05:57.440
<v Speaker 6>when they clearly flout the simple, the mere idea that

1:05:57.480 --> 1:06:03.320
<v Speaker 6>they should be nonpartisan, impartial arbiters of the law. They

1:06:03.320 --> 1:06:08.240
<v Speaker 6>don't even pretend to be that anymore, and they never

1:06:08.360 --> 1:06:11.400
<v Speaker 6>will until there's an ethics bill. Now, legal scholars will

1:06:11.440 --> 1:06:14.240
<v Speaker 6>say that there's a separation of powers problem because the

1:06:14.680 --> 1:06:17.800
<v Speaker 6>Court has defined powers and they're punished by another branch

1:06:17.840 --> 1:06:21.480
<v Speaker 6>of government. Then that the offends. That makes Thomas Jefferson

1:06:21.520 --> 1:06:24.200
<v Speaker 6>cry or something. I don't really care, but if you

1:06:24.280 --> 1:06:27.080
<v Speaker 6>want it to go down that roll road, I always

1:06:27.120 --> 1:06:31.120
<v Speaker 6>point out that the Supreme Court's budget is controlled by Congress,

1:06:31.600 --> 1:06:34.400
<v Speaker 6>and so again dictator for a day, I cut their

1:06:34.440 --> 1:06:38.560
<v Speaker 6>budget until they agree to third party ethics oversight, right,

1:06:38.640 --> 1:06:41.880
<v Speaker 6>like that is a congressional power. The Constitution says there

1:06:41.880 --> 1:06:44.439
<v Speaker 6>should be a Supreme Court. Doesn't say where they should meet.

1:06:45.040 --> 1:06:46.840
<v Speaker 6>Doesn't say that they get to have a fancy court house.

1:06:46.920 --> 1:06:48.640
<v Speaker 6>They can meet out on the lawn. They can hold

1:06:48.680 --> 1:06:51.160
<v Speaker 6>their hearings out on the lawn, on the Washington Mall

1:06:51.240 --> 1:06:53.760
<v Speaker 6>for all the Constitution cares. Right, doesn't say they get

1:06:53.760 --> 1:06:57.920
<v Speaker 6>fancy clerks. Doesn't say they get security. That's something that

1:06:58.040 --> 1:07:02.280
<v Speaker 6>Congress has provided these people. They are armed security forces,

1:07:02.440 --> 1:07:04.560
<v Speaker 6>so they do not face the gun violence that they

1:07:04.560 --> 1:07:07.400
<v Speaker 6>have inflected upon the rest of the nation. I would

1:07:07.400 --> 1:07:09.600
<v Speaker 6>take it back. I would take it back. I would

1:07:10.240 --> 1:07:13.080
<v Speaker 6>I would let Harlan Crowe to provide their security for

1:07:13.120 --> 1:07:15.920
<v Speaker 6>all I care. But if you're gonna get money from

1:07:15.920 --> 1:07:19.440
<v Speaker 6>the federal government, goddamn a, your gunna follow some ethics rules.

1:07:19.760 --> 1:07:22.720
<v Speaker 6>That is the hard ball I would play. And then

1:07:22.840 --> 1:07:25.920
<v Speaker 6>Nick Dick Durbin emails my magazine yells at me for

1:07:26.040 --> 1:07:26.880
<v Speaker 6>being too radical.

1:07:27.960 --> 1:07:30.600
<v Speaker 3>Well, we appreciate it. I have a question, not well

1:07:30.640 --> 1:07:32.280
<v Speaker 3>for you, Ellie, but I also want to hear from

1:07:32.320 --> 1:07:35.880
<v Speaker 3>Angela and Baccari on this, because I'm outnumbered by these

1:07:35.920 --> 1:07:41.479
<v Speaker 3>three lawyers. And so Bacary just brought up a really

1:07:41.520 --> 1:07:44.360
<v Speaker 3>interesting point, a really poignant point about this judge, a

1:07:44.360 --> 1:07:47.440
<v Speaker 3>federal judge on the Court of Appeals at a Trump rally.

1:07:47.640 --> 1:07:51.720
<v Speaker 3>You're talking about how the structure you know, these are

1:07:51.720 --> 1:07:55.200
<v Speaker 3>just words in the Constitution. I keep saying this, I

1:07:55.240 --> 1:07:58.280
<v Speaker 3>don't have the knowledge of the Supreme Court that you do,

1:07:58.840 --> 1:08:01.720
<v Speaker 3>or the law that all you eyes do. I keep saying,

1:08:01.760 --> 1:08:04.680
<v Speaker 3>the courts will not hold. We keep talking about these

1:08:04.720 --> 1:08:07.720
<v Speaker 3>infrastructures as though they're going to be around in five years,

1:08:07.720 --> 1:08:09.920
<v Speaker 3>ten years fifteen years before we came on, Ellie and

1:08:09.960 --> 1:08:12.560
<v Speaker 3>I were talking about our love for and or the

1:08:12.600 --> 1:08:15.400
<v Speaker 3>series and or that that reads that I watch it

1:08:15.440 --> 1:08:19.040
<v Speaker 3>like a documentary. Do you guys think the courts are

1:08:19.080 --> 1:08:21.200
<v Speaker 3>going to sustain ten years from now? Are we going

1:08:21.280 --> 1:08:23.879
<v Speaker 3>to be talking about the Supreme Court and Congress controlling

1:08:23.920 --> 1:08:26.280
<v Speaker 3>their budget? Do you think this infrastructure we're trying to

1:08:26.360 --> 1:08:31.040
<v Speaker 3>navigate is indestructible given that we've already seen the norms

1:08:31.040 --> 1:08:34.160
<v Speaker 3>of it erode. We're seeing it every single day erode.

1:08:34.280 --> 1:08:37.080
<v Speaker 3>So how important is this the Supreme Court going to be?

1:08:37.360 --> 1:08:39.040
<v Speaker 3>When Donald Trump is like, Oh, I don't like what

1:08:39.120 --> 1:08:42.120
<v Speaker 3>you said, so poof the Supreme Court doesn't matter. I

1:08:42.120 --> 1:08:44.120
<v Speaker 3>don't like these rules you're putting in place, so poof

1:08:44.240 --> 1:08:46.519
<v Speaker 3>Congress doesn't matter. I'm just curious child's thoughts.

1:08:46.560 --> 1:08:50.920
<v Speaker 5>Everybody I think. I think that. I think that the

1:08:52.040 --> 1:08:56.000
<v Speaker 5>Supreme Court God's democracy and God society, not the other

1:08:56.000 --> 1:08:59.439
<v Speaker 5>way around. I think the courts God society, and society

1:08:59.439 --> 1:09:01.920
<v Speaker 5>doesn't dig take what happens to the courts. And the

1:09:01.960 --> 1:09:03.920
<v Speaker 5>only reason I believe that is because I've deduced the

1:09:03.960 --> 1:09:09.360
<v Speaker 5>three most consequential political events in my lifetime actually are

1:09:10.520 --> 1:09:13.240
<v Speaker 5>centered around the courts. I mean, the three most consequential

1:09:13.240 --> 1:09:15.680
<v Speaker 5>political events I've had since nineteen eighty four, since I

1:09:15.760 --> 1:09:21.280
<v Speaker 5>was born, was replacing Thirdgod Marshal with Clarence Thomas, Conservative

1:09:21.320 --> 1:09:25.719
<v Speaker 5>pressure on the right to remove Harriet Myers and replace

1:09:25.760 --> 1:09:29.639
<v Speaker 5>her with Justice Alito, and the election of Donald Trump

1:09:29.720 --> 1:09:32.559
<v Speaker 5>over Hillary Clinton and him being able to put three

1:09:32.720 --> 1:09:35.200
<v Speaker 5>justices on the Supreme Court. So in my forty one

1:09:35.280 --> 1:09:39.000
<v Speaker 5>years of living, I believe that the court the courts

1:09:39.240 --> 1:09:45.360
<v Speaker 5>have dictated societies machinations, not the other way around. So yeah,

1:09:45.479 --> 1:09:48.280
<v Speaker 5>I don't think the courts will be at the whim

1:09:48.560 --> 1:09:50.719
<v Speaker 5>of society. I think it's the other way around.

1:09:52.160 --> 1:09:58.200
<v Speaker 1>And yeah, I want to say first that I think

1:09:58.240 --> 1:10:01.679
<v Speaker 1>it's really important that we understand and the court's role here.

1:10:01.720 --> 1:10:04.680
<v Speaker 1>Agreeing would be to an extent, but I think that

1:10:04.720 --> 1:10:07.840
<v Speaker 1>they are the reason for the demise, whether we're talking

1:10:07.880 --> 1:10:13.200
<v Speaker 1>about extending presidential immunity to criminal cases or we're talking

1:10:13.200 --> 1:10:16.000
<v Speaker 1>about these other two cases that we haven't gotten to yet.

1:10:16.360 --> 1:10:18.720
<v Speaker 1>But in particular, and this is kind of where I

1:10:18.760 --> 1:10:22.280
<v Speaker 1>want to transition Elie to next is we've talked about

1:10:22.280 --> 1:10:26.400
<v Speaker 1>the long standing impact now of Citizens United. You know,

1:10:26.520 --> 1:10:30.400
<v Speaker 1>the case with FEC or no McCutchen McCutchen versus the

1:10:30.439 --> 1:10:36.280
<v Speaker 1>FEC where campaign contributions were no longer capped for individuals.

1:10:36.560 --> 1:10:39.479
<v Speaker 1>So this is democracy is now a numbers game, and

1:10:39.520 --> 1:10:41.840
<v Speaker 1>if you don't have money to play the game, then

1:10:41.880 --> 1:10:44.479
<v Speaker 1>you're out. And so what they're getting ready to do

1:10:45.240 --> 1:10:48.160
<v Speaker 1>in this case where JD Vance frankly should no longer

1:10:48.240 --> 1:10:51.640
<v Speaker 1>have standing with this in a in a n S

1:10:51.800 --> 1:10:56.720
<v Speaker 1>r C case against the the FEC. Also, I think

1:10:56.840 --> 1:10:59.960
<v Speaker 1>is an important note because I think it expands Citizen

1:11:00.280 --> 1:11:03.160
<v Speaker 1>United and its intent and McCutcheon to a very very

1:11:03.240 --> 1:11:07.160
<v Speaker 1>dangerous place where it is purely pay to play, and

1:11:07.200 --> 1:11:10.320
<v Speaker 1>it sounds like they're gonna win on the merits on

1:11:10.360 --> 1:11:12.120
<v Speaker 1>this case. So Ellie, I want to hear you on this,

1:11:12.200 --> 1:11:13.920
<v Speaker 1>and I'd love to hear if there's time on the

1:11:14.000 --> 1:11:14.840
<v Speaker 1>FDC as well.

1:11:15.280 --> 1:11:17.040
<v Speaker 3>But before you weigh in, Ellie, can I just say

1:11:17.040 --> 1:11:19.840
<v Speaker 3>because if I don't follow this stuff, I'm so confused.

1:11:19.840 --> 1:11:21.479
<v Speaker 3>So I just want to in R s C, I

1:11:21.520 --> 1:11:24.320
<v Speaker 3>just want to be clear you're saying National Republic Senate campaign,

1:11:24.320 --> 1:11:25.280
<v Speaker 3>that's what you're talking about.

1:11:25.360 --> 1:11:28.080
<v Speaker 2>Yes, Yes, go ahead.

1:11:28.360 --> 1:11:32.519
<v Speaker 6>So for the thirty thousand foot question, people need to

1:11:32.560 --> 1:11:36.160
<v Speaker 6>remember courts are extremely useful, useful to fascists. Right, courts

1:11:36.680 --> 1:11:40.439
<v Speaker 6>have always been in the fascist corner because courts are

1:11:40.479 --> 1:11:44.719
<v Speaker 6>what legitimizes the fascist regime. Right, the fascist does something

1:11:44.760 --> 1:11:47.479
<v Speaker 6>that's illegal and the courts say, actually, it's not illegal,

1:11:47.520 --> 1:11:49.759
<v Speaker 6>and then everybody's like, oh, well it's not illegal, We're fine.

1:11:49.840 --> 1:11:54.360
<v Speaker 6>Like the fascists throughout history have always used the courts

1:11:54.439 --> 1:11:57.320
<v Speaker 6>to their own ends. That's why taking over the courts

1:11:57.560 --> 1:12:01.160
<v Speaker 6>is always like step one in any fashion authoritarian takeover.

1:12:01.360 --> 1:12:03.320
<v Speaker 6>Which is why I've been screaming about court expansion for

1:12:03.320 --> 1:12:06.040
<v Speaker 6>the past ten years, because it is the courts or

1:12:06.080 --> 1:12:10.880
<v Speaker 6>a leading indicator of fascism, not a lagging indicator of fascism.

1:12:11.040 --> 1:12:14.240
<v Speaker 6>So that's to Tiffany's thirty thousand foot question, and we're

1:12:14.280 --> 1:12:17.240
<v Speaker 6>seeing it on Angela's on the ground question about campaign

1:12:17.240 --> 1:12:21.160
<v Speaker 6>finance reform. What the Court is essentially doing, big picture wise,

1:12:21.600 --> 1:12:25.599
<v Speaker 6>is making corruption legal, right, Like, that's how we have

1:12:25.720 --> 1:12:29.280
<v Speaker 6>to think about it. They're making corruption in our political

1:12:29.320 --> 1:12:33.160
<v Speaker 6>system legal. Two years ago, Brett Kavanaugh issued an opinion

1:12:33.360 --> 1:12:36.439
<v Speaker 6>where he basically said that you couldn't charge people for

1:12:36.600 --> 1:12:39.679
<v Speaker 6>corruption for taking legal bribes if they took the illegal

1:12:39.720 --> 1:12:42.960
<v Speaker 6>bribe after they had already performed the service that they

1:12:42.960 --> 1:12:46.040
<v Speaker 6>were bribed to do. At that point, it's just a gratuity.

1:12:46.840 --> 1:12:50.040
<v Speaker 6>That is me quoting capital. It's a gratuity for job

1:12:50.120 --> 1:12:53.080
<v Speaker 6>well done. If you pay a politician after they've taken

1:12:53.160 --> 1:12:56.040
<v Speaker 6>the vote that you wanted them to take, no mention

1:12:56.160 --> 1:12:58.280
<v Speaker 6>of that you promised to pay them that money only

1:12:58.320 --> 1:13:00.000
<v Speaker 6>if they voted the way that you want it. Right.

1:13:00.479 --> 1:13:04.280
<v Speaker 6>That is, there was a case with Bob McDonald and Virginia.

1:13:04.360 --> 1:13:07.920
<v Speaker 6>Like the Supreme Court is trying to make corruption in

1:13:07.960 --> 1:13:10.920
<v Speaker 6>our political system legal, and that is really at the

1:13:10.960 --> 1:13:15.080
<v Speaker 6>heart of this NRS, this Republican National Committee case. What

1:13:15.120 --> 1:13:18.360
<v Speaker 6>they're trying to do is remove the cap on spending.

1:13:18.439 --> 1:13:21.040
<v Speaker 6>Right so, like, right now you have a limited amount

1:13:21.080 --> 1:13:23.439
<v Speaker 6>of money that you can give to political candidates. They're

1:13:23.439 --> 1:13:25.080
<v Speaker 6>trying to take that away. I'm just trying to say,

1:13:25.160 --> 1:13:26.600
<v Speaker 6>is if you're a rich if you're a billionaire, if

1:13:26.640 --> 1:13:29.400
<v Speaker 6>you're Elon Musk, you can pay these guys as much

1:13:29.439 --> 1:13:33.920
<v Speaker 6>as you want. Right So, again, it's allowing more corruption

1:13:34.479 --> 1:13:38.040
<v Speaker 6>to be in the system, and that the Supreme Court

1:13:38.080 --> 1:13:40.879
<v Speaker 6>is very interested in doing. Why because they're a leading

1:13:40.960 --> 1:13:45.559
<v Speaker 6>indicator of fascism because they're a leading indicator of oligarchy, Like,

1:13:45.640 --> 1:13:48.400
<v Speaker 6>this is how you make the oligarchs and the fascist

1:13:48.600 --> 1:13:52.160
<v Speaker 6>legal by allowing them to spend as much money as

1:13:52.200 --> 1:13:56.759
<v Speaker 6>they want to influence and quite frankly buy political candidates

1:13:56.800 --> 1:14:00.840
<v Speaker 6>and political campaigns. And that's absolutely what they're doing and

1:14:00.880 --> 1:14:09.360
<v Speaker 6>what we're saying right now, and it's bad. It's it's

1:14:09.520 --> 1:14:10.040
<v Speaker 6>very bad.

1:14:10.080 --> 1:14:12.599
<v Speaker 5>We it didn't sound it didn't sound good. It ain't

1:14:12.600 --> 1:14:14.640
<v Speaker 5>sound good. I can tell you that much, right.

1:14:14.680 --> 1:14:15.400
<v Speaker 2>And again, this is.

1:14:17.120 --> 1:14:19.479
<v Speaker 6>That really bothers me about this case is that obviously

1:14:19.520 --> 1:14:23.920
<v Speaker 6>the legal jargon for why they're saying that they can

1:14:24.000 --> 1:14:26.920
<v Speaker 6>remove the limits is that they're saying corporations are people right,

1:14:26.960 --> 1:14:30.920
<v Speaker 6>that corporations have free speech right. Money is speech, corporations

1:14:30.960 --> 1:14:34.720
<v Speaker 6>have a personhood's free speech right to to spend as

1:14:34.800 --> 1:14:38.439
<v Speaker 6>much speech as they want to if you will. And that, again,

1:14:38.600 --> 1:14:42.880
<v Speaker 6>on the hypocrisy level, rocks into their birthright citizenship thing. Right,

1:14:43.280 --> 1:14:48.880
<v Speaker 6>So they're basically protecting the personhood of corporations but not

1:14:49.000 --> 1:14:52.599
<v Speaker 6>protecting the personhood of actual fucking people, Like that's what

1:14:52.640 --> 1:14:56.560
<v Speaker 6>they're that's what they're doing. And again, the hypocrisy is

1:14:56.680 --> 1:14:59.000
<v Speaker 6>rife and and disgusting.

1:15:00.000 --> 1:15:01.519
<v Speaker 5>Well, I need to argue in front of Supreme Court

1:15:01.520 --> 1:15:03.519
<v Speaker 5>one day. That's one of my dreams because one of

1:15:03.520 --> 1:15:06.040
<v Speaker 5>my goals is to not get rid of, but limit

1:15:06.120 --> 1:15:09.000
<v Speaker 5>qualified immunity. I know you have your dreams. I have.

1:15:09.080 --> 1:15:12.360
<v Speaker 5>That's that's one of my judicial dreams because.

1:15:11.200 --> 1:15:15.679
<v Speaker 6>It's if you ever get the opportunity, can I ask

1:15:15.720 --> 1:15:18.559
<v Speaker 6>you just to blow these people up? Because so many

1:15:18.560 --> 1:15:20.360
<v Speaker 6>of the people who argue in front of the Supreme Court,

1:15:20.439 --> 1:15:22.720
<v Speaker 6>and obviously there are lawyers, they're trying to win their case,

1:15:22.760 --> 1:15:26.960
<v Speaker 6>and so they're really solicitous and nice and and play

1:15:27.000 --> 1:15:30.000
<v Speaker 6>along with the justices. And I just want one person

1:15:30.280 --> 1:15:33.160
<v Speaker 6>to show up at court and just call these people

1:15:33.200 --> 1:15:36.759
<v Speaker 6>out on their hypocritical bull craft, because that never happens,

1:15:36.920 --> 1:15:38.360
<v Speaker 6>and that's what I want to see. That's why my

1:15:38.479 --> 1:15:42.479
<v Speaker 6>dream is to be nominated for a Circuit Court appointment.

1:15:42.520 --> 1:15:43.960
<v Speaker 6>I don't want the actual job. I think I would

1:15:43.960 --> 1:15:47.519
<v Speaker 6>actually be probably a bad judge because I'm pretty freaking biased.

1:15:49.200 --> 1:15:49.960
<v Speaker 5>I don't know, man.

1:15:50.000 --> 1:15:55.120
<v Speaker 6>I think the confirmation hearing, the confirmation hearing where I

1:15:55.160 --> 1:15:57.240
<v Speaker 6>get to sit in front of the center judicial community

1:15:57.400 --> 1:15:59.080
<v Speaker 6>and do not care if they vote for me.

1:15:59.640 --> 1:16:01.799
<v Speaker 2>Oh perview, that would.

1:16:01.560 --> 1:16:04.920
<v Speaker 5>Be I want to see you and you buddy from

1:16:05.080 --> 1:16:08.880
<v Speaker 5>h You and buddy from Louisiana. Right, I would, just

1:16:08.960 --> 1:16:16.040
<v Speaker 5>I would. What's his name, John Kennedy, John Kennedy.

1:16:16.040 --> 1:16:19.679
<v Speaker 3>I was like my Louisiana Republican centator from Wisiam.

1:16:19.960 --> 1:16:22.360
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, we're blaking on name today. I argued in front

1:16:22.400 --> 1:16:24.960
<v Speaker 5>of the South Carolina State Supreme Court one time. Our

1:16:25.000 --> 1:16:29.880
<v Speaker 5>domestic violence laws specifically stated one man, one woman, and

1:16:29.920 --> 1:16:34.320
<v Speaker 5>so gay couples did not get domestic violence protection, meaning

1:16:34.360 --> 1:16:36.880
<v Speaker 5>that the charges didn't escalate, you didn't get an order protection,

1:16:37.000 --> 1:16:40.160
<v Speaker 5>all those things. Uh. And so I actually won that

1:16:40.200 --> 1:16:42.160
<v Speaker 5>case in front of the South Carolina Supreme Court when

1:16:42.160 --> 1:16:44.320
<v Speaker 5>I had a young lady who was the victim of

1:16:44.439 --> 1:16:47.880
<v Speaker 5>domestic violence here. So now South Carolina loss cover same

1:16:47.920 --> 1:16:50.320
<v Speaker 5>sex couples. Very proud of that, Eli, but it's not

1:16:50.360 --> 1:16:52.200
<v Speaker 5>the big dogs, but it was big enough for me.

1:16:52.400 --> 1:16:58.320
<v Speaker 5>Right for your service, Oh, I'm sorry, go ahead.

1:16:58.120 --> 1:17:01.120
<v Speaker 1>Well sorry, I just if you could ellie in thirty seconds.

1:17:01.200 --> 1:17:04.400
<v Speaker 1>This is another pain point for me in this slaughter case,

1:17:04.439 --> 1:17:09.880
<v Speaker 1>of course, is where Donald Trump may get the ability

1:17:09.960 --> 1:17:13.360
<v Speaker 1>to overrule what happens traditionally with the FTC. That's the

1:17:13.360 --> 1:17:17.599
<v Speaker 1>Federal Trade Commission and I just remember a point where

1:17:17.640 --> 1:17:22.160
<v Speaker 1>the Supreme Court unanimously decided that Barack Obama couldn't even

1:17:22.200 --> 1:17:26.920
<v Speaker 1>make a recess appointment for the nation National Labor Relations Board.

1:17:26.960 --> 1:17:29.519
<v Speaker 1>So if you could really quickly just go into this,

1:17:29.640 --> 1:17:31.479
<v Speaker 1>because I think this is a case that Trump is

1:17:31.560 --> 1:17:32.160
<v Speaker 1>likely to win.

1:17:32.280 --> 1:17:33.439
<v Speaker 2>So if you could really quit this.

1:17:34.240 --> 1:17:37.080
<v Speaker 6>Is a hugely important case. It's called Trump Freesolary. It

1:17:37.160 --> 1:17:40.040
<v Speaker 6>basically deals not just with the FTC, but Trump's ability

1:17:40.120 --> 1:17:43.080
<v Speaker 6>to fire everybody in the executive ranch. It's that unitary

1:17:43.080 --> 1:17:46.080
<v Speaker 6>executive theory. All executive power is vested in the president,

1:17:46.200 --> 1:17:50.360
<v Speaker 6>and so you can fire the head of any federal agency.

1:17:50.520 --> 1:17:56.280
<v Speaker 6>He can fire any commissioner on an independent federal commission commission.

1:17:56.439 --> 1:17:58.760
<v Speaker 6>He can fire any employee of the federal government if

1:17:58.760 --> 1:18:00.639
<v Speaker 6>they just happen to be black, happen to be gained,

1:18:00.680 --> 1:18:03.800
<v Speaker 6>doesn't like them. Because everything is everybody starves with the

1:18:03.840 --> 1:18:06.400
<v Speaker 6>pleasure of the president. According to this made up unitary

1:18:06.439 --> 1:18:10.240
<v Speaker 6>executive theory, it is the end of the administrative state,

1:18:10.360 --> 1:18:13.400
<v Speaker 6>is the hollowing out of the state bureaucracy. And I

1:18:13.479 --> 1:18:16.680
<v Speaker 6>know that when I say that defending the bureaucrats and

1:18:16.720 --> 1:18:20.200
<v Speaker 6>the experts doesn't sound particularly sexy, But people need to

1:18:20.280 --> 1:18:25.920
<v Speaker 6>understand that one of the some thrusts of constitutional liberal democracy,

1:18:26.200 --> 1:18:31.240
<v Speaker 6>one of the reasons for the bourgeois revolts of the seventeenth, eighteenth,

1:18:31.240 --> 1:18:35.519
<v Speaker 6>and nineteenth centuries was to take away the power of

1:18:35.560 --> 1:18:42.120
<v Speaker 6>the absolute monarch to fire government ministers and functionaries at will.

1:18:42.479 --> 1:18:45.800
<v Speaker 6>That was actually one of the huge points of contentions

1:18:45.920 --> 1:18:50.280
<v Speaker 6>between constitutional democracy and absolute monarchy. That you shouldn't be

1:18:50.320 --> 1:18:53.880
<v Speaker 6>able to fire federal officials just because they don't do

1:18:53.960 --> 1:18:56.920
<v Speaker 6>what you say. You shouldn't be able to fill the

1:18:56.960 --> 1:19:01.120
<v Speaker 6>federal bureaucracy with your cronies and friends as opposed to

1:19:01.280 --> 1:19:06.160
<v Speaker 6>experts and people represented by the elective branches, right Like,

1:19:06.240 --> 1:19:09.439
<v Speaker 6>That's actually part of what the revolutions are about. And

1:19:09.520 --> 1:19:12.600
<v Speaker 6>so when the Supreme Court gives this power back to

1:19:12.640 --> 1:19:17.320
<v Speaker 6>Trump to fire any federal official at his whim and will,

1:19:17.640 --> 1:19:21.840
<v Speaker 6>what they're doing is truly giving him a monarchical power

1:19:22.080 --> 1:19:24.160
<v Speaker 6>in the same way that Trump the United States gave

1:19:24.240 --> 1:19:26.840
<v Speaker 6>him immunity from criminal protection, which is the power of

1:19:26.880 --> 1:19:30.960
<v Speaker 6>a king. This also is the power of the king

1:19:31.400 --> 1:19:34.400
<v Speaker 6>that they are regiving to Donald Trump, and it's part

1:19:34.400 --> 1:19:38.840
<v Speaker 6>of a long term conservative legal project to destroy the

1:19:38.880 --> 1:19:42.599
<v Speaker 6>administrative state to destroy the regulatory state, and they are

1:19:42.640 --> 1:19:45.680
<v Speaker 6>absolutely winning and they're absolutely going to win this. And

1:19:45.720 --> 1:19:47.519
<v Speaker 6>so in my article in the Nation, I wrote, like

1:19:48.120 --> 1:19:50.960
<v Speaker 6>people might not think that they see the importance of

1:19:51.000 --> 1:19:55.519
<v Speaker 6>the bureaucracy now, but y'all will You will when you

1:19:55.520 --> 1:19:58.960
<v Speaker 6>can't get a vaccine because Trump has fired everybody who

1:19:59.080 --> 1:20:01.800
<v Speaker 6>is able to provide you a vaccine. You will see

1:20:01.840 --> 1:20:05.360
<v Speaker 6>it when there's uranium and mercury in your drinking water

1:20:05.560 --> 1:20:08.840
<v Speaker 6>because Trump fired all the people at the EPA, because

1:20:08.920 --> 1:20:13.280
<v Speaker 6>groundwater studies are too woke for the Trump administration. You

1:20:13.320 --> 1:20:17.599
<v Speaker 6>will see. You will see it as AI turns into

1:20:17.680 --> 1:20:21.759
<v Speaker 6>the terminator because it's completely unregulated by the federal government.

1:20:21.920 --> 1:20:25.439
<v Speaker 6>All of these issues are actually issues of whether or

1:20:25.479 --> 1:20:28.080
<v Speaker 6>not we're allowed to have a state bureaucracy run by

1:20:28.160 --> 1:20:31.840
<v Speaker 6>experts or a state bureaucracy run by cronies. And the

1:20:31.880 --> 1:20:34.639
<v Speaker 6>Supreme Court and Donald Trump have decided to go all

1:20:34.720 --> 1:20:37.640
<v Speaker 6>in on the crony system, and that is going to

1:20:37.720 --> 1:20:42.439
<v Speaker 6>have significant consequences for how we live every day in

1:20:42.479 --> 1:20:45.519
<v Speaker 6>this country. And he's going to win sixty three, He's

1:20:45.560 --> 1:20:48.000
<v Speaker 6>gonna win six three, and that's it.

1:20:48.160 --> 1:20:50.479
<v Speaker 1>This case, of course, is argued this week, please make

1:20:50.520 --> 1:20:54.599
<v Speaker 1>sure you all check out Ellie's peace on this court case.

1:20:54.760 --> 1:20:56.920
<v Speaker 1>And with that we are going to jump into our

1:20:57.000 --> 1:20:57.679
<v Speaker 1>cost to action.

1:21:03.160 --> 1:21:05.280
<v Speaker 6>Who cares about truth? When the last.

1:21:05.000 --> 1:21:09.519
<v Speaker 1>Morning saying it, Ellie, you are here, you lighten it up,

1:21:10.280 --> 1:21:12.680
<v Speaker 1>no pun intended. But I also want to ask you

1:21:12.720 --> 1:21:14.599
<v Speaker 1>if you have a call to action for our audience

1:21:14.640 --> 1:21:17.080
<v Speaker 1>since you're still here with this oh.

1:21:16.960 --> 1:21:19.120
<v Speaker 6>My god, packed the court. I mean, like I can't.

1:21:19.560 --> 1:21:21.200
<v Speaker 6>I say it all the time, and I know it

1:21:21.240 --> 1:21:24.720
<v Speaker 6>almost sounds like broken record, but like we even at

1:21:24.720 --> 1:21:27.559
<v Speaker 6>this late date, even when all the Supreme Court is doing,

1:21:28.040 --> 1:21:32.439
<v Speaker 6>we still do not have Democratic candidates running explicitly on

1:21:32.520 --> 1:21:33.799
<v Speaker 6>a court reform package.

1:21:33.880 --> 1:21:34.040
<v Speaker 5>Right.

1:21:34.360 --> 1:21:36.920
<v Speaker 6>We still do not have the Democrat who wants to

1:21:36.960 --> 1:21:39.479
<v Speaker 6>be running for president in a couple of years saying

1:21:39.520 --> 1:21:42.479
<v Speaker 6>that when they are president day one, they will expand

1:21:42.479 --> 1:21:45.400
<v Speaker 6>the Supreme Court and roll back all of the horrible

1:21:45.439 --> 1:21:49.080
<v Speaker 6>decisions that we're talking about. So pay attention to who

1:21:49.200 --> 1:21:52.080
<v Speaker 6>is on the side of court reform and vote for

1:21:52.200 --> 1:21:55.920
<v Speaker 6>those people and reject the people who think that the

1:21:56.000 --> 1:21:59.560
<v Speaker 6>saying that politics as usual are when it comes to

1:21:59.640 --> 1:22:02.040
<v Speaker 6>Supreme Court is what's going to get us through this.

1:22:03.720 --> 1:22:05.800
<v Speaker 1>Thank you, Ellie. Tip what you got.

1:22:06.640 --> 1:22:09.280
<v Speaker 3>I will just use this time quickly to say thank

1:22:09.320 --> 1:22:12.880
<v Speaker 3>you to the National Council of Negro Women. Chavn Arleen

1:22:13.200 --> 1:22:17.720
<v Speaker 3>Bradley honored Joy Reed, Melissa Harris Perry, and myself at

1:22:17.800 --> 1:22:21.400
<v Speaker 3>their dinner this week. Please support the National Council of

1:22:21.439 --> 1:22:23.920
<v Speaker 3>Negro Women. Learn about the legacy of doctor Dorothy Height

1:22:24.000 --> 1:22:27.400
<v Speaker 3>and Mary McLeod Beffoon, who founded the organization. I've been

1:22:27.439 --> 1:22:30.200
<v Speaker 3>a member since I was twenty one years old, and

1:22:30.240 --> 1:22:32.000
<v Speaker 3>so I just want people to make sure that we

1:22:32.080 --> 1:22:34.479
<v Speaker 3>carry the legacy of our people who may not be

1:22:34.520 --> 1:22:36.800
<v Speaker 3>household names to some people, who may be household names

1:22:36.840 --> 1:22:39.000
<v Speaker 3>to others, but carry the legacy of our civil rights

1:22:39.080 --> 1:22:41.360
<v Speaker 3>leaders into the work that we're doing today. So thank

1:22:41.400 --> 1:22:45.040
<v Speaker 3>you Shavon and the NCNW for honoring me and my

1:22:45.120 --> 1:22:47.639
<v Speaker 3>sisters this past weekend and Karen Finney. They also honored

1:22:47.800 --> 1:22:50.679
<v Speaker 3>Karen Finney as well, so congrats to her.

1:22:50.720 --> 1:22:51.439
<v Speaker 2>Congrats Tip.

1:22:51.520 --> 1:23:01.280
<v Speaker 5>It is much deserved, well deserved, well deserved. Yeah, no, y'all, don't.

1:23:03.120 --> 1:23:06.960
<v Speaker 3>You know we're pretty unfiltered, right, That's okay.

1:23:08.200 --> 1:23:09.200
<v Speaker 2>Truth is welcome here.

1:23:09.760 --> 1:23:14.439
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, yeah, I love it. Congratulations Tiffany, you deserve all

1:23:14.439 --> 1:23:18.000
<v Speaker 5>those blessings and many many more. Truly. Indeed, I remember

1:23:18.040 --> 1:23:20.559
<v Speaker 5>my mama used to get that mail from the uh

1:23:20.720 --> 1:23:22.439
<v Speaker 5>what is it U N CW and that what I

1:23:22.560 --> 1:23:31.280
<v Speaker 5>and that is that the acronym. Did I get it right? Yeah, y'all, Yeah,

1:23:31.560 --> 1:23:33.680
<v Speaker 5>that's why I don't talking to Adam. But it's been

1:23:33.720 --> 1:23:35.920
<v Speaker 5>around a long time, great women, and you all are

1:23:36.000 --> 1:23:39.200
<v Speaker 5>part of that lineage. Mineus quick. It's only about three

1:23:39.240 --> 1:23:41.800
<v Speaker 5>weeks or so, less than three weeks left in the year.

1:23:42.960 --> 1:23:45.280
<v Speaker 5>Go get your physicals. Man, y'all gotta go get your

1:23:45.479 --> 1:23:49.000
<v Speaker 5>yearly physicals. I get really depressed around this time because

1:23:49.040 --> 1:23:51.000
<v Speaker 5>one of us are going to have somebody who drops

1:23:51.040 --> 1:23:54.880
<v Speaker 5>dead who need not be dead, around this holiday season.

1:23:55.080 --> 1:23:58.759
<v Speaker 5>Go get your yearly physicals. If you haven't, you still

1:23:58.760 --> 1:24:02.439
<v Speaker 5>got time. If you got the ACA, Obamacare is free,

1:24:03.040 --> 1:24:06.000
<v Speaker 5>even go to urgent care. I like to get the

1:24:06.040 --> 1:24:08.760
<v Speaker 5>Cadillac because I'm a little bit of a hypochondriac. So

1:24:08.800 --> 1:24:11.879
<v Speaker 5>I make them test me for everything, eatbola, eat cola,

1:24:12.439 --> 1:24:14.840
<v Speaker 5>all the stuff. So I want you all to get

1:24:15.040 --> 1:24:18.160
<v Speaker 5>get get your physicals, particularly black men, if you're over

1:24:18.160 --> 1:24:20.640
<v Speaker 5>the age or whatever it is, let them let them

1:24:20.680 --> 1:24:22.760
<v Speaker 5>get real intimate with you, touch you in all the

1:24:22.800 --> 1:24:25.040
<v Speaker 5>places you don't necessarily want to be touched, but go

1:24:25.040 --> 1:24:27.479
<v Speaker 5>get your physicals so we can live a little bit

1:24:27.520 --> 1:24:28.639
<v Speaker 5>longer this holiday season.

1:24:31.840 --> 1:24:38.120
<v Speaker 1>I actually, Bakari, I appreciate you going there for two reasons.

1:24:38.160 --> 1:24:41.240
<v Speaker 1>One is a good friend of ours, Stephanie Brown James

1:24:41.280 --> 1:24:45.120
<v Speaker 1>lost her best friend this week. The young woman is

1:24:45.160 --> 1:24:48.479
<v Speaker 1>just forty four years old. Erica makes she rest in power.

1:24:49.600 --> 1:24:53.280
<v Speaker 1>But it also reminded me of I have like reiki

1:24:53.360 --> 1:24:57.120
<v Speaker 1>sessions weekly that are virtual, and in my reiki session

1:24:58.400 --> 1:25:03.400
<v Speaker 1>from last week, Danielle told me that this was a

1:25:03.439 --> 1:25:09.960
<v Speaker 1>season for me to really engage in clearing out any negativity,

1:25:10.479 --> 1:25:14.400
<v Speaker 1>so any old wounds that I may have, any old baggage,

1:25:14.479 --> 1:25:16.840
<v Speaker 1>any you know, points of bitterness, any places where I

1:25:16.880 --> 1:25:20.519
<v Speaker 1>needed to release someone or ask for forgiveness, to really

1:25:20.560 --> 1:25:22.720
<v Speaker 1>deepen into that. And I was re listening to that

1:25:22.840 --> 1:25:25.679
<v Speaker 1>session on Monday of this week, and I just want

1:25:25.720 --> 1:25:28.640
<v Speaker 1>y'all to know and hold me accountable to it. And

1:25:28.680 --> 1:25:31.000
<v Speaker 1>I also invite you into the journey to do the same,

1:25:31.160 --> 1:25:32.439
<v Speaker 1>to release any of.

1:25:32.400 --> 1:25:33.920
<v Speaker 2>That baggage I got stuff.

1:25:34.000 --> 1:25:36.320
<v Speaker 1>Y'all clearly know that I need to resolve with my brother,

1:25:37.560 --> 1:25:39.600
<v Speaker 1>you know, I just I want to make sure that

1:25:39.880 --> 1:25:42.360
<v Speaker 1>when I go into twenty twenty six, I'm leaving all

1:25:42.400 --> 1:25:45.519
<v Speaker 1>of that behind. Whether there are places where I've offended

1:25:45.600 --> 1:25:48.720
<v Speaker 1>or hurt people, I've seen comments from people said I

1:25:48.760 --> 1:25:50.960
<v Speaker 1>was mean to them when I saw them, Please forgive me.

1:25:51.000 --> 1:25:52.800
<v Speaker 1>I don't know what was going on, But more often

1:25:52.840 --> 1:25:55.080
<v Speaker 1>than that, it's not me being the beat. It's just

1:25:55.160 --> 1:25:57.320
<v Speaker 1>anxiety and I'll be spending and Tiff will be like,

1:25:57.360 --> 1:26:00.479
<v Speaker 1>you gotta calm down, says, and she's right, and so

1:26:00.560 --> 1:26:02.639
<v Speaker 1>to that, I want to be much more intentional about

1:26:02.640 --> 1:26:05.720
<v Speaker 1>how you are encountering me and make sure that I

1:26:05.760 --> 1:26:07.439
<v Speaker 1>clear the air. So for those of you who I

1:26:07.479 --> 1:26:09.720
<v Speaker 1>don't have your phone numbers or emails, if I've done

1:26:09.760 --> 1:26:13.280
<v Speaker 1>anything to offend you or cause you harm, please forgive me.

1:26:13.640 --> 1:26:15.200
<v Speaker 1>Charge it to my head and out my heart, and

1:26:15.240 --> 1:26:17.519
<v Speaker 1>I ask that you and you join me on this

1:26:17.600 --> 1:26:19.120
<v Speaker 1>journey at the end of the year for us to

1:26:19.160 --> 1:26:21.880
<v Speaker 1>clear out any of that negativity so we can go

1:26:21.960 --> 1:26:24.400
<v Speaker 1>into this next year with much more positivity.

1:26:25.720 --> 1:26:30.280
<v Speaker 5>Apology accepted, Apology accepted. Thank you for finally acknowledging that

1:26:30.360 --> 1:26:33.040
<v Speaker 5>I'm glad we got took years, but I'm glad. I'm

1:26:33.040 --> 1:26:35.360
<v Speaker 5>glad I finally took Ellie coming on the show to

1:26:35.360 --> 1:26:36.200
<v Speaker 5>get the apology.

1:26:36.240 --> 1:26:38.840
<v Speaker 1>I'm here so glad his WiFi is breaking up me in.

1:26:40.439 --> 1:26:40.759
<v Speaker 6>Again.

1:26:43.000 --> 1:26:45.519
<v Speaker 2>That's what happened. The Laura won't let him have the floor.

1:26:45.600 --> 1:26:50.120
<v Speaker 2>Thank you Jesus with that, y'all. This show is a rap.

1:26:50.160 --> 1:26:54.320
<v Speaker 1>Thank you again to our guests, our favorite Supreme Court expert, Elie, Vesta,

1:26:55.120 --> 1:26:58.559
<v Speaker 1>tiff And Bakari and Andrew. Y'all pray that our good

1:26:58.560 --> 1:27:00.599
<v Speaker 1>brother Andrew gets better with this od y has when

1:27:00.600 --> 1:27:02.800
<v Speaker 1>you got that many kids that do bring the germs home,

1:27:02.920 --> 1:27:05.200
<v Speaker 1>So pray for our nist and our nephews as well.

1:27:05.640 --> 1:27:09.479
<v Speaker 1>We are Angela, Rie, Tiffany Cross, Andrew Gillim and Macari Sellers.

1:27:09.520 --> 1:27:10.439
<v Speaker 2>Welcome home, y'all.

1:27:10.439 --> 1:27:12.760
<v Speaker 1>There are three hundred and twenty seven days in token

1:27:12.880 --> 1:27:13.400
<v Speaker 1>in termolation.

1:27:14.400 --> 1:27:17.439
<v Speaker 9>Welcome home to the native landing on the podcast face

1:27:17.479 --> 1:27:18.640
<v Speaker 9>that's a for greatness.

1:27:18.680 --> 1:27:21.120
<v Speaker 6>Sixty minutes is so hit, not too long.

1:27:20.920 --> 1:27:23.640
<v Speaker 9>For the grave shit, high level combo politics in a

1:27:23.720 --> 1:27:27.000
<v Speaker 9>way that you could taste it then digest it. Politics

1:27:27.040 --> 1:27:29.000
<v Speaker 9>touches you even if you don't touch it.

1:27:29.120 --> 1:27:30.120
<v Speaker 6>So get invested.

1:27:30.360 --> 1:27:33.160
<v Speaker 9>Across the t's and doctor I kill them, got them

1:27:33.200 --> 1:27:36.000
<v Speaker 9>ass Sellers Staying on business or why you could have

1:27:36.080 --> 1:27:39.760
<v Speaker 9>been anywhere, but you trust us. Native Lampard is a brand.

1:27:39.439 --> 1:27:40.320
<v Speaker 6>That you can trust.

1:27:58.080 --> 1:28:01.160
<v Speaker 1>Native Lampard is a production of iHeart Radio and partnership

1:28:01.160 --> 1:28:04.439
<v Speaker 1>with reisent Choice Media. For more podcasts from iHeartRadio, visit

1:28:04.479 --> 1:28:06.800
<v Speaker 1>the iHeartRadio app, Apple Podcasts, or

1:28:06.880 --> 1:28:09.040
<v Speaker 2>Wherever you listen to your favorite shows.